GE 113 REMOTE SENSING
|
|
- Madison Short
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 GE 113 REMOTE SENSING Topic 8. Image Classification and Accuracy Assessment Lecturer: Engr. Jojene R. Santillan Division of Geodetic Engineering College of Engineering and Information Technology Caraga State University
2 Outline Part 1. Image Classification Concepts What is image classification? Supervised vs. Unsupervised Classification The Different Stages of Supervised Image Classification Part 2. Different Types of Supervised and Unsupervised Image Classifiers Part 3. Image Classification Accuracy Assessment 2
3 Expected Outcomes The students would be able to: Discuss the principles of image classification Identify the different methods of image classification Identify the procedures involved in image classification and accuracy assessment Perform image classification and accuracy assessment using a remote sensing image analysis software Discuss the importance of yielding high accuracies in image classification 3
4 PART 1. IMAGE CLASSIFICATION CONCEPTS 4
5 Image Classification: 5
6 Image Classification: An operation that replace visual analysis of the image data with quantitative techniques for automating the identification of features in a scene Involves: Analysis of multispectral image data Application of statistically-based decision rules for determining the identity of each pixel in an image 6
7 What is the intent of image classification? To categorize all pixels in a digital image into one of several classes or themes Or to assign all pixels in the image to particular classes or themes (e.g. water, forest, barren land, built-up, etc.). Note: A class or theme could be anything like landcover classes, type of vegetation, tree species, etc. 7
8 What is the basic output of an image classification? The resulting classified image is comprised of: a mosaic of pixels, each of which belong to a particular class or theme, and is essentially a thematic "map" of the original image. 8
9 Image Classification Example Input Image Classified Image CSU Phil-LiDAR 2 9
10 Image Classification Concepts (1) Image classification uses the concept of Spectral Pattern Recognition 10
11 (In general) 11
12 Image Classification Concepts (1) Image classification uses the concept of Spectral Pattern Recognition 12
13 Image Classification Concepts (1) Image classification uses the concept of Spectral Pattern Recognition Spectral Patterns 13
14 Image Classification Concepts (1) Image classification uses the concept of Spectral Pattern Recognition spectral information represented by the Digital Numbers or Radiance or Reflectance in one or more spectral bands is used by a classifier, and attempts to classify each individual pixel based on this spectral information. Spectral Patterns 14
15 Basic Illustration: 15
16 What are the common image classification procedures? Common classification procedures can be broken down into two broad subdivisions based on the method used: Supervised classification Unsupervised classification 16
17 What are the main differences between the two? Supervised The image analyst supervises the pixel categorization process by specifying, to the computer algorithm (or classifier ), numerical descriptors of the various land-cover types present in an image Involves a training step followed by a classification step Utilizes training data Unsupervised The image analyst lets the computer algorithm to determine which pixels are related and groups them into classes The land-cover identity of these groups are determined by comparing with ground reference data Involves a classification step followed by a training step Do not utilize training data as basis during the start of the classification 17
18 Basic Steps involved in a Supervised Classification Step 1: TRAINING STAGE The analyst identifies in the imagery homogeneous representative samples of the different surface cover types (information classes) of interest. These samples are referred to as training areas. The selection of appropriate training areas is based on the analyst's familiarity with the geographical area and their knowledge of the actual surface cover types present in the image
19 What are the uses of training areas? Training areas are used to develop a numerical description of the spectral attributes of each land-cover type of interest in an image The numerical information in all spectral bands for the pixels comprising these areas are used to "train" a computer to recognize spectrally similar areas for each class. The computer uses a special program or algorithm ( classifier ), to determine the numerical "signatures" for each training class. 19
20 Basic Steps involved in a Supervised Classification Step 2: CLASSIFICATION STAGE Once the computer has determined the signatures for each class, each pixel in the image is compared to these signatures and labeled as the class it most closely "resembles" digitally
21 Basic Illustration: In supervised image classification, the multidimensional image matrix is used to develop a matrix of interpreted land cover category types. 21
22 Basic Steps involved in a Supervised Classification Step 2: CLASSIFICATION STAGE Once the computer has determined the signatures for each class, each pixel in the image is compared to these signatures and labeled as the class it most closely "resembles" digitally. What if the pixel is insufficiently similar to any training data? 22 22
23 Basic Steps involved in a Supervised Classification Step 3: THE OUTPUT STAGE After the entire data set has been categorized, the results are presented in the output stage Three typical forms of output products: Thematic maps Tables of land-cover statistics Digital data files that can be used in a GIS The classification output becomes a GIS input 23 23
24 Examples of Supervised Classification Outputs 24
25 Examples of Supervised Classification Outputs 25
26 PART 2A. SUPERVISED IMAGE CLASSIFIERS 26
27 Examples of Supervised Image Classifiers Minimum-Distance-to-Means Classifier (also known as Minimum Distance ) Parallelepiped Classifier Maximum Likelihood Classifier How does each classifier work? 27
28 Consider the following Landsat image overlaid with the Training Areas corresponding to 6 Land-cover classes: Water (sea) Water (river) Urban Grassland Forest Barren 28
29 Consider the following Landsat image overlaid with the Training Areas corresponding to 6 Land-cover classes: Water (sea) Water (river) Urban Grassland Forest Barren 29
30 The band values for each pixel for each landcover class of the training areas can be extracted: 30
31 Band 4 Digital Numbers From the extracted values, a 2D scatter plot or scatter diagram can be generated: Forest Grassland Barren Built-up 20 Water (Sea) 0 Water (River) Band 3 Digital Numbers 31
32 Or even a n-dimensional visualization (where n = no. of bands used) 32
33 The clouds of points represent multidimensional descriptions of the spectral response patterns of each category of land-cover type to be interpreted. These training set descriptions are used by the supervised image classifiers as interpretation keys by which pixels of unidentified cover type are categorized into their appropriate classes. 33
34 To understand how the supervised image classifier works, let s consider Band 3 and Band 4 of the Landsat image as input for classification. 34
35 Band 4 Digital Numbers What would be the land-cover type of Pixels X, Y and Z? Answer: It depends on what classifier to use! Forest X Grassland Barren Y Built-up 20 Water (Sea) 0 Z Water (River) Band 3 Digital Numbers 35
