Rover Processing with Network RTK and
|
|
- Kory Bryan
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Rover Processing with Network RTK and Quality Indicators P. Alves, H. Kotthoff, I. Geisler, O. Zelzer, and H.-J. Euler Leica Geosystems AG Heerbrugg, Switzerland BIOGRAPHIES Paul Alves graduated in 2005 with a Ph.D. in Geomatics Engineering form the University of Calgary, Canada. His research interests include network RTK, carrier phase processing, and ambiguity resolution. He is currently working as a software engineer for Leica Geosystems. Holger Kotthoff graduated in geodesy at the Technical University of Bonn, Germany, in In July of 2000, he joined Leica Geosystems in Switzerland as part of the data processing group, further developing the real-time and post-processing kernel used in various products. Ines Geisler graduated in 2005 with a Diploma in Geodesy from the Dresden University of Technology, Germany. Her research interests are in the field of Network RTK positioning. Ines is currently working as an Application Engineer in the Network Reference Stations team of Leica Geosystems in Switzerland. Oliver Zelzer graduated in Physics at the Technical University of Vienna in 1996 and worked as technical Software engineer in a variety of industries. He joined Leica Geosystems in 2002 and mainly worked on GPS network processing and rover real time GPS data processing. Hans-Juergen Euler studied Surveying at the Technical University of Darmstadt. He graduated in 1990 with a PhD on Fast GPS Integer Resolution in Small-Scale Networks. His research interests are in the field of Network RTK and application of the information in GNSS rovers. He serves in the standardization process of RTCM SC104 as chairman for Network RTK and Galileo. ABSTRACT The multiple reference station approach is widely known as a method for combining the data from a regional reference station network to provide precise measurement correction to users. This is performed by measuring the regional errors at the reference station locations and interpolating them for the location of the rover. The quality of those corrections is dependent on the reference station spacing, the location of the rover, and the characteristics of the measurement errors. This paper introduces a network RTK quality indicator based on the characteristics of the measurement errors. The indicator assumes that the more linear the regional correlated errors, the better the interpolation methods will perform. The linearity of the network measurement errors is measured and weighted based on the distance to the rover. The quality indicator shown, successfully models the network RTK performance over time in the observation domain. There is an insignificant improvement in the position domain when fixed ambiguities are used however there is a small yet notable improvement in the percentage of fixed ambiguity solutions. INTRODUCTION The quality of Network RTK corrections is a function of the following factors: network geometry, measurement errors, elimination of nuisance parameters (i.e. ambiguities), and the interpolation model that is used. All of these aspects are intermixed, for example, the interpolation model that is used should have the same spatial shape as the measurement errors. Alternatively, if the measurement errors are low then the reference stations can be located further away than if the measurement errors are high. The factors that affect Network RTK performance are generally focused around the qualities and characteristics of the measurement errors. An accurate understanding of the measurement errors leads to an optimal interpolation model and network geometry for a given level of desired rover performance. The following literature focuses on measuring and quantifying the properties of the measurement errors (Alves, 2004; Wanninger, 2004; Wübbena, 2004; Chen, 2003; Raquet, 1998). In some of the more advanced cases the measurement error
2 properties are extrapolated using network geometry to predict the performance for the rover in addition to the performance of the network. Many quality indicators for network RTK use the residual errors measured by the network reference stations to derive the current error conditions and characteristics (Chen, 2003; Wanninger, 2004). These characteristics are compared against the current interpolation model to determine the model residuals. For example, if the measured network residuals are linear and a linear interpolation model is used then there is a high likelihood that the rover will experience a high level of performance. The model residuals can then be used to predict the model inaccuracies as a function of the distance to the nearby reference stations. For example, if the model residuals are high but the rover is at a reference station then the model errors have no effect. The ability to determine the model residuals is a function of the degrees of freedom of the interpolation model. If there are no degrees of freedom then no residuals can be determined. In this case degrees of freedom can be created by excluding one of the reference stations from the model calculation. NETWORK RTK OVERVIEW Network-Based RTK methods use a network of reference stations to measure the correlated error over a region and to predict their effects spatially and temporally within the network. Although the name suggests that these methods are real-time specific, they can also be used in postmission analysis. This process can reduce the effects of the correlated errors much better than the single reference station approach, thus allowing for reference stations to be spaced much further apart thereby covering a larger service area than the traditional approach, while still maintaining the same level of rover performance. Network RTK is comprised of six main processes: 1. Processing of the reference station data to resolve the network ambiguities, 2. Selection of the reference stations that will contribute to the corrections for the rover, 3. Generation of the network corrections, 4. Interpolation of the corrections for the rover s location, 5. Formatting, and transmission of the corrections, and 6. Computation of the rover position. The main task of the network computation is to resolve the ambiguities for all stations in the network to a common ambiguity level, such that the bias caused by the ambiguities is cancelled when double differences are formed (Euler et al., 2001). The network correction computation uses the ambiguity leveled phase observations from the network reference stations to precisely estimate the differential correlated errors for the region. A subset of stations from the reference network, known as a cell, is selected to generate the correction for the rover based on the rover s position. One station in the cell, usually the one closest to the rover, is selected as the master station. The correction interpolation process models the network corrections to determine the effects of the correlated errors at the rover s position. Depending on the correction concept (master-auxiliary, VRS or FKP), the interpolation may be done either by the reference station software or the rover itself. The corrections are formatted in such a way that the rover or standard RTK software can interpret them. Note that until the release of the RTCM 3.0 network messages there has been no official standard for the transmission of network corrections. The interpolated corrections are then applied to the observations of the master station, which are then used by the rover or RTK software to compute its position. METHODOLOGY The proposed method is a geometric approach to determining the linearity of the measurement errors. In single point positioning (no differencing) the absolute magnitudes of all measurement errors affect positioning and navigation performance. When differential methods are used, the difference in measurement errors and not the absolute values of the measurement errors dictate the level of performance. This brought forth the somewhat standard measure of parts per million of the baseline length for describing the magnitude of data set measurement errors. In network RTK the linear trend of the errors is modeled and removed. Consequently, a large parts per million of the baseline length or error gradient value does not dictate the level of performance in network RTK if this gradient is consistent throughout the network. Figure 1 shows an example of this. The red line is the absolute measurement error, which has a high parts per million value (indicated by its slope). The green line indicates the single reference station differential measurement error using the green station as the reference and the blue line shows the differential measurement error using the blue station as the reference. Assuming linear measurement errors and a linear interpolation model for the corrections, the rover would have no measurement errors in network RTK mode. This is because the slope of the measurement errors is modeled in the network RTK interpolation model. Chen (2003) also briefly discusses
3 this effect when discussing the ionosphere index I95 (Wanninger, 2004). PROCEDURE The calculation of this quality measure is performed in the following stages: Absolute error Location Rover Reference stations Figure 1: Example of the difference between single reference station (shown in blue and green) and m u l t iple reference station measurement error characteristics. The absolute measurement error is shown in red. The method described in this paper uses the change in the slope of the measurement errors as an indicator of the network RTK performance. The linearity of the model is realized in two dimensions by triangulating the network and visualizing the network as a two dimensional surface or triangular facets. If the regional errors are linear then this surface will be flat (although it may not be horizontal) as shown in Figure 2 (top). Non-linearity in this surface appears as joints along the edges of the two dimensional surface (Figure 2, bottom). This method measures the change in the slope of the facets of a 2D triangulated network as an indication of the linearity of the measurement errors. 1. Triangulate the network. 2. Determine the triangle that contains the rover station and the corresponding three connecting stations. 3. Determine the three triangles that are connected to the edges of the rover s triangle. 4. Calculate the slopes of the surfaces for the triangle containing the rover and the three connected triangles using the network residuals for the connected stations. 5. Calculate the differences in the slopes along the direction of the intersection of the center surface with the outer surfaces. 6. Calculate the shortest distance between the rover position and the interface between the surfaces. 7. Weight the difference in slope values by the inverse of the distance to the surface boundary. Triangulation of the network can be performed through any of the available methods. In the cases shown, a Delaunay triangulation was used. The double difference slopes are calculated in the north and east directions using a plain fit to the double difference misclosures at the connecting reference stations. The single difference cannot be used because the station clocks will adversely affect the slopes. The difference in the slopes is calculated by using the dot product of a vector of the slopes. The vector perpendicular to the surface is derived from the north and east slopes as follows n v = e (1) 1 where n is the slope in the north direction and e is the slope in the east direction. The difference in the slopes is calculated by s T v1 v2 12 = v1 v2 1. (2) Figure 2: Examples of the shape of a triangulated network. Top shows a network with only linear measurement errors. Bottom shows a network with non - linear measurement errors. The absolute value and minus one are added to change the range to a value between 0 and 2. This value represents the difference in the slopes and the linearity of the measurement errors across the local region of the network.
