Design of an OpAmp Gain Compensator for SwitchedCapacitor Integrators


 Nathan Farmer
 1 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 國立交通大學 電機與控制工程學系 碩士論文 交換電容式積分器 之運算放大器增益補償的設計 Design of an Opmp Gain Compensator for SwitchedCapacitor Integrators 研究生 : 許皓淵指導教授 : 鄭木火博士 中華民國九十七年七月
2 交換電容式積分器 之運算放大器增益補償的設計 Design of an Opmp Gain Compensator for SwitchedCapacitor Integrators 研究生 : 許皓淵指導教授 : 鄭木火博士 Student : HaoYuan Hsu dvisor : Dr. MuHuo Cheng 國立交通大學 電機與控制工程學系 碩士論文 Thesis Submitted to Department of Electrical and Control Engineering College of Electrical Engineering National Chiao Tung University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master in Electrical and Control Engineering July 008 Hsinchu, Taiwan, Republic of China 中華民國九十七年七月
3 交換電容式積分器 之運算放大器增益補償的設計 研究生 : 許皓淵 指導教授 : 鄭木火博士 國立交通大學電機與控制工程學系 摘要 在類比系統中, 切換電容積分器為具有重要功能的電路 切換電容積分器包含一運算放大器 運算放大器的非理想特性, 例如有限增益, 有限頻寬以及輸入偏移將會降低積分器的效能 舉例來說, 運算放大器之有限增益將會使離散時間積分器的極點偏離理想位置 z=, 造成有限的直流增益及相位誤差 這個影響顯著地降低了三角積分調變器之 MSH 架構的性能, 因為對雜訊修整濾波器而言直流值上不再有一零點 一直接的方法為設計運算放大器有非常大的增益, 但是以現在的技術要達到高增益是非常複雜以及幾乎不可能 在本論文中我們專注於有限增益運算放大器對切換電容積分器的影響, 並且設計一可以降低因運算放大器有限增益所造成在積分器之轉移函數上誤差的新型切換電容積分器 因此, 這經過設計的積分器可以等效增加運算放大器的增益, 以及改善其在應用上的效能 此新架構是以相關雙取樣的方法及利用回授運算放大器被提出 我們首先推導其轉移函數並使用 MTLB 計算因運算放大器有限增益造成的誤差 其性能將與現有的電路做比較 接著, 我們使用 TSMC 0.35 微米互補式金氧半的製程來設計, 以及 HSPICE 來模擬電路在數個頻率之頻率響應 預先模擬與佈局後模擬的結果接近相同, 並且與原始設計規格相符 最後畫出電路佈局, 晶片大小大約是 40 35µm 關鍵詞 : 相關雙取樣, 交換電容式積分器, 有限增益 i
4 Design of an Opmp Gain Compensator for SwitchedCapacitor Integrators Student: HaoYuan Hsu dvisor: Dr. MuHuo Cheng Institute of Electrical and Control Engineering National ChiaoTung University bstract The Switched Capacitor(SC) integrator is an important functional circuit block in the analog systems. SC integrator contains an operational amplifier. The nonidealities of the operational amplifier, such as the finite gain, the finite bandwidth, and the input offset will degrade the performance of the integrator. For example, the finitegain of the operational amplifier will make the pole of discretetime integrator deviate from the ideal position z = yielding a DC finite gain and phase error in the SC integrator. This effect degrades significantly the performance of delta sigma modulators via the MSH structure, because the noiseshaping filter has no longer a zero at DC. One direct approach is to design an opamp with extremely high gain, but it is complicated and nearly impossible via the present technology. In this thesis, we focus on the effect of finitegain opamp in SC integrators, and design a new SC integrator circuit which can reduce the error in the integrator transfer characteristic due to the finitegain of the opamp. Hence, the designed integrator enhances equivalently the opamp finite gain, and improves the performance in applications. The new topology is proposed using the feedback opamp and the correlated double sampling (CDS) technique. We first derive the transfer function and use MTLB to evaluate the errors arisen from the effect of finitegain in opamp. The performances of proposed circuit and other existing circuits are compared. Then, we design the circuit using TSMC 0.35µm CMOS technology, and simulate the circuit frequency responses at several frequencies via HSPICE. The presim or postsim simulation results are approximately identical, and conform to the original design specifications. Finally, the layout is drawn and the chip size is about 40 35µm. Keywords: CDS, SC Integrator, FiniteGain ii
5 誌謝 在這短暫的兩年研究所生活, 我要特別感謝鄭木火教授, 由於老師的指導, 使得此論文能順利完成 老師在治學態度上的嚴謹細心, 使我在學識上獲益良多 因此, 在本論文付梓之際, 對於辛勤傳道並耐心授業的老師致上最誠摯的謝意 在口試期間, 承蒙口試委員蘇朝琴教授 莊正教授以及方維倫教授撥冗指導並提供許多寶貴意見, 使此論文能更臻於完善, 在此也誠摯地感謝你們的辛勞 同時, 我要感謝 Lab94 同仁們 感謝已畢業的學長衍禎與嘉華的提攜與照顧 實驗室一起學習的夥伴宏楊 嘉明 志全 立中與英哲, 在課業上的砥礪互勉以及生活中的鼓勵和幫忙, 都成為我求學生涯中最好的助力 也感謝學弟啟仁 明華與建男, 因為你們的幫忙, 讓我能更專心於研究上 最後, 我要特別感謝我的家人, 尤其是我的父母親, 因為你們長久以來的支持和包容體諒, 使我能順利完成學業 僅以此小小的成果, 呈現給我的親朋好友, 並感謝所有曾幫助過我的人 iii
6 Contents BSTRCT IN CHINESE BSTRCT IN ENGLISH 誌謝 Contents List of Figures List of Tables i ii iii iv vi x Introduction. Background Motivation n Overview of Integrator 5. Introduction Switch Capacitor Integrator Continuous time Integrator Switched Capacitor Integrator Nonideal Effects of Switched Capacitor Integrator DoubleSampled Technique Summary The GainCompensated SC Integrators 0 3. SC Integrator With No Compensation Introduction Conventional SC Integrator Existed GainCompensated Integrators Introduction SingleSampled GainCompensated Integrator iv
7 3..3 DoubleSampled GainCompensated Integrator The Modification of DoubleSampled GainCompensated SC Integrators New SingleSampled GainCompensated SC Integrator Simulation nd Results Operational mplifier nd Common Mode Feedback Switch Simulations Of New SingleEnd GainCompensated Integrator Conclusion 67 bibliography 68 v
8 List of Figures. Block diagram of deltasigma modulator with a  MSH structure SNR variations with amplitude for a  MSH structure SNR variations with amplitude for a  MSH structure and a comparison between conventional and gaincompensated integrator CT noninverting integrator CT inverting integrator Magnitude and phase response for CT integrator Magnitude and phase response for inverting CT integrator when (0) and UGB are finite (a) Switched capacitor resistor (b) and the equivalent circuit (c) and the clock signal with the equivalent circuit (a) Negative and (b) positive switched capacitor circuit (a) Inverting and (b) noninverting SC integrator that are insensitive to parasitic capacitors Magnitude response of CT and DT noninverting integrator Phase response of CT and DT noninverting integrator Smallsignal models of (a) sampling (b) integrating noninverting SC integrator [] SC integrator during integration phase Feedback model consisting of a feedforward term d(s), a feedback term β(s), an amplifier OL (s), and an input scaler γ(s) [8] Equivalent circuits for (a) γ(s) (b) β(s) for an ideal SC integrator [8] Opamp with offset voltage Inverting SC integrator with offset error SC integrator with offset error at (a) sampling phase (b) integration phase Simple configuration using an NMOS switch to show charge injection []... 6 vi
9 .8 Doublesampled SC integrator firstorder doublesampled delta sigma modulator [7] firstorder doublesampled modulator using additiveerror switching [7] (a) Noninverting and (b) Inverting SC integrator Noninverting SC integrator during (a) φ and (b) φ Inverting SC integrator during (a) φ and (b) φ Noninverting doublesampled SC integrator Noninverting doublesampled SC integrator during (a) φ and (b) φ Noninverting doublesampled SC integrator with two integration capacitors Noninverting doublesampled SC integrator with two integration capacitors during (a) φ and (b) φ Gaincompensated SC integrator with limit in input [] The SC integrator during (a) phase and (b) phase Gaincompensated SC integrator with no limitation for input signal [3] The SC integrator during phase (a) φ and (b) φ The frequency response of the macro model opamp with 40dB magnitude The output voltage of the SC integrator with no gain compensation, f in = 0kHz with amplitude mv, f s = 0MHz, and =40dB The output voltage of the SC integrator with gain compensation, f in = 0kHz with amplitude mv, f s = 0MHz, and =40dB The output voltage of the SC integrator with no gain compensation, f in = 0kHz with amplitude mv, f s = 0MHz, and =80dB Doublesampled and gaincompensated SC integrator with no limit to input [4] Doublesampled and gaincompensated SC integrator with no limit to input during phase (a) φ and (b) φ Magnitude errors of the integrator for =, f in = 0kHz, and f s = 0MHz The vary doublesampled and gaincompensated SC with no limit to input The vary doublesampled and gaincompensated SC with no limit to input during (a) φ and φ The comparison of gain errors between paper proposed and we proposed for κc a = C b = = κc s = C s = = C f, f in = 0kHz, and f s = 0MHz.. 38 vii
10 3. The output voltage for a noninverting SC integrator with no compensation shown in Fig. 3.6, f in = 0kHz with amplitude mv, f s = 0MHz, and =40dB The transferred charge on the integration capacitor, shown in Fig. 3.6, f in = 0kHz with amplitude mv, f s = 0MHz, and =40dB The output voltage for a SC integrator that paper proposed shown in Fig. 3.6, f in = 0kHz with amplitude mv, f s = 0MHz, and =40dB The transferred charge on the integration capacitor, shown in Fig. 3.6, f in = 0kHz with amplitude mv, f s = 0MHz, and =40dB The output voltage for a SC integrator shown in Fig. 3.9, k=/8, f in = 0kHz with amplitude mv, f s = 0MHz, and =40dB The transferred charge on the integration capacitor, shown in Fig. 3.9, k=/8, f in = 0kHz with amplitude mv, f s = 0MHz, and =40dB The transferred charge on the integration capacitor, shown in Fig. 3.9, k=/8, f in = 0kHz with amplitude mv, f s = 0MHz, and =0dB The transferred charge on the integration capacitor, shown in Fig. 3.6, f in = 0kHz with amplitude mv, f s = 0MHz, and =0dB new singlesampled gaincompensated SC integrator singlesampled gaincompensated SC integrator during (a) phase (b) phase simple feedback system The output voltage for a SC integrator shown in Fig. 3.30, f in = 0kHz with amplitude mv, f s = 0MHz, =40dB, and f = 80dB Magnitude errors of the integrator for = = C c = C c, f in = 0kHz, and f s = 0MHz Magnitude of pole errors for conventional circuit and new gaincompensated topology fully differential foldedcascode operational amplifier with commonmode feedback wideswing constant transconductance bias circuit The frequency response of the fully differential foldedcascode amplifier (a) 50dB magnitude (b) 88 phase margin Simulation of bias output voltage Singleend foldedcascode opamp with output buffer viii
11 3.4 The frequency response of a singleend foldedcascode opamp (a) 60dB magnitude (b) 84 phase margin Definition of speed in a sampling circuit for NMOS switch Definition of speed in a sampling circuit for Transmission gate Comparison of onresistance of switch The output voltage for a SC integrator with no compensation shown in Fig. 3.(a), f in = 0kHz with amplitude mv, f s = 0MHz, and =50dB The FFT of the output voltage for a SC integrator with no compensation shown in Fig. 3.(a), f in = 0kHz with amplitude mv, f s = 0MHz, and =50dB The output voltage for a SC integrator that we proposed shown in Fig. 3.30, f in = 0kHz with amplitude mv, f s = 0MHz, =50dB, and f = 60dB The FFT of the output voltage for a SC integrator that we proposed shown in Fig. 3.30, f in = 0kHz with amplitude mv, f s = 0MHz, =50dB, and f = 60dB The output voltage for a SC integrator that we proposed shown in Fig. 3.30, f in = 0kHz with amplitude mv, f s = 0MHz, =50dB, and f = 60dB The FFT of the output voltage for a SC integrator that we proposed shown in Fig. 3.30, f in = 0kHz with amplitude mv, f s = 0MHz, =50dB, and f = 60dB The output voltage for a SC integrator that we proposed shown in Fig. 3.30, f in = 30kHz with amplitude mv, f s = 0MHz, =50dB, and f = 60dB The FFT of the output voltage for a SC integrator that we proposed shown in Fig. 3.30, f in = 30kHz with amplitude mv, f s = 0MHz, =50dB, and f = 60dB The post simulation for a SC integrator that we proposed, f in = 0kHz with amplitude mv, f s = 0MHz, =50dB, and f = 60dB The magnification for a SC integrator that we proposed by varying the input frequency shown in Fig. 3.30, with amplitude mv, f s = 0MHz, =50dB, and f = 60dB Layout photo of the new gaincompensated switched capacitor integrator ix
12 List of Tables 3. Simulated summary of the fully differential foldedcascode amplifier x
13 Chapter Introduction. Background Integrators are used in many analog systems, such as oversampled analogtodigital converters, filters, and so on []. Perhaps the most popular approach for realizing analog signal processing in MOS integrated circuits is through the use of SwitchedCapacitor (SC) circuits, because they can get accurate frequency response. The filter coefficients are determined by capacitance ratio which can be set quite precisely in an integrated circuit. SC circuit is realized with the use of some basic building blocks, such as opamp, capacitors, switches, and nonoverlapping clock. The basic principles of a SC integrator can be well understood with an ideal opamp. However, some important nonidealities of the opamp in practical SC circuits are DC gain, unitgain frequency, phase margin, slew rate, and dc offset [3]. The DC gain of amplifiers in a MOS technology intended for SC circuits is typically on the order of 40dB to 80dB. Low gain affects the coefficient of the discrete time transfer function of the Silters. The unitgain frequency and phase margin of an opamp gives an indication of the small signal settling behavior of an opamp. general rule of the thumb is the clock frequency should be at least five times lower than the unitfrequency assuming phase margin is greater than 70 degrees [4]. The trade off between gain and bandwidth makes high speed and high accuracy circuits not easy be designed. Chapter reviews an overview and modeling of the integrators for both discrete time and continuous time. The nonidealities of the SC integrators, and a double sampling technique that used to improve the sampling rate are also introduced. Chapter 3 demonstrates the design, theory, implementations and simulations of the gaincompensated SC integrators. way called CDS technique can significantly enhance the opamp finite gain and reduce the input offset
14 voltage. It is very attractive when used for the delta sigma modulators with MSH structure to reduce the pole error. Finally, we proposed a new topology that have effectively high opamp finite gain.. Motivation Q ( z) X(z) ( ) z ( ) z Y (z) z Y(z) Q ( z) ( ) z ( ) z Y (z) z Figure.: Block diagram of deltasigma modulator with a  MSH structure The cascaded (MSH) structure provides the high order noise shaping combined with the robust stability of the first order system. The overall performance, in general, is largely determined by the characteristics of the analog components, specially the integrator. The actual integrator transfer function differs from the ideal case due to the nonzero switch resistance, finite DC gain, finite bandwidth of opamp, and so on. In general, the integrator transfer function can be written as [4] H(z) = V out(z) V in (z) = ( ζ)z (.) ( δ)z Where ζ and δ are the gain error and pole error, respectively. The effects of the gain error and the pole error can be derived by the analysis of typical deltasigma modulators with a  MSH structure shown in Fig... nalysis of Fig.., assume the errors ζ i and δ i (i= and ) are small. The zdomain output of first, second, and the overall of the modulator is given by Y (z) ( ζ )z X(z) + [ ( δ )z ]Q (z) (.) Y (z) ( ζ )z Q (z) + [ ( δ )z ]Q (z) (.3)
15 Y (z) = Y (z) z + Y (z) ( z ) = ( ζ )z X(z) + [δ z + ζ z ( z )]Q (z) + [( z ) + δ z ( z )]Q (z) (.4) The second and the third term of Eq.(.4) are quantization noise due to the pole error and gain error. In the second term, the noise of first integrator due to the pole error δ is unshaped. However, the pole error of second modulator and both of the gain error was shaped to high frequency, because a zero at DC. It makes the first integrator be a dominant factor that influence the performance of MSH structure. ssuming a conventional SC integrator, the capacitor mismatch of the sampling capacitor and integration capacitor cause the gain error was 0.0. The finite gain of opamp is 40dB, then the transfer function can described as V out (z) V in (z) = The ideal transfer function, can be described as z ( + ) ( + )z =.0z.0.0z (.5) V out (z) V in (z) = z z (.6) The entire analog, clock and digital control circuits for the modulators has been implemented in software by Matlab and Simulink. Taking the transfer function of Eq.(.5) and substitute it into the block diagram shown in Fig... The SNR obtained by varying the signal amplitude shown in Fig.., and depict the quantization noise cannot be shaped when the nonideal integrator at first stage. However, if the nonideal integrator at second stage, it will not decrease the performance of the whole system. From Fig.. and the derivation of Eq.(.4), we can find that nonideality due to opamp finite gain for the SC integrator at first stage in MSH structure dominate the performance. One direct approach to reduce the error is to design a high gain opamp. Taking the transfer function of Eq. (.5), and assume is 60dB. From the simulation result shown in Fig..3, we can find that the SC integrator with high gain at first stage really reduce the errors. In order to solve the pole error that caused by opamp finite gain, we try to find some way that can enhance the opamp gain, and don t need to change the opamp itself. way called Correlated Double Sampling (CDS) technique can used for the SC integrator. It sampled the error at one half phase, then compensated it at next half phase, and makes the opamp finite gain effectively enhanced. In this thesis, we will show how the compensated SC integrator work. Finally, a new topology is proposed. 3
