SCARSDALE PUBLIC SCHOOLS

Transcription

1 SCARSDALE PUBLIC SCHOOLS GREENACRES FEASIBILITY STUDY PROGRESS REPORT BOARD OF EDUCATION Mary Beth Gose Leila Shames Maude Lewis Leone, Jr. Christopher Morin William Natbony Suzanne Seiden Scott E. Silberfein Greenacres Elementary Aerial View

2 Scarsdale Public Schools Greenacres Feasibility Study Progress Report 4/15/15 1. Introduction In the summer of 2014 the Scarsdale Board of Education commissioned KG&D Architects to complete a feasibility study to assist in determining the future of Greenacres Elementary School. This study was commissioned in conjunction with the planning of a set of district wide capital projects that addressed many high priority needs in other buildings across the District. It became clear that before any additional capital was committed to the Greenacres site there needed to be a clear vision for the future of this facility. This document is a progress report on that effort and represents a summary of the work that has been completed to date. There are no specific recommendations included at this point and this is very much a work in progress. The goal of this process is to conduct an open and transparent investigation that is based on facts and the thoughtful consideration of the full range of concerns. Greenacres Elementary School will celebrate its 100 th anniversary in The building and site have been modified many times over the course of its history as can be seen in the attached plan diagram that outlines the growth of the building. This does make it clear however that the majority of the building was constructed between 1916 and The building currently accommodates approximately 400 students in grades K 5. This includes some students with special needs who are served in smaller settings as well as included in with regular education students. 2. Process The study is being conducted by a team of Architects, Engineers and Specialists lead by KG&D. The District is guiding the process through the involvement of an advisory committee that includes District Administrators, Building Administrators, Parents and community stakeholders. They are listed below: Linda Purvis Scarsdale Public Schools Assistant Superintendent for Business John Trenholm Scarsdale Public Schools Director of Facilities Sharon Hill Scarsdale Public Schools Greenacres Principal Scott Silberfein Scarsdale Board of Education Trustee & Parent Debbie Leitner Greenacres 3 rd grade teacher Karen Guardino Greenacres teacher Barry Meiselman Greenacres PTA president & Parent Amy Nadasdi Parent David Siegel Parent Liz Marrinan, AICP Village of Scarsdale Village Planner Over the course of several meetings the work of the professional team has been reviewed with the advisory committee. The discussions have been in depth so that each member understands the level of investigation and the professional team has direction and guidance as the process unfolds. 3. Building Conditions Survey New York State requires that all school buildings be evaluated every five years to assess what work is needed to return the building to overall good condition. This standard is relatively low in that it only includes work that would be necessary to return the building to its original code compliant condition. For a building such as Greenacres the Building Conditions Survey (BCS) would identify the work necessary to return it to its original condition that met building codes that may have been in place years ago. For the purposes of this study the standard that is used to assess conditions has been elevated to better align with the expectations of today. Generally the recommendations include replacements and upgrades that would be compatible with new construction or recent renovations similar to the projects completed at other Elementary schools in the District. The work identified during the BCS both lists materials and systems that have exceeded their expected useful life as well as systems in need of upgrade to better serve the occupants and increase energy efficiency. The BCS work was conducted by an inter disciplinary team of architects, engineers and a roof specialist. Since the purpose of this study is to analyze the long term future of the school, the work is separated into two categories: Replacement and upgrades that should take place within the next five years and, Replacement and upgrades that will be necessary in the next twenty years. These two categories will allow for better comparisons with other options for expansion and or replacement of the older building. The detailed report will be included in the final study but a few key issues are important to note as part of this progress report. Kaeyer, Garment & Davidson Architects page 1

