PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM DISTRICT OF HOPE PAVED ROAD NETWORK INCLUDING COLLECTOR AND LOCAL ROADS

Transcription

1 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM DISTRICT OF HOPE PAVED ROAD NETWORK INCLUDING COLLECTOR AND LOCAL ROADS PRESENTED TO District of Hope NOVEMBER 2016 ISSUED FOR USE FILE: 704-TRN.PAVE Tetra Tech EBA Inc. Suite th Floor, 885 Dunsmuir Street Vancouver, BC V6C 1N5 CANADA Tel Fax

2 This page intentionally left blank.

3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Tetra Tech EBA Inc. (Tetra Tech) was retained by the District of Hope (District) to provide a network wide pavement condition assessment, as well as 10-year ( ) pavement maintenance and capital improvement program for an example budget condition. The District required the services of an engineering consultant to establish the current network status, as well as provide input into future maintenance, rehabilitation, and preservation programs. This project provides a single point in time snapshot of the condition of all roads. The pavement condition of each of the District s roads was assessed in July 2016 and included measurement of pavement surface distresses, roughness and rutting measurements, and collection of digital images at regular intervals. The PCI is the Pavement Condition Index as defined by American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) on a scale from 100 to 0 where 100 represents a new road and zero represents a failed road surface. The road network was found to generally be in satisfactory condition in terms of average Pavement Condition Index (PCI), with an overall average of 70. The PCI includes many distresses, some of which have little to no effect on pavement life-cycle cost. Therefore, the ACA (All Cracked Area) was used for life-cycle cost analysis and represents the percentage of the road surface with cracking. ACA is also used to compare to other municipalities. The road network was found to generally be in poor condition in terms of average All Cracked Area (ACA), with an average of 22%. Roads that are deteriorated beyond the condition where they would be repaired if funding was available are referred to as backlog (poor and very poor condition). These backlog roads begin to require increased reactive maintenance for patching and pothole filling. The backlog in 2016 is approximately 60% of the road network; because of its direct relationship to life-cycle cost ACA was the governing criteria in determining backlog. The last network-wide pavement condition survey was in At that time, the average ACA was 13.7% and the backlog of poor and very poor roads was 51% of the road network. Therefore, the overall condition has deteriorated from 2003 to Life-cycle cost analysis was conducted for each road segment so that the overall condition of the network could be forecast with alternative budget scenarios. The scenarios investigated were the estimated annual budget of $500,000 per year, and the alternative budgets of $700,000 per year, $1,000,000 per year, and $1,500,000 per year; these scenarios include both rehabilitation and routine maintenance. The estimated funding of $500,000 is not adequate to maintain the road network in its current condition. A rehabilitation program for 10 years based on a $700,000 scenario is provided along with a map of the first 10 years of the program. The program has been based on a higher budget than estimated to provide a greater number of projects for the District to consider moving forward to implementation. It is understood that the District will consider integration with underground utilities and other projects when determining which projects to implement. i

4 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION General Authorization to Proceed Project Definition Background PAVEMENT DATA COLLECTION PLATFORM Surface Distress Ratings Pavement Roughness and Rut Survey Digital Right-of-Way Imagery Historical Construction Data PAVEMENT CONDITION INDICES World Bank s HDM Indices Pavement Condition Index Pavement Roughness and Rutting Indices Pavement Condition Classification PAVEMENT CONDITION PRESENT STATUS Road Network PCI Condition Pavement Percent Cracking Historical Pavement Condition in the District Pavement Condition Comparison to Other Municipalities Road Network Roughness and Rut Condition (Collector and Arterial Roads) Average Condition Summary Length of Backlog Roads PAVEMENT STRENGTH ANALYSIS Background LIFE-CYCLE COST ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY Data Analysis Software Pavement Performance Modelling PCI Prediction Based on HDM Indices Remaining Life Parametric Data Analysis Sets Treatment Types and Costs Treatment Triggers Treatment Resets Method to Measure Benefit Budget Scenarios ANALYSIS RESULTS ii

5 7.1 Required Annual Budget Analysis year Rehabilitation Program CONCLUSION CLOSURE LIST OF TABLES IN TEXT Table 1: Extent of Survey for Travel Lanes... 1 Table 2: PCI Ranges for Condition Descriptions According to ASTM Standard... 6 Table 3: Index Ranges for Condition Descriptions... 6 Table 4: City Major Roads Comparison in Terms of ACA... 9 Table 5: City Local Roads Comparison in Terms of ACA... 9 Table 6: Average 2016 Pavement Condition for Road Classes Table 7: Length of Backlog Roads in Table 8: Treatments and Unit Costs Used In Analysis Table 9: Maintenance and Rehabilitation Triggers Table 10: Budget Scenarios used in the 2016 Analysis LIST OF FIGURES IN TEXT Figure 1: 2016 Pavement Condition Distribution in Terms of PCI... 7 Figure 2: 2016 Pavement Condition Distribution in Terms of ACA... 8 Figure 3: 2016 Pavement Condition Distribution in Terms of IRI and Rut for Collector Roads Figure 4: Predicting Pavement Performance Figure 5: Relationship between 2016 measured PCI (ASTM Methodology) and PCI Calculated from Correlation using HDM Indices Figure 6: Example of Calculating the Benefit for an Overlay Strategy Figure 7: Annual Maintenance Costs for Different Budget Scenarios Figure 8: Predicting ACA and PCI for Different Budget Scenarios Figure 9: Future Backlog Projection based on Various Budget Scenarios APPENDIX SECTIONS Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Tetra Tech s General Conditions GIS Map - Overview 2016 Pavement Condition Rehabilitation Program iii

6 ACRONYMS & ABBREVIATIONS AADT ACA AASHTO dtims FHWA FWD HDM IFR IFU IRI LCC LCCA LOS PCI PMS PSP Average Annual Daily Traffic All Cracked Area American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Deighton Total Infrastructure Management System Federal Highway Administration FWD Falling Weight Deflectometer Highway Development and Management Issue For Review Issue For Use International Roughness Index Life-Cycle Cost Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Level of Service Pavement Condition Index Pavement Management System Pavement Surface Profiler iv

7 LIMITATIONS OF REPORT This report and its contents are intended for the sole use of District of Hope and their agents. Tetra Tech EBA Inc. (Tetra Tech) does not accept any responsibility for the accuracy of any of the data, the analysis, or the recommendations contained or referenced in the report when the report is used or relied upon by any Party other than the District of Hope, or for any Project other than the proposed development at the subject site. Any such unauthorized use of this report is at the sole risk of the user. Use of this report is subject to the General Conditions that are provided in Appendix A of this report. v

8 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 GENERAL Tetra Tech EBA Inc. (Tetra Tech) was retained by the District of Hope (District) to provide a network wide pavement condition assessment, as well as pavement management services including a minimum 10 years ( ) maintenance and capital improvement program intended to sustain an overall minimum pavement condition. The District required the services of an engineering consultant to establish the current network status, as well as provide input into future maintenance, rehabilitation, and preservation programs. This report documents the methodology followed to collect and analyze the road network data, and reports the existing network pavement condition. Furthermore, it examines various budget scenarios and the effect that they would have on the condition of the network. The report also provides a suggested network-level 10-year paving plan for one of the budget scenarios. 1.2 AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED Authorization to proceed with this work was received from the District via purchase order based on Tetra Tech s response RFP Reference Number PW PROJECT DEFINITION The District s municipal road network consists of approximately 80.2 km of asphalt roads, including a mix of collector and local roads. Highway 1, Highway 3, Highway 7, and Old Hope Princeton Way are under Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure (MOTI) jurisdiction and were not included in the scope of this project. Pavement distress data was collected for all District roadways; pavement roughness and rut survey was conducted on collector roadways only. The District of Hope has approximately 80.2 centreline-km of collector and local roads (not including laneways and Provincial Highways). Roads were surveyed in two directions for divided roads, resulting in 86.4 lane kilometers of data collection for travel lanes. The extent of the roadway and survey lengths are summarized in Table 1 below. Table 1: Extent of Survey for Travel Lanes Road Class Road Centreline-km from District GIS Road Centreline-km Surveyed Survey Lane-km Collector Local Network Some of the roads identified in the District s GIS were not surveyed because they were inaccessible or unpaved. In addition to the survey lengths summarized above, 6.0 survey lane-km of data was collected in the parking lanes. A GIS map showing an overview of the road network is included in Appendix B. 1

9 1.4 BACKGROUND The last network-wide pavement condition survey was in The 2003 study was conducted by St. Michel Consulting Inc. which was acquired by Tetra Tech in Therefore, that condition survey was available in Tetra Tech archives and used to obtain information on roadway width, presence of curb and gutter, and historical condition data. 2.0 PAVEMENT DATA COLLECTION PLATFORM Tetra Tech collected pavement condition data in July 2016 on 80.2 centrelinekm of the District s network. Georeferenced pavement condition assessments were conducted with the Pavement Surface Profiler (PSP-6000) vehicle. This vehicle was used to collect roughness (IRI), rutting, pavement surface distress and digital image log for the roadway. The survey lane included a single lane on two lane roads, and a single lane in each direction on wider roads in the downtown area. In addition, parking lanes were collected on selected roads downtown. 2.1 SURFACE DISTRESS RATINGS Tetra Tech performed semi-automated pavement surface condition surveys using a Distress / Event Keyboard system in the PSP-6000 consistent to the most recent ASTM D6433 methodology. The PSP-6000 collects continuously and referencing is achieved through linear referencing by a vehicle based Distance Measuring Instrument (DMI) and high precision and inertial aided GPS locations. Tetra Tech provided the data at a maximum interval of 30 m. This raw data was processed and loaded into the GIS. For this assignment, the set of distresses that were collected are: Alligator cracking Edge cracking Longitudinal cracking Transverse Cracking Patching and utility cut patching Weathering and Ravelling Potholes Block Cracking Distortions (bleeding, rippling, shoving, depressions, corrugation, bumps and sags) 2

10 Consistent with ASTM D6433, each surface distress was measured for three severity classifications in each 30 m sample interval. Surface distresses were inventoried for the entire width of the surveyed lane. 2.2 PAVEMENT ROUGHNESS AND RUT SURVEY The PSP-6000 vehicle s longitudinal profile, transverse rut, and IRI capabilities are provided by an inertial profiling system, which is a FHWA Class II profiler and ASTM E950, AASHTO M and AASHTO PP70-10 compliant. The heart of this system is Tetra Tech s Road Profiler with a high precision laser sensor array and two wheelpath accelerometers. Close-up view of PSP bumper showing laser/accelerometer (green) positions Tetra Tech conducted IRI data collection and processing for this project in conformance with the Best Practice Guidelines, as described in the Transportation Association of Canada (TAC) document Standardization of IRI Data Collection and Reporting in Canada (October 2001). Exceptions to these guidelines specific to this work include a minimum start-up length reduction to 50 m in recognition of urban roadway environments. Transverse profile rut measurements were calculated for the left and right wheelpaths using a multi-point measurement, incorporating sensors near the centre of the vehicle, the wheelpath, and sensors outside the wheelpath. The roughness and rutting data were collected for all roadways except local residential roadways. 3

11 2.3 DIGITAL RIGHT-OF-WAY IMAGERY Tetra Tech collected digital images using an integrated Digital Imaging System. This system provides a forward looking, full roadway view (the image spans from left side ROW to right side ROW) and is a permanent and fully referenced record of the roadway corridor at the time of survey. For the District, the image system captured images every 6 m. Digital imagery was collected on all routes surveyed. PSP 6000 Digital Image log 2.4 HISTORICAL CONSTRUCTION DATA The District s pavement inventory and surface age data was obtained from the pavement condition database, as it existed in 2003 study, and updated with recent projects (2010 or later provided by the District) where the pavement was rehabilitated. 3.0 PAVEMENT CONDITION INDICES A pavement condition index is a value which expresses the overall condition of pavement by considering various factors such as surface distresses, structural defects, and ride quality. The suitable pavement condition index depends upon the objectives of whatever system is used to manage a particular pavement network. The following indices and measures were used in this project: World Bank s Highway Development and Management (HDM) Indices; The Pavement Condition Index (PCI); and Roughness and rutting. For the District, these indices can help to determine the existing level of service (LOS) and can be used in the treatment selection process and pavement performance modelling. 3.1 WORLD BANK S HDM INDICES Tetra Tech uses indices as defined by the World Bank s Highway Development and Management (HDM-4) models. Cracking is one of the most important distress in bituminous pavements. There are two types of cracking considered in HDM-4: Fatigue cracking and Thermal cracking. For each type of crack, separate index is given as described in below: The fatigue crack index is defined as the percent area with load and age related cracks including alligator cracking; edge cracking; block cracking; potholes and patching (excluding low severity). The fatigue cracking is modelled as (Paterson, 1987): 4