16 90 80 Nnoideal first stage Nonideal second stage Ideal integrator SNR (db) Signal mplitude (db) Figure.: SNR variations with amplitude for a  MSH structure Integrator with no first stage Integrator with gain first stage SNR (db) Signal mplitude (db) Figure.3: SNR variations with amplitude for a  MSH structure and a comparison between conventional and gaincompensated integrator 4
17 Chapter n Overview of Integrator. Introduction This chapter discuss the difference between Discrete Time(DT) and Continuous Time(CT) integrators, and the nonidealities of the real integrators, then a double sampling technique that used to increase the sampling rate also introduced. There are several nonidealities of a opamp, such as finite gain, finite bandwidth, settling time, offset voltage, and so on, which all need to be concerned when design a SC integrator. The transfer function of the integrators used in the systems must be closed to an ideal function, /( z ). The chapter will debate the trade off between both the specifications, and review some basic concepts of the SC integrators.. Switch Capacitor Integrator.. Continuous time Integrator CT integrator as shown in Fig.. and Fig.. are noninverting and inverting topology. The ideal transfer function of the two topology can given by [3] where ω I = integrator frequency V out (jω) V in (jω) = = jω I jωr C ω V out (jω) V in (jω) = τ I = integrator time constant = j ωτ I (.) jωr C = jω I ω = j ωτ I (.) Both of the two ideal integrator have magnitude and phase response shown in Fig..3. The magnitude response is the same but phase response is different by 80. From Eq. (.) and Eq. (.) can find it has a pole at zero in frequency domain. 5
18 Vin R C R R Vout Figure.: CT noninverting integrator Vin R C Vout Figure.: CT inverting integrator Here we add the influence of finite gain and finite unitgainbandwidth (UGB) to CT inverting opamp show in Fig.., and the closedloop transfer function can be described as V out (s) V in (s) = ( sr C ) (s)sr C +sr C + (s)sr C +sr C ssume that (s) of opamp can be described as (s) = = ( ω I s ) (s)(s/ω I ) (s/ω I )+ + (s)(s/ω I) (s/ω I )+ (.3) (0) + s ω 3dB (.4) t low frequencies (s 0), (s) is approximately (0) and (.3) becomes V out V in = (0) (.5) t high frequencies (s ), (s) is approximately UGB, and (.3) becomes s V out = ( UGB )( ω I V in s s ) (.6) Eq. (.) (.5) and (.6) describe the different frequency transfer function of Eq. (.3). In order to discriminate the frequency region of the nonideal integrator due to opamp finite gain and bandwidth. We can simply assume Eq. (.) equal to Eq. (.5) and Eq. (.6), and can get ω x = ω I (0) (.7) ω x = UGB (.8) 6
19 00 Vout(s)/Vin(s) 50 db rg[vout(s)/vin(s)] rad/s 0 Noninverting Inverting log Figure.3: Magnitude and phase response for CT integrator 50 Vout(s)/Vin(s) Magnitude 0 db X X3 X rg[vout(s)/vin(s)] Phase rad/s 3 X4 X log Figure.4: Magnitude and phase response for inverting CT integrator when (0) and UGB are finite Here we assume the integrator frequency ω I is 0kHz, unitgainbandwidth UGB is 0MHz, and opamp gain is 40dB. The resulting magnitude and phase response of inverting integrator show how the gain and pole effect the ideal integrator. From the simulation result shown in Fig..4, where X = ω x is due to opamp finite gain, X = ω x is due to opamp finite bandwidth, and X 3 = ω I is the integrator frequency. The idealness of the integrator is determine whether the phase is nearly ±90. From the phase response of Fig..4 can get the operational frequency range of CT integrator at the interval between X 4 and X 5, the CT integrator will approximate ideal behavior, where X 4 = 0ω I (0) and X 5 = UGB 0 [3]. s we can see, a real integrator was limited by the two parameters, gain and bandwidth of opamp. 7
20 .. Switched Capacitor Integrator Consider the circuit shown in Fig..5. The dynamic circuit is useful in simulating a large value of resistor, generally > MΩ which not occupy much area in layout []. The clock signals φ and φ form two phase of nonoverlapping clock signal. v S S v C v R sc v (a) (b) v C T (c) v C Figure.5: (a) Switched capacitor resistor (b) and the equivalent circuit (c) and the clock signal with the equivalent circuit When φ is high, the S is on and the capacitor C is charged to V The charge q stored on the capacitor during this interval is q = CV (.9) When S is on, the charge stored on the capacitor is q = CV (.0) If V and V are not equal, then a charge equal to the difference between q and q is transferred during the interval of clock. The average current is given by I avg = C(V V ) T = V V R sc (.) The resistance of the switched capacitor circuit is given by R sc = T C = Cf clk (.) 8
21 C C V V V V (a) (b) Figure.6: (a) Negative and (b) positive switched capacitor circuit Vin Cs Vout Vin Cs Vout (a) (b) Figure.7: (a) Inverting and (b) noninverting SC integrator that are insensitive to parasitic capacitors Where f clk is the clock frequency and R sc is the equivalent resistance. Because the SC resistor of Fig..5 is sensitive to parasitic capacitors, it finds little use. Consider the circuit of Fig..6 (a) negative and (b) positive switched capacitor resistor that are insensitive to the capacitor parasitics [6], and using the switched capacitor resistor to replace the R of Fig... The noninverting and inverting SC integrator are shown in Fig..7. The ideal transfer function of noninverting integrator can be described as H(z) = V out(z) V in (z) = ( z ) z = ( ) z (.3) To get the frequency response, replace z by e jωt and get H(e jωt ) = V out(e jωt ) V in (e jωt ) = ( ) e jωt = ( e jωt/ ) (.4) e jωt/ e jωt/ Replacing e jωt/ e jωt/, Eq.(.4) becomes H(e jωt ) = ( e jωt/ ) j sin(ωt/) = ( ωt/ )( jωt sin(ωt/) )(e jωt/ ) (.5) Where the integrator frequency can be expressed as ω I = T (.6) 9
22 0 Vout(w)/Vin(w) SC integrator CT integrator 8 Magnitude (db) 6 4 Wi W/W s Figure.8: Magnitude response of CT and DT noninverting integrator 4 3 rg[vout(w)/vin(w)] SC integrator CT integrator Phase (rad/s) 0 Wi W/W s Figure.9: Phase response of CT and DT noninverting integrator The integrator frequency, ω I, of the SC integrator can be well defined, because it is proportional to the ratio of capacitors. The second and third terms in Eq. (.5) represent the magnitude and phase error respectively. Here, we assume the CT integrator frequency ω I is equal to 0. ω s, where ω s is five times the sampling frequency ω s of a SC integrator, and ω is the input frequency. The comparison between ideal CT and DT integrators shown in Fig..8 and Fig..9 are magnitude and phase frequency response. The magnitudes of the CT and DT integrators are closed to each other when input frequency is smaller than ω I, but the phase is equal only when ω = 0. We can find when the input signal compare to the sampling frequency is low, like delta sigma modulator. The DT integrator would work like a CT integrator. In many applications, a noninverting and an inverting SC integrators are in series in a feedback loop [3]. Then, the phase errors of each integrator will be canceled. 0
23 ..3 Nonideal Effects of Switched Capacitor Integrator The nonideal behavior of the SC integrators include charge injection, finite gain, settling time, slew rate of amplifier and so on. In this section, we will consider some primary nonidealities of the SC integrators. Finite Gain of mplifier V in C p V x V x C l V out V in V x C p V x C l Vout (a) (b) Figure.0: Smallsignal models of (a) sampling (b) integrating noninverting SC integrator [] Fig..0 shows the smallsignal linear model of Fig..7 (b). The transfer function of the integrator can be calculated and expressed as [] H(z) = ( r z ) r (.7) r z Where r and r are the closedloop static errors. They can be expressed r = r = f + f f + f (.8) (.9) Where f and f are the Deedback factors during both sampling and integration phase. They can be expressed f = f = + C p (.0) + + C p (.) Where is the sampling capacitor, is the integration capacitor, and C p is the parasitic capacitor of opamp. s can be seen from Eq.(.7), the gain and pole errors of the integrator transfer function depend on the gain of the amplifier and the dc feedback factors.
24 Slew Rate of mplifier The SC integrators like Fig..7 are less sensitive to slewrate limits than amplifiers. This is because the feedback capacitor,, holds the output voltage of the opamp constant when no capacitors are being connected to the inverting inputs of the opamp. Slewrate limitations occur only when the output of opamp is changing due to the change of charge on during the interval of integration phase. To avoid this limitation, it is necessary that the following inequality be satisfied[3] v out (max) SR Where v out (max) is the maximum output swing of the integrator, T is the integration time. Setting time of amplifier < T (.) V in V out C p Figure.: SC integrator during integration phase The realization of highspeed and highaccuracy SC integrators are critical for analog signal processing applications, such as data converters. key component is the settling time of opamp. The noninverting integrator of Fig..7(b) sampled the input voltage by during φ, and then transferred to during φ. During the integration phase φ, the opamp output must settle to desire level of accuracy within the allotted time. Fig.. shows the configuration of SC integrator during the integration phase, assuming ideal switches. To develop a generalized analysis for SC integrator during the integration phase, the circuit in Fig.. is mapped into the general model [8] shown in Fig... The closed loop is given by CL (s) = γ(s) OL(s) + d(s) (.3) + OL (s)β(s)
25 d(s) Vin out γ(s) (s) V Figure.: Feedback model consisting of a feedforward term d(s), a feedback term β(s), an amplifier OL (s), and an input scaler γ(s) [8] β(s) V in  V V out Cp Cs  Cp V (a) (b) Figure.3: Equivalent circuits for (a) γ(s) (b) β(s) for an ideal SC integrator [8] The amplifier transfer function (s) can be expressed as OL (s) = (0) + s ω 3dB (.4) Where γ(s) is the transfer function from the integrator input to the input terminals of the opamp is simply a capacitive network. It is determine by the equivalent circuit shown in Fig..3(a), and can be expressed γ = + + C p (.5) Where β(s) is the feedback transfer function. It is computed from the equivalent circuit shown in Fig..3(b), and can be expressed β = + + C p (.6) The contribution of V in to V out is determined by the feedforward transfer function, d(s). The SC integrator, d(s) contributes an RHP zero at ω z = g m / [8], where g m is the transconductance of opamp. The effect of the RHP zero is to cause a small initial step in the output that is opposite in direction to the response to the input step. 3
26 For the SC integrator, the feedforward term, d(s), is much smaller than the first term in Eq.(.3) and can be neglected. During the integration phase, the closedloop gain of the inverting SC integrator can be described as CL (s) OLγ + OL β (.7) Combine Eq.(.4) and Eq.(.7), and assuming /[β OL (0)], we can get CL (s) + j γ β f f UGB β (.8) Where f 3dB OL (0) = f UGB is the unitgain frequency, the step response of a singlepole system with time constant, τ, can be expressed as τ = πf UGB β (.9) For a step input to the opamp, the output voltage is given by V out = V outfinal ( e t/τ ) (.30) For the output voltage of the opamp to settle less than % of its final value, V outfinal, requires 5τ []. ruleofthumb estimate for the settling time is simply /(f UGB β). Offset of mplifier Opamp with offset  V + V V os V out Offset free opamp Figure.4: Opamp with offset voltage The source of offset may arise from the physical design of the differential amplifier or process variations. Circuit thresholds, mismatch of device sizes, are all source of offset error. Many different techniques for calibrating differential amplifier offset error have been proposed. 4
27 V in  V V out V os Figure.5: Inverting SC integrator with offset error  V V os V out V in  V V os V out (a) (b) Figure.6: SC integrator with offset error at (a) sampling phase (b) integration phase One analog technique involves careful physical layout to minimize the basic offset error, or the use of a switch capacitor circuit to correct offset error shown in Fig..4. nother digital technique is to cancel the offset at the output of amplifier [5]. Here we discuss a topical way that used to cancel the offset voltage with switched capacitor topology. n inverting SC integrator shown in Fig..5 is used to discuss. When Φ on, the integrator start to sample the offset voltage with the capacitor shows in Fig..6 (a). Then, next phase Φ on, it integrate the input voltage shown in Fig..6 (b). t the same time the voltage that storage on during previous phase Φ, will cancel the offset voltage. The offset voltage will not be integrated to the output for one cycle clock period. Charge Injection Charge injection can be simple displayed in Fig..7. When the MOSFET switch is on, and V ds is small, the charge under the gate oxide resulting from the inverted channel is Q ch. When the MOSFET turn off, this charge is injected to the capacitor and V in. However the charge is less effect when the switch turn on, because the input voltage is connected to C through the 5
28 v in Charge Injection C Figure.7: Simple configuration using an NMOS switch to show charge injection [] channel resistance makes the error unimportant. Charge injection is itself a complex one. It has been shown that if the clock signal turns off fast, the channel charge is distributes fairly equally between the adjacent nodes. Thus, half of the channel charge is distributed onto C [], and if it is assumed that clock swings between VDD and ground, the charge that appear at the output of C can be approximated as Where V c = C oxwl(v DD V in [V THN0 + γ( V fp + V in V fp )]) C C ox = Oxide capacitance per area V fp = Electrostatic potential of ptype substrate V THN = NMOS threshold voltage (.3) Eq.(.3) shows the problem associate with charge injection. The change in voltage across C is nonlinear where respect to V in due to the threshold voltage. Thus, it can be said that if the charge injection is signaldependent, harmonic distortion appear, such as sampleddata systems. In this section we have discussed some nonideal effects that primary occur at switched capacitor topology. There are still many other effects, such as clock jitter, capacitive feedthrough, thermal noise, and so on, still need to be concerned. One of the important nonideal effects is opamp finite gain and will still be discussed in next chapter..3 DoubleSampled Technique conventional singlesampled SC integrator is shown in Fig..7. It consists of opamp, one sampling capacitor, one integrating capacitor, and several switches that are controlled by a twophase nonoverlapping clock. With this approach, the output is updated only during φ, and the maximum sampling rate is limited to /(τ), where τ is the opamp settling time. From Eq.(.9) can find the minimum settling time. 6
