DELTA Test Report. Certification testing of generic cabling products: Unscreened channel, Class E, 4 connector model. Performed for Sterling

Transcription

1 DELTA Test Report TEST Reg. no. 19 Certification testing of generic cabling products: Unscreened channel, Class E, 4 connector model Performed for Sterling DANAK-19/16909 Project no.: T Page 1 of 72 7 October 2016 DELTA Venlighedsvej Hørsholm Denmark Tel. (+45) Fax (+45) VAT No This report is issued under the rules of DANAK (Danish Accreditation) and ILAC (International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation) including its MRA (Mutual Recognition Arrangement). Further information can be found at and The report must not be reproduced, except in ful l, without the written approval of DELTA.

2 Page 2 of 72 DELTA Headquarter, Hørsholm Denmark

3 Page 3 of 72 Title Product description Certification testing of generic cabling products Unscreened channel, Class E, 4 connector model Product identification See Clause 2 EC Cabling product ID 6080 Compliance statement Accreditation no. DANAK-19/16909 Project no. T Test object received 22 September 2016 Test period September - October 2016 Client Contact Sterling 3 The Business Centre Molly Millars Lane Wokingham Berks RG41 2EY Daniel Nicholson Specification ISO/IEC Results Prepared by Reviewed by Compliance with specifications is verified Lars Bjerring Lars Lindskov Pedersen Date 7 October 2016 Responsible Lars Lindskov Pedersen, Test Manager DELTA LAN Components and Systems Testing

4 Page 4 of 72 Table of content Page 1. Summary 5 2. Channel components 6 3. Conclusion 8 4. Test results Cable marking High frequency transmission test results. Channel #1 (85 m horizontal cable) High frequency transmission test results. Channel #2 (85 m horizontal cable) High frequency transmission test results. Channel #3 (15 m horizontal cable) Resistance properties Reference to applicable standards and documents Generic cabling standards Special requirements for EC VERIFIED Test procedures Electrical test Attenuation (Att) Return loss (RL) Near end crosstalk (NEXT) Powersum near end crosstalk (PSNEXT) Attenuation to crosstalk loss ratio (ACR-N) Power sum ACR (PSACR-N) Attenuation to crosstalk ratio-far end (ACR-F) Power sum attenuation to crosstalk ratio far end (PSACR-F) Attenuation unbalance, near end (Transverse conversion loss, TCL) DC loop resistance Propagation delay Delay skew Test software 72

5 Page 5 of Summary A communication channel has been tested for compliance with generic cabling standards. The purpose of the testing was to certify certification of the channel according to the EC VERIFIED programme. The channel for this electrical performance test was assembled and delivered to DELTA by the client. The channel testing has been performed under laboratory conditions at the EC Cabling Group of DELTA. This report firstly gives a detailed description of the channels under test. Then the conclusion is given followed by the test results. At last an overview of the test procedures and applied standards are given.

6 Page 6 of Channel components Terminal (PC) TO B CP C1 C2 Equipment (Server) D A C E Channel under test (without end plugs) Figure 1. Channel definition (4 connector model). The channel consists of the following components: Item Name Cable type Length Connecting hardware A Terminal cord Flexible cable 5 m 1 plug B Consolidation point cable Flexible cable 5 m 1 socket 1 plug C Horizontal cable Horizontal cable Channel #1: 85 m Channel #2: 85 m Channel #3: 15 m 2 sockets D Patch cord Flexible cable 2m 2 plugs E Equipment cord Flexible cable 3 m 1 socket TO CP C1, C2 Telecommunications Outlet / Wall Outlet Consolidation Point connector (Sockets) Horizontal cross-connector / Floor Distributor / Patch panel

