TOKYO, JP. Foundations of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems Working Session: Innovative Capacity

Transcription

1 TOKYO, JP Foundations of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems Working Session: Innovative Capacity

2 Disclaimer The data provided are designed to help initiate and frame your thinking about data-driven decision making for your regional innovative and entrepreneurial ecosystem. Much of the information provided is at a national level, but represents commonly used measures to evaluate regional innovation and entrepreneurship and to provide comparisons. The measures are not meant to be exhaustive, but rather informative examples of publicly available information to outside observers. Where possible, the data is for your specific region. Not all measures will be relevant to every area, so we may emphasize different metrics based on the unique qualities of your individual region.

3 Innovative Capacity (I-Capacity) The capacity of a region to generate and develop new to the world ideas from inception to market. INNOVATIVE CAPACITY PERFORMANCE -Innovation output (patents and published papers) INNOVATION CAPACITY ELEMENT PEOPLE FUNDING INFRASTRUCTURE POLICY ENVIRONMENT CULTURE & COMMUNITY DEMAND CHARACTERISTICS -Pool of innovators -Education in tech commercialization -Networks -Funding for research -Government programs -Corporate R&D spending -Physical infrastructure -Example: hi speed internet -Competition policy -Intellectual property policy -Technology transfer and collaboration policy -Experimentation culture -Celebration of invention and innovation - Rewards to innovation tenure process -Nature of established companies in region -Demand by Local Firms for Innovative Products and Services

4 Measured Characteristics of I-Capacity I-CAPACITY PERFORMANCE Number of patents filed/year Number of published papers/year INNOVATION CAPACITY ELEMENT MEASUREABLE CHARACTERISTICS PEOPLE FUNDING INFRASTRUCTURE POLICY ENVIRONMENT Number of STEM graduates/year Researchers in R&D (per million people) Quality of scientific research institutions Quality of math and science education Gross R&D Expenditure / GDP Company spending on R&D Personal computers per 100 inhabitants Fixed broadband Internet subscribers (per 100 people) Internet users (%, per 100 people) Intellectual property protection ranking Government strategy for ICT Laws related to ICT FDI and technology transfer Availability of scientists and engineers Low brain drain Government success in ICT promotion Secure internet servers (per 1M people) Top 3 research institutions Accessibility of digital content Quality of telephone infrastructure Charges for the use of IP, payments and receipts (BoP, current USD) Scientific and tech journal articles Government prioritization of ICT CULTURE & COMMUNITY Number of innovation-related programs Celebrated regional innovation DEMAND GDP/Capita Availability of latest technology Firm-level technology absorption State of cluster development

5 Regional Innovative Capacity Performance

6 I-Capacity Performance of Tokyo 250 Patent Applications/Million Tokyo OECD Japan Source: OECD Regions and Cities Database

7 I-Capacity Performance of Tokyo GDP/Capita Tokyo OECD Japan Source: OECD Regions and Cities Database

8 Regional Innovative Capacity Assessment

9 Japan s I-Capacity vs. World Median Japan World Median People Funding Infrastructure Policy Env. Demand

10 I-Capacity of Japan: People Capacity Number of STEM graduates/year Source: OECD Education and Training Database Japan OECD (Avg) Quality of scientific research institutions 5.68 Availability of scientists and engineers 5.50 Quality of math and science education 4.65 Low Brain Drain Note: Variables were realigned in the descending order of magnitude, with advantages towards the top and disadvantages towards the bottom.

11 I-Capacity of Japan: Funding Capacity R&D Expenditure/GDP (%) Japan 2 OECD Source: OECD Regions and Cities Database and The World Bank World Development Indicators Company spending on R&D 5.71 Government success in ICT promotion Note: Variables were realigned in the descending order of magnitude, with advantages towards the top and disadvantages towards the bottom.

