Facility, Unit and Test Equipment Data

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Facility, Unit and Test Equipment Data"

Transcription

1 Facility, Unit and Test Equipment Data Medical hysicist's Tests - SAMLE FORMS Facility Information Facility Name Happy Valley Mammography Address Suite 1 Address 1 Oak Street City, State, Zip Anywhere ST MA ID# (00000) MA Unit# ( ) 05 Lead Interpreting Radiologist Dr. Mary Awsome Quality Control Technologist Sue Fantastic, RT(R)(M) Survey Date August 29, 2016 M Report Date August 31, 2016 Date of revious Survey July 16, 2015 DM Unit Information X-Ray Unit Manufacturer Ford X-Ray Unit Model Imager X-Ray Unit Control Serial # January 2, 2015 X-Ray Unit Date of Manufacture January 3, 2015 X-Ray Unit Date of Installation X DR X CR Boeing CR Reader Manufacturer 5000 CR Reader Model CR Reader Serial # January 3, 2016 CR Date of Manufacture January 6, 2016 CR Date of Installation March 6, 1900 SID (cm) 66 DC Offset ma Large 100 ma Small 40 Magnification Stand Factor Used 1.5 Nominal ixel Size (µm) 100 Test Equipment Info ACR DM hantom Manufacturer and S/N Sunbeam 333 Dosimeter Manufacturer/Model Apple 1010 Dosimeter Calibration Date August 31, 2016 kvp Meter Manufacturer/Model Sanyo Volt kvp Meter Calibration Date September 1, 2016 Medical hysicist Info Medical hysicist Name Jane Incredible, hd Telephone Number (444) mmm@ppp.edu Signature Medical hysicist's Section 6. M FORMS - Final_ Sample

2 1. Mammography Equipment Evaluation (MEE) MA ID-Unit# ( ) Survey Date August 29, 2016 MQSA Requirements for Equipment [FDA Rule Sec (b)] - only applies to MEE Feature Motion of tubeimage receptor assembly Image receptor sizes Light fields Magnification Focal spot selection Application of compression FDA Rule 3(i) 3(ii) 4(iii) 5 6(i) 6(ii) 7(i) 7(ii) 7(iii) 8(i)(A) 8(i)(B) 8(ii)(A) Requirement The assembly shall be capable of being fixed in any position where it is designed to operate. Once fixed in any such position, it shall not undergo unintended motion. This mechanism shall not fail in the event of power interruption. Systems used for magnification procedures shall be capable of operation with the grid removed from between the source and image receptor. For any mammography system with a light beam that passes through the X-ray beam-limiting device, the light shall provide an average illumination of not less than 160 lux (15 ft-candles) at 100 cm or the maximum sourceimage receptor distance (SID), whichever is less. Systems used to perform noninterventional problem-solving procedures shall have radiographic magnification capability available for use by the operator. Systems used for magnification procedures shall provide, at a minimum, at least one magnification value within the range of 1.4 to 2.0. When more than one focal spot is provided, the system shall indicate, prior to exposure, which focal spot is selected. When more than one target material is provided, the system shall indicate, prior to exposure, the preselected target material. When the target material and/or focal spot is selected by a system algorithm that is based on the exposure or on a test exposure, the system shall display, after the exposure, the target material and/or focal spot actually used during the exposure. Each system shall provide an initial power-driven compression activated by hands-free controls operable from both sides of the patient. Each system shall provide fine adjustment compression controls operable from both sides of the patient. Systems shall be equipped with different sized compression paddles that match the sizes of all full-field image receptors provided for the system. Compression 8(ii)(B) Compression paddle shall be flat and parallel to the breast support table and shall not deflect from parallel by more than 1.0 cm at any point on the surface of the compression paddle when compression is applied. paddle Equipment intended by the manufacturer s design to not be flat and parallel to the breast support table during 8(ii)(C) compression shall meet the manufacturer s design specifications and maintenance requirements. 8(ii)(D) Chest wall edge of the compression paddle shall be straight and parallel to the edge of the image receptor. 8(ii)(E) Chest wall edge may be bent upward to allow for patient comfort but shall not appear on the image. 9(i) Manual selection of mas or at least one of its component parts (ma and/or time) shall be available. The technique factors (kvp and either ma and seconds or mas) to be used during an exposure shall be Technique factor 9(ii) indicated before the exposure begins, except when AEC is used, in which case the technique factors that are set selection and prior to the exposure shall be indicated. display Following AEC mode use, the system shall indicate the actual kvp and mas (or ma and time) used during the 9(iii) exposure. Lighting** 14 The facility shall make special lights for film illumination, i.e., hot-lights, capable of producing light levels greater than that provided by the view box, available to the interpreting physicians. Film masking Film masking devices that can limit the illuminated area to a region equal to or smaller than the exposed portion 15 devices** of the film are available to all interpreting physicians interpreting for the facility. Beam quality Must meet the specifications of FDA's erformance Standards for Ionizing Radiation Emitting roducts (art * assessment ) kvp accuracy & * The mean kvp must not differ from the nominal by more than + 5% of the nominal kvp. reproducibility * The coefficient of variation must be * If sum of left plus right edge deviations or anterior plus chest edge deviations exceeds 2% of SID, seek service adjustment. Collimation If X-ray field exceeds image receptor at any side by more than + 2% of SID or if X-ray field falls within image * assessment receptor on the chest wall side, seek service adjustment. * If chest-wall edge of compression paddle is within the image receptor or projects beyond the chest-wall edge of the image receptor by more than 1% of SID, seek service correction. Overall ass/fail * ACR adoption for MEEs of pertinent sections in FDA Rule (e)(5) that apply to annual testing of screen-film only ** NA is acceptable if 1) no hard copy interpretations are made, 2) no hard copy comparisons are made or 3) for new units at existing facilities if these were previously evaluated and have not changed Meets? /No/NA ass Medical hysicist's Section 6. M FORMS - Final_ Sample

3 2. ACR DM hantom Image Quality MA ID-Unit# ( ) ACR DM hantom Mfr and S/N Sunbeam 333 Survey Date August 29, 2016 hantom Setup Equipment: ACR DM hantom (required) hantom Setup: AEC mode: Follow procedure in the Technologist's ACR Technique & rocedure Summaries: addle size (IR size): Use clinical technique for typical screening exam of 4.2 cm 50/50 breast addle type (reg or flex): Largest IR & paddle, 5 dan or 12 lbs, Score on AW View or selected image: Adjust W/L to optimize test objects, zoom & pan entire image Compression force: For Config 2 & 3 using kvp & mas closest to phantom techniques AEC cell position (if avail): hantom patient name: Test Target/filter (if app): Mo/Rh kvp (if app): hantom patient ID: Test Density setting (if app): Image sent to which ACS? Main Mag factor (mag mode only): AO STD 24x30 flex LCC 5 dan Center Resulting Techniques (if available) ACR DM hantom Evaluation SNR & CNR Raw Image Distance Measurement Analysis Fibers Specks Masses Full oint 8 mm long 4-6 specks ¾ border Contact Mode Manual - Target/Filter Config 2 Target/filter Rh/Rh Image receptor size large kvp 29 mas 42.0 Unit-indicated AGD (mgy) 0.96 Artifacts /F Fiber score 4.0 Speck group score 6.0 Mass score 4.0 hantom /F DC offset (if applicable) Mean cavity signal Mean background signal Std dev of background 10.6 Calculated SNR Calculated CNR 4.19 SNR 40.0 (/F) CNR 2.0 (/F) 4.17 arallel to A-C axis (mm) 74.9 Meas = 70.0 ±14.0 mm (/F) Overall ass/fail Half oint 5 & <8 mm 2-3 specks ½ & < ¾ border Clinical - ACR DM hantom CNR from revious Year (if avail; does not apply to MEEs) Manual - Target/Filter Config 3 CNR Lower Limit (85% of Y) 3.5 CNR -15% of revious Year (/F) Initiated (or updated) technologist's ACR Technique and rocedure Summaries form Distance ass Clinical - ACR DM hantom Mo/Rh 19x Mag Mode Manual - Target/Filter Config 2 Manual - Target/Filter Config 3 ACR DM hantom image must be free of clinically significant artifacts. Fiber score must be 2.0; speck group score must be 3.0; mass score must be 2.0. MEE & Annual: SNR must be 40.0; CNR 2.0. Annual: CNR must be 85% of previous year. Measured wax insert distance must be 70.0 ± 14.0 mm. Failures of required items must be corrected before clinical use. Medical hysicist's Section 6. M FORMS - Final_ Sample

4 3. Spatial Resolution MA ID-Unit# ( ) Survey Date August 29, 2016 rocedure Equipment: ACR DM hantom, line-pair test tool hantom Setup: lace ACR DM hantom reversed on breast support (wax insert away from chest edge) addle size (IR size): lace bar pattern on top of phantom and under paddle at ~45 o addle type (reg or flex): Lightly compress paddle to touch bar pattern Acquire "raw" images using manual mode closest to ACR DM hantom technique large flex Contact Mode Mag Mode Mag factor Contact 1.5 Setup Techniques Target/filter kvp mas Rh/Rh Mo/Rh Spatial Resolution Score Line-pair score Overall ass/fail ass ass Spatial resolution must be 4.0 lp/mm for contact mode and 6.0 lp/mm for magnification mode. Failures must be corrected within 30 days. ~45 o Chest Edge Medical hysicist's Section 6. M FORMS - Final_ Sample

