PAS 24:2012 Enhanced security performance requirements for doorsets and windows in the UK. Laboratory Engineer D Knight

Transcription

1 Page 1 of 16 Technical Report Report No Product Tested: Test Conducted for: Standard Specified: R16623 Thermal brake window ALTW62 Alumin Techno LLC Selitskogo str FEZ Minsk Minsk Region Minsk Area PAS 24:2012 Enhanced security performance requirements for doorsets and windows in the UK Project No: Date of Test: 16 th September 2016 Test Conducted at: Wintech Engineering Limited Halesfield 2 Telford Shropshire TF7 4QH Test Conducted by: D Woodcock Laboratory Technician Dave Adams Laboratory Engineer D Knight Laboratory Technician Report Compiled by: S Ward Laboratory Apprentice Authorised by: M Wass Technical Director Revision 1 This report has been amended to include an update to the overall number of pages/page numbers in the contents. Includes updated sample description and drawings, a change of the company name/address under test conducted for and under who supplied the sample information, as well as an update to the information about what the test sample was mounted in. This Revision of the report replaces all Previous Versions. 13/10/2016 This report is copyright and contains 16 numbered pages REPRODUCTION OF THIS DOCUMENT IN WHOLE OR ANY PART THEREOF MUST NOT BE MADE WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM WINTECH ENGINEERING LTD. This report and the results shown within are based upon the information, drawings, samples and tests referred to in the report. The results obtained do not necessarily relate to samples from the production line of the above named company and in no way constitute any form of representation or warranty as to the performance or quality of any products supplied or to be supplied by them. Wintech Engineering Ltd or its employees accept no liability for any damages, charges, cost or expenses in respect of or in relation to any damage to any property or other loss whatsoever arising either directly or indirectly from the use of the report.

2 Page 2 of 16 Contents Page No. 1. Introduction 3 2. Summary of Test Results 3 3. Description of Test Sample 4 4. Test Arrangement 7 5. Test Procedures 8 6. Test Results 9 7. System Drawings 11

3 Page 3 of Introduction This report describes testing of a window sample conducted at the test laboratory of Wintech Engineering Ltd on behalf of ALUTECH Systems s.r.o. in order to determine compliance with PAS 24:2012. Wintech Engineering Ltd is accredited by the United Kingdom Accreditation Service as UKAS Testing Laboratory No Summary of Results The following summarises the results of testing carried out, in accordance with PAS 24:2012 Test Description C.4.3 Manipulation Test C Infill Manual Test C Infill Mechanical Test C.4.5 Mechanical Loading Test C.4.6 Manual Check Test Overall Classification in accordance with PAS 24:2012 Result Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass WKT More comprehensive details are reported in Section 6. Note: These results are valid only for the conditions under which the test was conducted Note: All measurement devices, instruments and other relevant equipment were calibrated and traceable to National Standards.

4 Page 4 of Description of Test Sample Product range name: Configuration: Opening direction: Outer Frame Thermal brake window ALTW62 One leaf window Inside open Outer frame width: 1188 mm Outer frame material: Aluminium Outer frame height: 2345 mm Outer frame gasket Outer frame Part Numbers Gasket type: EPDM Top: AYPC.W Manufacturer: Secil, Turkey Bottom: AYPC.W Product name: FRK52 Lock side: AYPC.W Product code: Hinge side: AYPC.W Threshold None Outer frame section size Manufacturer: - Width: 72 mm Product name: - Depth: 62 mm Product code: - Reinforcing: none Material: - Leaf Manufacturer: - Outer frame joint method Product name: - Head: Aluminium press corner with polyurethane glue Product code: - Foot: Aluminium press corner with polyurethane glue Material: - Leaf width: 1100 mm Leaf material: Aluminium Leaf height: 2257 mm Leaf gasket Leaf Part Numbers Gasket type: EPDM Top: AYPC.W Manufacturer: Secil, Turkey Bottom: AYPC.W Product name: FRK98 Lock side: AYPC.W Product code: Hinge side: AYPC.W Leaf midrail: None Leaf section size Manufacturer: Width: 92 mm Product name: Depth: 70,4 mm Product code: Reinforcing: none Material: Manufacturer: - Leaf joint method Product name: - Head: Aluminium press corner with polyurethane glue Product code: - Foot: Aluminium press corner with polyurethane glue Material: - Glazing Glass unit Glazing gasket Manufacturer: Belarusian man Gasket type: EPDM Inner thickness: 8 mm tempered Manufacturer: Secil, Turkey Spacer material: aluminium, 14 mm Product name: FRK38

