Wideband Receiver for Communications Receiver or Spectrum Analysis Usage: A Comparison of Superheterodyne to Quadrature Down Conversion

Similar documents
RADIO RECEIVERS ECE 3103 WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS

ADI 2006 RF Seminar. Chapter II RF/IF Components and Specifications for Receivers

Radio Receiver Architectures and Analysis

Technician License Course Chapter 3 Types of Radios and Radio Circuits. Module 7

Receiver Design. Prof. Tzong-Lin Wu EMC Laboratory Department of Electrical Engineering National Taiwan University 2011/2/21

Recap of Last 2 Classes

Receiver Architecture

Introduction to Receivers

Session 3. CMOS RF IC Design Principles

ELEN 701 RF & Microwave Systems Engineering. Lecture 2 September 27, 2006 Dr. Michael Thorburn Santa Clara University

Superheterodyne Receiver Tutorial

RF/IF Terminology and Specs

RFID Systems: Radio Architecture

RF Integrated Circuits

ADI 2006 RF Seminar. Chapter VI A Detailed Look at Wireless Signal Chain Architectures


Receiver Architectures

Low Cost Mixer for the 10.7 to 12.8 GHz Direct Broadcast Satellite Market

HF Receivers, Part 2

INTRODUCTION TO TRANSCEIVER DESIGN ECE3103 ADVANCED TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS

TSEK38: Radio Frequency Transceiver Design Lecture 3: Superheterodyne TRX design

Chapter 6. Case Study: 2.4-GHz Direct Conversion Receiver. 6.1 Receiver Front-End Design

Termination Insensitive Mixers By Howard Hausman President/CEO, MITEQ, Inc. 100 Davids Drive Hauppauge, NY

Evolution of the Modern Receiver in a Crowded Spectrum Environment White Paper

Module 8 Theory. dbs AM Detector Ring Modulator Receiver Chain. Functional Blocks Parameters. IRTS Region 4

Topic Advanced Radio Receivers. Explain that an RF amplifier can be used to improve sensitivity;

Antenna Measurements using Modulated Signals

Radio Receivers. Al Penney VO1NO

Wideband Receiver Design

1 Introduction to Highly Integrated and Tunable RF Receiver Front Ends

Analog Devices Welcomes Hittite Microwave Corporation NO CONTENT ON THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT HAS CHANGED

Instrumentation Receiver: Analog Signal Processing for a DSP World. Rick Campbell Portland State University

Radio Receivers. Al Penney VO1NO

ENSC327 Communications Systems 5: Frequency Translation (3.6) and Superhet Receiver (3.9)

RF Receiver Hardware Design

Lecture 15: Introduction to Mixers

TSEK38 Radio Frequency Transceiver Design: Project work B

EE470 Electronic Communication Theory Exam II

PTX-0350 RF UPCONVERTER, MHz

Lecture 6. Angle Modulation and Demodulation

Production Test and Spectral Monitoring

Some Radio Implementation Challenges in 3G-LTE Context

Integrated receivers for mid-band SKA. Suzy Jackson Engineer, Australia Telescope National Facility

1. General Outline Project Proposal April 9, 2014 Kayla Esquivel and Jason Yang

Analog and RF circuit techniques in nanometer CMOS

5.4: A 5GHz CMOS Transceiver for IEEE a Wireless LAN

QUICK START GUIDE FOR DEMONSTRATION CIRCUIT 678A 40MHZ TO 900MHZ DIRECT CONVERSION QUADRATURE DEMODULATOR

Low Distortion Mixer AD831

Technical Article A DIRECT QUADRATURE MODULATOR IC FOR 0.9 TO 2.5 GHZ WIRELESS SYSTEMS

Co-existence. DECT/CAT-iq vs. other wireless technologies from a HW perspective

Integrated receivers for mid-band SKA. Suzy Jackson Engineer, Australia Telescope National Facility

Keysight Technologies Pulsed Antenna Measurements Using PNA Network Analyzers

Interference Issues between UMTS & WLAN in a Multi-Standard RF Receiver

Understanding Low Phase Noise Signals. Presented by: Riadh Said Agilent Technologies, Inc.

