Independent Testing - For End User Confidence

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Independent Testing - For End User Confidence"

Transcription

1 Independent Testing - For End User Confidence EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE OF LEVEL IIIe FIELD TESTER FROM FLUKE NETWORKS, TYPE DTX-1800 CABLE ANALYZER, FOR 500 MHz PERMANENT LINK MEASUREMENTS Main Unit, Type DTX-1800 CableAnalyzer Remote Unit, Type DTX-1800 SmartRemote Measurement Adaptors, Type DTX-PLA001 Universal Permanent Link Adapter Prepared by Poul Villien Project No

2 Page 2 of 43 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. IDENTIFICATION 4 2. SURVEY OVER THE WORK 5 3. CONDITIONS OF TESTING Reference Permanent Link Test Sequence Laboratory Reference Measurements Field Tester Measurements Pattern Recognition Ability Calculation of Repeatability Calculation of Field Tester Performance Electrical Measurements 9 4. APPLIED PERMANENT LINK SPECIFICATIONS RETURN LOSS PERFORMANCE Repeatability of Reference Measurements Repeatability of Field Tester Measurements Return Loss Performance of Field Tester ATTENUATION PERFORMANCE Repeatability of Reference Measurements Repeatability of Field Tester Measurements Attenuation Performance of Field Tester NEAR END CROSSTALK PERFORMANCE Repeatability of Reference Measurements Variability of Near End Crosstalk Performance within the Allowed Range of Applied Category 6 RJ 45 Plugs Repeatability of Field Tester Measurements Near End Crosstalk Performance of Field Tester EQUAL LEVEL FAR END CROSSTALK PERFORMANCE Repeatability of Reference Measurements Repeatability of Field Tester Measurements Equal Level Far End Crosstalk Performance of Field Tester 26

3 Page 3 of PROPAGATION DELAY PERFORMANCE Repeatability of Reference Measurements Repeatability of Field Tester Measurements Propagation Delay Performance of Field Tester DELAY SKEW PERFORMANCE Repeatability of Reference Measurements Repeatability of Field Tester Measurements Delay Skew Performance of Field Tester CONCLUSION APPENDIX: Test Data Sheets 32

4 Page 4 of IDENTIFICATION Project No.: Subject: Identification of Field Tester: Supplier: Prepared by: Evaluation of Performance of Level IIIe Field Tester from Fluke Networks, Type DTX-1800 Cable Analyzer, for 500 MHz Permanent Link Measurements Main Unit, Type DTX-1800 CableAnalyzer, Serial number Remote Unit, Type DTX-1800 SmartRemote, Serial number Software version Main Unit Measurement Adaptor, Type DTX-PLA001 Universal Permanent Link Adapter, Serial number Remote Unit Measurement Adaptor, Type DTX-PLA001 Universal Permanent Link Adapter, Serial number Fluke Networks PO Box 777 Everett, WA USA 3P Third Party Testing Agern Allé 3 DK-2970 Hoersholm Denmark 3Ptest@3Ptest.dk Phone: Fax: Homepage: Author: Poul Villien

5 Page 5 of SURVEY OF THE WORK 3P has evaluated the performance of a Fluke Level IIIe field tester, type DTX-1800, by making comparative measurements of available parameters on a fixed reference permanent link. The reference measurements are made using laboratory equipment and are carried out strictly according to specified laboratory test methods. Measurements are made to 500 MHz and the applied limit requirements are as specified for 10 Gigabit Ethernet applications in TIA/EIA TSB-155, Draft 2.0. Verified performance parameters include return loss, attenuaton, pair - pair near end crosstalk, pair - pair far end crosstalk, propagation delay and delay skew. Measurement of alien crosstalk has not been included in the present evaluation. The evaluated Fluke Level IIIe field tester includes the following units and software: Main Unit, Type DTX-1800 CableAnalyzer, Serial number Remote Unit, Type DTX-1800 SmartRemote, Serial number Main Unit Measurement Adaptor, Type DTX-PLA001 Universal Permanent Link Adapter, Serial number Remote Unit Measurement Adaptor, Type DTX-PLA001 Universal Permanent Link Adapter, Serial number Software version The applied software records data up to 600 MHz. In the present report 3P only shows performance data from 1 MHz to 500 MHz, as 500 MHz is the specified bandwidth for the 10 Gigabit Ethernet application in all international draft standards. Correlation of measured field tester readings with reference data is in all cases carried out at the specified permanent link limits, where the significance of the measurement precision is most significant. This is done by transfer of measured performance values to the applicable permanent link limit by calculation for the frequencies in question. The overall result of the evaluation is that the Fluke field tester, type DTX-1800, has performance safely complying with the Level IIIe field tester accuracy and fine identification of all performance traces. The repeatability of the measurements is excellent in the complete frequency range from 1 MHz to 500 MHz. It is concluded that the performance of the field tester is generally equal to the outcome of normal laboratory type testing. The evaluation of the field tester has been based on comparison of field tester measurements, using the test adaptors supplied with the tester, with reference laboratory testing using Category 6 RJ 45 plugs. For some parameters the comparison of measurement results is therefore significantly influenced by the different plugs used for the testing. This corresponds to the actual market situation, which also is subject to the great variability of near end crosstalk and probably also return loss and equal level far end crosstalk, due to the range of allowed Category 6 plug performance. The present study only includes performance evaluation of one sample of field tester. The general

6 Page 6 of 43 recommendation of the field tester is made on the premise that the measured performance is characteristic for other produced Level IIIe field testers from Fluke, Type DTX This point has not been evaluated by 3P.

7 Page 7 of CONDITIONS OF TESTING 3.1 Reference Permanent Link The field tester evaluation has been done by comparing its measurements with the similar laboratory type measurements, which are carried out by 3P on the same fixed permanent link. This reference permanent link has been fixed to reduce the risk that handling during measurements affects the results. The performance verification of the field tester is made according to the 10 Gigabit Ethernet extended Class E / Category 6 permanent link requirements as specified in TIA/EIA TSB-155, draft 2.0. The permanent link has been selected with near end crosstalk close to the specified limit. Measurements are covering the complete specified frequency range from MHz. Measurement of alien crosstalk has not been included in the present study. 3.2 Test Sequence The testing has included repeated measurements in order to validate if that performance has changed during progress of the measurement programme. The following measurements have been done: A: Initial laboratory measurements of all relevant performance parameters. B: Initial field tester measurements of all relevant performance parameters. C: Repeated laboratory measurements of all relevant performance parameters. D: Repeated field tester measurements of all relevant performance parameters. Comparison of measurement series A and C were used to evaluate the stability of the permanent link during the test sequence and to determine the repeatability of laboratory type measurements. In the same way measurement series B and D were used to determine the stability and repeatability of field tester measurements. The accuracy of the field tester was concluded based on the worst case results of the two comparative measurement series, i.e. A & B and C & D, respectively. 3.3 Laboratory Reference Measurements The laboratory type measurements have been carried by connection of the reference permanent link to the network analyser using the full specified range of Category 6 RJ 45 plugs. This means that near end crosstalk measurements have been performed using each of the following RJ 45 plugs: Pair combination 1/2-3/6: Low level plug of 46,5 db Center level plug of 47,9 db High level plug of 49,5 db

8 Page 8 of 43 Pair combination 1/2-4/5: Low level plug of 57,0 db Center level plug of 62,8 db High level plug of 70,0 db Pair combination 1/2-7/8: Low level plug of 60,0 db Center level plug of 60,3 db with negative phase High level plug of 60,0 db (no high level plug is specified) Pair combination 3/6-4/5: Low level plug of 36,4 db Center level plug of 37,0 db High level plug of 37,6 db Pair combination 3/6-7/8: Low level plug of 46,5 db Center level plug of 47,8 db High level plug of 49,5 db Pair combination 4/5-7/8: Low level plug of 57,0 db Center level plug of 62,1 db High level plug of 70,0 db All other performance parameters than near end crosstalk have been carried out using a RJ 45 plug with performance as specified in all international connecting hardware specifications. High and low level plug measurements have been applied for conclusion of significance of the allowed variation of plug performance on the near end crosstalk of the permanent link. This always present variability of near end crosstalk performance due to the plugs applied in patch cords is essential for conclusion of uncertainty of field measurements. 3.4 Field Tester Measurements The field tester measurements have been performed using the test heads with measurement cords supplied with the field tester. Comparison of field tester near end crosstalk data with reference laboratory measurements has been performed using the worst case results from the full range of specified plugs. 3.5 Pattern Recognition Ability The field tester's ability to correctly recognize characteristic peaks and valleys of the reference traces in question has been subjectively evaluated using the following three scales: : All main peaks are correctly detected, both with respect to frequency and peak value. All differences from the reference measurements may be explained by alowable variations in plug performance. No false main valleys are found in the performance trace ("reduced sensitivity areas"). Fair: Main peaks are mostly correctly detected, both with respect to frequency and peak value. Some small parts of the frequency range are having reduced pattern recognition, for instance due to false main valleys, or some general level differences

9 Page 9 of 43 from the reference measurements, which cannot be explained by alowable variations in plug performance. Poor: Main parts of the frequency range are having poor pattern recognition with low or no peak detection and many areas with false main valleys, and major general level differences from the reference measurements, which can not be explained by alowable variations in plug performance. 3.6 Calculation of Repeatability Repeatability of field tester or laboratory type measurements is calculated from repeated measurements of the permanent link (see clause 3.2). For each parameter in question the measurement procedure includes: A. In each measurement point the difference between the two measurements in question is calculated in unit "millivolt". B. Correllation of the calculated difference in point A to the specified permanent link limit using method of calculation specified in equation B.1 of TSB-155, draft 2.0. C. Calculation of the values of point B in unit "db". D. Conclusion of the maximum repeatability value at the specified limit in unit "db" This way of presenting repeatability data will, independent of the actual performance trace, give the repeatability at the permanent link limit where it is most significant. 3.7 Calculation of Field Tester Performance Field tester performance is correlated to the applicable permanent link limit in the same way as used for the repeatability measurements specified in point A, B and C of clause Electrical Measurements The following electrical parameters have been measured for all pairs or combination of pairs of the permanent link: Return loss from MHz, measured from both ends of the permanent link Attenuation from MHz Pair - pair near end crosstalk from MHz, measured from both ends of the permanent link Pair - pair equal level far end crosstalk from MHz, measured for all 2 6 pair combinations from both ends of the permanent link Propagation delay from MHz

