TEST REPORT. Product Name: Model No.: Applicant: Date of Receipt: Jul. 07, 2018

Transcription

1 Report No.:FCCA Page: 1 of 80 Product Name: Model No.: Applicant: Date of Receipt: Jul. 07, 2018 HyperX Cloud Flight Wireless Gaming Headset USB Dongle Cloud Flight, HXS-HSDG2 Kingston Digital, Inc Newhope Street Fountain Valley, CA 92708, U.S.A Finished date of Test: Aug. 03, 2018 Applicable Standards: 47 CFR Part 15, Subpart C, ANSI C63.10: 2013 FCC publication KDB D01 DTS Meas Guidance v04 Measurement on Digital Transmission Systems (DTS) Operating under Section Apr 5, 2017 We, Testing Laboratory Inc., hereby certify that one sample of the above was tested in our laboratory with positive results according to the above-mentioned standards. The records in the report are an accurate account of the results. Details of the results are given in the subsequent pages of this report. Tested By : (Richard Lin), Date: Approved By : ( Johnson Ho, Director ), Date: FMNG-059_1.1 REPORT

2 Page: 2 of 80 Revisions History Report No. Issue Date Revisions FCCA Jun. 19, 2017 Initial issue FCCA Aug. 14, 2018 Update RF Antenna (ANT1), Class II Change

3 Page: 3 of 80 Table of Contents 1. DOCUMENT POLICY AND TEST STATEMENT DOCUMENT POLICY TEST STATEMENT EUT MODIFICATION DESCRIPTION OF EUT AND TEST MODE GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF EUT DESCRIPTION OF EUT INTERNAL DEVICE DESCRIPTION OF TEST MODE EUT OPERATING CONDITION DESCRIPTION OF SUPPORT UNIT CHANNEL AND FREQUENCY TABLE DESCRIPTION OF CLASS II CHANGE DIFFERENCE DESCRIPTION OF APPLIED STANDARDS SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS TECHNICAL CHARACTERISTICS TEST CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST LIMIT TEST EQUIPMENT TEST SETUP TEST PROCEDURE TEST RESULT RADIATED EMISSION TEST LIMIT TEST EQUIPMENT TEST SET-UP TEST PROCEDURE TEST RESULT DB BANDWIDTH LIMIT TEST EQUIPMENT TEST SET-UP TEST PROCEDURE EUT OPERATING CONDITION TEST RESULT PEAK POWER TEST LIMIT TEST EQUIPMENT TEST SET-UP TEST PROCEDURE EUT OPERATING CONDITION TEST RESULT BAND EDGE TEST LIMIT...68

4 Page: 4 of TEST EQUIPMENT TEST SETUP TEST PROCEDURE TEST RESULT POWER DENSITY TEST LIMIT TEST EQUIPMENT TEST SET-UP TEST PROCEDURE EUT OPERATING CONDITION TEST RESULT ANTENNA APPLICATION ANTENNA REQUIREMENT RESULT TERMS OF ABBREVIATION...80

5 Page: 5 of DOCUMENT POLICY AND TEST STATEMENT 1.1 DOCUMENT POLICY - The report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of SRT Lab, Inc. - FCC Registered Test Site Number:TW TEST STATEMENT - The test results in the report apply only to the unit tested by SRT Lab. - There was no deviation from the requirements of test standards during the test. - DC power source, DC 5.0V from PC USB Port. 1.3 EUT MODIFICATION - No modification in SRT Lab.

6 Page: 6 of DESCRIPTION OF EUT AND TEST MODE 2.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF EUT HyperX Cloud Flight Wireless Gaming Headset PRODUCT USB Dongle MODEL NO. POWER SUPPLY CABLE FREQUENCY BAND CARRIER FREQUENCY Cloud Flight, HXS-HSDG2 DC power source, DC 5.0V from PC USB Port NA NUMBER OF CHANNEL 40 RATED RF OUTPUT POWER MODULATION TYPE MODE OF OPERATION ANTENNA TYPE ANTENNA GAIN OPERATING TEMPERATURE RANGE 2.4 GHz ~ GHz GHz ~ GHz 2.44 dbm (1.75 mw) Pi/4 DQPSK Duplex Chip Antenna ANT0:-1.73 dbi ANT1:1.69 dbi 0 ~ 40 C NOTE: For more detailed information, please refer to the EUT s specification or user s manual provided by manufacturer. 2.2 DESCRIPTION OF EUT INTERNAL DEVICE DEVICE BRAND / MAKER MODEL # FCC ID / DOC REMARK Micro USB Cable N/A N/A N/A 1.m shielded power cable AUXCable N/A N/A 1.3m shielded data cable. Microphone N/A N/A N/A N/A HyperX Cloud Flight Wireless Gaming Headset Kingston Cloud Flight N/A N/A

7 Page: 7 of DESCRIPTION OF TEST MODE Mode 1 Tx-1_ANT MHz 2 Tx-1_ANT MHz 3 Tx-2_ANT MHz 4 Tx-2_ANT MHz 5 Tx-3_ANT MHz 6 Tx-3_ANT MHz 7 Standby N/A 8 Link N/A NOTE: 1. Below 1 GHz were pre-tested in chamber and chosen the worst case for conducted and radiated emission test. 2. Above 1 GHz were tested individually. 3. The axis X,Y and Z we evaluate in chamber, the X axis is worst case. 2.4 EUT OPERATING CONDITION Tx-1, Tx-2, Tx3, Standby: 1. Setup the EUT and all peripheral devices. 2. Turn on the power of all equipment and EUT. 3. We will use the following programs under Windows 10 system to test EUT. 4. Open program VMItest Into mode Tx-1,. Tx-2, Tx3, Standby Link: 1. Setup the EUT and all peripheral devices. 2. Turn on the power of all equipment and EUT. 3. We will use the following programs under Windows 10 system to test EUT. 4. Play music & Use the recorder to record.

8 Page: 8 of DESCRIPTION OF SUPPORT UNIT The EUT was configured by the requirement of ANSI C63.10:2013. All interface ports were connected to the appropriate support units via specific cables. The support units and cables are listed below. NO DEVICE BRAND MODEL # FCC ID/DOC CABLE 1 PC ASUS M32AA1 DoC 1.5m unshielded power cable. 2 LCD Monitor ViewSonic VS10866 DoC 1.8m unshielded power cable. 1.5m shielded data cable. 3 Keyboard ASUS AW211 DoC 1.8m unshielded data cable. 4 Mouse ASUS MOBTUO DoC 1.5m unshielded data cable. 5 Printer HP C8991A DoC 1.5m unshielded power cable. 1.5m shielded data cable. 6 USB 2.0 HDD TERASYS F12-U DoC 1.5m unshielded power cable. NOTE: For the actual test configuration, please refer to the photos of testing. 2.6 CHANNEL AND FREQUENCY TABLE Channel Channel Channel CH MHz CH MHz CH MHz CH MHz CH MHz CH MHz CH MHz CH MHz CH MHz CH MHz CH MHz CH MHz CH MHz CH MHz CH MHz CH MHz CH MHz CH MHz CH MHz CH MHz CH MHz CH MHz CH MHz CH MHz CH MHz CH MHz CH MHz CH MHz CH MHz CH MHz CH MHz CH MHz CH MHz CH MHz CH MHz CH MHz CH MHz CH MHz CH MHz CH MHz -- --

9 Page: 9 of DESCRIPTION OF CLASS II CHANGE DIFFERENCE Models No.: Cloud Flight, HXS-HSDG2 are certified are identical in all aspects except for model number. In this application, one of the antennas wants to update. In the future, there will be two configurations of antenna in circulation on the market.

10 Page: 10 of DESCRIPTION OF APPLIED STANDARDS The EUT is a wireless product. According to the specifications provided by the applicant, it must comply with the requirements of the following standards: 47 CFR Part 15, Subpart C, ANSI C63.10: 2013 FCC publication KDB D01 DTS Meas Guidance v04 Measurement on Digital Transmission Systems (DTS) Operating under Section Apr 5, 2017 All tests have been performed and recorded as the above standards. 3.1 SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS The EUT has been tested according to the following specifications: STANDARD SECTION (c)(1)(i) TEST TYPE AND LIMIT RESULTS Antenna requirement RESULTS PASS AC Power Line Conducted Emission N/A (a)(2) 6 db Bandwidth PASS (b) Maximum Peak Conducted Output Power PASS (d) Band Edge Measurement: PASS (d) (e) Transmitter Radiated Emissions Limit: Table Power Density: Limit: 8dBm/3kHz PASS PASS

11 Page: 11 of TECHNICAL CHARACTERISTICS TEST 4.1 CONDUCTED EMISSION TEST LIMIT Class A (dbµv) Class B (dbµv) Quasi-peak Average Quasi-peak Average NOTE: 1. The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequencies. 2. The limit decreases in line with the logarithm of the frequency in the range of 0.15 to 0.50 MHz TEST EQUIPMENT The following test equipment was used for the test: EQUIPMENT/ FACILITIES EMI TEST RECEIVER SPECIFICATIONS MANUFACTURER 9 khz ~ 2.75 GHz ROHDE & SCHWARZ LISN 50 µh, 50 ohm SOLAR LISN 50 µh, 50 ohm SCHWARZBECK 50Ω BNC TYPE TERMINATOR 50Ω BNC TYPE TERMINATOR COAXIAL CABLE 50 ohm N/A 50 ohm N/A 5 m HUBER+SUHNE R FILTER 2 LINE, 30 A FIL.COIL GROUND PLANE GROUND PLANE PULSE LIMITER 2 m (H) x 3 m (W) 2.5 m (H) x 3 m (W) 9 khz ~ 30 MHz Insertion Loss= 10dB±0.3dB C, 0-100% RH MODEL#/ SERIAL# ESCS30 / R-24-BNC / NSLK 8127/ A/ L1TEQU005 B00-CD-357/ L1TEQU009 RG214/U / #5M (L1TCAB013) FC-943 / NCR 771 DUE DATE OF CAL. & CAL. CENTER JAN. 01, 2019 ETC OCT. 30, 2018 ETC DEC. 07, 2018 ETC NOV. 08, 2018 ETC MAY 17, 2019 ETC MAY 13, 2019 ETC FINAL TEST BE USED SRT N/A NCR SRT N/A NCR ROHDE & SCHWARZ ESH3Z2/ L1TTES009 MAR. 25, 2019 ETC THERMO-HYGR SEP. 17, 2018 TOP 20-A / 6644 O ETC TEST --- EZ-EMC SRT-03A1 NCR SOFTWARE NOTE:The calibration interval of the above test equipment is one year and the calibrations are traceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA.

12 Page: 12 of TEST SETUP NOTE : 1. The EUT was put on a wooden table with 0.8m heights above ground plane, and 0.4m away from reference ground plane (> 2mx2m). 2. For the actual test configuration, please refer to the photos of testing TEST PROCEDURE The EUT was tested according to the requirement of ANSI C63.10:2013 and CISPR22:2003. The frequency spectrum from 0.15 MHz to 30 MHz was investigated. The LISN used was 50 ohm/50µh as specified. All readings were quasi-peak and average values with 10 khz resolution bandwidth of the test receiver. The EUT system was operated in all typical methods by users. Both lines of the power mains of EUT were measured and the cables connected to EUT and support units were moved to find the maximum emission levels for each frequency. First, find the margin or higher points at least 6 points by software, then use manual to find the maximum data. The procedure is referred on the test procedure of SRT LAB.

