Infill Guide. Landmark Preservation. Community Planning & Development 3/15/16
|
|
- Melissa Oliver
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Infill Guide Infill Guide- Commission Infill design review is a collaborative process used to examine projects in designated historic districts or on Denver landmark properties for architectural design and compatibility with the nearby historic built environment. Applications submitted for infill design review must be accompanied with specific information which adeuately describes and studies the proposal and its relationship to its historic surroundings. To comply with the reuired submittal standards of Denver, submitted documentation shall clearly illustrate the existing conditions as well as any proposed features. To facilitate the mission of the Denver Commission (LPC) to preserve and protect the integrity of Denver s historical and architectural structures, the LPC has developed the Design Guidelines for Denver Landmark Structures & Districts which serve as the basis for decisions by LPC and Landmark staff. The guidelines follow the Secretary of Interior s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. Consult the design guidelines to ascertain if your project meets the guidelines. Infill construction in designated historic districts or Denver landmark properties reuires a minimum of two separate meetings of the Commission (LPC). This process allows for thoughtful consideration of the proposed infill by dividing the review into two manageable components Part I: Mass, Form and Context review and Part II: Design Detail Review. Pre-Review Meetings 1. Schedule a pre-review meeting with staff. A pre-app is reuired for all infill projects. 2. If applicable; for multi-unit or commercial structures, schedule a concept pre-review meeting with Development Services Project Coordination staff. Please conduct this meeting prior to filing a formal submittal with Landmark staff. 3. The Commission reuires applicants to present new infill proposals to the applicable Registered Neighborhood Organization (RNO) who choose to participate in Design Review (see staff) for consideration and feedback. Formal feedback from the RNO is reuired before submittal may be a considered complete submittal. Submit Application and Documents 4. If a proposal includes demolition, Parks Parkway review or Zone Lot Amendment (ZLA)/Site Development Plan (SDP), please submit those applications prior to the infill application. The Commission will handle those applications to the appropriate agencies prior to consideration of any other proposal. This may add extra meetings to the process. 5. Submit a completed application and the reuired components found on the Landmark Infill Submittal Checklist. Review does not begin until a complete submittal is received. Please complete all fields on the checklist and application. Applications may be submitted by , by mail, or in person. Incomplete applications delay the design review process. By Send to landmark@denvergov.org. Electronic submission should include two attachments: one PDF with the completed form ( youraddress-app.pdf ) and one PDF that combines all supporting materials ( youraddress-app-materials.pdf ). File size should not exceed more than 25 MB combined. In person: Records Counter, 2nd floor Webb Municipal Building, 201 West Colfax Ave. 8-4 p.m., Monday Friday The initial review comment period is 5 business days in which staff will communicate the status of your application and further steps. 6. Landmark staff will evaluate the completeness of an application, and perform a preliminary design guideline evaluation within 5 business days. Only applications deemed complete by Landmark staff are forwarded to the LPC. 7. For applications deemed complete, see the Basic Submittal Calendar on the next page: 3/15/16
2 Basic Submittal Calendar Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Submittal Deadline Staff Initial Review Staff Communicates with Applicant/Resubmittal Review Staff Communicates with Applicant/Resubmittal Review Staff Report is prepared 15 copies of revised submittal due by 9am Packets sent to Commissioners Meetings The filing deadline for the Commission is a minimum of four (4) weeks prior to each meeting. LPC meets the 1st and 3rd Tuesday of each month. One set of the application and submittal documentation is all that is reuired at the filing deadline. Once the application is cleared by staff to move on to a Commission meeting, the applicants are responsible for providing 15 hard copies of the updated submittal for the Commission at a maximum 11 X 17 size (simple stapled/no covers) at least 7 business days prior to the meeting. A digital submission to staff is also reuired. If the documentation set is not received the application is removed from the agenda. Meeting 1a. If reuested by applicant, concept discussion item for Commission consideration Meeting 1b. If applicable, demolition application Meeting 1c. If applicable, Zone Lot Amendment (ZLA) or Site Development Plan (SDP) Review of the division or combining of lots Meeting 2. Meeting 3. Meeting 4. No new information may be submitted prior to the Meeting LPC Meeting 1:00pm Mass, Form, and Context Review of application as compared to area s historic structures and context Design Detail Review to ensure that the proposed infill materials and details are compatible with the area and relate to the historic context* If applicable, final review of proposed infill updated with any conditions reuired by the Commission* * For items approved with conditions or continuances, all re-submittals must clearly demonstrate in writing and on drawings how the listed conditions/items are met. If conditions/reuired items are not provided, the submittal will be considered incomplete. 8. Once a project has LPC approval, staff will review construction drawings for conformance with this approval. Please coordinate with Landmark staff on any changes to determine if additional LPC review is reuired. 9. If the application is approved by the Commission, Landmark staff will issue a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) after satisfactory review of construction documents to Development Services. The Commission The Commission (LPC) is a nine member Commission appointed by the Denver Mayor. The Commission meets the 1st and 3rd Tuesday of each month. At the meeting, a representative for the application is given the opportunity to address the Commission for 10 minutes. Staff can add slides to the PowerPoint presentation for applicants, but slides will need to be items that are part of the submittal packet. Any PowerPoint presentations need to be submitted to staff by the Monday, one week prior to the meeting. The Commission reuests that the submittal packet not be on the PowerPoint presentation unless there is a particular area that reuires a detailed discussion. City policy does not allow thumb drives, CD s, or laptops to interface with city euipment. Changes or alterations to submitted plans are not allowed to be submitted at Commission meeting. Changes will result in the application being deferred until staff can review changes. The Commission will deliberate the application and make a motion for approval, approval with conditions, or denial. The Commission is the deciding body for applications and their comments may differ from staff s review. Although the Commission endeavors to be brief in their application review, please be aware that some applications may have a lengthy deliberation. Standards that apply and are used for LPC review: Design Guidelines for Landmark Structures and Districts (2014) Design Guidelines for Country Club Historic District (1995) Revised Municipal Code of the City and County of Denver, Colorado; Chapter 30 Secretary of the Interior s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties Amendments to the Building Code for the City and County of Denver;
3 Pre-Review Pre-Review 3/15/16 The pre-review is meant to notify applicants of the process for the eight special project types noted below and offer initial feedback. Design review for this project will not begin until the final complete application is received. Staff s initial comments do not constitute design review or approval/denial. Property Address(es) Property Type/Use Contact Name and Company Address 1 or 2 Unit Building (Single Family Home, Duplex) Commercial, Mixed-Use or Multi-Use Multi-Unit Residential Other Historic District Name (if known) Phone Number (area code first) Please indicate the project type: Infill Construction Zone Lot Amendments Second Floor (Pop-Top) Additions Historic Window Replacement ADU Construction Large Additions Demolition in Historic Districts or Landmark Structures *Only these eight project types reuire a pre-review, or as determined by staff* Description of Project Concept: Comprehensive Sign Plans Pre-Review Checklist The following is REQUIRED for Pre-Review: 1. Complete Application for Pre-Review 2. Plans/drawings/sketches that adeuately depict the project (clearly note existing and proposed) 3. Color photos of existing conditions Please note: if the proposal includes demolition of an existing structure, a separate demolition application will need to be submitted for approval. Staff will schedule a meeting, call, or communicate via for the pre-review meeting. To submit electronically: this form and supporting materials to landmark@denvergov.org. Electronic submission should include two attachments: one pdf with the completed form ( yourname-preapp.pdf ) and one pdf that combines all supporting materials ( yourname-preapp-materials.pdf ). File size should not exceed 25MB combined. Contact us if you are having trouble with your electronic submission. To submit in person: Submit this form and supporting materials to the Records Counter weekdays between 7:30am and 4:30pm on the 2nd floor of the Webb Municipal Building, 201 W. Colfax Ave.
