Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study

Transcription

1 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study Prepared by: AECOM 50 Sportsworld Crossing Road, Suite tel Kitchener, ON, Canada N2P 0A fax May, 2016 Project Number:

2 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study Distribution List # Hard Copies PDF Required Association / Company Name 4 Yes City of London 2 No Public Review 1 No AECOM Revision History Revision # Date Revised By: Revision Description 1 February 5, 2016 HK Incorporation of City of London Comments 2 March 11, 2016 HK Incorporation of City of London Comments 3 May 25, 2016 HK Incorporation of Environmental and Ecological Planning Advisory Committee Comments Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

3 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study Statement of Qualifications and Limitations The attached Report (the Report ) has been prepared by AECOM Canada Ltd. ( AECOM ) for the benefit of the Client ( Client ) in accordance with the agreement between AECOM and Client, including the scope of work detailed therein (the Agreement ). The information, data, recommendations and conclusions contained in the Report (collectively, the Information ): is subject to the scope, schedule, and other constraints and limitations in the Agreement and the qualifications contained in the Report (the Limitations ); represents AECOM s professional judgement in light of the Limitations and industry standards for the preparation of similar reports; may be based on information provided to AECOM which has not been independently verified; has not been updated since the date of issuance of the Report and its accuracy is limited to the time period and circumstances in which it was collected, processed, made or issued; must be read as a whole and sections thereof should not be read out of such context; was prepared for the specific purposes described in the Report and the Agreement; and in the case of subsurface, environmental or geotechnical conditions, may be based on limited testing and on the assumption that such conditions are uniform and not variable either geographically or over time. AECOM shall be entitled to rely upon the accuracy and completeness of information that was provided to it and has no obligation to update such information. AECOM accepts no responsibility for any events or circumstances that may have occurred since the date on which the Report was prepared and, in the case of subsurface, environmental or geotechnical conditions, is not responsible for any variability in such conditions, geographically or over time. AECOM agrees that the Report represents its professional judgement as described above and that the Information has been prepared for the specific purpose and use described in the Report and the Agreement, but AECOM makes no other representations, or any guarantees or warranties whatsoever, whether express or implied, with respect to the Report, the Information or any part thereof. Without in any way limiting the generality of the foregoing, any estimates or opinions regarding probable construction costs or construction schedule provided by AECOM represent AECOM s professional judgement in light of its experience and the knowledge and information available to it at the time of preparation. Since AECOM has no control over market or economic conditions, prices for construction labour, equipment or materials or bidding procedures, AECOM, its directors, officers and employees are not able to, nor do they, make any representations, warranties or guarantees whatsoever, whether express or implied, with respect to such estimates or opinions, or their variance from actual construction costs or schedules, and accept no responsibility for any loss or damage arising therefrom or in any way related thereto. Persons relying on such estimates or opinions do so at their own risk. Except (1) as agreed to in writing by AECOM and Client; (2) as required by-law; or (3) to the extent used by governmental reviewing agencies for the purpose of obtaining permits or approvals, the Report and the Information may be used and relied upon only by Client. AECOM accepts no responsibility, and denies any liability whatsoever, to parties other than Client who may obtain access to the Report or the Information for any injury, loss or damage suffered by such parties arising from their use of, reliance upon, or decisions or actions based on the Report or any of the Information ( improper use of the Report ), except to the extent those parties have obtained the prior written consent of AECOM to use and rely upon the Report and the Information. Any injury, loss or damages arising from improper use of the Report shall be borne by the party making such use. This Statement of Qualifications and Limitations is attached to and forms part of the Report and any use of the Report is subject to the terms hereof. AECOM: AECOM Canada Ltd. All Rights Reserved. Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

4 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study Quality Information Report Prepared By: Heather Kime, B.Sc.(Hons.) Terrestrial Ecologist Michael Godard, Hons B.Sc Fisheries Biologist Report Reviewed By: Jillian deman, Hons B.Sc. Senior Terrestrial and Wetland Ecologist Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

5 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study Table of Contents 1. Introduction Study Area and Surrounding Land Use Identified Natural Heritage Features Relevant and Concurrent Studies Municipal and Agency Correspondence Legislative Requirements Federal Policies and Legislation Fisheries Act Migratory Birds Convention Act, Provincial Policies and Legislation Provincial Policy Statement, Natural Heritage Reference Manual, Significant Wildlife Habitat Technical Guide, Endangered Species Act Conservation Authorities Act Municipal Policies and Legislation City of London Official Plan Natural Heritage Features & Functions Aquatic Ecosystem Background Methods Results and Discussion Terrestrial and Wildlife Ecosystems Vegetation Communities and Plants Background Field Investigation Methods Results and Discussion Wetlands Background Methods Results and Discussion Breeding Birds Background Field Investigation Methods Results and Discussion Herpetofauna Background Methods Results and Discussion Mammals Background Methods page Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

6 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study Results and Discussion Lepidoptera and Odonata Background Methods Results and Discussion Species at Risk Assessment Background Methods Results Significant Wildlife Habitat Assessment Background Methods Results and Discussion Assessment of Significance Federally Recognized Features and Species Provincially Recognized Features and Species Municipally Recognized Features and Species Significant River, Stream and Ravine Corridor Significant Woodlands Proposed Works Assessment of Potential Impacts Existing Environmental Impacts Potential Short-term Impacts Potential Long-term Impacts Design and Layout of Pathway Site Grading Impact Mitigation Avoidance Mitigation Standard Mitigation Enhancement Mitigation Net Effects Environmental Management Recommendations Subject Land Status Report Recommendations Environmental Management Plan Recommendations Natural Heritage Protection Zones Pathway Route Detailed Design & Management Recommendations Construction Mitigation Recommendations Ecological Enhancement Recommendations Conclusions References Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

7 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study List of Figures Figure 1: Study Area... 2 Figure 2: Official Plan Natural Heritage Feature Designation... 3 Figure 3: Terrain & Drainage Figure 4: Ecological Land Classification Figure 5: Wetlands Figure 6: Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat Figure 7: Significant Woodland Boundary Delineation Figure 8: Preferred Pathway Alignment Figure 9: Environmental Protection Zones List of Tables Table 1: Relevant Legislation, Policies & Guidelines... 5 Table 2: Summary of Field work and Field Dates Table 3: Ecological Land Classification Community Rankings Table 4: Wetland Plant Forms Table 5: Wetland Community Descriptions Table 6: Summary of SAR Bird Species Known from the Area Table 7: Summary of 2014 Breeding Bird Evidence within and Adjacent to the Richmond Street Study Area Table 8: Summary of Anuran Call Surveys Conducted on April 21, Table 9: Summary of Anuran Call Surveys Conducted on June 12, Table 10: Summary of Anuran Call Surveys Conducted on June 24, Table 11: Lepidoptera Species Observed within the Richmond Street Study Area Table 12: Odonata Species Observed within the Richmond Street Study Area Table 13: Species at Risk and Provincially Significant Species Table 14: Results of Significant Woodland Evaluation Table 15: Non-native Invasive Plant Species within the Study Area Table 16: Net Effects Predicted from the Proposed Pathway Appendices Appendix A. Appendix B. Appendix C. Appendix D. Appendix E. Appendix F. Appendix G. Appendix H. Appendix I. Appendix J. Appendix K. City of London Official Plan Schedule Agency Correspondence Staff Resumes Vegetation Community Descriptions Plant Species List ELC Data Cards Bird Species List SAR Habitat Screening SWH Habitat Screening Woodland Evaluation Standard Mitigation Measures Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

8 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study 1. Introduction AECOM Canada Ltd. has been retained by the City of London to undertake the required investigations to prepare an Environmental Impact Study (EIS) Report for a proposed pedestrian connection for lands along Richmond Street, in north London. The preparation of an EIS Report is an integral step in the municipal planning process and is a requirement of the City of London s Official Plan policies. This EIS Report has been prepared as a requirement of a Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (MCEA) for Proposed Pedestrian / Cycling Connection and bridge infrastructure across Richmond Street. The following EIS provides a detailed description of existing environmental conditions, descriptions of the proposed pathway connection, an assessment of potential impacts, as well as environmental management recommendations. This report has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the City of London s Official Plan (2006), and is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2014), the Natural Heritage Reference Manual (2010), City of London s Environmental Management Guidelines (2007) and other relevant provincial and federal legislation, policies and regulations as outlined below in Section Study Area and Surrounding Land Use The study area for this EIS Report includes lands east and west of Richmond Street, north of Sunningdale Road East to the northern limits of the City of London. The portion of the study area located east of Richmond Street consists of agricultural field, woodland, wetland and cultural meadow. The portion of the study area located west of Richmond Street is largely comprised of recently cleared land for development and includes a watercourse channel. Figure 1 shows the study area and surrounding land uses. Schedule A of the City of London s Official Plan shows the study area land use as a mixture of high and medium density residential, low density residential, community commercial node and open space. The land located at the southwest corner of the study area is designated as a community commercial node. Open space present within the study area is associated with the tributary to Medway Creek and the wetland feature present east of Richmond Street. 1.2 Identified Natural Heritage Features Schedule B-1 of the City of London s Official Plan shows the Arva Moraine Provincially Significant Wetland (PSW) within the east portion of the study area. Lands north of the PSW are designated as Big Picture Meta-cores and Meta-corridors. Schedule B-2 of the City of London s Official Plan indicates that a majority of lands within the eastern portion of the subject property are within the Upper Thames River Conservation Authority s Regulation Limits. These limits continue along the tributary to Medway Creek and Medway Creek, located at the western boundary of the study area. Appendix A provides City of London Official Plan Schedules A, B-1 and B-2 mapping for the study area. Figure 2 provides the delineation of Natural Heritage Features for the study area as per the Official Plan Schedules. Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

9 ¹ Arva Moraine Wetland Complex (UT 15) City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study MCWADE PL Key Map ^ City Limit Sunningdale Rd ¹ Oxford St W Approximate Study Area Roadside Drainage Arva Moraine Wetland Complex (UT 15) Commissioners Rd CASTLEHILL CLO SE SAWGRASS LINK PEBBLECRE EK WALK ROYAL Tributary OAKS BEND to Medway Creek TORREY PINES WAY Roadside Drainage RICHMOND ST SUNNINGDALE RD E SKYLINE AVE Legend Wonderland Rd Hwy 401 Highbury Ave Watercourse Railway MNR Approved PSW Boundary Study Area Lot Lines Water Body BERKLEY CRES CALLAWAY RD UPLANDS DR This drawing has been prepared for the use of AECOM's client and may not be used, reproduced or relied upon by third parties, except as agreed by AECOM and its client, as required by law or for use by governmental reviewing agencies. AECOM accepts no responsibility, and denies any liability whatsoever, to any party that modifies this drawing without AECOM's express written consent. SUNNINGDALE RD W VILLAGEWALK BLVD REDFORD RD NORTHCREST GATE Figure 1 Study Area MEADOWLANDS WAY Scale: 1:5,000 CALLINGHAM DR NORTHCREST DR Date: May 2015 Metres

10 03041 ¹ City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study MCWADE PL Key Map Sunningdale Rd ^ City Limit ¹ Oxford St W Approximate Study Area Roadside Drainage Commissioners Rd CASTLEHILL CLO SE SAWGRASS LINK PEBB LECRE EK WALK Tributary ROYAL OAKS BEND to Medway Creek TORREY PINES WAY Roadside Drainage RICHMOND ST Stoney Creek Subwatershed SUNNINGDALE RD E Legend Wonderland Rd Study Area Hwy 401 Maximum Hazard Line Big Picture Meta-Corridors Highbury Ave Potential ESA # PotentialNaturalizationArea Provincially Significant Wetland Significant Corridor (Significant River, Stream and Ravine Corridor) SKYLINE AVE Unevaluated Wetland Unevaluated Vegetation Patches and ID Woodland BERKLEY CRES MNR Approved PSW Boundary Subwatershed Boundary CALLAWAY RD SUNNINGDALE RD W MEADOWLANDS WAY VILLAGEWALK BLVD Medway Creek Subwatershed UPLANDS DR REDFORD RD The Forks Subwatershed This drawing has been prepared for the use of AECOM's client and may not be used, reproduced or relied upon by third parties, except as agreed by AECOM and its client, as required by law or for use by governmental reviewing agencies. AECOM accepts no responsibility, and denies any liability whatsoever, to any party that modifies this drawing without AECOM's express written consent. Figure 2 Identified Natural Heritage Features Schedule B1 of the City of London Official Plan Scale: 1:5,000 CALLINGHAM DR NORTHCREST DR Metres Date: May 2015

11 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study 1.3 Relevant and Concurrent Studies Existing studies of the study area s natural heritage features are limited to general studies of the watershed. Previous studies conducted for the area, to be referenced for relevant information and mapping, include: AECOM Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Subject Land Status Report. Upper Thames River Conservation Authority Middlesex Natural Heritage Study. BioLogic Incorporated Issues Scoping Report 2300 Richmond Street pp. Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Arva Moraine Wetland Complex Evaluation Record. Stantec Weldon Property EIS Sunningdale North Area Plan. AECOM Sunningdale Area Storm Drainage & Stormwater Management Servicing for Undeveloped Lands Schedule B Class EA. City of London City of London Subwatershed Studies. Group 1 Subwatersheds Medway, Stanton and Mud Creeks Final Report. 1.4 Municipal and Agency Correspondence On July 17 th, 2014, separate letters were addressed to Amanda McCloskey, District Planner for the Alymer District Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (MNRF) and Cari Ramsey, Environmental Regulations Technician for the Upper Thames River Conservation Authority (URTCA). The following information was requested: Presence of Natural Areas including ESAs, Provincially Significant Wetlands (PSW), Significant Woodlands, Provincial Parks, Conservation Reserves and Wildlife Management Areas (WMA); Species at Risk records/occurrences; Presence of critical habitat; Species at Risk Recovery Strategies; Evaluated Wetlands including wetland evaluation records (if available); Thermal and flow regime classification of watercourses (GIS data); and Fish collection records. On July 25 th, 2014, a response was received from Cari Ramsey, Environmental Regulations Technician for the UTRCA. Similarly, a response was received by Heather Riddell, District Planner at the MNRF, on September 11, Appendix B provides a copy of the correspondence from both agencies regarding the study area. 1.5 Legislative Requirements The proposed Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection requires the consideration of federal, provincial, regional and local policies, legislation and regulations. The following sections outline the legislation, policies and regulations relevant to natural heritage features and functions as they relate to the proposed pathway. Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

12 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study Table 1 provides an outline of the legislation and policies relevant to natural heritage features and functions as they relate to lands within the study area. Table 1: Relevant Legislation, Policies & Guidelines Legislation Policies/Regulations Guidelines Federal Fisheries Act Policy for the Management of Fish Migratory Birds Convention Act Regulations Respecting the Protection of Migratory Birds Provincial Conservation Authorities Act Ontario Regulation 150/06 Upper Thames River Conservation Authority Policies for the Development, Interference, with Wetlands and Alterations to Shorelines and Water Courses Regulation Endangered Species Act Municipal City of London Official Plan Environmental Policies Environmental Management Guidelines (2007) London Strengthening Neighbourhoods Strategy (2010) 2030 Transportation Master Plan: SmartMoves (2013) Age Friendly London (2012) Parks and Recreation Strategic Master Plan (2009) Federal Policies and Legislation Fisheries Act The federal Fisheries Act was amended on June 29, 2012 to focus on protecting the productivity of recreational, commercial and Aboriginal fisheries. On November 25, 2013, the new fisheries protection program provisions came into force. The Fisheries Protection Program contains a new prohibition that combines the previous section 32 (killing of fish by means other than fishing) and section 35 (harmful alteration, disruption or destruction of fish habitat). The new prohibition is focused on protecting serious harm to fish, which is the death of fish or any permanent alteration to, or destruction of, fish habitat. As part of the changes and streamlining of the approvals process, a proponent-based project screening is required to be conducted by a qualified environmental professional to determine whether the works will require Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) review. Measures to avoid serious harm to fish are to be outlined to ensure compliance with the Act. With these recent amendments, certain activities are exempt from Project Review and if the project activities do not meet the associated criteria, Project Review by DFO will determine whether or not the works can avoid serious harm to fishes that are part of or that support a commercial, recreational or Aboriginal fishery. DFO may issue a letter that outlines the implementation of mitigation measures to avoid and mitigate serious harm to fish, or, request an Authorization under Paragraph 35(2)(b) of the Fisheries Act Migratory Birds Convention Act, 1994 The federal Migratory Birds Convention Act (MBCA) is applied through The Regulations Respecting the Protection of Migratory Birds that states that [ ] no person shall disturb, destroy or take a nest, egg [ ] of a migratory bird. This law protects all birds aside from the introduced species European Starling (Sturnus vulgaris), House Sparrow (Passer domesticus), and Rock Pigeon (Columba livia). Bird nests that are destroyed during the course of construction and other related activities is referred to as incidental take and is illegal except under the authority of a permit obtained through the CWS (Canadian Wildlife Service). In order to remain in compliance with the Migratory Bird Convention Act and Fish and Wildlife Act, it is recommended that any vegetation removal that may be required take place outside of the breeding bird season for Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

13 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study this region which is typically from April 1 st to August 31 st. These dates may differ on a yearly basis depending on the current weather patterns and therefore would be adjusted to accommodate current conditions. In most cases nest searches during the nesting season (April 1 st to August 31 st ) are not recommended within complex habitats, as the ability to detect nests is largely low while the risk of disturbance to active nests is high. Disturbance increases the risk of nest predation and abandonment by adults. Therefore, nest searches are not recommended unless nests are known to be easily located without disturbing them. Nests searches may be completed during the nesting period (April 1 st to August 31 st) by a qualified biologist within simple habitats (CWS 2014). Simple habitats refer to habitats that contain few likely nesting spots or a small community of migratory birds. Examples of simple habitats include: an urban park consisting mostly of lawns with a few isolated trees; a vacant lot with few possible nest sites; a previously cleared area where there is a lag between clearing and construction activities (and where ground nesters may have been attracted to nest in cleared areas or in stockpiles of soil, for instance); or a structure such as a bridge, a beacon, a tower or a building (often chosen as a nesting spot by robins, swallows, phoebes, Common Nighthawks, gulls and others) (CWS 2014). Similarly, nest searches can also be considered when investigating: conspicuous nest structures (such as nests of Great Blue Herons); cavity nesters in snags (such as woodpeckers, goldeneyes, nuthatches); or colonial-breeding species that can often be located from a distance (such as a colony of terns or gulls) (CWS 2014). As such, all vegetation clearing is recommended outside of the nesting period (April 1 st to August 31 st ) to eliminate the need for nest searches and any potential impacts to nesting birds. It should be noted that these dates may change on a yearly basis given the variability in weather patterns we have been experiencing in recent years Provincial Policies and Legislation Provincial Policy Statement, 2014 The Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) provides policy direction on provincial matters of interest related to land use planning and development. The PPS sets the policy framework for regulating development and use of land and is issued under the authority of section 3 of the Planning Act. The revised PPS came into effect on April 30, Section 1.5 of the PPS outlines polices that promote healthy, active communities. These include planning public streets, spaces and facilities to be safe, meet the needs of pedestrians, foster social interaction and facilitate active transportation and community connectivity, as well as planning and providing for a full range and equitable distribution of publicly-accessible built and natural settings for recreation, including parklands, public spaces, open space areas, and trails and linkages. Section 2.1 of the PPS outlines policies that provide legislative protection for the natural environment. These policies include the exclusion of development within Provincially Significant Wetlands (PSW), habitat of endangered Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

14 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study species and threatened species, fish habitat as well as within Significant Wildlife Habitat (SWH), significant woodlands, significant valleylands, significant areas of natural and scientific interest and adjacent lands unless it has been demonstrated that there will be no negative impacts on the natural features or their ecological functions. It should be noted, however, that under the Planning Act, development does not include activities that create or maintain infrastructure, such as the proposed pathway, authorized under an environmental assessment process. The Natural Heritage Reference Manual (2010) was developed to provide technical guidance for implementing the natural heritage policies of the PPS (2005). This document is discussed in more detail in Section below Natural Heritage Reference Manual, 2010 The Natural Heritage Reference Manual (2010) (NHRM) was created to compliment the 2005 PPS by providing technical guidance for implementing its natural heritage policies. Although not yet updated to reflect changes adopted in the 2014 PPS, it still functions as an important tool for those involved in development and review of policy documents, review and approval of development applications, and matters before provincial boards and tribunals. The NHRM is organized by specific natural heritage policies and provides basic guidance materials in the main sections, supported by more technical material in its appendices. The NHRM provides criteria in which to evaluate natural heritage features for their significance as well as recommendations for mitigation. Natural heritage features covered under the NRHM include: Significant Habitat of Endangered and Threatened Species Significant Wetlands and Significant Coastal Wetlands Significant Woodlands Significant Valleylands Significant Wildlife Habitat Significant Areas of Natural and Scientific Areas Fish Habitat Significant Wildlife Habitat Technical Guide, 2000 Similar to the NHRM, the Significant Wildlife Habitat Technical Guide (SWHTG) (OMNR 2000) was prepared by MNRF to assist planning authorities and other participants in the land use planning systems. The SWHTG (2000) provides a more detailed technical manual that presents information on the identification, description, and prioritization of Significant Wildlife Habitat (SWH). More specifically, the document describes in detail, some of the techniques, issues and process identified in the NRHM and provides compilation of relevant technical support materials and references. In order to ensure a comprehensive approach to identifying and evaluating SWH, the SWHTG divides wildlife habitat into four categories including: seasonal concentration areas; rare vegetation communities or specialized habitats for wildlife; habitats of species of conservation concern, excluding the habitats of endangered and threatened species; and animal movement corridors. Additionally, due to Ontario s vast size and biodiversity, the MNRF created draft SWH Ecoregion Criteria Schedules that support the SWHTG and provide significance criteria that are reflective of geographic differences. Significant Wildlife Habitat Criteria Schedules for Ecoregion 7E (OMNR 2015) provides the recommended criteria for Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

15 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study identifying SWH within Ecoregion 7E as four (4) categories of SWH outlined in the SWHTG and its appendices. The schedules provide information including descriptions of wildlife habitat, wildlife species, and the criteria required to determine SWH Endangered Species Act Ontario contains over 200 flora and fauna species that are at risk. Ontario s Endangered Species Act (ESA) (2007) provides protection for provincial Species at Risk (SAR) and their habitats. Species are classified into one of four levels of risk (extirpated, endangered, threatened, special concern) through science-based assessment via the Committee on the Status of Species at Risk in Ontario (COSSARO); classification is based on best-available science and Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge. Species classified as Threatened or Endangered on the Species at Risk in Ontario (SARO) list are then afforded protection under the ESA Protection for these species under the act includes individuals of the species and their habitat. Protection under the ESA 2007 thus prohibits the killing, harming, harassing, possessing, buying, selling, trading, leasing or transporting species listed as threatened, endangered or extirpated. The ESA 2007 also includes preparation of recovery strategies for species ranked as Threatened or Endangered, and management plans for those ranked as Special Concern. The objectives of the ESA 2007 are as follows: 1. To provide for government regulation and permitting procedures for activities that would otherwise be prohibited under the Act; 2. Recognize the importance of both species and habitat protection; 3. Recognize and incorporate community and Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge; 4. Encourage and promote stewardship activities to help protect and recover species at risk; and 5. Create greater accountability in government reporting requirements. Species and their habitats are protected under the ESA 2007 by restrictions on activities that may affect these flora or fauna and their habitats. Where a proposed activity may negatively affect protected species or habitat, changes to timing, location and methods of the proposed activity should be considered, wherever feasible, to avoid impacts to SAR. Where impacts cannot be avoided or mitigated, a permit process may be pursued. The MNRF may grant a permit, or other authorization, for activities that would otherwise not be allowable under the Act. Several permit types are available, depending on the nature of the proposed work and may include conditions for the activity to meet which aid in protection or recovery of the targeted SAR Conservation Authorities Act A number of watercourses are contained within the subject lands and as such will require review and input from the Upper Thames River Conservation Authority (UTRCA) for any proposed plans involving these features. The subject lands also contain features, such as wetlands, regulated by the Conservation Authorities Act Ontario Generic Regulation 97/04, with the implementation of it falling under UTRCA s local Ontario Regulation 157/06. Any proposed option for the pathway connection that involves lands within proximity to on-site watercourses and wetlands will require review by the UTRCA and will require the submission of an Application for Development, Interference with Wetlands, and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses. Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

16 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study Municipal Policies and Legislation City of London Official Plan The general requirements for an Environmental Impact Study in the City of London are detailed in the City of London s Official Plan Policies Section 15. The guidelines for application of those policies are further articulated in the City s Environmental Management Guidelines (EMG) dated January Within the City of London s EMGs are the Guidelines for the Preparation and Review of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS), which provide an outline of the EIS Review process and reporting requirements. Other sections of the EMG relevant to the present application include: Section 2.0 Data Collection Standards for Ecological Inventory, and Section 3.0 Guideline Documents for Environmental Significant Areas Identification, Evaluation and Boundary Delineation. The proposed pathway triggers the requirement for an Environmental Assessment (EA). Section vii) of the City s Official Plan requires an EIS for any alternatives involving development and site alteration within the Natural Heritage System such that they will only be considered after the evaluation of options that would avoid development and site alteration within the Natural Heritage System. Although this project is not considered development or site alteration, the construction of the pedestrian bridge over Richmond Street is considered infrastructure in this case. To be consistent with the City s proposed process for amalgamating EAs and EISs the City completed an EIS for this project. Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

17 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study 2. Natural Heritage Features & Functions The following section provides detailed information on existing conditions within the Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection study area. Background reviews were completed to obtain existing information on natural features and species occurrences within the study area and surrounding landscape. Additionally, the following sections will provide details on methods used to conduct field investigations required to fill information gaps. Field investigations of features within the subject lands included: breeding bird surveys; vegetation community delineation using the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry s (MNRF) Ecological Land Classification (ELC) system; wetland community delineation using MNRF s Wetland Evaluation guidelines for Southern Ontario (3 rd Edition); floral species inventory; anuran call surveys; incidental reptile surveys; incidental butterfly, dragonfly and damselfly surveys; Significant Wildlife Habitat assessments; and aquatic habitat assessments along the tributary to Medway Creek. Table 2 below presents the field dates for each of these assessments. Table 2: Summary of Field work and Field Dates Field Survey Date Surveyors Amphibian Surveys April 21, June 12 and June 24, 2014 Tom Shorney, Adam Sparga, Jessica Walker and Jillian deman Breeding Bird Survey May 27 and June 6, 2014 Rob Tymstra Significant Wildlife Habitat Assessment August 7, August 15 and October 1, 2014 Jessica Piette and Tom Shorney Aquatic Habitat Assessment October 1, 2014 Michael Godard Wetland Boundary Assessment August 7 and August 15, 2014 Jessica Piette and Tom Shorney Ecological Land Classification August 7 and August 15, 2014 Jessica Piette and Tom Shorney Floral Species List April 21, June 12, August 7, August 15 and October 1, 2014 Jillian deman, Jessica Piette, Tom Shorney and Jessica Walker Species at Risk Assessment August 7, August 15 and October 1, 2014 Michael Godard, Jessica Piette and Tom Shorney Appendix C provides staff resumes. 2.1 Aquatic Ecosystem The following sections describe the existing aquatic conditions within the Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection study area. Aquatic ecosystems are those associated with bodies of water such as, but not limited to, pools, ponds, lakes, rivers, streams and wetlands. Aquatic ecosystems provide habitat for a variety of wildlife species, some of which are rare or sensitive. These ecosystems and species identified within the study area during the background review and site investigations are described in detail below Background A review of the Stantec Weldon Property EIS (2004) was undertaken to obtain information for the watercourse located to the west of Richmond Street. Stantec refers to the watercourse as the Uplands Tributary; however, recent correspondence with MNRF has suggested that there is no connectivity to Uplands and this is in fact a tributary of Medway Creek. No fish species information was provided by the MNRF for the watercourse. Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

