REGIONAL PROJECT COORDINATION COMMITTEE 9:00 A.M. AUGUST 15, 2018

Transcription

1 DocuSign Envelope ID: AA90160B-B81E-4A8A-91DF-98875C79D044 NOTICE AND AGENDA OF PUBLIC MEETING REGIONAL PROJECT COORDINATION COMMITTEE 9:00 A.M. AUGUST 15, 2018 RTC/RFCD ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 600 S. GRAND CENTRAL PARKWAY, ROOM 108 LAS VEGAS, NV (702) This agenda with full backup is available at the Regional Transportation Commission Administration Building, 600 S. Grand Central Pkwy., Las Vegas, Nevada; the Regional Transportation Commission s website, or by contacting Tammy McMahan at (702) THIS MEETING HAS BEEN PROPERLY NOTICED AND POSTED IN THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: Clark County Government Center 500 S. Grand Central Pkwy. Las Vegas, NV City of Henderson Office of the City Clerk 240 Water Street Henderson, NV CC Regional Justice Center 200 Lewis Ave. Las Vegas, NV RTC 600 S. Grand Central Pkwy. Las Vegas, NV RTC website Nevada Public Notice website BY: REGIONAL PROJECT COORDINATION COMMITTEE AGENDA AUGUST 15, 2018 Page 1 of 3

2 DocuSign Envelope ID: AA90160B-B81E-4A8A-91DF-98875C79D044 Items 2 through 8 are items for possible action. Items 1, 9, and 10 are discussion items and no action can be taken. Please be advised that the Regional Project Coordination Committee has the discretion to take items on the agenda out of order, combine two or more agenda items for consideration, remove an item from the agenda or delay discussion relating to an item on the agenda any time. 1. CONDUCT A COMMENT PERIOD FOR CITIZENS PARTICIPATION: No action can be taken on any matter discussed under this item, although the Committee can direct that it be placed on a future agenda. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Meeting of June 20, 2018 (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Meeting of July 18, 2018 (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) 4. RECEIVE AN UPDATED LIST OF ENTITY AND UTILITY COMPANY CONTACT PERSONS AND DIRECT STAFF ACCORDINGLY (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) 5. RECEIVE APPROVED PLANNED PROJECTS FROM MEMBER ENTITIES AND UTILITY COMPANIES (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) 6. DISCUSS PROJECTS THAT ARE STARTING THE ENGINEERING DESIGN PHASE OF PROJECT DELIVERY (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) 7. DISCUSS PROJECTS THAT WILL SOON BE STARTING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF PROJECT DELIVERY (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) 8. RECEIVE A REPORT FROM THE CONE MANAGEMENT WORKING GROUP (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) 9. DISCUSS TOPICS OF INTEREST 10. CONDUCT A COMMENT PERIOD FOR CITIZENS PARTICIPATION: No action can be taken on any matter discussed under this item, although the Committee can direct that it be placed on a future agenda. During the initial Citizens Participation, any citizen in the audience may address the Committee on an item featured on the agenda. During the final Citizens Participation, any citizens in the audience may address the Committee on matters within the Committee s jurisdiction, but not necessarily featured on the agenda. No vote can be taken on a matter not listed on the posted agenda; however, the Committee can direct that the matter be placed on a future agenda. Each citizen must be recognized by the Chair. The citizen is then asked to approach the microphone at the podium, to state his or her name, and to spell the last name for the record. The Chair may limit remarks to three minutes duration, if such remarks are disruptive to the meeting or not within the Committee s jurisdiction. The Regional Transportation Commission keeps the official record of all proceedings of the meeting. In order to maintain a complete and accurate record, copies of documents used during presentations should be submitted to the Recording Secretary. The Regional Transportation Commission appreciates the time citizens devote to be involved in this important process. In compliance with Nevada Revised Statute (4), the Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada shall create an audio and/or video recording of the meeting and retain such recording(s) for the required period of time. REGIONAL PROJECT COORDINATION COMMITTEE AGENDA AUGUST 15, 2018 Page 2 of 3

3 DocuSign Envelope ID: AA90160B-B81E-4A8A-91DF-98875C79D044 The Regional Transportation Commission Meeting Room and Conference Room are accessible to the disabled. Assistive listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. A sign language interpreter for the deaf will be made available with a forty-eight hour advance request to the Regional Transportation Commission offices. Phone: TDD: Any action taken on these items is advisory to the Regional Transportation Commission. REGIONAL PROJECT COORDINATION COMMITTEE AGENDA AUGUST 15, 2018 Page 3 of 3

4

5 DocuSign Envelope ID: 69A81EBA-A7C8-4F10-B57A-B910EC REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA AGENDA ITEM Metropolitan Planning Organization [X] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ] SUBJECT: INITIAL CITIZENS PARTICIPATION PETITIONER: TINA QUIGLEY, GENERAL MANAGER REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER: THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA REGIONAL PROJECT COORDINATION COMMITTEE CONDUCT A COMMENT PERIOD FOR CITIZENS PARTICIPATION GOAL: ENHANCE PUBLIC AWARENESS AND SUPPORT OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM FISCAL IMPACT: None BACKGROUND: In accordance with State of Nevada Open Meeting Law, the Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada Regional Project Coordination Committee (RPCC) shall invite interested persons to make comments. For the initial Citizens Participation, the public should address items on the current agenda. For the final Citizens Participation, interested persons may make comments on matters within the Regional Project Coordination Committee's jurisdiction, but not necessarily on the current agenda. No action can be taken on any matter discussed under this item, although the RPCC can direct that it be placed on a future agenda. Respectfully submitted, JOHN R. PEÑUELAS, JR., P.E. Director of Engineering Services Streets and Highways tde

6

7 DocuSign Envelope ID: EE30E0BB-C58F-4071-BECD-EE07015A57F0 AMENDED MINUTES REGIONAL PROJECT COORDINATION COMMITTEE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA JUNE 20, 2018 These minutes are prepared in compliance with NRS Text is in summarized rather than verbatim format. For complete contents, please refer to meeting recordings on file at the Regional Transportation Commission. THIS MEETING WAS PROPERLY NOTICED AND POSTED IN THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS ON JUNE 11, 2018 Clark County Government Center 500 S. Grand Central Pkwy. Las Vegas, NV City of Henderson Office of the City Clerk 240 Water Street Henderson, NV CC Regional Justice Center 200 Lewis Ave. Las Vegas, NV RTC 600 S. Grand Central Pkwy. Las Vegas, NV RTC website Nevada Public Notice website These minutes supersede the minutes of June 20, 2018 featured in the July 18, 2018 agenda for the Regional Project Coordination Committee. CALL TO ORDER Mr. Mark Sorensen, Chair, called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. in Meeting Room 108 of the Regional Transportation Commission Administration Building. MEMBERS PRESENT: Mark Sorensen, City of Las Vegas, Chair Diana Hubbard, Southwest Gas Corporation, Vice-Chair (Alternate) Vivian Browning, Bureau of Land Management Tim Gibson, Clark County Water Reclamation District William Bill Harty, Nevada Department of Transportation Chris Helda, Las Vegas Valley Water District Shital Patel, Freeway and Arterial System of Transportation Tahmineh Pennington, Southern Nevada Water Authority (Alternate) Priscilla Raudenbush, NV Energy Matt Roybal, City of Henderson (Alternate) Cindy Shackelford, Kern River Gas Transmission Company (Alternate) Robert Thompson, Clark County Public Works Dimitrios Karapanagiotis, Clark County School District (Alternate) (Non-voting) MEMBERS ABSENT: Dale Daffern, City of North Las Vegas Dell Howard, CenturyLink Vern Lacro, Kinder Morgan Percy Lucban, Public Utilities Commission of Nevada Abi Mayrena, Clark County Regional Flood Control District Patrick Coyne, Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority (Non-voting) Paul Moradkhan, Las Vegas Metro Chamber of Commerce (Non-voting) RTC STAFF: John Peñuelas, Director of Engineering Services-Streets and Highways Joe Damiani, Manager of Engineering Dante Bongolan, Project Engineer

8 DocuSign Envelope ID: EE30E0BB-C58F-4071-BECD-EE07015A57F0 Minutes-Regional Project Coordination Committee Meeting of June 20, 2018 Page 2 of 12 RTC STAFF CONT D: Chris Schwarz, Regional Traffic Control Coordinator Todd Gurnee, GIS Analyst Tammy McMahan, Management Analyst Tamika Davis-Edwards, Administrative Specialist INTERESTED PARTIES: Doug Johnson, Nevada Department of Transportation William Grennan, Nevada Department of Transportation Brad Gallimore, Bureau of Land Management Edwin Miranda, Southern Nevada Water Authority/Las Vegas Valley Water District Tony Zhang, Southern Nevada Water Authority/Las Vegas Valley Water District Carlos Espinoza, Clark County Water Reclamation District Item: 1. CONDUCT A COMMENT PERIOD FOR CITIZENS PARTICIPATION Comments: No comments were made. Motion: No motion was necessary. Vote/Summary: No vote was taken. Item: 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Meeting of May 16, 2018 (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) Comments: No comments were made. Motion: Chair Mark Sorensen, City of Las Vegas, made a motion to approve the minutes. Vote/Summary: 11 Ayes. 0 Nays. The motion carried. Ayes: Chair Mark Sorensen, Vice-Chair Diana Hubbard, Vivian Browning, Tim Gibson, Bill Harty, Chris Helda, Shital Patel, Tahmineh Pennington, Priscilla Raudenbush, Cindy Shackelford, and Robert Thompson Nays: None Absent: Dale Daffern, Dell Howard, Vern Lacro, Percy Lucban, and Abi Mayrena NOTE: One Regional Project Coordination Committee alternate, representing an entity with voting privileges, had not yet arrived for the meeting. Item: 3. RECEIVE AN UPDATED LIST OF ENTITY AND UTILITY COMPANY CONTACT PERSONS AND DIRECT STAFF ACCORDINGLY (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) Comments: Mr. John Peñuelas, Director of Engineering Services-Streets and Highways, Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (RTC), mentioned that the Nevada Regional Common Ground Alliance contacts had been incorporated into the Entity and Utility Contact List. He asked the Regional Project Coordination Committee members to consider whether the addition of emergency contacts specific to the entities and utility companies they represented would be in order.

9 DocuSign Envelope ID: EE30E0BB-C58F-4071-BECD-EE07015A57F0 Minutes-Regional Project Coordination Committee Meeting of June 20, 2018 Page 3 of 12 No other comments were made. Motion: No motion was necessary. Vote/Summary: No vote was taken. Item: 4. RECEIVE PRESENTATIONS FROM A MEMBER ENTITY AND UTILITY ON UPCOMING PROJECTS, NEW TECHNOLOGIES, AND OTHER TOPICS OF INTEREST (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) Comments: Mr. John Peñuelas, Director of Engineering Services-Streets and Highways, Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (RTC), informed the Regional Project Coordination Committee (RPCC or Committee) that the RTC Board of Commissioners (RTC Board) had approved the agency s Capital Improvements Program (CIP) at the RTC Board s June 14, 2018 meeting. He stated that Mr. Joe Damiani, RTC Manager of Engineering, would provide a presentation on the RTC s CIP. RTC Capital Improvements Program Fiscal Years Roadway Planning and Funding Following a detailed PowerPoint presentation [attached], Mr. Damiani first detailed the RTC s CIP funding sources and amounts. Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax (MVFT) o $30,000,000 (NOTE: Mr. Damiani explained that the estimated MVFT receipts are $90 million, but, after various expenses, the RTC will have approximately $30 million for projects.) Fuel Revenue Indexing o $60,000,000 o $182,000,000 (NOTE: Mr. Damiani shared that this figure represented the amount against which the RTC could bond for the first fiscal year) Sales Tax o $11,000,000 The RTC Manager of Engineering stated that the RTC facilitated regional roadway planning and funding for the member agencies; namely, Clark County, the City of Las Vegas (Las Vegas), the City of North Las Vegas (North Las Vegas), the City of Henderson (Henderson), City of Boulder City, and City of Mesquite. The RTC and the local entities formally made arrangements regarding these particular projects via interlocal contracts. Mr. Damiani further stated that the RTC can advance monies for construction under the following conditions: the agency has funds available for construction and the member entity is at the 90 percent mark in design and has procured right of-way. RPCC GIS Project Map: New Legend for CIP Projects Mr. Damiani then displayed a slide entitled Clark County Projects which was in the style of the RPCC GIS Project Map visuals. He pointed out the legend in the lower left corner, noting that the RTC had created a new guide with the aim of focusing upon projects in design, planned projects, and recently approved. The RTC Manager of Engineering told the Committee that the legend would be applicable for the project maps that would be displayed in the presentation regarding the other above-mentioned Southern Nevada jurisdictions. From there, he discussed the legend in detail.