3 Scarsdale Public Schools Greenacres Feasibility Study Progress Report 4/15/15 Ventilation and Air Conditioning The building currently has steam heat and fresh air ventilation provided by unit ventilators in most of the classrooms. The amount of fresh air brought into the classrooms is far below current standards. If the same unit types were upgraded to provide the current code compliant amount of fresh air, the system would be quite loud and will have a big impact on noise levels making it difficult for students to hear an instructor. In addition to the issue of providing adequate fresh air to improve indoor air quality there was considerable discussion with the advisory committee about cooling or air conditioning. A consensus emerged that when studying the long term future of the school that air conditioning should be included in the plan. Considering that Fall and Spring temperatures are trending to be warmer and with the possibility of year round schools or increased summer use of the building for a variety of purposes it makes sense to include full air conditioning in the future of the renovated or replaced Greenacres School. These requirements coupled with the age of the existing systems leads to the recommendation to completely replace the building s heating and ventilation systems with a hot water system with energy recovery ventilation, mechanical cooling and digital controls. This alone is a very significant cost but also requires considerable collateral general construction work to both remove the aging system and to install all of the new piping, ductwork and fresh air intakes throughout the entire building. A few of the highlights of this collateral work include: new dormers to provide fresh air and exhaust to energy recovery units in the attic, patching of brick in exterior walls where unit ventilators are removed, additional shelving or casework in classrooms to fill the space left after removing unit ventilators, removal of asbestos, installation of sprinklers to maintain fire protection, all new ceilings made necessary by the new ductwork, related re painting and updating of finishes due to the demolition of older components of the system. Roof Systems The building has three types of roofing systems that have all been very well maintained and require no short term repair or replacement. The majority of the roof is covered with a fading green Vermont slate which typically has a 100 year life span so it is nearing the end of its useful life. The long term improvement of the building will include a complete roof replacement. This may want to be done slightly sooner than absolutely necessary as the heating and ventilation system replacement discussed above will also require alteration of the roof to create dormers for fresh air intake. Ground water intrusion & high water table The northern corner of the building has a lower level that routinely has odors and other evidence of some water intrusion. Despite several attempts at repairing the condition there does not seem to be any easy answer to this problem. It is likely the result of a high water table which varies seasonally and has many sub surface points of entry into the aging structure. With moisture penetration likely coming from under slabs and through walls that are significantly below grade it is difficult to imagine a cost effective method of repair. The condition could be made more tolerable with improved ventilation and air conditioning but will still require monitoring and could continue to make this portion of the building uncomfortable or inappropriate for student use. This area is currently used for Art, Music, Instrumental Music, Art Storage and mechanical support spaces. Aging systems The school did experience the collapse and failure of the main sewer pipe that exits the building a few years ago. This type of failure can be very disruptive and costly to repair in an emergency situation. Given the age of the building and the expected useful life of building materials and systems these types of failures are likely to continue. As a result the long term recommendation is to completely replace all of the original piping and plumbing systems that have not already been updated. 4. Demographics The District has a long history of relatively stable enrollments. The most recent projections commissioned by the District (2014/2015) show a minor increase of approximately 12 students total over the next ten years which results in an overall projected population of about 412 students in the school year. Given the minor overall change and the typical margin of error for projections it seems sensible to plan for a long term enrollment of 415 students. The scope of this study does not include the consideration of closing this location completely and redrawing attendance zones to add students to the other four elementary schools. This type of option would require careful capacity studies of each of the four remaining schools to determine if the population can be absorbed into existing structures or if additions to those buildings are required or possible. This type of re organization or redistricting is typically very disruptive and highly controversial to a community. 5. Model Program To evaluate the adequacy of a structure to serve as a 21 st century school building it makes sense to establish a list of spaces that represents the ideal or model for what is minimally required. To accomplish this the architects met with the principal and head teacher to better understand the current and anticipated future needs. Starting with this information it was then combined with the results of the analysis of existing space use and the team s knowledge of state minimum room sizes. The result is a draft of model space program for the school. This was reviewed in depth with the advisory committee and revised to reflect the priorities and comments of all of the stakeholders. This model program is used as a benchmark for the design options that were explored as well as a basis for comparison to the other schools in the District. Both of these comparisons are included later in this report. Perhaps the most meaningful statistic to emerge from this comparison is the amount of net useable square footage per student: Greenacres Existing Average Edgewood, Fox Meadow, Heathcote & Quaker Ridge This highlights one of the major issues with the Greenacres building there is not adequate space for the full student program. Perhaps the most serious manifestation of this issue is the size of the core instructional classrooms themselves. New York State has minimum size standards for classrooms based on anticipated classroom enrollments which can easily be converted to a square foot per student factor. Scarsdale has its own classroom enrollment guidelines that when applied to the square foot per student factor can result in a minimum classroom size for Scarsdale. National standards are significantly higher than New York State minimum standards. The table below summarizes these statistics and calculations: Kaeyer, Garment & Davidson Architects page 2