18 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study The MNRF supplied potential SAR species (from a review of LIO and DFO Aquatic SAR mapping) within the open watercourses within or adjacent to the proposed subjects lands and these may include: Wavy-rayed Lampmussel (threatened) receives species and general habitat protection Records around Sunningdale Road Silver Shiner (threatened) receives species and general habitat protection records upstream/downstream of Sunningdale Road Black Redhorse (threatened) receives species and general habitat protection AECOM also undertook a review of the DFO SAR mapping for the Upper Thames River watershed on October 3 rd, 2014, with Pugnose Minnow, Silver Shiner and Wavy-rayed Lampmussel identified as potentially being within both Medway Creek as well as the tributary to Medway Creek. A 1 km 2 NHIC search was also undertaken by AECOM using the MNRF online database. No aquatic SAR were identified within the area. The NHIC database search undertaken by Stantec in 2004 revealed the presence of Greenside Darter, which at the time was a COSEWIC species of special concern. Greenside Darter was designated as Special Concern in 1990, with its status re-examined, it is now designated as Not at Risk as of November Methods The aquatic study area included the tributary to Medway Creek and the Provincially Significant Arva Moraine Wetland Complex. The tributary to Medway Creek is located on the west side of Richmond Street, whereas the Provincially Significant Arva Moraine Wetland Complex is located to the east of Richmond Street. Fisheries habitat assessments were conducted at each location on October 1 st, Figure 3 provides an indication of the area of investigation and locations. The following aquatic habitat features were documented: surrounding natural features and land uses (i.e., wetland, agriculture, etc.); channel dimensions, substrate composition, channel morphology and bank stability; runs- typically deep, fast moving water with little to no turbulence of water; riffles- shallow, fast moving water typically running over rocks; riffles provide areas of high oxygenated waters; flats- low flowing water with a smooth un-agitated surface; pools- are described as deep pockets of slow moving water that provide refuge habitat for fish; substrate composition (e.g., clay, silt, sand, gravel, cobble, rock, boulder, muck or detritus); indicators of water quality: clarity, colour, presence and type of macrophytes and algal growth, evidence of runoff; basic field parameters of water chemistry (ph, conductivity, dissolved oxygen and temperature); pollution sources(i.e., tile drain discharges, other piped discharges and road runoff). Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

19 ¹ City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study MCWADE PL Roadside Drainage Key Map Sunningdale Rd Oxford St W ^ City Limit Commissioners Rd Approximate Study Area ¹ Wonderland Rd Hwy 401 Highbury Ave SAWGRASS LINK Legend CALLAWAY RD CASTLEHILL CLOSE PEBBLE CREEK WALK < ROYAL OAKS BEND Tributary to Medway Creek TORREY PINES WAY < Roadside Drainage 270 Roadside Drainage RICHMOND ST VILLAGEWALK BLVD SUNNINGDALE RD W Roadside Drainage SUNNINGDALE RD E REDFORD RD BERKLEY CRES UPLANDS DR REDFORD RD SKYLINE AVE Metres MNR Approved PSW Boundary Ploughed Wet Depression Study Area Wetland Watercourse Contours Lot Lines Significant River, Stream, and Ravine Corridor 1 Photo Location and ID This drawing has been prepared for the use of AECOM's client and may not be used, reproduced or relied upon by third parties, except as agreed by AECOM and its client, as required by law or for use by governmental reviewing agencies. AECOM accepts no responsibility, and denies any liability whatsoever, to any party that modifies this drawing without AECOM's express written consent. Figure 3 Terrain and Drainage Scale: 1:3,500 Overland Flow Direction Date: May 2015

20 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study In-stream cover was documented based on the percent of cover provided by woody debris, boulders (>256 mm diameter), cobble ( mm diameter), gravel (64-2 mm), aquatic vegetation and undercut banks. In-stream cover was classified as high if there was in-stream coverage between the areas of %; moderate 31-75%; and low 0-30%. Riparian vegetation canopy cover was provided as a percentage of cover over the stream. Overall canopy cover was classified as: high %; moderate cover 31-60%; and low cover 0-30%. Obstructions to fish passage were also noted within the area of site investigation. A representative photo-log and site sketches were included to detail the general site layout and aquatic habitat features. Photographs of the assessed areas are shown on Figure 3. The tributary of Medway Creek was also reviewed using Chapter 15 of the City of London Official Plan. Criterion as outlined in the Official Plan for Significant River, Stream and Ravine Corridors (City of London, 2006) are as follows, The corridor performs an important water resources role relating to surface drainage, groundwater recharge or discharge, and filtering of surface water sediments, or is located in a headwater area Results and Discussion On October 1, 2014 an AECOM fisheries biologist investigated a reach of the tributary to Medway Creek, roadside drainage on the east side of Richmond Street and the Provincially Significant Arva Moraine Wetland Complex. A description of both the tributary to Medway Creek and roadside drainage can be found below, while the Provincially Significant Arva Moraine Wetland Complex is addressed in Section 3.3 below. Tributary to Medway Creek West Side of Richmond Street A portion of the tributary to Medway Creek, approximately 100 m in length, is located within the subject lands, and flows from east to west through the property, receiving water from the Arva Moraine Provincially Significant Wetland located east of Richmond Street. The tributary appears to have a permanent flow, but exhibited signs of low flow during warm periods with dry algae observed in sections of the watercourse. Studies have identified the tributary as a tolerant warmwater community. Background studies also suggest that the tributary to Medway Creek within the study area provides direct fish habitat and contributes flow and nutrients to fish habitat in the Medway Creek. The area of investigation was located in a steep ravine with the surrounding area a gently sloped mix of meadow species. The area surrounding the watercourse has been affected by the construction of the nearby subdivision. At the upstream end of the assessment area, a drainage ditch runs south to north towards the tributary which at the time of assessment had no flow and was heavily choked with common reed grass (Phragmites australis). The tributary flows into the assessed area through a box culvert, with the watercourse in this area having a flat, run, pool morphological section, dominated by flats. From this point the tributary had an average wetted width of 2.1 metres (m) and average depth of 0.25 m. The substrate consisted of mainly muck and sediment with some cobble and gravel present. Overhanging vegetation upstream provided almost complete coverage (95%) and was dominated by common reed grass and occasional cattails (Typha spp.). From the end of the common reed grass section, the tributary narrows and became shallower with a morphological sequence of flats and pools and a wetted with of 1.0 m and depth of 0.2 m in the flats and an average wetted width of 1.7 and average depth of 0.29 m in the pools. In this section the canopy cover was dominated by cottonwood (Populus deltoides) and crack willow (Salix fragilis). Substrate consisted of sediment, detritus, muck and cobble. As it leaves the treed area, it enters into a run section with watercress; a groundwater indicator that was observed at this location. The run had an average wetted width of 0.6 m and average depth of 0.17 m, with the substrate dominated by clay, with cobble and gravel also observed. The flow in this area was fast moving and may not be indicative of base flows as recent precipitation is likely to have increased these values. Canopy cover was low with instream cover also low and supplied mainly by grasses. In the final section of the assessed area, similar to the upstream portion, was a small pool area dominated Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

21 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study by cattails and reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) with gravel and sand leading into the downstream culvert. This culvert was lined with cobble and boulders. Near the downstream end of the assessed area there was evidence of overland flow with a defined channel cut into the banks. Riparian habitat was 10 to 15 m in width on either bank and was comprised of meadow species such as; Canada goldenrod (Solidago canadensis), tall goldenrod (Solidago altissima), Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense), grassleaved goldenrod (Euthamia graminifolia), and lance-leaved aster (Symphyotrichum lanceolatum). Low flow barriers were observed as obstructions to fish passage during the investigation, as well as the boulders and cobble placed throughout the downstream culvert. Cyprinids were observed in the upstream culvert at the Richmond Street crossing. For this tributary to be considered a Significant River, Stream and Ravine Corridor within the City of London, it is required to perform an important water resources role relating to surface drainage, groundwater recharge or discharge, and filtering of surface water sediments, or is located in a headwater area. Considering the field data collected as described above and review of background documents, it was determined that this portion of the tributary to Medway Creek west of Richmond Street is considered significant based on the following: Tributary transports overland flow and flows from the Arva Moraine Provincially Significant Wetland downstream to Medway Creek; and Tributary system is located in a headwater area. Roadside Drainage East Side of Richmond Street A ditch runs on the east side, parallel to Richmond Street and appears to collect runoff from Richmond Street as well as the Provincially Significant Arva Moraine Wetland Complex with drainage pooling at the culvert, which runs under Richmond Street towards the tributary to Medway Creek. At the time of assessment the ditch had standing water throughout and had an average wetted width of 1.6 m and average depth of 0.1 m before it meets the water from the wetland where it widens and has an average wetted width of 2.5 m and an average depth of 0.2 m. Similar to the tributary to Medway Creek, these values may not be indicative of base flows as recent precipitation is likely to have increased these values. Morphologically the assessed area within the ditch is a large flat with the substrate consisting of sediment and muck. Overhanging vegetation provided 95% coverage and was dominated by common reed grass in the drain side, and cattails and reed canary grass on the wetland side. Riparian habitat was 5 m on either bank and was dominated by a mixture of cultural meadow and meadow marsh species including Canada goldenrod, tall goldenrod, New England aster (Symphyotrichum novae-angliae), broad-leaved cattail (Typha latifolia), and reed canary grass. Cyprinids were observed in the area directly surrounding the culvert. However, habitat within the remainder of the ditch is not considered suitable fish habitat since it acts as roadside drainage, has heavy vegetation and a steep slope. Therefore, this area would not be considered a Significant River, Stream and Ravine Corridor according to the City s Official Plan criteria. 2.2 Terrestrial and Wildlife Ecosystems The following sections document the existing terrestrial conditions within the Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection study area. Terrestrial ecosystems are those associated with land including, but not limited to, forests, meadows, thickets and wetlands. Terrestrial ecosystems provide habitat for a variety of wildlife species, some of which are rare or sensitive. These ecosystems and species identified within the study area during the background review and site investigations are described in detail below. Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

22 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study Vegetation Communities and Plants Background Prior to completing field investigations, a background review of existing information was completed to gain an understanding of existing conditions within the study area. This included the review of: the wetland evaluation data record for the Provincially Significant Arva Moraine Wetland Complex, the City of London Subwatershed study on Medway, Stanton and Mud Creeks Final Report and the Issues Scoping report completed by BioLogic in 2013, as well as Stantec s EIS completed in 2004 and AECOM s Stormwater Management Class EA. Field Investigations were conducted on April 21 st, June 12 th, August 7 th, August 15 th, and October 1 st, Field investigations during these site visits included i) vegetation community delineation using the MNRF s Ecological Land Classification guidelines, ii) wetland community delineation using the MNRF s Wetland Evaluation guidelines for Southern Ontario (3 rd Edition), and iii) a floral species inventory Field Investigation Methods Vegetation Community Classification & Delineation Each vegetation community was delineated, assessed and classified as Ecological Land Classification (ELC) units according to the MNRF guidelines (Lee et al., 1998). This system provides a standard for comparing similar situations across Ontario. This protocol classifies vegetation communities through the completion of a multilayer (canopy, sub-canopy, ground cover) vegetation inventory. A summary of disturbance factors, community conditions, plant species list and representative photographs were also recorded for each vegetation patch. When wetland communities were observed their boundaries were refined using the 50/50 rule as per the MNRF s Wetland Evaluation Guidelines for Southern Ontario, 3rd Edition, Community Sensitivity Vegetation community sensitivity was based on the calculation of the Mean Coefficient of Conservatism, the Floristic Quality Index and the Weediness Index for all vegetation communities present within the study area. These three parameters are intended to be used together in order to assign an ecological community sensitivity ranking based on plant species composition, not the actual value of a particular community. Therefore, we are not concluding a cultural meadow to be more or less valuable than a forest community, we are simply trying to explain the community s overall sensitivity towards disturbance based on the groupings of plants present within the community. Co-efficient of Conservatism These values, range from 0 (low) to 10 (high), and are based on species tolerance of disturbance and fidelity to a specific habitat. Vegetation species and community sensitivity were assessed through the application of coefficient of conservatism values (CC), assigned to each native species in southern Ontario (Oldham et al., 1995). These values, range from 0 (low) to 10 (high), and the occurrence of species with a CC of 9 or 10 can be good indicators of undisturbed conditions such as mature forests, fens or bogs. General habitat values associated with the CC values are: species found in a wide variety of communities, including disturbed sites species associated with a specific community, but tolerate moderate disturbance Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

23 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study species associated with a community in an advanced successional stage, tolerant of minor disturbances species with a high degree of fidelity to a narrow range of synecological parameters Floristic Quality Index The floristic quality of an area is reflected in the mean value of CC. For example, an old field or grazed woodlot would tend have a low mean CC; these habitats are dominated by opportunistic species that occur in a wide range of site conditions and are tolerant of disturbance. A bog, prairie or intact forest would have a higher value, reflecting the specific habitat requirements of many of the species and a generally undisturbed condition. Weediness Index These values, range from -1 (low) to -3 (high) and quantifies the potential invasiveness of non-native plants. In combination with the percentage of non-native plants, it can be used as an indicator of disturbance. The sensitivity of natural areas can be assessed through application of the Weediness Index. The Weediness Index quantifies the potential invasiveness of non-native plants, and, in combination with the percentage of non-native plants can be used as an indicator of disturbance. Values (ranging from 1- to -3) have been assigned to most non-native species based on the potential impact each species can have in natural areas: little or no impact on natural areas (most non-native plants are in this category) occasional impacts on natural areas, generally infrequent or localized major potential impacts on natural areas Results and Discussion A total of 13 vegetation communities were delineated within the study area, seven (7) of which make up a portion of the Provincially Significant Arva Moraine Wetland Complex. The north and south vegetation patches east of Richmond Street are connected by a small cultural thicket located on the east side of the property. The observed vegetation communities can be further divided into three cultural (CUM, CUT, and CUW), one forest (FOD), four marsh (MAM, MAS), two swamp thicket (SWT), one deciduous swamp (SWD), and one floating-leaved shallow aquatic (SAF) community. Although these patches, individually, may be small in size, together they total of 4.9 hectares (ha) encompassing a good diversity of vegetation communities represented across nine different community series. This ecological diversity is beneficial not only for plants but for several wildlife species that will take advantage of the presence of the different community types and plant associations to carry out their life processes. A total of 80 plant species were observed, of which 61 are considered native, with one Provincially Endangered (butternut). The Floristic Quality Index for the entire feature is with 54% of the species observed falling within the lowest sensitivity (0-3) ranking, 41% within the moderate sensitivity (4-6) ranking and 5% represented within the high sensitivity (7-8) ranking. The species represented within the high sensitivity ranking are skunk cabbage (Symplocarpus foetitus), wild coffee (Triosteum aurantiacum), and swamp dock (Rumex verticilatus). These species were observed within vegetation communities which are being protected and will not be affected by the pedestrian pathway as discussed further within this report. The following table presents a summary of each of the vegetation communities observed within both the north and south patches. For a detailed description of community composition and their associated community sensitivities please refer to the table in Appendix D. Table 3 below provides a summary of the Ecological Land Classification communities identified and delineated within the study area. Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

24 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study Table 3: Ecological Land Classification Community Rankings Code Description Ranking Sensitivity Ranking CUM1-1 Dry-Moist Old Field Meadow Type S5 Low to Moderate CUT1 Mineral Cultural Thicket Ecosite S5 Low to Moderate CUW1 Mineral Cultural Woodland Ecosite S5 Low to Moderate CUP3 Coniferous Plantation S5 Low to Moderate FOD8-1 Fresh-Moist Poplar Deciduous Forest Type S5 Low to Moderate MAM2 Mineral Meadow Marsh Ecosite S5 Moderate to High MAM2-2 Reed-canary Grass Mineral Meadow Marsh Type S5 Moderate MAM2-10 Forb Mineral Meadow Marsh Type S5 Moderate to High MAS2-1 Cattail Mineral Shallow Marsh Type S5 Moderate to High SAF1-3 Duckweed Floating-leaved Shallow Aquatic Type S5 Moderate to High SWT2 (a&b) Mineral Thicket Swamp Ecosite S5 Moderate to High SWD4-1 Willow Mineral Deciduous Swamp Ecosite S5 Moderate to High All communities observed during investigations are considered common to Ontario (S5 rank). Figure 4 provides the delineation of the ELC communities for the study area. Photographs of key vegetation communities within the study area are provided on Figure 4. Appendix D provides a full description of ELC community composition for the communities summarized in Table 3. Appendix E provides a plant species list for the ELC communities identified. Appendix F provides ELC Data Cards Wetlands Background Evaluated wetlands are identified within the study area as per Schedule B-1 of the City of London s Official Plan. These wetland areas are part of the overall Arva Moraine Provincially Significant Wetland complex. The boundary of this complex was assessed during the 2014 field investigations Methods Wetland community boundaries were drawn where 50% of the plant species observed consists of upland species and 50% consists of wetland plant species. This protocol follows the guidelines outlined in the MNRF s Wetland Evaluation Manual for Southern Ontario (3 rd edition). The individual wetland communities were delineated considering the specific vegetation forms. Vegetation communities are recognized as assemblages of plant species representing one or more forms. Form is the physical structure or shape of a plant, determined by such features as height, branching pattern and leaf shape. The Wetland Evaluation guidelines utilize 16 forms. These include the following in Table 4. Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

25 1 View of SAF1-3 MAS2-1 SWT2b MAM2-10 MAM2 CUM SWT2a MAM2-10 MAS2-1 CUW1b 4 CUM1-1 CUP1 CUT1 6 Code Description Area (ha) CUM1-1 Dry-Moist Old Field Meadow Type 0.42 CUT1 Mineral Cultural Thicket Ecosite 0.09 CUW1 Mineral Cultural Woodland Ecosite 1.29 CUP3 Coniferous Plantation 0.09 FOD8-1 Fresh-Moist Poplar Deciduous Forest Type 0.56 MAM MAM2-2 Reed-canary Grass Mineral Meadow Marsh Type 0.14 MAM2-10 Forb Mineral Meadow Marsh Type 0.13 MAS2-1 Cattail Mineral Shallow Marsh Type 0.53 SAF1-3 Duckweed Floating-leaved Shallow Aquatic Type 0.05 SWT2 Mineral Thicket Swamp Ecosite 0.72 SWD4 Mineral Deciduous Swamp Ecosite 0.76 Total Area 4.9 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study Key Map ^ City Limit Sunningdale Rd ¹ Oxford St W Approximate Study Area MCWADE PL FOD8-1 Commissioners Rd 2 View of SWD4 Roadside Drainage MAM2-2 FOD CUW1a SAF1-3 MAM2-10 SWD4 SAF1-3 SWT2a MAM2-2 CUM1-1 Legend Wonderland Rd Watercourse Railway Tree Row Lot Lines Hwy 401 Highbury Ave MNR Approved PSW Boundary RICHMOND ST Roadside Drainage Water Body MAM2-2 MAM2-2 1 Photo Location and ID ELC Communities Code CASTLEHILL CLOSE SAWGRASS LINK 3 View of Mowed Field PEBBLECREEK WALK TORREY PINES WAY MAS2-1 CUM1-1 CUM1-1 Tributary to Medway Creek 5 View of MAS2-1 CUM - Cultural Meadow CUP - Cultural Plantation CUT - Cultural Thicket CUW - Cultural Woodland FOD - Deciduous Forest MAM - Meadow Marsh SAF - Duckweed Floating-Leaved Shallow Aquatic Type MAS SWD - Deciduous Swamp SWT VILLAGEWALK BLVD ¹ Scattered Trees This drawing has been prepared for the use of AECOM's client and may not be used, reproduced or relied upon by third parties, except as agreed by AECOM and its client, as required by law or for use by governmental reviewing agencies. AECOM accepts no responsibility, and denies any liability whatsoever, to any party that modifies this drawing without AECOM's express written consent. Figure 4 Ecological Land Classification ROYAL OAKS 4 View of CUM/CUP BEND 6 View looking South West SUNNINGDALE RD E Scale: 1:2,587 Date: March 2016 Metres

26 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study Table 4: Wetland Plant Forms h... deciduous trees c... coniferous trees dh... dead deciduous trees dc... dead coniferous trees ts... tall shrubs ls... low shrubs m... mosses re... robust emergents ne... narrow leaved emergents be... broad leaved emergents f... floating plants (rooted) ff... free floating plants ds...dead shrubs gc...herbs (ground cover) su...submerged plants u...unvegetated Results and Discussion The wetland communities located within the study area are considered part of the Arva Moraine Provincially Significant Wetland Complex, a complex which is comprised of the former Ballymote Wetland, Winder/Sunningdale Wetland, Gibbons Wetland and Powell Drain Wetlands. These wetland communities are contained within an overall woodland patch. A copy of the Wetland Evaluation Report was provided to AECOM by the City and MNRF. The overall points designated to this complex totals 739, a score which results in the Provincially Significant status of the complex. The boundaries of the wetland were assessed in the field and surveyed. During this time, MNRF completed a mapping exercise of the overall wetland complex, including the area within the Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway study area. Overall, the wetland boundary defined by MNRF and AECOM coincide. There is a slight difference along the east side of the main wetland patch where MNRF s line encroaches slightly within a community designated by AECOM as black walnut cultural woodland. Considering this slight discrepancy, for the purposes of this report, MNRF s wetland line will be used for definition of the wetland within the study area. Figure 5 presents MNRF s and AECOM s wetland boundaries. Table 5 below presents the overall wetland communities. Table 5: Wetland Community Descriptions Map Code Wetland Type Site Type Dominant Form rem1 Marsh Palustrine Robust emergent (re) gcm2 Marsh Palustrine Ground cover (gc) rem3 Marsh Palustrine Robust emergent (re) nem4 Marsh Palustrine Narrow-leaved emergents (ne) ffw5 Marsh Palustrine Free floating (ff) hs1 Swamp Palustrine Deciduous trees (h) tss2 Swamp Palustrine Tall Shrubs (ts) tss3 Swamp Palustrine Tall Shrubs (ts) Breeding Birds Breeding bird surveys are important components of environmental studies as they can assist in the evaluation of ecosystem health and sustainability. These studies are typically included in baseline environmental studies to develop an understanding of species composition, abundance and breeding activity of species within a study area. These surveys can also provide an opportunity to determine the presence/absence of significant species and can allow for repeated monitoring efforts. Due to the size and diversity of habitats within Ontario, several bird monitoring protocols have been developed that focus on targeting groups of birds including the Canadian Wildlife Service (CWS) Forest Bird Monitoring Program (Canadian Wildlife Service s 2009) and the Ontario Marsh Breeding Bird Monitoring Protocol (Bird Studies Canada et al. 2009). Similarly, the Ontario Breeding Bird Atlas Guide for Participants (2001) provides additional methodology for conducting breeding bird surveys throughout Ontario. These protocols outline the methods to be conducted in order to obtain representative and unbiased data. The methods listed above outline proper site selection, timing (including time of day and time of year to conduct the surveys) and suitable weather conditions (Canadian Wildlife Service s 2009 and Konze and McLaren 1997). Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

27 ¹ tss2 remi tss3 gcm2 rem3 remi tss2 Arva Moraine Wetland Complex (UT 15) City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study Richmond Street Significant Woodland Key Map ^ City Limit Sunningdale Rd ¹ Oxford St W Approximate Study Area Commissioners Rd Wonderland Rd Hwy 401 Highbury Ave MCWADE PL Richmond Street Significant Woodland Legend Watercourse Railway RICHMOND ST MNR Approved PSW Boundary Surveyed Wetland Boundary remi hs1 ffw5 Arva Moraine Wetland Complex (UT 15) gcm2 ffw5 Wetlands Significant Woodlands Lot Lines Water Body nem4 tss2 nem4 This drawing has been prepared for the use of AECOM's client and may not be used, reproduced or relied upon by third parties, except as agreed by AECOM and its client, as required by law or for use by governmental reviewing agencies. AECOM accepts no responsibility, and denies any liability whatsoever, to any party that modifies this drawing without AECOM's express written consent. SAWGRASS LINK PEBBLECREEK WALK TORREY PINES WAY Tributary to Medway Creek Metres Figure 5 Wetlands Scale: 1:2,000 Date: March 2016

28 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study Breeding bird surveys were completed in the spring of 2014 within and adjacent to the Richmond Street study area to identify species composition, including presence/absence of any significant species Background Prior to breeding bird surveys, background data from the Ontario Breeding Bird Atlas (OBBA) (Birds Studies Canada et al. 2006) was collected to identify the species of birds that have been recorded within the study area. Data obtained from the atlas squares covering the study area (17MH76) identified a total of 105 species with various levels of breeding evidence. A list of species identified using the OBBA squares as occurring within the study area can be found in Appendix G. Nine (9) significant species were identified as occurring within the study area during the background review. Table 6 below summarizes the significant species, their provincial and federal status, a description of suitable habitat and whether there is suitable habitat present within the study area. Appendix G presents a bird species list obtained from the OBBA, as well as the results from field investigations in Five of the species listed in Table 6 are designated as Threatened or Endangered by the Committee of on the Status of Species at Risk Ontario (COSSARO). These Species at Risk (SAR) and their general habitats are afforded protection under the ESA. The species include Barn Swallow (Hirundo rustica), Bobolink (Dolichonyx oryzivorus), Eastern Meadowlark (Sturnella magna), Northern Bobwhite (Colinus virginianus), and Chimney Swift (Chaetura pelagica). Species designated as Special Concern Provincially or as Threatened or Endangered by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) are considered Species of Conservation Concern (SCC). Additionally, species with an SRANK of S1 to S3 are also considered SCC. Habitat for these species is considered Significant Wildlife Habitat (SWH) and is afforded protection under the PPS (2014). Four SCC, including Wood Thrush (Hylocichla mustelina), Black Tern (Chlidonias niger), Eastern Wood Pewee (Contopus virens) and Common Nighthawk (Chordeiles minor) were identified during the background review Field Investigation Methods Under the Canadian Wildlife Service Forest Bird Monitoring Program, survey stations should typically occur within an individual community that is characterized by uniform physical conditions. Within these communities, stations should be located at least 250 m apart and 100 m from the edge of a forest. However, as the intent of the study was to determine species composition within the entire study area, all habitat types were surveyed. As such, survey protocol was adapted to encompass all habitat types including wetland and meadow communities and associated ecotones located along edges of natural areas. Each station was located at least 250 m apart to maintain a degree of separation and reduce the chances of double counting individual birds. A total of four stations were established within and adjacent to natural features located throughout the study area (Figure 6). As outlined in the OBBA and CWS protocols, four (4) point count surveys were completed at each station during the breeding bird period between May 24 th and July 10 th. The separate surveys are recommended as they typically provide data that more accurately reflects the number of species and birds utilizing the habitat at each station (CWS, 2009). Surveys were completed between 5:00 am and 10:00 am under appropriate weather conditions (i.e., no precipitation, calm to light wind) (CWS 2009). Each point count consisted of two 5-minute surveys during which time, species, breeding evidence and individual bird movement within 100 m radius of the survey station were mapped. Species heard outside of the 100 m radius or that were observed outside of their breeding habitat within the 100 m radius (i.e., Fly-overs) were recorded separately. Additionally, all incidental bird observations were document during field investigations within the Richmond Street study area. Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

