King Road / CN Rail Grade Separation
|
|
|
- Erin York
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 King Road / CN Rail Grade Separation A perfect confluence of environmental collaboration Project Proponents: Designers: Regulator: City of Burlington AMEC Environment & Infrastructure Conservation Halton Go Transit Hatch Mott MacDonald
2 Presentation Outline Part 1: Problem Statement Part 2: Challenges Part 3: Regulator s Role Part 4: Design Response Scott Hamilton, City of Burlington Ron Scheckenberger, AMEC Amy Mayes, Conservation Halton Ron Scheckenberger, AMEC Part 5: Construction and Outcomes Scott Hamilton, City of Burlington Part 6: Achievements Amy Mayes, Conservation Halton King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 2 2
3 Part 1: Problem Statement 1. Location and Land Use 2. Area Transportation King Road CNR Railway 3. Environmental Assessment Options Considered 4. Project Team King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 3
4 Part 1: Problem Statement 1. Location and Land Use King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 4
5 Part 1: Problem Statement 1. Location and Land Use Located at the interchange of King Road and the CNR corridor, west of QEW and south of Hwy 403 in Burlington, Ontario. King Road Highway 403 CN Railway King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 5
6 Part 1: Problem Statement 2. Area Transportation King Road Consists of a two-lane arterial road Connects the North Service Road to Plains Road over Highway 403 CNR Railway Rail crossing has 3 mainline tracks and 1 shunting track Wait times up to 45 minutes King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 6
7 Part 1: Problem Statement What is a Grade Separation? King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 7
8 Part 1: Problem Statement 3. Environmental Assessment Options Considered Overpass vs. Underpass King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 8
9 Part 1: Problem Statement 4. Project Team King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 9
10 Part 2: Challenges 1. Indian Creek 2. Subway Drainage 3. Railway Structure King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 10 10
11 Part 2: Challenges 1. Indian Creek 165 ha Sensitive stream Drains to Hamilton Harbour a designated receiver of the Remedial Action Plan 517 ha West Branch Indian Creek King Road Main Branch Indian Creek King Road King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 11 11
12 Part 2: Challenges 1. Indian Creek Conveyed under King Road (triple CSP) Historically altered Confluence to main branch West Branch Indian Creek King Road Main Branch Indian Creek King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 12 12
13 Part 2: Challenges 1. Indian Creek Creek realignment options constrained by existing land uses Alternative 2 Various high level options considered at EA Stage Alternative 3 King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 13 13
14 Part 2: Challenges 1. Indian Creek Class EA preferred alignment for creek over the road King Road Creek Realignment Railway Main Branch Indian Creek King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 14 14
15 Part 2: Challenges 2. Subway Drainage Road grade well below creek No local storm sewer Existing Creek Creek Bridge Rail Bridge Original Ground New King Road Grade King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 15 15
16 Part 2: Challenges 2. Subway Drainage Pumping Station Alternatives - Pumping station - Gravity drain Class EA preferred gravity drain Grade Separation King Road New Deep Sewer Main Branch Indian Creek King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 16 16
17 Part 2: Challenges 3. Railway Structure Highly used rail system No long windows for construction Limited area for rail track diversions Class EA preferred short duration window construction Conflict New Development Conflict Existing Development Conflict Existing Development Conflict Existing Development Existing at Grade Crossing King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 17 17
18 Part 3: Regulator s Role 1. Conservation Authority Mandate 2. Flood Risk 3. Design Questions and Clarifications 4. Fisheries Requirements 5. Habitat Re-creation King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 18 18
19 Part 3: Regulator s Role 1. Conservation Authority Mandate Empowered by through Conservation Authorities Act Mandated by Minister of Natural Resources and Forestry through O.Reg 162/06 to ensure development does not affect control of flooding, erosion, dynamic beaches, pollution, or the conservation of land Bound by Board approved policies Approval Authority King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 19 19
20 Part 3: Regulator s Role 2. Flood Risk Falcon Creek Indian Creek Limit of Creek Works Indian Creek has a broad, shallow floodplain. This extends Conservation Halton s regulatory authority to include all areas bounded in yellow. King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 20 20
21 Part 3: Regulator s Role 2. Flood Risk Sizing the Corridor: Safely convey Q Reg - 21m 3 /s Maintain incremental storage without artificial backwater Prevent increases in erosive velocities, flood depth off-site, creation of new spill zones, or increases to existing spill Meander belt sets valley floor Long term stable top of slope sets limit of corridor Minimum 0.3 m freeboard King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 21 21
22 Part 3: Regulator s Role Indian Creek Falcon Creek 2. Flood Risk Added Complications Spill Known - Falcon Creek spills frequently (1:5 year rainfall return period) Unknown Ratio of spill contributing to Indian Creek vs. Grindstone Creek EA anticipated Falcon Creek spill could be mitigated, however during detailed design City initiated a separate study of Falcon Creek Changes in spill conveyance cannot impact existing neighbourhoods beyond Falcon Creek floodplain limits King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 22 22
23 Part 3: Regulator s Role 2. Flood Risk Ice Induced Flooding Potential for layered ice build-up along the aqueduct or frazil ice formation causing blockages and flooding CH required AMEC analyze ice impacts on flooding, to determine the level of risk and appropriate mitigation strategies to control public safety risk from ice and spill King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 23 23
24 Part 3: Regulator s Role To limit property impacts, Indian Creek was elevated 1.6 m at the Grade Separation, necessitating the 475 m realignment 50 m length of flat geomorphic referenced engineered (GRE) design 350 m pool and riffle morphology (flattened to 0.44%) natural channel design 22.5 m creek bridge at 0.5% slope 50 m armoured step pool design (GRE) at 3.4% King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 24 24
