RECEIVED FEB 5 L. M. WILSON MINING LANDS SECTION REPORT A VLF-EM SURVEY TISDALE NO. 5 CLAIM GROUP TISDALE TWP.- PORCUPINE MINING DIVISION

Transcription

1 REPORT 42A11SW82e TISDALE 010 ON A VLF-EM SURVEY f TISDALE NO. 5 CLAIM GROUP TISDALE TWP.- PORCUPINE MINING DIVISION BY L. M. WILSON ESSO MINERALS CANADA 120 ADELAIDE ST. W. RECEIVED FEB 5 MINING LANDS SECTION TORONTO. ONTARIO FEBRUARY 1 982

2 INTRODUCTION PURPOSE OF SURVEY A VLF-EM survey was carried out on the Tisdale No. 5 group of claims, Tisdale Township, to assist in defining the bedrock stratigraphy in the area and to possibly outline potentially gold-bearing bedrock structures.

3 LOCATION AND ACCESS The Tisdale No. 5 claim group is located in the Tisdale Township, Porcupine Mining Division, and is centered approximately 5 kilometers northeast of the City of Timmins, northern Ontario. The Tisdale Township t o t is centered at approximately N and W and is indexed under N.T.S. 42-A/6, 11. The Tisdale No. 5 claim group is accessible year-round by means of La Forest Road (base line road) which runs from Hwy. 545 to the Tiramins airport road. Ontario. Regularly scheduled air service is provided by Air Canada to Timmins

4 PROPERTY The claims covered In this report are as follows (see enclosed Claim Map): TISDALE (GROUP NO. 5) Claim Number Description Lot Cone. P P P P P P P P IMP

5 PREVIOUS WORK TISDALE CLAIM GROUP NO. 5 No previous work has been filed for this group, r GEOLOGY TISDALE CLAIM GROUP NO. 5 The most recent mapping and compilation of Tisdale Township has been carried out by Ferguson, 1968 (Geological Report 58 and Map 2075). Based on this work there is no exposure on this group although it appears to be underlain by metasediments. i e. a, m- tir-

6 Si,... INTERPRETATION t VLF - EM SURVEY Details concerning equipment, survey procedures and data presentation are contained in Appendix I to this report. The reader is referred to the In-phase and Quadrature proifle plots presented on the map for the Tisdale No. 5 claim group. The profiles show a number of anomalies, many of which are considered to be due to culture, i.e., conductive overburden, geological noise, spurious sources. The general strike direction of these anomalies appears to be ENE. Two, or possibly three, of the observed anomalies warrant a more detailed explanation: i* Line W, Stn S to Line W, Stn S (Clain No. P ). These are fairly typical profiles, showing a positive in-phase crossover and a negative quadrature inflection anomaly. The amplitude response suggests a moderately conductive source. The observed, broad in-phase anomaly on Lines 17W - 19W suggests, however, that the conductor is probably due to overburden. Line W, Stn N to Line W, Stn N (Claim No. P ), AAgain we observe a positive in-phase crossover together with a negative quadrature inflection on several of the survey lines. The broad in-phase anomaly on Lines W W suggest, however, that this anomaly is due to a moderately conductive overburden layer.

7 INTERPRETATION (CONI*D) - Line 18-K)0 W, Stn N to Line W, Stn. 7+50N (Clain No. P595762). The exact location and strike extent of this conductor is not known as it occurs on the north edge of the Survey area and the shape of the in-phase and quadrature profiles is not fully defined. The positive in-phase crossover together with a weak, negative quadrature inflection suggest? a moderately conductive source. Further work is recommended on the Tisdale No, 5 claim group with the horizontal loop EM method to test those VLF - EM conductors outlined by the i* present survey. There is no bedrock outcrop in the area and the depth of overburden cover is not known. Two, or possibly, three, of the VLF-EM anomalies may be due to bedrock sources. Detailed magnetometer surveying should be carried out at the same time to assist in interpreting the geological structure in the area. February 3, 1982 Lloyd M. Wilson, B. A. Project Geophysicist Esso Minerals Canada

8 m 1) Ferguson, S.A., 1968, Geology and Ore Deposits of Tisdale jy' : REFERENCE Township! Ontario Department of Mines, Geological Report 58 plus Map 2075.