36 The Minimum-Distance-to-Means Classifier The mean, or average, spectral value in each band for each category is determined from the training areas. These values comprise the mean vector for each category A pixel of unknown identity maybe classified by computing the distance between the value of unknown pixel and each of the category means. The unknown pixel is assigned to the closest class. Note: An image analyst can define a maximum allowable distance between the mean to the unknown pixel. If a pixel is farther than the defined distance, it would be classified as unknown. 36
37 Band 4 Digital Numbers Using the Minimum Distance classifier, what would be the landcover type of Pixel X? FOREST! Forest + + Grassland 80 X Barren + Y + Built-up 20 Water (Sea) 0 + Z + Water (River) Band 3 Digital Numbers 37
38 Band 4 Digital Numbers Using the Minimum Distance classifier, what would be the landcover type of Pixel Y? (Seatwork) Forest + + Grassland 80 X Barren + Y + Built-up 20 Water (Sea) 0 + Z + Water (River) Band 3 Digital Numbers 38
39 Band 4 Digital Numbers Using the Minimum Distance classifier, what would be the landcover type of Pixel Z? (Seatwork) Forest + + Grassland 80 X Barren + Y + Built-up 20 Water (Sea) 0 + Z + Water (River) Band 3 Digital Numbers 39
40 Advantages and Disadvantages of the Minimum Distance Classifier Advantage Mathematically simple Computationally efficient Disadvantage Insensitive to different degrees of variance in the spectral response data Because of this, it is not widely used in applications where spectral classes are close to one another in the measurement space and have high variance. 40
41 Band 4 Digital Numbers Forest Grassland High variance in Built-up Barren Built-up 20 Water (Sea) 0 Water (River) Band 3 Digital Numbers 41
42 Parallelepiped Classifier Uses the range of values in each category training set to define decision regions that are then used to classify an unknown pixel. The range is defined by highest and lowest pixel values* in each band The decision region appears as: Rectangle in a 2D space Parallelepiped in multidimensional space An unknown pixel is classified according to the category range, or decision region, in which it lies. It remains unknown if it lies outside all regions. It if it lies in the overlap, can be arbitrarily placed in one (or both) of the two overlapping classes. *pixel values can be DN, radiance or reflectance 42
43 Parallelepiped Classifier 43
44 Band 4 Digital Numbers Using the Parallelepiped classifier, what would be the land-cover type of Pixels X, Y and Z? (Seatwork) Forest Grassland 80 X Barren Y Built-up 20 Z Water (River) Water (Sea) Band 3 Digital Numbers 44
45 Advantages and Disadvantages of Parallelepiped Advantages: Mathematically simple Computationally efficient Sensitive to category variance by considering the range of values in each category training set Major Disadvantage: Difficulties in classification can be encountered when category ranges overlap. 45
46 Problem (Seatwork) Given below are the statistics of 2 land-cover types based on training areas extracted from a Landsat 7 ETM+ image: Landcover: URBAN Min DN Max DN Mean DN Band Band Band Landcover: FOREST Min DN Max DN Mean DN Band Band Band Using the Minimum Distance and Parallelepiped Classifiers, classify the following unknown Pixels, with only Band 2 and Band 3 as input. DN Values Pixel A Pixel B Pixel C Band Band Band
47 The Maximum Likelihood Classifier Also called MLC The most common supervised classification method used with remote sensing data The MLC quantitatively evaluates the mean, variance and covariance of the category spectral response patterns (training data) when classifying an unknown pixel. 47
48 The Maximum Likelihood Classifier Classification is based on probability Through the use of probability distribution/probability density functions Probability is based on the mean, variance, covariance computed for each land-cover type 48
49 Variance? Co-variance? The variance refers to the spread of the data set how far apart the numbers are in relation to the mean, for instance. A covariance refers to the measure of how two variables will change together and is used to calculate the correlation between variables. In MLC, these variables are the band values (e.g., Band 1, Band 2) of a training dataset for a land-cover type 49
50 Band 4 Digital Numbers Forest Grassland Barren Built-up y = 0.253x R² = Water (Sea) 0 Water (River) Band 3 Digital Numbers 50
51 The Maximum Likelihood Classifier Using sufficient training data for each class, the mean, variance, covariance is computed for each land-cover type Given these parameters, the statistical probability of a given pixel being a member of a particular land-cover type is computed (also called probability distribution ) This probability distribution describes the chance or likelihood of finding a pixel from a certain cover type/class The probability distribution is computed for each landcover type for each unknown pixel After evaluating the probability for each category, the unknown pixel would be assigned to the most likely class (highest probability value). 51
52 Example Probability Distribution for an Unknown Pixel 52
53 Questions or clarifications? 53
54 PART 2B. UNSUPERVISED IMAGE CLASSIFIERS 54
55 Unsupervised Classifiers These classifiers identify the distinct spectral classes present in the image data Many of these classes might not be initially apparent/obvious to the analyst applying a supervised classifier The spectral classes maybe so numerous that it would be difficult to train on all of them In the unsupervised approach, they are found automatically 55
56 Commonly used Unsupervised Classifiers Also called clustering algorithms: K-Means ISODATA (Iterative Self-Organizing Data Analysis Techniques A) 56
57 The K-Means Classifier Used to determine the natural spectral groupings present in a dataset The number of groupings or clusters is defined by the analyst 57
58 The K-Means Classifier How does it work? Given the number of clusters to determine, the algorithm seeds or locates the number of cluster centers ( mean vectors or centroids ) in the multidimensional measurement space Each pixel in the image is then assigned to the cluster whose arbitrarily mean vector is closest (similar to Minimum Distance) After all pixels have been classified in this manner, revised mean vectors for each cluster are computed The revised means are then used as basis to reclassify the image data The procedure continues until there is no significant change in the location of class mean vectors between successive iterations of the algorithm. Once this point is reached, the analyst determines the land cover identify of each spectral class using reference data (e.g., from field surveys) 58
59 From: lva1-app6892/95/k-meanclustering-algorithm jpg?cb=
60 K-means: How it works (2D Example) Note: X and Y can be any band of the image 60
61 The ISODATA Classifier A variant of K-means Same procedure except that: It permits the number of clusters to change from on iteration to the next, by merging, splitting, and deleting clusters 61
62 The ISODATA Classifier The basis for merging, splitting and/or deleting clusters is defined by the analyst Merging: if the distance between the mean points of two clusters is less than some predefined minimum distance, the two clusters are merged together Splitting: a single cluster is split if it has a standard deviation (in any one dimension) that is greater than a predefined maximum standard deviation value Deleting: clusters with fewer than the specified minimum number of pixels are deleted 62
63 ISODATA Illustration From: 63
