ELEN 701 RF & Microwave Systems Engineering. Lecture 4 October 11, 2006 Dr. Michael Thorburn Santa Clara University

Similar documents
ELEN 701 RF & Microwave Systems Engineering. Lecture 2 September 27, 2006 Dr. Michael Thorburn Santa Clara University

ELEN 701 RF & Microwave Systems Engineering. Lecture 8 November 8, 2006 Dr. Michael Thorburn Santa Clara University

TSEK38: Radio Frequency Transceiver Design Lecture 7: Receiver Synthesis (II)

TSEK38: Radio Frequency Transceiver Design Lecture 6: Receiver Synthesis (I)

TSEK38 Radio Frequency Transceiver Design: Project work B

TSEK38: Radio Frequency Transceiver Design Lecture 3: Superheterodyne TRX design

RFIC Design ELEN 351 Lecture 2: RFIC Architectures

RADIO RECEIVERS ECE 3103 WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS

Receiver Architecture

TSEK02: Radio Electronics Lecture 8: RX Nonlinearity Issues, Demodulation. Ted Johansson, EKS, ISY

RF/IF Terminology and Specs

6.976 High Speed Communication Circuits and Systems Lecture 20 Performance Measures of Wireless Communication

Session 3. CMOS RF IC Design Principles

Receiver Design. Prof. Tzong-Lin Wu EMC Laboratory Department of Electrical Engineering National Taiwan University 2011/2/21

ADI 2006 RF Seminar. Chapter II RF/IF Components and Specifications for Receivers

TSEK02: Radio Electronics Lecture 8: RX Nonlinearity Issues, Demodulation. Ted Johansson, EKS, ISY

Receiver Architectures

Introduction to Receivers

RF Integrated Circuits

Analog Devices Welcomes Hittite Microwave Corporation NO CONTENT ON THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT HAS CHANGED

Radio Receiver Architectures and Analysis

Analog Devices Welcomes Hittite Microwave Corporation NO CONTENT ON THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT HAS CHANGED

Down-Converter Gilbert-Cell Mixer for WiMax Applications using 0.15µm GaAs HEMT Technology

RF, Microwave & Wireless. All rights reserved

RF Receiver Hardware Design

An All CMOS, 2.4 GHz, Fully Adaptive, Scalable, Frequency Hopped Transceiver

Wideband Receiver for Communications Receiver or Spectrum Analysis Usage: A Comparison of Superheterodyne to Quadrature Down Conversion

Today s communication

DMR Rx Test Solution. Signal Analyzer MS2830A. Reference Specifications

Interference Issues between UMTS & WLAN in a Multi-Standard RF Receiver

Agilent EEsof EDA.

26.8: A 1.9GHz Single-Chip CMOS PHS Cellphone

IC-R8500 Test Report. By Adam Farson VA7OJ/AB4OJ

THE BASICS OF RADIO SYSTEM DESIGN

Digitally-Controlled RF Self- Interference Canceller for Full-Duplex Radios

Introduction to CMOS RF Integrated Circuits Design

RF Design Final Spring 2005

Understanding IP2 and IP3 Issues in Direct Conversion Receivers for WCDMA Wide Area Basestations

Tanbir Haque Alpaslan Demir

HF Receivers, Part 2

RF Over Fiber Design Guide Overview. Provided by OPTICAL ZONU CORPORATION

Receiver Architectures

Modeling Physical PCB Effects 5&

C. Mixers. frequencies? limit? specifications? Perhaps the most important component of any receiver is the mixer a non-linear microwave device.

