Value-Based System of System Development
|
|
- Ethelbert Weaver
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Value-Based System of System Development Massachusetts Institute of Technology AIAA Infotech Conference 28 Sept 2005 Boston Sunday Globe supplement, August
2 Background Constellation Systems Study Explore the overall architecture near-term implications for returning to Moon going on to Mars CEV requirements Transportation system architecture Organization for systems engineering integration (SE&I) Multiple industry study teams funded by NASA Our team: Draper Laboratory MIT Components of the architecture we studied Launch/transportation, Information system, surface operations, campaigns, software/avionics, safety risk, enterprise, policy 6 month renewable study (12 months total Sept 04 to Aug 05) September Slide 2
3 Evolution of Thought About the Challenge MIT Graduate Design Class Space Systems Engineering semester study (report May 2004) Proposal summer 2004 Project first phase September 2004 Technical trades architecting Stakeholder value analysis Mid-term review December 2004 Extension phase February 2005 Refine technical architecture concepts (focused) Response to pop-up issues Continue stakeholder value analysis Begin enterprise architecture study Change of NASA Administrator April 2005 Project complete August 2005 September Slide 3
4 Starting Points Sustainability: primary organizing principle of the architecture concept Elements of sustainability: Well-understood minimized risks communicated to all stakeholders An affordable system Prolonged recognized delivery of value to all stakeholders A steady cadence of successes (addressing policy robustness) High-level design principles: Design for sustainability (which includes affordability) A holistic view of the SoS with a focus on value delivery A highly modular accretive design to allow for evolvability extensibility Mars as the reference goal to validate the Lunar concept September Slide 4
5 Initial Structure for the Study Sustainability Team: Enterprise architecture Policy Value delivery to stakeholders Architecture Team: CER System architecture Vehicle Team: CEV System design CEV subsystems Organization structure changed multiple times to reflect evolving study needs, understing of the problem Initial study structure reflects declared sponsor interests, existing architecture concepts, ideas about important departures from historical approaches September Slide 5
6 Baseline Mars Transportation Architecture 125 mt in-line SDLV (5-segment SRBs, XL ET, & upper stage; equivalent to lunar in-line LSDLV + upper stage) Earth Departure System TSH MAV ERV 30 mt Single Stick (5-segment SRB & upper stage) Aug Slide 6 NASA Concept Exploration Refinement Study
7 Mars Mission Campaign TImeline (Arch 969 w/ ERV) Months: Mission 1 Pre-deployment 180 Earth Departure 210 days 1375 days 180 days Mars Arrival Mission 1 Crew 605 Earth Departure Mars Arrival Human Surface Operations 158 days 605 days 0 B Mars Departure 0 Earth Arrival Mission 1 Backup ERV Earth Departure Mars Arrival Mars Arrival 210 days Mission 2 Pre-deployment Aug Slide 7 NASA Concept Exploration Refinement Study
8 Baseline Commonality Hardware Development Roadmap LEO / ISS Mission Hardware LES for CEV capsule: CEV + IPU (27 m 3 ): Rendezvous & Deorbit stage: CEV power pack: Design Philosophy: Maximize hardware commonality to minimize gap between lunar Mars s overall development production costs Mars Mission Hardware Mars ling gear & exosceleton: CEV launch vehicle: Heat protection parachutes for Mars Aerocapture Aeroentry SDLV upper stage (125 mt to LEO) Potentially EDSderived: Short Lunar Mission Hardware Common in-space propulsion stage (LCH 4 / LOX): Core propulsion stage Regular strap-on tanks XL strap-on tanks Lunar ling gear & exosceleton: Engine 1 (LCH 4 / LOX) Restartable, non-throttleable: Engine 2 (LCH 4 / LOX) Throttleable: Common Earth departure stage (LH 2 / LOX) Long Lunar Mission Hardware Habitat core inflatable pressurized tent for planetary surfaces: Note: Block upgrades across phases are not depicted OR Heavy Lift Launch Vehicle: ( 2 stages, 100 mt to LEO) Aug Slide 8 NASA Concept Exploration Refinement Study
9 Future Space Communications: Interplanetary Internet (IPN) Aug Slide 9 NASA Concept Exploration Refinement Study
10 Exploration System Stakeholders Direct indirect beneficiaries of space activities Categorized into stakeholder super groups that correspond with general areas of societal impact Exploration Stakeholders Addressed Science Economic Security Public, Engineers Technologists, NASA Scientists, NASA, Other US agencies Commercial enterprises, Other US agencies, Engineers Technologists DoD, Intelligence, International Partners US Public, Media, Educators, Executive Branch, Congress, NASA September Slide 10
11 Formal Modeling of Stakeholder Interests: Executive Branch President Re-Election Public Executive Policy Making Space Laws/Acts Other Executive Branch Entities Public Approval Implementing other less popular policies Public Perception of the President Exploration Program Technology Magmt Exploration Program Fiscal Magmt Value Delivery Improving public opinion Space Explorating Approval of National Policy Media Diffusion Space Exploration Program Approval of Security Policy Educating Approval of Global Leadership Approval of Foreign Policy Enabling technologies Foreign Soverngt Claim discouragement Dual use technologies Show Progress on Space Vision Security Leadership Home Abroad Providing Natl Security September Slide 11
12 Science Science Science Science Science Science of experience of experience of experience of experience Developmental of experience Technology outside NASA Scientists All Scientists All Quality results from Other Government Agencies DoE, HHS security providers DoD Other Government Agencies DoC/NOAA Space resource development Earth Operators Space resource development Other Government Agencies security providers Other Government Agencies DoE, HHS DoD DoC/NOAA Space resource development Earth Operators Space resource development about effects (e.g. radiation) on human health about effects (e.g. space habitat, low gravity) on human health Environmental data monitoring gather more per gather more per gather more per Science Science gather more per Earth Operators Space resource development Earth Operators Space resource development gather more per Scientists Scientists Training of crew NASA NASA Scientific Increase training of crew Science Science gather more per Security providers (DoD, NRO, etc) Scientific community Scientists Scientific community Other gov agencies (NOAA, DoE, FAA, EPA) youth future Commercial youth future Science youth future NASA youth future Security providers Scientific community Other gov agencies (NOAA, DoE, FAA, EPA) Commercial Science NASA (DoD, NRO, etc) Scientists youth future youth future youth future youth future Environmental data Understing of Universe to continue to attract a skilled to continue to attract a skilled to continue to attract a skilled to continue to attract a skilled