10 DocuSign Envelope ID: EE30E0BB-C58F-4071-BECD-EE07015A57F0 Minutes-Regional Project Coordination Committee Meeting of June 20, 2018 Page 4 of 12 Projects in Design The RTC Manager of Engineering stated that the blue lines represent projects in design. He informed the Committee members that RTC personnel planned to either include or present projects in design, respectively, in the RPCC agenda or at the RPCC meetings hereafter because this type of work should either already be in the coordination phase or coordination should commence very soon. Planned Projects The RTC Manager of Engineering informed the RPCC that the green lines represented the planned projects for the next three years. He said that planned projects beyond the three-year mark would be eliminated from the RPCC GIS Project Map because these efforts were too far in the future to discuss coordination. That being said, the RTC Manager of Engineering noted that the RPCC would talk about projects if they were moved forward into a CIP three-year timeframe for some reason. He cited the example of a CIP project being removed, allowing for work that had been scheduled further out to possibly begin sooner. Recently Approved (Projects About to Start) The RTC Manager of Engineering went on to say that the magenta lines represented projects recently approved projects by the RTC Board. He characterized these as projects about to start. Mr. Damiani mentioned that RTC staff members were planning to display this work on the RPCC GIS Project Map for approximately one month. He emphasized that entity and utility company personnel should actively coordinate on recently approved projects. Construction Projects The RTC Manager of Engineering told the Committee that projects in construction would be featured on the Cone Management Working Group GIS Project Map, not the RPCC GIS Project Map. Clark County Projects Clark County Projects Fiscal Year 2019 Next, Mr. Damiani showed a slide with a list of Clark County Fiscal Year (FY) 2019 projects that were included in the RTC s CIP. He stated that the following projects were in the design phase and were eligible for funding. Ann Road: Clark County 215 Beltway to Durango Drive Cactus Avenue: Fort Apache Road to Buffalo Drive Cimarron Road: Blue Diamond Road to Robindale Road Fort Apache Road: Blue Diamond Road to Warm Springs Road Elkhorn Road: Hualapai Way to Grand Canyon Drive Sloan Lane: Vegas Valley Drive to Ruby Creek Drive Silverado Ranch Boulevard: Jones Boulevard to Dean Martin Drive Rainbow Boulevard: Cactus Avenue to Blue Diamond Road Russell Road: Hualapai Way to 215 Beltway Mr. Penuelas noted that these projects would be featured on the RPCC GIS Project Map. ***A Regional Project Coordination Committee alternate, representing an entity with voting privileges, arrived at the meeting at approximately 9:10 a.m. *** Clark County Projects FY 2020 & 2021 Mr. Damiani went on to display a slide listing Clark County FY 2020 and 2021 projects as set forth below:

11 DocuSign Envelope ID: EE30E0BB-C58F-4071-BECD-EE07015A57F0 Minutes-Regional Project Coordination Committee Meeting of June 20, 2018 Page 5 of 12 Bermuda Road: St. Rose Parkway to Silverado Boulevard Buffalo Drive: Clark County 215 Beltway to Hacienda Avenue Cactus Avenue: Las Vegas Boulevard to Spencer Street Carey Avenue: Nellis Boulevard to Toiyabe Street Decatur Road: Clark County 215 Beltway to Tropicana Avenue Desert Inn Road: Nellis Boulevard to Hollywood Boulevard Starr Avenue: Las Vegas Boulevard to Bermuda Road Walnut Avenue: Owens Avenue to Craig Road Warm Springs Road: Durango Drive to Dean Martin Drive City of Las Vegas Projects Las Vegas Projects FY 2019 The RTC Manager of Engineering listed the Las Vegas FY 2019 projects that were included in the RTC s CIP as follows: Casino Center Complete Street: Colorado Avenue to Wyoming Avenue Rancho Drive Complete Streets Improvements: Sahara Avenue to Mesquite Avenue Wyoming Avenue Complete Street: Las Vegas Boulevard to Industrial Road US 95 Overpass Completion at Vegas Road (Design Only): Rock Springs Drive to Rainbow Boulevard Bradley Road: Whispering Sands Drive to Grand Teton Drive California Avenue Complete Street Improvements: Commerce Street to 3 rd Street Fremont Street Multi-Modal Improvements: Las Vegas Boulevard to Eastern Avenue Boulder Avenue Complete Street Improvements: 1 st Street to Art Square US 95 Overpass at Grant Teton Drive (Design Only): Fort Apache Road to El Capitan Way Las Vegas Projects FY 2020 and 2021 Mr. Damiani then went on to discuss the Las Vegas projects that were currently scheduled for FY 2020 and Eastern Avenue Complete Street: Cedar Avenue to Owens Avenue Martin L. King Boulevard Extension (Design Only): Oakey Boulevard to Desert Inn Road I-15 Frontage Roads (Design Only): Losee Road to Washington Avenue Bonanza Road Complete Street: Martin Luther King Boulevard to D Street Paradise Road Street Rehabilitation and Gateway Median: Sahara Avenue to St. Louis Avenue 8 th Street Complete Street Improvements: Stewart Avenue to Bridger Avenue US 95 Overpass Completion at Alexander Road (Design Only): Tenaya Way to Rainbow Boulevard City of North Las Vegas Projects North Las Vegas Projects FY 2019 The RTC Manager of Engineering touched upon the North Las Vegas projects that were currently scheduled for FY Lone Mountain Road: Decatur Boulevard to Losee Road Lone Mountain Road: Losee Road to Commerce Street Tropical Parkway: Clark County 215 Beltway to Ann Road Craig Road Pedestrian Bridge at Upper Las Vegas Wash: Craig Road to Upper Las Vegas Wash Ann Road Pedestrian Bridge: Ann Road to Upper Las Vegas Wash Centennial Parkway: Novak Street to Lamont Street

12 DocuSign Envelope ID: EE30E0BB-C58F-4071-BECD-EE07015A57F0 Minutes-Regional Project Coordination Committee Meeting of June 20, 2018 Page 6 of 12 Pecos Road: Carey Avenue to Tonopah Avenue North Las Vegas Projects FY 2020 and 2021 Mr. Damiani noted the North Las Vegas Projects that were currently scheduled for FY 2020 and Lamb Boulevard: Centennial Parkway to Clark County 215 connectivity Sloan Lane: Las Vegas Boulevard to Tropical Parkway Washburn Road: Valley Drive to Willis Street City of Henderson Projects Mr. Damiani moved on to show a map of the Henderson projects that would be part of the RTC s CIP. Henderson Projects FY 2019 The RTC Manager of Engineering stated that there were no projects for Henderson in Fiscal Year Henderson Projects FY 2020 and 2021 Mr. Damiani stated that the sole project in this category involved work on American Pacific Drive: Horizon Ridge Parkway to Appian Way. Future CIP Presentations by Entities and Utility Companies Mr. Damiani advised the RPCC representatives to design their CIP-related PowerPoint presentations so that matters relevant to the group would be provided. The RTC Manager of Engineering related that the presentations, along with any other CIP-related documentation, would be used by the RTC s Information Technology staff to populate the RPCC GIS Project Map. Questions and Answers What Sort of Information Should Entities Supply for Projects in Design and Planned Projects? Chair Mark Sorensen, City of Las Vegas, asked if the current to and from dates that the entities and utility company personnel supplied for project data on the RPCC GIS Project Map would be sufficient for the new projects in design and planned projects categories or if more information was needed. Mr. Damiani responded that the date details would be needed. That being said, he emphasized that was critically important to denote the street limits of a project so the users of the map would be aware of the roadways impacted by the work. He cited an example that the entity should set forth information along the lines of X Boulevard: Y Street to Z Drive. How Should the Entities Designate their CIP Projects Approved by Their Governing Authorities? Chair Sorensen asked how the entities should designate CIP projects that were not funded by the RTC, but approved by their governing authorities. Mr. Damiani believed that these fell into the recently approved category and would be outline in magenta. Moving Toward RTC Information Technology Handling Uploads to RPCC GIS Project Map Mr. Damiani noted that there had been technical difficulties associated with the data supplied by the entities and the RPCC GIS Project Map platform. This had resulted in various problems, including, but not limited to, the loss of data or the inclusion of extraneous information. The RTC wanted to address this problem. As such, agency personnel planned to talk to RPCC representatives about the RTC s proposal to change the map data upload process. The idea is that representatives would provide the RTC with their CIPs, via presentations made at the RPCC and/or other CIP-related documentation, and the RTC s Information Technology (IT) personnel would incorporate this information into the map. The RTC Manager of Engineering added that representatives could inform the agency about CIP adjustments and IT staff would also include these in the map. It was thought that such an arrangement

13 DocuSign Envelope ID: EE30E0BB-C58F-4071-BECD-EE07015A57F0 Minutes-Regional Project Coordination Committee Meeting of June 20, 2018 Page 7 of 12 would result in accurate, relevant data being incorporated into the map and time-saving for both the entities and the RTC. Mr. Damiani noted that the membership would have to be amenable to this change. Chair Sorensen expressed his support of this proposal. ***A Regional Project Coordination Committee member stepped out of the meeting at 9:18 a.m.*** Motion: No motion was necessary. Vote/Summary: No vote was taken. Item: 5. DISCUSS POTENTIAL PROJECTS ON THE ONE TO TWO YEAR PLANNING LIST (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) Comments: Mr. John Peñuelas, Director of Engineering Services-Streets and Highways, Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (RTC), related that the RTC had effectively set forth the agency s projects on the one to two year planning list in the Capital Improvements Program presentation which was the subject of Item 4. Mr. Peñuelas went on to say that he would be talking about proposed changes to the DISCUSS POTENTIAL PROJECTS ON THE ONE TO TWO YEAR PLANNING LIST (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION item as part of the discussion for the Topics of Interest (Item 8) agenda item. ***The Regional Project Coordination Committee member referenced in Item 4 returned to the meeting at 9:19 a.m.*** Motion: No motion was necessary. Vote/Summary: No vote was taken. Item: 6. DISCUSS PROJECTS UNDER DESIGN AND/OR ON AGENCY BOUNDARIES (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) Comments: Mr. John Peñuelas, Director of Engineering Services-Streets and Highways, Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (RTC), stated that he would address proposed changes to the DISCUSS PROJECTS UNDER DESIGN AND/OR ON AGENCY BOUNDARIES (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION item as part of the discussion for the Topics of Interest (Item 8) agenda item. Motion: No motion was necessary. Vote/Summary: No vote was taken. Item: 7. RECEIVE A REPORT FROM THE CONE MANAGEMENT WORKING GROUP (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) Comments: Mr. John Peñuelas, Director of Engineering Services-Streets and Highways, Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (RTC), announced that the Cone Management Working Group

14 DocuSign Envelope ID: EE30E0BB-C58F-4071-BECD-EE07015A57F0 Minutes-Regional Project Coordination Committee Meeting of June 20, 2018 Page 8 of 12 (CMWG) July 2018 meeting would be canceled. From there, Mr. Peñuelas recounted that he had asked the Regional Project Coordination Committee (RPCC or Committee) at the previous RPCC meeting to let him know if any of their colleagues might be interested in serving as the CMWG Chair. He shared that if no one came forward, the current chair, Mr. Lance Olson, with the City of Henderson, would continue to serve in that capacity. Next, Mr. Peñuelas reported that the CMWG would be focusing on work zone Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS). As part of that effort, the RTC had contracted Kimley-Horn & Associates to develop a work zone ITS specification. The RTC Director of Engineering Services said that the first step in developing that specification would involve holding workshops with representatives of agencies to discuss work zone management, work zone performance, work zone locations, and work zone placement that necessitated the taking of roadway lanes. Mr. Peñuelas announced that a work zone ITS workshop with the traffic engineers of the Southern Nevada entities had already been scheduled for July 2018 to discuss the above-mentioned topics. He added that the utility companies would eventually be involved in this process in some fashion as well. The RTC Director of Engineering Services was of the opinion that there was existing technology that could supply data and information regarding the aforementioned matters. Mr. Peñuelas concluded his report by saying that the RTC and certain local agencies were continuing to test smart arrow boards utilizing the WAZE traffic navigation technology platform. He reminded the RPCC that the data captured by these boards fed into the CMWG GIS Project Map, providing information on a variety of work zone-related matters including where the work zones are situated and if lanes had been taken. Motion: No motion was necessary. Vote/Summary: No vote was taken. Item: 8. DISCUSS TOPICS OF INTEREST Discussion of Proposed Changes to Regional Project Coordination Committee Agenda Mr. John Peñuelas, Director of Engineering Services-Streets and Highways, Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (RTC), informed the Regional Project Coordination Committee (RPCC or Committee) that the RTC was proposing to make some changes to the RPCC agenda. At this time, he wanted to discuss the matter with the Committee and revised items would be formally presented in the next agenda. Focus on Capital Improvements Program Projects and Their Movement from One Status to Another Mr. Peñuelas shared that the plan was to change the RPCC agenda so that some items would focus upon capital improvements programs or plans and the movement of projects from one status to another. Mr. Joe Damiani, RTC Manager of Engineering, related that one of the goals of the proposed changes was to prompt coordination efforts before projects moved into construction in order to enhance work zone and traffic management and performance. Revise Former Agenda Item to New Planned Projects Agenda Item Mr. Peñuelas stated that the RTC would like to change the item concerning the following subject matter: RECEIVE PRESENTATIONS FROM A MEMBER ENTITY AND UTILITY ON UPCOMING PROJECTS, NEW TECHNOLOGIES, AND OTHER TOPICS OF INTEREST (FOR

