DELINEATOR REFERENCE POINT 200' TYPICAL SPACING (YELLOW DELINEATORS) END OF MERGE LANE TAPER DELINEATOR REFERENCE POINT
|
|
|
- Aubrey Johnson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 200' TYP. 600' < EACH SIDE BOTH ROADWAYS END OF MERGE LANE TAPER TYPICAL FOR ALL 2-LANE MERGES EXCEPT WHERE THERE IS A MERGE FROM THE RIGHT AND NO OFFSET IN THE THROUGH LANES END OF MERGE LANE TAPER 200' TYPICAL SPACING (YELLOW DELINEATORS) DIVERGE LANE TAPER 600' < EACH SIDE OF RAMP AND RIGHT SIDE OF TANGENT SECTION END OF MERGE LANE TAPER TYPICAL FOR ALL 2-LANE MERGES WITH NO OFFSET IN THE THROUGH LANES 600' < EACH SIDE BOTH ROADWAYS 200' TYP. SPACING DIVERGE LANE TAPER TYPICAL FOR DIVERGING ROADWAYS WHEN WIDENING IS ON BOTH SIDES 200' TYPICAL SPACING (YELLOW DELINEATORS) DIVERGE LANE TAPER 600' * EACH SIDE BOTH ROADWAYS TYPICAL FOR DIVERGING ROADWAYS WHEN WIDENING IS ON RIGHT SIDE SPACING DIVERGE LANE TAPER 600' * EACH SIDE BOTH ROADWAYS 200' TYP. SPACING 200' TYPICAL SPACING (WHITE DELINEATORS) TYPICAL FOR DIVERGING ROADWAYS WHEN WIDENING IS ON LEFT SIDE DELINEATION OF FREEWAY TO FREEWAY CONNECTIONS * WHEN THE WIDTH EDGE OF TRAVELED WAY IS 12', PLACE DELINEATOR 14' FROM THE EDGE OF TRAVELED WAY. THE WIDTH OF THE GORE WILL BE INCREASED TO 24'. * 12' WIDTH WIDTH * 12' AREA * 22' WHITE ING DELINEATOR YELLOW ING DELINEATOR * 22' AREA 8' 8' EDGE OF TRAVELED WAY DIVERGE WIDTH ( 9' OR 10' ) WIDTH MERGE S FOR NORMAL 10' S EDGE OF TRAVELED WAY DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR Kirk T. Steudle Michigan Department of Transportation PREPARED BY APPROVED BY: DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF FIELD SERVICES DESIGN DIVISION DRAWN BY: B.L.T. APPROVED BY: W.K.P. CHECKED BY: 1 OF 8 DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT
2 5 DELINEATORS WITH RED ON BACK (BOTH SIDES OF ROADWAY) END OF ACCELERATION LANE TAPER DECELERATION LANE TAPER 500' MIN. 300' MIN. DELINEATORS ALSO ON THE LEFT OF RIGHT-CURVING RAMP WHEN RADIUS IS LESS THAN 1000' (TYPICAL) WHEN THE RAMP RADIUS IS LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 480', USE 3" x 12" YELLOW ING DELINEATORS AT ALL LOCATIONS INTERCHANGE AREA SEE NOTES FOR DELINEATOR OVERLAP (TYPICAL) DELINEATOR REFERENCE POINTS 100' 100' 100' DELINEATOR REFERENCE POINT END OF ACCELERATION LANE TAPER DECELERATION LANE TAPER 5 DELINEATORS WITH RED ON BACK (BOTH SIDES OF ROADWAY) INTERCHANGE DELINEATION 2 OF 8
3 MEDIAN CROSSOVER (FREEWAYS AND FREE ACCESS) DIRECTIONAL CROSSOVER 4 SPACES AT 100' AT INTERSECTIONS NOTE: BEGIN OR END DELINEATORS AT CURB RETURN OR SPRING POINT. DIVIDED HIGHWAY & MEDIAN CROSSOVER 4 SPACES AT 100' AT INTERSECTIONS RURAL TWO-LANE TWO-WAY ROADWAYS (OPTIONAL) 5 DELINEATORS WITH RED ON BACK (BOTH SIDES OF ROADWAY) END OF ACCELERATION LANE DELINEATOR REFERENCE POINT DELINEATOR REFERENCE POINT BEGIN DECELERATION LANE 300' MIN. 300' MIN. REST AREA & WEIGH STATION DELINEATOR FACE 90 DELINEATOR FACE RADIAL TANGENT DELINEATOR FACE 90 DELINEATOR FACE RADIAL DELINEATOR ORIENTATION ON HORIZONTAL CURVES FOR ONE WAY TRAFFIC 3 OF 8
4 LEGEND SPACING OF DELINEATORS ON HORIZONTAL CURVES DELINEATORS INSTALLED ON RIGID STEEL POSTS WHITE DELINEATORS: 400' MAXIMUM SPACING ON TANGENT AND CURVES WITH A RADIUS GREATER THAN 3500' 200' MAXIMUM SPACING IN INTERCHANGE AREAS 100' MAXIMUM SPACING ON INTERCHANGE RAMPS RADIUS (FEET) ("R") SPACING ON CURVE (FEET) ("S") AND BEYOND CURVE (FEET) (NOT TO EXCEED 300') 1ST SPACE 2ND SPACE 3RD SPACE (2 x "S") (3 x "S") (6 x "S") YELLOW DELINEATORS: 200' MAXIMUM SPACING IN MERGE OR DIVERGE AREAS OF MAJOR ROADWAYS 100' MAXIMUM SPACING ON INTERCHANGE RAMPS BACK TO BACK WHITE DELINEATORS: 400' MAXIMUM SPACING ON TANGENT AND CURVES WITH