4 Scarsdale Public Schools Greenacres Feasibility Study Progress Report 4/15/15 Classroom type / standard Class Enrollment Room Size Sf per student classroom NYS Kindergarten NYS Regular Ed. Grades NYS Self Cont. Spec. Ed. 12: Scarsdale Kindergarten ** 45 Scarsdale Regular Ed. Grades ** 28.5 Scarsdale Regular Ed. Grades ** 28.5 National Standard* Scarsdale National calc. Kindergarten Scarsdale National calc. Regular Ed. Grades Scarsdale National calc. Regular Ed. Grades Existing Greenacres Kindergarten *** 38 Existing Greenacres Regular Ed. Grades *** 32.7 Existing Greenacres Regular Ed. Grades *** 29.6 Existing other 4 elems. Kindergarten *** 39 Existing other 4 elems. Regular Ed. Grades *** 36 Existing other 4 elems. Regular Ed. Grades *** 31 *As referenced in article on class size (National Center for Education Statistics) and classroom size (Minimum Classroom Size by Kenneth Tanner, 2000). **Calculated from Enrollment, room size and SF per student factors ***Average size based on actual room dimensions These numbers do not take into account several key considerations that significantly impact space within a classroom. The largest factor is the inclusion of special education students into regular education classroom which are often accompanied by additional instructors or support personnel. As can be seen by the table above the sf per student is significantly different for special education students ( ). Additionally the incorporation of instructional technology occupies additional space within a classroom that was not taken into account when the New York State standards were adopted. The numbers cited above, even without the considerations just mentioned, do convey some important points: New York State classroom size standards are well below National recommendations. If Scarsdale agreed to the New York State sf per student factors the existing classroom sizes at Greenacres could be viewed as adequate even though they are smaller than the NYS minimum room size standards. Scarsdale s other four elementary schools have larger classrooms than exist at Greenacres in all categories. If special education inclusion and the space occupied by 21 st century instructional technologies were considered, classroom sizes would need to be even larger, which would be more in alignment with National recommendations. Greenacres has 26% less overall useable net square footage per student than the average of the other four elementary schools. After reviewing some of the data outlined above, review of reference materials and an extensive discussion of National standards and the importance of the classroom environment to the overall school experience, the advisory committee supported the use of the following classroom size standards in the model program: Classroom type / standard Class Enrollment Room Size Sf per student classroom Scarsdale Kindergarten Scarsdale Regular Ed. Grades Scarsdale Regular Ed. Grades Design Options The next step is to test some of the ideas by attempting to fit the model program into the existing building as is, then with additions, and also in an entirely new structure. Four design options were explored: Repair as is This approach incorporates no program related improvements and simply repairs what needs to be addressed in the next five years. Option A This approach incorporates as many aspects of the model program as can be accommodated through extensive renovation without adding any square footage to the building. This approach results in a reduction of the capacity to 335 students. Option B This approach accommodates much of the model program and proposes a building addition as well comprehensive renovation of the existing building. Option C This approach proposes building a new Greenacres school on the open play areas across the street and converting the existing site to playing fields. A summary description of each option is included below and drawings and images are attached after the narrative portion of the report. The Repair as is option is primarily included as a benchmark to evaluate what is needed to keep the building in overall good condition in the short term. It includes the replacement of the heating system and the collateral general construction work with the exception of the complete roof replacement. The insertion of dormers to provide the fresh air intakes and exhaust are included but the remainder of the roof will be addressed in a future five year plan. These improvements could be implemented over a period of time with construction occurring primarily during summer months and minimizing the disruption to students. It would result in approximately 78 nsf of program space per student and has an overall estimated cost of $24.4 Million Dollars. Option A reconfigures a significant portion of the interior of the building to comply with the requirements of the model program and incorporates all of the infrastructure upgrades needed in the long term. This includes heavy renovation involving complete demolition of interiors to reconfigure interior partitions to enlarge classrooms on the main floor and second level. It is estimated that this work will need to take place over two summers and during the school year between the two summers. As a result the cost for two temporary classrooms is included in the overall costs. This option results in approximately 103 nsf of program space per student (105 is the average for the other 4 buildings) and has an overall estimated cost of $35.9 Million Dollars. It is critical to keep in mind that this option reduces the capacity of the building to approximately 335 students. Option B proposes a three story, 21,000 square foot addition at the north corner of the building. This addition will replace a corner of the existing building allowing access to the lowest portion of the building so that the water intrusion issue can be aggressively addressed. It also connects to the existing second story portion of the building extending that level to the north and west. The addition occupies an area closer to Putnam Road than the footprint Kaeyer, Garment & Davidson Architects page 3