29 V in C s V out Figure.8: Doublesampled SC integrator To increase the sampling rate without reducing the opamp settling time, a double sampling technique can be used [7, 9] shown in Fig..8. During φ, sampled the input voltage and transferred the charge that have been stored at previous half phase to. During φ, both two capacitors also do the same thing. Therefore, the output is updated during both two half phase. The maximum sampling rate is limited to /τ, where τ is the settling time of opamp. The sampling rate is twice of the singlesampled SC integrators. The double sampling SC integrator uses two capacitors and to sample the input voltage. Each sampling capacitor samples the input by multiplying its capacitor by V in. If, the charge that transferred to will be different. But the errors due to the mismatch of capacitors and will be modulated to half of the sampling frequency, which can be filtered easily. Here we will show how it work. When φ on, was integrated by, and it can be expressed as V out (n ) = V out (n ) + V i (n 3 ) (.3) When φ on, was integrated by, and can be expressed V out (n) = V out (n ) + V i (n ) (.33) ssume that = + / and = /, then the inputoutput relationship can be written as [7] V out (n) = V out (n ) + V i (n ) + ( )n V i (n ) (.34) The last term of Eq.(.34) is the product of the input and ( ) n, which is the modulation of the input by a sampled cosine at frequency f s /, because ( ) n = cos(π((f s /)nt)).therefore, the errors can filtered to high frequency. 7
30 V in Cs C s D Q V out out V r out V r Figure.9: firstorder doublesampled delta sigma modulator [7] V in V r Y Cs C r Z Y Z C r D Q FSM V out Y Z Y Y Z Z Figure.0: firstorder doublesampled modulator using additiveerror switching [7] lthough a double sampling SC integrator is very attractive to have twice sampling rate, and have no problem on sampling capacitors mismatch for input voltage. However, when consider the application for delta sigma modulator shown in Fig..9, the errors that from the output quantizer will mixe to the baseband. Because the modulator works like a filter, and will shape the noise from baseband to high frequency. When there is a mismatch between and. From Eq.(.34), the noise that have already shaped to high frequency now will be mixed to baseband. There are many way [7, 9, 0] have been proposed to solve this problem. Fig..0 shows a first order doublesampled delta sigma modulator with a finite state machine(fsm) [7]. Compare to the conventional modulator show in Fig..9, the different of them are quantizer and FSM. The key point here is that the quantizer voltage V r shows in Fig..0 not switching. There is a constant voltage V r at the opamp input, it means that quantization noise will not mixed to the baseband. The FSM used here is to control phase Z and Y, which not only provide positive or negative feedback voltage V r, but also make the function of Eq.(.34) work. The algorithm that form by FSM is not complex and can be constructed by digital circuit. The double sampling way that used to improve the sampling rate is very attractive. 8
31 .4 Summary In this chapter we have discussed the difference between CT and DT integrators. Both of them will be similar when the input frequency of the DT integrators relative to the sampling frequency is low. The phenomenon makes the topology that operate at high frequency very attractive, such as delta sigma modulators. The nonidealities of the SC integrators and the trade off between both of them are also discussed. One of the nonidealities is the opamp finite gain, if it has infinite value, the SC integrator will work like an ideal integrator /( z ). The opamp finite gain makes the pole of discretetime integrator deviate from the ideal position z = yielding a Dinite gain in the SC integrator. There are some trade off between those nonideal parameters when design a circuit, how to choose the specification depends on the applications. doublesampled technique that used to increase the sampling rate makes it easier to design the bandwidth of opamp, because there is a trade off between high gain and high bandwidth of opamp. However, the offset voltage may not canceled during one of half phase. In next chapter, a SC integrator that has effective high gain will be introduced, It uses a CDS technique to sample the errors due to opamp finite gain, then compensates it at next half phase. 9
32 Chapter 3 The GainCompensated SC Integrators 3. SC Integrator With No Compensation 3.. Introduction This chapter discuss the SC integrators with no compensation first, then a CDS technique that used to compensate the errors due to opamp finite gain will be introduced. The sampling frequency of the SC integrators is limited by the opamp settling time. circuit combine the CDS technique with double sampling frequency is very attractive. However, there is a trade off between opamp offset voltage and sampling frequency. The comparison between doublesampled and singlesampled technique can makes it more clear. Finally, we proposed a new singlesampled gaincompensated SC integrator, the simulation results and math derivation are all conform to the original design specifications. 3.. Conventional SC Integrator Vin Φ C s Φ Φ Φ Φ Φ V  Vout Vin Φ Φ Φ Φ Φ Φ  V Vout Φ Φ Φ Φ (a) (b) Figure 3.: (a) Noninverting and (b) Inverting SC integrator 0
33 V in Vout  V Vout (a) (b) Figure 3.: Noninverting SC integrator during (a) φ and (b) φ Cs  V Cf V out V in  V V out (a) (b) Figure 3.3: Inverting SC integrator during (a) φ and (b) φ The topology shown in Fig. 3. (a) is a noninverting SC integrators, and it can be analyzed with two consecutive half phase shown in Fig. 3.. When φ on, the charge conservation at node V can be expressed as [V i (n )] [ V out(n 3 ) + V out(n 3 )] = [ V out(n )] [ V out(n ) + V out(n )] (3.) Taking the ztransform, and assume the capacitors =, the overall transfer function can be expressed V out (z) V i (z) = z ( + ) ( + (3.) )z The inverting SC integrator shown in Fig.3. (b), also can be analyzed with two consecutive half phase shown in Fig When φ on, the charge conservation at node V can be expressed as [ V out(n 3 ) + V out(n 3 )] = [ V out(n ) + V i(n )] [ V out(n ) + V out(n )] (3.3)
34 Taking the ztransform, and assume the capacitors =, the overall transfer function can be expressed as V out (z) V i (z) = ( + ) ( + )z (3.4) From Eq.(3.) and Eq.(3.4), can find that the noninverting and inverting SC integrator have the same pole error, which is proportional to /. The difference of them only a half of delay and phase shift by The transfer function also can derive from Eq.(.7), which combine the parasitical capacitor for more detail. Cs V in V  Vout Cs Figure 3.4: Noninverting doublesampled SC integrator The SC integrator with doublesampled technique, which used to double the sampling rate is shown in Fig The noninverting SC integrator can be analyzed with two consecutive half phase shown in Fig When φ on, the charge conservation at node V can be expressed as [V i(n )] [ V out(n ) + V out (n )] = [ V out(n )] [ V out(n ) + V out(n (3.5) )] Taking the ztransform, and assume the capacitors = =, the overall transfer function can be expressed V out (z) V i (z) = z ( + ) ( + )z (3.6)
35 Cs Cs Cf V in V  V out V in Cs V  V out Cs Cs (a) (b) Figure 3.5: Noninverting doublesampled SC integrator during (a) φ and (b) φ Cs Cf V in V  Vout Cs Cf Figure 3.6: Noninverting doublesampled SC integrator with two integration capacitors Cs Cf V in V  C f Vout V in Cs V  Vout Cf Cs Cs Cf (a) (b) Figure 3.7: Noninverting doublesampled SC integrator with two integration capacitors during (a) φ and (b) φ 3
36 nother doublesampled SC integrator used two integration capacitors shown in Fig. 3.6 also can be analyzed with two consecutive half phase shown in Fig When φ on, the charge conservation at node V can be expressed as C s[v i (n )] C f[ V out(n 3 ) + V out(n 3 )] = C s [ V out(n )] C f [ V out(n ) + V out(n )] (3.7) Taking the ztransform, and assume the capacitors = = =, the overall transfer function can be expressed H(z) = V out(z) V i (z) = z ( + ) ( + (3.8) )z The DC magnitude at z = can be expressed H(z) z= = (3.9) The circuit shown in Fig.3.6 use two integration capacitors,, and two sampling capacitors, C s to integrate the input voltage. It has two paths to transfer the charge alternately, and each path works like the circuit shown in Fig.3. (a) do. From the transfer function of the SC integrator that discussed above shown in Eq.(3.) and Eq.(3.8), can find they are same. The only difference is Fig.3.6 integrated input voltage during both half phase. Compare to the another doublesampled SC integrator shown in Fig. 3.4, which use only one integration capacitor. The charge always transfer to the capacitor during both half phase, the Eq.(3.6) show a half of delay term. It is a key point when design a gaincompensated SC integrator. Because the topology of Fig.3.4 that use only one integrating capacitor will accumulate input voltage and gain error for two consecutive half phase. It will make the gaincompensated SC integrator cannot be realized, the reason will discussed more detail in next section. s we can see, the pole error of SC integrator with no compensation is proportion to /. In order to reduce the nonideal effects, the way called gaincompensated technique will be introduced next. 3. Existed GainCompensated Integrators 3.. Introduction topology of SC integrator with gain compensation is proposed. It employs the same input as in the integrating phase during the calibration cycle to compensate for the integrating pole error due to the finite gain of opamp. The SC integrator error can be classified by its 4
37 gain and pole errors. Capacitor mismatch causes the gain error while the finite opamp gain causes the gain and pole errors. It is difficult to design an opamp with both high gain and wide bandwidth, therefore the combination of gaincompensated and doublesampled technique will be attractive. In this section we will discuss a singlesampled gaincompensated technique first, then a doublesampled technique will be introduced. t last, a new singlesampled gaincompensated circuit is proposed. 3.. SingleSampled GainCompensated Integrator V in V  V out Cs Cf Figure 3.8: Gaincompensated SC integrator with limit in input [] topology of SC integrator with gain compensation shows in Fig. 3.8 is proposed []. The output is valid during phase, and produce an output during phase equal to the output during phase. By maintaining an approximately constant output voltage from phase to phase, V = V out / remains nearly constant during phase and phase as desired. The circuit works well under the assumption that V in is approximately constant. First, we analysis how the circuit work, and discuss the limitation of V in. Then another topology that used to improve this topology will be introduced. Finally, make a comparison between of them. The topology that have effective high gain can be described as follow. The circuit can be analyzed with three half consecutive phase, form (n3/) to (n/). First, we assume the circuit start at φ (n3/) shown in Fig. 3.9(a). During this phase, the circuit not only integrated the input voltage but also mix the error voltage that due to opamp finite gain. The charge storage in the capacitors and, include the mixed error charge. The mixed error charge that due to the opamp finite gain is V out (n 3/)/. Next, the circuit 5
38 Cf V in Cs V  (a) Cf V out V in Cs V  (b) V out Figure 3.9: The SC integrator during (a) phase and (b) phase switch to φ (n) shown in Fig. 3.9(b). The capacitor C s = are used to cancel the input voltage that dump by at previous phase, also integrated the input voltage to output. There will be a problem here for input voltage limitation, and it will be discussed next. During this phase, the voltage V in (n ) and V out (n 3/)/ was integrated to the capacitor C f, where the second term V out (n 3/)/ was dumped by the capacitor. The capacitor C f now storage the previous and this moment input voltage and previous gain error. Then the capacitor will storage the voltage V out (n 3/)/ and V out (n )/ on it. t third phase, the circuit switch to φ (n /), the voltage storage on with V out (n )/ will be canceled by V out (n /)/, and only the term of V out (n 3/)/ preserve. The circuit works like to predict the error voltage and cancel it at next phase. This is how it have effective squared gain. Here shows the charge conservation at opamp inverted input. First, when φ high, and φ low, the charge conservation at node V can be described as [ V out(n 3 ) + V in(n 3 )] C f[v out (n 3 )] = [ V out(n )] C s [ V out(n ) + V in (n )] C f [ V out(n ) + V out (n )] Second, when φ high, and φ low, the charge conservation at node V can be described as [ V out(n )] [ V out(n 3 ) + V out(n 3 )] (3.0) = [ V out(n ) + V in(n )] [ V out(n ) + V out(n )] (3.) Combining Eq.(3.0) and Eq.(3.) assuming that =, and taking the ztransform, the overall transfer function can be expressed H(z) = V out(z) V in (z) = ( + 4 )z + z [( + 4 )( + ) + ( + 3 )]z [( + 4 )( + )]z (3.) 6
39 The DC magnitude at z= can be expressed H(z) z= = (3.3) To show the disadvantage of slow moving of input show in Fig. 3.8, we first assume ideal switch and ideal opamp here. The circuit can be analyzed over three consecutive half clock cycles shown in Fig On the last half cycle, phase, V in is integrated onto through to produce V out (n), and can be expressed as V out (n) = V out (n ) V in (n) (3.4) On phase at time (n /), dumps its charge V in (n ) to C f, also C s = inject a charge V in (n /) to C f. The total charge that transferred from C s and can be express Q total = Q Cs (n ) + Q Cs (n /) = V in (n ) V in (n /) (3.5) From Eq.(3.5) can find that V in (n ) V in (n /) is needed, and they are the reason why the input must be slow moving, it means that input must be approximately constant. To solve this disadvantage, another topology have been proposed [3] shown in Fig Fig.3. shows the circuit during φ and φ. It is assumed that the discrete time during φ is (n/) and that during φ it is n. Thus, the discrete times associate with the previous φ and φ are (n3/) and (n), respectively. The charge conversion equation at node V can be described in three half cycle. V in V  V out Cf Cs Figure 3.0: Gaincompensated SC integrator with no limitation for input signal [3] 7
40 V in Cs V  (a) Cf V out Cs V  Cf (b) V out Figure 3.: The SC integrator during phase (a) φ and (b) φ First, when φ, high, and φ, low, the conversion at node V can be described as [V in (n 3 ) + V out(n 3 ) ] + C sv in (n 3 ) C fv out (n 3 ) = [V out(n ) + V out(n ) ] V out (n ) V out (n ) Second, when φ, high, and φ, low, the conversion at node V can be described as (3.6) [ V out(n 3 ) + V out (n 3 )] [ V out(n ) ] = [V in (n ) + V out(n ) ] [ V out(n ) + V out (n (3.7) )] Combining Eq.(3.6) and Eq.(3.7), and assuming the opamp DC gain [5], the charge conservation equation of the V becomes V out (n )[ + + ] =V out (n 3 )[ + + f + C s )] C (C s V in (n (3.8) ) Taking the ztransform of Eq.(3.8), and assuming C s =, the approximated overall transfer function can be obtained as C f ( H(z) = + Cs ) (3.9) [ Cs ( + Cs )]z C f If = C s = = C f is assumed, Eq.(3.9) becomes H(z) = ( (3.0) )z Where the gain error is / and the pole error is /, the gain is enhanced significantly when compare to the DC gain of for simple integrator as shown in Fig..7. From analysis the 8
41 difference of them, we can find out the key point to design a SC integrator that insensitive to the finite gain of opamp is the. When always connect at the inverted input of opamp, the voltage of V out / will be sampled at the during both phase. Then the term of V out (n /)( /) and V out (n 3/)( /) will be canceled as shown in Eq.(3.8). It is the reason why have effective finite gain, because only the term / will keep. The offset of the opamp can also canceled by. The another advantage of Fig. 3.0 is the use of capacitor. The circuit use to sample the input first, and then compensate the voltage that dumped by at previous phase. It makes the disadvantage of slow moving will not happen. Here we use an ideal opamp to construct the singlesampled integrator shown in Fig In order to test the function of the topology, a 0kHz sinusoidal signal with amplitude of mv is applied to the topology. The sampling frequency is 0MHz, and the gain of the amplifier is 40dB. Then the output magnitude and phase of an ideal inverting integrator is given by H(z) ideal = z = 59.5 e jπ f in fs (3.) H(z) ideal = 90 The output magnitude and phase of the integrator with no compensation shown in Fig. 3.(b) is given by H(z) no compensation = 84.3 ( + ) ( + )z (3.) H(z) no compensation Where is the opamp finite gain. The output magnitude and the phase of the integrator with gain compensation that paper proposed shown in Fig. 3.0 is given by H(z) paper = ( 55.9 )z (3.3) H(z) paper 9 From Eq.(3.) and Eq.(3.3), can find the SC integrator with gain compensation is very close to ideal ones. The DC magnitude is effectively to /, and makes the opamp more easier to design without high opamp gain. The finite gain of opamp not only reduce the magnitude of output signal but also cause a phase error. The simulation results shown in Fig. 3.3 and Fig. 3.4 are the output signal of the SC integrators for conventional ones with no compensation and paper proposed. The simulation results shown in Fig. 3.5 is an SC integrator with no compensation but constructed of a 80dB opamp. The output voltage for a high gain opamp will be more approximately to an ideal SC integrator. The frequency response of the opamp with finite gain 40dB was shown in Fig