64 The ISODATA Classifier Requires from the analyst A range of number of clusters (not a single value like that of K-means) Minimum Distance between clusters Minimum number of pixels for each cluster Maximum standard deviation for each cluster 64
65 Notes on Unsupervised Classification The goal of unsupervised classification is simply the identification of spectrally distinct classes in image data The analyst must still use reference data to associate the spectral classes with the cover types of interest 65
66 Questions or clarifications? 66
67 PART 3. IMAGE CLASSIFICATION ACCURACY ASSESSMENT 67
68 Image Classification Accuracy Assessment A classification is not complete until its accuracy is assessed. 68
69 How do we assessed the accuracy of image classification? Use of reference data (also called ground truth data) E.g.: from site visits/field surveys, from aerial photographs, or from high resolution satellite images Accuracy of a classified pixel can be assessed by comparing its actual class based on the reference data 69
70 How do we assessed the accuracy of image classification? (2) Two ways to assess: Compare reference data to the classified image If a pixel is classified as forest on the ground, is it also forest on the classified image? Compare the classified image to the reference data If a pixel is classified as forest classified image, is it also forest on the ground? Accuracy assessment requires sufficient number of reference data for each land-cover class If reference data is many, some classified pixels maybe correct and some maybe not In this case, how can we determine the accuracy of the classified image? 70
71 Example: Pixel No. Reference/Ground Truth Data Classified Result 1 Forest Grassland 2 Forest Forest 3 Forest Forest 4 Forest Water 5 Urban Urban 6 Urban Urban 7 Urban Urban 8 Grassland Grassland 9 Grassland Grassland 10 Grassland Forest 11 Grassland Urban 12 Water Water 13 Water Forest 14 Water Grassland 15 Water Water 71
72 Example: Pixel No. Reference/Ground Truth Data Classified Result 1 Forest Grassland 2 Forest Forest 3 Forest Forest 4 Forest Water 5 Urban Urban 6 Urban Urban HOW DO WE 7 Urban Urban DETERMINE 8 Grassland Grassland 9 Grassland Grassland ACCURACY? 10 Grassland Forest 11 Grassland Urban 12 Water Water 13 Water Forest 14 Water Grassland 15 Water Water 72
73 The Use of Classification Error Matrix One of the most common means of expressing classification accuracy is the preparation of an error matrix Also called: Confusion matrix Contingency table An error matrix compares, on a category-bycategory basis, the relationship between known reference data and the corresponding results of the classification The matrix is square, with the number of rows and columns equal to the number of categories whose classification accuracy is being assessed. 73
74 A Simple Example of an Error Matrix 74
75 OVERALL ACCURACY AS OBTAINED FROM THE ERROR MATRIX: The major diagonal (running from upper left to lower right) represent pixels that are classified into their proper category (i.e., classified correctly) Overall accuracy (OA): computed by dividing the total number of correctly classified pixels (sum of diagonal) by the total number of reference pixels In the given example: OA = ( )/( ) = 63/100 = 0.63 or 63% 75
76 CLASSIFICATION ERRORS AS OBTAINED FROM THE ERROR MATRIX: Classification Errors: Ommision (Exclusion) Errors Commission (Inclusion) Errors All non-diagonal elements of the matrix represent errors of omission or commission Omission and commission errors are determined according to category 76
77 OMMISSION ERRORS Omission errors correspond to nondiagonal column elements Example: 14 pixels + 1 pixel that should have been classified as Water were omitted from that category, and falsely classified as Forest (14 pixels) and Urban (1 pixel) Omission Error for a Category = number of omitted pixels/total number of reference pixels In the above error matrix, the omission errors can be computed as follows: For Forest: Omission Error = (1+1)/30 = 2/30 = 0.07 or 7% For Water: Omission Error = (14+1)/30 = 15/30 = 50% For Urban: Omission Error = 50% 77
78 COMMISSION ERRORS Commission errors correspond to nondiagonal row elements Example: 1 pixel (Water)+ 5 pixels (Urban) were falsely included/classified as Water Commission Error for a Category = number of committed or included pixels/total number of classified pixels In the above error matrix, the commission errors can be computed as follows: For Forest: Commission Error = (14+15)/57= 29/57 = 0.51 or 51% For Water: Commission Error = (1+5)/21 = 6/21 = 29% For Urban: Commission Error = 2/22=9% 78
79 79
80 ACCURACIES OF INDIVIDUAL CATEGORIES AS OBTAINED FROM THE ERROR MATRIX: PRODUCER S ACCURACY (PA) Computed by dividing the number of correctly classified pixels in a category (on the major diagonal) by the number of reference pixels for that category (column total) The Producer s accuracy of category would tell us how many of the reference pixels for that category were correctly classified as such. E.g., If 30 pixels of Forest were found on the ground, how many of it were correctly classified as forest in the classified image? It is a measure how good the classified image is in correctly classifying a particular category. In the above error matrix, the Producer s Accuracy for Forest can be computed as follows: For Forest: PA = 28/30 = 0.93 or 93% Alternatively: PA =100% Omission Error For Forest, PA = 100% - 7% =93% 80
81 ACCURACIES OF INDIVIDUAL CATEGORIES AS OBTAINED FROM THE ERROR MATRIX: USER S ACCURACY (UA) Computed by dividing the number of correctly classified pixels in a category (on the major diagonal) by the number of pixels that were classified for that category (row total) The User s accuracy of category would tell us how many of the classified pixels for that category were correctly classified as such. E.g., If 57 pixels of Forest were classified, how many of it were are actually forest? It indicates the probability that a pixel classified into a given category actually represents that category on the ground. In the above error matrix, the User s Accuracy for Forest can be computed as follows: For Forest: UA = 28/57 = 0.49 or 49% Alternatively: UA =100% Commission Error For Forest, UA = 100% - 51% =49% 81
82 Some notes to remember Producer s accuracy: Compare reference data to classified data E.g., visit forest locations on the ground, and compare with the classified image. How many of it were correctly classified as forest? User s accuracy Compare classified data to reference data E.g., get pixels classified as forest in the classified image. Then, visit these locations on the ground. How many of it were actually forest? 82
83 Example: Build a confusion matrix based on this table, and compute the different measures of errors and accuracies. Pixel No. Reference/Ground Truth Data Classified Result 1 Forest Grassland 2 Forest Forest 3 Forest Forest 4 Forest Water 5 Urban Urban 6 Urban Urban 7 Urban Urban 8 Grassland Grassland 9 Grassland Grassland 10 Grassland Forest 11 Grassland Urban 12 Water Water 13 Water Forest 14 Water Grassland 15 Water Water 83
84 Solution: Overall accuracy: 9/15 = 60% 84
85 References/Further Reading Lillesand, T. M., Kiefer, R. W., & Chipman, J. W. (2008). Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation 6th Edition. United States of America: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 85
GE 113 REMOTE SENSING
GE 113 REMOTE SENSING Topic 5. Introduction to Digital Image Interpretation and Analysis Lecturer: Engr. Jojene R. Santillan jrsantillan@carsu.edu.ph Division of Geodetic Engineering College of Engineering
More informationRemote Sensing. The following figure is grey scale display of SPOT Panchromatic without stretching.