Radio Research Directions. Behzad Razavi Communication Circuits Laboratory Electrical Engineering Department University of California, Los Angeles

Radioelectronics RF CMOS Transceiver Design

ELEN 701 RF & Microwave Systems Engineering. Lecture 4 October 11, 2006 Dr. Michael Thorburn Santa Clara University

Transceiver Architectures (III)

High Dynamic Range Receiver Parameters

NOISE PERFORMANCE CHARACTERSITICS OF DIRECT CONVERSION RECEIVERS

ISSCC 2003 / SESSION 20 / WIRELESS LOCAL AREA NETWORKING / PAPER 20.5

A Guide to Calibrating Your Spectrum Analyzer

CUSTOM INTEGRATED ASSEMBLIES

6.101 Project Proposal April 9, 2014 Kayla Esquivel and Jason Yang. General Outline

Keysight Technologies 8 Hints for Making Better Measurements Using RF Signal Generators. Application Note

A 1.9GHz Single-Chip CMOS PHS Cellphone

STUDY OF THREE PHASE DEMODULATOR BASED DIRECT CONVERSION RECEIVER

Description of the AM Superheterodyne Radio Receiver

Software Defined Radio in Ham Radio Dennis Silage K3DS TS EPA Section ARRL

MAHALAKSHMI ENGINEERING COLLEGE TIRUCHIRAPALLI UNIT III TUNED AMPLIFIERS PART A (2 Marks)

A low-if 2.4 GHz Integrated RF Receiver for Bluetooth Applications Lai Jiang a, Shaohua Liu b, Hang Yu c and Yan Li d

ELT Receiver Architectures and Signal Processing Exam Requirements and Model Questions 2018

Full Duplex Radios. Sachin Katti Kumu Networks & Stanford University 4/17/2014 1

An All CMOS, 2.4 GHz, Fully Adaptive, Scalable, Frequency Hopped Transceiver

ELT Radio Architectures and Signal Processing. Motivation, Some Background & Scope

4- Single Side Band (SSB)

THE BASICS OF RADIO SYSTEM DESIGN

8 Hints for Better Spectrum Analysis. Application Note

MAKING TRANSIENT ANTENNA MEASUREMENTS

Digital Signal Analysis

TESTING METHODS AND ERROR BUDGET ANALYSIS OF A SOFTWARE DEFINED RADIO By Richard Overdorf

Optimizing the Performance of Very Wideband Direct Conversion Receivers

Making Noise in RF Receivers Simulate Real-World Signals with Signal Generators

Keywords: GPS, receiver, GPS receiver, MAX2769, 2769, 1575MHz, Integrated GPS Receiver, Global Positioning System

INTRODUCTION TO COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS AND TRANSMISSION MEDIA

PLC2 FPGA Days Software Defined Radio

Development of Signal Analyzer MS2840A with Built-in Low Phase-Noise Synthesizer

Designing a 960 MHz CMOS LNA and Mixer using ADS. EE 5390 RFIC Design Michelle Montoya Alfredo Perez. April 15, 2004

Speech, music, images, and video are examples of analog signals. Each of these signals is characterized by its bandwidth, dynamic range, and the

8 Hints for Better Spectrum Analysis. Application Note

Third-Method Narrowband Direct Upconverter for the LF / MF Bands

Software Defined Radio! Primer + Project! Gordie Neff, N9FF! Columbia Amateur Radio Club! March 2016!

Introduction. In the frequency domain, complex signals are separated into their frequency components, and the level at each frequency is displayed

Receiver Architectures

Techniques for Extending Real-Time Oscilloscope Bandwidth

DISCRETE-TIME CHANNELIZERS FOR AERONAUTICAL TELEMETRY: PART II VARIABLE BANDWIDTH

9 Best Practices for Optimizing Your Signal Generator Part 2 Making Better Measurements

CHAPTER 4 ULTRA WIDE BAND LOW NOISE AMPLIFIER DESIGN

Down-Converter Gilbert-Cell Mixer for WiMax Applications using 0.15µm GaAs HEMT Technology

Pulsed VNA Measurements:

Transcription:

A Comparison of Superheterodyne to Quadrature Down Conversion Tony Manicone, Vanteon Corporation There are many different system architectures which can be used in the design of High Frequency wideband receivers for communications or spectrum analysis usage. In general, however, the higher the required RF frequency and the wider the bandwidth required, the more demanding and complex the design will be. Hence, a 400 to 6000 MHz receiver design will be a much more difficult task than an AM broadcast band receiver covering.540 to 1.6. Virtually all radio signals which are desired to be received must first be converted from a high frequency radio signal (RF) into a much lower frequency Baseband (BB) signal. Some examples are: A 2400 MHz Bluetooth radio signal (RF) used for hands free Cellular Radio applications must be down converted to a 300-3000 Hz Baseband (BB) audio signal. A 512 MHz TV radio signal (RF) must be down converted to a 2-6 MHz Baseband (BB) video signal. A 5800 MHz Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) radio signal (RF) for mobile laptop\tablet communications must be down converted to a 20 MHz Baseband (BB) data stream. One of the major problems in receiver design is dealing with undesired RF signals at the antenna input which can interfere with and obscure the proper reception of the desired signals. This is generically referred to as the Selectivity or Undesired Signal(s) Rejection characteristic(s) of the radio. And as mentioned, higher operating frequency and bandwidth compounds this problem. Unfortunately, the conversion process from RF to Baseband opens the door to allowing certain types of potentially undesired signals into the receiver signal path and causing interference. Hence, some means of reducing or eliminating these undesired RF signals must be utilized in a radio receiver in order that the Baseband (BB) signals can be properly decoded. This paper will show that for many applications, Quadrature Down Conversion may be the best choice with respect to cost, size and design effort. In some cases, Superheterodyne Down Conversion may still be the performance winner, however. In all the following discussions and diagrams, signal boosting RF Low Noise Amplifiers (LNAs) right after the antenna have not been included, as they are necessary for almost all types of receivers. It is assumed that any of these receivers would in practice have LNA s that have been designed for sufficient linearity and stability, such that they do not generate interference products (Intermodulation Distortion) nor oscillations. A comparison of Superheterodyne to Quadrature Down Conversion page 1

Superheterodyne Down Receiver In the most common class of radio receivers, the Superheterodyne Receiver has historically been the topology of choice, largely because of its superior ability to prevent undesired signals from interfering with desired signals. A Superheterodyne receiver can provide a high degree of rejection of unwanted signals, while being able to provide a high degree of selection for desired signals. (Selectivity is the degree to which a receiver will pass desired signals well, while rejecting undesired signals.) It does this by utilizing a series of filters and frequency translation circuits (s and Oscillators) in the RF signal path. Typically in a Superheterodyne radio receiver, the RF signal is first converted to an Intermediate Frequency (IF) signal, filtered, and then the IF is converted to Baseband and filtered again. Often times there will be more than one Intermediate Frequency and filter, but at a minimum there will always be at least one. The figure below shows a basic Superheterodyne topology: Radio Frequency (RF) Intermediate Frequency (IF) Base Band Frequency (BB) RF Input RF lter IF lter BB lter BaseBand Output (BB) 1 st Local Oscillator (1 st LO) Frequency Translation Networks 2nd Local Oscillator (2 nd LO) gure 1 One major source of undesired signals which can get into the radio signal path due to the conversion process is called the Image Frequency(s), F i. In the conversion process, there are 2 signals which can be converted to the Intermediate Frequency (IF) in a receiver: The Desired signal F d The Undesired Image signal, F i A comparison of Superheterodyne to Quadrature Down Conversion page 2

The Image Frequency(s) translate to the same exact Intermediate (IF) frequency(s) as the RF Desired signal (F d ), and both F d and F i are present in the IF. Once the Image Frequency has converted to IF, there is no way to remove it, and if it s magnitude is on par with the Desired F d, it will block F d from further processing, and the receiver is impaired. In a Superheterodyne receiver, the Undesired signal F d due to the Image signal F i occurs when F i = F d + (2 x IF), when the Local Oscillator signal (F lo ) is higher in frequency than the Desired Signal F d : With F lo > F d : F i = F d + (2 x IF) The example below illustrates how two different signals, a desired and an undesired Image signal, can end up in the IF at the same exact frequency, on top of each other. The undesired, being the stronger signal, will block the desired signal. F d = 900 MHz (Desired Signal) IF = 200 MHz F lo = 1100 MHz ( F lo > F d) F i = F d + (2 x IF) = 900 + (2 x 200) = 1300 MHz (Undesired Image frequency) The picture below illustrates this; note that there are two 200 MHz signals in the middle of the IF passband: One due to the desired down converted 900 MHz signal F d One due to the undesired down converted Image signal at 1300 MHz, F i downconverted = 200 MHz RF Input Signals: esired = = 900 MHz mage = = 1300 MHz =900 =1300 downconverted = 200 MHz 0 200 500 1000 1500 Frequency, MHz 0 500 1000 1500 Frequency, MHz IF lter: f = 200 MHz Center Frequency Local Oscillator (LO) Flo = 1100 MHz Flo =1100 MHz 0 500 1000 1500 Frequency, MHz gure 2 A comparison of Superheterodyne to Quadrature Down Conversion page 3