42 Figure 3.: The frequency response of the macro model opamp with 40dB magnitude Figure 3.3: The output voltage of the SC integrator with no gain compensation, f in = 0kHz with amplitude mv, f s = 0MHz, and =40dB 30
43 Figure 3.4: The output voltage of the SC integrator with gain compensation, f in = 0kHz with amplitude mv, f s = 0MHz, and =40dB Figure 3.5: The output voltage of the SC integrator with no gain compensation, f in = 0kHz with amplitude mv, f s = 0MHz, and =80dB 3
44 The gaincompensated technology that we discussed above are singlesampled topology. It sampled the gain error during one half phase, then compensated it during next half phase. The another one was constructed with a doublesampled technology, which integrated the input voltage during both two half phase, but only one half phase has the gain compensation. Next, we will show a doublesampled gaincompensated SC integrator and find the trade off between both of them. Finally, we design a circuit which is the modification of the paper proposed, and make a comparison of them DoubleSampled GainCompensated Integrator topology of SC integrator shown in Fig. 3.6 that combine with the doublesampled technique, and gain compensation has been proposed. The output is valid during both two half phase, and effectively double the sampling rate. The primary difference between doublesampled and singlesampled integrator is the sampling phase. singlesampled SC integrator sample the gain errors only during one half phase, and then compensated it at next half phase. However, there is no additional phase for doublesampled SC integrator to use, because it integrated the input voltage at both two half phase. The circuit has two feedback capacitors and C f, two sampling capacitors and C s, one compensated capacitor C s, and was constructed C s Cs Cf Vin  V Vout Cs Cf C s Figure 3.6: Doublesampled and gaincompensated SC integrator with no limit to input [4] 3
45 in differential pair. It is not only reduced the odd harmonic effects, but also can use by C s to cancel the slow moving effect. There are some other properties for this topology, and can be analyzed from three half consecutive phase as shown in Fig To analyze more convenient, here we assume the capacitor number that connect at inverted input of opamp during φ is α, during φ is β. C s Cs Cf Cs V in C s  V  V out Vin V Cf Vout C s Cf Cs Cf Cs C s (a) (b) Figure 3.7: Doublesampled and gaincompensated SC integrator with no limit to input during phase (a) φ and (b) φ First, when φ high and φ low, the charge conversion at node V can be described as [V in (n 3 ) + V out(n 3 ) = [ V out(n ) ] C s[ V out(n ) + V in (n )] C C f[ V out(n ) + V out (n )] ] [V out(n ) + V out(n ) ] + [V in(n 3 )] s [ V out(n ) ] Second, when φ high and φ low, the charge conversion at node V can be described as (3.4) [ V out(n ) = [V in (n ) + V out(n ) ] [V out (n 3 ) + V out(n 3) ] ] [V out (n ) + V out(n ) ] (3.5) 33
46 Combining Eq.(3.4) and Eq.(3.5), assuming that = = C s = =, the charge conservation equation of the V becomes V out (n )[ ] + V out(n 3 ) )[ (β ( β )(α + )( + )] + V in(n ) = V out (n )[( + α )( + β )( β )] + V in(n )[( α )( β )] (3.6) Taking the Ztransform of Eq.(3.6), the overall transfer function can be obtained as H(z) = V out(z) V in (z) = ( α )( ) z β z 3 ( ) + z [ (β ) ( )( α + )( + )] + [( + α)( + β )( )] β β (3.7) The DC gain at z= can be described as, and α β H(z) z= = ( β ) ( + α (3.8) α β From Fig. 3.7 can find that the number of capacitors at inverted input of opamp during both β ) φ (α = 4) and φ (β = ), then substitute the value into Eq.(3.8), the DC magnitude at z= can be expressed as H(z) z= = + 5 (3.9) fter a careful analysis including the opamp finite gain, here we assume = /µ, the integrator output voltage in the zdomain also can given by[4] Where assume = C s = C s, = C f and E(z) = V out (z) = H i (z)e(z)v in (z) (3.30) H i (z) = z (3.3) x + µ Cs z x( + µ) + z [xµ Cs (µ Cs ) z ( + µ)µ Cs z 3 ] (3.3) x = + µ + 3µ (3.33) H i (z) represents the ideal transfer function of a SC integrator, and E(z) gives an estimation of the transferfunction deviation caused by the opamp finite gain. The error function magnitude was computed as E. Here we use a SC integrator with no compensation shown in Fig..7, and compare to the circuit shown in Fig The gain errors are in the order of / for compensated topology, but/ for noncompensated topology. s Fig.3.8 demonstrates, the compensated topology has better magnitude accuracy. 34
47 0 0 SC Integrator With No Gain Compensation ( E ) Double Sampled Gain Compensated SC Integrator ( E ) 0 Magnitude Error (db) Op mp DC Gain Figure 3.8: Magnitude errors of the integrator for =, f in = 0kHz, and f s = 0MHz The circuit has twice sampling rate, equivalent high opamp gain, and no limitation to input signal for slow moving. But there is a disadvantage for opamp offset voltage, and cannot be canceled. To know how this happen, we can see the capacitors C s and C s shown in Fig During phase φ the right hand side of capacitor connected at inverted input of opamp, C s short to ground at two side, and C s connect at the inverted input with its left hand side. During phase φ the right hand side of capacitor still connected at inverted input of opamp, and the offset voltage that storage on the capacitor during previous phase will be canceled. The capacitor C s integrated to the output. The capacitor C s connect to the inverted input of opamp, and the offset now connect to the inverted input of opamp with its right hand side to compensate the input voltage that dump by the at previous phase, it also integrated the offset voltage to the output. We can find that the offset voltage will be integrated due to the capacitor C s and C s. If we assume that the offset voltage shows in Fig..4 is mv, it means the mv will be integrated to the output during φ in this topology. One reason that cause the offset voltage is the capacitor not always connect at opamp inverted input shown in Fig Is it possible to reduce or cancel the offset voltage, and also have gaincompensated effect. In next section we will alter the topology of Fig. 3.6, and explain the trade off between offset voltage, input limitation, gaincompensation, and doublesampled technique. 35
48 3..4 The Modification of DoubleSampled GainCompensated SC Integrators In this section, we will vary the circuit of Fig.3.6 and discuss the restrictions when design a doublesampled gaincompensated SC integrator. The modification circuit shown in Fig. 3.9 have two integrating capacitors, two sampling capacitors and three compensated capacitors. There are three steps to design the circuit and we can find out the trade off between offset voltage, input limitation, and gain compensation. + V in  V in Cs Cs V  Cf V out  V in  V in + V in C s C a C b  V  V  V  V + V in + V in  V in C s C a C b + V + V + V + V Cf Figure 3.9: The vary doublesampled and gaincompensated SC with no limit to input + V in  V in C b Cs C a C s C s C a Cs Cs V  Cf V out Cf + V in  V in C b C s C s C b C a Ca Cs Cs V  Cf Cf Cf Vout C b (a) (b) Figure 3.0: The vary doublesampled and gaincompensated SC with no limit to input during (a) φ and φ 36
49 s we can see from Fig. 3.6, the sampling capacitor not always connect at the inverted input of opamp. It causes the offset voltage cannot be canceled and will integrate to the output. To improve this condition, first, we vary the capacitor and always connect at the inverted input of opamp shown in Fig. 3.9 to cancel the offset voltage. But now the previous input voltage would be dumped by and C s at next phase. In order to solve this problem, second, we use the capacitors C s and C a to cancel the previous input voltage that dumped by and C s. But now the capacitor C a sample the negative input voltage, it will make the integrator have no input voltage can integrated to output during φ. In order to solve this problem, third, we use the capacitor C b connect to the positive input. There are three steps for us to construct the topology. The capacitors we discuss above are all upper half of the differential pair circuit show in Fig We can find that during each phase, the capacitors are used to solve different problems that cause by the other capacitors. Then, let we check if the offset voltage can be reduced or canceled now. The capacitors and C s shown in Fig. 3.9 will not integrate the offset voltage during each consecutive half phase, because they always connect at the inverted input of opamp. However, the capacitor C b and C s will contribute a offset voltage now. Compare to the Fig. 3.6 that the offset voltage was caused of the capacitors C s and C s. We can find that the offset voltage still cannot reduced. How about the finite gain in this topology. It can be described with the same way shown in Eq.(3.4) Eq.(3.6). The DC magnitude of this topology can be expressed from Eq.(3.8). Here we assume the capacitors C a = C b = = = C s = =. Substitute α = 6 and β = 4 into Eq.(3.8), the DC magnitude can be expressed H(z) z= = (3.34) s we can see, the performance of the effective finite gain is inferior to Fig To make the effective gain better, here we adjust the size of the capacitors C a and. The capacitors size can be expressed C b = = C s = = C f = C and C a = C s = κc where 0 κ. It will not influence the original integrator function when adjust the size of the capacitors C a and C s, because the input voltage that integrated by C a and are canceled by each other. The input voltage only integrated by C b, during φ, and integrated by, C f during φ. The analysis of this circuit is also the same, and can substitute the value of capacitor number into α and β shown in Eq.(3.8). However the value of α and β should consider of the coefficient κ. In this topology, the coefficients α and β can be expressed as α = 4 + κ β = + κ (3.35) 37
50 Here we make a comparison between the circuit that has been modified by us shown in Fig. 3.9, and paper proposed shown in Fig From the result shown in Fig. 3. can find that the magnitude of the gain errors are proportional to the coefficient κ. We can find that the magnitude for both two circuits are very approximate, when κ is smaller than /8. The derivation of Eq.(3.4) and Eq.(3.5) describe the charge conservation at inverted input of opamp. We can find that the gain errors due to opamp finite gain are attenuated during three half consecutive phase. There is only one integration capacitor can integrate the input voltage more accuracy, the another one is inferior corresponsively. Because the circuit need to sample the previous gain errors first and then cancel it at next phase. The two topologies all have at least one sampling capacitor always connect at the opamp inverted input. It makes the gain errors can be stored and then compensated at next half phase. The effective finite gain of the SC integrator is enhanced, because it reduce the gain error at inverted input, and the charge can transferred to the output more accuracy. In order to show how this work, we use an opamp macro model with several finite gains to construct the two topology and simulate it by HSPICE. 0 0 Modification SC Integrator ( E, k=/) Modification SC Integrator ( E, k=/8) Paper Proposed SC Integrator ( E, k=0) 0 Magnitude Error (db) Op mp DC Gain Figure 3.: The comparison of gain errors between paper proposed and we proposed for κc a = C b = = κc s = C s = = C f, f in = 0kHz, and f s = 0MHz 38
51 In order to test the function of an integrator, a 0kHz sinusoidal signal with amplitude of mv is applied to the integrator. To see the gaincompensated effect more clear, here we assume the gain is small. The sampling frequency is 0MHz, and the gain of operational amplifier is 40dB. The magnitude of an ideal noninverting integrator is given by f in fs z / H(z) ideal = z = e jπ = 59.5 e jπ f in fs (3.36) H(z) ideal 90 The magnitude of an integrator with no compensation shown in Fig. 3.6 is given by, where is the opamp finite gain z / H(z) no compensation = 84.3 ( + ) ( + )z (3.37) H(z) no compensation 3.53 The magnitude of the inverting integrator that paper proposed shown in Fig. 3.6 is given by, where α = 4, β = ( α H(z) paper = )( ) z β z 3 ( ) + z [ (β ) ( )( α + )( + )] + [( + α)( + β )( )] β β 56.7 H(z) paper 9.89 (3.38) The magnitude of the inverting integrator that we proposed shown in Fig. 3.9 is also can given by Eq.(3.38), where α = 4 8, β = 8 ( α H(z) alter = )( ) z β z 3 ( ) + z [ (β ) ( )( α + )( + )] + [( + α)( + β )( )] β β 56.3 (3.39) From the simulation results shown in Fig. 3.8 and Fig. 3.9, can find that the charge on the capacitors and C f are different, it verify the inequality that we derive above. The gaincompensated situation only occurred during one half phase, the another half phase has no compensation. The doublesampled technique integrated the input voltage during both two half phase, so the sampling rate is twice as fast as the singlesampled technique. The effective DC gain is proportional to /. It makes the opamp don t need to be designed to a very high gain and also can reduce the power consumption. 39
52 Figure 3.: The output voltage for a noninverting SC integrator with no compensation shown in Fig. 3.6, f in = 0kHz with amplitude mv, f s = 0MHz, and =40dB Figure 3.3: The transferred charge on the integration capacitor, f in = 0kHz with amplitude mv, f s = 0MHz, and =40dB shown in Fig. 3.6, 40
53 Figure 3.4: The output voltage for a SC integrator that paper proposed shown in Fig. 3.6, f in = 0kHz with amplitude mv, f s = 0MHz, and =40dB Figure 3.5: The transferred charge on the integration capacitor, f in = 0kHz with amplitude mv, f s = 0MHz, and =40dB shown in Fig. 3.6, 4
54 Figure 3.6: The output voltage for a SC integrator shown in Fig. 3.9, k=/8, f in = 0kHz with amplitude mv, f s = 0MHz, and =40dB Figure 3.7: The transferred charge on the integration capacitor, k=/8, f in = 0kHz with amplitude mv, f s = 0MHz, and =40dB shown in Fig. 3.9, 4
55 Figure 3.8: The transferred charge on the integration capacitor, shown in Fig. 3.9, k=/8, f in = 0kHz with amplitude mv, f s = 0MHz, and =0dB Figure 3.9: The transferred charge on the integration capacitor, f in = 0kHz with amplitude mv, f s = 0MHz, and =0dB shown in Fig. 3.6, 43
56 The simulation result shown in Fig. 3. is the output voltage of a doublesampled SC integrator with no gain compensation. It shows the magnitude for a sinusoidal input, and was derived by Eq.(3.37) that combined with a term of. Compared the Fig. 3.4 with Fig. 3.6, which are the simulation results for a gaincompensated SC integrator that paper proposed and it s modification that we proposed. We can find the accuracy for those two circuits are very approximate. It also can derived from Eq.(3.38) and Eq.(3.39) independently, that combine with a term of. The charge transferred form sampling capacitor to the integrating capacitor was restricted by the opamp finite gain. Here we reduce the opamp finite gain to 0dB to see the difference of the charge that transferred between sampling and integrating capacitors shown in Fig. 3.8 and Fig The integrating capacitor that during compensated half phase have higher amplitude. Because it reduce the error voltage due to opamp finite gain to V out /, then the stored charge on sampling capacitor can transferred to integrating capacitor more accuracy. However, the another one half phase don t have gain compensation, because it was used to sample the errors. This is why only a half of phase can compensated the gain errors. s we can see, when the gain of opamp is higher the charge during the two integrating paths will more closer shown in Fig. 3.5 and Fig The doublesampled gaincompensated SC integrators have the trade off between offset voltage and gain compensation, because it only have a half of phase to cancel the offset, however the input voltage always integrated at both two half phase. lthough the doublesampled SC integrator cannot cancel the offset voltage completely, but it can use other auxiliary circuits to accomplish this purpose. There are some ways to reduce the offset voltage, which can be digital [5], or analog circuits [5]. Those circuits were proposed by papers and let the doublesampled gaincompensated technique can solve this problem more easier. The way that used to cancel the offset voltage, and reduce the flicker noise can be classified into two type. First, is the correlated double sampling(cds) technique. Second, is the CHopper Stabilization(CHS) technique. The way that we use can be generalized to CDS, which can enhance the opamp finite gain effectively. The another way of CHS technique can also makes offset voltage does not count anymore and flicker noise impact is highly reduced. But the disadvantage is that the effective gain is usually reduced[7], and usually used in continuous time system. The doublesampled gaincompensated technique is very useful and attractive in the application that need high gain and wide bandwidth. 44
