VISUAL INSPECTION CHECKLIST FOR GENERAL NPDES PERMIT FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES (PAG-02)
|
|
|
- Aleesha Golden
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU OF WATERSHED MANAGEMENT VISUAL INSPECTION CHECKLIST FOR GENERAL NPDES PERMIT FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES (PAG-02) Note: It is a condition of NPDES permits that a visual inspection is conducted by the permittee and all copermittees on a weekly basis and after every measurable rainfall event. Failure to conduct the required inspection may result in permit suspension or the imposition of civil penalties. Inspection Type (check one): Weekly Post Rain Event Date: Time: Inspector Name: 1. Approved (stamped & signed) E & S plan and PCSM plan present on site? 2. Are there activities occurring outside of the limits of disturbance shown on the plan drawings? 3. Are areas intended for PCSM BMP s protected from compaction? 4. Identify the Stage(s) of Construction (BMP) Sequence the jobsite is at? E & S BMPs identified in the Sequence up to that stage installed properly? 5. Construction Entrance(s) installed correctly at locations shown on plan drawings? a. Construction entrance(s) installed as per the plan detail(s)? b. Construction entrance(s) properly maintained? c. Public roadways kept clean of tracked mud? - 1 -
2 6. Off-site discharges a. Turbid water leaving site? b. Turbid water entering a surface water? c. Evidence of sediment pollution from accelerated erosion entering a surface water? d. Evidence of previous undocumented sediment pollution to a surface water? 7. Clearing & Grubbing a. Perimeter BMPs installed concurrently with clearing operations? b. Are perimeter BMPs installed prior to general site clearing and grubbing? c. Are/were stabilized crossings (as specified in the plan) used at all stream/wetland crossings? 8. Work within stream channels/wetlands being conducted as specified in the plans? a. Base flow bypassing work area as per plans? b. Disturbed areas returned to original contours and stabilized as per plan upon completion of work? 9. Water pumped from work areas treated in the manner prescribed by the plan prior to discharge to a surface water? a. Filter bags installed, used, & maintained properly? b. Vegetated filter strips functioning properly and maintained properly? c. Other devices installed, used, & maintained properly? 10. Silt fence installed where shown on plan drawings? a. Installed on existing level grade? b. Properly anchored? c. Stakes meet plan specifications? - 2 -
3 d. Fences properly maintained? i. Sediment removed when at ½ above-ground height of fence? ii. Undercut or overtopped fence replaced with rock filter outlet? iii. Torn or weathered fence replaced? 11. Compost socks installed where shown on plan drawings? a. Socks installed on level grade? b. Properly staked? c. Properly maintained? i. Sediment removed when ½ height of sock? ii. Undercut or overtopped socks repaired & concentrated flows directed away from sock? iii. Torn or damaged sock repaired/replaced? 12. Stabilized access provided to trap and/or basin locations as shown on plan drawings? a. Any evidence of runoff problems due to the access roads? 13. Sediment traps installed where shown on plan drawings? a. Embankment properly constructed? i. Does the embankment lack compaction? ii. Side slopes over steep? iii. Any low points? iv. Embankment vegetated or blanketed (if newly constructed)? v. Any tension cracks evident along the top? vi. Any evidence of piping (holes in embankment)? b. Barrel/Riser Spillways located where shown on plan? i. Any elevation problems (e.g. riser higher than embankment, etc.)? ii. Any perforation problems (holes located at bottom of trap, too many holes, holes larger or smaller than 1 dia.)? iii. Trash rack & antivortex device shown on plan drawings provided? iv. Riser has water-tight connection to outlet barrel? v. Any leaking problems (scouring or holes at base of riser, sound of running water with water level below lowest hole)? - 3 -
4 vi. vii. Any piping around outlet barrel? Spillway properly maintained? 1. Holes not plugged? 2. Damaged risers repaired/replaced? c. Embankment spillways located where shown on plan? i. Stone is the correct size per the plan? ii. Stone lower in center than at sides? iii. Layer of filter stone on inside face of spillway? iv. Filter fabric securely staked on top of filter stone up to top of sediment storage elevation? v. Spillway properly maintained? 1. Clogged spillway repaired/replaced? 2. Damaged/displaced filter cloth replaced/restaked? d. Skimmers installed as per plan details? i. Attachment to permanent riser or outlet barrel appears to be water-tight? ii. Skimmer has a stable landing place? iii. Any problems with the flexible hose? e. Outlet protection installed as shown on plan drawings? i. Stone is the correct size per the plan? ii. Discharges are safely conveyed to receiving surface water? iii. Outlet protection properly maintained? 1. Any signs of rock displacement? 2. Any sediment deposits on apron? 3. Any erosion around or below apron? f. Trap interior stabilized? g. Any evidence of slope failure inside the trap? h. Any evidence of sink holes developing inside the trap? i. Are baffles, silt curtains, forebays provided as shown on the plan drawings? j. Has suitable protection been provided at the inflows as shown on the plans? 14. Sediment Basins installed where shown on the plan drawings? a. Embankment properly constructed? i. Does the embankment lack compaction? ii. Side slopes over steep? iii. Any low points? iv. Embankment vegetated or blanketed (if newly constructed)? - 4 -
