Space engineering. Space data links - Telemetry synchronization and channel coding. ECSS-E-ST-50-01C 31 July 2008

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Space engineering. Space data links - Telemetry synchronization and channel coding. ECSS-E-ST-50-01C 31 July 2008"

Transcription

1 ECSS-E-ST-50-01C Space engineering Space data links - Telemetry synchronization and channel coding ECSS Secretariat ESA-ESTEC Requirements & Standards Division Noordwijk, The Netherlands

2 Foreword This Standard is one of the series of ECSS Standards intended to be applied together for the management, engineering and product assurance in space projects and applications. ECSS is a cooperative effort of the European Space Agency, national space agencies and European industry associations for the purpose of developing and maintaining common standards. Requirements in this Standard are defined in terms of what shall be accomplished, rather than in terms of how to organize and perform the necessary work. This allows existing organizational structures and methods to be applied where they are effective, and for the structures and methods to evolve as necessary without rewriting the standards. This Standard has been prepared by the Working Group, reviewed by the ECSS Executive Secretariat and approved by the ECSS Technical Authority. Disclaimer ECSS does not provide any warranty whatsoever, whether expressed, implied, or statutory, including, but not limited to, any warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose or any warranty that the contents of the item are error free. In no respect shall ECSS incur any liability for any damages, including, but not limited to, direct, indirect, special, or consequential damages arising out of, resulting from, or in any way connected to the use of this Standard, whether or not based upon warranty, business agreement, tort, or otherwise; whether or not injury was sustained by persons or property or otherwise; and whether or not loss was sustained from, or arose out of, the results of, the item, or any services that may be provided by ECSS. Published by: Copyright: ESA Requirements and Standards Division ESTEC, P.O. Box 299, 2200 AG Noordwijk The Netherlands 2008 by the European Space Agency for the members of ECSS 2

3 Change log ECSS E 50 01A 6 November 2007 ECSS E 50 01B First issue Never issued Second issue consistency with CCSDS and other ECSS standards 3

4 Table of contents Change log Scope Normative references Terms, definitions and abbreviated terms Terms from other standards Terms specific to the present standard Abbreviations Conventions Overview Introduction Coding Channel codes Connection vectors Convolutional codes Reed-Solomon codes Concatenated codes Turbo codes Synchronization and pseudo-randomization Convolutional coding Properties General Basic convolutional code Punctured convolutional code Reed-Solomon coding Properties General Specification Parameters and general characteristics

5 6.3.2 Generator polynomials Symbol interleaving depth Symbol interleaving mechanism Reed-Solomon codeblock partitioning Shortened codeblock length Dual basis symbol representation and ordering Synchronization Ambiguity resolution Reed-Solomon with E= Introduction General Turbo coding Properties General Specification General Parameters and general characteristics Turbo code permutation Backward and forward connection vectors Turbo encoder block Turbo codeblock specification Turbo codeblock synchronization Frame synchronization Introduction The attached sync marker (ASM) Overview Encoder side Decoder side ASM bit patterns Location of ASM Relationship of ASM to Reed-Solomon and turbo codeblocks ASM for embedded data stream Overview Embedded ASM Pseudo-randomizer General

6 9.1.1 Overview Application Pseudo-randomizer description Synchronization and application of pseudo-randomizer Overview Application Sequence specification...42 Annex A (informative) Transformation between Berlekamp and conventional representations...44 Annex B (informative) Expansion of Reed-Solomon coefficients...52 Annex C (informative) Compatible frame lengths...54 Annex D (informative) Application profiles...56 Annex E (informative) Changes from ESA-PSS Annex F (informative) Differences from CCSDS recommendations...63 Annex G (informative) Mission configuration parameters...64 Annex H (informative) Turbo code patent rights...68 Bibliography...69 Figures Figure 3-1: Bit numbering convention...11 Figure 4-1: Coding, randomization and synchronization (1)...15 Figure 4-2: Coding, randomization and synchronization (2)...16 Figure 5-1: Convolutional encoder block diagram...19 Figure 5-2: Punctured encoder block diagram...20 Figure 6-1: Functional representation of R-S interleaving...24 Figure 6-2: Reed-Solomon codeblock partitioning...25 Figure 7-1: Interpretation of permutation...32 Figure 7-2: Turbo encoder block diagram...33 Figure 7-3: Turbo codeblocks for code rates 1/2 and 1/ Figure 7-4: Turbo codeblock with attached sync marker...35 Figure 8-1: Format of channel access data unit (CADU)...36 Figure 8-2 ASM bit pattern for non-turbo-coded data...37 Figure 8-3: ASM bit pattern for rate 1/2 turbo-coded data...37 Figure 8-4: ASM bit pattern for rate 1/4 turbo-coded data

7 Figure 8-5: Embedded ASM bit pattern...39 Figure 9-1: Pseudo-randomizer configuration...41 Figure 9-2: Pseudo-randomizer logic diagram...43 Figure A-1 : Transformational equivalence...45 Tables Table 5-1: Basic convolutional code characteristics...18 Table 5-2: Punctured convolutional code characteristics...20 Table 5-3: Puncture code patterns for convolutional codes...20 Table 7-1: Specified information block lengths...31 Table 7-2: Codeblock lengths (measured in bits)...31 Table 7-3: Parameters k 1 and k 2 for specified information block lengths...32 Table 7-4: Forward connection vectors...33 Table 8-1: ASM bit patterns in hexadecimal notation...38 Table A-1 : Equivalence of representations (Part 1 of 4)...48 Table B-1 : Expansion for E= Table B-2 : Expansion for E= Table C-1 : Maximum frame lengths for E= Table C-2 : Maximum frame lengths for E= Table D-1 : Preferred coding schemes...58 Table D-2 : Coding gains and bandwidth expansions...60 Table D-3 : Coding gains for R-S(255, 239) and 4D-8PSK-TCM

8 1 Scope This Standard establishes a common implementation of space telemetry channel coding systems. Several space telemetry channel coding schemes are specified in this Standard. The specification does not attempt to quantify the relative coding gain or the merits of each scheme, nor the design requirements for encoders or decoders. However, some application profiles are discussed in Annex D. Performance data for the coding schemes specified in this Standard can be found in CCSDS G 1. Annex G describes the related mission configuration parameters. Further provisions and guidance on the application of this standard can be found in the following publications: ECSS E ST 50, Communications, which defines the principle characteristics of communication protocols and related services for all communication layers relevant for space communication (physical to application layer), and their basic relationship to each other. The handbook ECSS E HB 50, Communications guidelines, which provides information about specific implementation characteristics of these protocols in order to support the choice of a certain communications profile for the specific requirements of a space mission. Users of this present standard are invited to consult these documents before taking decisions on the implementation of the present one. This standard may be tailored for the specific characteristics and constraints of a space project in conformance with ECSS S ST 00. 8

9 2 Normative references The following normative documents contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this ECSS Standard. For dated references, subsequent amendments to, or revisions of any of these publications, do not apply. However, parties to agreements based on this ECSS Standard are encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent editions of the normative documents indicated below. For undated references the latest edition of the publication referred to applies. ECSS S ST ECSS system Glossary of terms 9

10 3 Terms, definitions and abbreviated terms 3.1 Terms from other standards For the purpose of this Standard, the terms and definitions from ECSS ST apply. 3.2 Terms specific to the present standard category A category of spacecraft having an altitude above the Earth s surface less than km category B category of spacecraft having an altitude above the Earth s surface equal to, or greater than km octet group of eight bits NOTE 1 NOTE 2 The numbering for octets within a data structure starts with 0. Refer to clause 3.4 for the convention for the numbering of bits physical channel stream of bits transferred over a space link in a single direction 3.3 Abbreviations For the purpose of this Standard, the abbreviated terms from ECSS S ST 00 01and the following apply: Abbreviation 8PSK AOS APP Meaning phase shift keying of eight states advanced orbiting systems a posteriori probability 10

11 ASM AWGN BER BPSK CADU CCSDS CRC FER GF(n) GMSK MSB MS/S NRZ L NRZ M QPSK R S TCM attached sync marker additive white Gaussian noise bit error rate binary phase shift keying channel access data unit Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems cyclic redundancy check frame error rate Galois field consisting of exactly n elements Gaussian minimum shift keying most significant bit mega symbols per second non return to zero level non return to zero mark quadrature phase shift keying Reed Solomon trellis coded modulation 3.4 Conventions bit 0, bit 1, bit N 1 To identify each bit in an N bit field, the first bit in the field to be transferred (i.e. the most left justified in a graphical representation) is defined as bit 0; the following bit is defined as bit 1 and so on up to bit N 1. Figure 3 1: Bit numbering convention most significant bit When an N bit field is used to express a binary value (such as a counter), the most significant bit is the first bit of the field, i.e. bit 0 (see Figure 3 1). 11

12 4 Overview 4.1 Introduction Telemetry channel coding is a method of processing data that is sent from a source to a destination so that distinct messages are created that are easily distinguishable from one another and thus enable reconstruction of the data with low error probability, thus improve the performance of the channel. 4.2 Coding Channel codes A channel code is the set of rules that specify the transformation of elements of a source alphabet to elements of a code alphabet. The elements of the source alphabet and of the code alphabet are called symbols. Depending on the code, the symbols can consist of one or more bits. The source symbols are also called information symbols. The code symbols are called channel symbols when they are the output of the last or only code applied during the encoding process. Block encoding is a one to one transformation of sequences of length k source symbols to sequences of length n code symbols. The length of the encoded sequence is greater than the source sequence, so n> k. The ratio k/n is the code rate, which can be defined more generally as the average ratio of the number of binary digits at the input of an encoder to the number of binary digits at its output. A codeword of an (n,k) block code is one of the sequences of n code symbols in the range of the one to one transformation. A codeblock of an (n,k) block code is a sequence of n channel symbols which are produced as a unit by encoding a sequence of k information symbols. The codeblock is decoded as a unit and, if successful, delivers a sequence of k information symbols. A systematic code is one in which the input information sequence appears in unaltered form as part of the output codeword. A transparent code has the property that complementing the input of the encoder or decoder results in complementing the output. 12

