API Ballot Summary Sheet 10/12/2004

Transcription

1 Vote Results Voter Comments Affirmative Negative Abstain Did t Vote Nelson Acosta HMT Inspection Yes Joel Andreani Equity Engineering Group, Inc., The Robert Annett Alyeska Pipeline Ronald Bailey American Tank & Vessel, Inc Kelly Baker Interline Plastics, Ltd Mark Baker Baker Consulting Group, Inc. Yes Chris Bashor Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Ernie Blanchard IMC-Phosphates Dan Boley DJA Inspection Services Steve Caruthers Tank Consultants, Inc John Cornell 7127 Earl Crochet Kinder Morgan Domingo de Para ExxonMobil Jeffrey DeArmond BP p.l.c. Whiting Refinery Kenneth Erdmann Matrix Service David Flight Dow Chemical, The Laurence Foster Marathon Ashland Petroleum LLC John Fumbanks Pond and Inc Alan Geis Colonial Pipeline Ty Hagen Hagen Engineering International, Inc Marty Herlevic James Machine Works, Inc Randy Kissell TGB Partnership Yes Manfred Lengsfeld John Lieb Tank Industry Consultants, Inc Thomas Lorentz AEC Engineering, Inc Francis Maitland Quense LLC David Martin Conservatek Industries, Inc. 1

2 James McBride Petrex, Inc Tim McMullen Terasen Pipelines (USA) Inc Craig Meier ConocoPhillips Carl Mikkola Enbridge Energy Partners. L.P Douglas Miller Chicago Bridge Yes Bhana Mistry TIW Steel Platework John Mooney George Morovich TEMCOR Philip Myers ChevronTexaco Corporation David Nasab Kellogg Brown & Root John Oleyar HMT, Inc Richard Pinegar Cargill Inc Roy Ralph Petro-Canada Michael Richardson International Paper Yes Bruce Roberts Marilyn Shores Sunoco Logistics Larry Speaks Mass Technology Corporation Tearle Taylor Flint Hills Resources Donald Thain Shell Global Solutions (US) Inc Leith Watkins Explorer Pipeline Alan Watson A. R. Watson USA Richard Whipple Fluor, Inc. 2

3 Affirmative Negative Abstain Did t Vote Balloting Totals: Total Responses: Total Ballots: Response Rate : Approval Rate: Consensus: % 97% YES Must be > 50% Must be > 67% 3

4 API Template for Ballot Comments and Resolution Ballot ID: 545 Date: October 12, 2004 Document: Ballot 53-04: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) # Voter/ Commenter Section. (e.g. 3.1) Type of comment Comment (justification for change) Proposed Change Comment Resolution 1 Mark Baker Baker Consulting Group, Inc. 2 Douglas Miller Chicago Bridge 3 Douglas Miller Chicago Bridge 4 Douglas Miller Chicago Bridge 5 Douglas Miller Chicago Bridge Randy Kissell TGB Partnership Technical Technical Consideration should be given to allowing additional testing methodologies to section b. In the past, I have used tensile tests across the weld seam as a basis for determining the joint efficiency instead of radiography. Currently as written only radiography can be used to use a higher joint efficiency. When the original edition and addenda are unknown.what should be shown on the API 653 Recertification Nameplate? Should it be unknown or do we show the edition/addenda of API 653 that is being applied at the time that the Recertification Nameplate is produced? Probably we need a separate style for Recertification Nameplates with a new figure in API 653 to illustrate it, rather than trying to work with an API 650 new tank nameplate format. Technical Capitalize "Nameplate" I suggest Replacement Nameplate. In place of Replacement nameplate Technical Partial stress relief, and material information will be often unknown. Also we should encourage the reader to not leave blanks on the nameplate Nelson Acosta HMT Inspection Para John Schroeder Marathon Ashland Petroleum LLC Editorial a, b, and c under are unnecessary. The reference in to sections 4 and 5 is sufficient. The only thing these extra words adds is instructions on putting unknown in some blanks Editorial Change "...fabricated by, and erected by." to "fabricator, and erector". Paragraph Editorial Ref. in last sentence should read "API Std. 650" or delete "std." altogether. I suggest with the exception of year completed, manufacturer s serial number, fabricated by, erected by, partial stress relief, and material. These may be shown as unknown where applicable. In place of with the exception of year completed, manufacturers serial number, fabricated by, and erected by. Delete a, b, and c under Technical At the owners owners should be possessive..."owner's" NOTE Columns 1, 2, 4, 6 are compulsory. API electronic balloting commenting template/version Page 1 of 2

5 API Template for Ballot Comments and Resolution Ballot ID: 545 Date: October 12, 2004 Document: Ballot 53-04: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) # Voter/ Commenter Section. (e.g. 3.1) Type of comment Comment (justification for change) Proposed Change Comment Resolution 9 John Schroeder Marathon Ashland Petroleum LLC Paragraph Technical At the owners owners should be possessive case..."owner's" 10 Michael Richardson International Paper Proposal Technical What I am reading is that if I do not know the joint efficiency that I can either use the efficiency factors from API 653 Table 4-2 or perform a radiographic examination to establish a higher joint efficiency. I do not feel that allowing the owner to redo the joint efficiecy as established by the original code of construction or amount of radiograph performed at erection is a good practice. If used, am I to assume that the higher joint efficency radiographic examination will be interpreted to the original acceptance standard and repaired accordingly? NOTE Columns 1, 2, 4, 6 are compulsory. API electronic balloting commenting template/version Page 2 of 2