Compensatory Mitigation Monitoring Report Aquatic Habitat Improvement City of Montrose Whitewater Park, Montrose County, Colorado March 6, 2014
|
|
- Leonard Lambert
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Compensatory Mitigation Monitoring Report Aquatic Habitat Improvement City of Montrose Whitewater Park, Montrose County, Colorado March 6, 2014 i. Project Overview 1. USACE # # SPK Permittee: City of Montrose (433 S. 1 st Street. Montrose, Colorado 81401) Mr. Scott Murphy, City Engineer. Phone (970) (smurphy@ci.montrose.co.us) Monitoring By: Ecological Resource Consultants Inc. (ERC). David Blauch, Senior Ecologist (303) (dave@erccolorado.net) 3. Project Description The Aquatic Habitat Improvement project is intended as compensatory mitigation for construction of a whitewater park that will span approximately 950 linear feet of the Uncompahgre River at Riverbottom Park within the City of Montrose. The whitewater park includes the placement of six whitewater rock drop structures, un grouted scoured rock toe armoring, un grouted rock bank work, and temporary dewatering areas, totaling approximately 3,000 cubic yards of dredged and fill material. The compensatory mitigation aquatic habitat improvement project (subject of this monitoring report) includes improvement features within approximately 1,540 linear feet of the Uncompahgre River immediately upstream of the planned whitewater park. Aquatic habitat improvements consist of creation of four individual riffle/pool/glide sequences and the reshaping of approximately 1.7 acres of existing streambed. The aquatic habitat improvement project also replaces previously constructed (2006) grant funded aquatic habitat improvements that were situated within the footprint of the whitewater park. 4. Location The project site is located at Riverbottom Park (immediately upstream of the pedestrian bridge and fishing pier), in the Uncompahgre River, within Section 33, Township 49 North, Range 9 West, New Mexico PM, Latitude , Longitude , City of Montrose, Montrose County, Colorado. 5. Completion Date February 21, (Aquatic Habitat Improvement Mitigation Only) 6. Performance As built condition built per design plan. Additional monitoring will be Standards Met required to determine long term achievement of performance standards. 7. Corrective Actions As built condition. No corrective or remedial actions required. 8. Recommendations As built condition. No recommendations at this time. Monitoring will continue by the spring of Notes: a. This monitoring report has been completed in accordance with USACE RGL No b. Construction commenced on 2/10/14 and was completed on 2/21/14. No significant deviations from the design plan were made during the construction activities. All created features are shown on the enclosed 2014 Monitoring Map (Figure 1).
2 ii. Monitoring Requirements Special Condition 2 of the Permit requires within 60 days following construction activities, postconstruction site photographs of the mitigation site, showing work conducted be submitted to the USACE. Photographs comparing the pre project and as built condition are provided herein. Special Condition 3 of the Permit requires submittal of annual monitoring reports detailing success of the aquatic habitat improvement site to the USACE by December 31 st for three years following completion of the construction, and for each additional year, if remediation is required. The report must follow RGL No and must contain repeatable surveys of four defined stream cross sections, a longitudinal profile and photos taken from permanent photo points. This as built monitoring report is intended as the first of three annual monitoring reports which outlines a monitoring protocol and results as specified. Special condition 4 of the Permit states the aquatic habitat improvement requirement will be considered successful once, after three years post construction, representatives of the USACE and CPW have determined that the site has been constructed as approved and that impacts to fish habitat from the whitewater park have been fully compensated. This monitoring protocol and annual report submittals to the USACE and CPW are intended to assist in making this determination. Summary of Monitoring Protocol Performance criteria are standards that are used to evaluate measurable aspects of the improved system and indicate the success of a project at achieving its stated goal of aquatic habitat improvement. This mitigation project focused on altering the physical characteristics of the river channel for the specific purpose of creating a variety of instream aquatic habitat. Two individual physical parameters; 1) channel profile and 2) channel cross section were selected for annual monitoring based on the ability to effectively and cost efficiently measure project success as it relates to the altered physical characteristics. In addition, visual observations and photo documentation will be completed to further provide more qualitative documentation of condition and success. Parameter 1: Channel Profile The channel profile provides a good indication of the overall channel bed stability. A stable channel is defined as one that has the ability to transport its flow and sediment load over time without either aggrading or degrading. If the profile remains relatively constant, it can be inferred that sediment is being transported efficiently. Method of Measurement The channel profile (at primary feature points) was surveyed as part of the initial monitoring program (as built condition). The survey will be completed in subsequent years with results from each year compared with previous years to detect changes in the profile. Evaluating Results Local adjustments to the channel profile should be expected from year to year. This will be especially true following the 2014 seasonal high flows as this will be the time when the natural system (flows, sediment, substrate and overall stream gradient) adjusts the constructed system. The improvements will be viewed successful if, over time, the constructed riffle/pool/glide sequences are 2