Remote Sensing Objectives This unit will briefly explain display of remote sensing image, geometric correction, spatial enhancement, spectral enhancement and classification of remote sensing image. At
More informationGE 113 REMOTE SENSING. Topic 7. Image Enhancement
GE 113 REMOTE SENSING Topic 7. Image Enhancement Lecturer: Engr. Jojene R. Santillan jrsantillan@carsu.edu.ph Division of Geodetic Engineering College of Engineering and Information Technology Caraga State
More informationSatellite image classification
Satellite image classification EG2234 Earth Observation Image Classification Exercise 29 November & 6 December 2007 Introduction to the practical This practical, which runs over two weeks, is concerned
More informationThis week we will work with your Landsat images and classify them using supervised classification.
GEPL 4500/5500 Lab 4: Supervised Classification: Part I: Selecting Training Sets Due: 4/6/04 This week we will work with your Landsat images and classify them using supervised classification. There are
More informationF2 - Fire 2 module: Remote Sensing Data Classification
F2 - Fire 2 module: Remote Sensing Data Classification F2.1 Task_1: Supervised and Unsupervised classification examples of a Landsat 5 TM image from the Center of Portugal, year 2005 F2.1 Task_2: Burnt
More informationImage Analysis based on Spectral and Spatial Grouping
Image Analysis based on Spectral and Spatial Grouping B. Naga Jyothi 1, K.S.R. Radhika 2 and Dr. I. V.Murali Krishna 3 1 Assoc. Prof., Dept. of ECE, DMS SVHCE, Machilipatnam, A.P., India 2 Assoc. Prof.,
More informationUnsupervised Classification
Unsupervised Classification Using SAGA Tutorial ID: IGET_RS_007 This tutorial has been developed by BVIEER as part of the IGET web portal intended to provide easy access to geospatial education. This tutorial
More informationUniversity of Technology Building & Construction Department / Remote Sensing & GIS lecture
8. Image Enhancement 8.1 Image Reduction and Magnification. 8.2 Transects (Spatial Profile) 8.3 Spectral Profile 8.4 Contrast Enhancement 8.4.1 Linear Contrast Enhancement 8.4.2 Non-Linear Contrast Enhancement
More informationStatistical Analysis of SPOT HRV/PA Data
Statistical Analysis of SPOT HRV/PA Data Masatoshi MORl and Keinosuke GOTOR t Department of Management Engineering, Kinki University, Iizuka 82, Japan t Department of Civil Engineering, Nagasaki University,
More informationUSING LANDSAT MULTISPECTRAL IMAGES IN ANALYSING FOREST VEGETATION
Technical Sciences 243 USING LANDSAT MULTISPECTRAL IMAGES IN ANALYSING FOREST VEGETATION Teodor TODERA teotoderas@yahoo.com Traian CR CEA traiancracea@yahoo.com Alina NEGOESCU alina.negoescu@yahoo.com
More informationRemote Sensing And Gis Application in Image Classification And Identification Analysis.
Quest Journals Journal of Research in Environmental and Earth Science Volume 3~ Issue 5 (2017) pp: 55-66 ISSN(Online) : 2348-2532 www.questjournals.org Research Paper Remote Sensing And Gis Application
More informationSpatial Analyst is an extension in ArcGIS specially designed for working with raster data.
Spatial Analyst is an extension in ArcGIS specially designed for working with raster data. 1 Do you remember the difference between vector and raster data in GIS? 2 In Lesson 2 you learned about the difference
More informationKeywords: Agriculture, Olive Trees, Supervised Classification, Landsat TM, QuickBird, Remote Sensing.
Classification of agricultural fields by using Landsat TM and QuickBird sensors. The case study of olive trees in Lesvos island. Christos Vasilakos, University of the Aegean, Department of Environmental
More informationDigital Image Processing
Digital Image Processing 1 Patrick Olomoshola, 2 Taiwo Samuel Afolayan 1,2 Surveying & Geoinformatic Department, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Rufus Giwa Polytechnic, Owo. Nigeria Abstract: This paper
More informationClassification in Image processing: A Survey
Classification in Image processing: A Survey Rashmi R V, Sheela Sridhar Department of computer science and Engineering, B.N.M.I.T, Bangalore-560070 Department of computer science and Engineering, B.N.M.I.T,
More informationDigital Image Classification for Monitoring Landcover
Digital Image Classification for Monitoring Landcover Trainer Khaled Mashfiq 2 / April / 2018 Training Module A1 Session 2 Advanced Application of Geospatial Information technology for Decision Support
More informationLand Cover Analysis to Determine Areas of Clear-cut and Forest Cover in Olney, Montana. Geob 373 Remote Sensing. Dr Andreas Varhola, Kathry De Rego
1 Land Cover Analysis to Determine Areas of Clear-cut and Forest Cover in Olney, Montana Geob 373 Remote Sensing Dr Andreas Varhola, Kathry De Rego Zhu an Lim (14292149) L2B 17 Apr 2016 2 Abstract Montana
More informationAugment the Spatial Resolution of Multispectral Image Using PCA Fusion Method and Classified It s Region Using Different Techniques.
