Ionospheric bending correction for GNSS radio occultation signals
|
|
- Leonard Stokes
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 RADIO SCIENCE, VOL. 46,, doi:10.109/010rs004583, 011 Ionospheric bending correction for GNSS radio occultation signals M. M. Hoque 1 and N. Jakowski 1 Received 30 November 010; revised 1 April 011; accepted 8 April 011; published 6 July 011. [1] Ionospheric propagation effects on Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) signals are the most pronounced during radio occultation due to long ionospheric travel paths of the received signal on low Earth orbiting satellites. Inhomogeneous plasma distribution and anisotropy cause higher order nonlinear refraction effects on GNSS signals which cannot be fully removed through a linear combination of dual frequency observables. In this paper, higher order ionospheric effects due to straight line of sight (LOS) propagation assumption such as the excess path length of the signal in addition to the LOS path and the total electron content difference between the curved path and the LOS path have been investigated for selected GPS CHAMP occultation events. Based on simulation studies we have derived correction formulas for computing raypath bending effects as functions of signal frequency, tangential height of the raypath, ionospheric parameters such as the maximum ionization and total electron content. If these parameters are known, the proposed correction method is able to correct on an average about 65 80% bending errors of GNSS occultation signals. Citation: Hoque, M. M., and N. Jakowski (011), Ionospheric bending correction for GNSS radio occultation signals, Radio Sci., 46,, doi:10.109/010rs Introduction [] The ionospheric propagation medium is characterized by a refractive index which is different from that of the free space. The phase refractive index is less than unity resulting in a phase velocity that is greater than the speed of light. However, the group refractive index is greater than unity resulting in a group velocity that is less than the speed of light. Therefore, when the Global Positioning System (GPS) signals propagate through the ionosphere, the carrier experiences a phase advance and the code experiences a group delay. The carrier phase pseudoranges are measured too short and the code pseudoranges are measured too long compared to the geometric range between the satellite and the receiver. Accurate range estimations between a receiver and four or more satellites enable accurate position determination of GNSS users in space and time. [3] The ionospheric range error is at first order directly proportional to the total number of free electrons along the path of the signal from the satellite to the receiver. It can vary from a few meters to tens of meters at the zenith [Klobuchar, 1996]. Since the ionosphere is a dispersive medium, the magnitude of the ionospheric delay depends on the signal frequency and therefore, the first order effect can be eliminated through a linear combination of dualfrequency observables. However, inhomogeneous plasma distribution and anisotropy cause higher order nonlinear effects which are not removed in this approach. Mainly the 1 Institute of Communications and Navigation, German Aerospace Center, Neustrelitz, Germany. Copyright 011 by the American Geophysical Union /11/010RS second and third order ionospheric terms (in the expansion of the refractive index) and errors due to bending of the signal remain uncorrected. They can be several tens of centimeters of range error at low elevation angles and during high solar activity conditions [Klobuchar, 1996]. [4] Early work was done by Brunner and Gu [1991] in computing higher order ionospheric effects and developing correction for them. Since then higher order ionospheric effects have been studied by different authors during last two decades [e.g., Bassiri and Hajj, 1993; Jakowski et al., 1994; Strangeways and Ioannides, 00; Kedar et al., 003; Fritsche et al., 005; Hawarey et al., 005; Hoque and Jakowski, 006, 007, 008; Hernández Pajares et al., 007; Datta Barua et al., 008; Morton et al., 009]. They found that higher order ionospheric terms are less than 1% of the first order term at GPS frequencies; however, they represent millimeter/centimeter level errors in geodetic measurements. Hernández Pajares et al. [007] found submillimeter level shifting in receiver positions along southward direction for low latitude receivers and northward direction for high latitude receivers applying the second order term correction. Fritsche et al. [005] found centimeter level correction in GPS positions considering higher order ionospheric terms. Recently Petrie et al. [010] investigated the potential effects of the bending terms described by Hoque and Jakowski [008] on global GPS network. They found the bending correction for the dual frequency linear L1 L combination to exceed the 3 mm level in the equatorial region. All these studies were conducted to compute higher order ionospheric effects on GNSS signals for ground based reception. [5] Recently Hoque and Jakowski [010] investigated ionospheric impact on GPS occultation signals received onboard Low Earth Orbiting (LEO) CHAMP (Challenging 1of9
2 Minisatellite Payload) satellite. LEO satellites have the opportunity to receive signals from occulting GNSS satellites using onboard limb pointing antennas. The observations have the dual purpose of studying electron densities in the ionosphere as well as temperature and moisture in the neutral atmosphere. A number of satellite and minisatellite missions such as GPS/ MET (GPS Meteorology Instrument), SAC C (Satelite de Aplicaciones Cientificas C), CHAMP, GRACE (Gravity Recovery And Climate Experiment) and COSMIC satellite network (Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere and Climate, also known as FORMOSAT 3) carry onboard GPS receivers for the GPS radio sounding of the Earth. Although occultation measurements are not usually used for positioning or navigation, it is worthy to know the ionospheric impact on accurate range estimation using these measurements. This paper investigates raypath bending effects in dual frequency range and total electron content (TEC) estimation and proposes correction for mitigating such effects. [6] During occultation both transmitter and receiver are out of the Earth s atmosphere. When the transmitted signal approaches the Earth, the closest point of approach to the Earth s surface is known as the tangential point and the altitude corresponding to this point is known as the tangential height. The perpendicular distances of the signal path from the straight line of sight (LOS) propagation are defined as the raypath deviations. Interested readers are referred to Figure 1 of Hoque and Jakowski [010] for an exaggerated view of GPS frequencies geometric paths during radio occultation. Radio wave traverses a long ionospheric limb path and therefore, the refraction effects are the most pronounced during radio occultation. The refraction effects depend on the actual condition of the ionospheric ionization and as well as on the raypath geometry. [7] Our previous investigation [Hoque and Jakowski, 010] for selected GPS CHAMP occultation events shows that the straight line propagation assumption errors such as the excess path length of the signal compared to the LOS propagation, raypath deviations and TEC differences along the curved and LOS paths significantly vary with the ionospheric profile shape and raypath geometry. We found the maximum estimates of the excess path length to be about.7 m, and the second and third order ionospheric terms to be about 13 cm and.1 cm, respectively, for the GPS L signal for an electron density profile with vertical TEC of about 167 TEC units (1 TEC unit = electrons/m ). We found the separation between the GPS L1 and L raypaths to exceed the kilometer level and errors in the GPS dual frequency range estimation and TEC estimation to exceed the meter and 10 TEC units level, respectively. [8] In this paper, simulation studies have been done to determine the straight line propagation assumption errors as functions of the signal frequency, different ionospheric parameters such as the maximum ionization and TEC, and geometrical parameters such as the tangential height of the raypath. Based on simulation studies we have proposed correction formulas for computing the excess path length and TEC difference between the signal and LOS paths.. Higher Order Refraction Terms [9] Ionospheric impact on the radio wave propagation is well described in the literature [e.g., Budden, 1985; Davies, 1990; Rawer, 1993; Leitinger and Putz, 1988]. For a right hand circularly polarized signal (e.g., GPS signals), the ionospheric phase refractive index can be written in terms of the inverse power of signal frequency ( f ) as n ¼ 1 f p f f p f g cos Q f 3 f " # p fp 4f 4 þ f g 1 þ cos Q where f p = n e e /(4p " 0 m) and f g = eb/(pm) are the plasma frequency and gyro frequency, respectively. The quantity n e is the electron concentration, e and m are the electron charge and mass, respectively, " 0 is the permittivity of the free space, Q is the angle between the Earth s magnetic field vector B and the propagation direction. The ionospheric phase delay for the GPS signal can be written as in which p ¼ 40:3 Z path Z t ¼ 437 Z d I ¼ ð1 nþds ¼ p f þ q f 3 þ t 3f 4 ð1þ ðþ n e ds ¼ 40:3TEC ¼ 40:3ðTEC LoS þ DTEC bend Þ ð3þ q ¼ : Z n e ds þ 4:74 10 Z n e B cos Qds ð4þ n e B 1 þ cos Q ds ð5þ where ds is the raypath element, the quantities p/f, q/(f 3 ) and t/(3f 4 ) are the first, second and third order ionospheric phase delays, respectively. The integral R n e ds path along a signal path is defined as the total electron content TEC. The raypath bending causes different TEC estimation along curved and LOS paths. Therefore, TEC in equation (3) is separated into TEC LOS along the straight LOS and DTEC bend which is the difference between TEC along the curved and LOS paths. The bending effect additionally causes a longer curved path length compared to the LOS path length. The excess path of the signal in addition to the LOS path length d len can be written as Z d len ¼ ds where r is the geometric distance between the transmitter and the receiver. 