25 Part 3: Regulator s Role 3. Design Questions and Clarifications How does flattening the channel grade over 400 m impact sediment transport? What geomorphic measures are required to fix the creek at the mouth of the creek bridge and prevent down-cutting and erosion at the embankment? How do we ensure increased grade downstream will not impact channel beyond tie-in? Aqueduct Wingwall King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 25 25
26 Part 3: Regulator s Role 3. Design Questions and Clarifications Grade separation must withstand the full range of forces anticipated under a Regional Storm CH required the Design Engineer s confirmation the structure can withstand: soil saturation, static and impact loadings, and catastrophic down-cutting, as well as prevent channel migration and overtopping. King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 26 26
27 Part 3: Regulator s Role 4. Fisheries Requirements Fish passage had to be maintained when flow persists Grades must be less than 4% Natural & appropriately sized substrate must be maintained bioengineering approaches preferred 80% TSS removal required for King Road per RAP Sediment release during construction is not permitted erosion to be controlled, work to be completed in the dry King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 27 27
28 Part 3: Regulator s Role 5. Habitat Re-creation EA approved works adjacent to/within a Regional Candidate Significant Woodland Prior to site alteration the site contained a regionally rare tallgrass prairie savannah community Landscaping Guidelines had to be implemented such that both of these habitats were re-created King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 28 28
29 Part 4: Design Response 1. Creek Bridge 2. Creek Natural Channel Design 3. Staging Plan 4. Flood Warning System 5. Subway Drainage King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 29 29
30 Part 4: Design Response 1. Creek Bridge No local precedents Researched internationally Some, but limited relevance to King Road/Indian Creek Edstone Aqueduct Warwickshire, England New Semington Aqueduct Semington, England Pont du Gard, Southern France King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 30 30
31 Part 4: Design Response 1. Creek Bridge Key geometric and physical design criteria - Invert - Creek tie-ins - Capacity - Alignment - Substrate King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 31 31
32 Part 4: Design Response 1. Creek Bridge Underside of creek bridge needed a minimum 5.05 m clearance for vehicles Creek Bridge Existing Creek Rail Bridge Original Ground Minimum Creek Invert 5.05 m New King Road Grade This, along with roadway geometrics set the minimum bridge/ creek inverts King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 32 32
33 Part 4: Design Response 1. Creek Bridge Hydraulic capacity of crossing established as the Regulatory Event (Hurricane Hazel) (20.66 m 3 /s) Conventional roadway culvert/bridges would have a lower standard (i.e. to obvert) however these can overtop the roadway and still offer serviceability (i.e. 25 year with Regional Storm overtopping) Road Grade Creek Bridge Rail Bridge Original Ground Culvert Creek King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 33 33
34 Part 4: Design Response 1. Creek Bridge Due to need for continuous fish passage bridge could not have a concrete bottom Centreline of Creek Placement of appropriate substrate though considered difficult to maintain in-place Creek Bridge King Road Creek Bridge Substrate Natural Substrate in cellular containment King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 34 34
35 Part 4: Design Response 2. Creek Natural Channel Design (NCD) Due to need to go over the road, creek profile and geometry needed to be substantially adjusted Railway King Road Reconstruction West Branch of Indian Creek and Main Branch of Indian Creek King Road Railway West Branch of Indian Creek Main Branch of Indian Creek King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 35 35
36 Part 4: Design Response 2. Creek Natural Channel Design (NCD) Resulted in 410 m of creek upstream being systematically raised opportunity due to land ownership by CNR and Developer Railway Creek Bridge King Road Reconstruction Creek Realignment MBW = 28.1 m Longitudinal Slope = 0.44 % King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 36 36
37 Part 4: Design Response 2. Creek Natural Channel Design (NCD) Required a robust/stable transition for steep channel connection at downstream end of bridge Creek Bridge Significant Grade Downstream end mm diameter stone at 3.5 % King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 37 37
38 Part 4: Design Response 2. Creek Natural Channel Design (NCD) Other creek design considerations Anti-seepage system Falcon Creek spill protection King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 38 38
39 Part 4: Design Response 2. Creek Natural Channel Design (NCD) Anti-seepage system King Road Anti-seepage system Creek Bridge King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 39 39
40 Part 4: Design Response 2. Creek Natural Channel Design (NCD) Falcon Creek spill protection King Road Falcon Creek West Branch of Indian Creek Railway Railway Creek Bridge King Road Reconstruction Creek Realignment King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 40 40
41 Part 4: Design Response 3. Staging Plan Due to need to maintain creek flow along with sufficient safe work area for construction a complex 9 phase staging plan was conceived Staging allowed for the road to remain open, and the Creek Bridge to be constructed during all flow conditions King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 41 41
42 Part 4: Design Response Preconstruction Original King Road Alignment Creek Alignment King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 42 42
43 Part 4: Design Response Staging 1: Construct Temporary Diversion Channel Original King Road Alignment Creek Alignment Creek Realignment King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 43 43
44 Part 4: Design Response Staging 2: Construct CNR Underpass Original King Road Alignment Creek Alignment Creek Realignment CNR Underpass King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 44 44
45 Part 4: Design Response Staging 3: Construct Creek Bridge Original King Road Alignment Original Creek Alignment Creek Realignment CNR Underpass Creek Bridge King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 45 45
46 Part 4: Design Response Staging 4a: Construct New Creek (Upstream Section) Original King Road Alignment Creek Alignment Creek Realignment CNR Underpass Creek Bridge King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 46 46
47 Part 4: Design Response Staging 4b: Construct New Creek (Downstream Section) Original King Road Alignment Creek Alignment Creek Realignment CNR Underpass Creek Bridge King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 47 47
48 Part 4: Design Response Staging 5: Construct Creek from Creek Bridge to existing Creek (Downstream Original King Road Alignment Creek Alignment Creek Realignment CNR Underpass Creek Bridge King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 48 48