4 The shortest distance between the rover and the three triangle borders is calculated to weight the three slope differences. The closer the rover is to an edge, the more weight this slope difference should have. The weighting used is the inverse of the distance to the nearest edge. The calculated values are all weighted together to give one value for each double difference as shown: s d + s d + s 12 r12 13 r13 23 r 23 δ r = (3) d r12 + d r13 + d r 23 where δ r is the rover correction, d r, 12 is the shortest distance between the rover and the edge between slopes 1 and 2. This correction value is, in general, very small because it is a weighted cosine of the angle between the surfaces. To make these values practical for plotting they have all been multiplied by 500. The quality is a relative value that must be calibrated and then fixed. The relative values of the quality indicator are of importance. INTERPOLATION OF CORRECTIONS There are a variety of methods of parameterization of the correction differences for the rover located within or near the network coverage area. All of the methods developed are based on function approximations. The following are examples of investigated interpolation methods: Distance-Based Linear Interpolation Method (Dai et al., 2004; Euler et al., 2004), Low-Order 2D Surface Model (Dai et al., 2004; Euler et al., 2004; Wanninger, 2000; Fotopoulos & Cannon, 2001), and Least-Squares Collocation Method (Raquet, 1998; Marel, 1998; Alves, 2004). The aim of each of these approaches is to model the distance-dependent errors along the baseline between master and rover station on an epoch-by-epoch and satellite-by-satellite basis. As the input parameters for each interpolation algorithm are between-master and auxiliary single-differenced observables (either carrier-phase residuals for the L1/L2 frequencies or geometric-/ionospheric-free linear combinations), an n-1 independent error vector is generated where n is the number of reference stations involved. In addition to unambiguous (ambiguity leveled) correction differences, coordinates for all reference stations are also needed to either generate coordinate differences (when applying low-order surface models), or baseline lengths between the master and each further d auxiliary station (when processing distance-weighted and least-squares collocation model). The vector of rover corrections is the result of a vector of reference station residuals (estimated errors) and a vector of coefficients (Dai et al., 2004) V rover V (4) where V rover ionospheric-free frequencies, is a vector of L1, L2, geometric-free or coefficients and V is an n-1 vector of errors, is a n-1 vector of Actual GPS measurements have to be observed in order to form the error vector. As a basic premise of all of the interpolation methods the coordinates of stations and satellites have to be known, and the ambiguities have to be correctly solved so that the correction differences share a common integer ambiguity level. All of the coefficients can be calculated from the known coordinates of the reference stations and are therefore derived from the geometry of the rover station and the network (Dai et al., 2004). Since the master-auxiliary concept is applied, the coefficient vector (as well as the error vector) refers to single baselines between a designated master and each auxiliary reference station. Once the correction differences are interpolated for the rover's location they are applied to the raw observations of the master reference station to improve the single baseline positioning between the master and rover station. Single baseline positioning based on network corrections in real-time mode is also referred to as Network RTK positioning. Previous research has shown that the various interpolation methods all produce similar results (Dai et al. 2004). The interpolation method shown in this research will be the least squares collocation method. L E A S T- SQUARES COLLOCATION METHOD The least-squares collocation method models the distancedependent errors based on their spatial correlation. It is assumed that the further apart the reference stations are the less correlated the errors, which leads to a minimization of the errors in a least-squares sense. Leastsquares collocation is based on several assumptions (Alves, 2004): The generated correction differences are measurements of the true signal s biased by the noise n.
5 The measurements (signal and noise) are zero mean with a normal distribution. s t is unknown, but the The true signal ( ) variance-covariance of s( t) is known. The signal to be estimated is defined by its covariance, which can be described as the likelihood that two points will have the same values. The distance-dependent errors will be more similar with decreasing baseline length. Raquet (1998) proposes the following least-squares collocation equation for which double-differenced residuals between the master and auxiliary reference stations have to be calculated: s C sls B T BC ll B T 1 A x B l (5) where s is a vector of the estimated signals (corrections) at rover's position, C sl s is the covariance matrix between the signal components of the network observations and the predicted signal (interpolated vector s ), B is the observation matrix, which transforms C ll into double difference space, C ll is the variance-covariance matrix of the network observations (measurement vector l), A is the design matrix of the estimated parameters, x is the vector of estimated parameters, l is the vector of network observations. Following the proposed Master-Auxiliary concept Equation (5) can be simplified by using single differences only. Thus the matrix B can be neglected assuming that the correction differences are uncorrelated. The simplified interpolation equation changes to s C sl s C ll 1 l (6) By inverting C ll, low variance values become high and high variance values become low, and hence high weight is assigned to precise observations when multiplying C ll 1 by l. A covariance function is used to generate the covariance matrices. It calculates the estimated covariance between the observation's signal components. Depending on the characteristics of a covariance function, each function has a different shape and prediction characteristics. Alves (2004) shows that the greatest difference in the prediction characteristics between several covariance functions will be when the network is sparse or the correlation length is short. The following are the requirements that a covariance function should fulfill to best suit the error characteristics within a reference station network: The covariance function should produce a positive definite variance covariance matrix. The prediction should represent the likelihood that the errors measured at the reference stations are the same as the errors measured at the rover station. The covariance should converge to zero with increasing distance between stations. As a consequence, if no reference station is in a position to predict the distance-dependent errors at the rover's location, then the covariance of the signal and the network's observation signal should be zero. Exponential covariance functions have all of the characteristics (described above) for modeling the distance-dependent errors between the stations. In contrast to the proposed covariance function of Raquet (1998) and Marel (1998) which, for example, also takes the satellite's elevation into account. The function applied in this paper is a function of the distance between all reference stations only. There is no need to correct for the elevation of satellites because single differenced observations are introduced in the error modeling process, and the interpolation is done on a satellite-by-satellite basis. The exponential covariance function is CF d ( d ) = e t (7) where is the correlation length, and d is the 3Ddistance between all reference stations. Combining Equations (4) and (6) gives a coefficient vector of C sl s C ll 1 DATA SET DESCRIPTION (8) Data from selected reference stations in Lower Saxony, Germany, was used for the evaluation of the interpolation methods and the quality indicator. The geometry of the network is shown in Figure 3.
