2010 Image acquisition campaign

Transcription

1 2010 Image acquisition campaign Eugenio Gervasini, Blanka Vajsová, Simone Gentilini, Cherith Aspinall, Pär Ästrand, Juergen Breunig - CID, MARS Unit, JRC Ispra

2 OUTLINE: 2010 Campaign overview: HR VHR Expenditure Campaign issues Preparation for 2011 SLIDE 2

3 2010 CwRS Campaign planning overview 342 VHR control zones (+20%), km² (+24%) 203 VHR backup zones, km² (57% of area) 278 HR zones, 715 images, 2,6 images/zone Budget 6,5 M plus 1,7 M (remaining budget from 2009) SLIDE 3

4 Evolution of CwRS HR imagery Description Planned HR sites (17 triplets Radar backup sites completed) 54 (26) 17 (-) (-) (-) (-) Total no. images acquired x 2.3 HR purchased (M euro) 1,6 1,7 2,0 2,3 2,3 1,6 2,13 2,12 VHR imagery Planned VHR sites (excl. 26 LPIS) Area (km 2 ) acquired VHR purchased (M euro) 0,3 1,6 3,0 3,0 3,3 3,8 3,90 4,55 MS participating (HR and/or VHR) Total purchased (M euro) 1,9 3,3 5,0 5,3 5,6 5,4 6,03 6,67 SLIDE 4 x 9 x 18 x 3.5

5 2010 High Resolution (HR) Campaign Imagery accepted on a first-come-first-served basis 255 zones, 669 scenes planned (@ CwRS kick-off) 46 MS requests for additional ARs 278 zones in total, 715 ARs opened (16 closed at contractors request) Overall success rate 96% SLIDE 5

6 HR Campaign HR status Final planned Opened Acquired Failed closed at contractor/national Administration request Autumn Winter HR HR HR/VHR n/a HR HR+3 n/a Success rate: 96% 2% 2% Failed windows over zones located in BE, DE, IE, PT SLIDE 6

7 HR Campaign Total acquired images ,7% ,7% IRS SPOT4 SPOT5 34 5% 4 0,6% SPOT 4-5, 93,4% 4 0,6% 2 0,3% LS5 DMC RAPIDEYE IRS P6 5%; DMC 0,6%; RapidEye 0,6%; LS5 0,3% SLIDE 7

8 Very High Resolution (VHR) area distribution (km 2 ) Total acquired area km ,7% ,8% ,9% GeoEye 1 Ikonos ,6% % QB - Eurimage QB - Eusi WorldView 2 SLIDE 8

9 ACQUIRED AREA km % % 68% % 73% % 27% % % % 37% 25% 27% 7% 3% IKONOS QUICKBIRD GEOEYE WORLDVIEW year WORLDVIEW 2 GEOEYE QUICKBIRD IKONOS SLIDE 9

10 VHR Campaign GEOEYE 1 37% of VHR area GeoEye1 Area (km 2 ) No. of zones 2 zones failed in DE,EE (backup Eros B and WV2) Backup planned for 76 zones (39% of total) Average acquisition time 35 days 23 extensions Planned Acquired Success rate 99% 98% 3 re-tasking because of haze, cloud cover, flooded area SLIDE 10

11 VHR Campaign - IKONOS 33% of VHR area Backup planned for 62 zones (31% of total) Ikonos Area (km2) No. of zones 1 zone failed in DE Average acquisition time - 26 days 15 extensions Planned Acquired Success rate 98% 99% 3 zones re-tasked because of haze SLIDE 11

12 VHR Campaign WorldView 2 28% of VHR area World View2 Area (km 2 ) No. of zones Backup planned for 58 zones (29% of total) Planned ,5 Average acquisition time - 10 days Acquired ,5 1 extension Success rate 99% 100% 2 zones re-tasked because of haze and cloud cover SLIDE 12

13 VHR Campaign QUICKBIRD -Eusi 2% of VHR area Quickbird Area (km 2 ) No. of zones Backup planned for 2 zones (1% of total) Average acquisition time - 32 days 1 extension No re-tasking Planned Acquired Success rate 100% 100% Change of framework contract holder SLIDE 13

14 VHR Campaign QUICKBIRD -Eurimage 1% of VHR area Quickbird Area (km2) No. of zones No backup planned Average acquisition time - 51 days 6 extensions No re-tasking Planned Acquired Success rate 100% 100% SLIDE 14

15 Average acquisition time (days) GeoEye 1 Ikonos QB - Eurimage QB - Eusi WorldView 2 SLIDE 15

16 days 60 ACQUISITION TIME WORLDVIEW 2 GEOEYE 1 QUICKBIRD IKONOS 10 IKONOS QUICKBIRD year GEOEYE 1 WORLDVIEW 2 SLIDE 16

17 23 Number of extensions GeoEye 1 Ikonos QB - Eurimage QB - Eusi WorldView 2 SLIDE 17

