Project 4.1 Puzzle Design Challenge Rubric

Transcription

1 Project 4.1 Puzzle Design Challenge Rubric Elements Weight 5 Points 4 Points 3 Points 2 Points 1-0 Points Total Activity 4.1a Puzzle Part Puzzle Parts Documentation Multiple combinations of three, four, five and six dated each and are of the is applied. enhances the Multiple combinations of three, four, five or six follow the isometric grid paper and of the correct line weight. object pleasing to the eye. Some combinations of three, four, five or six Student only signed or quality. fairly the and vary in restricted to three, four, five or six dated a few not the isometric grid other than three, four, five or six Student did not sign and dated each from the three dimensional image IED Project 4.1 Puzzle Design Challenge Rubric Page 1

2 Activity 4.1b Graphical Modeling Puzzle Cube Combination Isometric Sketches Puzzle Cube Consideration of Alternatives Documentation Two combinations with ten unique parts. Each of the five component parts clearly shows how they fit together. Selects most appropriate concept and clearly justifies the choice using the appropriate criteria. dated each and are of the is applied. enhances the Two combinations with less than ten unique parts. Each of the five somewhat shows how they fit together. Selects an appropriate concept and is somewhat able to justify the choice using some criteria. follow the isometric grid paper and of the correct line weight. object pleasing to the eye. One combination with ten unique parts. Each of the five component parts clearly shows how they fit together. Selects an appropriate concept and is somewhat able to justify the choice using marginally criteria. Student only signed or quality. fairly the and vary in One combination with less than ten unique parts. Each of the five somewhat shows how they fit together. Selects one using inadequate criteria. dated a few not the isometric grid Activity 4.1b Graphical Modeling Puzzle Cube Multi-View Drawings of Selected Design One combination with less than ten unique parts. Difficult to determine how fit together. No clear selection or criteria stated. Student did not sign and dated each from the three dimensional image IED Project 4.1 Puzzle Design Challenge Rubric Page 2

3 Multi-View Drawings of Selected Design Geometry Feedback all five puzzle pieces. paper and are of the Best front view chosen. All object and hidden lines between individual wooden cubes not correct; rectangles have 90 corners. feedback given for all criteria listed. four puzzle pieces. follow the paper and of the Best front view chosen. Most object and hidden lines included. Joints between individual wooden cubes not close to correct; rectangles have close to 90 corners. feedback given for most criteria listed. three puzzle pieces. quality. fairly the Front view chosen is fair. Most object and hidden lines included. Joints between individual wooden cubes sometimes recognizable; rectangle corners are close to 90. Adequate feedback given for some criteria listed. two puzzle pieces. not the Front view chosen is fair. Most object and hidden lines between individual wooden cubes often recognizable; rectangle corners vary from 90. Some feedback given for some criteria listed. Drawing includes one puzzle piece. Front view chosen is inadequate. Some object and hidden lines between individual wooden cubes often confusing; rectangle corners not consistent or close to 90. Inadequate IED Project 4.1 Puzzle Design Challenge Rubric Page 3

4 Puzzle Cube CAD Modeling Model Generation Dimensions and Annotation Views Presents, locates, and sizes all model features properly. Model is completely and efficiently constrained. Dimensions and annotates properly and clearly. Locates all properly and clearly. Uses appropriate number of views. Presents, locates, and sizes most model features properly. Model is partially constrained or missing a few Supplies most dimensions and annotations. Locates most of them properly. Locates most properly and clearly. Number of views fair. Presents, locates, and sizes some model features properly. Model is inefficiently constrained or missing a few Supplies some dimensions and annotations. Locates some of them properly. Does not locate all clearly or properly Some model features are missing or improper. Model is missing several Omits many dimensions or annotations. Some mislabeling. Omits views needed for clarity. Includes in. Model is missing most features or Dimensions or annotations have not been added, leaving only software determined defaults. Incomplete drawing submitted. IED Project 4.1 Puzzle Design Challenge Rubric Page 4

5 Puzzle Cube Construction and Statistics Construction Feedback Testing Analysis Optimization with care. Blocks all in alignment and fully adhered to adjacent block. is applied. enhances the puzzle. 10 or more subjects tested. data accurately all statistics related to testing. with care. Blocks mostly in alignment and fully adhered to adjacent block. puzzle pleasing to the eye. Adequate feedback given subjects tested. data accurately most statistics related to testing. Adequate with adequate care. Blocks somewhat in alignment and fully adhered to adjacent block. puzzle. mostly Some 4-6 subjects tested. data mostly some statistics related to testing. Some for with some care. Blocks somewhat in alignment and somewhat adhered to adjacent block. somewhat matches model. Little feedback given. <6 subjects tested. Some data Calculates, but some statistics related to testing. Unclear Puzzle constructed with little care. from the puzzle. does not match model. Inadequate Little or no data Little or no analysis done. Little or no IED Project 4.1 Puzzle Design Challenge Rubric Page 5