13 Page: 13 of TEST RESULT Temperature: 25 C Humidity: 71 %RH Range: MHz Tested Mode: Tx-1_ANT0 Receiver Detector: Q.P. and AV. Modulation Type: Pi/4 DQPSK Tested By: Richard Lin Tested Date: Jul. 23, 2018 Power Line Measured:Line NOTE : 1. Measurement uncertainty is 2.92 db. 2. Result = Reading + Correction factor. 3. Corrected Factor = Cable loss + Insertion loss of LISN Difference of Pulse Limiter Factor between EMI Test Receiver corrected 10dB insertion loss. 4. Margin = Result Limit.

14 Page: 14 of 80 Temperature: 25 C Humidity: 71 %RH Range: MHz Tested Mode: Tx-1_ANT0 Receiver Detector: Q.P. and AV. Modulation Type: Pi/4 DQPSK Tested By: Richard Lin Tested Date: Jul. 23, 2018 Power Line Measured:Neutral NOTE : 1. Measurement uncertainty is 2.92 db. 2. Result = Reading + Correction factor. 3. Corrected Factor = Cable loss + Insertion loss of LISN Difference of Pulse Limiter Factor between EMI Test Receiver corrected 10dB insertion loss. 4. Margin = Result Limit.

15 Page: 15 of 80 Temperature: 25 C Humidity: 71 %RH Range: MHz Tested Mode: Tx-1_ANT1 Receiver Detector: Q.P. and AV. Modulation Type: Pi/4 DQPSK Tested By: Richard Lin Tested Date: Jul. 23, 2018 Power Line Measured:Line NOTE : 1. Measurement uncertainty is 2.92 db. 2. Result = Reading + Correction factor. 3. Corrected Factor = Cable loss + Insertion loss of LISN Difference of Pulse Limiter Factor between EMI Test Receiver corrected 10dB insertion loss. 4. Margin = Result Limit.

16 Page: 16 of 80 Temperature: 25 C Humidity: 71 %RH Range: MHz Tested Mode: Tx-1_ANT1 Receiver Detector: Q.P. and AV. Modulation Type: Pi/4 DQPSK Tested By: Richard Lin Tested Date: Jul. 23, 2018 Power Line Measured:Neutral NOTE : 1. Measurement uncertainty is 2.92 db. 2. Result = Reading + Correction factor. 3. Corrected Factor = Cable loss + Insertion loss of LISN Difference of Pulse Limiter Factor between EMI Test Receiver corrected 10dB insertion loss. 4. Margin = Result Limit.

17 Page: 17 of 80 Temperature: 25 C Humidity: 71 %RH Range: MHz Tested Mode: Tx-2_ANT0 Receiver Detector: Q.P. and AV. Modulation Type: Pi/4 DQPSK Tested By: Richard Lin Tested Date: Jul. 23, 2018 Power Line Measured:Line NOTE : 1. Measurement uncertainty is 2.92 db. 2. Result = Reading + Correction factor. 3. Corrected Factor = Cable loss + Insertion loss of LISN Difference of Pulse Limiter Factor between EMI Test Receiver corrected 10dB insertion loss. 4. Margin = Result Limit.

18 Page: 18 of 80 Temperature: 25 C Humidity: 71 %RH Range: MHz Tested Mode: Tx-2_ANT0 Receiver Detector: Q.P. and AV. Modulation Type: Pi/4 DQPSK Tested By: Richard Lin Tested Date: Jul. 23, 2018 Power Line Measured:Neutral NOTE : 1. Measurement uncertainty is 2.92 db. 2. Result = Reading + Correction factor. 3. Corrected Factor = Cable loss + Insertion loss of LISN Difference of Pulse Limiter Factor between EMI Test Receiver corrected 10dB insertion loss. 4. Margin = Result Limit.

19 Page: 19 of 80 Temperature: 25 C Humidity: 71 %RH Range: MHz Tested Mode: Tx-2_ANT1 Receiver Detector: Q.P. and AV. Modulation Type: Pi/4 DQPSK Tested By: Richard Lin Tested Date: Jul. 23, 2018 Power Line Measured:Line NOTE : 1. Measurement uncertainty is 2.92 db. 2. Result = Reading + Correction factor. 3. Corrected Factor = Cable loss + Insertion loss of LISN Difference of Pulse Limiter Factor between EMI Test Receiver corrected 10dB insertion loss. 4. Margin = Result Limit.

20 Page: 20 of 80 Temperature: 25 C Humidity: 71 %RH Range: MHz Tested Mode: Tx-2_ANT1 Receiver Detector: Q.P. and AV. Modulation Type: Pi/4 DQPSK Tested By: Richard Lin Tested Date: Jul. 23, 2018 Power Line Measured:Neutral NOTE : 1. Measurement uncertainty is 2.92 db. 2. Result = Reading + Correction factor. 3. Corrected Factor = Cable loss + Insertion loss of LISN Difference of Pulse Limiter Factor between EMI Test Receiver corrected 10dB insertion loss. 4. Margin = Result Limit.

21 Page: 21 of 80 Temperature: 25 C Humidity: 71 %RH Range: MHz Tested Mode: Tx-3_ANT0 Receiver Detector: Q.P. and AV. Modulation Type: Pi/4 DQPSK Tested By: Richard Lin Tested Date: Jul. 23, 2018 Power Line Measured:Line NOTE : 1. Measurement uncertainty is 2.92 db. 2. Result = Reading + Correction factor. 3. Corrected Factor = Cable loss + Insertion loss of LISN Difference of Pulse Limiter Factor between EMI Test Receiver corrected 10dB insertion loss. 4. Margin = Result Limit.

22 Page: 22 of 80 Temperature: 25 C Humidity: 71 %RH Range: MHz Tested Mode: Tx-3_ANT0 Receiver Detector: Q.P. and AV. Modulation Type: Pi/4 DQPSK Tested By: Richard Lin Tested Date: Jul. 23, 2018 Power Line Measured:Neutral NOTE : 1. Measurement uncertainty is 2.92 db. 2. Result = Reading + Correction factor. 3. Corrected Factor = Cable loss + Insertion loss of LISN Difference of Pulse Limiter Factor between EMI Test Receiver corrected 10dB insertion loss. 4. Margin = Result Limit.