57 3.3 New SingleSampled GainCompensated SC Integrator R R C c f C c Vin Vout C c f C c R R Figure 3.30: new singlesampled gaincompensated SC integrator The singlesampled and doublesampled gaincompensated SC integrators have been discussed above. In this section we proposed a new topology shown in Fig that use an additional opamp and two compensated capacitors C c and C c to cancel the gain errors. The DC magnitude of the topology is ideally infinite, and can be described as follow. The circuit can be analyzed with three half consecutive phase, from (n 3/) to (n /). First, we assume the circuit start at the phase φ (n 3/) shown in Fig. 3.3(a). During this phase, the circuit integrated the input voltage to the output, and the errors due to opamp finite gain also stored in the capacitors C c and C c. The charge in the C c is three times of the charge in the C c, because it was amplified by a feedback noninverting opamp. Next, the circuit switch to the phase φ (n ) shown in Fig. 3.3(b), the capacitors C c and C c are connect together, and the charge that have been stored during previous phase will make an average now. During third phase, the capacitor C c will connect to the opamp input and cancel the errors due to opamp finite gain, then the input voltage can transferred to the capacitor completely. The gain errors in this topology is ideally zero. Here we will derive the charge conservation at opamp inverted input. 45
58 K C c  V C c C c  V C c C c V out Vin Vout C c C c C c K (a) (b) Figure 3.3: singlesampled gaincompensated SC integrator during (a) phase (b) phase First, when φ high, φ low, the charge on the capacitor C c can be described as Q Cc (n 3 ) = C c[ V out(n 3 )] KC c[ V out(n 3 )] (3.40) Where K is the closed loop gain of the feedback opamp, and is the opamp finite gain. Second, when φ high, φ low, the charge conservation at node V can be described as [ V out(n 3 ) + V out(n 3 )] [V in (n )] + Q Cc (n 3 ) = [ V out(n ) + V out(n )] [ V out(n )] C c[ V out(n )] (3.4) Combining Eq.(3.40) and Eq.(3.4), and taking the ztransform, the overall transfer function can be expressed as H(z) = V out(z) V in (z) = z [ C f + C c + C s + ] [ C f + (C c + KC c ) + ]z ssuming C c = C c = =, K=3, then the DC magnitude at z= can be expressed as (3.4) H(z) z= = (3.43) Form Eq.(3.43) can find that the topology have infinite DC magnitude and have no pole error. It works like an ideal SC integrator under the assumption that the feedback opamp can amplify the input voltage by a factor of three exactly. Here we use an macro opamp model to construct the topology shown in Fig Then an real opamp will substitute for the macro model, and the simulation results will also discussed in next chapter. 46
59 X β Y Figure 3.3: simple feedback system In order to test the function of the topology, a 0kHz sinusoidal signal with amplitude of mv is applied to the topology. The sampling frequency is 0MHz, and the gain of the amplifier is 40dB. Then the output magnitude and phase of the topology is given by z / H(z) propose = ( + 3 ) z ( ) (3.44) H(z) propose 90 Where the gain error is 3/ and pole error is zero. The simulation result shown in Fig is the output voltage of the topology. Compare to the circuit shown in Fig. 3.0, the phase error of the output signal was improved. The transfer function with no pole error is very attractive for the delta sigma modulator with MSH structure. The difficult of this topology is need to make the feedback opamp can amplify the error voltage by a factor of three exactly. However, it is not difficult to have a precision value of a factor of three, because of the gain desensitization. It can be described as [6] Y X = + β β ( β ) (3.45) Where β was called the loop gain, which plays an important role in feedback system. We see from Eq.(3.45) the higher β is the less sensitive Y/X will be to variations in shown in Fig Here we take an example of the feedback system. ssuming the feedback factor β of the feedback amplifier is / and opamp finite gain is 70dB. Then the gain error /(β) can be reduced to about 0.063%. The topology of the feedback opamp is a singleend foldedcascode amplifier, and it can be designed to have a high gain. The DC magnitude of Eq.(3.43) with a finite gain feedback opamp can be described as H(z) z= = z ( + 3 ) z ( + K+3 ) z= = Where the closed loop gain of the feedback opamp can given by 3 K (3.46) K = X Y = f + f 3 (3.47) 47
60 Combining Eq.(3.46) and Eq.(3.47), the DC magnitude can be described as H(z) z= = (3 + f) 9 (3.48) Where f is the feedback opamp finite gain shown in Fig From Eq.(3.48) we can find that the effective finite gain is the multiplication of the two opamps, and f. The conventional gaincompensated integrator used itself amplifier to achieve the effective gain of. However, this topology shown in Fig used an additional feedback amplifier to get the effective gain of f. The feedback amplifier was constructed of singleend topology, and can be achieve high gain easily. s we know, a traditional SC integrator was constructed with a single amplifier and sampling capacitors and integrating capacitors. If it was a gaincompensated topology, there will have additional compensation capacitors. The primary opamp in the SC integrator need to deal with the input signal, and should be designed with high gain and wide bandwidth. However, there is a trade off when design a high gain and wide bandwidth amplifier. In this topology, we can design the primary amplifier for lower gain, and the feedback amplifier to have higher gain. lthough the traditional gaincompensated SC integrator and the topology that we proposed are both can get a high effective gain of opamp. However, the topology that used an auxiliary feedback amplifier is more attractive, because it can enhance the SC integrator DC gain with an additional opamp and the whole circuit with no stable problem. fter a careful analysis including the opamp finite gain, here we describe the gain error of this circuitry. The output voltage in the zdomain can given by V out (z) = H i (z)e(z)v i (z) (3.49) Where H i (z) is the ideal transfer function, E(z) is the error transfer function, and is given by H i (z) = E(z) = z z z ( + 3 ) z ( + K+3) (3.50) The error function magnitudes was computed as E. Here we use a SC integrator with no compensation to compare with this topology and shown in Fig s it demonstrates, the gaincompensated topology has better magnitude accuracy. 48
61 Figure 3.33: The output voltage for a SC integrator shown in Fig. 3.30, f in = 0kHz with amplitude mv, f s = 0MHz, =40dB, and f = 80dB 0 SC Integrator With No Gain Compensation ( E ) Single sampled Gain Compensated SC Integrator ( E ) 0 Magnitude Error (db) Op mp DC Gain Figure 3.34: Magnitude errors of the integrator for = = C c = C c, f in = 0kHz, and f s = 0MHz 49
62 The error transfer function of Eq. (3.50) can also be described as E(z) = + 3 z ( z ) 9+6f + (3+ f ) + 3 = + 3 ( z ) z ( E pole ) (3.5) Where the pole error of Eq. (3.5) is given by E pole = 3 9+6f 6+ f + 3 = 9 ( + 3)( f + 6) (3.5) Compare to the conventional singlesampled gaincompensated integrator shown in Fig. 3.0, where the pole error is. The pole error of Eq. (3.5) is inverse proportional to the gain of f. The comparison between both the two topology is shown in Fig. 3.35, the pole error can be reduced by increasing a feedback amplifier. It is very useful on the application of sigma delta modulator with MSH structure. 0 0 Pole Error of Conventional Gain Compensated Integrator Pole Error of New Gain Compensated Integrator (f = 66dB) Pole Error of New Gain Compensated Integrator (f = 69dB) 0 Magnitude of Pole Error (db) Op mp DC Gain Figure 3.35: Magnitude of pole errors for conventional circuit and new gaincompensated topology 50
63 3.4 Simulation nd Results In order to construct the new topology of Fig. 3.30, here we use a foldedcascode fully differential amplifier with a gain 50dB to substitute the opamp on the signal path. The feedback amplifier was constructed with a current feedback singleend amplifier. This type have high gain and high speed. One of this opamp s advantages is its closedloop gain can be changed, when used in the feedback application, without significantly affecting its loop gain [4]. dditionally, this current feedback opamp use of an output buffer for resistive feedback network. Here, we construct it with a gain of 60dB. The sampling and integrating capacitors are all pf. ll of the switches would be realized by nchannel transistors only, expect for the switches connected to the outputs, which was realized by transmission gate to accommodate a wider signal swing. The resistance of the transmission gate is about 800Ω. In order to test the topology, we give a sinusoidal input with different frequency, then examine the output signal. The ratio of input signal frequency over sampling frequency, OSR, should be selected advisably to prevent the opamp s output swing distortion. Here, the sampling frequency is 0MHz and the input frequency is 0KHz or even larger. The results were verified by simulation results, and used TSMtandard 0.35µm CMOS technology to implement Operational mplifier nd Common Mode Feedback The fully differential analog circuits are used throughout the modulators for two reasons. First, a fully differential topology provides for high rejection of commonmode disturbances, such as commonvoltage offset, supply and substrate noise. Second, for a given voltage range, a differential signal has twice the amplitude of a singleended signal. fully differential foldedcascode operational amplifier shown in Fig The output swing of this amplifier can be greater than a direct stack of transistors. The output swing of the opamp is determined by the cascode NMOS, M 7 and M 8, and by the cascode PMOS, M 9 and M 0. For proper operation, all transistors should be operating in a saturation region. The new gaincompensated SC integrator operate in 0MHz sampling frequency. To make sure it has enough settling time for % accuracy. From Eq. (.9) we can know the opamp should have at least 60MHz unitgainbandwidth (UGB) where β = /3. The opamp also need a commonmode feedback, a constant current bias circuit, and they will also be discussed at next. From MOS current equation, the overdrive voltage can given by 5
64 V DD V bp M 4 M M V bp + V in M 3 M M  V in M9 M0  V out + V out M 7 V bn M 8 Vcm C C C C Vcm V ctr Vbn Vbn M 5 M 6 V SS Figure 3.36: fully differential foldedcascode operational amplifier with commonmode feedback I D = µc OX W L (V GS V t ) = µc OX V DS,sat = I D L µc OX W W L V DS,sat (3.53) The cascode devices operated in the saturation region limit the output swing of the opamp. given by (3.54) From Fig.3.36 can derive smallsignal parameters of the opamp. The output impedance is R out [g m8 r o8 (r o //r o6 )]//[g m0 r o0 r o ] (3.55) The open loop gain is given by = g m R out (3.56) If the second pole is behind of the unitygain frequency, then the unitgainbandwidth of the amplifier is derived by (s) = g m (R out // sc L ) g m sc L = (3.57) 5
65 ω UGB = g m C L (3.58) Where C L is the opamp output load capacitance, ω UGB is the unitgainbandwidth. The load capacitance will create a dominant pole at a frequency ω UGB = g m C L = g m R out ω p (3.59) ω p = Where ω p is the opamp dominant pole frequency. R out C L (3.60) For better speed, Nchannel devices should be chosen for the input pair, because of their higher mobility. Since the unitgainbandwidth of the opamp is determined by the ratio of the transconductance of the input device to the output load capacitance. But the Pchannel devices have better noise performance. Typically, Pchannel transistors have less flicker noise than Nchannel transistors. In CMOS Psubstrate fabrication, Pchannel transistors are isolated substratenoise by nwell protection. For low noise and high accuracy consideration, we choose Pchannel transistors as input devices. The mobility of the input devices can be compensated by increasing the width of the PMOS. The flicker noise is inversely proportional to the transistor area, (W L) [6]. The PMOS has less flicker noise than NMOS, if they have the same mobility. Here we choose the PMOS transistor as the input devices of opamp. From Eq.(3.58) can find that the opamp could be made fast by increasing the width and bias current of the input devices. However, to maintain stability, all concomitant poles must occur at the frequencies higher than the unitgainbandwidth of the opamp. Therefore, the speed of opamp is limited by the location of the first nondominant pole. The pole is given by ω p = g m8 8 (3.6) It is the ratio of the transconductance of the cascode Nchannel devices to the total capacitance on its source. The nondominantpole frequency can be increased by increasing the current density through the cascode device M 8. The common mode output level of the amplifier is maintained by the Seedback circuitry also shown in Fig The commonmode feedback (CMFB) circuit is based on the use of SC circuits. In this approach, capacitor C generate the average of the output voltage, which is used to create control voltage for the opamp output current sources, M 5 and M 6. This circuit acts like a simple SC lowpass filter having a DC input signal. The bias voltage is designed to be equal to the difference between the desired commonmode voltage, V cm, and the desire control voltage, V ctr used for the opamp current source. The capacitor C form a voltage divider to 53
66 V DD V bp M 8 M 7 M V bp M9 M 6 M0 M 4 V SS M 8 V bn M 3 M4 M 5 M3 M5 M6 V bn M M M M 7 R b Bias Loop V SS Cascode Bias Stratup Figure 3.37: wideswing constant transconductance bias circuit drive node V ctr, the gates of the NMOS current source transistors in the output stage. If the voltage V + out and V out raise, the V ctr also raise to keep the charge of C at the same time. It increase the NMOS current source and reduce the output common mode voltage. The bias circuit of the opamp is implemented by incorporating wideswing current mirrors into the constanttransconductance bias is shown in Fig The circuit includes wide swing cascode current mirrors, stable transconductance bias circuit, and a startup circuit [4]. The bias circuit is presently becoming the most popular CMOS bias circuit. The stable transconductance bias is provided by the resistor R b and transistors M, M in the bias loop shown in Fig If (W/L) 7 and (W/L) 8 is the same. The equality results M and M of the circuit having the same current due to the current mirror pair M 7, M 8. The loop consisting of M, M and R b, can obtain V GS = V GS + I D R b (3.6) 54