49 Part 4: Design Response Staging 6: King Road Realignment King Road Realignment Creek Realignment Creek Alignment CNR Underpass Creek Bridge King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 49 49
50 Part 4: Design Response Staging 7: Realign Creek through Creek Bridge Original King Road Alignment Creek Alignment Creek Realignment CNR Underpass Creek Bridge King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 50 50
51 Part 4: Design Response Staging 8: Realign and Connect Creek to Outlet Original King Road Alignment Creek Alignment Creek Realignment CNR Underpass Creek Bridge King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 51 51
52 Part 4: Design Response 4. Flood Warning System Due to the relatively quick runoff for the watershed, Conservation Halton concerned about creek bridge spill over potential into subway without adequate warning Flood warning system designed and implemented Water level sensor telemetered to City Works King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 52 52
53 Part 4: Design Response 5. Subway Drainage As noted, gravity drain was recommended in Class Environmental Assessment as opposed to the pumping station due to long term costs and functionality considerations Challenges related to Capacity Alignment Construction King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 53 53
54 Part 4: Design Response 5. Subway Drainage Design capacity set as 1.12 m 3 /s or 100 year event allowing access for a 25 year flood 975 mm diameter pipe at 0.25 % Very deep construction (up to 6 m depth) Allowed for urbanization of local streets King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 54 54
55 Part 4: Design Response 5. Subway Drainage King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 55 55
56 Part 5: Construction 1. Summary of Complexities 2. Lessons learned 3. The Big Push King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 56 56
57 Part 5: Construction 1. Summary of Complexities Keeping road open during construction Emergency North/South route for Burlington Access to local businesses 130 Trains per day The Oakville line is one of CN s busiest lines Serves GO Train, VIA, Amtrak and CN Freight King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 57
58 Part 5: Construction 1. Summary of Complexities Buried Utilities in the Area CN Right of Way main trunk line for Utilities such as Fibre Optic Data cable for Toronto (TSX, Banks etc.) Railway and Creek to remain open and functional King Road Project / CN Rail TitleGrade & Date Separation 58
59 Part 5: Construction 1. Summary of Complexities Ground water and sandy soil Unstable trenches and washout Existing Residential Development created a confined work zone King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 59
60 Part 5: Construction 1. Summary of Complexities Surge of water from Hanson Brick Batch ponds release Saturated Flowing Sand Layer King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 60
61 Part 5: Construction 1. Summary of Complexities Maintaining creek through bypass pumping instead of diversion channel Dewatering King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 61
62 Part 5: Construction 1. Summary of Complexities Weather King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 62
63 Part 5: Construction 2. Lessons Learned Building understanding and committing to the delivery of the project by all parties at the on start was vital for it s success Where no design standards existed, collaboration by all parties assisted in designing and delivering an effective solution A key factor for success was the setting of "do-able" short term milestones, as well as longer term challenging objectives Components of the project were submitted and evaluated on a continuous basis, rather than at an all inclusive application King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 63
64 Part 5: Construction The Big Push Oct 5-8, 2012 King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 64
65 Part 6: Achievements 1. Stable Valley Corridor 2. Habitat Enhancements 3. Monitoring King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 65
66 Part 6: Achievements 1. Stable Valley Corridor Regulatory policies required creation of a stable valley corridor 2012 prior to construction 2014 constructed, landscaping incomplete Native habitat re-creation in a highly altered landscape Fish passage restored Flooding and erosion hazards are contained within a municipally owned creek block, and spill from the adjacent Falcon Creek system is safely conveyed along it s existing flow route Automated monitoring and alerts will allow City staff to close King Road should there be risk. King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 66
67 Part 6: Achievements 2. Habitat Enhancements >35 m riparian planting zone across the valley floor, consisting of riparian woodland and tallgrass prairie savannah communities Water quality improvements through treatment of road runoff prior to discharge, and increased channel separation from the railway Maintenance of natural and varied substrate through the aqueduct and deep pools and resting areas in the downstream cascade to allow for fish passage King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 67
68 Part 6: Achievements 3. Monitoring Geomorphic 3 year monitoring Cross Sectional Form and Area Longitudinal Profile Substrate Composition & Stability Lateral Migration General Performance Ice 5 year monitoring commitment Every 2 weeks when temp. remains below zero for first 2 years, and then 3 additional years post development King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 68
69 Part 6: Achievements King Road Grade Separation and Indian Creek Creek Bridge Project has been recognized winning the following awards: Nominee for the 2014 TAC Environmental Achievement Award The Ontario Society of Professional Engineers Hamilton/Halton Engineering Week Committee 2014 Award for Engineering Project of the Year Civil Structural Category OPWA 2013 Public Works Project of the Year Transportation, $10 - $50 Million Category Consulting Engineers of Ontario Transportation Award of Merit King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 69
70 Part 6: Achievements Key Project Team Members Steve Chipps, AMEC Jason Stahl, AMEC Terry Kelly, Hatch Bob Jurk, City of Burlington Jason Forde, City of Burlington King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 70
71 Special Thanks to Ray Guther Whose out of box thinking could not only envision the end product but helped make it a reality King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 71
72 Comments or Questions King Road Project / CN Rail Title Grade & Date Separation 72
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS. General Submission Requirements
COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST Jan 2016 The following checklist has been compiled to assist the applicant in preparing their application for approval pursuant to Ontario Regulation 162/06. This checklist
B422 - PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX CULVERTS AND BOX SEWERS - OPSS 422