A RADIUS GREATER THAN 3500' 100' MAXIMUM SPACING ALONG RIGHT TURN LANES RED DELINEATORS ON BACK OF WHITE DELINEATORS RED DELINEATORS ON BACK OF YELLOW DELINEATORS GREEN DELINEATORS 3, , , , , , , , , , , , DELINEATORS INSTALLED ON FLEXIBLE POSTS 3" x 12" WHITE ING DELINEATORS: 200' MAXIMUM SPACING IN INTERCHANGE AREAS 100' MAXIMUM SPACING ON INTERCHANGE RAMPS " x 12" YELLOW ING DELINEATORS: 200' MAXIMUM SPACING IN MERGE OR DIVERGE AREAS OF MAJOR ROADWAYS 100' MAXIMUM SPACING ON INTERCHANGE RAMPS 3" x 12" RED ING ON BACK OF 3" x 12" WHITE ING DELINEATORS 3" x 12" RED ING ON BACK OF 3" x 12" YELLOW ING DELINEATORS BACK TO BACK 3" x 12" WHITE ING DELINEATORS THE SPACING "S" IS FOUND USING THE FORMULA S = 3 R - 50 WHERE "R" IS THE RADIUS OF THE CURVE IN FEET. SPACING BEYOND SPACING ON CURVE SPACING BEYOND SPACING ON CURVE SPACING ON CURVE SPACING BEYOND NOTE: DELINEATORS SHALL BE PLACED ON TWO LANE TWO WAY SPACING ON CURVE SPACING BEYOND ROADWAY HORIZONTAL CURVES WITH A RADIUS OF 1910' OR LESS, OR AS DIRECTED BY THE REGION/TSC TRAFFIC AND SAFETY ENGINEER. DELINEATOR FACE SHALL BE INSTALLED PERPENDICULAR (OR RADIAL) TO ROADWAY. NOTE: MEDIAN DELINEATORS NOT REQUIRED FOR RADII GREATER THAN 1900' DELINEATOR LOCATION ON THROUGH ROADWAY CURVES DELINEATOR LOCATION ON TWO LANE TWO WAY ROADWAY CURVES 4 OF 8
5 DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC OUTSIDE EDGE OF TRAVELED LANE GUARDRAIL APPROACH TERMINAL TYPES 1B & 1T (SRT) DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC OUTSIDE EDGE OF TRAVELED LANE GUARDRAIL APPROACH TERMINAL TYPES 1B & 1T (FLEAT) DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC OUTSIDE EDGE OF TRAVELED LANE GUARDRAIL APPROACH TERMINAL TYPES 2B & 2T (ET OR SKT) DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC OUTSIDE EDGE OF TRAVELED LANE GUARDRAIL DEPARTING TERMINAL TYPES B & T GREEN DELINEATORS AT GUARDRAIL INSTALLATIONS 5 OF 8
6 START OF DECELERATION LANE OR TAPER (TYP) MAINTENANCE CROSSOVER EACH END OF CURB & GUTTER RUN INTERSECTION EACH END OF CURB & GUTTER RUN AT CATCH BASINS IN YARDS AND FIELDS CURB & GUTTER AND CATCH BASINS GREEN DELINEATOR LOCATIONS 6 OF 8
7 TOP OF DELINEATOR HEAD-MOUNT APPROX. FLUSH WITH POST TOP NORMAL + 2'-0" (MIN.) TOP OF DELINEATOR HEAD-MOUNT APPROX. FLUSH WITH POST TOP TOP OF REFLECTIVE ING SHALL BE 1" BELOW TOP OF POST NORMAL + 2'-0" (MIN.) EDGE OF PAVEMENT ELEVATION 4'-0"< EDGE OF PAVEMENT ELEVATION 4'-0"< 2'-0" MIN. 4'-0"< CURB DEPTH AS RECOMMENDED BY THE MANUFACTURER INSTALLATION OF DELINEATORS ON RIGID STEEL POST INSTALLATION OF REFLECTIVE ING ON FLEXIBLE POST 3" 1" 1 " 7'-0" < 1" " DIAMETER HOLES AT 1" O.C. 1 " (18 REQUIRED) 12" " DIA. HOLE (TYP.) ƒ" R (TYP.) DELINEATOR REFLECTOR DETAIL.852" X.382" Y.871" 2.25" NOMINAL WEIGHT = 1.12 LBS/FT MINIMUM MOMENT OF INERTIA ABOUT X-X AXIS = in. 4 RIGID STEEL POST DETAIL 7 OF 8
8 NOTES: DELINEATORS SHOULD BE PLACED 2'-0" BEYOND THE NORMAL, 2'-0" BEYOND THE FACE OF A BARRIER CURB, OR IMMEDIATELY BEHIND THE GUARDRAIL POST. DELINEATORS INSTALLED ON FLEXIBLE POSTS SHALL NOT BE PLACED BEHIND GUARDRAIL. FLEXIBLE POST DELINEATORS SHALL BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE CURRENT SPECIFICATIONS AND INSTALLED AT ALL LOCATIONS SPECIFIED ON THIS STANDARD PLAN, OR WHERE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. ON RAMPS, WHITE DELINEATORS SHALL BE PLACED ON THE RIGHT AND YELLOW DELINEATORS SHALL ALSO BE PLACED ON THE LEFT FOR A RIGHT-CURVING RAMP WITH A RADIUS OF 1000' OR LESS. WHERE DELINEATION ON ONE SIDE OF THE ROADWAY OR RAMP ENDS AND DELINEATION ON THE OTHER SIDE APPEARS, THE DELINEATORS SHOULD BE OVERLAPPED A MINIMUM OF TWO UNITS. DELINEATORS SHALL BE OMITTED ALONG THE THROUGH ROADWAY