4 Infill Checklist Part 1 Infill Part 1: Mass, Form & Context Checklist The purpose of this step is to review the building envelope and basic exterior appearance concept to ensure a contextual fit. Project Address: Pre-Application Date: Registered Neighborhood Organization: Meeting Held Date: REQUIRED for Mass, Form, and Context Review: Note: All drawings must have a scale, and the scale must be accurate printed out at a maximum 11 x 17 size. All plans must be clearly labeled with hightlighted titles. 1. Complete Application for Design Review 2. Complete Infill Checklist Part 1 3. Digital submission of all reuired documentation 4. Site plan with scale (1 = 40 or larger if possible). Include existing/proposed driveways and curb cuts. Show mechanical euipment locations. Include spot elevations delineated at existing grade. (This is reuired to establish the base elevation, and evaluate height within the historic context and ensure that the ordinance-prescribed height limits for the project are met.) 5. Interior floor plans with scale (1 = 40 or larger if possible). Include all levels/floors. Please omit any/all furniture from the plan and use simple room titles (bedroom, bathroom, etc.). 6. Color photos of existing conditions, clearly labeled showing proposed building site and surroundings. 7. Worksheets for Context, Composision, and components of Proposed Infill (Attached): Ground Plan Comparison is a plan sheet providing footprint sizes and street/side setbacks for the immediate and adjacent block face(s). Streetscape Drawings compare the size & dimensions of a building in elevation to other buildings on the same block face(s). Compatibility Demonstration compares the proposed structure with existing historic structures in the area. This can be any contributing structure in teh district boundary, not just adjacent structures. Character Defining Features is a detailed comparison of the proposal and the district s Character Defining Features. 8. Isometric Drawings (3D), should be provided at key public/street level views and at an average pedestrian height. Additional aerial view isometric drawings are reuired if the entire building mass is not evident by public level views. Note: A physical model may be provided to compliment, but not substitute, for isometric drawings. 9. Elevations with overall dimensions and floor/ceiling heights denoted; show window/door openings; demarcate porches, awnings, and major protrusions or indentations. Provide at least 1 = 30 scale. No materials, siding or other details unless important to denote scale or to distinguish solid and void surfaces. 10. Other (as reuired by staff).. Coordinate with staff to determine if any additional information is needed due to the uniue circumstances of your project. For multi-unit (three [3] or more units) or commercial structures, also include: 11. Street sections for each distinct building mass, 1 = 20 scale or larger. Width should extend from the center of ROW to at least the front 15 depth of building. Demarcate property line and street edge. Show all façade height step backs, indentations and major protursions, such as awnings, balconies, etc. Please note: Signage and outdoor seating are separate reviews.
5 LANDMARK CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Application Design review for this project will not begin until a complete application and reuired submittal materials are received. reserves the right to delay consideration and/or action on a submittal in the event that information is missing and/or changed at the time of the scheduled design review or public hearing. Please use the appropriate project checklist for guidance. A pre-application review is reuired first for certain projects. SUBJECT PROPERTY INFORMATION Property Address Property Type/Use 1 or 2 Unit Building (Single Family Home, Duplex) Historic District Commercial Multi-Unit Residential Other Applicant Name: Street: Company: City: Phone: Zip: ITEMIZED LISTING OF PROPOSED WORK ITEMS - only listed items will be reviewed: [Example: Replace roof shingles, Construct 2-car detached garage, etc.] Only work listed below will be considered. Community Planning & Development Application 3/15/16 Materials of work: (Example: Type of window materials, siding, roofing, etc.) Amount of demolition of original features/materials suare feet APPLICATIONS ARE NOT CONSIDERED COMPLETE UNTIL ALL INFORMATION REQUIRED ON THE APPROPRIATE SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST IS SUBMITTED I attest that no additional exterior work or window work will occur under this application (sign, and print application). Design Review Deadline: The filing deadline is 4 weeks prior to scheduled Commission (LPC) meetings, and 23 days (3 weeks and 2 days) prior to the first Thursday of each month for the Lower Downtown Design Review Board (LDDRB). A complete application, including full supporting documentation, is due in the office by 12:00pm (noon) on the filing deadline. Landmark staff will determine whether LPC or LDDRB review is reuired based on adopted design guidelines. Staff will contact the applicant regarding staff comments, meeting dates (if applicable) and any additional materials that may be reuired. To submit electronically: this form and supporting materials to landmark@denvergov.org. Electronic submission should include two attachments: one pdf with the completed form ( yourname-app.pdf ) and one pdf that combines all supporting materials ( yourname-app-materials.pdf ). File size should not exceed 25MB combined. Contact us if you are having trouble with your electronic submission. To submit in person: Submit this form and supporting materials to the Records Counter weekdays between 7:30am and 4:30pm on the 2nd floor of the Webb Municipal Building, 201 W. Colfax Ave. All submittals become the property of the City & County of Denver. Submittals are open records. Submittals will be posted online or made available to any party that reuests a copy.