B422 - PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX CULVERTS AND BOX SEWERS - OPSS 422 422.1 GENERAL The work under these tender items consists of the fabrication and installation in open cut of precast reinforced
Section 1. Introduction
Overview of Manual Acknowledgements i x Section 1. Introduction 1.0 Overview of Section 1 1-1 1.1 The GESC and DESC Permits 1-2 1.2 Reasons for the GESC and DESC Permits 1-2 1.3 Legislative Mandate 1-3
Attachment #2 PPW133-07
Attachment #2 PPW133-07 Pg. 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Environmental Assessment Study In January 2005, Regional staff retained to commence a Schedule C Environmental Assessment Study to identify the improvements
RE: Engineered Riffle Concepts for Sodom Dam Removal Grade Control Elements
November 19, 2009 Ms. Melissa Jundt NOAA Fisheries Hydropower Division 1201 NE Lloyd Boulevard, Suite 1100 Portland, Oregon 97232 RE: Engineered Riffle Concepts for Sodom Dam Removal Grade Control Elements
Technical Memorandum ECO-7
To: Woody Frossard, TRWD From: Bob Brashear, CDM This document is released for the purpose of interim review under the authority of Robert Brashear, P.E., TX license 80771 on 21-Mar-2005. It is not to
Re: Survey of constructed cross section per Restoration Framework on Wind River, Fremont County, WY
1-11-17 LeClair Irrigation District 1418 Cowboy Lane Riverton, WY 82501 (307) 856-4018 Re: Survey of constructed cross section per Restoration Framework on Wind River, Fremont County, WY Dear Mr. Hoelzen,
APPLICATION FOR SITE PREPARATION PERMIT
Engineering Division 550 Landa Street New Braunfels, Texas 78130 (830) 221-4020 1. Subdivision/Plat Name: Location Description/ Nearest Intersection: Acreage: APPLICATION FOR SITE PREPARATION PERMIT No.
City of Massillon Site Plan Checklist
City of Massillon Site Plan Checklist The following information MUST be included with all Site Plans submitted for review and processing in order to constitute a complete Site Plan Package. Incomplete
List of Figures. List of Forms
City of Columbia Engineering Regulations PART 1: SUBMISSION OF PLANS Table of Contents Paragraph Description Page No. 1.1 General 1-1 1.2 Engineer s Report 1-1 1.3 Plans 1-3 1.4 Revisions to Approved Plan
Compensatory Mitigation Monitoring Report Aquatic Habitat Improvement City of Montrose Whitewater Park, Montrose County, Colorado March 6, 2014
Compensatory Mitigation Monitoring Report Aquatic Habitat Improvement City of Montrose Whitewater Park, Montrose County, Colorado March 6, 2014 i. Project Overview 1. USACE # # SPK 2013 00851 2. Permittee:
B.2 MAJOR SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAN CHECKLIST
B.2 MAJOR SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAN CHECKLIST YES* GENERAL SUBMISSION ITEMS Does the submission include: 1. Thirteen (13) copies of completed Application Form? 2. Thirteen (13) copies of the Preliminary
Survey Data and TOPO Checklist
Checklists Survey Data and TOPO Preliminary Plan Field Review Plans o Field Review Erosion Control Right-of-Way and Utility Meeting Plans Final Plan Field Review Plans Methods of Plan Markups Plan-in-Hand
Zoning District: R-1, R-2, and R-4 Applicant: Exeter Rose Farm, LLC, 953 Islington Street #23D Portsmouth, NH 03801
2220.00, Town Planner Town Planning Office, Town of Exeter 10 Front Street Exeter, NH 03833 Re: Exeter Rose Farm Subdivision Design Review Engineering Services Exeter, New Hampshire Site Information: Tax
PREPARATION GUIDELINES FOR UDFCD MAINTENANCE SITE PLAN
PREPARATION GUIDELINES FOR UDFCD MAINTENANCE SITE PLAN Overview The Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (District) is now requiring that a Maintenance Site Plan (Plan) be submitted for all pond projects
SECTION 100 PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS & INSTRUCTIONS
SECTION 100 PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS & INSTRUCTIONS 101 General 102 Submittal Requirements A. Initial Submittal B. Second Submittal 103 Plan Requirements A. Subdivisions B. Site Plans 104 Approval of
The Basics. HECRAS Basis Input. Geometry Data - the basics. Geometry Data. Flow Data. Perform Hydraulic Computations. Viewing the Output
The Basics HECRAS Basis Input Geometry Data. Flow Data. Perform Hydraulic Computations by G. Parodi WRS ITC The Netherlands Viewing the Output ITC Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation
Authorized Agent: City of Manassas Check List Attached: Contact: Address: Phone Number: Fax Number: Developer s Name: Phone Number:
CITY OF MANASSAS DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION 9027 Center Street Room 201 Manassas, Virginia, 20110 Phone: 703-257-8278 Fax: 703-257-5831 Application Date: APPLICANT
Anne Arundel County Dept. of Inspections and Permits Storm Drain Checklist
Project Name Project Number Engineer Plans are to be designed based on the standards set forth in the Anne Arundel County Design Manual Standards and Specifications, and all other manuals as stipulated
Sewer Line Extension Permit Design Checklist
CHECKLIST C1 Revised 4/7/2017 Sewer Line Extension Permit Design Checklist DISCLAIMER - This checklist is provided to Consulting Engineers for the express purpose of assisting them in compiling sewer line
APPENDIX D: DRAWING SUBMISSION STANDARDS
1.0 FIRST SUBMISSION CONCEPTUAL DESIGN Once the Developer has obtained approval for a Development Application where Park or Open Space improvements are required, a detailed Park or Open Space submission
Application Submittal Checklist for a BASIC USE PERMIT (BUP) Planning & Development Department Planning Division
Application Submittal Checklist for a BASIC USE PERMIT (BUP) APPLICABILITY. This checklist should be used when submitting an application for a Basic Use Permit. When is a Basic Use Permit required? Section
Deep Creek Canyon US Highway 12
Deep Creek Canyon US Highway 12 ABC Techniques in Rural Montana Jim Scoles Morrison-Maierle 1 Location Deep Creek Canyon US Highway 12 Helena National Forest Great Falls Map of mid MT showing Location
Please type or print legibly using blue or black ink. Incomplete applications cannot be accepted. Project Information. Address or Location:
Rec d Rec d: GWINNETT COUNTY Department of Planning & Development One Justice Square 446 West Crogan Street, Suite 150 Lawrenceville, Georgia 30046 Phone: 678.518.6000 Fax: 678.518.6240 www.gwinnettcounty.com
TOWN of LAKESHORE SITE PLAN CHECKLIST
TOWN of LAKESHORE SITE PLAN CHECKLIST Last Revised December 17, 2009 Project Name: Project Location: Date Submitted: Name Phone Number E-mail Address Owner: Contractor/ Engineer: ( ) ( ) Applicant: ( )
BRASELTON WATER AND WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT CONSTRUCTION PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST May 2006
Project Name: BRASELTON WATER AND WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT CONSTRUCTION PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST May 2006 Phase: Unit: # Lots: Development Type (residential, commercial, industrial, etc.) Braselton Project No.