5 4. Automatic Exposure Control System erformance MA ID-Unit# ( ) Survey Date August 29, 2016 rocedure Equipment: 2, 4, 6 cm of BR-12, BR-50 or acrylic hantom Setup: addle size (IR Size): Install small paddle (reg or flex) (Use large if small not available) addle type (reg or flex): Use regular or flex paddle used for most clinical imaging AEC cell position (if avail): Set thickness at actual thickness of phantom (2, 4, or 6 cm) Mag setting: Acquire images using clinical techniques Mfr DC offset, if app: SNR data must be obtained from raw image Other settings: large flex center 1.5 AEC Thickness Tracking Setup Techniques Resultant Techniques Signal and Noise Measurements Mode Contact Thickness (cm) 2 AEC Mode AO STD Density setting 0 Target/ Filter Mo/Mo kvp 26 mas 29 Indicated AGD (mgy) 0.90 Mean Bkgd Signal Std Dev of Bkgd 10.5 DC Offset (if app) SNR Contact 4 AO STD 0 Mo/Rh Contact 6 AO STD 0 Rh/Rh Mag 4 AO STD 0 Mo/Rh Analysis Mode Thickness (cm) Contact 2 Contact 4 Contact 6 Mag 4 SNR Lowest Limit for SNR 40.0 MEE and Annual ass/fail revious Year (Y) SNR Annual SNR Lower Limit (85% of Y) SNR -15% of Y (/F) Overall ass/fail ass MEE and Annual: SNR must be 40.0 for 4.0 cm in contact mode. Annual: SNR must be -15% of previous year over the clinically used phantom thickness and imaging modes. Failures must be corrected within 30 days. Medical hysicist's Section 6. M FORMS - Final_ Sample

6 5. Average Glandular Dose MA ID-Unit# ( ) ACR DM hantom Mfr & S/N Sunbeam 333 Survey Date August 29, 2016 rocedure Equipment: Dosimeter Dosimetry system: Use the technique from the ACR DM hantom image page. Calibration date: Measure mr/mas or total exposure for dose calculation(s). Correction factor, if app: Make exposure measurements at 4.2 cm SID (cm): Apple /31/ Technique Factors Resulting From ACR DM hantom Acquisition Exposure Data (at skin surface) AGD Calculation D = Kgcs hantom Breast thickness (cm) ACR DM hantom material AEC mode Target/filter kvp mas Measured HVL (mm Al) mas Setting for Manual Exposure Measurement Exposure #1 (mr) Exposure #2 (mr) Exposure #3 (mr) Average Exposure (mr) Total Exposure (mr) Average Entrance Exposure - K (mr) g-factor x c-factor x (8.76 mgy/r) s-factor Computed AGD (mgy) ACR DM hantom 4.2 Acrylic AO STD Rh/Rh #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! AGD Result ass/fail ass Indicated vs. Calculated AGD (if avail) Unit-indicated AGD from DM hantom Image (mgy) % Difference Indicated within ±25% of measured? % ass Recommended: AGD for a single cranio-caudal view of the ACR DM hantom must not exceed 3.0 mgy. If available, unit-indicated AGD should be within ±25% of calculated AGD. Doses >3 mgy must be corrected before clinical use; failures of the unit-indicated AGD must be corrected within 30 days. Medical hysicist's Section 6. M FORMS - Final_ Sample

7 6. Unit Checklist MA ID-Unit# ( ) Survey Date August 29, 2016 rocedure Equipment: None Inspect the unit and evaluate the functionality according to the checklist below Item 1. Free-standing unit is mechanically stable.* 2. All moving parts move smoothly, without obstructions to motion. 3. All locks and detents work properly.* 4. Image receptor holder assembly is free from vibrations.* 5. Image receptor slides smoothly into holder assembly (CR). 6. Image receptor is held securely by assembly in any orientation (CR).* 7. atient or operator is not exposed to sharp or rough edges, or other hazards.* 8. addles are all intact with no cracks or sharp edges.* 9. Mammography area is clean and free from significant dust and debris that may cause artifacts. 10. Operator protected during exposure by adequate radiation shielding.* 11. All indicators working properly. 12. Autodecompression can be overridden to maintain compression (and status displayed).* 13. Manual emergency compression release can be activated in the event of a power failure.* 14. Is the audible exposure indicator at an appropriate volume level? 15. Operator technique charts are current and posted. 16. Other: 17. Other: 18. Other: Overall ass/fail /No/NA ass All items, both critical (*) and noncritical, must pass. Failures of critical items (*) must be corrected before clinical use; less critical items must be corrected within 30 days. Medical hysicist's Section 6. M FORMS - Final_ Sample

8 7. Computed Radiography (if applicable) MA ID-Unit# ( ) CR Room Main CR Reader Survey Date August 29, 2016 CR Serial Number Medical hysicist Jane Incredible, hd CR Date of Manufacture January 6, 2016 Signature Inter-late Consistency & Artifact Evaluation rocedure Equipment: ACR DM hantom AEC mode: AO STD AEC detector position: ACR DM hantom on breast support plate with associated paddle. Target/filter: Auto-Time, Set kv to ACR DM hantom kv, cell position 2 if available. kvp: center Mo/Rh 28 Small Cassettes mas Evaluation SNR Evaluation (if available) Artifact Overall Cassette ID mas /F Signal Std Dev SNR /F ass/fail ass/fail ass ass ass ass 5 F F Fail 6 F F Fail 7 8 F F F F Fail Fail Minimum mas: Mean mas: Maximum mas Allowable Minimum SNR: Mean SNR: Maximum SNR Allowable Small Cassettes mas Evaluation SNR Evaluation (if available) Artifact Cassette ID mas /F Signal Std Dev SNR /F ass/fail ass ass ass ass 5 F F Fail 6 F F Fail 7 F F Fail 8 F F Fail Allowable Allowable Minimum mas: Minimum SNR: Mean mas: Mean SNR: Maximum mas Maximum SNR Overall ass/fail mas must be within ±10% of average mas. SNR must be within ±15% of average SNR. Must be free of clinically significant artifacts. Failures must be corrected before clinical use. Medical hysicist's Section 6. M FORMS - Final_ Sample

9 7. Computed Radiography (if applicable, continued) MA ID-Unit# ( ) Survey Date August 29, 2016 CR Reader Scanner erformance rocedure Equipment: 2 thin metal rulers (or equivalent). lace rulers in the shape of a T on a cassette which is placed on top of the breast support. Expose at extremely low manual technique (~25 kvp, 4 mas). arallel to Chest Wall erpendicular to Chest Wall ass/fail ass ass Recommendation: The edges of the "T" should appear smooth and sharp. If they are not, and appear jagged or nonsmooth, then this could indicate a problem with the CR reader performance. Breast Support Cassette Ruler Ruler Medical hysicist's Section 6. M FORMS - Final_ Sample

10 8. Acquisition Workstation (AW) Monitor QC MA ID-Unit# ( ) Medical hysicist Jane Incredible, hd Survey Date August 29, 2016 Signature rocedure Equipment: Luminance meter Note: Some of these QC tests may or may not be possible to perform depending on the monitor QC capabilities Test attern Image Quality: Use TG18-QC, SMTE or other relevant pattern (if available) Luminance Check: TG 18 LN8-01 & LN8-18 test patterns, or others that provide measure of L min & L max (if available) Monitor manufacturer: Volkswagon Model: Bright Monitor serial number Monitor date of manufacture Monitor Condition Significant findings /F Test pattern centered appropriately? 0%-5% contrast boxes visible? 95%-100% contrast boxes visible? Alphanumerics sharp and legible? 3 "Quality Control" patches visible (TG18)? Line-pair images distinct (center)? Line-pair images distinct (corners)? Grayscale ramps smooth (if avail)? Test pattern /F Measured Luminance minimum (cd/m 2 ) Mfr recommendation for L min (if avail) L min meets mfr recommendation ±30%? Test attern Image Quality (if available) Luminance Check (if available) DICOM GSDF Measured Luminance maximum (cd/m 2 ) Mfr recommendation for L max (if avail) L max meets mfr recommendation ±10%? Luminance check /F W/in ±10% of targeted contrast response /F (if avail) /12/ Significant findings indicated on figure below Luminance Uniformity Center Upper Left Upper Right Lower Left Lower Right Max Min Mfr Automated Test Most recent set of mfr automated tests /F % Diff 3.3 Overall ass/fail ass /F Any identified screen blemish that could interfere with clinical information must be removed. Test pattern image quality must pass all visual tests. L min must be within ±30% of mfr specifications (or, if not available 1.5 cd/m 2 ). L max must be within ±10% of mfr specifications (or, if not available 150 cd/m 2 ). Luminance uniformity must be 30% GSDF measured contrast response must be within ±10% of targeted contrast response. Mfr's automated tests must pass mfr specifications (if 1 test fails, indicate "F"). Significant monitor cleanliness defects must be corrected before clinical use; all other required tests must be corrected within 30 days. Medical hysicist's Section 6. M FORMS - Final_ Sample