BETWEEN INTERCHANGES WHERE FIXED SOURCE LIGHTING EXISTS, BUT SHALL BE PLACED ON ALL RAMPS AT RURAL INTERCHANGES, WHETHER OR NOT THE INTERCHANGES ARE LIGHTED. RED DELINEATORS SHALL BE LOCATED ON THE BACK OF RAMP DELINEATORS TO FACE WRONG-WAY TRAFFIC MOVEMENTS. PLACEMENT SHALL START AT RAMP TERMINAL AND END MILE IN ADVANCE OF THE DECELERATION LANE. DELINEATOR TO POST ATTACHMENT SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED ON THIS STANDARD PLAN. CRIMP TYPE COLLAR MAY BE SWAGED ON EITHER THE DELINEATOR FACE SIDE OR THE POST SIDE. ON LEFT DECELERATION AND ACCELERATION LANES, USE YELLOW DELINEATORS ON THE LEFT. DELINEATOR PLACEMENT SHOULD CONTINUE WHERE GUARDRAIL OR CONCRETE BARRIER IS PRESENT. DO NOT PLACE DELINEATORS BEHIND GUARDRAIL APPROACH TERMINALS. IF TERRAIN OR OTHER FACTORS PROHIBIT POST MOUNTED DELINEATOR PLACEMENT, INSTALLATION OF GUARDRAIL OR BARRIER MOUNTED ENHANCED DELINEATORS IS RECOMMENDED. CONSIDER PLACING YELLOW DELINEATORS ON THE LEFT SIDE OF FREEWAYS AND DIVIDED HIGHWAYS WHERE NO CABLE BARRIER OR OTHER DELINEATION IS PRESENT. SPACING MAY BE ADJUSTED IN THE FIELD WHERE DRIVEWAYS OR OTHER OBSTACLES PREVENT DELINEATOR PLACEMENT. FINAL SPACING SHALL NOT EXCEED 528'. 8 OF 8
E:\Wilmot\DGN\14018pp.dgn 3/11/2015 6:49:16 AM
600-06 SHOULDER WIDENING FOR TYPE (SPECIAL) GUARDRAIL TERMINALS E:\Wilmot\DGN\08pp.dgn //05 6:9:6 AM E:\DGN\08SUP.dgn //05 ::55 PM E:\DGN\08SUP.dgn //05 :8:0 PM E:\DGN\08-WRG.dgn //05 :8:5 PM E:\DGN\08SM.dgn
END VIEW WEDGE TOP VIEW WOOD POST FOUNDATION DETAILS
X (NOMINAL POST) 1-1/ DIA. 2 HOLES X 8" (NOMINAL POST) 3-1/ DIA. 2 HOLES TAPERED HARD WOOD WEDGES (HARDWOOD WEDGE TO BE OAK, MAPLE OR OTHER APPROVED DENSE HARDWOODS) TO HOLD POST IN A STABLE POSITION AFTER
Jointing Rural Intersections
Design Manual Chapter 5 - Roadway Design 5G - PCC Pavement Joints 5G-4 Jointing Rural Intersections This section describes how to joint rural intersections by following the guidelines outlined in Iowa
5/16" Flange nut. Bolt Keeper Plate (8" Sq. SYS.) (3) 1/2" x 3" Hex head connector zinc plated bolt w/ washers and nut. Anchor 3" sq. 7 Ga.
2 1/2" x 2 1/2" x 10 Ga. 6" 5" 4" Variable Slipbase (8" Sq. SYS.) 5/16 Corner Bolt W/ nut 5/16" Flange nut Stub Insert (8" Sq. SYS.) Bolt Keeper Plate (8" Sq. SYS.) (3) 1/2" x 3" Hex head connector zinc
Ohio Department of Transportation Office of Roadway Engineering January 18, 2013
Ohio Department of Transportation Office of Roadway Engineering January 18, 2013 To: Holders of the Traffic Standard Construction Drawings (SCDs) and Plan Insert Sheets (PISs) As of January 18, 2013, eighteen
INSTRUCTIONS: 1. Record the transmittal letter number, date, and subject on the transmittal record sheet located in the front of the manual.
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPED BY: Design Standards ISSUED BY: Office of Technical Support Design Services Section TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (0-03) MANUAL: Standard Plates DATED: September
MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL ROAD DESIGN CHAPTER
1.01 DEVELOPMENT METHODS 1.01.01 References 1.01.02 General 1.01.03 Survey and Mapping Methods 1.02 PLAN SHEETS MICHIGAN DESIGN MANUAL 1.02.01 Title Sheet A. Project Location B. Traffic Data C. Project
MISCELLANEOUS SIGN CONNECTION DETAILS TYPICAL ROUTE MARKER ASSEMBLIES SIGN TO POST MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
5-4" SEE DETAIL I COUPLING BAR ON 3 2-10" CANTILEVER SIGN SUPPORT TYPICAL ROUTE MARKER ASSEMBLIES 5/1 DIAMETER STAINLESS STEEL BOLT AND NYLON INSERT LOCK NUT SELF-ALIGNING STEEL REINFORCING PLATE ( TYPE
Existing and proposed contours at 1-foot intervals. The fill and/or excavation quantities in cubic yards.