7 Page 7 of 72 Test samples and qualification status Horizontal cable (C): Sterling Cat6 U/UTP LSZH horizontal cable. Part no Telecommunication outlet (TO): Sterling Cat6 UTP module. Part no. C6-UTP-50FMx (x: colour) Consolidation point connector (CP): Sterling Cat6 UTP keystone jack. Part no. C6-UTP-KSx (x: colour) Equipment cord (E) and CP cord (B): Sterling Cat6 U/UTP consolidation cable. Part no. C6-PCSx-xx-x (x: length and colour) (with jack C6-UTP-KSx added for CP cord, and equipment cord terminated in patch panel) Patch panel (C1, C2): Sterling Cat6 UTP patch panel. Part no. C6-UTP-PPxx (xx: number of ports) Terminal cord and patch cord (A/D): Sterling Cat6 U/UTP patch cable. Part no. 66xxxx (xxxx: length and colour)

8 Page 8 of Conclusion The tested samples comply with the applied requirements. The test results are only applicable for the tested samples.

9 Page 9 of Test results 4.1 Cable marking Table 1. Cable marking, horizontal cable Characteristic Type of printing Colour of text Text Result jet ink black on a mauve jacket STERLING CAT6 U/UTP LSZH 23AWG VERIFIED TO TIA/EIA-568-B.2-1 & ISO/IEC M 03/07/2015 Table 2. Cable marking, flexible cable (cords and CP cable) Characteristic Type of printing Colour of text Text Result jet ink blue on a grey jacket 550 MHz (UL) E TYPE CM 24AWG 75 C CSA CM 75 C ETL VERIFIED TIA/EIA-568-C.2 UTP CAT.6 STERLING

10 Page 10 of High frequency transmission test results. Channel #1 (85 m horizontal cable) NEAR END CROSSTALK (NEXT). From terminal end Channel #1. Worst case margin: 5.5 db at MHz for Blue /Orange pair. Table 3. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies

11 Page 11 of 72 PS NEAR END CROSSTALK(PSNEXT). From terminal end Channel #1. Worst case margin: 5.6 db at MHz for Blue pair. Table 4. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies

12 Page 12 of 72 RETURN LOSS. From terminal end Channel #1. Worst case margin: 6 db at MHz for Orange pair. Table 5. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies

13 Page 13 of 72 ATTENUATION TO CROSSTALK RATIO, NEAR END (ACR-N). From terminal end Channel #1. Worst case margin: 10.3 db at MHz for Blue/Green-Blue pair. Table 6. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies

14 Page 14 of 72 PS ATT TO CROSSTALK RATIO, NEAR END (PSACR-N). From terminal end Channel #1. Worst case margin: 11.4 db at MHz for Blue pair. Table 7. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies

15 Page 15 of 72 TRANSVERSE CONVERSION LOSS (TCL). From terminal end Channel #1. Worst case margin: 4.8 db at 40.8 MHz for Green pair. Table 8. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies

16 Page 16 of 72 NEAR END CROSSTALK (NEXT). From equipment end Channel #1. Worst case margin: 1.4 db at MHz for Blue /Green pair. Table 9. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies

17 Page 17 of 72 PS NEAR END CROSSTALK(PSNEXT). From equipment end Channel #1. Worst case margin: 3.5 db at MHz for Blue pair. Table 10. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies

18 Page 18 of 72 RETURN LOSS. From equipment end Channel #1. Worst case margin: 4.1 db at MHz for Brown pair. Table 11. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies

19 Page 19 of 72 ATTENUATION TO CROSSTALK RATIO, NEAR END (ACR-N). From equipment end Channel #1. Worst case margin: 7.3 db at MHz for Blue/Green-Blue pair. Table 12. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies

20 Page 20 of 72 PS ATT TO CROSSTALK RATIO, NEAR END (PSACR-N). From equipment end Channel #1. Worst case margin: 9.4 db at MHz for Blue pair. Table 13. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies

21 Page 21 of 72 TRANSVERSE CONVERSION LOSS (TCL). From terminal end Channel #1. Worst case margin: 14.2 db at 4.1 MHz for Orange pair. Table 14. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies

22 Page 22 of 72 BALANCED MODE ATTENUATION. Channel #1. Worst case margin: 0.7 db at 4.1 MHz for Green pair. Table 15. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies

23 Page 23 of 72 ATTENUATION TO CROSSTALK RATIO - FAR (ACR-F). Channel #1. Worst case margin: 7.3 db at 98.7 MHz for Blue/Green-Blue pair. ATTENUATION TO CROSSTALK RATIO - FAR (ACR-F). Channel #1. Worst case margin: 9.4 db at MHz for Green/Blue-Green pair.