433MHz front-end with the SA601 or SA620

Miniaturization Technology of RF Devices for Mobile Communication Systems

Common RF Test On ATE

CHAPTER 4 ULTRA WIDE BAND LOW NOISE AMPLIFIER DESIGN

Low noise amplifier, principles

AST-GLSRF GLONASS Downconverter

RF System Aspects for SDR. A Tutorial. Dr. Ruediger Leschhorn, Rohde & Schwarz 29. November 2011

Keysight Technologies Making Accurate Intermodulation Distortion Measurements with the PNA-X Network Analyzer, 10 MHz to 26.5 GHz

Digital Signal Analysis

Design Considerations for 5G mm-wave Receivers. Stefan Andersson, Lars Sundström, and Sven Mattisson

1. Device Overview. 1.2 Electrical Summary. 1.3 Applications. 1.4 Functional Block Diagram. 1.5 Part Ordering Options 1 QFN

Designing a 960 MHz CMOS LNA and Mixer using ADS. EE 5390 RFIC Design Michelle Montoya Alfredo Perez. April 15, 2004

Figure 1 shows the placement of a mixer in a ANTENNA. f R f I LNA R I. Figure 1. Schematic diagram showing mixer placement in a receiver front end.

APPLICATION NOTE 1962 Mar 26, 2003 Figure 1

Mixer. General Considerations V RF VLO. Noise. nonlinear, R ON


QUICK START GUIDE FOR DEMONSTRATION CIRCUIT 678A 40MHZ TO 900MHZ DIRECT CONVERSION QUADRATURE DEMODULATOR

INSTALLATION AND OPERATING MANUAL

INTEGRATED CIRCUITS. AN1000 Evaluation of the SA601/SA606 demoboard. Author: Randall Yogi 1997 Aug 20

Final draft ETSI EN V1.1.1 ( )

Reconfigurable and Simultaneous Dual Band Galileo/GPS Front-end Receiver in 0.13µm RFCMOS

Module 8 Theory. dbs AM Detector Ring Modulator Receiver Chain. Functional Blocks Parameters. IRTS Region 4

A 900MHz / 1.8GHz CMOS Receiver for Dual Band Applications*

The best radio for worst events. Over HF links. Hana Rafi - CEO Eder Yehuda - VP R&D

MASTER S THESIS RF SYSTEM MODEL FOR IN-BAND FULL DUPLEX COMMUNICATIONS. Professor Aarno Pärssinen

Data Sheet SC5317 & SC5318A. 6 GHz to 26.5 GHz RF Downconverter SignalCore, Inc. All Rights Reserved

CMOS LNA Design for Ultra Wide Band - Review

COMTECH TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. DVBS SPECIFICATION

Introduction to Surface Acoustic Wave (SAW) Devices

LF to 4 GHz High Linearity Y-Mixer ADL5350

Selecting the Right Mixer for Your Application Using Yoni -the Advanced Search Engine (AN )

High Dynamic Range Receiver Parameters

RFID Systems: Radio Architecture

Radioelectronics RF CMOS Transceiver Design

Fully integrated UHF RFID mobile reader with power amplifiers using System-in-Package (SiP)

INTRODUCTION TO TRANSCEIVER DESIGN ECE3103 ADVANCED TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS

ISSCC 2006 / SESSION 33 / MOBILE TV / 33.4

AST-GPSRF. GPS / Galileo RF Downconverter GENERAL DESCRIPTION FEATURES APPLICATIONS FUNCTIONAL BLOCK DIAGRAM. Preliminary Technical Data

800 MHz BIDIRECTIONAL AMPLIFIER Technical manual

QUICK START GUIDE FOR DEMONSTRATION CIRCUIT 1455A 5MHZ TO 1600MHZ HIGH LINEARITY DIRECT QUADRATURE MODULATOR LTC5598 DESCRIPTION

TETRA Tx Test Solution

Description Package Green Status. Refer to our website for a list of definitions for terminology presented in this table.