12 AFCL (%): Narrow Fatigue Cracking Area; AFCW (%): Wide Fatigue Cracking Area; and AFCA (%): All Fatigue Cracking Area (AFCL + AFCW). The thermal crack index is defined as the percent area with cracks that are affected by temperature including transverse cracking and Non-wheelpath longitudinal cracking (e.g. joint cracks). It is defined as: (Paterson, 1987): TCL (%): Narrow Thermal Cracking Area; TCW (%): Wide Thermal Cracking Area; and TCA (%): All Thermal Cracking Area (TCL+ TCW). The ACA Index is defined as total area of cracking including all fatigue cracks and thermal cracks: ACA (%): AFCA + TCA. Ravelling can be related to poor mixture quality and inadequate compaction. The weathering distress is the wearing away of the asphalt binder and fine aggregate matrix primarily through oxidization of the bitumen due to age and environment. Since 2009, ASTM has treated these two distresses separately, because the mechanism causing these distresses is different. They have therefore also been recorded and analyzed separately in this report: RVL (%): Low severity Ravelling Area; RVH (%): Moderate to High severity Ravelling Area; WRL (%): Low severity Weathering Area; and WRH (%): Moderate to High severity Weathering Area. 3.2 PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX The Pavement Condition Index (PCI) is used to express the overall condition of the pavement surface as a function of the severity and extent of the observed surface distresses. The PCI is a numerical rating of the pavement condition that ranges from 0 to 100 with 0 being the worst possible condition and 100 being the best. The PCI is an indication of the overall health of the pavement segment and includes all of the measured surface distresses. The PCI was determined using the methodology documented in the ASTM D6433 standard. The PCI is used to indicate the general condition of a pavement; however, it does not take into account pavement roughness or structural adequacy. 3.3 PAVEMENT ROUGHNESS AND RUTTING INDICES Pavement roughness is a measure of the irregularities in the surface of a pavement that adversely affects the ride quality from a vehicle or user standpoint. The roughness is attributed to deviations of the surface from a true planar surface with characteristic dimensions that affect vehicle dynamics, ride quality, dynamic loads and drainage, expressed in the International Roughness Index (IRI). The IRI is the roughness index in millimetres per meter (mm/m) which is derived from measured longitudinal road profiles. Since its introduction in 1986, IRI has become the road roughness index most commonly used worldwide for evaluating and managing road systems. 5

13 Pavement surface ruts can pose a major safety concern and they affect the handling characteristics of a vehicle. The Rut depth is in millimetres and is defined as average of inner and outer wheelpath rutting depths. 3.4 PAVEMENT CONDITION CLASSIFICATION According to the ASTM 6433 standard, a verbal description of pavement condition as a function of the PCI value that varies from Failed to Good as shown in Table 2. Table 2: PCI Ranges for Condition Descriptions According to ASTM Standard Condition Description Colour Code PCI Pavement Index Range Good 85 < PCI 100 Satisfactory 70 < PCI 85 Fair 55 < PCI 70 Poor 40 < PCI 55 Very Poor 25 < PCI 40 Serious 10 < PCI 25 Failed 0 < PCI 10 Pavement condition represented by AFCA, IRI, and Rut can be classified into five categories as very good, good, fair, poor or very poor. Table 3 provides the range of values used for each condition description. Table 3: Index Ranges for Condition Descriptions Rating ACA and AFCA Index Range (%) IRI Index Range (mm/m) Rut (mm) Very Good 0-1 < 1.9 < 3 Good Fair Poor Very Poor > 5.4 >25 Colour Code 6

14 PAVEMENT CONDITION PRESENT STATUS As described in Section 3, the pavement condition indices including HDM Indices, PCI, IRI, and rut depth are used to report pavement condition status. A detailed tabular output of 2016 pavement condition is provided in Appendix C. 4.1 ROAD NETWORK PCI CONDITION The distribution of PCI values for the network and for each roadway classification is shown below in Figure 1. For roads with parking lanes, the parking lane condition was also included in the reporting of PCI. PCI % Length 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 13.5% 26.6% 25.0% 22.2% 25.2% 24.9% 21.1% 17.2% 28.0% 27.2% 25.0% 17.6% 17.5% 2.3% 5.1% Collector Local Network Failed Serious Very Poor Poor Fair Satisfactory Good Figure 1: 2016 Pavement Condition Distribution in Terms of PCI The 2016 paved network was found to have a mean PCI of 70 indicating that, on average, the surface is in Satisfactory condition (PCI from 70 to 85) overall. A GIS map displaying the 2016 pavement condition index of the road network based on PCI is presented in Appendix C. 7

15 4.2 PAVEMENT PERCENT CRACKING The distribution of ACA values for the network and for each roadway classification is shown below in Figure 2. For roads with parking lanes, the parking lane condition was also included in the reporting of ACA. ACA % Length 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 8.6% 9.1% 9.0% 12.8% 13.8% 13.7% 24.2% 14.7% 15.9% 14.7% 26.7% 25.2% 39.6% 35.6% 36.1% Collector Local Network Very Poor Poor Fair Good Very Good Figure 2: 2016 Pavement Condition Distribution in Terms of ACA The network was found to have an average ACA of 22.1%, indicating that on average the surface is in Poor Condition (ACA from 10% to 30%) overall. The breakdown of this cracking between fatigue (AFCA) and non-fatigue related cracking (TCA) was 20.2% and 1.9%, respectively, indicating that the majority of the distress is load and age-related. GIS maps displaying the 2016 pavement percent cracking based on the ACA Index are presented in Appendix C Historical Pavement Condition in the District The last network-wide pavement condition survey was in At that time, the average ACA was 13.7% and the percentage of poor and very poor roads was 51% of the road network. Therefore, there has been an overall deterioration in the average condition of the network from 2003 to Pavement Condition Comparison to Other Municipalities Table 4 and Table 5 show a comparison of the District s roadway network to the roads of other municipalities in British Columbia in terms of ACA. 8

16 Table 4: City Major Roads Comparison in Terms of ACA Municipality % Cracking Length (centreline-km) Hope (2016) Hope (2003) (all roads, a break-down by class is not available for 2003) Coquitlam (2010) New Westminster (2015) Maple Ridge (2008) Surrey (2014) North Vancouver (2009) Langley City (2008) Pitt Meadows (2011) Mission (2016) Coquitlam (2014) Delta (2011) Langley Township (2008) Oak Bay (2012) Richmond (2004) New Westminster (2006) Abbotsford (2013) Surrey (2008) Victoria (2012) Note 1: The City Major category excludes the portion of Arterial and Collector roads that are included in the TransLink MRN roads for municipalities in Metro Vancouver Table 5: City Local Roads Comparison in Terms of ACA Municipality % Cracking Length (centreline-km) Hope (2016) Hope (2003) (all roads, a break-down by class is not available for 2003) Fernie (2007) Langley Township (2008) New Westminster (2015) Dawson Creek (2015) Banff (2006) North Vancouver (2009) Pitt Meadows Mission (2016) Coquitlam (2009) New Westminster (2006) Maple Ridge (2008) Victoria (2012) Abbotsford (2014) Salmon Arm (2008)

17 4.3 ROAD NETWORK ROUGHNESS AND RUT CONDITION (COLLECTOR AND ARTERIAL ROADS) As discussed previously, The IRI and Rut were collected only for collector roads. The average IRI and Rut values were 2.8 mm/m and 4.8 mm respectively in The distribution of IRI and Rut values for arterial and collector roads is shown in Figure 3. IRI Rut 100% 100% 90% 80% 90% 80% 33.0% % Length 70% 60% 50% 40% 70.5% % Length 70% 60% 50% 40% 40.3% 30% 20% 10% 0% 14.9% 12.3% Collector 30% 20% 10% 0% 26.8% Collector Very Poor Poor Fair Good Very Good Very Poor Poor Fair Good Very Good Figure 3: 2016 Pavement Condition Distribution in Terms of IRI and Rut for Collector Roads The IRI that roadway users will consider to be above acceptable limits is a function of roadway operating speed and user expectations. The limit between fair and poor is therefore different in urban areas compared to high speed highways. A paper by (Yu, Chou, & Yau, 2006) resulted in recommended thresholds for different travel speeds that correlates to jolts experienced by users. The scale used in this report, as presented in Section 3.4, has a maximum IRI of 3.0 mm/m for roads in Good condition, and a maximum IRI of 3.8 for roads in Fair condition. This is consistent with that recommended by Yu et al. for a travel speed of 60 km/h. Urban networks generally have shorter segments with curbed cross-sections, lower operating speed, frequent intersections, and numerous interfaces with utility access boxes which causes the IRI to increase. The average IRI of 2.8 mm/m across the collector roads within the District s network is considered good. GIS map displaying the 2016 pavement roughness and rutting are presented in Appendix C. 10

18 4.4 AVERAGE CONDITION SUMMARY A summary of the weighted average condition data for the network is provided in Table 6. Table 6: Average 2016 Pavement Condition for Road Classes Road Class ACA (%) PCI Rut (mm) IRI (mm/m) Collector Local Network LENGTH OF BACKLOG ROADS The road segments in poor to very poor condition (ACA < 10%) that have not yet been rehabilitated are defined as backlog roads. A road is said to be in backlog when its ACA is greater than 10% indicating poor to very poor condition. Rut was excluded from the determination of backlog because there were no roadway sections with average Rut greater than 12 mm. Table 7 shows length of backlog roads in 2016 based on the ACA index. This backlog represents approximately 60% of the road network. Table 7: Length of Backlog Roads in 2016 Road Class Centre-line Length of Backlog Roads (m) Collector 5,381 Local 43,823 Network 49, PAVEMENT STRENGTH ANALYSIS 5.1 BACKGROUND The District provided two reports that discussed the strengthening requirements for roadways within the network: Geotechnical Engineering Report, Benkelman Beam Testing, Conducted by Levelton Consultants Ltd (May 2011), included Benkelman Beam testing on Flood Hope Road, 6 th Avenue, Coquihalla Street, Kawkawa Lake Road and Othello Road. Based on the Most Probable Spring Rebound values and the roadway classifications, only Coquihalla Street was found to be structurally deficient. This report recommended an asphalt overlay of 35mm to 50mm to meet the pavement structure deficiency for a collector road classification. Coquihalla Street was retested in 2016 (see below). Condition Assessments of Roadway Structures, Water Mains, Storm Sewers and Sanitary Sewers, conducted by Omega & Associates Engineering Ltd (June 2016), includes condition assessments for 6 th Avenue, Coquihalla Street, and Rupert Street. All three roadway structures were found to be in good condition, with some localized deficiencies on the surface. Coquihalla Street, which had been identified by Levelton Consultants Ltd in the 2011 report as requiring strengthening, was found to be structurally adequate. The reports, when retesting of Coquihalla Street is considered, indicate no strengthening requirements. Therefore, additional strengthening was not included as a treatment and the strength testing results did not influence the outcome of the Life Cycle Cost Analysis. 11

19 6.0 LIFE-CYCLE COST ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY 6.1 DATA ANALYSIS SOFTWARE Tetra Tech used Deighton s Total Infrastructure Management System (dtims) software for data analysis and reporting. The software is unique in its ability to model pavement performance by any possible method including user-defined models and indices, which can be tailored to meet the District s specific needs with local conditions. 6.2 PAVEMENT PERFORMANCE MODELLING Tetra Tech used the World Bank s Highway Development and Management (HDM-4) models that have been developed and updated by a worldwide team of experts over the past 20 years. These models are able to predict the propagation of individual distresses such as cracking, rutting, and roughness. Figure 4 illustrates the progression of these models from required inputs through to predicted condition. Figure 4: Predicting Pavement Performance This enables systems using these models to select appropriate treatments, and to accurately assess current condition and value. 12

20 6.3 PCI PREDICTION BASED ON HDM INDICES In order to predict PCI during the analysis period, a relationship between 2016 PCI and HDM indices was developed as shown in the following formula: PPPPPP = (ee ( AFCA TCA RVH Rut+4.605) )/1.033 A graphical comparison between the predicted and actual PCI values in 2016 is depicted in Figure 5. The purpose of this correlation is to be able to calculate PCI in future years using modelled HDM distresses. The figure indicates that PCI can be estimated from HDM indices with good accuracy Predicted PCI based on HDM Indices y = 1x R² = Measured PCI Figure 5: Relationship between 2016 measured PCI (ASTM Methodology) and PCI Calculated from Correlation using HDM Indices Remaining Life As part of their asset management planning, the District has requested Remaining Life be estimated. This has been estimated based on the pavement deterioration model as the year when the PCI would drop below 40 (falling into the very poor range). This is reported as 0 years for roads that are already below 40, and reported as greater than 20 years for roadways that are not projected to deteriorate below a PCI of 40 in the next 20 years. The results have been included in Appendix C. 13

21 6.4 PARAMETRIC DATA In addition to the inventory sections and condition data, additional data was required to define the parameters of potential improvements and interventions. The analysis required the following parametric data to be established: Analysis Sets; Treatments Types and Costs; Treatment Triggers; Treatment Resets; and Budget Scenarios. A brief description of each of the parametric datasets is provided in the following sections Analysis Sets The analysis constraints are the centre of a life-cycle cost analysis. They define the boundary conditions for the analysis. Analysis constraints are parameters such as: How long the analysis will go into the future (the analysis period of 10 years was used); Which elements are being analyzed; Which list of treatments is involved; and Discount rate to be used to establish present value (Discount rate of 4% was used) Treatment Types and Costs A number of maintenance and rehabilitation treatments were established, based on input from District. The treatments and their unit costs are shown in Table 8. Typically crack sealing and patching are considered maintenance treatments whereas the other treatments are considered rehabilitation treatments. Table 8: Treatments and Unit Costs Used In Analysis Treatment Crack Sealing Shallow Patching Overlay (50 mm) Mill and Fill (50 mm) Reclaim Reconstruction Reconstruct Travel Lane, Mill and Fill adjacent Parking Lane (50mm) Mill and Fill Travel Lane Only (50mm) Unit Cost $2/L-m $15/m² $15/m² +(Repair of Cracked Areas*) $22/m² + (Repair of Cracked Areas**) $45/m² $65/m² $65/m² in Travel Lane, $22/m² + (Repair of Cracked Areas**) in Parking Lane $22/m² + (Repair of Cracked Areas**) in Travel Lane applied to 60% of the surface area 14

