Key words: fluoroscopy, dose-area-product, kerma-area-product, calibration of KAP meters, patient exposure

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Key words: fluoroscopy, dose-area-product, kerma-area-product, calibration of KAP meters, patient exposure"

Transcription

1 Accuracy and calibration of integrated radiation output indicators in diagnostic radiology: A report of the AAPM Imaging Physics Committee Task Group 190 Pei-Jan P. Lin a) Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia Beth A. Schueler Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota Stephen Balter Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York Keith J. Strauss Children s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio Kevin A. Wunderle Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio M. Terry LaFrance Baystate Health Systems, Inc., Springfield, Massachusetts Don-Soo Kim Children s Hospital Boston, Boston, Massachusetts Richard H. Behrman Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts S. Jeff Shepard University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas Ishtiaq H. Bercha Children s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado (Received 29 April 2015; revised 4 September 2015; accepted for publication 19 October 2015; published 6 November 2015) Due to the proliferation of disciplines employing fluoroscopy as their primary imaging tool and the prolonged extensive use of fluoroscopy in interventional and cardiovascular angiography procedures, dose-area-product (DAP) meters were installed to monitor and record the radiation dose delivered to patients. In some cases, the radiation dose or the output value is calculated, rather than measured, using the pertinent radiological parameters and geometrical information. The AAPM Task Group 190 (TG-190) was established to evaluate the accuracy of the DAP meter in Since then, the term DAP-meter has been revised to air kerma-area product (KAP) meter. The charge of TG 190 (Accuracy and Calibration of Integrated Radiation Output Indicators in Diagnostic Radiology) has also been realigned to investigate the Accuracy and Calibration of Integrated Radiation Output Indicators which is reflected in the title of the task group, to include situations where the KAP may be acquired with or without the presence of a physical meter. To accomplish this goal, validation test protocols were developed to compare the displayed radiation output value to an external measurement. These test protocols were applied to a number of clinical systems to collect information on the accuracy of dose display values in the field. C 2015 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. [ Key words: fluoroscopy, dose-area-product, kerma-area-product, calibration of KAP meters, patient exposure TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND INFORMATION A KAP, the units, and the geometry B Regulatory requirement C Digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) radiation dose structured report (RDSR) D Integrated radiation output indicators INTEGRATED RADIATION OUTPUT SYSTEM VALIDATION METHOD Med. Phys. 42 (12), December /2015/42(12)/6815/15/$ Am. Assoc. Phys. Med. 6815

2 6816 Lin et al.: AAPM TG 190 Report on KAP-meter accuracy A Protocol overview A.1 An external radiation dosimeter A.2 Attenuator A.3 Field-size measurement plate A.4 Radiation detector/fsmp stand B Interventional fluoroscopy system protocol (vertical geometry) B.1 Determination of focal spot location. 6 3.B.2 Determination of isocenter location. 6 3.B.3 Measurement setup for K a,r and radiation field size B.4 Measurement process B.5 Calculation process C Interventional fluoroscopy system protocol (horizontal geometry) C.1 Determination of focal spot location. 8 3.C.2 Measurement setup C.3 Measurement process C.4 Calculation process D Undertable fluoroscopy system protocol D.1 Measurement setup D.2 Measurement process D.3 Calculation process E Overtable fluoroscopy system protocol E.1 Measurement setup E.2 Measurement process E.3 Calculation process F Multipurpose fluoroscopy system protocol G Mobile C-arm system protocol G.1 Measurement setup G.2 Measurement process G.3 Calculation process H Mini-C-arm protocol H.1 Measurement setup H.2 Measurement process H.3 Calculation process I Radiographic systems protocol I.1 Measurement setup I.2 Measurement process I.3 Calculation process DISCUSSION A Sources of uncertainty A.1 External dosimeter reading uncertainty A.2 External detector location uncertainty A.3 Displayed dose value accuracy A.4 X-ray field-size measurement uncertainty B KAP meter performance variation with beam quality SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS A APPENDIX A: THE FIELD-SIZE MEASUREMENT PLATE AND STAND B APPENDIX B: THE HORIZONTAL GEOMETRICAL ARRANGEMENT NOMENCLATURE INTRODUCTION Over the past two decades, several publications have addressed concerns on the dramatic increase of radiation dose patients receive from fluoroscopic examinations has increased dramatically. 1 3 This has been due in part to the proliferation of medical disciplines that are new to the application of fluoroscopy, in employing this imaging tool in their patient care. 1,2 On the other hand, the development of complex surgical procedures resulted in prolonged extensive use of fluoroscopy in interventional and cardiovascular angiography procedures which contributed substantial increase in radiation exposures to patients. 3 5 To better understand and control this increase in dose, manufacturers began providing real-time displays of the radiation dose that a patient was receiving. These realtime displays work by either performing calculations using the pertinent generator parameters and geometrical information or by measuring the x-ray beam directly with what is known as a dose-area-product (DAP) meter. The AAPM Task Group 190 (TG-190) was established in 2008 initially to assess the accuracy of the DAP meter. Since then, the term DAP-meter has been revised to air kerma-area product (KAP) meter. Furthermore, the charge of TG 190 has been realigned to investigate the Accuracy and Calibration of Integrated Radiation Output Indicators which is reflected in the title of the task group (Accuracy and Calibration of Integrated Radiation Output Indicators in Diagnostic Radiology), to include situations where the KAP may be acquired with or without a physical meter. To accomplish that goal, validation test protocols for different equipment types were developed to compare the displayed radiation output value to an external measurement. These test protocols were applied to a number of clinical systems to collect information on the accuracy of radiation output in the field. 2. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 2.A. KAP, the units, and the geometry The KAP is the air kerma integrated over the area of the exposure field in the plane perpendicular to the beam axis. The value of KAP is independent of the distance from the x- ray source since the air kerma decreases proportionally to the square of the distance from the source while the x-ray beam area increases proportionally to the square of that distance. When displayed on radiographic and fluoroscopic systems, the units of KAP used will vary with manufacturer, equipment type, and software revision, including (Gy-cm 2 ), (cgy-cm 2 ), (mgy-m 2 ), and (µgy-m 2 ). The mgy displayed by fluoroscopic systems is the accumulated air kerma at a demarcated reference point (RP) K a,r. This quantity is defined under lowscatter conditions with all removable attenuators (e.g., tabletop and pad) removed from the beam-path between the x-ray source and the measurement point. The RP is defined to approximate the location of the patient s entrance skin surface. This location will differ for various fluoroscopic equipment configurations. The RP may also be specified by the manufacturer at an alternative

3 6817 Lin et al.: AAPM TG 190 Report on KAP-meter accuracy 6817 location which represents the location of the patient s entrance skin surface. Listed in Table I is a summary of RP locations defined by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA, 21CFR ). 6 It should be noted that actual patient skin dose will likely be different from the displayed K a,r value. K a,r represents an approximate sum of air kerma delivered to all areas of the patient s skin exposed to fluoroscopic radiation during the procedure. In most procedures, the x-ray beam is moved to different entrance locations, exposing different skin areas, so that the air kerma to any one anatomical area will be lower than the accumulated total. As pointed out by Jones and Pasciak, skin dose estimation must also account for backscatter, tabletop and pad attenuation, soft tissue f -factor, and the actual source to skin distance. 7 2.B. Regulatory requirement Both International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC 2000) 8 and (IEC 2010) 9 and the FDA, 6 for equipment manufactured after June 2006, require fluoroscopy equipment to display the cumulative K a,r and the K a,r rate during the procedure at the operator s working position. IEC also requires that an indication of the KAP value be provided. As a TABLE I. Nominal reference point (RP) location specifications for different fluoroscope types. a Fluoroscope type Vertical orientation fixed C-arm system Horizontal orientation fixed C-arm, L-arm, or lateral system Undertable x-ray tube Overtable x-ray tube Mobile C-arm Mini-C-arm Radiographic unit Reference point (RP) location 15 cm from the isocenter toward the x-ray source along the centerline of x-ray beam 15 cm from the centerline of the x-ray table and in the direction of the x-ray source with the end of the beam-limiting device or spacer positioned as closely as possible to the point of measurement 1 cm above the tabletop or cradle 30 cm above the tabletop with the end of the beam-limiting device or spacer positioned as closely as possible to the point of measurement 30 cm from the entrance surface of the image receptor toward the x-ray source along the centerline of x-ray beam Typically located 3 6 cm from the image receptor toward the x-ray source along the centerline of x-ray beam 30 cm above the tabletop toward the x-ray source along the centerline of x-ray beam, with the end of the beam-limiting device or spacer positioned as closely as possible to the point of measurement Note: The cumulative air kerma represents the value for conditions of free-in-air irradiation at one of the RP locations specified according to the type of fluoroscope. Alternative locations of the RP may be specified by the manufacturer. The user is advised to refer to Instructions for Use or Operator s Manual to verify the RP location for the system. a 21CFR , Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Volume 8, Performance Standards for Ionizing Radiation Emitting Products: Fluoroscopic Equipment, April 1, result, both K a,r and KAP are displayed on most fluoroscopic systems. These requirements and/or regulations also specify the accuracy requirements for K a,r and KAP values. The displayed K a,r value shall not deviate from the actual value by more than ±35% above 100 mgy (Refs. 6 and 9) and KAP shall not deviate from the actual value by more than ±35% above 2.5 Gy-cm 2. 7,9 2.C. Digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) radiation dose structured report (RDSR) More recently, some fluoroscopic systems have begun to provide a report file that contains a summary of procedure dose information for later analysis and recording. The RDSR, as specified by DICOM 2011 standards, 10 contains detailed dose and geometry data for each irradiation event (individual fluoroscopy or image acquisition sequence) and an accumulated dose summary for the entire procedure. In addition, the RDSR includes fields for the recording of information related to the calibration of dose values and calibration factors to account for the deviation of the displayed dose from the external measurement. Table II is a summary of the dose calibration data fields specified. It should be noted that the calibration factor is not utilized by the equipment manufacturer to modify the displayed dose values. Instead, the calibration information is to be utilized by the customer, typically a medical physicist. The calibration factor, accounting for tabletop attenuation, backscatter, and geometry considerations, for example, may be applied to the dose values that are displayed or recorded in the RDSR to allow for greater accuracy in individual patient dose estimation. Additional specification of RDSR content has been provided in a publicly available specification from IEC (IEC 2007). 11 This prestandard defines four levels of conformance with specified RDSR elements required for each level. For all levels above level 0 limited conformance (level 1 limited dose monitoring, level 2 general dose monitoring, level 3 advanced dose monitoring), the dose calibration elements included in Table II must be provided. Furthermore, level 2 conformance includes the source to reference point distance and the collimated field area per irradiation event. TABLE II. RDSR dose calibration definitions. Attribute Calibration Calibration date Calibration factor Calibration uncertainty Calibration responsible party Definition Procedure used to calibrate measurements or measurement devices Last calibration date for the integrated dose meter or dose calculation Factor by which a measured or calculated value is multiplied to obtain the estimated real-world value Uncertainty of the actual value. Value ranges from 0% to 100% Individual or organization responsible for calibration