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
OVERVIEW Effective January 1, 1992 all applications for multi-family residential and all non-residential building permits require site plan approval before permit issuance. All new developments and existing
Please remove and replace the entire Table of Contents, Section A to Section J and all Appendices.
Please remove and replace the entire Table of Contents, Section A to Section J and all Appendices. The following is a list of changes to the Design Criteria: 1. A2.01 General Note 4 Utility Coordination
Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control (GESC) Checklist
Development Services Department 100 N. Wilcox Street, Castle Rock CO 80104 Planner of the Day 303-660-1393 Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control (GESC) Checklist A complete Grading, Erosion and Sediment
A. Dewatering observation wells are part of dewatering allowance.
SECTION 312319 - DEWATERING PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 RELATED DOCUMENTS A. Drawings and general provisions of the Contract, including General and Supplementary Conditions and Division 01 Specification Sections,
Loy Gulch, Paint Pony, East Fork Paint Pony LOMR
Loy Gulch, Paint Pony, East Fork Paint Pony LOMR Woodland Park, CO Prepared by: Michael Baker International 165 S. Union Blvd, Suite 200 Lakewood, CO 80226 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... 2 1.1 Purpose...
KKR S. 6 th St. to I-94 Bridge Project Location. Expanded Floodplains
Kinnickinnic River Watercourse Rehabilitation Early Out Project Achieving Multiple Design Objectives Thomas R. Sear, PE, CFM Short Elliott Hendrickson Patrick C. Elliott, PE Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage
Bestall Collaborative Limited Planning Environment Construction Management Development
November 18, 2017 Bestall Collaborative Limited Lori Hight, AICP, Senior Planner City Development Department City of Thornton City Hall 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, Colorado 80229-4326 RE: River Valley
SECTION DEWATERING PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 RELATED DOCUMENTS
SECTION 312319 - DEWATERING PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 RELATED DOCUMENTS A. Drawings and general provisions of the Contract, including General and Supplementary Conditions and Division 01 Specification Sections,
Methods for characterization of freshwater turtle nesting beaches in an urban environment
Methods for characterization of freshwater turtle nesting beaches in an urban environment Nicole Richards MES candidate, York University In Collaboration with the Toronto Zoo The Plight of Urban Turtles
September 21, Mannik Smith Group 1771 North Dixie Highway Monroe, Michigan RE: LA Fitness City File No.: CVLP
CITY OF ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN Public Services Area / Engineering 301 E. Huron Street, P.O. Box 8647 Ann Arbor, Michigan 48107 Phone (734) 794-6410 Fax (734) 994-1744 Web: www.a2gov.org Printed on recycled
Porter County Plan Commission
Plan Type: Development Plan Administrative DRC PC Primary Plan Administrative DRC PC Secondary Plat/Replat Administrative DRC PC PUD Conceptual Detailed Final Project Information Project Name: Developer
B-PERMIT PLAN CHECK MANUAL
B-PERMIT PLAN CHECK MANUAL 5. SEWER PLANS Sewer Plans are usually submitted in conjunction with Street Plans to meet the requirements of conditions imposed on a Planning or Zoning action. In some cases
Plan Preparation Checklist
Appendix D Plan Preparation Checklist It is the responsibility of the Designer to complete and submit this checklist along with all required drawings for OUC (EFP) Review. All drawings submitted for OUC
The Long Point Causeway: a history and future for reptiles. Scott Gillingwater
The Long Point Causeway: a history and future for reptiles Scott Gillingwater Environmental Effects Long Point World Biosphere Reserve UNESCO designated the Long Point World Biosphere Reserve in April
50.24 Type, Size and Location Plans for Culverts, Bridges and Culvert Bridges
50.24 Culverts, Bridges and Culvert Bridges Type, Size and Location (T, S & L) Plans shall be required for all Bridges, Culvert Bridges and Culverts of eight-foot (8') clear span or greater as follows:
Appendix CANADA / Québec Montréal tunnels Ville-Marie & Viger
PIARC WG5 Complex Underground Road Networks Part A Case Studies - appendices Appendix 3.1 - CANADA / Québec Montréal tunnels Ville-Marie & Viger 1. SUMMARY The Ville-Marie and Viger tunnel complex is part
APPENDIX E - FLOODPLAIN INFORMATION
CITY OF WOODLAND PARK STORMWATER MASTER PLAN - Floodplain Information APPENDIX E - FLOODPLAIN INFORMATION E1 - Floodplain Information TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... 2 Loy Gulch, Paint Pony, East
Guidelines and Checklist For SAWS Sanitary Sewer. Developmental Engineering Division
Guidelines and Checklist For SAWS Sanitary Sewer Developmental Engineering Division INITIAL CONSIDERATIONS UTILITY SERVICE AGREEMENT Utility Service Agreement A Utility Service Agreement (USA) will be
Government Of Newfoundland & Labrador Municipal Water, Sewer And Roads Master Construction Specifications
PAGE NO. : 1 OF 4 Revision Date: July 2009 STANDARD DRAWINGS TABLE OF CONTENTS DRAWING # DESCRIPTION 0030............ Work Adjacent to Roadway 0040............ Work at the Edge of Roadway 0050............