22 Table 8: Treatments and Unit Costs Used In Analysis Treatment Mill and Fill Parking Lane Only (50mm) Unit Cost $22/m² + (Repair of Cracked Areas**) in Parking Lane applied to 60% of the surface area which assumes some overlap between treatments because the treatments are at least 8 years apart. Subsequent Rehabilitations * Repair of Cracked Areas for Overlay: $15/m 2 * AFCL + $65/m 2 * AFCW ** Repair of Cracked Areas for Mill and Fill: $65/m 2 * AFCW AFCL= Narrow fatigue crack (%); AFCW= Wide fatigue cracking (%) $15/m² (no curb) or $22/m² (with curb) Treatment Triggers The feasibility of applying a treatment on a given performance section is usually limited by physical or other constraints. For example, thick overlays cannot be directly applied to sections with curb and gutter. Similarly, a treatment should never be applied in the absence of any surface distress and an overlay should not be considered if the pavement is too severely distressed. A set of triggers are developed so that only feasible strategies are explored. The triggers (shown in Table 9) limit the number of strategies to those that can feasibly be applied. Table 9: Maintenance and Rehabilitation Triggers Treatment Trigger Criteria Variable Abbreviations Crack Sealing Patching Overlay (50 mm) Mill and Fill (50 mm) Reconstruction Reclamation Reconstruct Travel Lane, Mill and Fill adjacent Parking Lane (50mm) Mill and Fill Travel Lane Only (50 mm) Mill and Fill Parking Lane Only (50 mm) AFCL > 1% Or TCL > 1% and Surface Age > 5 years and (AFCW + TCW) < 10% AFCW + TCW > 1% and Surface Age > 5 years AFCA > 8% and AFCA < 25% and (No Curb) AFCA > 8% and AFCA < 25% and (Curb Exists) AFCA > 25% and (Curb Exists) and Surface Age > 8 years AFCA > 25% and (No Curb) and Surface Age > 8 years AFCA > 25% and (Curb Exists) and Surface Age > 8 years, and PCI in the Parking Lane is at least 15 points higher than PCI in the Travel Lane AFCA > 8% and AFCA < 25% and (Curb Exists), and PCI in the Parking Lane is at least 15 higher than PCI in the Travel Lane Parking lane AFCA > 8% and Parking lane AFCA < 25% and (Curb Exists) and Travel Lane has been Mill and Filled already more than 8 years ago AFCL: Narrow fatigue crack (%) AFCW: Wide fatigue cracking (%) AFCA: All fatigue cracking (%) TCL: Narrow thermal cracking (%) TCW: Wide thermal cracking (%) Treatment Resets With the selection and application of any given treatment, the performance of a road will improve. For example with a 50 mm overlay, ruts would be filled, cracking would be overlaid, roughness would decrease, and strength would increase. Therefore, to predict performance over time and account for and compare possible interventions, the 15

23 performance models have to adjust the individual distress data to reflect the application of the treatment. These changes to the value of the analysis variables as a result of the application of a treatment are called resets. Some heavy rehabilitation treatments, such as reconstruction, might reset virtually all of the analysis variables Method to Measure Benefit One method to derive the benefit is to multiply the area under the pavement performance curve and the length of the pavement section. The Area under the Curve was calculated by summing the present value of the difference between the condition index (such as AFCA) resulting from a strategy and the condition index for the do-nothing strategy (base case strategy) for each year in the analysis period. A strategy is a collection of treatments over time that addresses the deficiency of the road segment. Figure 6 shows an example of calculating the benefit based on AFCA Index, for an overlay strategy during a sample 20-year analysis period. Traffic (i.e., AADT) as a customer criteria could be considered in the benefit definition. For this project, the benefit was defined combining both condition and traffic, as shown in the following formula: BBBBBBBBBBBBBB = PPPPPPPPPPPPPP VVVVVVVVVV oooo AAAAAAAA uuuuuuuuuu PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP CCCCCCvvvv AAAAAAAA Budget Scenarios Figure 6: Example of Calculating the Benefit for an Overlay Strategy For the purposes of this study, four funding levels were used as budget constraints in order to assist the District with its decision making process. The budget levels used are given in Table 10. Routine maintenance (Crack seal and Patching) costs were included in the total budgets. 16

24 Table 10: Budget Scenarios used in the 2016 Analysis Budget Average Annual Funding Average Over 10 Years Scenario Limit per Year Maintenance Rehabilitation $500,000 $336,000 $160,000 $700,000 $313,000 $386,000 $1,000,000 $276,000 $721,000 $1,500,000 $227,000 $1,270,000 Figure 7 below illustrates how increasing the total annual budget will reduce the annual maintenance cost. $800,000 Annual Maintenance Costs $600,000 $400,000 $200,000 MAINTENANCE ONLY 0.5 MILL / YR 0.7 MILL / YR 1.0 MILL / YR 1.5 MILL / YR $ Figure 7: Annual Maintenance Costs for Different Budget Scenarios Year ANALYSIS RESULTS 7.1 REQUIRED ANNUAL BUDGET ANALYSIS Various scenarios were analyzed to measure the effects of alternative funding levels and to determine the funding needed keep current condition of the road network or improve it over the next 10 years. The condition in each of these graphs is slightly better than measured because it accounts for projects scheduled for 2016 after the data was collected. Figure 8 shows the average AFCA and PCI values of the road network for different budget scenarios over a 10- year period. As shown in the figure, the pavement percent cracking is expected to increase from 21.8% to 44.8% with the estimated budget of $500,000 per year. The PCI value is expected to decrease from 71 to 52 in this scenario. 17

25 $500,000 / yr $700,000 / yr $1,000,000 / yr $1,500,000 / yr ACA (%) Year 100 $500,000 / yr 90 $700,000 / yr $1,000,000 / yr 80 $1,500,000 / yr PCI Figure 8: Predicting ACA and PCI for Different Budget Scenarios Road segments are considered backlog roads when they have an ACA greater than 10% and have not yet been rehabilitated in the 2016 program. The effect of various funding levels in terms of backlog roads length is also shown in Figure 9. The figure indicates that there is currently 48.5km of backlog within the network, which is expected to increase to 61.5 km of backlog by 2026 at the estimated annual budget of $500,000. If the funding is increased to $1,000,000 per year, the backlog length remains similar to the current condition. The backlog could be reduced with higher funding: for example, the backlog length is expected to decrease to 33.6km over the next ten years if the annual budget is $1,500,000. Year 18

26 $500,000 / yr $700,000 / yr Length of Backlog Roads (km) $1,000,000 / yr $1,500,000 / yr Year Figure 9: Future Backlog Projection based on Various Budget Scenarios YEAR REHABILITATION PROGRAM GIS maps showing a 10 year paving program based upon $700,000 annual budget for the road network is provided in Appendix D. This program includes the major rehabilitation treatments chosen by the analysis; the rehabilitation program suggested should be confirmed by completing project level assessments and designs. 8.0 CONCLUSION Life-cycle cost analysis was conducted for each road segment so that the overall condition of the network could be forecast with alternative budget scenarios. Scenarios investigated were the estimated annual budget of $500,000 per year, $700,000 per year, $1,000,000 per year, and $1,500,000 per year; these scenarios include both rehabilitation and routine maintenance. Overall long-term life-cycle cost of the network is minimized by rehabilitating pavements before reconstruction and/or extensive deep patching is required. This is achieved by setting the budget at a level that minimizes the cost of maintaining the network s asset value. The network is currently in poor condition due to cracking and has a significant backlog. In order to prevent the backlog from increasing, additional funding is required. 19

27

28 REFERENCES Paterson, W. (1987). Road Deterioration and Maintenance Effects. Washington, D.C, USA: World Bank Publications. Yu, J., Chou, E., & Yau, J.-T. (2006). "Development of Speed-Related Ride Quality Thresholds using International Roughness Index". Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1974, Transportation Reesarch Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, pp

29 APPENDIX A TETRA TECH S GENERAL CONDITIONS

30 GENERAL CONDITIONS DESIGN REPORT This report incorporates and is subject to these General Conditions. 1.0 USE OF REPORT AND OWNERSHIP This Design Report pertains to a specific site, a specific development, and a specific scope of work. The Design Report may include plans, drawings, profiles and other support documents that collectively constitute the Design Report. The Report and all supporting documents are intended for the sole use of Tetra Tech EBA s Client. Tetra Tech EBA does not accept any responsibility for the accuracy of any of the data, analyses or other contents of the Design Report when it is used or relied upon by any party other than Tetra Tech EBA s Client, unless authorized in writing by Tetra Tech EBA. Any unauthorized use of the Design Report is at the sole risk of the user. All reports, plans, and data generated by Tetra Tech EBA during the performance of the work and other documents prepared by Tetra Tech EBA are considered its professional work product and shall remain the copyright property of Tetra Tech EBA. 2.0 ALTERNATIVE REPORT FORMAT Where Tetra Tech EBA submits both electronic file and hard copy versions of reports, drawings and other project-related documents and deliverables (collectively termed Tetra Tech EBA s instruments of professional service), only the signed and/or sealed versions shall be considered final and legally binding. The original signed and/or sealed version archived by Tetra Tech EBA shall be deemed to be the original for the Project. Both electronic file and hard copy versions of Tetra Tech EBA s instruments of professional service shall not, under any circumstances, no matter who owns or uses them, be altered by any party except Tetra Tech EBA. Tetra Tech EBA s instruments of professional service will be used only and exactly as submitted by Tetra Tech EBA. Electronic files submitted by Tetra Tech EBA have been prepared and submitted using specific software and hardware systems. Tetra Tech EBA makes no representation about the compatibility of these files with the Client s current or future software and hardware systems. 4.0 CALCULATIONS AND DESIGNS Tetra Tech EBA has undertaken design calculations and has prepared project specific designs in accordance with terms of reference that were previously set out in consultation with, and agreement of, Tetra Tech EBA s client. These designs have been prepared to a standard that is consistent with industry practice. Notwithstanding, if any error or omission is detected by Tetra Tech EBA s Client or any party that is authorized to use the Design Report, the error or omission should be immediately drawn to the attention of Tetra Tech EBA. 5.0 GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS A Geotechnical Report is commonly the basis upon which the specific project design has been completed. It is incumbent upon Tetra Tech EBA s Client, and any other authorized party, to be knowledgeable of the level of risk that has been incorporated into the project design, in consideration of the level of the geotechnical information that was reasonably acquired to facilitate completion of the design. If a Geotechnical Report was prepared for the project by Tetra Tech EBA, it will be included in the Design Report. The Geotechnical Report contains General Conditions that should be read in conjunction with these General Conditions for the Design Report. 6.0 INFORMATION PROVIDED TO TETRA TECH EBA BY OTHERS During the performance of the work and the preparation of the report, Tetra Tech EBA may rely on information provided by persons other than the Client. While Tetra Tech EBA endeavours to verify the accuracy of such information when instructed to do so by the Client, Tetra Tech EBA accepts no responsibility for the accuracy or the reliability of such information which may affect the report. 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL AND REGULATORY ISSUES Unless so stipulated in the Design Report, Tetra Tech EBA was not retained to investigate, address or consider, and has not investigated, addressed or considered any environmental or regulatory issues associated with the project specific design. 1

31 APPENDIX B GIS MAP - OVERVIEW

32 LEGEND Inventory Class Collector Road Local Road ROSS RD K ST UNION BAR RD WARDLE ST OTHELLO RD W:\Projects\VAN\83438\PAVE03041\GIS\Figures\Hope_PMS_Figure_B1_Overview_R0.mxd modified 11/1/2016 by york.law HUNTER CREEK RD YALE RD AIRPORT RD SILVER SKAGIT RD TOM BERRY RD TH AVE PROJECTION UTM ZONE 10 FILE NO. Hope_PMS_Figure_B1_Overview_R0.mxd PROJECT NO. TRN.PAVE OFFICE Tt EBA-VANC Map Extent NOTES Base data source: ESRI Basemaps, 2016 DWN YL DATE November, 2016 DATUM NAD83 CKD APVD REV MEZ AR 0 STATUS ISSUED FOR USE DISTRICT OF HOPE 2016 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN 2016 Project Overview Scale: 1:50, Kilometres CLIENT District of Hope Figure B1

33 APPENDIX C 2016 PAVEMENT CONDITION 2016 Pavement Condition Spreadsheet GIS Map PCI GIS Map ACA GIS Map 2016 IRI GIS Map 2016 Rut

