Nº

Transcription

1 COMUNICAÇÃO TÉCNICA Nº My fire: multidisciplinary networking of research communities in fire Alessandro Santiago dos Santos Mario Yoshikazu Miyake Trabalho apresentado Simpósio Brasileiro de Redes de Computadores e Sistemas Distribuídos, 30., 2012, Ouro Preto. A série Comunicação Técnica compreende trabalhos elaborados por técnicos do IPT, apresentados em eventos, publicados em revistas especializadas ou quando seu conteúdo apresentar relevância pública. Instituto de Pesquisas Tecnológicas do Estado de São Paulo S/A - IPT Av. Prof. Almeida Prado, 532 Cidade Universitária ou Caixa Postal 0141 CEP São Paulo SP Brasil CEP Tel /4000 Fax

2 Multidisciplinary networking of research communities in FIRE Franck Le Gall, Marianne Baumberger Inno group France Rao Sathya, Phillip Cousin, Jörgen Friis ETSI Alain Vouffo Fraunhofer / Fokus Germany; Philip Inglesant UEDIN United Kingdom Alessandro Santiago, Mario Miyake IPT - Brazil Paventhan ERNet India;Andrey Rubin ITMO Russia; Frank BII - China

3 FP7 project: FP7-ICT Start date: 01/06/2010 Duration: 25 months Target countries: EU and BRICs Target groups: research testbeds users and beneficiaries The project MyFIRE

4 Agenda Agenda 3

5 FIBRE FIRST

6 Project objectives: overview Standardisation: Research and technology: the real needs for test beds Innovation and impacts: define the necessary standardized methodologies commercial exploitation strategies, impact evaluation of testbed utilization 5

7 Walking to objectives Survey 301 surveys Best practices report analysis 7 workshops (4 in BRICs) 48 interviews 15 Cases studies Deliverables 6

8 7

9 8 Documentos públicos

10 The main results: requirements, gaps, recommendations

11 Requirements Facility Provider Requirements The testbed should provide technological transparency to the research user community to assess whether the facility is suitable for the quick deployment of the planned experiment, and how to run it, if the facility was found to be appropriate User Requirements More related to the availability, accessibility and usability of experimental facilities at their disposal. Clear information in terms of technology offered, applications supported and technical support to conduct the experiment efficiently are indispensable mainly for external users Federation Requirements Central idea to extend the benefits of FIRE, allowing to run experiments using resources provided by different testbeds. Federation may take the form of a common interface to multiple underlying testbeds. Standardization Requirements Testbed facilities should explicit which standardised methods of testing they support. This is essential to minimize test effort and allow repeatability of experiments.

12 Gaps Testing methodologies and standards The experimental facilities announce the available features for testing in general terms, but do not identify the testing methodologies supported or standards to be followed. Interconnectivity and Interoperability Generally, testbeds do not support such interconnectivity and interoperability criteria and do not specify standards needed to interface with their experimental facilities. Sustainability We have seen over years that the testbeds are available during the last few months of the project for any experimentation and are not generally supported after the project conclusion, with some exceptions in NRENs. The testbeds so developed reappear to the stage once the follow-on projects are funded. Otherwise they simply disappear.

13 Gaps Protection of intellectual property There is no general guideline in this respect, whereas it should be developed to make the FIRE experimental facility a successful initiative. Security and privacy Future Internet has to be trustworthy with secure transactions and privacy protected. Though FP7 projects cover a large spectrum of related issues, there is few FIRE testbed project with security or privacy as major focus in the project. Socio-economic aspects Most of testbeds privilege technical aspects, so the social aspects are of less value in these projects. However, Living labs which make use of some FIRE testbeds give higher relevance to social aspects of users.

14 Some Recommendations Standardization Paths to Innovation Sustainability Business Models

15 Conclusions Experimental facilities (EF) rely mostly on public grant for a specific project, and more often than not has a limited group of users at the end of project If innovation and research advancement is the value, the technologies and services provided by an EF would be better used if they could benefit more users, and so permit increased exploitation of produced innovation and research advancement a necessary condition is to raise the capacity of the EF to adapt to the needs of external users, with special attention to end-users from enterprises. To guarantee sustainability of experimental facilities it is fundamental to develop a suitable business model. Demonstrate sustainability has been the weakest achievement of all experimental facilities in the European research framework. 14

16 Thank you!

17 Invitation Transport planning and traffic information systems in cities International Demonstrations of Platform for Transport Planning and Travel Information Viajeo Final Workshop: São Paulo Demo Site Results IPT - Institute for Technological Research Av. Prof Almeida Prado 532, Cid. Universitária, Auditório Adriano Marchini Prédio nº1 São Paulo, Brazil Tuesday 29 May 2012, 10:30-16: