PA-100 RP-10 RAM R-200

Transcription

1 Tuesday, December 27, 2016 PA-100 RP-10 RAM R-200 Report on the inspection for compliance with United States Military Standards MIL-STD-810E MIL-STD-462 MIL-STD-1512 Name Date Signature Conducted by: Valentin Ladizhensky 30/11/2016 Approved by: Dimitry Ginzburg 04/12/2016

2 Contents 1. Scope Standard test conditions Executive Summary Detailed requirements and test procedures Environmental factors EMC ANNEX A Qualitech-Environment Test Report... ANNEX B Qualitech-EMC Test Report... Page 2 of 74

3 This Page Is Left Blank Page 3 of 74

4 1. Scope 1.1. Purpose. - The test report describes all the requirements, procedures and results in accordance with the United States Military Standards. This report includes all the test activities that were performed to demonstrate compliance with the standard. - Basis for inspections is a document 720-ERAV /1 that lists the requirements for inspection and special conditions - Report Arrangement : Section 4 of this test report is an executive summary with test results. The numbering of the tests is according to the MIL-STD- numbers Equipment under test: - PA-100M Alpha Detector contains atmospheric cells made of aluminium containing a thin anode wire. The surface of the cell is a membrane of aluminized Mylar, protected by a fine stainless steel wire mesh. - RP-10 Gamma Detector scintillation probe. Contains a highly efficient, hermetically sealed, NaI(Tl) scintillator, 2 diameter and 0.04 thick, coupled to a 2 photomultiplier tube. This is encased in a rugged, window splash proof housing for protection against shock, vibration and humidity, with 1mm Aluminium. - RAM R This Monitor connect with the two above-mentioned detectors (PA-100 and RP-10). RAM-R-200 is portable multifunctional, rugged survey meter designed for measuring wide range gamma radiation fields and contamination. The RAM R-200 along with its internal detectors is waterproof to a depth of 1 meter. - RAM R-200 Detector Cable: This is a special cable for connection between the Monitor and Detectors. - Case (BAK-1425) Case for storage and transportation of the above equipment. Watertight, crushproof, and dustproof with Foam. (By Polycart Technologies Ltd.) Table 1. Detectors under Test No Hardware Component Manufacturer PN Serial N Quantity 1 RAM R RAM R RAM R RAM R PA-100M BAK PA-100M BAK RP-10 BAK RP-10 BAK Page 4 of 74

5 1.3. References Testing is carried out according the recommendations and requirements of the following sources: ERAV /1 Document Basis for inspections - DoD Test Readiness Review Checklist (TRR) - TEST AND EVALUATION MANAGEMENT GUIDE, PUBLISHED BY THE DEFENSE ACQUISITION UNIVERSITY PRESS FORT BELVOIR, VA IEC (ESD Immunity) - MIL-STD-810 MILITARY STANDARD: ENVIRONMENTAL TEST METHODS AND ENGINEERING GUIDELINES - MIL-STD-462 MILITARY STANDARD: MEASUREMENT OF ELECTROMAGNETIC INTERFERENCE CHARACTERISTICS - MIL-STD-1512 MILITARY STANDARD: ELECTROEXPLOSIVE SUBSYSTEMS, ELECTRICALLY INITIATED, DESIGN REQUIREMENTS AND TEST METHODS. MILITARY STANDARD ELECTROEXPLOSIVE SUBSYSTEMS, ELECTRICALLY INITIATED, DESIGN REQUIREMENTS AND TEST METHODS Page 5 of 74

6 2. Standard test conditions Table 2. Compliance test standards ## Test Name Standard Notes 1 Temperature Storage MIL-STD-810E, Meth 501.3/502.3, Proc I Environment 2 Operation Temperature MIL-STD-810E, Meth 501.3/502.3, Proc II Environment 3 Low Pressure MIL-STD-810E, Meth 500.3, Proc II. Environment 4 Humidity MIL-STD-810E, Meth 507.3, Proc I, Cycle 3 Environment 5 Sand and Dust MIL-STD-810E, Meth 510.3, Proc I. Environment 6 Vibration MIL-STD-810E, Meth Environment 7 Rain MIL-STD-810E, Meth Section-II Environment 8 Radiated Emissions MIL-STD-462, RE02 EMC 9 Radiated Susceptibility MIL-STD-462, RS03 EMC 10 ESD MIL-STD-1512, Proc.205 EMC 11 RFI/EMI IEC 61503, Ed.1 EMC 12 Mechanical Shock MIL-STD-810E, Meth 516.4, Proc IV Environment Page 6 of 74