34 - APPENDIX C FILE: TRN.PAVE NOVEMBER 2016 ISSUED FOR USE Appendix C - Pavement Condition Data July 2016 Road From To Length From_Description To_Description Class Average Rut (mm) Average IRI (mm/m) PCI ACA (%) 3RD AVE Southeast End TURNER ST COL RD AVE TURNER ST RAAB ST COL RD AVE RAAB ST ODD ST COL RD AVE ODD ST HUDSON BAY ST COL RD AVE HUDSON BAY ST FORT ST COL RD AVE FORT ST WALLACE ST COL RD AVE WALLACE ST COMMISSION ST LOC >20 3RD AVE COMMISSION ST PARK ST LOC >20 3RD AVE PARK ST DOUGLAS ST LOC >20 3RD AVE DOUGLAS ST QUEEN ST LOC RD AVE QUEEN ST COQUIHALLA ST LOC RD AVE COQUIHALLA ST KING ST LOC RD AVE KING ST HOPE ST LOC >20 3RD AVE HOPE ST 4TH AVE / STUART ST LOC TH AVE Southeast End CORBETT ST LOC TH AVE CORBETT ST RAAB ST LOC TH AVE Southeast End HUDSON BAY ST LOC >20 4TH AVE HUDSON BAY ST FORT ST LOC TH AVE FORT ST WALLACE ST LOC TH AVE WALLACE ST PARK ST LOC TH AVE PARK ST QUEEN ST LOC TH AVE QUEEN ST COQUIHALLA ST LOC TH AVE COQUIHALLA ST KING ST LOC >20 4TH AVE KING ST HOPE ST LOC TH AVE HOPE ST 3RD AVE / STUART ST LOC TH AVE RD AVE / STUART ST RUPERT ST / WARDLE ST LOC >20 5TH AVE STUART ST / YALE ST KING ST LOC TH AVE KING ST COQUIHALLA ST LOC TH AVE COQUIHALLA ST QUEEN ST LOC TH AVE QUEEN ST QUEEN ST LOC TH AVE QUEEN ST DOUGLAS ST LOC TH AVE DOUGLAS ST PARK ST LOC TH AVE PARK ST COMMISSION ST LOC TH AVE COMMISSION ST WALLACE ST LOC >20 5TH AVE WALLACE ST FORT ST LOC >20 5TH AVE FORT ST FORT ST LOC >20 5TH AVE FORT ST HUDSON BAY ST LOC >20 5TH AVE Northwest End RAAB ST LOC >20 5TH AVE RAAB ST CORBETT ST LOC TH AVE CORBETT ST Southeast End LOC >20 6TH AVE Southeast End CORBETT ST / KAWKAWA LAKE COL TH AVE CORBETT ST / KAWKAWA LAKE RAAB ST COL TH AVE RAAB ST HUDSON BAY ST COL TH AVE HUDSON BAY ST FORT ST COL >20 6TH AVE FORT ST WALLACE ST COL TH AVE WALLACE ST COMMISSION ST COL TH AVE COMMISSION ST COMMISSION ST COL TH AVE COMMISSION ST PARK ST COL TH AVE PARK ST DOUGLAS ST COL TH AVE DOUGLAS ST DOUGLAS ST COL TH AVE DOUGLAS ST QUEEN ST COL TH AVE QUEEN ST COQUIHALLA ST COL TH AVE COQUIHALLA ST KING ST LOC TH AVE KING ST RUPERT ST LOC TH AVE RUPERT ST DEWDNEY AVE / THACKER AVE LOC TH AVE WARDLE ST HAZEL ST LOC >20 7TH AVE HAZEL ST WILLOW ST LOC >20 7TH AVE WILLOW ST MAPLE ST LOC TH AVE MAPLE ST YALE ST LOC TH AVE YALE ST THACKER AVE LOC TH AVE COQUIHALLA ST GOLF COURSE RD LOC >20 7TH AVE GOLF COURSE RD DOUGLAS ST LOC TH AVE DOUGLAS ST PARK ST LOC TH AVE PARK ST OGILVIE RD LOC TH AVE OGILVIE RD WALLACE ST LOC TH AVE RIVER PARADE FORT ST LOC >20 7TH AVE FORT ST HUDSON BAY ST LOC TH AVE Northwest End KAWKAWA LAKE RD LOC >20 7TH AVE KAWKAWA LAKE RD Southeast End LOC >20 ACACIA DR South End MOUNTAIN ASH DR LOC >20 ACACIA DR MOUNTAIN ASH DR DOGWOOD DR LOC >20 ACACIA DR DOGWOOD DR GORDON DR LOC >20 ACACIA DR GORDON DR KAWKAWA LAKE RD LOC >20 AIRPORT RD YALE RD DELAIR RD LOC AIRPORT RD DELAIR RD BRISTOL SLOUGH RD LOC AIRPORT RD BRISTOL SLOUGH RD YALE RD LOC ALLISON AVE WARDLE ST HAZEL ST LOC ALLISON AVE HAZEL ST WILLOW ST LOC ALLISON AVE WILLOW ST WILLOW ST LOC ALLISON AVE WILLOW ST MAPLE ST LOC ALLISON AVE MAPLE ST YALE ST LOC ALLISON AVE YALE ST Southeast End LOC ANSON PL South End BIRCHTREES DR / LILA PL LOC >20 ARSENEAU RD South End ROSS RD LOC BAILEY CRES OLD YALE RD OLD YALE RD / PETER ST LOC >20 BEACON RD FLOOD HOPE RD / OWL RD SCHOOL RD LOC BEACON RD SCHOOL RD EDWARDS DR LOC BEACON RD EDWARDS DR Northwest End LOC >20 BEECH AVE West End SILVERVIEW RD LOC BEECH AVE SILVERVIEW RD CYPRESS ST LOC >20 BIRCH PL GLENAIRE DR West End LOC BIRCH PL BIRCH ST Northwest End LOC >20 BIRCH ST BIRCH PL ROSEWOOD AVE LOC BIRCH ST ROSEWOOD AVE HEATHER AVE LOC BIRCHTREES DR West End MOUNT HOPE RD LOC >20 BIRCHTREES DR MOUNT HOPE RD ANSON PL / LILA PL LOC BIRCHTREES DR ANSON PL / LILA PL Southeast End LOC BRISTOL SLOUGH RD AIRPORT RD North End LOC CARIBOO AVE South End HOPE ST LOC >20 CARIBOO AVE HOPE ST RUPERT ST LOC COMMISSION ST Southwest End FRASER AVE LOC COMMISSION ST FRASER AVE 3RD AVE LOC COMMISSION ST TH AVE 6TH AVE LOC COMMISSION ST TH AVE Northeast End LOC COQUIHALLA ST WATER AVE FRASER AVE COL COQUIHALLA ST FRASER AVE 3RD AVE COL COQUIHALLA ST RD AVE HEMLOCK AVE COL COQUIHALLA ST HEMLOCK AVE 4TH AVE COL COQUIHALLA ST TH AVE 5TH AVE COL COQUIHALLA ST TH AVE SKAGIT AVE COL COQUIHALLA ST SKAGIT AVE 6TH AVE COL COQUIHALLA ST TH AVE 7TH AVE LOC >20 COQUIHALLA ST TH AVE THACKER AVE LOC AFCA (%) Remaining Life (Years) Appendix C - Pavement Condition 1

35 - APPENDIX C FILE: TRN.PAVE NOVEMBER 2016 ISSUED FOR USE Appendix C - Pavement Condition Data July 2016 Road From To Length From_Description To_Description Class Average Rut (mm) Average IRI (mm/m) PCI ACA (%) CORBETT ST TH AVE 5TH AVE LOC >20 CORBETT ST TH AVE 6TH AVE / KAWKAWA LAKE RD LOC >20 CYPRESS ST South End WALNUT DR LOC CYPRESS ST WALNUT DR BEECH AVE LOC DEWDNEY AVE TH AVE / THACKER AVE YALE ST LOC DOGWOOD DR GREENWOOD DR ACACIA DR LOC DOUGLAS ST Southwest End FRASER AVE LOC >20 DOUGLAS ST FRASER AVE 3RD AVE LOC >20 DOUGLAS ST TH AVE 6TH AVE LOC >20 DOUGLAS ST TH AVE 7TH AVE LOC EDWARDS DR BEACON RD East End LOC >20 ELDER RD YALE RD East End LOC ESTELL RD East End FLOOD HOPE RD LOC FERRY LANDING PL Northwest End WARDLE ST LOC >20 FISH CAMP RD OTHELLO RD East End LOC FLOOD HOPE RD West End FLOOD RD OVERPASS COL FLOOD HOPE RD FLOOD RD OVERPASS ESTELL RD COL FLOOD HOPE RD ESTELL RD FLOODS RD COL FLOOD HOPE RD FLOODS RD TOBINA RD COL FLOOD HOPE RD TOBINA RD YALE RD COL FLOOD HOPE RD SILVER SKAGIT RD BIRCH PL COL >20 FLOOD HOPE RD BIRCH PL SILVERHOPE RD / SILVERVIEW COL FLOOD HOPE RD SILVERHOPE RD / SILVERVIEW MARIE ST COL >20 FLOOD HOPE RD MARIE ST PETER ST COL >20 FLOOD HOPE RD PETER ST SCHOOL RD COL >20 FLOOD HOPE RD SCHOOL RD BEACON RD / OWL RD COL >20 FLOOD HOPE RD BEACON RD / OWL RD OLD YALE RD COL FLOOD HOPE RD OLD YALE RD HOCKIN RD COL FLOOD HOPE RD HOCKIN RD Northeast End COL FLOODS RD South End FLOOD HOPE RD LOC FLOODS RD FLOOD HOPE RD YALE RD LOC FORREST CRES West End GLENAIRE DR LOC FORREST CRES GLENAIRE DR Southeast End LOC >20 FORT ST Southwest End FRASER AVE LOC FORT ST FRASER AVE 3RD AVE LOC FORT ST RD AVE 4TH AVE LOC FORT ST TH AVE 5TH AVE LOC FORT ST TH AVE 6TH AVE LOC FORT ST HUDSON BAY ST 7TH AVE LOC FOSTER RD Northwest End SILVERHOPE RD LOC FRASER AVE LINCOLN TERR HUDSON BAY ST LOC >20 FRASER AVE HUDSON BAY ST FORT ST LOC FRASER AVE FORT ST WALLACE ST LOC FRASER AVE WALLACE ST COMMISSION ST LOC FRASER AVE COMMISSION ST PARK ST LOC FRASER AVE PARK ST DOUGLAS ST LOC FRASER AVE DOUGLAS ST QUEEN ST LOC FRASER AVE QUEEN ST COQUIHALLA ST LOC FRASER AVE COQUIHALLA ST KING ST LOC FRASER AVE KING ST Northwest End LOC GAGNON PL West End SILVERHOPE RD LOC >20 GARDNER DR West End MOUNT HOPE RD LOC >20 GARDNER DR MOUNT HOPE RD Southeast End LOC GLENAIRE DR FORREST CRES BIRCH PL LOC >20 GLENAIRE DR BIRCH PL Northwest End LOC GOLF COURSE RD TH AVE Northeast End LOC GORDON DR GREENWOOD DR ACACIA DR LOC GREENWOOD DR Southeast End DOGWOOD DR LOC >20 GREENWOOD DR DOGWOOD DR GORDON DR LOC GREENWOOD DR GORDON DR SKYLARK DR LOC GREENWOOD DR SKYLARK DR KAWKAWA LAKE RD LOC HAIG STATION RD LANDSTROM RD Northeast End LOC HAZEL ST ALLISON AVE 7TH AVE LOC HEATHER AVE BIRCH ST SILVERVIEW RD LOC HEMLOCK AVE Southeast End QUEEN ST LOC HEMLOCK AVE QUEEN ST COQUIHALLA ST LOC HEMLOCK AVE COQUIHALLA ST KING ST LOC HEMLOCK AVE KING ST HOPE ST LOC HOCKIN RD FLOOD HOPE RD North End LOC HOPE ST CARIBOO AVE 3RD AVE LOC >20 HOPE ST RD AVE HEMLOCK AVE LOC HOPE ST HEMLOCK AVE 4TH AVE LOC HUDSON BAY ST Southwest End WATER AVE LOC >20 HUDSON BAY ST WATER AVE FRASER AVE LOC HUDSON BAY ST FRASER AVE 3RD AVE LOC >20 HUDSON BAY ST RD AVE ODD ST LOC >20 HUDSON BAY ST ODD ST 4TH AVE LOC >20 HUDSON BAY ST TH AVE 5TH AVE LOC >20 HUDSON BAY ST TH AVE FORT ST LOC HUDSON BAY ST FORT ST 7TH AVE LOC >20 HUMPHRYS RD West End SILVERHOPE RD LOC JASON RD OTHELLO RD East End LOC JOHNSON RD KAWKAWA LAKE RD East End LOC KAWKAWA LAKE RD TH AVE / CORBETT ST 7TH AVE LOC >20 KAWKAWA LAKE RD TH AVE UNION BAR RD LOC >20 KAWKAWA LAKE RD UNION BAR RD SWALLOW PL LOC KAWKAWA LAKE RD SWALLOW PL GREENWOOD DR LOC KAWKAWA LAKE RD GREENWOOD DR ACACIA DR LOC KAWKAWA LAKE RD ACACIA DR DR FROST RD / MOUNT HOPE LOC KAWKAWA LAKE RD DR FROST RD / MOUNT HOPE KETTLE VALLEY RD LOC KAWKAWA LAKE RD KETTLE VALLEY RD LAKEVIEW CRES LOC KAWKAWA LAKE RD LAKEVIEW CRES LAKE COUNTRY DR LOC >20 KAWKAWA LAKE RD LAKE COUNTRY DR EMERALD RD LOC >20 KAWKAWA LAKE RD EMERALD RD LAKEVIEW CRES LOC >20 KAWKAWA LAKE RD LAKEVIEW CRES OTHELLO RD LOC KAWKAWA LAKE RD OTHELLO RD OTHELLO RD 1 LOC >20 KAWKAWA LAKE RD OTHELLO RD 1 SUMMER RD LOC KAWKAWA LAKE RD SUMMER RD STEPHENS RD LOC KAWKAWA LAKE RD STEPHENS RD KAW RD LOC KAWKAWA LAKE RD KAW RD KERELUK RD LOC KAWKAWA LAKE RD KERELUK RD JOHNSON RD LOC KAWKAWA LAKE RD JOHNSON RD West End LOC KERELUK RD KAWKAWA LAKE RD East End LOC KETTLE VALLEY RD Southeast End KAWKAWA LAKE RD LOC KETTLE VALLEY RD KAWKAWA LAKE RD KETTLE VALLEY PL LOC KING ST Southwest End FRASER AVE LOC >20 KING ST FRASER AVE 3RD AVE LOC KING ST RD AVE HEMLOCK AVE LOC KING ST HEMLOCK AVE 4TH AVE LOC >20 KING ST TH AVE 5TH AVE LOC KING ST TH AVE STUART ST LOC >20 KING ST STUART ST 6TH AVE LOC >20 KLASSEN RD TOBINA RD STARRET RD LOC >20 AFCA (%) Remaining Life (Years) Appendix C - Pavement Condition 2