9 APPENDIX NO. l VLF-EM METHOD A. GENERAL PRINCIPLES The VLF (Very Low Frequency) EM method employs an artificial source of EM waves - a VLF antenna, several hundred feet high, which acts essentially as a vertically grounded wire. A worldwide network of high-power VLF stations established for marine and air navigation act as the sources for the VLF-EM exploration method. At present, suitable transmitters for EM prospecting in North America ace located at Cutler, Maine; Annapolis, Md. and Seattle, Washington. The transmitted frequencies (in the 20 KHz band) are very low frequency (VLF) only by comparison to broadcasting standards, but are in fact very high relative to any other geophysical EM system. The VLF antenna current is vertical. The main magnetic field component of the primary (transmitted) signal is horizontal and theoretically tangent to circles about the antenna mast. Hence, a transmitting station should be chosen so that its direction is almost parallel to the geological strike in the survey area so as to produce a magnetic field perpendicular to the strike. If a conductor is located in the survey area, eddy currents are established producing a secondary field in the vicinity of the conductor. The VLF-EM-16 equipment measures the vertical components of this secondary field. The fact that the source is at infinity means the primary field is essentially uniform over the survey area and hence all conductors are energized uniformly. This enables the detection of a broad variety of conductors, ranging from good conductors - graphite, massive sulphides, to poor conductors - muskeg, clay edges, shear zones, contacts...at times this may be a disadvantage, however, since it may emphasize large-scale, relatively poor conductors at the expense of smaller concentrated bodies. In many environments, the anomalies of interest can be masked by the large amount of geological noise. The penetration of the system is limited by its high frequency in the presence of conductive overburden. However, if the subsurface is resistive, for example, little overburden^ the penetration can be quite deep due to the transmitter being so far removed. m The VLF-EM method is also affected by topographic effects; spurious anomalies being picked up on top of conductive hills because the resultant field tends to follow the slope. The distinction between anomaly conductivity and depth is also often difficult. Another major drawback is that it is not always possible to use a transmitting station which gives a primary horizontal field striking at right angles to the. ~ geologic strikes in the survey area. In this case, two VLF transmitters, at approx. right angles to each other, should be used to provide better coverage.

10 APPENDIX NQ. l PAGE TWO B. EQUIPMENT The Geonics EM-16 measures the tilt angle and quadrature components of the resultant (secondary) EM field. The instrument consists of two coils or antennas with axes perpendicular to each other and linked to appropriate electronics. C. SURVEY PROCEDURE Readings were taken at 25 meter intervals along lines generally spaced 100 meters apart.using Cutler, Maine as the transmitting station. The survey technique is listed below: 1. The most probably strike of interest is decided and the transmitter station more closely along strike, with a detectable signal, is chosen. 2. The proper receiver channel is selected to receive the transmitted signal. This may involve plugging in a circuit module. 3. Direction to transmitter station is determined by rotating the axis of the longer receiver coil in a horizontal plane. The transmitter is located in the direction of minimum field -strength, - i.e., minimum noise from the speaker. With this orientation the axis of the long coil should be pointing more or less in the direction of the transmitter station. 4. Receiver is then oriented with the long coil vertical ancj axis of the small coil at the bottom, the reference coil, oriented perpendicular to the transmitter direction. 5. Tilt angle response is measured by rotating the instrument about a horizontal line which points toward the transmitter, until minimum noise is heard. 6. Quadrature response is measured by rotating the small dial until the best minimum is heard. 7. Facing direction and local terrain is recorded together with the. tilt angle and out of phase measurements. A complete specification for a V.L.F. reading includes: 1. tilt angle response 2. quadrature response 3. facing direction 4. line azimuth 5. transmitter and frequency 6. terrain

11 APPENDIX NO. l PAGE THREE C.. SURVEY PROCEDURE (CONT'D) The direction the operator is facing during measurement is very important with the Geonics EM 16 instrument because tilt angles above horizontal are positive and those below are negative. Other conventions exist for recording the tilt angle but only the facing convention is discussed here. The tilt angle and quadrature responses for the survey reported herein have been plotted at a horizontal scale of 1:2500 and a vertical scale of l cm - 10Z. All readings were taken facing north along the survey line. l,r