5 Scarsdale Public Schools Greenacres Feasibility Study Progress Report 4/15/15 of the existing building, which will have visual impact on the residences in that area. It addresses most of the substantive space issues identified in the model program. This approach also includes all of the infrastructure upgrades required for the long term and will take approximately two and a half years to construct. The cost for temporary classrooms to facilitate the renovation and new construction is also included. This option provides approximately 107 nsf of program space per student and has an overall estimated cost of $51.4 Million Dollars. While this approach includes a comprehensive renovation of the building it is the largest amount of gross square footage (99,675), has a poor efficiency factor (gross to net ratio of 2.2) and will still have significant amounts of the older structure and systems that will require ongoing maintenance and eventually some portion of these will need to be replaced. Option C proposes a new two story building on the flat site across the street. The conceptual design breaks the building into two primary areas. The east side (plan right) contains the public or community aspects of the program including a full size gymnasium and a large multi purpose room and cafeteria. This configuration will allow this portion of the building to be opened separately from the instructional areas, which can facilitate increased community access. This is also the only approach with a full size gym. The advisory committee confirmed the inclination of the architects that if a new building were to be constructed that a full size gym, which accommodates a regulation sized basketball court and bleachers is appropriate. The western portion of the building includes a two story classroom wing with a center courtyard / lightwell. This is a very efficient layout and allows classrooms to be clustered in grade levels and allows for short travel distances to special subjects. All rooms can be provided at the size recommended in the model program or larger, and more importantly, ideal adjacencies between related program spaces can be achieved. The concept provides approximately 120 nsf of program space per student but when you remove the additional gym space this drops to 108 nsf of program space per student. Due to the opportunity to design on a new site this concept has less overall square footage (84,000), more compliance with the model program, some additional gym space and a better efficiency factor (gross to net ratio of 1.7). The new construction can take place while the existing building remains in use. There would be a loss of most of the open space used for playgrounds and playing fields while the construction is underway. Once the new construction is completed, the older building can be demolished and replaced with playing fields. The overall estimated cost of this concept is $52.5 Million Dollars. 7. Evaluation Criteria It is helpful to establish a structure for evaluating the options to both facilitate the discussion and to identify particular strengths or weaknesses of each approach. The proposed evaluation criteria categories are listed below with a description and how they may relate to the options discussed earlier Initial Construction Cost This is the budget that will require voter approval. The budgets are developed to include all related project costs including contingencies, project costs and estimated cost escalation to the year Building Condition Evaluation This category will address the level of improvement of the existing building from a health, safety and maintenance point of view Educational Adequacy The evaluation of this category is best summarized in the attached charts that identify compliance with the model program. The design layout also becomes part of the evaluation of educational adequacy as well due to travel times to various programs and adjacencies of related or linked program areas Operational Issues including ongoing costs This category combined with 7.1 above represents the true life cycle cost of the approach. There will be some estimation of utility costs completed to assist with this evaluation. Overall custodial and maintenance costs should also be estimated for each approach. Given that the life of financing for new construction is 30 years it makes sense to compare the complete costs for each approach for a full 30 years Future Expansion Capabilities This may or may not be an important consideration given the stability of enrollments in the District. While there had been earlier concerns expressed by New York State about the limits of the existing site, a more recent conversation indicated that Option B could be approve able with appropriate justification. While Option B allows for the expansion of the building on that site, it is most likely the last possible expansion of the school possible on that site. With that in mind, Option C is clearly the option with the most capability for future expansion including building out the second floor over the northern classroom wing with another four classrooms Aesthetic Considerations This category can become quite subjective. The proposed new building is expected to be a traditional brick and limestone building in the Georgian Revival style with metal or slatelike roofing similar to the existing building and other elementary schools in the District (Fox Meadow and Edgewood). Option B does propose a three story addition closer to existing residences and could be viewed as having a negative visual impact due to the change in scale. Option C moves the school from one site to another so there will be concerns of some losing their view of open space or for those who once faced a one story old school building they will now face open space that will occasionally be used as a playing field Historical and Community Significance While original portions of Greenacres are nearing 100 years old and in some respects it could be argued that the building is eligible for the National Register of Historic Buildings this designation does not seem likely or possible for this structure. The building has been heavily altered over the years, does not represent a unique or iconic style and did not accommodate any significant historical event. Community significance may relate more to the fact that there will be a school in this neighborhood in all options. While the older building may be more acceptable due to the tradition of its presence, the new building may provide for more community use Safety and Security All options can be made secure and safe. It is typically easier to accomplish this with an approach that has a smaller footprint and overall gross square footage and is efficiently arranged Accessibility Similar to 7.8 above all options will be accessible to the disabled. A more efficiently arranged building with two as opposed to three stories will certainly be preferable from an accessibility point of view Sustainability New Construction offers the most opportunity to adopt efficient building systems. It is anticipated that Option C will utilize a ground source heat pump system (geo thermal) with energy recovery ventilation, solar thermal, photovoltaics, LED lighting, high performance glazing, highly efficient insulation and be constructed of environmentally friendly materials. New buildings can be constructed to operate on 50% of the energy needed for conventionally constructed buildings with the same performance criteria of the same size. Renovated buildings can be designed to operate on up to 30% less energy than needed for conventionally constructed buildings. It is also critical to include the evaluation of the environmental impact of new construction versus renovation as part of the sustainability evaluation. In many respects the most responsible approach is to recycle the older building thus preserving the embodied energy of the structure and avoiding the very significant expenditure of resources to get all the new materials and systems manufactured, delivered to the site and the older building removed and properly recycled. Kaeyer, Garment & Davidson Architects page 4