The usual solution to this problem is to choose the rst IF Frequency to be higher than the highest Desired Frequency F d. This then places the Image Frequency F i very high, and out of band, where it can be filtered off and rejected. The next example is that of a practical wide RF Bandwidth 400-6000 MHz Superheterodyne Receiver : F d = 400-6000 MHz. 1 st IF = 8000 MHz ( IF > F d ; 8000 > 6000 MHz) Bandwidth = 2% =.02 x 8000 MHz = 160 MHz 1 st LO = F d + 1 st IF = [(400 6000 MHz) + 8000 MHz] = 8400 14,000 MHz. F i = Image Frequency range = ( F d + 2 x 1 st IF) = (400 6000) + (2 x 8000) = 16,400 22,000 MHz. This is very far removed from the highest frequency F d ( 22,000 > 6000 MHz), so it can be relatively easily filtered and rejected. 2 nd IF = 380 MHz, chosen to be below the desired lowest F d signal: (380 < 400 MHz) 3 rd IF =, chosen to get the Baseband signal within range of the ADC. 400-6000 MHz Wideband Superheterodyne Receiver 1 st IF: 8 GHz 2nd IF: 380 MHz 3rd IF: 6 GHz 8.4-14 GHz RF Amp 8 GHz 1st IF BPF CF: 8 GHz BW: 160 MHz IF Amp 380 MHz 2nd IF BPF CF: 380 MHz BW: 370 MHz 3rd IF 20 MHz RX: 400-6000 MHz LO1 Amp 8.4-14 GHz LO2 Amp LO3 Amp 370 MHz RF Switch LO2 LO3 390 MHz LO1a 8.4-10 GHz LO1b 10-12 GHz LO1c 12-14 GHz gure 3 While this is great for selectivity and rejection of the Image frequencies, it creates Engineering and cost issues: 1. The 1 St IF lter must be VERY high in frequency, while maintaining a fairly narrow pass band of just a few % wide. This can be very expensive and\or large, depending upon the filter technology required for the very high frequency and narrow bandwidth; typically large cavity resonators might be required. 2. Since the 1 st IF Frequency is very high, it means that the first Local Oscillator (LO1) must be very high as well, since the LO Frequency LO = F d + f. This causes several issues: Higher Frequency\Wider Bandwidth Local Oscillators typically are more difficult to design and costly. A comparison of Superheterodyne to Quadrature Down Conversion page 4

Minimizing important noise characteristics (referred to as Phase Noise) is problematic, and often requires that multiple Oscillators be used to cover the entire desired range. Here, 3 different LO1 s (L01a, LO1b, LO1c) would be required to cover the 8.4-14 GHz range Maintaining the ability to change frequency rapidly can be difficult. 3. More sections of down conversion must be used, in order to down convert the high 1 st IF to a low enough Base Band frequency that can be used to extract the desired signal, using Analog to Digital s (ADC s). 4. As the number of IF s grow, so do the accompanying loss of the extra filters and converter (mixer) circuits. This additional loss must be offset by adding gain amplifiers, which must simultaneously be high gain at high frequency, low noise, and linear. 5. The 2 nd IF frequency must be chosen so that it does not fall within the desired 400-6000 MHz range, F d. If it were within the F d range, say 600 MHz, then a strong signal at 600 MHz at the RF input could easily leak into the 600 MHz IF, and block any desired signals from passing. Forcing this filter to be out of the F d range (400-6000 MHz) has implications for the choice of LO3 and the 3 rd IF filter, and could prove costly. A comparison of Superheterodyne to Quadrature Down Conversion page 5