13 4.2.2 Connection vectors Convolutional and turbo coding use connection vectors. A forward connection vector is a vector which specifies one of the parity checks computed by the shift register(s) in the encoder. For a shift register with s stages, a connection vector is an s bit binary number. A bit equal to ʺ1ʺ in position i (counted from the left) indicates that the output of the ith stage of the shift register is used in computing that parity check. In turbo coding, a backward connection vector is a vector which specifies the feedback to the shift registers in the encoder. For a shift register with s stages, a backward connection vector is an s bit binary number. A bit equal to ʺ1ʺ in position i (counted from the left) indicates that the output of the ith stage of the shift register is used in computing the feedback value, except for the leftmost bit which is ignored. 4.3 Convolutional codes A convolutional code is a code in which a number of output symbols are produced for each input information bit. Each output symbol is a linear combination of the current input bit as well as some or all of the previous k 1 bits, where k is the constraint length of the code. The constraint length is the number of consecutive input bits that are used to determine the value of the output symbols at any time. The rate 1/2 convolutional code is specified in clause 5. Depending on performance requirements, this code can be used alone. For telecommunication channels that are constrained by bandwidth and cannot accommodate the increase in bandwidth caused by the basic convolutional code, clause 5 also specifies a punctured convolutional code which has the advantage of a smaller bandwidth expansion. A punctured code is a code obtained by deleting some of the parity symbols generated by the convolutional encoder before transmission. There is an increase in the bandwidth efficiency due to puncturing compared to the original code, however the minimum weight (and therefore its error correcting performance) is less than that of the original code. 4.4 Reed-Solomon codes The Reed Solomon (R S) code specified in clause 6 is a powerful burst error correcting code. In addition, the code has the capability of indicating the presence of uncorrectable errors, with an extremely low undetected error rate. The Reed Solomon code has the advantage of smaller bandwidth expansion than the convolutional code. The Reed Solomon symbol is a set of J bits that represents an element in the Galois field GF(2 J ), the code alphabet of a J bit Reed Solomon code. For the code specified in clause 6, J = 8 bits per R S symbol. 13

14 4.5 Concatenated codes Concatenation is the use of two or more codes to process data sequentially, with the output of one encoder used as the input to the next. In a concatenated coding system, the first encoding algorithm that is applied to the data stream is called the outer code. The last encoding algorithm that is applied to the data stream is called the inner code. The data stream that is input to the inner encoder consists of the codewords generated by the outer encoder. To achieve a greater coding gain than the one that can be provided by the convolutional code or Reed Solomon code alone, a concatenation of the convolutional code as the inner code with the Reed Solomon code as the outer code can be used for improved performance. This Standard also specifies the concatenation of the Reed Solomon code with the 4 dimensional 8PSK trellis coded modulation (4D 8PSK TCM) defined in ECSS E ST In this case, the Reed Solomon code with E=8 is the outer code and the 4D 8PSK TCM is the inner code. 4.6 Turbo codes A turbo code is a block code formed by combining two component recursive convolutional codes. A turbo code takes as input a block of information bits. The input block is sent unchanged to the first component code and bit wise interleaved to the second component code. The interleaving process, called the turbo code permutation, is a fixed bit by bit permutation of the entire input block. The output is formed by the parity symbols contributed by each component code plus a replica of the information bits. The turbo codes specified in clause 7 can be used to increase the coding gain in cases where the environment tolerates the bandwidth overhead. 4.7 Synchronization and pseudo-randomization The methods for synchronization specified in clause 8 apply to all telemetry channels, coded or uncoded. An attached sync marker (ASM) is attached to the codeblock or transfer frame. The ASM can also be used for resolution of data ambiguity (sense of 1 and 0 ) if data ambiguity is not resolved by the modulation method used. Successful bit synchronization at the receiving end depends on the incoming signal having a minimum bit transition density. Clause 9 specifies the method of pseudo randomizing the data to improve bit transition density. Figure 4 1 and Figure 4 2 provide an overview of how pseudo randomization and synchronization are combined with the different coding options at the sending and receiving end. 14

15 At the sending end, the order of convolutional encoding and modulation is dependent on the implementation. At the receiving end, the order of demodulation, frame synchronization and convolutional decoding are dependent on the implementation. The figures do not imply any hardware or software configuration in a real system. When designing a communications system, the system designer usually takes into account radio regulations and modulation standardization requirements from other standards, such as ECSS E ST Figure 4 1: Coding, randomization and synchronization (1) 15

16 Figure 4 2: Coding, randomization and synchronization (2) 16

17 5 Convolutional coding 5.1 Properties Convolutional coding is suitable for channels with predominantly Gaussian noise. The basic convolutional code defined in clause 5.3 is a rate 1/2, constraint length 7 transparent code. The basic code can be modified by puncturing, which removes some of the symbols before transmission, thus providing lower overhead and lower bandwidth expansion than the original code, but with reduced error correcting performance. The punctured convolutional codes are defined in clause 5.4 The codes are non systematic. The convolutional decoder is a maximumlikelihood decoder using the Viterbi decoding scheme. Decoding failures are not signalled and produce error bursts. The requirements in clause 5.2 apply to the basic and punctured convolutional codes. The convolutional code, by itself, cannot guarantee sufficient symbol transitions when non binary modulation schemes such as QPSK are used. The pseudorandomizer defined in clause 9 can be used to increase the symbol transition density. If the decoderʹs correction capability is exceeded, undetected burst errors can appear in the output. For this reason, when telemetry transfer frames are used, reference ECSS E ST specifies that a cyclic redundancy check (CRC) field be used to validate the frame unless the Reed Solomon code is used. Similarly, the CRC is used for the AOS transfer frames defined in CCSDS B General a. Soft bit decisions with at least 3 bit quantization shall be used for the decoder. b. The frame synchronization defined in clause 8 shall be used. c. If differential encoding (i.e. conversion from NRZ L to NRZ M) is used at the sending end, the conversions should be as follows: the conversion is performed at the input to the convolutional encoder; 17

18 the corresponding conversion at the receiving end from NRZ M to NRZ L is performed at the output of the convolutional decoder. NOTE 1 NOTE 2 NOTE 3 This prevents avoidable link performance loss. When suppressed carrier modulation systems are used, NRZ M or NRZ L can be used as a modulating waveform. In NRZ M a data ʺ1ʺ is represented by a change in level and a data ʺ0ʺ is represented by no change in level. In NRZ L a data ʺ1ʺ is represented by one of two levels, and a data ʺ0ʺ is represented by the other level. When a fixed pattern (the fixed part of the convolutionally encoded attached sync marker) in the symbol stream is used to provide node synchronization for the Viterbi decoder, the modulating waveform conversion can cause a modification of the pattern. 5.3 Basic convolutional code a. The basic convolutional code shall have the characteristics shown in Table 5 1. NOTE 1 The encoding rule can be represented by the following equations: s1(t) = i(t) + i(t 1) + i(t 2) + i(t 3) + i(t 6) modulo 2 s2(t) = i(t) + i(t 2) + i(t 3) + i(t 5) + i(t 6) + 1 modulo 2 where the equations use modulo 2 addition, and s1 is the first output symbol, s2 is the second output symbol and i(t) is the input information at time t. NOTE 2 An encoder block diagram is shown in Figure 5 1. NOTE 3 The output symbol sequence is: C1(1), C2(1), C1(2), C2(2).... Table 5 1: Basic convolutional code characteristics Characteristic Nomenclature Code rate Constraint length Connection vectors Symbol inversion Value Convolutional code with maximum likelihood (Viterbi) decoding 1/2 bit per symbol 7 bits G1 = (171 octal); G2 = (133 octal) On output path of G2 18

19 Figure 5 1: Convolutional encoder block diagram 5.4 Punctured convolutional code a. The punctured convolutional code shall have the characteristics shown in Table 5 2. NOTE 1 NOTE 2 NOTE 3 A single code rate of 2/3, 3/4, 5/6 or 7/8 is selected when it provides the appropriate level of error correction and symbol rate for a given service or data rate. Figure 5 2 depicts the punctured encoding scheme. The punctured convolutional code does not include the symbol inverter associated with G2 in the rate 1/2 code defined above. b. The puncturing patterns for each of the punctured convolutional code rates shall be the patterns defined in Table

20 Table 5 2: Punctured convolutional code characteristics Characteristic Nomenclature Value Punctured convolutional code with maximumlikelihood (Viterbi) decoding. Code rate 1/2, punctured to 2/3, 3/4, 5/6 or 7/8 Constraint length Connection vectors Symbol inversion 7 bits G1 = (171 octal); G2 = (133 octal) None Figure 5 2: Punctured encoder block diagram Table 5 3: Puncture code patterns for convolutional codes Puncturing pattern (a) Code rate Output sequence (b) C 1 : 1 0 C 2 : 1 1 2/3 C 1 (1) C 2 (1) C 2 (2)... C 1 : C 2 : /4 C 1 (1) C 2 (1) C 2 (2) C 1 (3)... C 1 : C 2 : C 1 : C 2 : /6 7/8 C 1 (1) C 2 (1) C 2 (2) C 1 (3) C 2 (4) C 1 (5)... C 1 (1) C 2 (1) C 2 (2) C 2 (3) C 2 (4) C 1 (5) C 2 (6) C 1 (7)... (a) (b) 1 = transmitted symbol 0 = non transmitted symbol C 1 (t), C 2 (t) denote values at bit time t 20