3 evident in the profile and no major areas of aggradation or degradation are identified. These as built results will be compared with future surveys to assist in evaluating success. Parameter 2: Channel Cross section The improved channel is generally narrower and deeper for a given flow than prior to improvements. Measuring the channel cross section provides a method of evaluating whether the new channel remains at its designed width and shape. Channel width also provides a measure of whether flow depths were increased during low flow periods which was a primary goal of the improvement project. Method of Measurement Four permanent channel cross sectional monitoring locations were established by installing rebar set in concrete along the banks to denote the surveyed locations. The elevations along the cross sections were tied into the construction datum to allow for comparison in future years. The survey will be completed in subsequent years with results from each year compared with previous years to detect changes in the channel cross section. Evaluating Results Local adjustments to the channel cross sections should be expected from year to year. This will be especially true following 2014 seasonal high flows results as side slopes will seek their stable configurations. The restoration will be viewed successful if, over time, the width and shape remains relatively constant. Parameter 3: Visual Observation and Photo Documentation The improved channel included four (4) constructed riffle/pool/glide sequences that are intended to create a variety of habitat types critical to local fish populations that were lacking. The riffle/pool/glide sequence were constructed in combination with channel reshaping to create a low flow channel within the main channel to improve instream habitat during times of limited flows. In addition, boulder habitat clusters were strategically located to increase instream, structural diversity and available habitat. Method of Measurement The condition of the constructed instream habitat will be evaluated through a combination of photographic documentation, visual inspection and general observation of aquatic life utilizing the different river features. It will also be evaluated based on the sustainability of channel forms (riffles, pools and glides) and the variety of habitat provided. Eight (8) permanent photo points have been established. Evaluating Results The condition of the created instream features will be compared from year to year to determine whether the constructed habitat is in place and continuing to function as designed. Visual observations will be made and compared from year to year to qualitatively determine whether habitat variety is being maintained including, deep pools, silt free, oxygenated riffles, slower moving glide sections and instream boulder habitat clusters. This parameter is the most subjective and results will be given in a qualitative manner. iii. Summary Data The following graphs, tables and photographs provide a summary of data collected as part of the monitoring requirements and protocol outlined above. 3
4 Table 1. Profile Survey Data Summary Survey Date Feature Design 2/10/2014 2/21/2014 ID STA Pre Elev AS Built Elev RB RE P RB RE P RB RE P RB RE P End Notes: 1. Minor deviations in the as built profile occurred from the design plan between Stations 5408 (RE 4) to 5100 (End) as excavation was limited by bedrock. 4
5 Table 2. Cross Section Survey 1 Cross Section 1 Pin Elev= Pre Construction Dec 13 (XS 1) As Built Feb 14 Dist (ft) Elev (ft) Dist (ft) Elev (ft) Notes: 5
6 Table 3. Cross Section Survey 2 Cross Section 2 Pin Elev= Pre Construction Dec 13 (XS 2) As Built Feb 14 Dist (ft) Elev (ft) Dist (ft) Elev (ft) Notes: 6
7 Cross Section 3 Pin Elev= Pre Construction Dec 13 ` (XS 3) As Built Feb 14 Dist (ft) Elev (ft) Dist (ft) Elev (ft) Notes: 7
8 Table 5. Cross Section Survey 4 Cross Section 4 (XS 4) Pin Elev= Pre Contruction Dec 13 As Built Feb 14 Dist (ft) Elev (ft) Dist (ft) Elev (ft) Notes: 1. Minor deviations in the as built crosssection shape occurred from design as excavation was limited by bedrock. 8
9 Photo Comparison of Pre construction (Left Column ) and As built Conditions (Right Column ) from Permanent Photo Points. Refer to Figure 1 for Photo Point Locations and Features. Photo Point 1. Looking north downstream. Wide and shallow channel present during low flow. Pre Photo Point 1. Looking north downstream at RB1. Constructed point bars and defined, deeper low flow channel is evident. Post Photo Point 2. Looking south upstream. Channel lacks any aquatic habitat variety and useable deeper water during low flow periods. Pre. Photo Point 2. Looking south upstream at RE1. Constructed point pars and fast moving riffle is evident. Post. Photo Point 2. Looking north downstream. Photo Point 2. Looking north downstream G1. Deep slow moving water and boulder clusters. Post 9
10 Photo Point 3. Looking south upstream. Shallow water with limited useable habitat. Pre. Photo Point 3. Looking south upstream at G1 and P1. Deep slow moving water and boulder clusters. Post. Photo Point 3. Looking north downstream. Shallow water with limited useable habitat. Pre. Photo Point 3. Looking north downstream at RB2 and RE2. Cobble point bars create a more defined low flow channel and deeper water depths in riffle sections. Post Photo Point 4. Looking south upstream. Continuous riffle with limited water depth and habitat variety. Pre Photo Point 4. Looking south upstream at P2 and RE2. Riffle flows into pool providing varying habitats and critical deep overwintering holding water. Post 10
11 Photo Point 4. Looking north downstream. Channel is wide and water depth limiting during winter low flows. Pre. Photo Point 4. Looking north downstream at P2, G2 and RB3. Deeper slower water and boulder habitat clusters. Critical deep overwintering holding water present. Post Photo Point 5. Looking south upstream. Pre. Photo Point 5. Looking south upstream at G2. Post. Photo Point 5. Looking north downstream. Pre. Photo Point 5. Looking north downstream at RB3 and RE3. Cobble point bars create a more defined low flow path and habitat variety. Post. 11
12 Photo Point 6. Looking south upstream. Pre. Photo Point 6. Looking south upstream at RE3 and RB3. Post Photo Point 6. Looking north downstream. Pre. Photo Point 6. Looking north downstream at G3. Deeper slower water and boulder habitat clusters. Post Photo Point 7. Looking south upstream. Pre. Photo Point 7. Looking south upstream at G3, P3 and RE3. Deeper slower water and boulder habitat clusters. Post. 12