6 Infill Checklist Part 2 Infill Part 2: Design Detail Checklist The purpose of this step is to ensure that a building s materieals and details are compatible with and relate to the historic context. Project Address: Registered Neighborhood Organization*: Meeting Held Date*: REQUIRED for Design Detail Review: Note: All drawings must have a scale, and the scale must be accurate printed out at a maximum 11 x 17 size. All plans must be clearly labeled with hightlighted titles. 1. Complete Infill Checklist Part 2 2. The applicant submittal should include reuirements of the Part 1 submittal. 3. Digital submission of all reuired documentation 4. Additional/updated drawings and explanatory text. In tyhe submittal, state how each mass, form, and context condition approved by the Commission is met by the Design Detail submittal, and indicate the page/detail numbers showing where the condition is met. This is reuired to ensure that mass and scale conditions are met, prior to considering design details. 5. Elevation drawings with scale (1 = 20 of all sides). Please label and include base elevation, and include heights for all floor/ceiling levels, to top of roof deck, cornice, and top of appurtenances behind that façade. Show and label all materials, such as windows, doors, porches, roofs, siding, etc. 6. Enlarged section drawings at all entry locations (3/4 = 1 scale). Include windows, canopies, columns, exterior walls, door locations, etc. Key wall section to the site plan. 7. Enlarged elevations and sections for each distinct window type and location, showing full window, including head, jamb, sill, muntins and other details/profile information. Please key sections to larger elevations sheets and site plans to clarify location. For projects with more than 3 window types/sizes, please provide a window schedule. 8. Details on exterior architectural elements, including balconies, railings, vents, awnings, etc. Provide enlarged elevation and information on all exterior archetecutral elements. 9. Landscape plans and elevations. Provide to scale, showing curbs, sidewalks, utility locations. Reuires elevations, materials and supplemental information on lighting, plant material, hardscape and any structural elements. 10. Materials. Provide all of the following: a. Material samples/boards of ALL exterior materials with labels for each building/building component indicating material and finish. b. Provide manufacturer cut sheets on products. c. Reference materials and numbers from samples/boards onto elevation sheets and site plans as needed to clarify which materials correlate to which building/building component. d. For glass, provide visible transparency ratings of glass. 11. Other. Coordinate with staff to determine if any additional information is needed due to the uniue circumstances of your project. For multi-unit (three [3] or more units) or commercial structures, also include: 12. Roof plan with scale (1 = 40 or larger if possible). Label all roof appurtenances, materials, provide dimensions from street façade on roof plan, and show proposed screening on sides and top, if applicable. Additional drawings, including elevations, are reuired for unusual features such as stair overruns, towers, etc. 13. Enlarged building wall sections and plands (with corresponding elevation) through each distinct or uniue building component at façade locations (3/4 = 1 scale). Include all rooftop euipment/stair overruns/setback stories. Please coordinate with staff to determine distinct building components. Please include key wall sections to a site plan.
7 Worksheets - Context, Composition and Components of Proposed Infill Worksheets - Context, Composition and Components of Proposed Infill Infill documentation must examine the context, composition, and components of proposed new structures for compatibility with the existing historic structures of the district. These documents will examine how new infill will fit in the neighborhood. Applications submitted for infill construction must be accompanied with specific information which adeuately describes and studies the proposal. To comply with the reuired submittal standards of Denver, submitted documentation shall clearly illustrate the existing conditions as well as any proposed infill structure. Please fill in the worksheets completely. Approximate measurements are acceptable. Only contributing historic structures should be evaluated for compatibility. A contributing structure is one that was built during the Period of Significance for the district or designated property and can be recognized as being from that period (meaning they retain integrity). (Design Guidelines Glossary of Terms page C-4.) Worksheets may be customized or recreated for the specifics of each particular proposal CONTEXT 1. Ground Plan Comparison that gathers footprint size, setbacks, and a comparison to the proposed structure. The surrounding eight parcels are studied as to setback as listed. Include all structures regardless if they are contributing or non-contributing. Setbacks for new infill should correspond to surrounding context. (Guidelines 4.1, 4.2, 4.9) Question to be answered: How will the footprint of a proposed structure fit into the existing historic ground context? Please do not trespass to gather data. Stay on the public sidewalk or use aerial photographs (such as Google or Bing) to estimate measurements/ distances. Include the proposed project within the same document for comparison purposes. Notated aerial photos may also be used, however please outline the structures for clarity. 2. Street-Scape that compares the front elevation of new infill to existing neighboring structures. The neighboring 3-4 structures, on the same side of the street, should be studied. Compatibility between the new infill and the existing/neighboring historic structures should be achieved. (Guidelines 4.3, 4.4, 4.10, 4.11, 4.12, Page 80) Scaled and measured photos or drawings are to be referenced and include lines indicating primary features. Question to be answered: How will front façade design, overall height and floor to floor heights compare to existing, neighboring structures? Street-scape should include photos of structures on either side of the proposed work area (minimum of two on either side). Photos of existing structures should be of the front facade, free of vegetation, and include estimated measurements of 4 main features (foundation, entry, upper floors, and overall height). Lines of main features should be drawn across existing photos (Design Guidelines, page 80). COMPOSITION 3. Compatibility Demonstration that compares the proposed structure with existing historic structures in the historic district. This can be any supporting contributing structure in the historic district boundary, not necessarily next door or across the street. This shows the compatibility of the proposed infill by using similar style structures in the same historic district. (Guidelines 4.5, 4.13) Photos of existing structures should be of the front façade and free of vegetation. Information such as materials and estimated heights should be included. Question to be answered: How will the proposal fit within the neighborhood? CHARACTER 4. Character Defining Features is a detailed comparison of the neighborhood character defining features and the proposed structure. (Guideline 4.6, 4.7, 4.8, 4.14, 4.15, 4.16) Question to be answered: How will the components of the proposed infill correspond to the district?