7 2.1. List of tests and responsibilities Table 3. List of tests and responsibilities ## Test Name Performed by Date Reference detailed Report No 1 Temperature (Operation/Storage) Qualitech-Environment 18-20/09/ Low Pressure Qualitech-Environment 20/09/ Humidity Qualitech-Environment 20-22/09/ Sand and Dust Carmel Laboratories 3-6/11/ Vibration Qualitech-Environment 25/10/ Rain Qualitech-Environment 25/10/ Radiated Emissions Qualitech-EMC 6/10/2016 RMI Radiated Susceptibility Qualitech-EMC 9/10/2016 RMI ESD Qualitech-EMC 13/10/2016 RMI RFI/EMI Qualitech- EMC 5/10/ Mechanical Shock Qualitech-Environment 7/11/ Test Source: Thorium-232 Page 7 of 74

8 3. Executive Summary Tested instruments demonstrated compliance with the referenced standards. Few deficiencies were identified and recommendations were made for their correction. One failure was observed during one the Operation Temperature test that requires reviewing the instrument specifications for this characteristic. All the results are detailed in Table 4. Table 4. Test summary and detailed results ## Test Name Standard Test Result 1 Temperature Storage MIL-STD-810E, Meth 501.3/502.3, Proc I Passed 2 Operation Temperature MIL-STD-810E, Meth 501.3/502.3, Proc II 3 Low Pressure MIL-STD-810E, Meth 500.3, Proc II. Passed 4 Humidity MIL-STD-810E, Meth 507.3, Proc I, Cycle 3 Passed 5 Sand and Dust MIL-STD-810E, Meth 510.3, Proc I. Passed 6 Vibration MIL-STD-810E, Meth Passed 7 Rain MIL-STD-810E, Meth Section-II Passed 8 Radiated Emissions MIL-STD-462, RE02 Passed 9 Radiated Susceptibility MIL-STD-462, RS03 Passed 10 ESD MIL-STD-1512, Proc.205 Passed 11 RFI/EMI IEC 61503, Ed.1 Passed 12 Mechanical Shock MIL-STD-810E, Meth 516.4, Proc IV Passed Passed for RP-10 Failed for PA-100 Page 8 of 74

9 4. Detailed requirements and test procedures Detailed requirements and test methods are described in the attached documents laboratory reports: QualiTech Compliance Engineering Environmental & Mechanical Lab Annex A - Report No: QualiTech EMC Laboratory Annex B - Report No: RMI Page 9 of 74

10 5. Environmental factors The Environmental tests were conducted at the accredited laboratory QualiTech Compliance Engineering Environmental & Mechanical Lab. See Annex A - Report No: Storage Temperature Scope This document describes the testing process of the EUT response in the Storage temperature according to the MIL-STD-810E Meth 501.3/502.3 Procedure I. Use high and low temperature tests to obtain data to help evaluate effects of high/low temperature conditions on material safety, integrity, and performance. An instrument shall not exhibit a response greater than that stated by the manufacturer to radiation other than the type of radiation for which it is designed Experiment Use Procedure-I to investigate how high/low temperatures during storage affect the material (integrity of materials, and safety/performance of the material). This test procedure includes exposing the test item to high/low temperatures (and low humidity where applicable) that may be encountered in the material's storage situation, followed by an operational test at controlled or high temperature ambient conditions. Storage -20 C/+70 C. Total test duration of 50 hours, 24 hours in each extreme temperature. Page 10 of 74

11 Fig Temperature profile on Storage mode All devices in the test are packed in Case (Pic ) Pic Page 11 of 74

12 Table UUT configuration Results: Table Storage test result. a) Instrument functionality Instruments show solid performance after the test, the measurement is correct and does not differ from measurement before the storage. The loss of product functionality is not detected. Page 12 of 74