13 Photo Point 7. Looking north downstream. Pre. Photo Point 7. Looking north downstream at RB4 and RE4. Post. Photo Point 8. Looking south upstream. Pre. Photo Point 8. Looking south upstream at RE4 and RB4. Post. Photo Point 8. Looking north upstream. Pre. Photo Point 8. Looking north upstream at G4. Slower deeper water and boulder habitat clusters. Post 13
14 iv. Maps Figure Monitoring Map As Built 14
15 v. Conclusions Ecological Resource Consultants, Inc. (ERC) has prepared this 2014 As built Mitigation Monitoring Report on behalf of the permittee, City of Montrose, per special conditions specified in USACE Permit (SPK ). This is the first of three anticipated annual monitoring reports. This monitoring report provides an evaluation of condition and performance standards for the Uncompahgre River aquatic habitat improvements specifically intended as compensatory mitigation for the whitewater park. Construction of the mitigation commenced on 2/10/14 and was completed on 2/21/14. Work generally progressed from upstream to downstream through each section. The main channel was rough cut and general channel formed. No significant deviations from the design plan were made during the construction activities. All created features are shown on the enclosed 2014 Monitoring Map (Figure 1). The compensatory mitigation has been completed prior to construction of the whitewater park, which is slated for the fall of Notes: Notification of project initiate was provided to CPW and USACE via on 2/7/14. Minor deviations in the as built profile (elevations) and cross section shape occurred from the design plan between Stations 5408 (RE 4) to 5100 (End) as excavation was limited by bedrock. A project close out site tour was conducted with the City of Montrose and CPW. Eric Gardunio, CPW Area Aquatic Biologist provided an (attached) stating the project appears to meet the design criteria and goals. Only the northern river access was utilized for construction. The southern river access was not required and therefore no wetland impacts occurred. All access and staging areas were reclaimed, soils loosened, raked smooth, seeded with a native seed mix and covered with erosion control blanket and coir logs. Parameter 1: Channel Profile Results Results of the 2014 as built channel profile survey compared to the pre project channel profile are presented in Graph 1 and Table 1. The channel profile has been altered to form distinct varying slopes creating the primary habitat features of riffles, pools and glides. The as built condition has been implemented per plan and will be evaluated and compared in the future for significant changes. Parameter 2: Channel Cross section Results Results of the 2014 as built channel cross section survey compared to the pre project channel cross section profile are presented in Graph 2 5 and Table 2 5. The channel cross section has been altered along the entire project reach to form a new distinct crosssection. The as built condition has been implemented per plan and will be evaluated and compared in the future for significant changes. Parameter 3: Visual Observation and Photo Documentation Results Photos from eight (8) permanent photo locations are provided herein along with general notes and comments. The as built condition has notably altered the physical characteristics of the channel per plan. Currently under low flow condition a variety of habitat including fast moving riffles, deep slower pools and glides as well as available instream cover is present. Trout were observed (and caught by anglers) within the improved section immediately upon completion. 15
16 Please let us know if you have any questions or require additional information at this time. This report has been prepared by: Ecological Resource Consultants, Inc. David J. Blauch, V.P., Senior Ecologist Troy Thompson, President, Sr. Water Resource Engineer CC: Scott Murphy, City of Montrose Eric Gardunio, CPW Area Aquatic Biologist Attachments CPW correspondence 16
17 Attachment CPW Correspondence 17
Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control (GESC) Checklist
Development Services Department 100 N. Wilcox Street, Castle Rock CO 80104 Planner of the Day 303-660-1393 Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control (GESC) Checklist A complete Grading, Erosion and Sediment
More informationSPECIAL PUBLIC NOTICE
SPECIAL PUBLIC NOTICE Draft Map and Drawing Standards for the South Pacific Division Regulatory Program August 6, 2012 Corps contacts: Sacramento District: Michael Finan (916) 557-5324 (Michael.C.Finan@usace.army.mil)
More informationB422 - PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX CULVERTS AND BOX SEWERS - OPSS 422
B422 - PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE BOX CULVERTS AND BOX SEWERS - OPSS 422 422.1 GENERAL The work under these tender items consists of the fabrication and installation in open cut of precast reinforced
More informationRE: Engineered Riffle Concepts for Sodom Dam Removal Grade Control Elements
November 19, 2009 Ms. Melissa Jundt NOAA Fisheries Hydropower Division 1201 NE Lloyd Boulevard, Suite 1100 Portland, Oregon 97232 RE: Engineered Riffle Concepts for Sodom Dam Removal Grade Control Elements
More informationTechnical Memorandum ECO-7
To: Woody Frossard, TRWD From: Bob Brashear, CDM This document is released for the purpose of interim review under the authority of Robert Brashear, P.E., TX license 80771 on 21-Mar-2005. It is not to
More informationInformation for File # RMM
Information for File # 3-4-RMM Applicant:, L.P. Corps Contact: Ryan Malterud Address: 8 Fifth Street East, St. Paul, Minnesota 56 E-Mail: Ryan.M.Malterud@usace.army.mil Phone: (65) 9-586 Primary County:
More informationMap and Drawing Standards for the South Pacific Division Regulatory Program
Map and Drawing Standards for the South Pacific Division Regulatory Program Hollis Jencks Project Manager, Nevada/Utah Section Sacramento District Regulatory Program Workshop 31 May 2018 US Army Corps
More informationSPECIAL PUBLIC NOTICE