15 DocuSign Envelope ID: EE30E0BB-C58F-4071-BECD-EE07015A57F0 Minutes-Regional Project Coordination Committee Meeting of June 20, 2018 Page 9 of 12 POSSIBLE ACTION). The RTC was proposing a new standing agenda item with language along the lines of RECEIVE PLANNED PROJECTS FROM MEMBER ENTITIES AND UTILITY COMPANIES (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION). He explained that the modification was intended to facilitate the sharing of CIP information among the RPCC members and for the RTC so that the agency could incorporate this into the RPCC GIS Project Map. The Director of Engineering Services added that representatives could provide updates on CIP adjustments, such as projects moving in or out of the three-year timeframe, during the discussion related to this agenda item. Mr. Peñuelas noted that the representatives would likely need to supply CIP documentation in addition to the presentation in the near term to ensure the RTC had all of the relevant information. Remove Potential Projects on Planning List Agenda Item Mr. Peñuelas went on to say that RTC staff members were proposing to the remove DISCUSS POTENTIAL PROJECTS ON THE ONE TO TWO YEAR PLANNING LIST (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) from the RPCC agenda. Simplify Projects Under Design And/Or On Agency Boundaries Agenda Item The RTC Director of Engineering stated that agency personnel were aiming to simplify the agenda item with the recommendation DISCUSS PROJECTS UNDER DESIGN AND/OR ON AGENCY BOUNDARIES (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION). The current thinking was to revise the item with language along the lines of DISCUSS PROJECTS STARTING DESIGN (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION). Regarding this phase in a project s lifecycle, Mr. Damiani reminded the Committee that starting design was the equivalent of recently approved. He strongly encouraged the Committee to inform the RPCC about such work and commence coordination efforts with the appropriate parties as soon as possible. He noted that these projects would be outlined in magenta on the RPCC GIS Project Map and would only be displayed for a month period. Regarding this proposed new agenda item, Mr. Tim Gibson, Clark County Water Reclamation District, asked what sort of information should be shared at the meetings and for the RPCC GIS Project Map. Mr. Damiani stated that it was critically important to set forth the roadways impacted by the projects. He gave an example of X Boulevard: Y Street to Z Drive. Mr. Peñuelas mentioned that providing information could come in the form of the CIP presentation, CIP-related digital files and documentation, or a list of such projects. Include New Proposed Moving to Construction Phase Agenda Item Mr. Peñuelas announced that RTC staff members were developing a new agenda item as follows: DISCUSS PROJECTS MOVING TO CONSTRUCTION PHASE (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION). He informed the RPCC that this item would concern those projects which were moving from the design to construction phase. The work would be outlined in red in the RPCC GIS Project Map and would only be displayed for a one-month period. Mr. Damiani mentioned that members take careful note of these projects and if coordination efforts were not already in place to move forward with such collaboration. Mr. Peñuelas added that this could serve to mitigate or eliminate the number of instances when a particular roadway is subject to repeated disruptions due to conflicting construction projects. This would be of great benefit to the traveling public. The RTC Director of Engineering Services shared that these projects would also be featured on the Cone Management Working Group GIS Project Map. Formally Reviewing and Approving New RPCC Agenda Mr. Peñuelas stated that in the next RPCC agenda the RTC would include an Approve an Agenda item to cover the above-mentioned matter. He informed the group that the RPCC would be free to make comment to indicate whether the members were in favor or opposed to these changes.

16 DocuSign Envelope ID: EE30E0BB-C58F-4071-BECD-EE07015A57F0 Minutes-Regional Project Coordination Committee Meeting of June 20, 2018 Page 10 of 12 Capital Improvements Program Presentations and CIP Information for RPCC GIS Project Map Next, Mr. Damiani asked that the RPCC representatives structure their Capital Improvements Program presentation to focus on the city/county/utility-specific CIP projects that were scheduled for the next three years. The Committee members did not need to include their jurisdiction s CIP projects funded by the Clark County Regional Flood Control or the RTC. Regarding the RPCC GIS Project Map, Mr. Damiani stated that it was likely a great deal of information would be gleaned from the CIP presentations, but he noted that the Committees should still submit the capital plans and related documentation to ensure the RTC had accurate and complete information. For the near term, Mr. Damiani asked the representatives to send him a list of their projects in design. Regarding both presentations and the map, the RTC Manager of Engineering asked that the representatives ensure that they provided information on projects that impacted streets or rights-of-ways and set forth the specific limits. RPCC GIS Project Map Private Developments to be Featured on RPCC GIS Project Map Mr. Damiani went on to say that the RTC was aiming to have all private development projects on the RPCC GIS Project Map by January Comments on RPCC GIS Project Map Chair Mark Sorensen, City of Las Vegas, thought that the new RPCC GIS Project Map legend and the request that the RPCC representatives specifically denote roadways and rights-of-way that would be impacted by the CIP projects of their jurisdictions or companies would be beneficial to all map users. While Chair Sorensen understood that RTC personnel would be talking to the Committee members about the RPCC GIS Project map data fields, he wanted to note that the field for listing the project manager and the digital space to provide a detailed project description had been of great value to Las Vegas staff members. Notifying Kern River Gas Transmission Company About Projects in Vicinity of Company s Facilities Ms. Cindy Shackelford, Kern River Gas Transmission Company (Kern River), shared that Kern River had been receiving notifications of projects nearing the start of construction and some of the work was in the vicinity of the company s facilities. She said that there had been instances when company officials had to ask that project progress be put on hold until Kern River staff could assess activities. Ms. Shackelford expressed that Kern River needed communications much earlier in the project development phase. The Kern River staff member expressed willingness to meet with the project managers of the Southern Nevada agencies to talk about this matter. Mr. Peñuelas offered to help make these connections. He also recounted that the RPCC had discussed the addition of a layer displaying Kern River facilities on the RPCC GIS Project Map. Mr. Todd Gurnee, RTC GIS Analyst, said that he had not yet received files from the company. Ms. Shackelford said she would check on this matter. Chair Sorensen invited Ms. Shackelford and other Kern River representatives to speak with the Las Vegas City Engineer about the issue she had raised. Furthermore, he was in favor of a Kern River facilities layer on the RPCC GIS Project Map.

17 DocuSign Envelope ID: EE30E0BB-C58F-4071-BECD-EE07015A57F0 Minutes-Regional Project Coordination Committee Meeting of June 20, 2018 Page 11 of 12 Bureau of Land Management Believes RPCC GIS Project Map Could Be Used As Tool to Expedite Right-of-Way Application Process Ms. Vivian Browning, Bureau of Land Management (BLM), mentioned that BLM personnel thought that they might be able to use the RPCC GIS Project Map as a tool to expedite processing related to National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) analyses. She provided an example to illustrate: An entity had a project in X area where BLM has jurisdictional authority and the entity applies for right-of-way (ROW) and said project has to go through the NEPA analysis. If there are other parties who have projects in the same area and, likewise apply for ROW for their projects (which also have to go through the NEPA analysis), BLM staff members think that if there was sufficient information included on the map, the information from all the parties and their respective projects could be contained in one NEPA document and analyzed at the same time. This could expedite the processing of the ROW applications. Ms. Browning went on to note that the BLM was planning a customer service workshop which would address how to complete a BLM permit application including a request for a NEPA analysis. This event would likely occur sometime in October Mr. Peñuelas asked if Ms. Browning or a BLM representative could provide a condensed overview on this process to the RPCC. Ms. Browning stated that it would be helpful to the BLM if the RPCC indicated what sort of information the Committee wanted to know regarding BLM permit applications. That being said, she said it might be possible for BLM to provide a basic overview of the process and highlight the information upon which applicants should focus. Chair Sorensen felt that a brief overview of the BLM permit application process would be helpful to the group and encouraged Ms. Browning to confer with her colleagues to determine if this was feasible. Upcoming CIP Presentations Mr. Peñuelas explained to the RPCC that the agency wanted to provide an example of a CIP presentation and discuss the above-referenced revised agenda items before the RPCC members discussed their CIPs. The Director of Engineering Services then said that the RTC would be working with the representatives of the entities and the utility companies to schedule CIP presentations. Mr. Damiani suggested that the representatives be prepared to inform the group as to when their CIPs would likely be adopted at the next RPCC meeting. Nevada Department of Transportation Work Mr. Doug Johnson, Nevada Department of Transportation (NDOT), reported that NDOT had issued permits on a limited basis for work on State Route (SR) 593 (Tropicana Avenue). The project limits were from the western side of Las Vegas Boulevard to Boulder Highway. Mr. Johnson informed the Committee that mill and fill work would start at the western side of Las Vegas Boulevard and end at Eastern Avenue. He continued, saying that open grade activities would be carried out from Eastern Avenue to Boulder Highway. The NDOT staff member reported that sidewalk median improvements would encompass the entire project Mr. Peñuelas thanked for this notification and told the Committee that the project was included on the RPCC GIS Project Map. Announcement of Retirement Ms. Priscilla Raudenbush, NV Energy, announced that she would be retiring from the company and this was her last RPCC meeting. She shared that Mr. Shawn Arnold with NV Energy would become the company s member representative and Ms. Pat Brown would become alternate for the RPCC. She lauded the Committee members for their efforts to facilitate project coordination in the Las Vegas Valley. RPCC members expressed appreciation to Ms. Raudenbush for her service on the Committee.

18 DocuSign Envelope ID: EE30E0BB-C58F-4071-BECD-EE07015A57F0 Minutes-Regional Project Coordination Committee Meeting of June 20, 2018 Page 12 of 12 Motion: No motion was necessary. Vote/Summary: No vote was taken. Item: 9. CONDUCT A COMMENT PERIOD FOR CITIZENS PARTICIPATION Comments: No comments were made. Motion: No motion was necessary. Vote/Summary: No vote was taken. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 9:54 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Tammy McMahan Recording & Transcription Secretary

19 R E G I O N A L T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N Fiscal Years CIP Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax $30,000,000 Fuel Revenue Indexing $60,000,000 $182,000,000 Sales Tax $11,000,000 ROADWAY PLANNING & FUNDING 1

20 Clark County Projects Clark County Projects FY

21 Clark County Projects FY 2020 & 2021 Las Vegas Projects 3

22 Las Vegas Projects FY 2019 Las Vegas Projects FY 2020 &

23 North Las Vegas Projects North Las Vegas Projects FY

24 North Las Vegas Projects FY 2020 & 2021 Henderson Projects 6

25 Henderson Projects FY 2019 NO PROJECTS Henderson Projects FY 2020 &

26 8

27

28 DocuSign Envelope ID: 06A819E5-C A3-D7042DA543DA MINUTES REGIONAL PROJECT COORDINATION COMMITTEE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA JULY 18, 2018 These minutes are prepared in compliance with NRS Text is in summarized rather than verbatim format. For complete contents, please refer to meeting recordings on file at the Regional Transportation Commission. THIS MEETING WAS PROPERLY NOTICED AND POSTED IN THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS ON JULY 10, 2018 Clark County Government Center 500 S. Grand Central Pkwy. Las Vegas, NV City of Henderson Office of the City Clerk 240 Water Street Henderson, NV CC Regional Justice Center 200 Lewis Ave. Las Vegas, NV RTC 600 S. Grand Central Pkwy. Las Vegas, NV RTC website Nevada Public Notice website CALL TO ORDER Mr. Mark Sorensen, Chair, called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. in Meeting Room 108 of the Regional Transportation Commission Administration Building. MEMBERS PRESENT: Mark Sorensen, City of Las Vegas, Chair Diana Hubbard, Southwest Gas Corporation, Vice-Chair (Alternate) Shawn Arnold, NV Energy Vivian Browning, Bureau of Land Management Willie Davidson, CenturyLink (Alternate) Ortary Davila, Kern River Gas Transmission Company William Bill Harty, Nevada Department of Transportation Chris Helda, Las Vegas Valley Water District Scott Jarvis, City of Henderson Heidi Martell, Clark County Water Reclamation District (Alternate) Abi Mayrena, Clark County Regional Flood Control District Tahmineh Pennington, Southern Nevada Water Authority (Alternate) Tammi Tiger, Clark County Public Works (Alternate) Chris Dingell, Clark County School District (Non-voting) MEMBERS ABSENT: Dale Daffern, City of North Las Vegas Vern Lacro, Kinder Morgan Percy Lucban, Public Utilities Commission of Nevada Shital Patel, Freeway and Arterial System of Transportation Patrick Coyne, Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority (Non-voting) Paul Moradkhan, Las Vegas Metro Chamber of Commerce (Non-voting) RTC STAFF: John Peñuelas, Director of Engineering Services-Streets and Highways Dante Bongolan, Project Engineer Chris Schwarz, Regional Traffic Control Coordinator Todd Gurnee, GIS Analyst Tammy McMahan, Management Analyst Tamika Davis-Edwards, Office Specialist