29 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study Table 6: Summary of SAR Bird Species Known from the Area Species Northern Bobwhite Colinus virginianus ESA Status END SARA Status END Schedule 1 COSEWIC Status END Preferred Habitat1, 2,3,4 Northern Bobwhites live in savannahs, grasslands, around abandoned farm fields, along brushy fencerows and other similar sites. Grasslands that are occasionally burned are particularly important because the fires help keep the habitat from becoming too forested. In such places, bobwhites can find most of their needs such as food, nesting cover, and places to hide and rest throughout the year. In severe winter conditions bobwhites sometimes need to move into small forest areas to find snow-free areas for foraging. Bobwhites lay up to 16 eggs in a shallow natural depression that they line with plant material and conceal with grasses and vines. Source Identifying Species Record OBBA Atlas Square 17MH76 Habitat Identified within the Study Area During the Background Review Yes A variety of vegetation types are present within the study area including mowed fallow field, Cultural Meadow and Cultural Woodland. Species Identified within the Study Area During Site Investigations No This species was not identified during breeding bird surveys. Barn Swallow Hirundo rustica Bobolink Dolichonyx oryzivorus This species can typically be associated with the following ELC communities: TPO, TPS, CUM, CUT, CUS and CUW. THR No Status THR Barn Swallows often live in close association with humans, building their cup-shaped mud nests almost exclusively on human-made structures such as open barns, under bridges and in culverts. The species is attracted to open structures that include ledges where they can build their nests, which are often re-used from year to year. They prefer unpainted, rough-cut wood, since the mud does not adhere as well to smooth surfaces. This species can typically be associated with the following ELC communities: TPO, CUM1, MAM, MAS, OAO, SAS1, SAM1, SAF1; containing or adjacent structures that are suitable for nesting. THR No Status THR Historically, Bobolinks lived in North American tallgrass prairie and other open meadows. With the clearing of native prairies, Bobolinks moved to living in hayfields and wheat fields. Bobolinks often build their small nests on the ground in dense grasses. Both parents usually tend to their young, sometimes with a third Bobolink helping. OBBA Atlas Square 17MH76 OBBA Atlas Square 17MH76 Yes Nesting habitat is present within the adjacent lands including residential properties to the south and west of study area. Foraging habitat is present within the MAM, CUM communities. Yes Cultural Meadow and agricultural fields are present within and adjacent to the study area. Yes Species observed in suitable habitat during breeding bird season at three point count stations. At least one Barn Swallow nest was observed within the end of the culvert located under Richmond Street. Two other nests were observed in the culvert but showed evidence of being old Cliff Swallow nests. No Bobolink were observed courting within the agricultural field east of the study area. This species can typically be associated with the following ELC communities: TPO, TPS, CUM1 and MAM2. Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

30 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study Table 6: Summary of SAR Bird Species Known from the Area Species Chimney swift Chaetura pelagica Eastern Meadowlark Sturnella magna ESA Status THR SARA Status THR Schedule 1 COSEWIC Status THR Preferred Habitat1, 2,3,4 Before European settlement Chimney Swifts mainly nested on cave walls and in hollow trees or tree cavities in old growth forests. Today, they are more likely to be found in and around urban settlements where they nest and roost (rest or sleep) in chimneys and other human-made structures. They also tend to stay close to water as this is where the flying insects they eat congregate. Foraging habitat for this species can be associated with the following ELC codes: TPO, CUM1, MAM, MAS, OAO, SAS1, SAM1, SAF1 containing or adjacent structures with suitable nesting habitat (i.e., chimneys). THR No Status THR Eastern Meadowlarks breed primarily in moderately tall grasslands, such as pastures and hayfields, but are also found in alfalfa fields, weedy borders of croplands, roadsides, orchards, airports, shrubby overgrown fields, or other open areas. Small trees, shrubs or fence posts are used as elevated song perches. Source Identifying Species Record OBBA Atlas Square 17MH76 OBBA Atlas Square 17MH76 Habitat Identified within the Study Area During the Background Review Yes Foraging habitat is present within the study area including MAM and CUM communities. Nesting habitat is not likely present within the study area but may be present within the neighbouring residential lands. Yes Cultural Meadow and agricultural fields are present within the study area. Species Identified within the Study Area During Site Investigations No Chimney Swifts were not observed during breeding bird surveys. No Two Eastern Meadowlarks were observed singing outside of the study area from BBS-002 This species can typically be associated with the following ELC communities: TPO, TPS, CUM1, CUS and MAM2 with elevated song perches. Black Tern Chlidonias niger SC No Status Not at Risk Black Terns build floating nests in loose colonies in shallow marshes, especially in cattails. In winter they migrate to the coast of northern South America. Nesting habitat for this species can be associated with the following ELC communities: MAS2-1 and OAO. These two communities must be present immediately adjacent each other and with sufficient water to provide suitable habitat. OBBA Atlas Square 17MH76 No There is no open water or shallow marsh communities present within the study area. No Black Tern was not observed within the study area during breeding bird surveys. Common Nighthawk Chordeiles minor SC THR Schedule 1 THR Traditional Common Nighthawk habitat consists of open areas with little to no ground vegetation, such as logged or burned-over areas, forest clearings, rock barrens, peat bogs, lakeshores, and mine tailings. Although the species also nests in cultivated fields, orchards, urban parks, mine tailings and along gravel roads and railways, they tend to occupy natural sites. OBBA Atlas Square 17MH76 No Low quality habitat such as cultivated fields are present however, ground is covered by vegetation. No This species was not observed during anuran call surveys or breeding bird surveys conducted in This species can typically be associated with the following ELC communities: SD, BB, RB, CUM, BO, FOM, FOC and FOD with openings with little vegetation. Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

31 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study Table 6: Summary of SAR Bird Species Known from the Area Species Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina ESA Status SARA Status COSEWIC Status Preferred Habitat1, 2,3,4 SC No Status THR The Wood Thrush can typically be found in the interior and along the edges of well-developed upland deciduous and mixed forests. Key elements of these forests include trees that are greater than 16 m in height, high variety of deciduous tree species, moderate subcanopy and shrub density, shade, fairly open forest floor, moist soils and decaying leaf litter. Wood Thrush is more likely to occur in larger forests but may also nest in 1 ha fragments and semi-wooded residential areas and parks. Smaller habitat fragments have lower fecundity when compared to larger fragments. Source Identifying Species Record OBBA Atlas Square 17MH76 Habitat Identified within the Study Area During the Background Review No There are no upland forested communities present within the study area. Species Identified within the Study Area During Site Investigations No Wood Thrush was not observed within the study area during breeding bird surveys. This species can typically be associated with the following ELC communities: FOD and FOM that are greater than 1 ha in size. Eastern Wood-Pewee Contopus virens SC No Status SC The Eastern Wood-Pewee can be found in every type of wooded community in eastern North America. The size of the forest does not appear to be an important factor in habitat selection as this species has been found in both small fragmented forests and larger forest tracks. OBBA Atlas Square 17MH76 Yes Cultural woodlands are present within the study area. No Eastern Wood Pewee was not observed within the study area during breeding bird surveys. This species can typically be associated with the following ELC communities: FOC, FOM, FOD, and CUW. Notes: 1. Species at Risk. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. Queens Printer for Ontario, Species at Risk Status Reports. Committed on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa Evans, Melissa, Elizabeth Gow, R. R. Roth, M. S. Johnson and T. J. Underwood Wood Thrush (Hylocichla mustelina), The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole, Ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology; Retrieved from the Birds of North America Online: 4. McCarty, John P Eastern Wood-Pewee (Contopus virens), The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole, Ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology; Retrieved from the Birds of North America Online: Legend: SC - Special Concern THR Threatened END - Endangered Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

32 MAS2-1 SWT2b MAM2-10 MAM2 BBS-003 [b Barn Swallow (Foraging) CUM1-1!?!( AMP-001 SWT2a MAM2-10 MAS2-1 CUW1b CUM1-1 CUP1 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study CASTLEHILL CLOSE Bank Swallow (Nesting) MCWADE PL!? SAWGRASS LINK PEBBLECREEK WALK [b TORREY PINES WAY MAS2-1 BBS-004 CUM1-1 Roadside Drainage MAM2-2 CUM1-1 Tributary to Medway Creek RICHMOND ST FOD8-1 MAM2-2 Roadside Drainage!? VILLAGEWALK BLVD AMP-002 FOD8-1!( Butternut!? SWD4 MAM2-2 Barn Swallow (Nesting) SWT2a CUT1 CUW1a SAF1-3 MAM2-10 SAF1-3 CUM1-1!? Butternut MAM2-2 [b!? Eastern Meadowlark!? BBS-002 Bobolink Key Map Legend!( [b Watercourse Railway Tree Row Lot Lines Water Body ELC Boundary Sunningdale Rd Oxford St W Wonderland Rd ^ City Limit Commissioners Rd Hwy 401 Approximate Study Area This drawing has been prepared for the use of AECOM's client and may not be used, reproduced or relied upon by third parties, except as agreed by AECOM and its client, as required by law or for use by governmental reviewing agencies. AECOM accepts no responsibility, and denies any liability whatsoever, to any party that modifies this drawing without AECOM's express written consent. Figure 6 Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat Highbury Ave Amphibian Anuran Call Station (AMP) Breeding Bird Station (BBS) MNR Approved PSW Boundary Breeding Bird Area Search!?!? Significant Wildlife Habitat Amphibian Breeding (woodland) ¹ Bird Species At Risk Butternut Tree Monarch Butterfly Terrestrial Crayfish Scale: 1:2,587 ROYAL OAKS BEND [b BBS Metres SUNNINGDALE RD E ¹ Date: March 2016

33 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study Results and Discussion Breeding bird surveys were conducted on May 27 th and June 6 th, A total of 39 bird species, included in Table 7, were identified during the breeding bird point count surveys within and adjacent to the study area. An additional six species were recorded during area searches conducted between point counts. Of the 48 species observed, 14 were recorded as probable or confirmed breeders within the Richmond Street study area. One (1) bird SAR, Barn Swallow (Hirundo rustica) was observed within the study area during the breeding bird point count surveys. Three (3) bird SAR, Eastern Meadowlark (Sturnella magna), Bank Swallow (Riparia riparia) and Bobolink (Dolichonyx oryzivorus), were observed outside of the study area during the breeding bird point count surveys and/or area searches conducted between point counts. Table 7: Summary of 2014 Breeding Bird Evidence within and Adjacent to the Richmond Street Study Area Species Name Scientific Name Breeding Bird Stations BBS-001 BBS-002 BBS-003 BBS-004 American Crow Corvus brachyrhynchos H H American Goldfinch Cardeulis tristis T T S T American Robin Turdus migratorius S S Baltimore Oriole Icterus galbula S S S Barn Swallow Hirundo rustica H H H Belted Kingfisher Ceryle alcyon H Black-capped Chickadee Poecile atricapillus T P Blue Jay Cyanocitta cristata H Bobolink Dolichonyx oryzivorus D Brown Thrasher Toxostoma rufum S Brown-headed Cowbird Molothrus ater H S Canada Goose Branta canadensis H Cedar Waxwing Bombycilla cedrorum S S Chipping Sparrow Spizella passerina T Common Grackle Quiscalus quiscula H H Common Yellowthroat Geothlyphis trichas T T S Downy Woodpecker Picoides pubescens H Eastern Kingbird Tyrannus tyrannus S Eastern Meadowlark Sturnella magna S European Starling Sturnus vulgaris H H Field Sparrow Spizella pusilla S S Gray Catbird Dumetella carolinensis S S S S Great Blue Heron Ardea herodias T X X House Finch Carpodacus mexicanus S House Wren Troglodytes aedon S Killdeer Charadrius vociferus H Least Flycatcher Empidonax minimus S Northern Cardinal Cardinalis cardinalis S S T Northern Flicker Colaptes auratus H Northern Rough-winged Swallow Stelgidopteryx serripennis H Red-eyed Vireo Vireo olivaceus S Red-winged Blackbird Agelaius phoeniceus T T T Rose-breasted Grosbeak Pheucticus ludovicianus S T S Savannah Sparrow Passerculus sandwichensis S Song Sparrow Melospiza melodia S S T T Spotted Sandpiper Actitis macularia H Warbling Vireo Vireo gilvus T S Willow Flycatcher Empidonax traillii T T Yellow Warbler Dendroica petechia T T T Legend: Breeding Bird Evidence (OBBA 2001) Observed X - Species observed in its breeding season (no evidence of breeding). Possible H - Species observed in its breeding season in suitable habitat S - Singing male present, or breeding calls heard, in its breeding season in suitable nesting habitat Probable T - Permanent territory presumed through registration of territorial song on at least 2 days, a week or more apart at the same place. D Courtship or display between a male and female or 2 males, including courtship feeding or copulation. N Nest-building or excavation of nest hole. Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

34 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study As noted, Barn Swallows and their habitat are afforded protection under the ESA. Barn Swallows exist in close associated with humans and almost exclusively nest on man-made structures including barns, bridges and culverts. This species forages in open communities that provide an abundance of aerial insects (OMNR 2014a). Barn Swallow was observed during both breeding bird surveys. One individual Barn Swallow was observed flying in suitable habitat at BBS- 001 and two individuals were observed flying in suitable habitat at BBS-004 on May 27 th, One Barn Swallow was also observed at BBS-002 on June 6 th, At least one barn Swallow nest was observed within the existing culvert under Richmond Street during aquatic investigations. Several other nests were observed but showed evidence of old Cliff Swallow nesting (remnants of mud and nesting material displaying the hive like structure typical of Cliff Swallows). Eastern Meadowlark is designated as Threatened provincially. This species and its habitat are afforded protection under the ESA. Eastern Meadowlark primarily breeds and nests in moderately tall grasslands including pastures and hayfields however, they are also known to use alfalfa fields, weedy borders or croplands, roadsides, orchards, airports, shrubby overgrown fields, or other open areas (OMNR 2014b). Two (2) male Eastern Meadowlarks were observed singing outside of the study area from BBS-002 on May 27 th, Similarly, Bobolink is designated as Threatened Provincially. This species and its habitat are afforded protection under the ESA. Bobolinks prefer tallgrass prairie communities but are encountered in agricultural communities such as hay and wheat fields (OMNR 2014c). Six (6) male Bobolinks were observed displaying at BBS-002 on May 27 th, Additionally, one individual was observed during the June 6 th visit at BBS-002 during breeding bird point counts. It is possible that this species is nesting within the pasture located at the east portion of the study area. In addition to the above noted SAR bird species, Bank Swallow was observed outside of the study area during area searches to and from point count locations. Bank Swallow is newly listed as Threatened provincially and therefore is afforded protection under the ESA. This species nests in burrows in natural and human-made settings where there are vertical faces in silt and sand deposits. Many nests are on banks of rivers and lakes, but they are also found in active sand and gravel pits or former ones where the banks remain suitable (OMNR 2014d). Approximately 20 individuals were observed flying around a freshly built colony on the north side of a large mound of excavated dirt. An estimate of at least 10 nests was recorded within the mound. This habitat is associated with clearing and excavation of an adjacent development. Two (2) Level One Municipal Priority Species were observed within the study area during breeding bird surveys Brown Thrasher (Toxostoma rufum) and Savannah Sparrow (Passerculus sandwichensis). One Brown Thrasher was observed at BBS-003 on June 6 th, This species generally inhabits thickets and hedgerows in deciduous forest clearings and forest edges (Cavitt & Haas 2000). This species is also listed as a Conservation Priority Species by Partners In Flight (PIF). Additionally, one Savannah Sparrow (Passerculus sandwichensis) was observed calling at BBS-004 on May 27 th, This species frequently inhabits grassy meadows, cultivated fields (especially alfalfa), lightly grazed pastures, roadsides, coastal grasslands, sedge bogs and edge of salt marshes (Wheelwright and Rising 2008). Seven (7) additional PIF Conservation Priority Species were observed within the study area during breeding bird surveys. These species include: Baltimore Oriole (Icterus galbula), Eastern Kingbird (Tyrannus tyrannus), Field Sparrow (Spizella pusilla), Northern Flicker (Colaptes auratus), Rose-breasted Grosbeak (Pheuticus ludovicianus), Belted Kingfisher (Ceryle alcyon), and Willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii). Willow Flycatcher has a PIF Conservation Priority status of Continental Concern. Rose-breasted Grosbeak and Baltimore Oriole have received PIF status of Regional Stewardship. The remaining species have a Regional Concern status. The PIF Conservation Priority Species observed and their associated status can be found in Appendix G. All other bird species observed are fairly common to abundant and widespread in southern Ontario. Most are habitat generalists that are commonly encountered in urban settings adjacent to natural areas. Actively nesting migratory birds are protected under the Migratory Birds Act. Some species which are not identified in the Migratory Birds Act, such as Raptors, are protected under the Fish and Wildlife Act. Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

35 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study Herpetofauna Anuran call surveys are important components of environmental studies as they can assist in the evaluation of wetland health and sustainability. Call surveys are typically included in baseline environmental studies to develop an understanding of species composition, abundance and breeding activity of species within a study area. These surveys can also provide an opportunity to determine the presence/absence of significant species and can allow for repeated monitoring efforts. The Marsh Monitoring Program developed an amphibian monitoring protocol that aimed at monitoring population changes and habitat of amphibians. The Marsh Monitoring Program Participant s Handbook for Surveying Amphibians (2008) outlines the methods to be followed in order to obtain representative and unbiased data. The protocol listed above outlines proper site selection, timing (including time of day and time of year to conduct the surveys) and suitable weather conditions. Anuran call surveys were completed in the spring of 2014 within the Richmond Street study area to identify species composition, including presence/absence of any significant species Background Prior to anuran call surveys, background data from the Ontario Reptile and Amphibian Atlas (Ontario Nature 2013) was collected to identify the species of amphibians that have been recorded within the study area. There were no significant amphibian species identified as occurring within the study area during the background review. Although there were no significant species identified during the background review, the potential presence of other species such as Gray Treefrog (Hyla versicolor) and Western Chorus Frog (Pseudacris triseriata) indicate the potential for Significant Wildlife Habitat. Therefore, anuran call surveys were conducted to determine the presence and populations of anuran species within the study area and determine the presence of Significant Wildlife Habitat including Amphibian Breeding Habitat. Additionally, three (3) SAR snake species were identified as potentially occurring within the study area during the background review including Eastern Milksnake (Lampropeltis triangulum), Eastern Ribbonsnake (Thamnophis sauritus) and Eastern Hog-nosed (Heterodon platirhinos) Methods Three anuran call surveys were conducted at two wetland communities within the Richmond Street study area (Figure 6). These surveys were conducted following the Ontario Marsh Monitoring Program (Bird Studies Canada 2008). The Marsh Monitoring Program s survey protocol provides standardized field methods for audio-surveys of breeding anurans (i.e., frogs and toads) within the province. In order to detect both early and late anuran breeders, three site visits were conducted at the wetland communities during the breeding season. In accordance with the protocol, surveys did not begin until at least one-half hour after sunset and were completed before midnight. In addition, surveys were only conducted during suitable weather conditions which included winds less than 19 km/hr and minimum night-time air temperatures of at least 5C for the first survey, 10C for the second survey and 17C for the third survey. It should be noted that surveys can be conducted at lower temperatures if there is strong calling activity observed. Species observed and call frequency were recorded by biologists during each three minute point count. The frequency categories of anuran calls are as follows: 0... None heard Individuals can be counted, calls not overlapping Numbers of some individuals can be estimated or counted, others overlapping Full chorus, calls continuous and overlapping, and individuals not distinguishable. Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

36 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study Incidental observations of snakes during the 2015 field investigations were recorded. The presence of snake hibernacula was assessed as part of Significant Wildlife Habitat surveys and is discussed in Section Results and Discussion During the 2015 field investigations, one Eastern Gartersnake was observed. The first round of amphibian surveys was conducted on the evening of April 21 st, Weather conditions consisted of air temperatures of 10C with a Beaufort wind scale of 3 and no precipitation. Table 8 summarizes the weather conditions and results of the first round of anuran call surveys conducted within the study area. Table 8: Summary of Anuran Call Surveys Conducted on April 21, 2014 Anuran Call Station Start Time End Time Temp. (C) Wind (Beaufort Scale) Species Observed Call Code Notes AMP :08 pm 10:11 pm 10 3 None - Spring Peeper heard calling south of point count location. AMP :14 pm 10:17 pm 10 2 Western Chorus Frog Spring Peeper 1(2) 3 American toad was heard outside of the 100 m radius. The second round of anuran surveys was conducted on the evening of June 12 th, Weather conditions consisted of an air temperature of 19C with 50% cloud cover, a Beaufort wind scale of 0 and no precipitation. Field investigations took place at 9:49 pm and were completed at 10:02 pm. Table 9 summarizes the results of the second round of anuran call surveys conducted within the Richmond Street study area. Table 9: Summary of Anuran Call Surveys Conducted on June 12, 2014 Anuran Call Station Start Time End Time Temp. (C) Wind (Beaufort Scale) Species Observed Call Code Notes AMP-001 9:59 pm 10:02 pm 19 0 None - Abundant firefly population in field. AMP-002 9:49 pm 9:55 pm 19 0 Green Frog Gray Tree Frog 1(2) 3 Gray Tree Frogs calling borderline call codes 2 and 3, overlap but hard to tell numbers. The third round of anuran surveys was conducted on the evening of June 24, Weather conditions consisted of an air temperature of 22C with 30% cloud cover, a Beaufort wind scale of 0 and no precipitation. Table 10 summarizes the results of the third round of anuran call surveys conducted within the Richmond Street study area. Table 10: Summary of Anuran Call Surveys Conducted on June 24, 2014 Anuran Call Station Start Time End Time Temp. (C) Wind (Beaufort Scale) Species Observed Call Code Notes AMP :42 pm 10:45 pm 22 0 None - Bats observed flying overhead. American woodcock heard calling. AMP-002 9:35 pm 9:38 pm Green Frog Gray Tree Frog 1(1) 1(3) - A total of five (5) anuran species were observed during anuran call surveys conducted in 2014 including Green Frog (Lithobates clamitans), Spring Peeper (Pseudacris crucifer), American Toad (Anaxyrus americanus), Western Chorus Frog (Pseudacris triseriata) and Gray Treefrog (Hyla versicolor). Early breeders such as Spring Peeper were most abundant within the study area during the April visit while later breeders including Green Frog and Gray Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

37 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study Tree Frog were most prevalent during the second and third round of anuran call surveys. Additionally, one species, Northern Leopard Frog (Lithobates pipiens) was observed on August 7 th, 2014 during a site investigation. Therefore, a total of six (6) species were recorded within the Richmond Street study area. No SAR herpetofaunal species were observed however, anuran observations within the wetland communities at Station 2 (AMP-002) met the criteria for Significant Wildlife Habitat for Amphibian Breeding Habitat - Woodlands. As such, confirmed breeding amphibian habitat is present within study area. Significant Wildlife Habitat is discussed further in Section Mammals Similar to birds and herpetofauna, the presence of balanced and functioning mammal populations is an indicator of the general health of the environment. This is especially important in areas with increased human activities or areas identified as sensitive to human activity. Many mammal populations within Ontario are secure or apparently secure within the province; however, some groups are rapidly being up listed as Endangered provincially due to environmental factors such as habitat loss or highly contagious diseases. The following section provides a summary of mammal species identified as potentially occurring the study area as well as the methods and results of mammal specific surveys completed on site Background During a background review, three (3) SAR mammal species were identified as potentially occurring within the study area including Northern Myotis (Myotis septentrionalis), Little Brown Myotis (Myotis lucifuga) and Eastern Small-footed Bat (Myotis leibii). All three species are listed as Endangered Provincially and are afforded protection under the ESA. Little Brown Myotis frequently roosts in trees and buildings during the day and often choose attics, abandoned buildings and barns for summer colonies where they can raise their pups (OMNR 2014e). Northern Myotis prefer boreal forests and roost under loose bark and in tree cavities (OMNR 2014f). Eastern Small-footed Bat roosts during the spring in summer in variety of habitats such as under rocks, in rock outcrops, buildings, under bridges as well as in caves, mines or hollow trees (OMNR 2014g). All three resident species hibernate in caves during the winter months Methods Field ecologists conducted Ecological Land Classification of vegetation communities present within the study area to determine the presence of candidate habitat for all mammal species identified during the background review including SAR habitat Results and Discussion All mammal observations were recorded during 2014 site investigations. Evidence of White-tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus) was observed through the study area. This species is commonly encountered and has secure populations within Ontario. On-site forest (FOD), woodland (CUW) and swamp (SWD) communities provide potential suitable roosting habitat for bat species. Bat specific surveys were not completed during site investigations however; several bats were observed flying overhead during amphibian call surveys on June 24 th, Tree removal is not being proposed for the construction of the Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection and, as such, all habitats associated with Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

38 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study bat habitat mentioned above are being considered Candidate Bat Habitat. In the event trees are to be removed it is recommended that all trees be assessed in order to identify suitable cavity trees. They should all be accurately marked and a Bat and Bat Habitat Impact Analysis will be conducted. Should it be determined that negative impacts to the identified Candidate Bat Habitat will occur as a result of the proposed work, additional exit and acoustic monitoring surveys may be required to determine the presence of SAR bat species Lepidoptera and Odonata Background During a background review of the Ontario Insects Atlas, a total of 74 butterfly species were identified within 10 km Square 17MH76 and a total of 84 Odonata species were identified as potentially occurring within the study area. One species, Monarch, is listed provincially as Special Concern and is therefore considered a species of Conservation Concern. All other species are commonly encountered in Ontario and have apparently secure (S4) or secure (S5) populations Methods There were no Lepidoptera or Odonate specific surveys completed within the study area. However, all lepidopteran and Odonate species observed incidentally within the study area were recorded during all site investigations in Results and Discussion All Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths) and Odonota (dragonflies and damselflies) observed during 2014 site investigations were documented. A total of five (5) butterfly species were observed including Common Wood-Nymph (Cercyonis pegala), Monarch Butterfly (Danaus plexippus), Black Swallowtail (Papilio polyxenes), Mourning Cloak (Nymphalis antiopa), and an unidentified fritillary species (Nymphalidae sp). A list of species observed and their federal, provincial and regional rankings is provided in Table 11. Table 11: Lepidoptera Species Observed within the Richmond Street Study Area Scientific Name Common Name S Rank COSEWIC SARA status MNRF/ SARO Status Tracked by NHIC Status in Middlesex Cercyonis pegala Common Wood-Nymph S5 A Danaus plexippus Monarch S2N, S4B SC SC SC C Nymphalidae sp. Fritillary species Nymphalis antiopa Mourning Cloak S5 C Papilio polyxenes Black Swallowtail S5 C Monarch is designated as Special Concern provincially and is therefore considered a Species of Conservation Concern. Habitat for Monarch butterfly consists of meadows and open areas with the species host plant - common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca). Adults can be found within a diverse set of habitats that provide a variety of wildflowers as a source of nectar (OMNR 2014h). One Monarch was observed within the mowed field located in between the north and south vegetation patches. According to the Criterion Schedule for Ecoregion 7E, the observation of a species listed as Special Concern or Provincially Significant in its habitat is considered SWH. Several cultural meadows are found within and surrounding the study area, however this does not mean all cultural Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