SPECIAL PUBLIC NOTICE Draft Map and Drawing Standards for the South Pacific Division Regulatory Program March 5, 2012 Comment period: ends April 5, 2012 Corps contact: Thomas Cavanaugh (415) 503-6574 (Thomas.J.Cavanaugh@usace.army.mil)
More informationApplication Submittal Checklist for a BASIC USE PERMIT (BUP) Planning & Development Department Planning Division
Application Submittal Checklist for a BASIC USE PERMIT (BUP) APPLICABILITY. This checklist should be used when submitting an application for a Basic Use Permit. When is a Basic Use Permit required? Section
More informationSupporting Guidance Note
Supporting Guidance Note Supporting Guidance Note: SGN 2 Geomorphology photosurveys for hydropower developments We require a geomorphology photosurvey to be submitted with applications for abstraction
More informationSection 1. Introduction
Overview of Manual Acknowledgements i x Section 1. Introduction 1.0 Overview of Section 1 1-1 1.1 The GESC and DESC Permits 1-2 1.2 Reasons for the GESC and DESC Permits 1-2 1.3 Legislative Mandate 1-3
More informationRebman Creek Evaluation of In-Stream Rehabilitation Structures
Rebman Creek Evaluation of In-Stream Rehabilitation Structures Draft Report Prepared for: Weldwood of Canada Ltd. Quesnel, BC by: G3 Consulting Ltd. 4508 Beedie Street Burnaby, BC V5J 5L2 December 2000
More informationRe: Survey of constructed cross section per Restoration Framework on Wind River, Fremont County, WY
1-11-17 LeClair Irrigation District 1418 Cowboy Lane Riverton, WY 82501 (307) 856-4018 Re: Survey of constructed cross section per Restoration Framework on Wind River, Fremont County, WY Dear Mr. Hoelzen,
More informationMAPPING YOUR STREAM. TIME REQUIRED 50 minutes in Field 50 minutes in Classroom 50 minutes Homework
OUR MAPPING YOUR STREAM STREAM ACTIVITY SUMMARY Students will draft a cross-sectional profile of the stream and measure the velocity of the current. They will use both of these to calculate the discharge
More informationPREPARATION GUIDELINES FOR UDFCD MAINTENANCE SITE PLAN
PREPARATION GUIDELINES FOR UDFCD MAINTENANCE SITE PLAN Overview The Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (District) is now requiring that a Maintenance Site Plan (Plan) be submitted for all pond projects
More informationCE 365K Exercise 2: HEC-RAS Modeling Spring 2014 Hydraulic Engineering Design
CE 365K Exercise 2: HEC-RAS Modeling Spring 2014 Hydraulic Engineering Design This exercise was prepared by Fernando R. Salas and David R. Maidment Introduction In this exercise, we will learn how to setup
More informationPART XIII: HYDRAULIC/ HYDROLOGY SURVEYS
PART XIII: HYDRAULIC/ HYDROLOGY SURVEYS 13.1 Purpose and Scope Hydraulic surveys are required for flow analysis to determine bridge and culvert design characteristics. A hydraulic survey is usually but
More informationSECTION DEWATERING TANKAGE PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 RELATED DOCUMENTS
SECTION 31 23 19 - DEWATERING TANKAGE PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 RELATED DOCUMENTS A. Drawings and general provisions of the Contract, including General and Supplementary Conditions and Division 1 Specification
More informationHAMILTON TOWNSHIP Department of Planning and Zoning Application for a Commercial / Industrial Site Plan Review
HAMILTON TOWNSHIP Department of Planning and Zoning Application for a Commercial / Industrial Site Plan Review Date: Application is hereby made for a Site Plan Review for a commercial or industrial use.
More informationKKR S. 6 th St. to I-94 Bridge Project Location. Expanded Floodplains
Kinnickinnic River Watercourse Rehabilitation Early Out Project Achieving Multiple Design Objectives Thomas R. Sear, PE, CFM Short Elliott Hendrickson Patrick C. Elliott, PE Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage
More informationAmyMarie Accardi-Dey (The Louis Berger Group, Inc.)
Correspondence Date: January 27, 2010 To: From: Re: Scott Thompson (The Louis Berger Group, Inc.) AmyMarie Accardi-Dey (The Louis Berger Group, Inc.) Details on Net Suspended Sediment Estimation by Plume-Width
More informationDEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE. SUBJECT: Excavation Dewatering at Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE PACIFIC AIR FORCES 24 January 2017 MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD FROM: 354th Civil Engineer Squadron 2310 Central Avenue, Suite 100 Eielson AFB AK 99702 SUBJECT: Excavation Dewatering
More informationHartwell Lake Application for Dry Dredging
Hartwell Lake Application for Dry Dredging Applicant: Mailing Address: E-Mail Address: Day Time Phone Number/s: Dredging Site Address: Subdivision: Lot #: Shoreline Use Permit #: Next Upstream Permit #,
More informationRESIDENTIAL DEMOLITION PERMIT APPLICANT CHECKLIST
RESIDENTIAL DEMOLITION PERMIT APPLICANT CHECKLIST The purpose of this form is to inform applicants of: 1) the requirements for building permits and stormwater permits for residential demolition projects;
More informationState Listed Threatened Mussels and Zebra Mussels: What You Need to Know
State Listed Threatened Mussels and Zebra Mussels: What You Need to Know Texas Association of Environmental Professionals May Luncheon Houston, Texas May 21, 2015 GENERAL OUTLINE Native Mussels Lifecycle
More informationKing And Queen County, VA P.O. Box 177 King and Queen Courthouse, VA (804) (804) (fax)
King And Queen County, VA P.O. Box 177 King and Queen Courthouse, VA 23085 (804) 785-5975 (804) 785-5999 (fax) Shoreline Erosion Project Water Quality Impact Assessment (WQIA) & Wetland Board Permit Submittal
More informationU.S Army Corps Of Engineers ENG 4345 Permit Application Video Script Feb- 10
U.S Army Corps Of Engineers ENG 4345 Permit Application Video Script - 03- Feb- 10 TRANSCRIPT Hi there, I'm Debra and welcome to the US Army Corps of Engineers permit application video. The purpose of
More informationSUMMIT COUNTY PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
SUMMIT COUNTY PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT SINGLE-FAMILY SITE PLAN INFORMATION PACKET GENERAL INFORMATION This information packet explains how your application for a single-family site plan will
More informationTYPICAL SECTIONS TYPICAL NO. 1 (MAINLINE) STA TO STA STA TO STA ROUNDING DETAIL TYPICAL NO.