Town of Westlake Construction Plans Review Checklist
CONSTRUCTION PLANS CONTENTS All Drawings 24 x 36 Cover Sheet Final Plat Site Plan Demolition Plan Utility Plan Drainage Area Map and Calculations Paving Plan & Profile Sheets Storm Drain Plan & Profile
CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST PROJECT: LOCATION:
CITY OF APACHE JUNCTION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST PROJECT: LOCATION: LOG NO.: LEGEND REVIEW REVIEWED BY DATE / - Requirement satisfied 1 O Requirement not satisfied 2?
Town of Skowhegan Application For Development Review
Town of Skowhegan Application For Development Review Return to: Skowhegan Planning Office 225 Water St., Skowhegan, ME 04976 (207) 474-6904 skowcodesec@skowhegan.org To be filled in by Staff: Project Name:
CITY OF MUSKEGO DRAFTING STANDARDS
CITY OF MUSKEGO DRAFTING STANDARDS GENERAL - These standards apply to all plans. 1. Plans must be prepared on sheets measuring 36 inch across and 22 inch to 24 inch high unless otherwise specified under
BOX CULVERTS DRAINAGE & WATER MANAGEMENT. v2.1
BOX CULVERTS DRAINAGE & WATER MANAGEMENT v2.1 FPMCCANN.CO.UK Magherafelt UddingSton Alnwick Designed and manufactured in accordance with all current design specifications and relevant standards, FP McCann
SECTION DEWATERING TANKAGE PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 RELATED DOCUMENTS
SECTION 31 23 19 - DEWATERING TANKAGE PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 RELATED DOCUMENTS A. Drawings and general provisions of the Contract, including General and Supplementary Conditions and Division 1 Specification
VISUAL INSPECTION CHECKLIST FOR GENERAL NPDES PERMIT FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES (PAG-02)
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU OF WATERSHED MANAGEMENT VISUAL INSPECTION CHECKLIST FOR GENERAL NPDES PERMIT FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION
1 MUNICIPAL INFRASTRUCTURE
Engineering Design Criteria & Standard Drawings Page 5 1 MUNICIPAL INFRASTRUCTURE 1.1 Drawing & Submission Requirements 1.1.1 General This section discusses the requirements for the submission of engineering
MINOR SUBDIVISION. [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] B. Dimensions, bearings and curve data for all property lines and easements.
![MINOR SUBDIVISION. [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] B. Dimensions, bearings and curve data for all property lines and easements.](/thumbs/90/102241643.jpg "MINOR SUBDIVISION. [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] B. Dimensions, bearings and curve data for all property lines and easements.")
MINOR SUBDIVISION 190-69. Minor subdivisions. In addition to the requirements indicated in 190-67 (SEE BELOW), the information below shall be shown on the plans for all minor subdivision applications.
CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS Department of Public Works and Transportation Civil Engineering Division STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST
CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS Department of Public Works and Transportation Civil ing Division STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST The following checklist consists of the minimum requirements for preparation
APPENDIX 4. Checklists. Township of King Design Criteria and Standard Detail Drawings
APPENDIX 4 Checklists Township of King Design Criteria and Standard Detail Drawings Township of King Design Criteria and Standard Detail Drawings APPENDIX 4 CHECKLISTS Engineering Submissions : The following
MAINTENANCE HOLES, CATCH BASINS AND DITCH INLETS - MTC FORM 407 INDEX
407-1 - MAINTENANCE HOLES, CATCH BASINS AND DITCH INLETS - MTC FORM 407 INDEX 407-1.1 GENERAL Tender Items Specifications Standard Drawings 407-1.1.1 Frame and Grate Selection 407-1.1.2 Selection of Structure
East Bridgewater Conservation Commission Administrative Fee Schedule
Administrative Fee Schedule RDA $50.00 NOI - Residential $50.00 NOI Commercial $ 100.00 ANRAD $1.00/linear foot 100.00 Minimum $1000.00 Maximum Certificate of Compliance -Residential $25.00 Certificate
MAJOR GRADING PLAN CHECKLIST
MAJOR GRADING PLAN CHECKLIST PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT / ENGINEERING DIVISION 8130 Allison Avenue, La Mesa, CA 91942 Phone: (619) 667-1166 Fax: (619) 667-1380 Grading plans shall address both rough grading
CITY OF TUMWATER 555 ISRAEL RD. SW, TUMWATER, WA (360)
CITY OF TUMWATER 555 ISRAEL RD. SW, TUMWATER, WA 98501 (360) 754-4180 Email: cdd@ci.tumwater.wa.us WATER-SEWER-STREET-STORM (IN CITY) Submittal Checklist TUM - RCVD BY DATE STAMP APPLICANT INFORMATION
APPENDIX K DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND CODE ENFORCEMENT SUBDIVISION APPLICATION CENTER SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
VI-K -1 of 8 APPENDIX K DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND CODE ENFORCEMENT SUBDIVISION APPLICATION CENTER SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Final Submittal Major Subdivision Project Name Subdivision Number Location (Street
Maintenance of Traffic sequence of operations including any phasing and detour maps;
All Local-let projects are required to have a Stage 2 submittal to the LPA Manager for review. The only exceptions are 2-lane resurfacing, striping, guardrail, and raised pavement markers, unless otherwise
CONSTRUCTION CERTIFICATION PACKAGE
Purpose: The intent of this Construction Certification Package is to ensure that acceptable documentation is maintained during the construction of stormwater management practices (SMPs). For general information
CHAPTER 11. Plan Standards
CHAPTER 11 Plan Standards A. Introduction The city requires uniform public improvement plans for ease of record keeping and understanding. The following standards govern most plan submittals to the city.