21 6 Reed-Solomon coding 6.1 Properties The Reed Solomon code defined in this clause provides an excellent forward error correction capability in a burst noise channel with an extremely low undetected error rate. This means that the decoder can reliably indicate whether it can make the proper corrections or not. For this reason, when telemetry transfer frames are used, ECSS E ST does not specify the use of a cyclic redundancy check (CRC) field to validate the frame when this Reed Solomon Code is used. The Reed Solomon error correction and detection presupposes correct frame synchronization. The Reed Solomon frame validation can only deliver a valid frame if the frame is correctly synchronized. If a frame is not correctly synchronized, then the Reed Solomon decoder can perform a meaningless error correction of the frame and deliver it as valid. The reliability of the Reed Solomon error correction and detection depends on the correct operation of the pseudo randomization defined in clause 9. If frames are randomized and then not derandomized, or not randomized and then derandomized, then the Reed Solomon decoder can perform meaningless error correction of a frame and deliver it as valid. In particular, this can happen when the Reed Solomon interleaving depth, I, is 5. The Reed Solomon coding, by itself, cannot guarantee sufficient channel symbol transitions to keep receiver symbol synchronizers in lock. The pseudorandomizer defined in clause 9 can be used to increase the symbol transition density. 6.2 General a. For Reed Solomon coding, the frame synchronization defined in clause 8 shall be used. NOTE The reliability of the Reed Solomon code depends on proper codeblock synchronization b. To provide additional coding gain, the Reed Solomon code may be concatenated with one of the convolutional codes defined in clause 5. 21

22 NOTE Used this way, the Reed Solomon code is the outer code, while the convolutional code is the inner code. Figure 4 2 shows the order of the codes at the sending and receiving ends. 6.3 Specification Parameters and general characteristics The Reed Solomon code shall have the following parameters and general characteristics: J = 8, where J is the number of bits per R S symbol. E = 16, where E is the Reed Solomon error correction capability, in symbols, within an R S codeword. J, E, and I (the depth of interleaving) are independent parameters. n = 2 J 1 = 255, where n is the number of symbols per R S codeword. 2E is the number of parity check symbols in each codeword. Therefore there are 32 parity check R S symbols in each 255 symbol codeword. k = n 2E, where k is the number of information symbols in each codeword. Therefore there are 223 information R S symbols in each 255 symbol codeword. NOTE The specified Reed Solomon code is a systematic code and results in a systematic codeblock Generator polynomials a. The Reed Solomon code shall have the following field generator polynomial over GF(2): F(x) = x 8 + x 7 + x 2 + x + 1 b. The Reed Solomon code shall have the following code generator polynomial over GF(2 8 ), where F(α) = 0: 127+ E g( x) = ( x α 11 j ) = 2E j= 128 E i= 0 G x NOTE 1 α 11 is a primitive element in GF(2 8 ). NOTE 2 For E=16, F(x) and g(x) characterize a (255,223) Reed Solomon code. NOTE 3 Each coefficient of the code generator polynomial can be represented as a power of α or as a binary polynomial in α of degree less than 8, where F(α) = 0 (i.e. α is one of the roots of the field generator polynomial F(x)). The two representations are given in Annex B. i i 22

23 6.3.3 Symbol interleaving depth a. The interleaving depth, I, shall take one of the following values: NOTE 1 NOTE 2 I = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or 8. I=1 is equivalent to the absence of interleaving. The maximum codeblock length Lmax, measured in R S symbols, depends on the value of I as follows: Lmax = ni = (2 J 1)I = 255I b. The interleaving depth on a physical channel shall be fixed for a mission phase Symbol interleaving mechanism Symbol interleaving is accomplished as shown functionally in Figure 6 1. The physical implementation of an encoder can differ from this functional description. Data bits to be encoded into a single Reed Solomon codeblock enter at the port labelled ʺINʺ. Switches S1 and S2 are synchronized together and advance from encoder to encoder in the sequence 1,2,, I, 1,2,, I,, spending one R S symbol time (8 bits) in each position. One codeblock is formed from ki R S symbols entering ʺINʺ. In this functional representation, a space of 2EI R S symbols in duration occurs between each entering set of ki R S information symbols. Due to the action of S1, each encoder accepts k of these symbols, each symbol spaced I symbols apart (in the original stream). These k symbols are passed directly to the output of each encoder. The synchronized action of S2 reassembles the symbols at the port labelled ʺOUTʺ in the same way as they entered at ʺINʺ. Following this, each encoder outputs its 2E check symbols, one symbol at a time, as it is sampled in sequence by S2. If, for I=5, the original symbol stream is d 1... d 1 d 2... d 2... d k... d k [2E 5 ] then the output is the same sequence with the [2E 5] filled by the [2E 5] check symbols as shown below: p 1... p 1... p 2E... p 2E where i i i d 1 d 2... d k i i p 1... p 2E is the R S codeword produced by the ith encoder. If q virtual fill symbols (see clause 6.3.6) are used in each codeword, then replace k by (k q) in this functional description. 23

24 With this method of interleaving, the original ki consecutive information symbols that enter the encoder appear unchanged at the output of the encoder with 2EI R S check symbols appended. Figure 6 1: Functional representation of R S interleaving Reed-Solomon codeblock partitioning The R S codeblock is partitioned as shown in Figure 6 2. The attached sync marker used with R S coding is a 32 bit pattern specified in clause 8 as an aid to synchronization. It precedes the transmitted codeblock. Frame synchronizers are therefore set to expect a marker at every transmitted codeblock + 32 bits. The telemetry transfer frame is defined in ECSS E ST When used with R S coding, only specified lengths can be contained within the codeblock s data space. See Annex C for the maximum lengths, not including the 32 bit attached sync marker. The Reed Solomon check symbols consist of the trailing 2EI symbols (2EIJ bits) of the codeblock. For example, when E=16 and I=5, then the length occupied by the check symbols is always 1280 bits. The transmitted codeblock consists of the telemetry transfer frame (without the 32 bit sync marker) and R S check symbols, which is the received data entity physically fed into the R S decoder. For example, when E=16, k=223 and I=5, the length of the transmitted codeblock is bits, unless virtual fill is used. If virtual fill is used, the length of the transmitted codeblock is reduced by the length of the virtual fill. A description of the use of virtual fill is provided in clause The logical codeblock is the logical data entity operated upon by the R S decoder. It can have a different length than the transmitted codeblock because it accounts for the amount of virtual fill that was introduced. For example, when E=16, k=223 and I=5, the logical codeblock always appears to be exactly bits in length. 24

25 Figure 6 2: Reed Solomon codeblock partitioning Shortened codeblock length Overview In a systematic block code, a codeword can be divided into an information part and a parity (check) part. If the information part is k symbols long, a shortened code is created by taking only s (s < k) information symbols as input, appending a fixed string of length k s and then encoding in the normal way. This fixed string is called virtual fill. Since the fill is a predetermined sequence of symbols, it is not transmitted over the channel, resulting in a shortened codeblock length. Thus the length of the transmitted codeblock is reduced by the length of the virtual fill. At the receiving end, the decoder appends the same fill sequence before decoding. The transmitted codeblock together with the virtual fill forms the logical codeblock. Figure 6 2 illustrates the transmitted codeblock and the logical codeblock. Shortening the transmitted codeblock length in this way changes the overall performance to a degree dependent on the amount of virtual fill used. Since it incorporates no virtual fill, the maximum codeblock length provides full performance General a. A shortened codeblock length may be used to accommodate frame lengths smaller than the maximum. b. Virtual fill shall be inserted only in integer multiples of 8I bits. c. The virtual fill shall not change in length during a mission phase. d. Virtual fill shall be inserted only at the beginning of the codeblock (i.e. after the attached sync marker but before the beginning of the transmitted codeblock). e. Virtual fill shall not be transmitted. NOTE Virtual fill is used to logically complete the codeblock. 25

26 f. Virtual fill shall consist of all zeros. g. If virtual fill is used, the resulting rate of codeblocks per unit time shall be calculated to ensure that the maximum operating speed of the decoder is not exceeded. NOTE As virtual fill in a codeblock is increased (at a specific bit rate), the number of codeblocks per unit time increases Use of virtual fill Since the Reed Solomon code is a block code, the decoder always operates on a full block basis. To achieve a full codeblock, virtual fill is added to make up the difference between the shortened block and the maximum codeblock length. Successful decoding depends on the configuration of the encoder and decoder to insert the correct length of virtual fill. Otherwise, the decoding cannot be carried out properly. When an encoder (initially cleared at the start of a block) receives ki Q symbols representing information (where Q, representing fill, is a multiple of I, and is less than ki), 2EI check symbols are computed over ki symbols, of which the leading Q symbols are treated as all zero symbols. A (ni Q, ki Q) shortened codeblock results where the leading Q symbols (all zeros) are neither entered into the encoder nor transmitted Dual basis symbol representation and ordering Each 8 bit Reed Solomon symbol is an element of the finite field GF(256). Since GF(256) is a vector space of dimension 8 over the binary field GF(2), the actual 8 bit representation of a symbol is a function of the particular basis that is chosen. One basis for GF(256) over GF(2) is the set ( 1, α 1, α 2,..., α 7 ). This means that any element of GF(256) has a representation of the form u 7 α 7 + u 6 α u 1 α 1 + u 0 α 0 where each u i is either a 0 or a 1. Another basis over GF(2) is the set ( 1, β 1, β 2,..., β 7 ) where β = α 117. To this basis there exists a so called ʺdual basisʺ (l 0, l 1,..., l 7 ). This has the property Tr(l i β j ) = 1, if i = j 0, otherwise for each j = 0, 1,..., 7. The function Tr(z), called the ʺtraceʺ, is defined by 7 Tr(z) = z 2k k=0 26

27 for each element z of GF(256). Each Reed Solomon symbol can also be represented as z 0 l 0 + z 1 l z 7 l 7 where each z i is either a 0 or a 1. The representation used in this Standard is the dual basis 8 bit string z 0, z 1,..., z 7, transmitted in that order (i.e. with z 0 first). The relationship between the two representations is given by the two equations and [z 0,..., z 7 ] = [u 7,..., u 0 ] [u 7,..., u 0 ] = [z 0,..., z 7 ] Further information relating the dual basis (Berlekamp) and conventional representations is given in Annex A. Also included is a scheme for transforming the symbols generated in a conventional encoder to the symbol representation used by this Standard Synchronization Codeblock synchronization of the Reed Solomon decoder is achieved by synchronization of the attached sync marker associated with each codeblock (see clause 8.) Ambiguity resolution a. The ambiguity between true and complemented data shall be resolved so that only true data is provided to the Reed Solomon decoder. NOTE Data in NRZ L form is normally resolved using the 32 bit attached sync marker. NRZ M data is selfresolving. 27