23 Page: 23 of 80 Temperature: 25 C Humidity: 71 %RH Range: MHz Tested Mode: Tx-3_ANT1 Receiver Detector: Q.P. and AV. Modulation Type: Pi/4 DQPSK Tested By: Richard Lin Tested Date: Jul. 23, 2018 Power Line Measured:Line NOTE : 1. Measurement uncertainty is 2.92 db. 2. Result = Reading + Correction factor. 3. Corrected Factor = Cable loss + Insertion loss of LISN Difference of Pulse Limiter Factor between EMI Test Receiver corrected 10dB insertion loss. 4. Margin = Result Limit.

24 Page: 24 of 80 Temperature: 25 C Humidity: 71 %RH Range: MHz Tested Mode: Tx-3_ANT1 Receiver Detector: Q.P. and AV. Modulation Type: Pi/4 DQPSK Tested By: Richard Lin Tested Date: Jul. 23, 2018 Power Line Measured:Neutral NOTE : 1. Measurement uncertainty is 2.92 db. 2. Result = Reading + Correction factor. 3. Corrected Factor = Cable loss + Insertion loss of LISN Difference of Pulse Limiter Factor between EMI Test Receiver corrected 10dB insertion loss. 4. Margin = Result Limit.

25 Page: 25 of 80 Temperature: 25 C Humidity: 71 %RH Range: MHz Tested Mode: Standby Receiver Detector: Q.P. and AV. Modulation Type: Pi/4 DQPSK Tested By: Richard Lin Tested Date: Jul. 23, 2018 Power Line Measured:Line NOTE : 1. Measurement uncertainty is 2.92 db. 2. Result = Reading + Correction factor. 3. Corrected Factor = Cable loss + Insertion loss of LISN Difference of Pulse Limiter Factor between EMI Test Receiver corrected 10dB insertion loss. 4. Margin = Result Limit.

26 Page: 26 of 80 Temperature: 25 C Humidity: 71 %RH Range: MHz Tested Mode: Standby Receiver Detector: Q.P. and AV. Modulation Type: Pi/4 DQPSK Tested By: Richard Lin Tested Date: Jul. 23, 2018 Power Line Measured:Neutral NOTE : 1. Measurement uncertainty is 2.92 db. 2. Result = Reading + Correction factor. 3. Corrected Factor = Cable loss + Insertion loss of LISN Difference of Pulse Limiter Factor between EMI Test Receiver corrected 10dB insertion loss. 4. Margin = Result Limit.

27 Page: 27 of 80 Temperature: 25 C Humidity: 71 %RH Range: MHz Tested Mode: Link Receiver Detector: Q.P. and AV. Modulation Type: Pi/4 DQPSK Tested By: Richard Lin Tested Date: Jul. 23, 2018 Power Line Measured:Line NOTE : 1. Measurement uncertainty is 2.92 db. 2. Result = Reading + Correction factor. 3. Corrected Factor = Cable loss + Insertion loss of LISN Difference of Pulse Limiter Factor between EMI Test Receiver corrected 10dB insertion loss. 4. Margin = Result Limit.

28 Page: 28 of 80 Temperature: 25 C Humidity: 71 %RH Range: MHz Tested Mode: Link Receiver Detector: Q.P. and AV. Modulation Type: Pi/4 DQPSK Tested By: Richard Lin Tested Date: Jul. 23, 2018 Power Line Measured:Neutral NOTE : 1. Measurement uncertainty is 2.92 db. 2. Result = Reading + Correction factor. 3. Corrected Factor = Cable loss + Insertion loss of LISN Difference of Pulse Limiter Factor between EMI Test Receiver corrected 10dB insertion loss. 4. Margin = Result Limit.

29 Page: 29 of RADIATED EMISSION TEST LIMIT FCC Part15, Subpart C Section limit of radiated emission for frequency below1000mhz. The emissions from an intentional radiator shall not exceed the field strength levels specified in the following table: FREQUENCY FIELD STRENGTH FIELD STRENGTH DISTANCE (m) (microvolts/meter) /F(kHz) log(kHz) /F(kHz) log(kHz) Above NOTE: dbuv (in 30m) = 70 dbuv (in 3m). 2. In the emission tables above, the tighter limit applies at the band edges. 3. Distance refers to the distance between measuring instrument, antemma, and the closest point of any part of the device or system. FCC Part 15, Section15.35(b) limit of radiated emission for frequency above 1000 MHz Class A (dbuv/m) (at 3m) Class B (dbuv/m) (at 3m) FREQUENCY PEAK AVERAGE PEAK AVERAGE Above

30 Page: 30 of TEST EQUIPMENT Below 1 GHz The following test equipment was used during the radiated emission test: EQUIPMENT/ FACILITIES SPECTRUM ANALYZER LOOP ANTENNA BICONICAL ANTENNA LOG PERIODIC ANTENNA PRE-AMPLIFIER OPEN AREA TEST SITE ANECHOIC CHAMBER SPECIFICATIONS MANUFACTURER 9 khz ~ 40GHz 9 khz ~ 30 MHz 30 MHz ~ 200 MHz 200 MHz ~ 1 GHz 0.1 MHz ~ 1.3 GHz 3 10 M MEASUREMENT 3 M MEASUREMENT ROHDE & SCHWARZ ROHDE & SCHWARZ EMCO EMCO HP SRT SRT COAXIAL CABLE 30 M TIMES COAXIAL CABLE 9k - 1GHz Suncity FILTER 2 LINE, 30 A FIL.COIL MODEL#/ SERIAL# FSP40 / HFH2-Z2 / / / 11966C 3146/ D / 2944A06746 A02 / SRT002 A01 / SRT001 LMR-400 / #30M(L1TCAB014) CABLE14/ EQM-0158, #14-1M FC-943/ 869 CDN L-801 M2/M3 / 2790 DUE DATE OF CAL. & CAL. CENTER JAN. 01, 2019 ETC FEB. 24, 2019 ETC JUN. 12, 2019 ETC DEC. 24, 2018 ETC DEC. 14, 2018 ETC MAR. 08, 2019 SRT SEP. 13, 2018 SRT JUN. 03, 2019 ETC DEC. 17, 2018 ETC NCR FINAL TEST BE USED 0.15 MHz ~ MAY 28, 2019 CDN LUTHI 300 MHz ETC 15 40, SEP. 17, 2018 THERMO-HYGRO TOP 20-A / % RH ETC TEST SOFTWARE --- EZ-EMC SRT-03A1 NCR NOTE: The Open Area Test Site (SRT-1) is registered by FCC with No