6 Scarsdale Public Schools Greenacres Feasibility Study Progress Report 4/15/15 8. Next Steps To conclude this study there are several additional steps and refinements to be completed. The most important discussion is to review each of the options with the Advisory Committee and evaluate them in accordance with the criteria outlined above. Additional analysis, review and refinement of the Building Conditions Survey, budget estimates and operating costs will be completed. Some additional imagery of the proposed exterior of Options B & C will also be developed. Once this is complete, the Board will have the information it needs to determine which of several paths should be taken. The Board should be aware that Option A (renovation of the existing building which results in a lower capacity) will also require discussion of a re districting plan for all of the elementary schools. That discussion is beyond the purview of this study. This is not an easy decision but it is important to take the long view when you are the stewards of a public asset such as Greenacres School. Kaeyer, Garment & Davidson Architects page 5

7

8 Date of Issue 4/16/15 Scarsdale Public Schools Greenacres Feasibility Study Program Comparison DRAFT Model Quaker Ridge Heathcote Fox Meadow Edgewood Description Qty. Avg. Size total nsf Qty. Avg. Size total nsf Qty. Avg. Size total nsf Qty. Avg. Size total nsf Qty. Avg. Size total nsf Kindergarten Classrooms Kindergarten Toilet Room First Grade Classroom Toilet Rooms Second Grade Classroom Third Grade Classroom Fourth Grade Classroom Fifth Grade Classroom Small Group Instruction Room Maker Space Art Room Art Storage Computer Room Foreign Language Classroom Instrumental Music Room Instrumental Music Lesson Room Choral Music Room Multi Purpose Music Storage Life Skills Special Ed./ Special Placement Science Room Library Library Office Gym / Physical Education / Audit Gym Storage Lockers Auditorium Stage Multi Purpose Room / Café Kitchen Parent Center OT/PT Room Principal's Office Teacher in Charge Main Office Conference Room Copy Room Psychologist's Office Nurse's Suite Physical Education Office Faculty Room Subtotal Net Use able Total Gross Square Footage Gross to Net Ratio Building Footprint Red color indicates shortage Green color indicates overage