NASA NASA Highperformance NASA NASA Highperformance Security providers (DoD, NRO, etc) youth future Planetary scientists Security providers (DoD, NRO, etc) Geologists youth future Understing the evolution of the solar system to continue to attract a skilled Technoloigst Technoloigst Rewarding stimulating endeavors Increase Increase Increase attract attract attract attract attract attracting create or maintain fidelity of transmitted data about effects (e.g. radiation) on human health about effects (e.g. space habitat, low gravity) on human health of Earth's environment explorer explorer explorer explorer explorer explorer explorer results from science explorer quality of environmental data provided to DoD scientific about the evolution of planetary surface a a a a top scientists engineers top scientists engineers both the perception reality of simulating rewarding science techology jobs the skills of the using running running developing developing developing increasing increasing increasing high quality trans means (e.g HDTV) experiments, observations measurements experiments, observations measurements Technology Capabilities (e.g. sensors that can be used for environmental monitoring) that are of interest of other agencies the ability to plan under uncertainty the ability to plan under uncertainty interaction communication with explorers interaction communication with explorers interaction communication with explorers fidelity of transmitted data BY using high quality trans means (e.g HDTV) TO about effects (e.g. radiation) on human health BY running experiments, observations measurements TO about effects (e.g. space habitat, low gravity) on human health BY running experiments, observations measurements To Increase of Earth's environment BY developing Technology Capabilities (e.g. sensors that can be used for environmental monitoring) that are of interest of other agencies TO explorer BY developing the ability to plan under uncertainty TO explorer BY developing the ability to plan under uncertainty TO explorer BY increasing interaction communication with explorers TO explorer BY increasing interaction communication with explorers TO explorer BY increasing interaction communication with explorers training explorers TO explorer BY training explorers training explorers TO explorer BY training explorers conducting studies TO Increase results from BY conducting studies developing improving studying investigating the ability to plan under uncertainty inter-agency data transfer capability results of (video, data, images, samples) communicating gained through experience to workers currently in yet to enter the communicating gained through experience to workers currently in yet to enter the communicating gained through experience to workers currently in yet to enter the communicating gained through experience to workers currently in yet to enter the creating creating increasing developing impactor flux vs time stimulating rewarding jobs stimulating rewarding jobs positive visibility of results of jobs new technologies TO science explorer BY developing the ability to plan under uncertainty quality of environmental data provided to DoD BY improving inter-agency data transfer capability TO Increase scientific BY studying results of (video, data, images, samples) TO Increase about the evolution of planetary surface BY investigating impactor flux vs time BY communicating gained through experience to workers currently in yet to enter the BY communicating gained through experience to workers currently in yet to enter the BY communicating gained through experience to workers currently in yet to enter the BY communicating gained through experience to workers currently in yet to enter the TO attract top scientists engineers BY creating stimulating rewarding jobs To attracting top scientists engineers BY creating stimulating rewarding jobs To create both the perception reality of simulating rewarding science techology jobs BY increasing positive visibility of results of jobs or maintain the skills of the BY developing new technologies science science science science science science science or maintain the skills of the polling data related to space Generate positive perception to electorate Increase NASA Budget throughigh Visibility N/A Metrics health of astronauts, pilots, service members radiation health assessments protocols (Amount information exchanged??) natio american identity on natio american identity on Object written havent touched it better wellness improve human health in the presence of radiation mate to explore, political support in Congress with general public Architecture proxy for the metric technologies or disobtain Technologies/ of use in agencies dom # publications, # of citations per publication Quality of data Health level, accident rate in the launch reliability Metrics shorter times from need to capability on orbit; cheaper cost per unit capability on orbit # of partner countries partnering ; popularity of the us governement abroad International media opinion polls; international partnership in space activities Amount of data collected returned Amount of data Commerical components; launch process changes Enhance grow international partnerships focused on space as well as wide global interest in space in general, commercial human space in particular NASA funding stable or growing Freedom of action for US other countries in space. n; a n; a Science payload delivered to M surface Observation days for crew on surface Observation days for robots on surface Recon survey Spacial area of a given site that can be reached Diversity of sites Ability to temporally re-plan within (week to month) Ability to temporally re-plan adapt in campaign N/A Architecture proxy for the metric DoD support for NASA activities no proxies necessary, these metrics are directly measurable no proxies necessary, these metrics are directly measurable n; a From Stakeholder Interests to Technical Measures Auxiliary columns Auxiliary columns Stakehol Need Objective Overarching der objective Scientists Scientific TO underst origin, evolution fate of the solar system BY interpreting geologic environments Identify stakeholder, their needs derived objectives (14) Stakeholder needs (171) Use object process modeling (OPM) to define value flow system descriptive language Overarching Exploration objectives (39) Metric # of publications, # of citations Clustered through objectives hierarchy tree Translate objectives into metrics, proximate measure indicators Proximate indicators drive system of systems architecture Proximate Measure Amount of data collected returned Quality of data Indicator Metric Science payload delivered to M surface Observation days for crew on surface Observation days for robots on surface Recon survey Spacial area of a given site that can be reached Diversity of sites Ability to temporally re-plan within (week to month Ability to temporally re-plan adapt in campaign September Slide 12