5 v. Any tension cracks evident along the top? vi. Any evidence of piping (holes in embankment)? b. Barrel/Riser Spillways located where shown on plan? i. Any elevation problems (e.g. riser higher than embankment, etc.)? ii. Any perforation problems (holes located at bottom of basin, too many/few holes, holes larger or smaller than 1 dia.)? iii. Trash rack & antivortex device shown on plan drawings provided? iv. Riser has water-tight connection to outlet barrel? v. Any leaking problems (scouring or holes at base of riser, sound of running water with water level below lowest hole)? vi. Any piping around outlet barrel? vii. Riser properly maintained? 1. Holes not plugged? 2. Damaged risers repaired/replaced? c. Skimmers installed as per plan details? i. Attachment to permanent riser or outlet barrel appears to be water-tight? ii. Skimmer has a stable landing place? iii. Any problems with the flexible hose? d. Emergency Spillway constructed at the location shown on the plan drawings? i. Any dimension problems (width of spillway, size of rock, depth of spillway)? ii. Was the spillway choked with rock? iii. Has an outlet channel been provided for the emergency spillway as shown on the plan drawings? e. Outlet protection installed as shown on plan drawings? i. Stone is sized properly per the plan? ii. Discharges are safely conveyed to receiving surface water? iii. Outlet protection properly maintained? 1. Any signs of rock displacement? 2. Any sediment deposits on apron? 3. Any erosion around or below apron? f. Basin interior stabilized? g. Any evidence of slope failure inside the basin? h. Any evidence of sink holes developing inside the basin? i. Are baffles, silt curtains, forebays provided as shown on the plan drawings? j. Has suitable protection been provided at the inflows as shown on the plans? 15. Are all channels constructed at the locations shown on the plan drawings? a. Any dimension or shape problems (smaller than details show, V-channel instead of trapezoid, etc.)? b. Have the protective linings been installed as specified? - 5 -
6 c. Are there any gradient problems (standing water, sediment deposits)? d. Are there any flow obstructions (large rocks, soil slips, straw bales, non-culverted crossings, etc.)? e. Any erosion problems? f. Any out-of-channel flow problems (erosion trails leading away downslope from the channel)? g. Any failures of the channel linings? h. Do collector channels enter basins/traps on the upslope sides? i. Any disturbed areas above diversion channels? j. Any disturbed areas below collector channels with no additional BMPs? 16. Are slope pipes installed where shown on the plans? a. Are they water-tight? b. Are they anchored? c. Has runoff been directed to the head of the pipe? d. Has outlet protection been provided per the plans? 17. Are trenching operations being conducted at the locations & in the manner shown on the plan drawings? a. Are area limitations being followed? b. Are stream crossings being conducted in the proscribed manner? i. Base flow bypassed as specified? ii. Disturbed areas within 50 of top-of-bank blanketed? c. Are trench plugs being used as specified? d. Are waterbars being installed on backfilled areas? 18. Has inlet protection been installed at the locations shown on the plans? a. Is the type of inlet protection shown in the approved plans installed? b. Was it installed according to the details? c. Does any of the inlet protection need to be cleaned or replaced? - 6 -
7 19. Is stabilization being kept current with final grade? a. Cut & fill slopes stabilized in regular vertical increments. b. Erosion control blanketing installed where shown on the plans & according to the plan details? c. Erosion gullies addressed & stabilized in a timely manner? d. Poorly vegetated areas reseeded? 20. Final stabilization achieved? a. Vegetated areas meet uniform 70%, perennial vegetation requirement? b. Non-vegetated areas have a stable erosion-resistant surface? 21. Pictures taken to document findings of the inspection (good and bad)? 22. Inspection report completed on site? a. All parts of the report filled out? b. Contents of the report discussed with site representative along with possible means to correct deficiencies where needed? 23. Are the measures or activities that are installed (or being installed) to address postconstruction stormwater runoff properly installed and maintained to function as designed after the site has been stabilized? Signature Title - 7 -
Section 1. Introduction
Overview of Manual Acknowledgements i x Section 1. Introduction 1.0 Overview of Section 1 1-1 1.1 The GESC and DESC Permits 1-2 1.2 Reasons for the GESC and DESC Permits 1-2 1.3 Legislative Mandate 1-3
CONSTRUCTION CERTIFICATION PACKAGE
Purpose: The intent of this Construction Certification Package is to ensure that acceptable documentation is maintained during the construction of stormwater management practices (SMPs). For general information
City of Massillon Site Plan Checklist
City of Massillon Site Plan Checklist The following information MUST be included with all Site Plans submitted for review and processing in order to constitute a complete Site Plan Package. Incomplete
GCG ASSOCIATES, INC. February 8, Mr. Nathaniel Strosberg, Town Planner 101 Main Street Town of Ashland Ashland, MA 01721
GCG ASSOCIATES, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERING AND LAND SURVEYING 84 Main Street Wilmington, Massachusetts 01887 Phone: (978) 657-9714 Fax: (978) 657-7915 February 8, 2016 Mr. Nathaniel Strosberg, Town Planner
Documents: Response letter and attachments, Prepared by: AMEC Massachusetts, Inc., Dated February 17, 2016.