12 APPENDIX I I NAMES. ADDRESSES AND DUTIES L. Wilson, 1485 Fieldlight Blvd., Pickering, L1V 2S3 - Project Geophysicist, Operator, Co-ordinator, (Esso Minerals Canada) Author G. Do'ucet, 425 Hodder Avenue, Thunder Bay - Operator ' (Esso Minerals Canada) M. Wong, 86 Wilkinson Dr., Willowdale, M2J 3Z5 - Operator (U. of Waterloo, Student) D. Heaman, 149 Perry Crescent, Islington, M9A 1K8 - Operator (U. of Waterloo, Student) D. Cotg, Box 1504, Timmins - linecutter A. Beaudoin, Box 512, Timmins - linecutter L. LePine, 473 Spruce St., Timmins - linecutter J. Mackenzie, 25 Pine St. S., Timmins - linecutter R. Dionne, 407 Louise, Timmins - linecutter M. Larivee, 185 Golden East, Timmins - linecutter E. Hoard, 324 Elam South, Timmins - linecutter J. Rodrique, 367 Cherry, Timmins - linecutter D. McLeod, 225 Pine South, Timmins - linecutter P. Rodrique, 177 Wilson, Timmins - linecutter L. Valcourt, 88a Mountjoy South, Timmins - linecutter

13 APPENDIX III QUALIFICATIONS OF AUTHOR Lloyd M. Wilson attended Memorial University of Newfoundland between 1966 and 1971, graduating with a B.A. (Honors) degree in Mathematics. From May, 1971 to October, 1973, Mr. Wilson worked full-time in oil and gas exploration for Arooco Canada Petroleum Co. Ltd. in Calgary, Alberta, specializing in gravity, magnetics and seismic methods. Since then he has had seven years of experience as a mineral exploration geophysicist - three with Geoterrex Ltd. in Ottawa and four with Esso Minerals Canada in Toronto. For the past two and a half years he has been in charge of project planning, geophysical field activities and training of student personnel for Esso Minerals Canada. He is a member of the Society of Exploration Geophyslcists, the Prospectors and Developers Association, CIMM (Toronto Branch)'and KEGS.

14 - l ^\[) p.d.'!!!!!! C e 5 *".. type of Su'veyls) Rt;;:.;; t/ '.'.ork (G-' jp'iysicd'. Geological, l. GROUND VLF-EM (VERY LOW FREQUENCY EM) i fiaim Holder (s), f'u'rwiy Company HOLLINGER ARGUS LTD - P. O. Box 320 Timmins, Ont. P4N 7E2 Esso Minerals Canada Name and Address o1 Author (of Geo-Technical report) t l IlllllVlliHM 42A11SWe TISDALE 900 Township or Ara* Tisdale Township M315 Data of Survey (from ft to) ZA,8,al u. laiiiia.1% Prospector's Licence No. A20822 Total Miles of line Cut 42 (67.2 km) innes every iuu Lloyd M. Wilson c/o Esso Minerals Canada 120 Adelaide St. W., Toronto, ON ^.redits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at right Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence) - - Special Provisions Geophysical Days per Mining Claim Expend. Mining Claim Claim Prefix Number Days Cr. Prefix Number p" For first survey: - Electromagnetic 40 ' Enter 40 days. (This f. VLF-EM i, includes line cutting) - Magnetometer j 1 For each additional survey: 1 using the same grid:,' 'Enter 20 days (for each) f[ Man Days Complete reverse side :- and enter total (s) here S-"* tv s f: Airborne Credits Note: -Special provisions ij ' credits do not apply,, to Airborne Surveys. r - Radiometric - Other Geological Geochemical Geophysical - Electromagnetic - Magnetometer - Radiometric - Other Geological '. Geochemical Electromagnetic Magnetometer Radiometric ' expenditures (excludes power stripping) r Type of Work Performed. l Performed on ClaimU) Hi - iil.. Days per Claim Days per Claim Calculation 'Of 'Expenditure Days Credits 1 '-',, ' \ '2 l ~. \ Total " Toter^xpenditures i; \' u- } J Days Credits ^ -15J - J ' ls-*~ j.if, - r ~. Instjuctions P Tpt [lidays Credits may b e ipport'io/ied at the claim holder's cbolcec.enter number ol lays ofedjtflplr claim selected \* f* j/ - P.,:., n :i {;; VVp-.t-,y ^5fe ''.-. ' as ili.^^ii * "V*"*''ir' " --.'.-."j S^-'^'iV"'' I**-!V *j* "?j X^V ^ ^-VS ^ ^ ^, " } " j ,/ ; / / ^ C ' ^^ ^ U x Jj ^ ^~ x S Sr*-"^*-* J ' "*f * *^ j^" ** / ' Total Days Cr. Recorded For Office Use Only RecordedyH^ider orapant (Signature) Date Approved as Recorded K6*? Branch BwiHtwi Mining Hecoitfef [ Dec. 16/81 r Certification VerifyfrTglteport of Work l ;v# Y7, j t/.^j * # #9 1 i i Ei. O o Date Bacorded., QJL&C.. f ^ f 9/ -.:.L. w,-. 1. T1. i H 1 s*,*^?* **.-"4 " * '7ft- St ^ li.:'.-' 'y.v it V: t' i- 1 rf ^ "J a S t f t i b lw M 'i &J j AM1-t M- lumber of minfrft"" *^^^^!"! Total clalmi covered by the) 1 VQ II report of work. j */ 11 t. Sf * ^ " " ^ ^ ^ x ?-ys V6, *s ^ * f ' ) ' 'V * t/?roor? V 1 " ^** V^ 1 V DEC i 6 Expend. Days Cr. K i^var; - 3Frr ^ 1-* lv Jbl Minftfg Rt x^* " s* ^ -: 1 hereby cenifytftat 1 have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true., Name end.postal Address of Pereon Certifying! Lloyd M. Wilson 1485 Fieldlifcht Blvd., Pickerin] 5, ON L1V 2S3 Date Certified lc*nkiiedby (Signature) \ December 10, 1981 ^//, ( Qrf f m, ^ ^ 1 B)