11 9. Radiologist Workstation (RW) Monitor QC MA ID-Unit# ( ) Workstation ID RW ID#4 Survey Date August 29, 2016 Medical hysicist Jane Incredible, hd Signature rocedure Equipment: ACR DM hantom Image, luminance meter Note: Some of these QC tests may or may not be possible to perform depending on the monitor QC capabilities ACR DM hantom: use phantom acquired from any DM within facility network, preferably one M has acquired Test attern Image Quality: Use TG18-QC, SMTE or other relevant pattern Luminance: TG 18 LN8-01, LN8-18 & TG 18 UNL80 test patterns or other relevant test patterns ACR DM hantom Evaluation Test attern Image Quality Luminance Check Monitor manufacturer: Volkswagon Model: Brighter Monitor serial number Monitor date of manufacture Ambient Light Are ambient light conditions adequate for DM? Monitor Condition Significant findings /F Artifacts /F Fiber score Speck group score Mass score hantom /F arallel to A-C axis (mm) Distance Measurement Meas = 70.0 ±14.0 mm (/F) Test pattern centered appropriately? 0%-5% contrast boxes visible? 95%-100% contrast boxes visible? Alphanumerics sharp and legible? 3 "Quality Control" patches visible (TG18)? Line-pair images distinct (center)? Line-pair images distinct (corners)? Grayscale ramps smooth? Test pattern /F Measured Luminance minimum (cd/m 2 ) Mfr recommendation for L min (if avail) L min meets mfr recommendation ±30%? Measured Luminance maximum (cd/m 2 ) Mfr recommendation for L max (if avail) L max meets mfr recommendation ±10%? Luminance check /F DICOM GSDF (if avail) Mfr Automated Test W/in ±10% of targeted contrast response /F Most recent set of mfr automated tests /F Overall ass/fail Left* Right* /1/2010 8/1/ ass ass Significant findings indicated on figures below *Left and right monitors; complete additional forms if more than 2 monitors used Luminance Uniformity Monitor Center Upper L Upper R Lower L Lower R Max Min % Diff /F Left Right Luminance Matching /F Recommended: Any identified monitor blemish that could interfere with clinical information must be removed. ACR DM hantom image must be free of clinically significant artifacts. Fiber score must be 2.0; speck group score must be 3.0; mass score must be 2.0. Measured distance of wax insert must be 70.0 ±14.0 mm. Test pattern image quality must pass all visual tests. L min must be within ±30% of mfr specifications (or, if not available 1.5 cd/m 2 ). L max must be within ±10% of mfr specifications (or, if not available 420 cd/m 2 ). Luminance uniformity must be 30%; luminance matching must be 20%. GSDF measured contrast response must be within ±10% of targeted contrast response. Mfr's automated tests must pass mfr specifications (if 1 test fails, indicate "F"). Ambient light conditions should be appropriate for mammography; max of 45 lux is recommended. hantom must pass and significant monitor cleanliness defects must be corrected before clinical use; all other required tests must be corrected within 30 days. Medical hysicist's Section 6. M FORMS - Final_ Sample

12 10. Film rinter QC (if applicable) MA ID-Unit# ( ) rinter ID rinter #1 Survey Date August 29, 2016 Medical hysicist Jane Incredible, hd Signature rocedure Applicability: If film printer is used clinically for mammography (i.e., for interpretation and to provide images to referring physicians and patients) Equipment: Densitometer rint an ACR DM hantom image acquired from any DM unit within facility network, preferably one M has just acquired. Do not change window/level settings from acquired image prior to printing. rint the phantom image from the workstation/computer typically used to print clinical films. Dmax should be measured either at extreme left or right edge of film or at extreme non-chest wall edge. Film rinter Manufacturer Suzuki Film rinter Serial Number Film rinter Model Fast Film rinter Date of Manufacture 9/1/2013 Workstation for printing RW ID#4 DM ID or workstation ID Film size 8 x 10 Artifacts /F ACR DM hantom Fiber score Speck group score Mass score hantom /F F Background Bkgd OD (Outside cavity) Bkgd OD 1.6 (/F) 1.72 F Cavity OD 1.88 Contrast Bkgd OD (use value from above) Contrast = Cavity OD - Bkgd OD Contrast 0.1 (/F) F D max D max OD D max OD 3.1 (/F) 3.62 F Distance Measurement arallel to A-C axis (mm) Meas = 70.0 ±14.0 mm (/F) 71.5 F Overall ass/fail ass Fail ACR DM hantom image must be free of clinically significant artifacts. Fiber score must be 2.0; speck group score must be 3.0; mass score must be 2.0. Background OD must be 1.6 (1.7 to 2.2 is recommended; approx 2.0 is optimal). Contrast (Cavity OD - Background OD) must be 0.1. D max must be 3.1 ( 3.5 is recommended). Measured distance of wax insert must be 70.0 ±14.0 mm. Failures of required items must be corrected before printing of clinical images. Medical hysicist's Section 6. M FORMS - Final_ Sample

13 11. Evaluation of Site's Technologist QC rogram MA ID-Unit# ( ) Survey Date August 29, 2016 Radiologic Technologist's Quality Control Tests 1. ACR DM hantom Image Quality Frequency Weekly Test erformed, Analyzed & Documented Missing Data Incorrect Scoring or Calculations Missing Corrective Action Documentation Other Comments Scores of latest phantom image: Fiber Latest QC Tech Score 4.0 Med hys Score 4.0 Speck group Mass CR Cassette Erasure (if app) 3. Comp Thickness Indicator 4. Visual Checklist 5. AW Monitor QC 9. Facility QC Review 10. Compression Force 11. Mfr Detector Calibration (if app) Optional - Repeat Analysis Optional - System QC for Radiologist Optional - Radiologist IQ Feedback Corrective Action Log documentation adequate? Additional Comments: Great job, Sue! Weekly Monthly Monthly Monthly Quarterly Semiannual As Needed NA NA Overall ass/fail for erformance of Technologist QC rogram ass MQSA regulations [FDA Rule (d)(1)(iii) specify that "each facility shall have the services of a medical physicist available to survey mammography equipment and oversee the equipment-related quality assurance practices of the facility. " Completion of this "Evaluation of Site's Technologist QC rogram" form documents that this oversight has been conducted. In order for the overall evaluation to pass, there must be a) no significant missing data, b) the tests must be analyzed without gross errors, and c) appropriate corrective action for failures must be taken (and documented). See test procedures for more information. Failures must be corrected within 30 days. Medical hysicist's Section 6. M FORMS - Final_ Sample

14 12. Evaluation of Display Device Technologist QC rogram MA ID-Unit# ( ) Medical hysicist Jane Incredible, hd Display Device Location Main Signature Survey Date August 29, 2016 Display Device ID & Room Example: Mammography reading room Display Device Description (RW, rinter, Viewbox) RW Test erformed, Analyzed & Documented Incorrectly Missing Data Incorrect Scoring or Calculations Missing Corrective Action Documentation Mfr Automated Tests (if Applicable) Other Comments Discussed with manager /F Rad Read East RW Rad Read West RW Main 2 RW Corrective Action Log documentation adequate? Overall ass/fail for erformance of Display Device Technologist QC rogram ass Additional Comments: MQSA regulations [FDA Rule (d)(1)(iii) specify that "each facility shall have the services of a medical physicist available to survey mammography equipment and oversee the equipment-related quality assurance practices of the facility. " Completion of this "Evaluation of Site's Technologist QC rogram" form documents that this oversight has been conducted. In order for the overall evaluation to pass, there must be a) no significant missing data, b) the tests must be analyzed without gross errors, and c) appropriate corrective action for failures must be taken (and documented). See test procedures for more information. Failures must be corrected within 30 days. Medical hysicist's Section 6. M FORMS - Final_ Sample

15 MEE or Troubleshooting Beam Quality (Half-Value Layer) Assessment MA ID-Unit# ( ) Survey Date August 29, 2016 rocedure Equipment: Dosimeter, 0.1 mm Al sheets, lead sheet Dosimetry system: Cover the detector with lead sheet or apron Calibration date: Make at least 1 measurement for each available target-filter combination Apple 1010 August 31, 2016 DM hantom Target/Filter 1 Target/Filter 2 Target/Filter 3 Target/filter Rh/Rh Mo/Mo Mo/Rh Nominal kvp setting mas Exposure Measurements mm AL X (mr) mm AL X (mr) mm AL X (mr) mm AL X (mr) mm AL X (mr) mm AL X (mr) No Aluminum E Al Thickness (mm) t a 0.5 E a Al Thickness (mm) t b E b Calculated or measured HVL (mm Al) #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Minimum allowed HVL Overall ass/fail ass ass ass #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! HVL = t b ln[2e a /E 0 ] - t a ln[2e b /E 0 ] ln [E a /E b ] The HVL must meet the specifications of FDA's erformance Standards for Ionizing Radiation Emitting roducts (art ) as shown below. All failures must be corrected before clinical use. FDA X-ray Tube Voltage (kilovolt peak) and Minimum HVL Designed Operating Range (kv) Below 50 Measured Operating Voltage (kv) Minimum HVL (mm of Al) Medical hysicist's Section 6. M FORMS - Final_ Sample

16 MEE or Troubleshooting kvp Accuracy and Reproducibility MA ID-Unit# ( ) Survey Date August 29, 2016 kvp Accuracy and Reproducibility rocedure Equipment: kvp meter, lead sheet Cover the entire detector with lead sheet, a lead apron or other device. Remove the paddle. kvp meter Sanyo Volt Calibration Date: 9/1/2016 Setting Low Clinical kvp ACR DM hantom Clinical kvp High Clinical kvp Technique Nominal kvp setting Target/filter Focal spot mas 24 Mo/Mo Rh/Rh Rh/Rh Measured kvp value Data Measured kvp value 2 Measured kvp value Mean kvp Standard deviation (SD) Mean kvp - nominal kvp Analysis 0.05 x nominal kvp % error % error /F % % % Coefficient of variation (CV) 0.0 CV /F Overall ass/fail ass ass ass Mean kvp must not differ from the nominal by more than ±5% of the nominal kvp. Coefficient of variation must be When test is for MEE, all failures must be corrected before clinical use. When test is for troubleshooting, all failures must be corrected within 30 days. Medical hysicist's Section 6. M FORMS - Final_ Sample