29 DocuSign Envelope ID: 06A819E5-C A3-D7042DA543DA Minutes-Regional Project Coordination Committee Meeting of July 18, 2018 Page 2 of 15 INTERESTED PARTIES: David Swallow, Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada Pat Brown, NV Energy Brad Gallimore, Bureau of Land Management Tony Zhang, Las Vegas Valley Water District Nikki-Ann Bosque, Las Vegas Valley Water District Celine Bannourah, Las Vegas Valley Water District Matt Roybal, City of Henderson Bob Leuck, Clark County Public Works Doug Johnson, Nevada Department of Transportation Steve Weber, Clark County Water Reclamation District Jacob Snow, JABarrett Company Dwayne McClinton, Southwest Gas Corporation Mary Carr, Atkins Jay Barrett, JABarrett Company Item: 1. CONDUCT A COMMENT PERIOD FOR CITIZENS PARTICIPATION Comments: No comments were made. Motion: A motion was not necessary. Vote/Summary: A vote was not taken. Item: 2. APPROVE AGENDA (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) Comments: Mr. John Peñuelas, Director of Engineering Services-Streets and Highways, Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (RTC), explained that this item was necessitated because of the replacement of the former standing agenda items with new ones. He specified that Items 7, 8, and 9 represented the new standing agenda items which had been discussed at the Regional Project Coordination Committee June 20, 2018 meeting. Mr. Peñuelas related that RTC staff recommended approval of the agenda. Motion: Chair Mark Sorensen, City of Las Vegas, made a motion to follow staff recommendation. Vote/Summary: 12 Ayes. 0 Nays. The motion carried. Ayes: Chair Mark Sorensen, Vice-Chair Diana Hubbard, Shawn Arnold, Vivian Browning, Willie Davidson, Ortary Davila, Bill Harty, Scott Jarvis, Heidi Martell, Abi Mayrena, Tahmineh Pennington, and Tammi Tiger Nays: None Absent: Dale Daffern, Vern Lacro, Percy Lucban, and Shital Patel NOTE: One Regional Project Coordination Committee member with voting privileges had not yet arrived for the meeting.

30 DocuSign Envelope ID: 06A819E5-C A3-D7042DA543DA Minutes-Regional Project Coordination Committee Meeting of July 18, 2018 Page 3 of 15 Item: 3. DESIGNATE OFFICERS FOR 2018/2019 (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) Comments: Mr. John Peñuelas, Director of Engineering Services-Streets and Highways, Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (RTC), explained the officer designation process according to the Regional Project Coordination Committee (RPCC) Policies and Procedures. He proceeded to say that the offices of chair and vice-chair were to be rotated annually between a governmental entity and a utility company. He asked that any nominations name the entity and company instead of specific individuals. In this way, if the members or regularly attending alternates for the entity and company holding the offices were unable to attend, any representative for the entity or company could serve in their stead. ***A Regional Project Coordination Committee member with voting privileges arrived for the meeting at 9:10 a.m.*** Mr. Peñuelas related that the RTC recommended that Southwest Gas Corporation be designated as Chair and the City of Henderson be designated as Vice-Chair for the RPCC. Motion: Chair Mark Sorensen, City of Las Vegas, made a motion to follow staff recommendation that Southwest Gas Corporation be designated as Chair and the City of Henderson be designated as Vice- Chair for the Regional Project Coordination Committee. Vote/Summary: 13 Ayes. 0 Nays. The motion carried. Ayes: Chair Mark Sorensen, Vice-Chair Diana Hubbard, Shawn Arnold, Vivian Browning, Willie Davidson, Ortary Davila, Bill Harty, Chris Helda, Scott Jarvis, Heidi Martell, Abi Mayrena, Tahmineh Pennington, and Tammi Tiger Nays: None Absent: Dale Daffern, Vern Lacro, Percy Lucban, and Shital Patel ***NOTE: With the vote of approval, Ms. Diana Hubbard, Southwest Gas Corporation, led the meeting in her capacity as Chair. Also, Mr. Scott Jarvis, City of Henderson, was now serving as Vice- Chair. *** Item: 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Meeting of June 20, 2018 (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) Comments: Ms. Vivian Browning, Bureau of Land Management (BLM), requested a number of revisions regarding her statements set forth on pages of the minutes. She planned to write out proposed revisions and provide them to Ms. Tammy McMahan, Management Analyst, Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (RTC). Mr. John Peñuelas, RTC Director of Engineering Services- Streets and Highways, suggested that these minutes be held, BLM submit the suggested revisions and RTC would incorporate them as appropriate, and the revised minutes would be presented in the next Regional Project Coordination Committee (RPCC) agenda for review and approval. The RPCC did not object. Motion: A motion was not made. Vote/Summary: A vote was not taken.

31 DocuSign Envelope ID: 06A819E5-C A3-D7042DA543DA Minutes-Regional Project Coordination Committee Meeting of July 18, 2018 Page 4 of 15 Item: 5. RECEIVE AN UPDATED LIST OF ENTITY AND UTILITY COMPANY CONTACT PERSONS AND DIRECT STAFF ACCORDINGLY (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) Comments: Mr. John Peñuelas, Director of Engineering Services-Streets and Highways, Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (RTC), stated that RTC staff members were not aware of any changes to the Entity and Utility Company Contact List. Mr. Shawn Arnold, NV Energy, mentioned that Ms. Priscilla Raudenbush had retired and that he and Ms. Patricia ( Pat ) Brown, NV Energy, would be serving on the Regional Project Coordination Committee (RPCC). Next, Mr. Mark Sorenson, City of Las Vegas (Las Vegas), shared that he would remain as the Las Vegas member representative for RPCC. He understood that Mr. Allen Pavelka, the current Las Vegas alternate representative for RPCC, may be replaced though. Mr. Sorensen said that when the matter was finalized, he would submit the appropriate documentation to make the change. Mr. Willie Davidson, CenturyLink, informed the RPCC that Mr. Dell Howard, the current member representative, had been assigned to an Arizona office for CenturyLink. He went on to say that the proper form to re-designate him as the member representative for the company would be provided to the RTC. Motion: A motion was not necessary. Vote/Summary: A vote was not taken. Item: 6. RECEIVE A PRESENTATION REGARDING THE ON BOARD YOUR FUTURE TRANSIT PLAN INITIATIVE Comments: On Board Your Future Transit Plan Following a detailed PowerPoint presentation [attached], Mr. David Swallow, Senior Director of Engineering and Technology, Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (RTC), discussed this plan. What Will On Board Do? Mr. Swallow stated that the On Board-Your Future Transit Plan (On Board) constituted a long-range vision of the community s transit needs over the next 20 years. On Board Focus Areas The RTC Senior Director said the plan would focus upon the following three key areas: 1. Traditional transit improvements 2. High-capacity transit (HCT) options 3. Emerging transit technology opportunities Input for On Board Mr. Swallow noted that numerous stakeholders and certain studies and other sources of information would provide input for On Board. He mentioned that the stakeholders included the community-at-

32 DocuSign Envelope ID: 06A819E5-C A3-D7042DA543DA Minutes-Regional Project Coordination Committee Meeting of July 18, 2018 Page 5 of 15 large, On Board Technical Advisory Groups (TAG) (Engineering and Planning), RTC public committees, and the RTC Board of Commissioners (RTC Board). Regarding the On Board TAGs, he explained that public works and planning department representative of the local jurisdictions comprised these groups. Mr. Swallow described the feedback of all of these parties as critical for developing a plan that would reflect the mobility needs of Southern Nevadans and ways to address them. High-Capacity Transit Mr. Swallow informed the Regional Project Coordination Committee (RPCC or Committee) that determining the viability of transit options, including high-capacity transit, in the community was a critical element of the On Board plan. Universe of Corridors The RTC Senior Director of Engineering and Technology said the On Board TAGs (Engineering and Planning), the RTC, and other stakeholders had initially identified numerous Las Vegas Valley (Valley) roadways, dubbed the Universe of Corridors, which might be suited to HCT investment. Phase 2 Corridors Mr. Swallow continued, saying that the On Board TAGs, the RTC, and other stakeholders had pared down the Universe of Corridors to 25 roadways and continue to discuss how to determine the most likely candidates for HCT. He noted that the number of corridors would be less than 25 for the sake of the plan s viability. Transit-Oriented Development Typologies Mr. Swallow shared that another aspect of On Board is examining how transportation and land use work together. He informed the Committee that investments in HCT lines tended to support local developments, a concept known as transit-oriented development (TOD). As such, On Board includes a TOD typology component that assesses areas in the Valley and how HCT investments would affect development in each unique area. Stakeholders had provided feedback on this matter. Where We ve Been The RTC Senior Director highlighted some of the On Board s extensive and varied outreach efforts: More than 15,000 completed surveys Attendance of more than 105 community events and engagements 68 speaking engagements 16 On Board TAG meetings Five Transportation Resource Advisory Committee and Community Collaboration (TRAC) meetings Four public information meetings Next Steps Mr. Swallow pointed out that the On Board plan was in the recommendations and final plan stage. The aim was to complete the work by the end of Resort Corridor Feasibility Study Mr. Swallow noted that two studies would provide valuable data and insights for On Board. One of those is the Resort Corridor Feasibility Study, which would assess the opportunities and challenges presented by the development of an HCT transit system to and from the Resort Corridor.

33 DocuSign Envelope ID: 06A819E5-C A3-D7042DA543DA Minutes-Regional Project Coordination Committee Meeting of July 18, 2018 Page 6 of 15 Critical Links The RTC Senior Director set forth the critical links on the Resort Corridor as recognized in the study: McCarran International Airport (McCarran Airport) to the Las Vegas Strip (the portion of Las Vegas Boulevard with a high concentration of hotels, casinos, and entertainment venues): movement along the Las Vegas Strip; and the Las Vegas Strip to the downtown area of the City of Las Vegas (Las Vegas). Key Inputs Mr. Swallow detailed the most significant information that would be used to formulate the study findings: Technology-enabled data collection Stated preference survey Emerging trends and development patterns Key mobility concerns Stakeholder priorities Feasibility Study Timeline The RTC Senior Director of Engineering and Technology indicated that the goal was to complete the study by November 2018 and it would be included in the overall On Board plan. Maryland Parkway Study Next, Mr. Swallow talked about the Maryland Parkway Study which was a source of information for the On Board plan. He shared that the Maryland Parkway Study was currently in an environmental assessment phase. Why Maryland Parkway? The RTC Senior Director highlighted some of the many significant elements of the Maryland Parkway corridor: Connection to numerous top transit lines in the Las Vegas Valley Highest productivity route, second only to Resort Corridor Links key destinations in Las Vegas Site of 85,685 jobs Serves 93,096 residents approximate to area Proposed Route Mr. Swallow displayed an image of the proposed HCT route, explaining that the line is 8.7 miles long and connects from downtown Las Vegas area to McCarran Airport. This routing would result in several key connection points, including links to the Las Vegas Medical District, the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, and McCarran Airport. What is Being Considered? The RTC Senior Director of Engineering and Technology said that different transit options were being considered for this important corridor. He followed by providing detailing the alternatives. Enhanced Route 109 Primarily involves reducing number of transit stops to speed up service along corridor Lowest cost option Least construction impact Attracts fewer riders than any other option

34 DocuSign Envelope ID: 06A819E5-C A3-D7042DA543DA Minutes-Regional Project Coordination Committee Meeting of July 18, 2018 Page 7 of 15 Minimal opportunities for TOD Bus Rapid Transit Primarily involves creating dedicated transit lanes to better facilitate bus movement without significant disruptions to traffic flow Increased service frequency, faster travel time, higher expected ridership Moderate capital and ongoing operations cost May attract some TOD Requires major reconstruction of corridor Light Rail Primarily involves installing dedicated transit line through center of roadway or along sides of existing roadway Increased service frequency, fastest possible travel time, highest ridership Improved community image Highest capital and ongoing operations cost Greatest opportunity for TOD Requires major reconstruction of corridor Maryland Parkway Study Next Steps Regarding next steps for the study, Mr. Swallow mentioned that several public outreach efforts and presentations to local entities were planned to solicit feedback. The responses would be presented to the RTC Board in the near future to get their recommendation on the preferred option. This recommendation would be incorporated into the On Board plan. Questions and Answers Mr. Shawn Arnold, NV Energy, asked for an estimate on the year of construction start for Maryland Parkway after an option was chosen and approved. He also asked for details about possible funding sources for this work. Mr. Swallow replied that a timetable would depend upon which option the RTC Board recommended. He noted that a light rail plan would take the longest to implement. The RTC Senior Director noted that construction on light rail might be completed by 2024, with a goal of revenue service by Regarding funding, he said that this would depend upon the RTC Board s direction. Next, Mr. Arnold asked when construction might commence for a Resort Corridor project if such was approved. Mr. Swallow answered that the exact modalities for that corridor had not yet been identified since the feasibility study was ongoing. He went on to say that changes to the transit system on Las Vegas Boulevard would require the agreement of multiple stakeholders in that area. Mr. Swallow told Mr. Arnold that the feasibility study, which was expected to be finished by November 2018, should provide more insight on possible transit options. Mr. Arnold went on to ask if the RTC was considering the installation of electronic boards at every transit station. He thought this would be a helpful informational resource for passengers. Mr. Swallow responded that the RTC was currently uses real-time tracking systems via on-bus Wi-Fi to collect data on the vehicles and this information was provided to riders via mobile application. He said this was a less expensive method compared to dynamic message signs. However, Mr. Swallow noted that digital signage may be explored if light rail investments are made.

