Using ontologies to check that requirements are met Subsea Valley 2017 Masterclass

Transcription

1 OIL & GAS Using ontologies to check that requirements are met Subsea Valley 2017 Masterclass Johan W. Klüwer April 5, 2017 SAFER, SMARTER, GREENER

2 Standards, digitalisation and a new approach 2 / 16 DNV GL 2017 April 5, 2017 Using ontologies to check that requirements are met

3 Why we have standards View of boiler lodged in home of Miss Mary Pratt (1905; Wikipedia ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code) 2 / 16 DNV GL 2017 April 5, 2017 Using ontologies to check that requirements are met

4 Competing with algorithms. Finansavisen, November 09, 2015: 3 / 16 DNV GL 2017 April 5, 2017 Using ontologies to check that requirements are met

5 Competing with algorithms.. Finansavisen, November 09, 2015: 4 / 16 DNV GL 2017 April 5, 2017 Using ontologies to check that requirements are met

6 Competing with algorithms Finansavisen, November 09, 2015: 5 / 16 DNV GL 2017 April 5, 2017 Using ontologies to check that requirements are met

7 Enterprise Taxonomy and Ontology Management New on the Gartner curve, / 16 DNV GL 2017 April 5, 2017 Using ontologies to check that requirements are met

8 O&G current ontology applications 7 / 16 DNV GL 2017 April 5, 2017 Using ontologies to check that requirements are met

9 Enterprise ontology: Material Master Aibel Who EPC contractor Aibel supported by DNV GL EIRM What Uniform information management across all EPC project phases: Requirements, designs, and products Why Better quality Higher efficiency How Ontology-based management of requirements, designs, and physical assets. Semantic technology for exchange and reasoning services. 7 / 16 DNV GL 2017 April 5, 2017 Using ontologies to check that requirements are met

10 Johan Sverdrup Drilling Platform (JSDP) MMD is Aibel s enterprise ontology, serving as material master for piping bulk and structural steel at JSDP 8 / 16 DNV GL 2017 April 5, 2017 Using ontologies to check that requirements are met

11 Standards in a modular ontology: Aibel s MMD AL-PROFILES_DIM structural-geometry structural-core DIN_1025-1_DIM DIN_1026-2_DIM EN_ _DIM EN_ _DIM EN_ _DIM EURONORM_19_DIM EURONORM_53_DIM NS_1911_DIM STR_AIBEL_DIM STR_BAR_DIM STR_FASTENER_DIM STR_HP_DIM STR_NUT_DIM STR_PLATE_DIM STR_THREAD_FEA STR_TUB_FEA STR_WASHER_DIM core-collect ALLOY_MAT ASTM_BOLT_MAT NORSOK_M630_MAT ASME_B16_5_MAT ASME_B31_3_MAT ASTM_A-collect UNS_MAT ASTM_B-collect ANNULUS core disciplines CAD_3D_PROP FASTENER_DIM GEOSPATIAL_LOCATION IEC_60079_EX IEC_60529_IP MMD_UOM PLATE_DIM RAL_COD SYSCODE_MMD UNSPSC clients control API_594 piping-valve piping-collect API_600_VALVES API_602_VALVES API_609 API_6D_DESIGN API_6D_DIM ASME_B16_10_DIM ASME_B16_11_DIM ASME_B16_11_MOD ASME_B16_20_DIM ASME_B16_21_DIM ASME_B16_34_VALVES ASME_B16_36_DIM ASME_B16_36_MOD_DIM ASME_B16_47_DIM ASME_B16_5_DIM ASME_B16_9_DIM BOLTING_DIM BOLTING_DIM_2HH0W BOLTING_DIM_2HH1W BOLTING_DIM_2HH2W ELBOW_5D_DIM FLANGE_TAPER_B_DIM ISO_6162_DIM ISO_6164_DIM MANIFOLD_FIT_DIM MECH_J_DIM NORSOK_L_005_DIM OLET_B31_3_DIM OLET_DIM STATOIL_ENS STATOIL_SBR3_DIM STATOIL_SLBN STATOIL_SLBN2 STATOIL_SLBN3 domains-collect API_MAT materials-core ASME_B16_20_MAT ASME_B16_21_MAT ASTM_A_MAT ASTM_B_MAT EN_10025_MAT EN_10088_MAT EN_10210_MAT EN_10219_MAT EN_10225_MAT EN_485_MAT EN_515_MAT EN_755_MAT STR_FASTENER_MAT TR2000_COMMODITY ASME_B16_11_CAD_ATTR piping-bulk ASME_B16_11_MOD_CAD_AT ASME_B16_20_CAD_ATTR materials-collect ASME_B16_21_CAD_ATTR ASME_B16_25_FEA piping-core ASME_B16_47_FEA ASME_B16_5_FEA ASME_B36_10_19_FEA END_PREP_FEA FITTING_PATTERN_FEA ISO_4200_FEA ISO_6162_FEA ISO_6164_FEA MECH_J_FEA NORSOK_L_005_FEA OLET_FEA ASME_B16_47_CAD_ATTR ASME_B16_5_CAD_ATTR ASME_B16_9_CAD_ATTR ASME_B36_10_19_CAD_ATT ASME_PCC_1_DIM ASTM_A105 ASTM_A106 ASTM_A126 ASTM_A135 ASTM_A139 ASTM_A182 ASTM_A203 ASTM_A204 ASTM_A216 ASTM_A217 ASTM_A234 ASTM_A240 ASTM_A268 ASTM_A269 ASTM_A278 ASTM_A283 ASTM_A285 ASTM_A302 ASTM_A312 ASTM_A333 ASTM_A334 ASTM_A335 ASTM_A350 ASTM_A351 ASTM_A352 ASTM_A358 ASTM_A369 ASTM_A376 ASTM_A381 ASTM_A387 ASTM_A403 ASTM_A409 ASTM_A420 ASTM_A426 ASTM_A451 ASTM_A47 ASTM_A479 ASTM_A48 ASTM_A487 ASTM_A494 ASTM_A515 ASTM_A516 ASTM_A524 ASTM_A53 ASTM_A553 ASTM_A571 ASTM_A671 ASTM_A672 ASTM_A691 ASTM_A694 ASTM_A788 ASTM_A789 ASTM_A790 ASTM_A815 ASTM_A860 ASTM_A928 ASTM_A995 ASTM_B148 ASTM_B171 ASTM_B265 ASTM_B333 ASTM_B335 ASTM_B338 ASTM_B348 ASTM_B363 ASTM_B366 ASTM_B367 ASTM_B381 ASTM_B443 ASTM_B444 ASTM_B446 ASTM_B466 ASTM_B467 ASTM_B494 ASTM_B564 ASTM_B619 ASTM_B622 ASTM_B705 ASTM_B861 ASTM_B862 BOLTING_MAT_CAD_ATTR BOLTING_INTERNAL_DIM PIP_BOLT_CAD_ATTR statoil-spec STATOIL_MAT MDS_TEST_CRIT_STATOIL ELBOW_5D_CAD_ATTR NORSOK_M120_MAT EN_10088_MDS STR_SSTEEL_MAT NORSOK_M121_MAT admin MANIFOLD_FIT_CAD_ATTR MECH_J_CAD_ATTR MMD_USERS skos-mmd NORSOK-Z-014 WCO_HS standards NORSOK_L_005_CAD_ATTR OLET_CAD_ATTR statoil-client statoil-plants STR_STOCK_NO STATOIL_SLBN_CAD_ATTR STATOIL_VSK_V852_DIM VALVE_COMMODITY astm_a-collect commodity structural-collect STR_TUB_DIM SYSTEM TR2000_VDS UNSPSC_REF client-core manuf-core client-spec da-core da-collect pdc PIP_DA STR_DA manuf-data manufacturers prod-core pav-mmd iso PDC_PIP_ PDC_PIP_ PDC_STR_ PDC_STR_ PDC_STR_ PDC_STR_ AIBEL_FEA MISSING product PIP_QN STR_QN 9 / 16 DNV GL 2017 April 5, 2017 Using ontologies to check that requirements are met