17 MEE or Troubleshooting Collimation Assessment MA ID-Unit# ( ) Survey Date August 29, 2016 rocedure Equipment: Coins, film, electronic collimation test tool(s), etc. Eqpt used: coins kvp: 24 mas: 5 Largest Detector Size Available Small Detector Size (CR only) Technique Target material Collimator size (cm) SID (mm) Molybdenum 24x Deviation Between X-ray Field and Light Field Left edge deviation (mm) Right edge deviation (mm) Sum of left and right edge deviations Sum as % of SID Anterior edge deviation (mm) Chest edge deviation (mm) Sum of anterior and chest edge deviations Sum as % of SID ass/fail Deviation Between X-ray Field and Edges of the Image Receptor Left edge deviation % of SID (retain sign) Right edge deviation % of SID (retain sign) Anterior edge deviation % of SID (retain sign) Chest edge deviation % of SID (retain sign) ass/fail Alignment of Chest-Wall Edges of Compression addle and IR Difference between paddle edge and film Difference as % of SID ass/fail Overall ass/fail ass If sum of left plus right edge deviations or anterior plus chest edge deviations exceeds 2% of SID, seek service adjustment. If X-ray field exceeds image receptor at any side by more than +2% of SID or if X-ray field falls within image receptor on the chest wall side, seek service adjustment. If chest-wall edge of compression paddle is within the image receptor or projects beyond the chest-wall edge of the image receptor by more than 1% of SID, seek service correction. When test is for MEE, all failures must be corrected before clinical use. When test is for troubleshooting, all failures must be corrected within 30 days. Medical hysicist's Section 6. M FORMS - Final_ Sample

18 Troubleshooting Ghost Image Evaluation MA ID-Unit# ( ) Survey Date Happy Valley Mammography rocedure Equipment: ACR DM hantom, 0.1 mm Al sheet (10 cm x 10 cm) hantom Setup Largest image receptor size addle Size (IR size) : Clinical paddle (reg or flex) addle Type (reg or flex) : Apply 5 dan or 12 lbs comp force Exposure Mode: Compression Force: osition ACR DM hantom with wax insert opposite from chest wall edge. AEC Cell osition (if avail) : AEC cell position to position "3". Density Setting: Use clinical (AEC) technique for both images Image 1: osition phantom like Setup Image #1 (edge extends 1" beyond midline). Image 2: osition phantom like Setup Image #2 with Al placed on top. Signal data must be obtained from raw image large flex AO STD 12 lbs or 5 dan Image 1 Image 2 Resulting Techniques from Image Acquisition Target/filter kvp mas Rh/Rh Rh/Rh Ghosting Analysis (see images below) S 1 S 2 S 3 Ghosting Index Overall ass/fail ass Ghosting Index = (S 3 - S 2 ) (S 1 - S 2 ) The ghosting index must be within 0±0.3. Failures must be corrected before clinical use. Setup Image 1 Setup Image 2 Evaluation Image S 1 S 2 S 3 Image 2 Image 1 Medical hysicist's Section 6. M FORMS - Final_ Sample

19 Troubleshooting Viewbox Luminance MA ID-Unit# ( ) Medical hysicist Jane Incredible, hd Viewbox Location Main Office Signature Survey Date August 29, 2016 rocedure Equipment: Luminance meter Measure luminance for all viewboxes, record the luminance value for the viewbox with the lowest luminance. Note: Only check a deficiency if it is significant and could impact interpretation; if the observation is not significant, just make a note in comments Measurements Significant Deficiencies 1. Viewbox Designation Hallway - 1 Viewbox Luminance (cd/m 2 ) 3010 Dirt and Marks Color Difference Luminance Difference Non-Uniformity Functioning Masks Missing ass/fail 2. Hallway Tech QC Review for Viewbox Luminance Overall ass/fail ass Comments: Recommended: Mammography viewboxes should be capable of a luminance of 3,000 cd/m 2, be uniform, clean and have functioning masks; if these are not met, corrective action should be taken. Medical hysicist's Section 6. M FORMS - Final_ Sample

20 Medical hysicist's DM QC Test Summary Facility Name Happy Valley Mammography Address Suite 1 1 Oak Street Anywhere ST Survey Date Report Date Date of revious Survey August 29, 2016 August 31, 2016 July 16, 2015 MA ID Unit# ( ) Months Between Surveys 13 (must be 14) X-Ray Unit Manufacturer Ford X-Ray Unit Model Imager X-Ray Unit Control Serial # it Date of Manufacture January 3, 2015 Date of Installation X CR Unit Mfr 5000 CR Unit Model CR Unit Serial # Medical hysicist Jane Incredible, hd Telephone (444) Signature Quality Control Manual Used for Survey and Facility QC: 2015 ACR Digital Mammography Quality Control Manual Survey Type: Mammography Equipment Evaluation (MEE) - Acceptance Testing Routine Annual Survey Equipment Tested: DM Unit AW Monitor RW Monitor Viewbox rinter Other M Oversight Level: Medical hysicist On-Site Medical hysicist Oversight Unit Description: Digital radiography (DR) Computed Radiography (CR) Tomosynthesis (DBT) Unit Use: Diagnostic & Screening Diagnostic Only Screening Only ("ass" means all components of test passes; "Fail" means any or all components fail; if "CA" checked, see Corrective Action Summary) Overall Overall Medical hysicists Tests ass/fail/na CA Tech QC Evaluation ass/fail/na CA 1. Mammography Equip Eval (MEE) ass 1. ACR DM hantom Image Quality ass 2. ACR DM hantom Image Quality ass 2. CR Cassette Erasure (if app) ass 3. Spatial Resolution ass 3. Comp Thickness Indicator ass 4. AEC System erformance ass 4. Visual Checklist ass 5. Average Glandular Dose ass 5. AW Monitor QC ass 6. Unit Checklist ass 6. RW Monitor QC ass 7. Computed Radiography (if app) ass 7. Film rinter QC (if app) ass 8. AW Workstation Monitor QC ass 8. Viewbox Cleanliness (if app) ass 9. RW Monitor QC ass 9. Facility QC Review ass 10. Film rinter QC (if app) ass 10. Compression Force ass 11. Site's Tech QC rogram ass 11. Mfr Detector Calibration (if app) ass 12. Display Device Tech QC rogram ass Optional - Repeat Analysis ass MEE or Troubleshooting Beam Quality (HVL) Assessment kvp Accuracy and Reproducibility Collimation Assessment Ghost Image Evaluation Viewbox Luminance Medical hysicist's QC Tests Overall ass/fail/na ass ass ass ass ass CA ACR DM hantom Summary Value Limit Fiber score Speck group score Mass score SNR CNR AGD (mgy) Medical hysicist's Section 6. M FORMS - Final_ Sample

21 Medical hysicist's DM QC Test Summary Medical hysicist's QC Tests (continued) MA ID-Unit# ( ) Survey Date August 29, Corrective Action Summary* *Note: This is only a summary page, the Corrective Action Log Form may contain further details. Required/ Recommended Time Frame Description Utilize Corrective Action Log Form Date Completed Initials Medical hysicist's Section 6. M FORMS - Final_ Sample

22 Mammography Technique Chart MA ID-Unit# ( ) Survey Date August 29, 2016 Screening/Diagnostic Mammography Compressed Breast Thickness <3 cm 50% Fatty - 50% Dense Breast AEC Mode Target/Filter kvp AO STD Mo/Mo 26 3 to 5 cm AO STD Mo/Rh 27 5 to 7 cm AO STD Rh/Rh 30 > 7 cm AO STD Rh/Rh. 32 Implant Displaced Mammography Views (Manual Technique) Target/Filter kvp mas Small Mo/Rh Medium Mo/Rh Large Rh/Rh ACR DM hantom Technique (Weekly QC) AEC mode AO STD addle size (IR Size) addle type (reg or flex) View/selected image type Compression force AEC cell position (if avail) Target/filter (if app) kvp (if app) Density setting (if app) 24x30 flex LCC 5 dan Center Rh/Rh Medical hysicist's Section 6. M FORMS - Final_ Sample

23 Medical hysicist QC Letter for the Radiologist Dr. Mary Awsome Happy Valley Mammography Suite 1 1 Oak Street Anywhere ST August 31, 2016 Re: Medical hysicist Survey of on August 29, 2016 Dear Lead Interpreting Radiologist, The above mammography unit at your facility recently underwent an Annual Medical hysics Survey. Below is the relevant summary information as a result of this survey. lease note that your facility must follow-up on the Action Items below and obtain relevant documentation from the service engineer. lease evaluate the ACR Digital Mammography hantom image acquired during the medical physicist testing (Image ID information listed below) and see my comments. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to call. Image Quality atient Name (hantom): atient ID (hantom): Date: Test Test 8/29/2016 Fiber score Speck group score Mass score Artifacts ACR Digital Mammography hantom Scores Your Unit assing Criteria ass /Fail No Clinically Significant Artifacts Comments on phantom image: Radiation Dose ACR hantom Dose (mgy) Note: The above dose is an estimate determined with a phantom representing the FDA-defined 4.2 cm thick, 50% glandular/50% adipose standard breast. Doses will vary with patient size and density. Specific patient doses can be estimated by your medical physicist. Comments on radiation dose: ACR Digital Mammography hantom Radiation Dose Values Your Unit assing Criteria ass /Fail Medical hysicist's Section 6. M FORMS - Final_ Sample