36 - APPENDIX C FILE: TRN.PAVE NOVEMBER 2016 ISSUED FOR USE Appendix C - Pavement Condition Data July 2016 Road From To Length From_Description To_Description Class Average Rut (mm) Average IRI (mm/m) PCI ACA (%) LAKEVIEW CRES KAWKAWA LAKE RD OGILVIEW DR LOC LAKEVIEW CRES OGILVIEW DR PARK AVE LOC LAKEVIEW CRES PARK AVE COTTONWOOD DR LOC LAKEVIEW CRES COTTONWOOD DR MOUNTAINVIEW CRES LOC LAKEVIEW CRES MOUNTAINVIEW CRES PARK AVE LOC LAKEVIEW CRES PARK AVE KAWKAWA LAKE ACCESS LOC >20 LAKEVIEW CRES KAWKAWA LAKE ACCESS KAWKAWA LAKE RD LOC LANDERS RD West End LANDSTROM RD LOC LANDSTROM RD Northwest End CROFT RD LOC LANDSTROM RD CROFT RD LAUZON RD LOC LANDSTROM RD LAUZON RD LANDERS RD LOC LANDSTROM RD LANDERS RD HAIG STATION RD LOC MALLARD DR RICHMOND DR Southeast End LOC >20 MAPLE ST ALLISON AVE 7TH AVE LOC MARIE ST OLD YALE RD YVONNE AVE LOC >20 MARIE ST YVONNE AVE FLOOD HOPE RD LOC MOUNT HOPE RD GARDNER DR BIRCHTREES DR LOC MOUNT HOPE RD BIRCHTREES DR DR FROST RD / KAWKAWA LAKE LOC MOUNTAINVIEW CRES PARK AVE LAKEVIEW CRES LOC >20 NELSON AVE Southeast End RAAB ST LOC NELSON AVE RAAB ST RAAB ST LOC ODD ST RD AVE HUDSON BAY ST LOC OGILVIE RD West End 7TH AVE LOC OGILVIEW DR West End LAKEVIEW CRES LOC OGILVIEW DR LAKEVIEW CRES ALDER PL LOC OLD YALE RD West End SILVERHOPE RD LOC >20 OLD YALE RD SILVERHOPE RD MARIE ST LOC >20 OLD YALE RD MARIE ST TUM TUM RD LOC >20 OLD YALE RD TUM TUM RD BAILEY CRES LOC OLD YALE RD BAILEY CRES BAILEY CRES / PETER ST LOC >20 OLD YALE RD BAILEY CRES / PETER ST OWL RD LOC >20 OLD YALE RD OWL RD FLOOD HOPE RD LOC OLSON AVE Southeast End PARK ST LOC >20 OTHELLO RD Southeast End FISH CAMP RD LOC OTHELLO RD FISH CAMP RD JASON RD LOC OTHELLO RD JASON RD OTHELLO RD 1 LOC OTHELLO RD OTHELLO RD 1 KAWKAWA LAKE RD LOC >20 OWL RD OLD YALE RD BEACON RD / FLOOD HOPE RD LOC >20 PARK AVE LAKEVIEW CRES MOUNTAINVIEW CRES LOC >20 PARK AVE MOUNTAINVIEW CRES LAKEVIEW CRES LOC PARK ST Southwest End FRASER AVE LOC PARK ST FRASER AVE 3RD AVE LOC >20 PARK ST RD AVE 4TH AVE LOC PARK ST TH AVE 5TH AVE LOC PARK ST TH AVE 6TH AVE LOC PARK ST TH AVE 7TH AVE LOC PARK ST TH AVE OLSON AVE LOC >20 PETER ST BAILEY CRES / OLD YALE RD YVONNE AVE LOC >20 PETER ST YVONNE AVE FLOOD HOPE RD LOC >20 QUEEN ST Southwest End FRASER AVE LOC QUEEN ST FRASER AVE 3RD AVE LOC >20 QUEEN ST RD AVE HEMLOCK AVE LOC >20 QUEEN ST HEMLOCK AVE 4TH AVE LOC >20 QUEEN ST TH AVE 5TH AVE LOC QUEEN ST TH AVE SKAGIT AVE LOC >20 QUEEN ST SKAGIT AVE 6TH AVE LOC >20 RAAB ST RD AVE NELSON AVE LOC RAAB ST NELSON AVE 4TH AVE LOC RAAB ST TH AVE 6TH AVE LOC RICHMOND DR MALLARD DR PARSONS AVE LOC >20 RICHMOND DR PARSONS AVE North End LOC >20 RIVER PARADE TH AVE East End LOC RIVERVIEW DR South End SKYLARK DR LOC >20 ROBERTSON CRES Southwest End West End LOC ROSEWOOD AVE BIRCH ST SILVERVIEW RD LOC ROSS RD ROSS RD 1 ARSENEAU RD LOC ROSS RD ARSENEAU RD Northeast End LOC >20 RUPERT ST WATER AVE CARIBOO AVE LOC RUPERT ST CARIBOO AVE 4TH AVE / WARDLE ST LOC >20 RUPERT ST TH AVE / WARDLE ST WILLOW ST LOC RUPERT ST WILLOW ST YALE ST LOC >20 RUPERT ST YALE ST 6TH AVE LOC RYDER ST South End SCOTT DR LOC RYDER ST SCOTT DR Northwest End LOC SCHOOL RD FLOOD HOPE RD BEACON RD LOC SCOTT DR RYDER ST East End LOC >20 SILVER SKAGIT RD South End FLOOD HOPE RD LOC SILVERHOPE RD Southwest End HUMPHRYS RD LOC SILVERHOPE RD HUMPHRYS RD UPLANDS DR LOC SILVERHOPE RD UPLANDS DR OLD YALE RD LOC SILVERHOPE RD OLD YALE RD GAGNON PL LOC SILVERHOPE RD GAGNON PL FOSTER RD LOC SILVERHOPE RD FOSTER RD FLOOD HOPE RD / SILVERVIEW LOC SILVERVIEW RD FLOOD HOPE RD / SILVERHOPE ROSEWOOD AVE LOC SILVERVIEW RD ROSEWOOD AVE HEATHER AVE LOC SILVERVIEW RD HEATHER AVE WALNUT DR LOC SILVERVIEW RD WALNUT DR BEECH AVE LOC SKAGIT AVE QUEEN ST COQUIHALLA ST LOC SKYLARK DR West End RIVERVIEW DR LOC SKYLARK DR RIVERVIEW DR SWALLOW PL LOC SKYLARK DR SWALLOW PL GREENWOOD DR LOC >20 STARRET RD KLASSEN RD YALE RD LOC STEPHENS RD KAWKAWA LAKE RD East End LOC STUART ST RD AVE / 4TH AVE 5TH AVE / YALE ST LOC >20 STUART ST TH AVE / YALE ST KING ST LOC >20 SUMMER RD KAWKAWA LAKE RD East End LOC SWALLOW PL South End SKYLARK DR LOC SWALLOW PL SKYLARK DR KAWKAWA LAKE RD LOC THACKER AVE WARDLE ST WILLOW ST LOC THACKER AVE WILLOW ST YALE ST LOC THACKER AVE YALE ST 6TH AVE / DEWDNEY AVE LOC >20 THACKER AVE TH AVE / DEWDNEY AVE 7TH AVE LOC >20 THACKER AVE TH AVE COQUIHALLA ST LOC THACKER MOUNTAIN RD South End PARSONS AVE LOC THACKER MOUNTAIN RD PARSONS AVE UNION BAR RD LOC TOBINA RD KLASSEN RD YALE RD LOC >20 TOM BERRY RD YALE RD East End LOC >20 TUM TUM RD Southeast End OLD YALE RD LOC >20 TURNER ST West End 3RD AVE LOC >20 UNION BAR RD Southeast End KAWKAWA LAKE RD LOC >20 UNION BAR RD KAWKAWA LAKE RD THACKER MOUNTAIN RD LOC >20 UNION BAR RD THACKER MOUNTAIN RD West End LOC UPLANDS DR SILVERHOPE RD East End LOC >20 AFCA (%) Remaining Life (Years) Appendix C - Pavement Condition 3

37 - APPENDIX C FILE: TRN.PAVE NOVEMBER 2016 ISSUED FOR USE Appendix C - Pavement Condition Data July 2016 Road From To Length From_Description To_Description Class Average Rut (mm) Average IRI (mm/m) PCI ACA (%) WALLACE ST Southwest End FRASER AVE COL WALLACE ST FRASER AVE 3RD AVE COL WALLACE ST RD AVE 4TH AVE COL WALLACE ST TH AVE 5TH AVE COL WALLACE ST TH AVE 6TH AVE COL WALLACE ST TH AVE 7TH AVE LOC WALNUT DR West End SILVERVIEW RD LOC >20 WALNUT DR SILVERVIEW RD CYPRESS ST LOC WARDLE ST TH AVE / RUPERT ST FERRY LANDING PL LOC WARDLE ST FERRY LANDING PL THACKER AVE LOC WARDLE ST THACKER AVE ALLISON AVE LOC WARDLE ST ALLISON AVE 7TH AVE LOC >20 WATER AVE RUPERT ST COQUIHALLA ST LOC WATER AVE HUDSON BAY ST WATER AVE ACCESS LOC >20 WATER AVE WATER AVE ACCESS South End LOC WILLOW ST RUPERT ST THACKER AVE LOC >20 WILLOW ST THACKER AVE THACKER AVE LOC >20 WILLOW ST THACKER AVE ALLISON AVE LOC WILLOW ST ALLISON AVE 7TH AVE LOC YALE RD West End FLOODS RD LOC YALE RD FLOODS RD AIRPORT RD LOC YALE RD AIRPORT RD AIRPORT RD LOC YALE RD AIRPORT RD TOM BERRY RD LOC YALE RD TOM BERRY RD STARRET RD LOC >20 YALE RD STARRET RD TOBINA RD LOC >20 YALE RD TOBINA RD ELDER RD LOC >20 YALE RD ELDER RD Southeast End LOC >20 YALE RD North End FLOOD HOPE RD LOC YALE ST TH AVE / STUART ST RUPERT ST LOC YALE ST RUPERT ST THACKER AVE LOC YALE ST THACKER AVE THACKER AVE LOC YALE ST THACKER AVE ALLISON AVE LOC YALE ST ALLISON AVE DEWDNEY AVE LOC YALE ST DEWDNEY AVE 7TH AVE LOC YVONNE AVE MARIE ST PETER ST LOC >20 AFCA (%) Remaining Life (Years) Appendix C - Pavement Condition 4

38 LEGEND Inset Map PCI Hope Routes Good ( ) Satisfactory (70-85) Fair (55-70) Poor (40-55) Very Poor (25-40) Serious (10-25) Failed (0-10) HUNTER CREEK RD ROSS RD K ST UNION BAR RD HAIG STATION RD WARDLE ST W:\Projects\VAN\83438\PAVE03041\GIS\Figures\Hope_PMS_Figure_C1_PCI_R0.mxd modified 11/1/2016 by york.law Please see Inset Map YALE RD AIRPORT RD SILVER SKAGIT RD TOM BERRY RD LANDSTROM RD FLOOD HOPE RD 6TH AVE TH AVE OTHELLO RD JASON RD NOTES Base data source: ESRI Basemaps, 2016 PROJECTION UTM ZONE 10 FILE NO. Hope_PMS_Figure_C1_PCI_R0.mxd PROJECT NO. TRN.PAVE OFFICE Tt EBA-VANC Map Extent DWN YL DATE November, 2016 DATUM NAD83 CKD APVD REV MEZ AR 0 STATUS ISSUED FOR USE DISTRICT OF HOPE 2016 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN 2016 PCI Condition Scale: 1:40, Kilometres CLIENT District of Hope Figure C1

39 LEGEND Inset Map Hope Routes ACA Index Range (%) Very Good (0-1) Good (1-5) Fair (5-10) Poor (10-30) Very Poor (30-100) HUNTER CREEK RD ROSS RD K ST UNION BAR RD HAIG STATION RD WARDLE ST W:\Projects\VAN\83438\PAVE03041\GIS\Figures\Hope_PMS_Figure_C2_ACA_R0.mxd modified 11/1/2016 by york.law Please see Inset Map YALE RD AIRPORT RD SILVER SKAGIT RD TOM BERRY RD LANDSTROM RD FLOOD HOPE RD 6TH AVE TH AVE OTHELLO RD JASON RD NOTES Base data source: ESRI Basemaps, 2016 PROJECTION UTM ZONE 10 FILE NO. Hope_PMS_Figure_C2_ACA_R0.mxd PROJECT NO. TRN.PAVE OFFICE Tt EBA-VANC Map Extent DWN YL DATE November, 2016 DATUM NAD83 CKD APVD REV MEZ AR 0 STATUS ISSUED FOR USE DISTRICT OF HOPE 2016 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN 2016 ACA Condition Scale: 1:40, Kilometres CLIENT District of Hope Figure C2