10 Page 10 of 43 Delay skew from MHz The following instruments were applied for the reference laboratory measurements of the permanent link: HP Network Analyzer, type 8753D with internal S-parameter Test Set HP Network Analyzer, type 8753ES with internal S-parameter Test Set North Hills Baluns, types 0320BF, 0322BF and NH13734 BH Electronics Baluns, type P Baluns, type 3P-250-Cat6-C 3P Baluns, type 3P-600-Cat7 HP LCR Meter, type 4263A

11 Page 11 of APPLIED PERMANENT LINK SPECIFICATIONS The applied permanent link requirements are as specified in TIA/EIA TSB-155, Draft 2.0. This generally includes limits also specified in the following standards and standard proposals: 2nd Edition ISO/IEC CENELEC EN ANSI/TIA/EIA-568-B.2-1 IEEE P802.3an (Draft 2.2) ISO/IEC Technical Report TR (Draft 3N 746) CENELEC Technical Report (Draft TC 215 WG 1 Document 5/34)

12 Page 12 of RETURN LOSS PERFORMANCE 5.1 Repeatability of Reference Measurements Repeatability of the return loss measurements using laboratory equipment has been concluded by measuring return loss both before and after the first field tester measurements. Summarized results of the testing are found in table 5.1. Table 5.1 Summarized Results of Repeated Return Loss Measurements by Laboratory Equipment from 1 MHz to 500 MHz PAIR RETURN LOSS PERFORMANCE 1 Near End Far End Maximum Deviation at Limit 2 Pattern Recognition 3 Maximum Deviation at Limit 2 Pattern Recognition 3 1/2 3/6 4/5 7/8 0,4/0,5/0,1 0,4/0,2/0,1 0,2/0,3/0,2 0,9/0,7/0,6 1 : Return Loss requirements are defined by the functions: 1 MHz - 3 MHz: 21+4log( ) db 3 MHz - 40 MHz: 26-5log(f) db 40 MHz MHz: 34-10log(f) db 250 MHz MHz: 10-20log( ) db 400 MHz MHz: 6 db, 0,4/0,3/0,2 0,2/0,2/0,1 0,2/0,2/0,2 1,1/0,6/0,4 where f is frequency in MHz. Calculated requirements more strict than 21 db are equalled to this value. 2 : The first of the three values in each row is the worst case calculated deviation at limit from 1 MHz MHz, the second value is the is the worst case calculated deviation at limit from 100 MHz MHz and the third value is the is the worst case calculated deviation at limit from 250 MHz MHz. 3 : Patter recognition of the field tester is concluded by 3P by estimating ability to correctly reflect positions and magnitude of peaks in the frequency domain. Three scales have been applied as specified in clause 3.5 of the report. It is concluded from table 5.1 that the worst case return loss repeatability for all pairs is 1,1 db in the complete frequency range from 1 MHz to 500 MHz (at the specified permanent link limit). It is concluded that the brown pair has significantly worse repeatability than the other pairs possibly due to a less stable construction of the cable. The worst case repeatability for the three other pairs is 0,5 db. The measured repeatability of the blue, orange and green pairs corresponds with the measuring uncertainty level expected for return loss measurements from MHz. It is concluded that the return loss performance of the blue, orange and green pairs has not changed during progress of the permanent link measurements.

13 Page 13 of 43 The measurements are carried out using the same Category 6 test plugs. Variability caused by allowable difference in test plug performance consequently does not contribute to the measured repeatability. 5.2 Repeatability of Field Tester Measurements Repeatability of the return loss measurements using field tester has been concluded by measuring return loss both before and after the 2nd laboratory type reference measurements. Summarized results of the testing are found in table 5.2. Table 5.2 Summarized Results of Return Loss Measurements by Field Tester from 1 MHz to 500 MHz PAIR RETURN LOSS PERFORMANCE 1 Main Unit End Remote Unit End Maximum Deviation at Limit 2 Pattern Recognition 3 Maximum Deviation at Limit 2 Pattern Recognition 3 1/2 3/6 4/5 7/8 0,4/0,4/0,2 0,1/0,2/0,2 0,1/0,1/0,3 0,9/0,4/0,4 1 : Return Loss requirements are defined by the functions: 1 MHz - 3 MHz: 21+4log( ) db 3 MHz - 40 MHz: 26-5log(f) db 40 MHz MHz: 34-10log(f) db 250 MHz MHz: 10-20log( ) db 400 MHz MHz: 6 db, 0,4/0,4/0,3 0,2/0,1/0,1 0,1/0,3/0,4 1,2/0,5/0,8 where f is frequency in MHz. Calculated requirements more strict than 21 db are equalled to this value. 2 : The first of the three values in each row is the worst case calculated deviation at limit from 1 MHz MHz, the second value is the is the worst case calculated deviation at limit from 100 MHz MHz and the third value is the is the worst case calculated deviation at limit from 250 MHz MHz. 3 : Patter recognition of the field tester is concluded by 3P by estimating ability to correctly reflect positions and magnitude of peaks in the frequency domain. Three scales have been applied as specified in clause 3.5 of the report. It is concluded from table 5.2 that the worst case return loss repeatability for all pairs is 1,2 db in the complete frequency range from 1 MHz to 500 MHz (at the specified permanent link limit). It is concluded, like reported for the laboratory type measurements in clause 5.1, that the brown pair has significantly worse repeatability than the other pairs possibly due to a less stable construction of the cable. The worst case repeatability for the three other pairs is 0,4 db. The measured repeatability for the field tester measurements of return loss is of the same magnitude as for the laboratory type measurements in the complete frequency range from 1 to 500 MHz. It is concluded that the return loss performance of the blue, orange and green pairs has

14 Page 14 of 43 not changed during progress of the permanent link measurements. The measurements are carried out using the same test heads. Any variability of test head performance consequently does not contribute to the measured repeatability. 5.3 Return Loss Performance of Field Tester Summarized results of the comparative testing of the field tester are found in table 5.3, and include all four tested pairs measured from both ends of the reference permanent link. Presented data are worst case of two different set of measurements, i.e. (A) comparison of the first field tester measurement with the first laboratory type reference measurement and (B) comparison of the second field tester measurement with the second laboratory type reference measurement. Two different types of field tester return loss traces are found in the appendix. 1. The worst and best case recordings of field tester measured return loss versus frequency is presented together with the corresponding reference traces in page 33. These recordings demonstrate how well the peaks and valleys of a reference trace is correctly reported by the field tester. 2. Characteristic recordings of calculated field tester performance at the specified Class E / Category 6 permanent link limit are presented in pages 34 and 35 for the main and remote unit end, respectively. All of the four pairs of the permanent link are included in both cases. The specified uncertainty of Level IIIe field tester return loss measurements is also included as a shaded yellow area.

15 Page 15 of 43 Table 5.3 Summarized Results of Comparative Return Loss Measurements from 1 MHz to 500 MHz PAIR RETURN LOSS PERFORMANCE 1 Main Unit End Remote Unit End Maximum Deviation at Limit 2 Pattern Recognition 3 Maximum Deviation at Limit 2 Pattern Recognition 3 1/2 3/6 4/5 7/8 1,1/0,7/1,6 1,0/1,1/2,1 0,7/1,1/1,3 1,3/1,1/1,7 1 : Return Loss requirements are defined by the functions: 1 MHz - 3 MHz: 21+4log( ) db 3 MHz - 40 MHz: 26-5log(f) db 40 MHz MHz: 34-10log(f) db 250 MHz MHz: 10-20log( ) db 400 MHz MHz: 6 db, 1,4/0,8/1,2 1,2/0,8/1,3 1,2/0,7/1,8 1,9/1,0/2,0 where f is frequency in MHz. Calculated requirements more strict than 21 db are equalled to this value. 2 : The first of the three values in each row is the worst case calculated deviation at limit from 1 MHz MHz, the second value is the is the worst case calculated deviation at limit from 100 MHz MHz and the third value is the is the worst case calculated deviation at limit from 250 MHz MHz. 3 : Patter recognition of the field tester is concluded by 3P by estimating ability to correctly reflect positions and magnitude of peaks in the frequency domain. Three scales have been applied as specified in clause 3.5 of the report. It is concluded from table 5.3 and return loss recordings in pages 34 and 35 that the field tester return loss performance is within the specified Level IIIe uncertainty for field testers at the Class E / Category 6 limit, even considering the additional variability caused by the influence of the RJ 45 plug. It is concluded from table 5.3 and recordings in page 33 that the field tester has a fine recognition of significant peaks in the return loss trace, considering the additional variability caused by the influence of the RJ 45 plug. The worst case ability of the field tester to demonstrate the return loss performance is 2,1 db at the Class E / Category 6 limit. This applies for the complete frequency range from 1 MHz to 500 MHz and for both the main and remote units. The major part of the max. 2,1 db difference between field tester and reference measurements may be explained by the allowed variability of Category 6 plug performance. Different Category 6 plugs have been applied for the two measurements. The effect on return loss by the different Category 6 plugs has not been covered by standardisation and has not been evaluated by 3P.

16 Page 16 of ATTENUATION PERFORMANCE 6.1 Repeatability of Reference Measurements Repeatability of the attenuation measurements using laboratory equipment has been concluded by measuring attenuation both before and after the first field tester measurements. Summarized results of the testing are found in table 6.1. Table 6.1 Summarized Results of Repeated Attenuation Measurements by Laboratory Equipment from 1 MHz to 500 MHz PAIR ATTENUATION PERFORMANCE 1 Maximum Deviation at Limit 2 Pattern Recognition 3 1/2 3/6 4/5 7/8 0,1/0,1/0,7 0,1/0,3/2,0 0,1/0,1/0,8 0,2/0,2/1,7 1 : Attenuation requirements are defined by the functions: 1, MHz: 1, ,0153 f + + 0,0015 f db, where f is frequency in MHz. : The first of the three values in each row is the worst case calculated deviation at limit from 1 MHz MHz, the second value is the is the worst case calculated deviation at limit from 100 MHz MHz and the third value is the is the worst case calculated deviation at limit from 250 MHz MHz. : Patter recognition of the field tester is concluded by 3P by estimating ability to correctly reflect attenuation traces in the frequency domain. Three scales have been applied as specified in clause 3.5 of the report. 2 3 It is concluded from table 5.1 that the worst case attenuation repeatability for all pairs is 2,0 db in the complete frequency range from 1 MHz to 500 MHz (at the specified permanent link limit). The measured repeatability corresponds with the measuring uncertainty level expected for attenuation measurements from MHz. Reflection are found over approx 250 MHz,which causes degradation of the repeatability of the measurements. It is concluded that the attenuation performance has not changed during progress of the permanent link measurements. The measurement accuracy will not be significantly influenced by the Category 6 test plugs. 6.2 Repeatability of Field Tester Measurements Repeatability of the attenuation measurements using field tester has been concluded by measuring attenuation both before and after the 2nd laboratory type reference measurements. Summarized results of the testing are found in table 6.2.