SAMPLING FREQUENCY SELECTION SCHEME FOR A MULTIPLE SIGNAL RECEIVER USING UNDERSAMPLING

RF and Microwave Test and Design Roadshow 5 Locations across Australia and New Zealand

Satellite System Parameters

Low-Voltage IF Transceiver with Limiter/RSSI and Quadrature Modulator

Termination Insensitive Mixers By Howard Hausman President/CEO, MITEQ, Inc. 100 Davids Drive Hauppauge, NY

Design of S-Band Double-Conversion Superheterodyne Receiver Front-End for RADAR Systems

Low Cost Mixer for the 10.7 to 12.8 GHz Direct Broadcast Satellite Market

The Friis Transmission Formula

Low Distortion Mixer AD831

GPS/Galileo/BeiDou/GLONASS multisystem single-band receiver

Analog and RF circuit techniques in nanometer CMOS

3250 Series Spectrum Analyzer

The Schottky Diode Mixer. Application Note 995

FEU (Front End Unit) for Optic Repeater

Transcription:

ELEN 7 RF & Microwave Systems Engineering Lecture 4 October, 26 Dr. Michael Thorburn Santa Clara University

Lecture 5 Receiver System Analysis and Design, Part II Key Parameters Intermodulation Characteristics Linearity of Receiver Adjacent Channel and Alternate Channel Selectivity Channel Filters and Phase Noise of Local Oscillator Single-Tone Desensitization Linearity of Receiver Interference Blocking Channel Filters and Phase Noise of Local Oscillator Dynamic Range Automatic Gain Control

Superheterodyne Full-Duplex Architecture Configuration Receiver Section

Key Characteristics of Receiver Sensitivity Noise Figure, Noise Temperature Gain Linearity Signal S Noise N Self Noise No Receiver Noise Figure F Gain G Linearity C/3IM or NPR Signal G x S Noise G x (N+No) N F + N + N N N NF *log(f)

System Noise Figure Total Receiver Noise Figure is Computed from Assembly of Component Gains and Noise Figures g, F g2, F2 g3, F3 g4, F4 g5, F5 g6, F6 g7, F7 Iterative Formula CF Cumulative Noise Figure CG Cumulative Gain CF CF n F CF n + ( Fn ) / CGn EXAMPLE: g, F g2, F2 NF NF Total Total log F log F 2 + g NF + NF 2 G

System Noise Figure Unit Gain (db) Gain Cumm G Cumm NF Cumm G NF (db) NF Cumm NF (db) (db) Cumm Pct Pct Pre-selector -3. 5.E- -3. 5.E- 3. 2.E+ 2. 3. 48.3% 48.3% LNA 5. 3.6E+ 2..58E+.5.4E+ 2.82 4.5 72.4% 24.% RF BPF -2.5 5.62E- 9.5 8.9E+ 2.5.78E+ 2.87 4.58 73.6%.2% RFA 8. 6.3E+ 7.5 5.62E+..E+ 3.88 5.89 94.7% 2.% RF D/C..E+ 7.5 5.62E+..26E+ 3.88 5.89 94.7%.% IFA..E+ 7.5 5.62E+..26E+ 3.89 5.9 94.8%.% BPF -3.5 4.47E- 4. 2.5E+ 3.5 2.24E+ 3.9 5.92 95.2%.4% VGA 23.6 2.29E+2 37.6 5.75E+3 8.5 7.8E+ 4.5 6.8 99.4% 4.2% VGA stage 2 3..E+3 67.6 5.75E+6 2..E+2 4.7 6.2 99.7%.3% LPF -5..E-5 7.6 5.75E+ 5..E+5 4.9 6.22.%.3% Computation example of Receiver Line-up for Gain and Noise Figure Inputs are in Yellow (unit characteristics) Note: For passive units the F /g (NF -G) Many columns here to illustrate example. Must remember to assemble the NF properly (i.e. Don t Mix Up ratios and dbs!) Iterative Formula CF CF Cumulative Noise Figure F CG Cumulative Gain CFn CFn + ( Fn ) / CGn