8 Ground Plan Comparison How will the footprint of a proposed structure fit into the existing historic ground context? Demonstrate fit of proposed design in the context of the neighboring structures in the same district. A. B. C D. 7. Proposed Infill E F. G. H. Address 1. Setback to 2. Setback to Porch* 3. Setback to 4. Setback to 5. Distance Between 6. Distance Between 7. Structure Width Structure* (if applicable) Left Property Line Right Property Line Structures-Left Side Structures-Right Side P. A. B. D. E. F. G. (* From Inside Edge of Sidewalk) staff is solely responsible for determining if the above criteria are met.
9 Street-Scape How will front façade design, overall height and floor to floor heights compare to existing, neighboring structures? Demonstrate fit of proposed design with neighboring structures on same side of the street. 0.0 Maximum Height 0.0 Minimum Height 0.0 Second Floor 0.0 Door 0.0 Foundation/Porch Floor Address: Proposed: Address: Address: Foundation Height Foundation Height Foundation height Foundation height Door Height Door Height Door Height Door Height Second Floor Height Second Floor Height Second Floor Height Second Floor Height Max Height Min Block Height Max Height Max Height Max Block Height * please include relevant lines from existing neighboring structures * exisiting may be photos or drawings staff is solely responsible for determining if the above criteria are met.
10
11 The earliest development is from the 1870s, and includes a few wood-frame worker houses on the south end of the district. Late 1880s streetcar service stimulated growth throughout the neighborhood until the Silver Crash of This era is represented by many Queen Anne style homes and Victorian eclectic variations. After the economy recovered less elaborate styles became the norm including the Classic Cottage, Shingle Style, the Denver Suare with Classical Revival elements, and the Craftsman Bungalow. Address: How will the components of the proposed infill correspond to the district? Fill out here: Element Character of neighborhood Element Does the proposed element match the Character Defining Feature? Mass & Height: One- story to two-stories in height. Form Mass & Height (in stories): Shape: Rectangular forms very common; many with Form nested front gables. Shape: Materials Brick construction with wood ornamentation. Materials Brick Yes No If No, why? Roofs Forward facing gable and combined gable and hipped roof types. Roofs Gable Hip Flat Roofs have boxed eaves; some front gabled homes have gabled side dormers. Entries & Offset forward facing single entries, with transoms. Entries & Door material: Doors Doors typically solid wood or with single glass pane. Doors Full Light Half Light Other Transom Windows Double hung one-over-one wood windows are common. Windows are typically tall and narrow, often grouped or paired. Stone headers and lintels common. Porches Width: Partial and half width porches are typical, however, a few examples of full width or wrap-around porches. Height: One story typical. Materials: Masonry foundations with wooden columns and railings. Ornamentation: Turned, and simple suare and round porch columns. Baker Character Defining Features Comparison BakerSample Windows Style: Eaves: Boxed Exposed Other Material: Porches Width Full Partial Materials: staff or Commission is solely responsible for determining if the above criteria are met. Community Planning & Development Yes No Sidelights Yes No If needed, include extra sheets.
CHICAGO LANDMARKS PERMIT APPLICATION AND PRE-PERMIT SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
CHICAGO LANDMARKS PERMIT APPLICATION AND PRE-PERMIT SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS The Commission on Chicago Landmarks reviews all permit applications for work to designated and proposed Chicago Landmarks and
More informationCertificate of Appropriateness (CoA) Checklist
Certificate of Appropriateness (CoA) Checklist This Checklist is intended to assist you in preparing a complete application for submittal. Occasionally, additional items may be required to complete the
More informationAPPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS IN THE HISTORIC DESIGN REVIEW DISTRICT
209 South Main Street Marysville, Ohio 43040 Phone: (937) 645-7350 Fax: (937) 645-7351 www.marysvilleohio.org APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS IN THE HISTORIC DESIGN REVIEW DISTRICT *** IMPORTANT
More informationCERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS AND CHECK LIST
Certificate of Appropriateness Instructions and Checklist (revised 1/18) SYRACUSE LANDMARK PRESERVATION BOARD CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS AND CHECK LIST INSTRUCTIONS: Please
More informationCITY OF MERCER ISLAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES GROUP 9611 SE 36 th Street, Mercer Island, WA (206)
CITY OF MERCER ISLAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES GROUP 9611 SE 36 th Street, Mercer Island, WA 98040 (206) 275-7605 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR DESIGN COMMISSION APPROVAL & SIGNAGE APPROVAL PURPOSE: Design Commission
More informationLandmarks Preservation Commission Tacoma Economic Development Department Culture and Tourism Division
Tacoma Economic Development Department Culture and Tourism Division 747 Market Street Room 1036 Tacoma WA 98402-3793 253.591.5220 APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES
More informationPlease Print Clearly. Applicant s Signature: Date:
Application for CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FEES: Staff Review: $20; HPC Reviews: $50-Minor Project; $150-Moderate Project; $500-Major Project Check with staff for correct amount. (Cash/check only make
More informationArchitectural Review Application
Architectural Review Application City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 Tel. (310) 285 1141 Fax. (310) 858 5966 Architectural Review Overview: The Architectural
More informationKNOXVILLE HISTORIC ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT - CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS APPLICATION
KNOXVILLE HISTORIC ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT - CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS APPLICATION PROPERTY ADDRESS: DISTRICT: Fourth and Gill H-1 906 Luttrell St 37917 FILE NO.: 11-I-13-HZ MEETING DATE: 11/21/2013
More informationDESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION EXTERIOR PLAN / LANDSCAPE PLAN
209 S. Main Street Marysville, Ohio 43040 Phone: (937) 645-7350 Fax: (937) 645-7351 www.marysvilleohio.org DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION EXTERIOR PLAN / LANDSCAPE PLAN *** IMPORTANT INFORMATION Please
More informationUPDATE TO ARCOM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS - JULY 2018
UPDATE TO ARCOM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS - JULY 2018 Please note that for all ARCOM submittals, the following must be included in your application, record and presentation files/folders: Dimensioned details
More informationDeveloper Design Review Submittal Requirements - SECTION 5
Developer Design Review Submittal Requirements - SECTION 5 5.0 Developer Design Review 1.0 Procedures for Submittals - All Housing Types 1. Submittals shall be by the Guest Builder or authorized agent
More informationDESIGN REVIEW PROCESS AND APPLICATION
DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS AND APPLICATION Design review is the first step in the process of any construction project requiring permits. The Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) Board is responsible for ensuring
More informationCITY OF OLIVETTE SITE PLAN AND COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW INFORMATION PACKET
CITY OF OLIVETTE SITE PLAN AND COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW INFORMATION PACKET THE FOLLOWING PACKET CONTAINS: PETITION FOR NONRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN AND COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW SCHEDULE OF DATES
More informationPLANNED SIGN PROGRAM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
PLANNED SIGN PROGRAM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS City of Greenwood Village Community Development Department 6060 S. Quebec Street Greenwood Village, CO 80111-4591 (303) 486-5783; FAX (303) 773-1238 SUBMITTAL
More informationApplying for a Site Development Review
Guide What is it? Applying for a Who approves it? ensures that new buildings or land uses are compatible with their sites and with the surrounding environment, other development, and traffic circulation.