17 Page 17 of 43 Table 6.2 Summarized Results of Attenuation Measurements by Field Tester from 1 MHz to 500 MHz PAIR ATTENUATION PERFORMANCE 1 Maximum Deviation at Limit 2 Pattern Recognition 3 1/2 3/6 4/5 7/8 0,1/0,2/0,4 0,1/0,3/0,5 0,1/0,3/0,5 0,1/0,1/0,6 1 : Attenuation requirements are defined by the functions: 1, MHz: 1, ,0153 f + + 0,0015 f db, where f is frequency in MHz. : The first of the three values in each row is the worst case calculated deviation at limit from 1 MHz MHz, the second value is the is the worst case calculated deviation at limit from 100 MHz MHz and the third value is the is the worst case calculated deviation at limit from 250 MHz MHz. : Patter recognition of the field tester is concluded by 3P by estimating ability to correctly reflect attenuation traces in the frequency domain. Three scales have been applied as specified in clause 3.5 of the report. 2 3 It is concluded from table 6.2 that the worst case attenuation repeatability for all pairs is 0,6 db in the complete frequency range from 1 MHz to 500 MHz (at the specified permanent link limit). The measured repeatability for the field tester measurements of attenuation is significantly better than for the laboratory type measurements in the frequency range over approximately 250 MHz. This worse performance of the reference measurements is caused by the normally observed reflection in the high frequency range which are not present for the field tester measurements. All measurements have been performed at the same temperature and consequently the temperature degradation of attenuation is not having any impact on the measuring repeatability in the present case. However, temperature degradation of attenuation is a major negative contributor to repeatability of this measurement, with high frequency degradation being up to approx. 0,8 %/ C for some unscreened cable types. This does not mean that measurements at higher temperatues are incorrect, but that significantly varying results may be obtained in different seasons or times of the day where temperatures may differ much. It is estimated that the measurement accuracy will not be significantly influenced by the test heads. 6.3 Attenuation Performance of Field Tester Summarized results of the comparative testing of the field tester are found in table 6.3, and include all four tested pairs measured from one end of the reference permanent link. Presented data are worst case of two different set of measurements, i.e. (A) comparison of the first field tester measurement with the first laboratory type reference measurement and (B) comparison of

18 Page 18 of 43 the second field tester measurement with the second laboratory type reference measurement. Two different types of field tester attenuation traces are found in the appendix. 1. The worst and best case recordings of field tester measured attenuation versus frequency is presented together with the corresponding reference traces in page 36. These recordings demonstrate how well a reference trace is correctly reported by the field tester. 2. Characteristic recordings of calculated field tester performance at the specified Class E / Category 6 permanent link limit are presented in page 37. All of the four pairs of the permanent link are included. The specified uncertainty of Level IIIe field tester attenuation measurements is also included as a shaded yellow area. Table 6.3 Summarized Results of Comparative Attenuation Measurements from 1 MHz to 500 MHz PAIR ATTENUATION PERFORMANCE 1 Maximum Deviation at Limit 2 Pattern Recognition 3 1/2 3/6 4/5 7/8 0,2/0,5/0,6 0,2/0,6/1,6 4 0,2/0,5/0,8 4 0,3/0,4/1,3 4 1 : Attenuation requirements are defined by the functions: 1, MHz: 1, ,0153 f + + 0,0015 f db, where f is frequency in MHz. : The first of the three values in each row is the worst case calculated deviation at limit from 1 MHz MHz, the second value is the is the worst case calculated deviation at limit from 100 MHz MHz and the third value is the is the worst case calculated deviation at limit from 250 MHz MHz. : Patter recognition of the field tester is concluded by 3P by estimating ability to correctly reflect attenuation traces in the frequency domain. Three scales have been applied as specified in clause 3.5 of the report. : The apparent rapidly decreasing accuracy of the field tester is caused by reflection of the reference measurements, i.e. the lower accuracy is only connected with the laboratory testing, see table It is concluded from table 6.3 and attenuation recordings in page 37 that the field tester attenuation performance is well within the specified Level IIIe uncertainty for field testers at the Class E / Category 6 limit. It is concluded from table 6.3 and recordings in page 36 that the field tester has a fine recognition of attenuation trace, and that the field tester measurements are not subject to the reflections, which degrade the laboratory type testing at the highest frequencies. The worst case ability of the field tester to demonstrate the attenuation performance is estimated to be 0,6 db at the Class E / Category 6 limit. This applies for the complete frequency range from 1 MHz to 500 MHz, when the reflections of the reference measurements are disregarded.

19 Page 19 of NEAR END CROSSTALK PERFORMANCE 7.1 Repeatability of Reference Measurements Repeatability of the pair - pair near end crosstalk measurements using laboratory equipment has been concluded by measuring pair - pair near end crosstalk both before and after the first field tester measurements. Summarized results of the testing are found in table 7.1. The results in table 7.1 are worst case of repeated measurements using both low limit, central limit and high limit plugs. Table 7.1 Summarized Results of Repeated Pair - Pair Near End Crosstalk Measurements by Laboratory Equipment from 1 MHz to 500 MHz PAIR COMBINAT ION PAIR - PAIR NEXT PERFORMANCE 1 Near End Far End Maximum Deviation at Limit 2 Pattern Recognition 3 Maximum Deviation at Limit 2 Pattern Recognition 3 1/2-3/6 1/2-4/5 1/2-7/8 3/6-4/5 3/6-7/8 4/5-7/8 1,8/0,2/0,7 0,7/0,2/0,2 0,6/0,2/0,3 0,6/1,1/2,2 0,8/0,9/1,4 0,6/0,4/0,8 0,4/0,3/06 0,2/0,2/0,2 0,6/0,2/0,2 0,3/0,4/0,9 0,4/0,5/0,7 1,0/0,6/0,6 1 : Pair - Pair NEXT requirements are defined by the functions: (-3,715+0,75log(f)) (-4,700 + log(f)) MHz: -20log( ) db MHz: 34,0-48log( ) db, where f is frequency in MHz. : The first of the three values in each row is the worst case calculated deviation at limit from 1 MHz MHz, the second value is the is the worst case calculated deviation at limit from 100 MHz MHz and the third value is the is the worst case calculated deviation at limit from 250 MHz MHz. : Patter recognition of the field tester is concluded by 3P by estimating ability to correctly reflect positions and magnitude of peaks in the frequency domain. Three scales have been applied as specified in clause 3.5 of the report. 2 3 It is concluded from table 7.1 that the worst case pair - pair near end crosstalk repeatability for all pairs is 2,2 db in the complete frequency range from 1 MHz to 500 MHz (at the specified permanent link limit). The measured repeatability is lower than the measuring uncertainty level expected for pair - pair near end crosstalk measurements in the lowest frequency range (for the first measurement points). It is concluded that the pair - pair near end crosstalk performance has not changed during progress of the permanent link measurements.

20 Page 20 of 43 The measurement results are separately evaluated for each of the three individual types of test plug. Variability caused by allowable difference in test plug performance consequently does not contribute to the measured repeatability. The variability caused by allowed Category 6 difference in RJ 45 plug performance is concluded in clause Variability of Near End Crosstalk Performance within the Allowed Range of Applied Category 6 RJ 45 Plugs The variability of near end crosstalk within the allowed range of RJ 45 plugs is concluded from laboratory measurements of the permanent link using low limit, central limit and high limit plugs, see clause 3.3. For pair combination 1/2-7/8 only one de-embedded NEXT value for the RJ 45 plug is specified and therefore the two different specified angles are applied instead. The variability data have been correlated to the specified permanent link limit as specified in clause 3.6. The below listed worst case variability of the pair - pair near end crosstalk performance has been concluded. For each pair combination the specified value is the worst case permanent link variability at the limit covering the complete range of allowed Category 6 RJ 45 plug performance in frequency ranges MHz/ MHz/ MHz. Pair 1/2-3/6: max. 1,1/1,2/1,1 db Pair 1/2-4/5: max. 1,2/1,3/1,3 db Pair 1/2-7/8: max. 1,3/1,0/1,4 db Pair 3/6-4/5: max. 1,8/2,3/1,9 db Pair 3/6-7/8: max. 1,5/1,4/1,6 db Pair 4/5-7/8: max. 1,2/1,2/1,2 db It is concluded that the pair - pair near end crosstalk performance vary significantly depending on pair combination and performance of the applied RJ 45 plugs. This variability, which is adding to the measuring accuracy, will always apply for installations (unless the same cords are used for the permanent link testing and the final installation). This means that the actual Class E / Category 6 installation performance may as a minimum vary by the the above specified values even when a perfect field testing is concluded. 7.3 Repeatability of Field Tester Measurements Repeatability of the pair - pair near end crosstalk measurements using field tester has been concluded by measuring pair - pair near end crosstalk both before and after the 2nd laboratory type reference measurements. Summarized results of the testing are found in table 7.3.