13 The Gap Between Value Engineering Metrics Stakeholder Values Pride, inspiration, economic development, policy support, etc. Metrics Gap Technical Architecture Kg, N, M, Kº, bits/sec, etc. The gap is caused (in part) by: Stakeholder diversity/ dispersion Different levels of stakeholders definition/ aggregation Multiple pathways for flows of benefits Multiple interaction modes (e.g., markets, hierarchies, clans, etc.) Temporal separation between cause effect The architect is the arbitrator in interpreting/ bridging the gap September Slide 13
14 Exploration Functions 85 Function Population A B C D E Continuously increasing safety 66 reliability Inspecting overseeing technical 67 systems safety Architecture review 68 analysis 69 Manufacturing oversight Increasing 70 safety/minimizing risk 71 Mitigating hazards Having contingency 72 plans 73 Validating systems 74 Testing systems Ensuring crew skill 75 diversity Inspecting overseeing operations 76 safety 77 Assessing Risk 78 Instilling safety culture Capturing tacit operations 79 Ensuring explorer 80 health Explorer health monitoring 81 evaluating Mitigating radiation 82 exposure Radiation Health 83 assessing Managing thermal 84 environment Assuring crew L0 6 functions L1 26 functions L2 68 functions L3 150 functions L4 205 functions L5 91 functions L6 4 functions Total: 550 diversity Background Based on inputs from all effort areas in the study Implications Defining the architecture in a useful way involves mapping functions to forms Comprehensive list provides holistic perspective Enterprise functions based on surrogate enterprises Disparity in progress between technical enterprise system definition highlights differing analytical maturity levels 550 functions defined Addresses both social technical systems Organized into hierarchical tree structure 7 levels of hierarchy 6 main branches in the hierarchical structure What is driving the architecture? Stakeholder values or modeling capability? September Slide 14
15 Value Defines, is Delivered by Architecture Beneficiaries Other stakeholders Needs Value Delivery process feedback loop Responses, including resources received Directed Resources Actions including delivering benefits Value creating organization(s) Capabilities Needed Resources The Value Delivery System (i.e., the architecture) must be designed to deliver value to the stakeholders, actually deliver that value Actual value delivery process depends on nature of relationships/ exchanges among stakeholders Proximate measures feed the technical architecture process Enterprise architecture governs value flows among stakeholders This architecting process was found to be highly Iterative September Slide 15
16 Which Stakeholders Benefit From This Architecture? # functions of interest Scientific Commercial Executive- Congress US People Intl Partners The architecture that emerged (based on fairly narrowly-defined technical merit) most looked like previous architectures, not surprisingly most addressed the needs of legacy stakeholders Media Security Educators Benefits valued by stakeholders are linked to the functions that produce those benefits Sum of functions that produce stakeholder-valued benefits are displayed by stakeholder in graph Not weighted (e.g., by $, intrinsic value, etc) Top beneficiaries are /Scientists (traditional NASA constituency; jobs) Commercial (providing launch services systems, jobs) Executive Congress (fiduciary concerns, political capital) September Slide 16
17 Comments on Enterprise Architecting Creating adapting structures in response to needs Create structures that enable value creation (e.g., new products are created by innovative product development systems) More efficient enterprises are created through an on-going transformation process that relies on feedback, analysis correction High-performance supplier logistics networks are created in the service of providing customers with fast, inexpensive, high-quality products in a way that beats competitors makes money There is evidence that a few exceptional enterprise architects with vision have created new ways of structuring enterprises This process generally unfolds over many years (decades), with accounts suggesting it was largely through the types of processes outlined above: Solving problems a few at a time, relentlessly, with deliberate focused alteration of decision rules We haven t systematically investigated whether there have been other enterprise architects that have been equally visionary have led their enterprises to ruin Is EA unequivocally good? September Slide 17
18 Lessons Learned Large gap between stakeholder analysis technical system architecting Stakeholder analysis is immature in theory, tools, concepts, empirical evidence, (i.e., which apply: economics, political science, physics, decision theory, etc?) Phasing of work: don t start the stakeholder analysis at the same time you start hardware architecting No formal theory-supported methods to derive technical measures from societal stakeholder values independent of architecture concepts Formalized analytical processes can yield any solutions depending on the assumptions made along the way Formality is not a (very good) substitute for architecting judgment The architect is ultimately the arbitrator to bridge the gap between stakeholders technical system, whether intentional, systematic, transparent, acd, or not In our study, the technical architecture concept was fairly defined at the outset; in reality the architecture is even more defined by existing constraints Enterprise system of system architecting challenges introduce social temporal dynamics that are not well characterized/modeled in existing system architecting methods September Slide 18
The Global Exploration Roadmap International Space Exploration Coordination Group (ISECG)
The Global Exploration Roadmap International Space Exploration Coordination Group (ISECG) Kathy Laurini NASA/Senior Advisor, Exploration & Space Ops Co-Chair/ISECG Exp. Roadmap Working Group FISO Telecon,
More informationConstellation Systems Division
Lunar National Aeronautics and Exploration Space Administration www.nasa.gov Constellation Systems Division Introduction The Constellation Program was formed to achieve the objectives of maintaining American
More informationNASA Space Exploration 1 st Year Report
Exploration Systems Mission Directorate NASA Space Exploration 1 st Year Report Rear Admiral Craig E. Steidle (Ret.) Associate Administrator January 31, 2005 The Vision for Space Exploration THE FUNDAMENTAL
More informationA RENEWED SPIRIT OF DISCOVERY
A RENEWED SPIRIT OF DISCOVERY The President s Vision for U.S. Space Exploration PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH JANUARY 2004 Table of Contents I. Background II. Goal and Objectives III. Bringing the Vision to
More informationExploration Systems Research & Technology
Exploration Systems Research & Technology NASA Institute of Advanced Concepts Fellows Meeting 16 March 2005 Dr. Chris Moore Exploration Systems Mission Directorate NASA Headquarters Nation s Vision for
More informationUnderstand that technology has different levels of maturity and that lower maturity levels come with higher risks.