Cascaded Noise Figure of Un-Matched Blocks of Receiver Chain + n i i j j i n g F F CF 2 Iterative Formula for Matched Stages CF Cumulative Noise Figure g is power gain g, F g2, F2 g3, F3 g4, F4 g5, F5 g6, F6 g7, F7 Total Receiver Noise Figure is Computed from Assembly of Component Gains and Noise Figures + + n m m l l o l o l i l o l i l v m cascade t R R R R R g F F CF 2,, 2,,, 2. _ Iterative Formula for Un-Matched Stages F Overall cascaded noise figure g is voltage gain R is input/output resistance

Receiver Desensitization Evaluation Due to Transmitter Noise Emission in the Receiver Band Rest of Transmitter Equivalent Antenna Temperature Method Duplexer NF 2.5 db PA Isolator Receiver NF 3.5 db Antenna Port P S kt BW Duplexer degradation T T e N, Rx e, Rx F F F Rx Rx Rx Rx Port kt kt + P e, Rx ( F T T e e T T Rx, T + ( F + ( F P kt N, Tx _ Rx N, Tx _ Rx ) T Rx, Rx, LNA + F ) T Te + ( F T Rx, Rx, kt ) ) T + P Rest of Receiver kt N, Tx _ Rx + ( F Rx, ) Unit Gain (db) Gain Cumm G (db) Cumm G NF (db) NF Cumm NF Cumm NF (db) Duplexer -2.5 5.62E- -2.5 5.62E- 2.5.78E+.78 2.5 Receiver 5. 3.6E+ 2.5.78E+ 3.5 2.24E+ 3.98 6.

Receiver Desensitization Evaluation Due to Transmitter Noise Emission in the Receiver Band Equivalent Antenna Temperature Method F Rx NF PN, Tx kt Rx _ Rx + F Rx, PN, Tx log kt _ Rx + F Rx, Duplexer NF 2.5dB Receiver NF 3.5 db NF Rx 2.33 log 4 8 8 + 3.98 6.6dB EXAMPLE: Desensitization is.6 db for this example Unit Gain (db) Gain Cumm G (db) Cumm G NF (db) NF Cumm NF Cumm NF (db) Duplexer -2.5 5.62E- -2.5 5.62E- 2.5.78E+.78 2.5 Receiver 5. 3.6E+ 2.5.78E+ 3.5 2.24E+ 3.98 6.

Influence of Antenna VSWR to Receiver Noise Figure We can characterize impedance mismatch by VSWR or Return Loss Antenna Noise Temp T A T + T F Equivalent Input Noise Temp, T F Feeder Input Loss, /L F T 2 + T Rx Equivalent Input Noise Temp, T Rx Noise-free system, Gain G RX For mobile system VSWR may vary between.5 and 6 depending on how system is held and how close to the head Feeder Network Note: L F > T T A + T F (L F -) + [ T Rx / (/L F ) ] T A + T F (L F -) + [T Rx * L F ] Receiver T 2 T A / L F + T F (L F -) / L F + T Rx R g V g V N I N Receiver Noiseless generator Equivalent Noise Voltage & Current load R L

Influence of Antenna VSWR to Receiver Noise Figure R g Simple approximation: Antenna input resistance is much larger than input reactance. V g generator V N I N Equivalent Noise Voltage & Current Receiver Noiseless R L load F NFRx log + Ra ρ R g, o Freq (MHz) 2 + ρ ρ Rx, o Comparison of ADS Simuluation with Calculation Original Antenna Simulation Calculation Difference 87.45.8.66.74 +.5 89.38 3.8 2.38 2.45 +.7

Intermodulation Characteristics The Ratio of the fundamental signal S_ (db) to the mth-order intermodulation product S_m (db) satisfies the following equation S S m ( m )( IIP S ) m i Where S_i is the input desired signal of the system or device and IIP is the mthorder input intercept point