Augment the Spatial Resolution of Multispectral Image Using PCA Fusion Method and Classified It s Region Using Different Techniques. Israa Jameel Muhsin 1, Khalid Hassan Salih 2, Ebtesam Fadhel 3 1,2 Department
More informationGEOG432: Remote sensing Lab 3 Unsupervised classification
GEOG432: Remote sensing Lab 3 Unsupervised classification Goal: This lab involves identifying land cover types by using agorithms to identify pixels with similar Digital Numbers (DN) and spectral signatures
More informationRaster is faster but vector is corrector
Account not required Raster is faster but vector is corrector The old GIS adage raster is faster but vector is corrector comes from the two different fundamental GIS models: vector and raster. Each of
More informationModule 11 Digital image processing
Introduction Geo-Information Science Practical Manual Module 11 Digital image processing 11. INTRODUCTION 11-1 START THE PROGRAM ERDAS IMAGINE 11-2 PART 1: DISPLAYING AN IMAGE DATA FILE 11-3 Display of
More informationGEOG432: Remote sensing Lab 3 Unsupervised classification
GEOG432: Remote sensing Lab 3 Unsupervised classification Goal: This lab involves identifying land cover types by using agorithms to identify pixels with similar Digital Numbers (DN) and spectral signatures
More informationLand Remote Sensing Lab 4: Classication and Change Detection Assigned: October 15, 2017 Due: October 27, Classication
Name: Land Remote Sensing Lab 4: Classication and Change Detection Assigned: October 15, 2017 Due: October 27, 2017 In this lab, you will generate several gures. Please sensibly name these images, save
More informationEvaluating the Effects of Shadow Detection on QuickBird Image Classification and Spectroradiometric Restoration
Remote Sens. 2013, 5, 4450-4469; doi:10.3390/rs5094450 Article OPEN ACCESS Remote Sensing ISSN 2072-4292 www.mdpi.com/journal/remotesensing Evaluating the Effects of Shadow Detection on QuickBird Image
More informationAPCAS/10/21 April 2010 ASIA AND PACIFIC COMMISSION ON AGRICULTURAL STATISTICS TWENTY-THIRD SESSION. Siem Reap, Cambodia, April 2010
APCAS/10/21 April 2010 Agenda Item 8 ASIA AND PACIFIC COMMISSION ON AGRICULTURAL STATISTICS TWENTY-THIRD SESSION Siem Reap, Cambodia, 26-30 April 2010 The Use of Remote Sensing for Area Estimation by Robert
More informationApplication of GIS to Fast Track Planning and Monitoring of Development Agenda
Application of GIS to Fast Track Planning and Monitoring of Development Agenda Radiometric, Atmospheric & Geometric Preprocessing of Optical Remote Sensing 13 17 June 2018 Outline 1. Why pre-process remotely
More information* Tokai University Research and Information Center
Effects of tial Resolution to Accuracies for t HRV and Classification ta Haruhisa SH Kiyonari i KASA+, uji, and Toshibumi * Tokai University Research and nformation Center 2-28-4 Tomigaya, Shi, T 151,
More informationRemote Sensing in an
Chapter 20: Accuracy Assessment Remote Sensing in an ArcMap Environment Remote Sensing Analysis in an ArcMap Environment Tammy E. Parece Image source: landsat.usgs.gov Tammy Parece James Campbell John
More informationUSING REMOTE SENSING TO MAP THE DISTRIBUTION OF SAGO PALMS IN NORTHEASTERN MINDANAO, PHILIPPINES: RESULTS BASED ON LANDSAT ETM+ IMAGE ANALYSIS
USING REMOTE SENSING TO MAP THE DISTRIBUTION OF SAGO PALMS IN NORTHEASTERN MINDANAO, PHILIPPINES: RESULTS BASED ON LANDSAT ETM+ IMAGE ANALYSIS Jojene R. SANTILLAN a, Meriam M. SANTILLAN b, Richelle FRANCISCO
More informationSommersemester Prof. Dr. Christoph Kleinn Institut für Waldinventur und Waldwachstum Arbeitsbereich Fernerkundung und Waldinventur.
Basics of Remote Sensing Some literature references Franklin, SE 2001 Remote Sensing for Sustainable Forest Management Lewis Publishers 407p Lillesand, Kiefer 2000 Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation
More informationUniversity of Texas at San Antonio EES 5053 Term Project CORRELATION BETWEEN NDVI AND SURFACE TEMPERATURES USING LANDSAT ETM + IMAGERY NEWFEL MAZARI
University of Texas at San Antonio EES 5053 Term Project CORRELATION BETWEEN NDVI AND SURFACE TEMPERATURES USING LANDSAT ETM + IMAGERY NEWFEL MAZARI Introduction and Objectives The present study is a correlation
More informationIMPROVEMENT IN THE DETECTION OF LAND COVER CLASSES USING THE WORLDVIEW-2 IMAGERY
IMPROVEMENT IN THE DETECTION OF LAND COVER CLASSES USING THE WORLDVIEW-2 IMAGERY Ahmed Elsharkawy 1,2, Mohamed Elhabiby 1,3 & Naser El-Sheimy 1,4 1 Dept. of Geomatics Engineering, University of Calgary
More informationImage interpretation I and II
Image interpretation I and II Looking at satellite image, identifying different objects, according to scale and associated information and to communicate this information to others is what we call as IMAGE
More informationVALIDATION OF THE CLOUD AND CLOUD SHADOW ASSESSMENT SYSTEM FOR LANDSAT IMAGERY (CASA-L VERSION 1.3)
GDA Corp. VALIDATION OF THE CLOUD AND CLOUD SHADOW ASSESSMENT SYSTEM FOR LANDSAT IMAGERY (-L VERSION 1.3) GDA Corp. has developed an innovative system for Cloud And cloud Shadow Assessment () in Landsat
More informationRemote Sensing. Odyssey 7 Jun 2012 Benjamin Post
Remote Sensing Odyssey 7 Jun 2012 Benjamin Post Definitions Applications Physics Image Processing Classifiers Ancillary Data Data Sources Related Concepts Outline Big Picture Definitions Remote Sensing
More informationApplication of Linear Spectral unmixing to Enrique reef for classification
Application of Linear Spectral unmixing to Enrique reef for classification Carmen C. Zayas-Santiago University of Puerto Rico Mayaguez Marine Sciences Department Stefani 224 Mayaguez, PR 00681 c_castula@hotmail.com
More informationEnhancement of Multispectral Images and Vegetation Indices
Enhancement of Multispectral Images and Vegetation Indices ERDAS Imagine 2016 Description: We will use ERDAS Imagine with multispectral images to learn how an image can be enhanced for better interpretation.