Technology 1 Agenda Understand that technology has different levels of maturity and that lower maturity levels come with higher risks. Introduce the Technology Readiness Level (TRL) scale used to assess
More informationScience Enabled by the Return to the Moon (and the Ares 5 proposal)
Science Enabled by the Return to the Moon (and the Ares 5 proposal) Harley A. Thronson Exploration Concepts & Applications, Flight Projects Division NASA GSFC and the Future In-Space Operations (FISO)
More informationTestimony to the President s Commission on Implementation of the United States Space Exploration Policy
Testimony to the President s Commission on Implementation of the United States Space Exploration Policy Cort Durocher, Executive Director American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics NTSB Conference
More informationPanel Session IV - Future Space Exploration
The Space Congress Proceedings 2003 (40th) Linking the Past to the Future - A Celebration of Space May 1st, 8:30 AM - 11:00 AM Panel Session IV - Future Space Exploration Canaveral Council of Technical
More informationESA Human Spaceflight Capability Development and Future Perspectives International Lunar Conference September Toronto, Canada
ESA Human Spaceflight Capability Development and Future Perspectives International Lunar Conference 2005 19-23 September Toronto, Canada Scott Hovland Head of Systems Unit, System and Strategy Division,
More informationChapter 2 Planning Space Campaigns and Missions
Chapter 2 Planning Space Campaigns and Missions Abstract In the early stages of designing a mission to Mars, an important measure of the mission cost is the initial mass in LEO (IMLEO). A significant portion
More informationAsteroid Redirect Mission and Human Exploration. William H. Gerstenmaier NASA Associate Administrator for Human Exploration and Operations
Asteroid Redirect Mission and Human Exploration William H. Gerstenmaier NASA Associate Administrator for Human Exploration and Operations Leveraging Capabilities for an Asteroid Mission NASA is aligning
More informationNASA s Exploration Plans and The Lunar Architecture
National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA s Exploration Plans and The Lunar Architecture Dr. John Olson Exploration Systems Mission Directorate NASA Headquarters January 2009 The U.S. Space Exploration
More informationHuman Spaceflight: The Ultimate Team Activity
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Human Spaceflight: The Ultimate Team Activity William H. Gerstenmaier Associate Administrator Human Exploration & Operations Mission Directorate Oct. 11, 2017
More informationExploration Partnership Strategy. Marguerite Broadwell Exploration Systems Mission Directorate
Exploration Partnership Strategy Marguerite Broadwell Exploration Systems Mission Directorate October 1, 2007 Vision for Space Exploration Complete the International Space Station Safely fly the Space
More informationThe Lunar Exploration Campaign
The Lunar Exploration Campaign ** Timeline to to be be developed during during FY FY 2019 2019 10 Exploration Campaign Ø Prioritize human exploration and related activities Ø Expand Exploration by Ø Providing
More informationA RENEWED SPIRIT OF DISCOVERY
A RENEWED SPIRIT OF DISCOVERY The President s Vision for U.S. Space Exploration PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH JANUARY 2004 Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for
More informationA Call for Boldness. President Kennedy September 1962
A Call for Boldness If I were to say, we shall send to the moon a giant rocket on an untried mission, to an unknown celestial body, and return it safely to earth, and do it right and do it first before
More informationESA UNCLASSIFIED - Releasable to the Public. ESA Workshop: Research Opportunities on the Deep Space Gateway
ESA Workshop: Research Opportunities on the Deep Space Gateway Prepared by James Carpenter Reference ESA-HSO-K-AR-0000 Issue/Revision 1.1 Date of Issue 27/07/2017 Status Issued CHANGE LOG ESA Workshop:
More informationOffice of Chief Technologist - Space Technology Program Dr. Prasun Desai Office of the Chief Technologist May 1, 2012
Office of Chief Technologist - Space Technology Program Dr. Prasun Desai Office of the Chief Technologist May 1, 2012 O f f i c e o f t h e C h i e f T e c h n o l o g i s t Office of the Chief Technologist
More information2009 Space Exploration Program Assessment
AIAA Space Exploration Program Committee 2009 Space Exploration Program Assessment Presentation to the AIAA Technical Activities Committee 08 January 2008 John C. Mankins Chair, Space Exploration Program
More informationAnalysis of European Architectures for Space Exploration
Analysis of European Architectures for Space Exploration 9 th International Conference on Exploration and Utilisation of the Moon 22 26 October, Sorrento 1 Exploration Goals Extend access and a sustainable
More informationSpace Technology FY 2013
Space Technology FY 2013 Dr. Mason Peck, Office of the Chief Technologist ASEB April 4, 2012 O f f i c e o f t h e C h i e f T e c h n o l o g i s t Technology at NASA NASA pursues breakthrough technologies
More informationNASA Keynote to International Lunar Conference Mark S. Borkowski Program Executive Robotic Lunar Exploration Program
NASA Keynote to International Lunar Conference 2005 Mark S. Borkowski Program Executive Robotic Lunar Exploration Program Our Destiny is to Explore! The goals of our future space flight program must be
More informationHEOMD Update NRC Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board Oct. 16, 2014
National Aeronautics and Space Administration HEOMD Update NRC Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board Oct. 16, 2014 Greg Williams DAA for Policy and Plans Human Exploration and Operations Mission Directorate
More informationESA PREPARATION FOR HUMAN LUNAR EXPLORATION. Scott Hovland European Space Agency, HME-HFH, ESTEC,
ESA PREPARATION FOR HUMAN LUNAR EXPLORATION Scott Hovland European Space Agency, HME-HFH, ESTEC, Scott.Hovland@esa.int 1 Aurora Core Programme Outline Main goals of Core Programme: To establish set of
More informationThe Global Exploration Roadmap
The Global Exploration Roadmap September 2011 International Space Exploration Coordination Group The surface of the Earth is the shore of the cosmic ocean. From it we have learned most of what we know.