PLAN REQUIREMENTS The plans for street design shall conform to the requirements of Sections 3 and 4. The following requirements shall also be shown on the plans where applicable. Road and Storm Plans:
STANDARD DRAWINGS INDEX MODIFIED FOR CENTRAL REGION Revised August 6, 2018
SYMBOLS STANDARD DRAWINGS INDEX No Statewide Standard - Use Regional A3 Legend Detail Sheet BRIDGE AND STRUCTURES B-08.00 Bin Walls 1 CONSTRUCTION-BARRICADES AND SIGNING C-04.12 Location of Double Traffic
Current Standard Plates including Transmittal Letters are available on the web at:
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPED BY: Design Standards ISSUED BY: Office of Project Management and Technical Support, Design Support Section TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (17-04) MANUAL: Standard
Manhole or Catch Basin Type A & B Cone Sections Precast - Design F Manhole or Catch Basin Cover (Reducer Cone Section Precast) Design D
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPED BY: Design Standards ISSUED BY: Office of Program Management and Technical Support, Design Support Section TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (14-02) MANUAL: Standard
TYPE 4-C TYPE 6 TYPE 7 TYPE 8
````` Face of ase rad. 42 TYPE rad. " T T T 22.5 2'- unless otherwise shown on plans 5" 5" 5" Slope 2: TYPE 2 rad. Concrete TYPE 2-A rad. Wearing Course Concrete ase Course TYPE 2-0" rad. TYPE 3 As Shown
CITY OF LA MARQUE CHAPTER GRAPHIC REQUIREMENTS CONSTRUCTION PLAN AND MISCELLANEOUS REQUIREMENTS
CITY OF LA MARQUE CHAPTER 2 -------------------------------------------- GRAPHIC REQUIREMENTS CONSTRUCTION PLAN AND MISCELLANEOUS REQUIREMENTS CHAPTER 2 ------------------------------------------------
CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST PROJECT: LOCATION:
CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST PROJECT: LOCATION: LOG NO.: LEGEND REVIEW REVIEWED BY DATE / - Requirement satisfied 1 O Requirement not satisfied 2?
DESIGN GUIDELINES (SD) COUNTY OF ALAMEDA PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY 399 ELMHURST STREET HAYWARD, CA
DESIGN GUIDELINES (SD) COUNTY OF ALAMEDA PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY 399 ELMHURST STREET HAYWARD, CA 94544-1395 PUBLIC WORKS DESIGN GUIDELINES TABLE OF CONTENTS SD-100 SERIES SPECIAL DRAWINGS SD-100 8/1991 SILT
City of Regina Standard Construction Specification SECTION 2999 LISTING OF ROADWAY STANDARD DRAWINGS
City of Regina Standard Construction Specification SECTION 2999 LISTING OF ROADWAY STANDARD DRAWINGS R-1 Alternate Pavement Structures July/10 R-2 Typical Cross Sections for Asphaltic Concrete Pavements
City of Vaughan Engineering Department DESIGN STANDARD DRAWINGS
City of Vaughan Engineering Department DESIGN STANDARD DRAWINGS March 2004 STANDARD DRAWINGS Partners With The Environment March 2004 FORWARD The March 2004 version of the City of Vaughan Design Standard
SECTION EDITION - REVISION 2. Large Guide
SECTION 4 0 EDITION - REVISION Large Guide March 017 (This page left intentionally blank) Guide Sign Design Guidelines Design Guidelines There are general guidelines to follow in the design of highway
2. Remove from the Standard Plate manual: Standard Plate Index, Sheets 1-4 of 4, Numerical Index of Standard Plates (August 31, 2012)
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPED BY: Design Standards ISSUED BY: Office of Program Management & Technical Support, Design Support Section TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (12-04) MANUAL: Standard
Table 5G-2.01: Transverse Joint Requirements. Transverse Joint Type 6 C 12 7 C 15 8 CD CD CD 1 20
Design Manual Chapter 5 - Roadway Design 5G - PCC Pavement Joints 5G-2 Types of Joints A. Jointing PCC pavement joints are necessary primarily to control the location of cracks that occur from natural
Construction Plan Reading Basics & Applications
Construction Plan Reading Basics & Applications July 12 th, 2016 / 4 p.m. Richland County Transportation Penny Office Instructor Ben W. Lewis, PE Welcome & Introductions Instructor Ben W. Lewis, PE Project
Plan Preparation Checklist
Appendix D Plan Preparation Checklist It is the responsibility of the Designer to complete and submit this checklist along with all required drawings for OUC (EFP) Review. All drawings submitted for OUC
CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS Department of Public Works and Transportation Civil Engineering Division STREET/ALLEY IMPROVEMENT PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST
CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS Department of Public Works and Transportation Civil ing Division STREET/ALLEY IMPROVEMENT PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST The following checklist consists of the minimum requirements for preparation
CHAPTER 3 INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONSTRUCTION PLANS TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 3 INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONSTRUCTION PLANS TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page 3.1 General... 3-1 3.1.1 Plan Set...3-1 A. Loveland (City Limits Only)...3-1 3.1.2 Final Mylars...3-1
(50 FT FT) MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 10-0" 7-6" 8-0" 6-0" Truss Depth. 3" sheets 5 & 6 of 10) DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR. Kirk T.
Column truss connection (See details sheets 3 & 4 of 10) \ Span (Odd number of panels) \ Span (Even number of panels) Back truss chord Top truss chord \ Truss Chord splice Truss depth (See details \ Left
50.24 Type, Size and Location Plans for Culverts, Bridges and Culvert Bridges
50.24 Culverts, Bridges and Culvert Bridges Type, Size and Location (T, S & L) Plans shall be required for all Bridges, Culvert Bridges and Culverts of eight-foot (8') clear span or greater as follows:
Date Requested, 200_ Work Order No. Funding source Name of project Project limits: Purpose of the project
Bureau of Engineering SURVEY DIVISION REQUEST FOR TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY Date Requested, 200_ Work Order No. Funding source Name of project Project limits: Purpose of the project Caltrans involvement (must
Please remove and replace the entire Table of Contents, Section A to Section J and all Appendices.