6 quality indicator follows the behavior of the network RTK performance Figure 3: Reference station network in Lower Saxony, Germany. All distances shown in blue are in km. Data was processed with a one second data rate with an elevation mask of 13 degrees, however results will be shown with a 30 second interval. This data set is from Oct. 31, 2003, which is the day after an ionospheric storm. The ionosphere error for this short baseline reaches up to 2.5 parts per million of the baseline length. All the receivers in this network are Trimble 4700s. The rover station (0652) is located 19 km from the nearest reference station. The reference station baseline lengths range from 30 to 69 km. This is a medium scale network. QUALITY INDEX RESULTS The quality index values can be computed for every double difference satellite pair using only one epoch of data. The quality indicator is always positive and represents the potential magnitude of the network RTK measurement errors. A low value quality index means that the network errors are linear and that interpolation should be able to minimize the errors at the rover. A high value quality index means that the network errors are non-linear relative to the reference station scale and the interpolation may not be able to model the correlated errors. The double difference L1 carrier phase residuals of the single reference station and network RTK solutions are compared to the quality values in Figures 8 to 11. In general, there is a high level of correlation between the level of error in the network RTK solution and the quality value. This shows that this quality indicator is effective in monitoring network RTK performance. Figure 8 shows satellite pair 27 and 10. In this case the double difference residuals are higher at the beginning of the data set and decrease towards the end of the dataset. Once again, there is a high level of correlation between the quality value and the network RTK performance. The Figure 8: Comparison of the quality value with the double difference residuals L1 carrier phase of the single reference station approach and the 2D interpolation for satellites 27 and 10. Figure 9 shows satellite pair 13 and 4. In this case the quality indicator closely matches the network RTK performance. At the beginning of the data set the network approach provides a high level of improvement over the single reference station approach. During this time the quality indicator shows a relatively low value, which matches the network RTK performance. This shows that the quality indicator is an indication of network RTK quality and not the quality of the single reference station RTK. Figure 9: Compariso n of the quality value with the double difference L1 carrier phase residuals of the single reference station approach and the 2D interpolation for satellites 13 and 4. The next example, shown in Figure 10, is for satellite pair 8 and 13. In this case the quality indicator follows the network RTK performance less closely, however there is
7 a noticeable change in behavior in the network RTK results, which is shown in the quality value. At the end of the data set the network RTK residuals become larger and more varied. This is shown as an increase in the quality indicator. The dual frequency data was processed at one Hertz but the quality indicator was computed at 30 seconds and interpolated to the intermediate times. A 15 degree elevation mask was used. Data from the static rover station was processed in kinematic mode to simulate rover performance in the field. POSITION DOMAIN RESU LTS The position domain results compare the single reference station approach to the network approach with standard observation weighting and the network approach with the quality indicator weighting. Figure 10: Comparison of the quality value with the double difference L1 carrier phase residuals of the single reference station approach and the 2D interpolation for satellites 8 and 13. Figure 11 shows the x, y, and z position solutions for the three cases. This data was collected the day after an inospheric storm. The measurement errors are decreasing over time. This explains the improvement of the positioning over time. The single reference station and standard network approach approaches both have small periods where they could not maintain a fixed ambiguity solution. The network solution using the quality indicator was the only solution to maintain a fixed ambiguity solution for the entire dataset. USE OF THE QUALITY INDEX IN THE POSITION DOMAIN The previous results have shown that the quality indicator is effective in monitoring and tracking the residual measurement errors after applying reference station corrections. This is also an indication of the quality of the reference station corrections and the ability of the network to interpolate measurement errors. An important characteristic of the quality indicator is that an independent value can be calculated for each double difference satellite pair. This property allows for the quality indicator to independently track the measurement quality for each satellite pair. The quality indicator can be used for adjusting the relative weighting of the observations to down-weight observations with expected worse interpolation performance than other measurements. The following results compare the network reference station approach using a standard observation-weighting scheme and the quality indicator as a weighting scheme. The standard observation weighting method is an elevation dependent model where higher elevation satellites are given more weight than lower elevation satellites. Mathematical correlation between the measurements due to base satellite observations being used in multiple double-difference observations is not changed. Figure 11: Position domain results for the single reference station, network approach with and without quality indicator weighting. For further analysis Figure 12 shows the same position solutions as Figure 11 but with a smaller scale. This figure shows the difference between the three solutions. The single reference station approach is clearly worse than the network solutions, especially at the beginning of the dataset when the ionosphere is more active. The difference between the single reference station approach and the network approaches becomes less pronounced towards the end of the dataset. However the z component shows improvement due to the network corrections for nearly the entire length of the dataset.