31 Page: 31 of 80 Above 1 GHz The following test equipment was used during the radiated emission test: EQUIPMENT/ FACILITIES SPECTRUM ANALYZER HORN ANTENNA SPECIFICATIONS MANUFACTURER 9 khz ~ 40GHz 1 GHz ~ 18 GHz ROHDE & SCHWARZ EMCO MODEL#/ SERIAL# FSP40 / / HORN ANTENNA 18 ~ 40 GHZ ETS-LINDGREN 3116 / PRE-AMPLIFIER OPEN AREA TEST SITE K-TYPE CABLE K-TYPE CABLE 1 GHz ~ 26.5 GHz AGILENT 3 10 M MEASUREMENT UP TO 40 GHz 3 m UP TO 40 GHz, 1 m SRT HUBER+SUHNE R HUBER+SUHNE R FILTER 2 LINE, 30 A FIL.COIL THERMO-HYGRO 15 40, 0-100% RH 8449B/ 3008A01995 A02 / SRT002 SF102-46/2*11SK2 52 /MY2611/2 SF102/2*11SK252 /MY3331/2 FC-943/ 869 TOP 20-A / 7685 DUE DATE OF CAL. & CAL. CENTER JAN. 01, 2019 ETC NOV. 28, 2018 ETC JAN. 15, 2019 ETC DEC. 27, 2018 ETC MAR. 08, 2019 SRT MAR. 05, 2019 ETC SEP. 28, 2018 ETC NCR SEP. 17, 2018 ETC FINAL TEST BE USED

32 Page: 32 of TEST SET-UP 9KHz ~ 30MHz Turn Table EUT Power Cable Coaxial 0.8m Cable Filter To utility Power 3m EMI Receiver Ground Plane 30 MHz ~ 1 GHz

33 Page: 33 of 80 Above 1 GHz NOTE: The EUT system was put on a wooden table with 1.5m heights above a ground plane. For the actual test configuration, please refer to the photos of testing TEST PROCEDURE The EUT was tested according to the requirement of ANSI C63.10:2013 and CISPR 22:2003. When the frequency spectrum measured started from 9 khz to 30 MHz, then use antenna is a loop antenna. The measurements were made at an open area test site with 3 meter measurement distance under 1 GHz and with 3m distance above 1GHz. The frequency spectrum measured started from 9kHz to 30MHz and 30 MHz to 1 GHz, all readings were quasi-peak values with 120 khz resolution bandwidth of the test receiver. Above 1 GHz, the measurements were made at an open area test site with 3 meter measurement distance and all readings were peak or average values with 1 MHz resolution bandwidth of the test receiver. The EUT system was operated in all typical methods by users. The cables connected to EUT and support units were moved to find the maximum emission levels for each frequency. First, find the margin or higher points at least 6 points by software, then use manual to find the maximum data. The procedure is referred on the test procedure of SRT LAB.

34 Page: 34 of TEST RESULT Temperature: 21 C Humidity: 66 %RH Range: 9 khz 30 MHz Measured Distance: 3 m Receiver Detector: AV. Tested Mode: Tx-1_ANT0 Tested By: Richard Lin Tested Date: Aug. 02, 2018 Cable Ant. Fac. Reading Emission Limit Margin (KHz) Loss (db/m) (dbμv) (dbμv/m) (dbμv/m) Temperature: 21 C Humidity: 66 %RH Range: 9 khz 30 MHz Measured Distance: 3 m Receiver Detector: AV. Tested Mode: Tx-1_ANT1 Tested By: Richard Lin Tested Date: Aug. 02, 2018 Cable Ant. Fac. Reading Emission Limit Margin (KHz) Loss (db/m) (dbμv) (dbμv/m) (dbμv/m)

35 Page: 35 of 80 Temperature: 21 C Humidity: 66 %RH Range: 9 khz 30 MHz Measured Distance: 3 m Receiver Detector: AV. Tested Mode: Tx-2_ANT0 Tested By: Richard Lin Tested Date: Aug. 02, 2018 Cable Ant. Fac. Reading Emission Limit Margin (KHz) Loss (db/m) (dbμv) (dbμv/m) (dbμv/m) Temperature: 21 C Humidity: 66 %RH Range: 9 khz 30 MHz Measured Distance: 3 m Receiver Detector: AV. Tested Mode: Tx-2_ANT1 Tested By: Richard Lin Tested Date: Aug. 02, 2018 Cable Ant. Fac. Reading Emission Limit Margin (KHz) Loss (db/m) (dbμv) (dbμv/m) (dbμv/m)

36 Page: 36 of 80 Temperature: 21 C Humidity: 66 %RH Range: 9 khz 30 MHz Measured Distance: 3 m Receiver Detector: AV. Tested Mode: Tx-3_ANT0 Tested By: Richard Lin Tested Date: Aug. 02, 2018 Cable Ant. Fac. Reading Emission Limit Margin (KHz) Loss (db/m) (dbμv) (dbμv/m) (dbμv/m) Temperature: 21 C Humidity: 66 %RH Range: 9 khz 30 MHz Measured Distance: 3 m Receiver Detector: AV. Tested Mode: Tx-3_ANT1 Tested By: Richard Lin Tested Date: Aug. 02, 2018 Cable Ant. Fac. Reading Emission Limit Margin (KHz) Loss (db/m) (dbμv) (dbμv/m) (dbμv/m)