67 Subtract the threshold voltage V t from both sides can get V GS V t = V GS V t + I D R b (3.63) The Eq.(3.63) can be rewritten as I D I D = + I D R b (3.64) µ n C ox (W/L) µ n C ox (W/L) Since I D =I D, Eq.(3.64) can also be written as We also know that µn C ox (W/L) I D ( From Eq.(3.65) and Eq.(3.66), can obtain (W/L) (W/L) ) = R b (3.65) g m = µ n C ox (W/L) I D (3.66) g m = R b ( (W/L) (W/L) ) (3.67) The transconductance of M is determined by the ratio of M and M size only. It is independent of power supply voltage, process parameter, temperature, or any other parameters with large variation. For special case of (W/L) = 4(W/L), can simplified Eq.(3.67) as g m = R b (3.68) The circuit is necessary to add a startup circuit that only affects the operation if all the currents are zero at start up. The startup circuit consists of transistors M 5, M 6, M 7, and M 8. In the state that all currents in the bias loop and cascode bias are zero, the gate voltage of M 7 would close to V ss, and M 7 would be turn off. We assume the aspect ratio (W/L) 8 is very small, so the output impedance of M 8 would be very large. Since the M 8 operates as a highimpedance load is always on. The gates voltage of M 5 and M 6 would be pulled up. The transistors M 5 and M 6 will inject currents into M 9 and M 4, respectively, which will start up the bias loop. Once the loop start up, the bias voltages, V bp, V bp, V bn, and V bn, would settle to a stable state, then M 7 would turn on and sinking all the current from M 8. Then M 8 operates in the saturation region and M 7 operates in the triode region. This pull down the gate voltage of M 5 and M 6 and thereby turns them off so no longer affect the bias circuit. The frequency response of the fully differential foldedcascode opamp simulated by HSPICE is shown in Fig The transient response of the bias circuit is shown in Fig. 3.39, and it start up at t=00 ns. Then the simulated performance is summarized in Table
68 ( a) ( b) Figure 3.38: The frequency response of the fully differential foldedcascode amplifier (a) 50dB magnitude (b) 88 phase margin Figure 3.39: Simulation of bias output voltage 56
69 DC Gain 50 db Load pf Phase Margin 88 Unitgain Frequency 63. MHz Slew rate 3.9 V/µs Power. mw Supply Voltage 3.3 V Process 0.35 µm P 4M Table 3.: Simulated summary of the fully differential foldedcascode amplifier SingleEnd Opmp V DD M 4 V bp M M M 3 V bp V bn M9 M0 M 5 M 3 + V in M M  V in M 4 C C V out M 6 V bn M 7 M8 V bn M 5 M 6 V SS Figure 3.40: Singleend foldedcascode opamp with output buffer singleend opamp shown in Fig with buffer circuit is used to isolate the opamp from the load. The load can be resistive, capacitive or a combination of the two. Capacitor C c is used to compensated the circuit with a technique called Miller compensation. However, it will cause a zero at righthand plane, and the stability degrades considerably. The gatedrain connected MOSFETs M3 and M4 can be though of as zerocanceling resistors, which used to shift the righthand plane zero into the lefthand plane []. The current through M3 and M4 is well defined, and increase the lengths of them can push the zero further into the lefthalf plane. Normally, since the gain of the output buffer can be low, the output MOSFETs, M5 and M6, can be sized with minimum or nearminimums lengths. The frequency response shown in FIg. 3.4 has 60 db magnitude and 84 phase margin. 57
70 ( a) (b) Figure 3.4: The frequency response of a singleend foldedcascode opamp (a) 60dB magnitude (b) 84 phase margin 3.4. Switch The speed of the sampling circuit is an important factor to influence the harmonic distortions of the integrator. Since the output voltage of the sampling circuit speed would take infinite time to become equal V in. We consider the output voltage V out settled when it is within a certain error band, V, around the final value. Thus, the speed specification must be accompanied by an accuracy specification as well. The source and drain voltages to be approximately equal after switch turns on t s seconds shown in Fig The speed of a sampling circuit is given by two factors, the onresistance of the switch and the sampling capacitor. In order to achieve higher speed, a large W/L and small capacitor should be used. However, the onresistance depends on the input level shown in Fig In the case of NMOS switch, the time constant is proportional to the increasing positive input voltage. In Fig. 3.4, for V out V in, the transistor must operate in deep triode region and hence the upper bound of V in equals V DD V t. Thus, we can obtain the onresistance V ds I d = R on,n = W µ n C ox (V L gs V tn ) = W µ n C ox (V L DD V in V tn ) (3.69) 58
71 V ctrl V ctrl V DD V in V out 0 t V out V in ΔV 0 t s t Figure 3.4: Definition of speed in a sampling circuit for NMOS switch The onresistance of the switch shown in Fig as a function of the input level. In the figure, for a NMOS switch, the sharp rise as V in approaches V DD V t. The device threshold voltage directly limits the input voltage swings. In order to accommodate greater voltage swings in the sampling circuit, we can observe a PMOS switch exhibits a onresistance that decrease as the input voltage becomes more positive. Then, it is reasonable to employ a transmission gate shown in Fig.3.43 as the sampling switch at the input of integrators. The transmission gate allows railtorail swings, and produce an equivalent resistance which can be described as R on,eq =R on,n R on,p = µ n C ox ( W ) L n(v DD V in V tn ) µ p C ox ( W ) L p(v in V tp ) = µ n C ox ( W ) L n(v DD V tn ) [µ n C ox ( W ) L n µ p C ox ( W ) L p]v in µ n C ox ( W ) L pv tp From Eq.(3.7), if (3.70) µ n C ox ( W L ) n = µ p C ox ( W L ) p (3.7) The R on,eq is independent to the input signal level. The turn on resistance of the transmission gate is shown in Fig. 3.44, it has less variation than the corresponding to only a NMOS or PMOS switch alone. In order to prevent the incomplete settling noise in the integrator, the sampling and integrating times of the integrator should be at least five times the RC time constant for a % accuracy shown in Fig It can express as, T s is sampling period R on,eq < 5 (T s ) (3.7) 59
72 V ctrl V out V in ΔV Vin Vout 0 t s t V ctrl V ctrl V DD 0 t Figure 3.43: Definition of speed in a sampling circuit for Transmission gate Figure 3.44: Comparison of onresistance of switch Simulations Of New SingleEnd GainCompensated Integrator In order to test the new SC integrator, a 0kHz sinusoidal signal with amplitude of mv is applied to the topology, and the sampling frequency is 0MHz. The Fig Fig show its output voltage with different input frequency. The Fig and Fig show a conventional noninverting SC integrator with no compensation to make a comparison with the new topology. The Fig is the post layout simulation with 0KHz input frequency, and is approximate to the presimulation shown in Fig The Fig shows a comparison between real circuit and ideal one, and the results also conform to the specifications. 60
73 Figure 3.45: The output voltage for a SC integrator with no compensation shown in Fig. 3.(a), f in = 0kHz with amplitude mv, f s = 0MHz, and =50dB Figure 3.46: The FFT of the output voltage for a SC integrator with no compensation shown in Fig. 3.(a), f in = 0kHz with amplitude mv, f s = 0MHz, and =50dB 6
74 Figure 3.47: The output voltage for a SC integrator that we proposed shown in Fig. 3.30, f in = 0kHz with amplitude mv, f s = 0MHz, =50dB, and f = 60dB Figure 3.48: The FFT of the output voltage for a SC integrator that we proposed shown in Fig. 3.30, f in = 0kHz with amplitude mv, f s = 0MHz, =50dB, and f = 60dB 6
75 Figure 3.49: The output voltage for a SC integrator that we proposed shown in Fig. 3.30, f in = 0kHz with amplitude mv, f s = 0MHz, =50dB, and f = 60dB Figure 3.50: The FFT of the output voltage for a SC integrator that we proposed shown in Fig. 3.30, f in = 0kHz with amplitude mv, f s = 0MHz, =50dB, and f = 60dB 63
76 Figure 3.5: The output voltage for a SC integrator that we proposed shown in Fig. 3.30, f in = 30kHz with amplitude mv, f s = 0MHz, =50dB, and f = 60dB Figure 3.5: The FFT of the output voltage for a SC integrator that we proposed shown in Fig. 3.30, f in = 30kHz with amplitude mv, f s = 0MHz, =50dB, and f = 60dB 64
77 Figure 3.53: The post simulation for a SC integrator that we proposed, f in = 0kHz with amplitude mv, f s = 0MHz, =50dB, and f = 60dB The Magnification of Math Derivation The Magnification of HSPICE Simulation 0 Magnitude Input Frequency (Hz) x 0 4 Figure 3.54: The magnification for a SC integrator that we proposed by varying the input frequency shown in Fig. 3.30, with amplitude mv, f s = 0MHz, =50dB, and f = 60dB 65
78 Figure 3.55: Layout photo of the new gaincompensated switched capacitor integrator 66
國立交通大學 電子研究所 碩士論文 多電荷幫浦系統及可切換級數負電壓產生器之設計及生醫晶片應用
國立交通大學 電子研究所 碩士論文 多電荷幫浦系統及可切換級數負電壓產生器之設計及生醫晶片應用 Design of MultipleChargePump System and StageSelective Negative Voltage Generator for Biomedical Applications 研究生 : 林曉平 (ShiauPin Lin) 指導教授 : 柯明道教授 (Prof.
More information行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告
行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告 WCDMA 基地台接收系統之初始擷取與多用戶偵測子系統之研究與實作 Study and Implementation of the Acquisition and Multiuser Detection Subsystem for WCDMA systems 計畫編號 :NSC 90229E0090 執行期限 : 90 年 月 日至 9 年 7
More information國立交通大學 經營管理研究所 碩士論文 上游獨占下之外部授權者的最適授權策略. The Optimal Licensing Strategy of an Outsider Patentee under. the Single Upstream Supplier 研究生 : 林錦宏
國立交通大學 經營管理研究所 碩士論文 上游獨占下之外部授權者的最適授權策略 The Optimal Licensing Strategy of an Outsider Patentee under the Single Upstream Supplier 研究生 : 林錦宏 指導教授 : 胡均立教授 中華民國九十八年五月 上游獨占下之外部授權者的最適授權策略 The Optimal Licensing
More informationMULTILAYER HIGH CURRENT/HIGH FREQUENCY FERRITE CHIP BEAD
INTRODUCTION 產品介紹 Multilayer high current chip beads are SMD components that possess a low DC resistance. Their impedance mainly comprises resistive part. Therefore, when this component is inserted in
More information書報討論報告 應用雙感測觸覺感測器於手術系統 之接觸力感測
書報討論報告 應用雙感測觸覺感測器於手術系統 之接觸力感測 報告者 : 洪瑩儒 授課老師 : 劉雲輝教授 指導老師 : 莊承鑫 盧登茂教授 Department of Mechanical Engineering & Institute of Nanotechnology, Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Tainan, TAIWAN
More information國立交通大學 電子工程學系電子研究所 碩士論文. An Effective Heart Rate Variability Processor Design for. Portable 3Lead ECG Monitoring SystemonChip 研究生 : 曾少彥
國立交通大學 電子工程學系電子研究所 碩士論文 適用於可攜式三通道 ECG 遠端照護系統晶片之有 效的心跳變異率處理器設計 An Effective Heart Rate Variability Processor Design for Portable 3Lead ECG Monitoring SystemonChip 研究生 : 曾少彥 指導教授 : 方偉騏教授 中華民國九十九年十二月 適用於可攜式三通道
More information國立交通大學 碩士論文. Design and Realization of Capacitive Sensor Readout Circuit in LTPS Technology 研究生 : 林佑達. (YuTa Lin) 指導教授 : 柯明道教授 (Prof.
國立交通大學 電子工程學系 電子研究所碩士班 碩士論文 應用於低溫多晶矽製程下電容式感測器電容式感測器讀出讀出電路設計與實現 Design and Realization of Capacitive Sensor Readout Circuit in LTPS Technology 研究生 : 林佑達 (YuTa Lin) 指導教授 : 柯明道教授 (Prof. MingDou Ker) 中華民國九十九年九月
More information國立交通大學 電信工程學系 碩士論文 連續時間轉導電容式三角積分調變器之實現. Implementation of the continuoustime transconductorcapacitor DeltaSigma modulator 研究生 : 吳國璽 指導教授 : 洪崇智博士
國立交通大學 電信工程學系 碩士論文 連續時間轉導電容式三角積分調變器之實現 Implementation of the continuoustime transconductorcapacitor DeltaSigma modulator 研究生 : 吳國璽 指導教授 : 洪崇智博士 中華民國九十六年十月 連續時間轉導電容式三角積分調變器之實現 Implementation of the continuoustime
More information國立交通大學 工業工程與管理學系 博士論文 利用電腦輔助設計資料防止錯打線的視覺偵測系統之設計與開發
國立交通大學 工業工程與管理學系 博士論文 利用電腦輔助設計資料防止錯打線的視覺偵測系統之設計與開發 A CADbased Vision Approach for Incorrect Wire Bonding Prevention System Design and Development 研究生:李恕明 指導教授:彭德保博士 中華民國九十八年七月 利用電腦輔助設計資料防止錯打線的視覺偵測系統之設計
More information電機驅動方案產品介紹 廣閎科技 2016 May. 25 inergy 大比特研讨会资料区 :
電機驅動方案產品介紹 廣閎科技 2016 May. 25 Copyright 2016 technology incorporation. All rights reserved. 廣閎科技簡介 廣閎科技是專注於節能方案應用之 IC 設計公司, 提供了由方案角度延伸的各類 IC 產品, 包含了照明 電源及電機驅動領域 廣閎科技不僅提供高品質的 IC 產品, 也協助客戶完成系統的設計及生產, 近幾年來更結合了許多上下游產業提供客戶更完整的服務
More informationDesign of A Fast Lockin AllDigital PhaseLocked Loop in 40nm CMOS Technology
國立中正大學 資訊工程研究所碩士論文 40 奈米製程下開發與設計快速鎖定之 全數位鎖相迴路 Design of A Fast Lockin AllDigital PhaseLocked Loop in 40nm CMOS Technology 研究生 : 指導教授 : 羅啟光 鍾菁哲博士 中華民國一零四年七月  I   I   II   III  摘要 近年來, 系統晶片 (SoC)
More information微奈米光電製程 管傑雄 國立台灣大學電機系
微奈米光電製程 管傑雄 國立台灣大學電機系 1 Outlines 1. 基本概念 2. Optical Lithography 3. EBeam Lithography 4. Etching Techniques 5. Applications 6. Summary 2 基本概念 (I) Scattering Length 載子傳導並遭遇散射 1. 影響散射機制 : 雜質 ( 低溫 ) 及聲子振動
More information國立交通大學 資訊科學與工程研究所碩士論文 多天線傳送系統干擾抑制及路徑衰減補償之可適性封包檢測. Adaptive Packet Acquisition with Interference and TimeVariant Path Loss in MIMOOFDM Systems
國立交通大學 資訊科學與工程研究所碩士論文 多天線傳送系統干擾抑制及路徑衰減補償之可適性封包檢測 Adaptive Packet Acquisition with Interference and TimeVariant Path Loss in MIMOOFDM Systems 研究生 : 呂理聖 指導教授 : 許騰尹教授 中華民國九十五年七月 多天線傳送系統干擾抑制及路徑衰減補償之可適性封包檢測
More information計畫編號 : NSC E 執行時程 : 93 年 8 月 1 日至 94 年 7 月 31 日 計畫主持人 : 連豊力 國立台灣大學電機系助理教授 共同主持人 : 呂良鴻 國立台灣大學電子所助理教授 計畫參與人員 : 許瑋豪 方文杰 林雍倫 馮天俊 魏嘉樑 麥肇元
微型仿生生物體之研發 (2/3) 子計畫二 : 生物群體協調行為之探討與無線通訊機制之整合 (2/3) Study of Group Behaviors of Biological Systems and Integration of Wireless Communication Protocol Design 計畫編號 : NSC 932213E002049 執行時程 : 93 年 8
More informationUnit 6: Movies. Film Genre ( 可加 film 或 movie) Adjectives. Vocabulary. animation. action. drama. comedy. crime. romance. horror
Unit 6: Movies Vocabulary Film Genre ( 可加 film 或 movie) action comedy romance horror thriller adventure animation drama crime science fiction (scifi) musical war Adjectives exciting fascinating terrifying
More informationClassAB RailtoRail CMOS Buffer Amplifier for TFTLCD Source Drivers 應用於薄膜電晶體液晶顯示器資料驅動電路的 AB 類軌對軌互補式金屬氧化物半導體場效電晶體緩衝放大器
興大工程學刊第二十一卷第三期 ( 二 一 年十一月 ) Journal of Engineering, National Chung Hsing University, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 112 (2010) 1 ClassAB RailtoRail CMOS Buffer Amplifier for TFTLCD Source Drivers YenTing Chen
More information國立交通大學 碩士論文 90 奈米互補式金氧半製程下 之多功能輸入 / 輸出元件庫設計. Design of Configurable I/O Cell Library in 90nm CMOS Process
國立交通大學 電子工程學系 電子研究所碩士班 碩士論文 90 奈米互補式金氧半製程下 之多功能輸入 / 輸出元件庫設計 Design of Configurable I/O Cell Library in 90nm CMOS Process 研究生 : 陳世範 (ShihFan Chen) 指導教授 : 柯明道教授 (Prof. MingDou Ker) 中華民國九十七年九月 90 奈米互補式金氧半製程下
More information海象觀測同調性都卜勒微波雷達的開發 林昭暉 國立中央大學水文與海洋科學研究所助理教授 2 國立中央大學水文與海洋科學研究所博士班研究生 2 國立中央大學水文與海洋科學研究所研究助理 國家實驗研究院台灣海洋科技研究中心助理研究員
第 35 屆海洋工程研討會論文集國立中山大學 2013 年 11 月 Proceedings of the 35 th Ocean Engineering Conference in Taiwan National Sun Yatsen University, November 2013 海象觀測同調性都卜勒微波雷達的開發 錢樺 1 鄭皓元 2 林昭暉 3 賴堅戊 1 國立中央大學水文與海洋科學研究所助理教授
More informationVirtual Reality 虛擬實境
Virtual Reality 0. Course Introduction NCU IPVR Lab. 1 Virtual Reality 虛擬實境 Prof. DinChang Tseng Dept. of CSIE, National Central Univ. 曾定章教授中央大學資訊工程系 Email: tsengdc@ip.csie.ncu.edu.tw Feb. ~ Jun. 2019
More information#5802 使用者研究 Design and Research on User Experience
本週課程大綱 #5802 使用者研究 Design and Research on User Experience Week 02 交大應用藝術研究所 / 工業技術研究院資通所 Dr. 莊雅量 複習 : 使用者研究的趨勢與重要性 Chap 1. Experience in Products 相關調查方法概論 Chap 2. Inquiring about Pepole s Affective Product
More information凱思隆科技股份有限公司 公司與產品簡介. KeithLink Technology Co., Ltd. TEL: FAX:
凱思隆科技股份有限公司 公司與產品簡介 KeithLink Technology Co., Ltd. TEL: 0229786535 FAX: 0229782726 service@keithlink.com 公司簡介 手動探針台 / 探針座 提供各式量測應用之探針台 / 探針座, 適用於 : 晶圓 ( 直流電性 或高頻 ) 量測 ; 液晶面板量測 ; 觸控面板 ITO 薄膜 導電高分子薄膜 矽晶片
More informationNT8540 / NT8560 / NT8580 Laser Distance Measurer
NT8540 / NT8560 / NT8580 Laser Distance Measurer User s Manual 1 st Edition, 2015 2015 Prokit s Industries Co., Ltd Overview Please carefully read this product Quick Start to ensure the safe and efficient
More information一個可以創造奇蹟的行業 儒鴻企業股份有限公司 成衣事業部陳總經理坤鎕
一個可以創造奇蹟的行業 儒鴻企業股份有限公司 成衣事業部陳總經理坤鎕 1 1 Comfortable Life Enterprise EverLasting COMFORTABLE LASTING ELASTIC & EVERGREEN E.C.L.A.T ADVANCED Advanced Technology Fabrics & Garments TECHNOLOGY Constantly Technical
More information可程式計數陣列 (PCA) 功能使用方法. 可程式計數陣列功能使用方法 Application Note 1 適用產品 :SM59D04G2,SM59D03G2
可程式計數陣列 (PCA) 功能使用方法 1 適用產品 :SM59D04G2,SM59D03G2 2 應用說明 : PCA 共有五組, 每組皆可工作於以下七種模式 : 捕獲模式  正緣捕獲模式 (Positive edge capture mode) 捕獲模式  負緣捕獲模式 (Negative edge capture mode) 捕獲模式  正緣及負緣捕獲模式 (Both positive
More informationPublication Lists (2001~2005) 1. Journal Papers:
Liaw, ChangMing ( 廖聰明 ) Professor Ph.D., National Tsing Hua University, 1988 Power Electronics, Motor Drive, Electric Machine Control Email: cmliaw@ee.nthu.edu.tw Fax: 88635715971 Dr. Liaw was born
More information國立交通大學 電信工程研究所 博士論文 新穎交錯耦合濾波器之開發設計與寬頻高階馬迅平衡非平衡轉換器合成設計
國立交通大學 電信工程研究所 博士論文 新穎交錯耦合濾波器之開發設計與寬頻高階馬迅平衡非平衡轉換器合成設計 Development and Design of Novel CrossCoupled Filters and Exact Synthesis of New HighOrder Wideband Marchand Balun 研究生 : 呂哲慶 指導教授 : 張志揚 (JheChing
More informationMultimeter 3 1/2經濟款數位電錶 MT User s Manual 2nd Edition, Copyright by Prokit s Industries Co., Ltd.