4 6818 Lin et al.: AAPM TG 190 Report on KAP-meter accuracy 6818 Section 2.D of this report includes detailed methods for measurement of the calibration factor for various equipment types. To provide a method to enter this information into the RDSR for individual interventional fluoroscopy systems, a user quality control mode has been specified in a National Electrical Manufacturers Association standard (NEMA XR ). 12 Note that currently the RDSR provides for entry of a single calibration factor. A single calibration factor may not be sufficient to account for the complexity encountered in all types of fluoroscopy equipment and clinical geometry. However, the attenuation due to the tabletop for a given system may be applied. Therefore, it is possible that the dose display correction factor may be different for K a,r and KAP and/or differ for variations in beam quality and dose rate. Additional examination of this issue is included in Sec. 4. For convenience, a summary of acronyms and abbreviations employed in this report is provided in Nomenclature. 2.D. Integrated radiation output indicators Several different methods are currently used by manufacturers of radiographic and fluoroscopic equipment to provide a measurement or estimate of K a,r and KAP. One common method is direct measurement of KAP with a KAP-meter. The KAP-meter is a thin, parallel-plate transmission ionization chamber that is fixed in the x-ray tube-collimator assembly, typically at the end of the collimator and at all times intercepts the entire x-ray field. In order to estimate K a,r, the KAP is divided by the irradiated field area at the RP location. The exposure area is determined by system indicators of the collimator blade position. Using this method, KAP accuracy will depend on the accuracy of the KAP-meter itself and K a,r accuracy will depend on both the KAP-meter accuracy and the field-size measurement. Instead of direct KAP measurement, some models determine K a,r computationally based on x-ray tube output for given technique factors and added filtration. KAP can then be estimated by multiplying K a,r by the x-ray beam area. For this method, K a,r accuracy will depend on the accuracy of x-ray output values that are used and KAP accuracy will depend on both the K a,r computation and the field-size measurement. 3. INTEGRATED RADIATION OUTPUT SYSTEM VALIDATION METHOD 3.A. Protocol overview The following sections describe integrated radiation output indicator validation protocols for various types of fluoroscopic and radiographic equipment configurations. 3.B. Interventional fluoroscopy, vertical x-ray beam. 3.C. Interventional fluoroscopy, horizontal x-ray beam. 3.D. Undertable x-ray fluoroscopy. 3.E. Overtable x-ray fluoroscopy. 3.F. Multipurpose fluoroscopy (C-arm with integrated table). 3.G. Mobile C-arms. 3.H. Minimobile C-arms. 3.I. Radiographic systems. For each equipment configuration, irradiation data are collected from both an external dosimeter and the system s integrated radiation output display. The measurements from the external dosimeter are compared to the system s internal display. This process yields a correction factor C where C(x) = measured external value/system s displayed value, where x is either K a,r or KAP. A system with C < 1.0 will display a value that is greater than the external value, and a system with C > 1.0 will display a value that is smaller than the external value. The following materials are required to perform validation measurements. 3.A.1. An external radiation dosimeter The dosimeter should be able to make accurate measurements over the appropriate air kerma and beam quality range. It should have a traceable current calibration based on relevant beam qualities. The measured external air kerma value should include necessary adjustments for the calibration factor of the dosimeter and appropriate temperature-pressure corrections. A note on the requirements of this section: Typically, the dosimeter is calibrated with standard radiation quality RQR 5 [70 kilovolt peak (kvp), homogeneity coefficient 0.71, nominal first HVL 2.58 mm Al] and/or RQR 8 (100 kvp, homogeneity coefficient 0.68, nominal first HVL 3.97 mm Al) as specified in Table 4 of IEC ed The energy response over the kv should be better than ±2.5% of the RQR calibration points. It is possible to use an external KAP-meter to perform validation measurements. This device will allow for direct validation of displayed KAP values and calculated K a,r values with measurement of the field area. Also available are dual chamber KAP-meters which incorporate a small detector to allow for simultaneous KAP and K a,r measurement. For either type of meter, a current calibration is needed for accurate validation measurements. It is important to note that when performing validation measurements, external KAP-meters and radiation dosimeters without incorporated lead backing should be placed so that the sensitive area of the dosimeter is not in a region where the measurement may be impacted by backscatter from the image receptor. A spacing of at least 10 cm away from the image receptor is recommended, for an irradiated field size of cm 2. The dosimeter will be operated in integrate mode to allow for accumulation of sufficient air kerma (a minimum of 50 mgy is suggested) for improved radiation output accuracy. In integrate mode, multiple acquisitions or fluoroscopy irradiation events can be combined to achieve the desired air kerma total. Use of an automatic reset mode is allowable; in this mode, the integrated dose is reset at the start of each exposure. Use of a dose rate mode for fluoroscopy measurements is not recommended due to variations in the radiation output delivered over time. This is particularly important in

5 6819 Lin et al.: AAPM TG 190 Report on KAP-meter accuracy 6819 interventional systems in acquisition (cine) modes, which can have substantial variations by design. 3.A.2. Attenuator An attenuator consisting of copper sheets of approximately 1 mm totaling at least 8 mm is required. Copper is selected as the attenuator to reduce weight and excessive x-ray scatter production. The copper sheets should be large enough (at least cm) to cover the collimated exposure field and placed as close as possible to the image receptor. The copper sheets do not need to be high purity. Commonly available copper sheets, type C101 with 99.99% purity, are acceptable. The purpose of the copper is only to drive the fluoroscope within the target kvp range. Individual copper sheets approximately 1 mm (or, alternatively 1/32 in.) thick are recommended to allow for adjustment of the total attenuator thickness as needed. This thickness of attenuator will typically drive a fluoroscopic system under automatic dose rate control to moderately high kvp and K a,r rates. Use of high kvp minimizes deviations in KAP-meter accuracy that are common at low kvp and use of high K a,r rates allows for more rapid accumulated air kerma measurements A.3. Field-size measurement plate The plate should contain radio-opaque ruled demarcations in orthogonal directions to allow for measurement of the exposure field area. A sample field-size measurement plate (FSMP) is depicted in Fig. 1. On the FSMP, the cutout is 7 7 cm in size which serves two purposes. It is a blank space to accommodate a 30 cm 3 flat pancake-type ionization chamber typically 5 cm in diameter or smaller. The physical size of the square (7 7 cm) pro- FIG. 2. Enlarged view of FSMP. vides a 49 cm 2 area for KAP measurement. (To be exact, a cm 2 would provide a 50 cm 2 area.) The 10, 15, and 20 cm square boxes and the radio-opaque ruled demarcations work as landmarks aiding setup and measurements of the radiation field size. Small lead numbers may be embedded to assist in identifying the field size. One enlarged section of the radio-opaque ruler on the FSMP is shown in Fig. 2. Note that the linewidth of radio-opaque ruler and the square boxes is 1 mm. 3.A.4. Radiation detector/fsmp stand If using the interventional fluoroscopy system protocol (vertical geometry) method described below, a stand to hold the radiation dosimeter and field-size measurement plate is useful. The stand may be as simple as using the FSMP itself, as described later in Sec. 3.C.3, securely affixed and extended out from the tabletop for the field-size measurement. The FSMP may also be employed as a supporting device to hold the radiation detector. Alternatively, a more elaborate stand can be fabricated to hold the FSMP and the detector in a more convenient configuration. One such example of FSMP stand is shown in Appendix A. FIG. 1. Field-size measurement plate (FSMP). 3.B. Interventional fluoroscopy system protocol (vertical geometry) This section of the report is specific to isocentric fluoroscopes with a fixed focal spot to isocenter distance [source to axis distance (SAD)]. The default RP location is along the central ray of the x-ray beam at a distance of 15 cm from the isocenter toward the x-ray tube. Note that any particular system might have a different RP location. This and other important geometric dimensions are available in the Instructions for Use or Operator s Manual that the manufacturer is required to supply with each system. This method makes use of the FSMP at the plane of radiation measurements for the positioning of the dosimeter as well as the placement and thickness adjustment of the copper sheets. In addition, the physical sizes of the copper sheets need to be large enough to encompass the entire area of the x-ray beam at the location of the tabletop.

6 6820 Lin et al.: AAPM TG 190 Report on KAP-meter accuracy 6820 The measurement procedure includes a method to determine the exact location of the focal spot within the x-ray tube housing and a method to verify the location of the isocenter of the C-arm gantry. Once this information is obtained for a system, it need not be repeated for subsequent measurements. 3.B.1. Determination of focal spot location In some cases, the focal spot location may not be marked on the x-ray tube housing or a precise determination of the focal spot location is desired. To find the location, two test objects will be employed; a 1 1 cm and a 2 2 cm copper sheets (1 mm thick). The 1 1 cm copper sheet can be placed on the tabletop or a stand where the FSMP is located while the 2 2 cm copper sheet is attached to the front face of the image receptor. The exact location of the focal spot can then be determined as follows. (1) All clinically removable attenuators except the x-ray table (i.e., removable without tools) shall be removed from the path between the x-ray tube assembly and the measuring detector before acquiring data. (2) Place the 1 1 cm copper sheet on the FSMP (which is securely affixed on and extended from the tabletop) and attach the 2 2 cm copper sheet on the front cover of the image receptor housing assembly as shown in Fig. 3. Both copper sheets should be aligned and placed in the center of the imaging field as shown on the top right of Fig. 3. (3) During fluoroscopy with the x-ray beam vertical, either change the elevation of the tabletop or the elevation of the image receptor until the size of the two copper sheet test objects in the fluoroscopic image is identical. This will place the small 1 1 cm copper sheet exactly midway between the focal spot and the 2 2 cm copper sheet. The images of copper sheets appear as shown on bottom right of Fig. 3. When both sheets appear the same in size, by triangulation, A is equal to B (A = B). (4) Without moving the vertical position of the examination table or the detector, carefully measure the distance between the two copper sheets. Make sure that the tape measure is vertical during this measurement; it may be necessary to move the table horizontally to ensure this. Then, measure the distance from the 1 1 cm copper sheet test object to the x-ray tube. This will provide the location of the focal spot. This location can be marked permanently on the x-ray tube housing surface for future reference. (5) Using the determined focal spot location, measure the distance from the focal spot to the exit point of the x-ray tube housing assembly (SHD). 3.B.2. Determination of isocenter location (1) All clinically removable attenuators (i.e., removable without tools) shall be removed from the path between the x-ray tube assembly and the measuring detector before acquiring data. This can be accomplished either by retracting the examination table or using a horizontal x-ray beam. (2) Set the system to the medium field-of-view (FOV) with the collimator opened to its fullest extent. The medium FOV, typically, is a 23 cm image intensifier input field size or a cm flat panel image receptor. (3) Set the gantry to the maximum source to image receptor distance (SID) that allows free rotation of the gantry. (4) Tape a small lead marker to the surface of the tabletop. Or, use the FSMP in place of the tabletop as continuation of Sec. 3.B.1. (5) Set the x-ray beam to a vertical orientation: The small radio-opaque marker is placed approximately at isocenter by moving the tabletop horizontally. (6) Set the x-ray beam to a horizontal orientation: Center the radio-opaque marker by adjusting tabletop height. (7) Repeat steps (5) and (6) until the marker does not move across the field as the gantry is rotated. The marker is now at the isocenter. (8) Orient the x-ray beam vertically with the tube over the table. (9) Without moving the vertical elevation of the x-ray table, carefully measure the vertical distance from the focal spot marking on the x-ray tube housing to the lead marker taped to the tabletop. Note that moving the table horizontally may be included during this measurement to ensure that the tape measure is vertically oriented. Record this distance as the focal spot to isocenter distance, SAD. FIG. 3. Geometry of utilizing two copper sheets for localization of focal spot, under vertical geometry. 3.B.3. Measurement setup for K a,r and radiation field size (1) All clinically removable attenuators (i.e., removable without tools) shall be removed from the path between