28 6.4 Reed-Solomon with E= Introduction There is a Reed Solomon code which has E=8 and which otherwise follows the specification in clauses to This alternative code has lower overhead with reduced performance and can correct 8 Reed Solomon symbols per codeword. For E=8: 2E, the number of parity check symbols in each codeword, is 16. k, the number of information symbols in each codeword, is 239. J = 8 and n = 255 as for the E=16 code in clause For E=8, the generator polynomials F(x) and g(x) specified in clause characterize a (255,239) Reed Solomon code. In this Standard, the use is limited to links which have 4 dimensional 8PSK trellis coded modulation (4D 8PSK TCM). When Reed Solomon with E=8 is used, then the requirements in clause apply General a. The Reed Solomon code with E=8 shall only be used if the modulation scheme is 4D 8PSK TCM. NOTE The modulation scheme 4D 8PSK TCM is defined in ECSS E ST 05. b. The Reed Solomon code with E=8 shall not be concatenated with one of the convolutional codes defined in clause 5. c. For the Reed Solomon code with E=8, the interleaving depth, I, shall take the value 8. NOTE The error correction and detection capability of Reed Solomon code with E=8 is limited and the output of a 4D 8PSK TCM decoder is liable to burst errors. An interleaving depth of I=8 improves the combined error correction and detection capability of the Reed Solomon code with 4D 8PSK TCM. 28

29 7 Turbo coding 7.1 Properties Turbo codes are binary block codes with large code blocks (hundreds or thousands of bits). They are systematic and inherently non transparent. Phase ambiguities are resolved using frame markers, which are used for codeblock synchronization. Turbo codes can be used to obtain even greater coding gain than those provided by concatenated coding systems. Turbo coding, by itself, cannot guarantee sufficient bit transitions to keep receiver symbol synchronizers in lock. The pseudo randomizer defined in clause 9 can be used to increase the symbol transition density. Further details on the operational environment and performance of the specified turbo codes can be found in CCSDS G 1. While providing significant coding gain, turbo codes can still leave some residual errors in the decoded output. For this reason, when telemetry transfer frames are used, reference ECSS E ST specifies that a cyclic redundancy check (CRC) field be used to validate the frame. Similarly, the CRC is used for the AOS transfer frames defined in CCSDS B-2. Implementers are informed that a wide class of turbo codes is covered by patent rights (see Annex H). 7.2 General a. For turbo coding, the frame synchronization defined in clause 8 shall be used. b. Differential encoding (i.e. NRZ M signalling) after the turbo encoder should not be used. NOTE Soft decoding implies the use of differential detection with considerable loss of performance. Differential encoding before the turbo encoder cannot be used because the turbo codes specified in this Standard are non transparent. This implies that phase ambiguities are detected and resolved by the frame synchronizer. 29

30 7.3 Specification General A turbo encoder is a combination of two simple encoders. The input is a frame of k information bits. The two component encoders generate parity symbols from two simple recursive convolutional codes, each with a small number of states. The information bits are also sent uncoded. A key feature of turbo codes is an interleaver which permutes, bit wise, the original k information bits before input to the second encoder. The turbo code defined in this Standard is a systematic code Parameters and general characteristics a. The turbo code shall have the following parameters and general characteristics: 1. The code type is a systematic parallel concatenated turbo code. 2. There are 2 component codes, and there is also an uncoded component to make the code systematic. 3. The component codes are recursive convolutional codes. 4. Each convolutional component code has 16 states. b. The nominal code rate, r, shall be selected from one of the following values: r = 1/2 or 1/4. NOTE Due to trellis termination symbols (see clause 7.3.6), the true code rates (defined as the ratios of the information block lengths to the codeblock lengths in Table 7 2) are slightly smaller than the nominal code rates. In this Standard, code rate always refers to the nominal code rates, r = 1/2 or 1/4. c. The information block length k shall be selected from one of the values specified in Table 7 1. NOTE 1 NOTE 2 The lengths are chosen for compatibility with the corresponding Reed Solomon interleaving depths, also shown in Table 7 1. The corresponding codeblock lengths in bits, n=(k+4)/r, for the specified code rates are shown in Table 7 2. NOTE 3 An additional information block length of bits (2048 octets) is currently under study. d. If the information block length of 1784 bits is used, the resulting rate of codeblocks per unit time shall be calculated to ensure that the maximum operating speed of the decoder is not exceeded. 30

31 NOTE A short block length can result in a high number of codeblocks per unit time. The decoding latency and performance are considered in this case. Table 7 1: Specified information block lengths Information block length k, bits Corresponding Reed Solomon interleaving depth I 1784 (=223 1 octets) (=223 2 octets) (=223 4 octets) (=223 5 octets) 5 Table 7 2: Codeblock lengths (measured in bits) Information block length k, bits Codeblock length n, bits rate 1/2 rate 1/ Turbo code permutation The interleaver is a fundamental component of the turbo encoding and decoding process. The interleaver for turbo codes is a fixed bit by bit permutation of the entire block of data. Unlike the symbol by symbol rectangular interleaver used with Reed Solomon codes, the turbo code permutation scrambles individual bits and resembles a randomly selected permutation in its lack of apparent orderliness. The permutation for each specified block length k is given by a specific reordering of the integers 1, 2,..., k as generated by the following algorithm. First, k is expressed as k=k 1 k 2. The parameters k 1 and k 2 for the specified block sizes are given in Table 7 3. Next, the following operations are performed for s=1 to s=k to obtain permutation numbers π(s). In the equations below, x denotes the largest integer less than or equal to x, and p q denotes one of the following eight prime integers: p 1 = 31; p 2 = 37; p 3 = 43; p 4 = 47; p 5 = 53; p 6 = 59; p 7 = 61; p 8 = 67 m = (s 1) mod 2 i = s 1 2 k 2 31

32 j = s 1 2 i k 2 k 1 t = (19i + 1) mod 2 q = t mod c = (p q j + 21m) mod k 2 π(s) = 2(t + c k ) m The interpretation of the permutation numbers is such that the sth bit read out on line ʺin bʺ in Figure 7 2 is the π(s)th bit of the input information block, as shown in Figure 7 1. Table 7 3: Parameters k1 and k2 for specified information block lengths Information block length (bits) k 1 k Figure 7 1: Interpretation of permutation 32

33 7.3.4 Backward and forward connection vectors The backward connection vector for both component codes and all code rates is: G0 = The forward connection vectors are shown in Table 7 4. Table 7 4: Forward connection vectors Rate Components Vectors Puncturing 1/2 both codes G1 = every other symbol from each component code 1/4 1 st component code G2 = G3 = nd component code G1 = none Figure 7 2: Turbo encoder block diagram 33

34 7.3.5 Turbo encoder block In Figure 7 2 each input frame of k information bits is held in a frame buffer, and the bits in the buffer are read out in two different orders for the two component encoders. The first component encoder (a) operates on the bits in unpermuted order (ʺin aʺ), while the second component encoder (b) receives the same bits permuted by the interleaver (ʺin bʺ). The read out addressing for ʺin aʺ is a simple counter, while the addressing for ʺin bʺ is specified by the turbo code permutation described in clause The component encoders are recursive convolutional encoders realized by feedback shift registers as shown in Figure 7 2. The circuits shown in this figure implement the backward connection vector, G0, and the forward connection vectors, G1, G2, G3, specified in Table 7 4. The block diagram also shows the encoding for rate 1/3 and rate 1/6 codes which are not specified in this Standard. A key difference between these convolutional component encoders and the standalone convolutional encoder specified in clause 5 is their recursiveness. In the figure this is indicated by the signal (corresponding to the backward connection vector G0) fed back into the leftmost adder of each component encoder Turbo codeblock specification Both component encoders in Figure 7 2 are initialized with zeros in all registers, and both are run for a total of k+4 bit times, producing an output codeblock of (k+4)/r encoded symbols, where r is the nominal code rate. For the first k bit times, the input switches are in the lower position (as indicated in the figure) to receive input data. For the final 4 bit times, these switches move to the upper position to receive feedback from the shift registers. This feedback cancels the same feedback sent (unswitched) to the leftmost adder and causes all four registers to become filled with zeros after the final 4 bit times. Filling the registers with zeros is called terminating the trellis. During trellis termination the encoder continues to output non zero encoded symbols. In particular, the ʺsystematic uncodedʺ output (line ʺout 0aʺ in the figure) includes an extra 4 bits from the feedback line in addition to the k information bits. In Figure 7 2, the encoded symbols are multiplexed from top to bottom along the output line for the selected code rate to form the turbo codeblock. For the rate 1/2 code, the output sequence is (out 0a, out 1a, out 0a, out 1b), repeated (k+4)/2 times. This pattern implies that puncturing is applied first to out 1b, second to out 1a, and so forth. For the rate 1/4 code, the output sequence is (out 0a, out 2a, out 3a, out 1b). This sequence is repeated for (k+4) bit times. The turbo codeblocks constructed from these output sequences are depicted in Figure 7 3 for the two nominal code rates. 34

35 Figure 7 3: Turbo codeblocks for code rates 1/2 and 1/ Turbo codeblock synchronization Codeblock synchronization of the turbo decoder is achieved by synchronization of an attached sync marker (ASM) associated with each turbo codeblock. The ASM is a bit pattern specified in clause 8. The ASM precedes the turbo codeblock. Frame synchronizers are set to expect a marker at a recurrence interval equal to the length of the ASM plus that of the turbo codeblock. A diagram of a turbo codeblock with attached sync marker is shown in Figure 7 4. The length of the turbo codeblock is inversely proportional to the nominal code rate r. Figure 7 4: Turbo codeblock with attached sync marker 35