8 The difference between the network approach with the standard observation weighting and the network approach with the quality indicator weighting, when only the fixed ambiguity solutions are compared, is insignificant. The two solutions are nearly identical. Figure 12: Position domain results for the single reference station, network approach with and without quality indicator weighting (zoomed in). Table 1 shows the position domain statistics for the three solutions. The single reference station approach performs noticeably worse than the network solutions. Comparing all of the solutions (with both float and fixed ambiguities) the network approach improves the positioning solution by 38 percent. When using the quality indicator weighting this improvement increases to 51 percent. Although this is a significant improvement relative to the single reference station approach, the difference between the standard observation weighting and the quality indicator weighting in only in the ability to maintain a fixed ambiguity solution. During observation intervals when both network solutions have fixed ambiguities the difference is negligible. Although negligible the network approach with the quality indicator provides a 0.5% improvement over the standard weighting solution when fixed ambiguity solutions are compared. Table 1: Position domain statistics for the single reference station, the network approach with standard observation weighting for all solutions and only fixed ambiguity solution, and the network approach with quality indicator weighting. (cm) Mean Standard RMS deviation Single RS Network (all) Network (fixed) Network with QI Table 2 shows the ambiguity domain results for the three solutions. Two ambiguity qualities are shown in the table: The percentage of fixed ambiguities in the position domain (shown in Table 2) relates to the position errors shown in Figures 11 and 12. This is the percentage of fixed ambiguities from the position domain test. There is very little difference between the solutions for this ambiguity resolution statistic. However, the quality indicator network approach is able to resolve all of the ambiguities for the entire length of the dataset. The standard weighting network approach and the single reference station approach are able to fix nearly all of the ambiguities, 99.8 and 99.3 percent, respectively. This is the only notable improvement when using the quality indicator weighting to improve the position domain performance. The second statistic is the percentage of fixed ambiguity attempts, when the ambiguities are searched every ten seconds. The float solution is reset after each search. This means that each ten second dataset is independent. This is an indication of the ability to resolve ambiguities after a reset. This demonstrates the strength of the network approach. The network approaches both fixed 99.4 percent of their ambiguity attempts while the single reference station approach was only able to resolve 67.4 percent. This shows that the network approach is able to better resolve ambiguities after a loss of lock, a system restart or a startup at any given time. There is no difference between the standard observation weighting and the quality indicator weighting for this statistic. Table 2: Ambiguity domain statistics for the single reference station, network approach with and without quality indicator weighting. % fixed ambiguities in position domain % successful fix attempts (every 10 seconds) Single RS Network Network w i t h Q I CONCLUSIONS This paper proposes a geometry based quality index to monitor network RTK quality. This quality index can monitor the linearity of the instantaneous network errors in terms of each double difference measurement independently. The quality index was shown over time for three double difference satellite pairs and compared to the L1 carrier phase double difference residuals. In all the cases shown, the quality value closely follows the network RTK results, stating that this geometry-based quality index is a good
9 indicator for measurement quality after interpolating and applying the corrections. This quality indicator was later used to try and improve the position accuracy by using it as a weighting tool for the measurements. The network approach for both the standard weighting and quality indicator weighting showed a noticeable improvement over the single reference station approach in terms of position accuracy and ambiguity resolution performance, maintaining fixed ambiguities for the entire dataset, while the standard weighting solution fell into float mode for.2% of the dataset. This was the only noticeable difference between the two approaches. When both solutions had fixed ambiguities the difference between the solution s statistics (mean, standard deviation and RMS) was less than one millimeter. This shows that although the quality indicator is effective in tracking and monitoring network interpolation performance, it had a minimal effect on the position domain solution in this case. The quality indicator weighted method appears to be slightly more robust in terms of maintaining a fixed ambiguity solution, however this was only obvious for 0.2% of the dataset. The rest of the time the quality indicator weighted method provided no noticeable improvement. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors would like to thank Volker Wegener of the Zentrale Stelle SAPOS, LGN, Hannover for kindly supplying us the data used for the numerical analysis. REFERENCES Alves, P. (2004) Development of Two Novel Carrier Phase-Based Methods for Multiple Reference Station Positioning, UCGE Report number 20203, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Calgary Chen, X., H. Landau, U. Volloth (2003) New Tool for Network RTK Integrity Monitoring, Proceedings of the National Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation ION GPS 2003 (September 2003, Portland, USA), Dai, L., Han, S., Wang, J., Rizos, C. (2004) Comparison of Interpolation Techniques in Network-Based GPS Techniques, Journal of The Institute of Navigation, Vol. 50, No. 4, Euler, H.-J., C.R. Keenan, B.E. Zebhauser, G. Wübbena, (2001) Study of a Simplified Approach in Utilizing Information from Permanent Reference Station Arrays, Proceedings of National Technical Meeting of the Institute of Naviagation, ION GPS 2001 (September 2001, Salt Lake City, USA), Euler, H.-J., S. Seeger, O. Zelzer, F. Takac, B.E. Zebhauser (2004) Improvement of Positioning Performance Using Standardized Network RTK Messages, Proceedings of the Institute of Navigation National Technical Meeting, ION NTM 2004 (January 2004, San Diego, USA), Fotopoulos, G. and Cannon, M. E. (2001) An Overview of Multi-Reference Station Methods for Cm-Level Positioning, GPS Solutions, Vol. 4, No. 3, 1-10, 2001 Gao, Y., Z. Li and J.F. McLellan (1997) Carrier Phase Based Regional Area Differenctial GPS for Decimetre-Level Positioning and Navigation, Proceedings of the National Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation, ION GPS 1997 (September 1997, Kansas City, USA), Marel, H. van der (1998) Virtual GPS Reference Stations in the Netherlands, Proceedings of the National Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation, ION GPS 1998 (September 1998, Nashville, USA), Raquet, J. (1998) Development of a Method for Kinematic GPS Carrier-Pahse Ambiguity Resolution Using Multiple Reference Receivers. UCGE Reports 20116, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Calgary, Canada. Wanninger, L. (2000) Präzise Positionierung in regionalen GPS-Referenzstationsnetzen, PhD Thesis, published by Deutsche Geodätische Kommission, series C, booklet 508, Munich 2000, Germany Wanninger, L. (2004) Ionospheric Disturbance Indicies for RTK and Network RTK Positioning, Proceedings of the National Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation, ION GPS 2004 (September 2004, Long Beach, USA), Wübbena, G., Schmitz, M., Bagge, A. (2004) GNSMART Irregularity Readings for Distance Dependent Errors, Geo++ White Paper, Garbsen, Germany.
Network RTK Quality Indication Using Linear Interpolation Residuals
Network RTK Quality Indication Using Linear Interpolation Residuals September 2005 Published in proceedings of ION GNSS September 13-16, 2005, Long Beach, CA P. Alves, I. Geisler, N. Brown, J. Wirth, and
More informationRTK Rover Performance using the Master-Auxiliary Concept
Journal of Global Positioning Systems (2006) Vol. 5, No. 1-2:135-144 RTK Rover Performance using the Master-Auxiliary Concept N. Brown, I. Geisler and L. Troyer Networked Reference Stations and Structural
More informationRTK Rover Performance using the Master- Auxiliary Concept
RTK Rover Performance using the Master- Auxiliary Concept N. Brown, I. Geisler and L. Troyer Networked Reference Stations and Structural Monitoring Leica Geosystems, Heinrich-Wild-Strasse, Heerbrugg, 9435,
More informationNew Tools for Network RTK Integrity Monitoring
New Tools for Network RTK Integrity Monitoring Xiaoming Chen, Herbert Landau, Ulrich Vollath Trimble Terrasat GmbH BIOGRAPHY Dr. Xiaoming Chen is a software engineer at Trimble Terrasat. He holds a PhD
More informationIonospheric Disturbance Indices for RTK and Network RTK Positioning
Ionospheric Disturbance Indices for RTK and Network RTK Positioning Lambert Wanninger Geodetic Institute, Dresden University of Technology, Germany BIOGRAPHY Lambert Wanninger received his Dipl.-Ing. and
More informationPerformance Evaluation of Multiple Reference Station GPS RTK for a Medium Scale Network
Journal of Global Positioning Systems (2004) Vol. 3, No. 12: 173182 Performance Evaluation of Multiple Reference Station GPS RTK for a Medium Scale Network T.H. Diep Dao, Paul Alves and Gérard Lachapelle
More informationJournal of Global Positioning Systems
Vol. 7, No. 2, 2008 Journal of Global Positioning Systems ISSN 1446-3156 (Print Version) ISSN 1446-3164 (CD-ROM Version) International Association of Chinese Professionals in Global Positioning Systems
More informationLatest Developments in Network RTK Modeling to Support GNSS Modernization
Journal of Global Positioning Systems (2007) Vol.6, No.1: 47-55 Latest Developments in Network RTK Modeling to Support GNSS Modernization Herbert Landau, Xiaoming Chen, Adrian Kipka, Ulrich Vollath Trimble
More informationAN ALGORITHM FOR NETWORK REAL TIME KINEMATIC PROCESSING
AN ALGORITHM FOR NETWORK REAL TIME KINEMATIC PROCESSING A. Malekzadeh*, J. Asgari, A. R. Amiri-Simkooei Dept. Geomatics, Faculty of Engineering, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran - (Ardalan.Malekzadeh,
More informationReal-time RTK messages for permanent reference station applications standardized by RTCM. Dr.-Ing. Hans-Juergen Euler Leica Research Fellow
Real-time RTK messages for permanent reference station applications standardized by RTCM Dr.-Ing. Hans-Juergen Euler Leica Research Fellow Permanent Station Arrays Arrays with Permanent Stations are established
More informationSUPPORT OF NETWORK FORMATS BY TRIMBLE GPSNET NETWORK RTK SOLUTION
SUPPORT OF NETWORK FORMATS BY TRIMBLE GPSNET NETWORK RTK SOLUTION TRIMBLE TERRASAT GMBH, HARINGSTRASSE 19, 85635 HOEHENKIRCHEN, GERMANY STATUS The Trimble GPSNet network RTK solution was first introduced
More informationSome of the proposed GALILEO and modernized GPS frequencies.