FILL SECTION TYPICAL NO. 1 (MAINLINE) STA. 2434. TO STA. 244035.16 STA. 244396.83 TO STA. 2449. CUT SECTION ROUNDING DETAIL FILL SECTION TYPICAL NO. 3 (DETOUR) CUT SECTION STA. 242849.86 TO STA. 2453.88
More informationGuide to Developing a Stream Photograph Documentation Program
Guide to Developing a Stream Photograph Documentation Program William Robertson: MSUEWQ & BSWC Introduction Landscape photographs can offer a qualitative and, in some situations, quantitative evaluation
More information50.24 Type, Size and Location Plans for Culverts, Bridges and Culvert Bridges
50.24 Culverts, Bridges and Culvert Bridges Type, Size and Location (T, S & L) Plans shall be required for all Bridges, Culvert Bridges and Culverts of eight-foot (8') clear span or greater as follows:
More informationNWP of 10 Enclosure
#6301 4/16/2018 Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. 9450 SW Commerce Circle, Suite 180 Wilsonville, OR 97070 Project Site General Location and Topography Reed Pit Expansion - Marion County, Oregon United States
More informationSECTION 100 PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS & INSTRUCTIONS
SECTION 100 PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS & INSTRUCTIONS 101 General 102 Submittal Requirements A. Initial Submittal B. Second Submittal 103 Plan Requirements A. Subdivisions B. Site Plans 104 Approval of
More informationMemorandum. Application for Amendment to DNR Land Use Permit # LAS29209
Memorandum Date: September 12, 2013 Project Number: 1992.06k To: From: Subject: cc: Jessica Meybin (ADNR) Tim Sullivan (R2) Application for Amendment to DNR Land Use Permit # LAS29209 Kevin Petrone and
More informationMake Your Own Monitoring Equipment
Make Your Own Monitoring Equipment Stadia Rod A stadia rod is used to take depth measurements in a stream channel. With this rod you can measure in both metric and English systems. You can also take length
More informationb. Building Areas or Building Pads having an average grade steeper than 5% (some elevation information may be required to verify grade).
Snyderville Basin G. Site Plan Requirements: Three (3) copies of a site plan, a minimum size of 11" x 17" (must be legible) and a maximum size of 36" x 48" shall be submitted with all building permit applications
More informationA. Dewatering observation wells are part of dewatering allowance.
SECTION 312319 - DEWATERING PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 RELATED DOCUMENTS A. Drawings and general provisions of the Contract, including General and Supplementary Conditions and Division 01 Specification Sections,
More informationAttachment C. Implementation Schedule for Technical Study Plans as of December 31, Aquatic Resources
Attachment C. Implementation Schedule for s as December 31, 2008. Resources 2007 2008 2009 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr
More informationQUANTITY SURVEYS. Introduction
QUANTITY SURVEYS Introduction In engineering surveying, we often consider a route (road, sewer pipeline, channel, etc.) from three distinct perspectives. The plan view of route location is the same as
More informationSECTION DEWATERING PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 RELATED DOCUMENTS
SECTION 312319 - DEWATERING PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 RELATED DOCUMENTS A. Drawings and general provisions of the Contract, including General and Supplementary Conditions and Division 01 Specification Sections,
More informationIntroduction to Aerial Photographs and Topographic maps (Chapter 7, 9 th edition) or (chapter 3, 8 th edition)
GEOLOGY 306 Laboratory Instructor: TERRY J. BOROUGHS NAME: Introduction to Aerial Photographs and Topographic maps (Chapter 7, 9 th edition) or (chapter 3, 8 th edition) For this assignment you will require:
More informationMinnesota Department of Natural Resources
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Fisheries Management VERSION - PRELIMINARY DATA (AS OF //4) Lake Name: Ocheda Survey Type: Winter Kill Assessment DOW Number: -4- Survey ID Date: //4 Lake Identification
More informationTOWN OF DOUGLAS EARTH REMOVAL SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION FORM Pursuant to Section 6.1 of the Douglas Zoning Bylaw
I. Owner Information II. Applicant Information III. Representative Information IV. Operator Information er.doc Page 1 of 5 Douglas Planning Board V. Site Information Assessors Map Assessors Parcel Deed
More informationIntroduction to Aerial Photographs and Topographic maps (Chapter 3)
GEOLOGY 306 Laboratory Instructor: TERRY J. BOROUGHS NAME: Introduction to Aerial Photographs and Topographic maps (Chapter 3) For this assignment you will require: a calculator and metric ruler. Objectives:
More informationExpansion Work Has Begun The perimeter dike for Cell 7 is now visible
Summer/Fall 2017 In This Issue Poplar Island Expansion Wetland Cell 5AB Development Wildlife Update Birding tours on Poplar Island Expansion Work Has Begun The perimeter dike for Cell 7 is now visible
More informationEast Chaska Creek Restoration Project
East Chaska Creek Restoration Project Lower Minnesota River Watershed District & the City of Chaska East Chaska Creek Restoration Project Project No. 86550 February 2016 East Chaska Creek Restoration Project
More informationWhakapapa River: 2014 Drift Dive Survey. Author: Adam Daniel Publication date: June 6, 2014 Auckland/Waikato Fish and Game Hamilton New Zealand