Please remove and replace the entire Table of Contents, Section A to Section J and all Appendices. The following is a list of changes to the Design Criteria: 1. A2.01 General Note 4 Utility Coordination
MINIMUM C/L RADII OF CURVATURE OF LOCAL ROADS IN SUBDIVISIONS
75m 70m 65m 60m DEFLECTION ANGLE C/L RADII OF CURVATURE 55m 50m 45m 40m 35m 30m 25m 20m 15m 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 DEFLECTION ANGLE - MINIMUM C/L RADII OF CURVATURE OF LOCAL ROADS IN SUBDIVISIONS
Guide Sign Policy for Secondary State Highways Edition
Massachusetts Highway Department, Ten Park Plaza, Boston, MA 02116-3973 ` Guide Sign Policy for Secondary State Highways 2005 Edition Revised September 2005 1. PURPOSE The Massachusetts Highway Department
SKT-SP Tangent Terminal
Assembly Instructions for metric SKT-SP Tangent Terminal & FLEAT-SP Flared Terminal SP Standard Post System Guardrail Terminals ROAD SYSTEMS, INC. P. O. Box 2163 Big Spring, Texas 79721 Phone: (432) 263-2435
BRIDGE RAILING, 4 TUBE B-26-F POST DETAILS MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
\ ƒ" x 1 " SLOTTED HOLE IN POST AND \ ƒ"! HOLE IN RAIL \ "! x 6" SLOTTED ROUND HEAD BOLTS, WITH 1 PLATE WASHER, 1 LOCK WASHER AND HEX. NUT \ ƒ" x 1 " SLOTTED HOLE IN POST AND \ ƒ"! HOLE IN RAIL \ "! x
SUBJECT: Standard Plates 4132, 4155, Drainage Structures and Castings Info
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPED BY: Design Standards ISSUED BY: Office of Project Management and Technical Support, Design Support Section TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (18-01) MANUAL: Standard
3. DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS
Schedule H to Bylaw 7452, Subdivision Bylaw Page 10 3. DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS 3.1 General 3.1.1 The Design Specifications apply to the design of sanitary sewers, storm drains, waterworks, roadways, and
PROJECT NAME: TRACT, PARCEL MAP PROJECT ID NO. PLAN CHECKED BY: 1ST CHECK 3RD CHECK 2ND CHECK COMMENTS FINAL MYLAR DATE CHECKED:
CITY OF COLTON PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN REVIEW LIST (PROVIDE SEPARATE ON-SITE & OFF-SITE STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN SETS) PROJECT NAME: TRACT, PARCEL MAP PROJECT ID NO.
TYPE J (20 FT - 40 FT) MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 10-0" 7-6" NOTE: sheet 5 & 6 of 10) DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR. Kirk T.
Column truss connection Chord splice (see details (See details sheets 3 & 4 of 10) s Top truss chord Free end panel 10-0" Support end panels length varies (See chart below) \ Truss Back truss chord Top
The Shoppes at Forney Crossings
F M 548 U.S. HWY 80 U.S. HWY 80 F M 688 F M 548 COOL SPRINGS F M 1641 F M 548 TROPHY BUGLE CALL PHESANT WHITE PORCH SPINAKER The Shoppes at Forney Crossings 18' 14'-8" 18' 15'-8 1 2 " 14' 7' 23'-0" 21'-0"
TURNPIKE DESIGN HANDBOOK (TDH) DESIGN CRITERIA PART 2
TURNPIKE DESIGN HANDBOOK (TDH) DESIGN CRITERIA PART 2 FLORIDA S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE PRODUCTION DESIGN DEPARTMENT OCOEE, FL January 2018 May 2, 2018 Addendum #1 Introduction As part of the Turnpike s continuing
B-27-A BRIDGE RAILING, 3 TUBE WITH PICKETS SECTION THROUGH RAILING WITH BRUSH BLOCK SECTION THROUGH RAILING WITH SIDEWALK
3" 1'- ƒ " 11 " 7 " TOP OF REAR FLANE TO BE ROUND 2'- LON PICKET 1'- W6 x 25 1 " THICK BASE PLATE " " ELASTOMERIC BOUND FABRIC PAD 8" SLAB DETAIL A (SEE 3) OVERHAN SECTION THROUH RAILIN WITH BRUSH BLOCK
CASS TL-3 (Utilizing C-Shaped Post) Assembly Manual
CASS TL-3 (Utilizing C-Shaped Post) Assembly Manual Part No. 620289B Revision March 2007 INDEX Page Important Notice 3 Introduction 3 General Description 3 Ground Preparation and Barrier Alignment 3 Layout
SUBJECT: Standard Plate Turf Establishment Areas (at Pipe Culvert Ends)
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPED BY: Design Standards ISSUED BY: Office of Program Management and Technical Support, Design Support Section TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (14-01) MANUAL: Standard
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGN TYPE III BARRICADE = IMPACT ATTENUATOR STRIPING KEY TRIANGLE - PAINT PLASTIC MARKING 1ST DIGIT WIDTH 4" OR 8"
TES & GUIDELINES TRAIC CONTROL DEVICES & SYMBOLS LEGEND INDEX 2. GENERAL IRMATION: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL URNISH, INSTALL AND MAINTAIN THE DEVICES IN THIS TRAIC CONTROL PLAN UNLESS OTHERWISE TED. IELD CONDITIONS
Installation Instructions
Installation Instructions SRT-350 8 POST Guardrail End Treatment Revised July 2005 TRINITY HIGHWAY SAFETY PRODUCTS, INC. BUILDING TOMORROW S HIGHWAY SAFETY SOLUTIONS TODAY 2 SRT TM 8-POST SYSTEM FOR SPECIFIC
Standard Plate 7036 is discontinued. It is replaced by Standard Plan Pedestrian Curb Ramp Details.
DEVELOPED BY: Design Standards ISSUED BY: Office of Program Management & Technical Support, Design Support Section TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (12-02) MANUAL: Standard Plates DATED: May 11, 2012 SUBJECT: Standard
Chapter 4. Accessible Routes
ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 401 General 401.1 Scope. Accessible routes required by the scoping provisions adopted by the administrative authority shall comply with the applicable provisions of Chapter 4. 402
Government Of Newfoundland & Labrador Municipal Water, Sewer And Roads Master Construction Specifications
PAGE NO. : 1 OF 4 Revision Date: July 2009 STANDARD DRAWINGS TABLE OF CONTENTS DRAWING # DESCRIPTION 0030............ Work Adjacent to Roadway 0040............ Work at the Edge of Roadway 0050............