24 Page 24 of 72 ATTENUATION TO CROSSTALK RATIO - FAR (ACR-F). Channel #1. Worst case margin: 8 db at MHz for Green/Orange-Green pair. Table 16. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies

25 Page 25 of 72 PS SUM ATTENUATION TO CROSSTALK RATIO - FAR (PSACR-F). Channel #1. Worst case margin: 8.6 db at MHz for Green pair. Table 17. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies

26 Page 26 of 72 PROPAGATION DELAY. Channel #1. Worst case margin: µs at MHz for Green pair. Table 18. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies. [ns] [ns] [ns]

27 Page 27 of 72 DELAY SKEW. Channel #1. Worst case margin: 26.6 ns. Table 19. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies. [ns] [ns] [ns]

28 Page 28 of High frequency transmission test results. Channel #2 (85 m horizontal cable) NEAR END CROSSTALK (NEXT). From terminal end Channel #2. Worst case margin: 7.8 db at MHz for Blue /Green pair. Table 20. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies

29 Page 29 of 72 PS NEAR END CROSSTALK(PSNEXT). From terminal end Channel #2. Worst case margin: 8.7 db at MHz for Green pair. Table 21. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies

30 Page 30 of 72 RETURN LOSS. From terminal end Channel #2. Worst case margin: 5.3 db at 66.4 MHz for Green pair. Table 22. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies

31 Page 31 of 72 ATTENUATION TO CROSSTALK RATIO, NEAR END (ACR-N). From terminal end Channel #2. Worst case margin: 11.6 db at 4.1 MHz for Blue/Orange-Blue pair. Table 23. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies

32 Page 32 of 72 PS ATT TO CROSSTALK RATIO, NEAR END (PSACR-N). From terminal end Channel #2. Worst case margin: 11 db at 4.1 MHz for Orange pair. Table 24. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies

33 Page 33 of 72 TRANSVERSE CONVERSION LOSS (TCL). From terminal end Channel #2. Worst case margin: 2.1 db at MHz for Green pair. Table 25. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies

34 Page 34 of 72 NEAR END CROSSTALK (NEXT). From equipment end Channel #2. Worst case margin: 2 db at MHz for Blue /Green pair. Table 26. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies

35 Page 35 of 72 PS NEAR END CROSSTALK(PSNEXT). From equipment end Channel #2. Worst case margin: 3.5 db at MHz for Green pair. Table 27. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies

36 Page 36 of 72 RETURN LOSS. From equipment end Channel #2. Worst case margin: 4.9 db at MHz for Brown pair. Table 28. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies

37 Page 37 of 72 ATTENUATION TO CROSSTALK RATIO, NEAR END (ACR-N). From equipment end Channel #2. Worst case margin: 7.2 db at MHz for Blue/Green-Blue pair. Table 29. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies

38 Page 38 of 72 PS ATT TO CROSSTALK RATIO, NEAR END (PSACR-N). From equipment end Channel #2. Worst case margin: 8.9 db at MHz for Green pair. Table 30. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies

39 Page 39 of 72 BALANCED MODE ATTENUATION. Channel #2. Worst case margin: 0.7 db at 4.1 MHz for Green pair. Table 31. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies

40 Page 40 of 72 ATTENUATION TO CROSSTALK RATIO - FAR (ACR-F). Channel #2. Worst case margin: 5.3 db at 98.7 MHz for Blue/Green-Blue pair. ATTENUATION TO CROSSTALK RATIO - FAR (ACR-F). Channel #2. Worst case margin: 9.7 db at MHz for Green/Blue-Green pair.