GCG ASSOCIATES, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERING AND LAND SURVEYING 84 Main Street Wilmington, Massachusetts 01887 Phone: (978) 657-9714 Fax: (978) 657-7915 February 23, 2016 Mr. Nathaniel Strosberg, Town Planner
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC. Response to Technical Deficiency Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection October 2016 DEP File No. ESG03000150001 Cleveland, Franklin, Greenwood, Hemlock, Jackson, Montour, Mount
SECTION 58 PRECAST CONCRETE BOX CULVERT. This work consists of furnishing and installing Pre-cast Concrete Box Culverts.
SECTION 58 PRECAST CONCRETE BOX CULVERT 58.1 DESCRIPTION A. General This work consists of furnishing and installing Pre-cast Concrete Box Culverts. B. Related Work Section 51 Section 52 Section 53 Section
Stormwater & Water Quality Training Programs for Colorado
Altitude Training Associates, LLC www.altitudeta.com Stormwater & Water Quality Training Programs for Colorado WINTER/SPRING 2018 Contact: Scott Olson scott@altitudeta.com (307) 630-8110 Altitude Training
Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control (GESC) Checklist
Development Services Department 100 N. Wilcox Street, Castle Rock CO 80104 Planner of the Day 303-660-1393 Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control (GESC) Checklist A complete Grading, Erosion and Sediment
MSD STANDARD DRAWINGS LOUISVILLE AND JEFFERSON COUNTY METROPOLITAN SEWER DISTRICT 700 WEST LIBERTY STREET LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY
MSD M etr o p olitan S e w e r Di s t r ict STANDARD DRAWINGS LOUISVILLE AND JEFFERSON COUNTY METROPOLITAN SEWER DISTRICT 700 WEST LIBERTY STREET LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY 40203-1911 STANDARD DRAWINGS DIVISION
MULTIPLE-FAMILY DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
MULTIPLE-FAMILY DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST This application lists the content and format of the submittal requirements to initiate the Design Review process. An incomplete application will not be
MILL HILL ARTS VILLAGE
OWNER CIVIL ENGINEER MACON-BIBB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ALEX MORRISON, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 200 CHERRY STREET, SUITE 300 MACON, GA 31201 OFFICE PHONE : (478) 803-2402 TRIPLE POINT ENGINEERING DAN WALLACE,
VICINITY MAP LOCATION MAP GRAPHIC SCALES
VICINITY MAP LOCATION MAP GI-01 LEGEND TABLE OF CONTENTS CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE NOTES GENERAL NOTES SEDIMENTATION & EROSION CONTROL ABBREVIATIONS GI-02 M P P P P M EXISTING HYDRAULIC PROFILE AND DEMOLITION
A. Dewatering observation wells are part of dewatering allowance.
SECTION 312319 - DEWATERING PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 RELATED DOCUMENTS A. Drawings and general provisions of the Contract, including General and Supplementary Conditions and Division 01 Specification Sections,
APPENDIX K DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND CODE ENFORCEMENT SUBDIVISION APPLICATION CENTER SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
VI-K -1 of 8 APPENDIX K DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND CODE ENFORCEMENT SUBDIVISION APPLICATION CENTER SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Final Submittal Major Subdivision Project Name Subdivision Number Location (Street
SECTION DEWATERING PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 RELATED DOCUMENTS
SECTION 312319 - DEWATERING PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 RELATED DOCUMENTS A. Drawings and general provisions of the Contract, including General and Supplementary Conditions and Division 01 Specification Sections,
B422 - PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX CULVERTS AND BOX SEWERS - OPSS 422
B422 - PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX CULVERTS AND BOX SEWERS - OPSS 422 422.1 GENERAL The work under these tender items consists of the fabrication and installation in open cut of precast reinforced
CITY OF TUMWATER 555 ISRAEL RD. SW, TUMWATER, WA (360)
CITY OF TUMWATER 555 ISRAEL RD. SW, TUMWATER, WA 98501 (360) 754-4180 Email: cdd@ci.tumwater.wa.us WATER-SEWER-STREET-STORM (IN CITY) Submittal Checklist TUM - RCVD BY DATE STAMP APPLICANT INFORMATION
Authorized Agent: City of Manassas Check List Attached: Contact: Address: Phone Number: Fax Number: Developer s Name: Phone Number:
CITY OF MANASSAS DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION 9027 Center Street Room 201 Manassas, Virginia, 20110 Phone: 703-257-8278 Fax: 703-257-5831 Application Date: APPLICANT
Attachment A Construction Inspection Log (Required for initial certification of stormwater treatment facilities)
Rain Garden Soil Amendments meet requirements (if amendments required) Final grades/location/volume conform with construction plans Overflow installed at location/elevation shown on plans Type and thickness
Pipe Product Catalog Table of Contents