13 b) Mechanical status - Observed slight compression and deformation of foam inside the case. (Pic ) - In one place foam damage found (Pic ) Despite the damage, the functionality of the Case is according to requirements. The loss of product functionality is not detected. (Pic ) (Pic ) Page 13 of 74

14 Conclusion The results of this test confirm that the EUT withstands the Storage temperature test according to the MIL-STD-810E Meth 501.3/502.3 Procedure I standard. Foam in the case needs improvement Solution Representative of Polycart Technologies Ltd. proposed changes of material and technology, which should solve the problem and eliminate the disadvantages. The requirement is met Page 14 of 74

15 5.2. Operation Temperature Scope This document describes the testing process of the EUT response in the Operation temperature according to the MIL-STD-810E Meth 501.3/502.3 Procedure II. Use Procedure II to investigate how high/low ambient temperatures may affect material performance while it is operating. Specification of UUT: a) Detector PA-100: - Temperature Range Operation: -10 C to +50 C - Accuracy ± 15% b) Detector RP-10: - Temperature Range Operation: -30 C to +60 C - Instrument accuracy is not determined to be a function of temperature and does not affect the functionality of the device Experiment Operation -10 C/+55 C, 3 cycle of 4 hours in each extreme temperature. Total test duration of 40 hours. Fig Temperature profile on Operation temperature test Page 15 of 74

16 Results: Checking prior to the test. All instruments have been tested in the chamber in a stable geometry before starting Temperature testing at room temperature +24 C Table Page 16 of 74

17 Results of Temperature Operation Test Table RP-10 S/N (Det-8): Demonstrated stable operation over the entire temperature range. Test Passed. - RP-10 S/N (Det-7): Demonstrated stable operation over the entire temperature range. Registered unintentional entering into the calibration mode. The UUT then continued normal operation. Test Passed. - PA-100 S/N (Det-5): It does not operate at temperatures -10 С, to absence of measurement. At other temperatures operation is normal. Test Failed. - PA-100 S/N (Det-6): does not operate at temperatures -10 С, unacceptable measurement error. At other temperatures operation is normal. Test Failed. Page 17 of 74

18 Conclusion: a) The results of this test confirm that the EUT RP-10 withstands the Temperature Operation requirement according to the MIL-STD-810E. The requirement is met b) The results of this test confirm that EUT PA-100 withstands, except the operation at low temperatures preventing Temperature Operation requirement according to the MIL-STD-810E. The requirement is met partially Solution: Adjust instrument specification of the device PA-100 with revised Operational Temperature conditions. Page 18 of 74

19 5.3. Low pressure (altitude) test Scope This document describes the testing process of the EUT response in the Low pressure (altitude) test according to the Mil-Std-810E, Method Procedure I & II standard. Use low pressure (altitude) tests to determine if material can withstand and/or operate in a low pressure environment and/or withstand rapid pressure changes. This method includes four low pressure tests. In this test, only the first two procedures: Procedure I (Storage); Procedure II (Operation). a) Procedure I - Storage/Air Transport. Procedure I is appropriate if the material is to be transported or stored at high ground elevations or transported by air in its shipping/storage configuration. b) Procedure II - Operation/Air Carriage. Use Procedure II to determine the performance of the material under low pressure conditions Experiment a) Storage at altitude of 15,000 ft. for 1 hour b) Operation at altitude of 5,000 ft. for 1 hour Pic Equipment located in Low Pressure (Altitude) chamber. Page 19 of 74

20 Results: Table Results of measuring during Low Pressure Test Conclusion The results of this test confirm that the EUT withstands the Low pressure (altitude) test requirement according to the MIL-STD-810E. The requirement is met Page 20 of 74

21 5.4. Humidity Test Scope This document describes the testing process of the EUT response in the Humidity Test according to the MIL-STD-810E, Meth 507.3, Proc I, Cycle 3. The purpose of this method is to determine the resistance of material to the effects of a warm, humid atmosphere Experiment Test condition of 30 C/94% RH for duration of 48 hours. Pic Equipment located in Temperature/Humidity chamber. - RP-10 Instruments are exposed the test while it is Operating mode. - Instruments PA-100 during the test storage into Cases. Page 21 of 74