36 8 Frame synchronization 8.1 Introduction Frame or codeblock synchronization is an essential part of the processing of the telemetry data stream. The following actions depend on accurate synchronization: Correct decoding of Reed Solomon codeblocks and turbo codeblocks. Processing of the transfer frames. Synchronization of the pseudo random generator, if used (see clause 9). It is also useful in assisting the node synchronization process of the Viterbi decoder for the convolutional code. 8.2 The attached sync marker (ASM) Overview Synchronization of the Reed Solomon or turbo codeblock (or transfer frame, if the telemetry channel is not Reed Solomon coded or turbo coded) is achieved by using a stream of fixed length codeblocks (or transfer frames) with an attached sync marker (ASM) between them. The data unit that consists of the ASM and the Reed Solomon or turbo codeblock or transfer frame is called the channel access data unit (CADU), as shown in Figure 8 1. Figure 8 1: Format of channel access data unit (CADU) Figure 4 1 and Figure 4 2 show how synchronization is combined with the different coding options. Synchronization is acquired at the receiving end by recognizing the specific bit pattern of the ASM in the telemetry channel data stream; synchronization is then customarily confirmed by making further checks. 36

37 8.2.2 Encoder side a. If the telemetry channel is uncoded, Reed Solomon coded, or turbo coded, the code symbols comprising the ASM shall be attached directly to the encoder output without being encoded by the Reed Solomon or turbo code. b. If an inner convolutional code is used in conjunction with an outer Reed Solomon code, the ASM shall be encoded by the inner code but not by the outer code Decoder side a. For a concatenated Reed Solomon and convolutional coding system, the ASM may be acquired either in the channel symbol domain (i.e. before any decoding) or in the domain of bits decoded by the inner code (i.e. the code symbol domain of the Reed Solomon code). b. For a turbo coding system, the ASM shall be acquired in the channel symbol domain (i.e. the code symbol domain of the turbo code). 8.3 ASM bit patterns a. The ASM for telemetry data that is not turbo coded shall consist of a 32 bit (4 octet) marker with the pattern shown in Figure 8 2. b. The ASM for data that is turbo coded with nominal code rate r = 1/2 or 1/4 shall consist of a 32/r bit (4/r octet) marker with bit patterns shown in Figure 8 3 and Figure 8 4. NOTE Table 8 1 shows the ASM bit patterns in hexadecimal notation. Figure 8 2 ASM bit pattern for non turbo coded data Figure 8 3: ASM bit pattern for rate 1/2 turbo coded data 37

38 Figure 8 4: ASM bit pattern for rate 1/4 turbo coded data Table 8 1: ASM bit patterns in hexadecimal notation Data type ASM in hexadecimal notation non turbo coded data 1ACFFC1D rate 1/2 turbo coded data C B0 rate 1/4 turbo coded data C B0 FCB88938 D8D76A4F 8.4 Location of ASM a. The ASM shall be attached to, and immediately precede, the Reed Solomon or turbo codeblock, or the transfer frame if the telemetry channel is not Reed Solomon or turbo coded. b. The ASM for one codeblock (or transfer frame) shall immediately follow the end of the preceding codeblock (or transfer frame). NOTE This implies that there are no intervening bits (i.e. data or fill) preceding the ASM. 8.5 Relationship of ASM to Reed-Solomon and turbo codeblocks a. The ASM shall not be presented to the input of the Reed Solomon encoder or decoder. NOTE 1 This prevents the encoder from routinely regenerating a second, identical marker in the check symbol field under certain repeating datadependent conditions (e.g. a test pattern of ) which can cause synchronization difficulties at the receiving end. NOTE 2 NOTE 3 The ASM is not a part of the encoded data space of the Reed Solomon codeblock. The relationship between the ASM, Reed Solomon codeblock, and transfer frame is illustrated in Figure 6 2. b. The ASM shall not be presented to the input of the turbo encoder or decoder. NOTE The ASM is directly attached to the turbo codeblock as shown in Figure

TELEMETRY CHANNEL CODING

TELEMETRY CHANNEL CODING Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems RECOMMENDATION FOR SPACE DATA SYSTEM STANDARDS TELEMETRY CHANNEL CODING CCSDS.-B-5 BLUE BOOK June 2 DEDICATION This document is dedicated to the memory of

More information

TM SYNCHRONIZATION AND CHANNEL CODING

TM SYNCHRONIZATION AND CHANNEL CODING Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems RECOMMENDATION FOR SPACE DATA SYSTEM STANDARDS TM SYNCHRONIZATION AND CHANNEL CODING CCSDS 3.-B- BLUE BOOK September 23 AUTHORITY Issue: Blue Book, Issue Date:

More information

TELEMETRY CHANNEL CODING

TELEMETRY CHANNEL CODING RECOMMENDATION FOR SPACE DATA SYSTEM STANDARDS TELEMETRY CHANNEL CODING CCSDS.-B-4 BLUE BOOK May 999 AUTHORITY Issue: Blue Book, Issue 4 Date: May 999 Location: Newport Beach, California, USA This document

More information

TM SYNCHRONIZATION AND CHANNEL CODING

TM SYNCHRONIZATION AND CHANNEL CODING Recommendation for Space Data System Standards TM SYNCHRONIZATION AND CHANNEL CODING RECOMMENDED STANDARD CCSDS 3.-B-3 BLUE BOOK September 27 Recommendation for Space Data System Standards TM SYNCHRONIZATION

More information

CCSDS Historical Document

CCSDS Historical Document CCSDS Historical Document This document s Historical status indicates that it is no longer current. It has either been replaced by a newer issue or withdrawn because it was deemed obsolete. Current CCSDS

More information

ETSI TS V1.1.2 ( )

ETSI TS V1.1.2 ( ) Technical Specification Satellite Earth Stations and Systems (SES); Regenerative Satellite Mesh - A (RSM-A) air interface; Physical layer specification; Part 3: Channel coding 2 Reference RTS/SES-25-3

More information

ERROR CONTROL CODING From Theory to Practice

ERROR CONTROL CODING From Theory to Practice ERROR CONTROL CODING From Theory to Practice Peter Sweeney University of Surrey, Guildford, UK JOHN WILEY & SONS, LTD Contents 1 The Principles of Coding in Digital Communications 1.1 Error Control Schemes

More information

Outline. Communications Engineering 1

Outline. Communications Engineering 1 Outline Introduction Signal, random variable, random process and spectra Analog modulation Analog to digital conversion Digital transmission through baseband channels Signal space representation Optimal

More information

6. FUNDAMENTALS OF CHANNEL CODER

6. FUNDAMENTALS OF CHANNEL CODER 82 6. FUNDAMENTALS OF CHANNEL CODER 6.1 INTRODUCTION The digital information can be transmitted over the channel using different signaling schemes. The type of the signal scheme chosen mainly depends on

More information

Rep. ITU-R BO REPORT ITU-R BO SATELLITE-BROADCASTING SYSTEMS OF INTEGRATED SERVICES DIGITAL BROADCASTING

Rep. ITU-R BO REPORT ITU-R BO SATELLITE-BROADCASTING SYSTEMS OF INTEGRATED SERVICES DIGITAL BROADCASTING Rep. ITU-R BO.7- REPORT ITU-R BO.7- SATELLITE-BROADCASTING SYSTEMS OF INTEGRATED SERVICES DIGITAL BROADCASTING (Questions ITU-R 0/0 and ITU-R 0/) (990-994-998) Rep. ITU-R BO.7- Introduction The progress

More information

Physical-Layer Network Coding Using GF(q) Forward Error Correction Codes

Physical-Layer Network Coding Using GF(q) Forward Error Correction Codes Physical-Layer Network Coding Using GF(q) Forward Error Correction Codes Weimin Liu, Rui Yang, and Philip Pietraski InterDigital Communications, LLC. King of Prussia, PA, and Melville, NY, USA Abstract

More information

EFFECTIVE CHANNEL CODING OF SERIALLY CONCATENATED ENCODERS AND CPM OVER AWGN AND RICIAN CHANNELS

EFFECTIVE CHANNEL CODING OF SERIALLY CONCATENATED ENCODERS AND CPM OVER AWGN AND RICIAN CHANNELS EFFECTIVE CHANNEL CODING OF SERIALLY CONCATENATED ENCODERS AND CPM OVER AWGN AND RICIAN CHANNELS Manjeet Singh (ms308@eng.cam.ac.uk) Ian J. Wassell (ijw24@eng.cam.ac.uk) Laboratory for Communications Engineering

More information

Performance of Reed-Solomon Codes in AWGN Channel

Performance of Reed-Solomon Codes in AWGN Channel International Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering. ISSN 0974-2166 Volume 4, Number 3 (2011), pp. 259-266 International Research Publication House http://www.irphouse.com Performance of

More information

ECE 6640 Digital Communications

ECE 6640 Digital Communications ECE 6640 Digital Communications Dr. Bradley J. Bazuin Assistant Professor Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering College of Engineering and Applied Sciences Chapter 8 8. Channel Coding: Part

More information

PROJECT 5: DESIGNING A VOICE MODEM. Instructor: Amir Asif

PROJECT 5: DESIGNING A VOICE MODEM. Instructor: Amir Asif PROJECT 5: DESIGNING A VOICE MODEM Instructor: Amir Asif CSE4214: Digital Communications (Fall 2012) Computer Science and Engineering, York University 1. PURPOSE In this laboratory project, you will design

More information

SECTION 4 CHANNEL FORMAT TYPES AND RATES. 4.1 General

SECTION 4 CHANNEL FORMAT TYPES AND RATES. 4.1 General SECTION 4 CHANNEL FORMAT TYPES AND RATES 4.1 General 4.1.1 Aircraft system-timing reference point. The reference timing point for signals generated and received by the AES shall be at the antenna. 4.1.2

More information

Implementation of Different Interleaving Techniques for Performance Evaluation of CDMA System

Implementation of Different Interleaving Techniques for Performance Evaluation of CDMA System Implementation of Different Interleaving Techniques for Performance Evaluation of CDMA System Anshu Aggarwal 1 and Vikas Mittal 2 1 Anshu Aggarwal is student of M.Tech. in the Department of Electronics

More information

C802.16a-02/76. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

C802.16a-02/76. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group < Project IEEE 802.16 Broadband Wireless Access Working Group Title Convolutional Turbo Codes for 802.16 Date Submitted 2002-07-02 Source(s) Re: Brian Edmonston icoding Technology

More information

Physical Layer: Modulation, FEC. Wireless Networks: Guevara Noubir. S2001, COM3525 Wireless Networks Lecture 3, 1

Physical Layer: Modulation, FEC. Wireless Networks: Guevara Noubir. S2001, COM3525 Wireless Networks Lecture 3, 1 Wireless Networks: Physical Layer: Modulation, FEC Guevara Noubir Noubir@ccsneuedu S, COM355 Wireless Networks Lecture 3, Lecture focus Modulation techniques Bit Error Rate Reducing the BER Forward Error

More information

TSTE17 System Design, CDIO. General project hints. Behavioral Model. General project hints, cont. Lecture 5. Required documents Modulation, cont.