More informationLAND USE MAP PRODUCTION BY FUSION OF MULTISPECTRAL CLASSIFICATION OF LANDSAT IMAGES AND TEXTURE ANALYSIS OF HIGH RESOLUTION IMAGES
LAND USE MAP PRODUCTION BY FUSION OF MULTISPECTRAL CLASSIFICATION OF LANDSAT IMAGES AND TEXTURE ANALYSIS OF HIGH RESOLUTION IMAGES Xavier OTAZU, Roman ARBIOL Institut Cartogràfic de Catalunya, Spain xotazu@icc.es,
More informationUrban Classification of Metro Manila for Seismic Risk Assessment using Satellite Images
Urban Classification of Metro Manila for Seismic Risk Assessment using Satellite Images Fumio YAMAZAKI/ yamazaki@edm.bosai.go.jp Hajime MITOMI/ mitomi@edm.bosai.go.jp Yalkun YUSUF/ yalkun@edm.bosai.go.jp
More informationPresent and future of marine production in Boka Kotorska
Present and future of marine production in Boka Kotorska First results from satellite remote sensing for the breeding areas of filter feeders in the Bay of Kotor INTRODUCTION Environmental monitoring is
More informationOn the use of synthetic images for change detection accuracy assessment
On the use of synthetic images for change detection accuracy assessment Hélio Radke Bittencourt 1, Daniel Capella Zanotta 2 and Thiago Bazzan 3 1 Departamento de Estatística, Pontifícia Universidade Católica
More informationImage Extraction using Image Mining Technique
IOSR Journal of Engineering (IOSRJEN) e-issn: 2250-3021, p-issn: 2278-8719 Vol. 3, Issue 9 (September. 2013), V2 PP 36-42 Image Extraction using Image Mining Technique Prof. Samir Kumar Bandyopadhyay,
More informationAim of Lesson. Objectives. Background Information
Lesson 8: Mapping major inshore marine habitats 8: MAPPING THE MAJOR INSHORE MARINE HABITATS OF THE CAICOS BANK BY MULTISPECTRAL CLASSIFICATION USING LANDSAT TM Aim of Lesson To learn how to undertake
More informationDISCRIMINANT FUNCTION CHANGE IN ERDAS IMAGINE
DISCRIMINANT FUNCTION CHANGE IN ERDAS IMAGINE White Paper April 20, 2015 Discriminant Function Change in ERDAS IMAGINE For ERDAS IMAGINE, Hexagon Geospatial has developed a new algorithm for change detection
More informationComparing of Landsat 8 and Sentinel 2A using Water Extraction Indexes over Volta River
Journal of Geography and Geology; Vol. 10, No. 1; 2018 ISSN 1916-9779 E-ISSN 1916-9787 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Comparing of Landsat 8 and Sentinel 2A using Water Extraction
More informationSEMI-SUPERVISED CLASSIFICATION OF LAND COVER BASED ON SPECTRAL REFLECTANCE DATA EXTRACTED FROM LISS IV IMAGE
SEMI-SUPERVISED CLASSIFICATION OF LAND COVER BASED ON SPECTRAL REFLECTANCE DATA EXTRACTED FROM LISS IV IMAGE B. RayChaudhuri a *, A. Sarkar b, S. Bhattacharyya (nee Bhaumik) c a Department of Physics,
More informationCaatinga - Appendix. Collection 3. Version 1. General coordinator Washington J. S. Franca Rocha (UEFS)
Caatinga - Appendix Collection 3 Version 1 General coordinator Washington J. S. Franca Rocha (UEFS) Team Diego Pereira Costa (UEFS/GEODATIN) Frans Pareyn (APNE) José Luiz Vieira (APNE) Rodrigo N. Vasconcelos
More informationAn Introduction to Geomatics. Prepared by: Dr. Maher A. El-Hallaq خاص بطلبة مساق مقدمة في علم. Associate Professor of Surveying IUG
An Introduction to Geomatics خاص بطلبة مساق مقدمة في علم الجيوماتكس Prepared by: Dr. Maher A. El-Hallaq Associate Professor of Surveying IUG 1 Airborne Imagery Dr. Maher A. El-Hallaq Associate Professor
More informationThe techniques with ERDAS IMAGINE include:
The techniques with ERDAS IMAGINE include: 1. Data correction - radiometric and geometric correction 2. Radiometric enhancement - enhancing images based on the values of individual pixels 3. Spatial enhancement
More informationMULTISPECTRAL IMAGE PROCESSING I
TM1 TM2 337 TM3 TM4 TM5 TM6 Dr. Robert A. Schowengerdt TM7 Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) multispectral images of desert and agriculture near Yuma, Arizona MULTISPECTRAL IMAGE PROCESSING I SENSORS Multispectral
More informationREMOTE SENSING. Topic 10 Fundamentals of Digital Multispectral Remote Sensing MULTISPECTRAL SCANNERS MULTISPECTRAL SCANNERS
REMOTE SENSING Topic 10 Fundamentals of Digital Multispectral Remote Sensing Chapter 5: Lillesand and Keifer Chapter 6: Avery and Berlin MULTISPECTRAL SCANNERS Record EMR in a number of discrete portions
More informationDISTINGUISHING URBAN BUILT-UP AND BARE SOIL FEATURES FROM LANDSAT 8 OLI IMAGERY USING DIFFERENT DEVELOPED BAND INDICES
DISTINGUISHING URBAN BUILT-UP AND BARE SOIL FEATURES FROM LANDSAT 8 OLI IMAGERY USING DIFFERENT DEVELOPED BAND INDICES Mark Daryl C. Janiola (1), Jigg L. Pelayo (1), John Louis J. Gacad (1) (1) Central
More informationImage Classification (Decision Rules and Classification)
Exercise #5D Image Classification (Decision Rules and Classification) Objective Choose how pixels will be allocated to classes Learn how to evaluate the classification Once signatures have been defined
More informationTEMPORAL ANALYSIS OF MULTI EPOCH LANDSAT GEOCOVER IMAGES IN ZONGULDAK TESTFIELD
TEMPORAL ANALYSIS OF MULTI EPOCH LANDSAT GEOCOVER IMAGES IN ZONGULDAK TESTFIELD Şahin, H. a*, Oruç, M. a, Büyüksalih, G. a a Zonguldak Karaelmas University, Zonguldak, Turkey - (sahin@karaelmas.edu.tr,
More informationCLASSIFICATION OF HISTORIC LAKES AND WETLANDS
CLASSIFICATION OF HISTORIC LAKES AND WETLANDS Golden Valley, Minnesota Image Analysis Heather Hegi & Kerry Ritterbusch 12/13/2010 Bassett Creek and Theodore Wirth Golf Course, 1947 FR 5262 Remote Sensing
More informationRaster Based Region Growing
6th New Zealand Image Processing Workshop (August 99) Raster Based Region Growing Donald G. Bailey Image Analysis Unit Massey University Palmerston North ABSTRACT In some image segmentation applications,
More informationLand Cover Type Changes Related to. Oil and Natural Gas Drill Sites in a. Selected Area of Williams County, ND
Land Cover Type Changes Related to Oil and Natural Gas Drill Sites in a Selected Area of Williams County, ND FR 3262/5262 Lab Section 2 By: Andrew Kernan Tyler Kaebisch Introduction: In recent years, there
More informationMod. 2 p. 1. Prof. Dr. Christoph Kleinn Institut für Waldinventur und Waldwachstum Arbeitsbereich Fernerkundung und Waldinventur