12 Collaborating with ontologies The standards of the digital world will be ontologies. A typical industrial software application is analogous to the unverified boiler of pre-standardisation process industry. The algorithm is open and standardised OWL reasoning. 10 / 16 DNV GL 2017 April 5, 2017 Using ontologies to check that requirements are met

13 Industrial user community The Norwegian community adopting ontologies: Aibel Aker DNV GL EPIM Based on standards: ISO using W3C s OWL / 16 DNV GL 2017 April 5, 2017 Using ontologies to check that requirements are met

14 Demonstration: Reasoning with requirements 12 / 16 DNV GL 2017 April 5, 2017 Using ontologies to check that requirements are met

15 Work process: Requirements checking 1. Build knowledge base/vocabulary the core domain ontology mainly from standards 2. Build plant model mainly from enterprise engineering database 3. Build product database from manufacturer/vendor catalogues 4. Ask the resulting knowledge base about compatibilities 12 / 16 DNV GL 2017 April 5, 2017 Using ontologies to check that requirements are met

16 Case description: A valve on a manifold We have a subsea facility called Subsea A. This has a part Manifold A, which has part Piping Segment A, and again a part my valve, which is a tag a functional object. The project Develop Manifold A is responsible for designing the manifold. 13 / 16 DNV GL 2017 April 5, 2017 Using ontologies to check that requirements are met

17 Three valve product types There are three valve product classes defined, ACME A, ACME B, and Super X. We have chosen values for some selected attributes so that ACME A will not be suitable for the my valve tag, but the other two have sufficient attribute values. These are the products: Valve_id Name Class Manufacturer_name MWP Cv Tmin Tmax Dim ACME_Valve_A ACME A on/off valve rdl:actuated_onoff_valve ACME ACME_Valve_B ACME B on/off valve rdl:actuated_onoff_valve ACME Super_Valve_X Super X on/off valve rdl:actuated_onoff_valve SuperValves This is my valve (Operating Temp will be matched with Tmin, Tmax in the above table). MWP Cv Operating Temp / 16 DNV GL 2017 April 5, 2017 Using ontologies to check that requirements are met

18 NORSOK U-001 and M-650 qualification The development project is a NORSOK U-001 project. This class of projects carries a constraint saying all designed artefacts are U-001 Compliant. Furthermore, the ontology states that all Isolation Valves designed in this particular project are High Performance high alloy items, which carries a requirement (from U-001) that they may only be manufactured by M-650 qualified manufacturers. There are two manufacturers, ACME and SuperValves. ACME has the M-650 qualification. For SuperValves, we know only that it is a Manufacturer. 15 / 16 DNV GL 2017 April 5, 2017 Using ontologies to check that requirements are met

19 Interactive demonstration using the Protégé ontology workbench 16 / 16 DNV GL 2017 April 5, 2017 Using ontologies to check that requirements are met

20 Thanks! Johan W. Klüwer 16 / 16 DNV GL 2017 April 5, 2017 Using ontologies to check that requirements are met