TSTE17 System Design, CDIO. General project hints. Behavioral Model. General project hints, cont. Lecture 5. Required documents Modulation, cont. TSTE17 System Design, CDIO Lecture 5 1 General project hints 2 Project hints and deadline suggestions Required documents Modulation, cont. Requirement specification Channel coding Design specification

More information

Lecture 4: Wireless Physical Layer: Channel Coding. Mythili Vutukuru CS 653 Spring 2014 Jan 16, Thursday

Lecture 4: Wireless Physical Layer: Channel Coding. Mythili Vutukuru CS 653 Spring 2014 Jan 16, Thursday Lecture 4: Wireless Physical Layer: Channel Coding Mythili Vutukuru CS 653 Spring 2014 Jan 16, Thursday Channel Coding Modulated waveforms disrupted by signal propagation through wireless channel leads

More information

International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology (IJCTT) Volume 40 Number 2 - October2016

International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology (IJCTT) Volume 40 Number 2 - October2016 Signal Power Consumption in Digital Communication using Convolutional Code with Compared to Un-Coded Madan Lal Saini #1, Dr. Vivek Kumar Sharma *2 # Ph. D. Scholar, Jagannath University, Jaipur * Professor,

More information

Performance comparison of convolutional and block turbo codes

Performance comparison of convolutional and block turbo codes Performance comparison of convolutional and block turbo codes K. Ramasamy 1a), Mohammad Umar Siddiqi 2, Mohamad Yusoff Alias 1, and A. Arunagiri 1 1 Faculty of Engineering, Multimedia University, 63100,

More information

Chapter 3 Convolutional Codes and Trellis Coded Modulation

Chapter 3 Convolutional Codes and Trellis Coded Modulation Chapter 3 Convolutional Codes and Trellis Coded Modulation 3. Encoder Structure and Trellis Representation 3. Systematic Convolutional Codes 3.3 Viterbi Decoding Algorithm 3.4 BCJR Decoding Algorithm 3.5

More information

RADIO FREQUENCY AND MODULATION SYSTEMS PART 1: EARTH STATIONS AND SPACECRAFT

RADIO FREQUENCY AND MODULATION SYSTEMS PART 1: EARTH STATIONS AND SPACECRAFT Draft Recommendations for Space Data System Standards RADIO FREQUENCY AND MODULATION SYSTEMS PART 1: EARTH STATIONS AND SPACECRAFT DRAFT RECOMMENDED STANDARD CCSDS 401.0-P-26.1 PINK SHEETS March 2017 Draft

More information

Single Error Correcting Codes (SECC) 6.02 Spring 2011 Lecture #9. Checking the parity. Using the Syndrome to Correct Errors

Single Error Correcting Codes (SECC) 6.02 Spring 2011 Lecture #9. Checking the parity. Using the Syndrome to Correct Errors Single Error Correcting Codes (SECC) Basic idea: Use multiple parity bits, each covering a subset of the data bits. No two message bits belong to exactly the same subsets, so a single error will generate

More information

Contents Chapter 1: Introduction... 2

Contents Chapter 1: Introduction... 2 Contents Chapter 1: Introduction... 2 1.1 Objectives... 2 1.2 Introduction... 2 Chapter 2: Principles of turbo coding... 4 2.1 The turbo encoder... 4 2.1.1 Recursive Systematic Convolutional Codes... 4

More information

Using TCM Techniques to Decrease BER Without Bandwidth Compromise. Using TCM Techniques to Decrease BER Without Bandwidth Compromise. nutaq.

Using TCM Techniques to Decrease BER Without Bandwidth Compromise. Using TCM Techniques to Decrease BER Without Bandwidth Compromise. nutaq. Using TCM Techniques to Decrease BER Without Bandwidth Compromise 1 Using Trellis Coded Modulation Techniques to Decrease Bit Error Rate Without Bandwidth Compromise Written by Jean-Benoit Larouche INTRODUCTION

More information

EESS 501 REVISION HISTORY

EESS 501 REVISION HISTORY Page i EESS 5 REVISION HISTORY Issue/Revision Revision Date Pages revised since the last version / 4 November 994 Original Issue 2/ 3 August 996 All 3/ March 24 All Page ii TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION

More information

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R M *, **

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R M *, ** Rec. ITU-R M.589-3 1 RECOMMENDATION ITU-R M.589-3 *, ** Technical characteristics of methods of data transmission and interference protection for radionavigation services in the frequency bands between

More information

IEEE P Wireless Personal Area Networks

IEEE P Wireless Personal Area Networks IEEE P802.15 Wireless Personal Area Networks Project Title IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) TVWS-NB-OFDM Merged Proposal to TG4m Date Submitted Sept. 18, 2009 Source

More information

Implementation of Reed-Solomon RS(255,239) Code

Implementation of Reed-Solomon RS(255,239) Code Implementation of Reed-Solomon RS(255,239) Code Maja Malenko SS. Cyril and Methodius University - Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technologies Karpos II bb, PO Box 574, 1000 Skopje, Macedonia

More information

High Data Rate QPSK Modulator with CCSDS Punctured FEC channel Coding for Geo-Imaging Satellite

High Data Rate QPSK Modulator with CCSDS Punctured FEC channel Coding for Geo-Imaging Satellite International Journal of Advances in Engineering Science and Technology 01 www.sestindia.org/volume-ijaest/ and www.ijaestonline.com ISSN: 2319-1120 High Data Rate QPSK Modulator with CCSDS Punctured FEC

More information

Error Control Codes. Tarmo Anttalainen

Error Control Codes. Tarmo Anttalainen Tarmo Anttalainen email: tarmo.anttalainen@evitech.fi.. Abstract: This paper gives a brief introduction to error control coding. It introduces bloc codes, convolutional codes and trellis coded modulation

More information

Chapter 2 Direct-Sequence Systems

Chapter 2 Direct-Sequence Systems Chapter 2 Direct-Sequence Systems A spread-spectrum signal is one with an extra modulation that expands the signal bandwidth greatly beyond what is required by the underlying coded-data modulation. Spread-spectrum

More information

A GSM Simulation Platform using MATLAB

A GSM Simulation Platform using MATLAB A GSM Simulation Platform using MATLAB Mr. Suryakanth.B*, Mr. Shivarudraiah.B*, Mr. Sree Harsha H.N** *Asst Prof, Dept of ECE, BMSIT Bangalore, India **Asst Prof, Dept of EEE, CMR Institute of Technology,

More information

Digital Transmission using SECC Spring 2010 Lecture #7. (n,k,d) Systematic Block Codes. How many parity bits to use?

Digital Transmission using SECC Spring 2010 Lecture #7. (n,k,d) Systematic Block Codes. How many parity bits to use? Digital Transmission using SECC 6.02 Spring 2010 Lecture #7 How many parity bits? Dealing with burst errors Reed-Solomon codes message Compute Checksum # message chk Partition Apply SECC Transmit errors

More information

Robust Reed Solomon Coded MPSK Modulation

Robust Reed Solomon Coded MPSK Modulation ITB J. ICT, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2, 95-4 95 Robust Reed Solomon Coded MPSK Modulation Emir M. Husni School of Electrical Engineering & Informatics, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jl. Ganesha, Bandung 432, Email:

More information

Advanced channel coding : a good basis. Alexandre Giulietti, on behalf of the team

Advanced channel coding : a good basis. Alexandre Giulietti, on behalf of the team Advanced channel coding : a good basis Alexandre Giulietti, on behalf of the T@MPO team Errors in transmission are fowardly corrected using channel coding e.g. MPEG4 e.g. Turbo coding e.g. QAM source coding

More information

ECE 6640 Digital Communications

ECE 6640 Digital Communications ECE 6640 Digital Communications Dr. Bradley J. Bazuin Assistant Professor Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering College of Engineering and Applied Sciences Chapter 8 8. Channel Coding: Part

More information

Maximum Likelihood Sequence Detection (MLSD) and the utilization of the Viterbi Algorithm

Maximum Likelihood Sequence Detection (MLSD) and the utilization of the Viterbi Algorithm Maximum Likelihood Sequence Detection (MLSD) and the utilization of the Viterbi Algorithm Presented to Dr. Tareq Al-Naffouri By Mohamed Samir Mazloum Omar Diaa Shawky Abstract Signaling schemes with memory

More information

Lecture 9b Convolutional Coding/Decoding and Trellis Code modulation

Lecture 9b Convolutional Coding/Decoding and Trellis Code modulation Lecture 9b Convolutional Coding/Decoding and Trellis Code modulation Convolutional Coder Basics Coder State Diagram Encoder Trellis Coder Tree Viterbi Decoding For Simplicity assume Binary Sym.Channel

More information

Performance Analysis of n Wireless LAN Physical Layer

Performance Analysis of n Wireless LAN Physical Layer 120 1 Performance Analysis of 802.11n Wireless LAN Physical Layer Amr M. Otefa, Namat M. ElBoghdadly, and Essam A. Sourour Abstract In the last few years, we have seen an explosive growth of wireless LAN

More information

Digital to Digital Encoding

Digital to Digital Encoding MODULATION AND ENCODING Data must be transformed into signals to send them from one place to another Conversion Schemes Digital-to-Digital Analog-to-Digital Digital-to-Analog Analog-to-Analog Digital to

More information

Department of Electronic Engineering FINAL YEAR PROJECT REPORT

Department of Electronic Engineering FINAL YEAR PROJECT REPORT Department of Electronic Engineering FINAL YEAR PROJECT REPORT BEngECE-2009/10-- Student Name: CHEUNG Yik Juen Student ID: Supervisor: Prof.