Town of Apex, North Carolina
POND DRAINAGE PLAN APPLICATION Town of Apex, North Carolina POND DRAINAGE PLAN APPLICATION: Applications are due by 12:00 pm on the first business day of each month. Please see the Minor Site Plan Schedule
VARIANCE APPLICATION (NO SITE PLAN OR SUBDIVISION)
VARIANCE APPLICATION (NO SITE PLAN OR SUBDIVISION) 190-66. General procedure for completeness review. A. In order to be determined complete for review by the Board, all of the required information must
Table of Contents. Chapter 1.0 Purpose and Need
Table of Contents Chapter 1.0 Purpose and Need CHAPTER 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED... 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION... 1 1.1.1 EA ORGANIZATION... 1 1.2 PROJECT AREA... 1 1.3 PROPOSED ACTION... 2 1.3.1 SCOPE OF THE PROPOSED
Chapter 13 Plan Submittals
Chapter 13 Plan Submittals U30013.DOC 02/01/07 Chapter 13 Plan Submittals Section Topic Page 13.1 General 13.1 13.2 Subdivision Plans 13.1 13.3 Capital Improvement Project Plans 13.12 U30013.DOC 02/01/07
WATER & SEWER CONSTRUCTION SITE PLAN DESIGN SUMMARY COMMERCIAL & RESIDENTIAL
WATER & SEWER CONSTRUCTION SITE PLAN DESIGN SUMMARY COMMERCIAL & RESIDENTIAL This summary is not all inclusive of the requirements set forth by the York County Planning & Development Services, York County
CHAPTER 2C - PRELIMINARY DESIGN. General... 2C-1. Review of Work Load... 2C-2 Establishing Priorities... 2C-2
SECTION 2C - 1 - PROJECT REVIEW CHAPTER 2C - PRELIMINARY DESIGN General... 2C-1 SECTION 2C - 2 - COORDINATING TIME SCHEDULES Review of Work Load... 2C-2 Establishing Priorities... 2C-2 SECTION 2C 3 - REVIEW
BOX CULVERTS DRAINAGE & WATER MANAGEMENT. v2.1
BOX CULVERTS DRAINAGE & WATER MANAGEMENT v2.1 FPMCCANN.CO.UK Lisnaskea Magherafelt ARMAGH UddingSton Alnwick Weston Underwood Ellistown Byley Grantham Littleport Wellesbourne Lydney London Cadeby FP McCann
ATTACHMENT H TACOMA HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT FEATURES
ATTACHMENT H TACOMA HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT FEATURES The Tacoma Hydroelectric Project is located about 20 miles north of Durango, Colorado, on a high intermountain plateau west of
Site Plan Review Application. Interest in the Property (e.g. fee simple, land option, etc.)
1. Identification CITY OF FENTON 301 South Leroy Street Fenton, Michigan 48430-2196 (810) 629-2261 FAX (810) 629-2004 Site Plan Review Application Project Name Applicant Name Address City/State/Zip Phone
Iowa Bridge Sensor Demonstration Project Phase I and Phase II Executive Summary Report. Floodplain Management Services Silver Jackets Pilot Study
Iowa Bridge Sensor Demonstration Project Phase I and Phase II Executive Summary Report Floodplain Management Services Silver Jackets Pilot Study Final Report AUGUST 2016 Iowa Bridge Sensor Demonstration
MnDOT Contract Exhibit A - Scope of Services
Introduction Information Introduction This Scope of Services represents work on two individual highway improvement projects as described below. The State intends to let two of the projects as separate
Appendix C Photo Plates
Appendix C Photo Plates Photo Plate 1 Site E1 Ravelling cutslope has infilled the culvert inlet Photo Plate 3 Site E1 Ravelling cutslope Photo Plate 2 Site E1 Damaged culvert inlet Photo Plate 4 Site E1
CONCEPT REVIEW GUIDELINES
Department of Planning & Community Development @ Jefferson Station 1526 E. Forrest Avenue Suite 100 East Point, GA 30344 404.270.7212 (Phone) 404.765.2784 (Fax) www.eastpointcity.org CONCEPT REVIEW GUIDELINES
Floodplain Modeling 101. Presentation Goals
Floodplain Modeling 101 Presenter: Joseph L. Miller, P.E., CFM 2016 INAFSM Conference Presentation Goals Introduction to Indiana s and FEMA s floodplain modeling technical requirements for riverine modeling
Existing and proposed contours at 1-foot intervals. The fill and/or excavation quantities in cubic yards.