12 I-Capacity of Japan: Infrastructure Capacity Internet users (per 100 people) Fixed broadband subscribers (per 100 people) Source: The World Bank World Development Indicators Quality of telephone infrastructure 6.80 Accessibility of digital content Top 3 Tokyo Research Institutions 1 : The University of Tokyo; Tokyo Institute of Technology; Keio University Note: Variables were realigned in the descending order of magnitude, with advantages towards the top and disadvantages towards the bottom. 1 QS University Rankings: Asia 2015

13 I-Capacity of Japan: Policy Environment Capacity Intellectual Property Protection 5.71 Government prioritization of ICT 5.12 Laws related to ICT 4.78 FDI and tech transfer 4.77 Government strategy for ICT Notable policy: Comprehensive Strategy on Science, Technology, and Innovation Note: Variables were realigned in the descending order of magnitude, with advantages towards the top and disadvantages towards the bottom.

14 I-Capacity of Tokyo: Culture and Community Capacity Celebrated Innovations: Phototelegraphic Method (precursor to fax machines) (1928) Bullet trains (shinkansen) (1964) Sony's Walkman (1979) Celebrated Innovators: Dr. Yoshiro Nakamatsu, aka Dr. NakaMats Sakichi Toyoda (automatic power loom, King of Japanese Invention) Shunpei Yamazaki (prolific inventor of liquid crystal displays, solar cells, OLEDs) Innovation Organizations: Council for Science, Technology, and Innovation Japan Innovation Network Japan Institute of Invention and Innovation Tokyo Metropolitan Industrial Technology Research Institute (TIRI) Recognition of Innovation (administered from Tokyo): National Commendation for Invention The Imperial Prize Japan Academy Prize

15 I-Capacity of Japan: Demand Capacity Availability of latest technology 6.28 Firm-level tech absorption 6.06 State of cluster development Note: Variables were realigned in the descending order of magnitude, with advantages towards the top and disadvantages towards the bottom.

16 Cross-Country Comparison of Innovative Capacity

17 Cross-National Comparison of People I-Capacity Thailand Japan China Israel Norway MIN MAX Chile Saudi Arabia UK Note: Dark shade for below-median and light shade for above-median; 7 Likert scale

18 Cross-National Comparison of Funding I-Capacity Thailand Japan China Israel Norway MIN MAX Chile Saudi Arabia UK Note: Dark shade for below-median and light shade for above-median; 7 Likert scale

19 Cross-National Comparison of Infrastructure I-Capacity Thailand Japan China Israel Norway MIN MAX Chile Saudi Arabia UK Note: Dark shade for below-median and light shade for above-median; 7 Likert scale

20 Cross-National Comparison of Policy Environment I-Capacity Thailand Japan China Israel Norway MIN MAX Chile Saudi Arabia UK Note: Dark shade for below-median and light shade for above-median; 7 Likert scale

21 Cross-National Comparison of Demand I-Capacity Thailand Japan China Israel Norway MIN MAX Chile Saudi Arabia UK Note: Dark shade for below-median and light shade for above-median; 7 Likert scale

22 Cross-country Comparison: People Highest- Performing Country Lowest- Performing Country Quality of scientific research institutions Quality of math and science education Availability of scientists and engineers Low brain drain Note: Sorted left to right by decreasing average value across all indicators. The zero horizontal line corresponds to the median value of the indicator.

23 Cross-country Comparison: Funding Highest- Performing Country Lowest- Performing Country Company spending on R&D Government success in ICT promotion Note: Sorted left to right by decreasing average value across all indicators. The zero horizontal line corresponds to the median value of the indicator.

24 Cross-country Comparison: Infrastructure Highest- Performing Country Lowest- Performing Country Accessibility of digital content Quality of telephone infrastructure Note: Sorted left to right by decreasing average value across all indicators. The zero horizontal line corresponds to the median value of the indicator.

25 Cross-country Comparison: Policy Environment Highest- Performing Country Government strategy for ICT Laws relating to ICT Intellectual property protection Lowest- Performing Country FDI and technology transfer Government prioritization of ICT Note: Sorted left to right by decreasing average value across all indicators. The zero horizontal line corresponds to the median value of the indicator.

26 Cross-country Comparison: Demand Highest- Performing Country Availability of latest technologies Firm-level technology absorption Lowest- Performing Country State of cluster development Note: Sorted left to right by decreasing average value across all indicators. The zero horizontal line corresponds to the median value of the indicator.