21 Page 21 of 43 Table 7.3 Summarized Results of Repeated Pair - Pair Near End Crosstalk Measurements by Field Tester from 1 MHz to 500 MHz PAIR COMBINAT ION PAIR - PAIR NEXT PERFORMANCE 1 Main Unit End Remote Unit End Maximum Deviation at Limit 2 Pattern Recognition 3 Maximum Deviation at Limit 2 Pattern Recognition 3 1/2-3/6 1/2-4/5 1/2-7/8 3/6-4/5 3/6-7/8 4/5-7/8 0,1/0,2/0,1 0,1/0,1/0,1 0,1/0,1/0,2 0,2/0,1/0,2 0,2/0,2/0,4 0,4/0,1/0,2 0,2/0,1/0,1 0,1/0,2/0,2 0,3/0,1/0,4 0,2/0,2/0,2 0,2/0,2/0,3 0,4/0,4/0,3 1 : Pair - Pair NEXT requirements are defined by the functions: (-3,715+0,75log(f)) (-4,700 + log(f)) MHz: -20log( ) db MHz: 34,0-48log( ) db, where f is frequency in MHz. 2 : The first of the three values in each row is the worst case calculated deviation at limit from 1 MHz MHz, the second value is the is the worst case calculated deviation at limit from 100 MHz MHz and the third value is the is the worst case calculated deviation at limit from 250 MHz MHz. 3 : Patter recognition of the field tester is concluded by 3P by estimating ability to correctly reflect positions and magnitude of peaks in the frequency domain. Three scales have been applied as specified in clause 3.5 of the report. It is concluded from table 7.3 that the worst case pair - pair near end crosstalk repeatability for all pairs is 0,4 db in the complete frequency range from 1 MHz to 500 MHz (at the specified permanent link limit). The measured repeatability for the field tester measurements of pair - pair near end crosstalk is of the same magnitude or better than for the laboratory type measurements in the complete frequency range from 1 MHz to 500 MHz. It is concluded that the pair - pair near end crosstalk performance has not changed during progress of the permanent link measurements. The measurements are carried out using unchanged test heads. Any variability of test head performance consequently does not contribute to the measured repeatability. 7.4 Near End Crosstalk Performance of Field Tester Summarized results of the comparative testing of the field tester are found in table 7.4, and include all six combinations of the four tested pairs measured from both ends of the reference permanent link. Presented data are worst case of two different set of measurements, i.e. (A) comparison of the first field tester measurement with the first laboratory type measurement and (B) comparison of the second field tester measurement with the second laboratory type measurement. In both cases the worst case performance using the low, central and high limit plugs

22 Page 22 of 43 are documented in the table. Two different types of field tester pair - pair near end crosstalk recordings are found in the appendix. 1. The worst and best case recordings of field tester measured pair - pair near end crosstalk versus frequency is presented together with the corresponding reference traces in page 38. These recordings demonstrate how well the peaks and valleys of a reference trace is correctly reported by the field tester. 2. Characteristic recordings of calculated field tester performance at the specified Class E / Category 6 permanent link limit are presented in pages 39 and 40 for the main and remote unit end, respectively. All of the six pair combinations of the permanent link are included in both cases. The specified uncertainty of Level IIIe field tester pair - pair near end crosstalk measurements is also included as a shaded yellow area. Table 7.4 Summarized Results of Comparative Pair - Pair Near End Crosstalk Measurements from 1 MHz to 500 MHz PAIR COMBINAT ION PAIR - PAIR NEXT PERFORMANCE 1 Main Unit End Remote Unit End Maximum Deviation at Limit 2 Pattern Recognition 3 Maximum Deviation at Limit 2 Pattern Recognition 3 1/2-3/6 1/2-4/5 1/2-7/8 3/6-4/5 3/6-7/8 4/5-7/8 1,5/1,7/2,3 1,4/1,4/1,3 1,0/0,7/1,3 1,4/1,3/1,8 1,9/2,6/2,8 1,0/1,2/1,3 0,9/1,2/1,6 1,2/1,3/1,6 0,9/0,8/0,9 1,4/1,6/2,2 1,1/1,1/1,2 1,3/0,9/1,1 1 : Pair - Pair NEXT requirements are defined by the functions: (-3,715+0,75log(f)) (-4,700 + log(f)) MHz: -20log( ) db MHz: 34,0-48log( ) db, where f is frequency in MHz. 2 : The first of the three values in each row is the worst case calculated deviation at limit from 1 MHz MHz, the second value is the is the worst case calculated deviation at limit from 100 MHz MHz and the third value is the is the worst case calculated deviation at limit from 250 MHz Mhz. Evaluation of field tester accuracy has been done by comparing with central value Category 6 plugs. 3 : Patter recognition of the field tester is concluded by 3P by estimating ability to correctly reflect positions and magnitude of peaks in the frequency domain. Three scales have been applied as specified in clause 3.5 of the report. It is concluded from table 7.4 and pair - pair near end crosstalk recordings in pages 39 and 40 that the field tester pair - pair near end crosstalk performance is within the specified Level IIIe uncertainty for field testers at the Class E / Category 6 limit, even considering the additional variability caused by the influence of the RJ 45 plug, see clause 7.2. It is concluded from table 7.4

23 Page 23 of 43 and recordings in page 38 that the field tester has a fine recognition of significant peaks in the pair - pair near end crosstalk trace, even considering the additional variability caused by the influence of the RJ 45 plug. The worst case ability of the field tester to demonstrate the pair - pair near end crosstalk performance is 2,8 db at the Class E / Category 6 limit. This applies for the complete frequency range from 1 MHz to 500 MHz and for both the main and remote units. The major part of the max. 2,8 db difference between field tester and reference measurements may be explained by the allowed variability of Category 6 plug performance, see clause 7.2.

24 Page 24 of EQUAL LEVEL FAR END CROSSTALK PERFORMANCE 8.1 Repeatability of Reference Measurements Repeatability of the pair-pair equal level far end crosstalk measurements using laboratory equipment has been concluded by measuring pair-pair equal level far end crosstalk both before and after the first field tester measurements. Summarized results of the testing are found in table 8.1. Table 8.1 Summarized Results of Repeated Pair - Pair Equal Level Far End Crosstalk Measurements by Laboratory Equipment from 1 MHz to 500 MHz PAIR COMBINAT ION PAIR - PAIR ELFEXT PERFORMANCE 1 Signal Injection on Pair Receiving on Pair Maximum Deviation at Limit 2 Pattern Recognition 3 Maximum Deviation at Limit 2 Pattern Recognition 3 1/2-3/6 1/2-4/5 1/2-7/8 3/6-4/5 3/6-7/8 4/5-7/8 0,4/0,1/0,5 04/0,1/0,7 0,1/0,1/0,5 0,1/1,0/0,5 0,4/0,7/1,6 0,0/0,1/0,5 0,5/0,2/0,8 0,5/0,1/0,6 0,1/0,1/1,5 0,3/0,5/0,9 0,3/0,3/0,9 0,4/0,4/1,9 1 : Pair - Pair ELFEXT requirements are defined by the function: (-3,390+log(f)) (-4,155 + log(f)) MHz: -20log( ) db where f is frequency in MHz. : The first of the three values in each row is the worst case calculated deviation at limit from 1 MHz MHz, the second value is the is the worst case calculated deviation at limit from 100 MHz MHz and the third value is the is the worst case calculated deviation at limit from 250 MHz MHz. : Patter recognition of the field tester is concluded by 3P by estimating ability to correctly reflect positions and magnitude of peaks in the frequency domain. Three scales have been applied as specified in clause 3.5 of the report. 2 3 It is concluded from table 8.1 that the worst case pair-pair equal level far end crosstalk repeatability for all pairs is 1,9 db in the complete frequency range from 1 MHz to 500 MHz (at the specified permanent link limit). The measured repeatability corresponds with the measuring uncertainty level expected for pairpair equal level far end crosstalk measurements from MHz. Reflection are found over approx 200 MHz,which causes degradation of the repeatability of the measurements. It is concluded that the pair-pair equal level far end crosstalk performance has not changed during progress of the permanent link measurements. The measurements are carried out using the same Category 6 test plugs. Variability caused by

25 Page 25 of 43 allowable difference in test plug performance consequently does not contribute to the measured repeatability. 8.2 Repeatability of Field Tester Measurements Repeatability of the pair-pair equal level far end crosstalk measurements using field tester has been concluded by measuring pair-pair equal level far end crosstalk both before and after the 2nd laboratory type reference measurements. Summarized results of the testing are found in table 8.2. Table 8.1 Summarized Results of Repeated Pair - Pair Equal Level Far End Crosstalk Measurements by Field Tester from 1 MHz to 500 MHz PAIR COMBINAT ION PAIR - PAIR ELFEXT PERFORMANCE 1 Main Unit End Remote Unit End Maximum Deviation at Limit 2 Pattern Recognition 3 Maximum Deviation at Limit 2 Pattern Recognition 3 1/2-3/6 1/2-4/5 1/2-7/8 3/6-4/5 3/6-7/8 4/5-7/8 0,1/0,1/0,3 0,0/0,1/0,4 0,0/0,1/0,3 0,1/0,1/0,3 0,1/0,2/0,6 0,2/0,8/1,3 0,1/0,1/0,3 0,0/0,1/0,4 0,0/0,1/0,3 0,0/0,1/0,4 0,1/0,2/0,6 0,3/0,8/1,3 1 : Pair - Pair ELFEXT requirements are defined by the function: (-3,390+log(f)) (-4,155 + log(f)) MHz: -20log( ) db where f is frequency in MHz. : The first of the three values in each row is the worst case calculated deviation at limit from 1 MHz MHz, the second value is the is the worst case calculated deviation at limit from 100 MHz MHz and the third value is the is the worst case calculated deviation at limit from 250 MHz MHz. : Patter recognition of the field tester is concluded by 3P by estimating ability to correctly reflect positions and magnitude of peaks in the frequency domain. Three scales have been applied as specified in clause 3.5 of the report. 2 3 It is concluded from table 8.2 that the worst case pair-pair equal level far end crosstalk repeatability for all pairs is 1,3 db in the complete frequency range from 1 MHz to 500 MHz (at the specified permanent link limit). The measured repeatability for the field tester measurements of pair-pair equal level far end crosstalk is of the same magnitude as for the laboratory type measurements in the complete frequency range from 1 to 500 MHz. It is concluded that the pair-pair equal level far end crosstalk performance has not changed during progress of the permanent link measurements. The measurements are carried out using the unchanged test heads. Any variability of test head performance consequently does not contribute to the measured repeatability.

26 Page 26 of Equal Level Far End Crosstalk Performance of Field Tester Summarized results of the comparative testing of the field tester are found in table 8.3, and include all six combinations of the four tested pairs measured from both ends of the reference permanent link. Presented data are worst case of two different set of measurements, i.e. (A) comparison of the first field tester measurement with the first laboratory type reference measurement and (B) comparison of the second field tester measurement with the second laboratory type reference measurement. Two different types of field tester pair-pair equal level far end crosstalk traces are found in the appendix. 1. The worst and best case recordings of field tester measured pair-pair equal level far end crosstalk versus frequency is presented together with the corresponding reference traces in page 41. These recordings demonstrate how well the peaks and valleys of a reference trace is correctly reported by the field tester. 2. Characteristic recordings of calculated field tester performance at the specified Class E / Category 6 permanent link limit are presented in pages 42 and 43 for the main and remote unit end, respectively. All of the six pair combinations of the permanent link are included in both cases. The specified uncertainty of Level IIIe field tester pair-pair equal level far end crosstalk measurements is also included as a shaded yellow area.