9

10 GREENACRES ELEMENTARY LEGEND: ADDITION / NEW BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING OPTION A N FEASIBILITY STUDY - RENOVATED SITE SCALE 1" = 100'

11 STORAGE 1249 sf CUS OFFICE 436 sf SERVICE CUS STOR. CUS STOR. WORK 194 sf SERVICE BOILER ROOM STORAGE 350 sf UNEXCAVATED (COURTYARD ABOVE) MECH. ROOM 436 sf ART STORAGE 485 sf STORAGE MUSIC sf sf INS MUSIC & MAKER O sf LEGEND: ART ROOM 1120 sf SERVICE - STAIRS, STORAGE, TOILET, OTHER SPECIAL CLASSROOM - SPECIAL ED, MUSIC, ART,TECH, LEARNING CENTER CLASSROOM PUBLIC TOILET ADMINISTRATION ASSEMBLY / PUBLIC USE PARTITION WALLS TO BE DEMOLISHED AREA OF RENOVATION - 1,286 sf GROSS AREA - 20,334 sf OPTION A N FEASIBILITY STUDY - GROUND FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1/32" = 1'-0"

12 KINDER. K sf sf #6 C T WORK KINDER. K sf sf #5 CL. 2nd SGI sf sf 2-1 S 823 sf #11 T C C. COATS sf KINDER. K sf sf #4 SPECIAL EDUCATION sf sf #7 SPEECH 188 sf 1st sf #8 1st sf sf # sf SAGE TERRACE RECEP 445 sf CONF. PRINC. 184 sf C. LRC / MATH 426 sf S COPY C. C. SGI OFF. NURSE PSYCH. NURSE OT/PT120 sf 770 sf 610 sf BOYS 288 GIRLS sf MAKER 390 sf 390 sf E.S.L. MATH INS 4th 734 MUSIC sf 1060 sf #21 SPANISH INS LESSONS 681 sf 530 sf #20 CHORUS 4th sf sf #19 SP sf SP. ED. LEARN CENTER 3rdS.G.I sf sf #18 3rd sf sf #13 3rd 506 sf 3 # sf TECH. 551 sf PUTNAM ROAD LUNCH 2022 sf K. STAFF LOUNGE 520 sf C. P.E. C. 169 sf GYM STOR. 316 sf GYM-AUDITORIUM 3423 sf STAGE 767 sf ELEV. LOBBY S C B. G. WORK 190 sf C LIBRARY 1988 sf LEGEND: SERVICE - STAIRS, STORAGE, TOILET, OTHER SPECIAL CLASSROOM - SPECIAL ED, MUSIC, ART,TECH, LEARNING CENTER CLASSROOM PUBLIC TOILET ADMINISTRATION C. ASSEMBLY / PUBLIC USE PARTITION WALLS TO BE DEMOLISHED MULTI-PURPOSE MUSIC ROOM sf AREA OF RENOVATION - 19,880 sf GROSS AREA - 47,189 sf OPTION A N FEASIBILITY STUDY - 1st FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1/32" = 1'-0"

13 5th sf sf #25 5th 717 sf #24 5th sf 692 sf #27 5th sf sf #22 LEGEND: CL. BALC. UPPER GYM - AUDITORIUM UPPER STAGE ELEV. LOBBY SERVICE - STAIRS, STORAGE, TOILET, OTHER SPECIAL CLASSROOM - SPECIAL ED, MUSIC, ART,TECH, LEARNING CENTER CLASSROOM PUBLIC TOILET ADMINISTRATION ASSEMBLY / PUBLIC USE PARTITION WALLS TO BE DEMOLISHED AREA OF RENOVATION - 3,306 sf GROSS AREA - 11,878 sf OPTION A N FEASIBILITY STUDY - 2nd FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1/32" = 1'-0"