Whakapapa River: 2014 Drift Dive Survey Author: Adam Daniel Publication date: June 6, 2014 Auckland/Waikato Fish and Game Hamilton New Zealand 1 SUMMARY Two drift dive surveys were carried out in the headwaters
More informationADDENDUM No. 1. ITB No Northside Interceptor Condition Assessment. Due: February 1, 2018 at 10:00 A.M. (Local Time)
ADDENDUM No. 1 ITB No. 4521 Northside Interceptor Condition Assessment Due: February 1, 2018 at 10:00 A.M. (Local Time) The following changes, additions, and/or deletions shall be made to the Invitation
More informationMILL HILL ARTS VILLAGE
OWNER CIVIL ENGINEER MACON-BIBB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ALEX MORRISON, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 200 CHERRY STREET, SUITE 300 MACON, GA 31201 OFFICE PHONE : (478) 803-2402 TRIPLE POINT ENGINEERING DAN WALLACE,
More informationAPPENDIX L1. U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE LETTER
APPENDIX L1. U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE LETTER Environmental Assessment May 2016 South Central Light Rail Extension This page is intentionally left blank. Environmental Assessment May 2016 South Central
More informationMinor Site Plan Application and Checklist Land Disturbing Activities
Minor Site Plan Application and Checklist Land Disturbing Activities INSTRUCTIONS: Please provide the requested information below. The Development Services Department reviews each site plan submittal based
More informationPerformance Monitoring
Performance Monitoring Rock Island District Kara N. Mitvalsky, P.E. CEMVR-EC-DN Traditional Reports Analysis of existing data Comparison of data points to objectives identified in the feasibility reports
More informationUPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER RESTORATION LAKE ODESSA HABITAT REHABILITATION AND ENHANCEMENT PROJECT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL APPENDIX F
UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER RESTORATION LAKE ODESSA HABITAT REHABILITATION AND ENHANCEMENT PROJECT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL APPENDIX F PROJECT PHOTOGRAPHS Table of Photographs Photograph 1: Lake Odessa
More informationExcavation and embankment (cut and fill)
Excavation and embankment (cut and fill) Excavation = the removal of soil or rock from its natural location. Embankment = the placement and compaction of layers of earth or rock to form a roadbed of the
More informationStormwater & Water Quality Training Programs for Colorado
Altitude Training Associates, LLC www.altitudeta.com Stormwater & Water Quality Training Programs for Colorado WINTER/SPRING 2018 Contact: Scott Olson scott@altitudeta.com (307) 630-8110 Altitude Training
More informationVICINITY MAP LOCATION MAP GRAPHIC SCALES
VICINITY MAP LOCATION MAP GI-01 LEGEND TABLE OF CONTENTS CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE NOTES GENERAL NOTES SEDIMENTATION & EROSION CONTROL ABBREVIATIONS GI-02 M P P P P M EXISTING HYDRAULIC PROFILE AND DEMOLITION
More informationWISCONSIN BIRD CONSERVATION INITIATIVE IMPORTANT BIRD AREAS PROGRAM
WISCONSIN BIRD CONSERVATION INITIATIVE IMPORTANT BIRD AREAS PROGRAM NOMINATION FORM The Wisconsin Bird Conservation Initiative (WBCI) is conducting an inventory of areas that may qualify as Important Bird
More informationCat Island Chain Restoration Project Brown County Port & Resource Recovery Department
Cat Island Chain Restoration Project Brown County Port & Resource Recovery Department February 2, 2015 Fox River and Lower Green Bay Cat Island Chain - 1938 Cat Island Brown County Aerial Photography,
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. Chapter 6 Environmental Division
Chapter 6 Environmental Division TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 6...2 6.1 Noise Section...2 6.1.1 Introduction...2 6.1.2 Procedures...2 6.2 Natural Resource Section... 6.2.1 Introduction:... 6.2.2 File Names:...
More informationGENERAL DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS. General Submission Requirements
COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST Jan 2016 The following checklist has been compiled to assist the applicant in preparing their application for approval pursuant to Ontario Regulation 162/06. This checklist
More informationEcological Restoration Drafting & Design Guidelines
Ecological Restoration Drafting & Design Guidelines Version 2.0 July 2017 Philadelphia Water Ecological Restoration Drafting & Design Guidelines Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION...2 2.0 GENERAL PLAN
More informationMinnesota Department of Natural Resources
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Fisheries Management DRAFT VERSION - PRELIMINARY DATA (AS OF /2/21) Lake Name: String Survey Type: Standard Survey DOW Number: 17-24- Survey ID Date: /8/21 Lake
More informationCounty Wetlands Board Minutes. July 8, 2008
County Wetlands Board Minutes July 8, 2008 Call to Order The July 8, 2008 meeting of the Middlesex County Wetlands Board was called to order by Chairman Miller Smither at 9:00 A.M. in the Boardroom of
More informationThe City is interested in hearing from residents about an alternative plan which is being considered to provide dredge material management for the
1 The City is interested in hearing from residents about an alternative plan which is being considered to provide dredge material management for the 2017 hydraulic dredge program. This program is required
More informationA B C D E F G H SEE NOTE 1 EL (MIN.) 2 NEW UNCOMPACTED EL. VARIES EARTH EMBANKMENT 3 (MIN.) TYPICAL SECTION EMBANKMENT AND BORROW 6 (MIN.