More information

Lab/Project Error Control Coding using LDPC Codes and HARQ

Lab/Project Error Control Coding using LDPC Codes and HARQ Linköping University Campus Norrköping Department of Science and Technology Erik Bergfeldt TNE066 Telecommunications Lab/Project Error Control Coding using LDPC Codes and HARQ Error control coding is an

More information

BROADCAST SERVICES FOR NOAA S NPP/JPSS In response to CGMS action 38.47

BROADCAST SERVICES FOR NOAA S NPP/JPSS In response to CGMS action 38.47 Prepared by NOAA Agenda Item: IV/1 Discussed in WG IV BROADCAST SERVICES FOR NOAA S NPP/JPSS In response to CGMS action 38.47 In response to CGMS action 38.47, NOAA presented information on the direct

More information

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON ELEC6014W1 SEMESTER II EXAMINATIONS 2007/08 RADIO COMMUNICATION NETWORKS AND SYSTEMS Duration: 120 mins Answer THREE questions out of FIVE. University approved calculators may

More information

VOYAGER IMAGE DATA COMPRESSION AND BLOCK ENCODING

VOYAGER IMAGE DATA COMPRESSION AND BLOCK ENCODING VOYAGER IMAGE DATA COMPRESSION AND BLOCK ENCODING Michael G. Urban Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology 4800 Oak Grove Drive Pasadena, California 91109 ABSTRACT Telemetry enhancement

More information

Intro to coding and convolutional codes

Intro to coding and convolutional codes Intro to coding and convolutional codes Lecture 11 Vladimir Stojanović 6.973 Communication System Design Spring 2006 Massachusetts Institute of Technology 802.11a Convolutional Encoder Rate 1/2 convolutional

More information

Improved concatenated (RS-CC) for OFDM systems

Improved concatenated (RS-CC) for OFDM systems Improved concatenated (RS-CC) for OFDM systems Mustafa Dh. Hassib 1a), JS Mandeep 1b), Mardina Abdullah 1c), Mahamod Ismail 1d), Rosdiadee Nordin 1e), and MT Islam 2f) 1 Department of Electrical, Electronics,

More information

Error Detection and Correction

Error Detection and Correction . Error Detection and Companies, 27 CHAPTER Error Detection and Networks must be able to transfer data from one device to another with acceptable accuracy. For most applications, a system must guarantee

More information

Error Protection: Detection and Correction

Error Protection: Detection and Correction Error Protection: Detection and Correction Communication channels are subject to noise. Noise distorts analog signals. Noise can cause digital signals to be received as different values. Bits can be flipped

More information

Lecture 17 Components Principles of Error Control Borivoje Nikolic March 16, 2004.

Lecture 17 Components Principles of Error Control Borivoje Nikolic March 16, 2004. EE29C - Spring 24 Advanced Topics in Circuit Design High-Speed Electrical Interfaces Lecture 17 Components Principles of Error Control Borivoje Nikolic March 16, 24. Announcements Project phase 1 is posted

More information

Turbo coding (CH 16)

Turbo coding (CH 16) Turbo coding (CH 16) Parallel concatenated codes Distance properties Not exceptionally high minimum distance But few codewords of low weight Trellis complexity Usually extremely high trellis complexity

More information

Improvements encoding energy benefit in protected telecommunication data transmission channels

Improvements encoding energy benefit in protected telecommunication data transmission channels Communications 2014; 2(1): 7-14 Published online September 20, 2014 (http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/com) doi: 10.11648/j.com.20140201.12 ISSN: 2328-5966 (Print); ISSN: 2328-5923 (Online) Improvements

More information

AN INTRODUCTION TO ERROR CORRECTING CODES Part 2

AN INTRODUCTION TO ERROR CORRECTING CODES Part 2 AN INTRODUCTION TO ERROR CORRECTING CODES Part Jack Keil Wolf ECE 54 C Spring BINARY CONVOLUTIONAL CODES A binary convolutional code is a set of infinite length binary sequences which satisfy a certain

More information

CHAPTER 8 DIGITAL DATA BUS ACQUISITION FORMATTING STANDARD TABLE OF CONTENTS. Paragraph Subject Page

CHAPTER 8 DIGITAL DATA BUS ACQUISITION FORMATTING STANDARD TABLE OF CONTENTS. Paragraph Subject Page CHAPTER 8 DIGITAL BUS ACQUISITION FORMATTING STANDARD TABLE OF CONTENTS Paragraph Subject Page 8.1 General... 8-1 8.2 Word Structure... 8-1 8.3 Time Words... 8-3 8.4 Composite Output... 8-4 8.5 Single

More information

Revision of Lecture Eleven

Revision of Lecture Eleven Revision of Lecture Eleven Previous lecture we have concentrated on carrier recovery for QAM, and modified early-late clock recovery for multilevel signalling as well as star 16QAM scheme Thus we have

More information

CH 4. Air Interface of the IS-95A CDMA System

CH 4. Air Interface of the IS-95A CDMA System CH 4. Air Interface of the IS-95A CDMA System 1 Contents Summary of IS-95A Physical Layer Parameters Forward Link Structure Pilot, Sync, Paging, and Traffic Channels Channel Coding, Interleaving, Data

More information

High-Rate Non-Binary Product Codes

High-Rate Non-Binary Product Codes High-Rate Non-Binary Product Codes Farzad Ghayour, Fambirai Takawira and Hongjun Xu School of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering University of KwaZulu-Natal, P. O. Box 4041, Durban, South

More information

Thus there are three basic modulation techniques: 1) AMPLITUDE SHIFT KEYING 2) FREQUENCY SHIFT KEYING 3) PHASE SHIFT KEYING

Thus there are three basic modulation techniques: 1) AMPLITUDE SHIFT KEYING 2) FREQUENCY SHIFT KEYING 3) PHASE SHIFT KEYING CHAPTER 5 Syllabus 1) Digital modulation formats 2) Coherent binary modulation techniques 3) Coherent Quadrature modulation techniques 4) Non coherent binary modulation techniques. Digital modulation formats:

More information

Simulink Modelling of Reed-Solomon (Rs) Code for Error Detection and Correction

Simulink Modelling of Reed-Solomon (Rs) Code for Error Detection and Correction Simulink Modelling of Reed-Solomon (Rs) Code for Error Detection and Correction Okeke. C Department of Electrical /Electronics Engineering, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike, Abia State,

More information

Open Access Concatenated RS-Convolutional Codes for Cooperative Wireless Communication

Open Access Concatenated RS-Convolutional Codes for Cooperative Wireless Communication Send Orders of Reprints at reprints@benthamscience.net The Open Electrical & Electronic Engineering Journal, 2013, 7, 9-20 9 Open Access Concatenated RS-Convolutional Codes for Cooperative Wireless Communication

More information

CT-516 Advanced Digital Communications

CT-516 Advanced Digital Communications CT-516 Advanced Digital Communications Yash Vasavada Winter 2017 DA-IICT Lecture 17 Channel Coding and Power/Bandwidth Tradeoff 20 th April 2017 Power and Bandwidth Tradeoff (for achieving a particular

More information

Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering 1

Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering 1 UNIT I SAMPLING AND QUANTIZATION Pulse Modulation 1. Explain in detail the generation of PWM and PPM signals (16) (M/J 2011) 2. Explain in detail the concept of PWM and PAM (16) (N/D 2012) 3. What is the

More information

Convolutional Coding Using Booth Algorithm For Application in Wireless Communication

Convolutional Coding Using Booth Algorithm For Application in Wireless Communication Available online at www.interscience.in Convolutional Coding Using Booth Algorithm For Application in Wireless Communication Sishir Kalita, Parismita Gogoi & Kandarpa Kumar Sarma Department of Electronics

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER TITLE PAGE

TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER TITLE PAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER TITLE PAGE DECLARATION ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ABSTRACT ABSTRAK TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS i i i i i iv v vi ix xi xiv 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1

More information

Chapter 1 Coding for Reliable Digital Transmission and Storage

Chapter 1 Coding for Reliable Digital Transmission and Storage Wireless Information Transmission System Lab. Chapter 1 Coding for Reliable Digital Transmission and Storage Institute of Communications Engineering National Sun Yat-sen University 1.1 Introduction A major

More information

Multilevel RS/Convolutional Concatenated Coded QAM for Hybrid IBOC-AM Broadcasting

Multilevel RS/Convolutional Concatenated Coded QAM for Hybrid IBOC-AM Broadcasting IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BROADCASTING, VOL. 46, NO. 1, MARCH 2000 49 Multilevel RS/Convolutional Concatenated Coded QAM for Hybrid IBOC-AM Broadcasting Sae-Young Chung and Hui-Ling Lou Abstract Bandwidth efficient

More information

Serially Concatenated Coded Continuous Phase Modulation for Aeronautical Telemetry

Serially Concatenated Coded Continuous Phase Modulation for Aeronautical Telemetry Serially Concatenated Coded Continuous Phase Modulation for Aeronautical Telemetry c 2008 Kanagaraj Damodaran Submitted to the Department of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science and the Faculty of

More information

TS 5G.201 v1.0 (2016-1)

TS 5G.201 v1.0 (2016-1) Technical Specification KT PyeongChang 5G Special Interest Group (); KT 5th Generation Radio Access; Physical Layer; General description (Release 1) Ericsson, Intel Corp., Nokia, Qualcomm Technologies

More information

Digital Video Broadcast Library (DVB)

Digital Video Broadcast Library (DVB) Digital Video Broadcast Library (DVB) Conforming to European Telecommunications Standard ETS 300 744 (March 1997) DVB SystemView by ELANIX Copyright 1994-2005, Eagleware Corporation All rights reserved.