Histograms of gray values for TM bands 1-7 for the example image - Band 4 and 5 show more differentiation than the others (contrast=the ratio of brightest to darkest areas of a landscape). - Judging from
More informationGST 101: Introduction to Geospatial Technology Lab Series. Lab 6: Understanding Remote Sensing and Aerial Photography
GST 101: Introduction to Geospatial Technology Lab Series Lab 6: Understanding Remote Sensing and Aerial Photography Document Version: 2013-07-30 Organization: Del Mar College Author: Richard Smith Copyright
More informationSeparation of crop and vegetation based on Digital Image Processing
Separation of crop and vegetation based on Digital Image Processing Mayank Singh Sakla 1, Palak Jain 2 1 M.TECH GEOMATICS student, CEPT UNIVERSITY 2 M.TECH GEOMATICS student, CEPT UNIVERSITY Word Limit
More informationImage interpretation and analysis
Image interpretation and analysis Grundlagen Fernerkundung, Geo 123.1, FS 2014 Lecture 7a Rogier de Jong Michael Schaepman Why are snow, foam, and clouds white? Why are snow, foam, and clouds white? Today
More informationSSB Debate: Model-based Inference vs. Machine Learning
SSB Debate: Model-based nference vs. Machine Learning June 3, 2018 SSB 2018 June 3, 2018 1 / 20 Machine learning in the biological sciences SSB 2018 June 3, 2018 2 / 20 Machine learning in the biological
More informationCanImage. (Landsat 7 Orthoimages at the 1: Scale) Standards and Specifications Edition 1.0
CanImage (Landsat 7 Orthoimages at the 1:50 000 Scale) Standards and Specifications Edition 1.0 Centre for Topographic Information Customer Support Group 2144 King Street West, Suite 010 Sherbrooke, QC
More informationUrban Feature Classification Technique from RGB Data using Sequential Methods
Urban Feature Classification Technique from RGB Data using Sequential Methods Hassan Elhifnawy Civil Engineering Department Military Technical College Cairo, Egypt Abstract- This research produces a fully
More informationEXERCISE 1 - REMOTE SENSING: SENSORS WITH DIFFERENT RESOLUTION
EXERCISE 1 - REMOTE SENSING: SENSORS WITH DIFFERENT RESOLUTION Program: ArcView 3.x 1. Copy the folder FYS_FA with its whole contents from: Kursdata: L:\FA\FYS_FA to C:\Tempdata 2. Open the folder and
More informationMODULE 4 LECTURE NOTES 4 DENSITY SLICING, THRESHOLDING, IHS, TIME COMPOSITE AND SYNERGIC IMAGES
MODULE 4 LECTURE NOTES 4 DENSITY SLICING, THRESHOLDING, IHS, TIME COMPOSITE AND SYNERGIC IMAGES 1. Introduction Digital image processing involves manipulation and interpretation of the digital images so
More informationQGIS LAB SERIES GST 101: Introduction to Geospatial Technology Lab 6: Understanding Remote Sensing and Analysis
QGIS LAB SERIES GST 101: Introduction to Geospatial Technology Lab 6: Understanding Remote Sensing and Analysis Objective Explore and Understand How to Display and Analyze Remotely Sensed Imagery Document
More informationChapter 3 Interpreting Images
Chapter 3 Interpreting Images 3.1 Introduction With few exceptions the reason we record images of the earth in various wavebands is so that we can build up a picture of features on the surface. Sometimes
More informationRGB colours: Display onscreen = RGB
RGB colours: http://www.colorspire.com/rgb-color-wheel/ Display onscreen = RGB DIGITAL DATA and DISPLAY Myth: Most satellite images are not photos Photographs are also 'images', but digital images are
More informationHyperspectral image processing and analysis
Hyperspectral image processing and analysis Lecture 12 www.utsa.edu/lrsg/teaching/ees5083/l12-hyper.ppt Multi- vs. Hyper- Hyper-: Narrow bands ( 20 nm in resolution or FWHM) and continuous measurements.
More informationEXAMPLES OF OBJECT-ORIENTED CLASSIFICATION PERFORMED ON HIGH-RESOLUTION SATELLITE IMAGES
EXAMPLES OF OBJECT-ORIENTED CLASSIFICATION... 349 Stanisław Lewiński, Karol Zaremski EXAMPLES OF OBJECT-ORIENTED CLASSIFICATION PERFORMED ON HIGH-RESOLUTION SATELLITE IMAGES Abstract: Information about
More informationMonitoring land-cover change by satellite
Change in the Right Direction Monitoring land-cover change by satellite by Introduction Problem Can city utility services use remote satellite data, processed with geographic information systems (GIS),
More informationRemote sensing in archaeology from optical to lidar. Krištof Oštir ModeLTER Scientific Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts
Remote sensing in archaeology from optical to lidar Krištof Oštir ModeLTER Scientific Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts Introduction Optical remote sensing Systems Search for
More informationRemote Sensing in an
Chapter 6: Displaying Data Remote Sensing in an ArcMap Environment Remote Sensing Analysis in an ArcMap Environment Tammy E. Parece Image source: landsat.usgs.gov Tammy Parece James Campbell John McGee
More informationof Stand Development Classes
Wang, Silva Fennica Poso, Waite 32(3) and Holopainen research articles The Use of Digitized Aerial Photographs and Local Operation for Classification... The Use of Digitized Aerial Photographs and Local
More informationAn Introduction to Remote Sensing & GIS. Introduction
An Introduction to Remote Sensing & GIS Introduction Remote sensing is the measurement of object properties on Earth s surface using data acquired from aircraft and satellites. It attempts to measure something
More informationCellular automata applied in remote sensing to implement contextual pseudo-fuzzy classication - The Ninth International Conference on Cellular
INDEX Introduction Spectral and Contextual Classification of Satellite Images Classical aplications of Cellular Automata in Remote Sensing Classification of Satellite Images with Cellular Automata (ACA)
More informationUsing Imagery for Intelligence Analysis. Jim Michel Renee Bernstein
Using Imagery for Intelligence Analysis Jim Michel Renee Bernstein Deriving Value from GIS and Imagery Capabilities Evolved Along Separate but Parallel Paths GIS Imagery brings value Imagery Contextual
More informationIn late April of 1986 a nuclear accident damaged a reactor at the Chernobyl nuclear
CHERNOBYL NUCLEAR POWER PLANT ACCIDENT Long Term Effects on Land Use Patterns Project Introduction: In late April of 1986 a nuclear accident damaged a reactor at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant in Ukraine.