7 6821 Lin et al.: AAPM TG 190 Report on KAP-meter accuracy 6821 the x-ray tube assembly and the measuring detector before acquiring data. (2) The examination tabletop should be moved to its maximum height. To the extent practicable, there should be no objects, including the x-ray table, in the x-ray beam that can scatter x-rays from within 10 cm of the sensitive volume of the measuring detector. (3) Set the x-ray beam to a vertical orientation. (4) Set the gantry to the maximum SID. (5) Set the system to a medium FOV with open collimation. (6) Affix the FSMP on the tabletop as shown in Fig. 4. The field-size measurement pattern is extended out from the tabletop and into air. Place the external dosimeter in the cutout of the FSMP and centered within FSMP. (7) Using a tape measure, carefully measure and record the distance from the focal spot to the center of the external dosimeter (source to detector distance, SDD). (8) Set the system to a FOV of approximately 17 cm (diagonal) at the image receptor and maximum SID. Note: A legacy of circular image intensifier specification. A 17 cm diagonal flat panel image receptor is equivalent to 6 7 in. round FOV of an image intensifier. (9) Set the collimators using the cm 2 marker on the FSMP. All edges of the irradiated field should be seen on the monitor almost superimposed on the square box and well within the full FOV border. (If the penumbra makes the location of the edge uncertain, place the corresponding edge of the cm 2 marker on the FSMP to the middle of the penumbra.) (10) Place an attenuator (approximately a total of 8 mm Cu) on the tabletop so it completely intercepts the x- ray beam. (11) Select the medium dose rate modes for fluoroscopy. If the system only has two dose rate mode choices, then select the higher. FIG. 4. Measurement setup for K a,r and radiation field size. (12) Do a test irradiation. Adjust the attenuator thickness if this is necessary to bring the displayed tube voltage into the kvp range and record the attenuator thickness required. Note on the selection of tube voltage in the range of kvp. (i) It is preferred to have one measurement point for verification of accuracy and calibration of integrated output indicators. (ii) The tube potential for various fluoroscopic examinations, typically, falls in the kvp range. (iii) The TG 190 members compared a half dozen radiation detectors typically employed in the field and found better agreement amongst different types of detectors at kvp (<5%) than at kvp ( 15%). 3.B.4. Measurement process The following procedure should be done both with the fluoroscopic and the acquisition mode, using the amount of filtration appropriate for each to bring the displayed tube voltage into the kvp range. (1) Collect data using the external dosimeter in the integrate mode. (2) Precision is increased if each measurement is appropriately replicated (three is suggested). The coefficient of variation in the value of C calculated from the repeated measurements (see Sec. 3.B.5) should be less than (3) Record the initial displayed system values of K a,r and KAP and the external dosimeter reading before each irradiation. If using the external dosimeter s autodose mode, you need not record the external reading. (4) Each irradiation should be long enough so that the resolution of the digital displays does not significantly limit the accuracy of the measurements. For example, for a system that displays K a,r in units of mgy in a whole number (rounded to the nearest integer value), the external dosimeter should show approximately 50 mgy after each irradiation. (5) Record the final displayed system values of K a,r and KAP and the external dosimeter reading after each irradiation. Record the associated generator factors (kvp, ma, ms, beam filter) if available. (6) Calculate C(K a,r ) using the process described in Eq. (3) in Sec. 3.B.5. (7) Remove the external dosimeter from the beam without disturbing the collimator setting. (8) Place the FSMP at isocenter by rotating the gantry between the vertical and the horizontal imaging projections to confirm the correct placement of the FSMP at the isocenter. (9) Perform a fluorographic irradiation (nonsubtracted) to image the FSMP, or a fluoroscopic irradiation with last image hold.

8 6822 Lin et al.: AAPM TG 190 Report on KAP-meter accuracy 6822 (10) Determine the field size at isocenter by observing the image of the FSMP on the system monitor. If the system is equipped with black shutters or automatic masking these should be turned off before making this measurement. Record the two dimensions of the rectangular field as AL and AW. 3.B.5. Calculation process (1) Calculate the measured KAP, KAP = [measured K amas ] AW AL, (1) where K amas is the accumulated air kerma measured with the external dosimeter at isocenter. If using integrate rather than autodose mode, this is the value recorded after an irradiation event minus the value recorded before the event. (2) Calculate the air kerma K a,r at the RP by multiplying the measured air kerma at isocenter K a,sad by a geometric factor G1, G1 = [SAD/(SAD RPD)] 2, (2) where RPD = isocenter to reference point distance K a,r = [measured K a,sad ] G1. (3) For example, for SAD = 750 mm, RPD = 150 mm, G1 = [750/( )] 2 = (3) Calculate the correction factor C separately for each irradiation event for both K a,r and KAP. Caution: The following processes may need further corrections to account for the dose units in which a particular fluoroscope displays KAP. (a) C(KAP) is determined by dividing the measured KAP value by the KAP value displayed by the system. (b) C(K a,r ) is determined by dividing the measured K a,r value by the K a,r value displayed by the system. (4) Average the individual C factors over the measurement repetitions for K a,r, and separately for KAP. 3.C. Interventional fluoroscopy system protocol (horizontal geometry) While this section is similar to Sec. 3.B, an important difference is that the dosimetry measurements are completed with a horizontal as opposed to a vertical x-ray beam geometry. the x-ray tube assembly and the measuring detector before acquiring data. (2) As much as practicable and possible, there should be no objects that can scatter x-rays within 10 cm of the sensitive volume of the measuring detector. Specific attention should be directed toward the location of the tabletop and the supports for the measuring detector. (3) Set the system to a medium FOV with open collimation. (Typically 6 9 in. or cm FOV.) (4) Set the gantry to the maximum SID that allows free rotation of the gantry. (5) Set the x-ray beam to a vertical orientation. The external dosimeter is placed approximately at isocenter by moving the table horizontally. Note that the radiation detector may be suspended in air or placed on the FSMP. This is described in Sec. 3.B.3, Fig. 4, and the corresponding photographs in Fig. 7 of the Appendix. (6) Set the x-ray beam to a horizontal orientation. Center the detector by adjusting table height. See Appendix B for a photograph and description of the setup. (7) When the detector appears to rotate in the image but remains fixed at the center of the field of view as the gantry rotates, it is at isocenter. Repeat steps (5) and (6) until the detector does not move across the field as the gantry is rotated. (8) Use a tape measure to determine the distance from the focal spot to the chamber and record this distance as the SAD. (9) Rotate the system for a horizontal x-ray beam. (10) Set the system to a FOV of approximately 17 cm (or 22 cm) at the image receptor and maximum SID. (11) Set the collimators using the cm 2 marker on the FSMP. All edges of the irradiated field should be seen on the monitor almost superimposed on the square box and well within the full FOV border. (12) Attach an attenuator ( 8 mm Cu) to the face of the image receptor. The attenuator thickness may need to be adjusted later to yield kvp while taking measurements. (13) Select the medium dose rate modes for fluoroscopy. If the system only has two dose rate mode choices, then select the higher. (14) Do a test irradiation. Adjust the attenuator thickness if this is necessary to bring the displayed tube voltage into the kvp range and record the attenuator thickness required. 3.C.1. Determination of focal spot location Follow the procedure in Sec. 3.B.1. 3.C.2. Measurement setup (1) All clinically removable attenuators (i.e., removable without tools) shall be removed from the path between 3.C.3. Measurement process Follow the procedure described in Sec. 3.B.4. 3.C.4. Calculation process Follow the procedure described in Sec. 3.B.5.

9 6823 Lin et al.: AAPM TG 190 Report on KAP-meter accuracy D. Undertable fluoroscopy system protocol This section of the report addresses fluoroscopic systems with x-ray tubes mounted under the procedure table. These units typically have variable SIDs between 75 and 120 cm. The default RP is located 1 cm above the procedure table. (Note that any particular make or model may have a different RP location and this should be confirmed in the vendor documentation.) 3.D.1. Measurement setup (1) Remove any table pads from the path between the x-ray tube and the measuring detector before acquiring data. To the extent practicable, there should be no objects that can scatter x-rays within 10 cm of the sensitive volume of the external dosimeter. (2) Set the system to a FOV of approximately 22 cm and raise the image receptor tower to the maximum height. (3) Place the FSMP and the external dosimeter 1 cm above the tabletop or at the manufacturer specified RP if different from 1 cm above the tabletop. If necessary, raise the FSMP with spacers. Set the collimators using the cm 2 marker on the FSMP. All edges of the irradiated field should be seen on the monitor almost superimposed on the square box and well within the full FOV. (4) Place an attenuator (approximately 5 mm Cu) above the radiation detector in the primary beam. The attenuator sheets may be attached to the image receptor tower or placed on a stand to hold the sheets at least 10 cm above the radiation detector. (5) Select the medium dose rate mode for fluoroscopy. If the system only has two dose modes, select the higher. (6) Do a test irradiation. Adjust the attenuator thickness if this is necessary to bring the tube voltage into the kvp range. 3.D.2. Measurement process Follow the procedure described in Sec. 3.B.4. 3.D.3. Calculation process Follow the procedure described in Sec. 3.B.5. Note that since air kerma is measured at the RP, the geometric factor G1 = 1. If the external dosimeter could not be placed at the RP, use an appropriate value of G1. 3.E. Overtable fluoroscopy system protocol This section of the report addresses fluoroscopic systems with x-ray tubes mounted above the procedure table. These units typically have SIDs between 115 and 150 cm which can be fixed or variable. The typical RP is located along the central ray of the x-ray beam 30 cm above the procedure table. (Note that any particular make or model may have a different RP location and this should be confirmed in the vendor documentation.) 3.E.1. Measurement setup (1) Set the system to a FOV of approximately 22 cm field of view at the image receptor. If adjustable, set the SID to the maximum possible. (2) Place attenuator (approximately 5 mm Cu) on the procedure table in the primary beam. (3) Select the medium dose rate mode for fluoroscopy. If the system only has two dose modes, select the higher. (4) Place the FSMP and the external dosimeter at the RP and center in the field. Typically, the RP is 30 cm above the tabletop. Raise the FSMP with spacers as needed. Set the collimators using the cm 2 marker on the FSMP. All edges of the irradiated field should be seen on the monitor almost superimposed on the square box and well within the full FOV border. (5) Do a test irradiation. Adjust the attenuator thickness if this is necessary to bring the tube voltage into the kvp range. 3.E.2. Measurement process Follow the procedure described in Sec. 3.B.4. 3.E.3. Calculation process Follow the procedure described in Sec. 3.B.5. Note that since air kerma is measured at the RP, the geometric factor G1 = 1. 3.F. Multipurpose fluoroscopy system protocol Multipurpose fluoroscopy systems (sometimes referred to as universal or tilt-c systems) generally consist of a floormounted C-arm stand with an integrated patient table. The fluoroscopic C-arm is capable of angulation about the table and the table and C-arm can be tilted together from the stand base. Either the interventional fluoroscopy system protocol (vertical geometry) described in Sec. 3.B or the interventional fluoroscopy system protocol (horizontal geometry) described in Sec. 3.C can be used to determine K a,r and KAP correction factors for this configuration. However, some manufacturers have chosen to design their multipurpose fluoroscopy systems to comply with IEC radiography standards (IEC, 2009) 14 and as a result, assume that the patient table is present in the x-ray beam when calibrating K a,r and KAP displayed values. Consultation with the manufacturer is recommended to determine if a particular model of multipurpose fluoroscopy system includes the table in the x-ray beam for K a,r and KAP displays. For these systems, the vertical geometry measurement setup should be followed with the external dosimeter and FSMP positioned above the tabletop. 3.G. Mobile C-arm system protocol This section of the report addresses mobile C-arm fluoroscopic systems. For mobile C-arms, typically the RP is located 30 cm from the entrance surface of the image receptor