BORROW AS NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT RIVERWARD SEE NOTE EL.. (MIN.) (MIN.) NEW UNCOMPACTED EL. EARTH C L C C C TYPICAL SECTION AND BORROW NO SCALE. CDF FLAT POOL EL.. JULJRP/REH AS CONSTRUCTED Approved Description
More informationProduct Dimensions (Width x Length x Height) (inches)
Mr. Dennis Hallahan, P.E. Infiltrator Water Technologies 4 Business Park Road P.O. Box 768 Old Saybrook, CT 06475 RE: Product Registration Renewal #2 Notice of Proprietary Distribution Product Listing
More informationCITY OF TUMWATER 555 ISRAEL RD. SW, TUMWATER, WA (360)
CITY OF TUMWATER 555 ISRAEL RD. SW, TUMWATER, WA 98501 (360) 754-4180 Email: cdd@ci.tumwater.wa.us WATER-SEWER-STREET-STORM (IN CITY) Submittal Checklist TUM - RCVD BY DATE STAMP APPLICANT INFORMATION
More informationThis document downloaded from vulcanhammer.net vulcanhammer.info Chet Aero Marine
This document downloaded from vulcanhammer.net vulcanhammer.info Chet Aero Marine Don t forget to visit our companion site http://www.vulcanhammer.org Use subject to the terms and conditions of the respective
More informationNortheast Florida Coastal Wetland Restoration Program A Partnership Based Regional Approach for Estuary Habitat Restoration
Northeast Florida Coastal Wetland Restoration Program A Partnership Based Regional Approach for Estuary Habitat Restoration Paul Haydt Restore America s Estuaries November 15, 2010 St Johns River Water
More informationPRELIMINARY PLAT CHECK LIST
Name of Proposed Subdivision: The following items must be included with the initial submittal of a Preliminary Plat: Application, filled out completely Project Narrative Pre-application Conference Report
More informationPrepared for Humboldt County Gravel Operators. Prepared by Stillwater Sciences 850 G Street, Suite H Arcata, CA 95521
2007 Fisheries Monitoring Program Report for Gravel Extraction Operations on the Mad, Lower Eel, South Fork Eel, Van Duzen, and Trinity Rivers, California Prepared for Humboldt County Gravel Operators
More informationSurvey Data and TOPO Checklist
Checklists Survey Data and TOPO Preliminary Plan Field Review Plans o Field Review Erosion Control Right-of-Way and Utility Meeting Plans Final Plan Field Review Plans Methods of Plan Markups Plan-in-Hand
More informationIncreasing Access to Certain North Carolina Environmental Data -- North Carolina Policy Collaboratory Project Update
Increasing Access to Certain North Carolina Environmental Data -- North Carolina Policy Collaboratory Project Update Submitted on behalf of the North Carolina Policy Collaboratory by W. Christopher Lenhardt,
More informationAPPLICATION FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) DEVELOPMENT PLAN
209 S. Main Street Marysville, Ohio 43040 Phone: (937) 645-7350 Fax: (937) 645-7351 www.marysvilleohio.org APPLICATION FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) DEVELOPMENT PLAN *** IMPORTANT INFORMATION ~ Please
More informationConceptual, Preliminary and Final Site Plan Review in Holladay City
Conceptual, Preliminary and Final Site Plan Review in Holladay City The City of Holladay incorporated in December, 1999 and adopted its own zoning ordinance in May, 2000. All land use decisions are made
More informationVISUAL INSPECTION CHECKLIST FOR GENERAL NPDES PERMIT FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES (PAG-02)
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU OF WATERSHED MANAGEMENT VISUAL INSPECTION CHECKLIST FOR GENERAL NPDES PERMIT FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION
More informationMONTHLY UPDATE REPORT - PRIMROSE SOUTH W4M OCTOBER 7, 2013
MONTHLY UPDATE REPORT - PRIMROSE SOUTH 09-21-067-04 W4M OCTOBER 7, Introduction The Primrose South in situ oil sands project is located in the Cold Lake Air Weapons Range approximately 65 km north-northeast
More informationAnne Arundel County Dept. of Inspections and Permits Storm Drain Checklist
Project Name Project Number Engineer Plans are to be designed based on the standards set forth in the Anne Arundel County Design Manual Standards and Specifications, and all other manuals as stipulated
More informationPre-Construction, Construction, and Post- Construction Monitoring Report for Greenland Meadows for July October 2010
Pre-Construction, Construction, and Post- Construction Monitoring Report for Greenland Meadows for July 2007- October 200 Prepared by The University of New Hampshire Stormwater Center December 200 Pre-Construction,
More informationStationary PIT detection system in the Green River Canal, Green River, UT
COLORADO RIVER RECOVERY PROGRAM FY 2013 ANNUAL PROJECT REPORT RECOVERY PROGRAM PROJECT NUMBER: C-28a Stationary PIT detection system in the Green River Canal, Green River, UT USU cooperative agreement
More informationMAJOR GRADING PLAN CHECKLIST
MAJOR GRADING PLAN CHECKLIST PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT / ENGINEERING DIVISION 8130 Allison Avenue, La Mesa, CA 91942 Phone: (619) 667-1166 Fax: (619) 667-1380 Grading plans shall address both rough grading
More informationPermits (Submitted to Permit Counter) APPLICATION CHECKLIST
Permits (Submitted to Permit Counter) APPLICATION CHECKLIST SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: 1. Completed signed and notarized Development Services Department Permit Application, submit to Permit Counter. 2. Copy