Quadrature Down Conversion Receiver Quadrature Down Conversion is a technique that mitigates the Image Frequency(s) problem by using phase cancellation techniques to cancel the Image frequency(s), rather than the Superheterodyne method of rejecting them with filtering. The RF input Frequency signals F in are converted directly to Baseband; there are no IF stages or Band pass filters required. The Quadrature Down Conversion process does place the undesired Image frequency signal in the Baseband path where it could cause interference of the Desired signal, except that there are phase shifts added to the signals, which, along with DSP processing, ultimately allows the Image signals to be cancelled, leaving only the Desired Signals. The Image Frequency in a Quadrature Down is equal to (2 x LO Frequency ) - Desired Frequency: F i = (2 x F lo ) - F d The figure below shows the most basic Quadrature Down Conversion topology: In Phase Channel Quadrature Down In Phase Base Band I channel ADC Digital Signal Processing (DSP) n = esired, + mage, 0 deg Signal Splitter 0 deg Signal Splitter Local Oscillator Flo Summer Desired Signal 90 deg Phase Shifter Quadrature Base Band 90 deg Phase Shifter Quadrature Channel Q channel ADC Quadrature Down Conversion is accomplished by: gure 4 1. rst passing the RF input signal (F in ) through a Quadrature Down, which: Splits n into 2 channels: an In Phase Channel and a Quadrature Channel. Down converts both channels directly to Baseband Further, adds the following phase shifts to the channels: o Quadrature Channel: Desired Signal F d = F in + 90 degrees Undesired Image signal F i = F in - 90 degrees o In Phase Channel: No phase shift added to either F d or F i One important requirement is that this is typically accomplished, in part, by creating two versions of the LO signal with 90 degrees phase difference. A comparison of Superheterodyne to Quadrature Down Conversion page 6

2. After low pass filtering the Baseband In Phase and Quadrature Channel signals, they are then sampled by independent s (ADCs). 3. Digital Signal Processing (DSP) then operates on these 2 channels: Quadrature channel receives another 90 Degree phase shift In Phase channel receives no further phase shift. The 2 channels are then added together. 4. The resultant from combining the 2 channels is that the Image Signal F i has been cancelled, and the Desired Signal F d has been enhanced. Hence, rejection of the Image Signals has been accomplished without filtering. 5. The Desired Base Band Signal F d will be passed for any further processing such as demodulation. The following example illustrates how two different signals, a desired and an undesired Image signal, will be processed in a Quadrature Down. At the output, the Image Frequency F i signal will have been removed by phase cancellation, and the Desired signal F d will be preserved and passed on for further processing, such as demodulation. Desired Signal Frequency: Local Oscillator Frequency: Undesired Image Frequency: Base Band Frequency: F d = 1005 MHz F lo = 1000 MHz F i = 995 MHz [ = (2 x F lo ) - F d = (2 x 1000) -1005 = 995 MHz] 5 MHz Quadrature Down Conversion: - Translates: - from 1005 MHz to (1005-1000) = + 5 MHz - from 995 MHz to (1000-995) = + 5 MHz - Phase shifts and as noted Digital Signal Processing - Adds further phase shift to Q Channel as noted - Sums (I + Q) Channels RF input Signals n I (In Phase) Base Band Channel - Does not phase shift during conversion - Does not phase shift during conversion I Channel ADC Base Band In Phase Channel I (In Phase) Channel - Does not shift - Does not shift Image Signal O Hz 5 MHz Desired Signal Quadrature Downconverter O Hz 5 MHz I Channel + Q Channel 995 MHz 1000 MHz 1005 MHz Flo = 1000 MHz LO 1000 MHz 90 deg - 90 deg + 90 deg O Hz 5 MHz Q (Quadrature) Channel - Shifts - 90 Deq - Shifts + 90 deg Base Band Quadrature Channel Q Channel ADC Adder Q (Quadrature) Channel - Shifts - 90 Deq - Shifts - 90 deg 90 deg Phase Shifter O Hz O Hz ( +5 MHz) - 90 deg - 90 deg 5 MHz are in phase so they add constructively I Channel + Q Channel are 180 deg out of phase so they cancel destructively 995 MHz 1000 MHz 1005 MHz gure 5 A comparison of Superheterodyne to Quadrature Down Conversion page 7