On the selection of frequencies for long baseline GALILEO ambiguity resolution P.J.G. Teunissen, P. Joosten, C.D. de Jong Department of Mathematical Geodesy and Positioning, Delft University of Technology,
More informationTrimble Business Center:
Trimble Business Center: Modernized Approaches for GNSS Baseline Processing Trimble s industry-leading software includes a new dedicated processor for static baselines. The software features dynamic selection
More informationGeneration of Consistent GNSS SSR Corrections
Generation of Consistent GNSS SSR Corrections for Distributed CORS Networks Jannes Wübbena, Martin Schmitz, Gerhard Wübbena Geo++ GmbH 30827 Garbsen, Germany www.geopp.de Abstract Generation of Consistent
More informationReal-Time Carrier Phase Ambiguity Resolution for GPS/GLONASS Reference Station Networks
Real-Time Carrier Phase Ambiguity Resolution for GPS/GLONASS Reference Station Networks Liwen Dai, Jinling Wang, Chris Rizos and Shaowei Han School of Geomatic Engineering University of New South Wales
More informationRTCM State Space Representation (SSR) Overall Concepts Towards PPP-RTK
RTCM State Space Representation (SSR) Overall Concepts Towards PPP-RTK Gerhard Wübbena Geo++ GmbH 30827 Garbsen Germany www.geopp.de Contents Terms and Abbreviations RTCM-SSR Working Group GNSS Error Sources
More informationCOMPARISON OF RELATIVE AND ABSOLUTE PRECISION OF OHIO S WIDE AREA GPS NETWORK INCLUDING THE COMPARISON WITH ALTERNATIVE METHODS.
COMPARISON OF RELATIVE AND ABSOLUTE PRECISION OF OHIO S WIDE AREA GPS NETWORK INCLUDING THE COMPARISON WITH ALTERNATIVE METHODS A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree
More informationDECIMETER LEVEL MAPPING USING DIFFERENTIAL PHASE MEASUREMENTS OF GPS HANDHELD RECEIVERS
DECIMETER LEVEL MAPPING USING DIFFERENTIAL PHASE MEASUREMENTS OF GPS HANDHELD RECEIVERS Dr. Ahmed El-Mowafy Civil and Environmental Engineering Department College of Engineering The United Arab Emirates
More informationTest of a 400 km x 600 km Network of Reference Receivers for Precise Kinematic Carrier-Phase Positioning in Norway
Test of a 400 km x 600 km Network of Reference Receivers for Precise Kinematic Carrier-Phase Positioning in Norway Captain J. Raquet, Air Force Institute of Technology G. Lachapelle, The University of
More informationProMark 3 RTK. White Paper
ProMark 3 RTK White Paper Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 1 2. ProMark3 RTK Operational Environment... 2 3. BLADE TM : A Unique Magellan Technology for Quicker Convergence... 3 4. ProMark3 RTK Fixed
More informationAsian Journal of Science and Technology Vol. 08, Issue, 11, pp , November, 2017 RESEARCH ARTICLE
Available Online at http://www.journalajst.com ASIAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ISSN: 0976-3376 Asian Journal of Science and Technology Vol. 08, Issue, 11, pp.6697-6703, November, 2017 ARTICLE INFO
More informationGAVIN DOCHERTY & CRAIG ROBERTS School of Surveying & Spatial Information Systems. University of NSW
FIG2010, Sydney, Australia 15 April 2010 The impact of Solar Cycle 24 on Network RTK in Australia GAVIN DOCHERTY & CRAIG ROBERTS School of Surveying & Spatial Information Systems University of NSW School
More informationPerformance of Research-Based N-RTK Positioning System in ISKANDAR Malaysia
1 International Symposium on GPS/GNSS October -8, 1. Performance of Research-Based N-RTK Positioning System in ISKANDAR Malaysia Shariff, N. S. M., Musa, T. A., Omar, K., Ses, S. and Abdullah, K. A. UTM-GNSS
More informationJun CHEN. Differential GNSS positioning with low-cost receivers. Background. Objective: Methods:
Jun CHEN Differential GNSS positioning with low-cost receivers Duration of the Thesis: 6 months Completion: May 2013 Tutor: Prof. Dr. sc.-techn. Wolfgang Keller Dr. Maorong Ge (Potsdam-GFZ) Examiner: Prof.
More informationProMark 500 White Paper
ProMark 500 White Paper How Magellan Optimally Uses GLONASS in the ProMark 500 GNSS Receiver How Magellan Optimally Uses GLONASS in the ProMark 500 GNSS Receiver 1. Background GLONASS brings to the GNSS
More informationNew Developments of Inertial Navigation Systems at Applanix
Hutton et al 1 New Developments of Inertial Navigation Systems at Applanix JOE HUTTON, TATYANA BOURKE, BRUNO SCHERZINGER, APPLANIX ABSTRACT GNSS-Aided Inertial Navigation for Direct Georeferencing of aerial
More informationDetection and Mitigation of Static Multipath in L1 Carrier Phase Measurements Using a Dual- Antenna Approach
Detection and Mitigation of Static Multipath in L1 Carrier Phase Measurements Using a Dual- Antenna Approach M.C. Santos Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, University of New Brunswick, P.O.