35 DocuSign Envelope ID: 06A819E5-C A3-D7042DA543DA Minutes-Regional Project Coordination Committee Meeting of July 18, 2018 Page 8 of 15 Mr. John Peñuelas, Director of Engineering Services-Streets and Highways, RTC, asked Mr. Swallow what sort of feedback that he needed from the RPCC. Mr. Swallow replied that he could take input during the meeting or interested parties could contact him and share their thoughts. He concluded discussion on this item by noting that the meeting attendees could visit the On Board website for information on the plan. Motion: A motion was not necessary. Vote/Summary: A vote was not taken. Item: 7. RECEIVE INFORMATION REGARDING APPROVED PLANNED PROJECTS FROM MEMBER ENTITIES AND UTILITY COMPANIES (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) Comments: Clark County Regional Flood Control District Ten-Year Construction Program Presentation Following a detailed PowerPoint presentation [attached], Ms. Abi Mayrena, Principal Civil Engineer, Clark County Regional Flood Control District (CCRFCD or Flood Control District), talked about the CCRFCD s 10-year construction program spanning fiscal years 2019 through Flood Control District s Historical Annual Expenditures Ms. Mayrena provided a breakdown of the CCRFCD s historical annual expenditures as follows: Pay-as-you-go (57 percent) Debt service (29 percent) Maintenance (8 percent) Operations (6 percent) Fiscal Years Total 10-Year Resources Ms. Mayrena next provided a brief summary of the total estimated resources for the upcoming 10-year period, noting that the total of all the bonding and the pay-as-you-go money would be approximately $886 million. Prorated Share of Funding The Flood Control District principal civil engineer next displayed a chart of the prorated shares of funding that each CCRFCD member entity receives: City of Las Vegas (38.7 percent) Clark County (29.6 percent) City of North Las Vegas (19.2 percent) City of Henderson (8.4 percent) City of Mesquite (2.2 percent) City of Boulder City (2.0 percent) Ms. Mayrena explained that these numbers were based on the estimated Las Vegas Valley Master Plan (Master Plan). She shared that the 2018 Master Plan Update is expected to be released by September Projects Planned for the CCRFCD Member Entities Explanation of Project Map Legend Related to Work Planned for CCRFCD Member Entities Displaying a map of a planning area managed by the City of Henderson (Henderson), she explained

36 DocuSign Envelope ID: 06A819E5-C A3-D7042DA543DA Minutes-Regional Project Coordination Committee Meeting of July 18, 2018 Page 9 of 15 the legend which would be featured on the maps relating to the other member entities. The Flood Control District engineer said that the blue lines represented completed projects (or projects under construction) on the Master Plan, red lines indicated facilities that are proposed in the 10-year plan, green lines stood for facilities that are proposed beyond the current 10-year plan, and red ovals around a facility meant that the structure would be eligible funding in the first year of the 10-year program. Ms. Mayrena added that construction projects that are programmed in the first three years of the 10- year plan are first-year eligible once the prerequisites for funding are met. City of Henderson Ms. Mayrena addressed projects managed by the City of Henderson. Pittman Planning Area: Whitney Wash Channel: Replacement of failing concrete trapezoidal channel with rectangular concrete channel and reinforced concrete box culvert Anthem Parkway Channel: Concrete channel from Horizon Ridge Parkway to Sienna Heights Drive Ms. Mayrena summarized the Henderson work, saying that there were two construction projects and one design project that are first-year eligible. The city s projects total approximately $9.3 million and the 10-year plan total is approximately $45 million for this municipality. City of Las Vegas Next, Ms. Mayrena talked about projects managed by the City of Las Vegas (Las Vegas). Central Planning Area Ms. Mayrena stated that there were three construction projects which were first-year eligible in the Central planning area. The work is all a part of the Flamingo Boulder Highway North System. Boulder Highway branch of the Flamingo Boulder Highway North system: Storm drain in Boulder Highway between Sahara Avenue and Charleston Boulevard Charleston branch of the Flamingo Boulder Highway system: Extension of storm drain from Boulder Highway to Maryland Parkway within Charleston Boulevard; and extension of storm drain lateral extending north in Maryland Parkway to protect downstream residential developments to the east Charleston Branch of the Flamingo Boulder Highway North system: Completion with extension of storm drain from Maryland Parkway to Main Street Gowan Planning Area The Flood Control District principal civil engineer mentioned that there were four first-year eligible projects in the Gowan Planning area. Gowan Box Canyon: Storm drain in Lone Mountain Road which will serve as outfall future Box Canyon Detention Basin Gowan North El Capitan Branch: Storm drain in El Capitan extending from Ann Road to Centennial Parkway; second phase of El Capitan storm drain; first phase from Lone Mountain Road to Ann Road set to start construction soon Gowan Alexander Road system: Storm drain in Alexander Road from Simmons Street to Decatur Boulevard Gowan Alexander Road system: Storm drain in upstream segment from Decatur Boulevard to Rancho Road

37 DocuSign Envelope ID: 06A819E5-C A3-D7042DA543DA Minutes-Regional Project Coordination Committee Meeting of July 18, 2018 Page 10 of 15 Upper Northern Las Vegas Wash Planning Area Ms. Mayrena went on to note that the Las Vegas project in this area concerned open channel improvements in the Moccasin Road alignment from Skye Canyon Park Drive to the Upper Las Vegas Wash. The Flood Control District engineer summarized the Las Vegas work, saying that there were eight construction projects that are first-year eligible. The city s projects total approximately $121.7 million and the 10-year plan total is approximately $345 million for this municipality. City of North Las Vegas Ms. Mayrena went on to address projects managed by the City of North Las Vegas (North Las Vegas). Lower Northern Las Vegas Wash Planning Area The Flood Control District principal civil engineer talked about the Fifth Street Collector, a storm drain project in Fifth Street from Deer Springs Way to Centennial Parkway. The plan was to tie the collector into the existing Centennial Parkway Channel east facility Range Wash Planning Area Ms. Mayrena went on to discuss projects in the Range Wash planning area. The proposed work would involve the following facilities: Orchard Collector Charleston to Linden: Collector facility to intercept runoff from Frenchman mountains to the east and convey it to Orchard Detention Basin Hollywood System, Dunes South Detention Basin to Centennial Parkway: Phase 2 of Hollywood System which consists of conveyance facility through Nellis Air Force Base from Las Vegas Boulevard to future Dunes South Detention Basin Range Wash Ann Branch: Storm drain system in Mt. Hood extending from just south of Tropical Parkway to Ann Road; in Ann Road, extending from Mt. Hood to downstream Hollywood system Hollywood System, Centennial Parkway to Speedway #2 Detention Basin: Conversion of two existing retention basins into detention basins; includes open channel improvements, storm drain crossing Interstate 15 (I-15) at Hollywood Boulevard, and storm drain improvements from I-15 to Centennial Parkway Vandenberg North Detention Basin: Detention basin project located south of 215 Beltway at Pecos Road; includes inflow and outflow facilities Range Wash Beltway Conveyance: Open channel improvements on north side of 215 Beltway Beltway Collection System Pecos: Reinforced concrete box culverts within infield of Pecos Road/215 Beltway interchange The Flood Control District engineer summarized the North Las Vegas work, saying that there were eight construction projects, three design projects, and two rights-of-way projects that are first-year eligible. The city s projects total approximately $75.5 million and the 10-year plan total is approximately $171.5 million for this municipality. Clark County Ms. Mayrena proceeded to address projects managed by Clark County (County). Tropicana/Flamingo Planning Area The Flood Control District principal civil engineer stated that work was proposed in this area at the

38 DocuSign Envelope ID: 06A819E5-C A3-D7042DA543DA Minutes-Regional Project Coordination Committee Meeting of July 18, 2018 Page 11 of 15 following facilities and environs: Wagon Trail Channel Sunset to Teco: Missing link project consisting of storm drain in Procyon Street extending from existing facilities at Sunset Road to existing facility in Teco Avenue Airport Channel Naples: Peaking basin and open channel improvements from Tropicana Avenue to Harmon Avenue Tropicana Avenue Conveyance: Storm drain in Tropicana Avenue from Las Vegas Wash to Boulder Highway Flamingo Wash Industrial Road to Hotel Rio Drive: Improves portion of Flamingo Wash upstream of I-15 Flamingo Wash Maryland to Palos Verde: Open channel improvements of two segments of Flamingo Wash from Maryland Parkway to Cambridge Street, and from Swenson Street to Palos Verde Street Duck Creek/Blue Diamond Planning Area Ms. Mayrena went to discuss projects in the Duck Creek/Blue Diamond planning area. Duck Creek Wash, Torrey Pines to Rainbow: Developer participation project that includes collection and diversion facilities connecting to existing inflow channel for Central Duck Creek Detention Basin Duck Creek Jones Boulevard: Storm drain in Jones Boulevard being constructed as part of Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (RTC) roadway project Duck Creek Wash Tributary 4: Project is outfall pipe for Duck Creek Railroad Detention Basin; located in Pyle Avenue, extending from Union Pacific Railroad to Jones Boulevard Silverado Ranch Detention Basin and Outfall and Inflow Facilities: In design under two contracts o Silverado Ranch Detention Basin and Outfall Facilities: Includes inflow facilities in Decatur Boulevard, south of Le Baron Avenue; 170 acre-foot detention basin, and an outfall storm drain in Silverado Ranch Boulevard that connects to existing system downstream of I-15 o Blue Diamond Channel 02, Decatur Le Baron to Richmar: Anticipated to be constructed as a part of RTC roadway project and includes collection system in Decatur Boulevard that will tie into future Silverado Ranch Detention Basin Duck Creek Haven Street project: Storm drain from Pyle Avenue to Cactus Avenue Duck Creek/Blue Diamond project: Open channel and storm drain improvements from Bermuda Road to Las Vegas Boulevard Blue Diamond Wash: Extends outfall pipe from Lower Blue Diamond Detention Basin and extends it from Arville Street to the I-15 within Robindale Road Outlying Areas The CCRFCD engineer touched upon Clark County s proposed projects involving outlying areas in Goodsprings, Nevada and communities in the vicinity of the Muddy River and its tributaries. She noted that Clark County had submitted a request for the Goodsprings Phase 1 work which would entail open channel improvements to protect residents from runoff coming from the north. She went on to say that Clark County has submitted a 90 percent plan for the Fairgrounds detention basin which will be located in Logandale, Nevada. The placement of the basin would be upstream of the Clark County Fairgrounds property with an outfall facility along Whipple Street. Ms. Mayrena summarized the Clark County work, saying that there were 15 construction projects, seven design projects, and four right-of-way projects that are first-year eligible. The County s projects

39 DocuSign Envelope ID: 06A819E5-C A3-D7042DA543DA Minutes-Regional Project Coordination Committee Meeting of July 18, 2018 Page 12 of 15 total approximately $99.5 million and the 10-year plan total is approximately $278.7 million for this government entity. City of Boulder City Next, Ms. Mayrena proceeded to discuss the work managed by the City of Boulder City (Boulder City). Hemenway Watershed The principal civil engineer stated that the project would involve the Hemenway System, Phase IIB including improvements to the Hemenway Wash along US 93. The aim is to increase channel capacity and the armoring of an unlined wash east of US 93. The CCRFCD engineer summarized the Boulder City work, saying that there was one first-year eligible construction project totaling $730,000 dollars. The 10-year plan total is approximately $6.5 million for the municipality. City of Mesquite Next, Ms. Mayrena proceeded to discuss the work managed by the City of Mesquite (Mesquite). Virgin River Planning Area Ms. Mayrena stated that Mesquite was requesting the development of a Virgin River Flood Wall which would involve the construction of a flood wall along the southeastern edge of the City of Mesquite extending into the State of Arizona. This project will offer flood protection to existing residential developments adjacent to the river. Town Wash Watershed The Flood Control District engineer went on to discuss the Mesa Boulevard, El Dorado to Town Wash work which would include concrete channel improvements within the I-15 corridor extending northeast from the Town Wash and a storm drain extending north to the intersection of Mesa Boulevard and El Dorado Road. Ms. Mayrena summarized the Mesquite work, noting that city has two first-year eligible construction projects totaling approximately $13.7 million. The 10-year plan total is approximately $23.5 million for this municipality. Master Plan and 10-Year Construction Program Summary Ms. Mayrena detailed that there were 821 total miles of conveyance facilities on the Master Plan. Of those 821 total miles, 619 miles had been completed, 82 miles had been proposed for work on the Master Plan, and 120 miles were remaining. She went on to say that the current Master Plan also includes 126 detention/debris basins. Of these 126 facilities, 93 were complete, 12 are proposed in the 10-year plan for , and 21 would be outstanding if the aforementioned twelve projects were finished. The principal civil engineer informed the Regional Project Coordination Committee that once the facilities listed on the Ten-Year Construction Program ( ) were completed, the Clark County Regional Flood Control District would be approaching the 85 percent mark based on the current Master Plan Update.

