Bureau Veritas Áreas de Competência a Projetos de P&D. 1º. Seminário COPEDI 13 e 14 de Março de 2012

Transcription

1 Bureau Veritas Áreas de Competência a Projetos de P&D 1º. Seminário COPEDI 13 e 14 de Março de 2012

2 Outline Global R&D strategy BV Brazil Areas of Excellence R&D Projects 2

3 Global R&D Strategy Standards development Machinery, Pollution and Energy Efficiency Software development R&D Artic Offshore Large Floating Structures 3

4 Global R&D Strategy Areas of excellence HYDROSTAR VeriSTAR Hydrodynamics & Mooring CFD & Sloshing Assessment Hydro - Structure RISK MODEL Structural Integrity & RBI New Technologies Ice Structure Interaction 4

5 Global R&D Strategy Context Offshore ULCS LNGC Alignment of local needs and R&D expertise Increase business growth opportunities Offshore & Complex Vessels (ULCS, LNGC) Milestones January 2006: BV CHINA Advanced Technology Department (B. Le Gallo) June 2008: BV KOREA DR Coordinator (Yun-Suk Chung) January 2011: BV BRAZIL Technology Development Centre (Flavia Rezende) Objective: Perform complex engineering studies; Enhance internal and external communication in order to facilitate innovative initiatives. Contribute to change perception internally Initiate R&D projects and develop partnership with Shipyards, Designers, Operators, R&D institutes, Universities and other companies. 5

6 Global R&D Strategy Our R&D is based on cooperation: Actively participating in FPSO Forum and CRS; Cooperation with Universities (exchange of researchers, scholarship, projects, etc). Participation on several JIPs Cooperation with other companies and R&D institutes 6

7 BV Brazil: Areas of excellence / Focus Topics of focus Dynamics of offshore platforms Hydrodynamics Single-body Multi-body Second order motions Mooring Multi-body (offloading and other marine operations) Poliester modelling Coupling with risers Dynamic Positioning Subsea Global performance Steel Catenary Riser Flexible risers Hybrid Riser Tower Sub-surface buoy Stability Lateral buckling Fatigue Rigid pipes Flexible pipes Risk assessment Qualification of new technologies HAZID FMEA Etc Quantitative risk assessment Dispersion of gas (ex. H2S) Fire and explosion CCS (Carbon Capture and Storage) 7

8 JIP ROLL FPSO ROLL JIP Dynamic effects Hydrostatic effect Frozen WHY? Large roll experienced on several FPSO s in various areas resulting in delay and production loss Prediction methods use empirical data for ships not valid for FPSO s WHAT? Reduction of roll motion s of FPSO s: In-situ behaviour Prediction by model tests and numerically Control of roll motion in design and operation 8

9 JIP CALM BUOY II KEY ISSUE Provide a "Guideline for the analysis of deepwater offloading systems" based on in-field measurements, extra model tests and numerical investigations. BV CONRIBUTION Elaboration of the guidelines Main methodology for buoy design using the different results of the JIP (hydrodynamics of buoy, influence of tanker, In-situ measurements, fatigue prediction) Formulation of drag loads on the buoy and skirt in the numerical models 9

10 JIP SALT Fluid motion modify motions of the ship KEY ISSUES Improve current numerical and experimental tools to predict coupling effects between vessel motion and liquid motion in tanks. Identify conditions when coupling effects are important and derive methodology to assess these effects for different structures. BV CONRIBUTION Leader of WP3 Methodology for coupling effects Elaboration of Guidelines 10

11 JIP HAWAI H A W A I HAWAI JIP SHALLOW Hydro WATER Term HAWAI HYDRODYNAMICS JIP: INITIATIVE Shallow BY water MARIN, hydrodynamics SBM, WL AND BV OBJECTIVE To improve the reliability of offshore (LNG) terminals in shallow water by using the combined expertise of offshore hydrodynamics and coastal engineering to better address key issues regarding motion and mooring prediction methods in shallow water KEY ISSUES Accurate description of near-shore wave climate including LF content Current loads on LNG carriers Drift forces in shallow water KEY ISSUES Effect of bathymetry Accurate description of near-shore wave climate including Low-Frequency content Current loads on LNG carriers BV is the leader of WP3 (195 K ) Hydrodynamic Drift forces in wave shallow loading water 24 participants including, TOTAL, SHELL, PETROBRAS, Effect of bathymetry CONOCOPHILIPS, CHEVRON, STATOIL, TECHNIP, BLUWATER, HYUNDAI, DMSE, MOSS MARITINE, SANDWELL, OCEANIC, MARINTEK, beach PROSAFE, MOFFAT&NICHOL, SOFEC, ABS, DNV, LR, 1:20 R&D in Hydrodynamics of BV 1 11