24 Medical hysicist QC Summary Letter for the Radiologist, Cont'd Required Action Items Time Frame Description Recommended Action Items Time Frame Description Comments on Monitors, Monitor QC, & Viewing Conditions Time Frame Description Comments on Tech QC Time Frame Sue does an excellent job! Description If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Jane Incredible, hd hone (444) Medical hysicist's Section 6. M FORMS - Final_ Sample

Acceptance Testing of a Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Unit

Acceptance Testing of a Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Unit Acceptance Testing of a Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Unit 2012 AAPM Spring Clinical Meeting Jessica Clements, M.S., DABR Objectives Review of technology and clinical advantages Acceptance Testing Procedures

More information

STEREOTACTIC BREAST BIOPSY EQUIPMENT SURVEYS

STEREOTACTIC BREAST BIOPSY EQUIPMENT SURVEYS STEREOTACTIC BREAST BIOPSY EQUIPMENT SURVEYS JAMES A. TOMLINSON, M.S. Diagnostic Radiological Physicist American Board of Radiology Certified Medical Physics Consultants, Inc. Bio 28 yrs experience 100%

More information

8/2/2017. Radiologist Responsibilities. Radiologist Responsibilities. Medical Physicist Mammography Equipment Evaluation and Annual Survey

8/2/2017. Radiologist Responsibilities. Radiologist Responsibilities. Medical Physicist Mammography Equipment Evaluation and Annual Survey Implementation of the 2016 ACR Digital Mammography QC Manual Medical Physicist Mammography Equipment Evaluation and Annual Survey Eric A Berns, PhD, FACR Radiologist Responsibilities Radiologist Responsibilities

More information

Practical Aspects of Medical Physics Surveys of Mammography Equipment and Facilities

Practical Aspects of Medical Physics Surveys of Mammography Equipment and Facilities Practical Aspects of Medical Physics Surveys of Mammography Equipment and Facilities Melissa Martin, M.S., FAAPM, FACR, FACMP AAPM Annual Meeting - Philadelphia July 19, 2010 MO-B-204C-1 Educational Objectives

More information

Surveying and QC of Stereotactic Breast Biopsy Units for ACR Accreditation

Surveying and QC of Stereotactic Breast Biopsy Units for ACR Accreditation Surveying and QC of Stereotactic Breast Biopsy Units for ACR Accreditation AAPM Annual Clinical Meeting Indianapolis, IN August 5, 2013 Learning Objectives Become familiar with the recommendations and

More information

Introduction. Digital Mammography QA: Comparing the Manufacturers Recommendations. What is QC and why is it important? Review & compare QC tests

Introduction. Digital Mammography QA: Comparing the Manufacturers Recommendations. What is QC and why is it important? Review & compare QC tests Slide 1 Digital Mammography QA: Comparing the Manufacturers Recommendations Eric A. Berns, Ph.D. Slide 2 Introduction What is QC and why is it important? Review & compare QC tests Key take home points

More information

Quality Control for Stereotactic Breast Biopsy. Robert J. Pizzutiello, Jr., F.A.C.M.P. Upstate Medical Physics, Inc

Quality Control for Stereotactic Breast Biopsy. Robert J. Pizzutiello, Jr., F.A.C.M.P. Upstate Medical Physics, Inc Quality Control for Stereotactic Breast Biopsy Robert J. Pizzutiello, Jr., F.A.C.M.P. Upstate Medical Physics, Inc. 716-924-0350 Methods of Imaging Guided Breast Biopsy Ultrasound guided, hand-held needle

More information

Aspire HD. Program Manual. 2nd Edition - October 2012

Aspire HD. Program Manual. 2nd Edition - October 2012 Quality Control 1 Aspire HD Quality Control Program Manual 2nd Edition - October 2012 Overview Installation of FDR Mammography QC Program Weekly Test 2 3 4 Quarterly Test 5 Semi-annual Test 6 Annual Test

More information

Quality Control of Full Field Digital Mammography Units

Quality Control of Full Field Digital Mammography Units Quality Control of Full Field Digital Mammography Units Melissa C. Martin, M.S., FACMP, FACR, FAAPM Melissa@TherapyPhysics.com 310-612-8127 ACMP Annual Meeting Virginia Beach, VA May 2, 2009 History of

More information

NJDEP Medical Physicist s Radiographic QC Survey Registration Number:

NJDEP Medical Physicist s Radiographic QC Survey Registration Number: Facility Name NJDEP ID # NJDEP Medical Physicist s Radiographic QC Survey PLEASE PRINT Facility Information Unit Information Manufacturer Model Console Model # Console serial # Tube serial # Location (room)

More information

Breast Tomosynthesis. Bob Liu, Ph.D. Department of Radiology Massachusetts General Hospital And Harvard Medical School

Breast Tomosynthesis. Bob Liu, Ph.D. Department of Radiology Massachusetts General Hospital And Harvard Medical School Breast Tomosynthesis Bob Liu, Ph.D. Department of Radiology Massachusetts General Hospital And Harvard Medical School Outline Physics aspects of breast tomosynthesis Quality control of breast tomosynthesis

More information

7/20/2014. Outline. Outline. Disclosures. Learning Objectives. SBB: Practical Aspects of ACR Accreditation, QC and ACR On Site Surveys

7/20/2014. Outline. Outline. Disclosures. Learning Objectives. SBB: Practical Aspects of ACR Accreditation, QC and ACR On Site Surveys Outline SBB: Practical Aspects of ACR Accreditation, QC and ACR On Site Surveys Robert J. Pizzutiello, MS, FACR, FAAPM, FAC Residency Program Director, Upstate Medical Physics, PC Senior Vice President,

More information

Ansur TNT Users Manual. Plug-In

Ansur TNT Users Manual. Plug-In Ansur TNT 12000 Plug-In Users Manual August 2009, Rev. 2, 12/09 2009 Fluke Corporation. All rights reserved. Specifications are subject to change without notice. All product names are trademarks of their

More information

REQUIREMENTS FOR LICENCE HOLDERS WITH RESPECT TO QUALITY CONTROL TESTS FOR DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY IMAGING SYSTEMS

REQUIREMENTS FOR LICENCE HOLDERS WITH RESPECT TO QUALITY CONTROL TESTS FOR DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY IMAGING SYSTEMS REQUIREMENTS FOR LICENCE HOLDERS WITH RESPECT TO QUALITY CONTROL TESTS FOR DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY IMAGING SYSTEMS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH DIRECTORATE: RADIATION CONTROL Implementation date: 31 March 2009 Contents

More information

MAMMOGRAPHY - HIGH LEVEL TROUBLESHOOTING

MAMMOGRAPHY - HIGH LEVEL TROUBLESHOOTING MAMMOGRAPHY - HIGH LEVEL TROUBLESHOOTING Maynard High New York Medical College SS2001-M.High 1 Objectives: Review MQSA and ACR annual QC tests as opportunities for troubleshooting before a significant

More information

4/19/2016. Quality Control Activities for the RadiologicTechnologist. Objectives. 3D Tomosynthesis QC differences

4/19/2016. Quality Control Activities for the RadiologicTechnologist. Objectives. 3D Tomosynthesis QC differences Quality Control Activities for the RadiologicTechnologist Quality Control Tests 2D QC Tomosynthesis QC DICOM Printer Quality Control Weekly Detector Flat Field Calibration Weekl Artifact Evaluation Weekly

More information

Overview of Safety Code 35

Overview of Safety Code 35 Common Quality Control Procedures for All s Quality Control Procedures Film All s Daily Quality Control Tests Equipment Warm-up (D1) According to manufacturers instructions Can include auto calibration(d1)

More information

FFDM -FCRm QC Requirements- What You REALLY Need to Know

FFDM -FCRm QC Requirements- What You REALLY Need to Know FFDM -FCRm QC Requirements- What You REALLY Need to Know Melissa C. Martin, M.S., FACR, FAAPM, FACMP AAPM Annual Meeting July 28, 2008 FDA Approval for Mammography Fuji FCRm System approved for Mammography

More information

Collimation Assessment Using GAFCHROMIC XR-M2

Collimation Assessment Using GAFCHROMIC XR-M2 Collimation Assessment Using GAFCHROMIC XR-M2 I. Introduction A method of collimation assessment for GE Senographe full-field digital mammography (FFDM) systems is described that uses a self-developing

More information

FFDM in the Field: Physicist's Role in the QC of Mammography Laser Printers May Carl R. Keener, Ph.D., DABMP, DABR

FFDM in the Field: Physicist's Role in the QC of Mammography Laser Printers May Carl R. Keener, Ph.D., DABMP, DABR FFDM in the Field: Physicist's Role in the QC of Mammography Laser Printers May 2010 Carl R. Keener, Ph.D., DABMP, DABR keener@marpinc.com MARP Medical & Radiation Physics, Inc. Physicist's Role in the

More information

Nuclear Associates

Nuclear Associates Nuclear Associates 07-647 R/F QC Phantom Operators Manual March 2005 Manual No. 07-647-1 Rev. 2 2004, 2005 Fluke Corporation, All rights reserved. All product names are trademarks of their respective companies

More information

THE ART OF THE IMAGE: IDENTIFICATION AND REMEDIATION OF IMAGE ARTIFACTS IN MAMMOGRAPHY

THE ART OF THE IMAGE: IDENTIFICATION AND REMEDIATION OF IMAGE ARTIFACTS IN MAMMOGRAPHY THE ART OF THE IMAGE: IDENTIFICATION AND REMEDIATION OF IMAGE ARTIFACTS IN MAMMOGRAPHY William Geiser, MS DABR Senior Medical Physicist MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas wgeiser@mdanderson.org INTRODUCTION