40 DocuSign Envelope ID: 06A819E5-C A3-D7042DA543DA Minutes-Regional Project Coordination Committee Meeting of July 18, 2018 Page 13 of 15 Questions and Answers Ms. Tammi Tiger, Clark County Public Works, inquired about the CCRFCD plans after all facilities are completed. Ms. Mayrena replied that the Flood Control District might shift to reconstruction and maintenance of facilities, depending upon how the plan unfolded. Chair Diana Hubbard, Southwest Gas Corporation, asked for clarification on the meaning of the term first-year eligible. Ms. Mayrena replied that the 10-year plan is broken into two sections: The first five years and the second five years. Projects identified in the first three years of the first five years are eligible for funding. The local government entities identifies d projects within the first three years. For the local entities projects to be eligible for funding, the work has d to be 90 percent in design, with rights-of-way and environmental permits obtained. This meant that even if projects are scheduled for the third year, they would secure funding in the first year. Ms. Mayrena noted that these monies are based on the entity s a prorated share. Chair Hubbard asked if one could reasonably assume that these projects will be in the design or construction phases in the timeframe of those three years unless something brought about changes. Ms. Mayrena answered in the affirmative. No other comments were made. Motion: A motion was not necessary. Vote/Summary: A vote was not taken. Item: 8. DISCUSS PROJECTS THAT ARE STARTING THE ENGINEERING DESIGN PHASE OF PROJECT DELIVERY (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) Comments: Mr. John Peñuelas, Director of Engineering Services-Streets and Highways, Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (RTC), explained that this item would focus on projects moving from the planning phase to the design phase. Mr. Penuelas noted that if utility companies were involved in these projects or had work in the vicinity, such matters should be mentioned in the discussion for this item. He stated that the Regional Project Coordination Committee (RPCC) could report on these projects and the RTC would handle information on the RPCC GIS Project Map. Motion: A motion was not necessary. Vote/Summary: A vote was not taken. Item: 9. DISCUSS PROJECTS THAT WILL SOON BE STARTING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF PROJECT DELIVERY (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) Comments: Mr. John Peñuelas, Director of Engineering Services-Streets and Highways, Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (RTC), noted that this item was designed to highlight projects that move from the design phase to the pending construction phase. He mentioned that the Regional Project Coordination Committee should provide reports on this type of projects. Mr. Penuelas noted that the Cone Management Working Group (CMWG) would focus on the coordination of projects that were actually in construction.

41 DocuSign Envelope ID: 06A819E5-C A3-D7042DA543DA Minutes-Regional Project Coordination Committee Meeting of July 18, 2018 Page 14 of 15 Motion: A motion was not necessary. Vote/Summary: A vote was not taken. Item: 10. RECEIVE A REPORT FROM THE CONE MANAGEMENT WORKING GROUP (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) Comments: Mr. John Peñuelas, Director of Engineering Services-Streets and Highways, Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (RTC), stated that the Cone Management Working Group (CMWG) July 2018 meeting had been cancelled due to the July 4 th holiday. The RTC Director of Engineering Services recounted that the RTC had entered a contract with Kimley-Horn and Associates to explore Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) solutions regarding construction work zones. As part of this effort, the RTC and the agency s member entities are seeking technology that can help them accurately and easily determine work zone placement in the Las Vegas Valley (Valley), the impacts of these work zones on the traveling public, and how to effectively share work zone-related information to the public. Mr. Penuelas pointed out that the deployment of arrow boards connected to the WAZE traffic navigation software in the Valley was an example of technology being utilized in the attempt to meet the above-mentioned information needs. The RTC Director of Engineering Services announced that the next workshop would focus operational parameters which would entail such matters as where to place work zone ITS and acceptable amounts to pay for these devices. He informed the Committee that this gathering had been scheduled for August 7, 2018, which is the same date as the next CMWG meeting. Motion: A motion was not necessary. Vote/Summary: A vote was not taken. Item: 11. DISCUSS TOPICS OF INTEREST Comments: Ms. Tammi Tiger, Clark County Public Works, introduced Mr. Bob Leuck, the new Deputy Director for Clark County Public Works. No other comments were made. Motion: A motion was not necessary. Vote/Summary: A vote was not taken. Item: 12. CONDUCT A COMMENT PERIOD FOR CITIZENS PARTICIPATION Comments: No comments were made. Motion:

42 DocuSign Envelope ID: 06A819E5-C A3-D7042DA543DA Minutes-Regional Project Coordination Committee Meeting of July 18, 2018 Page 15 of 15 A motion was not necessary. Vote/Summary: A vote was not taken. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 10:04 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Tammy McMahan Recording Secretary Marek Biernacinski Transcription Secretary

43 WHAT WILL ON BOARD DO? Traditional Transit Improvements High Capacity Transit Options Emerging Transit Technology Opportunities 1

44 ON BOARD ON BOARD 2

45 CORRIDOR SCREENING Identify universe of corridors Segment corridors Screen / evaluate Top corridors for next round UNIVERSE OF CORRIDORS 3

46 PHASE 2 CORRIDORS TOD Typologies Las Vegas Strip Downtown - Regional Downtown - Local Urban Neighborhood Town Center Entertainment District Employment District Medical District Educational Campus 4

47 TOD Typologies TOD Locations: All 5

48 WHERE WE VE BEEN More than 15,000 surveys Attended more than 105 events 68 speaking engagements 16 technical advisory group meetings 5 TRAC meetings 4 public meetings NEXT STEPS 6

49 ON BOARD RESORT CORRIDOR FEASIBILITY STUDY 7

50 STUDY OVERVIEW OBJECTIVE: Consider feasibility of a highcapacity transit system to improve access to, from and within the Resort Corridor CRITICAL LINKS: Airport to the Strip Movement along the Strip Strip to downtown Las Vegas KEY INPUTS Technology-enabled data collection Stated preference survey Emerging trends and development patterns Key mobility concerns Stakeholder priorities 8

51 FEASIBILITY STUDY TIMELINE DEC 17 JAN 18 FEB MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV WE ARE HERE ON BOARD 9

52 WHY MARYLAND PARKWAY? Connects to the top 5 transit lines Links key destinations 93,096 Residents High-productivity route 85,685 Jobs PROPOSED ROUTE Las Vegas Medical District 12,000 Downtown Las Vegas 30,000 Downtown to Airport 8.7-Mile Route Technology Options: Bus Rapid Transit Light Rail 25 Station Locations 0.35-mile spacing Sunrise Hospital 4,600 Boulevard Mall 1,000 UNLV 3,500 employees 30,000 students McCarran International Airport 16,000 10

53 WHAT IS BEING CONSIDERED? ENHANCED ROUTE

54 ENHANCED TRANSIT Attracts more riders but less than bus rapid transit (BRT) and light rail (LRT) Minimal opportunity for transit-oriented development Least construction impact Increased service can be phased in faster than BRT or LRT Lowest capital and annual operations & maintenances costs BUS RAPID TRANSIT 12

55 BUS RAPID TRANSIT Increased frequency, faster travel time, higher ridership Operates like light rail transit, but not as many riders May attract some transit-oriented development Major reconstruction of the corridor Higher capital and annual operations & maintenance costs LIGHT RAIL 13

56 URBAN LIGHT RAIL Improves community image and attracts new riders Increased frequency, fastest travel time, highest ridership Greatest opportunity for economic and transit-oriented development Major reconstruction of the corridor Highest capital and annual operations and maintenance costs MARYLAND PARKWAY NEXT STEPS 30-Day Public Comment Period Input from Local Jurisdictions Input from RTC Advisory Committees RTC Board Adopts Locally Preferred Alternative 14

57 On Board Approval Process Technical Advisory Group Local Municipal Planning and Engineering Representatives Public Stakeholder Community Interested Businesses, Community Organizations, Local Jurisdictions and Elected Officials Transit Riders / General Public TRAC RTC Committees Local Government Boards RTC Board 15

58 TEN YEAR CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM Fiscal Year 2019 through 2028 Historical Annual Expenditure Operations 6% Debt Service 29% Pay-As-You Go 57% Maintenance 8% 1

59 $300 FY Total 10-Year Resources $250 $200 Millions $150 $100 Year 1 $49.5M TOTAL PLAN $886.3 Million $50 $ Year PAYG Debt Proceeds Prorated Share of Funding Based on estimated Master Plan costs of facilities remaining to be constructed Las Vegas 38.7% North Las Vegas 19.2% Mesquite 2.2% Clark County 29.6% Henderson 8.4% Boulder City 2.0% 2

60 North Las Vegas Las Vegas Clark County Henderson Boulder City 2018/19 Project List City of Henderson Pittman Planning Area Legend Existing Facilities (Blue) Proposed Facilities Ten Year Plan (Red) First Year Eligible (Red Oval) Beyond Ten Year Plan (Green) Whitney Wash Channel Suns et Anthem Parkway Channel Horizon Ridge to Sienna Heights 3

61 City of Henderson FY 2018/19 First Year Eligible 2 Construction Projects 1 Design Project $ 9,341, Year Plan Total $ 44,979,642 Las Vegas North Las Vegas Clark County Henderson Boulder City 4

62 2018/19 Project List City of Las Vegas Central Planning Area Legend Existing Facilities (Blue) Proposed Facilities Ten Year Plan (Red) First Year Eligible (Red Oval) Beyond Ten Year Plan (Green) Flamingo Boulder Hwy North, Charleston Boulder Hwy to Maryland Pkwy and Maryland Pkwy System Charleston Flamingo Boulder Hwy North, Charleston Boulder Hwy to Maryland Pkwy and Maryland Pkwy System Flamingo Boulder Hwy North Boulder Hwy Sahara to Charleston Maryland Sahara 2018/19 Project List City of Las Vegas Gowan Planning Area Legend Existing Facilities (Blue) Proposed Facilities Ten Year Plan (Red) First Year Eligible (Red Oval) Beyond Ten Year Plan (Green) Ann Gowan North El Capitan Branch Ann Road to Centennial Lone Mountain El Capitan Decatur Gowan Box Canyon Lone Mountain Road Simmons Alexander Gowan Alexander Road, Rancho to Decatur Gowan Alexander Road, Decatur Blvd to Simmons Street 5

63 2018/19 Project List City of Las Vegas Upper Northern Las Vegas Wash Planning Area Legend Existing Facilities (Blue) Proposed Facilities Ten Year Plan (Red) First Year Eligible (Red Oval) Beyond Ten Year Plan (Green) Moccasin N. Skye Canyon Park Durango Kyle Canyon System LVW Moccasin, Skye Canyon Park to Upper LVW City of Las Vegas FY 2018/19 First Year Eligible 8 Construction Projects $121,688, Year Plan Total $ 345,362,282 6

64 North Las Vegas Las Vegas Clark County Henderson 2018/19 Project List City of North Las Vegas Lower Northern Las Vegas Wash Planning Area Deer Springs Legend Existing Facilities (Blue) Proposed Facilities Ten Year Plan (Red) First Year Eligible (Red Oval) Beyond Ten Year Plan (Green) Centennial Fifth Street Collector Centennial to Deer Springs 7