22 Results: Table Randomly monitoring of measurements during Humidity test progress The loss of product functionality is not detected. Test Passed Conclusion The results of this test confirm that the EUT withstands the Humidity Test requirement according to the MIL-STD-810E. The requirement is met Page 22 of 74

23 5.5. Sand and Dust Scope This document describes the testing process of the EUT response in the Dust according to the MIL-STD-810E Meth Procedure I. Dust (< 150μm) procedure. This test is performed to help evaluate the ability of material to resist the effects of dust that may obstruct openings, penetrate into cracks, crevices, bearings, and joints, and to evaluate the effectiveness of filters. Procedure I - Blowing Dust. Use Procedure I to investigate the susceptibility of material to concentrations of blowing dust Experiment Total test duration of 12 hours, 6 hours in each extreme temperature (+70 C) Table UUT configuration Page 23 of 74

24 EUT is packed in Cases and placed in the Chamber: Before Test: Pic After Test: Pic Page 24 of 74

25 Pic Results: Leak tightness of Case: The penetration of dust inside of the case is not detected. Test Passed Operating after test: Check measurement function after the test Page 25 of 74

26 Deviations in dimensions of less than 10 percent. The loss of product functionality is not detected. Test Passed Conclusion The results of this test confirm that the EUT withstands the Dust requirement according to the MIL-STD-810E. The requirement is met Page 26 of 74

27 5.6. RANDOM VIBRATION Scope This document describes the testing process of the EUT response in the Vibration according to the MIL-STD-810E Meth Procedure I standard Experiment During the test instruments were attached to vibration exciter. Vibration is carried out on three axes - Vertical, Longitudinal and Transverse, of 15 minutes in each axis. Table Vibration exposures Page 27 of 74

28 Pic UUT mounted on Electrodynamic Shaker Results: Table Pre-Test (Before the start of stage of tests Vibration resistance) Page 28 of 74

29 ERROR [%] Table Test after vibration on Vertical axe. Vertical Time [min] UUT-1 UUT-2 UUT-3 UUT-4 Fig Test after vibration on Vertical axe. Page 29 of 74

30 ERROR [%] Table Test after vibration on Transverse axe. Transverse Time [min] UUT-1 UUT-2 UUT-3 UUT-4 Fig Test after vibration on Transverse axe. Page 30 of 74

31 ERROR [%] Table Test after vibration on Longitudinal axe. Longitudinal Time [min] UUT-1 UUT-2 UUT-3 UUT-4 Fig Test after vibration on Longitudinal axe. Note: AVERAGE* - after stabilization of Detector PA-100M 5 minutes after stopping vibration. The loss of product functionality is not detected. Test Passed Conclusion The results of this test confirm that the EUT withstands the Vibration requirement according to the MIL-STD-810E. The requirement is met Page 31 of 74

32 5.7. Rain Scope This document describes the testing process of the EUT response in the Rain according to the MIL-STD-810E, Meth Section-II standard. This method to evaluate material likely to be exposed to rain, water spray, or dripping water during storage, transit, or operation Experiment - UUT-2 (RAM R PA-100M) - tested on Storage into Case (BAK-1425) (See Annex A: Sec.8 - DRIP BOX WATER TEST - 16/7024) - UUT-1 (RAM R RP-10) - tested in Operation Mode (See Annex A: Sec.8 - DRIP BOX WATER TEST - 16/7061) Pic Instruments under Drip water test. Page 32 of 74

33 Results: a) Instrument functionality Table Measurements before the Rain test. Table Measurements after the Rain test. The loss of product functionality is not detected. Test Passed. Page 33 of 74

34 b) Impermeability - UUT-2 (RAM R PA-100M) - tested on Storage into Case (BAK-1425) Pic The Case (BAK-1425) after the Rain test. Page 34 of 74

35 Pic Instruments RAM R PA-100M into The Case (BAK-1425) after the Rain test. During visual inspection, at completion of the test, no water penetration was observed. Test Passed Conclusion The results of this test confirm that the EUT withstands the Rain requirement according to the MIL-STD-810E. The requirement is met Page 35 of 74