3. Estimate of Higher Order Refraction Terms [10] We have used a two dimensional ray tracing program [Hoque and Jakowski, 008] to simulate refraction effects on GPS signals for typical occultation geometries. The ray tracing program assumes that the ionosphere is composed of numerous thin spherical layers in each of which the ionization is homogeneous, i.e., the horizontal gradient of the ionosphere is ignored. To take into account the effect of the Earth s magnetic field on the radio wave propagation the International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF) model [Mandea and Macmillan, 000] has been used. ð6þ of9
3 Figure 1. Ionospheric refraction effects on GPS L signal during occultation. [11] As already mentioned, radio occultation observations are used to derive electron densities in the ionosphere. The reconstruction technique has been described by Jakowski et al. [00] and Jakowski [005]. The retrieval algorithm assumes a spherically layered ionosphere and uses an adaptive Chapman layer [Rishbeth and Garriott, 1969] superposed by an exponential decay function for estimating the topside ionosphere and plasmasphere above the CHAMP orbit. The reconstructed profiles contain electron densities from E layer (about 90 km from the Earth s surface) up to the GPS orbit. In the present work, electron densities below the E layer have been calculated using an adaptive Chapman layer. Two electron density profiles retrieved from CHAMP measurements have been used as the input of the ray tracing program. The simulation results are referred to as case 1 and case. The case 1 profile has a maximum ionization NmF of m 3 at an altitude hmf of 417 km (see Figure 1a, plotted until 1000 km altitude) at the geographic latitude 5.7 S, longitude 16 W and 15.1 h local time (LT). The case profile has a maximum ionization NmF of m 3 at hmf = 313 km (see Figure 1b, plotted until 1000 km altitude) at 7.6 N,. W and 16.4 LT. 3of9
4 The corresponding vertical TEC up to GPS height is estimated as about 16 and 167 TEC units, respectively. The actual GPS and CHAMP positions over phase connected arcs of the specific case 1 and case events have been used to trace signals for GPS CHAMP paths. Obtained refraction effects have been plotted in Figure 1 as a function of the tangential height. We have found that refraction effects experienced by the received signal vary with the tangential height of the received signal. [1] Figures 1a and 1b show electron density profiles used for case 1 and case, respectively, and Figures 1 (left) and 1 (right) below Figures 1a and 1b represent corresponding simulation results. Figures 1c and 1d show the variation of the excess path length d len and DTEC bend with the tangential height (see left and right scales, respectively). Figures 1e and 1f show the variation of the maximum raypath deviation and deviation at the tangential height, Figures 1g and 1h give the variation of the second and third order phase delays, Figures 1i and 1j show the variation of the TEC and dtec/dh T (see left and right scales, respectively). The quantity dtec/dh T is defined as the TEC rate and determined by dividing the TEC difference between two measurement epochs by the corresponding tangential height difference. [13] Comparing the variation of different higher order terms with the TEC and TEC rate dtec/dh T, we found that bending related effects such as the d len, DTEC bend, and raypath deviations are more sensitive to TEC rate changes than to the absolute TEC level. However, the second and third order ionospheric phase delays are found to be more closely related to TEC than to TEC rate. For detailed description of different curves plotted in Figure 1 we refer to our previous paper [Hoque and Jakowski, 010]. The variation of different higher order terms had been plotted as a function of the measurement time and described in that paper. [14] The maximum estimates of different higher order terms found for case 1 and case have been summarized in Table 1 for the GPS L signal. Their dependency on the signal frequency is also given in the Table 1. [15] We found that bending effects such as DTEC bend and raypath deviation are inversely proportional to the square of the signal frequency whereas the excess path length is inversely proportional to the quartic power of the frequency (see Table 1). 4. Raypath Bending Correction [16] One approach to mitigate raypath bending effects is the introduction of empirical formulas, which compute refraction effects by using ionospheric parameters such as TEC, scale height, maximum ionization, its height, and geometrical parameters such as elevation angle or tangential height of the raypath. For modeling purposes a singlelayered Chapman profile [Rishbeth and Garriott, 1969] has been considered for electron density distribution n e as a function of height h in the ionosphere. n e ðhþ ¼ NmF expð0:5ð1 z expðzþþþ ð7þ where NmF is the maximum ionization and z =(h hmf)/h in which hmf is the height of maximum ionization and H is the atmospheric scale height. [17] In the previous section, we have found that refraction effects experienced by occultation signals depend on the tangential height of the raypath. Therefore, tangential height is a parameter that characterizes occultation raypaths. The excess path length between a GPS and a LEO satellite at 450 km altitude has been computed for typical occultation geometries by the ray tracing program considering Chapman profiles with different hmf = 50, 350 and 450 km. The signal frequency f = 17.6 MHz, parameters H =70km and NmF = m 3 are kept constant in each case. The total electron content in the vertical direction will be the same since VTEC 4.13HNmF 143 TEC units [Hoque and Jakowski, 008]. The obtained excess path length d len, TEC and dtec/dh T have been plotted as a function of tangential height in Figures a c, respectively. [18] Figure a shows that the peak of the d len plot moves to the higher tangential height and its value decreases significantly with the increase of hmf from 50 km to 450 km. Therefore, the magnitude of the d len depends on the magnitude of hmf as well as on the tangential height of the raypath. [19] For the same occultation geometries, the excess path lengths have been computed considering Chapman profiles with different scale heights H = 60, 70 and 80 km. In each case the NmF and hmf are kept constant as m 3 and 450 km, respectively. The obtained d len has been plotted as a function of the tangential height in Figure 3. We see that the peak of the d len plot moves to the lower tangential height and its value decreases with the increase of H from 60 km to 80 km. Therefore, the d len is inversely proportional to H; however the H dependency of the d len is not as prominent as its dependency on hmf. [0] Considering the d len dependency on the signal frequency, ionospheric profile shape and raypath geometry, ray tracing calculation has been carried out to compute d len for different geometrical and ionospheric conditions. By Chapman layers a broader variety of ionospheric conditions are created varying layer parameters H, NmF and hmf. Functional dependencies have been studied separately for different parameters to develop correction formulas. Thus, the following formula has been obtained for the excess path length correction. d len ¼ TEC 0ðdTEC=dhT ÞB f 4 A 1 cos 0km < h T < h Tml 400 For fof 8 MHz For 8 < fof 5 MHz B ¼ c 1 þ c fof þ c 3 fof ð8þ ð9þ A ¼ c 4 c 5 expðfof=1:1881þ ð10þ A ¼ c 6 c 7 expðfof=:56þ ð11þ dtec dh T ¼0:031 þ 0:007foF 0:016foF ð1þ max pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi where fof 8.98 NmF is the critical plasma frequency and measured in Hz when maximum ionization NmF is 4of9