37 Page: 37 of 80 Temperature: 21 C Humidity: 66 %RH Range: 9 khz 30 MHz Measured Distance: 3 m Receiver Detector: AV. Tested Mode: Standby Tested By: Richard Lin Tested Date: Aug. 02, 2018 Cable Ant. Fac. Reading Emission Limit Margin (KHz) Loss (db/m) (dbμv) (dbμv/m) (dbμv/m) Temperature: 21 C Humidity: 66 %RH Range: 9 khz 30 MHz Measured Distance: 3 m Receiver Detector: AV. Tested Mode: Link Tested By: Richard Lin Tested Date: Aug. 02, 2018 Cable Ant. Fac. Reading Emission Limit Margin (KHz) Loss (db/m) (dbμv) (dbμv/m) (dbμv/m)

38 Page: 38 of 80 Temperature: 21 C Humidity: 66 %RH Range: 30 M 1 GHz Tested Mode: Tx-1_ANT0 Detector Type: Quasi-peak IF Bandwidth: 120 khz Tested By: Richard Lin Tested Date: Aug. 02, 2018 Antenna Polarization:Horizontal Cable Antenna Reading Emission Pre-Amp Loss Factor Data Level (db/m) (dbµv) Limit Margin AZ( o ) EL(m) Antenna Polarization:Vertical Cable Loss Antenna Factor (db/m) Reading Data (dbµv) Pre-Amp Emission Level Limit Margin AZ( o ) EL(m) NOTE : 1. Measurement uncertainty is 4.20 db. 2. "*": Measurement does not apply for this frequency. 3. Emissiom Level = Reading Value + Ant. Factor + Cable Loss Pre-Amplifier. 4. The field strength of other emission frequencies were very low against the limit.

39 Page: 39 of 80 Temperature: 21 C Humidity: 66 %RH Range: 30 M 1 GHz Tested Mode: Tx-1_ANT1 Detector Type: Quasi-peak IF Bandwidth: 120 khz Tested By: Richard Lin Tested Date: Aug. 02, 2018 Antenna Polarization:Horizontal Cable Antenna Reading Emission Pre-Amp Loss Factor Data Level (db/m) (dbµv) Limit Margin AZ( o ) EL(m) Antenna Polarization:Vertical Cable Loss Antenna Factor (db/m) Reading Data (dbµv) Pre-Amp Emission Level Limit Margin AZ( o ) EL(m) NOTE : 1. Measurement uncertainty is 4.20 db. 2. "*": Measurement does not apply for this frequency. 3. Emissiom Level = Reading Value + Ant. Factor + Cable Loss Pre-Amplifier. 4. The field strength of other emission frequencies were very low against the limit.

40 Page: 40 of 80 Temperature: 21 C Humidity: 66 %RH Range: 30 M 1 GHz Tested Mode: Tx-2_ANT0 Detector Type: Quasi-peak IF Bandwidth: 120 khz Tested By: Richard Lin Tested Date: Aug. 02, 2018 Antenna Polarization:Horizontal Cable Antenna Reading Emission Pre-Amp Loss Factor Data Level (db/m) (dbµv) Limit Margin AZ( o ) EL(m) Antenna Polarization:Vertical Cable Loss Antenna Factor (db/m) Reading Data (dbµv) Pre-Amp Emission Level Limit Margin AZ( o ) EL(m) NOTE : 1. Measurement uncertainty is 4.20 db. 2. "*": Measurement does not apply for this frequency. 3. Emissiom Level = Reading Value + Ant. Factor + Cable Loss Pre-Amplifier. 4. The field strength of other emission frequencies were very low against the limit.

41 Page: 41 of 80 Temperature: 21 C Humidity: 66 %RH Range: 30 M 1 GHz Tested Mode: Tx-2_ANT1 Detector Type: Quasi-peak IF Bandwidth: 120 khz Tested By: Richard Lin Tested Date: Aug. 02, 2018 Antenna Polarization:Horizontal Cable Antenna Reading Emission Pre-Amp Loss Factor Data Level (db/m) (dbµv) Limit Margin AZ( o ) EL(m) Antenna Polarization:Vertical Cable Loss Antenna Factor (db/m) Reading Data (dbµv) Pre-Amp Emission Level Limit Margin AZ( o ) EL(m) NOTE : 1. Measurement uncertainty is 4.20 db. 2. "*": Measurement does not apply for this frequency. 3. Emissiom Level = Reading Value + Ant. Factor + Cable Loss Pre-Amplifier. 4. The field strength of other emission frequencies were very low against the limit.

42 Page: 42 of 80 Temperature: 21 C Humidity: 66 %RH Range: 30 M 1 GHz Tested Mode: Tx-3_ANT0 Detector Type: Quasi-peak IF Bandwidth: 120 khz Tested By: Richard Lin Tested Date: Aug. 02, 2018 Antenna Polarization:Horizontal Cable Antenna Reading Emission Pre-Amp Loss Factor Data Level (db/m) (dbµv) Limit Margin AZ( o ) EL(m) Antenna Polarization:Vertical Cable Loss Antenna Factor (db/m) Reading Data (dbµv) Pre-Amp Emission Level Limit Margin AZ( o ) EL(m) NOTE : 1. Measurement uncertainty is 4.20 db. 2. "*": Measurement does not apply for this frequency. 3. Emissiom Level = Reading Value + Ant. Factor + Cable Loss Pre-Amplifier. 4. The field strength of other emission frequencies were very low against the limit.

