科学技術学術審議会大型プロジェクト作業部会 2015 年 12 月 22 日永野博

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "科学技術学術審議会大型プロジェクト作業部会 2015 年 12 月 22 日永野博"

Donna Doyle
6 years ago
Views:

1 資料 2 科学技術学術審議会学術分科会研究環境基盤部会学術研究の大型プロジェクトに関する作業部会 ( 第 49 回 ) H ESFRI について ~ European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures ~ 科学技術学術審議会大型プロジェクト作業部会 2015 年 12 月 22 日 OECD クローハルサイエンスフォーラム議長永野博 1

2 The International Landscape of Science Policy Groups of Research and Funding agencies Others IGFA Belmont Forum GRC Active role in the governance Regional bodies EC ESFRI High Level APEC Science Europe ASEAN Others G8 High Level Groups (e.g. Ministerial, CSA meetings) Carnegie Group( G8+5) Others International Organizations Institutions for Policy Research SPRU Rathenau PREST Others NISTEP RAND Various Collaboration and Cooperation IPCC UN and related bodies UN Secretary-General s Scientific Advisory Board (UNESCO is the secretariat.) UNESCO IAEA Specific Committees WHO WMO FAO ITU WIPO International Societies/Academies IAP IAC ICSU Others OECD GSF TIP High Level CSTP NESTI Others Others ISSC Social Science IUPAP IUPAC International Scientific Unions IAU Others NAS (USA) National Members Royal Society (UK) Others AAAS International Forums ESOF WSF STS Forum Others Inter-governmental and generalpurpose committee for consultations between government officials, and between officials and scientists. 2

3 国際機関の活用 OECD GSF (Global Science Forum) の事例 OECD 諸国の政府関係者資金助成機関科学者が集まり政策的に重要な課題への提言 1 国際的な調整が必要な政策的課題 ( 例 : 基盤的研究施設の国際的視点での戦略的立案 ) 2 科学と社会の接点 ( 例 : 科学上の不正の防止策 ) 3 新興注目科学分野への世界的対応 ( 例 : 宇宙粒子物理学 ) 資金の効果的使い方大規模施設の設立を計画するときに決まって発生する課題への事前対応国際的な協力事項への構想段階からの参加など我が国が最も不得意とする分野のパフォーマンスを改革しようとするならこのような機関を積極的に活用すべき ( 最近の活用例 :Opportunities, Challenges and Good Practices in International Research Cooperation between Developed and Developing Countries) 3

4 OECD クローハルサイエンスフォーラム 4

5 Through the Global Science Forum, senior government officials develop findings and action recommendations on high-priority science policy issues. Since 1992, GSF has been a general-purpose committee, dealing with a wide range of subjects: Policy issues where international consultations are needed, e.g., strategic planning of infrastructures Issues at the intersection of science/society/government e.g., scientific advice for policymaking Specific scientific domains where something new, noteworthy is happening, e.g., astroparticle physics 5

6 Strategic Visions/Roadmaps Neutron Sources High-Energy Neutrinos Radio Astronomy Proton Accelerators Nuclear Physics Structural Genomics Condensed Matter Facilities High-Intensity Lasers Astronomy and Astrophysics High-Energy Physics Grid Computing Astroparticle Physics Science & Society Science Education Dialogues with Civil Society Incubating International Initiatives Bioinformatics (GBIF) Neuroinformatics (INCF) Earthquake Risk (GEM) GSF Scientific Collections (SciColl) Activities Temperate Agriculture Network (TempAg) Supporting International Cooperation Scientific advice for policy-making Cooperation with developing countries Clinical research trials Preventing research misconduct International years of science Complexity science & public policy Data ISs for the social sciences Models of urban environments Roadmapping and establishing large research infrastructures 6

7 7

8 Outcome of the activity is a 40-page compendium of issues and options, based on past experience. - Practical - Nonpresciptive - Nonexhaustive - Nonjudgemental 8

9 ICRI 2014 : International Conference on Research Infrastructures 2 4 April Athens 9

10 Importance of Research Infrastructures Broad consensus that future competitiveness in a globalising knowledge economy depends on research capability Requires Investment in higher education and research institutions Access to first class research infrastructures RIs are Innovation and skills hubs, not (just) big machines or big datasets

11 European Approach Coordination on European (and global) scale increasingly needed because Limited investment funds available Increasing level of infrastructure investments needed to remain at the cutting edge Problems require broad data sharing and networking between national nodes distributed RIs

12 Role of ESFRI Set up by the EU Council of Research Ministers in 2002 Brings together representatives of Ministers of the 27 Member States, 10 Associated States, and of the European Commission Supports a coherent and strategy-led approach to policy making on Research Infrastructures in Europe Mandate to develop a Roadmap and prioritise research infrastructures ESFRI provides a forum for coordination, information sharing, help and best practice, but Member States must be the major source of funding, in variable geometry Strong support for these principles

ESFRI Roadmap Roadmap identifies new pan-european Research Infrastructures or major upgrades to existing ones, to meet the needs of European research communities in the next 10 to 20 years, in all

13 ESFRI Roadmap Roadmap identifies new pan-european Research Infrastructures or major upgrades to existing ones, to meet the needs of European research communities in the next 10 to 20 years, in all fields of research First Roadmap published in 2006 Followed by two updates in 2008 and version contained 48 projects Requires major financial investment (~20 B ) and long term commitment for operation (~2 b /year)