Current Standard Plates including Transmittal Letters are available on the web at:
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPED BY: Design Standards ISSUED BY: Office of Project Management and Technical Support, Design Support Section TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (15-03) MANUAL: Standard
MAINTENANCE HOLES, CATCH BASINS AND DITCH INLETS - MTC FORM 407 INDEX
407-1 - MAINTENANCE HOLES, CATCH BASINS AND DITCH INLETS - MTC FORM 407 INDEX 407-1.1 GENERAL Tender Items Specifications Standard Drawings 407-1.1.1 Frame and Grate Selection 407-1.1.2 Selection of Structure
SECTION 3 IMPROVEMENT PLAN REQUIREMENTS
SECTION 3 IMPROVEMENT PLAN REQUIREMENTS CONTENTS Page 3-1 Digital Submittals 3-2 3-2 Paper Size and Scale 3-2 3-3 Drafting Standard 3-2 3-4 Title Sheet 3-2 3-5 Title Block 3-3 3-6 Drainage, Sewer, Water,
CHECKLIST PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN
N/A Waiver (1) Four (4) copies of application form. (2) Fifteen (15) copies of plan (3) Subdivision/site plan application fee & professional review escrow deposit (4) Variance application fee & professional
24" B B Joint X501 Joint See MARKINGS Note PCB-RXX-350-TL3 " X501 Y301 (Typ.) " A PLAN (reinforced casting option shown) A " dia. Hinge Bar (Typ.) NOT
B B Joint Joint See MARKINGS Note PCB-RXX-350-TL3 " Y301 (Typ.) " A PLAN (reinforced casting option shown) A " dia. Hinge Bar (Typ.) NOTES GENERAL: This barrier may be manufactured with reinforcing steel
Section 101. Street Design
Section 101 Street Design This section establishes the uniform policies and procedures for the preparation of street design plans and construction requirements in the City of Irvine. It is not intended
CITY OF MUSKEGO DRAFTING STANDARDS
CITY OF MUSKEGO DRAFTING STANDARDS GENERAL - These standards apply to all plans. 1. Plans must be prepared on sheets measuring 36 inch across and 22 inch to 24 inch high unless otherwise specified under
Introduction 3. System Overview 3. Before Installation 3. Limitations and Warnings 4. Safety Statements 4. Parts Identification 5.
June 2015 Table of Contents Introduction 3 System Overview 3 Before Installation 3 Limitations and Warnings 4 Safety Statements 4 Parts Identification 5 Preparation 7 Soil Conditions 7 Tools Required 7
BOSTON EVERETT HORIZON WAY BROADWAY ALFORD ST BOW ST BOSTON CITY LINE EVERETT CITY LINE DEXTER ST MYSTIC ST COURTLAND ST LYNDE ST THORNDIKE ST
BOSTON HORIZON WAY ALFORD ST BROADWAY BOSTON CITY LINE CITY LINE MANHOLE #101 (STA 5+00) BOW ST DEXTER ST ST LYNDE ST THORNDIKE ST COURTLAND ST RIVER PROP (TYP) ROBIN ST BETTY ST 50 500 1. BASELINE STATIONING
DEVELOPMENT PLAN CHECKLIST
Project Identification Information: DEVELOPMENT PLAN CHECKLIST 1.0 GENERAL 1.1 Additional information as required by specific Land Use 1.2 All sheets to include sheet number ( of ) 1.3 Seal and signature
Chapter 23. Signing and Pavement Marking Plans
Chapter 23 Signing and Pavement Marking Plans 23.1 General... 23-3 23.2 Key Sheet... 23-4 23.3 Signature Sheet... 23-4 23.4 Tabulation of Quantities and Pay Item Notes... 23-4 23.4.1 Standard Notes...
CITY OF REEDLEY NEW DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW CHECK LIST
CITY OF REEDLEY NEW DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW CHECK LIST Tract Number and Subdivision Name: Engineering Firm: Contact Person: Address: City: State: Zip: Phone No. Fax No. Assessor s Parcel Number(s) Tentative
Florida's Turnpike Enterprise Roadway Phase III (90%) & Phase IV (100%) Check List Per FDM and TDH Part 3
Notes to Reviewers Section 301 Design Exceptions, Variation, and Technical Memorandums Special directives date and source Key Sheet Section 302 Location Map w/ location of project on map All applicable
Expressway Authority Standards for Preparation of Signing and Pavement Marking Plans
Expressway Authority Standards for Preparation of Signing and Pavement Marking Plans Expressway Authority Standards for Preparation of Signing and Pavement Marking Plans 408 414 417 429 451 528 CENTRAL
BID TABULATION SHEET
Title: Guide Rail & Guide Rail Parts Opening Date: Thursday, January 5, 2017 @ 2:00 pm Contract #: CC-0039-17 Total Bids Received: Signed Proposal Stock Disclose BID TABULATION SHEET Non- Collusion Affirm
Survey Requirements. Design Guidelines and Standards. June Office of the University Architect
Design Guidelines and Standards Survey Requirements June 2004 Office of the University Architect Construction Management P.O. Box 210181 Cincinnati, Ohio 45221-0181 Table of Contents Survey Requirements
Standard Signs Manual
Standard Signs Manual NEW, CHANGED, OR DELETED 1/2017 STANDARD SIGN DETAILS Title Page Number Fractions... 101 Straight Arrows... 102 Double Head Arrows... 102A Double Head Arrows - 90... 102B Advance
CHAPTER 2C - PRELIMINARY DESIGN. General... 2C-1. Review of Work Load... 2C-2 Establishing Priorities... 2C-2
SECTION 2C - 1 - PROJECT REVIEW CHAPTER 2C - PRELIMINARY DESIGN General... 2C-1 SECTION 2C - 2 - COORDINATING TIME SCHEDULES Review of Work Load... 2C-2 Establishing Priorities... 2C-2 SECTION 2C 3 - REVIEW
Appendix E-4. City of Fort Collins. Requirements for Utility Plans
Appendix E-4 City of Fort Collins Requirements for Utility Plans Project Name: Project Planner: Design Engineering Firm: Developer: All applications for final development plans must include final development
DIVISION PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND MARKERS
DIVISION 61 66 PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND MARKERS 66.01 SCOPE: The purpose of these specifications is to describe the minimum requirements of the City of Chesapeake for pavement markings and shall be in addition
Plate 8132A - Preformed Rigid PVC Conduit Loop Detector, is a new plate requested by OTST.