More informationGPS STATIC-PPP POSITIONING ACCURACY VARIATION WITH OBSERVATION RECORDING INTERVAL FOR HYDROGRAPHIC APPLICATIONS (ASWAN, EGYPT)
GPS STATIC-PPP POSITIONING ACCURACY VARIATION WITH OBSERVATION RECORDING INTERVAL FOR HYDROGRAPHIC APPLICATIONS (ASWAN, EGYPT) Ashraf Farah Associate Professor,College of Engineering, Aswan University,
More informationEFFECTS OF IONOSPHERIC SMALL-SCALE STRUCTURES ON GNSS
EFFECTS OF IONOSPHERIC SMALL-SCALE STRUCTURES ON GNSS G. Wautelet, S. Lejeune, R. Warnant Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium, Avenue Circulaire 3 B-8 Brussels (Belgium) e-mail: gilles.wautelet@oma.be
More informationOn the GNSS integer ambiguity success rate
On the GNSS integer ambiguity success rate P.J.G. Teunissen Mathematical Geodesy and Positioning Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences Introduction Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) ambiguity
More informationUCGE Reports Number 20054
UCGE Reports Number 20054 Department of Geomatics Engineering An Analysis of Some Critical Error Sources in Static GPS Surveying (URL: http://www.geomatics.ucalgary.ca/links/gradtheses.html) by Weigen
More informationSpace Weather influence on satellite based navigation and precise positioning
Space Weather influence on satellite based navigation and precise positioning R. Warnant, S. Lejeune, M. Bavier Royal Observatory of Belgium Avenue Circulaire, 3 B-1180 Brussels (Belgium) What this talk
More informationThe Performance of Virtual Reference Stations in Active Geodetic GPS-networks under Solar Maximum Conditions
The Performance of Virtual Reference Stations in Active Geodetic GPS-networks under Solar Maximum Conditions Lambert Wanninger, Geodetic Institute, Dresden University of Technology, Germany Proc. ION GPS
More informationFirst results from Virtual Reference Station (VRS) and Precise Point Positioning (PPP) GPS research at the Western Australian Centre for Geodesy
Journal of Global Positioning Systems (2004) Vol. 3, No. 1-2: 79-84 First results from Virtual Reference Station (VRS) and Precise Point Positioning (PPP) GPS research at the Western Australian Centre
More informationA comparison of the VRS and MAC principles for network RTK
International Global Navigation Satellite Systems Society IGNSS Symposium 2009 Holiday Inn Surfers Paradise, Qld, Australia 1 3 December, 2009 A comparison of the VRS and MAC principles for network RTK
More informationAccuracy Evaluation Internet-Based GNSS for Kinematic Surveying the Case Study in Thailand
Accuracy Evaluation Internet-Based GNSS for Kinematic Surveying the Case Study in Thailand Kritsada Anantakarn 1 1 Faculty of Engineering and Architectural : Uthenthawai campus. Rajamongala University
More informationReference Station Network Based RTK Systems - Concepts and Progress
BIOGRAPHY Reference Station Network Based RTK Systems - Concepts and Progress Rizos C School of Surveying and Spatial Information Systems The University of New South Wales, Sydney NSW 2052 AUSTRALIA E-mail:
More informationFieldGenius Technical Notes GPS Terminology
FieldGenius Technical Notes GPS Terminology Almanac A set of Keplerian orbital parameters which allow the satellite positions to be predicted into the future. Ambiguity An integer value of the number of
More informationIonospheric Estimation using Extended Kriging for a low latitude SBAS
Ionospheric Estimation using Extended Kriging for a low latitude SBAS Juan Blanch, odd Walter, Per Enge, Stanford University ABSRAC he ionosphere causes the most difficult error to mitigate in Satellite
More informationGNSS Technologies. PPP and RTK
PPP and RTK 29.02.2016 Content Carrier phase based positioning PPP RTK VRS Slides based on: GNSS Applications and Methods, by S. Gleason and D. Gebre-Egziabher (Eds.), Artech House Inc., 2009 http://www.gnssapplications.org/
More informationBroadcast Ionospheric Model Accuracy and the Effect of Neglecting Ionospheric Effects on C/A Code Measurements on a 500 km Baseline
Broadcast Ionospheric Model Accuracy and the Effect of Neglecting Ionospheric Effects on C/A Code Measurements on a 500 km Baseline Intro By David MacDonald Waypoint Consulting May 2002 The ionosphere
More informationGeodetic Reference via Precise Point Positioning - RTK
2012 Geo++ GmbH Geodetic Reference via Precise Point Positioning - RTK Gerhard Wübbena Geo++ GmbH 30827 Garbsen Germany www.geopp.de 2012 Geo++ GmbH Contents Terms and Abbreviations GNSS Principles GNSS
More informationThe Performance of Virtual Reference Stations in Active Geodetic GPS-networks under Solar Maximum Conditions
The Performance of Virtual Reference Stations in Active Geodetic GPS-networks under Solar Maximum Conditions Lambert Wanninger, Geodetic Institute, Dresden University of Technology, Germany (Proceedings
More informationPerformances of Modernized GPS and Galileo in Relative Positioning with weighted ionosphere Delays
Agence Spatiale Algérienne Centre des Techniques Spatiales Agence Spatiale Algérienne Centre des Techniques Spatiales الوكالة الفضائية الجزائرية مركز للتقنيات الفضائية Performances of Modernized GPS and
More informationA GLONASS Observation Message Compatible With The Compact Measurement Record Format
A GLONASS Observation Message Compatible With The Compact Measurement Record Format Leica Geosystems AG 1 Introduction Real-time kinematic (RTK) Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) positioning has
More informationProcedures for Quality Control of GNSS Surveying Results Based on Network RTK Corrections.
Procedures for Quality Control of GNSS Surveying Results Based on Network RTK Corrections. Limin WU, China Feng xia LI, China Joël VAN CRANENBROECK, Switzerland Key words : GNSS Rover RTK operations, GNSS
More informationCarrier Phase Multipath Corrections Based on GNSS Signal Quality Measurements to Improve CORS Observations
Carrier Phase Multipath Corrections Based on GNSS Signal Quality Measurements to Improve CORS Observations Christian Rost and Lambert Wanninger Geodetic Institute Technische Universität Dresden Dresden,
More informationIntegrated Quality Indicators and Stochastic Modelling for Real-Time Positioning: Overview and Implementation
Integrated Quality Indicators and Stochastic Modelling for Real-Time Positioning: Overview and Implementation Simon FULLER, Eldar RUBINOV, Philip COLLIER and James SEAGER, Australia Keywords: Real-Time,
More informationInteger Ambiguity Resolution for Precise Point Positioning Patrick Henkel
Integer Ambiguity Resolution for Precise Point Positioning Patrick Henkel Overview Introduction Sequential Best-Integer Equivariant Estimation Multi-frequency code carrier linear combinations Galileo:
More informationGNSS OBSERVABLES. João F. Galera Monico - UNESP Tuesday 12 Sep
GNSS OBSERVABLES João F. Galera Monico - UNESP Tuesday Sep Basic references Basic GNSS Observation Equations Pseudorange Carrier Phase Doppler SNR Signal to Noise Ratio Pseudorange Observation Equation
More informationImproved Ambiguity Resolution by an Equatorial Ionospheric Differential Correction for Precise Positioning
Improved Ambiguity Resolution by an Equatorial Ionospheric Differential Correction for Precise Positioning NORSUZILA YA ACOB 1, MARDINA ABDULLAH,* MAHAMOD ISMAIL,* AND AZAMI ZAHARIM 3,** 1 Faculty of Electrical
More informationNetwork RTK Research and Implementation - A Geodetic Perspective
Journal of Global Positioning Systems (2002) Vol. 1, No. 2: 144-150 Network RTK Research and Implementation - A Geodetic Perspective C. Rizos School of Surveying and Spatial Information Systems, The University
More informationIonospheric Correction and Ambiguity Resolution in DGPS with Single Frequency
Applied Physics Research November, 9 Ionospheric Correction and Ambiguity Resolution in DGPS with Single Frequency Norsuzila Ya acob Department of Electrical, Electronics and Systems Engineering Universiti
More informationFAST PRECISE GPS POSITIONING IN THE PRESENCE OF IONOSPHERIC DELAYS
FAST PRECISE GPS POSITIONING IN THE PRESENCE OF IONOSPHERIC DELAYS Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Technische Universiteit Delft, op gezag van de Rector Magnificus prof.dr.ir.