5 Table 1. Maximum Estimate of Higher Order Propagation Effects for Case 1 and Case Maximum Propagation Effects Case 1, L Case, L Frequency Dependency Excess path length (m) /f 4 Second order delay (m) /f 3 Third order delay (m) /f 4 DTEC bend (TECU) /f Maximum raypath /f deviation (km) Deviation at tangential height (km) /f measured in m 3. The d len dependency on the TEC rate dtec/dh T has been modeled by a cosine function whose phase and amplitude are functions of fof and given by equations (9) (11). Since tropospheric refraction becomes a dominating source of raypath bending in lower tangential height (<0 km tangential height), we limit the usage of the correction formula to 0 km < h T < h Tml (see equation (8)). The quantity h Tml is the maximum tangential height limit at Figure 3. Variations of excess path length with tangential height for different scale heights H = 60, 70, and 80 km. which dtec/dh T becomes equal to the maximum TEC rate (dtec/dh T ) max defined by equation (1). The maximum TEC rate depends on fof and is measured in TECU/km units when fof is in MHz. The excess path length d len is measured in meters by equations (8) (1) when signal frequency f is measured in GHz, fof is in MHz, tangential height h T is in kilometers and slant TEC is in TECU. The polynomial coefficients c 1 c 7 are derived based on a nonlinear fit with ray tracing results in least square senses and given in Table. The residual error in the fitting procedure is found about 5% of ray tracing results on average. [1] Equation (8) shows that the d len is proportional to the square power of the slant TEC and inversely proportional to the quartic power of the signal frequency. The dependencies on fof and dtec/dh T have been described by equations (8) (1). If the above ionospheric parameters and coefficients in Table are known, the excess path length for occultation signals can be determined using the proposed correction formula. [] The LEO orbit is kept constant at 450 km for d len computation by the ray tracing. Therefore, the estimated coefficients c 1 c 7 (see Table ) are only valid for occultation raypaths with LEO orbit 450 km. However, LEO orbits are not the same for different missions and even the orbit for the same LEO reduces with time due to atmospheric drag (if not uplifted by external means). The CHAMP orbit was 454 km when it was launched and decreased to below 300 km before the CHAMP mission was ended on 19 September 010. Table. Correction Coefficients Are Dimensionless Numbers Number Figure. Variations of (a) excess path length, (b) TEC, and (c) dtec/dh T with tangential height. Dotted vertical lines show the occurrences of the highest excess paths and corresponding TEC and dtec/dh T e e e e e e e e e e e e+001 d c 1 c c 3 c 4 c 5 c 6 c 7 d 1 d d 3 d 4 d 5 5of9
6 GRACE was launched initially into an orbit of 500 km and decreased to 460 km by the end of 010. The six FORMOSAT 3/COSMIC spacecrafts are orbiting at different heights ranging from 746 to 845 km (information based on February 011). For a higher or lower LEO orbit instead of a 450 km orbit, the d len computation by the ray tracing will be different and therefore the estimated coefficients c 1 c 7 will be different. However, our limited investigation shows that d len relationships with TEC and f will not be changed for higher or lower LEO orbits. The same technique can be applied to calculate a new set of coefficients for another LEO orbit height. [3] To assess the performance of the correction formula the d len has been computed for occultation raypaths by the ray tracing program and also by the correction formula and plotted in Figures 4a 4c. For this the GPS L signal has been traced for single layered Chapman profiles with H = 70 km and different hmf values of 50, 350 and 450 km. [4] In order to utilize the correction formula we need to know the parameters NmF, slant TEC and corresponding tangential height to calculate dtec/dh T. The NmF is known for Chapman profiles. The unknown slant TEC and corresponding h T are considered as known and therefore, taken from the ray tracing results. However, in practical cases TEC and TEC rate can be estimated using dual frequency measurements, and NmF can be obtained from available ionospheric electron density models such as International Reference Ionosphere [Bilitza, 001] and NeQuick [Nava et al., 008]. In fact occultation measurements contain NmF information which can be obtained by a standard reconstruction technique [e.g., Jakowski et al., 00]. [5] The differences between the ray tracing results and the correction results have been computed and defined as the correction error (ray tracing result correction result). Then the maximum absolute correction error and the percentage error (correction error/ray tracing result) 100% have been determined. [6] The maximum estimate of ray tracing results is found about.6,.0 and 1. m, for Chapman profiles with hmf values of 50, 350 and 450 km, respectively. The maximum correction errors are computed about 0.6, 0.4 and 0. m and the root mean squared (RMS) percentage errors are about 6%, 19% and 8% for hmf values of 50, 350 and 450 km, respectively. We have found that for Chapman based ionospheric profiles on an average about 70 80% excess path error can be corrected by the proposed correction (equations (8) (1)). Our investigation shows that if fof is wrong by 0%, the RMS percentage error is increased to about 45%. [7] In the previous section we have seen that the bending effects such as d len, maximum raypath deviation, deviation at the tangential height, DTEC bend are all correlated. The d len versus DTEC bend plots drawn in Figures 4d 4f also prove this. Therefore, there is a possibility to derive approximation formulas for other effects from d len. We have found that the DTEC bend can be expressed in terms of d len and signal frequency as DTEC bend ¼ d 1 þ d f þ d 3 f 1 þ d4 d len þ d 5 d len þd6 d len 3 ð13þ where DTEC bend is measured in TECU, f is measured in GHz and d len is in meters. The polynomial coefficients d 1 d 6 are derived based on a nonlinear fit with ray tracing results in least square senses and given in Table. As already given in the Table 1, DTEC bend is proportional to the inverse square power of the frequency whereas d len is proportional to the inverse quartic power of the frequency. Due to this reason, equation (13) shows frequency dependency of DTEC bend in addition to the d len dependency. [8] To assess the performance of the d len and DTEC bend correction formulas for non Chapman profiles, we have computed correction errors (see Table 3) for GPS L1 and L signals using case 1 and case profiles. For CHAMP profiles NmF is known and the unknown parameters TEC, h T and thus dtec/dh T are considered as known and taken from the ray tracing results. As already mentioned, in practical cases TEC and TEC rate can be estimated using dual frequency GNSS measurements and NmF can be obtained either from standard ionospheric models or by processing occultation measurements which contain NmF information. The ray tracing and correction results for the L signal have been plotted in Figure 5. [9] In case of d len, the maximum correction error for the L signal is found about 0.5 and 0.6 m for case 1 and case, respectively, whereas without correction the maximum estimate of d len (i.e., ray tracing results) is about 1.4 and.7 m, respectively. The RMS percentage error is found about 34% and 19%, respectively. In case of DTEC bend computation, the maximum correction error is found about 4.1 and 4.9 TECU for case 1 and case, respectively, whereas without correction the maximum estimate is about 9.5 and 17.9 TECU, respectively. The RMS percentage error is found about 35% and 0%, respectively. We have found that on an average about 65 80% errors can be corrected by the proposed d len and DTEC bend correction (equations (8) (13)). [30] We see that the correction performance for case 1 is not as good as case. The case 1 profile gives a high vertical TEC of 16 TECU and we find the scale height H =98km for Chapman layer approximation VTEC 4.13HN m F [Hoque and Jakowski, 008]. Studies by different authors [Budden, 1985; Kelley, 1989; Davies, 1990; Norman, 003; Stankov and Jakowski, 006] show that Chapman layers with km scale height can well describe typical ionospheric F layer conditions. The case 1 profile scale height is very high compared to the typical representative scale height. This indicates that the case 1 profile deviates much from a Chapman layer approximation. Therefore, the correction formula based on a single layer Chapman approximation has not performed well. However, still about 65% bending errors are corrected. 5. Higher Order Correction of TEC Estimation [31] The dual frequency TEC LOS expression can be written in terms of carrier phase difference and higher order ionospheric terms as [Hoque and Jakowski, 010] TEC LoS ¼ f 1 f ð F 1 F Þ K f1 f DTEC bend1 DTEC nd þ DTEC len ð14þ 6of9
7 Figure 4. (a c) Comparison between excess path lengths computed by the ray tracing and by the correction (equations (8) (1)) for different hmf values. (d f) The relationship between the DTEC bend and d len. in which DTEC bend1 ¼ f 1 DTEC bend f DTEC bend1 f1 ð15þ DTEC nd ¼ q f1 1f þ f K f 1 f ðf 1 þ f Þ ð16þ DTEC len ¼ K d1 len f1 f ð17þ f1 f d len where K = 80.6 m 3 s, F 1 and F are the carrier phases of L1 and L, respectively, DTEC nd is the second order term due to Earth s magnetic field, and DTEC len and DTEC bend1 are the higher order terms due to excess path and TEC difference along L1 and L paths. The quantities q is given by equation (4), DTEC bend1 and DTEC bend are the excess TEC due to bending in addition to the LOS TEC (see equation (3)), and d 1 len and d len are the excess path for L1 and L signals, respectively. [3] Equations (15) and (17) show that the proposed d len and DTEC bend correction formulas (8) (13) can be used for computing higher order terms in dual frequency TEC estimation. To assess their performance, we have computed DTEC len and DTEC bend1 by the ray tracing program and also by the correction formulas for case 1 and case and the results are plotted in Figures 6a 6d. [33] In case of DTEC len, the maximum correction error (ray tracing result correction result) is found about 3.3 and 5 TECU for case 1 and case, respectively, whereas without correction the maximum estimate of DTEC len (i.e., ray tracing results) is about 8.3 and 16.5 TECU, respectively. The RMS percentage error is found about 34% and 0%, respectively. In case of DTEC bend1 computation, the maximum correction error is found about 6.7 and 10. TECU Table 3. Raypath Bending Errors With and Without Correction a Case 1 Case L1 L L1 L d len Maximum ray tracing result (m) Maximum correction error (m) RMS correction error (%) DTEC bend Maximum ray tracing result (TECU) Maximum correction error (TECU) RMS correction error (%) a That is, ray tracing results. 7of9