10 6824 Lin et al.: AAPM TG 190 Report on KAP-meter accuracy 6824 assembly. Note that any particular model might have a different RP location and this should be confirmed in the vendor documentation. 3.G.1. Measurement setup (1) Remove any material such as tabletop and pad from the path between the x-ray tube and the measuring detector before acquiring data. (2) To the extent practicable, there should be no objects that can scatter x-rays within 10 cm of the sensitive volume of the measuring detector. (3) Set the system to a normal FOV for that system. (4) Set the x-ray beam to either a vertical or horizontal orientation. For discussion purposes, the description in the main text will employ a vertical orientation with the x-ray tube at the top and the image receptor at the bottom. (5) Place attenuator (approximately 3 5 mm Cu) on the image receptor. (6) Select the medium dose rate mode for fluoroscopy. If the system only has two dose modes, select the higher. (7) Secure and suspend the FSMP and the external dosimeter, mechanically with appropriate means like a stand, at the RP and center in the field. As mentioned previously, typically the RP is set to 30 cm above the image receptor. (8) Set the collimators using the cm 2 marker on the FSMP. All edges of the irradiated field should be seen on the monitor almost superimposed on the square box and well within the full FOV border. (9) Do a test irradiation. Adjust the attenuator thickness if this is necessary to bring the tube voltage into the kvp range. 3.G.2. Measurement process Follow the procedure described in Sec. 3.B.4, with the following addition. (1) If the radiation field is hexagonal, octagonal, or circular, determine the diameter of field (D) with the radioopaque ruler on the FSMP. 3.G.3. Calculation process Follow the procedure described in Sec. 3.B.5, with the following change. (1) The measured KAP is KAP = [measured K a,r ] AW AL or KAP = [measured K a,r ] π (D/2) 2. (4) Note that since air kerma is measured at the RP, the geometric factor G1 = 1. 3.H. Mini-C-arm protocol This section of the report is specific to mobile C-arm fluoroscopes with a fixed SID less than or equal to 45 cm. Typically, the RP for these devices is located 3 6 cm from the entrance surface of the image receptor assembly. (Note that any particular make or model may have a different RP location and this should be confirmed in the vendor documentation.) 3.H.1. Measurement setup (1) Remove any material such as tabletop and pad from the path between the x-ray tube and the measuring detector before acquiring data. (2) To the extent practicable, there should be no objects that can scatter x-rays within 10 cm of the sensitive volume of the measuring detector. (3) Set the system to a normal FOV for that system. If collimation is adjustable, open the collimation to its fullest extent. (4) Set the x-ray beam to either a vertical or horizontal orientation. For discussion purposes, the description in the main text will employ a vertical orientation with the x-ray tube at the top and the image receptor at the bottom. (5) Place attenuator (approximately 2 3 mm Cu) on the face of the image receptor. (6) Select the normal dose rate mode for fluoroscopy. If the system only has two dose modes, select the higher. (7) Secure and suspend the FSMP and the external dosimeter, mechanically with appropriate means like a stand, at the RP and center in the field. As mentioned previously, typically the RP is 3 6 cm above the image receptor. (8) Set the collimators using the 7 7 cm 2 marker on the FSMP. All edges of the irradiated field should be seen on the monitor almost superimposed on the 49 cm 2 square box and well within the full FOV border. (9) Do a test irradiation. Adjust the attenuator thickness if this is necessary to bring the tube voltage to the maximum value (typically less than 80 kvp). 3.H.2. Measurement process Follow the procedure described in Sec. 3.B.4, with the following addition. (1) If the radiation field is hexagonal, octagonal, or circular, determine the diameter of field (D) with the radioopaque ruler on the FSMP. 3.H.3. Calculation process Follow the procedure described in Sec. 3.B.5, with the following change. (1) The measured KAP is KAP = [measured K a,r ] AW AL

11 6825 Lin et al.: AAPM TG 190 Report on KAP-meter accuracy 6825 or KAP = [measured K a,r ] π (D/2) 2. (5) Note that since air kerma is measured at the RP, the geometric factor G1 = 1. 3.I. Radiographic systems protocol This section of the report is specific to radiographic systems. The RP location of these systems may be based on user data entry or set to a default location. Review of the vendor documentation is recommended to determine how the RP is defined for any individual radiographic system. For measurement of the radiographic x-ray field size, any standard radiographic collimation test tool measurement plate with radioopaque fiducial markers can be used. 3.I.1. Measurement setup (1) As much as practicable and possible, ensure that there are no objects that could potentially produce scatter within 10 cm of the sensitive detector volume. (2) For a stationary system, position the x-ray tube above the tabletop [Fig. 5(A)]. If a radiographic table is not present (e.g., in a dedicated chest room), either direct the x-ray tube downward toward a flat horizontal surface or position the image receptor on supports for a horizontal x-ray beam. For a portable or mobile x-ray system, place the x-ray tube above a flat horizontal surface such as a tabletop of an examination room [Fig. 5(B)]. Notice the difference in the location of the image receptor. A cm (14 17 in.) cassette size image receptor is employed for the test procedure described here. (3) Orient the x-ray tube so the central ray of the beam is normal (90 ) to the tabletop/flat surface and the image receptor. Set the SID to the default setup of the radiographic room typically; SID = 100 cm. (4) Place the FSMP 30 cm over the tabletop or the image receptor, using spacer rods to support the FSMP. Center the FSMP within the radiation field. (5) Collimate the x-ray field so that it falls inside the image receptor and the FSMP. The collimated beam should be no smaller than cm at the plane of the FSMP. It is desirable to use the light field projected on the cm box drawn on the FSMP. Or, a larger field size should be employed to account for radiographic applications. (6) For systems with a K a,r display, place the external dosimeter at the RP if different from the setup shown in Fig. 5. Record the SDD. The setup in Fig. 5 allows for direct air kerma measurement assuming a typical patient size of 30 cm. 3.I.2. Measurement process (1) Set the x-ray generator to 100 kvp and a minimum of 50 mas. (2) Precision is increased if each measurement is appropriately replicated (3 is suggested). The coefficient of variation in the repeated measurements should be less than (3) Make an exposure and record the measured K a,r and the displayed KAP and K a,r, if applicable. Note: For screen-film systems, make one additional exposure at a lower technique to ensure the fiducial markers of the field-size measurement device can be read on the developed film. Do not record the K a,r or KAP for this exposure. (4) Calculate C(K a,r ) using the process described below. (5) Determine the field size by observing the image of the FSMP on the recorded image. Record the two dimensions of the rectangular field as AL and AW. FIG. 5. Measurement setup for radiographic systems. (A) is for a radiographic x-ray room with a Bucky tray or an integrated DR image receptor. (B) is for a portable radiographic unit using a tabletop for support. 3.I.3. Calculation process (1) Calculate the measured KAP, KAP = [measured K a,r ] AW AL. (6) (2) Calculate the correction factor C separately for each irradiation event for both K a,r and KAP. Caution: The following processes may need further corrections to account for the dose units in which a particular fluoroscope displays KAP. (a) C (KAP) is determined by dividing the measured KAP value by the KAP value displayed by the system. (b) C(K a,r ) is determined by dividing the measured K a,r value by the K a,r value displayed by the system.

12 6826 Lin et al.: AAPM TG 190 Report on KAP-meter accuracy 6826 (3) Average the individual C factors over the measurement repetitions for K a,r, and separately for KAP. 4. DISCUSSION 4.A. Sources of uncertainty There are multiple factors that contribute to inaccuracy in the correction factor value. These factors include uncertainty in the external detector reading, the external detector location relative to the x-ray source, the accuracy of displayed dose values, and accuracy of the x-ray field-size measurement. Additional discussion of each source of error is provided below. 4.A.1. External dosimeter reading uncertainty Accurate calibration of the external dosimeter is critical to minimize this source of variation. A mismatch between the calibration beam spectrum and the clinical beam spectrum causes an additional source of error for x-ray beams with heavy filtration (AAPM Report No. 125). 15 Depending on the type of calibration, the external dosimeter reading should be accurate to within 2% and 6%. 4.A.2. External detector location uncertainty Inaccuracy in positioning of the external detector at the correct distance from the x-ray source (either at isocenter or the RP) will result in an erroneous air kerma measurement. Utilization of the isocenter localization technique for fixed C- arm systems described in Sec. 3.A will generally reduce this error. An error in detector positioning of ±1 cm at a 65 cm source-chamber distance will result in an air kerma error of approximately ±3%. 4.A.3. Displayed dose value accuracy Error in the displayed dose value can become particularly large if K a,r is displayed in units of mgy in a whole number (rounded to the nearest integer value) and an insufficient total air kerma is not accumulated during the measurement. For example, a 20 mgy displayed K a,r value may have an error of ±0.5 mgy in the initial value and ±0.5 mgy in the final value, resulting in a total error of ±1 mgy or 5%. Accumulating a dose of at least 50 mgy will reduce this error to ±2%. 4.A.4. X-ray field-size measurement uncertainty Uncertainty in the x-ray exposure field size will affect the accuracy of the measured KAP value only. For a rectangular field with the exposure field edges clearly visible, an error of ±1 mm in reading the template rule on each side would yield a KAP error of ±3% for a 50 cm 2 area. Collimating to a larger FOV decreases this error. When electronic imaging shutters obstruct the exposure edges and cannot be readily eliminated, increased accuracy can be accomplished by using film, a CR, or a DR cassette to record the exposure FOV size instead of reading the field size from the monitor. Use of the FSMP will assist in setting up the actual radiation field at the time of data collection. However, if a software distance measurement function is built into the control console, the field size can be determined with a higher accuracy. If any magnification/minification exists, the ruler on the FSMP can be employed to provide the scaling corrections. 4.B. KAP meter performance variation with beam quality It is known that KAP meters may have a significant x-ray beam energy dependence which is affected by the materials and design of the chamber. 16 The greatest dependence on beam filtration occurs at low kvp values (50 80 kvp). Heavier filtered beams ( mm Cu) exhibit a higher dependence as compared to less filtered beams in the range of 10% 15% for kvp beams. Since clinical systems may have modes that include heavier beam filters, it is recommended that an initial validation of the system includes expanded measurements of the calibration for a range of operating modes. If a single calibration factor is desired (as for entry in the RSDR), the average of these values over the range of clinically used operating modes is recommended. Alternatively, if additional accuracy in the correction factor is desired, separate correction factors for different modes may be determined. Whether the radiological imaging equipment in question is a radiographic unit or a fluoroscopic unit, both types of KAP meters, physical and virtual, employed for dose measurements must be properly calibrated to the radiation beam quality encountered in clinical practices. This is also applicable to the external dosimeter to evaluate the accuracy of the KAP meters. 5. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS In this report, the accuracy of a KAP-meter or more precisely, the integrated radiation output indicators employed in diagnostic radiology has been investigated and the calibration methodology described in detail for various types of fluoroscopy system. The TG 190 Report has also been reviewed by various x-ray equipment manufacturers so that the calibration protocol is also acceptable to the industry. For the patient radiation dose estimation, the measurement protocol yields the radiation dose that can be employed for further modification to include corrections due to the geometry, the backscatter, and attenuation of the tabletop and the mattress. The RP for the interventional angiography fluoroscopy systems has been specified by IEC. The location of RP for other fluoroscopy systems was left in the hands of equipment manufacturers. TG 190 Report deals with the measurement and verification of the KAP-meter accuracy at or associated with the RP independent of manufacturers while permitting medical physicists to follow a unified approach in achieving more realistic radiation dose estimation. For these reasons, this report is likely to be of great interest to standard organizations such as IEC, MITA, and NEMA.