More informationGNSS Multi Station Adjustment for Permanent Deformation Analysis Networks
GNSS Multi Station Adjustment for Permanent Deformation Analysis Networks Gerhard Wübbena, Andreas Bagge Geo++ GmbH Gesellschaft für satellitengestützte geodätische und navigatorische Technologien mbh
More informationPPP with Ambiguity Resolution (AR) using RTCM-SSR
PPP with Ambiguity Resolution (AR) using RTCM-SSR Gerhard Wübbena, Martin Schmitz, Andreas Bagge Geo++ GmbH 30827 Garbsen Germany www.geopp.de PPP with Ambiguity Resolution (AR) using RTCM-SSR Abstract
More informationHigh Precision GNSS RTK Navigation for Soldiers and Other Military Assets
High Precision GNSS RTK Navigation for Soldiers and Other Military Assets Gérard Lachapelle Professor Department of Geomatics Engineering Schulich School of Engineering The University of Calgary 2500 University
More informationGeo++ GmbH Garbsen Germany
On GNSS Station Calibration of Antenna Near-Field Effects in RTK-Networks Gerhard Wübbena, Martin Schmitz Geo++ GmbH 30827 Garbsen Germany www.geopp.com Overview Motivation Near-Field Effects / Near-Field
More informationSatellite Navigation Integrity and integer ambiguity resolution
Satellite Navigation Integrity and integer ambiguity resolution Picture: ESA AE4E08 Sandra Verhagen Course 2010 2011, lecture 12 1 Today s topics Integrity and RAIM Integer Ambiguity Resolution Study Section
More informationPhase Center Calibration and Multipath Test Results of a Digital Beam-Steered Antenna Array
Phase Center Calibration and Multipath Test Results of a Digital Beam-Steered Antenna Array Kees Stolk and Alison Brown, NAVSYS Corporation BIOGRAPHY Kees Stolk is an engineer at NAVSYS Corporation working
More informationFast convergence of Trimble CenterPoint RTX by regional augmentation
Fast convergence of Trimble CenterPoint RTX by regional augmentation Dr. Ralf Drescher Trimble Terrasat GmbH, Munich EGU General Assembly 2015, Vienna Thursday, 16 April 2015 Outline Introduction CenterPoint
More informationIndoor Carrier Phase Tracking and Positioning with Difference Correlators
Indoor Carrier Phase Tracking and Positioning with Difference Correlators T. Pany (1), H.-J. Euler () and J. Winkel (1) (1) IFEN GmbH, Alte Gruber Straße 6, 85586 Poing, Germany, () inposition gmbh, PO
More informationPrecise Positioning with NovAtel CORRECT Including Performance Analysis
Precise Positioning with NovAtel CORRECT Including Performance Analysis NovAtel White Paper April 2015 Overview This article provides an overview of the challenges and techniques of precise GNSS positioning.
More informationGeo++'s Experiments on Android GNSS Raw Data
Geo++'s Experiments on Android GNSS Raw Data Temmo Wübbena, Francesco Darugna, Akira Ito, Jannes Wübbena Geo++ GmbH 30827 Garbsen, Germany www.geopp.de Outline SSRPOST concept Android Applications Absolute
More informationPositioning by an Active GPS System: Experimental Investigation of the Attainable Accuracy. Werner LIENHART, Andreas WIESER, Fritz K.
Positioning by an Active GPS System: Experimental Investigation of the Attainable Accuracy Werner LIENHART, Andreas WIESER, Fritz K. BRUNNER Key words: GPS, active GPS system, field test, positioning accuracy,
More informationThe Benefit of Triple Frequency on Cycle Slip Detection
Presented at the FIG Congress 2018, The Benefit of Triple Frequency on Cycle Slip Detection May 6-11, 2018 in Istanbul, Turkey Dong Sheng Zhao 1, Craig Hancock 1, Gethin Roberts 2, Lawrence Lau 1 1 The
More informationA Positon and Orientation Post-Processing Software Package for Land Applications - New Technology
A Positon and Orientation Post-Processing Software Package for Land Applications - New Technology Tatyana Bourke, Applanix Corporation Abstract This paper describes a post-processing software package that
More informationCOMPARISON OF GPS COMMERCIAL SOFTWARE PACKAGES TO PROCESSING STATIC BASELINES UP TO 30 KM
COMPARISON OF GPS COMMERCIAL SOFTWARE PACKAGES TO PROCESSING STATIC BASELINES UP TO 30 KM Khaled Mohamed Abdel Mageed Civil Engineering, Cairo, Egypt E-Mail: khaled_mgd@yahoo.com ABSTRACT The objective
More informationPositioning with Single and Dual Frequency Smartphones Running Android 7 or Later
Positioning with Single and Dual Frequency Smartphones Running Android 7 or Later * René Warnant, *Laura Van De Vyvere, + Quentin Warnant * University of Liege Geodesy and GNSS + Augmenteo, Plaine Image,
More informationGuochang Xu GPS. Theory, Algorithms and Applications. Second Edition. With 59 Figures. Sprin ger
Guochang Xu GPS Theory, Algorithms and Applications Second Edition With 59 Figures Sprin ger Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 AKeyNoteofGPS 2 1.2 A Brief Message About GLONASS 3 1.3 Basic Information of Galileo
More informationDevelopment and assessment of a medium-range real-time kinematic GPS algorithm using an ionospheric information filter
LETTER Earth Planets Space, 52, 783 788, 2000 Development and assessment of a medium-range real-time kinematic GPS algorithm using an ionospheric information filter Ming Yang 1, Chin-Hsien Tang 1, and
More informationPrecise GNSS Positioning for Mass-market Applications
Precise GNSS Positioning for Mass-market Applications Yang GAO, Canada Key words: GNSS, Precise GNSS Positioning, Precise Point Positioning (PPP), Correction Service, Low-Cost GNSS, Mass-Market Application
More informationGlobal Correction Services for GNSS
Global Correction Services for GNSS Hemisphere GNSS Whitepaper September 5, 2015 Overview Since the early days of GPS, new industries emerged while existing industries evolved to use position data in real-time.