More information

Image Display and Perception

Image Display and Perception Image Display and Perception J. Anthony Seibert, Ph.D. Department of Radiology UC Davis Medical Center Sacramento, California, USA Image acquisition, display, & interpretation X-rays kvp mas Tube filtration

More information

DISC QC/QA Program for Digital Imaging Systems using the DR Radchex Plus Meter

DISC QC/QA Program for Digital Imaging Systems using the DR Radchex Plus Meter DISC QC/QA Program for Digital Imaging Systems using the DR Radchex Plus Meter Revision Date: January 5th, 2017 www.disc-imaging.com Table of Contents Section A: Preliminary Setup Requirements... 4 Tools

More information

Mammography is a radiographic procedure specially designed for detecting breast pathology Approximately 1 woman in 8 will develop breast cancer over

Mammography is a radiographic procedure specially designed for detecting breast pathology Approximately 1 woman in 8 will develop breast cancer over Mammography is a radiographic procedure specially designed for detecting breast pathology Approximately 1 woman in 8 will develop breast cancer over a lifetime Breast cancer screening programs rely on

More information

Test Equipment for Radiology and CT Quality Control Contents

Test Equipment for Radiology and CT Quality Control Contents Test Equipment for Radiology and CT Quality Control Contents Quality Control Testing...2 Photometers for Digital Clinical Display QC...3 Primary Workstations...3 Secondary Workstations...3 Testing of workstations...3

More information

The Evaluation of Collimator Alignment of Diagnostic X-ray Tube Using Computed Radiography System

The Evaluation of Collimator Alignment of Diagnostic X-ray Tube Using Computed Radiography System The Evaluation of Collimator Alignment of Diagnostic X-ray Tube Using Computed Radiography System The Evaluation of Collimator Alignment of Diagnostic X-ray Tube Using Computed Radiography System Manus

More information

COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY CHAPTER 4 EFFECTIVE USE OF CR

COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY CHAPTER 4 EFFECTIVE USE OF CR This presentation is a professional collaboration of development time prepared by: Rex Christensen Terri Jurkiewicz and Diane Kawamura New Technology https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ptkzznazb 7U COMPUTED

More information

Mammography: Physics of Imaging

Mammography: Physics of Imaging Mammography: Physics of Imaging Robert G. Gould, Sc.D. Professor and Vice Chair Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging University of California San Francisco, California Mammographic Imaging: Uniqueness

More information

DIAGNOSTIC ACCREDITATION PROGRAM. Radiology and CT Quality Control Procedures Workbook

DIAGNOSTIC ACCREDITATION PROGRAM. Radiology and CT Quality Control Procedures Workbook DIAGNOSTIC ACCREDITATION PROGRAM Radiology and CT Quality Control Procedures Workbook Quality Control Procedures Radiography/CR/DR Safety Code 35 Summary For more detail about each quality control (QC)

More information

KODAK DIRECTVIEW CR Mammography Feature User s Guide

KODAK DIRECTVIEW CR Mammography Feature User s Guide KODAK DIRECTVIEW CR Mammography Feature User s Guide 17 September 2010 9G3741 Version 1.0 Carestream Health, Inc. 150 Verona Street Rochester, NY 14608 CARESTREAM, DIRECTVIEW, and DRYVIEW are trademarks

More information

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Digital Breast Tomosynthesis OLIVE PEART MS, RT(R) (M) HTTP://WWW.OPEART.COM 2D Mammography Not 100% effective Limited by tissue superimposition Overlapping tissue can mask tumors False negative Overlapping

More information

GE AMX 4+ Portable X-Ray

GE AMX 4+ Portable X-Ray GE AMX 4+ Portable X-Ray Typical Manufacturer s Picture GE Healthcare s AMX-4+ analog X-ray system provides high-performance in a compact, easy-to-maneuver package. The rotating arm and tube simplify positioning

More information

Investigation of the line-pair pattern method for evaluating mammographic focal spot performance

Investigation of the line-pair pattern method for evaluating mammographic focal spot performance Investigation of the line-pair pattern method for evaluating mammographic focal spot performance Mitchell M. Goodsitt, a) Heang-Ping Chan, and Bob Liu Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann

More information

Digital radiography (DR) post processing techniques for pediatric radiology

Digital radiography (DR) post processing techniques for pediatric radiology Digital radiography (DR) post processing techniques for pediatric radiology St Jude Children s Research Hospital Samuel Brady, MS PhD DABR samuel.brady@stjude.org Purpose Review common issues and solutions

More information

Y11-DR Digital Radiography (DR) Image Quality

Y11-DR Digital Radiography (DR) Image Quality Y11-DR Digital Radiography (DR) Image Quality Image quality is stressed for all systems in Safety Code 35. In the relevant sections Health Canada s advice is the manufacturer s recommended test procedures

More information

Exposure Indices and Target Values in Radiography: What Are They and How Can You Use Them?

Exposure Indices and Target Values in Radiography: What Are They and How Can You Use Them? Exposure Indices and Target Values in Radiography: What Are They and How Can You Use Them? Definition and Validation of Exposure Indices Ingrid Reiser, PhD DABR Department of Radiology University of Chicago

More information

QC Testing for Computed Tomography (CT) Scanner

QC Testing for Computed Tomography (CT) Scanner QC Testing for Computed Tomography (CT) Scanner QA - Quality Assurance All planned and systematic actions needed to provide confidence on a structure, system or component. all-encompassing program, including

More information

I. PERFORMANCE OF X-RAY PRODUCTION COMPONENTS FLUOROSCOPIC ACCEPTANCE TESTING: TEST PROCEDURES & PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

I. PERFORMANCE OF X-RAY PRODUCTION COMPONENTS FLUOROSCOPIC ACCEPTANCE TESTING: TEST PROCEDURES & PERFORMANCE CRITERIA FLUOROSCOPIC ACCEPTANCE TESTING: TEST PROCEDURES & PERFORMANCE CRITERIA EDWARD L. NICKOLOFF DEPARTMENT OF RADIOLOGY COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY NEW YORK, NY ACCEPTANCE TESTING GOALS PRIOR TO 1st CLINICAL USAGE

More information

Nuclear Associates

Nuclear Associates Nuclear Associates 07-649 CDRH Fluoroscopic Phantom Users Manual March 2005 Manual No. 07-649-1 Rev. 2 2004, 2005 Fluke Corporation, All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A. All product names are trademarks

More information

of sufficient quality and quantity

of sufficient quality and quantity of sufficient quality and quantity The patient s body attenuates the beam as it passes though the body More energy is deposited in organs located near the entry of the beam than near the exit of the beam

More information

Teaching Digital Radiography and Fluoroscopic Radiation Protection

Teaching Digital Radiography and Fluoroscopic Radiation Protection Teaching Digital Radiography and Fluoroscopic Radiation Protection WCEC 20 th Student Educator Radiographer Conference Dennis Bowman, RT(R), CRT (R)(F) Community Hospital of the Monterey Peninsula (CHOMP)

More information

Digital Imaging started in the 1972 with Digital subtraction angiography Clinical digital imaging was employed from the 1980 ~ 37 years ago Amount of

Digital Imaging started in the 1972 with Digital subtraction angiography Clinical digital imaging was employed from the 1980 ~ 37 years ago Amount of Digital Imaging started in the 1972 with Digital subtraction angiography Clinical digital imaging was employed from the 1980 ~ 37 years ago Amount of radiation to the population due to Medical Imaging

More information

Digital Mammography Quality Control for the Mammographic Technologist

Digital Mammography Quality Control for the Mammographic Technologist Ontario Breast Screening Program Digital Mammography Quality Control for the Mammographic Technologist Authors: G.E. Mawdsley, A.K. Bloomquist, M.J. Yaffe October 2011 Revision 3.1 Mammographic Physics

More information

Beam-Restricting Devices

Beam-Restricting Devices Beam-Restricting Devices Three factors contribute to an increase in scatter radiation: Increased kvp Increased Field Size Increased Patient or Body Part Size. X-ray Interactions a some interact with the

More information

SUSPENSION CRITERIA FOR IMAGE MONITORS AND VIEWING BOXES.

SUSPENSION CRITERIA FOR IMAGE MONITORS AND VIEWING BOXES. SUSPENSION CRITERIA FOR IMAGE MONITORS AND VIEWING BOXES. Tingberg, Anders Published in: Radiation Protection Dosimetry DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncs302 Published: 2013-01-01 Link to publication Citation for published

More information

New spectral benefi ts, proven low dose

New spectral benefi ts, proven low dose New spectral benefi ts, proven low dose Philips MicroDose mammography SI, technical data sheet Philips MicroDose SI with single-shot spectral imaging is a fullfi eld digital mammography solution that delivers

More information

A Practical Overview of the Clinical and Operational Impact of Computed Radiography(CR) Implementations. Shirley Weddle, RT(R)(M), CIIP, BBA

A Practical Overview of the Clinical and Operational Impact of Computed Radiography(CR) Implementations. Shirley Weddle, RT(R)(M), CIIP, BBA A Practical Overview of the Clinical and Operational Impact of Computed Radiography(CR) Implementations Shirley Weddle, RT(R)(M), CIIP, BBA OBJECTIVES Define Computed Radiography (CR) Discuss CR vendor

More information

Imaging Technique Optimization of Tungsten Anode FFDM System

Imaging Technique Optimization of Tungsten Anode FFDM System Imaging Technique Optimization of Tungsten Anode FFDM System Biao Chen a*, Andrew P. Smith b, Zhenxue Jing a, Elena Ingal a a Hologic, Inc. 600 Technology Drive, DE 1970 b Hologic, Inc. 35 Crosby Drive,

More information

TECHNICAL DATA. GIOTTO IMAGE SDL/W is pre-arranged for Full Field Digital Biopsy examination with the patient in prone position.