43 Page: 43 of 80 Temperature: 21 C Humidity: 66 %RH Range: 30 M 1 GHz Tested Mode: Tx-3_ANT1 Detector Type: Quasi-peak IF Bandwidth: 120 khz Tested By: Richard Lin Tested Date: Aug. 02, 2018 Antenna Polarization:Horizontal Cable Antenna Reading Emission Pre-Amp Loss Factor Data Level (db/m) (dbµv) Limit Margin AZ( o ) EL(m) Antenna Polarization:Vertical Cable Loss Antenna Factor (db/m) Reading Data (dbµv) Pre-Amp Emission Level Limit Margin AZ( o ) EL(m) NOTE : 1. Measurement uncertainty is 4.20 db. 2. "*": Measurement does not apply for this frequency. 3. Emissiom Level = Reading Value + Ant. Factor + Cable Loss Pre-Amplifier. 4. The field strength of other emission frequencies were very low against the limit.

44 Page: 44 of 80 Temperature: 21 C Humidity: 66 %RH Range: 30 M 1 GHz Tested Mode: Standby Detector Type: Quasi-peak IF Bandwidth: 120 khz Tested By: Richard Lin Tested Date: Aug. 02, 2018 Antenna Polarization:Horizontal Cable Antenna Reading Emission Pre-Amp Loss Factor Data Level (db/m) (dbµv) Limit Margin AZ( o ) EL(m) Antenna Polarization:Vertical Cable Loss Antenna Factor (db/m) Reading Data (dbµv) Pre-Amp Emission Level Limit Margin AZ( o ) EL(m) NOTE : 1. Measurement uncertainty is 4.20 db. 2. "*": Measurement does not apply for this frequency. 3. Emissiom Level = Reading Value + Ant. Factor + Cable Loss Pre-Amplifier. 4. The field strength of other emission frequencies were very low against the limit.

45 Page: 45 of 80 Temperature: 21 C Humidity: 66 %RH Range: 30 M 1 GHz Tested Mode: Link Detector Type: Quasi-peak IF Bandwidth: 120 khz Tested By: Richard Lin Tested Date: Aug. 02, 2018 Antenna Polarization:Horizontal Cable Antenna Reading Emission Pre-Amp Loss Factor Data Level (db/m) (dbµv) Limit Margin AZ( o ) EL(m) Antenna Polarization:Vertical Cable Loss Antenna Factor (db/m) Reading Data (dbµv) Pre-Amp Emission Level Limit Margin AZ( o ) EL(m) NOTE : 1. Measurement uncertainty is 4.20 db. 2. "*": Measurement does not apply for this frequency. 3. Emissiom Level = Reading Value + Ant. Factor + Cable Loss Pre-Amplifier. 4. The field strength of other emission frequencies were very low against the limit.

46 Page: 46 of 80 Temperature: 23 C Humidity: 69 %RH Range: 1 GHz 25 GHz Tested Mode: Tx-1_ANT0 Detector Type: PK. and AV. IF Bandwidth: 1 MHz VBW: 3 MHz Tested Date: Aug. 03, 2018 Antenna Polarization:Horizontal Reading Emission Correct Ant. Limit Margin Data Level AZ EL Factor Factor (dbµv) ( o ) (m) (db/m) PK. AV. PK. AV. PK. AV. PK. AV Antenna Polarization:Vertical Correct Factor Ant. Factor (db/m) Reading Data (dbµv) Emission Level Limit Margin PK. AV. PK. AV. PK. AV. PK. AV NOTE: 1. Measurement uncertainty is 4.04 db. 2. "*": The Peak reading value also meets average limit and measurement with the average detector is unnecessary. 3. Emissiom Level = Reading Value + Ant. Factor + Correct Factor (incl.:cable Loss and Pre-Amplifier Gain) 4. The field strength of other emission frequencies were very low against the limit. 5. (F):The field stregth of fundamental frequency. AZ ( o ) EL (m)

47 Page: 47 of 80 Temperature: 23 C Humidity: 69 %RH Range: 1 GHz 25 GHz Tested Mode: Tx-1_ANT0 (Fundamental and Harmonics) Detector: PK. and AV. IF Bandwidth: 1 MHz VBW: 3 MHz Tested Date: Aug. 03, 2018 Antenna Polarization:Horizontal Reading Emission Correct Ant. Limit Margin Data Level AZ EL Factor Factor (dbµv) ( o ) (m) (db/m) PK. AV. PK. AV. PK. AV. PK. AV (F) Antenna Polarization:Vertical Correct Factor Ant. Factor (db/m) Reading Data (dbµv) Emission Level Limit Margin PK. AV. PK. AV. PK. AV. PK. AV (F) NOTE: 1. Measurement uncertainty is 4.04 db. 2. "*": The Peak reading value also meets average limit and measurement with the average detector is unnecessary. 3. Emissiom Level = Reading Value + Ant. Factor + Correct Factor (incl.:cable Loss and Pre-Amplifier Gain) 4. The field strength of other emission frequencies were very low against the limit. 5. (F):The field stregth of fundamental frequency. AZ ( o ) EL (m)

48 Page: 48 of 80 Temperature: 23 C Humidity: 69 %RH Range: 1 GHz 25 GHz Tested Mode: Tx-1_ANT1 Detector Type: PK. and AV. IF Bandwidth: 1 MHz VBW: 3 MHz Tested Date: Aug. 03, 2018 Antenna Polarization:Horizontal Reading Emission Correct Ant. Limit Margin Data Level AZ EL Factor Factor (dbµv) ( o ) (m) (db/m) PK. AV. PK. AV. PK. AV. PK. AV Antenna Polarization:Vertical Correct Factor Ant. Factor (db/m) Reading Data (dbµv) Emission Level Limit Margin PK. AV. PK. AV. PK. AV. PK. AV NOTE: 1. Measurement uncertainty is 4.04 db. 2. "*": The Peak reading value also meets average limit and measurement with the average detector is unnecessary. 3. Emissiom Level = Reading Value + Ant. Factor + Correct Factor (incl.:cable Loss and Pre-Amplifier Gain) 4. The field strength of other emission frequencies were very low against the limit. 5. (F):The field stregth of fundamental frequency. AZ ( o ) EL (m)