More informationOwner / Architect Certification of Complete Documentation for the Additions and Remodels Conditional Approval Review
Step 1: Request for Conditional Approval, page 1 of 5 Owner / Architect Certification of Complete Documentation for the Additions and Remodels Conditional Approval Review I,, the Property Owner, or Owner
More informationDESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM AGENDA DATE: MARCH 16, 2016 TO: THRU: FROM: SUBJECT: Chair Fox and Members of the Design Review Committee Leslie Aranda Roseberry, Planning Manager Robert Garcia, Senior
More informationADMINISTRATIVE DESIGN REVIEW Information
Information The following information summarizes the City s Administrative Design Review (ADR) provisions. If you have any questions, please contact the Planning and Development Services Department at
More informationLANDMARK CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Sign Application
LANDMARK CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Sign Application Historic design review for proposed signage will begin when a complete application is received covering all proposed signage for a building or use.
More informationDEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN INFORMATION
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN INFORMATION 220 Clay Street Cedar Falls, Iowa 50613 General Information: Applications for developing a commercial, multi-family, or residential (in an overlay
More informationChecklist for Minor Plan Modification
Checklist for Minor Plan Modification All submittal information shall be provided to the Community Development Department. All submittal information shall be presented along with the Uniform Application,
More informationEstimated Cost of Project Contractor License No. Contractor Qualifier No.
Building, Safety and Zoning Department COMMERCIAL Application for Building Permit Owners and/or Contractors: Please fill out all the information listed below and submit those documents needed for your
More informationINCOMPLETE APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED COMPLETE ALL INFORMATION BELOW. Construction Value: $
CITY OF PORT ORCHARD Permit Center Office located at 720 Prospect Street Mailing address: 216 Prospect Street Port Orchard, WA 98366 (360) 874-5533 permitcenter@cityofportorchard.us COMMERCIAL or MULTI-FAMILY
More informationApplying for a Site Development Review (Sign CVCBD only)
Guide Applying for a Site Development Review (Sign CVCBD only) What is it? Site Development Review ensures that new buildings or land uses are compatible with their sites and with the surrounding environment,
More informationArchitectural Review Application New Application Processing Improvements
Architectural Review Application New Application Processing Improvements Dear Applicant, Fees Reduced. Application fees were reduced approximately 20% from the 2010 2011 fiscal year. The Planning Division
More informationMailing Address: Fax number: City: State: Zip: Property Owner: City: State: Zip: City: State: Zip:
/ Department of Community Development ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW APPLICATION 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert California 92260 (760) 346-0611 Fax (760) 776-6417 Applicant: Telephone: Mailing Address: Fax
More informationGUIDELINES FOR MEASURING BUILDING HEIGHT
GUIDELINES FOR MEASURING BUILDING HEIGHT THE CITY S POLICIES ON BUILDING HEIGHT In 1994, the City adopted a new General Plan that sets direction for development within Brisbane. Among its policies affecting
More informationPLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS CLASS 4 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS. A. Written Material
PLANNING DEPARTMENT 970.668.4200 0037 Peak One Dr. PO Box 5660 www.summitcountyco.gov Frisco, CO 80443 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS CLASS 4 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS Per the provisions
More informationMULTIPLE-FAMILY DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
MULTIPLE-FAMILY DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST This application lists the content and format of the submittal requirements to initiate the Design Review process. An incomplete application will not be
More informationCITY OF SCHENECTADY NEW YORK CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF SCHENECTADY NEW YORK CITY PLANNING COMMISSION Christine S. Primiano, Principal Planner Room 14, City Hall, Jay Street SCHENECTADY, NY 12305-1938 518.382.5147 cprimiano@schenectadyny.gov www.cityofschenectady.com
More informationSMALL PROJECTS & IMPROVEMENTS: DOG RUNS, PATIO ENCLOSURES & FENCES, EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS (Abbreviated Design Review Application)
REVIEW TYPE: PRELIMINARY FINAL LANDSCAPE ABBREVIATED ADDITION COLOR BOARD Application Form* X X X X X Design Review Fee* X X X Registered Survey** X Site Plan X X X X X Floor Plans X X X Elevations X X
More informationStaff Review Date: February 11, 2015 HDC
Charlotte Historic District Commission Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness Staff Review Date: February 11, 2015 HDC 2015-018 LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT: PROPERTY ADDRESS: SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
More informationCity of Whitefish Planning & Building Department PO Box E 2 nd Street Whitefish, MT Phone: Fax:
City of Whitefish Planning & Building Department PO Box 158 418 E 2 nd Street Whitefish, MT 59937 Phone: 406-863-2410 Fax: 406-863-2409 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW Multifamily, Townhouse, Duplex FEE ATTACHED
More informationDOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION
This application, including the Conceptual Review Presentation, must be completed and submitted to the Downtown Development Review Board (DDRB) Staff twenty (20) business days prior to the upcoming DDRB