8 Figure 5. (a and b) Comparison between excess path lengths computed by the ray tracing and correction formula for case 1 and case. (c and d) The corresponding DTEC bend computation. for case 1 and case, respectively, whereas without correction the maximum estimate is about 15. and 8.4 TECU, respectively. The RMS percentage error is found about 37% and 0%, respectively. We have found that on an average about 60 80% errors can be corrected by the proposed correction. The correction formula overestimates ray tracing results for d len and DTEC bend computation in Figure 5 and as well as DTEC len and DTEC bend1 computation in Figure 6. Since DTEC bend1 and DTEC len are opposite in sign in equation (14) and the magnitude of DTEC nd is very small (<1 TECU) compared to the magnitude of other terms, the total higher order contribution is less than the magnitude of DTEC bend1 alone and thus less than 1% of the first order TEC LOS which is about 107 and 177 TECU for case 1 and case, respectively. Although we have only discussed correction at GPS frequencies, the correction formulas are equally valid for the new upcoming Galileo frequencies. [34] Our approach requires the external information of NmF to run the correction calculation. However, occultation measurements contain this information and can be Figure 6. Comparison between higher order TEC terms (see equation (14)) computed by the ray tracing and correction formula for (a and c) case 1 and (b and d) case. 8of9
9 obtained by a standard reconstruction technique. Alternatively, we can assimilate the occultation information in a global ionospheric model and compute the bending effect from the initial background model or assimilated electron densities. Although the later approach may give more consistent result, the ray tracing calculation for numerous occultation raypaths will be computationally expensive. Additionally the results will be affected by the topside electron densities of the used background model since occultation measurements give only bottom side information. [35] It should be noted that the correction formula is derived based on a single Chapman layer assumption ignoring horizontal gradients of the ionosphere. The used profiles have no features like sporadic E which could lead to a kind of waveguide for electromagnetic signals to stay in that layer rather than continue its bending path. For such nonstandard cases the correction formula is neither derived nor tested. 6. Conclusions [36] Simulation studies have been done to determine the raypath bending error of GNSS occultation signals as functions of the signal frequency f, the raypath geometry and key ionospheric parameters such as the maximum ionization NmF and the total electron content TEC. Based on simulation studies we have derived correction formulas for computing the excess path length and TEC difference between the signal and LOS paths as functions of f, NmF, TEC and tangential height of the raypath. If these parameters are known, the proposed correction method is able to correct bending errors of GNSS occultation signals by about 65 80% on average. [37] In practical cases, the actual TEC and differential change of TEC with respect to the tangential height can be estimated using dual frequency GNSS measurements. Although the maximum ionization NmF is not immediately known, it can be obtained by processing occultation measurements using a reconstruction technique. [38] In our previous work [Hoque and Jakowski, 010] we found higher order ionospheric errors in the GPS dualfrequency range estimation and TEC estimation using occultation signals to exceed the meter and 10 TEC units level, respectively. In the present work, we have found that higher order TEC errors can be reduced significantly applying the proposed correction formulas. Similarly, improved range estimations can be obtained by applying the bending correction without tracing rays in the ionosphere. [39] It should be noted that we have used single Chapman and CHAMP derived profiles to trace rays. The horizontal gradient of the ionosphere is ignored although the rays cover many degrees of latitude and longitude between the transmitter and the receiver. This may overestimate/underestimate the raypath bending estimation and also the correction. References Bassiri, S., and G. A. Hajj (1993), Higher order ionospheric effects on the global positioning system observables and means of modeling them, Manuscr. Geod., 18(6), Bilitza, D. (001), International Reference Ionosphere 000, Radio Sci., 36(), 61 75, doi:10.109/000rs0043. Brunner, F. K., and M. Gu (1991), An improved model for the dual frequency ionospheric correction of GPS observations, Manuscr. Geod., 16(3), Budden, K. G. (Ed.) (1985), The Propagation of Radio Waves: The Theory of Radio Waves of Low Power in the Ionosphere and Magnetosphere, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U. K. Datta Barua, S., T. Walter, J. Blanch, and P. Enge (008), Bounding higher order ionosphere errors for the dual frequency GPS user, Radio Sci., 43, RS5010, doi:10.109/007rs Davies, K. (Ed.) (1990), Ionospheric Radio, Peter Peregrinus, London. Fritsche, M., R. Dietrich, C. Knöfel, A. Rülke, S. Vey, M. Rothacher, and P. Steigenberger (005), Impact of higher order ionospheric terms on GPS estimates, Geophys. Res. Lett., 3, L3311, doi:10.109/ 005GL0434. Hawarey, M., T. Hobiger, and H. Schuh (005), Effects of the nd order ionospheric terms on VLBI measurements, Geophys. Res. Lett., 3, L11304, doi:10.109/005gl079. Hernández Pajares, M., J. M. Jaun, J. Sanz, and R. Orus (007), Second order ionospheric term in GPS: Implementation and impact on geodetic estimates, J. Geophys. Res., 11, B08417, doi:10.109/006jb Hoque, M. M., and N. Jakowski (006), Higher order ionospheric effects in precise GNSS positioning, J. Geod., 81(4), 59 68, doi: / s Hoque, M. M., and N. Jakowski (007), Mitigation of higher order ionospheric effects on GNSS users in Europe, GPS Solut., 1(), doi: /s Hoque, M. M., and N. Jakowski (008), Estimate of higher order ionospheric errors in GNSS positioning, Radio Sci., 43, RS5008, doi:10.109/007rs Hoque, M. M., and N. Jakowski (010), Higher order ionospheric propagation effects on GPS radio occultation signals, J. Adv. Space Res., doi: /j.asr Jakowski, N. (005), Ionospheric GPS radio occultation measurements on board CHAMP, GPS Solut., 9, 88 95, doi: /s Jakowski, N., F. Porsch, and G. Mayer (1994), Ionosphere induced raypath bending effects in precise satellite positioning systems, Z. Satell. Position. Navig. Kommun., SPN 1/94, Jakowski, N., A. Wehrenpfennig, S. Heise, C. Reigber, and H. Lühr (00), GPS radio occultation measurements of the ionosphere on CHAMP: Early results, Geophys. Res. Lett., 9(10), 1457, doi:10.109/001gl Kedar, S., G. Hajj, B. Wilson, and M. Heflin (003), The effect of the second order GPS ionospheric correction on receiver positions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30(16), 189, doi:10.109/003gl Kelley, M. C. (1989), The Earth s Ionosphere, Plasmaphysics and Electrodynamics, Academic, New York. Klobuchar, J. A. (1996), Ionospheric effects on GPS, in Global Positioning System: Theory and Applications, vol. 1, edited by B. W. Parkinson and J. J. Spilker, pp , Am. Inst. of Aeronaut. and Astronaut, Alexandria, Va. Leitinger, R., and E. Putz (1988), Ionospheric refraction errors and observables, in Atmospheric Effects on the Geodetic Space Measurements, Monogr. 1, edited by F. K. Brunner, pp , Sch. of Surv., Univ. of N. S. W., Sydney, Australia. Mandea, M., and S. Macmillan (000), International Geomagnetic Reference Field: The eighth generation, Earth Planets Space, 5(1), Morton, Y. T., Q. Zhou, and F. van Graas (009), Assessment of secondorder ionosphere error in GPS range observables using Arecibo incoherent scatter radar measurements, Radio Sci., 44, RS100, doi:10.109/ 008RS Nava, B., P. Coisson, and S. M. Radicella (008), A new version of the NeQuick ionosphere electron density model, J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys., 70(15), , doi: /j.jastp Norman, R. J. (003), An inversion technique for obtaining quasi parabolic layer parameters from VI ionograms, Proc. IEEE Radar Conf., , doi: /radar Petrie, E. J., A. K. Matt, M. Philip, and A. L. David (010), A first look at the effects of ionospheric signal bending on a globally processed GPS network, J. Geod., 84, , doi: /s Rawer, K. (1993), Wave Propagation in the Ionosphere, Kluwer Acad., Boston, Mass. Rishbeth, H., and O. K. Garriott (Eds.) (1969), Introduction to Ionospheric Physics, Academic, New York. Stankov, S. M., and N. Jakowski (006), Topside ionospheric scale height analysis and modelling based on radio occultation measurements, J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys., 68, , doi: /j.jastp Strangeways, H. J., and R. T. Ioannides (00), Rigorous calculation of ionospheric effects on GPS Earth satellite paths using a precise path determination methods, Acta Geod. Geophys. Hung., 37( 3), M. M. Hoque and N. Jakowski, Institute of Communications and Navigation, German Aerospace Center, Kalkhorstweg 53, D 1735 Neustrelitz, Germany. (mainul.hoque@dlr.de; norbert.jakowski@dlr.de) 9of9
