Urban Settlements Development Grant (USDG) PERFORMANCE REVIEW. Presented to the Parliamentary Portfolio on Human Settlements - 06 March 2018

Transcription

1 Urban Settlements Development Grant (USDG) PERFORMANCE REVIEW Presented to the Parliamentary Portfolio on Human Settlements - 06 March 2018

2 Content of the Presentation 1. USDG Strategy, Planning, Monitoring and Delivery 2. Strategic Alignment 3. Budget and Delivery Planning 4. Project Monitoring 5. USDG Expenditure Status and Multi Year Trends Review 6. Informal Settlements Upgrading Strategy and Delivery Pipeline 7. Human Settlements Project Implementation

3 USDG Planning, Delivery, Monitoring Components Strategy Longer term planning Integrated Human Settlements Framework Transit Orientated Development IDP / MSDF / SMF Area Based Service Delivery Demand Analysis Planning Typologies, Land Acquisition & Disposal Strategy Strategy alignment and approval Project Portfolio Management - Screening Pipeline Development Delivery Project Portfolio Management Project reviews Budget at risk Programme Support Training, Coaching and Enablement

4 USDG ALIGNMENT TO STRATEGY

5 Strategy Management Framework The Strategy Management Framework (SMF) integrates the strategic planning activities and deliverables, across Directorates to bring together a holistic, shared strategy, which enables integrated decision making. Strategy Planning IDP Spatial planning Sectorial / Directorate planning Finance Etc.

6 SMF Timeline Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr - May - June Embed Strategy Review Draft to Council Public Participation Council Approval Programme Review Item Review Continuous Alignment Analysis Strategy & Budget Review 6

7 Key elements ABSD Spatial Dev Capacity Socio - Economic TOD *Standardised Data Set in development by DOM

8 Transversal Programme and Project Integration ISWWS TDA Social Serv Energy Transversal Integration *Existing Project, New Projects & Gaps

9 Area Based Views Multi Year FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 Total % Area 1 - North % Area 2 - East % Area 3 - Central % Area 4 - South % Multi Area (City Wide & % Untagged % % Apportionment for projects tagged in more than one area

10 USDG Fund Allocations per Area: All Applications Capital and Operational Budget FY2019 Budget FY2020 Budget FY2021 Area 1 (North) Area 2 (East) Area 3 (Central) Area 4 (South) City Wide VAT & Project Management Total DORA *Apportioned planning

11 City Wide Spatial MSDF View GIS Locations mapping resulting in better location specification. Provides better area based views as well as MSDF alignment view/validation.

12 Strategy alignment Spatial consolidation Transit-Oriented Development Basic service infrastructure Integrated investment programme Socio-economic need Enabling economic growth Top Programmes by Value Multi Year # Item Item Description Spatial Transformation Area IDP SFA Description Top Strategic Priorities Budget F CPX Desalination: CPT Harbour Land Based N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A H N/A 1 - UIC Opportunity City Resource Efficiency and Security CPX Cape Flats Plant Re-use N/A N/A N/A L N/A N/A N/A 4 - PROTECTED AREAS Well-Run City Operational sustainability CPX Athlone Plant Re-use UIC Well-Run City Operational sustainability CPX Zandvliet Plant Re-use N/A N/A N/A L N/A N/A N/A 2 - IGA Well-Run City Operational sustainability C Additional Resources Desalination Reclai M N/A N/A L N/A N/A N/A 3 - CITYWIDE Opportunity City Resource Efficiency and Security CPX Table Mountain Group Aquifer H N/A N/A L N/A N/A H 3 - CITYWIDE Opportunity City Resource Efficiency and Security CPX Macassar Plant Re-use N/A N/A N/A L N/A N/A N/A 4 - PROTECTED AREAS Well-Run City Operational sustainability C Steenbras: Refurbishment of Main Plant H M L H M M M 4 - PROTECTED AREAS Well-Run City Operational sustainability CPX Zandvliet WWTW: Prim Treatment & Sludge H M L M H H H 2 - IGA Opportunity City Position CT as globally competitive City CPX Cape Flats Aquifer H N/A N/A L N/A N/A H 3 - CITYWIDE Opportunity City Resource Efficiency and Security CPX Atlantis Aquifer M N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5 - SPECULATIVE AREAS Opportunity City Resource Efficiency and Security C IRT Phase 2A H H H M H H L 1 - UIC Inclusive City An Efficient Integrated Transport System CPX Zandvliet WWTW: Prim Treatment & Sludge H M L M H H H 2 - IGA Opportunity City Position CT as globally competitive City CPX Core and local fibre routes H H H M H H H 3 - CITYWIDE Opportunity City Leveraging Technology for Progress C Cape Flats WWTW-Refurbish various struct H H M H H H M 4 - PROTECTED AREAS Opportunity City Position CT as globally competitive City CPX Potsdam Plant Re-use N/A N/A N/A L N/A N/A N/A 4 - PROTECTED AREAS Well-Run City Operational sustainability C Potsdam WWTW - Extension H H N/A H H H M 1 - UIC Opportunity City Position CT as globally competitive City CPX Bellville Plant Re-use N/A N/A N/A L N/A N/A N/A 1 - UIC Well-Run City Operational sustainability CPX Meter Replacement Programme H N/A N/A H H N/A H 6 - UNTAGGED Opportunity City Position CT as globally competitive City CPX Meter Replacement Programme H M N/A H L H L 3 - CITYWIDE Opportunity City Position CT as globally competitive City

13 Area Based Location Specific # Item Item Description Department BUDGET FY CPX Zandvliet Plant Re-use Water & Sanitation CPX Macassar Plant Re-use Water & Sanitation C Steenbras: Refurbishment of Main Plant Electricity Generation & Distribution CPX Zandvliet WWTW: Prim Treatment & Sludge Water & Sanitation C IRT Phase 2A Built Environment Management CPX Zandvliet WWTW: Prim Treatment & Sludge Water & Sanitation CPX N2 Interchange (Phase 1) Urban Catalytic Investment C Zandvliet WWTW-Extension Water & Sanitation CPX Forest Village (Blue Downs) New Market Development CPX Enkanini-Khayelitsha Informal Settlements & Backyarders C Macassar WWTW Extension Water & Sanitation CPX HTS: Material Recovery Facility New Solid Waste Management CPX Metro South East Public Transport Facili Built Environment Management CPX Monwabisi Park-Khayelitsha Informal Settlements & Backyarders CPX Beacon Valley Housing Project - Mitchell New Market Development CPX Macassar BNG Housing Project New Market Development CPX Congestion Relief - Erica Drive Built Environment Management C Water Supply at Baden Powell Dr to Khaye Water & Sanitation C Zandvliet WWTW-Extension Water & Sanitation CPX Paardevlei Development - Electricity(MV) Electricity Generation & Distribution

14 City Wide Trends by Themes - Multiyear Item Item Description Fund Source FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 CPX F1 Table Mountain Group Aquifer 1 EFF C F1 Steenbras: Refurbishment of Main Plant 1 EFF CPX F1 Zandvliet WWTW: Prim Treatment & Sludge 1 EFF CPX F1 Cape Flats Aquifer 1 EFF: C F4 IRT Phase 2A 4 NT PTNG C F1 Potsdam WWTW - Extension 1 EFF Item Item Description Fund Source FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 CPX F1 Core and local fibre routes 1 EFF C F1 Cape Flats WWTW-Refurbish various struct 1 EFF C F1 Potsdam WWTW - Extension 1 EFF C F1 Borchards Quarry WWTW 4 NT USDG CPX F2 Cape Flats Rehabilitation 4 NT USDG CPX F1 City corporate access fibre connections 1 EFF Item Item Description Fund Source FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 CPX F1 IRT - Jan Smuts 4 NT PTNG CPX F2 Langa Hostels CRU Prj: Special Quarters 4 Prov House Dev Brd CPX F2 Metro South East Public Transport Facili 4 Private Sector Fin CPX F1 Macassar BNG Housing Project 4 NT USDG CPX F1 Metro Roads: Reconstruction 1 EFF Item Item Description Fund Source FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 C F1 Steenbras: Refurbishment of Main Plant 1 EFF C F1 Cape Flats WWTW-Refurbish various struct 1 EFF C F1 Potsdam WWTW - Extension 1 EFF CPX F2 Sir Lowry's Pass River Upgrade 1 EFF CPX F1 Meter Replacement Programme 1 EFF Item Item Description Fund Source FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 C F4 IRT Phase 2A 4 NT PTNG C F1 Potsdam WWTW - Extension 1 EFF CPX F1 IRT - Jan Smuts 4 NT PTNG CPX F1 Oakdale Switching Station Upgrade Ph 3 1 EFF C F1 Athlone WWTW-Capacity Extension-phase 11 EFF CPX F2 BWAS:M'vlei WTP-SBR P/Line-13km C4-C 1 EFF Item Item Description Fund Source FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 CPX F1 Desalination: CPT Harbour Land Based 1 EFF: CPX F2 Zandvliet WWTW: Prim Treatment & Sludge4 NT USDG CPX F1 Core and local fibre routes 1 EFF C F1 Cape Flats WWTW-Refurbish various struct 1 EFF C F1 Potsdam WWTW - Extension 1 EFF CPX F1 Meter Replacement Programme 1 EFF Item Item Description Fund Source FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 CPX F1 Zandvliet WWTW: Prim Treatment & Sludge1 EFF CPX F2 Zandvliet WWTW: Prim Treatment & Sludge4 NT USDG CPX F1 Core and local fibre routes 1 EFF CPX F2 Sir Lowry's Pass River Upgrade 1 EFF CPX F1 Meter Replacement Programme 1 EFF CPX F1 Oakdale Switching Station Upgrade Ph 3 1 EFF