18 Average time delay between first and last acquisition (days) ,5 10 GeoEye 1 Ikonos QB - Eurimage QB - Eusi WorldView 2 SLIDE 18

19 SENSORS vs. CLOUD COVER (CC) num. of uploads % 84% IKONOS GEOEYE 1 WORLDVIEW 2 79% num. of uploads % 93% EROS B QB -EURIMAGE QB-EUSI % % % 15% 20 7% 4% 14% 11% 12% 7% 2 7% 6% 0 x 5% 5< x 10% proposed CC % 0 CC % x 5% 5< x 10% proposed SLIDE 19

20 num.of acquisitions % 41% 38% 33% 31% 31% SENSORS vs. ELEVATION ANGLE IKONOS GEOEYE 1 WORLDVIEW 2 num.of acquisition EROS B QB -EURIMAGE QB-EUSI 46% 35% 60 21% 18% 21% % 19% 50% 41% 37% % 7% 7% % 13% 0 x 60 60<x 70 70<x 80 x>80 0 elevation angle [ ] x 60 60<x 70 70<x 80 x>80 SLIDE 20

21 Average upload time (working days) 4,4 1,9 2,3 2 working days 16 uploads 2,1 151 uploads 154 uploads 1,4 14 uploads 143 uploads GeoEye 1 Ikonos QB - Eurimage QB - Eusi WorldView 2 SLIDE 21

22 VHR Campaign BACKUP The same rules as in the previous Campaign: Backup opened 10 days after prime Backup zones identified in cooperation with the IPs and taking MS requests into account When prime acquired, backup programming cancelled No extension of prime VHR windows if backup available Dynamic backup was not necessary Sensors used: EROS B, SP5SPM, Formosat 2, Kompsat 2, WV1, WV2 SLIDE 22

23 VHR Campaign BACKUP 203 zones planned km 2 Opened - 69 zones ( km 2-41% of the planned area) Acquired 36 zones km 2 SLIDE 23

24 BACKUP - ACQUIRED AREA Acquired area km % % % 25% 33% 52% 40% 40% 47% 56% WV2 KOMPSAT FORMOSAT EROS A/B % 15% 20% 40% 21% SPOT 5 SM SPOT 5 SM % 18% EROS A/B % 3% 2010 year FORMOSAT KOMPSAT WV2 SLIDE 24

25 BACKUP use 36 zones acquired (with full acquisition of prime sensors) Replies received on 27/36 zones 10 were used for area measurement and LPIS quality control 17 were redundant Is it useful? SLIDE 25

26 VHR Campaign Procedural issues Uploads out of specs (i.e. >2 wd) - 84 control zones (25%) Delivery out of specs (i.e. > 6 wd) 19 orders Delay between first acquisition and last acquisition (0-66 days) Unannounced change of sensors Problems with use of LIODOTNET by providers SLIDE 26

27 VHR Campaign - Technical issues Contractors problems in downloading/reading imagery files Incomplete images delivered/made available to Contractors Patch images, sometimes created problems for CAPI controls Overlap between strips of images not adequate Wrong product delivered by providers (e.g. PAN instead of BUNDLE) SLIDE 27

28 VHR Campaign - Administrative issues: Late Budget release Contractors not reacting promptly (within specs) in receiving/accepting/rejecting proposed/retained images Contractors not validating images received (IDQA), some contractors wait until they have a lot of imagery before they start validation Providers sending final invoices before IDQA is filled by contractors New zones added, changes requested by MS (RO, DE) need for a better planning Flood in Hungary and Poland, extension of windows Merging orders in one invoice (problems with validation of imagery) SLIDE 28

29 Expenditure 2010 VHR Prime 4,41 M VHR Backup 0,14 M Total VHR 4,55 M HR 2,12 M Total Campaign: 6,67 M Surplus at Campaign end will be used for autumn imagery & bulk orders for CwRS 2011 SLIDE 29

30 Image return and Community Image Data portal (CID) : 29 contractors all source imagery delivered to contractors has been harvested automatically to CID portal via FTP image return of VHR ortho-corrected data on-going to-date 8/29 contractors have returned imagery no more image return of HR ortho-corrected data required SLIDE 30

31 2011 Campaign Template will be sent to you after the Conference, deadline for return 31/12/2010 CwRS Campaign y i --> VHR (prime) VHR (backup) NOV DEC ~4w ext. ~4w ext. JAN FEB MAR 6-8 weeks JULY AUG SEPT ~4w ext. 4-6 weeks 4-6 weeks ~4w ext. ~4w ext. autumn winter HR(-1) HR(VHR) HR(+1) HR(+2)...HR(+3) 2w 2w Already started for HR imagery: autumn window opened over 86 zones (DE, FR, IE, PT) 2w winter window published over 26 zones (DE, GR) 21 images accepted to-date 2w month We need MS Administrations & contractors cooperation for the successful management of the campaign SLIDE 31

32 Thank you very much for your attention!