13 6827 Lin et al.: AAPM TG 190 Report on KAP-meter accuracy F. 6. Drawing of the FSMP and the stand. APPENDIX A: THE FIELD-SIZE MEASUREMENT PLATE AND STAND It should be pointed out that the stand shown here is designed for a convenient measurement of KAP and Ka,r, as well as to perform other tasks related to the evaluation of fluoroscopy systems. While the details of the FSMP are given in the main text, the stand shown here may be replaced by a simple cardboard box of appropriate size. A sample FSMP with associated stand parts is depicted in Fig. 6. The drawing, including the actual dimensions, is intended for illustration purposes only. Note that the bottom plate of FSMP shown on the top left of the drawing is the same as that described in the main text. All parts are made of /2 in. (1.27 cm) thick PMMA plastic with the exception of the embedded FSMP gratings section. The FSMP section is embedded in an 8 8 in. (20 20 cm) square and is machined on a 1/4 in. (0.635 cm) thick PMMA plate. The length of the bottom plate of FSMP needs to be sufficiently long ( 18 in., 46 cm) so that the device can be properly secured at the edge of the examination table. In addition, the 8 8 1/4 in. ( cm) FSMP can be removed from the bottom plate of FSMP and interchanged with others designed for different tasks involved in the testing of fluoroscopic equipment. The top plate of FSMP is designed to hold the copper sheets for attenuation. The spacer rods shown are fabricated to provide a distance of 30 cm from the bottom to the top of the entire stand. Different sets of spacer rods may be necessary for specific fluoroscopic units being evaluated. Depicted in Fig. 7 is a series of photographs showing the experimental arrangement of the FSMP stand setup with a mobile C-arm fluoroscopy unit. (Note, the FSMP stand is of different design and size than the drawing.) Inset (A) on the left of the photographs shows the measurement arrangement similar to Fig. 4 in the main text. However, as described previously, the FSMP is embedded in a 1/4 in. (0.635 cm) plate which is interchangeable and may be removed or replaced with other test objects if desired. Inset (B) in Fig. 7 shows a closeup view of the FSMP with an ionization chamber placed in the middle, aligned to the center of the radiation field. Note that the ionization chamber and the copper attenuation sheets shown are for illustration purpose only. The copper sheets should be positioned close to the image receptor in actual measurements. Under this measurement arrangement, two corrections may be necessary for better accuracy;1 the locations of the FSMP and the sensing volume of the ionization chamber are displaced by one half of the ionization chamber thickness (0.6 cm), and2 attenuation due to the FSMP itself which is made of PMMA plastic (1/4 in., cm). F. 7. Photographs of the FSMP stand.

14 6828 Lin et al.: AAPM TG 190 Report on KAP-meter accuracy 6828 F. 8. Fluoroscopy images. Inset (C) in Fig. 7 shows that the small solid state detector is held in an interchangeable holder (with a thin transparency film) so that the sensing detector lies in the same plane as the FSMP. The corrections needed due to the attenuation of FSMP plastic plate and distance displacement are eliminated. The small amount of scattered radiation from the cm radiation field, for example, is further minimized. Shown in Fig. 8 are fluoroscopy images of the FSMP. Inset (A) is a last-image-hold image corresponding to the experimental arrangement shown in Fig. 7, inset (B). In Fig. 8, inset (B) shows the fluoroscopy image with the ionization chamber removed. The center circular cutout should be large enough to accommodate the ionization chamber employed. As indicated previously, the FSMP is fabricated such that it can be removed and replaced with a holder designed to accommodate the detector. In Fig. 8, inset (C) is the fluoroscopy image of an ionization chamber place in a holder so that the center plane of the ionization chamber is placed at the same plane where the FSMP is located. APPENDIX B: THE HORIZONTAL GEOMETRICAL ARRANGEMENT Isocentric fluoroscopes can also be evaluated without the stand. Figure 9 illustrates a horizontal-beam measurement setup. The radiation detector is shown at system isocenter. Its location was confirmed by rotating the gantry 90. Note that the description of each key component is identified with the annotation in the photograph with the description of each item listed in Fig. 9. The SAD may be obtained either from system documentation or measurement. Field size at isocenter is measured after radiation data are collected by removing the attenuator (C) and dosimeter (D) and then, sliding the field-size plate (F) such that the plate is perpendicular to the radiation beam (B) and at the fluoroscope s isocenter. As shown in Fig. 9, the plate can be slid into position by sliding it along the tight gap between blocks (G). Plate position can be confirmed by rotating the gantry 90 and verifying that the plate is seen on edge. F. 9. The horizontal geometry measurement setup. (A) is the x-ray tube assembly. (B) is the central ray of horizontal x-ray beam. (C) is image receptor with copper attenuation plate. (D) is the radiation detector (note that the sensitive volume is placed at the fluoroscope s isocenter). (E) is the tabletop (note that the table height was adjusted to place the horizontal scale of the field-size plate at approximately the same height as the central ray of the beam). (F) is the field-size plate with radio-opaque scale (any appropriate plate may be used). For illustrative purposes, the plate is shown outside the x-ray beam in this picture. (G) are aluminum blocks used as the supports to hold the field-size plate (F).

Joint ICTP/IAEA Advanced School on Dosimetry in Diagnostic Radiology and its Clinical Implementation May 2009

Joint ICTP/IAEA Advanced School on Dosimetry in Diagnostic Radiology and its Clinical Implementation May 2009 2033-6 Joint ICTP/IAEA Advanced School on Dosimetry in Diagnostic Radiology and its Clinical Implementation 11-15 May 2009 Dosimetry for Fluoroscopy Basics Renato Padovani EFOMP Joint ICTP-IAEA Advanced

More information

Clinical Experiences with a Patient Skin Dose Monitoring and Tracking Program

Clinical Experiences with a Patient Skin Dose Monitoring and Tracking Program Clinical Experiences with a Patient Skin Dose Monitoring and Tracking Program Allen R. Goode, MS, DABR Chief Diagnostic Medical Physicist Department of Radiology & Medical Imaging University of Virginia

More information

Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4732 X-ray Revision

Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4732 X-ray Revision Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4732 X-ray Revision DRAFT FLUOROSCOPIC X-RAY SYSTEMS, 1.0 Subpart 1. Applicability. Subpart 2. Limitation of the useful beam. Subpart 3. Measuring compliance; primary protective

More information

I. PERFORMANCE OF X-RAY PRODUCTION COMPONENTS FLUOROSCOPIC ACCEPTANCE TESTING: TEST PROCEDURES & PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

I. PERFORMANCE OF X-RAY PRODUCTION COMPONENTS FLUOROSCOPIC ACCEPTANCE TESTING: TEST PROCEDURES & PERFORMANCE CRITERIA FLUOROSCOPIC ACCEPTANCE TESTING: TEST PROCEDURES & PERFORMANCE CRITERIA EDWARD L. NICKOLOFF DEPARTMENT OF RADIOLOGY COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY NEW YORK, NY ACCEPTANCE TESTING GOALS PRIOR TO 1st CLINICAL USAGE

More information

SPECIFICATION. Kilovoltage X-ray calibration system for protection and diagnostic level dosimetry. Prepared by

SPECIFICATION. Kilovoltage X-ray calibration system for protection and diagnostic level dosimetry. Prepared by SPECIFICATION Kilovoltage X-ray Prepared by Igor Gomola, Technical Officer, Project ECU6023, Date 2015-Oct-06 Revision Date Status Comments 0.1 2015-Oct-06 Draft Igor Gomola Page 1 of 12 1. Scope This

More information

Calculating the peak skin dose resulting from fluoroscopically guided interventions. Part I: Methods

Calculating the peak skin dose resulting from fluoroscopically guided interventions. Part I: Methods JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, VOLUME 12, NUMBER 4, fall 2011 Calculating the peak skin dose resulting from fluoroscopically guided interventions. Part I: Methods A. Kyle Jones, 1a and Alexander

More information

Update on Fluoroscopy Physics AAPM MO-A-210A-1 Stephen Balter, Ph.D.

Update on Fluoroscopy Physics AAPM MO-A-210A-1 Stephen Balter, Ph.D. Update on Fluoroscopy Physics Stephen Balter, PhD Columbia University Draft for MO-A-210A-1 2009 AAPM Educational objectives Understand dosimetric concepts relating to interventional fluoroscopy Characterize

More information

X-RAYS - NO UNAUTHORISED ENTRY

X-RAYS - NO UNAUTHORISED ENTRY Licencing of premises Premises Refer Guidelines A radiation warning sign and warning notice, X-RAYS - NO UNAUTHORISED ENTRY must be displayed at all entrances leading to the rooms where x-ray units are

More information

Nuclear Associates

Nuclear Associates Nuclear Associates 07-706 Patient Phantom/Penetrometer System Users Manual March 2005 Manual No. 07-706-1 Rev. 2 2004, 2005 Fluke Corporation, All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A. All product names are

More information

Exposure Indices and Target Values in Radiography: What Are They and How Can You Use Them?

Exposure Indices and Target Values in Radiography: What Are They and How Can You Use Them? Exposure Indices and Target Values in Radiography: What Are They and How Can You Use Them? Definition and Validation of Exposure Indices Ingrid Reiser, PhD DABR Department of Radiology University of Chicago

More information

Learning Objectives: What s my motivation? (unknown screen actor) Workshop Overview

Learning Objectives: What s my motivation? (unknown screen actor) Workshop Overview Practical Medical Physics Adapting Traditional Clinical Medical Physics to Digital Radiography Charles E. Willis, Ph.D., DABR Associate Professor Department of Imaging Physics The University of Texas M.D.