15 BUDGET AND DELIVERY PLANNING

16 Project Parameters - Better understanding of Project Source: Long term planning Infrastructure Plans Public Participation Sub Councils Strategy Alignment: Opportunity City Safe City Caring City Inclusive City Well Run City Implementation Risk Assessment: Resources Schedule Scope Technical Dependencies Screening Readiness Assessment, using project achievability criteria : (1) Implementation Readiness (2) Financial Feasibility (3) Technical Feasibility (4) Strategic Alignment Gate Size: Major projects Medium projects Small Projects Identify Plan Screen Technical Category: Expand/Develop Upgrade Replace Rehab / Refurbish Upfront Planning Scoping Feasibility Support Conceptual/Preliminary Design Cost Estimate Project Status GATE: Proposals passed for next step in Project Planning Process

17 Building a Project Pipeline Corporate Capital Budget Ongoing (pre-screening) Directorates Upfront Planning Project Execution Scoping Feasibility Conceptual Design Detailed Design Execution Commission, Close Out Review Gate Project Proposals Gate Gate Gate Active Projects Gate Gate Gate 5 10 years 3 years

18 Technical Feasibility Strategic Alignment Financial Feasibility Implementation Readiness Screening Questionnaire Focus Area Criteria Questions Type 1. Is the scope of the project clearly defined, understood and documented? Project Pre-Planning a.) The scope/specifications is clearly defined and deliverables identified Yes / No Planning & regulatory requirements Procurement Timeline, Risks & Cost Plan Operational Plan Funding Sources & Affordability b.) Total project budget has been defined. c.) Timeline for the implementation of the project has been defined. 2. Have all the required planning and regulatory requirements been identified and addressed? a.) Is all land impacted upon, with infrastructure, owned by the City. b.) Is the correct zoning applicable. c.) Has Environmental impacts been considered and resolved. Yes / No Yes / No Yes / No / Not applicable Yes / No / Not applicable Yes / No / Not applicable d.) Is any Servitudes required and those registered. Yes / No / Not applicable e.) Has any other planning & regulatory requirements been identified and met. Yes / No / Not applicable f.) Have key stakeholders (communities/councillors) been engaged? 3. Have all the required supply chain requirements been identified and addressed? Yes / No / Not applicable a.) Has procurement strategy and plan been defined and documented. Yes / No / Not applicable b.) Supply chain has been engaged and the SCM demand plan has been captured. Yes / No / Not applicable 4. Has a timeline, cost plan, estimates package and associated risks been defined including future operational impacts? a.) Has a timeline for the project been defined and documented? Yes / No / Not applicable b.) Has a cost plan and estimates been defined and documented? Yes / No / Not applicable c.) Have the associated risks and mitigation measures been identified and documented? Yes / No / Not applicable 4. Has a operational impacts been taken into consideration? a.) The operational plan has been defined and approved by the operational owner. Yes / No / Not applicable b.) Operational resources has been identified, documented and budgeted Yes / No / Not applicable c.) Have alternative operational models been identified and explored Yes / No / Not applicable 5. Have the funding sources of the project been identified and addressed? a.) Have fund sources making up the total project cost has been identified and budgeted for in draft Capital