12 JIP HAWAI H A W A I BV has developed new method to account for bathymetry variation in the diffraction theory: HydroSTAR has been used by SBM as benchmark KEY ISSUES for comparison with other diffraction- radiation software Accurate description of near-shore wave climate including Low-Frequency content Current loads on LNG carriers BV has Drift delivered forces in shallow HydroSTAR water HAWAI (special version Effect of of HydroSTAR): bathymetry a) Diffraction code without treatment First- and second-order wave load computation; new «middle field» formulation; QTF in uni- and bi-directional waves; wave-current effects R&D in Hydrodynamics of BV 1:20 1 b) HydroSTAR using new method 12

13 JIP HAWA II OBJECTIVES To develop a consistent design methodology for offshore terminals in a nearshore wave climate KEY ISSUE Implement the knowledge from JIP HAWAI in the design (engineering) process METHOD Design case study Numerical simulations Model tests BV Participation Computation of radiation coefficients in frequency domain with bathymetry variation 13

14 JIP OFFLOADING OFFLOADING JIP Phase I : Tandem Configuration WHY? Difficulty to design hawsers and mooring systems adapted to this operation. Risks of collision during this operational phase, so it is very important to simulate critical cases. WHAT? Develop and validate tools that can assist in: The evaluation of the design and operation The assessment if limiting weather criteria The risk assessment of offshore offloading operations (phase 1 tandem position, phase 2 side-by-side position) BV CONRIBUTION Shielding effect on wave loading (phase I) Model of hydrodynamic resonance in the gap Most advanced numerical tool HydroStar 14

15 JIP OFFLOADING II BV CONTRIBUTION In-kind contribution on the calibration of dissipation parameter to treat the resonant wave kinematics in the gap using HydroSTAR; OBJECTIVES Execute research into the hydrodynamic aspects of mooring in close proximity; Implement numerical model for the side-byside offloading operation from LNG carriers to LNG FSRU s (two floating structures); 15

16 JIP SLOSHEL OBJECTIVES: Direct Assessment of the Structural Response Improve and complete the sloshing methodology regarding the sloshing impact loading and structural response of containment system and ship structure WHAT? Full scale experiments Numerical models for hydroelastic impacts HOW & WHEN? SLOSHEL project Cooperation with Prof. Korobkin & EGIM WHO? BV Leader MARIN, GTT, SHELL, CHEVRON, ABS, LRS, EGIM, Univ. Novosibirsk 16

17 CO 2 Sequestration CO2Field Lab Performance of Monitoring Techniques Monitoring Protocol, as a Tool for Certification SVELVIK 17

18 BV Brazil: R&D Projects 18

19 BV Brazil: R&D Projects Tandem offloading JRP BV-COPPETEC: On the loads acting on the shuttle tanker during offloading operations in tandem COPPETEC: wind and current loads based on CFD computations and approximated models developped during JIP Offloading I. BV: wave loads based on potential theory assumptions Wave kinematics for shuttle alone Wave kinematics for shuttle with FPSO 19

20 BV Brazil: R&D Projects ARIANE DP: JDP between BV and Chemtech DP module Mooring software DP module integration in Ariane7 New applications: Exploration and production applications Delivery :Option available in Ariane7.0.3 (2012) 20

21 BV Brazil: R&D Projects ARIANE DP: JDP between BV and Chemtech Copyright photo, courtesy of Noble Corporation Copyright photo, courtesy of Framo Engineering 21

22 Reservoir related Well related BV Brazil: R&D Projects (Proposal) CCS Brazil: Partnership with Geogreen Fornecer aos participantes uma metodologia integrada para análise dos riscos associados com injeção de CO 2 no âmbito das operações offshore nos campos do pré-sal Mapear os possíveis modos de falha Identificar sistemas críticos e fornecer um ranking dos riscos Identificar atores e ferramentas para mapeamento dos riscos e incertezas para cada sub-sistema Identificar necessidades para P&D Critical parameters to evaluate event probability Consequence Based Approach - Basic Bow-tie Final potential consequence Unsteady well bore, Choke of Drilling up and down, Mistake during drilling/completion Eruption (Macondo type) Post salt layer structure, Casing destroy after cementing... Default in well completion of injector HC spill in post salt aquifer system CAPTURA TRANSPORTE petrophysical properties, temperature, composition Well integrity failure: Salt properties, well logs, cement vs outside casing, cement quality, type of cement vs inside casing, casing cement, casing, factures in cement, cement and formation Work over Mistake Unproper abandonment technique Well related issues Creation of a path between post and pre-salt layer Loss of well Dissolution of salt layer due to aquifer activity and pressure differential Overcost Delay Inapropriate producer completion Remediation action cost Reputation issue CO 2 migration to producing Well work-over Environmental issue well Dimunution of producing well eficiency Asset efficiency in Jeopardy Drilling of new wells Regulatory and legal issue Reservoir structure, petrophysical properties, temperature, fluid composition, lab testing Geomechanical damage Dissolution of rock arround injector Precipitation / floculation of minerals on the well bore Precipitation / floculation of minerals on the well bore Abandonment of wells Asset abandonment ARMAZENAMENTO Thermal effect Drying effect 22

23 23