36 5.8. Mechanical Shock Scope This document describes the testing process of the EUT response in Mechanical Shock (Drop) the according to the MIL-STD-816E, Meth Paragraph IV standard. Shock tests are performed to: a) Provide a degree of confidence that material can physically and functionally withstand the relatively infrequent, non-repetitive shocks encountered in handling, transportation, and service environments. This may include an assessment of the overall material system integrity for safety purposes in any one or all of the handling, transportation, and service environments; b) Determine the material's fragility level, in order that packaging may be designed to protect the material's physical and functional integrity; and c) Test the strength of devices that attach material to platforms that can crash Experiment Free Fall (Drop) Test All instruments packed into Cases (BAK-1425). Pic Packaging instruments in the cases before the Free Fall (Drop) Test. Page 36 of 74

37 Pic UUT stranded on LANSMONT - PDT56ED Drop Tester Free Fall (Drop) Test. Test description: Drop Height: 1 m. Number of Drops of Test Item: One drop was performed on each of the 4 corners of test item. Total Number of Drops: 4 drops Bench Handling Drop Test One edge was raised to a height of 10 cm, or to a position that the chassis forms an angle of 45 with the horizontal bench top; 4 drops at each unit. Pic Bench Handling Drop Test procedure Page 37 of 74

38 Results: a) Functional test: Table Measurements before the Drop test. Table Measurements After Free Fall (Drop) Test (Packed into Case) Page 38 of 74

39 Table Measurements after Bench Handling Drop Test The loss of product functionality is not detected. Test Passed. b) Visual inspection: Damage is not detected. Test Passed Conclusion The results of this test confirm that the EUT withstands the Mechanical Shock requirement according to the MIL-STD-810E, Meth Paragraph IV. The requirement is met Page 39 of 74

40 6. Electromagnetic Compatibility Test (EMC) The Electromagnetic Compatibility Test tests were conducted at the accredited laboratory QualiTech EMC Laboratory, See Annex B - Report No: RMI Immunity to Electrostatic Discharge Scope This document describes the testing process of the EUT response in Electrostatic Discharge the according to IEC standard. IEC outlines the international immunity standard for electronic equipment ability to withstand ESD generated from a human body or metal objects with a built up static charge. The standard assumes that the source is an electrified human body discharge, and testing simulates the current waveform generated in those conditions Experiment Equipment: Noiseken, ESS-2000 Electrostatic Discharge Simulator. Contact Discharge Air Discharge kv kv Pic Immunity to Electrostatic Discharge Test Station Results: a) Functional test: Page 40 of 74

41 Table Measurements before ESD-Test Table Measurements after ESD-Test The loss of product functionality is not detected. Test Passed. Page 41 of 74

42 b) Visual Inspection: During the test, break segments appeared on the display and after the test the unit returned to normal operation.. Test Passed Conclusion The results of this test confirm that the EUT withstands the Electrostatic Discharge requirement according to the to IEC standard. The requirement is met 6.2. Immunity to Radiated Electromagnetic Field Scope This document describes the testing process of the EUT response in Immunity to Radiated Electromagnetic Field the according to IEC This standard is part of a set of basic EMC standards that outline test procedures that must be successfully accomplished before products can be sold. The object of this particular standard is to establish a common reference of a product or device to radiated RF immunity cause by any emitting source. Products must be designed and tested to insure that they are immune to both intentional transmitters, such as walkie talkies and cell phones, and unintentional RF emitting devices like electric motors and welders. Page 42 of 74

43 Experiment The EUT was placed in a full-anechoic chamber on a non-conductive table 0.8m above the absorbing ground plane, and was configured, arranged and operated in a manner consistent with typical application and load conditions. Normal performance of the EUT was verified. The EUT was positioned parallel to the pre-calibrated uniform area at a distance of 2.7m for frequency range below 1GHz and for the frequency range above 1GHz at 2.5m from the transmitting antenna. The frequency range was swept in steps of 1% with 1kHz sine-wave 80% Amplitude modulated with a dwell time of 1 sec. A list of clock and sensitive frequencies were analyzed separately if made available. Special exercising S/W was used in order to precisely generate the required electromagnetic field based on the calibrated field uniformity data. All tests were performed four times, with the antenna facing each of the four sides of the EUT. Each test was performed for both, horizontal and vertical antenna polarization During the tests, the EUT and external equipment were monitored to verify normal functional performance. Pic The EUT placed in a full-anechoic chamber. Page 43 of 74