5 Page 5 of 16 Bead Outer thickness: 8 mm tempered Product code: Unit sizes: Glazing clip none Manufacturer: Manufacturer: AluminTechno, LLC Product name: Product name: AYPC.C Product code: Product code: Glazing tape details none Bead size: 22x20 mm Manufacturer: Bead material: Aluminium Product name: Hardware Hinges: Product code: Manufacturer: Product description: Product code: Quantity: SAVIO (Italy) Non-handed hinge kit (weight capacity 110 Kg) in aluminum, premounted upper pin and counterplate in stainless steel 43, premounted nylon bushing and adjustment grub screw, 2 socket flat head screws M5x12 in stainless steel mounted on lower window leaf, 1 socket flat head screw M5x8 in stainless steel 304, nylon pin covers set Hinge fixing: SAVIO (Italy) Right lower support and pin for R 1 set secondary leaf hinge (weight capacity Kg), in stainless steel 304, right pin in stainless steel 201 with premounted counterplate in stainless steel 430 and pin in galvanized steel,1 self-forming countersunk head screw M5x18 in stainless steel 304 Hinge protectors: none Hinge protector fixings: none Door lock: none Door lock fixings: none Cylinder: none Cylinder fixing: none Handle: SAVIO (Italy) Handle for tilt and turn in die-cast metal pc. or brass, dist. between centres mm, 2 TORX (T15) cap screws M5x13 in stainless steel Handle fixings: SAVIO (Italy) 2 screw M5x13 2 pc. TORX Touch Bar none Cylinder Support none Cylinder Escutcheon none Keeps: SAVIO (Italy) Right kit for 6 closing points in white R 1 set galvanized zamak, premounted screws in stainless steel 304 and 430 Keep fixings: SAVIO (Italy) M5x12 1 set Keeps: SAVIO (Italy) Right Kit for 8 closing points in white R 1 set galvanized zamak, premounted screws in stainless steel 304 and 430 Keep fixings: SAVIO (Italy) M5x12 1 set

6 Page 6 of 16 Keeps: SAVIO (Italy) Intermediate closing point in white set galvanized zamak, premounted screws in stainless steel 304 and 430, and adjustable locking piece Drip bar: AluminTechno, Aluminium profile AYPC.C pc. LLC Drip bar fixings: Durer, Russia Screw 3,9x13 DIN pc. Additional Hardware: SAVIO (Italy) Anti-burglar device for groove mm and 2 countersunk head screws M5x18 in stainless steel. SAVIO (Italy) RH SKG security kit in white galvanized zamak, 8 countersunk head screws M5x18 in stainless steel sets R 1 set The description of the test sample in this section has been supplied by Alumin Techno LLC and has not been verified by Wintech Engineering Limited. See Section 7 for test sample drawings as supplied by Alumin Techno LLC.