TECHNICAL DATA. GIOTTO IMAGE SDL/W is pre-arranged for Full Field Digital Biopsy examination with the patient in prone position. Ver. 01/06/07 TECHNICAL DATA GIOTTO IMAGE SDL/W LOW DOSE, FULL FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY UNIT USING AMORPHOUS SELENIUM (a-se) TECHNOLOGY DETECTOR (pre-arranged for stereotactic biopsy with the same digital

More information

Patient-Assisted Compression Impact on Image Quality and Workflow

Patient-Assisted Compression Impact on Image Quality and Workflow Patient-Assisted Compression Impact on Image Quality and Workflow Senographe Pristina In 2017, GE Healthcare s Senographe Pristina ( Pristina ) was approved by the FDA using the standard technologist-controlled

More information

Essentials of Digital Imaging

Essentials of Digital Imaging Essentials of Digital Imaging Module 7 Transcript 2016 ASRT. All rights reserved. Essentials of Digital Imaging Module 7 Quality 1. ASRT Animation 2. Welcome Welcome to the Essentials of Digital Imaging:

More information

ACPSEM Position Paper RECOMMENDATIONS FOR A DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM V4.0

ACPSEM Position Paper RECOMMENDATIONS FOR A DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM V4.0 Heggie et al ACPSEM Position Paper: Digital Mammography V4.0 ACPSEM Position Paper RECOMMENDATIONS FOR A DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM V4.0 JCP Heggie 1, P Barnes 2, L Cartwright 3, J Diffey

More information

Exposure System Selection

Exposure System Selection Principles of Imaging Science II (RAD120) Exposure Systems Exposure System Selection Radiographic exposure is a very complex process Best technique systems manipulate one variable while holding others

More information

RAD 150 RADIOLOGIC EXPOSURE TECHNIQUE II

RAD 150 RADIOLOGIC EXPOSURE TECHNIQUE II RAD 150 RADIOLOGIC EXPOSURE TECHNIQUE II APPROVED 12/O2/2011 EFFECTIVE SPRING 2013-14 Prefix & Number RAD 150 Course Title: Radiologic Exposure Technique II & Lab Purpose of this submission: New Change/Updated

More information

Breast Imaging Basics: Module 10 Digital Mammography

Breast Imaging Basics: Module 10 Digital Mammography Module 10 Transcript For educational and institutional use. This test bank is licensed for noncommercial, educational inhouse or online educational course use only in educational and corporate institutions.

More information

MILADY. Product Data. Page 1 of 8

MILADY. Product Data. Page 1 of 8 Page 1 of 8 The MILADY Mammographic Unit offers the best quality-to-price ratio to our customers worldwide. The unit advanced technology together with the application of industrial production standards,

More information

Learning Objectives: What s my motivation? (unknown screen actor) Workshop Overview

Learning Objectives: What s my motivation? (unknown screen actor) Workshop Overview Practical Medical Physics Adapting Traditional Clinical Medical Physics to Digital Radiography Charles E. Willis, Ph.D., DABR Associate Professor Department of Imaging Physics The University of Texas M.D.

More information

Do you have any other questions? Please call us at (Toll Free) or , or

Do you have any other questions? Please call us at (Toll Free) or , or INSTRUCTIONS Read the appropriate course/ textbook. This is an open book test. A score of 75% or higher is needed to receive CE credit. You will have a maximum of three attempts to pass this course. Please

More information

3/31/2011. Objectives. Emory University. Historical Development. Historical Development. Historical Development

3/31/2011. Objectives. Emory University. Historical Development. Historical Development. Historical Development Teaching Radiographic Technique in a Digital Imaging Paradigm Objectives 1. Discuss the historical development of digital imaging. Dawn Couch Moore, M.M.Sc., RT(R) Assistant Professor and Director Emory

More information

Nuclear Associates

Nuclear Associates Nuclear Associates 07-644 Grid Alignment Test Tool Users Manual March 2005 Manual No. 07-644-1 Rev. 2 2004, 2005 Fluke Corporation, All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A. All product names are trademarks

More information

CR Basics and FAQ. Overview. Historical Perspective

CR Basics and FAQ. Overview. Historical Perspective Page: 1 of 6 CR Basics and FAQ Overview Computed Radiography is a term used to describe a system that electronically records a radiographic image. Computed Radiographic systems use unique image receptors

More information

X-ray Imaging. PHYS Lecture. Carlos Vinhais. Departamento de Física Instituto Superior de Engenharia do Porto

X-ray Imaging. PHYS Lecture. Carlos Vinhais. Departamento de Física Instituto Superior de Engenharia do Porto X-ray Imaging PHYS Lecture Carlos Vinhais Departamento de Física Instituto Superior de Engenharia do Porto cav@isep.ipp.pt Overview Projection Radiography Anode Angle Focal Spot Magnification Blurring

More information

X-RAYS - NO UNAUTHORISED ENTRY

X-RAYS - NO UNAUTHORISED ENTRY Licencing of premises Premises Refer Guidelines A radiation warning sign and warning notice, X-RAYS - NO UNAUTHORISED ENTRY must be displayed at all entrances leading to the rooms where x-ray units are

More information

Published text: Institute of Cancer Research Repository Please direct all s to:

Published text: Institute of Cancer Research Repository   Please direct all  s to: This is an author produced version of an article that appears in: MEDICAL PHYSICS The internet address for this paper is: https://publications.icr.ac.uk/1316/ Copyright information: http://www.aip.org/pubservs/web_posting_guidelines.html

More information

CHAPTER 6 QC Test For Fluoroscopic Equipment. Prepared by:- Kamarul Amin bin Abu Bakar School of Medical Imaging KLMUC

CHAPTER 6 QC Test For Fluoroscopic Equipment. Prepared by:- Kamarul Amin bin Abu Bakar School of Medical Imaging KLMUC CHAPTER 6 QC Test For Fluoroscopic Equipment Prepared by:- Kamarul Amin bin Abdullah @ Abu Bakar School of Medical Imaging KLMUC Lesson Outcomes Describe the objectives of each QC test done. Identify QC

More information

Maximizing clinical outcomes

Maximizing clinical outcomes Maximizing clinical outcomes Digital Tomosynthesis Dual Energy Subtraction Automated Long Length Imaging Improved image quality at a low dose Xray Xray Patented ISS capture technology promotes high sensitivity

More information

GE Healthcare. Senographe 2000D Full-field digital mammography system

GE Healthcare. Senographe 2000D Full-field digital mammography system GE Healthcare Senographe 2000D Full-field digital mammography system Digital has arrived. The Senographe 2000D Full-Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) system gives you a unique competitive advantage. That

More information

Ludlum Medical Physics

Ludlum Medical Physics Ludlum Medical Physics Medical Imaging Radiology QA Test Tools NEW LUDLUM PRODUCT LINE Medical Physics Products Medical Physics Products What are they? Products used to measure radiation output and to

More information

Compliance Guidance for RADIOGRAPHIC QUALITY CONTROL (5 th Edition)

Compliance Guidance for RADIOGRAPHIC QUALITY CONTROL (5 th Edition) Compliance Guidance for RADIOGRAPHIC QUALITY CONTROL (5 th Edition) New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of X-ray Compliance PO Box 420 Mail Code 25-01 Trenton, NJ 08625-0420 FAX 609-984-5811

More information

Half value layer and AEC receptor dose compliance survey in Estonia

Half value layer and AEC receptor dose compliance survey in Estonia Half value layer and AEC receptor dose compliance survey in Estonia K. Kepler, A. Vladimirov Training Centre of Medical Physics, University of Tartu Testing Centre of the University of Tartu, Estonia E-mail:

More information

While digital techniques have the potential to reduce patient doses, they also have the potential to significantly increase them.

While digital techniques have the potential to reduce patient doses, they also have the potential to significantly increase them. In press 2004 1 2 Guest Editorial (F. Mettler, H. Ringertz and E. Vano) Guest Editorial (F. Mettler, H. Ringertz and E. Vano) Digital radiology An appropriate analogy that is easy for most people to understand

More information

SYLLABUS. TITLE: Equipment Operation I. DEPARTMENT: Radiologic Technology

SYLLABUS. TITLE: Equipment Operation I. DEPARTMENT: Radiologic Technology CODE: RADT 156 INSTITUTE: Health Science TITLE: Equipment Operation I DEPARTMENT: Radiologic Technology COURSE DESCRIPTION: This course covers the principles of equipment operation and maintenance of radiographic

More information

Features and Weaknesses of Phantoms for CR/DR System Testing

Features and Weaknesses of Phantoms for CR/DR System Testing Physics testing of image detectors Parameters to test Features and Weaknesses of Phantoms for CR/DR System Testing Spatial resolution Contrast resolution Uniformity/geometric distortion Dose response/signal

More information

Mammography Solution. AMULET Innovality. The new leader in the AMULET series. Tomosynthesis, 3D mammography and biopsy are all available.