44 Results: Radiated Immunity 80MHz - 1GHz Table Pre-Test (Before the start of stage of tests Radiated Immunity on range 80MHz - 1GHz ) Page 44 of 74

45 Error [%] a) Table Deviation measurements while changing the frequency Frequency [MHz] UUT-1 UUT-2 UUT-3 UUT-4 Fig Page 45 of 74

46 Error [%] Table Deviation measurements while changing the frequency Frequency [MHz] UUT-1 UUT-2 UUT-3 UUT-4 Fig Page 46 of 74

47 Error [%] Table Deviation measurements while changing the frequency Frequency [MHz] UUT-1 UUT-2 UUT-3 UUT-4 Fig Page 47 of 74

48 Error [%] Table Deviation measurements while changing the frequency Frequency [MHz] UUT-1 UUT-2 UUT-3 UUT-4 Fig Page 48 of 74

49 Error [%] Table Deviation measurements while changing the frequency Frequency [MHz] UUT-1 UUT-2 UUT-3 UUT-4 Fig Page 49 of 74

50 Error [%] Table Deviation measurements while changing the frequency Frequency [MHz] UUT-1 UUT-2 UUT-3 UUT-4 Fig Page 50 of 74

51 Radiated Immunity 1.4GHz 2.7GHz (AM, 80%; 1kHz; 10V/M) Table Pre-Test (Before the start of stage of tests Radiated Immunity on range 80MHz - 1GHz ) Page 51 of 74

52 Error [%] Table Deviation measurements while changing the frequency Frequency [MHz] UUT-1 UUT-2 UUT-3 UUT-4 Fig Page 52 of 74

53 Error [%] Table Deviation measurements while changing the frequency Frequency [MHz] UUT-1 UUT-2 UUT-3 UUT-4 Fig Page 53 of 74

54 Error [%] Table Deviation measurements while changing the frequency Frequency [MHz] UUT-1 UUT-2 UUT-3 UUT-4 Fig Page 54 of 74

55 Error [%] Table Deviation measurements while changing the frequency Frequency [MHz] UUT-1 UUT-2 UUT-3 UUT-4 Fig Page 55 of 74

56 Error [%] Table Deviation measurements while changing the frequency Frequency [MHz] UUT-1 UUT-2 UUT-3 UUT-4 Fig Page 56 of 74

57 Error [%] Table Deviation measurements while changing the frequency Frequency [MHz] UUT-1 UUT-2 UUT-3 UUT-4 Fig Page 57 of 74

58 The loss of product functionality is not detected. Test Passed Conclusion The results of this test confirm that the EUT withstands the Immunity to Radiated Electromagnetic Field the according to IEC standard. The requirement is met Page 58 of 74

59 6.3. RE02 Radiated Emission, Electric Fields 14 khz to MHz Scope This document describes the testing process of the EUT response in Radiated Emission the according to the MIL-STD-462 C. This standard establishes general techniques for use in the measurement and determination of the electromagnetic emission and susceptibility characteristics of electronic, electrical, and electromechanical equipment and subsystems designed or procured for use by activities and agencies of the Department of Defense Experiment UUT are set in the Operating mode and checked by different types of antennas depending on the frequency range under test: 10 khz to 30 MHz, 104 cm rod with impedance matching network EMCO 3301B 30 MHz to 200 MHz, Biconical, 137 cm tip to tip, Schwarzbeck VHBB9124 w/bba MHz to 1GHz Log periodic Schwarzbeck VUSLP9111 1GHz 18 GHz DRG-118/A Pic UUT on Operating mode into Camber whit different types of antennas Page 59 of 74

