The Path Toward Efficient Nano-Mechanical Circuits and Systems

Similar documents
Beyond Transistor Scaling: New Devices for Ultra Low Energy Information Processing

Integrated Circuit Design with Nano-Electro-Mechanical Switches

Electronics Proliferation through Diversification of Solid-State Devices and Materials

Sustaining the Si Revolution: From 3D Transistors to 3D Integration

Design of Nano-Electro Mechanical (NEM) Relay Based Nano Transistor for Power Efficient VLSI Circuits

FinFET-based Design for Robust Nanoscale SRAM

Lecture #29. Moore s Law

NW-NEMFET: Steep Subthreshold Nanowire Nanoelectromechanical Field-Effect Transistor

ECE 5745 Complex Digital ASIC Design Topic 2: CMOS Devices

New Devices for Ultra Low Energy Information Processing

Advanced Digital Integrated Circuits. Lecture 2: Scaling Trends. Announcements. No office hour next Monday. Extra office hour Tuesday 2-3pm

Fin-Shaped Field Effect Transistor (FinFET) Min Ku Kim 03/07/2018

Improving CMOS Speed and Switching Energy with Vacuum-Gap Structures

Low-Power VLSI. Seong-Ook Jung VLSI SYSTEM LAB, YONSEI University School of Electrical & Electronic Engineering

Micro-Electro-Mechanical Diode for Tunable Power Conversion

2009 Spring CS211 Digital Systems & Lab 1 CHAPTER 3: TECHNOLOGY (PART 2)

Introduction to VLSI ASIC Design and Technology

Body-Biased Complementary Logic Implemented Using AlN Piezoelectric MEMS Switches

The 3 D Tri Gate transistor is a variant of the FinFET developed at UC Berkeley, and is being used in Intel s 22nmgeneration. microprocessors.

III-V CMOS: Quo Vadis?

Logic Synthesis of MEM Relay Circuits

Metal-Oxide-Silicon (MOS) devices PMOS. n-type

FinFET Devices and Technologies

Semiconductor Memory: DRAM and SRAM. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore

Homework 10 posted just for practice. Office hours next week, schedule TBD. HKN review today. Your feedback is important!

420 Intro to VLSI Design

Lecture 12 Memory Circuits. Memory Architecture: Decoders. Semiconductor Memory Classification. Array-Structured Memory Architecture RWM NVRWM ROM

Design cycle for MEMS

Low Transistor Variability The Key to Energy Efficient ICs

Sub-30 nm InAs Quantum-Well MOSFETs with Self-Aligned Metal Contacts and Sub-1 nm EOT HfO 2 Insulator

III-V CMOS: the key to sub-10 nm electronics?

+1 (479)

100nm Thick Aluminum Nitride Based Piezoelectric Nano Switches Exhibiting 1mV Threshold Voltage Via Body-Biasing

Practical Information

Practical Information

EE 42/100 Lecture 23: CMOS Transistors and Logic Gates. Rev A 4/15/2012 (10:39 AM) Prof. Ali M. Niknejad

Lecture 0: Introduction

VLSI Design. Introduction

ECE520 VLSI Design. Lecture 2: Basic MOS Physics. Payman Zarkesh-Ha

Performance of a Resistance-To-Voltage Read Circuit for Sensing Magnetic Tunnel Junctions

Topics. Memory Reliability and Yield Control Logic. John A. Chandy Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Connecticut

This Week s Subject. DRAM & Flexible RRAM. p-channel MOSFET (PMOS) CMOS: Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor

VLSI Design. Introduction

EE4800 CMOS Digital IC Design & Analysis. Lecture 1 Introduction Zhuo Feng

In pursuit of high-density storage class memory

Innovation to Advance Moore s Law Requires Core Technology Revolution

AS THE semiconductor process is scaled down, the thickness

ISSCC 2006 / SESSION 16 / MEMS AND SENSORS / 16.1

CMOS VLSI Design (A3425)

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED ENGINEERING RESEARCH, DINDIGUL Volume 1, No 3, 2010

Design of Optimized Digital Logic Circuits Using FinFET

Fabrication and Characterization of Emerging Nanoscale Memory

EECS 427 Lecture 13: Leakage Power Reduction Readings: 6.4.2, CBF Ch.3. EECS 427 F09 Lecture Reminders

Final Exam Topics. IC Technology Advancement. Microelectronics Technology in the 21 st Century. Intel s 90 nm CMOS Technology. 14 nm CMOS Transistors

Jack Keil Wolf Lecture. ESE 570: Digital Integrated Circuits and VLSI Fundamentals. Lecture Outline. MOSFET N-Type, P-Type.

Vertical InAs/GaAsSb/GaSb tunneling field-effect transistor on Si with S = 48 mv/decade and Ion = 10 A/m for Ioff = 1 na/m at VDS = 0.

Record I on (0.50 ma/μm at V DD = 0.5 V and I off = 100 na/μm) 25 nm-gate-length ZrO 2 /InAs/InAlAs MOSFETs

Comparison of 32nm High-k Metal Gate Predictive Technology Model CMOS and MOSFET-Like CNFET compact Model Based Domino logic Circuits

Analysis of Low Power-High Speed Sense Amplifier in Submicron Technology

Session 10: Solid State Physics MOSFET

Nanoscale III-V CMOS

Depletion-mode operation ( 공핍형 ): Using an input gate voltage to effectively decrease the channel size of an FET

Wafer-scale 3D integration of silicon-on-insulator RF amplifiers

ESE 570: Digital Integrated Circuits and VLSI Fundamentals

Silicon Single-Electron Devices for Logic Applications

Announcements. Advanced Digital Integrated Circuits. Quiz #3 today Homework #4 posted This lecture until 4pm

Static Random Access Memory - SRAM Dr. Lynn Fuller Webpage:

The Design of SET-CMOS Hybrid Logic Style of 1-Bit Comparator

Atomic-layer deposition of ultrathin gate dielectrics and Si new functional devices

Combinational Logic Gates in CMOS

Ultra Low Voltage Operation with Bootstrap Scheme for Single Power Supply SOI-SRAM

Low Energy Communication: NanoPhotonic & Electrical. Prof. Eli Yablonovitch EECS Dept. UC Berkeley

IR2110 HIGH AND LOW SIDE DRIVER. Features. Product Summary. Packages. Description. Typical Connection. 500V max. V OFFSET 10-20V VOUT.

Chapter 4. CMOS Cascode Amplifiers. 4.1 Introduction. 4.2 CMOS Cascode Amplifiers

A novel high performance 3 VDD-tolerant ESD detection circuit in advanced CMOS process

problem grade total

Low Power High Performance 10T Full Adder for Low Voltage CMOS Technology Using Dual Threshold Voltage

Topic 3. CMOS Fabrication Process

Total reduction of leakage power through combined effect of Sleep stack and variable body biasing technique

45nm Bulk CMOS Within-Die Variations. Courtesy of C. Spanos (UC Berkeley) Lecture 11. Process-induced Variability I: Random

Semiconductor Physics and Devices

ECE 340 Lecture 37 : Metal- Insulator-Semiconductor FET Class Outline:

InGaAs MOSFETs for CMOS:

LSI ON GLASS SUBSTRATES

Sub-Threshold Region Behavior of Long Channel MOSFET

ESD-Transient Detection Circuit with Equivalent Capacitance-Coupling Detection Mechanism and High Efficiency of Layout Area in a 65nm CMOS Technology

Energy Efficiency of Power-Gating in Low-Power Clocked Storage Elements

IFSIN. WEB PAGE Fall ://weble.upc.es/ifsin/

InAs Quantum-Well MOSFET for logic and microwave applications

MOSFET & IC Basics - GATE Problems (Part - I)

Sleepy Keeper Approach for Power Performance Tuning in VLSI Design

PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS OF EPAD PRECISION MATCHED PAIR MOSFET ARRAY

Gigahertz Ambipolar Frequency Multiplier Based on Cvd Graphene

CMPEN 411 VLSI Digital Circuits Spring Lecture 24: Peripheral Memory Circuits

Towards Sub-10 nm Diameter InGaAs Vertical nanowire MOSFETs and TFETs

I DDQ Current Testing

Architecture of Computers and Parallel Systems Part 9: Digital Circuits

Low Power Design of Schmitt Trigger Based SRAM Cell Using NBTI Technique

EECS130 Integrated Circuit Devices

Analyzing Combined Impacts of Parameter Variations and BTI in Nano-scale Logical Gates