65 2018/19 Project List City of North Las Vegas Range Wash Planning Area Legend Existing Facilities (Blue) Proposed Facilities Ten Year Plan (Red) First Year Eligible (Red Oval) Beyond Ten Year Plan (Green) Range Wash Beltway Conveyance Beltway Collection System - Pecos Stewart Hollywood System, Centennial Pkwy to Speedway #2 Detention Basin Range Wash Ann Branch Vandenberg North Detention Basin, Collection and Outfall Hollywood System, Dunes South Detention Basin to Centennial Pkwy, Phase 2 Orchard Collector Charleston to Linden City of North Las Vegas FY 2018/19 First Year Eligible 8 Construction Projects 3 Design Projects 2 Rights-of-Way Projects $ 75,500, Year Plan Total $ 171,499,890 8

66 North Las Vegas Las Vegas Clark County Henderson Boulder City 2018/19 Project List Clark County Tropicana/ Flamingo Planning Area Legend Existing Facilities (Blue) Proposed Facilities Ten Year Plan (Red) First Year Eligible (Red Oval) Beyond Ten Year Plan (Green) Flamingo Wash Maryland to Palos Verde Flamingo Wash Industrial Road to Hotel Rio Drive Tropicana Avenue Conveyance Las Vegas Wash to Boulder Hwy Wagon Trail Channel Sunset to Teco Airport Channel - Naples 9

67 2018/19 Project List Clark County Duck Creek/ Blue Diamond Planning Area Legend Existing Facilities (Blue) Proposed Facilities Ten Year Plan (Red) First Year Eligible (Red Oval) Beyond Ten Year Plan (Green) Duck Creek Wash Tributary 4 Detention Basin to Jones Blue Diamond Wash Arville to I-15 Duck Creek/Blue Diamond Bermuda to Las Vegas Blvd Duck Creek Jones Boulevard Duck Creek Wash, Torrey Pines to Rainbow Duck Creek Haven Street Silverado Ranch Detention Basin and Outfall Facilities Blue Diamond Channel 02, Decatur Le Baron to Richmar 2018/19 Project List Clark County Outlying Areas Goodsprings Legend Existing Facilities (Blue) Proposed Facilities Ten Year Plan (Red) First Year Eligible (Red Oval) Beyond Ten Year Plan (Green) Goodsprings Phase I 10

68 2018/19 Project List Clark County Outlying Areas Muddy River and Tributaries Legend Existing Facilities (Blue) Proposed Facilities Ten Year Plan (Red) First Year Eligible (Red Oval) Beyond Ten Year Plan (Green) Fairgrounds Detention Basin (Whipple Street) Clark County FY 2018/19 First Year Eligible 15 Construction Projects 7 Design Projects 4 Rights-of-way Projects $ 99,516, Year Plan Total $ 278,725,415 11

69 Boulder City Planning Area North Las Vegas Las Vegas Clark County Henderson Boulder City 2018/19 Project List Boulder City Hemenway Watershed Legend Existing Facilities (Blue) Proposed Facilities Ten Year Plan (Red) First Year Eligible (Red Oval) Beyond Ten Year Plan (Green) Hemenway System, Phase IIB Improvements 12

70 Boulder City FY 2018/19 First Year Eligible 1 Construction Project $ 729, Year Plan Total $ 6,493, /19 Project List Mesquite Virgin River Planning Area Legend Existing Facilities (Blue) Proposed Facilities Ten Year Plan (Red) First Year Eligible (Red Oval) Beyond Ten Year Plan (Green) Mesa Boulevard, El Dorado to Town Wash Old Mill Nevada Arizona Mesquite Virgin River Flood Wall 13

71 Mesquite FY 2018/19 First Year Eligible 2 Construction Projects $ 13,702, Year Plan Total $ 23,522,465 Master Plan and Ten Year Construction Program Summary Conveyance Facilities (miles) Debris/Detention Basins 619 Completed 93 Completed Proposed Proposed Remaining Remaining 821 total miles onmaster Plan 126 total basins on Master Plan 14

72 10-Year Construction Program Summary Entity Total Plan Henderson $44,979,642 Las Vegas $345,362,282 North Las Vegas $171,499,890 Clark County $278,725,415 Boulder City $6,493,241 Mesquite $23,522,465 Total $870,582,936 A total of $57 million is programmed in Year 1, which would create or sustain approximately 680 jobs Questions? 15

73

74 DocuSign Envelope ID: 69A81EBA-A7C8-4F10-B57A-B910EC REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA AGENDA ITEM Metropolitan Planning Organization [X] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ] SUBJECT: ENTITY AND UTILITY COMPANY CONTACT LIST PETITIONER: TINA QUIGLEY, GENERAL MANAGER REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER: THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA REGIONAL PROJECT COORDINATION COMMITTEE RECEIVE AN UPDATED LIST OF ENTITY AND UTILITY COMPANY CONTACT PERSONS AND DIRECT STAFF ACCORDINGLY (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) GOAL: ENHANCE PUBLIC AWARENESS AND SUPPORT OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM FISCAL IMPACT: None BACKGROUND: Attached is the most recent list of contacts provided by members of the Regional Project Coordination Committee. Respectfully submitted, JOHN R. PEÑUELAS, JR., P.E. Director of Engineering Services Streets and Highways tde

75 Regional Project Coordination Committee Members and Alternates Bureau of Land Management Vivian Browning (Member) (702) Brad Gallimore (Alternate) (702) CenturyLink Willie Davidson (Member) (702) Stephen Steve Reed (Alternate) (702) City of Henderson (Vice-Chair) Scott Jarvis (Member) (702) Matt Roybal (Alternate) (702) City of Las Vegas Mark Sorensen (Member) (702) Allen Pavelka (Alternate) (702) City of North Las Vegas Dale Daffern (Member) (702) Clint Fujii (Alternate) (702) Clark County Public Works Robert Thompson (Member) (702) Tammi Tiger (Alternate) (702) Clark County Regional Flood Control District Abi Mayrena (Member) (702) Andrew Trelease (Alternate) (702) Clark County School District Chris Dingell (Member) (702) Dimitrios Karapanagiotis (Alternate) (702) Clark County Water Reclamation District Tim Gibson (Member) (702) Heidi Martell (Alternate) (702) Freeway and Arterial System of Transportation Shital Patel (Member) (702) Jesus Marmolejo (Alternate) (702)

76 Regional Project Coordination Committee Members and Alternates Kern River Gas Transmission Company Ortary Davila (Member) (702) Brad Poulson (Alternate) (702) Courey Stacey (Alternate) (702) Cindy Shackelford (Alternate) (702) Kinder Morgan Vern Lacro (Member) (702) Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority Patrick Coyne (Member) (702) Jeremy Handel (Alternate) (702) Las Vegas Metro Chamber of Commerce Paul Moradkhan (Member) (702) Justin Harrison (Alternate) (702) Las Vegas Valley Water District Chris Helda (Member) (702) Las Vegas Valley Water District Cont d Sarge Benson (Alternate) (702) sarge.benson@lvvwd.com Nevada Department of Transportation William Bill Harty (Member) (702) wharty@dot.nv.gov Douglas Johnson (Alternate) (702) djohnson@dot.nv.gov NV Energy Shawn Arnold (Member) (702) sarnold@nvenergy.com Patricia Pat Brown (702) pbrown@nvenergy.com Public Utilities Commission Percy Lucban (Member) (702) plucban@puc.nv.gov Adam Danise (Alternate) (702) adanise@puc.nv.gov Southern Nevada Water Authority Adriana Ventimiglia (Member) (702) adriana.ventimiglia@lvvwd.com Tahmineh Pennington (Alternate) (702) tahmineh.pennington@lvvwd.com Ross Maxwell (Alternate) (702) ross.maxwell@lvvwd.com 2

77 Regional Project Coordination Committee Members and Alternates Southwest Gas Corporation (Chair) Christopher Anderson (Member) (702) James Frame (Alternate) (702) Lawrence Garcia (Alternate) (702) Diana Hubbard (Alternate) (702)

78 Entity and Utility Contact List Bureau of Land Management N. Torrey Pines, Las Vegas, NV Vivian Browning, Realty Specialist (702) Brad Gallimore, Realty Specialist (702) Tim Smith, Southern Nevada District Manager (702) Gayle Marrs-Smith, Las Vegas Field Manager (702) Deb McNeill, Pahrump Field Manager (702) Catrina Williams, Red Rock/Sloan Canyon Field Manager (702) CenturyLink 6700 Via Austi Pkwy., Las Vegas, NV Willie Davidson, Lead Engineer (702) City of Henderson 240 Water St., Henderson, NV Ed McGuire, Assistant Public Works Director (702) City Engineer Tom Davy, City Engineer (702) Department of Utility Services Donald Pelissier, Infrastructure Planning Manager (702) Engineering and Development Scott Jarvis, Project Engineer III (702) Matt Roybal, Project Engineer II (702) Quality Control Lance Olson, Quality Control Manager (702) Survey/Right of Way Michael Kidd, City Surveyor (702) Mary Baer, Real Property Agent (702) Traffic Engineering Alyssa Rodriguez, City Traffic Engineer (702) City of Las Vegas 333 N. Rancho Dr., Las Vegas, NV Mike Jansen, Public Works Director (702) Allen Pavelka, City Engineer (702) Construction Management (CIP) Cassandra Watson-Mihelcic, Project Manager (702) Tom Hayes, Construction Manager (702) Michael Ahlert, Construction Mgmt. Coordinator (702) Corey Schmidt, Project Manager (702) Rusty Coleman, Construction Mgmt. Coordinator (702) Jeff Galambas, Construction Mgmt. Coordinator (702) Chris Plutte, Project Manager (702) Wednesday, August 01, 2018 Page 1 of 7

79 Engineering Design (CPM) Matt Klainer, Quality Assurance Administrator (702) Sherri McMahon, Environmental Officer (702) Anita Marquez, Project Manager (702) Lyle Wilcox, Project Manager (702) Mark Sorensen, Program Manager (702) Jeremy Leavitt, Program Manager (702) Mike Sturdivant, Project Manager (702) Randy McConnell, Project Manager (702) Gina Venglass, Project Manager (702) Lorraine Dunford, Project Manager (702) Dennis Moyer, Project Manager (702) Tim Parks, Engineering Project Manager - Sanitation (702) Oh-Sang Kwon, Project Manager-Flood Control (702) Inspection and Testing Ralph Kouns, Construction Services/Inspection (702) Inspectors (702) Land Development Mike Cunningham, Building and Safety Manager (702) Operation and Maintenance Matthew Meyer, Streets and Sanitation Manager (702) Other Chris Marinch, PW (Mapping/GIS) (702) Anthony Willis, IT (Mapping/GIS) (702) City of North Las Vegas 2250 North Las Vegas Blvd., North Las Vegas, NV Mike Hudgeons, City Traffic Engineer (702) Development and Flood Control Robert McLaughlin, Manager (702) Engineering Construction Services Division Joemel Llamado, Deputy Director of Utilities (702) Maintenance Contact Scott Durbin, Utility Maintenance (702) Jeff Freels, Traffic Maintenance (702) John Runiks, Roadway Maintenance (702) Public Works Administration Dale Daffern, Acting Public Works Director (702) Real Property Services Lorena Candelario, Manager (702) Survey Division Gary Hancock, City Surveyor (702) Transportation Services John Runiks, Roadway Operations (702) Water and Sewer Utilities Randy DeVaul, Utilities Director (702) Scott Durbin, Utilities Operations Manager (Acting) (702) Wednesday, August 01, 2018 Page 2 of 7

80 Clark County S. Grand Central Pkwy., Las Vegas, NV Clark County Commission and Managers Dan Kulin, Public Information (702) Construction Management Mike Mamer, Assistant Manager, Offsite Construction (702) Michael Dunning, Principal Civil Engineer (702) Mathew Burke, Supervising Construction Management Inspector (702) Blair Lecker, Senior Construction Management Inspector (702) Design Engineering Joe Yatson, Design Engineering Manager (702) Brooke Prescia, Senior Civil Engineer (702) Ray Falcon, Senior Civil Engineer (702) Harold Elliot, Principal Civil Engineer (702) Kathleen Kingston, Principal Civil Engineer (702) Mona Stammetti, Principal Civil Engineer (702) Ray Kilmer, Principal Civil Engineer (702) Roy Davis, Principal Civil Engineer (702) John Catanese, Associate Civil Engineer (702) Russell Davis, Management Analyst (702) Development Review Erik Denman, Manager (702) Public Works Denis Cederburg, Public Works Director (702) Robert Thompson, Deputy Director (702) Roads Angelo Santovito, Manager (702) Survey James Marlett, County Surveyor (702) Traffic Engineering Kaizad Yazdani, Manager (702) Irene Lam, Senior Civil Engineer (702) Clark County Regional Flood Control District 600 S. Grand Central Pkwy., 3rd Floor, Las Vegas, NV Andrew Trelease, Assistant General Manager (702) Abi Mayrena, Principal Civil Engineer (702) Clark County School District 5100 W. Sahara Ave, Las Vegas, NV Facilities Division Chris Dingell, Coordinator IV ext 5417 (702) Clark County Water Reclamation District 5857 E. Flamingo Rd., Las Vegas, NV Main Number (702) Information Line (702) Construction Manager Kevin Love, Construction Manager (702) Wednesday, August 01, 2018 Page 3 of 7