39 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study meadows should be left undisturbed. Should areas containing milkweed be affected by the proposed works then it would be recommended to provide a seed mixture of meadow species including milkweed as compensation. All other identified Lepidoptera species observed within the study area are considered Common within Middlesex County and have secure population within Ontario. A total of three (3) Odonata species were observed during site investigations. Table 12 below lists the species observed and their federal, provincial and regional rankings. All species identified have secure or apparently secure populations within Ontario. No SAR Odonata were identified during site investigations. Table 12: Odonata Species Observed within the Richmond Street Study Area Scientific Name Common Name S Rank COSEWIC SARA status MNRF/ SARO Status Tracked by NHIC Status in Middlesex Libellula luctuosa Widow Skimmer S5 Libellula pulchella Twelve-spotted Skimmer S5 Sympetrum sp. Meadowhawk species Species at Risk Assessment Background In order to determine the potential for Species at Risk (SAR) occurrence within the subject property, AECOM ecologists conducted a Species at Risk Habitat Screening. This screening is done as a requirement that addresses Species at Risk legislation at various levels of government. The relevant legislation affecting SAR are described below. As part of this SAR Habitat Screening, AECOM requested SAR background information from the MNRF. MNRF correspondence can be found in Appendix B. Species at Risk Act (SARA) The Species at Risk Act (SARA) is a federal regulation. The goal of SARA is to monitor and protect disappearing species; provide recovery strategies for Extirpated, Endangered or Threatened species, as well as to manage Species of Special Concern. SARA is to be consulted when there is a need for permits and scientific/educational activities involving the handling of wildlife (Environment Canada, 2012). Extirpated... a species that no longer exists in the wild in Canada, but exists elsewhere in the wild (SARA Registry, 2012) Endangered:... a species that is facing imminent extirpation or extinction (SARA Registry, 2012) Threatened:... a species that is likely to become endangered if nothing is done to reverse the factors leading to its extirpation or extinction (SARA Registry, 2012) Special Concern:... a species that may become a threatened or an endangered species because of a combination of biological characteristics and identified threats (SARA Registry, 2012) Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

40 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study Endangered Species Act (ESA) The Endangered Species Act (ESA) (2007) provides a protection and recovery strategy for Species at Risk in Ontario. Methods of protection include protection of SAR habitat; support for private and public organizations; recovery of species; and strict enforcement (Ontario, 2012). The ESA 2007 regulation applies to Extirpated, Endangered and Threatened species. Species of Special Concern are not protected under the ESA Species of Conservation Concern Species listed as Special Concern provincially, with an SRANK of S1 to S3, or species that are listed as Endangered or Threatened federally (COSEWIC) are referred to as Species of Conservation Concern. Species with these designations are not afforded protection; however, their habitat is considered Significant Wildlife Habitat under the Significant Wildlife Habitat Technical Guide (MNRF 2000). Habitat for these species is afforded protection under the PPS (2014). These species and associated habitats will be discussed further in Section Methods Methods used to complete the Species at Risk Screening include the use of several available data sources to help identify potential Species at Risk within the study area. Data previously collected from the NHIC database prior to the termination of the site using the lower tier (City of London) spatial boundary tool, was used and supplemented with records obtained from correspondence with MNRF, DFO Species at Risk mapping, the Atlas of Breeding Birds of Ontario, the Ontario Atlas of Reptiles and Amphibians as well as the updated NHIC online database. Once the list of potential species is finalized preferred habitat characteristics for each species is recorded using data from the Significant Wildlife Habitat Technical Guide, Species at Risk registry, Royal Ontario Museum, and individual COSEWIC reports, and the MNRF Species at Risk website. The list of potential species is then screened for available preferred habitat within the study area through the confirmation of existing conditions completed during field investigations. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Natural Heritage Information Centre Database (NHIC) The Natural Heritage Information Centre Database (NHIC) is an online resource tool available to obtain information regarding Species at Risk and Species of Conservation Concern. However, recent changes made by MNRF have resulted in the termination of this database. Prior to the close of the database, AECOM completed a search using the spatial boundary tool for several areas within the Province to obtain historical records, this included records for the City of London. Table 13 below presents known occurrences of SAR identified in the study area within the last 113 years. The most recent record being the American Badger observed in 2009, as well thirty six (36) Species of Conservation Concern have also been identified to be found within the City of London. Table 13: Species at Risk and Provincially Significant Species Scientific Name Common Name S-rank COSEWIC Status SARO Status Last Date Observed Ammodramus henslowii Henslow s Sparrow SHB END END 1956 Apalone spinifera Spiny Softshell S3 THR THR 7/13/1993 Arisaema dracontium Green Dragon S3 SC SC Bryoandersonia illecebra Spoon-leaved Moss S1 END END 8/30/1988 Carex lupuliformis False Hop Sedge S1 END END 1940 Castanea dentata American Chestnut S2 END END 4/16/2007 Cornus florida Eastern Flowering Dogwood S2? END END 5/23/1987 Dendroica cerulea Cerulean Warbler S3B END SC Emydoidea blandingii Blanding s Turtle S3 THR THR 7/20/2005 Enemion biternatum False Rue-anemone S2 THR THR 6/27/1990 Falco peregrinus Peregrine Falcon S3B SC THR 5/29/1988 Fraxinus quadrangulata Blue Ash S3 SC SC Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

41 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study Table 13: Species at Risk and Provincially Significant Species Scientific Name Common Name S-rank COSEWIC Status SARO Status Last Date Observed Graptemys geographica Northern Map Turtle S3 SC SC Haliaeetus leucocephalus Bald Eagle S2N,S4B NAR SC Ichthyomyzon fossor Northern Brook Lamprey S3 SC SC Icteria virens Yellow-breasted Chat S2B SC SC Isotria verticillata Large Whorled Pogonia S1 END END 1900 Ixobrychus exilis Least Bittern S4B THR THR 9/5/1932 Juglans cinerea Butternut S3? END END Lampropeltis triangulum Milksnake S3 SC SC Lampsilis fasciola Wavy-rayed Lampmussel S1 END THR 5/14/1993 Liparis liliifolia Purple Twayblade S2 THR END 1965 Microtus pinetorum Woodland Vole S3? SC SC Notropis photogenis Silver Shiner S2S3 SC SC Phegopteris hexagonoptera Broad Beech Fern S3 SC SC Platanthera leucophaea Eastern Prairie Fringed-orchid S2 END END 6/7/1990 Potamogeton hillii Hill s Pondweed S2 SC SC Regina septemvittata Queensnake S2 END END 5/9/1929 Seiurus motacilla Louisiana Waterthrush S3B SC SC Simpsonaias ambigua Mudpuppy Mussel S1 END END 1933 Stylophorum diphyllum Wood-poppy S1 END END 6/20/2008 Taxidea taxus American Badger S2 END END 6/7/2009 Thamnophis sauritus Eastern Ribbonsnake S3 SC SC Trillium flexipes Drooping Trillium S1 END END 5/6/1987 Villosa fabalis Rayed Bean S1 END END Viola pedata Bird s-foot Violet S1 END END 8/14/1992 Notes: *Provincial Rank (Species of Conservation Concern), SH= Possibly Extirpated (Historical); S1= Critically Imperiled; S2 = Imperiled; S3 = Vulnerable; COSEWIC = Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada SARO = Species at Risk in Ontario Results A list of SAR known to occur within the City of London was obtained from the MNRF SAR database, and then supplemented with the records obtained from the Atlas of Breeding Birds of Ontario to create a full list of potential SAR species located within the study area. Based on a combination of agency correspondence and background information compiled, a total of 49 SAR were determined to potentially occur within the City of London. Following the aquatic and terrestrial characterization of the study area through background review and field investigations, a habitat assessment was completed for these species to assess whether suitable habitat is present in the study area. It was determined that 30 species have the potential, based on habitat preferences, to be found within the study area. Of these, 13 are listed as Endangered (END), eight (8) are listed as Threatened (THR), and nine (9) are listed as Special Concern (SC). Although the species listed as SC are not legally protected under the ESA, it is important to also have regard for these species and their habitats due to their conservation status and to avoid future implications should the species status change under the ESA. These species will also be addressed in Section 3.9 below. Appendix H provides the full SAR Habitat Assessment. Six (6) SAR were identified within the study area during site investigations. These species are described above in the respective taxa sections. An assessment of Significance of these species can be found in Section 3 below. Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

42 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study 2.4 Significant Wildlife Habitat Assessment Background As stated in the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS 2014), development and site alteration is not permitted within Significant Wildlife Habitat. Additionally, the PPS (2014) states that development is not permitted within adjacent lands to Significant Wildlife Habitat unless ecological function of the adjacent lands has been evaluated and it has been demonstrated that there will be no negative impacts on the natural features or their ecological functions. As noted above, this project is not considered development or site alteration, rather, the proposed pathway is considered infrastructure. The guiding principles of the PPS (2014), however, have still been applied to this assessment of the proposed pathway. As such, a Significant Wildlife Habitat (SWH) screening exercise was conducted using the Wildlife Habitat Ecoregion Criteria Schedules for Ecoregion 7E (OMNR 2015) to determine the presence of Candidate SWH. Species listed as Special Concern provincially, with an SRANK of S1 to S3, or species that are listed as Endangered or Threatened federally (COSEWIC) are referred to as Species of Conservation Concern. Species with these designations are not afforded protection; however, their habitat is considered Significant Wildlife Habitat under the Significant Wildlife Habitat Technical Guide (MNRF 2000). Habitat for these species is afforded protection under the PPS (2014) Methods A desktop background review was completed to determine the presence of any candidate SWH habitat within the study area. This included a review of aerial photography to determine existing habitats that my provide SWH. Field investigations were later conducted in the spring, summer and fall of 2014 to confirm the presence of species and SWH within the study area. ELC was conducted to confirm vegetation communities present within the study area and wildlife surveys such as breeding bird surveys and anuran call surveys were completed to confirm the presence/absence of SWH. The SWH screening exercise is provided can be found in Appendix I Results and Discussion A total of three (3) Significant Wildlife Habitats were confirmed within the study area including Amphibian Breeding Habitat (Woodland), Terrestrial Crayfish Habitat and Monarch Butterfly Habitat (Figure 6). The first two habitats were confirmed within the Arva Moraine Provincially Significant Wetland. Monarch Butterfly habitat is present within the cultural meadow communities at the northeast portion of the subject property. The potential for two Candidate Habitats, Snake hibernaculum and Bat Maternity Colony, was identified as part of the SWH screening exercise; however, these were not confirmed in the field. As noted in Section , tree removal is not being proposed for the construction of the Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection and, as such, all habitats associated with bat habitat are being carried forward as Candidate Bat Habitat. In the event trees are to be removed it is recommended that all trees be assessed in order to identify suitable cavity trees. They should all be accurately marked and a Bat and Bat Habitat Impact Analysis will be conducted. Should it be determined that negative impacts to the identified Candidate Bat Habitat will occur as a result of the proposed work, additional exit and acoustic monitoring surveys may be required to determine the presence of SAR bat species. Although the results did not indicate confirmed Shrub/early successional bird habitat, many of the indicator species including Brown Thrasher and Savannah Sparrow were observed. As such, maintaining and enhancing such habitat should be considered in the final pathway alignment. Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

43 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study 3. Assessment of Significance The features found within the study area have been assessed using federal, provincial and municipal ranking and evaluation systems outlined by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC), the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Upper Thames River Conservation Authority (UTRCA), and the City of London. The following provides a summary of the identified significant features found within the study area. 3.1 Federally Recognized Features and Species Two (2) federally ranked species listed on Schedule 1 of the Species at Risk Act were observed: Butternut Endangered on Schedule 1 Monarch Special Concern on Schedule 1 There are no Federal Lands found within the study area and, as such, the Federal Species at Risk Act (SARA) does not apply to the subject lands. Consequently, federal SAR species have not been carried forward. 3.2 Provincially Recognized Features and Species One Provincially Significant Wetland is present within the Richmond Street Study area. 1. The Provincially Significant Arva Moraine Wetland Complex is located within the northeast portion of the subject property contained within the boundaries of the Richmond Street Significant Woodland. Six (6) provincially ranked Species at Risk (SAR) were observed during AECOM field investigations: 1. Barn Swallow Threatened 2. Bank Swallow Threatened 3. Eastern Meadowlark Threatened 4. Bobolink Threatened 5. Butternut Endangered 6. Monarch Special Concern, confirmed in cultural meadow community. The remaining 24 species, listed in Section 2.3 and Appendix H, were screened out as part of our Species at Risk Screening process. Appendix H provides the full Species at Risk Screening completed for the Richmond Street Subject Land Status Report study area. Three (3) Significant Wildlife Habitats were confirmed within the Richmond Street study area during AECOM field investigations: 1. Amphibian Breeding Habitat Woodlands, 2. Terrestrial Crayfish Habitat and 3. Habitat for Monarch Butterfly. Two potential Candidate Significant Wildlife Habitat, Snake Hibernaculum and Bat Maternity Colonies, were identified as part of the SWH screening exercise, neither of these habitats were confirmed in the field. Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

44 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study 3.3 Municipally Recognized Features and Species The following section describes and provides rationale for the evaluation of the features within the study area based on the City of London s Environmental Management Guidelines Significant River, Stream and Ravine Corridor The portion of the tributary of Medway Creek within the study area is considered a Significant River, Stream and Ravine Corridor within the City of London based on the following: Tributary transports overland flow and flows from the Arva Moraine Provincially Significant Wetland downstream to Medway Creek; and Tributary system is located in a headwater area Significant Woodlands As stated in the PPS, woodlands are defined as treed areas that provide environmental and economic benefits such as erosion prevention, water retention, provision of habitat, recreation, and the sustainable harvest of woodland products. Appendix A.4 of the Natural Heritage Reference Manual outlines factors and standards for evaluating the significance of woodlands. Woodland areas that meet the suggested standards for one or more of the factors as follows can be considered significant; Woodland size, Ecological Functions (shape, linkages, woodland diversity), Uncommon characteristics and Economic and Social Values. The Richmond Street Woodland Patch has been evaluated according to the City of London s Guideline Document for Evaluation of Ecologically Significant Woodlands, Score Sheet for Significant Woodland Evaluation (March 2006). These guidelines follow the recommendations made under the PPS. Below is a summary of the results. Table 14: Results of Significant Woodland Evaluation Assessment Component Rationale 1.1 Site Protection A) High Wetland communities within the subject property were measured using GIS. Individual communities SWD4-1, SWT2a, SWT2b, MAM2-2, MAM2-10, MAS2-1, and SAF1-3 total 2.4 ha in size. According to received UTRCA mapping, area falls within the Regulated Limits. B) Low The entire site lies on gentle slopes (average slope less than 10%) 1.2 Landscape Integrity 2.1 Age & Site Quality A) High Woodland cover within a 2 km radius is >10% (15.22%). This was completed by delineating all vegetation communities through aerial photography interpretation and measuring their respective areas through GIS. B) High Patch is directly connected via a tree/hedgerow to vegetation patches to the east C) High Northern portion of the patch is identified as big Picture Meta Corridors A) High Patch contains one community classified as Mature (SWD4-1) B) Low Vegetation patch all have MCC less than 4.2. The overall patch MCC is Refer to plant species list in Appendix E. C) High All communities present within the subject property are in good condition 2.2 Size & Shape A) Medium The patch is 4.9 ha in size, as measured through GIS B) Low Subject property contains a perimeter to area ratio >3.0 m/m 2. The perimeter and area for the patch was measured through GIS and equals 1, m and 47,200 m 2 respectively. This equals a perimeter to area ration of C) High Patch contains two Level 1 species (Brown Thrasher and Savannah Sparrow) as possible breeders within the patch. Score (Based on highest standard achieved) High High High High Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

45 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study Table 14: Results of Significant Woodland Evaluation Assessment Component Rationale 2.3 Diversity A) High Subject property contains 6 or more Community Series. They consist of CUM, CUT, FOD, SWD, SWT, and MAM. B) High Subject property contains 7 Vegetation Types. They consist of CUM1-1, FOD8-1, SDW4-1, MAM2-2, MAM2-10, MAS2-1, and SAF1-3. C) High Patch contains 6 species of frog (Chorus frog, Spring Peeper, Green Frog, American Toad, Northern Leopard Frog and Gray Treefrog) D) Low Subject woodland contains no coniferous communities. E) Low Subject woodland contains no fish habitat 3.0 Threatened or Endangered Species 4.1 High Quality Communities 4.2 High Quality Landforms Total Score A) High 2 SAR species were observed within the patch (Butternut, and Barn Swallow, foraging over MAS2-1) A) Low All ELC communities are S5 B) Medium patch contains 3 Carolinian tree/shrub Cottonwood, black walnut and butternut C) Medium Trees found within the subject property having a 50 cm dbh or greater are rare or occasional in presence. D) Did not conduct prism sweeps within study area A) Medium vegetation communities in the northwest portion of the study area fall within the Till Plain and vegetation communities found in the southeast fall within the Till Moraine. Score (Based on highest standard achieved) High High Medium Medium High... 6 Medium... 2 Low... 0 As per Table 14, the woodland patch evaluation resulted in a total of 6 High and 2 Medium scores. To be considered significant, a woodland patch must receive a score of at least 1 High. There, the woodland patch east of Richmond is considered significant and herein referred to as the Richmond Street Significant Woodland. Refer to Appendix J for the complete Woodland Evaluation Score Sheet. Figure 7 provides the delineation of the woodland boundary according to the City of London s Guideline Documents for Environmentally Significant Areas Identification, Evaluation and Boundary Delineation. Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

46 ¹ MAS2-1 SWT2b MAM2-10 MAM2 CUM1-1 MAS2-1 SWT2a MAM2-10 Arva Moraine Wetland Complex (UT 15) Guideline 6: Wetland Communities greater than 0.2km in size are included Guideline 7: Cultural savannahs and woodland and old fields must be included within the ESA (or Sig. Woodland) boundary if they strengthen internal linkages in the patch by filling in "bays". City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study CUW1b Richmond Street Significant Woodland Guideline 3: Provides linkage with another patch less than 100m away Key Map Sunningdale Rd Oxford St W ^ City Limit Approximate Study Area ¹ Commissioners Rd CUM1-1 CUP1 Guideline 1: Habitat Zone for Species at Risk CUT1 Guideline 7: Cultural savannahs and woodland and old fields must be included within the ESA (or Sig. Woodland) boundary if they strengthen internal linkages in the patch by filling in "bays". Legend Wonderland Rd Hwy 401 Highbury Ave Watercourse FOD8-1 Richmond Street Significant Woodland Guideline 6: Wetland Communities greater than 0.2km in size are included Railway MNR Approved PSW Boundary Significant Woodland Boundary RICHMOND ST CUW1a ELC Boundary Wetlands Upland SAF1-3 MAM2-10 SAWGRASS LINK PEBBLECREEK WALK TORREY PINES WAY MAS2-1 CUM1-1 Roadside Drainage MAM2-2 CUM1-1 Tributary to Medway Creek MAM2-2 Roadside Drainage FOD8-1 SWD4 Arva Moraine Wetland Complex (UT 15) MAM2-2 SAF1-3 SWT2a CUM1-1 MAM This drawing has been prepared for the use of AECOM's client and may not be used, reproduced or relied upon by third parties, except as agreed by AECOM and its client, as required by law or for use by governmental reviewing agencies. AECOM accepts no responsibility, and denies any liability whatsoever, to any party that modifies this drawing without AECOM's express written consent. Figure 7 Significant Woodland Boundary Delineation Scale: 1:2,000 Date: March 2016 Metres

47 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study 4. Proposed Works The public requires a safe and efficient means of crossing Richmond Street from the existing multi-use pathway system located to the west (Figure 8). During the EA study, alternative solutions were developed and evaluated to address this need. The Preferred Pathway Alignment includes less grading, lower cost for retaining walls, better connectivity and shorter distance to the east side pathway terminus. The Preferred Pathway Alignment has been selected to minimize impacts to the natural environment by: avoiding the Richmond Street Significant Woodland to the greatest extent possible; protecting all trees including those within the Richmond Street Significant Woodland; avoiding the Arva Moraine PSW; and avoiding Species at Risk habitats and Significant Wildlife Habitats; and minimizing effects on development on both side of Richmond Street in terms of grading and size of footprint due to routing of pathway along edge of protected habitat areas. The vertical grade on Richmond Street directs drainage to two pronounced low points. Pathway routing and elevation of pathway were considered in the selection of the preferred pathway alignment and the study had regard for these to ensure major and minor flows were not impeded. The structural crossing of Richmond Street is an overhead pedestrian/bike structure over the ultimate Richmond Street corridor. This will be a single, integral abutment type structure approximately 50 m long with a 15 degree skew across the road. The superstructure consists of a concrete deck supported on precast concrete girders, designed to support future decorative enhancements. The bridge railing will be 1.37 m high suitable for bicyclists. The structure will be accessed with ramps located at each end. The bridge will be positioned in a manner to direct pathway users northeast and outside of the boundary of Arva Moraine PSW. The proposed pathway will have a clear width of 3 m. Pathway details, such as material to be used to construct the pathway, vegetation and maintenance adjacent to the pathway, retaining walls and/or hand rails, will be determined at the detailed design stage. Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

48 MAS2-1 SWT2b MAM2-10 CUW1b MAM2 Barn Swallow (Foraging) CUM1-1!? MAS2-1 SWT2a MAM2-10 Arva Moraine Wetland Complex (UT 15) Richmond Street Significant Woodland City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study CUM1-1 Key Map ^ City Limit Sunningdale Rd ¹ CUP1 Oxford St W Approximate Study Area Commissioners Rd Bank Swallow (Nesting)!? Preferred Bridge Location and Skew Butternut!? FOD8-1 CUT1 Richmond Street Significant Woodland Legend!?!? Wonderland Rd Hwy 401 Butternut Tree Bird Species At Risk West Side Pathway Highbury Ave Roadside Drainage RICHMOND ST MAM2-2 FOD8-1 SWD4 CUW1a SAF1-3 MAM2-10 Arva Moraine Wetland Complex (UT 15) SAF1-3 MAM2-2 SWT2a!? CUM1-1 Butternut!? Eastern Meadowlark!? Bobolink ELC Boundary Wetland Upland Significant Woodland Boundary Preferred Pathway Alignment Significant River, Stream, and Ravine Corridor MNR Approved PSW Boundary Significant Wildlife Habitat Amphibian Breeding (Woodland) Monarch Butterfly Terrestrial Crayfish SAWGRASS LINK PEBBLECREEK WALK TORREY PINES WAY MAS2-1 CUM1-1 MAM2-2 CUM1-1 Tributary to Medway Creek Roadside Drainage!? Barn Swallow (Nesting) MAM Metres ¹ This drawing has been prepared for the use of AECOM's client and may not be used, reproduced or relied upon by third parties, except as agreed by AECOM and its client, as required by law or for use by governmental reviewing agencies. AECOM accepts no responsibility, and denies any liability whatsoever, to any party that modifies this drawing without AECOM's express written consent. Figure 8 Preferred Pathway Alignment Scale: 1:1,877 Date: March 2016

49 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study 5. Assessment of Potential Impacts The following section identifies, describes and discusses the potential impacts to the identified natural heritage features resulting from the proposed works for the Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection. This section also identifies the existing impacts resulting from past activities. There are two key stages in the installation and management of the proposed Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection during which potential environmental effects may occur. These include the construction stage and the post-construction stage. The majority of short-term impacts will be related to the construction stage. Generally, these impacts are temporary in nature and are preventable through proper construction practices and site inspection. Longterm impacts are related to the pathway design and post-construction activities. Many of these impacts are prevented and mitigated through the site design, vegetated barrier creation and environmentally sound management practices. 5.1 Existing Environmental Impacts It is recognized that within Southern Ontario there are few, if any, natural areas that have not been disturbed by some human activity in the past. Therefore, in order to assess the potential impacts it is necessary to consider existing impacts that are present within the subject lands prior to the initiation of the proposed work. Existing impacts should be documented in order to determine whether, following construction, impacts are a result of the works or a result of previous activities or events on the lands. Some existing impacts provide an opportunity for the implementation of restoration initiatives. Based on AECOM s site investigations, we have identified the following existing impacts as being relevant to considerations of the proposed plan and future management of natural heritage features and functions within the subject lands: Edge Effects on Vegetation Communities With the clearing of forested communities, edge effects related to light and wind exposure are apparent along the agricultural field and the small open meadow. These edge effects also include the gradual invasion of weed species introduced by adjacent agricultural practices and residential gardens. Fragmentation of Vegetation Communities The study area and surrounding landscape have been heavily influenced by human clearing for agricultural and residential purposes. This has resulted in the Richmond Street Significant Woodland and Arva Moraine PSW to be isolated from the larger natural vegetation patches found to the east. Presence of Non-native Invasive Species Of the 79 plant species recorded within the study area, 19 were non-native. As discussed in Section , non-native plant species are assigned a Weediness value between -1 and -3 with the intention of indicating the degree of potential impact to a natural area (Oldham et al., 1995). Nine (9) of 19 the non-native plant species have a Weediness index of -3 and have the potential to cause serious impacts to natural areas. Thirteen (13) of the 19 non-native species are have become problem weeds in the Upper Thames River Watershed (UTRCA, 2011). Table 15 presents a list of non-native plants found within the study area along with the Weediness Index for each plant. It should be noted that Manitoba Maple (Acer negundo), which was found in the study area, is considered a native species (Oldham 1993) but has invasive tendencies and, as such, is considered an invasive species in the Upper Thames River Watershed. Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