41 Page 41 of 72 ATTENUATION TO CROSSTALK RATIO - FAR (ACR-F). Channel #2. Worst case margin: 5.4 db at 250 MHz for Green/Orange-Green pair. Table 32. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies

42 Page 42 of 72 PS SUM ATTENUATION TO CROSSTALK RATIO - FAR (PSACR-F). Channel #2. Worst case margin: 7.3 db at 98.7 MHz for Green pair. Table 33. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies

43 Page 43 of 72 PROPAGATION DELAY. Channel #2. Worst case margin: 0.04 µs at MHz for Green pair. Table 34. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies. [ns] [ns] [ns]

44 Page 44 of 72 DELAY SKEW. Channel #2. Worst case margin: 26.2 ns. Table 35. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies. [ns] [ns] [ns]

45 Page 45 of 72 TRANSVERSE CONVERSION LOSS (TCL). From terminal end Channel #2. Worst case margin: 13.5 db at MHz for Blue pair. Table 36. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies

46 Page 46 of High frequency transmission test results. Channel #3 (15 m horizontal cable) NEAR END CROSSTALK (NEXT). From terminal end Channel #3. Worst case margin: 0.2 db at 240 MHz for Blue /Green pair. Table 37. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies

47 Page 47 of 72 PS NEAR END CROSSTALK(PSNEXT). From terminal end Channel #3. Worst case margin: 2.4 db at 240 MHz for Blue pair. Table 38. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies

48 Page 48 of 72 RETURN LOSS. From terminal end Channel #3. Worst case margin: 1.3 db at 8.5 MHz for Green pair. Table 39. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies

49 Page 49 of 72 ATTENUATION TO CROSSTALK RATIO, NEAR END (ACR-N). From terminal end Channel #3. Worst case margin: 15.2 db at 18.4 MHz for Blue/Orange-Blue pair. Table 40. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies

50 Page 50 of 72 PS ATT TO CROSSTALK RATIO, NEAR END (PSACR-N). From terminal end Channel #3. Worst case margin: 16 db at 3.5 MHz for Green pair. Table 41. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies

51 Page 51 of 72 TRANSVERSE CONVERSION LOSS (TCL). From terminal end Channel #3. Worst case margin: 8.7 db at 34 MHz for Green pair. Table 42. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies

52 Page 52 of 72 NEAR END CROSSTALK (NEXT). From equipment end Channel #3. Worst case margin: 2.5 db at MHz for Blue /Green pair. Table 43. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies

53 Page 53 of 72 PS NEAR END CROSSTALK(PSNEXT). From equipment end Channel #3. Worst case margin: 3.1 db at MHz for Blue pair. Table 44. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies

54 Page 54 of 72 RETURN LOSS. From equipment end Channel #3. Worst case margin: 3 db at 17.8 MHz for Orange pair. Table 45. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies

55 Page 55 of 72 ATTENUATION TO CROSSTALK RATIO, NEAR END (ACR-N). From equipment end Channel #3. Worst case margin: 16.7 db at 27.8 MHz for Blue/Orange-Blue pair. Table 46. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies

56 Page 56 of 72 PS ATT TO CROSSTALK RATIO, NEAR END (PSACR-N). From equipment end Channel #3. Worst case margin: 17.5 db at 4.7 MHz for Brown pair. Table 47. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies

57 Page 57 of 72 TRANSVERSE CONVERSION LOSS (TCL). From terminal end Channel #3. Worst case margin: 9.2 db at 34 MHz for Green pair. Table 48. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies

58 Page 58 of 72 BALANCED MODE ATTENUATION. Channel #3. Worst case margin: 2.9 db at 3.5 MHz for Green pair. Table 49. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies

59 Page 59 of 72 ATTENUATION TO CROSSTALK RATIO - FAR (ACR-F). Channel #3. Worst case margin: 9.9 db at MHz for Blue/Green-Blue pair. ATTENUATION TO CROSSTALK RATIO - FAR (ACR-F). Channel #3. Worst case margin: 6.2 db at MHz for Green/Blue-Green pair.