More informationDemonstrations of Multi-Constellation Advanced RAIM for Vertical Guidance using GPS and GLONASS Signals
Demonstrations of Multi-Constellation Advanced RAIM for Vertical Guidance using GPS and GLONASS Signals Myungjun Choi, Juan Blanch, Stanford University Dennis Akos, University of Colorado Boulder Liang
More informationStudy and analysis of Differential GNSS and Precise Point Positioning
IOSR Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering (IOSR-JEEE) e-issn: 2278-1676,p-ISSN: 2320-3331, Volume 9, Issue 2 Ver. I (Mar Apr. 2014), PP 53-59 Study and analysis of Differential GNSS and Precise
More informationGeo++ White Paper. Comparison and Analysis of BLOCK II/IIA Offsets from Antenna Field Calibrations
Geo++ White Paper Comparison and Analysis of BLOCK II/IIA Offsets from Antenna Field Calibrations Gerhard Wübbena, Martin Schmitz Geo++ Gesellschaft für satellitengestützte geodätische und navigatorische
More informationBernese GPS Software 4.2
Bernese GPS Software 4.2 Introduction Signal Processing Geodetic Use Details of modules Bernese GPS Software 4.2 Highest Accuracy GPS Surveys Research and Education Big Permanent GPS arrays Commercial
More informationMultipath Error Detection Using Different GPS Receiver s Antenna
Multipath Error Detection Using Different GPS Receiver s Antenna Md. Nor KAMARUDIN and Zulkarnaini MAT AMIN, Malaysia Key words: GPS, Multipath error detection, antenna residual SUMMARY The use of satellite
More informationComparing the Quality Indicators of GPS Carrier Phase Observations. Chalermchon Satirapod Jinling Wang
Comparing the Quality Indicators of GPS Carrier Phase Observations Chalermchon Satirapod Jinling Wang STRACT School of Geomatic Engineering The University of New South Wales Sydney NSW 5 Australia email:
More informationApplication of GNSS Methods for Monitoring Offshore Platform Deformation
Application of GNSS Methods for Monitoring Offshore Platform Deformation Khin Cho Myint 1,*, Abd Nasir Matori 1, and Adel Gohari 1 1 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universiti Teknologi
More informationSidereal Filtering Based on GPS Single Differences for Mitigating Multipath Effects
International Global Navigation Satellite Systems Society IGNSS Symposium 2007 The University of New South Wales, Sydney, ustralia 4 6 December, 2007 Sidereal Filtering Based on GPS Single Differences
More informationPerformance Assessment of a GPS Network RTK Service
Jose APONTE, Xiaolin MENG and Mark BURBIDGE, United Kingdom Key words: network RTK GPS, corrections, service, GPRS, performance. SUMMARY Network RTK (NRTK) GPS positioning is considered the most appropriate
More informationNAVIGATION SYSTEMS PANEL (NSP) NSP Working Group meetings. Impact of ionospheric effects on SBAS L1 operations. Montreal, Canada, October, 2006
NAVIGATION SYSTEMS PANEL (NSP) NSP Working Group meetings Agenda Item 2b: Impact of ionospheric effects on SBAS L1 operations Montreal, Canada, October, 26 WORKING PAPER CHARACTERISATION OF IONOSPHERE
More informationThree and Four Carriers for Reliable Ambiguity Resolution
Three and Four Carriers for Reliable Ambiguity Resolution Knut Sauer, Trimble Terrasat GmbH Ulrich Vollath, Trimble Terrasat GmbH Francisco Amarillo, ESTEC BIOGRAPHY Dr. Knut Sauer received a Ph.D. in
More informationModelling GPS Observables for Time Transfer
Modelling GPS Observables for Time Transfer Marek Ziebart Department of Geomatic Engineering University College London Presentation structure Overview of GPS Time frames in GPS Introduction to GPS observables
More informationCycle slip detection using multi-frequency GPS carrier phase observations: A simulation study
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Advances in Space Research 46 () 44 49 www.elsevier.com/locate/asr Cycle slip detection using multi-frequency GPS carrier phase observations: A simulation study
More informationCycle Slip and Clock Jump Repair with Multi- Frequency Multi-Constellation GNSS data for Precise Point Positioning
International Global Navigation Satellite Systems Society IGNSS Symposium 2015 Outrigger Gold Coast, Qld Australia 14-16 July, 2015 Cycle Slip and Clock Jump Repair with Multi- Frequency Multi-Constellation
More informationTable of Contents. Frequently Used Abbreviation... xvii
GPS Satellite Surveying, 2 nd Edition Alfred Leick Department of Surveying Engineering, University of Maine John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1995 (Navtech order #1028) Table of Contents Preface... xiii Frequently
More informationComparative analysis of GNSS Real Time Kinematic methods for navigation
IAV Hassan II Comparative analysis of GNSS Real Time Kinematic methods for navigation Mourad BOUZIANI School of Geomatic Sciences, IAV Hassan II, Rabat, Morocco. Coordinator of the Master - GNSS, IAV&
More informationWhat to Expect with the Current Constellation
FIGURE 1 Galileo constellation and occupation status of orbital slots (RAAN: right ascension of the ascending node, May 9, 2017). Source: ESA HOW GALILEO BENEFITS HIGH-PRECISION RTK What to Expect with
More informationSSR Technology for Scalable Real-Time GNSS Applications
SSR Technology for Scalable Real-Time GNSS Applications Gerhard Wübbena, Jannes Wübbena, Temmo Wübbena, Martin Schmitz Geo++ GmbH 30827 Garbsen, Germany www.geopp.de Abstract SSR Technology for scalable
More informationChapter 6 GPS Relative Positioning Determination Concepts
Chapter 6 GPS Relative Positioning Determination Concepts 6-1. General Absolute positioning, as discussed earlier, will not provide the accuracies needed for most USACE control projects due to existing
More informationThe Performance of RTK GPS Mapping In Urban Environments
Presented at GNSS 2004 The 2004 International Symposium on GNSS/GPS Sydney, Australia 6 8 December 2004 The Performance of RTK GPS Mapping In Urban Environments InSu Lee Linlin Ge Satellite Navigation
More informationNear Term Improvements to WAAS Availability
Near Term Improvements to WAAS Availability Juan Blanch, Todd Walter, R. Eric Phelts, Per Enge Stanford University ABSTRACT Since 2003, when it was first declared operational, the Wide Area Augmentation
More informationThis article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and
This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution
More informationGUIDANCE NOTES FOR GNSS NETWORK RTK SURVEYING IN GREAT BRITAIN
GUIDANCE NOTES FOR GNSS NETWORK RTK SURVEYING IN GREAT BRITAIN ISSUE 4 MAY 2015 TSA Collaboration between: This leaflet has been produced to provide surveyors, engineers and their clients with guidelines
More informationABSTRACT: Three types of portable units with GNSS raw data recording capability are assessed to determine static and kinematic position accuracy
ABSTRACT: Three types of portable units with GNSS raw data recording capability are assessed to determine static and kinematic position accuracy under various environments using alternatively their internal
More informationPositioning Techniques. João F. Galera Monico - UNESP Tuesday 12 Sep
Positioning Techniques João F. Galera Monico - UNESP Tuesday 12 Sep Positioning methods Absolute Positioning Static and kinematic SPP and PPP Relative Positioning Static Static rapid Semi kinematic Kinematic
More informationIntegration of GPS with a Rubidium Clock and a Barometer for Land Vehicle Navigation
Integration of GPS with a Rubidium Clock and a Barometer for Land Vehicle Navigation Zhaonian Zhang, Department of Geomatics Engineering, The University of Calgary BIOGRAPHY Zhaonian Zhang is a MSc student
More informationPractical Test on Accuracy and Usability of Virtual Reference Station Method in Finland
Practical Test on Accuracy and Usability of Virtual Reference Station Method in Finland Pasi HÄKLI, Finland Key words: Real-time kinematic (RTK) GPS, Network RTK, Virtual reference station (VRS) SUMMARY
More information