14 OPTION B N FEASIBILITY STUDY - RENOVATED SITE SCALE 1" = 100'

15 STORAGE 1249 sf CUS OFFICE 436 sf SERVICE CUS STOR. CUS STOR. WORK 194 sf SERVICE BOILER ROOM STORAGE 350 sf UNEXCAVATED (COURTYARD ABOVE) MECH. ROOM 436 sf ART STORAGE 485 sf MUSIC 409 sf G. 160 sf MAKER 925 sf B. 160 sf CHORUS 1250 sf INS MUSIC & O. 877 sf STORAGE 420 sf MUSIC 812 sf ART ROOM 1120 sf LEGEND: SERVICE - STAIRS, STORAGE, TOILET, OTHER SPECIAL CLASSROOM - SPECIAL ED, MUSIC, ART,TECH, LEARNING CENTER CLASSROOM PUBLIC TOILET ADMINISTRATION ASSEMBLY / PUBLIC USE AREA OF RENOVATION sf AREA OF NEW CONSTRUCTION - 6,674 sf STOR. 480 sf ART 960 sf KILN 238 sf STOR. 240 sf STAIR 430 sf PARTITION WALLS TO BE DEMOLISHED AREA OF NEW CONSTRUCTION GROSS AREA - 20,334 sf PATIO 150 sf OPTION B N FEASIBILITY STUDY - GROUND FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1/32" = 1'-0"

16 KINDER. 875 sf #6 C T WORK KINDER. 802 sf #5 CL. 2nd SGI sf sf 2-1 S 930 sf #11 T C SGI 207 sf SGI 207 sf C. COATS sf SAGE TERRACE KINDER. 826 sf #4 RECEP 445 sf CONF. PRINC. 184 sf C. LRC / S.G.I. MATH 504 sf 426 sf S SPECIAL EDUCATION 1-1 SPEECH sf sf 188 sf #7 69 sf 1st 792 sf #8 COPY C. C. SGI OFF. PARENT PSYCH. NURSE NURSE OT/PT 120 sf 614 sf 940 sf 762 sf 288 sf MAKER E.S.L. MATH 4th sf sf #21 SPANISH sf 1060 sf #20 69 sf 4th 658 sf #19 1st sf 687 sf #9 GIRLS 454 SP. sf ED. STOR. SP. 120 sf LEARN BOYS CENTER 450 sf 3rd sf sf #18 98 sf sf SGI 276 sf 3rd 875 sf 1-3# sf 3rd sf 1060 sf #114 TECH. SGI 551 sf 569 sf NEW CORR sf sf SGI 303 sf NEW ENTRY 142 sf sf sf PUTNAM ROAD LUNCH 2022 sf K. STAFF LOUNGE 520 sf C. P.E. C. 169 sf GYM STOR. 316 sf GYM-AUDITORIUM 3423 sf STAGE 767 sf ELEV. LOBBY S C WORK B. G. 278 B. sf 223 G. sf190 sf C COMPUTER 894 sf SGI 430 sf LIBRARY 1988 sf sf LEGEND: SERVICE - STAIRS, STORAGE, TOILET, OTHER SPECIAL CLASSROOM - SPECIAL ED, MUSIC, ART,TECH, LEARNING CENTER CLASSROOM PUBLIC TOILET ADMINISTRATION C. AREA OF RENOVATION - 16,443 sf AREA OF NEW CONSTRUCTION - 10,130 sf LIBRARY 2070 sf STAIR 430 sf ASSEMBLY / PUBLIC USE PARTITION WALLS TO BE DEMOLISHED AREA OF NEW CONSTRUCTION MULTI-PURPOSE MUSIC ROOM sf GROSS AREA - 62,272 sf BALCONY 150 sf OPTION B N FEASIBILITY STUDY - 1st FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1/32" = 1'-0"