50 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study Table 15: Non-native Invasive Plant Species within the Study Area Scientific Name Common Name Weediness Index Non-native Invasive Plants in the Upper Thames River Watershed Pinus sylvestris Scotch Pine -3 X Daucus carota Wild Carrot -2 X Achillea millefolium var. millefolium Common Yarrow -1 Cirsium arvense Canada Thistle -1 X Cirsium vulgare Bull Thistle -1 Lonicera tatarica Tartatian Honeysuckle -3 X Lotus corniculatus Brid s-foot Trefoil -2 X Robinia pseudo-acacia Black Locust -3 X Geranium robertianum Herb-robert -2 X Prunella vulgaris ssp. vulgaris Common Heal-all -1 Lythrum salicaria Purple Loosestrife -3 X Polygonum persicaria Lady s-thumb -1 Lysimachia nummularia Moneywort -3 X Frangula alnus Glossy Buckthorn -3 X Rhamnus cathartica Common Buckthorn -3 X Rosa multiflora Multiflora Rose -3 X Salix X rubens Reddish Willow -3 Solanum dulcamara Bitter Nightshade -2 Epipactus helleborine Common Helleborine -2 X Noise impacts have had a long-term effect on birds and other wildlife species inhabiting the woodlands, likely reducing the number of, or altering the diversity and species of birds and/or mammals frequenting the area. Other bird species have likely acclimated to the noises generated by adjacent subdivisions and roads; Edge effects on wildlife include an increase in Brown-headed Cowbird nest parasitism rates on songbirds, increased rates of songbird nest predation, and concentrated wildlife traffic of both predators and prey along edges (due to easier passage), which can alter behaviour, predation, and competition. Breeding bird surveys confirmed the presence of Brown-headed Cowbird within the study area. Residential Development has increased sediment loads through erosion of stockpiles located within the vicinity of the tributary to Medway Creek. Improperly maintained sediment fencing around the stockpiles has also contributed to this impact. Road Construction for the residential development has necessitated the installation of a box culvert under Torey Pines Way in which large cobble was placed within the culvert to restrict downstream sedimentation. This cobble creates an impassable barrier within the culvert during normal stream flows. 5.2 Potential Short-term Impacts The potential short-term environmental effects associated with the proposed works relate primarily to construction activities. Many of the potential short-term impacts are common to various types of proposed works and, therefore, have associated standard mitigation measures. Standard recommended mitigation measures are summarized in Appendix K. Potential construction-related impacts that are of particular relevance to the construction of the proposed works and the adjacent natural heritage features include those discussed below. Construction related runoff, contributing to erosion of soils, soil exposure and loss of vegetation; Damage to rooting zones during grading and construction in areas immediately adjacent to natural areas; Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

51 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study Degradation of soil quality and overall soil health may occur due to construction machinery; Localized soil compaction could occur, increasing runoff and erosion; Contamination of soil in various areas from spills or leaks of oil, gasoline, and related fluids; An increase in the amount of litter and man-made debris on site due to increased human traffic. Disturbance to wildlife caused by increased noise, human activity and construction traffic. While many of these potential impacts are preventable, if they are not managed and prevented through proper construction practices and by monitoring of mitigation measures, they may lead to long-term impacts and significant damage to both ecological features and their functions. With the implementation of the recommendations of the Environmental Management Plan as discussed in Section 6, the above impacts will be avoided or mitigated during the construction phase. 5.3 Potential Long-term Impacts The following section discusses the potential for long-term impacts as they relate to effects, especially for areas where there are federally, provincially, regionally and municipally recognized features as discussed within Section 3. The sources of potential long-term impacts of the proposed works will generally be derived from 1) the design and layout of the pathway and 2) site grading. Refer to Section 4 for a description of the proposed works Design and Layout of Pathway The design and layout of the pathway considers one crossing of Richmond Street: a new crossing of Richmond Street via the construction of a pedestrian bridge; and a pathway located outside of the Richmond Street Significant Woodland and Arva Moraine PSW boundary, extending the existing pathway located west of Richmond Street. The pathway along the edge of the Richmond Street Significant Woodland and tributary to Medway Creek has the following potential effects to the natural environment: Potential negative effect to mature trees along the edge of the Richmond Street Significant Woodland through grading. Potential loss of wetland habitat to the west of Richmond Street. Potential negative effect to Amphibian Breeding Habitat (Woodland). Potential negative effect to Monarch habitat. Potential negative effect to Terrestrial Crayfish Habitat. Potential negative effect to the tributary to Medway Creek through loss of riparian vegetation leading to increased erosion and sedimentation. Potential negative effect to the tributary to Medway Creek and Richmond Street Significant Woodland through increased exposure to pedestrian traffic leading to disturbances. Potential positive effect to the Richmond Street Significant Woodland through the application of a vegetation barrier and plantings. Potential positive effect to local wildlife through the installation of bird boxes. Potential positive effect to monarch butterflies through seeding of common milkweed. Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

52 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study These potential effects are discussed further below. Loss of Breeding/Foraging Habitat for Local Wildlife Species The proposed pedestrian pathway will result in the loss of some cultural woodland area, which could have an effect on local wildlife populations. The proposed pathway, however, will only be affecting minimal (0.03 ha) amount of natural space and protecting all larger natural areas. Potential to Affect Species at Risk No negative effect to observed SAR is anticipated with respect to the proposed pathway as per the following discussion. Butternut (END) Two butternuts were observed within the Richmond Street Significant Woodland. Pathway alignment will not be interfering with butternut or its habitat. The alignment has also taken into consideration the application of a 25 m buffer surrounding the butternut located closest to the edge of the Significant Woodland. No negative impact to butternut is anticipated. Barn Swallow (THR) Barn Swallow was observed foraging during breeding bird surveys as well during vegetation surveys. Barn Swallows can be observed in close association with humans and almost exclusively nest on manmade structures including barns, bridges and culverts. This species forages in open communities that provide an abundance of aerial insects (OMNR 2014a). Small amounts of foraging habitat will be lost due to clearing and grading of the proposed pathway alignment. However, ample foraging habitat will be maintained following pathway construction. One nest cup was observed at the culvert located under Richmond Street; however, no works are proposed to occur at this culvert. In the event that the existing culvert would need to be retrofitted for the pedestrian pathway, a nest survey and ESA Notice of Activity would need to be completed and submitted to the MNRF. As such, no impact to Barn Swallow is anticipated as a result of the proposed pathway. Eastern Meadowlark (THR) Eastern Meadowlark was observed during breeding bird surveys outside of the construction area. Eastern Meadowlark primarily breeds and nests in moderately tall grasslands including pastures and hayfields however, they are also known to use alfalfa fields, weedy borders or croplands, roadsides, orchards, airports, shrubby overgrown fields, or other open areas (OMNR 2014b). Small amounts of Eastern Meadowlark habitat may be lost due to clearing and grading of the proposed pathway; however, ample habitat will be maintained following pathway construction. As such no impact to Eastern Meadowlark is anticipated as a result of the proposed pathway. Bobolink (THR) Bobolink was observed during breeding bird surveys outside of the construction area. Bobolinks prefer tallgrass prairie communities but are encountered in agricultural communities such as hay and wheat fields (OMNR 2014c). It is possible that this species is nesting within the pasture located at the east portion of the study area; however pathway alignment will only be skirting the edge of this habitat leaving ample suitable habitat once the pathway has been constructed. As such, no impact to Bobolink is anticipated as a result of the proposed pathway. Bank Swallow (THR) Bank Swallow was observed foraging during breeding bird surveys and during vegetation surveys. Bank Swallow This species nests in burrows in natural and human-made settings where there are Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

53 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study vertical faces in silt and sand deposits. Many nests are on banks of rivers and lakes, but they are also found in active sand and gravel pits or former ones where the banks remain suitable (OMNR 2014d). Approximately 20 individuals were observed flying around a freshly built colony on the north side of a large mound of excavated dirt. An estimate of at least 10 nests was recorded within the mound. This habitat is associated with clearing and excavation of an adjacent development. There is no habitat removal anticipated as a result of the proposed pathway. As such, no impact to Bank Swallow is anticipated as a result of the proposed pathway. Monarch (SC) Monarch was observed during vegetation surveys. A few milkweed specimens were observed along the edge of the Richmond Street significant Woodland and in the small cultural meadow areas. Mitigation will include plantings of common milkweed to ensure no net loss of this particular plant species. A net positive impact to Monarch is possible if an increased amount of milkweed is established at the site through the pathway planting plans. Potential to Affect Significant Wildlife Habitat Little to no negative effects to observed SWH are anticipated with respect to the proposed pathway as per the following discussion. Three Confirmed Significant Wildlife Habitats were found within the study area: Amphibian Breeding Habitat (Woodland), Terrestrial Crayfish Habitat and Monarch Butterfly Habitat. The Amphibian Breeding Habitat (Woodland) and Terrestrial Crayfish Habitats were confirmed within the Arva Moraine Provincially Significant Wetland, and the Monarch Butterfly Habitat is present within the cultural meadow community at the northeast portion of the subject property. It is anticipated that the Preferred Pathway Alignment will not cause negative impacts to these SWH habitats. The proposed pathway is located outside of the Arva Moraine PSW and the cultural meadow community identified as Monarch Butterfly Habitat. The planting of milkweed is recommended to enhance existing Monarch habitat within the site. The potential for two Candidate Habitats, Snake Hibernaculum and Bat Maternity Colony, was identified as part of the SWH screening exercise; however, these were not confirmed in the field. During the 2015 field investigations, one Eastern Gartersnake was observed within the study area; snake hibernacula were not found. Mitigation will include the clearing the site prior to construction by a qualified Ecologist and should any species be observed relocating them outside to an area outside of the construction zone followed by the installation of exclusionary fencing along the outer limits of the construction area to deter species from reentering the construction zone. No tree removal will occur as part of the proposed pathway construction. Therefore, the construction of the pathway will not impact bats or bat habitat. Mitigation will include vegetation removal outside of the bat roosting season of April 31 st to September 1 st, with a strict no vegetation removal from June 1 st to July 31 st. Potential to Affect Tributary to Medway Creek The proposed pathway may result in increased sedimentation and anthropogenic disturbances to the watercourse which has the potential to negatively affect the aquatic resources within the tributary as well as downstream Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

54 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study watercourses. The placement of the pathway approximately 5 m from the high water mark or top of bank (whichever is more conservative), as well as native plantings along the sides of the pathway, will assist in minimizing impacts to the watercourse Site Grading Changes in site grading adjacent to natural features on site may result in changes to drainage patterns and disruption of vegetation communities located within the Richmond Street Significant Woodland and Arva Moraine PSW. Portions of grading that are required within Significant Woodland boundary could result in damage to adjacent vegetation. Soil compaction caused by machinery may also impact the ability of nearby trees to uptake water and nutrients, which would lead to decreased health and, potentially, death. Construction mitigation practices, including tree protection fencing and sediment and erosion control measures, should be implemented as outlined in Section to reduce any potential impacts as a result of the proposed pedestrian pathway. 5.4 Impact Mitigation As a part of the consultation between the various technical study team members working on the Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection, various mitigation measures were developed to reduce or eliminate potential impacts to the natural environment. For the purpose of this report, mitigation measures have been divided into three categories: 1. Avoidance Mitigation Avoidance mitigation includes the design of a plan that considered the protection of natural heritage features and functions by keeping the proposed pathway outside of the natural features, where possible. 2. Standard Mitigation Standard mitigation involves the implementation of measures designed to eliminate or reduce impacts by designing facilities or including natural elements that filter or prevent impacts. 3. Enhancement Mitigation Enhancement mitigation involves the restoration of a feature and/or function that may be lost as a result of the construction and long-term presence of the proposed pathway. The following describes mitigation measures recommended to reduce or eliminate impacts associated with the proposed works Avoidance Mitigation Avoidance of potential impacts is an essential component in the identification and the protection of the identified natural heritage features within the study area. As previously noted, the location of the proposed pathway has been designed based on the protection of the Richmond Street Significant Woodland, the Arva Moraine PSW contained within it, and the ecological functions it provides. For this reason, many of the potential impacts typical to infrastructure have been avoided. This approach substantially reduces the overall potential impacts resulting from the proposed pathway. It should be noted that any changes to the boundaries of the Arva Moraine PSW based on MNRF mapping updates will be considered as part of detailed design to ensure avoidance of the feature. Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

55 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study Standard Mitigation Standard mitigations measures are typically associated with construction-related impacts. These mitigation measures are commonly implemented with infrastructure projects and include measures to reduce or eliminate potential impacts to the natural environment. The following measures have been implemented or recommended to further mitigate potential impacts: Establishment of a Vegetated Barrier Impacts from pathway construction and human intrusion into the Richmond Street Significant Woodland can be avoided or mitigated by the implementation of a vegetative barrier. This vegetative barrier will serve to protect the ecological integrity and function of Richmond Street Significant Woodland and will deter pedestrians and cyclists from entering the woodland. The barrier will mitigate impacts by providing naturalized separation of the significant woodland from the pathway which provides key ecological functions including opportunities for surface water infiltration, wildlife corridor opportunities, protection of sensitive habitats from wind and extreme weather, as well as contributing to habitat and species diversity. Species to be considered for planting include a mixture of prickly ash (Zanthoxylum americanum), native hawthorns, dogwoods and an herbaceous seed mixture. Pedestrian Pathway Placement Impacts from pathway construction to natural features, such as the Richmond Street Significant Woodland, can be avoided or mitigated by the strategic placement of the pathway outside of the Richmond Street Significant Woodland boundary dripline. Installation of Fencing The installation of fencing, including tree protection fencing and silt fencing, can reduce or eliminate constructionrelated impacts such as damage to trees or sediment loading in adjacent natural heritage features. It should be noted that proper installation and maintenance are necessary to ensure that impacts are mitigated appropriately. Timing Restrictions Restricting construction related activities outside of sensitive periods for local or significant wildlife species can limit disturbance during life cycle stages. Construction related activities should be limited to the daylight hours (i.e., 7:00 am to 7:00 pm) in order to reduce the amount of noise disturbance. Additionally, vegetation clearing should occur outside of April 1 st to October 15 th in order to avoid impacts to 1) birds during their breeding season, 2) bats during their roosting season, and 3) snakes during the sensitive time before hibernation. Installation of Educational Signage The installation of education signs could educate local residents as to the importance of the Significant Woodland and Provincially Significant Arva Moraine Wetland and recommendations for environmental stewardship Enhancement Mitigation Integrated Ecological Restoration Plan Restoration of the site can be achieved through an integrated Ecological Restoration Plan involving an Edge Management Plan, Invasive Species Management Plan, and 5-year Monitoring Plan. These plans will be implemented by trained/licenced professionals with the objective of restoring the existing invaded or degraded areas to improve overall ecological integrity. Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

56 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study A woodland edge is an important factor to consider in the overall health of a woodland community. A healthy, thick edge will help protect the Richmond Street Significant Woodland from disturbances such as windthrow, invasive species, sunlight and human impacts. Therefore, increasing vegetation cover and composition along the edge of the woodland will reduce the likelihood of new disturbances and protect the feature and its functions. This will be achieved through the planting of native and trees, shrubs and herbaceous species along the edge of the Richmond Street Significant Woodland. Removal of non-native, invasive species listed in Section 5.1 would increase the relative proportion of native vegetation and reduce impacts associated with invasive species, such as displacement of native plants and wildlife that depend on them (UTRCA, 2011). A monitoring plan will work to evaluate the progress and success of restoration efforts and address ongoing management needs. The plan may include planting successes and failures, invasive species establishment or spread, measurement of species diversity, plant density, percent cover, percentage of native species and wildlife usage. Monitoring throughout the early and later stages of restoration site succession is essential to evaluating sites at the end of the monitoring period (Lefler, 2006). Monitoring restoration sites is also a key component in assessing the effectiveness, progress and overall success of restoration sites relative to the original objective and goals (Lefler, 2006). Furthermore, monitoring of such sites will provide the opportunity to evaluate and learn from restoration methods used and can provide valuable guidance for similar future projects (Lefler, 2006). There is also some potential for the City to acquire land east of the study area. This land could be used to extend the proposed pathway and provide an ecological connection between portions of the Richmond Street Significant Woodland and Arva Moraine PSW within the study area to Arva Moraine PSW and vegetation patches to the east and north of the City limits. 5.5 Net Effects Net environmental impacts are considered to be those impacts that remain or are residual after avoidance, standard mitigation and enhancement migration measures have been implemented. Based on the identified potential impacts and mitigation measures listed above, it is anticipated that the net environmental impacts will be positive. This conclusion is based on the following: 1. The proposed pathway design is based on the protection of natural heritage features and functions by means of restricting the proposed pathway to areas outside of the identified natural heritage features. 2. A vegetated barrier has been included to mitigate effects of the proposed pathway and the potential for increase in human disturbances. 3. An integrated Ecological Restoration Plan involving an Invasive Species Management Plan, Edge Management Plan and 5-year Monitoring Plan will restore the existing invaded or degraded areas to improve overall ecological integrity. 4. Construction mitigation recommendations will more than adequately avoid and prevent construction related impacts during pathway construction. 5. Additional recommendations for pathway design and education signs will serve to increase awareness and assist in the protection and maintenance of the natural heritage features within the study area. Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

57 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study The following criteria were applied during the assignment of net effects. Impacts caused by the proposed pathway were considered relative to the significance and sensitivity of the ecological feature and/or function. No Net Effect:... Indicates no measurable impact to the identified ecological features. Low Net Effect:... Indicates loss of habitat possessing limited potential habitat value, and/or loss of a portion of habitat, which will not result in long-term impact to the remaining habitat and/or reduction in associated key ecological functions. Medium Net Effects:... Indicates loss of habitat possessing moderate potential habitat value, and/or loss of a portion of habitat that may result in long-term impacts to the remaining habitat, and/or loss of associated key ecological functions. High Net Effects:... Indicates loss of habitat possessing significant potential habitat value, and/or loss of a portion of habitat that may result in long-term and potentially critical impacts to the remaining habitat, and/or significant loss of associated key ecological functions. Source of Impact /Potential Impacts Table 16: Net Effects Predicted from the Proposed Pathway Potential Areas Affected /Potential Effects 1.0 Potential Short-term Impacts Construction 1.1 Construction related Deciduous forest, wetland runoff contributing to communities and tributary to erosion of soils Medway Creek 1.2 Damage to rooting zones 1.3 Degradation of soil quality through compaction/contami nation 1.4 Increase in litter and man-made debris 1.5 Disturbance to wildlife through noise impacts 2.0 Potential Long-term Impacts 2.1 Loss or damage of shrubs and wetland community Mature trees within Richmond Street Significant Woodland and along the tributary to Medway Creek. Throughout study area Mitigation/Compensation Installation of sediment control fencing; Maintenance of natural topography and site drainage Installation of protective fencing; Access restrictions/prohibition; Pathway will be placed outside of the Richmond Street Significant Woodland boundary dripline. Installation of protective fencing; Access restrictions/prohibition; Net Effects/Rationale NO NET EFFECT Proper installation of sediment control fencing can prevent deposition of fill and sedimentation. No changes to site drainage NO NET EFFECT Proper installation of protective fencing, restriction of access can prevent potential impacts. NO NET EFFECT Proper installation of protective fencing, restriction of access can prevent potential impacts. Throughout study area Education of contractor staff NO NET EFFECT Contractor staff will be made aware of the sensitive natural Disturbance of breeding birds and other wildlife within the Richmond Street Significant Woodland and Arva Moraine Provincially Significant Wetland communities. Loss of individual shrubs within a small portion of the Richmond Street Significant Woodland to accommodate the proposed pathway to the northeast as well as a small portion of reed-canary grass meadow marsh on the west of Richmond Street. Restriction of construction to 7:00 am to 7:00 pm; Restriction of vegetation clearing to periods outside of April 1 st to October 15 th. Vegetation removal minimized where possible. Ecological Restoration Plan to be determined at Detailed Design. features (-) LOW - NO NET NEGATIVE EFFECT With the implementation of restrictions to the timing of construction disturbance to birds & wildlife can be avoided (+) NET POSITIVE EFFECT Implementation of an Ecological Restoration Plan, including planting native shrubs, will provide greater shrub diversity and coverage. Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

58 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study Source of Impact /Potential Impacts 2.2 Loss of breeding/ foraging habitat for local wildlife 2.3 Invasive Species Management Plan 2.4 Edge Management Plan Table 16: Net Effects Predicted from the Proposed Pathway Potential Areas Affected /Potential Effects Reduction of food source within the landscape. Within MAM 2-2 community adjacent to the tributary to Medway Creek Target the control of invasive species within invaded or degraded areas. Will implement an edge management planting plan along the edge of the Richmond Street Significant Woodland and Arva Moraine PSW. 2.6 Native Plantings Planting of native species along the length of the pathway. Plantings as part of the Ecological Restoration Plan in areas to be determined. 2.5 Ecological Restoration Plan 2.7 Increased sedimentation 2.8 Increased anthropogenic disturbances Degraded natural areas within the study area as well as potential opportunities for restoration in areas east and north of the study area. Tributary to Medway Creek Natural areas adjacent to the pathway. Mitigation/Compensation Ecological Restoration Plan to be determined at Detailed Design. Invasive Species Management Plan to be determined at Detailed Design. Edge Management Plan Will increase biodiversity, wildlife habitat and will increase the density of the edge for the protection of the overall Richmond Street Significant Woodland and Arva Moraine PSW. Will increase native species cover and reduce the introduction of invasive species within the area. Will help in eliminating human intrusion into adjacent natural features present along the pathway. Will be integrated with Invasive Species Management Plan, Edge Management Plan, Planting Plans and 5 year Monitoring Plan The placement of the pathway approximately 5 m from the top of bank or high water mark (whichever is more conservation) as well as native plantings along the sides of the pathway will assist in minimizing impacts to the watercourse. Placement of the pathway approximately 5 m from the top of bank or high water mark (whichever is more conservation) along the tributary to Medway Creek. Placement of the pathway outside of natural areas (to the greatest extent possible). Net Effects/Rationale (+) NET POSITIVE EFFECT Implementation of an Ecological Restoration Plan, including planting native plants that provide breeding / foraging habitat for local wildlife, will increase available habitat. (+) NET POSITIVE EFFECT The removal of invasive plants within the MAM2-2 community will increase amphibian habitat Overall, control of invasive species will increase ecological integrity. (+) NET POSITIVE EFFECT The addition of a larger, denser edge will increase the protection of Richmond Street Significant Woodland and Arva Moraine PSW from wind, invasive species and human disturbance. (+) NET POSITIVE EFFECT The addition of native plantings will help in the reduction of invasive species and human related impacts into natural features. This will also be aesthetically pleasing for residents using the new pathway. (+) NET POSITIVE EFFECT The management of invasive species and addition of native species will result in an overall improvement to the site s ecological integrity. (+) NET POSITIVE EFFECT Placement of the pathway at least 5 m from the top of bank or high water mark will minimize any longterm effects associated with the pathway. An integrated Ecological Restoration Plan will provide a benefit to the watercourse. NO NET NEGATIVE EFFECT Through the placement of the pathway outside of natural areas, impacts associated with use will be minimized. A vegetated barrier between the pathway and natural areas will offset an impacts associated with use. Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

59 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study 6. Environmental Management Recommendations The work associated with the Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection will be limited to the pathway and bridge structures. The environmental management recommendations developed for the project are, therefore, specific to those works and are intended to avoid, mitigate and compensate for any potential impacts to features and functions within the Richmond Street Significant Woodland and Arva Moraine PSW. The following section outlines the environmental management recommendations for the Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection project. The intent of these recommendations is to provide protection of the natural heritage features identified in the Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection study area. 6.1 Subject Land Status Report Recommendations The Subject Lands Status Report (SLSR) for the Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection provided recommendations for the protection of natural heritage features within the study area, as follows: 1. The uplands and wetland communities associated with the Arva Moraine Wetland Complex should be recommended for inclusion on the City of London s Official Plan Schedule B-1 as Provincially Significant Wetland and Significant Woodland, following review and acceptance by the City s Environmental & Parks Planning staff. Wetland boundaries should follow MNRF s wetland line as provided in the Figures in this report. Appropriate zoning designations should be applied to the Significant Woodland and remaining Open Space, respectively. 2. The evaluation and selection of a preferred pathway connection or any other future works proposed for the subject lands should have regard for the natural heritage features identified for the area in this study. 3. Environmental Impact Study Issues Scoping should consider the following requirements for any works proposed for areas within the subject lands of this study should they affect their potential habitat: a) Snake hibernaculum surveys and area surveys; b) Species-specific surveys of the Species at Risk identified as having potential habitat within the study area to confirm presence or absence. These species include: Little Brown Myotis Endangered, Northern (Long-eared) Myotis Endangered, Eastern Ribbonsnake Special Concern, Milksnake Special Concern, and Snapping turtle Special Concern; c) Confirmation of candidate habitat (e.g., snake hibernaculum). d) If butternut specimens are directly affected by the proposed pathway, a Butternut Health Assessment is to be undertaken by a certified Butternut Health Assessor. 4. Restoration and enhancement of Monarch butterfly habitat within the study area to naturalize along the pedestrian pathway. Plantings of the monarch host plant, common milkweed are recommended to enhance existing monarch habitat. 5. Habitat for Shrub/early successional habitat should be maintained within the study area to further support existing bird species such as Brown Thrasher and Savannah sparrow which are considered Level One species within Middlesex County. Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

60 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study 6.2 Environmental Management Plan Recommendations The following section outlines the environmental management recommendations for the Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection study area. The intent of these recommendations is to provide protection of the natural heritage features identified and to mitigate any potential impacts of the proposed pathway connection. The Environmental Management Plan (EMP) recommendations for the Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection project include the following: 1. Natural Heritage Protection Zones 2. Pathway Route Detailed Design & Management Recommendations 3. Construction Mitigation Recommendations 4. Ecological Enhancement Recommendations These recommendations are outlined in the following sections. Figure 9 presents the EMP Recommendations Natural Heritage Protection Zones The Richmond Street Significant Woodland represents the primary natural heritage feature to be protected within the study area. Located within the boundaries of the Richmond Street Significant Woodland is a portion of the Provincially Significant Arva Moraine Wetland Complex. This feature being located within the boundaries of the Significant Woodland will therefore also be protected. The boundaries of the Richmond Street Significant Woodland and Arva Moraine Wetland Complex within the study area are delineated on Figure 9. Figure 9 provides a delineation of the Natural Heritage Protection Zones for the Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection. The following recommendations are provided with respect to the Natural Heritage Protection Zones: Recommendation 1 Natural Heritage Protection Zones The Richmond Pedestrian Pathway route shall have regard for the Natural Heritage Protection Zones delineation identified on Figure 9. The pathway alignment shall be maintained outside of the Arva Moraine PSW and keep outside the dripline of the Richmond Street Significant Woodland where feasible. In areas where this is not feasible, mitigation measures such as dense plantings of shrubs within the woodland are recommended Pathway Route Detailed Design & Management Recommendations In order to minimize adverse effects to the Richmond Street Significant Woodland, detailed routing and design will require site-specific pathway placement and mitigation measures tailored to existing features and site conditions. The following recommendations are intended to minimize and mitigate potential impacts of pathway routing and design. Recommendation 2 Minimize Effects to Mature Trees Minimizing negative effects to mature trees within the study area is a priority for the City. Therefore, the Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway alignment will have regard for large trees and will be located in areas where minimal vegetation removal is required and will be located outside of the Significant Woodland drip-line. No tree removals are required based on the Preferred Pathway Alignment Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