49 Page: 49 of 80 Temperature: 23 C Humidity: 69 %RH Range: 1 GHz 25 GHz Tested Mode: Tx-1_ANT1 (Fundamental and Harmonics) Detector: PK. and AV. IF Bandwidth: 1 MHz VBW: 3 MHz Tested Date: Aug. 03, 2018 Antenna Polarization:Horizontal Reading Emission Correct Ant. Limit Margin Data Level AZ EL Factor Factor (dbµv) ( o ) (m) (db/m) PK. AV. PK. AV. PK. AV. PK. AV (F) Antenna Polarization:Vertical Correct Factor Ant. Factor (db/m) Reading Data (dbµv) Emission Level Limit Margin PK. AV. PK. AV. PK. AV. PK. AV (F) NOTE: 1. Measurement uncertainty is 4.04 db. 2. "*": The Peak reading value also meets average limit and measurement with the average detector is unnecessary. 3. Emissiom Level = Reading Value + Ant. Factor + Correct Factor (incl.:cable Loss and Pre-Amplifier Gain) 4. The field strength of other emission frequencies were very low against the limit. 5. (F):The field stregth of fundamental frequency. AZ ( o ) EL (m)

50 Page: 50 of 80 Temperature: 23 C Humidity: 69 %RH Range: 1 GHz 25 GHz Tested Mode: Tx-2_ANT0 Detector Type: PK. and AV. IF Bandwidth: 1 MHz VBW: 3 MHz Tested Date: Aug. 03, 2018 Antenna Polarization:Horizontal Reading Emission Correct Ant. Limit Margin Data Level AZ EL Factor Factor (dbµv) ( o ) (m) (db/m) PK. AV. PK. AV. PK. AV. PK. AV Antenna Polarization:Vertical Correct Factor Ant. Factor (db/m) Reading Data (dbµv) Emission Level Limit Margin PK. AV. PK. AV. PK. AV. PK. AV NOTE: 1. Measurement uncertainty is 4.04 db. 2. "*": The Peak reading value also meets average limit and measurement with the average detector is unnecessary. 3. Emissiom Level = Reading Value + Ant. Factor + Correct Factor (incl.:cable Loss and Pre-Amplifier Gain) 4. The field strength of other emission frequencies were very low against the limit. 5. (F):The field stregth of fundamental frequency. AZ ( o ) EL (m)

51 Page: 51 of 80 Temperature: 23 C Humidity: 69 %RH Range: 1 GHz 25 GHz Tested Mode: Tx-2_ANT0 (Fundamental and Harmonics) Detector: PK. and AV. IF Bandwidth: 1 MHz VBW: 3 MHz Tested Date: Aug. 03, 2018 Antenna Polarization:Horizontal Reading Emission Correct Ant. Limit Margin Data Level AZ EL Factor Factor (dbµv) ( o ) (m) (db/m) PK. AV. PK. AV. PK. AV. PK. AV (F) Antenna Polarization:Vertical Correct Factor Ant. Factor (db/m) Reading Data (dbµv) Emission Level Limit Margin PK. AV. PK. AV. PK. AV. PK. AV (F) NOTE: 1. Measurement uncertainty is 4.04 db. 2. "*": The Peak reading value also meets average limit and measurement with the average detector is unnecessary. 3. Emissiom Level = Reading Value + Ant. Factor + Correct Factor (incl.:cable Loss and Pre-Amplifier Gain) 4. The field strength of other emission frequencies were very low against the limit. 5. (F):The field stregth of fundamental frequency. AZ ( o ) EL (m)

52 Page: 52 of 80 Temperature: 23 C Humidity: 69 %RH Range: 1 GHz 25 GHz Tested Mode: Tx-2_ANT1 Detector Type: PK. and AV. IF Bandwidth: 1 MHz VBW: 3 MHz Tested Date: Aug. 03, 2018 Antenna Polarization:Horizontal Reading Emission Correct Ant. Limit Margin Data Level AZ EL Factor Factor (dbµv) ( o ) (m) (db/m) PK. AV. PK. AV. PK. AV. PK. AV Antenna Polarization:Vertical Correct Factor Ant. Factor (db/m) Reading Data (dbµv) Emission Level Limit Margin PK. AV. PK. AV. PK. AV. PK. AV NOTE: 1. Measurement uncertainty is 4.04 db. 2. "*": The Peak reading value also meets average limit and measurement with the average detector is unnecessary. 3. Emissiom Level = Reading Value + Ant. Factor + Correct Factor (incl.:cable Loss and Pre-Amplifier Gain) 4. The field strength of other emission frequencies were very low against the limit. 5. (F):The field stregth of fundamental frequency. AZ ( o ) EL (m)

53 Page: 53 of 80 Temperature: 23 C Humidity: 69 %RH Range: 1 GHz 25 GHz Tested Mode: Tx-2_ANT1 (Fundamental and Harmonics) Detector: PK. and AV. IF Bandwidth: 1 MHz VBW: 3 MHz Tested Date: Aug. 03, 2018 Antenna Polarization:Horizontal Reading Emission Correct Ant. Limit Margin Data Level AZ EL Factor Factor (dbµv) ( o ) (m) (db/m) PK. AV. PK. AV. PK. AV. PK. AV (F) Antenna Polarization:Vertical Correct Factor Ant. Factor (db/m) Reading Data (dbµv) Emission Level Limit Margin PK. AV. PK. AV. PK. AV. PK. AV (F) NOTE: 1. Measurement uncertainty is 4.04 db. 2. "*": The Peak reading value also meets average limit and measurement with the average detector is unnecessary. 3. Emissiom Level = Reading Value + Ant. Factor + Correct Factor (incl.:cable Loss and Pre-Amplifier Gain) 4. The field strength of other emission frequencies were very low against the limit. 5. (F):The field stregth of fundamental frequency. AZ ( o ) EL (m)