More informationThe Global Exploration Roadmap
The Global Exploration Roadmap September 2011 International Space Exploration Coordination Group The Global Exploration Roadmap Human and robotic exploration of the Moon, asteroids, and Mars will strengthen
More informationFuture Directions: Strategy for Human and Robotic Exploration. Gary L. Martin Space Architect
Future Directions: Strategy for Human and Robotic Exploration Gary L. Martin Space Architect September, 2003 Robust Exploration Strategy Traditional Approach: A Giant Leap (Apollo) Cold War competition
More informationThe NASA-ESA. Comparative Architecture Assessment
The NASA-ESA Comparative Architecture Assessment 1. Executive Summary The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) is currently studying lunar outpost architecture concepts, including habitation,
More informationStakeholder Expectations Definition Process
Stakeholder Expectations Definition Process Stakeholder Expectations Definition Requirement 5 (Section 3.2..) The Center Directors or designees shall establish and maintain a process, to include activities,
More informationExploration Systems Mission Directorate: New Opportunities in the President s FY2011 Budget
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Exploration Systems Mission Directorate: New Opportunities in the President s FY2011 Budget Dr. Laurie Leshin Deputy Associate Administrator, ESMD Presentation
More informationAsteroid Redirect Mission (ARM) Update to the Small Bodies Assessment Group
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Asteroid Redirect Mission (ARM) Update to the Small Bodies Assessment Group Michele Gates, Program Director, ARM Dan Mazanek, Mission Investigator, ARM June
More informationNEO Science and Human Space Activity. Mark V. Sykes Director, Planetary Science Institute Chair, NASA Small Bodies Assessment Group
1 NEO Science and Human Space Activity Mark V. Sykes Director, Planetary Science Institute Chair, NASA Small Bodies Assessment Group Near-Earth Objects q
More informationThe Future of the US Space Program and Educating the Next Generation Workforce. IEEE Rock River Valley Section
The Future of the US Space Program and Educating the Next Generation Workforce IEEE Rock River Valley Section RVC Woodward Tech Center Overview of NASA s Future 2 Space Race Begins October 4, 1957 3 The
More informationA SPACE STATUS REPORT. John M. Logsdon Space Policy Institute Elliott School of International Affairs George Washington University
A SPACE STATUS REPORT John M. Logsdon Space Policy Institute Elliott School of International Affairs George Washington University TWO TYPES OF U.S. SPACE PROGRAMS One focused on science and exploration
More informationUpdate on ESA Planetary Protection Activities
Update on ESA Planetary Protection Activities Gerhard Kminek Planetary Protection Officer, ESA NASA Planetary Protection Subcommittee Meeting 19-20 December 2012, Washington D.C. Current R&D Micro-meteoroid
More informationGlobal Exploration Strategy. Jeff Volosin Strategy Development Lead NASA Exploration Systems Mission Directorate
Global Exploration Strategy Jeff Volosin Strategy Development Lead NASA Exploration Systems Mission Directorate February 27, 2007 2 What Is a Global Exploration Strategy Used For? A high-level compelling
More informationCYLICAL VISITS TO MARS VIA ASTRONAUT HOTELS
CYLICAL VISITS TO MARS VIA ASTRONAUT HOTELS Presentation to the NASA Institute of Advanced Concepts (NIAC) 2000 Annual Meeting by Kerry T. Nock Global June 7, 2000 Global TOPICS MOTIVATION OVERVIEW SIGNIFICANCE
More informationHuman Exploration Systems and Mobility Capability Roadmap. Chris Culbert, NASA Chair Jeff Taylor, External Chair
Human Exploration Systems and Mobility Capability Roadmap Chris Culbert, NASA Chair Jeff Taylor, External Chair 1 Human Exploration Systems and Mobility Capability Roadmap Team Co-Chairs NASA: Chris Culbert,
More informationBEYOND LOW-EARTH ORBIT
SCIENTIFIC OPPORTUNITIES ENABLED BY HUMAN EXPLORATION BEYOND LOW-EARTH ORBIT THE SUMMARY The Global Exploration Roadmap reflects a coordinated international effort to prepare for space exploration missions
More informationWhen Failure Means Success: Accepting Risk in Aerospace Projects NASA Project Management Challenge 2009
When Failure Means Success: Accepting Risk in Aerospace Projects NASA Project Management Challenge 2009 Daniel L. Dumbacher,, Director Christopher E. Singer, Deputy Director Engineering Directorate Marshall
More informationTHE NOAA SATELLITE OBSERVING SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE STUDY
THE NOAA SATELLITE OBSERVING SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE STUDY Dr. Karen St. Germain, NOAA/NESDIS Dr. Mark Maier, The Aerospace Corporation Dr. Frank W. Gallagher III, NOAA/NESDIS ABSTRACT NOAA is conducting a
More informationNASA Human Spaceflight Architecture Team Cis-Lunar Analysis. M. Lupisella 1, M. R. Bobskill 2