61 !? SAWGRASS LINK Recommendation 3 Vegetation Barrier: In areas between the Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway and the Richmond Street Significant Woodland, a vegetated barrier is to be created along the length of the pathway. This barrier is to be planted with a mixture of native hawthorns such as Crataegus crus-galli, Crataegus mollis and Crataegus punctata. The herbaceous layer should be planted with a native to Ontario seed mix which is to include milkweed. The details of this planting plan should be refined during Detailed Design, however, and could include but not be limited to: black eyed Susan (Rudbeckia hirta), Canada goldenrod (Solidago canadensis), Canada wild rye (Elymus canadensis), blue vervain (Verbena hastata), New England aster (Symphyotrichum novaeangliae), white goldenrod (Solidago bicolor), wild bergamot (Monarda fistulosa). The creation of a vegetated barrier will increase the integrity of the current edge of the Richmond Street Significant Woodland by creating a more pronounced mantle. Recommendation 6 Maintenance: Placement of garbage and recycling bins along the pathway should be included to minimize litter. Salt use for winter maintenance should be avoided to prevent soil and water contamination. Bank Swallow (Nesting) Recommendation 4 Educational signage or information boards will be provided along the Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway to explain the significance of the Arva Moraine Provincially Significant Wetland (PSW) and Richmond Street Significant Woodland. Signage should also note the importance of not disturbing the natural features and their functions and indicate that dogs must be kept on-leash. Recommendation 5 Proximity of Pathway from Tributary to Medway Creek: Placement of the pathway approximately 5 m from the top of bank or high water mark (whichever is more conservation) will reduce both erosion as well as anthropogenic disturbances to the watercourse. Recommendation 8 Construction Mitigation Plan: A detailed Construction Mitigation Plan should be developed, prior to the issuance of contract drawings, wherein the mitigation measures detailed in Appendix K are tailored to the site-specific requirements and conditions of the Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway route and included on the drawings. PEBBLECREEK WALK TORREY PINES WAY MAS2-1 CUM1-1 MAS2-1 SWT2b Roadside Drainage MAM2-2 CUM1-1 Tributary to Medway Creek MAM2-10 CUW1b RICHMOND ST MAM2 Barn Swallow (Foraging) CUM1-1 MAS2-1 MAM2-2 Barn Swallow (Nesting)!?!? Roadside Drainage Arva Moraine Wetland Complex (UT 15) Butternut Richmond Street Significant Woodland SWD4 FOD8-1!? SWT2a MAM2-10 FOD8-1 CUM1-1 SAF1-3 Arva Moraine Wetland Complex (UT 15) CUP1 Richmond Street Significant Woodland MAM2-2 CUW1a SWT2a CUT1 MAM2-10 SAF Metres!? Butternut CUM1-1 Recommendation 1 Natural Heritage Protection Zones: The Richmond Pedestrian Pathway route shall have regard for the Natural Heritage Protection Zones delineation identified on Figure 8. The pathway alignment shall be maintained outside of the Arva Moraine PSW and keep outside the dripline of the Richmond Street Significant Woodland where feasible. In areas where this is not feasible, mitigation measures such as dense plantings of shrubs within the woodland are recommended. Recommendation 2 Minimize Effects to Mature Trees: Minimizing negative effects to mature trees within the study area is a priority for the City. Therefore, the Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway alignment will have regard for large trees and will be located in areas where minimal vegetation removal is required and will be located outside of the Significant Woodland drip-line. No tree removals are required based on the Preferred Pathway Alignment Recommendation 7 Vegetation Removal with Respect to Wildlife: Restricting construction related activities outside of sensitive periods for local or significant wildlife species can limit disturbance during life cycle stages. Construction related activities should be limited to the daylight hours (i.e., 7:00 am to 7:00 pm) in order to reduce the amount of noise disturbance. Additionally, vegetation clearing should occur outside of April 1st to October 15th in order to avoid impacts to 1) birds during their breeding season, 2) bats during their roosting season, and 3) snakes during the sensitive time before hibernation. No tree removals are required based on the Preferred Pathway Alignment.!? Eastern Meadowlark Recommendation 9 Snake Survey: Prior to construction a qualified Ecologist should walk the construction area limits to search for snakes. Should any be found, they will be relocated outside of the construction zone and exclusionary fencing will be installed.!? Bobolink Recommendation 10 Ecological Enhancement: Ecological enhancement of the area can be achieved through an Integrated Ecological Restoration Plan involving and Invasive Species Management Plan, Edge Management Plan and 5-year Monitoring Plan. Proposed enhancement measures should be developed during MAM2-2 Detailed Design. In addition to the vegetation barrier, an Edge Management Plan, designed specifically to address edge effects associated with natural areas would further benefit the Richmond Street Significant Woodlot and Arva Moraine PSW. Removal of non-native, invasive species would increase the relative proportion of native vegetation and reduce impacts associated with invasive species, such as displacement of native plants and wildlife that depend on them. A monitoring plan will work to evaluate the progress and success of restoration efforts and address ongoing management needs. Additional opportunities for restoration outside of the study limits can also be explored during the Detailed Design phase. City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study Key Map Legend!?!? Figure 9 Environmental Protection Zones Scale: 1:1,877 Date: March 2016 City Limit Sunningdale Rd Oxford St W Wonderland Rd ^ Commissioners Rd Butternut Tree ELC Boundary Wetland Upland Hwy 401 Bird Species at Risk Approximate Study Area This drawing has been prepared for the use of AECOM's client and may not be used, reproduced or relied upon by third parties, except as agreed by AECOM and its client, as required by law or for use by governmental reviewing agencies. AECOM accepts no responsibility, and denies any liability whatsoever, to any party that modifies this drawing without AECOM's express written consent. Highbury Ave Significant Woodland Boundary Preferred Pathway Direction MNR Approved PSW Boundary Significant River, Stream, and Ravine Corridor Significant Wildlife Habitat Amphibian Breeding (woodland) Monarch Butterfly Terrestrial Crayfish ¹ ¹

62 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study Recommendation 3 Vegetation Barrier In areas between the Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway and the Richmond Street Significant Woodland, a vegetated barrier is to be created along the length of the pathway. This barrier is to be planted with a mixture of native hawthorns such as Crataegus crus-galli, Crataegus mollis and Crataegus punctata. The herbaceous layer should be planted with a native to Ontario seed mix which is to include milkweed. The details of this planting plan should be refined during Detailed Design, however, and could include but not be limited to: black eyed Susan (Rudbeckia hirta), Canada goldenrod (Solidago canadensis), Canada wild rye (Elymus canadensis), blue vervain (Verbena hastata), New England aster (Symphyotrichum novae-angliae), white goldenrod (Solidago bicolor), wild bergamot (Monarda fistulosa). The creation of a vegetated barrier will increase the integrity of the current edge of the Richmond Street Significant Woodland by creating a more pronounced mantle. Recommendation 4 Signage Educational signage or information boards will be provided along the Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway to explain the significance of the Arva Moraine Provincially Significant Wetland (PSW) and Richmond Street Significant Woodland. Signage should also note the importance of not disturbing the natural features and their functions and indicate that dogs must be kept on-leash. Recommendation 5 Proximity of Pathway from Tributary to Medway Creek Placement of the pathway approximately 5 m from the top of bank or high water mark (whichever is more conservation) will reduce both erosion as well as anthropogenic disturbances to the watercourse. Recommendation 6 Maintenance Placement of garbage and recycling bins along the pathway should be included to minimize litter. Salt use for winter maintenance should be avoided to prevent soil and water contamination Construction Mitigation Recommendations Natural areas are most susceptible during the construction phase of any project since this is the time during which site conditions are most significantly altered. Therefore, construction activities need to be mitigated and controlled to avoid significant impacts. Typical construction mitigation measures for the construction of the Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection include: Sediment and erosion control measures, Peripheral vegetation protection, Dust suppression, Control of construction vehicles and machinery access, Controls on vehicle re-fuelling, Root protection during grading and grubbing, Wildlife habitat protection and mitigation measures, Protection of breeding birds during vegetation removal, Mitigation of noise disturbance to wildlife, Species at Risk protection and handling. Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

63 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study Appendix K provides details regarding each of the above-noted construction mitigation measures. Recommendation 7 Vegetation Removal with Respect to Wildlife Restricting construction related activities outside of sensitive periods for local or significant wildlife species can limit disturbance during life cycle stages. Construction related activities should be limited to the daylight hours (i.e., 7:00 am to 7:00 pm) in order to reduce the amount of noise disturbance. Additionally, vegetation clearing should occur outside of April 1 st to October 15 th in order to avoid impacts to 1) birds during their breeding season, 2) bats during their roosting season, and 3) snakes during the sensitive time before hibernation. No tree removals are required based on the Preferred Pathway Alignment. In accordance with the Migratory Birds Convention Act, vegetation removal shall only be permitted outside the breeding bird period; April 1 st to August 31 st unless a nest survey is undertaken. Should woody vegetation removal be scheduled within the months of April through August, comprehensive breeding bird surveys need to be conducted prior to clearing to ensure there is no disturbance of nesting/breeding birds. Surveys should document the location of breeding pairs and potential location of nests. Should nests/ breeding pairs be discovered within the clearing area, the location should be clearly marked/flagged and a 10 m buffer surrounding the nest be implemented. The space within this buffer should be protected until the young are fully fledged. An ecologist with ornithological experience should conduct the surveys and monitor the nests (should nests be discovered) periodically. Clearing can only be undertaken if the ecologist is satisfied there are no breeding/nesting pairs within the affected area. Recommendation 8 Construction Mitigation Plan A detailed Construction Mitigation Plan should be developed, prior to the issuance of contract drawings, wherein the mitigation measures detailed in Appendix K are tailored to the site-specific requirements and conditions of the Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway route and included on the drawings. Recommendation 9 Snake Survey Prior to construction a qualified Ecologist should walk the construction area limits to search for snakes. Should any be found, they will be relocated outside of the construction zone and exclusionary fencing will be installed Ecological Enhancement Recommendations Ecological enhancement consists of modifying a site to increase and/or improve existing habitat conditions for plants and wildlife. This can include something as simple as installing bird boxes or as complex as creating vernal pools; however, the ultimate end goal is to increase the ecological value of the area in question. There are several opportunities for overall enhancement. Opportunities for enhancement include the following: Native tree and shrub plantings surrounding the Richmond Street Significant Woodland; and Provision of bird boxes along the pathway. Recommendation 10 Ecological Enhancement Ecological enhancement of the area can be achieved through an Integrated Ecological Restoration Plan involving an Invasive Species Management Plan, Edge Management Plan and 5-year Monitoring Plan. Proposed enhancement measures should be developed during Detailed Design. Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

64 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study In addition to the vegetation barrier, an Edge Management Plan, designed specifically to address edge effects associated with natural areas, would further benefit the Richmond Street Significant Woodland and Arva Moraine PSW. Removal of non-native, invasive species would increase the relative proportion of native vegetation and reduce impacts associated with invasive species, such as displacement of native plants and wildlife that depend on them. A monitoring plan will work to evaluate the progress and success of restoration efforts and address ongoing management needs. Additional opportunities for restoration outside of the study limits can also be explored during the Detailed Design phase. Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

65 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study 7. Conclusions With the implementation of the recommendations of the Environmental Management Plan outlined in this report, it is anticipated that the construction of the Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway will result in a net environmental benefit. The net environmental benefit will be based on the following: The protection of the Richmond Street Significant Woodland and Arva Moraine PSW by restricting the location of the pathway to lands outside of their boundaries, with the exception of the small intrusion in the cultural woodland area. The implementation of a vegetated barrier between the pathway and the significant features will reduce construction impacts as well as deter pedestrians and cyclists from entering the features. An integrated Ecological Restoration Plan involving an Invasive Species Management Plan, Edge Management Plan and 5-year Monitoring Plan will restore the existing invaded or degraded areas to improve overall ecological integrity. Implementation of construction mitigation recommendations designed to avoid and prevent construction related impacts during construction of the pathway and pedestrian bridge. The design and layout of the Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway and Pedestrian Bridge along with the implementation of the recommendations of this Environmental Management Plan will ensure compliance of this project with the City of London Official Plan policies, the Provincial Policy Statement, the Endangered Species Act, the Upper Thames River Conservation Authority s Ontario Regulation 150/06, the Fisheries Act, and the Migratory Birds Convention Act. Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

66 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study 8. References AECOM, 2009: Sunningdale Area Storm Drainage & Stormwater Management Servicing for Undeveloped Lands Schedule B Class EA AECOM, 2015: Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Subject Land Status Report. BioLogic Incorporated, 2013: Issues Scoping Report 2300 Richmond Street pp. Bird Studies Canada, Environment Canada s Canadian Wildlife Service, Ontario Nature, Ontario Field Ornithologists and Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, 2006: Ontario Breeding Bird Atlas, Website. Birds Studies Canada, Environment Canada and U.S Environmental Protection Agency, February 2009: Marsh Monitoring Program Participant s Handbook for Surveying Marsh Birds, 2009 Edition. 17 pages. Birds Studies Canada, Environment Canada and U.S Environmental Protection Agency, February 2008: Marsh Monitoring Program Participant s Handbook Surveying Amphibians Edition. 20 Pages. Canadian Wildlife Services, 2009: Forest Bird Monitoring Program Survey Instructions & Codes. Government of Canada. 8pp. Cavitt, J.F. and C.A. Haas, 2000: Brown Thrasher (Toxostoma rufum), The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole, Ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology; Retrieved from the Birds of North America Online: City of London, 1995: City of London Subwatershed Studies. Group 1 Subwatersheds Medway, Stanton and Mud Creeks Final Report. City of London, 2006: Official Plan. City of London, 2007: Environmental Management Guidelines (Revised January 2007). City of London, 2009: Parks and Recreation Strategic Master Plan. City of London, 2010: London Strengthening Neighbourhoods Strategy. City of London, 2012: Age Friendly London. Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

67 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study City of London, 2013: 2030 Transportation Master Plan: SmartMoves. COSEWIC, 2006: COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the greenside darter Etheostoma blennioides in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. Vii 34 pp. Dalton, K., 1990: COSEWIC status report on the greenside darter Etheostoma blennioides in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa pp. Konze, K. and M. McLaren, 1997: Wildlife Monitoring Programs and Inventory Techniques for Ontario. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. Northeast Science and Technology. Technical Manual TM pp. Lee, H.T., W.D. Bakowsky, J. Riley, J. Bowles, M. Puddister, P. Uhlig and S. McMurray, 1998: Ecological Land Classification for Southern Ontario: First Approximation and its Application. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Southcentral Science Section, Science Development and Transfer Branch. SCSS Field Guide FG-02. Lefler, Leah, 2006: Forest Restoration Outcomes: A Case Study for the Regional Municipality of Waterloo, Ontario. Leading Edge 2006 Conference Proceedings. Oldham, M.J., 1993: Distribution and status of the Vascular Plants of Southwestern Ontario. OMNR, Aylmer District. Oldham, M.J., W.D. Bakowsky and D.A. Sutherland, 1995: Floristic quality assessment system for Southern Ontario. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Natural Heritage Information Centre. Peterborough, Ontario. Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, 2014: Provincial Policy Statement. Queen s Printer for Ontario. Toronto. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, 2010: Natural Heritage Reference Manual for Policy 2.3 of the Ontario Provincial Policy Statement. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, 2011: Arva Moraine Wetland Complex Evaluation Record. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, 2014a: Species at Risk Barn Swallow. Queen s Printer for Ontario, Available on the internet at: Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, 2014b: Species at Risk Bobolink. Queen s Printer for Ontario, Available on the internet at: Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

68 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, 2014c: Species at Risk Eastern Meadowlark. Queen s Printer for Ontario, Available on the internet at: Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, 2014d: Species at Risk Bank Swallow. Queen s Printer for Ontario, Available on the internet at: Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, 2014e: Species at Risk Little Brown Bat Queen s Printer for Ontario, Available on the internet at: Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, 2014f: Species at Risk Northern Long-eared Bat. Queen s Printer for Ontario, Available on the internet at: Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, 2014g: Species at Risk Small-footed Bat. Queen s Printer for Ontario, Available on the internet at: Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, 2014h: Species at Risk Monarch. Queen s Printer for Ontario, Available on the internet at: Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, 2015: Significant Wildlife Habitat Criteria Schedules for Ecoregion 7E. Available on the internet at: Ontario Nature, 2013: Reptiles and Amphibians of Ontario. Available on the internet at: Stantec, 2004: Weldon Property EIS Sunningdale North Area Plan Upper Thames River Conservation Authority, 2014: The Middlesex Natural Heritage Study A study to identify Natural Heritage Systems in Middlesex County. Wheelwright, N.T. and J.D. Rising, 2008: Savannah Sparrow (Passerculus sandwichensis), The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole, Ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology; Retrieved from the Birds of North America Online: Rpt1_ _Richmond Street Eis_

69 Appendix A City of London Official Plan Schedule

70 SCHEDULE A TO THE CITY OF LONDON OFFICIAL PLAN - LANDUSE Downtown Area Community Commercial Node Enclosed Regional Commercial Node Neighbourhood Commercial Node New Format Regional Commercial Node Main Street Commercial Corridor Auto-Oriented Commercial Corridor WONDERLAND RD N Multi-Family, High Density Residential Multi-Family, Medium Density Residential Community Facility Office/Residential Light Industrial Open Space BLACK W ATER RD SANDYBROOK DR E AV CHAMB ERS EN R G TR O E DR AMBLE SID R NE RD HIGHBURY AVE N DR D YR AL LE ID O RA EV YS ADELAIDE ST N NN GLE N KILLA RNE Y RD ED G ST ACKACRES BLVD D ES R MCLEA N D WE BL E RN R E Y B ROOK C R GLENGARRY AVE HASTINGS DR RICHMOND ST DR N SU DOON DR E DR DR E CRES SCOTCH PIN E SSA NANETTE DR JE W ENT RD DER DE SI S E BL AM AV FANSHAWE PARK RD E ST O RD E R GLE NORA D AMBLESIDE DR DR RD VD BL PINNACLE PKY B A VE SE UI MCGA RREL L DR FANSHAW E PARK RD W WONDERLAND RD N IL L K DR DR OU N F ER NI PH U TH W E N IG E STAC K H NORTH CENT RE R D REPTON A V E R N E T REE D O RO LO FOXWOOD AVE SO CK S AVE BERRYHILL D R RD MEDW AY PARK DR WENIGE DR DR THISTLEWOOD FE LL ELDERBERRY AVE RD Urban Growth Boundary LE IER E RTH SUNNINGDAL E RD E BLUEBELL RD SKYLIN E AV Agricultural GOUGH AVE BLVD CKWATER RD LK WA VI L GE Environmental Review Rural Settlement BLA RD MEADOW LANDS WAY Y LA PE LK EY EA G General Industrial Urban Reserve Community Growth Urban Reserve Industrial Growth CO DENVIEW AVE Office Area CALLINGHAM DR ACE DR TR LE PL A CORLEY KILALLY RD BLACKM APL E D R WINDERMERE RD GAINSBOROUGH RD D TOWNSEND DR N RD L IMBERLOS T R TER KIPPS LANE MCNAY ST BELFIELD ST H AVE WATERLOO ST D PK ORT ST EP W RK ER BRIARHILL AVE WE S F ULLE R ST BA OO LAW SON RD WY CHW HO Regional Facility NI QUARR HAWT Office Business Park A S WAY C AN V CALLA W A BUROAK DR ER S B RO O K Low Density Residential NO SUNNINGDALE RD W AL D MAP NO. 2

71 BLACKACRES BLVD FOXWOOD AVE RD LOUISE BLVD NANETTE DR WATERLOO ST REPTON AVE STONEYBROOK CRES GOUGH AVE RICHMOND ST ELDERBERRY AVE SCHEDULE B-1 TO THE CITY OF LONDON OFFICIAL PLAN - NATURAL HERITAGE FEATURES MAP NO. 2 ESAs Woodlands Unevaluated Corridors Unevaluated Wetlands Ground Water Rechg SWS Bndry # # Potential ESAs Significant Woodlands Unevaluated Vegetation Patches Significant Corridors # CALLAWAY Prov Significant Wetlands Locally Significant Wetlands RD VILLAGEWALK BLVD S T O N E Y # Pot Naturalization Area # Pot Upland Corridor # C R E E K # # # ARVA MORAINE ESA CANVAS WAY Max Hazard Line Cons. Authority Bndry # M E D W A Y C R E ADELAIDE ST N E K Big Picture Meta-Cores and Meta-Corridors NORTH WENIGE DR # # BALLYMOTE WETLAND ESA SUNNINGDALE RD E DENVIEW AVE BUROAK DR EAGLETRACE DR MEDWAY PARK DR SUNNINGDALE RD W PINNACLE PKY PLANE TREE DR QUARRIER RD MEDWAY VALLEY HERITAGE FOREST ESA CALLINGHAM DR RD PELKEY SUNNINGDALE RD E M E D W A Y C R E E K NORTH CENTRE RD BERRYHILL DR SKYLINE AVE JENNIFER RD CHAMBERS AVE SANDYBROOK DR PHILLBROOK DR BLACKWATER RD THISTLEWOOD DR GRENFELL DR TROSSACKS AVE SOUTH WENIGE DR NICOLE AVE STACKHOUSE AVE HIGHBURY AVE N MCGARRELL DR FANSHAWE PARK RD E ALDERSBROOK RD FANSHAWE PARK RD W DERWENT T H E F O R K S T O N E Y C R E E K T H E F O R K S GLENGARRY AVE MCLEAN DR KILLARNEY RD WONDERLAND RD N AMBLESIDE DR HASTINGS DR GLENORA DR SUNNYSIDE DR S HAWTHORNE RD DOON DR KILALLY MEADOWS ESA EDGEVALLEY RD MEDWAY CREEK CORLEY DR WINDERMERE RD KILALLY RD BLACKMAPLE DR GAINSBOROUGH RD ADELAIDE ST N THAMES RIVER LIMBERLOST RD LAWSON RD WYCHWOOD PK M E D W A Y C R E E K T H E F O R K S WESTERN RD KAINS WOODS ESA RICHMOND ST EPWORTH AVE BELFIELD ST BARKER ST KIPPS LANE BRIARHILL AVE MCNAY ST FULLER ST HIGHBURY AVE N

72 BLACKACRES BLVD FOXWOOD AVE LOUISE BLVD NANETTE DR WATERLOO ST REPTON AVE STONEYBROOK CRES ADELAIDE ST N GOUGH AVE RICHMOND ST ELDERBERRY AVE ADELAIDE ST N SCHEDULE B-2 TO THE CITY OF LONDON OFFICIAL PLAN - NATURAL RESOURCES AND NATURAL HAZARDS MAP NO. 2 Natural Resources Extractive Industrial!? Emergency Municipal Water Wells Natural Hazards Regulatory Floodline Riverine Erosion Hazard Limit for Unconfined Systems B) Abandoned Oil/Gas Wells Base Map Features Water Courses\Ponds Conservation Authority Boundary Special Policy Areas Aggregate Resource Areas Riverine Erosion Hazard Limit for Confined Systems Steep Slopes Outside of the Riverine Erosion Hazard Limit Conservation Authority Regulation Limit Subwatershed Boundary Potential Special Policy Areas M E D W A Y C R E E K RD CALLAW AY VILLAGEWALK BLVD S T O N E Y C R E E K CANVAS WAY NORTH WENIGE DR SUNNINGDALE RD E DENVIEW AVE BUROAK DR EAGLETRACE DR MEDWAY PARK DR SUNNINGDALE RD W PINNACLE PKY PLANE TREE DR QUARRIER RD CALLINGHAM DR RD PELKEY SUNNINGDALE RD E NORTH K M E D W A Y C R E E CENTRE RD BERRYHILL DR SKYLINE AVE JENNIFER RD CHAMBERS AVE SANDYBROOK DR PHILLBROOK DR BLACKWATER RD THISTLEWOOD DR GRENFELL DR TROSSACKS AVE SOUTH WENIGE DR NICOLE AVE STACKHOUSE AVE HIGHBURY AVE N MCGARRELL DR FANSHAWE PARK RD E S T O N E Y C R E E K T H E F O R K S ALDERSBROOK RD FANSHAWE PARK RD W DERWENT RD GLENGARRY AVE MCLEAN DR KILLARNEY RD WONDERLAND RD N AMBLESIDE DR HASTINGS DR GLENORA DR SUNNYSIDE DR HAWTHORNE RD DOON DR EDGEVALLEY RD MEDWAY CREEK CORLEY DR WINDERMERE RD KILALLY RD BLACKMAPLE DR GAINSBOROUGH RD THAMES RIVER RICHMOND ST LIMBERLOST RD LAWSON RD WYCHWOOD PK M E D W A Y C R E E K T H E F O R K S WESTERN RD B) EPWORTH AVE BELFIELD ST BARKER ST KIPPS LANE BRIARHILL AVE MCNAY ST FULLER ST HIGHBURY AVE N

73 Appendix B Agency Correspondence

74 Piette, Jessica From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Martin, Nancy Friday, September 12, :44 AM Deman, Jillian FW: Inventory Meeting - Richmond Street North Pedestrian Crossing Opportunity_Constraints(11x17).pdf; Identifying wetlands and potential wetlands from ELC.doc Nancy Martin Project Coordinator D nancy.martin@aecom.com AECOM Citi Plaza 250 York Street, Suite 410 London, ON N6A 6K2 T F This communication is intended for the sole use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or subject to copyright. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately. Any communication received in error should be deleted and all copies destroyed. Please consider the environment before printing this page From: Riddell, Heather (MNR) [mailto:heather.riddell@ontario.ca] Sent: Friday, September 12, :41 AM To: Martin, Nancy Cc: Chen, Shaun; Fediw, Antony Subject: RE: Inventory Meeting - Richmond Street North Pedestrian Crossing Hi Nancy, The Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (MNRF) has screened the area shown in the attached Figure, which shows opportunities and constraints for the City of London s proposed Pedestrian Recreational Crossing of Richmond Street Environmental Assessment (EA). We provide the following information for your consideration and discussion during today s meeting. Species at Risk (SAR) The Species at Risk in Ontario (SARO) List ( is Ontario Regulation 230/08 issued under the Endangered Species Act, 2007 (ESA). The ESA came into force on June 30, 2008, and provides both species protection (section 9) and habitat protection (section 10) to species listed as endangered or threatened on the SARO List. The current SARO List can be found on e-laws ( An initial SAR screening for the above-noted property shows that there are no known occurrences of SAR on the subject lands. However, the following SAR are known to occur in the general area, with the potential to occur adjacent to the site: Barn Swallow (threatened) receives species and general habitat protection Eastern Hog-nosed Snake (threatened) receives species and general habitat protection False Rue-anemone (threatened) receives species and general habitat protection 1