40 LEGEND Inset Map Hope Routes IRI Index Range (mm/m) Very Good (<1.9) Good ( ) Fair ( ) Poor ( ) Very Poor (>5.4) HUNTER CREEK RD ROSS RD K ST UNION BAR RD HAIG STATION RD WARDLE ST W:\Projects\VAN\83438\PAVE03041\GIS\Figures\Hope_PMS_Figure_C3_IRI_R0.mxd modified 11/1/2016 by york.law Please see Inset Map YALE RD AIRPORT RD SILVER SKAGIT RD TOM BERRY RD LANDSTROM RD FLOOD HOPE RD 6TH AVE TH AVE OTHELLO RD JASON RD NOTES Base data source: ESRI Basemaps, 2016 PROJECTION UTM ZONE 10 FILE NO. Hope_PMS_Figure_C3_IRI_R0.mxd PROJECT NO. TRN.PAVE OFFICE Tt EBA-VANC Map Extent DWN YL DATE November, 2016 DATUM NAD83 CKD APVD REV MEZ AR 0 STATUS ISSUED FOR USE DISTRICT OF HOPE 2016 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN 2016 IRI Condition (Collector Roads) Scale: 1:40, Kilometres CLIENT District of Hope Figure C3

41 LEGEND Inset Map Hope Routes RUT (mm) Very Good (<3) Good (3-6) Fair (6-12) Poor (12-25) Very Poor (> 25) HUNTER CREEK RD ROSS RD K ST UNION BAR RD HAIG STATION RD WARDLE ST W:\Projects\VAN\83438\PAVE03041\GIS\Figures\Hope_PMS_Figure_C4_RUT_R0.mxd modified 11/1/2016 by york.law Please see Inset Map YALE RD AIRPORT RD SILVER SKAGIT RD TOM BERRY RD LANDSTROM RD FLOOD HOPE RD 6TH AVE TH AVE OTHELLO RD JASON RD NOTES Base data source: ESRI Basemaps, 2016 PROJECTION UTM ZONE 10 FILE NO. Hope_PMS_Figure_C4_RUT_R0.mxd PROJECT NO. TRN.PAVE OFFICE Tt EBA-VANC Map Extent DWN YL DATE November, 2016 DATUM NAD83 CKD APVD REV MEZ AR 0 STATUS ISSUED FOR USE DISTRICT OF HOPE 2016 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN 2016 RUT Condition (Collector Roads) Scale: 1:40, Kilometres CLIENT District of Hope Figure C4

42 APPENDIX D REHABILITATION PROGRAM 10 Year Rehabilitation Program Spreadsheet GIS Map 10 Year Paving Program

43 - APPENDIX D FILE: TRN.PAVE NOVEMBER 2016 ISSUED FOR USE Appendix D - Ten Year Rehabilitation Program $700,000 per year Road From From_Description To To_Description Width (m) Class Year Treatment Cost 3RD AVE 0 Southeast End 28 TURNER ST 13.0 COL 2022 Reconstruct_Travel_Lane $17,423 3RD AVE 28 TURNER ST 135 RAAB ST 13.0 COL 2020 Reconstruct_Travel_Lane $67,458 3RD AVE 135 RAAB ST 333 ODD ST 11.5 COL 3RD AVE 333 ODD ST 398 HUDSON BAY ST 16.0 COL 3RD AVE 398 HUDSON BAY ST 490 FORT ST 18.0 COL 2023 Reconstruct $107,640 3RD AVE 490 FORT ST 587 WALLACE ST 18.0 COL 2017 Mill_50 $46,424 3RD AVE 587 WALLACE ST 684 COMMISSION ST 18.0 LOC 3RD AVE 684 COMMISSION ST 782 PARK ST 14.0 LOC 3RD AVE 782 PARK ST 879 DOUGLAS ST 7.0 LOC 3RD AVE 879 DOUGLAS ST 974 QUEEN ST 7.0 LOC 3RD AVE 974 QUEEN ST 1078 COQUIHALLA ST 7.0 LOC 3RD AVE 1078 COQUIHALLA ST 1198 KING ST 7.0 LOC 3RD AVE 1198 KING ST 1389 HOPE ST 7.0 LOC 3RD AVE 1389 HOPE ST TH AVE / STUART ST 7.0 LOC 4TH AVE 0 Southeast End 170 CORBETT ST 6.0 LOC 4TH AVE 170 CORBETT ST 246 RAAB ST 6.0 LOC 4TH AVE 247 Southeast End 315 HUDSON BAY ST 6.0 LOC 4TH AVE 315 HUDSON BAY ST 410 FORT ST 12.2 LOC 4TH AVE 410 FORT ST 506 WALLACE ST 18.0 LOC 2023 Reconstruct_Travel_Lane $87,780 4TH AVE 506 WALLACE ST 699 PARK ST 18.0 LOC 2021 Full_Mill $121,590 4TH AVE 699 PARK ST 896 QUEEN ST 12.0 LOC 4TH AVE 896 QUEEN ST 996 COQUIHALLA ST 10.0 LOC 2023 Full_Mill $35,000 4TH AVE 996 COQUIHALLA ST 1118 KING ST 7.0 LOC 4TH AVE 1118 KING ST 1247 HOPE ST 6.0 LOC 2017 Mill_50 $17,179 4TH AVE 1247 HOPE ST RD AVE / STUART ST 6.0 LOC 2021 Mill_50 $26,560 4TH AVE RD AVE / STUART ST 1585 RUPERT ST / WARDLE ST 6.0 LOC 5TH AVE 0 STUART ST / YALE ST 166 KING ST 9.8 LOC 2024 Reconstruct $105,531 5TH AVE 166 KING ST 288 COQUIHALLA ST 12.0 LOC 5TH AVE 288 COQUIHALLA ST 380 QUEEN ST 12.0 LOC 2024 Reconstruct $71,760 5TH AVE 380 QUEEN ST 400 QUEEN ST 12.0 LOC 2019 Full_Mill $8,400 5TH AVE 400 QUEEN ST 480 DOUGLAS ST 12.0 LOC 2024 Mill_50 $21,962 5TH AVE 480 DOUGLAS ST 582 PARK ST 12.0 LOC 2024 Reconstruct $79,560 5TH AVE 582 PARK ST 711 COMMISSION ST 14.0 LOC 5TH AVE 711 COMMISSION ST 774 WALLACE ST 14.0 LOC 5TH AVE 774 WALLACE ST 871 FORT ST 14.0 LOC 5TH AVE 871 FORT ST 885 FORT ST 7.0 LOC 5TH AVE 885 FORT ST 965 HUDSON BAY ST 7.0 LOC 5TH AVE 981 Northwest End 1184 RAAB ST 6.0 LOC 5TH AVE 1184 RAAB ST 1282 CORBETT ST 6.0 LOC 5TH AVE 1282 CORBETT ST 1391 Southeast End 7.0 LOC 6TH AVE 0 Southeast End 390 CORBETT ST / KAWKAWA LAKE RD 13.7 COL 6TH AVE 390 CORBETT ST / KAWKAWA LAKE RD 487 RAAB ST 13.0 COL 2018 Reconstruct $81,965 6TH AVE 487 RAAB ST 751 HUDSON BAY ST 10.0 COL 2017 Reconstruct $171,600 6TH AVE 751 HUDSON BAY ST 880 FORT ST 10.7 COL 6TH AVE 880 FORT ST 990 WALLACE ST 14.0 COL 2018 Reconstruct $100,100 6TH AVE 990 WALLACE ST 1049 COMMISSION ST 14.0 COL 2017 Mill_50 $18,430 6TH AVE 1049 COMMISSION ST 1086 COMMISSION ST 14.0 COL 2025 Mill_50 $13,094 6TH AVE 1086 COMMISSION ST 1183 PARK ST 14.0 COL 2023 Mill_50 $33,144 6TH AVE 1183 PARK ST 1280 DOUGLAS ST 14.0 COL 2019 Reconstruct $88,270 6TH AVE 1280 DOUGLAS ST 1330 DOUGLAS ST 14.0 COL 2019 Reconstruct $45,500 6TH AVE 1330 DOUGLAS ST 1365 QUEEN ST 14.0 COL 2022 Reconstruct $31,850 6TH AVE 1365 QUEEN ST 1473 COQUIHALLA ST 14.0 COL 2023 Reconstruct $98,280 6TH AVE 1473 COQUIHALLA ST 1588 KING ST 14.0 LOC 2025 Reconstruct $104,650 6TH AVE 1588 KING ST 1666 RUPERT ST 9.0 LOC 2017 Full_Mill $24,570 6TH AVE 1666 RUPERT ST 1759 DEWDNEY AVE / THACKER AVE 9.0 LOC 2018 Full_Mill $29,295 7TH AVE 0 WARDLE ST 74 HAZEL ST 6.0 LOC 7TH AVE 74 HAZEL ST 159 WILLOW ST 6.0 LOC 7TH AVE 159 WILLOW ST 257 MAPLE ST 6.0 LOC 7TH AVE 257 MAPLE ST 360 YALE ST 6.0 LOC 7TH AVE 360 YALE ST 679 THACKER AVE 6.0 LOC 7TH AVE 680 COQUIHALLA ST 750 GOLF COURSE RD 8.0 LOC 7TH AVE 750 GOLF COURSE RD 799 DOUGLAS ST 9.0 LOC 2020 OL_50 $8,456 7TH AVE 799 DOUGLAS ST 944 PARK ST 9.0 LOC 7TH AVE 944 PARK ST 1113 OGILVIE RD 11.0 LOC 7TH AVE 1113 OGILVIE RD 1141 WALLACE ST 11.0 LOC 2022 Reclaim $13,860 7TH AVE 1142 RIVER PARADE 1222 FORT ST 7.0 LOC 7TH AVE 1222 FORT ST 1338 HUDSON BAY ST 8.0 LOC 7TH AVE 1339 Northwest End 1475 KAWKAWA LAKE RD 6.0 LOC 7TH AVE 1475 KAWKAWA LAKE RD 2014 Southeast End 8.6 LOC 2016 Full_Mill ACACIA DR 0 South End 84 MOUNTAIN ASH DR 8.0 LOC ACACIA DR 84 MOUNTAIN ASH DR 231 DOGWOOD DR 8.0 LOC ACACIA DR 231 DOGWOOD DR 320 GORDON DR 8.0 LOC ACACIA DR 320 GORDON DR 419 KAWKAWA LAKE RD 8.0 LOC AIRPORT RD 0 YALE RD 261 DELAIR RD 6.0 LOC AIRPORT RD 261 DELAIR RD 1819 BRISTOL SLOUGH RD 6.0 LOC AIRPORT RD 1819 BRISTOL SLOUGH RD 2298 YALE RD 6.0 LOC ALLISON AVE 0 WARDLE ST 81 HAZEL ST 7.0 LOC ALLISON AVE 81 HAZEL ST 175 WILLOW ST 7.0 LOC ALLISON AVE 175 WILLOW ST 210 WILLOW ST 7.0 LOC 2026 Reclaim $11,025 ALLISON AVE 210 WILLOW ST 279 MAPLE ST 7.0 LOC ALLISON AVE 279 MAPLE ST 392 YALE ST 7.0 LOC ALLISON AVE 392 YALE ST 546 Southeast End 6.0 LOC ANSON PL 0 South End 93 BIRCHTREES DR / LILA PL 7.0 LOC ARSENEAU RD 0 South End 89 ROSS RD 5.0 LOC BAILEY CRES 0 OLD YALE RD 241 OLD YALE RD / PETER ST 7.0 LOC BEACON RD 0 FLOOD HOPE RD / OWL RD 283 SCHOOL RD 6.8 LOC BEACON RD 283 SCHOOL RD 546 EDWARDS DR 8.0 LOC BEACON RD 546 EDWARDS DR 703 Northwest End 7.0 LOC BEECH AVE 0 West End 60 SILVERVIEW RD 7.0 LOC BEECH AVE 60 SILVERVIEW RD 144 CYPRESS ST 7.0 LOC BIRCH PL 0 GLENAIRE DR 106 West End 7.0 LOC BIRCH PL 313 BIRCH ST 375 Northwest End 8.0 LOC BIRCH ST 0 BIRCH PL 46 ROSEWOOD AVE 6.0 LOC 2018 OL_50 $5,454 BIRCH ST 46 ROSEWOOD AVE 143 HEATHER AVE 6.0 LOC BIRCHTREES DR 0 West End 14 MOUNT HOPE RD 7.0 LOC BIRCHTREES DR 14 MOUNT HOPE RD 134 ANSON PL / LILA PL 7.0 LOC BIRCHTREES DR 134 ANSON PL / LILA PL 310 Southeast End 7.0 LOC BRISTOL SLOUGH RD 0 AIRPORT RD 310 North End 6.0 LOC CARIBOO AVE 0 South End 33 HOPE ST 7.0 LOC CARIBOO AVE 33 HOPE ST 399 RUPERT ST 6.3 LOC COMMISSION ST 0 Southwest End 101 FRASER AVE 18.0 LOC 2019 Reconstruct_Travel_Lane $89,497 COMMISSION ST 101 FRASER AVE 205 3RD AVE 18.0 LOC 2020 Mill_50 $54,112 COMMISSION ST 206 5TH AVE 444 6TH AVE 7.0 LOC COMMISSION ST 445 6TH AVE 546 Northeast End 5.0 LOC COQUIHALLA ST 0 WATER AVE 91 FRASER AVE 12.0 COL COQUIHALLA ST 91 FRASER AVE 195 3RD AVE 12.0 COL 2022 Reconstruct $81,120 COQUIHALLA ST 195 3RD AVE 291 HEMLOCK AVE 12.0 COL 2020 Reconstruct $74,880 COQUIHALLA ST 291 HEMLOCK AVE 383 4TH AVE 12.0 COL 2026 Reconstruct $71,760 COQUIHALLA ST 383 4TH AVE 516 5TH AVE 12.0 COL 2022 Reconstruct $103,740 COQUIHALLA ST 516 5TH AVE 661 SKAGIT AVE 12.0 COL 2025 Reconstruct $113,100 COQUIHALLA ST 661 SKAGIT AVE 754 6TH AVE 12.0 COL Appendix D - Rehab Program 1