NASA Human Spaceflight Architecture Team Cis-Lunar Analysis M. Lupisella 1, M. R. Bobskill 2 1 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Applied Engineering and Technology Directorate, Greenbelt, MD, 20771; Ph
More informationMiguel A. Aguirre. Introduction to Space. Systems. Design and Synthesis. ) Springer
Miguel A. Aguirre Introduction to Space Systems Design and Synthesis ) Springer Contents Foreword Acknowledgments v vii 1 Introduction 1 1.1. Aim of the book 2 1.2. Roles in the architecture definition
More informationThe Promise and Realities of Additive Manufacturing (3D Printing) in Space Betsy Cantwell, PhD
The Promise and Realities of Additive Manufacturing (3D Printing) in Space Betsy Cantwell, PhD October 15, 2014 ASEB Meeting, Irvine, CA 1 Overview Background of the study Background on additive manufacturing
More informationNASA s Space Launch System: Powering the Journey to Mars. FISO Telecon Aug 3, 2016
NASA s Space Launch System: Powering the Journey to Mars FISO Telecon Aug 3, 2016 0 Why the Nation Needs to Go Beyond Low Earth Orbit To answer fundamental questions about the universe Are we alone? Where
More informationNATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION AT A GLANCE: 2006 Discretionary Budget Authority: $16.5 billion (Increase from 2005: 2 percent) Major Programs: Exploration and science Space Shuttle and Space
More informationSecretary-General of the European Commission, signed by Mr Jordi AYET PUIGARNAU, Director
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 20 August 2013 (OR. en) 13077/13 COVER NOTE From: date of receipt: 1 August 2013 To: No. Cion doc.: Subject: ESPACE 54 COMPET 608 RECH 380 IND 233 TRANS 446 COSDP
More informationSpace Technology Mission Directorate. NASA's Role in Small Spacecraft Technologies: Today and in the Future
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Space Technology Mission Directorate NASA's Role in Small Spacecraft Technologies: Today and in the Future Presented by: Jim Reuter Deputy Associate Administrator
More informationAn Analysis of Low Earth Orbit Launch Capabilities
An Analysis of Low Earth Orbit Launch Capabilities George Mason University May 11, 2012 Ashwini Narayan James Belt Colin Mullery Ayobami Bamgbade Content Introduction: Background / need / problem statement
More informationNew Methods for Architecture Selection and Conceptual Design:
New Methods for Architecture Selection and Conceptual Design: Space Systems, Policy, and Architecture Research Consortium (SSPARC) Program Overview Hugh McManus, Joyce Warmkessel, and the SSPARC team For
More information10/29/2018. Apollo Management Lessons for Moon-Mars Initiative. I Have Learned To Use The Word Impossible With The Greatest Caution.
ASTR 4800 - Space Science: Practice & Policy Today: Guest Lecture by Apollo 17 Astronaut Dr. Harrison Schmitt on Origins and Legacy of Apollo Next Class: Meet at Fiske Planetarium for guest lecture by
More informationEuropean Space Agency Aurora European Space Exploration Programme EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
European Space Agency Aurora European Space Exploration Programme EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Aurora Programme EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. What is Aurora? A European Space Exploration Programme based on a road map culminating
More informationHuman Exploration of Mars Design Reference Architecture 5.0
Human Exploration of Mars Design Reference Architecture 5.0 https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?r=20090012109 2018-07-20T17:22:56+00:00Z National Aeronautics and Space Administration Bret G. Drake Lyndon
More informationU.S. Space Exploration in the Next 20 NASA Space Sciences Policy
U.S. Space Exploration in the Next 20 ScienceYears: to Inspire, Science to Serve NASA Space Sciences Policy National Aeronautics and Space Administration Waleed Abdalati NASA Chief Scientist Waleed Abdalati
More informationThe NASA-ESA Comparative Architecture Assessment (CAA)
The NASA-ESA Comparative Architecture Assessment (CAA) Richard B. Leshner, PhD NASA Exploration Systems Mission Directorate Bernhard Hufenbach ESA Directorate of Human Spaceflight October 29, 2008 Overview
More informationSystem Architecture Module Exploration Systems Engineering, version 1.0
System Architecture Module Exploration Systems Engineering, version 1.0 Exploration Systems Engineering: System Architecture Module Module Purpose: System Architecture Place system architecture development
More informationDream Chaser for European Utilization (DC 4 EU):
54th European Space Science Committee Plenary Meeting 22-24 November 2017 German Aerospace Centre DLR Obepfaffenhofen, Germany Presenter: Dr. Marco Berg Dream Chaser for European Utilization (DC 4 EU):
More informationManufacturing Readiness Assessment Overview
Manufacturing Readiness Assessment Overview Integrity Service Excellence Jim Morgan AFRL/RXMS Air Force Research Lab 1 Overview What is a Manufacturing Readiness Assessment (MRA)? Why Manufacturing Readiness?