60 Results UUT-1 (Monitor RAM-R200 + Detector Rp-10): in the frequency range of 30MHz to 90MHZ spikes found (38MHz, 40MHz, 44MHz) with peaks 40 dbuv/m. The cause of the fall was UUT-1 damage to the RAM R-200 Detector Cable (BAK-0400) shield. This problem is fixed by adding to Cable the Ferrite Filter (ferrite number ) Pic RAM R-200 Detector Cable (BAK-0400) with Ferrite Filter ( ) After adding to Cable the Ferrite Filter UUT-1 passed the test successfully. All other UUT passed the test successfully. Test Passed Conclusion The results of this test confirm that the EUT withstands the Radiated Emission the according to the MIL-STD-462 C. Possible damage to the cable shield of RAM R-200 Detector Cable (BAK-0400), which do not affect the work of the tested Instruments, but the cause of Radiated Emission. For fix this problem by adding Ferrite Filter. The requirement is met Solution: a) Develop a methodology for testing cables RAM R-200 Detector Cable (BAK-0400.) serviceability b) Develop a version of the cable RAM R-200 Detector Cable (BAK-0400) with ferrite filter. Page 60 of 74

61 6.4. RS03 Radiated Susceptibility, Electric Field, 14 khz to 18 GHz Scope This document describes the testing process of the EUT response in Radiated Susceptibility the according to the MIL-STD-462 C. The radiated susceptibility test is performed to determine a device's ability to operate in the presence of an external interference signal propagated via free space Experiment A transmit antenna is placed in front of the EUT's most susceptible RF pickup area at the separation distance prescribed by the test specification. The EF(Electric Field) is established at the specified frequencies using a signal generator and an RF power amplifier to drive the transmit antenna. Used the suite of signal generators, power amplifiers, and antennas to cover the entire frequency range. Pic UUT on Operating mode into Camber whit different types of antennas Page 61 of 74

62 Results Table Pre-Test (Before the start of stage of tests Radiated Susceptibility) Page 62 of 74

63 Table Horizontal Polarization -- from 30 MHz to 1GHz * Problem identified RAM R-200 Detector Cable (BAK-0400). The problem fixed by adding to Cable the Ferrite Filter. (ferrite number ). Retest with Ferrite Filter: PASSED Page 63 of 74

64 Error [%] Deviation measurements while changing the frequency Frequency [MHz] UUT-1 UUT-2 UUT-3 UUT-4 Graph Horizontal Polarization -- from 30 MHz to 1GHz Page 64 of 74

65 Table Vertical Polarization -- from 30 MHz to 1GHz Page 65 of 74

66 Error [%] Deviation measurements while changing the frequency Frequency [MHz] UUT-1 UUT-2 UUT-3 UUT-4 Fig Vertical Polarization -- from 30 MHz to 1GHz Page 66 of 74

67 Table Horizontal Polarization -- from 1 GHz to 10 GHz Page 67 of 74

68 Error [%] Deviation measurements while changing the frequency Frequency [MHz] UUT-1 UUT-2 UUT-3 UUT-4 Fig Horizontal Polarization -- from 1 GHz to 10 GHz Page 68 of 74

69 Table Vertical Polarization-- from 1 GHz to 10 GHz Page 69 of 74

70 Error [%] Deviation measurements while changing the frequency Frequency [MHz] UUT-1 UUT-2 UUT-3 UUT-4 Fig Vertical Polarization-- from 1 GHz to 10 GHz Page 70 of 74

71 Table From 40 khz to 30 MHz Page 71 of 74

72 Error [%] Deviation measurements while changing the frequency Frequency [MHz] UUT-1 UUT-2 UUT-3 UUT-4 Fig From 40 khz to 30 MHz Page 72 of 74

73 Results: On Frequency range MHz, Horizontal antenna polarization the UUT-1 (Monitor-1(RAM R-200) + Detector-8 (RP-100)) switched to Calibration mode. After Reset UUT return to normal operation. Problem identified RAM R-200 Detector Cable (BAK- 0400). The problem fixed by adding to Cable the Ferrite Filter. (See Sec and Pic.6.3.3) After adding to Cable the Ferrite Filter UUT-1 passed the test successfully. All other UUT passed the test successfully. Test Passed Conclusion The results of this test confirm that the EUT withstands the Radiated Susceptibility the according to the MIL-STD-462 C. The requirement is met Solution: See Sec Page 73 of 74

74 END OF REPORT Page 74 of 74