Transcription:

The Path Toward Efficient Nano-Mechanical Circuits and Systems http://www.chi-yun.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/ba-road-less.jp Tsu-Jae King Liu 1 Elad Alon 1, Vladimir Stojanovic 2, Dejan Markovic 3 1 University of California at Berkeley 2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology 3 University of California at Los Angeles November 3, 2011 2 nd Berkeley Symposium on Energy Efficient Electronic Systems

Proliferation of Electronic Devices Transistor Scaling Higher Performance, Investment Lower Cost Market Growth # DEVICES (MM) Source: ITU, Mark Lipacis, Morgan Stanley Research YEAR http://www.morganstanley.com/institutional/techresearch/pdfs/2setup_12142009_ri.pdf 2

Vision for 2020: Swarms of Electronics Infrastructional core Driver for More of Moore s Law Mobile access Driver for More Than Moore s Law Sensory swarm (trillions of devices) J. Rabaey, ASPDAC 2008 3

Why Mechanical Switches? Relays have zero off-state leakage zero leakage energy 3-Terminal Switch Air gap Source t gap Gate Drain t dimple Relays switch on/off abruptly allows for aggressive V DD scaling (ultra-low dynamic energy) Drain Current 1.E-04 1.E-06 1.E-08 1.E-10 1.E-12 1.E-14 Measured I-V S 0.1mV/dec V RL V PI Gate Voltage 4

Outline Electro-Mechanical Relay Design for Digital ICs Relay-Based IC Design Relay Reliability Summary

4-Terminal Relay Structure Isometric View: Gate Oxide AA cross-section: OFF state Gate Drain A Body Drain Body insulator Source substrate Gate Body A Source AA cross-section: ON state Channel I DS A voltage is applied between the gate and body to bring the channel into contact with the source and drain. Folded-flexure design relieves residual stress. Gate oxide layer insulates the channel from the gate. R. Nathanael et al., IEDM 2009 6

4-T Relay Process Flow (I) Mask 1: Electrode 80 nm Al 2 O 3 50 nm W Si substrate Mask 2: Contact dimple 100nm SiO 2 Mask 3: Channel 50 nm W 100nm 200nm SiO 2 40 nm Al 2 O 3 Deposit Al 2 O 3 substrate insulator ALD at 300 o C Deposit & pattern W electrodes DC magnetron sputtering Deposit 1 st sacrificial LTO LPCVD at 400 o C Define contact regions Deposit 2 nd sacrificial LTO Deposit & pattern W channel Deposit Al 2 O 3 gate oxide R. Nathanael et al., IEDM 2009 7

Mask 4: Structure 4-T Relay Process Flow (II) SiO 2 1 m p+ poly-si 0.4 Ge 0.6 Deposit p+ poly-si 0.4 Ge 0.6 gate LPCVD at 410 o C Pattern gate & gate oxide layers using LTO as a hard mask HF vapor TiO 2 Release in HF vapor Coat with ultra-thin (~0.3nm) TiO 2 ALD at 300 o C R. Nathanael et al., IEDM 2009 8

4-T Relay I D -V G Characteristic Plan View SEM of 4-T Relay 20 μm I DS (A) (a) 1E-02 1E-04 1E-06 1E-08 1E-10 1E-12 1E-14 V B = 9V V B = 0V V D = 2V V S = 0V 0 2 4 6 8 10 V GS (V) Zero I OFF ; S < 0.1 mv/dec Hysteresis is due to pull-in mode operation (t dimple > t gap /3) and surface adhesion. R. Nathanael et al., 2009 IEDM / V. Pott et al., Proc. IEEE, Vol. 98, pp. 2076-2094, 2010 9