DISTRIBUTION: 7 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPED BY: Design Standards ISSUED BY: Design Services Section TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (0-0) MANUAL: Standard Plates DATED: January 9, 00 SUBJECT:
Chapter 6: SHOP DRAWINGS AND OTHER SUBMITTALS
Chapter 6: SHOP DRAWINGS AND OTHER SUBMITTALS A GUIDE FOR SHOP DRAWING ENGINEERS, AGENCIES, PRECASTERS AND CONTRACTORS Shop drawings are detailed working drawings, usually Starting The Shop Drawing Process
City of Beaumont. Public Works Engineering. Street Improvement Plan Checklist REV 4/18/16
City of Beaumont Public Works Engineering Project Name: TR: Project No.: Date: Street Improvement Plan Checklist Chk A. All Sheets 1. 24" x 36" 2. Signed by the engineer-of-work 3. Marked with the contact
We will study all three methods, but first let's review a few basic points about units of measurement.
WELCOME Many pay items are computed on the basis of area measurements, items such as base, surfacing, sidewalks, ditch pavement, slope pavement, and Performance turf. This chapter will describe methods
SECTION 6A ROADWAY PLAN PREPARATION
SECTION 6A ROADWAY PLAN PREPARATION Table of Contents Page No 6A.1 GENERAL...1 6A.2 PRELIMINARY PLANS...3 6A.2.1 PRELIMINARY PLAN SHEETS...3 6A.2.2 PRELIMINARY PROFILE SHEETS...4 6A.3 PHASE A PLANS...4
CITY OF VISTA STANDARD DRAWINGS
CITY OF VISTA STANDARD DRAWINGS May, 2015 THIS SHEET INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK TABLE OF CONTENTS MODIFICATIONS Modifications to San Diego Regional Standard Drawings DRAINAGE STRUCTURES DRN 01 Corrugated
Plan Submittal Checklist for Permit Projects Compliance Required Information. (Answer Yes or Not Applicable (NA)) Yes NA
Note: This Checklist has been created to assist in and maintain a uniform review of Construction Design Documents for projects done under permit with the County. This document has been created by the Permit
Section 4-02 Typical Sections TABLE OF CONTENTS. INTRODUCTION...2 General...2
Section 4-02 Typical Sections TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...2 General...2 DRAFTING GUIDELINES...3 General...3 Drawing Typical Sections...3 Attaching a Sheet...3 Text Size and Spacing...4 Labeling of
RAIL PANEL AT TRANSITION SECTION PLAN - POST DETAIL PLAN - TUBE SPLICE. Colorado Department of Transportation. Staff Bridge Branch
Limits of pay length for Bridge RailType 10M (For post spacing, see Dwg. No. B ) B60610 (Use with B60610A) 8 min. 1 max. 8 min. 1 max. 10 0 Max. 10 0 Max. post spacing 10 0 Max. 2 5 Post 1 x 1 slotted
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SAB3843. CHE ROS BIN ISMAIL and OTHMAN BIN CHE PUAN
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SAB3843 GEOMETRIC DESIGN OF ROADS CHE ROS BIN ISMAIL and OTHMAN BIN CHE PUAN SOME MAJOR ELEMENTS OF ROAD GEOMETRY: Horizontal alignment, Vertical alignment, Sight distances, Crosssection,
Ohio Department of Transportation Office of Traffic Engineering July 17, 2009
Ohio Department of Transportation Office of Traffic Engineering July 17, 2009 To Holders of the OTE Standard Construction Drawings (SCDs) and Plan Insert Sheets (PISs): As of July 17, 2009, fifteen SCDs
PROPOSED FIBER OPTIC CONDUIT INSTALLATION E. 50TH ST. AND S. COTTAGE GROVE AV. CHICAGO, ILLINOIS
EVANS DREXEL DREXEL ELLIS ELLIS PROPOSED FIBER OPTIC CONDUIT INSTALLATION E. 50TH ST. AND S. COTTAGE GROVE AV. CHICAGO, ILLINOIS SHEETS INDEX TO SHEETS DESCRIPTION 90 294 94 LANGLEY EVANS 48TH COTTAGE
Symmetrical Parabolic Curve In highway practice, abrupt change in the vertical direction of moving vehicles should be avoided. In order to provide
Symmetrical Parabolic Curve In highway practice, abrupt change in the vertical direction of moving vehicles should be avoided. In order to provide gradual change in its vertical direction, a parabolic
Exit 61 I-90 Interchange Modification Justification Study
Exit 61 I-90 Interchange Modification Justification Study Introduction Exit 61 is a diamond interchange providing the connection between Elk Vale Road and I-90. Figure 1 shows the location of Exit 61.
KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, 2007 EDITION
Sheet 1 of 7 KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, 2007 EDITION SECTION 502 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT (NON-QC/QA) Page 500-20, subsection 502.2.