Pipe Product Catalog Table of Contents Section A: Drawing #: Page Description A1 Reinforced Concrete Pipe A3 Storm Manhole Sizing Chart (48" - 96") A3.1 Storm Manhole Sizing Chart (108" - 144") A4 48"
Part 1 - Common Comments on Erosion and Sediment Control Plans (Walter Hamilton, SDID)
COMMON ERRORS Typical Site Review issues Part 1 - Common Comments on Erosion and Sediment Control Plans (Walter Hamilton, SDID) E&S Phase I Constructability (PFM 11-0109.3) Safety during construction and
Minor Site Plan Application and Checklist Land Disturbing Activities
Minor Site Plan Application and Checklist Land Disturbing Activities INSTRUCTIONS: Please provide the requested information below. The Development Services Department reviews each site plan submittal based
SECTION DEWATERING TANKAGE PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 RELATED DOCUMENTS
SECTION 31 23 19 - DEWATERING TANKAGE PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 RELATED DOCUMENTS A. Drawings and general provisions of the Contract, including General and Supplementary Conditions and Division 1 Specification
SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FOR DRT SUBMITTAL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Case #: SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FOR DRT SUBMITTAL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 171 North Ross Street, Suite 200 Auburn, AL 36830 (334) 501-3000 ~ Fax: (334) 501-7294 Applicant Name: Mailing Address: Email Address:
Porter County Plan Commission
Plan Type: Development Plan Administrative DRC PC Primary Plan Administrative DRC PC Secondary Plat/Replat Administrative DRC PC PUD Conceptual Detailed Final Project Information Project Name: Developer
VARIANCE APPLICATION (NO SITE PLAN OR SUBDIVISION)
VARIANCE APPLICATION (NO SITE PLAN OR SUBDIVISION) 190-66. General procedure for completeness review. A. In order to be determined complete for review by the Board, all of the required information must
TOWN OF DOUGLAS EARTH REMOVAL SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION FORM Pursuant to Section 6.1 of the Douglas Zoning Bylaw
I. Owner Information II. Applicant Information III. Representative Information IV. Operator Information er.doc Page 1 of 5 Douglas Planning Board V. Site Information Assessors Map Assessors Parcel Deed
Essential Skills: Reading and Interpreting Maps and Plans
Essential Skills: Reading and Interpreting Maps and Plans Prepared for: NEW YORK STATE PLANNING FEDERATION April 14, 2015 Prepared by: BME ASSOCIATES Peter G. Vars, P.E. Stages of Plan Review Concept /
PO Box 1089 Apex NC
PROJECT DETAILS Dragonfly Maintenance Report Property Client Name Client Email Address Client Email Address 2 Client Email Address 3 Client Email Address 4 Number of Ponds & Pond Type Service Type Standard
SUMMIT COUNTY PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
SUMMIT COUNTY PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT SINGLE-FAMILY SITE PLAN INFORMATION PACKET GENERAL INFORMATION This information packet explains how your application for a single-family site plan will
APPENDIX 4. Checklists. Township of King Design Criteria and Standard Detail Drawings
APPENDIX 4 Checklists Township of King Design Criteria and Standard Detail Drawings Township of King Design Criteria and Standard Detail Drawings APPENDIX 4 CHECKLISTS Engineering Submissions : The following
MINOR SUBDIVISION. [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] B. Dimensions, bearings and curve data for all property lines and easements.
![MINOR SUBDIVISION. [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] B. Dimensions, bearings and curve data for all property lines and easements.](/thumbs/90/102241643.jpg "MINOR SUBDIVISION. [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] B. Dimensions, bearings and curve data for all property lines and easements.")
MINOR SUBDIVISION 190-69. Minor subdivisions. In addition to the requirements indicated in 190-67 (SEE BELOW), the information below shall be shown on the plans for all minor subdivision applications.
b. Building Areas or Building Pads having an average grade steeper than 5% (some elevation information may be required to verify grade).
Snyderville Basin G. Site Plan Requirements: Three (3) copies of a site plan, a minimum size of 11" x 17" (must be legible) and a maximum size of 36" x 48" shall be submitted with all building permit applications
Information for File # RMM
Information for File # 3-4-RMM Applicant:, L.P. Corps Contact: Ryan Malterud Address: 8 Fifth Street East, St. Paul, Minnesota 56 E-Mail: Ryan.M.Malterud@usace.army.mil Phone: (65) 9-586 Primary County:
CITY OF DANA POINT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
Section I EARTHWORK CITY OF DANA POINT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COST ESTIMATE UNIT PRICE LIST May 2002 Page 1 of 12 Section I EARTHWORK TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION AND TOPICS...PAGE INTRODUCTION... i I EARTHWORK...