MT1210 Multimeter 3 1/2經濟款數位電錶 User s Manual 2nd Edition, 2017 2017 Copyright by Prokit s Industries Co., Ltd. SAFETY INFORMATION This multimeter has been designed according to IEC 1010 concerning electronic
More information允許學生個人 非營利性的圖書館或公立學校合理使用本基金會網站所提供之各項試題及其解答 可直接下載而不須申請. 重版 系統地複製或大量重製這些資料的任何部分, 必須獲得財團法人臺北市九章數學教育基金會的授權許可 申請此項授權請電郵
注意 : 允許學生個人 非營利性的圖書館或公立學校合理使用本基金會網站所提供之各項試題及其解答 可直接下載而不須申請 重版 系統地複製或大量重製這些資料的任何部分, 必須獲得財團法人臺北市九章數學教育基金會的授權許可 申請此項授權請電郵 ccmp@seed.net.tw Notice: Individual students, nonprofit libraries, or schools are
More information國立交通大學 工學院聲音與音樂創意科技碩士學位學程 碩士論文 虛擬類比電子琴聲源探討 : 可運用於聲音合成之 三角波型實作. Virtual Analog Synthesizer Discussion: Implementation of Triangle Wave Used in
國立交通大學 工學院聲音與音樂創意科技碩士學位學程 碩士論文 虛擬類比電子琴聲源探討 : 可運用於聲音合成之 三角波型實作 Virtual Analog Synthesizer Discussion: Implementation of Triangle Wave Used in Sound Synthesis 研究生 : 林育德指導教授 : 黃志方教授成維華教授中華民國一百零一年七月 虛擬類比電子琴聲源探討
More informationAcademic Year
Academic Year 201819 2018 Autumn Term: Chinese Language Computing/Electronic & Computer Engineering GEN B167CF Investment Fundamentals 基礎投資知識 GEN A205CF Discovering Cultures in China 中國文化探索 GEN E142CF
More informationWireless Communications
Wireless Communications Chapter 2 Modern Wireless Communication Systems [1] The widespread adoption of wireless communications was accelerated in the mid 1990s, when governments throughout the world provided
More information課程名稱 : 電子學 (2) 授課教師 : 楊武智 期 :96 學年度第 2 學期
課程名稱 : 電子學 (2) 授課教師 : 楊武智 學 期 :96 學年度第 2 學期 1 近代 電子學電子學 主要探討課題為 微電子電路設計原理電子電路設計原理 本教材分三部份 : 基礎 設計原理及應用 基礎部份 ( 電子學 (1) 電子學 (2)): 簡介 理想運算放大器 二極体 場效應電晶体 場效應電晶体 (MOSFET) 及雙極接面電晶体 (BJT) 原理部份 ( 電子學 (3) 電子學 (4)):
More information允許學生個人 非營利性的圖書館或公立學校合理使用本基金會網站所提供之各項試題及其解答 可直接下載而不須申請. 重版 系統地複製或大量重製這些資料的任何部分, 必須獲得財團法人臺北市九章數學教育基金會的授權許可 申請此項授權請電郵
注意 : 允許學生個人 非營利性的圖書館或公立學校合理使用本基金會網站所提供之各項試題及其解答 可直接下載而不須申請 重版 系統地複製或大量重製這些資料的任何部分, 必須獲得財團法人臺北市九章數學教育基金會的授權許可 申請此項授權請電郵 ccmp@seed.net.tw Notice: Individual students, nonprofit libraries, or schools are
More informationMilton Group Newsletter Season 1, 2015
1 Milton Group Project Management Workshop 2015 2 We are Celebrating 25th Anniversary 2015 3 Milton Granted The 4th outstanding SME Social Responsibility Award 2015 by The Mirror Post 4 Milton builds a
More informationLow Cost PC Power/Clone PC market Replace Passive PFC with Active PFC Single Range (230Vac only) Power (70% market)
CM6805A/B Low Cost PC Power/Clone PC market Replace Passive PFC with Active PFC Single Range (230Vac only) Power (70% market) Passive to Active PFC cm6805a/b PFC Single Switch Forward,Dual Switch Forward
More information震波醫療機之設計與開發 Design and Development of Shock Wave Therapy
震波醫療機之設計與開發 Design and Development of Shock Wave Therapy 梁勝明遠東科技大學電腦應用工程系教授 馬亞尼義守大學生物醫學工程學系副教授 1 萬龍瑞 國立成功大學航空太空學系研究生 摘 要 本研究設計與開發了一套具電子式高壓放電系統之電水式體外震波醫療機以提供在震波碎石術 骨疾治療 消脂及其他醫療技術所需之震波產生源 本文所設計與開發之震波醫療機是由五個子系統所組成,
More information數位移民的適應指南 : 不同數位程度者的電子書學習歷程
國立交通大學 應用藝術研究所 碩士論文 數位移民的適應指南 : 不同數位程度者的電子書學習歷程 The Adaptation Guideline for Digital Immigrants: The EReader Learning Journey of Different Digitalskilled Users 研究生沈致軒 指導教授莊明振鄧怡莘教授 中華民國一百零二年十一月 摘要 隨著數位科技迅速的發展,
More information24GHz BSD Radar. 24 GHz Radar Blind Spot Detection. Installation Guide
P/N : VS91A001 Page :1 of 8 24 GHz Radar Blind Spot Detection Installation Guide P/N : VS91A001 Page :2 of 8 CONTENT 1. SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE TURE 1.1 Layout... 3 1.2 Components.....4 2. Installation 2.1
More information工程圖學 (1) Engineering Drawing (I)
工程圖學 (1) Engineering Drawing (I) 09510PME 101302 Instructor: Lin, ChihWei ( 林志偉 ) 2006/09/13 Course Information Instructor: Lin, ChihWei ( 林志偉 ) d937708@oz.nthu.edu.tw Office: Room 534, Engineering Building
More informationECE626 Project Switched Capacitor Filter Design
ECE626 Project Switched Capacitor Filter Design Hari Prasath Venkatram Contents I Introduction 2 II Choice of Topology 2 III Poles and Zeros 2 IIIABilinear Transform......................................
More informationMusical Genre Classification
1 Musical Genre Classification WeiTa Chu 2014/11/19 G. Tzanetakis and P. Cook, Musical genre classification of audio signals, IEEE Trans. on Speech and Audio Processing, vol. 10, no. 5, 2002, pp. 293302.
More information允許學生個人 非營利性的圖書館或公立學校合理使用本基金會網站所提供之各項試題及其解答 可直接下載而不須申請. 重版 系統地複製或大量重製這些資料的任何部分, 必須獲得財團法人臺北市九章數學教育基金會的授權許可 申請此項授權請電郵
注意 : 允許學生個人 非營利性的圖書館或公立學校合理使用本基金會網站所提供之各項試題及其解答 可直接下載而不須申請 重版 系統地複製或大量重製這些資料的任何部分, 必須獲得財團法人臺北市九章數學教育基金會的授權許可 申請此項授權請電郵 ccmp@seed.net.tw Notice: Individual students, nonprofit libraries, or schools are
More informationORDER FORM 3A  Booth Packages Rental 訂購表格 3A  攤位裝修設計租用
ORDER FORM 3A  Booth Packages Rental 訂購表格 3A  攤位裝修設計租用 Post or fax to 請郵寄或傳真往 : Tel 電話 : (852) 3605 9551/ 3605 9615 Fax 傳真 : (852) 3605 9480 Optional 隨意交回 DEADLINE : January 8, 2016 截止日期 :2016 年 1 月
More information投稿類別 : 英文寫作類 篇名 : Superheroes: Comics vs. Movies 作者 : 王香云 苗栗高商 應外科三年 2 班周莨淇 苗栗高商 應外科三年 2 班洪靖嵐 苗栗高商 應外科三年 2 班 指導老師 : 王雅蘭老師
投稿類別 : 英文寫作類 篇名 : 作者 : 王香云 苗栗高商 應外科三年 2 班周莨淇 苗栗高商 應外科三年 2 班洪靖嵐 苗栗高商 應外科三年 2 班 指導老師 : 王雅蘭老師 Abstract The aim of this research was to discuss how superheroes are presented and whether comic books and movies
More information允許學生個人 非營利性的圖書館或公立學校合理使用本基金會網站所提供之各項試題及其解答 可直接下載而不須申請. 重版 系統地複製或大量重製這些資料的任何部分, 必須獲得財團法人臺北市九章數學教育基金會的授權許可 申請此項授權請電郵
注意 : 允許學生個人 非營利性的圖書館或公立學校合理使用本基金會網站所提供之各項試題及其解答 可直接下載而不須申請 重版 系統地複製或大量重製這些資料的任何部分, 必須獲得財團法人臺北市九章數學教育基金會的授權許可 申請此項授權請電郵 ccmp@seed.net.tw Notice: Individual students, nonprofit libraries, or schools are
More informationPower Challenges for IoT devices
Power Challenges for IoT devices Wireless signaling test/ DC Power consumption Solution Architect/ Keysight General Electronic Measurement Soluiton R&D Brian Chi 祁子年 Agenda IOT Signaling Test Solution
More informationBIOGRAPHICAL DETAILS OF DIRECTORS, COMPANY SECRETARY AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
BIOGRAPHICAL DETAILS OF DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS Mr. Lin Fan, aged 50, is the chairman and an executive director of the Company. Mr. Lin was appointed as the vice president of CIHC and CIHK in July
More informationOEM Installation Guidance Document For BRCM WLAN + Bluetooth Module, BCM94313HMGB FCC ID: QDSBRCM1051; IC: 4324ABRCM1051
Conditions on using BRCM regulatory approvals: A. Customer must ensure that its product (the CUSTOMER Product ) is electrically identical to Broadcom s reference designs. Customer acknowledges that any
More informationBig Data and High Performance Computing
Big Data and High Performance Computing Big data and high performance computing focus on academic research and technology development in areas of high performance computing platform architecture, parallel
More information聽力內容與圖片不符, 因此選 (B) 例題 Amy: Who s that man? Mike: 答案是 (C) (A) He s a cook. (B) Yes, he s my classmate. (C) He s our coach.