More informationCommittee on Earth Science and Applications from Space
Committee on Earth Science and Applications from Space Mark Abbott, Oregon State University Space Studies Board April 4, 2014 Disclaimer: These slides represent a personal assessment of the issues discussed
More informationSystems Engineering Overview. Axel Claudio Alex Gonzalez
Systems Engineering Overview Axel Claudio Alex Gonzalez Objectives Provide additional insights into Systems and into Systems Engineering Walkthrough the different phases of the product lifecycle Discuss
More informationJerome Tzau TARDEC System Engineering Group. UNCLASSIFIED: Distribution Statement A. Approved for public release. 14 th Annual NDIA SE Conf Oct 2011
LESSONS LEARNED IN PERFORMING TECHNOLOGY READINESS ASSESSMENT (TRA) FOR THE MILESTONE (MS) B REVIEW OF AN ACQUISITION CATEGORY (ACAT)1D VEHICLE PROGRAM Jerome Tzau TARDEC System Engineering Group UNCLASSIFIED:
More informationPlans for Human Exploration Beyond Low Earth Orbit. Doug Cooke, AA ESMD March 4, 2011
Plans for Human Exploration Beyond Low Earth Orbit Doug Cooke, AA ESMD March 4, 2011 1 Exploration Outcomes Discovery By addressing the grand challenges about ourselves, our world, and our cosmic surroundings
More informationScience Impact Enhancing the Use of USGS Science
United States Geological Survey. 2002. "Science Impact Enhancing the Use of USGS Science." Unpublished paper, 4 April. Posted to the Science, Environment, and Development Group web site, 19 March 2004
More informationWHO WE ARE: Private U.S. citizens who advocate at our own expense for a bold and well-reasoned space agenda worthy of the U.S.
Summary WHO WE ARE: Private U.S. citizens who advocate at our own expense for a bold and well-reasoned space agenda worthy of the U.S. NON-PROFIT SUPPORTING ORGANIZATIONS: A project of the Alliance for
More informationThe Disappearing Computer. Information Document, IST Call for proposals, February 2000.
The Disappearing Computer Information Document, IST Call for proposals, February 2000. Mission Statement To see how information technology can be diffused into everyday objects and settings, and to see
More informationJohn P. Holdren, Director, Office of Science and Technology Policy
September 8, 2009 To: John P. Holdren, Director, Office of Science and Technology Policy Charles F. Bolden, Jr., Administrator, National Aeronautics and Space Administration Lori B. Garver, Deputy Administrator,
More informationThe Hybrid Space Program: A Commercial Strategy for NASA s Constellation Program
The Hybrid Space Program: A Commercial Strategy for NASA s Constellation Program Daniel B. Hendrickson Florida Institute of Technology Washington Internships for Students of Engineering 5 August 2009 Introduction
More informationNASA Mars Exploration Program Update to the Planetary Science Subcommittee
NASA Mars Exploration Program Update to the Planetary Science Subcommittee Jim Watzin Director MEP March 9, 2016 The state-of-the-mep today Our operational assets remain healthy and productive: MAVEN has
More informationSpace Challenges Preparing the next generation of explorers. The Program
Space Challenges Preparing the next generation of explorers Space Challenges is one of the biggest educational programs in the field of space science and high technologies in Europe - http://spaceedu.net
More informationNASA Office of the Chief Technologist
National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA Office of the Chief Technologist Vicki K. Crisp Deputy Chief Technologist (Acting) Fall 2017 Office of the Chief Technologist Key Roles Advises the NASA
More informationHigh Level Forum, November Masazumi Miyake Director of International Relations Dept. JAXA
Global partnership for Space Exploration High Level Forum, November 7 2017 Masazumi Miyake Director of International Relations Dept. JAXA Table of Contents Coordination status on International Space Exploration
More informationlaunch probability of success
Using Architecture Models to Understand Policy Impacts Utility 1 0.995 0.99 Policy increases cost B C D 10 of B-TOS architectures have cost increase under restrictive launch policy for a minimum cost decision
More informationGlobal Exploration Strategy (GES): A Framework for Coordination, Progress, and Future Opportunities
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Global Exploration Strategy (GES): A Framework for Coordination, Progress, and Future Opportunities Dr. ohn Olson Exploration Systems Mission Directorate NASA
More informationUranus Exploration Challenges
Uranus Exploration Challenges Steve Matousek Workshop on the Study of Icy Giant Planet (2014) July 30, 2014 (c) 2014 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged. JPL URS clearance
More informationC. R. Weisbin, R. Easter, G. Rodriguez January 2001
on Solar System Bodies --Abstract of a Projected Comparative Performance Evaluation Study-- C. R. Weisbin, R. Easter, G. Rodriguez January 2001 Long Range Vision of Surface Scenarios Technology Now 5 Yrs
More informationInnovative Approaches in Collaborative Planning
Innovative Approaches in Collaborative Planning Lessons Learned from Public and Private Sector Roadmaps Jack Eisenhauer Senior Vice President September 17, 2009 Ross Brindle Program Director Energetics
More informationFlexibility for in Space Propulsion Technology Investment. Jonathan Battat ESD.71 Engineering Systems Analysis for Design Application Portfolio
Flexibility for in Space Propulsion Technology Investment Jonathan Battat ESD.71 Engineering Systems Analysis for Design Application Portfolio Executive Summary This project looks at options for investment
More informationPractical Implementation of an Enterprise Measurement System: From Inception to Transformation
Practical Implementation of an Enterprise Measurement System: From Inception to Transformation 2LT Craig Blackburn, USAF Dr. Ricardo Valerdi Massachusetts Institute of Technology 21 April 2009 Overview