More informationOperating Standards Attachment to Development Application
Planning & Development Services 2255 W Berry Ave. Littleton, CO 80120 Phone: 303-795-3748 Mon-Fri: 8am-5pm www.littletongov.org Operating Standards Attachment to Development Application 1 SKETCH PLANS
More informationCity of Whitefish 418 E 2 nd St PO Box 158 Whitefish, MT Phone: Fax:
City of Whitefish 418 E 2 nd St PO Box 158 Whitefish, MT 59937 406-863-2460 Fax: 406-863-2419 File #: : Intake Staff: Check #: Amount: ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW Multifamily, Townhouse, Duplex Complete: FEE
More informationRequired Supporting Information and Documentation for Historic Preservation Certification Applications
Required Supporting Information and Documentation for Historic Preservation Certification Applications Part 1 Submittal- Evaluation of Significance Descriptive Information Describe the major features of
More informationKNOXVILLE HISTORIC ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS APPLICATION
KNOXVILLE HISTORIC ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS APPLICATION PROPERTY ADDRESS: 910 Luttrell St 37917 FILE NO.: 6 K 16 HZ DISTRICT: Fourth and Gill H 1 MEETING DATE: 6/16/2016
More informationR 1 Design Review Application
City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 Tel. (310) 285 1141 Fax. (310) 858 5966 R 1 Design Review Application Design Review Overview Beverly Hills residential
More informationSingle Family Design Guidelines Update/ Neighborhood Preservation Ordinance Update ISSUE PAPER A. Definition: Mass, Bulk & Scale
The purpose of this issue paper is to: Single Family Design Guidelines Update/ Neighborhood Preservation Ordinance Update ISSUE PAPER A Definition: Mass, Bulk & Scale clarify current definitions of mass,
More informationFor Office Use: Filing Date: Case Number: Zoning District: LIST ALL ADDRESSES INVOLVED IN YOUR PROJECT:
City of Syracuse Zoning Administration Application for CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY Review by the Planning Commission City Hall Commons * Room 101 * 201 E. Washington Street * Syracuse, NY 13202-1426 * 315-448-8640
More informationArticle 4.0 Measurements and Exceptions
This Article identifies and explains some of the more common forms of measurement used throughout this Ordinance. It also specifies exceptions to certain requirements of this Ordinance. Sec. 4.1 Measurements
More informationSITE PLAN Application Packet (Required For All Non-Residential Development Projects)
SITE PLAN Application Packet (Required For All Non-Residential Development Projects) Community Development Department 90 North Main Street, Tooele, UT 84074 (435) 843-2130 Fax (435) 843-2139 Dear Applicant,
More informationC I T Y O F M c K I N N E Y PLANNING
C I T Y O F M c K I N N E Y PLANNING 221 N. TENNESSEE STR EE T, McKI NNEY, TEXA S 75069 CONTENTS Approval Process Flowchart FAQs Letter of Intent Requirements Façade Plan Submittal Checklist Non-Residential
More informationWhat Plans Do I Need for a Building Permit?
What Plans Do I Need for a Building Permit? 6 CITY OF PORTLAND, OREGON - BUREAU OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1900 SW 4th Avenue, Por tland, Oregon 97201 503-823-7300 www.portlandoregon.gov/bds This brochure
More informationTruman Heritage District Design Guidelines. Glossary
Glossary Glossary Alignment, the linear relationship of buildings along a streetscape. Baluster, an upright member supporting a railing or bannister. Bargeboard Balustrade, a porch or stair railing composed
More informationGateway Corridor Standards
Gateway Corridor Standards Building design and construction: Bungalow Classical Revival Colonial Revival Frame Vernacular Gothic Revival Italianate Mediterranean Revival Queen Anne Shingle architectural
More informationCity of Lompoc Building & Safety Services Section 100 Civic Center Plaza Lompoc, CA Phone: Fax:
City of Lompoc Building & Safety Services Section 100 Civic Center Plaza Lompoc, CA 93436 Phone: 805-875-8220 Fax: 805-875-8198 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PLANS SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS A. APPLICATION PROCESS
More informationARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE HOMESITE CONSTRUCTION SUBMITTAL FORM AND APPLICATION
For Office Use Only Date Received: Approved: ARC Non-Refundable Fees: ARC Refundable Deposit Pd: For Office Use Only Plat Name: Lot # Street Address: New Construction Alteration Preliminary Final ARCHITECTURAL
More informationTOWN OF MANCHESTER PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. 7:00 P.M. 494 Main Street AGENDA
TOWN OF MANCHESTER PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION September 18, 2017 Lincoln Center Hearing Room 7:00 P.M. 494 Main Street AGENDA PUBLIC HEARING: 1. TOWN OF MANCHESTER PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION To revise
More informationOperating Standards Attachment to Development Application
Operating Standards Attachment to Development Application Planning & Development Services 2255 W Berry Ave. Littleton, CO 80120 Phone: 303-795-3748 Mon-Fri: 8am-5pm www.littletongov.org SITE DEVELOPMENT
More informationOver-the-Rhine Historic District New Construction Guidelines Competition: The Challenge to elevate new build design in OTR to national recognition.
Over-the-Rhine Historic District New Construction Guidelines Competition: The Challenge to elevate new build design in OTR to national recognition. 1. Brief: Over the Rhine Foundation Infill Committee
More informationDisclaimer for Review of Plans
Disclaimer for Review of Plans The San Francisco Planning Code requires that the plans of certain proposed projects be provided to members of the public prior to the Cityʹs approval action on the project.