budget. Yes / No / Not applicable b.) Application for grant funding has been approved by fund coordinators Yes / No / Not applicable c.) Has the financial affordability of the project been determined including the operational impact? Yes / No / Not applicable 7. Does the project align with the strategic pillars and focus areas of the City of Cape Town? a.) Does the project align with the City development strategy? Strategic Alignment b.) Does the project align with the strategic pillars? c.) Does the project align with the IDP Programmes? d.)does the project support and contribute towards the Expanded Public Works Programme? 6. Has the technical feasibility been determined, addressed and documented? Yes / No Yes / No Yes / No Yes / No a.) Is the project aligned to the strategic outputs identified Yes / No / Not applicable Design & Standards b.) Have the project key performance indicators been identified and targets Yes / No / Not applicable agreed and documented c.) Is the project aligned to the Social and Economic Development Strategies? Yes / No / Not applicable d.) Have the project been considered in terms of green technology? Yes / No / Not applicable Strategic Alignment: Implementation readiness: Project Preplanning; Regulatory requirements; Procurement; Timeline, Risk & Cost plan; Operational Plan. Financial Feasibility: Funding Sources & Affordability. Technical Feasibility: Design & Standards.

19 Screening and Analysis 1. Capture in SAP PPM 2. IDP alignment 3. GIS tagging MSDF 4. Screening Questionnaire 5. Strategic Themes Qu IDP Transformational Priorities GIS Spatial Mapping (Purple Turtle) Capture in SAP PPM Strategic Themes Questionnaire Q Strategic theme 1 Strategy alignment 2 Spatial consolidation 3 Transit-Oriented Development 4 Basic service infrastructure 5 Integrated investment programme 6 Socio-economic need 7 Enabling economic growth Screening Questionnaire

20 PROJECT MONITORING

21 USDG Internal In-Year Reporting Weekly Financial Reports Monthly Financial Reports Progressive Capital Expenditure Report (PCER) Quarterly Financial and Non-Financial Reports S71 Reports Annual Evaluation Report Circular 88 reporting requirements will enhance the quality of non-financial reporting. etc

22 Programme Support in Key Areas Establish Analyse Facilitate Support Report Key principles: Establish structures; Determine reporting requirements and the current status of PPM Data; Facilitate planning to update PPM Data; Provide ongoing support to project managers; and Report via appropriate structures.

23 PPM Operational Dashboard View Dashboard view showing live status indicators for Screening, Overall Risk, Timeline, Spend, Governance and Procurement. Management by exception, identify issues early, drill down to detail, one version of the truth.

24 Fact Sheet

25 What is the Project Fact Sheet? Single source of information relating to project, produced on-demand from SAP PPM: Screening and Readiness summary (created and updated by PM as and when required). Status & Comments (updated monthly by PM). Spend Timeline Procurement Governance Implementation readiness Budget at Risk PCER comments (updated monthly by PM) Financial information. Spend/Forecasts plans (updated as and when required) Actuals (daily from SAP) Commitments (daily from SAP) Risks and Issues (created and updated by PM as and when required). Implementation risk details (created and updated by PM as and when required). PM Comments (created and updated by PM as and when required). Gantt chart (created and updated by PM as and when required).