Ionospheric Radio Occultation Measurements Onboard CHAMP
Ionospheric Radio Occultation Measurements Onboard CHAMP N. Jakowski 1, K. Tsybulya 1, S. M. Stankov 1, V. Wilken 1, S. Heise 2, A. Wehrenpfennig 3 1 DLR / Institut für Kommunikation und Navigation, Kalkhorstweg
More informationSpace geodetic techniques for remote sensing the ionosphere
Space geodetic techniques for remote sensing the ionosphere Harald Schuh 1,2, Mahdi Alizadeh 1, Jens Wickert 2, Christina Arras 2 1. Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformation Science, Technische Universität
More informationMonitoring the 3 Dimensional Ionospheric Electron Distribution based on GPS Measurements
Monitoring the 3 Dimensional Ionospheric Electron Distribution based on GPS Measurements Stefan Schlüter 1, Claudia Stolle 2, Norbert Jakowski 1, and Christoph Jacobi 2 1 DLR Institute of Communications
More informationMethods and other considerations to correct for higher-order ionospheric delay terms in GNSS
Methods and other considerations to correct for higher-order ionospheric delay terms in GNSS M. Hernández-Pajares(1), M.Fritsche(2), M.M. Hoque(3), N. Jakowski (3), J.M. Juan(1), S. Kedar(4), A. Krankowski(5),
More informationGPS Sounding of the Ionosphere Onboard CHAMP
N. Jakowski, C. Mayer, V. Wilken Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR) / Institut für Kommunikation und Navigation Kalkhorstweg 53 Neustrelitz GERMANY ABSTRACT Norbert.Jakowski@dlr.de / Christoph.Mayer@dlr.de
More informationIonospheric Imprint to LOFAR
Ionospheric Imprint to LOFAR Norbert Jakowski Institute of Communications und Navigation German Aerospace Center Kalkhorstweg 53, D-17235 Neustrelitz, Germany LOFAR Workshop, 8/9 November 2010, Potsdam,
More informationIonospheric Tomography with GPS Data from CHAMP and SAC-C
Ionospheric Tomography with GPS Data from CHAMP and SAC-C Miquel García-Fernández 1, Angela Aragón 1, Manuel Hernandez-Pajares 1, Jose Miguel Juan 1, Jaume Sanz 1, and Victor Rios 2 1 gage/upc, Mod C3
More informationIonospheric Range Error Correction Models
www.dlr.de Folie 1 >Ionospheric Range Error Correction Models> N. Jakowski and M.M. Hoque 27/06/2012 Ionospheric Range Error Correction Models N. Jakowski and M.M. Hoque Institute of Communications and
More informationGPS interfrequency biases and total electron content errors in ionospheric imaging over Europe
RADIO SCIENCE, VOL. 41,, doi:10.1029/2005rs003269, 2006 GPS interfrequency biases and total electron content errors in ionospheric imaging over Europe Richard M. Dear 1 and Cathryn N. Mitchell 1 Received
More informationStudy of small scale plasma irregularities. Đorđe Stevanović
Study of small scale plasma irregularities in the ionosphere Đorđe Stevanović Overview 1. Global Navigation Satellite Systems 2. Space weather 3. Ionosphere and its effects 4. Case study a. Instruments
More informationPlasma effects on transionospheric propagation of radio waves II
Plasma effects on transionospheric propagation of radio waves II R. Leitinger General remarks Reminder on (transionospheric) wave propagation Reminder of propagation effects GPS as a data source Some electron
More informationEstimation Method of Ionospheric TEC Distribution using Single Frequency Measurements of GPS Signals
Estimation Method of Ionospheric TEC Distribution using Single Frequency Measurements of GPS Signals Win Zaw Hein #, Yoshitaka Goto #, Yoshiya Kasahara # # Division of Electrical Engineering and Computer
More informationTOWARD A SIRGAS SERVICE FOR MAPPING THE IONOSPHERE S S F2 PEACK PARAMETERS
TOWARD A SIRGAS SERVICE FOR MAPPING THE IONOSPHERE S S F2 PEACK PARAMETERS C Brunini, F Azpilicueta, M Gende Geodesia Espacial y Aeronomía Facultad de Ciencias Astronómicas y Geofísicas Universidad Nacional
More informationOptimal Noise Filtering for the Ionospheric Correction of GPS Radio Occultation Signals
1398 J O U R N A L O F A T M O S P H E R I C A N D O C E A N I C T E C H N O L O G Y VOLUME 26 Optimal Noise Filtering for the Ionospheric Correction of GPS Radio Occultation Signals S. SOKOLOVSKIY, W.SCHREINER,
More informationImprovement of ionospheric electron density estimation with GPSMET occultations using Abel inversion and VTEC information
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 108, NO. A9, 1338, doi:10.1029/2003ja009952, 2003 Correction published 3 April 2004 Improvement of ionospheric electron density estimation with GPSMET occultations
More informationAn Assessment of Mapping Functions for VTEC Estimation using Measurements of Low Latitude Dual Frequency GPS Receiver
An Assessment of Mapping Functions for VTEC Estimation using Measurements of Low Latitude Dual Frequency GPS Receiver Mrs. K. Durga Rao 1 Asst. Prof. Dr. L.B.College of Engg. for Women, Visakhapatnam,
More informationNAVIGATION SYSTEMS PANEL (NSP) NSP Working Group meetings. Impact of ionospheric effects on SBAS L1 operations. Montreal, Canada, October, 2006
NAVIGATION SYSTEMS PANEL (NSP) NSP Working Group meetings Agenda Item 2b: Impact of ionospheric effects on SBAS L1 operations Montreal, Canada, October, 26 WORKING PAPER CHARACTERISATION OF IONOSPHERE
More informationThe ionosphere weather service SWACI and its capability for estimating propagation effects of transionospheric radio signals
The ionosphere weather service SWACI and its capability or estimating propagation eects o transionospheric radio signals Norbert Jakowski Institute o Communications und Navigation German Aerospace Center
More informationSignificant of Earth s Magnetic Field and Ionospheric Horizontal Gradient to GPS Signals
Proceeding of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Space Science and Communication (IconSpace), 1-3 July 2013, Melaka, Malaysia Significant of Earth s Magnetic Field and Ionospheric Horizontal Gradient
More informationA study of the ionospheric effect on GBAS (Ground-Based Augmentation System) using the nation-wide GPS network data in Japan
A study of the ionospheric effect on GBAS (Ground-Based Augmentation System) using the nation-wide GPS network data in Japan Takayuki Yoshihara, Electronic Navigation Research Institute (ENRI) Naoki Fujii,
More informationTopside Ionospheric Model Based On the Electron Density Profile Data of Cosmic Mission
Topside Ionospheric Model Based On the Electron Density Profile Data of Cosmic Mission PING Jingsong, SHI Xian, GUO Peng, YAN Haojian Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nandan
More informationGPS Sounding of the Ionosphere Onboard CHAMP
UNCLASSIFIED/UNLIMITED GPS Sounding of the Ionosphere Onboard CHAMP N. Jakowski, C. Mayer, V. Wilken Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR) / Institut für Kommunikation und Navigation Kalkhorstweg
More informationTotal Electron Content (TEC) and Model Validation at an Equatorial Region
Total Electron Content (TEC) and Model Validation at an Equatorial Region NORSUZILA YA ACOB 1, MARDINA ABDULLAH 2,* MAHAMOD ISMAIL 2,* AND AZAMI ZAHARIM 3,** 1 Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti
More informationExamination of Three Empirical Atmospheric Models
Examination of Three Empirical Atmospheric Models A Presentation Given to The Department of Physics Utah State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy
More informationComparative analysis of the effect of ionospheric delay on user position accuracy using single and dual frequency GPS receivers over Indian region
Indian Journal of Radio & Space Physics Vol. 38, February 2009, pp. 57-61 Comparative analysis of the effect of ionospheric delay on user position accuracy using single and dual frequency GPS receivers
More informationIonospheric Impacts on UHF Space Surveillance. James C. Jones Darvy Ceron-Gomez Dr. Gregory P. Richards Northrop Grumman
Ionospheric Impacts on UHF Space Surveillance James C. Jones Darvy Ceron-Gomez Dr. Gregory P. Richards Northrop Grumman CONFERENCE PAPER Earth s atmosphere contains regions of ionized plasma caused by
More informationLEO GPS Measurements to Study the Topside Ionospheric Irregularities
LEO GPS Measurements to Study the Topside Ionospheric Irregularities Irina Zakharenkova and Elvira Astafyeva 1 Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Paris Sorbonne Cité, Univ. Paris Diderot, UMR CNRS
More informationComparison of the first long-duration IS experiment measurements over Millstone Hill and EISCAT Svalbard radar with IRI2001
Advances in Space Research 37 (6) 1102 1107 www.elsevier.com/locate/asr Comparison of the first long-duration IS experiment measurements over Millstone Hill and EISCAT Svalbard radar with 1 Jiuhou Lei
More informationAPPLICATION OF SMALL SATELLITES FOR HIGH PRECISION MEASURING EFFECTS OF RADIO WAVE PROPAGATION
APPLICATION OF SMALL SATELLITES FOR HIGH PRECISION MEASURING EFFECTS OF RADIO WAVE PROPAGATION K. Igarashi 1, N.A. Armand 2, A.G. Pavelyev 2, Ch. Reigber 3, J. Wickert 3, K. Hocke 1, G. Beyerle 3, S.S.