81 Design Engineering & Construction Management Tim Gibson, Principal Civil Engineer (702) Steve Weber, Sr. Civil Engineer (702) Adam Werner, Manager of Design & Construction (702) Armando Monarrez, Principal Engineer (Construction Management) (702) Development Review Development Review Department (702) Heidi Martell, Principal Civil Engineer Leslie Long, Manager of Design and Construction (702) Developer Inspections (702) GIS & Survey Jason Hall, Senior GIS Analyst (702) Paul LeBaron, Principal Survey Technician (702) Operations & Maintenance Odors and Stoppages Hotline (702) Rick Donahue, Assistant General Manager Collections System (702) Cox Communications 1700 Vegas Dr., Las Vegas, NV Tracy Prince, ROW Supervisor (702) Gene Siegel, ROW Planner III (702) Carlos Rodriguez, ROW Agent II (702) Kern River Transmission Co E. Lone Mountain Rd., North Las Vegas, NV Ortary Davila, Assistant District Manager (702) (702) Brad Poulson, District Manager (702) Maintenance Contact Ortary Davila (702) Kinder Morgan (CalNev, LLC) 5049 N. Sloan Ln., Las Vegas, NV Vern Lacro, Area Manager (702) Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority 3150 Paradise Rd, Las Vegas, NV Patrick Coyne, Sr Director of Convention Services (702) Communications Jeremy Handel, Sr. Director of Communications (702) Las Vegas Metro Chamber of Commerce 575 Symphony Park Ave Ste 100, Las Vegas, NV Government Affairs Paul Moradkhan, Vice President of Government Affairs (702) Justin Harrison, Director of Government Affairs (702) Las Vegas Valley Water District 1001 S. Valley View Blvd., Las Vegas, NV Main Number (702) Wednesday, August 01, 2018 Page 4 of 7

82 Engineering Peter Jauch, Director, P.E. (702) Ryan Pearson, Engineering Design Manager (702) Adriana Ventimiglia, Civil Engineer, P.E. (702) Donald Bittle, Construction Manager (702) John Lyons, Development Inspection Supervisor (702) Robert Mayers, Development Inspection Supervisor (702) GIS Jason Schwartz, Scientific Systems Manager (702) Infrastructure Management Greg Kodweis, Director (702) Doa Meade, Engineering Services Manager (702) Sargent Benson, Electrical Engineer, P.E. (702) Chris Helda, Mechanical Engineer, P.E. (702) Laura B. Jacobsen, Planning Manager (702) Maintenance LVVWD Dispatch (702) Rick Mills, After hours contact (702) Nevada Department of Transportation 1263 S. Stewart St., Carson City, NV Rudy Malfabon, Director (775) Tony Illia, Public Information Officer (702) E. Washington Avenue, Las Vegas, NV Encroachment Permits Charles Molisee, Permit Supervisor (702) Engineering, Maintenance, Construction Mary Martini, District Engineer (702) Mario Gomez, Assistant District Engineer (702) Location Division Eric Warmath, GIS (775) Right of Way, Utilities Division District 1 Doug Johnson, Right-of-Way Agent (702) Vince Adams, Right of Way Agent (702) William "Bill" Harty, Right-of-Way Agent (702) NV Energy 6226 W. Sahara Ave., Las Vegas, NV Pat Brown, Sr. Project Coordinator/ Government Liaison (702) Shawn Arnold, Sr. Coordinator of Government Projects (702) (702) Maintenance Contact, cc: praudenbush@nvenergy.com Ismael Sanchez, isanchez@nvenergy.com (702) Public Utilities Commission of Nevada 1150 East William St., Carson City, NV Kirby Lampley, Regulatory Operations Director (775) West Diablo Dr., Ste 250, Las Vegas, NV Adam Danise, Electrical Engineer (702) Percy Lucban, Electrical Engineer (702) Wednesday, August 01, 2018 Page 5 of 7

83 Regional Transportation Commission 600 S. Grand Central Pkwy., Las Vegas, NV John Penuelas, Director of Engineering Services (702) Joe Damiani, Manager of Engineering Services (702) Dante Bongolan, Project Engineer (702) Chris Schwarz, Regional Traffic Control Coordinator (702) Jeff Truby, GIS Manager (702) Marin Dubois, Management Analyst, Agenda Coordinator (702) Tammy McMahan, Management Analyst, Agenda Coordinator (702) Jennifer Lilore, Administrative Specialist, RPCC Contact (702) Tamika Davis-Edwards, Administrative Specialist, RPCC Contact (702) RTC/Freeway and Arterial System of Transportation 4615 W. Sunset Rd., Las Vegas, NV Shital Patel, Projects and Traffic Operations Manager (702) Jesus Marmolejo, Traffic Systems Maintenance Manager (702) Southern Nevada Water Authority S. Valley View Blvd., Las Vegas, NV Engineering Peter Jauch, Director, P.E. (702) Ryan Pearson, Engineering Design Manager (702) Adriana Ventimiglia, Civil Engineer, P.E. (702) Tahmineh Pennington, Civil Engineer (702) Ross Maxwell, Civil Engineer P.E. (702) Jason Schwartz, Principal GIS Analyst (702) Donald Bittle, Construction Manager (702) John Lyons, Development Inspection Supervisor (702) Robert Mayers, Development Inspection Supervisor (702) Infrastructure Management Greg Kodweis, Director (702) Doug Oliverius, Engineering Plans Examiner I (702) Mike Dishari, Senior Civil Engineer (702) Maintenance SCADA Desk (702) Mark Walters (702) Southwest Gas Corporation P.O. Box 98512, Las Vegas, NV Wendy Thompson, Constuction Analyst (702) Shane Thacker, Construction Manager (702) Christopher Anderson, Engineering Manager (702) Rudy Ricardo, Construction Superintendent (702) Donnie Foster, Construction Superintendent (702) Lawrence Garcia, Engineering Supervisor (702) Engineering Diana Hubbard, Engineering Supervisor (702) Wednesday, August 01, 2018 Page 6 of 7

84 Emergency Contacts Nevada Regional Common Ground Alliance (NRCGA) Contact Phone Number #1 Phone Number #2 Notes Amerigas (Pahrump) AT&T Distribution Press 8 after hours Century Link City of Boulder After Hours: City of Henderson After Hours: City of Las Vegas Public Works CLV Fire Dispatch City of North Las Vegas Clark County Public Works After Hours: 311 Clark County Water Reclamation District Cox Communications After Hours: Holly Energy Partners/UNEV Pipeline Kern River Gas Transmission Company Kinder Morgan Liquid Product ER Las Vegas Valley Water District NDOT NV Energy Southern Nevada Water Authority Southwest Gas Corporation Verizon Business LD/Local Transport: Tampa OCC: Use Code LVCall for VSB & XOLVCal for XO Issues Wednesday, August 01, 2018 Page 7 of 7

85

86 DocuSign Envelope ID: 69A81EBA-A7C8-4F10-B57A-B910EC REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA AGENDA ITEM Metropolitan Planning Organization [X] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ] SUBJECT: PROJECT AND COORDINATION NEEDS PETITIONER: TINA QUIGLEY, GENERAL MANAGER REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER: THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA REGIONAL PROJECT COORDINATION COMMITTEE RECEIVE APPROVED PLANNED PROJECTS FROM MEMBER ENTITIES AND UTILITY COMPANIES (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) GOAL: ENHANCE PUBLIC AWARENESS AND SUPPORT OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM FISCAL IMPACT: None BACKGROUND: This standing item affords the Regional Project Coordination Committee (RPCC) member organizations the opportunity to inform the RPCC and the public about projects that have been approved and are planned to be delivered within three years. Respectfully submitted, JOHN R. PEÑUELAS, JR., P.E. Director of Engineering Services Streets and Highways tde

87

88 DocuSign Envelope ID: 69A81EBA-A7C8-4F10-B57A-B910EC REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA AGENDA ITEM Metropolitan Planning Organization [X] Transit [ ] Administration and Finance [ ] SUBJECT: PROJECT AND COORDINATION NEEDS PETITIONER: TINA QUIGLEY, GENERAL MANAGER REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA RECOMMENDATION BY PETITIONER: THAT THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA REGIONAL PROJECT COORDINATION COMMITTEE DISCUSS PROJECTS THAT ARE STARTING THE ENGINEERING DESIGN PHASE OF PROJECT DELIVERY (FOR POSSIBLE ACTION) GOAL: ENHANCE PUBLIC AWARENESS AND SUPPORT OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM FISCAL IMPACT: None BACKGROUND: This standing item affords the Regional Project Coordination (RPCC) member organizations the opportunity to inform the RPCC and the public of projects that are starting the engineering design phase of project delivery. Respectfully submitted, JOHN R. PEÑUELAS, JR., P.E. Director of Engineering Services Streets and Highways tde

89 BOARD DATE JULY 12, 2018 NEW CONTRACTS REQUESTING DESIGN FUNDS ENTITY PROJECT # STREET NAME! PROJECT NAME FROM TO CONTRACT AMOUNT CLARK COUNTY 135AB1 ARTERIAL RECONSTRUCTION PROGRAM FY 2019 SEE LIST $ 1,025, CLARK COUNTY 213A-FTI2 SLOAN LANE VEGAS VALLEY DRIVE RUBY CREEK DRIVE $ 800, CLARK COUNTY 114D-FTI2 SILVERADO RANCH BOULEVARD JONES AVENUE DEAN MARTIN DRIVE $ 796, LAS VEGAS 211B1 TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 2019 SEE LIST $ 1,035, LAS VEGAS 214A CASINO CENTER DRIVE COLORDO AVENUE WYOMING AVENUE $ 600, LAS VEGAS 037E-FTI2 RANCHO DRIVE SAHARA AVENUE MESQUITE $ 1,650, LAS VEGAS 212A-FTI2 CALIFORNIA DRIVE COMMERCE STREET 3RD STREET $ 500, BOARD DATE AUGUST 9, 2018 NEW CONTRACTS_REQUESTING_DESIGN FUNDS ENTITY PROJECT # STREET NAME / PROJECT NAME FROM TO CONTRACT AMOUNT CLARK COUNTY 113D-FTI2 FORT APACHE ROAD BLUE DIAMOND ROAD WARM SPRINGS ROAD $ 1,000, CLARKCOUNTY 147B-FTI2 CACTUSAVENUE FORTAPACHEROAD BUFFALODRIVE $ 1,500, LAS VEGAS 135AB3 ARTERIAL RECONSTRUCTION PROGRAM FY 2019 SEE LIST $ 100, LAS VEGAS 009P CHARLESTON BOULEVARD & DURANGO DRIVE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT $ 170, LAS VEGAS 215A CC-215 BELTWAY TRAIL ICENTENNIAL ROAD DECATUR BOULEVARD $ 350,000.00

90 EXHIBIT A Arterial Reconstruction Program FY 2019 I25T L VE(,A 1 Alta Drive, Hualapai Way Desert foothills Pavement Overlay 2 Desert Foothills Drive, Charleston Boulevard to far Hills Pavement Overlay 3 Durango Drive, Sahara Avenue Charleston Boulevard Pavement Overlay 4 Hualapai Way, Charleston Boulevard Town Center Drive Pavement Overlay 5 Lake Mead Boulevard, Lexington Street Revere Street Pavement Overlay 6 Pavilion Center Drive, Charleston Boulevard Laurelglen Drive Pavement Overlay 7 Rampart Boulevard, Lake Mead Boulevard Cheyenne Avenue Pavement Overlay 8 Roadway Condition Assessment Study for NDOT Roads to be Transferred to CLV Charleston Boulevard, CC215 to Boulder Highway Sahara Aventie, Rainbow Boulevard to Boulder Highway Fremont Street, 8th Street to Charleston Boulevard

91 Location Traffic Signal Improvements Program FY 2019 Deer Springs/Bradley Roundabout Buffalo/Lone Mountain Traffic Signal Peak/Torrey Pines Traffic Signal Bradley/Alexander Roundabout Elkhorn/Bradley Traffic Signal Elkhorn/Grand Canyon Traffic Signal Farm/Grand Canyon Traffic Signal Operations & Maintenance City-Wide Traffic Signals Exhibit A

92 EXH lb IT A Alexander Road, Pecos Road to Puebla Street Buffalo Drive, Tropicana Avenue to Sahara Avenue - - eoijr 1 Charleston Boulevard, Nellis Boulevard to Whitewind Lane Pebble Road, Eastern Avenue to Pecos Road