26 Screening Timeline JUL FY 17/18 Rollover and start up review FY 17/18 Screen & assess risks AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY FY 18/19 Draft FY 17/18 - Mid year FY 17/18 & FY18/19 budget provisional review & adjustment Assessment and Review review & adjustment ITERATION 1 ITERATION 2 FY 17/18 Screen & assess risks Mid year adjustment Submission FY 17/18 On-going monitoring Submission to Council FY 17/18 Screen & assess risks FY 17/18 Screen & assess risks JUN FY17/18 Assessment FY 18/19 Rollover Assessment and risk ITERATION 3 ITERATION 4 FY 18/19 Draft Budget 1 st Submission to Council Draft Budget & Project Ready Projects 2 nd Submission to Council FY 18/19 Screen & assess risks FY 18/19 Screen & assess risks 1st Draft submission FY 18/19 Screen & assess risks FY 18/19 Screen & assess risks FY18/19 On-going monitoring

27 FY 2017/18 Screening Review Progress Cycle REPORTING STATUS Directorate Department Proj Count Budget 2018 Budget 2019 Iteration 2 Interview Completed Area-Based Service Delivery Assets & Facilities Management Corporate Services Directorate of the Mayor Energy Safety & Security Social Services Transport & Urban Development Authority Informal Settlements, Water & Waste Serv Informal Settlements & Backyarders Solid Waste Management Water & Sanitation Interview Completed Total Iteration 2 Total Grand Total Example Status of Screening progress across Directorates Example Screening Statuses and Values at Risk across portfolio Portfolio Type Screening Qnnr Value At Risk 2018 Budget Decrease Budget Increase Budget 2018 Capex Red Amber Green Capex Total Opex Red Amber Green Opex Total Grand Total % % 11.41% Cycle REPORTING STATUS Directorate Department Proj Count Budget 2018 Value at Risk 2018 Budget Decrease Budget Increase Iteration 2 Interview Completed Area-Based Service Delivery Assets & Facilities Management Corporate Services Directorate of the Mayor Energy Safety & Security Social Services Transport & Urban Development Authority Informal Settlements, Water & Waste Serv Informal Settlements & Backyarders Solid Waste Management Water & Sanitation Interview Completed Total Iteration 2 Total Grand Total Example Screening Values at Risk by Directorates

28 Monitoring Actuals vs Plan to date * Actuals & Commitments as at 23 rd February 2018, within Period 8, FY2018

29 Example FY17/18 Top 25 Unspent by Value - 2,421Bn/7,852Bn (30.8%) Directorate (by Requesting CC) Department (by Requesting CC) Project Project Name Budget Actuals Commitments Unspent % Unspent Informal Settlements, Water & Waste Serv Water & Sanitation CPX Desalination: CPT Harbour Land Based % Informal Settlements, Water & Waste Serv Water & Sanitation CPX Cape Flats Aquifer % Informal Settlements, Water & Waste Serv Water & Sanitation CPX Atlantis Aquifer % Informal Settlements, Water & Waste Serv Water & Sanitation CPX Meter Replacement Programme % Transport & Urban Development Authority Asset Management & Maintenance CPX IRT Vehicle Acquisition % Informal Settlements, Water & Waste Serv Water & Sanitation CPX Zandvliet Plant Re-use % Informal Settlements, Water & Waste Serv Water & Sanitation CPX Point of Distribution Infrastructure % Informal Settlements, Water & Waste Serv Water & Sanitation CPX Pressure Management: COCT 17/ % Assets & Facilities Management Fleet Management CPX FS Fleet Replacement FY % Informal Settlements, Water & Waste Serv Water & Sanitation CPX Table Mountain Group Aquifer % Informal Settlements, Water & Waste Serv Solid Waste Management CPX Plant & Vehicles: Replacement FY % Energy Electricity Generation & Distribution CPX Bloemhof Network Control Centre % Informal Settlements, Water & Waste Serv Water & Sanitation CPX Bellville WWTW Extension % Informal Settlements, Water & Waste Serv Water & Sanitation CPX Desalination % Informal Settlements, Water & Waste Serv Water & Sanitation CPX BWAS:Muldersvlei Reservoir & Pipeline % Energy Electricity Generation & Distribution C Street Lighting: City Wide % Energy Electricity Generation & Distribution C Electrification % Informal Settlements, Water & Waste Serv Water & Sanitation CPX Zandvliet WWTW: Prim Treatment & Sludge % Transport & Urban Development Authority Built Environment Management CPX IRT PH2A-Stock Road % Informal Settlements, Water & Waste Serv Water & Sanitation CPX Sir Lowry's Pass River Upgrade % Informal Settlements, Water & Waste Serv Water & Sanitation CPX Acquisition & Commissioning of large Gen % Energy Electricity Generation & Distribution C Electrification - Backyarders % Corporate Services Information Systems & Technology CPX Core and local fibre routes % Informal Settlements, Water & Waste Serv Water & Sanitation CPX IT: System, Infra. Equipment: Additional % Informal Settlements, Water & Waste Serv Water & Sanitation CPX Contermanskloof Reservoir % Total % WR/NWP accounts for approx. R1.7 Bn of the 2.96Bn