More informationA (very) brief introduction to Remote Sensing: From satellites to maps!
Spatial Data Analysis and Modeling for Agricultural Development, with R - Workshop A (very) brief introduction to Remote Sensing: From satellites to maps! Earthlights DMSP 1994-1995 https://wikimedia.org/
More informationSupervised Land Cover Classification An introduction to digital image classification using the Multispectral Image Data Analysis System (MultiSpec )
Supervised Land Cover Classification An introduction to digital image classification using the Multispectral Image Data Analysis System (MultiSpec ) Level: Grades 9 to 12 Windows version With Teacher Notes
More informationVisualizing a Pixel. Simulate a Sensor s View from Space. In this activity, you will:
Simulate a Sensor s View from Space In this activity, you will: Measure and mark pixel boundaries Learn about spatial resolution, pixels, and satellite imagery Classify land cover types Gain exposure to
More informationImprovements in Landsat Pathfinder Methods for Monitoring Tropical Deforestation and Their Extension to Extra-tropical Areas
Improvements in Landsat Pathfinder Methods for Monitoring Tropical Deforestation and Their Extension to Extra-tropical Areas PI: John R. G. Townshend Department of Geography (and Institute for Advanced
More informationModelli tematici 3 D dell uso del suolo a partire da DTM e immagini telerilevate ad alta risoluzione WorldView 2
University of Naples Parthenope Department of Applied Sciences Modelli tematici 3 D dell uso del suolo a partire da DTM e immagini telerilevate ad alta risoluzione WorldView 2 3 D thematic models of land
More informationDirty REMOTE SENSING Lecture 3: First Steps in classifying Stuart Green Earthobservation.wordpress.com
Dirty REMOTE SENSING Lecture 3: First Steps in classifying Stuart Green Earthobservation.wordpress.com Stuart.Green@Teagasc.ie You have your image, but is it any good? Is it full of cloud? Is it the right
More informationCOLOR IMAGE SEGMENTATION USING K-MEANS CLASSIFICATION ON RGB HISTOGRAM SADIA BASAR, AWAIS ADNAN, NAILA HABIB KHAN, SHAHAB HAIDER
COLOR IMAGE SEGMENTATION USING K-MEANS CLASSIFICATION ON RGB HISTOGRAM SADIA BASAR, AWAIS ADNAN, NAILA HABIB KHAN, SHAHAB HAIDER Department of Computer Science, Institute of Management Sciences, 1-A, Sector
More informationUrban Land-use Classification Using Variogram-based Analysis with an Aerial Photograph
Urban Land-use Classification Using Variogram-based Analysis with an Aerial Photograph Shuo-sheng Wu, Bing Xu, and Le Wang Abstract In this study, a variogram-based texture analysis was tested for classifying
More informationFOREST MAPPING IN MONGOLIA USING OPTICAL AND SAR IMAGES
FOREST MAPPING IN MONGOLIA USING OPTICAL AND SAR IMAGES D.Enkhjargal 1, D.Amarsaikhan 1, G.Bolor 1, N.Tsetsegjargal 1 and G.Tsogzol 1 1 Institute of Geography and Geoecology, Mongolian Academy of Sciences
More informationChapter 1 Overview of imaging GIS
Chapter 1 Overview of imaging GIS Imaging GIS, a term used in the medical imaging community (Wang 2012), is adopted here to describe a geographic information system (GIS) that displays, enhances, and facilitates
More informationExercise 4-1 Image Exploration
Exercise 4-1 Image Exploration With this exercise, we begin an extensive exploration of remotely sensed imagery and image processing techniques. Because remotely sensed imagery is a common source of data
More informationWhite Paper. Medium Resolution Images and Clutter From Landsat 7 Sources. Pierre Missud
White Paper Medium Resolution Images and Clutter From Landsat 7 Sources Pierre Missud Medium Resolution Images and Clutter From Landsat7 Sources Page 2 of 5 Introduction Space technologies have long been
More informationEfficient Target Detection from Hyperspectral Images Based On Removal of Signal Independent and Signal Dependent Noise
IOSR Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering (IOSR-JECE) e-issn: 2278-2834,p- ISSN: 2278-8735.Volume 9, Issue 6, Ver. III (Nov - Dec. 2014), PP 45-49 Efficient Target Detection from Hyperspectral
More informationDigitization of Trail Network Using Remotely-Sensed Data in the CFB Suffield National Wildlife Area
Digitization of Trail Network Using Remotely-Sensed Data in the CFB Suffield National Wildlife Area Brent Smith DLE 5-5 and Mike Tulis G3 GIS Technician Department of National Defence 27 March 2007 Introduction
More informationM. Ellen Dean and Roger M. Hoffer Department of Forestry and Natural Resources. Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana
Evaluation of Thematic Mapper Data and Computer-aided Analysis Techniques for Mapping Forest Cover M. Ellen Dean and Roger M. Hoffer Department of Forestry and Natural Resources Laboratory for Applications
More informationDetecting Land Cover Changes by extracting features and using SVM supervised classification
Detecting Land Cover Changes by extracting features and using SVM supervised classification ABSTRACT Mohammad Mahdi Mohebali MSc (RS & GIS) Shahid Beheshti Student mo.mohebali@gmail.com Ali Akbar Matkan,
More informationApplication of Satellite Image Processing to Earth Resistivity Map
Application of Satellite Image Processing to Earth Resistivity Map KWANCHAI NORSANGSRI and THANATCHAI KULWORAWANICHPONG Power System Research Unit School of Electrical Engineering Suranaree University
More informationRADIOMETRIC CALIBRATION
1 RADIOMETRIC CALIBRATION Lecture 10 Digital Image Data 2 Digital data are matrices of digital numbers (DNs) There is one layer (or matrix) for each satellite band Each DN corresponds to one pixel 3 Digital
More informationMultispectral Data Analysis: A Moderate Dimension Example
Multispectral Data Analysis: A Moderate Dimension Example David Landgrebe School of Electrical Engineering Purdue University West Lafayette IN 47907-1285 landgreb@ecn.purdue.edu In this monograph we illustrate
More informationLANDSAT-SPOT DIGITAL IMAGES INTEGRATION USING GEOSTATISTICAL COSIMULATION TECHNIQUES
LANDSAT-SPOT DIGITAL IMAGES INTEGRATION USING GEOSTATISTICAL COSIMULATION TECHNIQUES J. Delgado a,*, A. Soares b, J. Carvalho b a Cartographical, Geodetical and Photogrammetric Engineering Dept., University
More information