The next example is that of a practical wide RF Bandwidth 400-6000 MHz Quadrature Down Conversion Receiver. Desired Signal: F d = 400-6000 MHz., same as for the Superheterodyne example. Base Band Bandwidth:, same as for the Superheterodyne example. 400-6000 MHz Wideband Quadrature Down Conversion Receiver In Phase Channel Quadrature Downconverter.4 6 GHz RX: 400-6000 MHz LO Amp.4 6 GHz Quadrature Channel LO.4-6 GHz gure 6 Note the relative simplicity, as compared to the Superheterodyne 400-6000 MHz Receiver. The main issues that need to be addressed (and can be addressed adequately) are: 1. The degree of Undesired Signal rejection entirely depends on how well the In Phase and Quadrature Channels are balanced, with respect to Amplitude and Phase differences. In order to maintain adequate rejection, these channels must be compensated continuously with correction networks, typically implemented in the DSP. This typically means: a. DSP algorithms must be developed to continuously perform this correction. b. A 2 nd covering the same range (400-6000 MHz) may need to be added to be used as a reference source that the DSP correction algorithms use to perform the compensation. However, there are no special requirements on this source, such as phase noise, which make it a cost driver. A comparison of Superheterodyne to Quadrature Down Conversion page 8

2. The LO is operating on or near the same frequency as the Desired Signal, as it should. This does allow for the possibility of leakage from the LO through the Quadrature Down to the RF input. If a Quadrature Demodulator with poor LO to RF isolation is used, this receiver could unintentionally broadcast a strong enough signal that might interfere with other nearby colocated radios on the same frequency. Note, though, that this is mitigated by the reverse isolation of any RF LNA added before the. 3. Quadrature Down Conversion is susceptible to down converting harmonics of the desired signal, 2F d, 3F d, etc. These signals could block the reception of a desired weaker signal at F d. The designer must make sure that both the Quadrature Down circuit, RF LNA and LO amplifier (if needed) all have appropriate 2 nd Order Intercept point linearity characteristics. Additionally, the synthesizer needs to exhibit decent 2 nd harmonic output levels. Sometimes relatively inexpensive Harmonic Low Pass lters may need to be added in front of the Quadrature Down converters, if the receiver is to be operated in environments where strong stations operating at a harmonic of a desired weak level signal is located. A comparison of Superheterodyne to Quadrature Down Conversion page 9

RF Down s Cost\size Comparison: Wideband 400-6000 MHz Superheterodyne vs Quadrature s 400-6000 MHz Wideband Quadrature Down Conversion Receiver In Phase Channel Quadrature Downconverter.4 6 GHz RX: 400-6000 MHz LO Amp.4 6 GHz Quadrature Channel LO.4-6 GHz gure 7 Quadrature Down 400-6000 MHz Wideband Superheterodyne Receiver 1 st IF: 8 GHz 2nd IF: 380 MHz 3rd IF: 6 GHz 8.4-14 GHz RF Amp 8 GHz 1st IF BPF CF: 8 GHz BW: 160 MHz IF Amp 380 MHz 2nd IF BPF CF: 380 MHz BW: 370 MHz 3rd IF 20 MHz RX: 400-6000 MHz LO1 Amp 8.4-14 GHz LO2 Amp LO3 Amp 370 MHz RF Switch LO2 LO3 390 MHz LO1a 8.4-10 GHz LO1b 10-12 GHz LO1c 12-14 GHz gure 8 Superheterodyne Down A comparison of Superheterodyne to Quadrature Down Conversion page 10

Bold Red = most expensive components Red = expensive components Receiver Type Superheterodyne Quadrature s 8.4-14 GHz (Double Balanced).4-6 GHz (I\Q Demodulators) Frequency s\lo Sources 8.4-10 GHz.4-6 GHz (Main LO) 10-12 GHz.4-6 GHz Calibration Oscillator 12-14 GHz 7.54 GHz 390 MHz RF\IF Amplifiers 8 GHz 460 MHz 70 MHz LO Amplifiers 8.4-14 GHz.4-6 GHz 460 MHz 70 MHz RF Low Pass lters 6 GHz Possiblly need Harmonic s RF Band Pass lters 8 GHz, 160 MHz BW 460 MHz, 20 MHz BW 70 MHz, 20 MHz BW Base Band Low Pass lters s (input Frequency) 70 MHz RF Switches 8.4-14 GHz.4-6 GHz.4-6 GHz gure 9 Relative Cost Comparison, Superheterodyne vs Quadrature Wideband Receivers A comparison of Superheterodyne to Quadrature Down Conversion page 11