15 Ministryof Geotechnical Series B-POrt Approval File Mining Lands Comments o: Geophysics Commenti ^.*Xv. i tf*^ Q Wish to tee again with correction! To: Geology - Expenditures Comment* r"j Approved f] Wish to tee again with corrections Signature To: Geochemistry Comments li Approved f~l Wish to see again with corrections Date Signature j JTo: Mining Lands Section, Room 6462, Whitney Block. (Tel: ) S 1693(61/10)

16 Ministry of Natural Resources Your (ile: Our tile:, Hollinger Argus Limited P.O. Box 320 Timmins, Ontario P4N 7E2 Dear Sir: RE: Electromagnetic Surveys submitted on Mining Claims P et al and P et al in the township ' of''tisdale; :; ' ;;;;:: ' ;; - ' ;;;; ' ; ' ;; ' ;; ''' ; - '' ;; - ; - Enclosed are the final pages and maps (in duplicate) for the above mentioned reports. Please sign these and return them to this office. For further information, please contact Mr. F.W. Matthews at 416/ Yours very truly, E7F Anderson Director Land Management Branch Whitney Block, Room 6450 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 Phone: 416/ A. Barr:se Ends: cc: Mining Recorder Timmins, Ontario

17 Mining Recorder Ministry o f Natural Resources 60 Wilson Avenue Tinmins, Ontario P4N 2S7 Dear Sir: We have received reports and naps for a Geophysical (Electro magnetic) survey submitted under Special Provisions (credit for Performance ancl Coverage) on mining claims P et al in the Tovnshlp of Tisdale. This material will be examined and assessed and a statement of assessment work credits will be issued. Yours very truly, E,F. Anderson Director Land Management Branch Whitney Block, Room 6450 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 Phone: 416/ J. Skura/amc cc: Hollinger Argus Ltd. Timrolns, Ontario cc: Esso Minerals Canada Attn: Lloyd M. Wilson Toronto, Ontario

18 Mining Recorder Ministry of Natural Resources 60 Wilson Avenue Timmins, Ontario P4N 2S7 Dear Sir: RE: Geophysical (Electromagnetic) Survey on Mining Claims P et al In the Township of Tisdale The Geophysical (Electromagnetic) Survey aseessment work credits as shown on the attached statement have been approved as of the above date. Please Inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so Indicate on your records. Yours very truly. E.F. Anderson Director Land Management Branch Whitney Block, Room 6450 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 Phone: 416/ A. Barr:se Ends: cc: Hollinger Argus Limited Timmins, Ontario cc: Esso Minerals Canada Toronto, Ontario Attn: Mr. L.M. Wilson. cc: Resident Geologist Timmins, Ontario