17 5th sf sf #25 5th sf1102 sf #24 5th 692 sf #27 5th sf sf #22 SGI 260 sf sf CL. BALC. UPPER GYM - AUDITORIUM UPPER STAGE ELEV. LOBBY B. 271 sf SGI 612 sf G. 271 sf NEW CORR sf SGI 392 sf F.L. 812 sf LEGEND: SERVICE - STAIRS, STORAGE, TOILET, OTHER SPECIAL CLASSROOM - SPECIAL ED, MUSIC, ART,TECH, LEARNING CENTER CLASSROOM PUBLIC TOILET ADMINISTRATION AREA OF RENOVATION - 3,615 sf AREA OF NEW CONSTRUCTION - 4,5260 sf ROOF STAIR 430 sf ASSEMBLY / PUBLIC USE PARTITION WALLS TO BE DEMOLISHED AREA OF NEW CONSTRUCTION GROSS AREA - 17,069 sf OPTION B N FEASIBILITY STUDY - 2nd FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1/32" = 1'-0"

18 OVERALL SITE VIEW NORTH ENTRANCE VIEW NORTHWEST ENTRANCE VIEW WEST EXTERIOR VIEW FEASIBILITY STUDY - 3D VIEWS

19 PLAYING FIELD 180' x 280' GREEN ROOF COURTYARD TOWN PLAYGROUND 15 PARKING S 15 PARKING S PLAYING FIELD 180' x 280' LEGEND: ADDITION / NEW BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING BUFFER OPTION C N FEASIBILITY STUDY - RENOVATED SITE SCALE 1" = 100'

20 CHORUS 770 sf STOR. 415 sf MULTI-PURPOSE 2,000 sf STOR. 415 sf FACULTY 770 sf KITCHEN 1,050 sf COMPUTER 885 sf ART STOR. 300 sf ART ROOM 1,000 sf STORAGE 510 sf INS MUSIC 1,000 sf 12,950 sf COURTYARD BOY'S 255 sf GIRL'S 255 sf LIBRARY 1,900 sf OT / PT 885 sf SGI sf PARENT CENTER 540 sf MECH. 815 sf BOY'S TOIL. 335 sf MULTI-PURPOSE / CAFE 3,710 sf GIRL'S TOIL. 335 sf STORAGE 1,270 sf STAGE 640 sf GYMNASIUM 8,325 sf T T SF BOY'S 255 sf MUSIC LESSON 400 sf GIRL'S 255 sf OFFICE 510 sf PSYCH. OFFICE 415 sf MAIN OFFICE 1,405 sf SECURITY OFFICE 385 sf ENTRY CONF. ROOM 815 sf sf sf K sf K sf K sf NURSE'S SUITE 885 sf LEGEND: CIRCULATION T T T T SERVICE - STORAGE, MECHANICAL, KITCHEN GROSS SQUARE FEET - 56,260 SPECIAL - SPECIAL ED, MUSIC, ART, COMPUTER, LEARNING CENTER CLASSROOM PUBLIC TOILET ADMINISTRATION ASSEMBLY / PUBLIC USE OPTION C APRIL 15, 2015 N FEASIBILITY STUDY - 1st FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1/32" = 1'-0"

21 5-1 GREEN ROOF 4,625 sf 8512 sf 2-1 SGI sf GIRL'S 350 sf MECH. 160 sf MECH. 160 sf BOY'S 350 sf SGI sf UPPER GYMNASIUM MAKER 830 sf COURTYARD BELOW ROOF FOREIGN LANGUAGE 770 sf 2-3 SGI sf BOY'S 350 sf MECH. 160 sf MECH. 160 sf GIRL'S 350 sf SGI sf SGI sf SGI sf LEGEND: CIRCULATION SERVICE - STORAGE, MECHANICAL, KITCHEN GROSS SQUARE FEET - 28,047 (NOT INCLUDING UPPER GYMNASIUM) SPECIAL - SPECIAL ED, MUSIC, ART, COMPUTER, LEARNING CENTER CLASSROOM PUBLIC TOILET ADMINISTRATION ASSEMBLY / PUBLIC USE OPTION C N FEASIBILITY STUDY - 2nd FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1/32" = 1'-0"

22 OVERALL SITE VIEW SOUTH EXTERIOR VIEW SOUTHEAST EXTERIOR VIEW GREEN ROOF VIEW FEASIBILITY STUDY - 3D VIEWS