60 Page 60 of 72 ATTENUATION TO CROSSTALK RATIO - FAR (ACR-F). Channel #3. Worst case margin: 11.5 db at MHz for Brown/Blue-Brown pair. Table 50. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies

61 Page 61 of 72 PS SUM ATTENUATION TO CROSSTALK RATIO - FAR (PSACR-F). Channel #3. Worst case margin: 11.5 db at MHz for Blue pair. Table 51. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies

62 Page 62 of 72 PROPAGATION DELAY. Channel #3. Worst case margin: µs at MHz for Green pair. Table 52. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies. [ns] [ns] [ns]

63 Page 63 of 72 DELAY SKEW. Channel #3. Worst case margin: 44 ns. Table 53. Worst case margins at selected nominal frequencies. [ns] [ns] [ns] Equipment: Network Analyser Hewlett Packard, type 8753E Instrument no.: Switch Agilent, type 87050A Instrument no.: Balun BH, type Instrument no.: to 31182

64 Page 64 of Resistance properties Table 54. DC loop resistance, channel #1 Pair Resistance [Ohm] Requirement Compliance < 25 YES YES YES YES Table 55. DC resistance unbalance, channel #1 Pair R unbalance [%] Requirement Compliance < 3 % YES YES YES YES Equipment: Micro-Ohmmeter Keithley, type 2000 Instrument no.: 31092

65 Page 65 of Reference to applicable standards and documents Test of the cabling product is performed with reference to the following standards: 5.1 Generic cabling standards ISO/IEC 11801:2011 (Ed. 2.2) Information technology - Generic cabling for customer premises CENELEC EN :2011 (Ed. 3.0) Information Technology - Generic cabling systems - Part 1: General requirements CENELEC EN :2007 Information technology - Generic cabling systems - Part 2: Office premises CENELEC EN /A1:2010 Amendment 1 to EN :2007 ANSI/TIA-568-C.2:2009 Commercial Building Telecommunications Cabling Standard - Part 2: Balanced Twisted-Pair Telecommunications Cabling and Components 5.2 Special requirements for EC VERIFIED DQP (version 28, 28 April 2015) Terms and conditions for the EC VERIFIED programme for Generic and Coaxial cabling

66 Page 66 of Test procedures The tests carried out on the communication cabling under test are performed according to the standard: IEC Specification for the testing of balanced and coaxial information technology cabling - Part 1: Installed balanced cabling as specified in ISO/IEC and related standards. The test methods are detailed in test procedures worked out by DELTA and approved by DANAK. In this section the procedures are described briefly. 6.1 Electrical test The electrical tests on the communication channel under test are performed according to the procedures described in this section. The performed tests are shown in the following table. The floor cable is stretched on a non-conductive surface. Table 56. Performed tests Measured from Equipment end (patch panel) Terminal end (wall outlet) Attenuation x Near end crosstalk (NEXT) x x Attenuation to crosstalk, far (ACR-F) x Return loss x x Propagation delay Delay skew x x TCL x x Resistance properties x

67 Page 67 of Attenuation (Att) Network Analyser Computer Network Balun Channel under test Balun Figure 2. Test set-up for attenuation measurements. Terminal end and equipment end are connected to one balun each. The measurement uncertainty for Attenuation is dependant of the level of measured Attenuation. The uncertainty is shown in the table below: Measured attenuation Uncertainty 1 db 0.1 db 10 db 0.3 db 60 db 0.5 db 80 db 2 db

68 Page 68 of Return loss (RL) Network Analyser Computer Network Balun Channel under test Load Figure 3. Test set-up for return loss measurements. The return loss of the channel under test is measured with the far end terminated with a resistance of the specified characteristic impedance of the channel under test. The measurement uncertainty for impedance is 1 % at 100 MHz. The measurement uncertainty for return loss is dependant of the measured return loss value. The error band is specified in the table below: Measured return loss Error band 5 db ±0.2 db 10 db ±0.3 db 15 db ±0.5 db 20 db ±1 db 25 db ±2 db 30 db ±3 db At frequencies above 500 MHz add 1 db to the uncertainty.