14 ESFRI Roadmap 2010 Social and Cultural Innovation ( 5 ) Health and Food ( 13 ) Environmental Sciences ( 9 ) Energy ( 7 ) Analytical Facilities ( 6 ) Physics Science and Engineering ( 10 ) e-infrastructures (1) SHARE BBMRI ELIXIR ICOS European Social Survey ECRIN INFRA FRONTIE R LIFEWATC H EURO- ARGO IAGOS CESSDA INSTRUCT EATRIS EMSO EPOS ECCSEL Euro-FEL ELI TIARA* PRACE Windscanner EU- SOLARIS EMFL SPIRAL2 CTA European XFEL E-ELT** SKA CLARIN EU-OPEN- SCREEN EMBRC SIOS EISCAT_3 D JHR ESRF Upgrade KM3NeT FAIR DARIAH Euro Bio- Imaging ERINHA COPAL IFMIF NEUTRON ESS SLHC-PP* ILC- HIGRADE* ISBE MIRRI HiPER ILL20/20 Upgrade ANAEE MYRRHA *Projects from CERN s European Strategy for Particle Physics Distributed research infrastructures Single sited research infrastructures Implemented according to AEG (2013) Red: 10-years expires in 2016

15 Roadmap 2016 Process RI proposal by Member State(s) ESFRI ESFRI Roadmap SWG SWG SWG SWG E-IRG Experts assigned to each SWG Peer reviewers External experts Pan-European Science case IG Technical case Business case Overall maturity SWG Recommended projects and analysis of landscape

16 5 Strategy Working Groups (SWG) と評価事項 Energy, Environment, Health & Food, Physics & Engineering, Social & Cultural innovation 1. Scientific Impact Scientific Field(s) User Analysis & Involvement Strategy Access Policy 2. Pan-European Relevance Pan-European Added Value European Investment Alignment European Geographical Coverage Internationalization Potential 3. Socio-economic Impact 4. E-NEEDS 16

17 Group on Implementaiton (IG) 評価事項 1. Preparatory work achieved 2. Commitment by stakeholders 3. Planning 4. Governance, scientific & legal management 5. HR policy & project management 6. Costs & financial commitments 7. Feasibility & risks 17

18 New ESFRI Roadmap 2016 ESFRI mandate updated at Informal Competitiveness Council in Milano (July 2014) to complete a new Roadmap for 2016 with new criteria of selection and format New Roadmap will contain fewer, more mature projects It will also be more of a strategy document that analyses: the landscape of RIs in EU and internationally gaps in the EU RI ecosystem pan-european projects synergies with the national/regional projects synergies with existing RIs and strategies for optimal use, continuous upgrade, sustainability and end of life perspectives global research infrastructure opportunities

19 Rules for new Roadmap Much shorter only ~25 Projects on the new Roadmap Projects that have been on the roadmap and not implemented will automatically roll off after 10 years Any project that wants to be considered again after 10 years must reapply, either in a different form or with bottlenecks resolved Room for 8-10 new projects on the 2016 roadmap Entry level projects will be at a more mature level conceptual design and feasibility done supported by at least three MS (1 + 2) Every 2-3 years audit of the project by ESFRI Implementation WG Opportunities to add more projects in 2018, 2020 as others roll off

Evaluation of Projects Proposals were screened for eligibility and assigned to one of ESFRI s strategic working groups Scientific merit and pan European relevance (based on ESFRI criteria) was

20 Evaluation of Projects Proposals were screened for eligibility and assigned to one of ESFRI s strategic working groups Scientific merit and pan European relevance (based on ESFRI criteria) was assessed by the SWG, using the advice of independent peer reviewers e-science aspects were coordinated with e-irg Project and governance maturity was assessed by the Implementation working group, again using advice from external experts, based on the approach used by the Assessment Expert group in 2012

21 Proposing projects for new roadmap The proposal process was on-line (reserved to National Delegations) Key questions included: What is the value for science? for innovation? Cost and Schedule? What is the strategy for siting? What is the governance model? What is the data management plan? How it the RI planned to be financed? Does it replace existing facilities? Is the project included on one or more national roadmaps? Which member states support? (3 required) What is the intended user community? Will it be open access? What preparatory work has been done? Design Studies? Business case? Investment plan? Is it intended to apply for H2020 preparatory phase?

22 今後の予定 Plenary Forum 開催 29の Landmarks と21のプロジェクトを決定 2016 年 3 月 10 日に公表 (5 月に欧州理事会承認 ) Landmarks は新概念これまで推進したもので欧州研究圏の競争力の象徴となるものを指定プロジェクトは最大 25に限定 21の構成:9(2018 年が期限 )+6(2020 年が期限 ) +6( 今回 20 提案より選定 ) 2018 年 2020 年に再公募予定 22

23 ESFRI 課題に対する EU 支援 (2~4 年間 ) ~ Horizon 2020 Work Programme ~ 1. Design Studies ( 1~3m) : conceptual design reports, RI of strategic importance 2. Preparatory Phase of new ESFRI projects (up to 4m) : preparation of the legal & financial agreements 3. Individual support ( 2~5m) : long-term sustainability 23

Developing Research Infrastructures for 2020 and beyond

Developing Research Infrastructures for 2020 and beyond Philippe Froissard Deputy Head of Unit Research Infrastructures European Commission DG Research & Innovation "The views expressed in this presentation

科学技術 学術審議会大型プロジェクト作業部会 2015 年 12 月 22 日 永野博

科学技術学術審議会大型プロジェクト作業部会 2015 年 12 月 22 日永野博