More informationClear Creek County Site Development
Clear Creek County Annex Community Development Clear Creek County Site Development The Clear Creek Board of County Commissioners has adopted design standards for the construction of driveways. These design
More informationSECTION SHOP DRAWINGS, PRODUCT DATA, AND SAMPLES
SECTION 01334 SHOP DRAWINGS, PRODUCT DATA, AND SAMPLES PART 1 GENERAL 1.01 SUMMARY A. Submit to the ENGINEER for review, such working drawings, shop drawings, test reports and data on materials and equipment
More informationAPC REGULATORY UPDATE NOVEMBER 16, PennDOT AND
APC REGULATORY UPDATE PennDOT AND NOVEMBER 16, 2017 WELCOME TO THE APC Regulatory Overview Threatened and Endangered Bats & Bridges PA DEP Functional Assessments & NPDES Waters of the United States Mitigation
More informationDragons of Ramsey Heights A review of the ponds and great crested newt Triturus cristatus population at Ramsey Heights Countryside Centre
Dragons of Ramsey Heights A review of the ponds and great crested newt Triturus cristatus population at Ramsey Heights Countryside Centre Josh Hellon and Terry Moore January 2015 Did you know? Great crested
More informationFloodplain Modeling 101. Presentation Goals
Floodplain Modeling 101 Presenter: Joseph L. Miller, P.E., CFM 2016 INAFSM Conference Presentation Goals Introduction to Indiana s and FEMA s floodplain modeling technical requirements for riverine modeling
More informationSubdivision Application Checklist
City of Portsmouth, New Hampshire Subdivision Application Checklist This subdivision application checklist is a tool designed to assist the applicant in the planning process and for preparing the application
More informationPLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
OVERVIEW Effective January 1, 1992 all applications for multi-family residential and all non-residential building permits require site plan approval before permit issuance. All new developments and existing
More informationTHREATENED, ENDANGERED, AND SENSITIVE SPECIES 2011 ANNUAL REPORT
LICENSE ARTICLE 410 THREATENED, ENDANGERED, AND SENSITIVE SPECIES 2011 ANNUAL REPORT REPORTING PERIOD JANUARY 1 DECEMBER 31, 2011 BAKER RIVER HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT FERC. 2150 April 2012 BAK LA 410 Annual
More informationFor crossing under a railroad, contact the specific railroad company's engineering department.
PAGE 330524-1 SECTION 330524 SPECIFIER: This section is for the underground installation of piping by directional drilling. When specifying this method of piping installation, care must be taken to ensure
More informationREPORT TO COUNCIL DORWICK DITCH PETITION REHABILITATION PROJECT JUNE 8, 2016
REPORT TO COUNCIL DORWICK DITCH PETITION REHABILITATION PROJECT JUNE 8, 2016 Based on a preliminary study by Euthenics, Inc. www.euthenics_inc.com 1 SECTION I GENERAL INFORMATION AND EXISTING CONDITIONS
More informationCommercial Fishing and Offshore Wind in Maine For more information: Josh Plourde (207) March 16, 2018
Commercial Fishing and Offshore Wind in Maine For more information: Josh Plourde (207) 907-0069 jp@maine.edu March 16, 2018 Future Offshore Wind Development in Maine The University of Maine will not license
More informationDivision: Habitat and Species Conservation Authors: Claire Sunquist Blunden and Brad Gruver
Division: Habitat and Species Conservation Authors: Claire Sunquist Blunden and Brad Gruver Report date: December 13, 2018 All photos by FWC unless otherwise acknowledged Presenting 6 new guidelines 1
More informationODFW Life Cycle Monitoring Project
ODFW Life Cycle Monitoring Project Background and Potential as Intensively Monitored Watersheds Erik Suring . Necanicum Lower Nehalem Upper Nehalem Nehalem Scappoose River Scappoose LCM Background Cummins
More informationAutoCAD 2016 for Civil Engineering Applications
Introduction to AutoCAD 2016 for Civil Engineering Applications Learning to use AutoCAD for Civil Engineering Projects Nighat Yasmin Ph.D. SDC P U B L I C AT I O N S Better Textbooks. Lower Prices. www.sdcpublications.com
More informationSCOUR: EVALUATION AND RIPRAP. John G. Delphia, P.E. TxDOT Bridge Division Geotechnical Branch
SCOUR: EVALUATION AND RIPRAP John G. Delphia, P.E. TxDOT Bridge Division Geotechnical Branch IMPORTANCE OF SCOUR The most common cause of bridge failures is from floods scouring bed material from around
More informationLoy Gulch, Paint Pony, East Fork Paint Pony LOMR
Loy Gulch, Paint Pony, East Fork Paint Pony LOMR Woodland Park, CO Prepared by: Michael Baker International 165 S. Union Blvd, Suite 200 Lakewood, CO 80226 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... 2 1.1 Purpose...
More informationSite Plan/Building Permit Review
Part 6 Site Plan/Building Permit Review 1.6.01 When Site Plan Review Applies 1.6.02 Optional Pre- Application Site Plan/Building Permit Review (hereafter referred to as Site Plan Review) shall be required
More informationB-PERMIT PLAN CHECK MANUAL
B-PERMIT PLAN CHECK MANUAL 5. SEWER PLANS Sewer Plans are usually submitted in conjunction with Street Plans to meet the requirements of conditions imposed on a Planning or Zoning action. In some cases
More information