27 Page 27 of 43 Table 8.3 Summarized Results of Comparative Pair - Pair Equal Level Far End Crosstalk Measurements from 1 MHz to 500 MHz PAIR COMBINAT ION PAIR - PAIR ELFEXT PERFORMANCE 1 Main Unit End Remote Unit End Maximum Deviation at Limit 2 Pattern Recognition 3 Maximum Deviation at Limit 2 Pattern Recognition 3 1/2-3/6 1/2-4/5 1/2-7/8 3/6-4/5 3/6-7/8 4/5-7/8 0,6/0,3/1,1 0,4/0,2/0,7 0,1/0,3/2,2 1,1/0,8/2,1 0,6/0,5/1,6 0,4/0,7/2,3 0,6/0,5/1,0 0,4/0,2/0,8 0,2/0,3/2,0 1,1/1,1/2,0 0,5/0,8/1,8 0,6/1,1/2,5 1 : Pair - Pair ELFEXT requirements are defined by the function: (-3,390+log(f)) (-4,155 + log(f)) MHz: -20log( ) db where f is frequency in MHz. : The first of the three values in each row is the worst case calculated deviation at limit from 1 MHz MHz, the second value is the is the worst case calculated deviation at limit from 100 MHz MHz and the third value is the is the worst case calculated deviation at limit from 250 MHz MHz. : Patter recognition of the field tester is concluded by 3P by estimating ability to correctly reflect positions and magnitude of peaks in the frequency domain. Three scales have been applied as specified in clause 3.5 of the report. 2 3 It is concluded from table 8.3 and pair-pair equal level far end crosstalk recordings in pages 42 and 43 that the field tester pair-pair equal level far end crosstalk performance is within the specified Level IIIe uncertainty for field testers at the Class E / Category 6 limit, even considering any additional variability caused by the influence of the RJ 45 plug. It is concluded from table 8.3 and recordings in page 41 that the field tester has a fine recognition of significant peaks in the pair-pair equal level far end crosstalk trace, and that the field tester measurements are not subject to the reflections, which degrade the laboratory type testing at the highest frequencies. The worst case ability of the field tester to demonstrate the pair-pair equal level far end crosstalk performance is 1,7 db at the Class E / Category 6 limit, when the reflections of the reference measurements are disregarded. This applies for the complete frequency range from 1 MHz to 500 MHz and for both the main and remote units. A major part of the max. 1,7 db difference between field tester and reference measurements may be explained by the accuracy of the laboratory measurements and variability of Category 6 plug performance. Different Category 6 plugs have been applied for the two measurements. The effect on equal level far end crosstalk by the different Category 6 plugs has not been covered by standardisation and has not been evaluated by 3P.

28 Page 28 of PROPAGATION DELAY PERFORMANCE 9.1 Repeatability of Reference Measurements Repeatability of the propagation delay measurements using laboratory equipment has been concluded by measuring propagation delay both before and after the first field tester measurements.the repeatability of the two performed reference propagation delay measurements was less than 1 nsec at 10 MHz. It is concluded that the propagation delay performance has not changed during progress of the permanent link measurements. 9.2 Repeatability of Field Tester Measurements Repeatability of the propagation delay measurements using field tester has been concluded by measuring propagation delay both before and after the 2nd laboratory type reference measurements. The repeatability of the two performed reference propagation delay measurements was less than 1 nsec at 10 MHz. It is concluded that the propagation delay performance has not changed during progress of the permanent link measurements. 9.3 Propagation Delay Performance of Field Tester The comparative testing of the field tester for propagation delay shows that the minimum propagation delay precision of the verified field tester is less than 1 nsec at 10 MHz.

Independent Testing - For End User Confidence

Independent Testing - For End User Confidence Independent Testing - For End User Confidence ELECTRICAL TRANSMISSION PERFORMANCE TESTING OF SCREENED CATEGORY 6 ISO/IEC, EN & TIA/EIA CONNECTING HARDWARE ACCORDING TO REQUIREMENTS OF 2ND EDITION ISO/IEC

More information

Field Measurements of Return Loss

Field Measurements of Return Loss Field Measurements of Return Loss White Paper By Mark Johnston and Jim Tonti Microtest October 21, 1998 Page 1 12/15/99 Overview Return loss is an important new measurement used to qualify the performance

More information

DELTA Test Report. Certification testing of generic cabling products: Unscreened channel, Class E, 4 connector model. Performed for Sterling

DELTA Test Report. Certification testing of generic cabling products: Unscreened channel, Class E, 4 connector model. Performed for Sterling DELTA Test Report TEST Reg. no. 19 Certification testing of generic cabling products: Unscreened channel, Class E, 4 connector model Performed for Sterling DANAK-19/16909 Project no.: T213173-01 Page 1

More information

Qualification testing of 100 ohm shielded channel, Class EA. Performed for Tyco Electronics Raychem N.V.

Qualification testing of 100 ohm shielded channel, Class EA. Performed for Tyco Electronics Raychem N.V. We help ideas meet the real world DELTA Test Report DANAK TEST Reg. no. 19 Qualification testing of 100 ohm shielded channel, Class EA Performed for Tyco Electronics Raychem N.V. DANAK-19J1636 Project

More information

Field Testing Update

Field Testing Update Field Testing Update Adrian Young Fluke Networks November, 2013 Singapore Objectives for this session Copper field standards update Look at new copper field measurements Fiber field standards update IEC

More information

Level III measurement accuracy of field testers for Twisted Pair Copper Cabling Explained in Technical Detail

Level III measurement accuracy of field testers for Twisted Pair Copper Cabling Explained in Technical Detail Level III measurement accuracy of field testers for Twisted Pair Copper Cabling Explained in Technical Detail 1 Outline Henriecus Koeman Fluke Networks July 9, 2001 This rather technical discussion contains

More information

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD INTERNATIONAL STANDARD IEC 61935-1 Edition 3.0 2009-07 Specification for the testing of balanced and coaxial information technology cabling Part 1: Installed balanced cabling as specified in ISO/IEC 11801

More information

Cabling Ad Hoc Cat 5e Measurements

Cabling Ad Hoc Cat 5e Measurements Cabling Ad Hoc Cat 5e Measurements Larry Cohen Solarflare Communications 1 Overview Cabling Ad Hoc Test Plan Measurement One Cat 5e horizontal cable sample, four test channel configurations characterized

More information

Cable Analysis. Extracting Information from Measured Data. The Performance Leader in Hand-Held Network Tools. Fanny Mlinarsky.

Cable Analysis. Extracting Information from Measured Data. The Performance Leader in Hand-Held Network Tools. Fanny Mlinarsky. Cable Analysis Extracting Information from Measured Data Fanny Mlinarsky 2-Nov-98 The Performance Leader in Hand-Held Network Tools Introduction Every cable tells a story. Cable certification measurements

More information

TSB-67. Transmission Performance Specifications for Field Testing of UTP Cabling Systems

TSB-67. Transmission Performance Specifications for Field Testing of UTP Cabling Systems TSB-67 Transmission Performance Specifications for Field Testing of UTP Cabling Systems Prepared by: ANSI/EIA/TIA PN-3287 Task Group on UTP Link Performance Required Field Test Parameters for TSB-67 Wire

More information

TEST REPORT. DANAK Reg. no. 19. Electrical performance testing of: Connecting Hardware according to IEC

TEST REPORT. DANAK Reg. no. 19. Electrical performance testing of: Connecting Hardware according to IEC Page 1 of 12 2 Appendices TEST REPORT DANAK Reg. no. 19 DELTA Danish Electronics, Light & Acoustics Venlighedsvej 4 DK-2970 Hørsholm Denmark Tel. (+45) 45 86 77 22 Fax (+45) 45 86 58 98 www.delta.dk Electrical

More information

Australian/New Zealand Standard

Australian/New Zealand Standard AS/NZS IEC 61935.1:2006 IEC 61935-1:2005 AS/NZS IEC 61935.1:2006 Australian/New Zealand Standard Testing of balanced communication cabling in accordance with ISO/IEC 11801 Part 1: Installed cabling AS/NZS

More information

GIGABIT ETHERNET CONSORTIUM

GIGABIT ETHERNET CONSORTIUM GIGABIT ETHERNET CONSORTIUM Clause 126 2.5G/5GBASE-T PMA Test Suite Version 1.2 Technical Document Last Updated: March 15, 2017 2.5, 5 and 10 Gigabit Ethernet Testing Service 21 Madbury Road, Suite 100

More information

2.5G/5G/10G ETHERNET Testing Service

2.5G/5G/10G ETHERNET Testing Service 2.5G/5G/10G ETHERNET Testing Service Clause 126 2.5G/5GBASE-T PMA Test Plan Version 1.3 Technical Document Last Updated: February 4, 2019 2.5, 5 and 10 Gigabit Ethernet Testing Service 21 Madbury Road,

More information

XX.7 Link segment characteristics

XX.7 Link segment characteristics XX.7 Link segment characteristics 10GBASE-T is designed to operate over a 4-pair balanced cabling system. Each of the four pairs supports an effective data rate of 2500 Mbps in each direction simultaneously.

More information

PDI TEST REPORT. No.0437

PDI TEST REPORT. No.0437 ABN 21 002 065 769 PDI TEST REPORT No.0437 COMPREHENSIVE Cat 6 TRANSMISSION TESTING ON 4 Pair 5m RJ45 Patch Cord With COBLE (COB) Cat 6 RJ45 Plug for Australian Communications Laboratories Pty Ltd DATE:

More information

AESA TECHNOLOGY OF LAN CABLE

AESA TECHNOLOGY OF LAN CABLE TECHNOLOGY OF LAN CABLE CONTENT CHAPTER INTRODUCTION CHAPTER LOCAL AREA NETWORK (LAN) CHAPTER STRUCTURED CABLING SYSTEM (SCS) CHAPTER OPTICAL FIBER CABLE CHAPTER STANDARD CHAPTER COPPER LAN CABLE DESIGN

More information

This document is a preview generated by EVS

This document is a preview generated by EVS INTERNATIONAL STANDARD IEC 61935-1 Edition 4.0 2015-12 colour inside Specification for the testing of balanced and coaxial information technology cabling Part 1: Installed balanced cabling as specified

More information

Special testing of 100 ohm unshielded channel, Class E. Performed for HCS KABLOLAMA SISTEMLERI SAN.VE TIS.A.S.