Cascaded IIP Expressions The cascaded mth order input intercept point of the n stage block is represented n k k m m IIP n IIP IIP IIP n k IIP k IIP m n k m m IIP k j j IIP P g g g P g g P g P P g g g P P g P 3, 2 3, 3,2 3, 3, 3, 2 2 2 2 2......... + + + + For the 3 rd order intermod:

Adjustments to IIP calculation Frequency Selective System Practically all the receiver systems have frequency selectivity and suppress interferers to a great extent. It is necessary to take the receive selectivity into account when calculating the overall input intercept point of the receiver Cascaded IIP Expressions in Voltage and Hybrid Form In the IF and analog BB blocks, input and output signals of each stage are measured based on their voltage instead of the power and the amplification level for individual stages is thus represented by voltage gain. We shall note this but defer it for purposes of this lecture

Calculation of Receiver Intermodulation Characteristics Allowed Degradation of the Received Desired Signal The linearity of a receiver, represented by the IIP, is the main casue of intermodulation distortion, but the intermodulation spurious response also depends on other factors. Other topics: Intermodulation Distortion Resulting from Finite Receiver Linearity Degradation Caused by Phase Noise and Spurs of Local Oscillators Degradation Resulting from Cross-Modulation

Single-Tone Desensitization A unique specification for CDMA mobile systems Cross-Modulation Products Determination of the Allowed Single-Tone Interferor

Adjacent Channel and Alternate Channel Selectivity The adjacent/alternate channel selectivity measures a receiver s ability to receive a desired signal at its assigned channel frequency in the presence of adjacent/alternative channel signal at a given frequency offset from the center frequency of the assigned channel. Desired Signal Level and Allowed Degradation Formula of Adjacent/Alternate Channel Selectivity and Blocking Characteristics Two-Tone Blocking and AM Suppression Characteristics

Receiver Dynamic Range and AGC System Dynamic Range of a Receiver The dynamic range of a mobile station receiver is the input signal power range at the antenna port of the receiver over which the data error rate (BER) does not exceed a specified value. The lower end of this range depends on the receiver sensitivity level The upper end of this range is determined by the allowed maximum input power at which the data error does not exceed the specified value. Automatic Gain Control To be able to operate over a wide dynamic range, a receive commonly employs an AGC system

Reciever System Design and Performance Evaluation Receiver System Design Basics Define design goals based on application Good electrical performance Low power consumption Low cost Small size Performance is represented mainly by Receiver sensitivity Intermodulation characteristics Adjacent and alternate channel selectivity Blocking characteristics Spurious emissions

Basic Requirements of Key Devices in Receiver System Filters Main Specifications of passive band-pass filters Center Frequency Pass-band Bandwidth Pass-band Insertion Loss Pass-band Ripple Group Delay Group Delay Distortion Rejection (i.e. Adjacent Channel Rejection or Rejection at other frequencies) Input Impedance Output Impedance Input Return Loss Output Return Loss

Basic Requirements of Key Devices in Receiver System LNA Main Specifications of LNAs Operating Frequency Band Nominal Gain Noise Figure IIP Reverse Isolation Input and Output Impedance Input and Output Return Loss Input Power Range

Basic Requirements of Key Devices in Receiver System Downconverter and I/Q Demodulator Main Specifications of LNAs Operating Frequency Band Nominal Gain Noise Figure IIP-M (in particular IIP-3) IIP-2 for Demod Isolation between RF/IF and LO ports Isolation between LO and IF/BB ports Isolation between RF/IF and IF/BB ports Nominal LO power Input and output impedance Input Return Loss RF power range

Reciever System Design and Performance Evaluation Receiver System Performance Evaluation

Homework (due Nov ) Expand your Spreadsheet (or Program) from last week to calculate the Noise Figure, the Signal Level and the C/3IM for the cascaded set of components comprising your receiver. Give yourself enough flexibility so that you can add components (passive or active) to your line up. Use example in text on page 297 to validate your equations For now, only consider center frequency of channel (do not try to characterize filters)