30 USDG: 2017/18 STATUS

31 USDG Actual Expenditure vs Funds Received to date Projected Cash flows 2017/18 Payment of Grant Tranches Actual Expenditure (Excluding Rollover Expenditure) % of Expenditure to Funds Received To date July August September October November December January February March April May June , , , ,00 85%

32 USDG Expenditure to date vs Planned Cash Flow per Service per Directorate

33 EXPENDITURE % USDG Expenditure Trends as at 28 February % 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% /13 1.1% 4.7% 9.9% 15.7% 22.1% 30.7% 33.1% 38.4% 46.4% 53.1% 69.4% 93.6% 2013/14 1.3% 4.1% 8.3% 12.8% 18.4% 24.0% 25.6% 31.1% 38.6% 46.2% 52.1% 77.3% 2014/15 0.4% 4.0% 10.5% 16.7% 25.4% 30.6% 31.7% 35.1% 39.5% 43.5% 49.1% 90.1% 2015/16 0.9% 6.6% 17.4% 20.8% 25.4% 31.3% 33.2% 38.3% 43.1% 47.6% 63.7% 90.4% 2016/17 0.7% 4.9% 11.9% 16.7% 22.9% 29.1% 29.0% 30.5% 44.7% 57.5% 68.5% 92.8% 2017/18 0.0% 3.8% 7.5% 11.7% 17.5% 24.0% 28.0% 31.0%

34 USDG Funding and Expenditure History 2011/ / / / / / /18 DoRA Allocation R R R R R R R Effective Rollover from previous year R - R R R R R R Rollover % to its Respective DoRA Allocation 8,6% 6,8% 24,0% 12,0% 10,8% 7,2% 3,8% Available Funds for the Year R R R R R R R Actual Expenditure for the Year R R R R R R Not Applicable Yet % of Expenditure to Available Funds 91,4% 93,6% 77,0% 90,0% 90,4% 92,8% Not Applicable Yet Calculation of Effective Rollover from 2016/17 Unspent USDG funds in 2016/17 R LESS: Saving from 2015/16 projects completed in 2016/17 -R LESS: Allocation to Knysna Fire Project -R Effective Rollover from 2016/17 R

35 Emphasis on Informal Settlement Projects Directorate Description In-situ upgrades Integrated Development Projects Relocation None of the Above Totals Project Management 14,499,379 14,499,379 Energy 1,185, ,916, ,101,291 Finance 8,344, ,344,804 Informal Settlements, Water & Waste Serv 261,898,098 36,445,933 73,126, ,630, ,101,466 Safety & Security 15,351,407 15,351,407 Social Services 23,895,852 45,874,573 21,610,596 91,381,020 Transport & Urban Development Authority 68,005, ,168,461 90,149, ,323,416 Totals 377,828, ,405,257 73,126, ,742,298 1,373,102,783 28% 39% 5% 28% **Amounts Above exclude VAT

36 USDG AND HSDG BUDGET ALLOCATION MAPS FOR 2018/19

37

38

39

40 USDG CAPEX and OPEX Budget Allocation Mapping for 2018/19

41 HSDG CAPEX and OPEX Budget Allocation Mapping for 2018/19

42 INFORMAL SETTLEMENTS UPGRADING

43 Area Based Plan A review of all informal settlements was undertaken from on an Area Based approach. All line departments contributed with their operational information towards the update of the dataset. Each informal settlement was jointly assessed, taken all spatial analytical data into account, in order to find and agree upon the most likely solution for the informal settlements. Area 1 : North Area 2 : East Area 3 : Central Area 4 : South