Special testing of 100 ohm unshielded channel, Class E. Performed for HCS KABLOLAMA SISTEMLERI SAN.VE TIS.A.S. We help ideas meet the real world Test Report DANAK Reg. no. 19 Special testing of 100 ohm unshielded channel, Class E Performed for HCS KABLOLAMA SISTEMLERI SAN.VE TIS.A.S. DANAK-19J1508 Project no.:

More information

AMP NETCONNECT Category 6 System

AMP NETCONNECT Category 6 System AMP NETCONNECT Category 6 System 2 How Did We Get Here? Basic Cabling Structure Component Specifications Link/Channel Specifications Additional Structure Options EIA/TIA TSB36 EIA/TIA 568 TIA/EIA TSB40

More information

University of New Hampshire InterOperability Laboratory Fast Ethernet Consortium

University of New Hampshire InterOperability Laboratory Fast Ethernet Consortium University of New Hampshire InterOperability Laboratory Fast Ethernet Consortium As of February 25, 2004 the Fast Ethernet Consortium Clause 25 Physical Medium Dependent Conformance Test Suite version

More information

n Proper pin termination at each end n Continuity to the remote end n Shorts between any two or more conductors n Transposed pairs: n Crossed pairs.

n Proper pin termination at each end n Continuity to the remote end n Shorts between any two or more conductors n Transposed pairs: n Crossed pairs. INTRODUCTION Structured Cabling or data cabling (also known Local Area Network or LAN Cabling) is increasing in its deployment for business, commercial and residential use to carry signaling for networks

More information

AUTOMOTIVE ETHERNET CONSORTIUM

AUTOMOTIVE ETHERNET CONSORTIUM AUTOMOTIVE ETHERNET CONSORTIUM Clause 96 100BASE-T1 Physical Medium Attachment Test Suite Version 1.0 Technical Document Last Updated: March 9, 2016 Automotive Ethernet Consortium 21 Madbury Rd, Suite

More information

University of New Hampshire InterOperability Laboratory Gigabit Ethernet Consortium

University of New Hampshire InterOperability Laboratory Gigabit Ethernet Consortium University of New Hampshire InterOperability Laboratory Gigabit Ethernet Consortium As of June 18 th, 2003 the Gigabit Ethernet Consortium Clause 40 Physical Medium Attachment Conformance Test Suite Version

More information

Verifying the Wideband Input of an AC Measurement Standard

Verifying the Wideband Input of an AC Measurement Standard Abstract erifying the of an AC Measurement Standard Speaker David Deaver Fluke Corporation PO Box 9090, Everett, WA, 98206 Phone: (425) 446-6434 FAX: (425) 446-5649 E-mail: david.deaver@fluke.com Authors:

More information

NXDN Signal and Interference Contour Requirements An Empirical Study

NXDN Signal and Interference Contour Requirements An Empirical Study NXDN Signal and Interference Contour Requirements An Empirical Study Icom America Engineering December 2007 Contents Introduction Results Analysis Appendix A. Test Equipment Appendix B. Test Methodology

More information

40 AND 100 GIGABIT ETHERNET CONSORTIUM

40 AND 100 GIGABIT ETHERNET CONSORTIUM 40 AND 100 GIGABIT ETHERNET CONSORTIUM Clause 85 40GBASE-CR4 and 100GBASE-CR10 Cable Assembly Test Suite Version 1.0 Technical Document Last Updated: April 9, 2014 40 and 100 Gigabit Ethernet Consortium

More information

Test Report based on DIN EN ISO/IEC 17025:2005

Test Report based on DIN EN ISO/IEC 17025:2005 Test Report based on DIN EN ISO/IEC 1725:25 GHMT Type Approval 2 Connector Permanent Link, Copper, Class E according ISO/IEC 1181-1 Ed.1. 217-11 Document-no: P4945b-18-E This Test Report with the measurements

More information

Test report number CRT-001b Project number CRT-001b

Test report number CRT-001b Project number CRT-001b 3933 US Route 11 Cortland, NY 13 Telephone: (7) 3-6711 Facsimile: (7) 8-39 www.intertek.com July 24, 215 Nexans Cabling Solutions Alsembergsesteenweg 2, b3 B-151 Buizingen BELGIUM Test report number 12193693CRT-1b

More information

ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 25/WG 3 N 755 Date: Replaces ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 25/WG 3 N n/a

ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 25/WG 3 N 755 Date: Replaces ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 25/WG 3 N n/a ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 25/WG 3 N 755 Date: 2005-05-18 Replaces ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 25/WG 3 N n/a ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 25/WG 3 Customer Premises Cabling Secretariat: Germany (DIN) DOC TYPE: Liaison document TITLE: Letter

More information

Test Report based on DIN EN ISO/IEC 17025

Test Report based on DIN EN ISO/IEC 17025 Test Report based on DIN EN ISO/IEC 17025 GHMT PREMIUM Verification Program Recertification Connector, Copper, Category 6A ISO/IEC 11801 Ed.2.2 This Test Report with the measurements consists of 28 pages.

More information

Protocol based on DIN EN ISO/IEC 17025

Protocol based on DIN EN ISO/IEC 17025 Protocol based on DIN EN ISO/IEC 17025 GHMT Informative Measurement 2 Connector Channel (30m), Copper, Class II according ISO/IEC/TR 11801-9901: 2014 Document-no.: I875a-16-E This Test Report with the

More information

10 GIGABIT ETHERNET CONSORTIUM

10 GIGABIT ETHERNET CONSORTIUM 10 GIGABIT ETHERNET CONSORTIUM Clause 54 10GBASE-CX4 PMD Test Suite Version 1.0 Technical Document Last Updated: 18 November 2003 10:13 AM 10Gigabit Ethernet Consortium 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2 Durham,

More information

10GECTHE 10 GIGABIT ETHERNET CONSORTIUM

10GECTHE 10 GIGABIT ETHERNET CONSORTIUM 10GECTHE 10 GIGABIT ETHERNET CONSORTIUM 10GBASE-T Clause 55 PMA Electrical Test Suite Version 1.0 Technical Document Last Updated: September 6, 2006, 3:00 PM 10 Gigabit Ethernet Consortium 121 Technology

More information

Requirements for Industrial Cabling Supporting Gigabit Applications for Control, A study of Noise

Requirements for Industrial Cabling Supporting Gigabit Applications for Control, A study of Noise Requirements for Industrial Cabling Supporting Gigabit Applications for Control, A study of Noise Bob Lounsbury Principal Engineer, Rockwell Automation Rockwell Automation Presented at the ODVA 2015 Industry

More information

Successful SATA 6 Gb/s Equipment Design and Development By Chris Cicchetti, Finisar 5/14/2009

Successful SATA 6 Gb/s Equipment Design and Development By Chris Cicchetti, Finisar 5/14/2009 Successful SATA 6 Gb/s Equipment Design and Development By Chris Cicchetti, Finisar 5/14/2009 Abstract: The new SATA Revision 3.0 enables 6 Gb/s link speeds between storage units, disk drives, optical

More information

Test Report based on DIN EN ISO/IEC 17025: 2005

Test Report based on DIN EN ISO/IEC 17025: 2005 Test Report based on DIN EN ISO/IEC 1725: 25 GHMT Type Approval 2 Connector Permanent Link, Copper, Class EA according ISO/IEC 1181-1 Ed.1. Document-no: P582a-18-E This Test Report with the measurements

More information

This is a preview - click here to buy the full publication

This is a preview - click here to buy the full publication ISO/IEC TR 11801-9901 TECHNICAL REPORT Edition 1.0 2014-10 colour inside Information technology Generic cabling for customer premises Part 9901: Guidance for balanced cabling in support of at least 40

More information

This document is a preview generated by EVS

This document is a preview generated by EVS TECHNICAL REPORT ISO/IEC TR 11801-9901 Edition 1.0 2014-10 colour inside Information technology Generic cabling for customer premises Part 9901: Guidance for balanced cabling in support of at least 40

More information

Power over Ethernet Consortium Interoperability Test Suite v2.3 Report

Power over Ethernet Consortium Interoperability Test Suite v2.3 Report Power over Ethernet Consortium Interoperability Test Suite v2.3 Report UNH-IOL 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2 Durham, NH 03824 +1-603-862-0090 Consortium Manager: Gerard Nadeau grn@iol.unh.edu +1-603-862-0166

More information

BACKPLANE ETHERNET CONSORTIUM

BACKPLANE ETHERNET CONSORTIUM BACKPLANE ETHERNET CONSORTIUM Clause 72 10GBASE-KR PMD Test Suite Version 1.1 Technical Document Last Updated: June 10, 2011 9:28 AM Backplane Ethernet Consortium 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2 Durham,

More information

ETHERNET TESTING SERVICES

ETHERNET TESTING SERVICES ETHERNET TESTING SERVICES 10BASE-Te Embedded MAU Test Suite Version 1.1 Technical Document Last Updated: June 21, 2012 Ethernet Testing Services 121 Technology Dr., Suite 2 Durham, NH 03824 University

More information

A Novel Simplified Four-Port Scattering Parameter Model for Design of Four-Pair Twisted-Pair Cabling Systems for Local Area Networks

A Novel Simplified Four-Port Scattering Parameter Model for Design of Four-Pair Twisted-Pair Cabling Systems for Local Area Networks IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MICROWAVE THEORY AND TECHNIQUES, VOL. 48, NO. 5, MAY 2000 815 A Novel Simplified Four-Port Scattering Parameter Model for Design of Four-Pair Twisted-Pair Cabling Systems for Local

More information

10GBASE-T Transmitter Key Specifications

10GBASE-T Transmitter Key Specifications 10GBASE-T Transmitter Key Specifications Sandeep Gupta, Jose Tellado Teranetics, Santa Clara, CA sgupta@teranetics.com 5/19/2004 1 1000BASE-T Transmitter spec. overview Differential voltage at MDI output

More information

Power Sensors Ltd. PQube 3 AC Analyzer IEC Class 0,2 S Accuracy Compliance Report

Power Sensors Ltd. PQube 3 AC Analyzer IEC Class 0,2 S Accuracy Compliance Report PSL Standards Lab 980 Atlantic Avenue Alameda, CA 94501 USA TEL ++1-510-522-4400 FAX ++1-510-522-4455 www.standards.com Sensors Ltd. PQube 3 AC Analyzer IEC Class 0,2 S Accuracy Compliance Report IEC 62053-22

More information

Practical PoE Tutorial

Practical PoE Tutorial Practical PoE Tutorial Chris DiMinico, MC Communications/Panduit Chad Jones, Cisco Systems Ron Nordin, Panduit Lennart Yseboodt, Philips Lighting Berlin, Germany July 10, 2017 Agenda Background/Scope Chris