75 Purple Twayblade (threatened) receives species and general habitat protection Aquatic SAR listed below under Fish and Fish Habitat section Please note that this is an initial screening for SAR and the absence of an element occurrence does not indicate the absence of a species. The province has not been surveyed comprehensively for the presence or absence of SAR, and MNRF data relies on observers to report sightings of SAR. Field assessments by a qualified professional may be necessary if there is a high likelihood for SAR species and/or habitat to occur within the project footprint. It is important to note that changes may occur in both species and habitat protection which could affect whether proposed projects may have adverse effects on SAR. The Committee on the Status of Species at Risk in Ontario (COSSARO) meets regularly to evaluate new species for listing and/or re-evaluate species already on the SARO List. As a result, species designations may change, which could in turn change the level of protection they receive under the ESA. Also, habitat protection provisions for a species may change if a species-specific habitat regulation comes into effect. If an activity or project will result in adverse effects to endangered or threatened species and/or their habitat, additional action would need to be taken in order to remain in compliance with the ESA. Additional action may include applying for an authorization under section 17(2)c of the ESA, or completing an online registry for an ESA regulation if the project is eligible. Please be advised that applying for an authorization does not guarantee approval and the process can take several months. Please visit MNRF s website to determine whether a project may be eligible for the online registry process ( Questions about the registry process should be directed to MNRF s Registry and Approval Services Centre at or at mnr.rasc@ontario.ca. Significant Wildlife Habitat (SWH) SWH may be present within the area identified as the proposed Richmond Street North Pedestrian Crossing subject lands. All SWH identified in the Ecoregion Criteria 7E Schedule should be considered and rationale should be provided (referring to field work completed on-site) for why a wildlife habitat is or is not considered candidate/significant based on the specific habitat requirements/criteria outlined in the Criteria Schedule. Please consult the Significant Wildlife Habitat Technical Guide (SWHTG, OMNR 2000), the Natural Heritage Reference Manual (NHRM) and the Ecoregion Criteria Schedule for criteria on identifying and determining significance of wildlife habitat. SWH is identified by planning authorities using the criteria and processes recommended in the SWHTG and Ecoregion Criteria Schedules. Link to the SWHTG: Link to Ecoregion 7E criteria schedule: Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest (ANSIs) There are no provincially or regionally Significant Earth or Life Science ANSIs within or adjacent to the proposed subject lands. Significant Woodlands There appears to be woodlands located in or within 120 m of the project area. We recommend referring to the London Official Plan for criteria for determining significance of woodlands at/in the vicinity of the project location. The NHRM also contains information and criteria for determining significant woodlands. Significant Wetlands The Provincially Significant Arva Moraine Wetland Complex is within the proposed subject lands. From the map attached to your , there appear to be wetland polygons missing. Please consult Land Information Ontario (LIO) for the most up-to-date wetland information. Site-specific investigation may find existing wetlands that have not yet been evaluated or designated. Please see the attached reference sheet for a list of Ecological Land Classification (ELC) communities that could possibly be considered wetlands in Aylmer District. Consideration of wetland areas should be determined using criteria and methodology as outlined in the Ontario Wetland Evaluation System (OWES). Significant Valleylands The MNRF does not possess significant valleylands mapping. We suggest you contact the Upper Thames River Conservation Authority (UTRCA) to find out if they have information pertaining to significant valleylands. The NHRM also provides guidance on evaluation criteria for determining significant valleylands. Fish and Fish Habitat Based on aerial imagery, watercourse/waterbody information found in LIO and DFO Aquatic SAR Mapping, it appears there are two open watercourses within or adjacent to the proposed subject lands: 2

76 A Tributary of Medway Creek to the west of Richmond Street o Watercourse is labeled as orange on DFO Aquatic SAR mapping, and may include the following species: Wavy-rayed Lampmussel (threatened) receives species and general habitat protection Records around Sunningdale Road Silver Shiner (threatened) receives species and general habitat protection records upstream/downstream of Sunningdale Road Black Redhorse (threatened) receives species and general habitat protection Powell Municipal Drain to the east of Richmond Street o No information on file of fish species present Additional Comments: Potential Crossing Locations and Trail Routes: Based on our initial review of the mapping provided, MNRF provides the following comments/recommendations: 1. Culvert underpass not recommended due to location of Provincially Significant Wetland (PSW) south of Municipal Boundary line 2. Bridge over Richmond St. not recommended due to proximity of PSW polygons 3. Culvert underpass not recommended due to location of Sensitive Watercourse west of Richmond Road and PSW east of Richmond Road 4. At grade crossing recommended as an option 5. At grade crossing recommended as an option Proposed Middlesex Centre Trails: Out of scope for this screening. Proposed London Trail System: This proposed trail route is adjacent to PSW polygons that do not appear on the map that was provided. Proposed Future SWMF: Proposed locations for two SWMF are outside of, but closely adjacent to PSW polygons. If you have any questions, please contact me. Regards, Heather Heather Riddell District Planner Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Aylmer District 615 John Street North Aylmer, ON N5H 2S8 Tel: heather.riddell@ontario.ca From: Martin, Nancy [mailto:nancy.martin@aecom.com] Sent: September :44 PM To: Riddell, Heather (MNR) Cc: Chen, Shaun; Fediw, Antony Subject: FW: Inventory Meeting - Richmond Street North Pedestrian Crossing Hi Heather The meeting for the Richmond Street Pedestrian Crossing will be a scoping meeting for a Subject Lands Status Report. This report will provide a preliminary assessment of the natural features that may be affected by the new section of pathway. The meeting will include an introduction to the project and the project team, the scope of work to be undertaken, a determination of the project limits, scheduling and background information review highlights. 3

77 It would be helpful if you could provide the project team with Species at Risk info which you can either provide at the meeting or following. I have included a figure outlining the general project area. If you have any questions or require additional information please do not hesitate to contact me directly. Thanks Heather Nancy Martin Project Coordinator D nancy.martin@aecom.com AECOM Citi Plaza 250 York Street, Suite 410 London, ON N6A 6K2 T F This communication is intended for the sole use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or subject to copyright. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately. Any communication received in error should be deleted and all copies destroyed. Please consider the environment before printing this page From: Riddell, Heather (MNR) [mailto:heather.riddell@ontario.ca] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, :28 AM To: Chen, Shaun Subject: RE: Inventory Meeting - Richmond Street North Pedestrian Crossing Hi Shaun, I m not clear on what AECOM and the City wishes to discuss and may need to bring along a biologist depending on the nature of the discussion. Before confirming our availability, could you please provide more detail on this project and the results that AECOM would like to talk about, i.e. wetlands or species at risk, etc.? Once I have more information, I can find out availability of other staff if needed. Thanks, Heather Heather Riddell MNRF Aylmer District From: Chen, Shaun [mailto:schen@london.ca] Sent: August :22 AM To: Riddell, Heather (MNR) Subject: RE: Inventory Meeting - Richmond Street North Pedestrian Crossing HI Heather, 4

78 Thanks for your response, The meeting has not took place yet, please provide your availability for this week and early next week. We will schedule it accordingly. Thank ou Shaun Chen, E.I.T. Transportation Planning and Design Division Phone: ext From: Riddell, Heather (MNR) Sent: Monday, August 25, :37 PM To: Chen, Shaun Subject: RE: Inventory Meeting - Richmond Street North Pedestrian Crossing Hi Shaun, Amanda was away on vacation when you contacted her previously and is now a Regional Planner in Peterborough. I am now the contact in the Aylmer office for planning files. Has this meeting already occurred? Regards, Heather Heather Riddell District Planner Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Aylmer District 615 John Street North Aylmer, ON N5H 2S8 Tel: heather.riddell@ontario.ca From: McCloskey, Amanda (MNR) Sent: August :39 AM To: Riddell, Heather (MNR) Subject: FW: Inventory Meeting - Richmond Street North Pedestrian Crossing From: Chen, Shaun [mailto:schen@london.ca] Sent: August 15, :32 AM To: 'Mark Snowsell'; McCloskey, Amanda (MNR) Cc: Grabowski, Karl; Martin, Nancy (Nancy.Martin@aecom.com) Subject: RE: Inventory Meeting - Richmond Street North Pedestrian Crossing HI MarK and Amanda, Have you get any chance to look at your schedule for the meeting? Please let us know when you get chance. 5

79 Thank you Regards, Shaun Chen, E.I.T. Transportation Planning and Design Division Phone: ext From: Chen, Shaun Sent: Wednesday, August 13, :35 AM To: 'Mark Snowsell'; Subject: Inventory Meeting - Richmond Street North Pedestrian Crossing Dear Mark/Amanda, As you may have already knew that the City is undertaking the Richmond Street North Pedestrian Crossing EA ( north of Sunningdale ) AECOM the selected consultant for the project has recently completed the inventory survey and would like to organize a meeting to discuss the survey result. We plan to schedule a meeting sometime next week to discuss it and you are invited. Can you please provide your availability for the next week and we will schedule the meeting accordingly. It will likely be held at City Hall. Thank you Regards, Shaun Chen, E.I.T. Transportation Planning and Design Division Phone: ext

80 Regulation Limit Regulation under s.28 of the Conservation Authorities Act Development, interference with wetlands, and alterations to shorelines and watercourses. O.Reg 157/06, 97/04. Legend Road Labels (1:64K) Middlesex NHS Woodland No Criteria Met 1+ Criteria Met The Regulation Limit depicted on this map schedule is a representation of O.Reg 157/06 under O.Reg 97/04. The Regulation Limit is a conservative estimation of the hazard lands within the UTRCA watershed. Depending on the specific characteristics of the hazard land and the land use proposed, the Regulation Limit may be subject to change. The UTRCA disclaims explicitly any warranty, representation or guarantee as to the content, sequence, accuracy, timeliness, fitness for a particular purpose, merchantability or completeness of any of the data depicted and provided herein. The UTRCA assumes no liability for any errors, omissions or inaccuracies in the information provided herein and further assumes no liability for any decisions made or actions taken or not taken by any person in reliance upon the information and data furnished hereunder. This map is not a substitute for professional advice. Please contact UTRCA staff for any changes, updates and amendments to the information provided. Sources:Data used under licence with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Copyright Queen's Printer for Ontario; City of London Aerial Photography Copyright 2006 First Base Solutions,2010 Aerial Photography Copyright 2010 Queen's Printer for Ontario. Notes: 0 Sunningdale and Richmond MNHS metres Created By: cr January 14, 2015 * Please note: Any reference to scale on this map is only appropriate when it is printed landscape on legal-sized (8.5" x 14") paper. 1: 16,000 Copyright 2015 UTRCA.

81 Regulation Limit Regulation under s.28 of the Conservation Authorities Act Development, interference with wetlands, and alterations to shorelines and watercourses. O.Reg 157/06, 97/04. Legend Road Labels (1:64K) Regulation Watershed Municipal Drain Classification A Cold/Coolwater,Baitfish B Warmwater,Sensitive,Cleanout<10 yrs C Warmwater,Baitfish D Cold/Coolwater,Sensitive E Warmwater,Sensitive,Cleanout >10 yrs F Intermittent/Ephemeral T Tiled/Closed Surface Drainage Non-Municipal Watercourse Regulation Cleared Area MNR Wetland Unit (May 2011) Evaluated Wetland (MNR) Unevaluated Wetland (UTRCA) London Hazard FLD250 Remnant Valley Stable Slope Toe Erosion - Stable Slope Top of Slope FLD 100 (DRAFT) Flooding Hazard Erosion Hazard Wetland Interference Regulation Limit The Regulation Limit depicted on this map schedule is a representation of O.Reg 157/06 under O.Reg 97/04. The Regulation Limit is a conservative estimation of the hazard lands within the UTRCA watershed. Depending on the specific characteristics of the hazard land and the land use proposed, the Regulation Limit may be subject to change. The UTRCA disclaims explicitly any warranty, representation or guarantee as to the content, sequence, accuracy, timeliness, fitness for a particular purpose, merchantability or completeness of any of the data depicted and provided herein. The UTRCA assumes no liability for any errors, omissions or inaccuracies in the information provided herein and further assumes no liability for any decisions made or actions taken or not taken by any person in reliance upon the information and data furnished hereunder. This map is not a substitute for professional advice. Please contact UTRCA staff for any changes, updates and amendments to the information provided. Sources:Data used under licence with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Copyright Queen's Printer for Ontario; City of London Aerial Photography Copyright 2006 First Base Solutions,2010 Aerial Photography Copyright 2010 Queen's Printer for Ontario. Notes: metres Created By: cr January 13, 2015 * Please note: Any reference to scale on this map is only appropriate when it is printed landscape on legal-sized (8.5" x 14") paper. 1: 16,000 Copyright 2015 UTRCA.

82 Piette, Jessica From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Cari Ramsey Wednesday, January 14, :51 AM Godard, Michael Re: Information Request Richmond_Sunningdale.pdf; Richmond_Sunningdale_MNHS.pdf Hi Michael; Attached is the mapping for the Richmond and Sunningdale area. I did a separate one for Middlesex Natural Heritage Study so it wasn't as busy. If you need mapping for more specific areas, please let me know. I also reviewed the are for issues regarding Drinking Water Source Protection and offer the following comments: DRINKING WATER SOURCE PROTECTION The Clean Water Act (CWA), 2006 is intended to protect existing and future sources of drinking water. The Act is part of the Ontario government's commitment to implement the recommendations of the Walkerton Inquiry as well as protecting and enhancing human health and the environment. The CWA sets out a framework for source protection planning on a watershed basis with Source Protection Areas established based on the watershed boundaries of Ontario s 36 Conservation Authorities. The Upper Thames River, Lower Thames Valley and St. Clair Region Conservation Authorities have entered into a partnership for The Thames-Sydenham Source Protection Region. Drinking Water Source Protection represents the first barrier for protecting drinking water including surface and ground water from becoming contaminated or overused thereby ensuring a sufficient, clean, safe supply now and for the future. Assessment Reports: The Thames-Sydenham Source Protection Region has prepared Assessment Reports which contain detailed scientific information that: identifies vulnerable areas associated with drinking water systems; assesses the level of vulnerability in these areas; and identifies activities within those vulnerable areas which pose threats to the drinking water systems, and assess the risk due to those threats. The Assessment Report for the Upper Thames watershed delineates three types of vulnerable areas: Wellhead Protection Areas, Highly Vulnerable Aquifers and Significant Groundwater Recharge Areas. We wish to advise that the subject property contains areas identified as being a; Mapping which shows these areas is available at: Highly Vulnerable Aquifers: 2_Highly%20Vulnerable%20Aquifers.pdf Significant Groundwater Recharge Areas 2%20SGRA%20Vulnerability.pdf Source Protection Plans: Using the information in the Assessment Report, a Proposed Source Protection Plan has been developed for the Upper Thames watershed. The Proposed Source Protection Plan, along with any written comments, has now been submitted to the Province for approval by the Minister of the Environment. The Proposed Source Protection Plan is available at: 1

83 The Proposed Plan consists of a range of policies that together, will reduce the risks posed by the identified water quality and quantity threats in the vulnerable areas. These proposed policies include a range of voluntary and regulated approaches to manage or prohibit activities which pose a threat to drinking water. Activities that can lead to; low, medium and significant threats have been identified in Appendix 10 of the Upper Thames River Source Protection Area Assessment Report, dated August 12, Available at: Threats%20and%20Risk%20Assessment.pdf DEPENDING ON THE AREA OF WORK AROUND RICHMOND AND SUNNINGDALE... AREA OF VULNERABILITY Highly Vulnerable Aquifer (HVA) Significant Groundwater Recharge Area (SGRA) Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA) n/a n/a VULNERABILITY THREATS & CIRCUMSTANCES SCORE 6 Moderate & Low Threats No Threats currently identified No Threats currently identified Moderate & Low Threats NOTE: At this time, certain activities on this property may be considered Moderate or Low threats to drinking water. Under the CWA, the Source Protection Committee has the authority to include policies in the Proposed Source Protection Plan that may prohibit or restrict activities identified as posing a significant threat to drinking water. Municipalities may also have or be developing policies that apply to vulnerable areas when reviewing development applications. Proponents considering land use changes, site alteration or construction in these areas need to be aware of this possibility. If you have any questions, please feel free to give me a call. Thanks! Cari Cari Ramsey Environmental Regulations Technician/ Health and Safety Specialist UTRCA 1424 Clarke Side Road London, ON N5V 5B9 (519) ext. 289 ramseyc@thamesriver.on.ca >>> "Godard, Michael" <Michael.Godard@aecom.com> 1/9/2015 2:49 PM >>> Hi Cari, Hope you had a nice break over the holidays! I was wondering if you had a regulation limit map for the area around Richmond and Sunningdale in London? The client has done some of the background work for this project but I don t believe they have sent a request to you. Please see the study area below. Many thanks and have a great weekend! 2

84 The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location. Michael Godard, B.Sc. (Hons) 3

85 AECOM Fisheries Biologist D C AECOM 50 Sportsworld Crossing Road Unit 290 Kitchener, ON N2P 0A4 Canada T F Please consider the environment before printing this . <The contents of this and any attachments are intended for the named recipient(s). This may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this message in error, are not the named recipient(s), or believe that you are not the intended recipient immediately notify the sender and permanently delete this message without reviewing, copying, forwarding, disclosing or otherwise using it or any part of it in any form whatsoever.> 4

86 Appendix C Staff Resumes

87 Jillian deman, H. BSc. Terrestrial and Wetland Ecologist Professional History 1997 Present, AECOM (formerly EarthTech), Terrestrial Ecologist - Kitchener, Ontario 05/ /2002, McSmith Agricultural Consultants, Field Researcher Vineland, Ontario 01/ /2003, Brock University, Senior Lab Demonstrator (mycology) St. Catharines, Ontario Education Honors Bachelor of Science, Biological Sciences and Earth Sciences Brock University, 2003 Years of Experience With AECOM: 17 Certification Amphibian and Reptile Survey Techniques, Nature Conservancy Canada/Ministry of Natural Resources, 2013 Butternut Health Assessor, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, 2011 Temperate Wetlands Restoration Training Course, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, 2005 Class 1 Electrofishing Certification Course, Watershed Science Centre, 2004 Wetlands Evaluation Course, Ontario Ministry of Natural Jillian deman is a terrestrial ecologist with AECOM s Environmental Division based out of Kitchener, Ontario. With the company for over 15 years, her expertise has a wide range of scope within the environmental, engineering and waste management fields enabling her to be involved with numerous projects across Canada that incorporate natural heritage issues/planning and restoration. Her technical skills include; wetland and woodland systems assessment, evaluation, delineation and restoration; Species at Risk habitat assessment and species inventories; amphibian and reptile surveys; multiscale floral inventories; vegetation community delineation; soils analysis and identification; air-photo interpretation and biomass fish sampling through seine net, minnow trap or electrofishing methods. She provides senior review and has experience in small to large-scale natural heritage baseline, environmental assessment, impact analysis, peer review and restoration work where she co-ordinates multi-disciplinary teams for projects across Canada. Consequently gaining familiarity with the Mixedwood Plains, Boreal Shield, Taiga Shield, Atlantic Maritime and Hudson Plains ecozones. Experience Effects Assessments, Delineation and Evaluation Ottawa 174/ Prescott-Russell County Road 17 Environmental Assessment Natural Environment Report. Jillian led the completion of the natural environment report which documented existing aquatic, terrestrial and wildlife conditions along alternative routes. Fieldwork encompassed aquatic habitat assessments, vegetation community delineation, identification of wetland areas, turtle basking surveys and auditory amphibian surveys. Effects to aquatic habitat, wetland, woodland, Species at Risk habitat, Significant Wildlife Habitat and natural corridors were determined for each alternative. Schedule B Class EA study for the Kitchener WWTP Phase 3 Upgrades, Ontario. Jillian led the completion of the natural heritage component of the Schedule B Class EA. Natural heritage considerations included wetland communities along the Grand River, fish habitat considerations at a new outlet structure and Species at Risk habitat assessments of a surrounding woodland. Region of Halton, Sheldon Creek, East Branch Assessment. Jillian conducted the fieldwork and data analysis for the

88 Resources, 2004 Ecological Land Classification for Southern Ontario Training Course, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Animal Care and Use, Brock University, 2002 understanding of the terrestrial environment along Sheldon Creek for the Burloak Water Purification Plant Expansion EA. Fieldwork included vegetation community delineation according to MNR s Ecological Land Classification system, a botanical inventory of all plants observed and notation of tree species and health along Sheldon Creek. NextEra Wind Energy, Natural Heritage Assessment of three Wind Energy projects, Lambton County, Ontario. Jillian provided oversight and senior review for the completion of wetland fieldwork, evaluation, restoration and analysis for three wind energy projects; Bluewater, Goshen and Jericho. These projects were throughout Lambton County and required consultation with wetland ecologists from MNR, ABCA and UTRCA. City of Kitchener, Blockline Road Extension, Kitchener, Ontario. Jillian led the completion of an Environmental Impact Study considering the preferred design of the Blockline Road extension and its effects to the natural environment. She ensured that existing aquatic and terrestrial conditions within the study area were collected in a comprehensive manner and that design measures integrated aspects of the natural system. Highway 401 Road Widening between Credit River and 403/410 Interchange, Ministry of Transportation, Ontario. Coordinated and conducted terrestrial assessments for the widening of Highway 401. Fieldwork included botanical surveys, vegetation community delineation, wetland assessment, bird surveys and amphibian habitat assessments. Determined overall constraints and provided recommendations for mitigation. Junbunzlauer, Transmission Line EA and Detailed Design, Port Colborne, Ontario. Co-ordinated natural heritage work to evaluate transmission line alignments from the facility to the east side of Welland Canal at Ramey Road. Species at Risk assessments, wetland and terrestrial assessments, and incidental wildlife were conducted in the field. Areas where direct effects were anticipated, snake hibernacula surveys were conducted. Maltby Road Improvements, City of Guelph, Ontario. Coordinated natural heritage work for the improvement of Maltby Road in the City of Guelph, Ontario. Natural heritage work comprised of wetland delineation surveys, providing input to wildlife crossings for Jefferson Salamander (a species considered Endangered under the Endangered Species Act) and tree surveys. Considering the occurrence of Jefferson Salamander, there was a high degree of agency consultation to ensure the project mitigated all potential negative effects towards the species. Region of Waterloo, Rapid Transit Initiative Draft Environmental Impact Study. Lead the completion of an environmental impact study for the proposed light rail transit route from Conestoga Mall to Fairview Mall in Waterloo and Kitchener

89 respectively. Baseline ecological data was collected and consisted of fish composition studies, floral species surveys, vegetation community classification, wildlife surveys and fish habitat assessments. Wetland features within proximity to the Transit alignment were delineated and an effects assessment was completed. Hamilton Port Authority, Randle Reef Risk Assessment, Hamilton Harbour, Ontario. Determined the potential associated risks for the confinement of Randle Reef, an underwater coal tar deposit of 630,000 cubic metres. As part of this task, the surrounding fisheries, wetlands, forests and species at risk were assessed and described including conditions of Cootes Paradise. Through this assessment, it was determined how these features could be potentially affected through the confinement of Randle Reef. A cumulative impact assessment was also conducted in accordance with the Cumulative Effects Practitioners Guide. Toyota Motor Manufacturing Canada, Woodstock Site Restoration Plan, Woodstock, Ontario. Lead the development of a restoration program for over 35 hectares of land for the new Toyota facility in the City of Woodstock, Ontario. The plan provided direction to implement wetland, forested, meadow and riparian communities along the provincially significant Vansittart Woods Wetland. Tasks included; 1) consultation with agencies such as Upper Thames River Conservation Authority, 2) design of restoration drawings showing locations of groundcover, shrub and tree plantings, 3) development of implementation procedures such as timing of plantings and methods and 4) development of a Restoration Plan Report. Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority, Fish Habitat and Wetland Enhancement Strategy, St. Catharines, Ontario. Aided in the completion of a Fish Habitat and Wetland Enhancement Strategy for two old oxbows along Twelve Mile Creek. The general goal for this Strategy was to facilitate an economically feasible, self sustaining wetland and recreational fishery (panfish and smallmouth bass) within the Glenridge and Riverview Ponds. Specific tasks included aiding in the creation of three remedial design options for a new bathymetric profile and new outlet structure and/or retrofit of the existing structures for both of the ponds, development of a cost analysis for each design option and recommending appropriate wetland plantings within a detailed planting plan. City of Sudbury, Frobisher Works Yard Wetland Evaluation, City of Sudbury, Ontario. Lead and completed a wetland evaluation of a portion of a wetland surrounding the City of Sudbury Works Yard. Wetland community boundaries were delineated and a vegetation survey was completed using the Ministry of Natural Resources Wetland Evaluation System (Northern Edition). Tasks included: wetland community mapping, vegetation inventories, background review and documentation, completion of wetland evaluation score sheet and consultation with the City of Sudbury, Ministry of Natural Resources and Nickel

90 District Conservation Authority. Area Studies/ Natural Heritage Strategies City of London, Southwest Area Plan, London, Ontario. Aided in the completion of the Southwest Area Plan for the City of London. Main tasks completed comprised of the development of a Natural Heritage Strategy for the natural features within the study area. City of London, Area Plan, London, Ontario. Aided in the completion of an ecological resources and natural heritage study. This Ecological Resources Background Report was prepared as background technical support for the London W12A Landfill Area Plan. The Ecological Resources Background Report and its Natural Heritage Strategy provided the framework for environmentally sound planning decisions and reasoned management of the natural resources for the area. The Ecological Resources Study and Natural Heritage Strategy report provided: a description of the existing natural heritage features, an assessment of ecosystem function, evaluation of significant features, recommendations regarding development constraints and opportunities and an outline of the requirements for more detailed environmental impact studies. County/City of Peterborough, Peterborough County/City Waste Management Facility Final North Fill Area Site Design, Peterborough, Ontario. Updated the EIS for the final design of the north fill area. Conducted plant and bird surveys, defined vegetation communities into ELC units and consulted with various ministry officials. City of Welland, Northwest Area Master Servicing Plan, Welland, Ontario. Aided in the preparation of an environmental impact study for an area within Welland. Conducted vascular plant inventories, assessed potential fish habitat along a watercourse, defined specific vegetation communities using ELC codes, and provided recommendations with regards to possible impacts to these vegetation communities. Environmental Impact Studies Region of Waterloo, Rapid Transit Initiative Draft Environmental Impact Study. Lead the completion of an environmental impact study for the proposed light rail transit route from Conestoga Mall to Fairview Mall in Waterloo and Kitchener respectively. Baseline ecological data was collected and consisted of fish composition studies, floral species surveys, vegetation community classification, wildlife surveys and fish habitat assessments. Sifton Properties, Development Assessment Report, Middlesex Centre, Ontario. Completed an evaluation of existing natural heritage features and net effects assessment for a single residential development along the Thames River within Middlesex Centre.