More informationThe GPS measured SITEC caused by the very intense solar flare on July 14, 2000
Advances in Space Research 36 (2005) 2465 2469 www.elsevier.com/locate/asr The GPS measured SITEC caused by the very intense solar flare on July 14, 2000 Weixing Wan a, *, Libo Liu a, Hong Yuan b, Baiqi
More informationFirst assimilations of COSMIC radio occultation data into the Electron Density Assimilative Model (EDAM)
Ann. Geophys., 26, 353 359, 2008 European Geosciences Union 2008 Annales Geophysicae First assimilations of COSMIC radio occultation data into the Electron Density Assimilative Model (EDAM) M. J. Angling
More informationOperational Products of the Space Weather Application Center Ionosphere (SWACI) and capabilities of their use
Operational Products of the Space Weather Application Center Ionosphere (SWACI) and capabilities of their use N. Jakowski, C. Borries, V. Wilken, K.D. Missling, H. Barkmann, M. M. Hoque, M. Tegler, C.
More informationOPAC-1 International Workshop Graz, Austria, September 16 20, Advancement of GNSS Radio Occultation Retrieval in the Upper Stratosphere
OPAC-1 International Workshop Graz, Austria, September 16 0, 00 00 by IGAM/UG Email: andreas.gobiet@uni-graz.at Advancement of GNSS Radio Occultation Retrieval in the Upper Stratosphere A. Gobiet and G.
More informationTHE USE OF GPS/MET DATA FOR IONOSPHERIC STUDIES
THE USE OF GPS/MET DATA FOR IONOSPHERIC STUDIES Christian Rocken GPS/MET Program Office University Corporation for Atmospheric Research Boulder, CO 80301 phone: (303) 497 8012, fax: (303) 449 7857, e-mail:
More informationPositioning performance of the NTCM model driven by GPS Klobuchar model parameters
J. Space Weather Space Clim. 2018, 8, A18 M.M. Hoque et al., Published by EDP Sciences 2018 https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2018009 Space weather effects on GNSS and their mitigation Available online at:
More informationCDAAC Ionospheric Products
CDAAC Ionospheric Products Stig Syndergaard COSMIC Project Office COSMIC retreat, Oct 13 14, 5 COSMIC Ionospheric Measurements GPS receiver: { Total Electron Content (TEC) to all GPS satellites in view
More informationPreparing for COSMIC: Inversion and Analysis of Ionospheric Data Products
Preparing for COSMIC: Inversion and Analysis of Ionospheric Data Products S. Syndergaard 1, W. S. Schreiner 1, C. Rocken 1, D. C. Hunt 1, and K. F. Dymond 2 1 COSMIC Project Office, University Corporation
More informationNeQuick model Overview. Y. Migoya Orue, S. M. Radicella, B. Nava, K. Alazo Cuartas and A. Kashcheyev (T/ICT4D) ICTP
NeQuick model Overview Y. Migoya Orue, S. M. Radicella, B. Nava, K. Alazo Cuartas and A. Kashcheyev (T/ICT4D) ICTP United Nations/Argentina Workshop on the Applications of Global Navigation Satellite Systems,
More informationImprovement and validation of retrieved FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC electron densities using Jicamarca DPS
Improvement and validation of retrieved FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC electron densities using Jicamarca DPS, Y.-A. Liou, C.-C. Lee, M. Hernández-Pajares, J.M. Juan, J. Sanz, B.W. Reinisch Outline 1. RO: Classical
More information3. Radio Occultation Principles
Page 1 of 6 [Up] [Previous] [Next] [Home] 3. Radio Occultation Principles The radio occultation technique was first developed at the Stanford University Center for Radar Astronomy (SUCRA) for studies of
More informationOutline. GPS RO Overview. COSMIC Overview. COSMIC-2 Overview. Summary 9/29/16
Bill Schreiner and UCAR/COSMIC Team UCAR COSMIC Program Observation and Analysis Opportunities Collaborating with the ICON and GOLD Missions Sept 27, 216 GPS RO Overview Outline COSMIC Overview COSMIC-2
More informationREFLECTION AND TRANSMISSION IN THE IONOSPHERE CONSIDERING COLLISIONS IN A FIRST APPROXIMATION
Progress In Electromagnetics Research Letters, Vol. 1, 93 99, 2008 REFLECTION AND TRANSMISSION IN THE IONOSPHERE CONSIDERING COLLISIONS IN A FIRST APPROXIMATION A. Yesil and M. Aydoğdu Department of Physics
More informationPolar Ionospheric Imaging at Storm Time
Ms Ping Yin and Dr Cathryn Mitchell Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering University of Bath BA2 7AY UNITED KINGDOM p.yin@bath.ac.uk / eescnm@bath.ac.uk Dr Gary Bust ARL University of Texas
More informationImpact of the low latitude ionosphere disturbances on GNSS studied with a three-dimensional ionosphere model
Impact of the low latitude ionosphere disturbances on GNSS studied with a three-dimensional ionosphere model Susumu Saito and Naoki Fujii Communication, Navigation, and Surveillance Department, Electronic
More informationESTIMATION OF IONOSPHERIC DELAY FOR SINGLE AND DUAL FREQUENCY GPS RECEIVERS: A COMPARISON
ESTMATON OF ONOSPHERC DELAY FOR SNGLE AND DUAL FREQUENCY GPS RECEVERS: A COMPARSON K. Durga Rao, Dr. V B S Srilatha ndira Dutt Dept. of ECE, GTAM UNVERSTY Abstract: Global Positioning System is the emerging
More informationTo Estimate The Regional Ionospheric TEC From GEONET Observation
To Estimate The Regional Ionospheric TEC From GEONET Observation Jinsong Ping(Email: jsping@miz.nao.ac.jp) 1,2, Nobuyuki Kawano 2,3, Mamoru Sekido 4 1. Dept. Astronomy, Beijing Normal University, Haidian,
More informationObtaining more accurate electron density profiles from bending angle with GPS occultation data: FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC constellation
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Advances in Space Research xxx (9) xxx xxx www.elsevier.com/locate/asr Obtaining more accurate electron density profiles from bending angle with GPS occultation
More informationGPS Ray Tracing to Show the Effect of Ionospheric Horizontal Gradeint to L 1 and L 2 at Ionospheric Pierce Point
Proceeding of the 2009 International Conference on Space Science and Communication 26-27 October 2009, Port Dickson, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia GPS Ray Tracing to Show the Effect of Ionospheric Horizontal
More informationAtmospheric propagation
Atmospheric propagation Johannes Böhm EGU and IVS Training School on VLBI for Geodesy and Astrometry Aalto University, Finland March 2-5, 2013 Outline Part I. Ionospheric effects on microwave signals (1)
More informationAutomated daily processing of more than 1000 ground-based GPS receivers for studying intense ionospheric storms
RADIO SCIENCE, VOL. 40,, doi:10.1029/2005rs003279, 2005 Automated daily processing of more than 1000 ground-based GPS receivers for studying intense ionospheric storms Attila Komjathy, Lawrence Sparks,
More informationIonosphere geomagnetic field: Comparison of IGRF model prediction and satellite measurements
RADIO SCIENCE, VOL. 46,, doi:10.1029/2010rs004529, 2011 Ionosphere geomagnetic field: Comparison of IGRF model prediction and satellite measurements 1991 2010 N. A. Matteo 1 and Y. T. Morton 1 Received
More informationAn Improvement of Retrieval Techniques for Ionospheric Radio Occultations
An Improvement of Retrieval Techniques for Ionospheric Radio Occultations Miquel García-Fernández, Manuel Hernandez-Pajares, Jose Miguel Juan-Zornoza, and Jaume Sanz-Subirana Astronomy and Geomatics Research
More informationMedium-scale 4-D ionospheric tomography using a dense GPS network
Ann. Geophys., 31, 75 89, 2013 doi:10.5194/angeo-31-75-2013 Author(s) 2013. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Annales Geophysicae Medium-scale 4-D ionospheric tomography using a dense GPS network M. M. J. L.