8' PUE 8' PUE VARIABLE 5' STORM SEWER (SOUTH AND EAST) 1. UTILITIES SHALL BE LOCATED AS SHOWN UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER.
R/W R/W 8' PUE 8' PUE VARIABLE VARIABLE C L 3.5' 2.5' MIN COVER 3' MIN COVER STANDARD CURB & GUTTER PWR, GAS, TEL, TV SEE NOTE 6 STORM SEWER (ALTERNATE LOCATION) SANITARY SEWER (NORTH AND WEST) 5' 5' STORM
Comparison of Safety Performance by Design Types at Freeway Diverge Areas and Exit Ramp Sections
University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 12-31-2010 Comparison of Safety Performance by Design Types at Freeway Diverge Areas and Exit Ramp Sections
Maintenance of Traffic sequence of operations including any phasing and detour maps;
All Local-let projects are required to have a Stage 2 submittal to the LPA Manager for review. The only exceptions are 2-lane resurfacing, striping, guardrail, and raised pavement markers, unless otherwise
TURNPIKE DESIGN HANDBOOK (TDH) PLANS PRODUCTION PART 3
TURNPIKE DESIGN HANDBOOK (TDH) PLANS PRODUCTION PART 3 FLORIDA S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE PRODUCTION DESIGN DEPARTMENT OCOEE, FL January 2018 May 2, 2018 Addendum #1 Introduction As part of the Turnpike s continuing
112" 72" 40" BIKE LANE MARKING SHARED LANE MARKING PAVEMENT MARKING DETAILS N.T.S. GENERAL NOTES
8 SB RTE ON RAMP " 0" GENERAL NOTES 7" SHARED LANE MARKING ' ' ' BIKE LANE MARKING PAVEMENT MARKING DETAILS N.T.S. YIELD LINE. ALL SIGNS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM CLEARANCE BETWEEN THE EDGE OF SIGN AND THE
SUBJECT: Standard Plate 9102 Turf Establishment Areas At Pipe Culvert Ends
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPED BY: Design Standards ISSUED BY: Office of Project Management and Technical Support, Design Support Section TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (17-03) MANUAL: Standard
X-Tension TM Guardrail End Terminal
Installation and Maintenance Manual X-Tension TM Guardrail End Terminal Step by Step Instructions for the Tangent, Flared and Median Applications Barrier Systems Sales and Service 3333 Vaca Valley Pkwy,
PART XII: TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYS
PART XII: TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYS 12.1 Purpose and Scope The purpose of performing topographic surveys is to map a site for the depiction of man-made and natural features that are on, above, or below the surface
CITY OF VISTA STANDARD DRAWINGS
CITY OF VISTA STANDARD DRAWINGS May, 2015 THIS SHEET INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK TABLE OF CONTENTS MODIFICATIONS Modifications to San Diego Regional Standard Drawings DRAINAGE STRUCTURES DRN 01 Corrugated
Midwest Roadside Safety Facility
B 64" 1626 602'-8 1/16" 183695 548'-0" 167030 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 14 15 16 17 18 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 373839 40 25 IMPACT 1500A 48" 12 27'-5" 8355 [] 3x7 CL A Galvanized
Porter County Plan Commission
Plan Type: Development Plan Administrative DRC PC Primary Plan Administrative DRC PC Secondary Plat/Replat Administrative DRC PC PUD Conceptual Detailed Final Project Information Project Name: Developer
Standard Plate Sheer Reinforcement for Precast Drainage Structures has been updated upon recommendation of the Bridge Office.
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPED BY: Design Standards ISSUED BY: Office of Program Management and Technical Support, Design Support Section TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (13-03) MANUAL: Standard
Project Name: County File No.: Checked by: For: Date:
Project Name: County File No.: Checked by: For: Date: Print name Firm or agency Items noted in the checklist shall be considered the minimum amount of information necessary for submission of construction
Guardrail End Treatment. Instructional Manual
SRT -27 AND SRT -31 Guardrail End Treatment Instructional Manual IMPORTANT: These instructions are to be used only in conjunction with the installation of the SRT -27 and SRT -31 systems. These instructions
APPENDIX C: MAIN RIVER BRIDGE PLANS. The graphics in this appendix depict the Practical Alternatives.
APPENDIX C: MAIN RIVER BRIDGE PLANS The graphics in this appendix depict the Practical Alternatives. NO. DESCRIPTION BY 4:36:17 PM 10/3/2007 STA.10+843.000 \ PYLON 6.000 5.000 (TYP) PYLON ELEVATION 210.000
CHAPTER 11 SURVEY CADD
CHAPTER 11 SURVEY CADD Chapter Contents Sec. 11.01 Sec. 11.02 Sec. 11.03 Sec. 11.04 Sec. 11.05 Sec. 11.06 Sec. 11.07 Sec. 11.08 Sec. 11.09 Sec. 11.10 General Description of Survey File Contents of Survey
UTILITY AND STREET CONSTRUCTION PLAN REQUIREMENTS SECTION 1
UTILITY AND STREET CONSTRUCTION PLAN REQUIREMENTS SECTION 1 ENGINEERING STANDARDS FOR UTILITY AND STREET CONSTRUCTION PLANS MARCH 2014 CONSTRUCTION PLAN SHEET FORMAT REQUIREMENTS REPRODUCIBLE MYLAR 1.
TURNPIKE PLANS PREPARATION AND PRACTICES HANDBOOK (TPPPH) VOLUME 1
TURNPIKE PLANS PREPARATION AND PRACTICES HANDBOOK (TPPPH) VOLUME 1 FLORIDA S TURNPIKE ENTERPRISE PRODUCTION DESIGN DEPARTMENT OCOEE, FL June October 18, Addendum #1 Turnpike Plans Preparation and Practices