SECTION MANHOLES
SECTION 33 05 13 MANHOLES PART 1 GENERAL 1.01 SECTION INCLUDES A. CONTRACTOR shall furnish and install precast concrete manhole base, sections, adjusting rings, steps, and manhole ring and cover, complete.
ATTACHMENT H TACOMA HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT FEATURES
ATTACHMENT H TACOMA HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT FEATURES The Tacoma Hydroelectric Project is located about 20 miles north of Durango, Colorado, on a high intermountain plateau west of
DESIGN GUIDELINES (SD) COUNTY OF ALAMEDA PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY 399 ELMHURST STREET HAYWARD, CA
DESIGN GUIDELINES (SD) COUNTY OF ALAMEDA PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY 399 ELMHURST STREET HAYWARD, CA 94544-1395 PUBLIC WORKS DESIGN GUIDELINES TABLE OF CONTENTS SD-100 SERIES SPECIAL DRAWINGS SD-100 8/1991 SILT
STORM M ANHOLE FOR 42" PIPE AND SM ALLER JOB NO. SHEET NO. DATE MARCH 2015 OF MIN OF 3 CRSES MAX OF 5 CRSES 30"MAX 3 OR 3.5 PRECAST ECCENTIC CONC
01-APR-2015 13:33 = I:\MSV8i\Plotting\piblack.ptb V:\201001\\C\8x11_Howell_Det\stm_det01_8x11_st01.dgn TIME = MIN 3 CRSES MAX 5 CRSES 3 OR 3.5 PRECAST ECCENTIC CONC ID PIPE GRADE A CONC FILL 4" 8" 2-0"SUMP
STANDARD CATCH BASIN GUTTER LINE CB INLET FRAME & GRATE, GROUTED TO GRADE RINGS AS REQ'D CONCRETE CURB FINISHED GRADE ASPHALT MAX 50 MIN
CB INLET FRAME & GRATE, GROUTED TO GRADE RINGS AS REQ'D ASPHALT 20 GUTTER LINE CONCRETE CURB FINISHED GRADE PRECAST GRADE RINGS, 2 50 100 MAX PRECAST CB LID GROUT ALL AROUND CB LEAD, INSIDE & OUTSIDE OF
CHAPTER 11. Plan Standards
CHAPTER 11 Plan Standards A. Introduction The city requires uniform public improvement plans for ease of record keeping and understanding. The following standards govern most plan submittals to the city.
SECTION 100 PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS & INSTRUCTIONS
SECTION 100 PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS & INSTRUCTIONS 101 General 102 Submittal Requirements A. Initial Submittal B. Second Submittal 103 Plan Requirements A. Subdivisions B. Site Plans 104 Approval of
Subdivision Application Checklist
City of Portsmouth, New Hampshire Subdivision Application Checklist This subdivision application checklist is a tool designed to assist the applicant in the planning process and for preparing the application
STANDARD BID ITEM NUMBERS
10701 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 10702 Traffic Control for Storm Sewer Installation LUMP SUM 10703 Traffic Control for Water Main Installation LUMP SUM 10704 Traffic Control for Sanitary Sewer Installation
DECK PERMIT APPLICATION PACKET
Building Division 865 SE Barrington Dr Oak Harbor, WA 98277 Ph 360.279.4510 Fax 360.279.4519 DECK PERMIT APPLICATION PACKET SUBMITTAL FORMS INDEX Basic Deck Submittal Checklist Residential Deck Submittal
Anne Arundel County Dept. of Inspections and Permits Storm Drain Checklist
Project Name Project Number Engineer Plans are to be designed based on the standards set forth in the Anne Arundel County Design Manual Standards and Specifications, and all other manuals as stipulated
MAJOR GRADING PLAN CHECKLIST
MAJOR GRADING PLAN CHECKLIST PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT / ENGINEERING DIVISION 8130 Allison Avenue, La Mesa, CA 91942 Phone: (619) 667-1166 Fax: (619) 667-1380 Grading plans shall address both rough grading
Before you begin. Rain Barrel Building Instructions
Before you begin 1. Start with Step 1 (big surprise right?). Note that the remaining steps 2 through 4 can be done in any order as long as you pay careful attention to adhere to the barrel layout. 2. SAFETY
ROUTES: 65 SECTIONS: miles in length. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS AND APPROXIMATE QUANTITIES ARE INVOLVED:
ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CA0801 HWY. 110 - CLINTON (WIDENING) (S) FEDERAL AID PROJECT ACNHPP-0071(31) THE PURPOSE OF THIS PROJECT IS TO WIDEN HIGHWAY 65 IN VAN BUREN COUNTY. THIS PROJECT CONSISTS
King And Queen County, VA P.O. Box 177 King and Queen Courthouse, VA (804) (804) (fax)
King And Queen County, VA P.O. Box 177 King and Queen Courthouse, VA 23085 (804) 785-5975 (804) 785-5999 (fax) Shoreline Erosion Project Water Quality Impact Assessment (WQIA) & Wetland Board Permit Submittal
11/06/2014 Pay Items - 1
Pay Item Description Pay Unit 90701 Mobilization.... LS 91101 Excavation.... L.F. 91102 Excavation.... mi 91103 Excavation.... LS 91104 Borrow..... C.Y. 91105 Borrow..... LS 91106 Existing Trail Restoration...