44 - APPENDIX D FILE: TRN.PAVE NOVEMBER 2016 ISSUED FOR USE Appendix D - Ten Year Rehabilitation Program $700,000 per year Road From From_Description To To_Description Width (m) Class Year Treatment Cost COQUIHALLA ST 754 6TH AVE 979 7TH AVE 10.0 LOC COQUIHALLA ST 979 7TH AVE 1057 THACKER AVE 7.0 LOC CORBETT ST 0 4TH AVE 131 5TH AVE 7.0 LOC CORBETT ST 131 5TH AVE 372 6TH AVE / KAWKAWA LAKE RD 8.4 LOC CYPRESS ST 0 South End 135 WALNUT DR 8.0 LOC CYPRESS ST 135 WALNUT DR 266 BEECH AVE 8.0 LOC DEWDNEY AVE 0 6TH AVE / THACKER AVE 245 YALE ST 7.0 LOC DOGWOOD DR 0 GREENWOOD DR 170 ACACIA DR 9.3 LOC DOUGLAS ST 0 Southwest End 97 FRASER AVE 8.0 LOC DOUGLAS ST 97 FRASER AVE 201 3RD AVE 6.0 LOC DOUGLAS ST 202 5TH AVE 439 6TH AVE 8.0 LOC DOUGLAS ST 440 6TH AVE 661 7TH AVE 6.0 LOC EDWARDS DR 0 BEACON RD 141 East End 10.0 LOC ELDER RD 0 YALE RD 343 East End 6.0 LOC ESTELL RD 0 East End 222 FLOOD HOPE RD 9.4 LOC 2025 Reclaim $93,690 FERRY LANDING PL 0 Northwest End 147 WARDLE ST 10.0 LOC FISH CAMP RD 0 OTHELLO RD 111 East End 5.0 LOC FLOOD HOPE RD 0 West End 129 FLOOD RD OVERPASS 16.0 COL 2026 OL_50 $46,870 FLOOD HOPE RD 129 FLOOD RD OVERPASS 362 ESTELL RD 16.0 COL 2021 OL_50 $90,576 FLOOD HOPE RD 362 ESTELL RD 804 FLOODS RD 13.0 COL 2021 OL_50 $138,825 FLOOD HOPE RD 804 FLOODS RD 2918 TOBINA RD 13.0 COL FLOOD HOPE RD 2918 TOBINA RD 3735 YALE RD 12.0 COL FLOOD HOPE RD 3748 SILVER SKAGIT RD 4125 BIRCH PL 9.0 COL FLOOD HOPE RD 4125 BIRCH PL 4221 SILVERHOPE RD / SILVERVIEW RD 9.0 COL FLOOD HOPE RD 4221 SILVERHOPE RD / SILVERVIEW RD 4332 MARIE ST 14.0 COL FLOOD HOPE RD 4332 MARIE ST 4395 PETER ST 13.0 COL FLOOD HOPE RD 4395 PETER ST 4484 SCHOOL RD 13.0 COL FLOOD HOPE RD 4484 SCHOOL RD 4603 BEACON RD / OWL RD 13.0 COL FLOOD HOPE RD 4603 BEACON RD / OWL RD 4823 OLD YALE RD 14.0 COL 2026 OL_50 $60,290 FLOOD HOPE RD 4823 OLD YALE RD 4862 HOCKIN RD 14.0 COL FLOOD HOPE RD 4862 HOCKIN RD 6348 Northeast End 14.0 COL FLOODS RD 0 South End 400 FLOOD HOPE RD 5.0 LOC FLOODS RD 400 FLOOD HOPE RD 565 YALE RD 8.0 LOC FORREST CRES 0 West End 111 GLENAIRE DR 7.0 LOC FORREST CRES 111 GLENAIRE DR 381 Southeast End 8.8 LOC FORT ST 0 Southwest End 101 FRASER AVE 14.0 LOC FORT ST 101 FRASER AVE 203 3RD AVE 14.0 LOC FORT ST 203 3RD AVE 389 4TH AVE 14.0 LOC FORT ST 389 4TH AVE 521 5TH AVE 7.0 LOC FORT ST 522 5TH AVE 760 6TH AVE 7.0 LOC FORT ST 761 HUDSON BAY ST TH AVE 6.4 LOC FOSTER RD 0 Northwest End 96 SILVERHOPE RD 4.0 LOC FRASER AVE 0 LINCOLN TERR 212 HUDSON BAY ST 7.0 LOC FRASER AVE 212 HUDSON BAY ST 305 FORT ST 24.0 LOC FRASER AVE 305 FORT ST 401 WALLACE ST 24.0 LOC 2019 Full_Mill $80,640 FRASER AVE 401 WALLACE ST 498 COMMISSION ST 24.0 LOC 2017 Full_Mill $81,480 FRASER AVE 498 COMMISSION ST 597 PARK ST 17.0 LOC 2020 Reconstruct_Travel_Lane $80,527 FRASER AVE 597 PARK ST 693 DOUGLAS ST 7.0 LOC 2019 OL_50 $12,785 FRASER AVE 693 DOUGLAS ST 790 QUEEN ST 7.0 LOC 2026 Reclaim $30,555 FRASER AVE 790 QUEEN ST 891 COQUIHALLA ST 8.0 LOC 2019 Reclaim $36,360 FRASER AVE 891 COQUIHALLA ST 1013 KING ST 7.0 LOC 2019 Reclaim $38,430 FRASER AVE 1013 KING ST 1100 Northwest End 11.0 LOC GAGNON PL 0 West End 81 SILVERHOPE RD 6.0 LOC GARDNER DR 0 West End 54 MOUNT HOPE RD 7.0 LOC GARDNER DR 54 MOUNT HOPE RD 476 Southeast End 7.0 LOC GLENAIRE DR 0 FORREST CRES 111 BIRCH PL 11.0 LOC GLENAIRE DR 111 BIRCH PL 169 Northwest End 11.0 LOC GOLF COURSE RD 0 7TH AVE 398 Northeast End 4.4 LOC GORDON DR 0 GREENWOOD DR 200 ACACIA DR 10.0 LOC GREENWOOD DR 0 Southeast End 107 DOGWOOD DR 10.5 LOC GREENWOOD DR 107 DOGWOOD DR 215 GORDON DR 11.0 LOC GREENWOOD DR 215 GORDON DR 256 SKYLARK DR 11.0 LOC GREENWOOD DR 256 SKYLARK DR 311 KAWKAWA LAKE RD 11.0 LOC HAIG STATION RD 0 LANDSTROM RD 1322 Northeast End 4.3 LOC HAZEL ST 0 ALLISON AVE 317 7TH AVE 6.0 LOC HEATHER AVE 0 BIRCH ST 190 SILVERVIEW RD 6.0 LOC HEMLOCK AVE 0 Southeast End 135 QUEEN ST 6.0 LOC HEMLOCK AVE 135 QUEEN ST 237 COQUIHALLA ST 6.0 LOC HEMLOCK AVE 237 COQUIHALLA ST 359 KING ST 6.0 LOC HEMLOCK AVE 359 KING ST 514 HOPE ST 6.0 LOC HOCKIN RD 0 FLOOD HOPE RD 153 North End 6.0 LOC HOPE ST 0 CARIBOO AVE 77 3RD AVE 7.0 LOC HOPE ST 77 3RD AVE 162 HEMLOCK AVE 7.0 LOC HOPE ST 162 HEMLOCK AVE 234 4TH AVE 7.0 LOC HUDSON BAY ST 0 Southwest End 32 WATER AVE 14.0 LOC HUDSON BAY ST 32 WATER AVE 104 FRASER AVE 14.0 LOC 2024 Mill_50 $23,061 HUDSON BAY ST 104 FRASER AVE 207 3RD AVE 12.0 LOC HUDSON BAY ST 207 3RD AVE 302 ODD ST 7.0 LOC HUDSON BAY ST 302 ODD ST 392 4TH AVE 7.0 LOC HUDSON BAY ST 392 4TH AVE 525 5TH AVE 7.0 LOC HUDSON BAY ST 526 6TH AVE 582 FORT ST 7.0 LOC 2020 Reclaim $17,640 HUDSON BAY ST 582 FORT ST 746 7TH AVE 7.0 LOC HUMPHRYS RD 0 West End 138 SILVERHOPE RD 6.0 LOC JASON RD 0 OTHELLO RD 532 East End 5.1 LOC JOHNSON RD 0 KAWKAWA LAKE RD 434 East End 5.0 LOC KAWKAWA LAKE RD 0 6TH AVE / CORBETT ST 232 7TH AVE 16.0 LOC KAWKAWA LAKE RD 232 7TH AVE 806 UNION BAR RD 9.0 LOC KAWKAWA LAKE RD 806 UNION BAR RD 1050 SWALLOW PL 10.6 LOC KAWKAWA LAKE RD 1050 SWALLOW PL 1166 GREENWOOD DR 10.0 LOC 2018 Reclaim $52,200 KAWKAWA LAKE RD 1166 GREENWOOD DR 1379 ACACIA DR 10.2 LOC 2017 Reclaim $98,055 KAWKAWA LAKE RD 1379 ACACIA DR 1504 DR FROST RD / MOUNT HOPE RD 10.0 LOC 2018 Reclaim $56,250 KAWKAWA LAKE RD 1504 DR FROST RD / MOUNT HOPE RD 1773 KETTLE VALLEY RD 10.0 LOC 2018 Reclaim $121,050 KAWKAWA LAKE RD 1773 KETTLE VALLEY RD 2059 LAKEVIEW CRES 10.0 LOC 2022 Reclaim $128,700 KAWKAWA LAKE RD 2059 LAKEVIEW CRES 2217 LAKE COUNTRY DR 10.0 LOC KAWKAWA LAKE RD 2217 LAKE COUNTRY DR 2327 EMERALD RD 10.0 LOC KAWKAWA LAKE RD 2327 EMERALD RD 2403 LAKEVIEW CRES 10.0 LOC KAWKAWA LAKE RD 2403 LAKEVIEW CRES 2806 OTHELLO RD 7.0 LOC KAWKAWA LAKE RD 2806 OTHELLO RD 2848 OTHELLO RD LOC KAWKAWA LAKE RD 2848 OTHELLO RD SUMMER RD 7.0 LOC 2020 Reclaim $104,265 KAWKAWA LAKE RD 3179 SUMMER RD 3260 STEPHENS RD 7.0 LOC 2019 Reclaim $25,515 KAWKAWA LAKE RD 3260 STEPHENS RD 3388 KAW RD 4.0 LOC 2024 Reclaim $23,040 KAWKAWA LAKE RD 3388 KAW RD 3535 KERELUK RD 4.0 LOC KAWKAWA LAKE RD 3535 KERELUK RD 3732 JOHNSON RD 3.0 LOC KAWKAWA LAKE RD 3732 JOHNSON RD 4178 West End 4.0 LOC KERELUK RD 0 KAWKAWA LAKE RD 456 East End 6.0 LOC KETTLE VALLEY RD 0 Southeast End 876 KAWKAWA LAKE RD 6.5 LOC KETTLE VALLEY RD 876 KAWKAWA LAKE RD 1331 KETTLE VALLEY PL 6.0 LOC KING ST 0 Southwest End 46 FRASER AVE 7.0 LOC KING ST 46 FRASER AVE 148 3RD AVE 7.0 LOC KING ST 148 3RD AVE 241 HEMLOCK AVE 7.0 LOC KING ST 241 HEMLOCK AVE 334 4TH AVE 7.0 LOC Appendix D - Rehab Program 2