More information

1) The addition of TCL and ELTCTL requirements to Category 6

1) The addition of TCL and ELTCTL requirements to Category 6 Subject 444 TO: SUBJECT: 455 East Trimble Road San Jose, CA 95131 July 28, 2008 Subscribers to UL s Listing and Verification Services for Communications Cable (DUZX) Revised Test and Follow-Up Service

More information

Power over Ethernet Consortium Interoperability Test Suite v2.3 Report

Power over Ethernet Consortium Interoperability Test Suite v2.3 Report Power over Ethernet Consortium Interoperability Test Suite v2.3 Report UNH-IOL 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2 Durham, NH 03824 +1-603-862-0090 Consortium Manager: Gerard Nadeau grn@iol.unh.edu +1-603-862-0166

More information

10 Mb/s Single Twisted Pair Ethernet Evaluation Board Noise Measurements Marcel Medina Steffen Graber Pepperl+Fuchs

10 Mb/s Single Twisted Pair Ethernet Evaluation Board Noise Measurements Marcel Medina Steffen Graber Pepperl+Fuchs 10 Mb/s Single Twisted Pair Ethernet Evaluation Board Noise Measurements Marcel Medina Steffen Graber Pepperl+Fuchs IEEE P802.3cg 10 Mb/s Single Twisted Pair Ethernet Task Force 9/6/2017 1 Content AWGN/Impulsive

More information

Samtec MODS-LJ Series (LIFEJACK ) Category 5/5e Qualification

Samtec MODS-LJ Series (LIFEJACK ) Category 5/5e Qualification Samtec MODS-LJ Series (LIFEJACK ) Category 5/5e Qualification J. Ferry, C. Arroyo Copyright 2008 Samtec, Inc Page 1 Summary LIFEJACK met or exceeded TIA/EIA-568-B.2-2001 Category 5e requirements for Insertion

More information

40 AND 100 GIGABIT ETHERNET CONSORTIUM

40 AND 100 GIGABIT ETHERNET CONSORTIUM 40 AND 100 GIGABIT ETHERNET CONSORTIUM Clause 93 100GBASE-KR4 PMD Test Suite Version 1.0 Technical Document Last Updated: October 2, 2014 40 and 100 Gigabit Ethernet Consortium 121 Technology Drive, Suite

More information

Experiment 2: Transients and Oscillations in RLC Circuits

Experiment 2: Transients and Oscillations in RLC Circuits Experiment 2: Transients and Oscillations in RLC Circuits Will Chemelewski Partner: Brian Enders TA: Nielsen See laboratory book #1 pages 5-7, data taken September 1, 2009 September 7, 2009 Abstract Transient

More information

An Evaluation of Artifact Calibration in the 5700A Multifunction Calibrator

An Evaluation of Artifact Calibration in the 5700A Multifunction Calibrator An Evaluation of Artifact Calibration in the 57A Multifunction Calibrator Application Note Artifact Calibration, as implemented in the Fluke Calibration 57A Multifunction Calibrator, was a revolutionary

More information

Data sheet Patch cord Cat.6 A AWG m yellow

Data sheet Patch cord Cat.6 A AWG m yellow Illustrations Dimensional drawing Page 1/6 See enlarged drawings at the end of document Product specification especially suitable for shielded and unshielded class E A systems fully shielded Cat.6 A patch

More information

The Metrology Behind Wideband/RF Improvements to the Fluke Calibration 5790B AC Measurement Standard

The Metrology Behind Wideband/RF Improvements to the Fluke Calibration 5790B AC Measurement Standard 1. Abstract The Metrology Behind Wideband/RF Improvements to the Fluke Calibration 5790B AC Measurement Standard Authors: Milen Todorakev, Jeff Gust Fluke Calibration. 6920 Seaway Blvd, Everett WA Tel:

More information

Composite Data, Audio, Video, Security and Control Cables Banana Peel Jacketless Cables Category 5e

Composite Data, Audio, Video, Security and Control Cables Banana Peel Jacketless Cables Category 5e R E S I D E N T I A L C A B L E S 21.4 Coposite Data, Audio, Video, Security and Control Cables Banana Peel less Cables Category 5e Coposite (2) Cat 5e 4-Bonded-Pair UTP 24 AWG (2) Series 6 Coax with Duobond

More information

40 AND 100 GIGABIT ETHERNET CONSORTIUM

40 AND 100 GIGABIT ETHERNET CONSORTIUM 40 AND 100 GIGABIT ETHERNET CONSORTIUM Clause 110 Cable Assembly Conformance Test Suite Version 1.0 Technical Document Last Updated: June 7, 2017 40 and 100 Gigabit Ethernet Consortium 21 Madbury Drive,

More information

A Study of Conducted-Emission Stable Source Applied to the EMC US and EU Standards

A Study of Conducted-Emission Stable Source Applied to the EMC US and EU Standards Fourth LACCEI International Latin American and Caribbean Conference for Engineering and Technology (LACCEI 2006) Breaking Frontiers and Barriers in Engineering: Education, Research and Practice, 21-23

More information

CTAG:b01ac469edcbee4d9e5f84a83a1962a5 Certificate of Calibration

CTAG:b01ac469edcbee4d9e5f84a83a1962a5 Certificate of Calibration CTAG:bac69edcbeed9e5f8a8a96a5 Certificate of Calibration Data Type: FOUND-LEFT Certificate No: 859 Instrument Description Manufacturer Model Serial Number Inventory Number CABLE ANALYZER FLUKE NETWORKS

More information

A New Method for the Calibration of the mv Ranges of an AC Measurement Standard

A New Method for the Calibration of the mv Ranges of an AC Measurement Standard A New Method for the Calibration of the mv Ranges of an AC Measurement Standard Speaker/Author Neil Faulkner Fluke Corporation PO Box 9090, Everett, WA 98206 Phone: (425) 446-5538 FAX: (425) 446-5649 E-mail:

More information

Tips for making accurate rise / fall time measurements for radar signals

Tips for making accurate rise / fall time measurements for radar signals Tips for making accurate rise / fall time measurements for radar signals Abstract: Output power measurement is one of the basic measurements for a radar system as it determines the performance, range and

More information

Clause 71 10GBASE-KX4 PMD Test Suite Version 0.2. Technical Document. Last Updated: April 29, :07 PM

Clause 71 10GBASE-KX4 PMD Test Suite Version 0.2. Technical Document. Last Updated: April 29, :07 PM BACKPLANE CONSORTIUM Clause 71 10GBASE-KX4 PMD Test Suite Version 0.2 Technical Document Last Updated: April 29, 2008 1:07 PM Backplane Consortium 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2 Durham, NH 03824 University

More information

Physical Test Setup for Impulse Noise Testing

Physical Test Setup for Impulse Noise Testing Physical Test Setup for Impulse Noise Testing Larry Cohen Overview Purpose: Use measurement results for the EM coupling (Campbell) clamp to determine a stable physical test setup for impulse noise testing.

More information

NETWORK CONNECTIVITY SYSTEMS

NETWORK CONNECTIVITY SYSTEMS NETWORK CONNECTIVITY SYSTEMS Installation Cable KS-STP Category 7 Installation Cable Certificates 10GBaseT FTP Category 6 Installation Cable UTP Category 6 Installation Cable UTP Category 5E Installation

More information

Power over Ethernet Consortium Interoperability Test Suite v2.2 Report

Power over Ethernet Consortium Interoperability Test Suite v2.2 Report Power over Ethernet Consortium Interoperability Test Suite v2.2 Report UNH-IOL 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2 Durham, NH 03824 (603) 862-0090 Consortium Manager: Gerard Nadeau grn@iol.unh.edu 603.862.0116

More information

Model 600 Switching Matrix Series Transparent Switching Matrix Modules for High-Bandwidth DSL Test Automation

Model 600 Switching Matrix Series Transparent Switching Matrix Modules for High-Bandwidth DSL Test Automation Model 600 Switching Matrix Series Transparent Switching Matrix Modules for High-Bandwidth DSL Test Automation High performance transparent switching solutions designed to automate testing of VDSL2 Vectoring

More information

Power over Ethernet Consortium Interoperability Test Suite v2.3 Report

Power over Ethernet Consortium Interoperability Test Suite v2.3 Report Power over Ethernet Consortium Interoperability Test Suite v2.3 Report UNH-IOL 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2 Durham, NH 03824 (603) 862-0090 Consortium Manager: Gerard Nadeau grn@iol.unh.edu 603.862.0166

More information

WHITE PAPER INTRODUCTION DC RESISTANCE UNBALANCE TESTING: EASY, LOW-COST INSURANCE FOR YOUR POE SYSTEMS

WHITE PAPER INTRODUCTION DC RESISTANCE UNBALANCE TESTING: EASY, LOW-COST INSURANCE FOR YOUR POE SYSTEMS WHITE PAPER DC RESISTANCE UNBALANCE TESTING: EASY, LOW-COST INSURANCE FOR YOUR POE SYSTEMS INTRODUCTION Originally ratified by IEEE in 999 and 00 respectively, gigabit Ethernet (000BASE-T) and power over

More information

Complimentary Reference Material

Complimentary Reference Material Complimentary Reference Material This PDF has been made available as a complimentary service for you to assist in evaluating this model for your testing requirements. TMG offers a wide range of test equipment

More information

ETHERNET TESTING SERVICES

ETHERNET TESTING SERVICES ETHERNET TESTING SERVICES 10BASE-T Embedded MAU Test Suite Version 5.4 Technical Document Last Updated: June 21, 2012 Ethernet Testing Services 121 Technology Dr., Suite 2 Durham, NH 03824 University of

More information

ADDENDUM TEST REPORT

ADDENDUM TEST REPORT Page : 1 of 19 ADDENDUM TEST REPORT Test Report No. : 11707924M Applicant : TAIYO YUDEN CO., LTD. Type of Equipment : Bluetooth Smart / ANT Module Model No. : EYSHCN Test standard : EN 300 328 V2.1.1 (Except

More information

Application Note 5044

Application Note 5044 HBCU-5710R 1000BASE-T Small Form Pluggable Low Voltage (3.3V) Electrical Transceiver over Category 5 Unshielded Twisted Pair Cable Characterization Report Application Note 5044 Summary The Physical Medium

More information

Irish Standard I.S. EN :2009

Irish Standard I.S. EN :2009 Irish Standard I.S. EN 61935-1:2009 Specification for the testing of balanced and coaxial information technology cabling -- Part 1: Installed balanced cabling as specified in the standards series EN 50173