See-Saw Relay Structure Plan View Close-Up of Channel Region Perfectly complementary operation is achieved in left and right channels V BL = 0 V; V BR = 10 V I DS (A) Measured I D -V G Characteristics 1E-03 1E-05 1E-07 1E-09 1E-11 1E-13 I DS_RIGHT V ON_RIGHT =V OFF_LEFT =3.16V I DS_LEFT L A =42μm L A1 =12μm W A =40μm V ON_LEFT =V OFF_RIGHT =7.14V 1E-15 0 2 4 6 8 10 V G (V) J. Jeon et al., IEEE Electron Device Letters, Vol. 31, pp. 371-373, 2010 10

See-Saw Relay Latch V WL SRAM Cell V CTRL Storage Node V SN NMOS V BL NMOS V DATA B L GND D L S L G D R S R Seesaw B R V DD V DATA (V) V CTRL (V) V WL (V) V BL (V) 12 12 6 0 6 0 12 6 0 12 6 0 Demonstrated SRAM Cell Operation R = READ W = WRITE W '0' V DD =12V W '0' W '1' W '1' R '0' R '0' R '1' R '1' (b-a) (b-b) (b-c) (b-d) 0 5 10 15 20 25 Time (s) J. Jeon et al., IEEE/ASME J. MicroElectroMechanical Systems, Vol. 19, pp. 1012-1014, 2010. 11

4-T Relay Turn-On Delay Turn-ON Time vs. Gate Voltage Turn-ON Time vs. Body Bias Turn-on delay improves with gate overdrive, and saturates at ~200ns for V B = 0V. Turn-on delay improves w/ body biasing to reduce V PI 100ns turn-on delay R. Nathanael et al., IEDM 2009 12

Relay Scaling, Scaling has similar benefits for relays as for MOSFETs. Pull-in Voltage: V PI Relay Parameter A Scaling Factor Spring constant 1 / Mass 1 / 3 Pull-in voltage 1 / Pull-in delay 1 / Switching energy 1 / 3 k eff Device density 2 Power density 1 0 t 3 gap Pull-in Delay: t PI 65 nm Relay Design Parameter Value Actuation Area 65 260 nm 2 Actuation Gap Dimple Gap Pull-in voltage Pull-in delay mt k eff dimple t gap V V PI DD 15 nm 10 nm 0.4V - 1V 100ns 10ns V. Pott et al., Proc. IEEE, Vol. 98, pp. 2076-2094, 2010 13

Outline Electro-Mechanical Relay Design for Digital ICs Relay-Based IC Design Relay Reliability Summary

Digital IC Design with Relays 4 gate delays 1 mechanical delay CMOS: delay is set by electrical time constant Quadratic delay penalty for stacking devices Buffer & distribute logical/electrical effort over many stages Relays: delay is dominated by mechanical movement Can stack ~100 devices before t elec t mech Implement relay logic as a single complex gate F. Chen et al., ICCAD 2008 15

Relay-Based VLSI Building Blocks 2010 ISSCC Jack Raper Award for Outstanding Technology Directions F. Chen et al., ISSCC 2010 16

Technology Transfer to SEMATECH UC Berkeley: 1 µm litho 1st prototype: 120 µm x 150 µm SEMATECH: 0.25 µm litho Scaled relay: 20 µm x 20 µm 17

Energy-Delay Comparison with CMOS CMOS 30-stage FO4 inverter chain: 0 V V dd Output 30-relay chain: V dd 0 V 65 nm technology transition probability=0.01 cap/cmos inverter=0.57ff Input Output Scaled relay technology is projected to provide for >10x energy savings, at clock rates up to ~100MHz V. Pott et al., Proc. IEEE, Vol. 98, pp. 2076-2094, 2010 18

Outline Electro-Mechanical Relay Design for Digital ICs Relay-Based IC Design Relay Reliability Summary

Stiction Hysteresis voltage (V PI -V RL ) scales with the pull-in voltage (V PI ) ignoring surface adhesion force Surface adhesion force scales with area of contacting region(s): Extracted from measured V PI,V RL I DS Relay I-V V RL V PI V GB H. Kam et al., 2009 IEDM 20

Contact Design for Logic Gates V DD R ON Mechanical Delay t PI ~10 100 ns Electrical Delay t RC < 1 ps C L High R ON (up to ~10 kω) is acceptable To achieve good endurance and reliability: 1. Use hard electrode material Tungsten 2. Apply a surface coating to reduce surface force and current density ALD TiO 2 F. Chen et al., ICCAD 2008 21