19 Ministry of Natural lurces Technical Assessment Work Credits FM* Recorded Holder Township or Area HOLLINGER ARGUS LIMITED TISDALE fe- Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim Mining Claim AsMMd ls- y f^- Geophysical Electromagnetic 40 days P to 62 1nclu*1ve l Magnetometer, days 1 s ' Radiometric. days 1 l f: Induced polarization.., Section 86 (18) days days Geological days, Geochemical days b mfi L, Man days D Airborne Special provision H Ground D m D Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims. P D Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant. - Special credits under section 86 (15a) for the following mining claims. r No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims f l l not sufficiently covered by the survey Insufficient technical data filed! The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary In order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical 60; Geological 40; Geochemical 40; Section 86(18)-80:

20 Ministry of Natural Resources C.100 Ontario GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORT FACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC. Type of Survey(s). Township or Area. Claim Holder(s) VLF-EM Tisdale. TWP. Hollitveer Areus Ltd. MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically 1 SPECIAL Survey Company Author of Report.. Esso Resources Canada Ltd. Llovd M. Wilson Address of Author 1485 Fieldlight Blvd., Pickering, Qnt, Covering Dates of Survey 15 Sept. ~ 3Q Nov. 1983^^...^ (linecutting to office) Total Miles of Line Chit 14.4 km cross Ijines ^^..^ 2.4 ton base/tie lines PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey. ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid. Geophysical Electromagnetic- O Mapnetnrneter _ Rndhmetrir.,,,..,... -Othmnpnlngiral fipnrhpmiral DAYS per claim 40 (prefix) (number) P, AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne lurveyi) Magnetometer..Electromagnetic.. Radiometric (enter days per claim) DATE:. SIGNATURE:. Author of Report or Agent Res. Geol... Qualifications ^ ^tfo*ff Previous Surveys File No. Type Date Claim Holder TOTAL CLAIMS.

21 GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA GROUND SURVEYS If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey Number of Stations. Station interval Profile scale ^^ Contour interval 473.Number of Readings meters.line spacing. 100 meters 1 : 2500 Horizontal 1 cm - 105K vertical N.A. MAGNETIC Instrument Accuracy Scale constant. Diurnal correction method. Base Station check-in interval (hours). Base Station location and value ELECTROMAGNETIC Instrument ueonics m-4.o u^rj C.ni] ronfignration Toil separation Accuracy Vertical 4 horizontal receiving cotla Readability ± 17, with axes perpendicular to each other. Method: Frequency Cjj Fixed transmitter Cutler, Maine d Shoot back (17.8 khz) D In line D Parallel line (specify V.L.F. station) Parameters measured In-phase S. Quadrature components of secondary vertical field. i g Instrument. Scale constant. Corrections made. Base station value and location Elevation accuracy. V. Instrument Method l l Time Domain Parameters On time - Off time -^. Delay time. Integration time. Power. Electrode array Electrode spacing. Type of electrode D Frequency Domain _ Frequency Range - ^

22 SELF POTENTIAL Instrument.. Range. Survey Method Corrections made. RADIOMETRIC Instrument. Values measured. Energy windows (levels) ^ ^ ^^ ^^ ^ ^^ ^^ Height of instrument^ -^ - - ^^. ^Background Count. Size of detector ^ ^ ^. ^. - ^.. ^^.^...,... Overburden -^^ ^ -.^ - ^^ - ^.....^.. (type, depth include outcrop map) )THERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) Type of survey Instrument Accuracy^^^ ^- - - ^^^- Parameters measured. Additional information (for understanding results). AIRBORNE SURVEYS Type of survey(s) Instrument(s) (specify for each type of survey) Accuracy^ - ^ ^ (specify for each type of survey) Aircraft used Sensor altitude- Navigation and flight path recovery method. Aircraft altitude Line Spacing. p Miles flown over total area -^^ ^ ^- Over claims only.

23 GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD Numbers of claims from which samples taken. Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample. (Nature of Material) Average Sample Weight Method of Collection, ^ Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development. Sample Depth Terrain.^^^ ^^ Drainage Development ^^-^ Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness. ANALYTICAL METHODS Values expressed in: per cent p. p. m. p. p. b. Cu, Pb, Others D D D Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As,-(circle) Field Analysis (. Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used Field Laboratory Analysis No.( Extraction Method. Analytical Method. Reagents Used -.tests).tests) SAMPLE PREPARATION (Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing) Mesh size of fraction used for analysis. Commercial Laboratory (. Name of Laboratory - Extraction Method Analytical Method Reagents Used^ ^ -tests) General. General.