More information

Calibration of KAP meters

Calibration of KAP meters Calibration of KAP meters Alexandr Malusek! Division of Radiological Sciences Department of Medical and Health Sciences Linköping University! 2014-04-15 1 Outline 1. KAP meter construction 2. Air kerma-area

More information

Test Equipment for Radiology and CT Quality Control Contents

Test Equipment for Radiology and CT Quality Control Contents Test Equipment for Radiology and CT Quality Control Contents Quality Control Testing...2 Photometers for Digital Clinical Display QC...3 Primary Workstations...3 Secondary Workstations...3 Testing of workstations...3

More information

RULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION DIVISION OF RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH CHAPTER USE OF X-RAY APPARATUS

RULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION DIVISION OF RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH CHAPTER USE OF X-RAY APPARATUS RULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION DIVISION OF RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH CHAPTER 0400-20-06 USE OF X-RAY APPARATUS TABLE OF CONTENTS 0400-20-06-.01 Purpose 0400-20-06-.06 Veterinary

More information

Collimation Assessment Using GAFCHROMIC XR-M2

Collimation Assessment Using GAFCHROMIC XR-M2 Collimation Assessment Using GAFCHROMIC XR-M2 I. Introduction A method of collimation assessment for GE Senographe full-field digital mammography (FFDM) systems is described that uses a self-developing

More information

C-ARM FLUOROSCOPIC AND SPOT-FILM SYSTEMS

C-ARM FLUOROSCOPIC AND SPOT-FILM SYSTEMS PART X C-ARM FLUOROSCOPIC AND SPOT-FILM SYSTEMS FORM FD 3260 REPRINTED APRIL 2000 ROUTINE COMPLIANCE TESTING C-ARM FLUOROSCOPES (Test Procedure CFA - Use Form FDA 3260) 1.0 GENERAL GUIDANCE 1.1 This procedure

More information

Disclosures. Outline 7/31/2017. Current Implementation Status of IEC Standard : Exposure Index (EI) for Digital Radiography

Disclosures. Outline 7/31/2017. Current Implementation Status of IEC Standard : Exposure Index (EI) for Digital Radiography Current Implementation Status of IEC Standard 62494-1: Exposure Index (EI) for Digital Radiography July 31, 2017 Ryan Fisher, PhD, DABR Katie Hulme, MS, DABR None Disclosures Outline Review of IEC Standard

More information

Nuclear Associates

Nuclear Associates Nuclear Associates 07-649 CDRH Fluoroscopic Phantom Users Manual March 2005 Manual No. 07-649-1 Rev. 2 2004, 2005 Fluke Corporation, All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A. All product names are trademarks

More information

Beam-Restricting Devices

Beam-Restricting Devices Beam-Restricting Devices Three factors contribute to an increase in scatter radiation: Increased kvp Increased Field Size Increased Patient or Body Part Size. X-ray Interactions a some interact with the

More information

Dose Reduction and Image Preservation After the Introduction of a 0.1 mm Cu Filter into the LODOX Statscan unit above 110 kvp

Dose Reduction and Image Preservation After the Introduction of a 0.1 mm Cu Filter into the LODOX Statscan unit above 110 kvp Dose Reduction and Image Preservation After the Introduction of a into the LODOX Statscan unit above 110 kvp Abstract: CJ Trauernicht 1, C Rall 1, T Perks 2, G Maree 1, E Hering 1, S Steiner 3 1) Division

More information

Digital Imaging started in the 1972 with Digital subtraction angiography Clinical digital imaging was employed from the 1980 ~ 37 years ago Amount of

Digital Imaging started in the 1972 with Digital subtraction angiography Clinical digital imaging was employed from the 1980 ~ 37 years ago Amount of Digital Imaging started in the 1972 with Digital subtraction angiography Clinical digital imaging was employed from the 1980 ~ 37 years ago Amount of radiation to the population due to Medical Imaging

More information

Teaching Digital Radiography and Fluoroscopic Radiation Protection

Teaching Digital Radiography and Fluoroscopic Radiation Protection Teaching Digital Radiography and Fluoroscopic Radiation Protection WCEC 20 th Student Educator Radiographer Conference Dennis Bowman, RT(R), CRT (R)(F) Community Hospital of the Monterey Peninsula (CHOMP)

More information

Ch. 223 VETERINARY MEDICINE CHAPTER 223. VETERINARY MEDICINE GENERAL PROVISIONS X-RAYS RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL. Authority

Ch. 223 VETERINARY MEDICINE CHAPTER 223. VETERINARY MEDICINE GENERAL PROVISIONS X-RAYS RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL. Authority Ch. 223 VETERINARY MEDICINE 25 223.1 CHAPTER 223. VETERINARY MEDICINE Sec. 223.1. Purpose and scope. 223.2. [Reserved]. 223.2a. Definitions. 223.3 223.6. [Reserved]. 223.7. Structural shielding. 223.8.

More information

Measurement of table feed speed in modern CT

Measurement of table feed speed in modern CT JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, VOLUME 15, NUMBER 3, 2014 Measurement of table feed speed in modern CT Atsushi Fukuda, 1,2a Pei-Jan P. Lin, 3 Kosuke Matsubara, 2 Tosiaki Miyati 2 Department

More information

Practical Medical Physics Session: TG-151 Dose Monitoring. August 5, 2013 Katie Hulme, M.S.

Practical Medical Physics Session: TG-151 Dose Monitoring. August 5, 2013 Katie Hulme, M.S. Practical Medical Physics Session: TG-151 Dose Monitoring August 5, 2013 Katie Hulme, M.S. Digital Imaging and Dose Creep Images courtesy of Agfa Healthcare Under-Exposed Over-Exposed Freedman et al.,

More information

Y11-DR Digital Radiography (DR) Image Quality

Y11-DR Digital Radiography (DR) Image Quality Y11-DR Digital Radiography (DR) Image Quality Image quality is stressed for all systems in Safety Code 35. In the relevant sections Health Canada s advice is the manufacturer s recommended test procedures

More information

CHAPTER 2 COMMISSIONING OF KILO-VOLTAGE CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY FOR IMAGE-GUIDED RADIOTHERAPY

CHAPTER 2 COMMISSIONING OF KILO-VOLTAGE CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY FOR IMAGE-GUIDED RADIOTHERAPY 14 CHAPTER 2 COMMISSIONING OF KILO-VOLTAGE CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY FOR IMAGE-GUIDED RADIOTHERAPY 2.1 INTRODUCTION kv-cbct integrated with linear accelerators as a tool for IGRT, was developed to

More information

NEMA XR X-ray Equipment for Interventional Procedures User Quality Control Mode

NEMA XR X-ray Equipment for Interventional Procedures User Quality Control Mode NEMA XR 27-2012 X-ray Equipment for Interventional Procedures User Quality Control Mode Published by: National Electrical Manufacturers Association 1300 North 17th Street, Suite 1752 Rosslyn, Virginia

More information

SUBCHAPTER 14. THERAPEUTIC INSTALLATIONS

SUBCHAPTER 14. THERAPEUTIC INSTALLATIONS SUBCHAPTER 14. THERAPEUTIC INSTALLATIONS 7:28-14.1 Scope (a) This subchapter covers therapeutic installations used in the healing arts. These therapeutic installations include x-ray, accelerator and teletherapy

More information

DISC QC/QA Program for Digital Imaging Systems using the DR Radchex Plus Meter

DISC QC/QA Program for Digital Imaging Systems using the DR Radchex Plus Meter DISC QC/QA Program for Digital Imaging Systems using the DR Radchex Plus Meter Revision Date: January 5th, 2017 www.disc-imaging.com Table of Contents Section A: Preliminary Setup Requirements... 4 Tools

More information

The Evaluation of Collimator Alignment of Diagnostic X-ray Tube Using Computed Radiography System

The Evaluation of Collimator Alignment of Diagnostic X-ray Tube Using Computed Radiography System The Evaluation of Collimator Alignment of Diagnostic X-ray Tube Using Computed Radiography System The Evaluation of Collimator Alignment of Diagnostic X-ray Tube Using Computed Radiography System Manus

More information

Interventional Radiological Equipment selection and installation

Interventional Radiological Equipment selection and installation Interventional Radiological Equipment selection and installation Renato Padovani ICTP Learning objectives To understand the main components of an interventional radiology equipment To understand the relevance

More information

Nuclear Associates

Nuclear Associates Nuclear Associates 07-591 Focal Spot Test Tool Users Manual February 2005 Manual No. 07-591-1 Rev. 2 2004, 2005 Fluke Corporation, All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A. All product names are trademarks

More information

Nuclear Associates , , CT Head and Body Dose Phantom

Nuclear Associates , , CT Head and Body Dose Phantom Nuclear Associates 76-414,76-414-4150,76-415 CT Head and Body Dose Phantom Users Manual March 2005 Manual No. 76-414-1 Rev. 2 2004, 2005 Fluke Corporation, All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A. All product

More information

ABOVETABLE X-RAY SOURCE FLUOROSCOPIC AND SPOT-FILM SYSTEMS

ABOVETABLE X-RAY SOURCE FLUOROSCOPIC AND SPOT-FILM SYSTEMS PART VI ABOVETABLE X-RAY SOURCE FLUOROSCOPIC AND SPOT-FILM SYSTEMS FORM FDA 3069 REPRINTED April 2000 ROUTINE COMPLIANCE TESTING ABOVETABLE X-RAY SOURCE FLUOROSCOPIC AND SPOT-FILM SYSTEMS (Test Procedure

More information

DIAGNOSTIC ACCREDITATION PROGRAM. Radiology and CT Quality Control Procedures Workbook

DIAGNOSTIC ACCREDITATION PROGRAM. Radiology and CT Quality Control Procedures Workbook DIAGNOSTIC ACCREDITATION PROGRAM Radiology and CT Quality Control Procedures Workbook Quality Control Procedures Radiography/CR/DR Safety Code 35 Summary For more detail about each quality control (QC)

More information

RAD 150 RADIOLOGIC EXPOSURE TECHNIQUE II

RAD 150 RADIOLOGIC EXPOSURE TECHNIQUE II RAD 150 RADIOLOGIC EXPOSURE TECHNIQUE II APPROVED 12/O2/2011 EFFECTIVE SPRING 2013-14 Prefix & Number RAD 150 Course Title: Radiologic Exposure Technique II & Lab Purpose of this submission: New Change/Updated

More information

I. Introduction.

I. Introduction. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, VOLUME 15, NUMBER 1, 2014 Accuracy of measuring half- and quarter-value layers and appropriate aperture width of a convenient method using a lead-covered case

More information

Half value layer and AEC receptor dose compliance survey in Estonia

Half value layer and AEC receptor dose compliance survey in Estonia Half value layer and AEC receptor dose compliance survey in Estonia K. Kepler, A. Vladimirov Training Centre of Medical Physics, University of Tartu Testing Centre of the University of Tartu, Estonia E-mail:

More information

Unfors EDD-30 Radiation Protection in Fluoroscopy

Unfors EDD-30 Radiation Protection in Fluoroscopy Unfors EDD-30 Radiation Protection in Fluoroscopy Immediate Warning Decrease Your Dose Interventional radiology procedures are considered to be essential to medical diagnosis and treatment. It is recognized,

More information

Mammography is a radiographic procedure specially designed for detecting breast pathology Approximately 1 woman in 8 will develop breast cancer over

Mammography is a radiographic procedure specially designed for detecting breast pathology Approximately 1 woman in 8 will develop breast cancer over Mammography is a radiographic procedure specially designed for detecting breast pathology Approximately 1 woman in 8 will develop breast cancer over a lifetime Breast cancer screening programs rely on

More information

CT Scanner Dose Survey

CT Scanner Dose Survey CT Scanner Dose Survey Measurement Protocol Version 5.0 July 1997 Co-ordinated by ImPACT and The Medical Physics Department,, London SW17, UK. 0181-725-3366 CT Scanner Dose Survey: Measurement Protocol

More information

Nuclear Associates

Nuclear Associates Nuclear Associates 07-647 R/F QC Phantom Operators Manual March 2005 Manual No. 07-647-1 Rev. 2 2004, 2005 Fluke Corporation, All rights reserved. All product names are trademarks of their respective companies

More information

Investigation of the line-pair pattern method for evaluating mammographic focal spot performance

Investigation of the line-pair pattern method for evaluating mammographic focal spot performance Investigation of the line-pair pattern method for evaluating mammographic focal spot performance Mitchell M. Goodsitt, a) Heang-Ping Chan, and Bob Liu Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann

More information

2012 :15th SESSION of ESMP

2012 :15th SESSION of ESMP 2012 :15th SESSION of ESMP Lecture presented in Archamps (Salève Building) by : Elly CASTELLANO (London) Patient dosimetry in x-ray imaging and CT Elly Castellano Objectives measurable dose quantities

More information

Enhanced Functionality of High-Speed Image Processing Engine SUREengine PRO. Sharpness (spatial resolution) Graininess (noise intensity)

Enhanced Functionality of High-Speed Image Processing Engine SUREengine PRO. Sharpness (spatial resolution) Graininess (noise intensity) Vascular Enhanced Functionality of High-Speed Image Processing Engine SUREengine PRO Medical Systems Division, Shimadzu Corporation Yoshiaki Miura 1. Introduction In recent years, digital cardiovascular

More information

GE AMX 4+ Portable X-Ray

GE AMX 4+ Portable X-Ray GE AMX 4+ Portable X-Ray Typical Manufacturer s Picture GE Healthcare s AMX-4+ analog X-ray system provides high-performance in a compact, easy-to-maneuver package. The rotating arm and tube simplify positioning

More information

Medical Imaging. Latest generation bucky room. system. radiology ahead

Medical Imaging. Latest generation bucky room. system. radiology ahead Medical Imaging Latest generation bucky room system radiology ahead system it grows efficiency, the productivity is on the up Moviplan ic System is the latest-generation X-ray equipment, combining all

More information

Overview. Professor Roentgen was a Physicist!!! The Physics of Radiation Oncology X-ray Imaging

Overview. Professor Roentgen was a Physicist!!! The Physics of Radiation Oncology X-ray Imaging The Physics of Radiation Oncology X-ray Imaging Charles E. Willis, Ph.D. DABR Associate Professor Department of Imaging Physics The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas Overview

More information

MXHF-1500RF is controlled by Digital key panel console that displays KV, ma and mas with APR menu programmed.

MXHF-1500RF is controlled by Digital key panel console that displays KV, ma and mas with APR menu programmed. R/F TV X-RAY SYSTEM DIAGNOSTIC RADIOGRAPHIC FLUOROSCOPIC TV SYSTEM MXHF-1500RF SYSTEM OUTLINE Product Data No. 041021-01 MXHF-1500RF is controlled by Digital key panel console that displays KV, ma and

More information

Nuclear Associates

Nuclear Associates Nuclear Associates 07-644 Grid Alignment Test Tool Users Manual March 2005 Manual No. 07-644-1 Rev. 2 2004, 2005 Fluke Corporation, All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A. All product names are trademarks

More information

Truly flexible to meet your clinical needs

Truly flexible to meet your clinical needs Truly flexible to meet your clinical needs 2 Adapting to meet your needs Flexible Fast and responsive Excellent image quality Designed with ergonomic efficiency Equipped with dose management tools 3 Three

More information

Digital radiography. bucky table and wall stand as a dual detector or wireless system. Amadeo DR Systems

Digital radiography. bucky table and wall stand as a dual detector or wireless system. Amadeo DR Systems Amadeo DR Systems with dicom PACS DX-R Software X-ray Systems for the Future Digital radiography with Amadeo R-DR including bucky table and wall stand as a dual detector or wireless system High contrast

More information

Diagnostic x-ray equipment compliance and facility survey

Diagnostic x-ray equipment compliance and facility survey Canada Health Canada Canada CA9600871 CA9600871 Diagnostic x-ray equipment compliance and facility survey Diagnostic x-ray equipment compliance and facility survey Recommended procedures for equipment

More information

universal Digital Radiography (DR) System

universal Digital Radiography (DR) System Vision Air universal Digital Radiography (DR) System Technical Specification Vision Air is a state-of-the-art, universal, overhead digital radiography system capable of virtually all radiography examinations

More information

Version 1.0. TechnicVR. Student Guide

Version 1.0. TechnicVR. Student Guide Version 1.0 TechnicVR s h a d e r w a r e. c o m Student Guide TechnicVR s h a d e r w a r e. c o m Student Guide shaderware 2008 PO Box 103 Saltburn Cleveland TS12 1WP w w w. s h a d e r w a r e. c o

More information

Time to take the gloves off: the use of radiation reduction gloves can greatly increase patient dose

Time to take the gloves off: the use of radiation reduction gloves can greatly increase patient dose JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, VOLUME 15, NUMBER 6, 2014 Time to take the gloves off: the use of radiation reduction gloves can greatly increase patient dose Alexander S. Pasciak, 1 and A.

More information

Estimation of signal transfer property for wireless digital detector in different measurement schemes

Estimation of signal transfer property for wireless digital detector in different measurement schemes Estimation of signal transfer property for wireless digital detector in different measurement schemes Anatoli Vladimirov, Kalle Kepler Training Centre of Medical Physics, University of Tartu, Estonia 11

More information

CHAPTER 6 QC Test For Fluoroscopic Equipment. Prepared by:- Kamarul Amin bin Abu Bakar School of Medical Imaging KLMUC

CHAPTER 6 QC Test For Fluoroscopic Equipment. Prepared by:- Kamarul Amin bin Abu Bakar School of Medical Imaging KLMUC CHAPTER 6 QC Test For Fluoroscopic Equipment Prepared by:- Kamarul Amin bin Abdullah @ Abu Bakar School of Medical Imaging KLMUC Lesson Outcomes Describe the objectives of each QC test done. Identify QC

More information

Digital radiography (DR) post processing techniques for pediatric radiology

Digital radiography (DR) post processing techniques for pediatric radiology Digital radiography (DR) post processing techniques for pediatric radiology St Jude Children s Research Hospital Samuel Brady, MS PhD DABR samuel.brady@stjude.org Purpose Review common issues and solutions

More information

Multi-Access Biplane Lab

Multi-Access Biplane Lab Multi-Access Biplane Lab Advanced technolo gies deliver optimized biplane imaging Designed in concert with leading physicians, the Infinix VF-i/BP provides advanced, versatile patient access to meet the

More information

Renato Padovani, University Hospital, Udine, Italy

Renato Padovani, University Hospital, Udine, Italy DATAMED II Training Course Sofia, May 19-20, 2011 Patient dose assessment in fluoroscopy and interventional procedures Renato Padovani, University Hospital, Udine, Italy Content Fluoroscopy guided diagnostic

More information

Electronic Brachytherapy Sources. Thomas W. Rusch

Electronic Brachytherapy Sources. Thomas W. Rusch Electronic Brachytherapy Sources Thomas W. Rusch Educational Objectives Understand key elements of ebx source construction & operation Understand the rationale and methods for air kerma strength calibration

More information

Acceptance Testing of a Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Unit

Acceptance Testing of a Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Unit Acceptance Testing of a Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Unit 2012 AAPM Spring Clinical Meeting Jessica Clements, M.S., DABR Objectives Review of technology and clinical advantages Acceptance Testing Procedures

More information

QUALITY CONTROL PHANTOMS FOR RADIOTHERAPY AND MEDICAL IMAGING

QUALITY CONTROL PHANTOMS FOR RADIOTHERAPY AND MEDICAL IMAGING 1 QUALITY CONTROL PHANTOMS FOR RADIOTHERAPY AND MEDICAL IMAGING QualiFormeD Phantoms A selection of test objects facilitating regulatory quality controls in radiation therapy and medical imaging Practical,

More information

C501-E029C. RADspeed. GENERAL RADIOGRAPHIC SYSTEM Automatic

C501-E029C. RADspeed. GENERAL RADIOGRAPHIC SYSTEM Automatic C501-E029C RADspeed GENERAL RADIOGRAPHIC SYSTEM Automatic High-Performance General Radiographic System Improves Workflow and Achieves Dose Reduction GENERAL RADIOGRAPHIC SYSTEM Automatic This state-of-the-art

More information

CT radiation profile width measurement using CR imaging plate raw data

CT radiation profile width measurement using CR imaging plate raw data JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, VOLUME 16, NUMBER 6, 2015 CT radiation profile width measurement using CR imaging plate raw data Thorarin A Bjarnason, 1,2,3a Chang-Ying Joseph Yang 3,4 Diagnostic

More information

Philips XPER FD10C R7.0.4

Philips XPER FD10C R7.0.4 Philips XPER FD10C R7.0.4 Reconditioned 2005 System- Upgraded to R7 in Oct 2010 The Allura Xper FD10 (Ceiling) single-plane cardiovascular system is comprised of a ceiling mounted C-arm stand and digital

More information

Technical aspects on DAP calibration and CT calibration

Technical aspects on DAP calibration and CT calibration EURADOS Report 2015-03 European Radiation Dosimetry Group e. V. Braunschweig, August 2015 Technical aspects on DAP calibration and CT calibration H. Järvinen, O. Turak, M. Ginjaume, J. Daures, C. Hourdakis,

More information

Outline. Digital Radiography. Understanding Digital Modalities: Image Quality and Dose. Image Quality. Dose Control

Outline. Digital Radiography. Understanding Digital Modalities: Image Quality and Dose. Image Quality. Dose Control Understanding Digital Modalities: Image Quality and Dose S. Jeff Shepard, M.S. University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas Special Acknowledgement: Stephen K. Thompson, M.S. William

More information

Image Display and Perception

Image Display and Perception Image Display and Perception J. Anthony Seibert, Ph.D. Department of Radiology UC Davis Medical Center Sacramento, California, USA Image acquisition, display, & interpretation X-rays kvp mas Tube filtration