Contact Stability ON-state Resistance vs. # ON/OFF Cycles Contact resistance [Ω] 1.E+06 1.E+05 1.E+04 1.E+03 1.E+02 100k specification L=25 m Measured in ambient 1.E+0 1.E+3 1.E+6 1.E+9 No. of on/off cycles AFM Measurements Contact (a) Dimple FRESH CONTACT Never tested (c) Contact Dimple AFTER 10 9 cycles Variations are likely due to W oxidation No surface wear is seen after 1 billion ON/OFF cycles 3 μm 3 μm Relative distribution (a. i.) Relative distribution (a. i.) Dimple 19nm (b) 0 10 20 Height 30 40(nm) 50 Height (nm) Dimple 19nm 19nm 19nm (d) 0 10 20 30 40 50 Height (nm) H. Kam et al., IEDM 2009, R. Nathanael et al., IEDM 2009 22

Relay Endurance Endurance increases exponentially with decreasing V DD, and linearly with decreasing C L Endurance is projected to exceed 10 15 cycles @ 1V H. Kam et al., IEDM 2010 23

Nanoscale Relay Technology Sub-100 mv operation is possible Zero I OFF enables V DD scaling without increasing leakage power Hysteresis voltage scales with pull-in voltage Node (nm) 15 11 8 Actuation Gap (nm) 5.5 4 3 Pull-in Voltage (mv) 113 100 86 Release Voltage (mv) 73 66 58 * All dimensions scaled with technology node Source2 Drain2 Device Layout Source1 Drain1 Node (nm) 15 11 8 Supply Voltage (V) 0.4 0.4 0.4 Mechanical Delay (ns) 6.2 3.8 2.5 Footprint for two switches = 14 14F 2 L. Hutin et al., to be published 24

Cross-Point Electro-Mechanical NVM Array Electro-mechanical diode cell design: Open circuit in Reset state Diode in Set state (built-in electric-field electrostatic force) SEM of NVM Array Cross-sectional SEM Current [A] 1E-04 1E-05 1E-06 1E-07 1E-08 1E-09 1E-10 1E-11 1E-12 Measured I-V Set state Reset state Smallest cell layout area (4F 2 ); 3-D stackable Low-voltage operation Excellent retention behavior Multiple-time programmable (> 10,000 cycles) 1E-13-1.5-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 V BL [V] W. Kwon et al., to appear in IEEE Electron Device Letters 25

Outline Electro-Mechanical Relay Design for Digital ICs Relay-Based IC Design Relay Reliability Summary

Summary Mechanical switches have the ideal properties of zero off-state leakage and abrupt turn-on/turn-off. potential for achieving very low E/op (<1 aj) Dimensional scaling is required to achieve low-voltage operation and adequate reliability V DD < 100 mv endurance > 10 15 cycles Materials optimization can yield further improvements. New circuit and system architectures are needed to fully realize the potential energy-efficiency benefits. device and circuit design co-optimization is key! 27

Acknowledgements NEM-Relay Team (current and former) members: Post-docs: Louis Hutin; Hei Kam (now with Intel); Vincent Pott (now with IME, Singapore) Students: Rhesa Nathanael, Jaeseok Jeon (now with Rutgers U.), I-Ru Chen, Yenhao Chen, Jack Yaung, Matt Spencer; Fred Chen and Hossein Fariborzi (MIT); Chengcheng Wang and Kevin Dwan (UCLA) Funding: DARPA/MTO NEMS Program DARPA/MARCO Focus Center Research Program Center for Circuits and Systems Solutions (C2S2) Center for Materials, Structures, and Devices (MSD) NSF Center of Integrated Nanomechanical Systems (COINS) NSF Center for Energy Efficient Electronics Science (E3S) UC Berkeley Micro/Nanofabrication Laboratory 28

Frequently Asked Questions 1. Displacement (x) due to gravity? x mg k eff 0.1fm 2. Mechanical shock causing pull-in? requires acceleration > 10 6 g due to small m (10-14 grams) 3. Thermal vibration? 1 2 k 1 2 BT k 2 eff x x 1Å for T = 300K 29