More informationAPPLICATION DESIGN REVIEW Please Print or Type
www.srcity.org ZONING ADMINISTRATOR (ZA) APPLICATION DESIGN REVIEW Please Print or Type DESIGN REVIEW BOARD File # Related Files: LOCATION OF PROJECT (ADDRESS) ASSESSOR S PARCEL NUMBER(S) EXISTING ZONING
More informationCITY OF BURLINGAME - PLANNING COMMISSION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW
CITY OF BURLINGAME - PLANNING COMMISSION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW Application to the must include certain minimum information before a project can be scheduled for a hearing. The
More information6.05 acres acres Single-family attached
R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, the Prince George's County Planning Board is charged with the approval of Detailed Site Plans pursuant to Part 3, Division 9 of the Zoning Ordinance of the Prince George's
More informationARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE TOWN APARTMENT CONSTRUCTION SUBMITTAL FORM AND APPLICATION
For Office Use Only Date Received: Approved: ARC Non-Refundable Fees ARC Refundable Deposit Pd: For Office Use Only Plat Name: Lot # Street Address: New Construction Alteration Preliminary Final ARCHITECTURAL
More informationI. REQUEST: The undersigned petition the Village of Matteson, Illinois to approve the application(s) submitted.
SITE PLAN BUILDING ELEVATION LANDSCAPE PLAN SIGNAGE PLAN APPLICATION FOR THE VILLAGE OF MATTESON I. REQUEST: The undersigned petition the Village of Matteson, Illinois to approve the application(s) submitted.
More informationSUBMITTAL CHECKLIST ARCHITECTURAL COMMITTEE APPLICATION WOODMOOR HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
(Owner to Complete) SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST ARCHITECTURAL COMMITTEE APPLICATION This checklist must be completed by the Owner and must be attached to the Architectural Committee Application. Failure to complete
More informationRadiocommunication Facility Review Protocol
Radiocommunication Facility Review Protocol 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 The purpose of this protocol is to outline the guidelines and review process through which Radiocommunication Facilities are evaluated within
More informationREHABILITATING HISTORIC PROPERTIES FOR FEDERAL INVESTMENT TAX CREDITS
REHABILITATING HISTORIC PROPERTIES FOR FEDERAL INVESTMENT TAX CREDITS State Historic Preservation Office Oklahoma Historical Society 800 Nazih Zuhdi Drive Oklahoma City, OK 73105 (405) 521-6249 http://www.okhistory.org/shpo
More informationChecklist for Tentative Subdivision Map
Checklist for Tentative Subdivision Map All submittal information shall be provided to the Community Development Department. All submittal information shall be presented along with the Uniform Application,
More informationSingle-Family Dwelling Submittal Requirements
Single-Family Dwelling Submittal Requirements The purpose of this guideline is to assist our customers in preparing for plan submittal. The items listed must be included before your plans can be accepted
More informationCity of Miami Planning and Zoning Department UDRB SUBMITTAL CHECK LIST
City of Miami Planning and Zoning Department UDRB SUBMITTAL CHECK LIST One 11 x 17 signed and sealed original set and 11 copies must be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Department inclusive of all
More informationAPPLICATION FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) DEVELOPMENT PLAN
209 S. Main Street Marysville, Ohio 43040 Phone: (937) 645-7350 Fax: (937) 645-7351 www.marysvilleohio.org APPLICATION FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) DEVELOPMENT PLAN *** IMPORTANT INFORMATION ~ Please
More informationNiguel Shores Community Association Architectural Committee (AC) EXTERIOR MODIFICATION SUBMITTAL (EMS) FINAL APPLICATION
Niguel Shores Community Association Architectural Committee (AC) EXTERIOR MODIFICATION SUBMITTAL (EMS) FINAL APPLICATION / / Date Received by NSCA Office / / Submittal Expiration Date Owner s Name: Tract:
More informationSUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR USE PROCESS III OR PROCESS IV
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 33325 8 th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cityoffederalway.com SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR USE PROCESS III OR PROCESS IV USE PROCESS
More informationA Visual Field Guide. Village of Danforth Historic Resource Survey. Syracuse, New York. for the
The Village of Danforth Historic Resources Survey, Syracuse, New York A Visual Field Guide for the Village of Danforth Historic Resource Survey Syracuse, New York 217 Montgomery Street, Suite 1000 Syracuse,
More informationORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, the city commission created the historic district. signage task force under Resolution Number ; and
ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF KEY WEST, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION S GUIDELINES FOR BANNERS, FLAGS, SIGNAGE AND LIGHTING AS REFERENCED IN SECTION 90-142
More informationCity of Hamilton INFORMATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
City of Hamilton INFORMATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT There is a $200.00 non-refundable fee for each request. Requests must be completed and submitted to the Public Works Department, City of Hamilton,
More informationLast Name: First Name: M.I:
ARCHITECTURE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION OFFICE USE ONLY APPLICATION # Permit # Fee Collected $ 1. Filing Status Initial Submission Amendment Withdrawal 2. Cost of Construction (Industry Standards)
More informationTown of Holly Springs Sign Installation Packet
Town of Holly Springs Sign Installation Packet Department of Planning & Zoning 128 S. Main Street P.O. Box 8 Holly Springs, NC 27540 (919) 557-3908 HSPlanning@hollyspringsnc.us GENERAL INFORMATION: If
More informationHome Improvement Application. Type of Improvement
1 Home Improvement Application Note: This application needs to be submitted 45 days before any planned activity. Homeowner Name: Property : : Email: Proposed Start Date: Proposed Completion Date Type of
More informationTOWN OF AMHERST PLANNING DEPARTMENT MINOR SITE PLAN AND MINOR ADJUSTMENT REVIEW AND APPROVAL PROCEDURE
TOWN OF AMHERST PLANNING DEPARTMENT MINOR SITE PLAN AND MINOR ADJUSTMENT REVIEW AND APPROVAL PROCEDURE This application package includes the following: Application Procedures Application Form & Checklist
More information1 copy of all plans in pdf format and I copy of this form must be submitted, or it will be returned because it is an incomplete submittal.