More information

X-ray Imaging. PHYS Lecture. Carlos Vinhais. Departamento de Física Instituto Superior de Engenharia do Porto

X-ray Imaging. PHYS Lecture. Carlos Vinhais. Departamento de Física Instituto Superior de Engenharia do Porto X-ray Imaging PHYS Lecture Carlos Vinhais Departamento de Física Instituto Superior de Engenharia do Porto cav@isep.ipp.pt Overview Projection Radiography Anode Angle Focal Spot Magnification Blurring

More information

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Non-destructive testing of welds Radiographic testing Part 1: X- and gamma-ray techniques with film

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Non-destructive testing of welds Radiographic testing Part 1: X- and gamma-ray techniques with film INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 17636-1 First edition 2013-01-15 Non-destructive testing of welds Radiographic testing Part 1: X- and gamma-ray techniques with film Contrôle non destructif des assemblages soudés

More information

STEREOTACTIC BREAST BIOPSY EQUIPMENT SURVEYS

STEREOTACTIC BREAST BIOPSY EQUIPMENT SURVEYS STEREOTACTIC BREAST BIOPSY EQUIPMENT SURVEYS JAMES A. TOMLINSON, M.S. Diagnostic Radiological Physicist American Board of Radiology Certified Medical Physics Consultants, Inc. Bio 28 yrs experience 100%

More information

QC Testing for Computed Tomography (CT) Scanner

QC Testing for Computed Tomography (CT) Scanner QC Testing for Computed Tomography (CT) Scanner QA - Quality Assurance All planned and systematic actions needed to provide confidence on a structure, system or component. all-encompassing program, including

More information

FMT18 FLOOR MOUNTED SYSTEM

FMT18 FLOOR MOUNTED SYSTEM mas Time AEC 320 kvp 64 mas 320 ma 320 ma 320 DEN 0.0 mm Cu 17 in X 17 in 72.0 in FMT18 FLOOR MOUNTED SYSTEM with Synchronized Tracking System Overview Clinical Efficiency The FMT18 System was designed

More information

X-RAY IMAGING EE 472 F2017. Prof. Yasser Mostafa Kadah

X-RAY IMAGING EE 472 F2017. Prof. Yasser Mostafa Kadah X-RAY IMAGING EE 472 F2017 Prof. Yasser Mostafa Kadah www.k-space.org Recommended Textbook Stewart C. Bushong, Radiologic Science for Technologists: Physics, Biology, and Protection, 10 th ed., Mosby,

More information

1-1. GENERAL 1-2. DISCOVERY OF X-RAYS

1-1. GENERAL 1-2. DISCOVERY OF X-RAYS 1-1. GENERAL Radiography is a highly technical field, indispensable to the modern dental practice, but presenting many potential hazards. The dental radiographic specialist must be thoroughly familiar

More information

Maximizing clinical outcomes

Maximizing clinical outcomes Maximizing clinical outcomes Digital Tomosynthesis Dual Energy Subtraction Automated Long Length Imaging Improved image quality at a low dose Xray Xray Patented ISS capture technology promotes high sensitivity

More information

ELECTRONIC CONTROL CONCEPTS 160 Partition Street Saugerties, NY or local phone

ELECTRONIC CONTROL CONCEPTS 160 Partition Street Saugerties, NY or local phone ELECTRONIC CONTROL CONCEPTS 160 Partition Street Saugerties, NY 12477 (800)VIP-XRAY (845)247-9028 Fax or 800-847-9729 local phone 845-246-9013 http://www.eccxray.com sales@eccxray.com INSTRUCTION MANUAL

More information

Overview of Safety Code 35

Overview of Safety Code 35 Common Quality Control Procedures for All s Quality Control Procedures Film All s Daily Quality Control Tests Equipment Warm-up (D1) According to manufacturers instructions Can include auto calibration(d1)

More information

QUALITY CONTROL TESTS IN SOME DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY UNITS IN BANGLADESH

QUALITY CONTROL TESTS IN SOME DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY UNITS IN BANGLADESH Bangladesh Journal of Medical Physics Vol. 4, No.1, 2011 QUALITY CONTROL TESTS IN SOME DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY UNITS IN BANGLADESH M. Begum 1, A. S. Mollah 2, M. A. Zaman 3 and A. K. M. M. Rahman 4 1 Health Physics

More information

Technical data CAMARGUE CS-VH50/300. VARIABLE Height Bucky Table With Ceiling Suspension

Technical data CAMARGUE CS-VH50/300. VARIABLE Height Bucky Table With Ceiling Suspension Technical data VARIABLE Height Bucky Table With Ceiling Suspension Model Variations CAMARGUE FH (Fixed Height) CAMARGUE FH Tomo CAMARGUE FH Ceiling suspension CAMARGUE VH (Variable Height) CAMARGUE VH

More information

Effect of patient support pads on image quality and dose in fluoroscopy a)

Effect of patient support pads on image quality and dose in fluoroscopy a) Effect of patient support pads on image quality and dose in fluoroscopy a) William R. Geiser, Walter Huda, b) and Nikolaos A. Gkanatsios Department of Radiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida

More information

Diagnostic X-Ray Shielding

Diagnostic X-Ray Shielding Diagnostic X-Ray Shielding Multi-Slice CT Scanners Using NCRP 147 Methodology Melissa C. Martin, M.S., FAAPM, FACR Therapy Physics Inc., Bellflower, CA AAPM Annual Meeting, Orlando, FL FL Refresher Course

More information

Derivation of total filtration thickness for diagnostic x-ray source assembly

Derivation of total filtration thickness for diagnostic x-ray source assembly Physics in Medicine & Biology PAPER OPEN ACCESS Derivation of total filtration thickness for diagnostic x-ray source assembly To cite this article: Michiharu Sekimoto and Yoh Katoh 2016 Phys. Med. Biol.

More information

NJDEP Medical Physicist s Radiographic QC Survey Registration Number:

NJDEP Medical Physicist s Radiographic QC Survey Registration Number: Facility Name NJDEP ID # NJDEP Medical Physicist s Radiographic QC Survey PLEASE PRINT Facility Information Unit Information Manufacturer Model Console Model # Console serial # Tube serial # Location (room)

More information

Appropriate Inspection Distance of Digital X-Ray Imaging Equipment for Diagnosis

Appropriate Inspection Distance of Digital X-Ray Imaging Equipment for Diagnosis Indian Journal of Science and Technology Vol 8(S8), 380-386, April 2015 ISSN (Print) : 0974-6846 ISSN (Online) : 0974-5645 DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2015/v8iS8/70528 Appropriate Inspection Distance of Digital

More information

YSF - 300/DAR i

YSF - 300/DAR i C506-E067 Integrated Digital R/F System YSF - 300/DAR - 8000i photo shown with optional I.I. cover A Fully Integrated Digital R/F System Expanding the Clinical Boundaries. With more than 130 years of dedication

More information

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD INTERNATIONAL STANDARD IEC 62220-1 First edition 2003-10 Medical electrical equipment Characteristics of digital X-ray imaging devices Part 1: Determination of the detective quantum efficiency Appareils

More information

Ultimate DR flexibility

Ultimate DR flexibility Ultimate DR flexibility to fit your room, workflow, and budget KODAK DIRECTVIEW DR 7500 System KODAK DIRECTVIEW DR 7500 System YOU HAVE NEVER SEEN A DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEM LIKE THIS! Your radiography

More information

NEMA. Cardiology Phantom Nuclear Associates Model Diagnostic Imaging. Introduction. Features. Applications

NEMA. Cardiology Phantom Nuclear Associates Model Diagnostic Imaging. Introduction. Features. Applications NEMA Cardiology Phantom Nuclear Associates Model 07-680 Diagnostic Imaging! Phantom and test procedures simulate a range of fluoroscopically-guided invasive and interventional procedures! Provides simultaneous

More information

FOUR CATEGORIES OF SAFETY

FOUR CATEGORIES OF SAFETY OCTOBER 2013 FOUR CATEGORIES OF SAFETY DOSIMETRY PERSONAL SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT KNOWLEDGE PHYSICAL SAFETY DOSIMETRY THERMAL LUMINISCENT DEVICES AND FILM BADGES CNSC PERMISSIBLE DOSES WHOLE BODY DOSE

More information

Visualization of sources of scattered radiation from x-ray equipment used for interventional radiology

Visualization of sources of scattered radiation from x-ray equipment used for interventional radiology Visualization of sources of scattered radiation from x-ray equipment used for interventional radiology Poster No.: C-1190 Congress: ECR 2011 Type: Scientific Exhibit Authors: K. Chida, T. Takahashi, D.

More information

Assessment of Beam Alignment, Collimation and Half Value Layer of Some Selected X-Ray Machines in Plateau State, Nigeria

Assessment of Beam Alignment, Collimation and Half Value Layer of Some Selected X-Ray Machines in Plateau State, Nigeria International Journal of Innovative Scientific & Engineering Technologies Research 5(4):-5, Oct.-Dec., 07 SEAHI PUBLICATIONS, 07 www.seahipaj.org ISSN: 60-896X Assessment of Beam Alignment, Collimation

More information

Ansur TNT Users Manual. Plug-In

Ansur TNT Users Manual. Plug-In Ansur TNT 12000 Plug-In Users Manual August 2009, Rev. 2, 12/09 2009 Fluke Corporation. All rights reserved. Specifications are subject to change without notice. All product names are trademarks of their

More information

CR Basics and FAQ. Overview. Historical Perspective

CR Basics and FAQ. Overview. Historical Perspective Page: 1 of 6 CR Basics and FAQ Overview Computed Radiography is a term used to describe a system that electronically records a radiographic image. Computed Radiographic systems use unique image receptors

More information

8/3/2017. Use of EPIDs for Non-Routine Linac QA. Disclosure. Learning Objectives. Parts of this project received support from Varian Medical System.

8/3/2017. Use of EPIDs for Non-Routine Linac QA. Disclosure. Learning Objectives. Parts of this project received support from Varian Medical System. Use of EPIDs for Non-Routine Linac QA Bin Cai PhD Disclosure Parts of this project received support from Varian Medical System. Learning Objectives Learn the recent development of EPID based Non-routine

More information

While digital techniques have the potential to reduce patient doses, they also have the potential to significantly increase them.

While digital techniques have the potential to reduce patient doses, they also have the potential to significantly increase them. In press 2004 1 2 Guest Editorial (F. Mettler, H. Ringertz and E. Vano) Guest Editorial (F. Mettler, H. Ringertz and E. Vano) Digital radiology An appropriate analogy that is easy for most people to understand

More information

Title: A COMPARISON OF Cs-137 AND X-RAY SOURCES AS CALIBRATION REFERENCES FOR THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETER CHIPS

Title: A COMPARISON OF Cs-137 AND X-RAY SOURCES AS CALIBRATION REFERENCES FOR THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETER CHIPS Title: A COMPARISON OF Cs-137 AND X-RAY SOURCES AS CALIBRATION REFERENCES FOR THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETER CHIPS By Aravind Ravichandran arr192@mail.usask.ca University of Saskatchewan Address: 2424 Cumberland

More information