More informationGAMMa - A modular ascender concept for sample return missions
GAMMa - A modular ascender concept for sample return missions IPPW 15, Boulder, Colorado, USA 14 th June 2018 R. Buchwald, F. Ebert, O. Angerer Lunar Polar Sample Return (LPSR) Mars Sample Return (MSR)
More informationOn January 14, 2004, the President announced a new space exploration vision for NASA
Exploration Conference January 31, 2005 President s Vision for U.S. Space Exploration On January 14, 2004, the President announced a new space exploration vision for NASA Implement a sustained and affordable
More informationJudith L. Robinson, Ph.D. Associate Director Space Life Sciences Directorate Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas USA
Building Partnerships In Support of Space Exploration Judith L. Robinson, Ph.D. Associate Director Space Life Sciences Directorate Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas USA Background National Vision for
More informationCredits. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. United Space Alliance, LLC. John Frassanito and Associates Strategic Visualization
A New Age in Space The Vision for Space Exploration Credits National Aeronautics and Space Administration United Space Alliance, LLC John Frassanito and Associates Strategic Visualization Coalition for
More informationNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Overview of Current Advanced Mission Studies at JSC February 1, 2017 Joe Caram Exploration Mission Planning Office Exploration Integration and Science Directorate
More informationHuman Spaceflight Programmes and Possible Greek Participation
Human Spaceflight Programmes and Possible Greek Participation By G. Reibaldi, R.Nasca, Directorate of Human Spaeflight European Space Agency Thessaloniki, Greece, December 1st, 2008 HSF-SP/2008.003/GR
More informationDesign for Affordability in Complex Systems and Programs Using Tradespace-based Affordability Analysis
Design for Affordability in Complex Systems and Programs Using Tradespace-based Affordability Analysis Marcus S. Wu, Adam M. Ross, and Donna H. Rhodes Massachusetts Institute of Technology March 21 22,
More informationAgent Model of On-Orbit Servicing Based on Orbital Transfers
Agent Model of On-Orbit Servicing Based on Orbital Transfers September 20, 2007 M. Richards, N. Shah, and D. Hastings Massachusetts Institute of Technology Agenda On-Orbit Servicing (OOS) Overview Model
More informationSPACOMM 2009 PANEL. Challenges and Hopes in Space Navigation and Communication: From Nano- to Macro-satellites
SPACOMM 2009 PANEL Challenges and Hopes in Space Navigation and Communication: From Nano- to Macro-satellites Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO): NASA's mission to map the lunar surface Landing on the
More informationEarth Observations from Space U.S. Geological Survey
Earth Observations from Space U.S. Geological Survey Geography Land Remote Sensing Program Dr. Bryant Cramer April 1, 2009 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Landsat Historical
More informationTechnology Roadmapping. Lesson 3
Technology Roadmapping Lesson 3 Leadership in Science & Technology Management Mission Vision Strategy Goals/ Implementation Strategy Roadmap Creation Portfolios Portfolio Roadmap Creation Project Prioritization
More information. Faye Goldman. July Contents
July 2018 Contents Background... 2 Introduction... 2 A new strategy for 2018-21... 2 Project overview... 2 Project partners... 3 Digital Product Development... 4 What we re looking for... 4 Deliverables...
More informationNASA s Human Space Exploration Capability Driven Framework
National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA s Human Space Exploration Capability Driven Framework Briefing to the National Research Council Committee on Human Spaceflight Technical Panel March 27,
More informationSESAR EXPLORATORY RESEARCH. Dr. Stella Tkatchova 21/07/2015
SESAR EXPLORATORY RESEARCH Dr. Stella Tkatchova 21/07/2015 1 Why SESAR? European ATM - Essential component in air transport system (worth 8.4 billion/year*) 2 FOUNDING MEMBERS Complex infrastructure =
More informationBeijing Lunar Declaration ILEWG Report
Beijing Lunar Declaration - 2010 ILEWG Report R. Arvidson Co-Chair Intl Programme Committee GLUC-ICEUM11** B. H. Foing Executive Director, ILEWG*, Co-Chair Intl Programme Committee GLUC-ICEUM11** B. A.
More informationPreliminary Report Regarding NASA s Space Launch System and Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle
Preliminary Report Regarding NASA s Space Launch System and Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle Pursuant to Section 309 of the NASA Authorization Act of 2010 (P.L. 111-267) January 2011 1 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE
More informationAdvanced Space Suit Project (formerly Extravehicular Activity Suit/Portable Life Support System)
ABSTRACT The primary objective of the Advanced Space Suit project is to develop EVA Systems technology to enhance and enable efficient human exploration missions to any destination. The project is focused
More informationA Framework for Incorporating ilities in Tradespace Studies
A Framework for Incorporating ilities in Tradespace Studies September 20, 2007 H. McManus, M. Richards, A. Ross, and D. Hastings Massachusetts Institute of Technology Need for ilities Washington, DC in
More informationSPACE. DG GROW Internal Market, Industry Entrepreneurship and SMEs GROW/I1 - Space Policy and Research Unit
1 SPACE DG GROW Internal Market, Industry Entrepreneurship and SMEs GROW/I1 - Policy and Research Unit mario.amaral@ec.europa.eu Lisbon, 14-15 September 2016 2017 call topics Competitiveness of the European
More informationRETURN TO THE LUNAR SURFACE Lunar Exploration Campaign. Next COTS Project?
RETURN TO THE LUNAR SURFACE Lunar Exploration Campaign Next COTS Project? 1 Commercial Development Summit - Lunar 08 Robert M. Kelso Manager, Commercial Space Development NASA JSC, Commercial Crew/Cargo
More information