More informationThree-dimensional and numerical ray tracing on a phenomenological ionospheric model
Three-dimensional and numerical ray tracing on a phenomenological ionospheric model Lung-Chih Tsai 1, 2, C. H. Liu 3, T. Y. Hsiao 4, and J. Y. Huang 1 (1) Center for Space and Remote Sensing research,
More informationReal-time HF ray tracing through a tilted ionosphere
RADIO SCIENCE, VOL. 41,, doi:10.1029/2005rs003378, 2006 Real-time HF ray tracing through a tilted ionosphere Xueqin Huang 1 and Bodo W. Reinisch 1 Received 14 September 2005; revised 30 January 2006; accepted
More informationStudy of the Ionosphere Irregularities Caused by Space Weather Activity on the Base of GNSS Measurements
Study of the Ionosphere Irregularities Caused by Space Weather Activity on the Base of GNSS Measurements Iu. Cherniak 1, I. Zakharenkova 1,2, A. Krankowski 1 1 Space Radio Research Center,, University
More informationELECTROMAGNETIC PROPAGATION (ALT, TEC)
ELECTROMAGNETIC PROPAGATION (ALT, TEC) N. Picot CNES, 18 Av Ed Belin, 31401 Toulouse, France Email : Nicolas.Picot@cnes.fr ABSTRACT For electromagnetic propagation, the ionosphere plays a key role. This
More informationInfluence of Major Geomagnetic Storms Occurred in the Year 2011 On TEC Over Bangalore Station In India
International Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering. ISSN 0974-2166 Volume 6, Number 1 (2013), pp. 105-110 International Research Publication House http://www.irphouse.com Influence of Major
More informationArtificial plasma cave in the low latitude ionosphere results from the radio occultation inversion of the FORMOSAT 3/ COSMIC
Click Here for Full Article JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 115,, doi:10.1029/2009ja015079, 2010 Artificial plasma cave in the low latitude ionosphere results from the radio occultation inversion
More informationActivities of the JPL Ionosphere Group
Activities of the JPL Ionosphere Group On-going GIM wor Submit rapid and final GIM TEC maps for IGS combined ionosphere products FAA WAAS & SBAS analysis Error bounds for Brazilian sector, increasing availability
More informationAn error analysis on nature and radar system noises in deriving the phase and group velocities of vertical propagation waves
Earth Planets Space, 65, 911 916, 2013 An error analysis on nature and radar system noises in deriving the phase and group velocities of vertical propagation waves C. C. Hsiao 1,J.Y.Liu 1,2,3, and Y. H.
More informationCOSMIC / FormoSat 3 Overview, Status, First results, Data distribution
COSMIC / FormoSat 3 Overview, Status, First results, Data distribution COSMIC Introduction / Status Early results from COSMIC Neutral Atmosphere profiles Refractivity Temperature, Water vapor Planetary
More informationEffects of magnetic storms on GPS signals
Effects of magnetic storms on GPS signals Andreja Sušnik Supervisor: doc.dr. Biagio Forte Outline 1. Background - GPS system - Ionosphere 2. Ionospheric Scintillations 3. Experimental data 4. Conclusions
More informationLocal GPS tropospheric tomography
LETTER Earth Planets Space, 52, 935 939, 2000 Local GPS tropospheric tomography Kazuro Hirahara Graduate School of Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8602, Japan (Received December 31, 1999; Revised
More informationIonospheric Corrections for GNSS
Ionospheric Corrections for GNSS The Atmosphere and its Effect on GNSS Systems 14 to 16 April 2008 Santiago, Chile Ing. Roland Lejeune Overview Ionospheric delay corrections Core constellations GPS GALILEO
More informationUse of GNSS Radio Occultation data for Climate Applications Bill Schreiner Sergey Sokolovskiy, Doug Hunt, Ben Ho, Bill Kuo UCAR
Use of GNSS Radio Occultation data for Climate Applications Bill Schreiner (schrein@ucar.edu), Sergey Sokolovskiy, Doug Hunt, Ben Ho, Bill Kuo UCAR COSMIC Program Office www.cosmic.ucar.edu 1 Questions
More informationSatellite Navigation Science and Technology for Africa. 23 March - 9 April, The African Ionosphere
2025-28 Satellite Navigation Science and Technology for Africa 23 March - 9 April, 2009 The African Ionosphere Radicella Sandro Maria Abdus Salam Intern. Centre For Theoretical Physics Aeronomy and Radiopropagation
More informationThe NeQuick ionosphere electron density model: GNSS applications
Navigation solutions powered by Europe The NeQuick ionosphere electron density model: GNSS applications B. Nava (1), S.M. Radicella (1), R. Orus (2) (1) ICTP - Trieste, Italy (2) ESTEC/TEC-EEP; ESA - Noordwijk,
More informationIONOSPHERIC EFFECTS UPON A SATELLITE NAVIGATION SYSTEM AT MARS
IONOSPHERIC EFFECTS UPON A SATELLITE NAVIGATION SYSTEM AT MARS Michael Mendillo 1, Xiaoqing Pi 2, Steven Smith 1, Carlos Martinis 1, Jody Wilson 1, and David Hinson 3 1 Center for Space Physics Boston
More information[EN-107] Impact of the low latitude ionosphere disturbances on GNSS studied with a three-dimensional ionosphere model
ENRI Int. Workshop on ATM/CNS. Tokyo, Japan (EIWAC21) [EN-17] Impact of the low latitude ionosphere disturbances on GNSS studied with a three-dimensional ionosphere model + S. Saito N. FUjii Communication
More informationData ingestion into NeQuick 2
RADIO SCIENCE, VOL. 46,, doi:10.1029/2010rs004635, 2011 Data ingestion into NeQuick 2 B. Nava, 1 S. M. Radicella, 1 and F. Azpilicueta 2,3 Received 31 December 2010; revised 2 June 2011; accepted 9 June
More informationVariations of topside ionospheric scale heights over Millstone Hill during the 30-day incoherent scatter radar experiment
Ann. Geophys., 25, 2019 2027, 2007 European Geosciences Union 2007 Annales Geophysicae Variations of topside ionospheric scale heights over Millstone Hill during the 30-day incoherent scatter radar experiment
More informationDeveloping systems for ionospheric data assimilation
Developing systems for ionospheric data assimilation Making a quantitative comparison between observations and models A.C. Bushell, 5 th European Space Weather Week, Brussels, 20 th November 2008 Collaborators
More informationConvergence Time Improvement of Precise Point Positioning
, Canada Key words: GPS, Precise Point Positioning, satellite orbit, clock corrections, ionosphere SUMMARY Presently, precise point positioning (PPP) requires about 30 minutes or more to achieve centimetreto
More informationGeneration of Klobuchar Coefficients for Ionospheric Error Simulation
Research Paper J. Astron. Space Sci. 27(2), 11722 () DOI:.14/JASS..27.2.117 Generation of Klobuchar Coefficients for Ionospheric Error Simulation Chang-Moon Lee 1, Kwan-Dong Park 1, Jihyun Ha 2, and Sanguk
More informationimaging of the ionosphere and its applications to radio propagation Fundamentals of tomographic Ionospheric Tomography I: Ionospheric Tomography I:
Ionospheric Tomography I: Ionospheric Tomography I: Fundamentals of tomographic imaging of the ionosphere and its applications to radio propagation Summary Introduction to tomography Introduction to tomography
More informationHigh-frequency radio wave absorption in the D- region