More information

125 Eugene O Neill Drive 6120 Powers Ferry Road New London, CT Suite 150 Ph (860) Atlanta, GA Fax (860)

125 Eugene O Neill Drive 6120 Powers Ferry Road New London, CT Suite 150 Ph (860) Atlanta, GA Fax (860) 3933 US Route 11 Cortland, NY 1345 Telephone: (67) 753-6711 Facsimile: (67) 758-3659 www.intertek.com December 16, 214 Test Report Number: 33592CRT-136 Project Number: 33592 Legrand North America Superior

More information

FIBRE CHANNEL CONSORTIUM

FIBRE CHANNEL CONSORTIUM FIBRE CHANNEL CONSORTIUM FC-PI-2 Clause 9 Electrical Physical Layer Test Suite Version 0.21 Technical Document Last Updated: August 15, 2006 Fibre Channel Consortium Durham, NH 03824 Phone: +1-603-862-0701

More information

Channel Characteristics and Impairments

Channel Characteristics and Impairments ELEX 3525 : Data Communications 2013 Winter Session Channel Characteristics and Impairments is lecture describes some of the most common channel characteristics and impairments. A er this lecture you should

More information

125 Eugene O Neill Drive 6120 Powers Ferry Road New London, CT Suite 150 Ph (860) Atlanta, GA Fax (860)

125 Eugene O Neill Drive 6120 Powers Ferry Road New London, CT Suite 150 Ph (860) Atlanta, GA Fax (860) 3933 US Route 11 Cortland, NY 1345 Telephone: (67) 753-6711 Facsimile: (67) 758-3659 www.intertek.com December 16, 214 Test Report Number: 33592CRT-137 Project Number: 33592 Legrand North America Superior

More information

Superiorr Essex. Suite 150

Superiorr Essex. Suite 150 3933 US Route 11 Cortland, NY 1345 Telephone: (67) 753-6711 Facsimile: (67) 758-3659 www.intertek.com March 2, 216 Test Report Number: 1246639CRT-14 Project Number: 1246639 Legrand North America 125 Eugene

More information

Improved 100GBASE-SR4 transmitter testing

Improved 100GBASE-SR4 transmitter testing Improved 100GBASE-SR4 transmitter testing Piers Dawe IEEE P802.3bm, May 2014, Norfolk, VA Supporters Paul Kolesar Mike Dudek Ken Jackson Commscope QLogic Sumitomo 2 Introduction The way of defining transmitter

More information

White Paper: The Ins and Outs of Testing Bend Insensitive Multimode Fiber (BIMMF): The Need for Encircled Flux

White Paper: The Ins and Outs of Testing Bend Insensitive Multimode Fiber (BIMMF): The Need for Encircled Flux White Paper: The Ins and Outs of Testing Bend Insensitive Multimode Fiber (BIMMF): The Need for Encircled Flux White Paper: The Ins and Outs of Testing Bend Insensitive Multimode Fiber (BIMMF): The Need

More information

Synergy RJ45 LCS 6 Category 6 data outlets

Synergy RJ45 LCS 6 Category 6 data outlets Legrand Electric Ltd. Arena Park - Dial Lane West Bromwich - West Midlands - B70 0EB- United Kingdom Technical enquiries : Tel. 0870 8 90 - Fax. 0870 8 9021 CONTENTS PAGE 7300 56 7300 57 1. Applications...

More information

Chapter 12: Transmission Lines. EET-223: RF Communication Circuits Walter Lara

Chapter 12: Transmission Lines. EET-223: RF Communication Circuits Walter Lara Chapter 12: Transmission Lines EET-223: RF Communication Circuits Walter Lara Introduction A transmission line can be defined as the conductive connections between system elements that carry signal power.

More information

Automatic measuring system for LAN cables AXT & Cat 8 HF only

Automatic measuring system for LAN cables AXT & Cat 8 HF only Picture for information only Automatic measuring system for LAN cables AXT & Cat 8 HF only The fastest measuring system on the market Checked against certified ISO 17025 standards High accuracy Easy to

More information

Media. Twisted pair db/km at 1MHz 2 km. Coaxial cable 7 db/km at 10 MHz 1 9 km. Optical fibre 0.2 db/km 100 km

Media. Twisted pair db/km at 1MHz 2 km. Coaxial cable 7 db/km at 10 MHz 1 9 km. Optical fibre 0.2 db/km 100 km Media Attenuation Repeater spacing Twisted pair 10-12 db/km at 1MHz 2 km Coaxial cable 7 db/km at 10 MHz 1 9 km Optical fibre 0.2 db/km 100 km conniq.com provides an excellent tutorial on physical media.

More information

Determination of Uncertainty for Dielectric Properties Determination of Printed Circuit Board Material

Determination of Uncertainty for Dielectric Properties Determination of Printed Circuit Board Material Determination of Uncertainty for Dielectric Properties Determination of Printed Circuit Board Material Marko Kettunen, Kare-Petri Lätti, Janne-Matti Heinola, Juha-Pekka Ström and Pertti Silventoinen Lappeenranta

More information

The Future of Cabling -

The Future of Cabling - FIET 2011 Limited Standards Activities onvenor T215 WG1: IT abling Secretary T215 WG2 The Future of abling beyond ategory 7A and OM4 Member JT1 S25 WG3: Generic abling onvenor JT1 S25 WG3 ITG: abling Implementation

More information

TEST REPORT OF THE. Inventek Systems

TEST REPORT OF THE. Inventek Systems TEST REPORT OF THE 2.4 GHz es-wifi Module Models: IN CONFORMANCE WITH ETSI EN 300 328 V2.1.1 (2016-11) Harmonized EN covering essential requirements under article 3.2 of the Radio Equipment Directive (RED)

More information

Correlation of Model Simulations and Measurements

Correlation of Model Simulations and Measurements Correlation of Model Simulations and Measurements Roy Leventhal Leventhal Design & Communications Presented June 5, 2007 IBIS Summit Meeting, San Diego, California Correlation of Model Simulations and

More information

Power over Ethernet Consortium Interoperability Test Suite v2.3 Report

Power over Ethernet Consortium Interoperability Test Suite v2.3 Report Power over Ethernet Consortium Interoperability Test Suite v2.3 Report UNH-IOL 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2 Durham, NH 03824 (603) 862-0090 Consortium Manager: Gerard Nadeau grn@iol.unh.edu 603.862.0166

More information

- Characteristic impedance of cabling links is characterised by Return Loss

- Characteristic impedance of cabling links is characterised by Return Loss ISO/IEC 11801 ISO 11801 is the principle design standard for structured cabling systems for all countries of the world that do not have more specific standards, such as ISO 11801 (European Union), TIA

More information

This document is a preview generated by EVS

This document is a preview generated by EVS EESTI STANDARD EVS-EN 61935-1:2010 Specification for the testing of balanced and coaxial information technology cabling - Part 1: Installed balanced cabling as specified in the standards series EN 50173

More information

Product Bulletin. Belden DataTwist 4800 Cables

Product Bulletin. Belden DataTwist 4800 Cables Product Bulletin PB 296 Belden DataTwist 4800 Cables DataTwist 4800 UTP Cables provide significant headroom and robust data transmission performance for today s most demanding applications. The cables

More information

Install & Go Cat.8 S/FTP Trunk Cable Assembly Description

Install & Go Cat.8 S/FTP Trunk Cable Assembly Description Description Cat 8 Filler Cat.8.2 S/FTP Horizontal cables (x6) Fan-Out Cables Cat 8 STP Keystones TRUNK CABLE SECTION VIEW Assembly Isometric Front View RiT s Copper Install & Go System provides a pre-terminated

More information

FCC & IC Certification. Test Report. FCC & Industry Canada Certification. Test Report. for Hetronic USA FCC ID: LW9-CS434TXN IC ID: 2219A-CS434TXN

FCC & IC Certification. Test Report. FCC & Industry Canada Certification. Test Report. for Hetronic USA FCC ID: LW9-CS434TXN IC ID: 2219A-CS434TXN FCC & IC Certification Test Report FCC & Industry Canada Certification Test Report for Hetronic USA March 3, 2005 Prepared for: Hetronic USA 4300 Highline Blvd Building 4 Oklahoma City, OK 73108 Prepared

More information

IEEE 100BASE-T1 Physical Media Attachment Test Suite

IEEE 100BASE-T1 Physical Media Attachment Test Suite IEEE 100BASE-T1 Physical Media Attachment Test Suite Version 1.0 Author & Company Curtis Donahue, UNH-IOL Title IEEE 100BASE-T1 Physical Media Attachment Test Suite Version 1.0 Date June 6, 2017 Status

More information

B. Division-16 Basic Materials and Methods section apply to work specified in this section.

B. Division-16 Basic Materials and Methods section apply to work specified in this section. Section 16745 PREMISE CABLING SYSTEMS PART ONE GENERAL 1.1 RELATED DOCUMENTS A. Drawings and general provisions of Contract, including General and Supplementary Conditions and Division-1 Specification

More information

HIGH BIT RATE OPTICAL FIBRE NETWORKS - optical fibre selection and implementation

HIGH BIT RATE OPTICAL FIBRE NETWORKS - optical fibre selection and implementation HIGH BIT RATE OPTICAL FIBRE NETWORKS - optical fibre selection and implementation prepared and delivered by ϕ 19th January 2000 PO Box MT65 LEEDS LS17 8YD UK Tel: +44 (0) 113 232 3721 Fax: +44 (0) 113

More information

RF Characterization Report

RF Characterization Report SMA-J-P-H-ST-MT1 Mated with: RF316-01SP1-01BJ1-0305 Description: 50-Ω SMA Board Mount Jack, Mixed Technology Samtec, Inc. 2005 All Rights Reserved Table of Contents Introduction...1 Product Description...1

More information

R&TTE (1999/5/EC) Directive ETSI EN V1.8.1: 2012 TEST REPORT

R&TTE (1999/5/EC) Directive ETSI EN V1.8.1: 2012 TEST REPORT Page: 1 of 50 R&TTE (1999/5/EC) Directive ETSI EN 300 328 V1.8.1: 2012 TEST REPORT FOR Product Name: Brand Name: Model No.: Model Different: Report No.: TomTom GPS watch TomTom 8RS00 N/A EF/2013/20012-01

More information

Reliable Power Meters Multipoint Power Recorder

Reliable Power Meters Multipoint Power Recorder Reliable Power Meters Multipoint Power Recorder High-speed capability for permanent installation Technical Data What is Full Disclosure Technology? Full Disclosure Technology is built into all Fluke and

More information