SEWER CORRECTION SHEET
Engineering Services Division 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 300 Santa Clarita, California 91355 (661) 255-4942 SEWER CORRECTION SHEET MC# Master Case No. Assessor s Parcel No. Tract / Parcel No. / Address
Town of Westlake Construction Plans Review Checklist
CONSTRUCTION PLANS CONTENTS All Drawings 24 x 36 Cover Sheet Final Plat Site Plan Demolition Plan Utility Plan Drainage Area Map and Calculations Paving Plan & Profile Sheets Storm Drain Plan & Profile
CHECKLIST THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTATION MUST BE SUBMITTED TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BEFORE YOUR APPLICATION CAN BE PROCESSED.
CHECK LIST MOBILEHOME PERMANENT FOUNDATION BUILDING PERMIT SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1810 E. HAZELTON AVENUE, STOCKTON CA 95205 BUSINESS PHONE: (209) 468-3121 INSPECTION REQUEST-24
Phone Number: Address:
Case #: SITE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR DRT SUBMITTAL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 171 North Ross Street, Suite 200 Auburn, AL 36830 (334) 501-3000 ~ Fax: (334) 501-7294 Applicant Name: Mailing Address: Project
Town of Apex, North Carolina
POND DRAINAGE PLAN APPLICATION Town of Apex, North Carolina POND DRAINAGE PLAN APPLICATION: Applications are due by 12:00 pm on the first business day of each month. Please see the Minor Site Plan Schedule
erosion control HasTec KGW 400 advantages: usage: For surface protection and greening of slopes in landscaping and traffic route engineering.
HasTec KGW 400 For surface protection and greening of slopes in landscaping and traffic route engineering. Surface covered with HasTec KGW 400. Fixing with nails of wood or steel (suggestion: 2-4 pieces
Slope analysis & Grading. Earth shape and earthwork Topographic map Slope form Slope analysis Grading
6 Slope analysis & Grading Earth shape and earthwork Topographic map Slope form Slope analysis Grading 81 Topographic Map Topographic Contour map Topographic contour map are composed of a series of line
PART 4 STANDARD DRAWINGS FOR CONSTRUCTION
4.0. INTRODUCTION PART 4 STANDARD DRAWINGS FOR CONSTRUCTION In this document, Ivins City adopts the most recent edition (currently 2007), including all amendments, of the APWA Utah Chapter s Manual of
DETAIL CROFT FARM OUTBUILDING RESTORATION TOWNSHIP OF CHERRY HILL, NEW JERSEY
2x DIMENSIONAL LUMBER SISTER/SCAB REINFORCEMENT MEMBER 060523 3/8" A304 BOLT @ 8" O.C., STAGGERED EXISTING FRAMING MEMBER SECTION PROVIDE MIN EDGE DISTANCES AS SHOWN, TYP. ELEVATION REFER TO IFICATION
Government Of Newfoundland & Labrador Municipal Water, Sewer And Roads Master Construction Specifications
PAGE NO. : 1 OF 4 Revision Date: July 2009 STANDARD DRAWINGS TABLE OF CONTENTS DRAWING # DESCRIPTION 0030............ Work Adjacent to Roadway 0040............ Work at the Edge of Roadway 0050............
SECTION MANHOLES
SECTION 02601 MANHOLES PART 1 GENERAL 1.01 SCOPE OF WORK A. WORK required under this section consists of all materials, accessories, equipment, tools, and labor required to install precast concrete standard
Ecological Restoration Drafting & Design Guidelines
Ecological Restoration Drafting & Design Guidelines Version 2.0 July 2017 Philadelphia Water Ecological Restoration Drafting & Design Guidelines Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION...2 2.0 GENERAL PLAN
I. GENERAL: The Bidding and Contract Documents for Riverside North Parking Lot are modified as described in this Addendum.