Utah State University From the SelectedWorks of David Smith Spring 2017 High-frequency radio wave absorption in the D- region David Alan Smith, Utah State University This work is licensed under a Creative
More informationCombining ionosonde with ground GPS data for electron density estimation
Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics 65 (23) 683 691 www.elsevier.com/locate/jastp Combining ionosonde with ground GPS data for electron density estimation M. Garca-Fernandez a;, M. Hernandez-Pajares
More informationContinued Development and Validation of the USU GAIM Models
Continued Development and Validation of the USU GAIM Models Robert W. Schunk Center for Atmospheric and Space Sciences Utah State University Logan, Utah 84322-4405 phone: (435) 797-2978 fax: (435) 797-2992
More informationThe NeQuick model genesis, uses and evolution
Vol52,3,2009 20-09-2009 19:06 Pagina 417 ANNALS OF GEOPHYSICS, VOL. 52, N. 3/4, June/August 2009 The NeQuick model genesis, uses and evolution Sandro M. Radicella ARPL, The Abdus Salam ICTP, Trieste, Italy
More informationChapter 4 Abel inversion
Chapter 4 Abel inversion Abel inversion is a technique used in several fields, for instance in Astronomy to derive the radial mass distribution of a galaxy using the observation of its emitted light. In
More informationQuantitative evaluation of the low Earth orbit satellite based slant total electron content determination
SPACE WEATHER, VOL. 9,, doi:10.109/011sw000687, 011 Quantitative evaluation of the low Earth orbit satellite based slant total electron content determination Xinan Yue, 1 William S. Schreiner, 1 Douglas
More informationExtreme values in ionospheric radio propagation
ANNALS OF GEOPHYSICS, VOL. 45, N. 1, February 2002 Extreme values in ionospheric radio propagation Peter A. Bradley Pandora, Farnham Common, Slough, Berks, U.K. Abstract Proposals are made for Earth-space
More information2 INTRODUCTION TO GNSS REFLECTOMERY
2 INTRODUCTION TO GNSS REFLECTOMERY 2.1 Introduction The use of Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) signals reflected by the sea surface for altimetry applications was first suggested by Martín-Neira
More informationSpatial and Temporal Variations of GPS-Derived TEC over Malaysia from 2003 to 2009
Spatial and Temporal Variations of GPS-Derived TEC over Malaysia from 2003 to 2009 Leong, S. K., Musa, T. A. & Abdullah, K. A. UTM-GNSS & Geodynamics Research Group, Infocomm Research Alliance, Faculty
More informationThe impact of low-latency DORIS data on near real-time VTEC modeling
The impact of low-latency DORIS data on near real-time VTEC modeling Eren Erdogan, Denise Dettmering, Michael Schmidt, Andreas Goss 2018 IDS Workshop Ponta Delgada (Azores Archipelago), Portugal, 24-26
More informationThe use of ionosondes in GPS ionospheric tomography at low latitudes
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 117,, doi:10.1029/2012ja018054, 2012 The use of ionosondes in GPS ionospheric tomography at low latitudes Alex T. Chartier, 1,2 Nathan D. Smith, 1 Cathryn N. Mitchell,
More informationObservation of the ionospheric storm of October 11, 2008 using FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC data
Earth Planets Space, 64, 505 512, 2012 Observation of the ionospheric storm of October 11, 2008 using FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC data I. E. Zakharenkova 1,2, A. Krankowski 2, I. I. Shagimuratov 1, Yu. V. Cherniak
More informationModeling the ionospheric response to the 28 October 2003 solar flare due to coupling with the thermosphere
RADIO SCIENCE, VOL. 44,, doi:10.1029/2008rs004081, 2009 Modeling the ionospheric response to the 28 October 2003 solar flare due to coupling with the thermosphere David J. Pawlowski 1 and Aaron J. Ridley
More informationROTI Maps: a new IGS s ionospheric product characterizing the ionospheric irregularities occurrence
3-7 July 2017 ROTI Maps: a new IGS s ionospheric product characterizing the ionospheric irregularities occurrence Iurii Cherniak Andrzej Krankowski Irina Zakharenkova Space Radio-Diagnostic Research Center,
More informationSwarm L2 TEC Product Description
Swarm Expert Support Laboratories Swarm L2 TEC Product Description British Geological Survey (BGS) National Space Institute DTU Space (DTU) Delft Institute of Earth Observation and Space Systems (DUT)
More informationEFFECTS OF IONOSPHERIC SMALL-SCALE STRUCTURES ON GNSS
EFFECTS OF IONOSPHERIC SMALL-SCALE STRUCTURES ON GNSS G. Wautelet, S. Lejeune, R. Warnant Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium, Avenue Circulaire 3 B-8 Brussels (Belgium) e-mail: gilles.wautelet@oma.be
More informationSpace weather Application Center Ionosphere A Near-Real-Time Service Based on NTRIP Technology
Space weather Application Center Ionosphere A Near-Real-Time Service Based on NTRIP Technology N. Jakowski, S. M. Stankov, D. Klaehn, C. Becker German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Communications
More informationMonitoring the Ionosphere and Neutral Atmosphere with GPS
Monitoring the Ionosphere and Neutral Atmosphere with GPS Richard B. Langley Geodetic Research Laboratory Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering University of New Brunswick Fredericton, N.B. Division
More informationAccuracy Assessment of GPS Slant-Path Determinations
Accuracy Assessment of GPS Slant-Path Determinations Pedro ELOSEGUI * and James DAVIS Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA, USA Abtract We have assessed the accuracy of GPS for determining
More informationA technique for calculating ionospheric Doppler shifts from standard ionograms suitable for scientific, HF communication, and OTH radar applications
RADIO SCIENCE, VOL. 44,, doi:10.1029/2009rs004210, 2009 A technique for calculating ionospheric Doppler shifts from standard ionograms suitable for scientific, HF communication, and OTH radar applications
More informationPUBLICATIONS. Radio Science. NeQuick and IRI-Plas model performance on topside electron content representation: Spaceborne GPS measurements
PUBLICATIONS RESEARCH ARTICLE Special Section: Ionospheric Effects Symposium 2015 Key Points: Electron content from the GPS of GOCE and TerraSAR-X used for analysis of the NeQuick and IRI-Plas Two periods
More informationUpdates on the neutral atmosphere inversion algorithms at CDAAC
Updates on the neutral atmosphere inversion algorithms at CDAAC S. Sokolovskiy, Z. Zeng, W. Schreiner, D. Hunt, J. Lin, Y.-H. Kuo 8th FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC Data Users' Workshop Boulder, CO, September 30 -
More informationAssimilation Ionosphere Model
Assimilation Ionosphere Model Robert W. Schunk Space Environment Corporation 399 North Main, Suite 325 Logan, UT 84321 phone: (435) 752-6567 fax: (435) 752-6687 email: schunk@spacenv.com Award #: N00014-98-C-0085
More informationJOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 114, A10309, doi: /2009ja014485, 2009
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 114,, doi:10.1029/2009ja014485, 2009 Topside ionospheric effective scale heights (H T ) derived with ROCSAT-1 and ground-based ionosonde observations at equatorial
More information