Mammography Solution. AMULET Innovality. The new leader in the AMULET series. Tomosynthesis, 3D mammography and biopsy are all available. Mammography Solution AMULET Innovality The new leader in the AMULET series. Tomosynthesis, 3D mammography and biopsy are all available. FUJIFILM supports the Pink Ribbon Campaign for early detection of

More information

Acquisition, Processing and Display

Acquisition, Processing and Display Acquisition, Processing and Display Terri L. Fauber, R.T. (R)(M) Department of Radiation Sciences School of Allied Health Professions Virginia Commonwealth University Topics Image Characteristics Image

More information

TESTING FLAT-PANEL IMAGING SYSTEMS: What the Medical Physicist Needs to Know. JAMES A. TOMLINSON, M.S., D.A.B.R. Diagnostic Radiological Physicist

TESTING FLAT-PANEL IMAGING SYSTEMS: What the Medical Physicist Needs to Know. JAMES A. TOMLINSON, M.S., D.A.B.R. Diagnostic Radiological Physicist TESTING FLAT-PANEL IMAGING SYSTEMS: What the Medical Physicist Needs to Know JAMES A. TOMLINSON, M.S., D.A.B.R. Diagnostic Radiological Physicist Topics Image Uniformity and Artifacts Image Quality - Detail

More information

Protocol for the Quality Control of the Physical and Technical Aspects of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Systems

Protocol for the Quality Control of the Physical and Technical Aspects of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Systems Protocol for the Quality Control of the Physical and Technical Aspects of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Systems Draft version 0.10 February 2013 European Reference Organisation for Quality Assured Breast

More information

Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4732 X-ray Revision

Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4732 X-ray Revision Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4732 X-ray Revision DRAFT FLUOROSCOPIC X-RAY SYSTEMS, 1.0 Subpart 1. Applicability. Subpart 2. Limitation of the useful beam. Subpart 3. Measuring compliance; primary protective

More information

TOPICS: CT Protocol Optimization over the Range of Patient Age & Size and for Different CT Scanner Types: Recommendations & Misconceptions

TOPICS: CT Protocol Optimization over the Range of Patient Age & Size and for Different CT Scanner Types: Recommendations & Misconceptions CT Protocol Optimization over the Range of Patient Age & Size and for Different CT Scanner Types: Recommendations & Misconceptions TOPICS: Computed Tomography Quick Overview CT Dosimetry Effects of CT

More information

Title: A COMPARISON OF Cs-137 AND X-RAY SOURCES AS CALIBRATION REFERENCES FOR THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETER CHIPS

Title: A COMPARISON OF Cs-137 AND X-RAY SOURCES AS CALIBRATION REFERENCES FOR THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETER CHIPS Title: A COMPARISON OF Cs-137 AND X-RAY SOURCES AS CALIBRATION REFERENCES FOR THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETER CHIPS By Aravind Ravichandran arr192@mail.usask.ca University of Saskatchewan Address: 2424 Cumberland

More information

Appropriate Inspection Distance of Digital X-Ray Imaging Equipment for Diagnosis

Appropriate Inspection Distance of Digital X-Ray Imaging Equipment for Diagnosis Indian Journal of Science and Technology Vol 8(S8), 380-386, April 2015 ISSN (Print) : 0974-6846 ISSN (Online) : 0974-5645 DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2015/v8iS8/70528 Appropriate Inspection Distance of Digital

More information

Dose Reduction and Image Preservation After the Introduction of a 0.1 mm Cu Filter into the LODOX Statscan unit above 110 kvp

Dose Reduction and Image Preservation After the Introduction of a 0.1 mm Cu Filter into the LODOX Statscan unit above 110 kvp Dose Reduction and Image Preservation After the Introduction of a into the LODOX Statscan unit above 110 kvp Abstract: CJ Trauernicht 1, C Rall 1, T Perks 2, G Maree 1, E Hering 1, S Steiner 3 1) Division

More information

Quality control for digital mammography: Part II recommendations from the ACRIN DMIST trial

Quality control for digital mammography: Part II recommendations from the ACRIN DMIST trial Quality control for digital mammography: Part II recommendations from the ACRIN DMIST trial Martin J. Yaffe, Aili K. Bloomquist, Gordon E. Mawdsley, Etta D. Pisano, R. Edward Hendrick, Laurie L. Fajardo,

More information

Introduction of Computed Radiography in Two Mammography Services: Image Quality and Dose Analysis

Introduction of Computed Radiography in Two Mammography Services: Image Quality and Dose Analysis Introduction of Computed Radiography in Two Mammography Services: Image Quality and Dose Analysis Rosangela Requi Jakubiak* a, Humberto Remigio Gamba a, Maria Manuela Ramos a, Gislene Gabrielle Faversani

More information

Outline. Digital Radiography. Understanding Digital Modalities: Image Quality and Dose. Image Quality. Dose Control

Outline. Digital Radiography. Understanding Digital Modalities: Image Quality and Dose. Image Quality. Dose Control Understanding Digital Modalities: Image Quality and Dose S. Jeff Shepard, M.S. University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas Special Acknowledgement: Stephen K. Thompson, M.S. William

More information

Digital Imaging Considerations Computed Radiography

Digital Imaging Considerations Computed Radiography Digital Imaging Considerations Digital Radiography Computed Radiography o Cassette based Direct or Indirect Digital Radiography o Cassetteless Computed Radiography 1 CR Image Acquisition Most like conventional

More information

Predicted image quality of a CMOS APS X-ray detector across a range of mammographic beam qualities

Predicted image quality of a CMOS APS X-ray detector across a range of mammographic beam qualities Journal of Physics: Conference Series PAPER OPEN ACCESS Predicted image quality of a CMOS APS X-ray detector across a range of mammographic beam qualities Recent citations - Resolution Properties of a

More information

Protocol for the Quality Control of the Physical and Technical Aspects of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Systems

Protocol for the Quality Control of the Physical and Technical Aspects of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Systems Protocol for the Quality Control of the Physical and Technical Aspects of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Systems Draft version 0.15 January 2014 European Reference Organisation for Quality Assured Breast

More information

FMT18 FLOOR MOUNTED SYSTEM

FMT18 FLOOR MOUNTED SYSTEM mas Time AEC 320 kvp 64 mas 320 ma 320 ma 320 DEN 0.0 mm Cu 17 in X 17 in 72.0 in FMT18 FLOOR MOUNTED SYSTEM with Synchronized Tracking System Overview Clinical Efficiency The FMT18 System was designed

More information

10/3/2012. Study Harder

10/3/2012. Study Harder This presentation is a professional collaboration of development time prepared by: Rex Christensen Terri Jurkiewicz and Diane Kawamura Study Harder CR detection is inefficient, inferior to film screen

More information

Evaluation of a quality control phantom for digital chest radiography

Evaluation of a quality control phantom for digital chest radiography JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, VOLUME 2, NUMBER 2, SPRING 2001 Evaluation of a quality control phantom for digital chest radiography Eugene Mah* Department of Radiology, Medical University

More information

diagnostic examination

diagnostic examination RADIOLOGICAL PHYSICS 2011 Raphex diagnostic examination Adel A. Mustafa, Ph.D., Editor PUBLISHED FOR: RAMPS (Radiological and Medical Physics Society of New York) preface The RAPHEX Diagnostic exam 2011

More information

10/26/2015. Study Harder

10/26/2015. Study Harder This presentation is a professional collaboration of development time prepared by: Rex Christensen Terri Jurkiewicz and Diane Kawamura Study Harder CR detection is inefficient, inferior to film screen

More information

Assessment of Beam Alignment, Collimation and Half Value Layer of Some Selected X-Ray Machines in Plateau State, Nigeria

Assessment of Beam Alignment, Collimation and Half Value Layer of Some Selected X-Ray Machines in Plateau State, Nigeria International Journal of Innovative Scientific & Engineering Technologies Research 5(4):-5, Oct.-Dec., 07 SEAHI PUBLICATIONS, 07 www.seahipaj.org ISSN: 60-896X Assessment of Beam Alignment, Collimation

More information

GE Healthcare. Performa. High-performance breast imaging

GE Healthcare. Performa. High-performance breast imaging GE Healthcare Performa High-performance breast imaging Moving mammography forward. And patients faster. GE Healthcare s unparalleled leadership across mammography begins with a deep understanding of breast

More information

X-RAY MEDICAL EQUIPMENT

X-RAY MEDICAL EQUIPMENT X-RAY MEDICAL EQUIPMENT CHEST RADIOGRAPHY GENERAL RADIOGRAPHY & FLUOROSCOPY RADIOTHERAPY MOBILE HEALTHCARE MAMMOGRAPHY MAMMOSCAN FULL FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY SYSTEM Biopsy Attachment џ MAMMOSCAN an ADANI

More information

DR _ solutions. We understand that customers don t need just products, they want. solutions

DR _ solutions. We understand that customers don t need just products, they want. solutions DR _ solutions We understand that customers don t need just products, they want solutions index company profile 1974-2005 2006-2007 - 2008 ITALRAY Srl was founded in 1974 as the production branch of Marzocchi

More information

Nuclear Associates , , CT Head and Body Dose Phantom

Nuclear Associates , , CT Head and Body Dose Phantom Nuclear Associates 76-414,76-414-4150,76-415 CT Head and Body Dose Phantom Users Manual March 2005 Manual No. 76-414-1 Rev. 2 2004, 2005 Fluke Corporation, All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A. All product

More information

Image Quality. HTC Grid High Transmission Cellular Grid provides higher contrast images

Image Quality. HTC Grid High Transmission Cellular Grid provides higher contrast images B R E A S T I M A G I N G S O L U T I O N S Setting the benchmark for mammography M-IV Series Innovations in breast imaging The Lorad M-IV Series exemplifies Hologic's commitment to developing advanced

More information