ADDENDUM 1 CITY OF MEDFORD RIVERSIDE NORTH PARKING LOT ITB 15-012BL JUNE 22, 2015 PAGE 1 I. GENERAL: The Bidding and Contract Documents for Riverside North Parking Lot are modified as described in this
MAY J. Collins Engineering Associates, LLC San Jose Blvd. Jacksonville, Florida 32223
PROJECT LOCATION: 95 NOCATEE PARKWAY PONTE VEDRA, FL. 38 J. Collins Engineering Associates, LLC 56-3 San Jose Blvd. Jacksonville, Florida 32223 NOT TO SCALE 904-262-42 sm sm ON DRAWING WHERE SECTION OR
Manhole or Catch Basin Type A & B Cone Sections Precast - Design F Manhole or Catch Basin Cover (Reducer Cone Section Precast) Design D
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPED BY: Design Standards ISSUED BY: Office of Program Management and Technical Support, Design Support Section TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (14-02) MANUAL: Standard
Oil-Water Separator Design Checklist
CHECKLIST C3 Revised 5/2/2016 Oil-Water Separator Design Checklist DISCLAIMER - This checklist is provided to Consulting Engineers for the express purpose of assisting them in compiling private oil-water
Appendix C Photo Plates
Appendix C Photo Plates Photo Plate 1 Site E1 Ravelling cutslope has infilled the culvert inlet Photo Plate 3 Site E1 Ravelling cutslope Photo Plate 2 Site E1 Damaged culvert inlet Photo Plate 4 Site E1
Crow Wing County Mound Design
Property Owner: Date: Mailing Address: City: State: Zip: Home Phone Number: - - Cell: - - Site Address: City: State: Zip: Driving directions if no address issued: Legal Description: Sec: Twp: Range: Township
Application for Site Plan Review
Application for Site Plan Review 3275 Central Blvd., Hudsonville, Michigan 49426-1450, 616.669.0200 fax 616.669.2330 It is STRONGLY recommended that any application that must go before the Planning Commission
East Chaska Creek Restoration Project
East Chaska Creek Restoration Project Lower Minnesota River Watershed District & the City of Chaska East Chaska Creek Restoration Project Project No. 86550 February 2016 East Chaska Creek Restoration Project
CRAFTSMAN EXAMINATION, JUNE 2008 PLUMBING QUESTION AND ANSWER BOOKLET. Time allowed THREE hours
Affix label with Candidate Code Number here. If no label, enter candidate Number if known No. 9195 CRAFTSMAN EXAMINATION, JUNE 2008 PLUMBING INSTRUCTIONS QUESTION AND ANSWER BOOKLET Time allowed THREE
Zoning District: R-1, R-2, and R-4 Applicant: Exeter Rose Farm, LLC, 953 Islington Street #23D Portsmouth, NH 03801
2220.00, Town Planner Town Planning Office, Town of Exeter 10 Front Street Exeter, NH 03833 Re: Exeter Rose Farm Subdivision Design Review Engineering Services Exeter, New Hampshire Site Information: Tax
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
OVERVIEW Effective January 1, 1992 all applications for multi-family residential and all non-residential building permits require site plan approval before permit issuance. All new developments and existing
CHECKLIST 9-O. 24. Area of project in square feet and acres? C-1 d
Development Name: Submitted by: Highlands County Engineering Department Improvement Plan Checklist Date Received: Due Date: Y N E N / S O A Permits/Approvals 1. Copy of water management district permit
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMENTS LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT (LDP) CLEARING CLEARING & GRUBBING GRADING. Date Reviewed by. Project Name
GWINNETT COUNTY Department of Planning and Development One Justice Square 446 West Crogan Street Suite 150 1 st Floor Lawrenceville, GA 30046 Phone: 678.518.6000 Fax: 678.518.6240 www.gwinnettcounty.com
City of Regina Standard Construction Specification SECTION 2999 LISTING OF ROADWAY STANDARD DRAWINGS
City of Regina Standard Construction Specification SECTION 2999 LISTING OF ROADWAY STANDARD DRAWINGS R-1 Alternate Pavement Structures July/10 R-2 Typical Cross Sections for Asphaltic Concrete Pavements
INSTALLATION OF PYRAMAT FOR CHANNELS
PYRAMAT PERPENDICULAR CHANNEL INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES Thank you for purchasing our PYRAMAT High Performance Turf Reinforcement Mat (HPTRM) or Turf Reinforcement Mat (TRM) by Propex Operating
CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION FOR PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX CULVERTS AND BOX SEWERS
ONTARIO PROVINCIAL STANDARD SPECIFICATION METRIC OPSS 422 MAY 1993 CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION FOR PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX CULVERTS AND BOX SEWERS 422.01 SCOPE 422.02 REFERENCES 422.03 DEFINITIONS
CITY OF PITTSBURG ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CONTRACT NO A WATER TREATEMENT PLANT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 1A ADDENDUM #1 FENCE AND DITCH AUGUST
CITY OF PITTSBURG ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CONTRACT NO. 2012-16A WATER TREATEMENT PLANT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 1A ADDENDUM #1 FENCE AND DITCH AUGUST 2014 CHAIN LINK FENCE SPECIFICATIONS Chain link fence,
SUBJECT: Standard Plate Turf Establishment Areas (at Pipe Culvert Ends)
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPED BY: Design Standards ISSUED BY: Office of Program Management and Technical Support, Design Support Section TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (14-01) MANUAL: Standard
PART 2 PRODUCTS Equipment... 5
STANDARD SPECIFICATION PAGE 1 CCTV INSEPCTION MAY 2017 PART 1 GENERAL... 2 1.1 Work Included... 2 1.2 Related Sections... 2 1.3 Reference Standards... 2 1.4 Submission of Certification... 3 1.5 Work Regulations...