7 Page 7 of Test Arrangement 4.1 Test Rig The test sample was supplied mounted in 100 x 75 mm timber sub-frame in accordance with manufacturer s installation requirements. It was fitted into the test rig, shown below which was constructed to meet the requirements of the test specification and was fitted plumb, square and without twist or bends. Figure 1 Test rig used for testing 4.2 Attack Tool Groups Tool Set A A Assorted mild steel wire A Two credit cards A Two paint scrapers A One craft knife A Two flat blade screwdrivers, 150mm length Tool Set B A One 25mm wood chisel A One 6mm wood chisel A One flat blade screwdriver, 200mm length A One brick bolster A One crosspoint screwdriver, 200mm length A One cross head screwdriver, 200mm length 4.3 Temperature A digital data logger capable of measuring temperature with an accuracy of ± 1 C was used. 4.4 Mechanical Load Application A series of parallel to plane loads and perpendicular to plane loads were applied to the products in using hydraulic cylinders.

8 Page 8 of Test Procedures 5.1 Manipulation test The objective of this test was to highlight any inherent vulnerability in the design of the window which, from the outside, would permit entry by the hardware being operated, released or disengaged when tested using all of group A tools from Section A.2.1 of PAS 24:2012 and, where applicable, tools specified in A.2.2.3, A and A in group B from Section A.2.2 of PAS 24:2012. No single attack technique was used for more than 3 minutes. 5.2 Infill manual test The objective of this test was to assess the vulnerabilities of the infill retention system, including gaskets and beading, using tool sets A & tool set B as described in section A.2.1 & A.2.2 of PAS 24:2012 for a maximum period of 3 minutes. 5.3 Infill mechanical test The objective of this test was to assess the ability of the glazed unit to withstand a specified sequence of loading without gaining entry through the sample. The loads and loading sequence were in accordance with Section C of PAS 24: Mechanical loading test A series of perpendicular to plane and parallel to plane loads were applied progressively in order to assess the specimen s integrity during a specified sequence of loading. All perpendicular to plane loads were held for 8-12 seconds. All parallel to plane loads were applied and maintained while the perpendicular to plane loads were applied, maintained and removed. 5.5 Manual check test The objective of this test was to assess any vulnerabilities of the sample that are not covered by the standard loading cases assessed in the mechanical loading test C.4.5. The tools described in Section B of PAS 24:2012 were used for a maximum period of 15 minutes in an attempt to gain entry through the sample.

9 Page 9 of Test Results The temperature measured inside the laboratory during the test was: 22.0 C Note The test samples were stored in a non-destructive environment at a temperature of C and a r.h. of % for a minimum of 24 hours, testing was also conducted at those conditions. Prior to testing, the door was closed and locked from the outside and any keys were removed. 6.1 Manipulation test Attempts were made from the external face to operate, release and disengage the system hardware in order to gain entry through the sample in accordance with Section C.4.3 of PAS 24:2012. The test lasted a total of 9 minutes during which no entry was gained. 6.2 Infill manual test Attempts were made from the external face to remove gaskets and beading in order to gain access to and remove the glazed unit using tools A.2.2 & A.2.3 in accordance with Section C of PAS 24:2012. No entry was gained throughout the test. 6.3 Infill mechanical test A series of loads were applied to the external face of the infill in order to remove the infill and gain access through the window as defined in Section C of PAS 24:2012. A load of 2.0kN was applied to each corner of the infill. Each load was held for 8-12 seconds before being removed. No entry was gained throughout this test. 6.4 Mechanical loading test A series of loads were applied to the sample as defined in Section C.4.5 of PAS 24:2012. A parallel-toplane load was applied and held while a perpendicular-to-plane load was applied and held. The perpendicular-to-plane load was then removed followed by the parallel-to-plane load. This was conducted at each loading point as shown in Figure 2. No entry was gained throughout this test. Figure 2 Loading points

10 Page 10 of Manual check test Attempts were made from the external face to gain entry through the sample by attacking those areas that were not tested during the mechanical loading test C.4.5. The overall attack time was limited to 15 minutes with no single attack technique being used for more than 3 minutes. No entry was gained through this test.

11 Page 11 of System Drawings

12 Page 12 of 16

13 Page 13 of 16

14 Page 14 of 16

15 Page 15 of 16

16 Page 16 of END OF REPORT ----