新北市立江翠國民中學 103 學年度第一學期第一次定期考查七年級英語科試卷 P.1 測驗說明 : ( 一 ) 範圍 : 翰林版第一冊 Starter Unit 至 Review 1 ( 二 ) 本試卷含答案卷共 4 頁 ( 雙面印製 ) ( 三 ) 全部試題共 50 題, 第 135 題為單一選擇題, 請以 2B 鉛筆將正確答案的代碼劃在答案卡上, 第 3650 題請用黑色或藍色原子筆寫在第 4
More informationFPGAbased Stepping Motor Drive System Design
基於 FPGA 的步進馬達驅動器設計 FPGAbased Stepping Motor Drive System Design 賴秋庚廖家宏戴勝淵林宏軒蔡守亮 ChiuKeng Lai ChiaHung Liao ShengYuan Dai HungHsuan Lin ChouLiang ai 國立勤益科技大學電機工程系 Department of Electrical Engineering
More information程序表 Agenda. Remarks by Mr. Thomas HUANG Executive Director of Exhibition Department Taiwan External Trade Development Council (TAITRA) 14:00
14:00 14:05 2019 年台北國際工具機展覽會記者會 The Press Conference of TIMTOS 2019 日期 / 時間 :2019 年 3 月 4 日 ( 星期一 ) 下午 2 時 Date:14:00, Monday, March 4, 2019 地點 : 南港展覽一館 403 會議室 Venue:Room 403, Nangang Exhibition Hall
More informationDCDC 轉換器的基本觀念與定義 2008 年 1 月 8 日. Lab808: 電力電子系統與晶片實驗室 台灣新竹 交通大學 電機與控制工程研究所. Power Electronic Systems & Chips, NCTU, TAIWAN
台灣新竹 交通大學 電機與控制工程研究所 808 實驗室電力電子系統晶片 數位電源 DSP 控制 馬達與伺服控制 Lab808: Power Electronic Systems & Chips Lab., NCTU, Taiwan http://pemclab.cn.nctu.edu.tw/ DCDC 轉換器的基本觀念與定義 鄒應嶼 教授 國立交通大學 電機與控制工程研究所 2008 年 1
More information允許學生個人 非營利性的圖書館或公立學校合理使用本基金會網站所提供之各項試題及其解答 可直接下載而不須申請. 重版 系統地複製或大量重製這些資料的任何部分, 必須獲得財團法人臺北市九章數學教育基金會的授權許可 申請此項授權請電郵
注意 : 允許學生個人 非營利性的圖書館或公立學校合理使用本基金會網站所提供之各項試題及其解答 可直接下載而不須申請 重版 系統地複製或大量重製這些資料的任何部分, 必須獲得財團法人臺北市九章數學教育基金會的授權許可 申請此項授權請電郵 ccmp@seed.net.tw Notice: Individual students, nonprofit libraries, or schools are
More information國家同步輻射研究中心出國報告書 出國人姓名 : 王端正 出國日期 :105 年 4 月 25 日至 29 日 目的地 ( 國家 城市 ): 中國, 蘇州
國家同步輻射研究中心出國報告書 出國人姓名 : 王端正 出國日期 :105 年 4 月 25 日至 29 日 目的地 ( 國家 城市 ): 中國, 蘇州 參加會議名稱或考察 研究訓練地點 : 2016 先進光學製造與檢測技術研討會 The 8 th SPIE international Symposium on advanced optical manufacturing and testing technology
More informationLecture 3 SwitchedCapacitor Circuits Trevor Caldwell
Advanced Analog Circuits Lecture 3 SwitchedCapacitor Circuits Trevor Caldwell trevor.caldwell@analog.com Lecture Plan Date Lecture (Wednesday 24pm) Reference Homework 20170111 1 MOD1 & MOD2 ST 2, 3,
More information電子工程學系電子研究所碩士班 碩士論文. 高功率元件 CoolMOS TM 的元件模擬與電性研究. A Study of Device Simulation and Electrical Properties for. High Power DeviceCoolMOS TM 研究生 : 李家明
國立交 通大學 電子工程學系電子研究所碩士班 碩士論文 高功率元件 CoolMOS TM 的元件模擬與電性研究 A Study of Device Simulation and Electrical Properties for High Power DeviceCoolMOS TM 研究生 : 李家明 指導教授 : 張國明博士 桂正楣博士 中華民國九十五年九月 高功率元件 CoolMOS TM
More information國立宜蘭大學電子工程學系 ( 研究所 ) 碩士論文. Department of Electronic Engineering. National Ilan University. Master Thesis
國立宜蘭大學電子工程學系 ( 研究所 ) 碩士論文 Department of Electronic Engineering National Ilan University Master Thesis 用於超寬頻之平面帶拒開槽天線分析與設計 Design and analysis of planar bandnotched slot antennas for UWB applications 指導教授
More information允許學生個人 非營利性的圖書館或公立學校合理使用本基金會網站所提供之各項試題及其解答 可直接下載而不須申請. 重版 系統地複製或大量重製這些資料的任何部分, 必須獲得財團法人臺北市九章數學教育基金會的授權許可 申請此項授權請電郵
注意 : 允許學生個人 非營利性的圖書館或公立學校合理使用本基金會網站所提供之各項試題及其解答 可直接下載而不須申請 重版 系統地複製或大量重製這些資料的任何部分, 必須獲得財團法人臺北市九章數學教育基金會的授權許可 申請此項授權請電郵 ccmp@seed.net.tw Notice: Individual students, nonprofit libraries, or schools are
More information國立交通大學 材料科學與工程學研究所 碩士論文
國立交通大學 材料科學與工程學研究所 碩士論文 使用 Iline 步進機與電子束微影並應用在 MHEMT 元件的新穎 T 形閘極製作方法之研究 Study of Novel Tgate Fabrication Methods Using Iline Stepper and Electron Beam System with Application to MHEMT Devices 研究生 :
More information5G Technology Development in ITRI
5G Technology Development in ITRI PangAn Ting Division for Emerging Wireless Application Technology ICL/ITRI 2017/01/22 Copyright 2017 ITRI 工業技術研究院 Our Views on 5G R&D Copyright 2017 ITRI 工業技術研究院 3 Our
More informationStatistical Tools for Digital Forensics. Information Technologies for IPR Protection
Statistical Tools for Digital Forensics Information Technologies for IPR Protection Henry ChangYu Lee One of the world s foremost forensic scientists. Chief Emeritus for Scientific Services for the State
More information行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫 成果報告 期中進度報告 六子棋與 K 子棋之研究
行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫 成果報告 期中進度報告 六子棋與 K 子棋之研究 The Study of Connect6 and Kinarow games 計畫類別 : 個別型計畫 整合型計畫計畫編號 : NSC 952221E009122 MY2 執行期間 :2006 年 08 月 01 日至 2008 年 7 月 31 日 計畫主持人 : 吳毅成共同主持人 : 計畫參與人員
More information初探設計類比思考之三種現象  傳統媒材與數位媒材
國立交通大學 建築研究所碩士論文 初探設計類比思考之三種現象  傳統媒材與數位媒材 研究生 : 廖元鈺 指導教授 : 劉育東 中華民國九十七年九月 初探設計類比思考之三種現象  傳統媒材與數位媒材 研究生 : 廖元鈺 指導教授 : 劉育東 Student:YuanYu Liao Advisor:YuTung Liu 國立交通大學 建築研究所 碩士論文 A Thesis Submitted to
More informationCreated by Po fortunecookiemom.com
Created by Po Tim @ fortunecookiemom.com THANK YOU SO MUCH for stopping by my blog and downloading this file. I promise I will do my best to proofread the content before posting, but if you find any mistakes
More informationINF4420 Switched capacitor circuits Outline
INF4420 Switched capacitor circuits Spring 2012 1 / 54 Outline Switched capacitor introduction MOSFET as an analog switch ztransform Switched capacitor integrators 2 / 54 Introduction Discrete time analog
More informationUser s Manual. WiFi Smart Plug HS100 WiFi Smart Plug with Energy Monitoring HS REV 2.0.0
WiFi Smart Plug HS100 WiFi Smart Plug with Energy Monitoring HS110 1910012024 REV 2.0.0 Copyright & Trademarks Specifications are subject to change without notice. TPLink is a registered trademark of
More information射頻微波通訊電路設計 RF/Microwave Communication Circuits Design
射頻微波通訊電路設計 RF/Microwave Communication Circuits Design HueyRu Chuang CCE/EE NCKU 莊惠如成功大學電通所 / 電機工程系 2014 Interference signals Desired Channel c Interference signals BPF response Desired Channel c LNA SHM
More informationLarge Signal Behavior of Microspeakers. by Wolfgang Klippel, KLIPPEL GmbH ISEAT 2013
Large Signal Behavior of Microspeakers by Wolfgang Klippel, KLIPPEL GmbH Institute of Acoustics and Speech Communication Dresden University of Technology ISEAT 2013 Klippel, Modeling of Microspeakers,
More informationChapter 13: Introduction to Switched Capacitor Circuits
Chapter 13: Introduction to Switched Capacitor Circuits 13.1 General Considerations 13.2 Sampling Switches 13.3 SwitchedCapacitor Amplifiers 13.4 SwitchedCapacitor Integrator 13.5 SwitchedCapacitor
More informationDESIGN OF MULTIBIT DELTASIGMA A/D CONVERTERS
DESIGN OF MULTIBIT DELTASIGMA A/D CONVERTERS DESIGN OF MULTIBIT DELTASIGMA A/D CONVERTERS by Yves Geerts Alcatel Microelectronics, Belgium Michiel Steyaert KU Leuven, Belgium and Willy Sansen KU Leuven,
More informationElectrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering Educational Objectives This major aims to cultivate wellgrounded, practical, creative and allround research talents who are well developed in morality, intelligence and physical
More information允許學生個人 非營利性的圖書館或公立學校合理使用本基金會網站所提供之各項試題及其解答 可直接下載而不須申請. 重版 系統地複製或大量重製這些資料的任何部分, 必須獲得財團法人臺北市九章數學教育基金會的授權許可 申請此項授權請電郵
注意 : 允許學生個人 非營利性的圖書館或公立學校合理使用本基金會網站所提供之各項試題及其解答 可直接下載而不須申請 重版 系統地複製或大量重製這些資料的任何部分, 必須獲得財團法人臺北市九章數學教育基金會的授權許可 申請此項授權請電郵 ccmp@seed.net.tw Notice: Individual students, nonprofit libraries, or schools are
More informationNew group velocity dispersion measurement technique by using periodic wavelengthscanning pulse light source
New group velocity dispersion measurement technique by using periodic wavelengthscanning pulse light source New group velocity dispersion measurement technique by using periodic wavelengthscanning pulse
More informationUser Manual bgn WLAN MODULE MODEL DWMW042
User Manual 802.11bgn WLAN MODULE MODEL DWMW042 The purpose of this manual is to explain correct way how to integrate module DWMW042 to the end product. It includes procedures that shall assist you to
More information國立中興大學電機工程學系 博士學位論文. 利用頻率合成器設計基因時鐘 Design of Genetic Clock Using Frequency Synthesizer
國立中興大學電機工程學系 博士學位論文 利用頻率合成器設計基因時鐘 Design of Genetic Clock Using Frequency Synthesizer 指導教授 : 林俊良 ChunLiang Lin 研究生 : 莊佳華 ChiaHua Chuang 中華民國一百零三年六月 誌謝 本論文得以順利完成, 承蒙恩師林俊良教授於求學期間細心指導與諄諄教誨, 使學生在專業領域上得以更深入地鑽研與拓展,
More informationThe Electronic Design Automation (EDA) Lab
The Electronic Design Automation (EDA) Lab 張耀文 YaoWen Chang ywchang@cc.ee.ntu.edu.tw http://cc.ee.ntu.edu.tw/~ywchang Graduate Institute of Electronics Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering
More informationINF4420. Switched capacitor circuits. Spring Jørgen Andreas Michaelsen
INF4420 Switched capacitor circuits Spring 2012 Jørgen Andreas Michaelsen (jorgenam@ifi.uio.no) Outline Switched capacitor introduction MOSFET as an analog switch ztransform Switched capacitor integrators
More information樊晉源簡歷 元智大學 / 工業工程與管理研究所 / 博士 (2005/06/30~2009/06/30) 大葉大學 / 事業經營研究所 / 碩士 (2001/06/30~2003/06/30) 科技政策研究與資訊中心政策研究組副研究員 (2014/01/01~ 迄今 )
樊晉源簡歷 一 基本資料 : 姓名 : 樊晉源 EMAIL:cyfan@stpi.narl.org.tw 二 教育背景 : 元智大學 / 工業工程與管理研究所 / 博士 (2005/06/30~2009/06/30) 大葉大學 / 事業經營研究所 / 碩士 (2001/06/30~2003/06/30) 三 現職 : 科技政策研究與資訊中心政策研究組副研究員 (2014/01/01 迄今 ) 四
More informationSTS & 社會學 課程介紹 課程大綱. 定稿 (6/Feb. 2015) 陽明大學 STS 所傅大為 ex: 7902 星期四 10am1pm
STS & 社會學 定稿 (6/Feb. 2015) 陽明大學 STS 所傅大為 ex: 7902 dwfu@ym.edu.tw 星期四 10am1pm 課程介紹 一些學界人士或研究生會有個看法, 多少有點望文生義, 說科技與社會研究 (STS), 是個社會學領域中的新興學門, 是個社會學中的次學門 但真的是如此嗎? 雖然有不少社會學家積極參與 STS, 但 STS 裡的研究者也包括了醫學史家 科學史家
More information機械工程研究所博士聯絡電話 : (03) International Crisis Management Association. 2003,2005 Training Organization 2003, 2005, 2007,2009.
姓名 : 陳文欽學歷 : 美國佛羅里達大學 (University of Florida) 機械工程研究所博士聯絡電話 : (03) 5186585 傳真 : (03) 5186575 E  mail:wenchin@chu.edu.tw 類別 : 專任師資職稱 : 教授兼推廣教育處處長研究專長 : 製程參數最佳化系統 先進製程控制與類神經應用 自動化監控系統 績效評估 國內外之成就與榮譽 International
More informationDBUBP705 Bluetooth Adapter User s Manual
DBUBP705 Bluetooth Adapter User s Manual This document provides safety instructions and describes the specifications. Read this document carefully before installing to ensure your safety and product performance.
More informationCMOS OperationalAmplifier
CMOS OperationalAmplifier 1 What will we learn in this course How to design a good OP Amp. Basic building blocks Biasing and Loading Swings and Bandwidth CH2(8) Operational Amplifier as A Black Box Copyright
More informationBOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEES 董事局及委員會
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEES 04 Hong Kong Internet Registration Corporation Limited 2017 Annual Report Hong Kong Internet Registration Corporation Limited ( HKIRC ) is a nonprofitdistributing, nonstatutory,
More informationteachers guide
HONG KONG SCIENCE MUSEUM. SPECIAL EXHIBITION 15.0617.10.2018 teachers guide Presented by Jointly organised by 簡介 超越天空 專題展覽由波音贊助, 展示在航空航天發展歷程上前所未見的互動體驗, 介紹人類首次動力飛行, 以至在地球上和太空中的最新創科成果 展覽採用了模擬飛行器 互動體驗劇場
More informationChapter 3 The FieldEffect ( 場效 ) Transistor
Chapter 3 The FieldEffect ( 場效 ) Transistor 1 In this chapter, we introduce a major type of transistor, the MetalOxide ( 氧化物 )Semiconductor FieldEffect Transistor (MOSFET). The MOSFET led to the electronics
More informationGSM/GPRS. By Mendy Ouzillou Silicon Laboratories Inc. Austin, TX GSM 3GPP (GSM) burst current) GSM900 DCS V
GSM/GPRS By Mendy Ouzillou Silicon Laboratories Inc. Austin, TX GSM Q ( ) 3GPP (GSM) burst current) GSM900 DCS1800 50 Ω 3.5 V 25 3.7 V www.silabs.com/pacalculations 32.75 (GSM) dbm (DCS) 29.75 dbm 13)
More informationModel RM Wireless Link Module External Interface Specification
Model 420128RM Wireless Link Module External Interface Specification 2016/6/13 Introduction Model 420128RM Wireless Link Module is for the low latency wireless link between console and bass box or rear
More informationMINECRAFT in EDUCATION 慈幼夢工場 點燃火炬 照耀人群
MINECRAFT in EDUCATION 慈幼夢工場 點燃火炬照耀人群 李安迪老師 慈幼學校課程統籌及資訊科技統籌主任 香港教育局科技教育委員會委員 Microsoft MIE Mentor and Certified Teacher Microsoft Innovative Educator Expert Microsoft 卓越教師 2011,2012,2013,2014,2015 Microsoft
More informationSecondOrder SigmaDelta Modulator in Standard CMOS Technology
SERBIAN JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING Vol. 1, No. 3, November 2004, 3744 SecondOrder SigmaDelta Modulator in Standard CMOS Technology Dragiša Milovanović 1, Milan Savić 1, Miljan Nikolić 1 Abstract:
More informationLI,Pulan. A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment. of the Requirements for the Degree of. Master of Philosophy. Information Engineering
A Remodulation Scheme for WavelengthDivision Multiplexing Passive Optical Network Using TimeInterleaved Differential Phase Shift Keying Modulation Format LI,Pulan A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment
More informationA new class AB foldedcascode operational amplifier
A new class AB foldedcascode operational amplifier Mohammad Yavari a) Integrated Circuits Design Laboratory, Department of Electrical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran a) myavari@aut.ac.ir
More information允許學生個人 非營利性的圖書館或公立學校合理使用本基金會網站所提供之各項試題及其解答 可直接下載而不須申請. 重版 系統地複製或大量重製這些資料的任何部分, 必須獲得財團法人臺北市九章數學教育基金會的授權許可 申請此項授權請電郵
注意 : 允許學生個人 非營利性的圖書館或公立學校合理使用本基金會網站所提供之各項試題及其解答 可直接下載而不須申請 重版 系統地複製或大量重製這些資料的任何部分, 必須獲得財團法人臺北市九章數學教育基金會的授權許可 申請此項授權請電郵 ccmp@seednettw Notice: Individual students, nonprofit libraries, or schools are permitted
More information香港藝術治療師協會 Hong Kong Association of Art Therapists
Jan 2015 二零一五年一月 (21 號 ) 香港藝術治療師協會 Hong Kong Association of Art Therapists GPO Box 4551, HK http://hkaat.com Email: hka_at@yahoo.com.hk P r e s i d e n t C o r n e r It s hard to believe the 2015 is here.
More informationCMOS OperationalAmplifier
CMOS OperationalAmplifier 1 What will we learn in this course How to design a good OP Amp. Basic building blocks Biasing and Loading Swings and Bandwidth CH2(8) Operational Amplifier as A Black Box Copyright
More informationChapter 5. Operational Amplifiers and Source Followers. 5.1 Operational Amplifier
Chapter 5 Operational Amplifiers and Source Followers 5.1 Operational Amplifier In single ended operation the output is measured with respect to a fixed potential, usually ground, whereas in doubleended
More informationTuesday, March 22nd, 9:15 11:00
Nonlinearity it and mismatch Tuesday, March 22nd, 9:15 11:00 Snorre Aunet (sa@ifi.uio.no) Nanoelectronics group Department of Informatics University of Oslo Last time and today, Tuesday 22nd of March:
More informationHONG KONG SAR, CHINA
HONG KONG SAR, CHINA Richard Kirke MANAGING DIRECTOR HONG KONG Richard.Kirke@colliers.com DIR +852 2822 0699 FAX +852 2107 6001 Richard Kirke joined in 2009 as Managing Director of the Hong Kong office.
More information