1 MUNICIPAL INFRASTRUCTURE
Engineering Design Criteria & Standard Drawings Page 5 1 MUNICIPAL INFRASTRUCTURE 1.1 Drawing & Submission Requirements 1.1.1 General This section discusses the requirements for the submission of engineering
Guide to the Single Family Site Development Process
Guide to the Single Family Site Development Process City of Virginia Beach Planning Department Development Services Center (DSC) (757) 385-8277 January 2008 Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Design Principles
APPENDIX A-1. Site Development Application for DRT Submittal
APPENDIX A-1. Site Development Application for DRT Submittal This page intentionally left blank. Case #: SITE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR DRT SUBMITTAL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 171 North Ross Street, Suite
HEXAGONAL DOUBBLE TWISTED GABION & ROCK FALL MATRESSES
Menufatchurar of HEXAGONAL DOUBBLE TWISTED GABION & ROCK FALL MATRESSES As per IS 16014 (2012): Mechanically woven, double -twisted, hexagonal Wire Mesh Gabions, Revet Mattresses and Rock fallnetting(
August 23, Gary Savage Faith Energy, LLC. P. O. Box 894 Shreveport, LA
August 23, 2011 Gary Savage Faith Energy, LLC. P. O. Box 894 Shreveport, LA 71161-0084 RE: AFIN: 50-00062, Permit Tracking No.: 0323-WG-SW-1 S. W. Willisville SWD System Dear Mr. Savage: On August 10,
SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR USE PROCESS III OR PROCESS IV
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 33325 8 th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cityoffederalway.com SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR USE PROCESS III OR PROCESS IV USE PROCESS
SECTION 9.00 AS-BUILT DRAWING REQUIREMENTS SUB-INDEX
SECTION 9.00 AS-BUILT DRAWING REQUIREMENTS SUB-INDEX 9.00 AS-BUILT DRAWING REQUIREMENTS 9.01 As-Built Check List 1 Supp 1 2016 Supp # 2 Aug. 2017 AS-BUILT DRAWING REQUIREMENTS As-Built Review Fee is $200.00
REGISTRATION EXAMINATION, JUNE 2008 DRAINLAYING ANSWER SCHEDULE
No. 9197 REGISTRATION EXAMINATION, JUNE 2008 DRAINLAYING ANSWER SCHEDULE Plumbers, Gasfitters and Drainlayers oard, 2008. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced by any means
APPLICATION FOR SITE PREPARATION PERMIT
Engineering Division 550 Landa Street New Braunfels, Texas 78130 (830) 221-4020 1. Subdivision/Plat Name: Location Description/ Nearest Intersection: Acreage: APPLICATION FOR SITE PREPARATION PERMIT No.
UTILITY AND STREET CONSTRUCTION PLAN REQUIREMENTS SECTION 1
UTILITY AND STREET CONSTRUCTION PLAN REQUIREMENTS SECTION 1 ENGINEERING STANDARDS FOR UTILITY AND STREET CONSTRUCTION PLANS MARCH 2014 CONSTRUCTION PLAN SHEET FORMAT REQUIREMENTS REPRODUCIBLE MYLAR 1.
2. Remove from the Standard Plate manual: Standard Plate Index, Sheets 1-4 of 4, Numerical Index of Standard Plates (August 31, 2012)
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPED BY: Design Standards ISSUED BY: Office of Program Management & Technical Support, Design Support Section TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (12-04) MANUAL: Standard
B.2 MAJOR SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAN CHECKLIST
B.2 MAJOR SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAN CHECKLIST YES* GENERAL SUBMISSION ITEMS Does the submission include: 1. Thirteen (13) copies of completed Application Form? 2. Thirteen (13) copies of the Preliminary
Slope Stabilization System
TECCO Slope Stabilization System Appendix Overview Installation Steps 1. TECCO system elements 2. System supporting elements 3. Correct system installation process 4. Additional information 5. Typical
List of Figures. List of Forms
City of Columbia Engineering Regulations PART 1: SUBMISSION OF PLANS Table of Contents Paragraph Description Page No. 1.1 General 1-1 1.2 Engineer s Report 1-1 1.3 Plans 1-3 1.4 Revisions to Approved Plan
Dewatering. Deep Wells Vacuum Wellpoints Eductor Wells Artesian Conditions System Design Water Treatment.
Dewatering Deep Wells Vacuum Wellpoints Eductor Wells Artesian Conditions System Design Water Treatment www.malcolmdrilling.com Deep Wells Vacuum Wellpoints Eductor Wells Artesian Conditions System Design
Engineering Design Standards for Public Improvements. Developed jointly by the Cities of Ashland and Medford
Engineering Design Standards for Public Improvements Developed jointly by the Cities of Ashland and Medford January 1, 2006 FORWARD The goal of the manual is to create a useful, consistent standard for
3. The PAC (Permit Application Center) will notify the design professional of plan review results.
Planning and Development Dept. Infrastructure Division P.O. Box 11706, or 155 Johnston Street Rock Hill, South Carolina 29731-1706 Phone: 803-329-5515 FAX: 803-329-7228 www.cityofrockhill.com AS-BUILT