69 Page 69 of Near end crosstalk (NEXT) Network Analyser Computer Network Balun Channel under test Balun Pair 1 Pair 2 Load Load Figure 4. Test set-up for near end crosstalk measurements. Near end crosstalk, NEXT, is measured as the attenuation from one pair to the others and these measurements are repeated for all pair combinations. In the far end all pairs are terminated with a resistor with a value of the nominal characteristic impedance of the component under test. The measurement uncertainty for NEXT is dependant of the level of measured NEXT. The uncertainty is shown in the table below: Measured NEXT Uncertainty 40 db 0.5 db 60 db 0.6 db 70 db 0.8 db 80 db 1.7 db Powersum near end crosstalk (PSNEXT) PSNEXT is calculated for each pair according to the formula: PSNEXT 10log( x1 / 10 x2 / 10 x3 / 10 ) where x1, x2, x3 are the pair-to-pair crosstalk measurements in db between the selected pair and the other three pairs. The measurement uncertainty is the same as for NEXT measurements.

70 Page 70 of Attenuation to crosstalk loss ratio (ACR-N) Attenuation to crosstalk ratio loss near end, ACR-N is calculated for each pair as the difference between the near end crosstalk loss and the attenuation. The measurement uncertainty is the same as for NEXT measurements Power sum ACR (PSACR-N) PSACR_N is calculated according to the formula: PSACR N 10log( x1/10 x2 /10 x3/10 x4 /10 Where x1, x2, x3, and x4 are the ACR-N values in db for each pair. The measurement uncertainty is the same as for NEXT measurements. ) Attenuation to crosstalk ratio-far end (ACR-F) Network Analyser Computer Network Channel under test Load Balun Pair 1 Pair 2 Load Balun Figure 5. Test set-up for far end crosstalk measurements. ACR-F is calculated from the measured values of far end cross talk, FEXT and attenuation, ATT. ACR-F = FEXT - ATT The measurement uncertainty for ACR-F is the sum of uncertainties for NEXT and ATT.

71 Page 71 of Power sum attenuation to crosstalk ratio far end (PSACR-F) PSACR-F is calculated for each pair according to the equation: PSACR F PSFEXT ATTENUATION PSFEXT 10log( x1 / 10 x2 / 10 x3 / 10 ) Where x1, x2, x3 are the pair-to-pair crosstalk measurements in db between the selected pair and the other three pairs Attenuation unbalance, near end (Transverse conversion loss, TCL) Network Analyser Computer Network Channel under test 25 Ω 50 Ω Figure Ω Test set-up for balance characteristics measurements. Balance characteristics, transverse conversion loss, is measured as the signal attenuation between the common mode and the differential mode port of the test balun. The test set-up is calibrated by imposing a known unbalance, consisting of a 50 Ohm resistor from one of the balance output terminals to ground. The instrument is adjusted for a reading of 16 db for this unbalance. All pairs are terminated for differential and common mode signals during the test. The measurement uncertainty for balance measurements is dependant of the level of balance. The uncertainty is shown in the table below: Measured TCL Uncertainty 20 db 0.3 db 30 db 1 db 40 db 3 db

72 Page 72 of DC loop resistance DC loop resistance is measured for each conductor in a pair. The loop resistance is calculated by adding the resistance of each conductor. The measured value is corrected for the temperature of the test object in order to obtain the resistance at 20 C. The measurement uncertainty for DC resistance is 1.4 % Propagation delay Propagation delay is measured by determining the phase delay of a signal transmitted through the cable. 2 f where is the phase delay. f is the frequency in Hertz. The measurement uncertainty for delay is 1 % Delay skew Delay skew is calculated as the difference between the maximum and minimum propagation delay over the four pairs at each frequency. The measurement uncertainty for skew is 10 %. 6.2 Test software Test software according to information in the table below is used for the conducted tests. Software name Function File name Version Date Cablingtotal Electrical cable tests Cabltot ECCalculate Calculated parameters ECCalculate ECReport Report Xreport Report programme Report Rapgen.xls DELTA Automatic Reporting Program Automatic word processing Rapport Cable report 2002 Cable report generation Cable report