More information

Digital Television Lecture 5

Digital Television Lecture 5 Digital Television Lecture 5 Forward Error Correction (FEC) Åbo Akademi University Domkyrkotorget 5 Åbo 8.4. Error Correction in Transmissions Need for error correction in transmissions Loss of data during

More information

Study of Turbo Coded OFDM over Fading Channel

Study of Turbo Coded OFDM over Fading Channel International Journal of Engineering Research and Development e-issn: 2278-067X, p-issn: 2278-800X, www.ijerd.com Volume 3, Issue 2 (August 2012), PP. 54-58 Study of Turbo Coded OFDM over Fading Channel

More information

Notes 15: Concatenated Codes, Turbo Codes and Iterative Processing

Notes 15: Concatenated Codes, Turbo Codes and Iterative Processing 16.548 Notes 15: Concatenated Codes, Turbo Codes and Iterative Processing Outline! Introduction " Pushing the Bounds on Channel Capacity " Theory of Iterative Decoding " Recursive Convolutional Coding

More information

Time division multiplexing The block diagram for TDM is illustrated as shown in the figure

Time division multiplexing The block diagram for TDM is illustrated as shown in the figure CHAPTER 2 Syllabus: 1) Pulse amplitude modulation 2) TDM 3) Wave form coding techniques 4) PCM 5) Quantization noise and SNR 6) Robust quantization Pulse amplitude modulation In pulse amplitude modulation,

More information

IDMA Technology and Comparison survey of Interleavers

IDMA Technology and Comparison survey of Interleavers International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 3, Issue 9, September 2013 1 IDMA Technology and Comparison survey of Interleavers Neelam Kumari 1, A.K.Singh 2 1 (Department of Electronics

More information

CDMA Tutorial April 29, Michael Souryal April 29, 2006

CDMA Tutorial April 29, Michael Souryal April 29, 2006 Michael Souryal April 29, 2006 Common Components Encoding, modulation, spreading Common Features/Functionality Power control, diversity, soft handoff System Particulars cdmaone (IS-95) cdma2000 Sources:

More information

A Survey of Advanced FEC Systems

A Survey of Advanced FEC Systems A Survey of Advanced FEC Systems Eric Jacobsen Minister of Algorithms, Intel Labs Communication Technology Laboratory/ Radio Communications Laboratory July 29, 2004 With a lot of material from Bo Xia,

More information

Forward Error Correction for experimental wireless ftp radio link over analog FM

Forward Error Correction for experimental wireless ftp radio link over analog FM Technical University of Crete Department of Computer and Electronic Engineering Forward Error Correction for experimental wireless ftp radio link over analog FM Supervisor: Committee: Nikolaos Sidiropoulos

More information

3GPP TS V5.6.0 ( )

3GPP TS V5.6.0 ( ) 3GPP TS 05.03 V5.6.0 (2000-09) Technical Specification 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group GERAN; Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Channel coding (Release

More information

IMPERIAL COLLEGE of SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY and MEDICINE, DEPARTMENT of ELECTRICAL and ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING.

IMPERIAL COLLEGE of SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY and MEDICINE, DEPARTMENT of ELECTRICAL and ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING. IMPERIAL COLLEGE of SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY and MEDICINE, DEPARTMENT of ELECTRICAL and ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING. COMPACT LECTURE NOTES on COMMUNICATION THEORY. Prof. Athanassios Manikas, version Spring 22 Digital

More information

THE idea behind constellation shaping is that signals with

THE idea behind constellation shaping is that signals with IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS, VOL. 52, NO. 3, MARCH 2004 341 Transactions Letters Constellation Shaping for Pragmatic Turbo-Coded Modulation With High Spectral Efficiency Dan Raphaeli, Senior Member,

More information

TECHNICAL CONDITIONS FOR RADIO EQUIPMENT OF INMARSAT SHIP EARTH STATIONS, etc

TECHNICAL CONDITIONS FOR RADIO EQUIPMENT OF INMARSAT SHIP EARTH STATIONS, etc TECHNICAL CONDITIONS FOR RADIO EQUIPMENT OF INMARSAT SHIP EARTH STATIONS, etc (Article 7 paragraph 21, Article 14 paragraph 3, Article 40.4 paragraph 1 item 5, Article 40.4 paragraph 2 item 4, Article

More information

FOR applications requiring high spectral efficiency, there

FOR applications requiring high spectral efficiency, there 1846 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS, VOL. 52, NO. 11, NOVEMBER 2004 High-Rate Recursive Convolutional Codes for Concatenated Channel Codes Fred Daneshgaran, Member, IEEE, Massimiliano Laddomada, Member,

More information

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S Allowable error performance for a satellite hypothetical reference digital path operating below 15 GHz

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S Allowable error performance for a satellite hypothetical reference digital path operating below 15 GHz Rec. ITU-R S.1062-4 1 RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S.1062-4 Allowable error performance for a satellite hypothetical reference digital path operating below 15 GHz (Question ITU-R 75-3/4) (1994-1995-1999-2005-2007)

More information

Spreading Codes and Characteristics. Error Correction Codes

Spreading Codes and Characteristics. Error Correction Codes Spreading Codes and Characteristics and Error Correction Codes Global Navigational Satellite Systems (GNSS-6) Short course, NERTU Prasad Krishnan International Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad

More information

S Coding Methods (5 cr) P. Prerequisites. Literature (1) Contents

S Coding Methods (5 cr) P. Prerequisites. Literature (1) Contents S-72.3410 Introduction 1 S-72.3410 Introduction 3 S-72.3410 Coding Methods (5 cr) P Lectures: Mondays 9 12, room E110, and Wednesdays 9 12, hall S4 (on January 30th this lecture will be held in E111!)

More information

FPGA BASED DIGITAL QPSK MODULATORS FOR ADVANCED KA-BAND REGENERATIVE PAYLOAD. Kishori Lal Sah, TVS Ram, V. Ramakrishna and Dr.

FPGA BASED DIGITAL QPSK MODULATORS FOR ADVANCED KA-BAND REGENERATIVE PAYLOAD. Kishori Lal Sah, TVS Ram, V. Ramakrishna and Dr. FPGA BASED DIGITAL QPSK MODULATORS FOR ADVANCED KA-BAND REGENERATIVE PAYLOAD Kishori Lal Sah, TVS Ram, V. Ramakrishna and Dr. K S Dasgupta On-board Signal Processing Division Advanced Digital Communication

More information

Lecture 3 Data Link Layer - Digital Data Communication Techniques

Lecture 3 Data Link Layer - Digital Data Communication Techniques DATA AND COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS Lecture 3 Data Link Layer - Digital Data Communication Techniques Mei Yang Based on Lecture slides by William Stallings 1 ASYNCHRONOUS AND SYNCHRONOUS TRANSMISSION timing

More information

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R BT.1302 *

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R BT.1302 * Rec. ITU-R BT.1302 1 RECOMMENDATION ITU-R BT.1302 * Interfaces for digital component video signals in 525-line and 625-line television systems operating at the 4:2:2 level of Recommendation ITU-R BT.601

More information

Comparison Between Serial and Parallel Concatenated Channel Coding Schemes Using Continuous Phase Modulation over AWGN and Fading Channels

Comparison Between Serial and Parallel Concatenated Channel Coding Schemes Using Continuous Phase Modulation over AWGN and Fading Channels Comparison Between Serial and Parallel Concatenated Channel Coding Schemes Using Continuous Phase Modulation over AWGN and Fading Channels Abstract Manjeet Singh (ms308@eng.cam.ac.uk) - presenter Ian J.

More information

IJESRT. (I2OR), Publication Impact Factor: 3.785

IJESRT. (I2OR), Publication Impact Factor: 3.785 IJESRT INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES & RESEARCH TECHNOLOGY ERROR DETECTION USING BINARY BCH (55, 15, 5) CODES Sahana C*, V Anandi *M.Tech,Dept of Electronics & Communication, M S Ramaiah

More information

n Based on the decision rule Po- Ning Chapter Po- Ning Chapter

n Based on the decision rule Po- Ning Chapter Po- Ning Chapter n Soft decision decoding (can be analyzed via an equivalent binary-input additive white Gaussian noise channel) o The error rate of Ungerboeck codes (particularly at high SNR) is dominated by the two codewords

More information

Improved PHR coding of the MR-O-QPSK PHY

Improved PHR coding of the MR-O-QPSK PHY Improved PHR coding of the MR-O-QPSK PHY Michael Schmidt- ATMEL July 12, 2010 1/ 48 IEEE P802.15 Wireless Personal Area Networks Title: Improved PHR coding of the MR-O-QPSK PHY Date Submitted: July 12,

More information

BER Analysis of BPSK and QAM Modulation Schemes using RS Encoding over Rayleigh Fading Channel

BER Analysis of BPSK and QAM Modulation Schemes using RS Encoding over Rayleigh Fading Channel BER Analysis of BPSK and QAM Modulation Schemes using RS Encoding over Rayleigh Fading Channel Faisal Rasheed Lone Department of Computer Science & Engineering University of Kashmir Srinagar J&K Sanjay

More information

Decoding of Block Turbo Codes

Decoding of Block Turbo Codes Decoding of Block Turbo Codes Mathematical Methods for Cryptography Dedicated to Celebrate Prof. Tor Helleseth s 70 th Birthday September 4-8, 2017 Kyeongcheol Yang Pohang University of Science and Technology

More information

Bit Error Rate Performance Evaluation of Various Modulation Techniques with Forward Error Correction Coding of WiMAX

Bit Error Rate Performance Evaluation of Various Modulation Techniques with Forward Error Correction Coding of WiMAX Bit Error Rate Performance Evaluation of Various Modulation Techniques with Forward Error Correction Coding of WiMAX Amr Shehab Amin 37-20200 Abdelrahman Taha 31-2796 Yahia Mobasher 28-11691 Mohamed Yasser

More information

Design of Reed Solomon Encoder and Decoder

Design of Reed Solomon Encoder and Decoder Design of Reed Solomon Encoder and Decoder Shital M. Mahajan Electronics and Communication department D.M.I.E.T.R. Sawangi, Wardha India e-mail: mah.shital@gmail.com Piyush M. Dhande Electronics and Communication

More information