CERTIFIED MANAGEMENT OF AUSTIN 9600 Great Hills Trail, Suite 100E Austin, Texas 78759 (512) 339-6962 frontdesk@cmaaustin.com RIVER PLACE ARCHITECTURAL COMPLIANCE SUBMITTAL ADDITIONS/MODIFICATIONS Date
More informationHDC November 13, 2013
Charlotte Historic District Commission Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness HDC 2013-169 November 13, 2013 ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: SUMMARY OF REQUEST: OWNER: APPLICANT: 2309 Dilworth Road West,
More informationSITE PLAN APPLICATION
SITE PLAN APPLICATION SECTION 1. APPLICANT/OWNER INFORMATION Please Print or Type Applicant/Developer: City: State: Zip: Telephone: Fax: E-mail: Applicant s Status: (Check One) Owner Tenant Prospective
More informationCRAFTSMAN. Craftsman Style Guide
CSMAN Craftsman Style Guide CSMAN Craftsman Style Guide able of Contents Craftsman (1902-1925)...1 Additional Examples of the Style...2 Building Form and Massing...3 oof Shape and Materials...3 Cladding...4
More informationCHAPTER 11 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL PROCESS
CHAPTER 11 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL PROCESS 11.01.00 Preliminary Site Plan Approval 11.01.01 Intent and Purpose 11.01.02 Review 11.01.03 Application 11.01.04 Development Site to be Unified 11.01.05
More informationDowntown Memphis Review Board Application
Downtown Memphis Review Board Application Program 114 North Main Street Memphis, TN 38103 901.575.0540 downtownmemphis.com Packet information revised on July 26, 2011 DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS 1. Pre-Design
More informationARCHITECTURAL STYLES. Turn of the Century Styles Airplane Bungalow ANGELINO HEIGHTS PRESERVATION PLAN - JUNE 10, 2004
Airplane Bungalow The Airplane Bungalow style dates from the early 1900s and became very popular in Los Angeles in the mid-teens. The Airplane Bungalow is a residential style that grew out of the Craftsman
More informationCity of Santa Paula Planning Department
City of Santa Paula Planning Department INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMITTING APPLICATIONS DESIGN REVIEW, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMITS, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS AND VARIANCES A. ITEMS / DOCUMENTS REQUIRED FOR SUBMITTAL:
More informationMinor Site Plan Review Process
Minor Site Plan Review Process Pre-Application Conference Community Meeting (optional) Submit Application Determination of Completeness Staff Report (optional) Technical Review Committee Decision Notice
More informationThe GMFI Process. Design Intent Document Preparation. Enroll in GMFI Program. Image Consultation. You are here. Design Intent Document.
Enroll in GMFI Program Image Consultation Design Intent Document Preparation Preliminary Drawings Final Drawings Design Intent Document You are here. 1-2 Construction Documents Services performed by dealer
More informationDRAFT V. SITE ELEMENTS SIGNS
1. SIGNS Intent Signs are an important streetscape design element that affect not only the visual character of the Historic District but also the vitality of its businesses. Signage provides business identification,
More informationPEPPER PIKE ARCHITECTURAL BOARD OF REVIEW
PEPPER PIKE ARCHITECTURAL BOARD OF REVIEW All structures, fences, or additions must be approved by the Architectural Board of Review (ABR) prior to issuance of a building permit. The purpose of the Board
More informationArchitrave: The molded from or ornament surrounding a window, door or other rectangular opening.
Section 8. Definitions. Architrave: The molded from or ornament surrounding a window, door or other rectangular opening. Bay Window: A window that projects out from the surface of an exterior wall and
More informationSITE PLAN, SUBDIVISION & EXTERIOR DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS
INCORPORATED VILLAGE OF ROCKVILLE CENTRE BUILDING DEPARTMENT SITE PLAN, SUBDIVISION & EXTERIOR DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS Presubmission - Prior to a formal submission, the applicant should meet in person with
More informationMONTECITO BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
MONTECITO BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW MONTECITO BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW (MBAR) encourages development which exemplifies the best professional design practices so as to enhance the visual quality
More informationARB Submittal Package Checklist
ARB Submittal Package Checklist This is not an all inclusive list, just some of the items that need to be considered before submitting your package to the ARB for review. Have you included sufficient information
More informationPROJECT ENTITLEMENT APPLICATION
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS (Print or Type) Name of Proposed Project: Location of Project: Legal Description of Project (Assessor s Parcel/Allotment No., Township/Range/Section): Staff Use Only CASE NO.: RELATED
More informationRESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL STYLES APRIL 3, 2008
RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL STYLES APRIL 3, 2008 ITALIANATE (1850-1890) 77 N. State Street, c. 1880, High Style Example Typical characteristics: Low-pitched hipped or gabled roofs. Wide, overhanging eaves.
More information5.7 Plan Documentation and Supporting Information.
5.7 and Supporting Information. In any case where the and Supporting Information for a Development Plan requires the submission of a Site Plan, Overall Plan, Landscape Plan, Building Elevations, Sign Plan
More informationWILTON MANORS, Island City 2020 WILTON DRIVE, WILTON MANORS, FLORIDA 33305
WILTON MANORS, Island City 2020 WILTON DRIVE, WILTON MANORS, FLORIDA 33305 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES (954) 390-2180 FAX: (954) 567-6069 This package includes: General Submittal Procedures Submittal
More informationGreen Valley Pharmacy 2415 Shirlington Road
Nov 23 2018 ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA HISTORICAL AFFAIRS AND LANDMARK REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS DATE Z- - -HD RPC# (TO BE COMPLETED BY STAFF) DESIGNATED PROPERTY: Name
More informationCITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD APPLICATION PACKET
Instruction Sheet... 2 Conceptual Plan Requirements... 3 Information Sheet... 4 Submittal Checklist... 5 Application Fee Sheet... 6 City of Cape Canaveral Community Appearance Board Application 12/2018
More informationHillside & Foothills Development Application
Hillside & Foothills Development Application This box for office use only File #: Cross Referenced File(s): Fee: Zone(s): Are Pre-Application materials attached? Yes No This application is a request to
More informationPLANNED SIGN PROGRAM CHECKLIST
Planning and Building Agency Planning Division 20 Civic Center Plaza P.O. Box 1988 (M-20) Santa Ana, CA 92702 (714) 647-5804 PLANNED SIGN PROGRAM CHECKLIST Applicant, please return this checklist with
More informationSITE PLAN REVIEW GUIDELINES Rev. 2016
SITE PLAN REVIEW GUIDELINES Rev. 2016 The Site Plan Review process mandates that all information required in the Zoning Resolution and on the checklist be submitted and/or indicated on the site plan before
More information