PLAN REQUIREMENTS The plans for street design shall conform to the requirements of Sections 3 and 4. The following requirements shall also be shown on the plans where applicable. Road and Storm Plans:
GCG ASSOCIATES, INC. February 8, Mr. Nathaniel Strosberg, Town Planner 101 Main Street Town of Ashland Ashland, MA 01721
GCG ASSOCIATES, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERING AND LAND SURVEYING 84 Main Street Wilmington, Massachusetts 01887 Phone: (978) 657-9714 Fax: (978) 657-7915 February 8, 2016 Mr. Nathaniel Strosberg, Town Planner
Field Observations and One-Dimensional Flow Modeling of Summit Creek in Mack Park, Smithfield, Utah
Sediment Transport Workshop, Utah State University, 1 August 2017 Field Observations and One-Dimensional Flow Modeling of Summit Creek in Mack Park, Smithfield, Utah I. Goals for learning and discussion:
In response to a request from Water Rights Branch, a short. In general, the sequence of post glacial events in the immediate. D. M.
. TO Dr. J. C. Foweraker......!...... C&* Groundwater Div i s ion... GOVERNMENT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA M EM0 RAN DU M D. M. Callan Groundwater Division... July 6th... 19... 71... SUBJECT GROUNDWATER INVESTIGATION
Part 1 - Common Comments on Erosion and Sediment Control Plans (Walter Hamilton, SDID)
COMMON ERRORS Typical Site Review issues Part 1 - Common Comments on Erosion and Sediment Control Plans (Walter Hamilton, SDID) E&S Phase I Constructability (PFM 11-0109.3) Safety during construction and
RIICCM203D Read and Interpret Plans and Specifications
RIICCM203D Read and Interpret Plans and Specifications Reference Material www.pertrain.com.au Table of Contents 1. Contents READ AND INTERPRET PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 1. General Obligations...2 2. Legislation
Clarifications in italics added July 2018
SECTION 10000 RECORD DRAWING CHECKLIST Clarifications in italics added July 2018 All entities who construct public infrastructure, private streets, private storm drain collection systems and travel lanes,
APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN CONTROL
APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN CONTROL Section 41 of the Planning Act, RSO 1990, as amended A Pre-Application Consultation with City staff is encouraged prior to submission of this application. This application
CHECKLIST THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTATION MUST BE SUBMITTED TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BEFORE YOUR APPLICATION CAN BE PROCESSED.
CHECK LIST MOBILEHOME PERMANENT FOUNDATION BUILDING PERMIT SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1810 E. HAZELTON AVENUE, STOCKTON CA 95205 BUSINESS PHONE: (209) 468-3121 INSPECTION REQUEST-24
MULTIPLE-FAMILY DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
MULTIPLE-FAMILY DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST This application lists the content and format of the submittal requirements to initiate the Design Review process. An incomplete application will not be
DEVELOPMENT PLAN CHECKLIST
Project Identification Information: DEVELOPMENT PLAN CHECKLIST 1.0 GENERAL 1.1 Additional information as required by specific Land Use 1.2 All sheets to include sheet number ( of ) 1.3 Seal and signature
CHAPTER 14: TRAFFIC SIGNAL STANDARDS Introduction and Goals Administration Standards Standard Attachments 14.
14.00 Introduction and Goals 14.01 Administration 14.02 Standards 14.03 Standard Attachments 14.1 14.00 INTRODUCTION AND GOALS The purpose of this chapter is to outline the City s review process for traffic
CHECKLIST PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN
N/A Waiver (1) Four (4) copies of application form. (2) Fifteen (15) copies of plan (3) Subdivision/site plan application fee & professional review escrow deposit (4) Variance application fee & professional
COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT of the PINELLAS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Prepared By: The Pinellas County Planning Department as staff to the LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY for THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
Florida's Turnpike Enterprise Roadway Phase III (90%) & Phase IV (100%) Check List Per FDM and TDH Part 3
Notes to Reviewers Section 301 Design Exceptions, Variation, and Technical Memorandums Special directives date and source Key Sheet Section 302 Location Map w/ location of project on map All applicable
Supporting Guidance Note
Supporting Guidance Note Supporting Guidance Note: SGN 2 Geomorphology photosurveys for hydropower developments We require a geomorphology photosurvey to be submitted with applications for abstraction
ACSA PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST (Guideline Only) (4) Standard water and sewer general plan notes (attached).
ACSA PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST (Guideline Only) Revised: December 3, 2015 General (1) Proper Title (2) Vicinity map on first sheet. (3) Date and latest plan revision. (4) Standard water and sewer general plan
ARMOUR TOWNSHIP SITE PLAN APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
SITE PLAN CONTROL ARMOUR TOWNSHIP SITE PLAN APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS Site Plan Control is a process involving municipal approval of the lay-out, design and appearance of certain new developments, as authorized
APPENDIX M NOISE ANALYSIS
APPENDIX M NOISE ANALYSIS McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION 2655 North Sheridan Way, Suite 300 Mississauga, Ontario, L5K 2P8 Tel: (905)823-8500 Fax: (905) 823-8503 E-mail: mrc@mrc.ca Website: www.mrc.ca MEMO
State College Area School District
State College Area School District The following is a guideline for project design submittals to the Facility Committee of the State College Area School District. During the design process the committee
INTENT An Administrative Site Plan is required for the following situations, excluding single-family detached development:
SECTION 13-400 ADMINISTRATIVE SITE PLAN 13-401 INTENT An Administrative Site Plan is required for the following situations, excluding single-family detached development: A. All development on vacant land
Application for Site Plan Review
Application for Site Plan Review 3275 Central Blvd., Hudsonville, Michigan 49426-1450, 616.669.0200 fax 616.669.2330 It is STRONGLY recommended that any application that must go before the Planning Commission