24 Ministry of Natural Resources File C.100 Ontario GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORT FACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION. CONCLUSIONS ETC. Type of Survey(s). 'i - ' Township or Area. Claim Holder(s)- VLF-EM Tisdale. Two. 'Hollinger Argus Ltd. MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically Survey Company Author of Report - Esso Resources Canada Ltd. Lloyd M. Wilson Address of Author 1485 Fieldli'ght Blvd., Pickering, Ont. Covering Dates of Survey 15 Sept. ~ 30 Nov. 1981,^ (linecutting to office). Total Miles of Line Cut 14.4 km cross lines ; km base/tie lines (prefix) (number) P, SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey. ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid. Geophysical Electromagnetic. Radiometric -Other Geological. Geochemical- DAYS per claim AIRBQRNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne turvcyi) Magnetometer..Electromagnetic.. Radiometric (enter days per claim) DATE:. SIGNATURE:. Author of Report or Agent Res. Geol..Qualifications. Previous Surveys File No. Type Date Claim Holder TOTAL CLAIMS.

25 GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA GROUND SURVEYS If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey Number of Stations -. Station interval Profile scale Contour interval. N.A Number of Readings ' ,.. 25 meters Line sparing 100 meters l ; 2500 Horizontal l cm ''- IPX vertical O C (i z; C < S Instrument. Accuracy Scale constant. Diurnal correction method. Base Station check-in interval (hours)- Base Station location and value Instrument Coil configuration flnil separation A crura ry Method: Frennpnry Geonics EM-16 (VLF) Vertical d horizontal receiving coils Readability * IX' CjJ Fixed transmitter D Shoot back Cutler, Maine (17.8 khz) with axes perpendicular to eacl. other.. - :.... j " y-jy ; din line. v. D Parallel line ; ' \~f * -,,-^-- t Parameters measured In-phase S. Quadrature components of secondary vertical field. l S O Instrument. Scale constant Corrections made. Base station value and location Elevation accuracy. DLARIZAT; itivity Instrument ^ Method f~l Time Domain Parameters On time - Off time ^^. Delay time. Integration time. Power. Electrode array Electrode spacing. Type of electrode l l Frequency Domain Frequency. Range

26 Murphy Twp THE TOWNSHIP OF JWI p. (g)"p 13555(13557 TISDALE ER.O S.CO (P) 79O5, R (P)jP. (P DISTRICT OF COCHRANE l l 3953 l 9634 if..it I297O j i 6270 PORCUPINE MINING DIVISION SCALE' 1-INCH* 40 CHAINS P. e, P- a 13834' J5776Za LEGEND PATENTED LAND CROWN LAND SALE or C. S. LEASES 5684G7 J53T377 o P. vhvi P. (p Oil LOCATED LAND LICENSE OF OCCUPATION MINING RIGHTS ONLY SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY Loc. L.O. M.R.O S.R.O. P- 'P. ROADS p. "li f) P. 4035, ^662I O P)IP B IMPROVED ROADS KINGS HIGHWAYS 2.t/^ RAILWAYS POWER LINES MARSH OR MUSKEG i MINES 1388 (3323 f (D GEODECTIC STATION SURFACE RIGHTS O NLY PATENTED I3O P. (g P NOTES R IP J l P. P. (pjik. (pj t3395 o ; i I35EI This township lief within the Municipality Of CITY of TIMMINS. 400 Surface rights reservation around all lakes fa rivers j Town boundary of TIMMINS shown thus i^^v^.^;.^ NOW WITHIN THE CITY OF TIMMINS l 133OO l \ )3I22 l i I31OO [ l ' tf 13/ P- P l \V\ J 13152)3776 P. ^l P l 3?l P~ flp \ OATE Of ISSUE FEB - i 082 Ministry of Natural Resources _ TORONTO 12 PLAN NO.-M. 315 Deloro Twp \ O NTAMO MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES 42A11SW TISDALE 200 :ro AND MAPPING BK

27 i T ri 6 \ "k 9575.& 6J /\ J \J) ; Base L ine 7 IAO 5 7TB 5 1\S 9 LEGEND VLF-EM SURVEY INSTRUMENT: IONICS'one TRANSMIT TER: CUTLER, MAINE HOLLINGER ARGUS LTD. HORIZONTAL SCALE VERTICAL SCALE ICM-10% ESSO MINERALS CANADA l * A Good Anemotjr f^ r- - A TISDALE No. 5 TISbALE TWP. ONT. Scale h 25'00 DRAFTED s : M. W*itf ft -W- B- CoufftM