44 Informal Settlement Dataset The following types of information was taken into consideration : Attribute data : Such as location; size in hectares; number of structures ; current service levels, zoning and land use rights; risk factors such as fire, flooding or ponding ; biodiversity criteria ; distance to nearest school, land ownership, etc. Human Input : Is the settlement to best upgraded or cleared? Is the settlement simple or complex in respect of engagement? Is it a high or low risk settlement? What percent of settlement is to be relocated? Management information : Is the settlement high, medium or low priority in respect of servicing? What kind of intervention is best i.e. re-blocking, in-situ upgrading (with or without relocation), full relocation etc.? The categorisation might need to change and MTEFs and the project pipeline schedule adjusted accordingly. This is a normal part of building a project pipeline consisting of large numbers of projects, each with diverse complexities and particularities.

45 Datasets Exclusion Zones (Koeberg / Landfill) Flood areas & water Bodies Rail & Road Reserves Power line Buffer Zones Biodiversity (core 1 & 2) Heritage Sites General Servitudes Basic Services Amenities ToD Land Ownership. Etc. Data Processing flow Structure Counts (SWaste Door Count & 2017 Aerial Photo) Areas of Informality Start Pockets of Informality Small Farmers / Rural Settlement Informal Settlement Back yarder Settlement IDA/TRA/ Reblocking Rental Stock Settlements Well-spaced dwelling units that normally has some form of subsistence farming on it. Also conventional areas of Informality that is situated outside the Urban edge It is an unplanned area of informality, where unauthorized housing structures is erected, and does not compliance with any exiting planning and building regulations. Areas of Informality that started as backyarders on private property and has spilled over to City of Cape Town property (mostly POS, vacant Community facility sites or roadways or road reserves vested to the CCT). Areas of Informality that was developed with the aim of creating temporary or incremental opportunities by CCT, WCG or Other. These developments require planning layouts, more formal service delivery and in the first phase towards formality Areas of Informality that is found on council rental stock properties E.g. amongst hostels or flats in Langa etc.

46 Stand Pipes Taps Modified Afrisan Anaerobic Chemical Container Dehydration (Enviro_loo) Full flush Urine Diversion (Mobisan) Pour flush Ventilated Pitliner PFT Area Occupied by Informality (Ha) Urban Edge (Inside / Outside) Biodiversity Sensitive - Core 1 Biodiversity Sensitive - Core 2 Waterbodies Below Floodline (1:50) Noise Zone > 65 Decibels Rail Reserve Metro Road Reserve Powerlines Servitude Landfill Site Density Settlement Name Settlement Aliases Type of Settlement Suburb Location City Private PRASA SANRAL TRANSNET ACSA DPW Informal Settlements - Dataset Settlement Name & Type Settlement Location Ward Sub Council Number of Structures Solid Waste Count 2016 Roof Count 2016 Land Ownership State Age of Settlement Risk Assessment Date Started Years Total Risk % Water Basic Services Type of Sanitation Ratio 1:25 Total Toilets Ratio 1:5

47 Community Centre Multi Purpose Centre Old Aged Home Recreational Hubs Early Childhood Facility Primary School High School Places of Worship Police Station Clinic Hospital Fire Station Cemetery Library Park / Sportsfield Business Hub City ESKOM % Electrification Single Residential General Residential Mixed Informal Settlements - Dataset Electricity Supply Area Zoning Public Transport Route Rail Station PT1 PT2 Amenities Concluding Comments Category & Developmental Pathway

48 INFORMAL SETTLEMENTS CITYWIDE CONTEXT

49 Structure Count per Area Area 2016 Structures Estimated Population (3.2 / structure) North Central East South Total South 28% North 18% Structures Central 15% East 39% North East Central South

50 Informality by Type Rental Stock Settlements 8% Small Farmers/ Rural Settlement 3% Backyarder Settlement 8% IDA/TRA/ Reblcoked 6% Informal Settlement 75%

51 Relocations required for Upgrading Area Total Structures Structures to be Relocated North % East % Central % South % Total % % North East Central South Total Structures Structures to be Relocated

52 Land Requirements for Informal Settlements Area Land for Relocation & De-densification (Ha) Central % East % North % South % TOTAL Land Requirement (Ha) Key: Access to well located land that is central and appropriate for human settlement % 329 Excluding backyarders and other land use requirements Central East North South