45 - APPENDIX D FILE: TRN.PAVE NOVEMBER 2016 ISSUED FOR USE Appendix D - Ten Year Rehabilitation Program $700,000 per year Road From From_Description To To_Description Width (m) Class Year Treatment Cost KING ST 334 4TH AVE 468 5TH AVE 6.1 LOC KING ST 468 5TH AVE 674 STUART ST 7.0 LOC KING ST 674 STUART ST 710 6TH AVE 7.0 LOC KLASSEN RD 0 TOBINA RD 192 STARRET RD 7.0 LOC LAKEVIEW CRES 0 KAWKAWA LAKE RD 162 OGILVIEW DR 6.0 LOC LAKEVIEW CRES 162 OGILVIEW DR 261 PARK AVE 6.0 LOC LAKEVIEW CRES 261 PARK AVE 338 COTTONWOOD DR 6.0 LOC LAKEVIEW CRES 338 COTTONWOOD DR 442 MOUNTAINVIEW CRES 6.0 LOC LAKEVIEW CRES 442 MOUNTAINVIEW CRES 934 PARK AVE 6.0 LOC LAKEVIEW CRES 934 PARK AVE 961 KAWKAWA LAKE ACCESS 6.0 LOC LAKEVIEW CRES 961 KAWKAWA LAKE ACCESS 1148 KAWKAWA LAKE RD 6.0 LOC LANDERS RD 0 West End 84 LANDSTROM RD 6.0 LOC LANDSTROM RD 0 Northwest End 411 CROFT RD 6.0 LOC LANDSTROM RD 411 CROFT RD 1047 LAUZON RD 6.0 LOC LANDSTROM RD 1047 LAUZON RD 1305 LANDERS RD 6.0 LOC LANDSTROM RD 1305 LANDERS RD 1510 HAIG STATION RD 6.0 LOC MALLARD DR 0 RICHMOND DR 145 Southeast End 7.0 LOC MAPLE ST 0 ALLISON AVE 242 7TH AVE 6.0 LOC MARIE ST 0 OLD YALE RD 275 YVONNE AVE 7.0 LOC MARIE ST 275 YVONNE AVE 434 FLOOD HOPE RD 7.0 LOC MOUNT HOPE RD 0 GARDNER DR 263 BIRCHTREES DR 7.0 LOC MOUNT HOPE RD 263 BIRCHTREES DR 356 DR FROST RD / KAWKAWA LAKE RD 7.0 LOC MOUNTAINVIEW CRES 0 PARK AVE 248 LAKEVIEW CRES 6.0 LOC NELSON AVE 0 Southeast End 175 RAAB ST 7.0 LOC NELSON AVE 175 RAAB ST 222 RAAB ST 7.0 LOC ODD ST 0 3RD AVE 164 HUDSON BAY ST 6.0 LOC OGILVIE RD 0 West End 155 7TH AVE 6.0 LOC OGILVIEW DR 0 West End 51 LAKEVIEW CRES 7.0 LOC 2021 OL_50 $7,922 OGILVIEW DR 51 LAKEVIEW CRES 118 ALDER PL 7.0 LOC OLD YALE RD 0 West End 156 SILVERHOPE RD 6.4 LOC OLD YALE RD 156 SILVERHOPE RD 362 MARIE ST 7.0 LOC OLD YALE RD 362 MARIE ST 392 TUM TUM RD 7.0 LOC OLD YALE RD 392 TUM TUM RD 502 BAILEY CRES 7.0 LOC OLD YALE RD 502 BAILEY CRES 618 BAILEY CRES / PETER ST 7.0 LOC OLD YALE RD 618 BAILEY CRES / PETER ST 889 OWL RD 7.0 LOC OLD YALE RD 889 OWL RD 1133 FLOOD HOPE RD 6.6 LOC OLSON AVE 0 Southeast End 150 PARK ST 10.0 LOC OTHELLO RD 0 Southeast End 60 FISH CAMP RD 7.0 LOC 2024 Reclaim $18,900 OTHELLO RD 60 FISH CAMP RD 700 JASON RD 7.0 LOC OTHELLO RD 700 JASON RD 3028 OTHELLO RD LOC OTHELLO RD 3028 OTHELLO RD KAWKAWA LAKE RD 6.0 LOC OWL RD 0 OLD YALE RD 78 BEACON RD / FLOOD HOPE RD 7.0 LOC PARK AVE 110 LAKEVIEW CRES 257 MOUNTAINVIEW CRES 6.0 LOC PARK AVE 257 MOUNTAINVIEW CRES 374 LAKEVIEW CRES 6.0 LOC PARK ST 0 Southwest End 98 FRASER AVE 19.0 LOC PARK ST 98 FRASER AVE 204 3RD AVE 11.0 LOC PARK ST 204 3RD AVE 388 4TH AVE 12.0 LOC PARK ST 388 4TH AVE 521 5TH AVE 19.0 LOC PARK ST 521 5TH AVE 759 6TH AVE 16.0 LOC PARK ST 759 6TH AVE 982 7TH AVE 12.0 LOC PARK ST 982 7TH AVE 1076 OLSON AVE 13.0 LOC PETER ST 0 BAILEY CRES / OLD YALE RD 99 YVONNE AVE 7.0 LOC PETER ST 99 YVONNE AVE 231 FLOOD HOPE RD 7.0 LOC QUEEN ST 0 Southwest End 92 FRASER AVE 6.0 LOC QUEEN ST 92 FRASER AVE 199 3RD AVE 6.0 LOC QUEEN ST 199 3RD AVE 295 HEMLOCK AVE 6.0 LOC QUEEN ST 295 HEMLOCK AVE 386 4TH AVE 6.9 LOC QUEEN ST 386 4TH AVE 517 5TH AVE 6.0 LOC QUEEN ST 518 5TH AVE 665 SKAGIT AVE 8.0 LOC QUEEN ST 665 SKAGIT AVE 756 6TH AVE 10.0 LOC RAAB ST 0 3RD AVE 93 NELSON AVE 7.0 LOC RAAB ST 94 NELSON AVE 187 4TH AVE 8.0 LOC RAAB ST 188 5TH AVE 429 6TH AVE 7.0 LOC RICHMOND DR 0 MALLARD DR 73 PARSONS AVE 7.0 LOC RICHMOND DR 73 PARSONS AVE 281 North End 7.0 LOC RIVER PARADE 0 7TH AVE 410 East End 7.0 LOC RIVERVIEW DR 0 South End 252 SKYLARK DR 10.0 LOC ROBERTSON CRES 0 Southwest End 722 West End 6.2 LOC ROSEWOOD AVE 0 BIRCH ST 236 SILVERVIEW RD 6.0 LOC ROSS RD 674 ROSS RD ARSENEAU RD 7.0 LOC ROSS RD 2174 ARSENEAU RD 2504 Northeast End 5.7 LOC RUPERT ST 65 WATER AVE 164 CARIBOO AVE 7.0 LOC RUPERT ST 164 CARIBOO AVE 211 4TH AVE / WARDLE ST 7.0 LOC RUPERT ST 211 4TH AVE / WARDLE ST 361 WILLOW ST 7.0 LOC RUPERT ST 361 WILLOW ST 572 YALE ST 6.0 LOC 2016 Reconstruct RUPERT ST 572 YALE ST 806 6TH AVE 6.0 LOC RYDER ST 0 South End 111 SCOTT DR 9.2 LOC RYDER ST 111 SCOTT DR 266 Northwest End 7.0 LOC SCHOOL RD 0 FLOOD HOPE RD 364 BEACON RD 7.0 LOC SCOTT DR 0 RYDER ST 85 East End 10.0 LOC SILVER SKAGIT RD 0 South End 1455 FLOOD HOPE RD 6.1 LOC SILVERHOPE RD 0 Southwest End 217 HUMPHRYS RD 6.0 LOC SILVERHOPE RD 217 HUMPHRYS RD 742 UPLANDS DR 6.0 LOC SILVERHOPE RD 742 UPLANDS DR 878 OLD YALE RD 6.0 LOC SILVERHOPE RD 878 OLD YALE RD 941 GAGNON PL 6.0 LOC SILVERHOPE RD 941 GAGNON PL 998 FOSTER RD 6.0 LOC SILVERHOPE RD 998 FOSTER RD 1480 FLOOD HOPE RD / SILVERVIEW RD 6.0 LOC SILVERVIEW RD 0 FLOOD HOPE RD / SILVERHOPE RD 115 ROSEWOOD AVE 6.0 LOC SILVERVIEW RD 115 ROSEWOOD AVE 212 HEATHER AVE 6.0 LOC SILVERVIEW RD 212 HEATHER AVE 317 WALNUT DR 7.0 LOC SILVERVIEW RD 317 WALNUT DR 438 BEECH AVE 7.0 LOC SKAGIT AVE 0 QUEEN ST 109 COQUIHALLA ST 6.0 LOC SKYLARK DR 0 West End 32 RIVERVIEW DR 10.0 LOC 2026 OL_50 $5,993 SKYLARK DR 32 RIVERVIEW DR 146 SWALLOW PL 10.0 LOC SKYLARK DR 146 SWALLOW PL 261 GREENWOOD DR 10.0 LOC STARRET RD 0 KLASSEN RD 425 YALE RD 7.0 LOC STEPHENS RD 0 KAWKAWA LAKE RD 469 East End 6.0 LOC STUART ST 0 3RD AVE / 4TH AVE 260 5TH AVE / YALE ST 10.0 LOC STUART ST 260 5TH AVE / YALE ST 477 KING ST 10.0 LOC SUMMER RD 0 KAWKAWA LAKE RD 470 East End 6.0 LOC SWALLOW PL 0 South End 224 SKYLARK DR 10.0 LOC SWALLOW PL 224 SKYLARK DR 277 KAWKAWA LAKE RD 10.0 LOC THACKER AVE 0 WARDLE ST 149 WILLOW ST 6.0 LOC THACKER AVE 150 WILLOW ST 360 YALE ST 7.0 LOC THACKER AVE 361 YALE ST 595 6TH AVE / DEWDNEY AVE 6.0 LOC THACKER AVE 595 6TH AVE / DEWDNEY AVE 684 7TH AVE 6.0 LOC THACKER AVE 684 7TH AVE 932 COQUIHALLA ST 6.0 LOC THACKER MOUNTAIN RD 0 South End 1234 PARSONS AVE 7.0 LOC THACKER MOUNTAIN RD 1234 PARSONS AVE 1649 UNION BAR RD 7.0 LOC TOBINA RD 146 KLASSEN RD 603 YALE RD 8.0 LOC TOM BERRY RD 0 YALE RD 1694 East End 6.2 LOC Appendix D - Rehab Program 3

46 - APPENDIX D FILE: TRN.PAVE NOVEMBER 2016 ISSUED FOR USE Appendix D - Ten Year Rehabilitation Program $700,000 per year Road From From_Description To To_Description Width (m) Class Year Treatment Cost TUM TUM RD 0 Southeast End 67 OLD YALE RD 6.0 LOC TURNER ST 0 West End 160 3RD AVE 7.0 LOC UNION BAR RD 0 Southeast End 34 KAWKAWA LAKE RD 7.0 LOC UNION BAR RD 34 KAWKAWA LAKE RD 279 THACKER MOUNTAIN RD 6.8 LOC UNION BAR RD 279 THACKER MOUNTAIN RD 2736 West End 6.0 LOC UPLANDS DR 0 SILVERHOPE RD 48 East End 8.0 LOC WALLACE ST 0 Southwest End 101 FRASER AVE 18.0 COL WALLACE ST 101 FRASER AVE 206 3RD AVE 18.0 COL WALLACE ST 206 3RD AVE 389 4TH AVE 18.0 COL WALLACE ST 389 4TH AVE 520 5TH AVE 18.0 COL 2026 Mill_50 $60,723 WALLACE ST 520 5TH AVE 760 6TH AVE 18.0 COL WALLACE ST 760 6TH AVE 978 7TH AVE 10.7 LOC WALNUT DR 0 West End 205 SILVERVIEW RD 8.0 LOC WALNUT DR 205 SILVERVIEW RD 288 CYPRESS ST 8.0 LOC WARDLE ST 0 4TH AVE / RUPERT ST 57 FERRY LANDING PL 7.0 LOC WARDLE ST 57 FERRY LANDING PL 157 THACKER AVE 7.0 LOC WARDLE ST 157 THACKER AVE 348 ALLISON AVE 7.0 LOC WARDLE ST 348 ALLISON AVE 693 7TH AVE 6.0 LOC WATER AVE 0 RUPERT ST 788 COQUIHALLA ST 6.7 LOC WATER AVE 789 HUDSON BAY ST 909 WATER AVE ACCESS 16.0 LOC WATER AVE 909 WATER AVE ACCESS 1034 South End 10.0 LOC WILLOW ST 0 RUPERT ST 115 THACKER AVE 6.0 LOC WILLOW ST 115 THACKER AVE 157 THACKER AVE 8.0 LOC WILLOW ST 157 THACKER AVE 277 ALLISON AVE 8.0 LOC WILLOW ST 278 ALLISON AVE 560 7TH AVE 6.0 LOC YALE RD 0 West End 1022 FLOODS RD 6.0 LOC YALE RD 1022 FLOODS RD 1223 AIRPORT RD 8.0 LOC YALE RD 1223 AIRPORT RD 3025 AIRPORT RD 8.0 LOC YALE RD 3025 AIRPORT RD 3648 TOM BERRY RD 7.1 LOC YALE RD 3648 TOM BERRY RD 3696 STARRET RD 8.0 LOC YALE RD 3696 STARRET RD 3795 TOBINA RD 8.0 LOC YALE RD 3795 TOBINA RD 3887 ELDER RD 8.0 LOC YALE RD 3887 ELDER RD 3920 Southeast End 8.0 LOC YALE RD 3921 North End 4126 FLOOD HOPE RD 6.0 LOC YALE ST 0 5TH AVE / STUART ST 100 RUPERT ST 7.0 LOC 2026 Reclaim $31,500 YALE ST 100 RUPERT ST 195 THACKER AVE 7.0 LOC YALE ST 195 THACKER AVE 219 THACKER AVE 7.0 LOC 2017 Reclaim $7,560 YALE ST 219 THACKER AVE 297 ALLISON AVE 7.0 LOC YALE ST 297 ALLISON AVE 409 DEWDNEY AVE 6.0 LOC YALE ST 409 DEWDNEY AVE 496 7TH AVE 7.0 LOC YVONNE AVE 0 MARIE ST 138 PETER ST 6.0 LOC Appendix D - Rehab Program 4

47 LEGEND Inset Map Hope Routes Treatment Type ( ) Full Mill Mill 50mm Overlay 50 mm Reclaim Reconstruct Reconstruct Travel Lane W:\Projects\VAN\83438\PAVE03041\GIS\Figures\Hope_PMS_Figure_D1_Treatment_Plan_R1.mxd modified 11/1/2016 by york.law Please see Inset Map NOTES Base data source: ESRI Basemaps, 2016 PROJECTION UTM ZONE 10 FILE NO. Hope_PMS_Figure_D1_Treatment_Plan_R1.mxd PROJECT NO. TRN.PAVE OFFICE Tt EBA-VANC Map Extent DWN YL DATE November, 2016 DATUM NAD83 CKD APVD REV MEZ AR 0 STATUS ISSUED FOR USE DISTRICT OF HOPE 2016 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN 10 Year Treatment Plan ( ) Scale: 1:40, Kilometres CLIENT District of Hope Figure D1