91 Labrador Iron Mines, Terrestrial Baseline for Redmond, James and Silveryards Properties, Schefferville, Quebec. Lead the completion of the terrestrial baseline report to be incorporated into an overall Environmental Impact Study for the re-opening of an iron ore open pit mining operation. Field investigations focused on identifying vegetation communities within three proposed sites and included botanical surveys, basal area calculations, soil profile analysis and air-photo interpretation. Traditional knowledge was also obtained from members of the local Cree and Inu communities. Public Works Canada, Bear Island Vegetation Assessment, Nunavut. Completed an assessment of the natural features on Bear Island in James Bay, Nunavut. This was required to determine the impacts of a proposed landfill to be located on the Island. Tasks include: vegetation species inventories, wildlife habitat assessments and vegetation community delineation. Traditional knowledge was obtained from members of the local Cree community. First Gulf, Environmental Impact Study, Woodstock, Ontario. Completed a Scoped Environmental Impact Study for a proposed business park. As part of the EIS study, preliminary amphibian surveys were completed within a wetland patch, which occurs to the west of the subject site, using point-count techniques as determined by the Great Lakes Marsh Monitoring Program and through incidental cues (i.e. observation and/or auditory). The EIS provided recommendations for the protection of this wetland patch. Airport Road Phase 3 & 4 Environmental Impact Study and Wetland Evaluations, London, Ontario. Aided in the completion of two Environmetnal Impact Studies and two wetland evaluations for terrestrial and wetland communities along Airport Road within Phases 3 & 4 of Innovation Industrial Park. Tasks include: 1) agency consultation, 2) background data collection, 3) field investigations comprised of floral and faunal inventories, 3) assessment of significance of habitat and identified species, 4) development of constraints and opportunities mapping and 5) development of an environmental management plan including buffer recommendations. Toyota Motor Manufacturing North America, Environmental Impact Study, Woodstock, Ontario. Aided with the completion of an environmental impact study (EIS) for 2000 acres of lands to be developed for Toyota Motor Manufacturing North America. These lands contained portions of the Vansittart Woods Provincially Significant Wetland and various other natural features including the non-provincially significant Eastwoods Wetland and blocks of woodlot stands. Confirmed and updated the wetland boundaries and delineating vegetation communities into ELC units. A detailed environmental management plan was prepared for the EIS to ensure that all the sensitive elements of this

92 property were protected. Chris Dayman, Scoped Environmental Impact Study, London, Ontario. Completed a scoped EIS supporting a zoning amendment a building application for a single residential home within the locally significant Bayfield South ANSI. Identified existing vegetation, assessed significance of the site and completed the final written report offering recommendations for mitigation measures and providing an environmental management plan. CP Rail, Spring Investigations for a Full Environmental Impact Study, Woodstock, Ontario. Completed a spring inventory of existing vegetation within communities along a proposed alignment of a new rail spur. Undertook detailed vegetation surveys within each delineated ELC unit. Glenview Estates Properties, Environmental Impact Study, Petrolia, Ontario. Aided in the completion of an EIS for lands to be developed into a combination of residential and golf course uses. The study area consisted of tablelands backing onto valleylands along Durham Creek (a tributary of the Sydenham River system). Recommended protection for areas falling below the 200 m contour (the valleylands). Paid particular attention to the effects of historical oil wells and rigs on the surrounding natural features. Z Group, Uplands North Residential Development Environmental Impact Study, London, Ontario. Aided in the preparation of an EIS for a property that contained a locally significant wetland and locally significant woodland and that bordered a woodland designated as an environmentally significant area. Determined buffer widths to the identified natural areas, delineated boundaries for the wetland and prepared the written report. Darryl Ormandy, Scoped Environmental Impact Study, London, Ontario. Completed a scoped EIS supporting a severance application of a property adjacent to an evaluated significant woodland. Identified existing vegetation and assessed their significance and completed the final written report offering recommendations for mitigation measures. Brian Sigmund, Scoped Environmental Impact Study, London, Ontario. Completed a scoped EIS supporting an application to remove some trees from an evaluated significant woodland for a single residential development along Dingman Creek. Prepared a tree preservation plan where trees within the building envelope for the house and driveway were identified to species and recommended to be removed. Prepared the final report with recommendations for mitigation measures. Erin Morris, Scoped Environmental Impact Study, Dunnville, Ontario. Completed a scoped EIS supporting a building application for a single residential dwelling adjacent to a provincially significant wetland. Identified existing vegetation within the study area and offered recommendations to mitigate

93 negative impacts to the PSW. Colehill Enterprises, Estate Residential Complex, Field Investigations, Mount Brydges, Ontario. Aided in the completion of field investigations to determine the existing conditions of a site. Conducted vegetation field sampling, conducted detailed ecological plots and prepared maps. During field investigations for this project, a federally threatened American chestnut (Castanea dentata) bearing fruit was observed. Contacted the appropriate authorities contacted informing them of its whereabouts. City of London, London Southeast Reservoir Subject Lands Status Report, London, Ontario. Aided in the preparation of a Subject Lands Status Report for vegetation patch #12108 located along Highbury Avenue. Conducted detailed ecological plots within the London portion of the patch, sampled vegetation, and prepared the written report. DLN Group, Huron Shores Estates, Environmental Impact Study, Lambton County, Ontario. Aided in the preparation of an EIS for a property, located along the shores of Lake Huron, that contained provincially significant wetland elements and old growth dune forest stands. A detailed environmental management plan was prepared for the EIS to ensure that all the sensitive elements of this property were protected. Z Group, Uplands North Residential Development. Constraints and Opportunities Report, London, Ontario. Aided in the preparation of the report for a property that contained a locally significant wetland and a locally significant woodland and bordered a woodland designated as an environmentally significant area. prepared a detailed account of existing constraints, recommending areas for development and areas for protection and restoration. Sifton Properties Ltd., Wickerson Road Environmental Impact Study, London, Ontario. Conducted an EIS to determine potential impacts from a proposed residential strip along a woodlot with wetland pockets. Delineated vegetation communities into ELC units, conducted plant and amphibian surveys, located onsite drainage routes, and provided construction recommendations to mitigate potential impacts. D&B Development/Green Lane Environmental Group Ltd., Environmental Investigations, St. Thomas, Ontario. Aided in the preparation of a constraints and opportunities report for a proposed residential area. Conducted vascular plant surveys, defined vegetation communities into suitable ELC units, provided an assessment of the significance of environmental features and functions of the site and provided recommendations with regards to possible impacts to the vegetation. Sifton Properties Ltd., River Bend Community Phases 1 & 2, Environmental Impact Study, London, Ontario. Participated in a study to determine potential impacts from an adjacent housing and golf course community and stormwater management pond to

94 invertebrate communities in the Thames River. Aided in collecting invertebrate samples along the Thames River and adjoining tributaries. Municipality of West Nipissing, Aquatic Impact Assessment, Field, Ontario. Participated in a study to determine potential impacts of a culvert to the aquatic community of Sturgeon Creek. Conducted fish and aquatic invertebrate and benthic sediment sampling of the creek. Tree Preservation Plans Sifton Properties, Hopedale Tree Preservation Plan, London, Ontario. Prepared a tree preservation plan according to City of London s Tree Preservation Guidelines for a Plan of Subdivision adjacent to significant woodland patch no Ninety-three trees within and adjacent to the development envelope were surveyed, identified, assessed and measured to provide rationale for preservation recommendations. Z Group, Glasgow Tree Preservation Plan, Kitchener, Ontario. Prepared a tree preservation plan according to City of Kitchener s Tree Preservation Guidelines for a Plan of Subdivision along Glasgow Street. A total of three hundred trees were flagged, surveyed, identified, measured and assessed in terms of their health. Future Streets, Future Streets Tree Preservation Plan, London, Ontario. Prepared a tree preservation plan according to City of London s Tree Preservation Guidelines for a Plan of Subdivision adjacent to natural features. A total of forty trees were assessed. Environmental Assessments Métis Nation of Ontario (MNO), Review of Hydro One Networks Inc. Draft EA report for the Bruce to Milton Transmission Reinforcement Project. On behalf of MNO, aided in the review of the, Bruce to Milton Transmission Reinforcement Environmental Assessment, where she evaluated the methods used for terrestrial field investigations, how the terrestrial natural features observed were assessed in terms of their federal, regional, local and traditional (i.e. species of concern for Métis Harvesting Rights) significance, the assessment of impacts of the corridor expansion on the existing natural features and recommended mitigation measures. She also attended one of Hydo One s Biodiversity Initiative Workshop as a representative of MNO where she observed the proceedings and provided clarification to MNO members. City of Mississauga, Hanlon Feedermain Class Environmental Assessment, Mississauga, Ontario. Lead the completion of the natural heritage component of the Hanlon Feedermain Class Environmental Assessment. Tasks comprised of terrestrial and aquatic assessments along alternative feedermain alignments. The alternative alignments were evaluated considering potential

95 affects to street trees, watercourses and natural heritage areas. Region of Niagara, 4th Avenue Trunk Water Main Extension, St. Catharines, Ontario. Aided in the completion of a Class EA for the extension of a trunk water main along 4th Avenue from Vansickle Road to Jordan Road. Ecological investigations included determining existing conditions of the natural environment along the road; providing recommendations illustrating which side of the road would be preferred for the water main installation; determining proper watercourse crossing methods (drilling or open cut); providing mitigation measures to minimize potential impacts to the wetland/woodland communities of the Twelve, Fifteen, Sixteen and Eighteen Mile Creek systems; and consulting with the appropriate authorities (DFO, Niagara Conservation Authority). Private Client, Russ Road Extension Class Environmental Assessment, Grimsby, Ontario. Collected terrestrial habitat information along a proposed road extension extending to two private residences. Environmental issues included the occurrence of a protected wetland to the south of the proposed road extension. Detailed terrestrial information was collected for areas within 30 metres of either side of the road extension documenting hedgerows, residential trees and potential occurrence of species at risk. County of Peterborough/ City of Peterborough, Parkhill Road and Sherbrooke Street Road Widening Class EA, Peterborough, Ontario. Completed a terrestrial inventory of street trees, woodlands and hedgerows along Parkhill Road and Sherbrooke Street. Provided recommendations for the protection of street trees. No significant woodlands/wetlands occurred within the immediate study area of both road widening EAs. Halton Region, Milton Alternative Water Supply Class EA, Milton, Ontario. Currently aiding in the completion of a Class EA for alternative water supply routes for Milton in Halton Region, Ontario. Tasks include collection of background information, documentation of existing conditions, evaluation of alternative routes and determining suitable mitigation recommendations with regards to construction and any potential negative affects to riparian zones of Sixteen Mile Creek and its tributaries. Regional Municipality of Peel, Beckett Sproule Feedermain & Hanlan PS Class EA, Peel, Ontario. Aided in the preparation of a Class EA for improvements to an existing reservoir and pumping station. Assessed vegetation communities where proposed alignments would cross watercourses, one watercourse being the Etobicoke Creek. Delineated these vegetation communities into ELC units and provided recommendations with regards to possible impacts to the vegetation. Region of Chatham-Kent, Installation of Sanitary Sewers Class Environmental Assessment, Bothwell, Ontario. Conducted vegetation assessments along alternative alignments for the proposed sanitary sewer. Defined vegetation into ELC communities, conducted vegetation field sampling, consulted with

96 property owners, provided recommendations to mitigate potential impacts to the vegetation communities during construction and aided in the preparation of the Class EA report. City of Stratford, South Stratford SWM Class EA, Stratford, Ontario. Provided ecological data for the completion of a Class EA for a new stormwater management facility in the City of Stratford, Ontario. Tasks include refinement of wetland boundaries for Stratford Wetland Complex, delineation of vegetation communities into ELC units, documentation of incidental wildlife observations and provision of appropriate mitigation measures. Regional Municipality of Niagara & Town of Fort Erie, Frenchman s Creek Trunk Sanitary Sewer Servicing Study Class EA, Fort Erie, Ontario. Aided in the completion of a Schedule C Class EA to site a new trunk sanitary sewer for the town of Fort Erie. Assessed the vegetation communities that occurred along the forcemain alignments and delineated these communities into ELC units providing recommendations with regards to possible impacts to the vegetation. City of Brantford, NW Area Pumping Station, Grand River Construction Monitoring, Brantford, Ontario. Monitored the construction of a new water main across the Grand River using an open-cut method in which cofferdams were placed in the river for dewatering. During the dewatering process, captured and released stranded fish using net/bucket and electrofishing methods. Region of Peel, North Peel Groundwater System Upgrade, Caledon East/Palgrave, Ontario. Confirmed wetland boundaries for the Widgett-Innis Lakes Provincially Significant Wetland Complex and provided planting recommendations for all pumping station sites. City of Hamilton, Culvert Replacement Master Plan Class EA, Hamilton, Ontario. Participated in a master plan Class EA for four culverts and two bridges including Valens Road-Spencer Creek, Mud Street - Three Mile Creek, Guyatt Road - Twenty Mile Creek, Studimon Road - Fairchild Creek, and Alberton Road - Big Creek. Assisted in a study of consolidation of culverts, sizing and impacts to aquatic resources. Participated in biomass surveys involving back pack electrofishing. Regional Municipality of Peel, Beckett Sproule Feedermain & Hanlan PS Class EA, Peel, Ontario. Aided in the preparation of a Class EA for improvements to an existing reservoir and pumping station. Assessed vegetation communities where proposed alignments would cross watercourses, one watercourse being the Etobicoke Creek. Delineated these vegetation communities into ELC units and provided recommendations with regards to possible impacts to the vegetation. Peer Reviews Métis Nation of Ontario, Peer Review of Hydro One s Draft Environmental Assessment Report of a Transmission

97 Reinforcement Project from Bruce to Milton, Ontario. Reviewed the terrestrial component of the Draft Environmental Assessment Report for a Transmission Reinforcement Project from Bruce to Milton. The review focused on how the MNO s harvesting rights and species of concern would be affected by the proposed transmission reinforcement. Kettle Creek Conservation Authority, Peer Review of Dalewood Meadows Environmental Impact Study, St. Thomas, Ontario. Lead the completion of a peer review of an Environmental Impact Study completed for lands adjacent to a significant valleyland and Kettle Creek Woods Provincially Significant Wetland owned by Kettle Creek Conservation Authority. Peer review methods were based on Environmental Impact Study guidelines developed by the KCCA, City of St. Thomas and the Provincial Policy Statement. To keep an unbiased opinion, reconnaissance terrestrial and aquatic investigations were completed prior to reviewing the EIS document. Proponents from the City, conservation authority, Ministry of Natural Resources, developer and the consultant who prepared the original EIS were also contacted. Sydney Tar Ponds Agency, Peer Review of Remediation of Sydney Tar Ponds and Coke Ovens Sites Environmental Impact Study, Sydney, Nova Scotia. Reviewed the terrestrial component of a 642 page Environmental Impact Study document for the clean-up of coal-based contaminants/sludge from a tidal estuary at the mouth of Muggah Creek. A comprehensive team was organized for the review including the completion of status reports and a presentation to the client. Region of Peel, Peer Review of YDSS Interceptor Sewer (19th Avenue-Leslie Street) Design, Peel, Ontario. Reviewed the terrestrial component of natural environment reports/maps for the design of a sewer alignment along 19th Avenue and Leslie Street. The intent of this review was to ensure that mitigation recommendations were carried forward to the final design. City of Woodstock, Peer Review of Sally Creek Development Environmental Impact Study, Woodstock, Ontario. Lead the completion of a peer review of an Environmental Impact Study completed for lands adjacent to a provincially significant wetland owned by Upper Thames River Conservation Authority. Peer review methods were based on Environmental Impact Study guidelines developed by UTRCA, the City of Woodstock and the Provincial Policy Statement. To keep an unbiased opinion, reconnaissance terrestrial and aquatic investigations were completed prior to reviewing the EIS document. Proponents from the City, conservation authority, Ministry of Natural Resources, developer and the consultant who prepared the original EIS were also contacted. Z Group, Peer Review of Parker Jackson Lands Environmental Impact Study, London, Ontario. Lead the completion of a peer review of an Environmental Impact Study completed for lands containing a woodland and headwaters of

98 Dingman Creek. Peer review methods were based on Environmental Impact Study guidelines developed by Upper Thames River Conservation Authority, City of London and the Provincial Policy Statement. Prior to reviewing the document, reconnaissance terrestrial and aquatic investigations were completed prior to reviewing the EIS document. Growth Management Strategies City of Brantford, Growth Management Strategy, Brantford, Ontario. Aided in the evaluation of blocks of land considered for annexation into the city of Brantford for the expansion of the urban area boundary. Evaluation criteria met those policies laid out in the Provincial Policy Statement as well as the county of Brant and city of Brantford s official plan policies. Determined criteria considering both the terrestrial and wetland resources that occurred within the study area. Site Plan Approvals Loblaw Properties Limited, Fortinos/Loblaw Site Plan Approvals, Grimsby, Ontario. Aided in the preparation of site plan approvals for the development of a Loblaws grocery store along the QEW. Determined the presence of any rare vegetation species within the study area as well as fisheries investigations where minnow traps and electrofishing techniques were used. Biomonitoring/ Surveys Sifton Properties, Riverbend Phase 1 & 2 Biomonitoring, London, Ontario. Aided in the continued monitoring of a residential/golf course development along the valleylands of the Thames River where data for established benthic, erosion and vegetation stations were collected for spring Niagara Parks Commission, Willoughby Lands Golf Course Facility, Ontario. Participated in the completion of a biomass survey for Ussher's Creek (Chippawa, Niagara Falls). Cordoned off 40 to 50 metre creek sampling areas. Assisted with the collection of biological species from electrofishing, species documentation-determination, weighing and recording, release and creek restoration. Woodland Evaluations Hampton Group, North Lambeth Woodlot Evaluation, North Lambeth, Ontario. Aided in the preparation of a woodlot evaluation. Defined vegetation communities into ELC units and conducted vascular plant inventories for each of the ELC units. Publications Digital analysis of lichen abundance testing EMAN s Lichen Monitoring Protocol Leading Edge: The Working Biosphere, 2004

99 Professional Development First Aid Certification, St. John s Ambulance, 2007 Temperate Wetlands Restoration Training Course, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, 2005 Class 1 Electrofishing Certification Course, Watershed Science Centre, 2004 Wetlands Evaluation Course, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, 2004 Ecological Land Classification for Southern Ontario Training Course, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Safety Orientation (06/2009) Hazard Communication/WHMIS (09/2009) Basics of Fall Protection (01/2010) Defensive Driving Awareness Training (06/2009) Field Safety 4 Hour (12/2009) Office Ergonomics Training (03/2010) First Aid (06/2010) CPR (06/2010) Hearing Protection (03/2010) General Excavation Safety Training (04/2009) Animal Care and Use, Brock University, 2002

100 Michael Godard, B. Sc. Hon. Fisheries Biologist Professional History present, AECOM, Fisheries Biologist OHL/FCC JV, Fisheries Biologist , Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Fisheries Biologist Heritage Aquaculture, Fish Health Technician Education Aquaculture Technology Diploma (Letter of Academic Achievement) Sir Sandford Fleming College Lindsay, ON Environmental Science (Honours) Open University, England Years of Experience With AECOM: 1 With Other Firms: 10 Training Canadian Pleasure Craft Operator WHMIS Training Fall Arrest Training Electrofishing Certification Level 2 Backpack Crew Leader Standard First Aid with CPR Level A Mr. Godard is an intermediate fisheries biologist with over 11 years of experience in the fisheries field in both the private and public sector. Michael is part of the Environmental Division and is based out of the Kitchener Office. He has worked on a diverse range of projects including environmental assessments, environmental baseline studies, environmental monitoring projects, Renewable Energy projects, transportation projects, environmental impact studies, construction monitoring projects, and Species at Risk screenings and surveys. Michael has co-ordinated and implemented a variety of ecological and water resource monitoring activities for various projects and also has experience collecting benthic invertebrates, fish sampling and conducting detailed fish habitat information. He has experience in the collection and analysis of water quality data, stream assessments, various lake sampling techniques, installation of a variety of surface water field equipment, and report writing. Michael has published research papers on a multitude of factors affecting fisheries such as hybridization with non-natives, predicting changes to fish populations based on climate change scenarios, density dependant growth and diel patterns of diet and habitat usage. Michael has much practical experience in fisheries management and in the techniques used to assess and monitor habitat and fish populations, including studies using acoustic telemetry to determine habitat utilization of the European Eel (Anguilla anguilla) as well as PIT (Passive Integrated Transponder) studies on eels to determine microhabitat preferences for this species. He is also experienced in the micro-tagging of Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) and Sea Trout (Salmo trutta) for long term studies on the migratory behaviour of these species. Fisheries Act Approvals Waterloo LRT, Waterloo, ON Prepared and submitted Fisheries Act requests for reviews for Cedar and Laurel Creek crossings in Waterloo. NextEra Wind Energy. Jericho and Goshen. Prepared and submitted Fisheries Act requests for reviews for 50+ culvert installations throughout the study areas. Middle Abutment Stabilization Works at Bridge CP#8304, French River, ON Completed fish habitat assessments on areas surrounding a bridge abutment within the French River to assess risk to fish and fish habitat to submit Request for Review for the proposed works to the DFO. 1 of 5

101 Michael Godard Fisheries Act Self-Assessments Bisch St Culvert Replacement Aquatic investigations were undertaken to aid in the assessment of potential effects of bridge replacement.. Detailed background review and fish habitat mapping was conducted using a standardized AECOM assessment protocol Floradale Bridge Replacement Aquatic investigations were undertaken to aid in the assessment of potential effects of bridge replacement. Detailed background review and fish habitat mapping was conducted using a standardized AECOM assessment protocol Fisheries and Fish Habitat Assessments Ottawa LRT EIS, Ottawa, ON Aquatic investigations were undertaken to aid in the assessment of potential effects of bridge replacements and road widening for the LRT project in Ottawa. Detailed background review and fish habitat mapping was conducted using a standardized AECOM assessment protocol. This also included the screening of SAR habitat within the study area. Waterloo LRT EIS, Waterloo, ON Aquatic investigations were undertaken to aid in the assessment of potential effects of bridge replacements and road widening for the LRT project in Kitchener and Waterloo. Detailed background review and fish habitat mapping was conducted using a standardized AECOM assessment protocol. This also included the screening of SAR habitat within the study area. Williams Parkway Road Widening, Brampton, ON Aquatic investigations were undertaken to aid in the assessment of potential effects of bridge replacements and road widening along Williams Parkway between McLaughlin Road to North Park Drive. Detailed background review and fish habitat mapping was conducted using a standardized AECOM assessment protocol. Ottawa Road 174-CR 17 Class EA Study from Highway 417 to Landry Road, City of Ottawa, ON Completed aquatic habitat investigations and assessment of alternatives for the proposed alternate Highway 417 routes along the entire study area for existing aquatic habitat conditions. This also included the screening of SAR habitat within the study area. Parkway Corridor Class EA, City of Peterborough, ON Completed aquatic habitat investigations and assessment of alternatives for Parkway Corridor including aquatic habitat mapping and fish community surveys. Middle Abutment Stabilization Works at Bridge CP#8304, French River, ON Completed fish habitat assessments on areas surrounding a bridge abutment within the French River to assess risk to fish and fish habitat. 2 of 5

102 Michael Godard MTO - Highway 17 Widening, North Bay, ON Completed aquatic habitat investigations and assessment of alternative routes for widening of Highway 17. Detailed background review and fish habitat mapping was conducted. MTO - Leamington Breakwater, Leamington, ON Environmental Assessment, Field data collection and reporting for fisheries assessment of the Leamington Breakwater to assess options for reconstruction or removal. Fisheries assessment consisted of diver-assisted video documentation and sediment sampling with dredge-type sampler. Indian Creek, Milton, ON Completed aquatic habitat investigations mapping and fish community surveys including aquatic habitat Victoria Street Widening, Whitby, ON Aquatic investigations were undertaken to aid in the assessment of potential effects of bridge and culvert replacements and road widening along Victoria Street between Halls Road and Seaboard Gate in Whitby, ON. Detailed background review, fish habitat mapping and Species at Risk investigations were conducted. GO Transit East Rail Maintenance Facility, Whitby ON Completed aquatic habitat investigations including aquatic habitat mapping and fish community surveys. Mineola Gardens, Mississauga, ON Completed aquatic habitat investigations including aquatic habitat mapping relating to alleviating existing erosion issues in a reach of Cooksville Creek. Environmental and Construction Monitoring Sideroad 27, Halton Hills, ON Coordinating and implementing the long-term monitoring program which monitored the impacts from a bridge widening over a coldwater Brook Trout stream. Daily, and then weekly construction monitoring and water quality sampling. Also responsible for data collection and organization and preparing reports for the client. Mining and Minerals Probe Mines Limited., Borden Lake, ON Environmental baseline studies (hydrology, hydrogeology, ecology, water quality). Completed an adult fish survey and detailed habitat mapping (shoreline and transects) in support of a proposed open pit gold mine in northern Ontario. Recent Publications G. Ziba, S. Staknas, M. Ives, M. J. Godard, J. Seymour, M. G. Carter and G. H. Copp Long-term decline of barbel Barbus barbus in the original course of the Lower River Lee (England), with particular reference 3 of 5

103 Michael Godard to the survival of tagged fish during a water pollution incident. Fundamentals of Applied Limnology. Fobert, E., Ziba, G., Vilizzi, L, Godard, M.J., Fox, M.G., Staknas, S. & Copp, G.H Non-native fish dispersal under conditions of climate change: case study in England of the pumpkinseed Lepomis gibbosus in a newly-invaded floodplain pond. Ecology of Freshwater Fish Godard, M.J., Davison, P.I., Copp, G.H. & Stebbing, P.D Review of invasion pathways and provisional pathway management plan for nonnative ponto-caspian species of potential invasion risk to Great Britain. Cefas contract report for Defra. Ziba, G., Staknas, S., Godard, M.J., Ives, M., Semour, J. Carter, M.G. & Copp, G.H. Long-term decline of barbel Barbus barbus in the original course of the Lower River Lee (England), with particular reference to the survival of tagged fish during a water pollution incident. (submitted) Godard, M.J., Almeida, D., Ziba, G. & Copp, G.H Diel patterns of diet and habitat use of non-native fathead minnow Pimephales promelas in England. Hydrobiologia. DOI: /s Sayer, C.D., Copp, G.H., Emson, D., Godard, M.J., Ziba, G., & Wesley, K.J Towards the conservation of crucian carp Carassius carassius: understanding the extent and causes of decline within parts of its native English range. Journal of Fish Biology 79, Masson, L., Almeida, D., Godard, M.J. & Copp, G.H Biometric relationships between body size and bone size of the threatened native crucian carp and its hybrids with goldfish for dietary studies of Eurasian otter. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 27, Tarkan, A.S., Gaygusuz, O., Godard, M.J. & Copp, G.H Densitydependent basis of long-term growth patterns in a pond-dwelling population of crucian carp Carassius carassius. Fisheries Management & Ecology 18, Britton, J.R., Cucherousset, J., Davies, G.D., Godard, M.J. & Copp, G.H Non-native fishes and climate change: predicting species responses to warming temperatures in a temperate region. Freshwater Biology 55, Tarkan, A.S., Cucherousset, J., Ziba, G., Godard, M.J. & Copp, G.H Growth and reproduction of introduced goldfish Carassius auratus in small ponds of southeast England with and without native crucian carp Carassius carassius. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 26, Copp, G.H., Tarkan, A.S., Godard, M.J., Edmonds, N.J. & Wesley, K.J A preliminary assessment of feral goldfish impacts on ponds, with particular reference to native crucian carp. Aquatic Invasions 5, Tarkan, A.S., Copp, G.H., Ziba, G., Godard, M.J. & Cucherousset, J Growth and reproduction of threatened native crucian carp 4 of 5

104 Michael Godard Carassius carassius in small ponds of Epping Forest, southeast England. Aquatic Conservation: Marine & Freshwater Ecosystems 19, Copp, G.H., Vilizzi, L., Mumford, J., Fenwick, G.V., Godard, M.J. & Gozlan, R.E Calibration of FISK, an invasive-ness screening tool for non-native freshwater fishes. Risk Analysis 29, of 5

105 Jessica Piette H. B.ES Terrestrial Ecologist Education Bachelor of Environmental Studies - Honors Environment and Resources Studies, University of Waterloo Diploma, Environmental Assessment, University of Waterloo Years of Experience With AECOM: 7 Training and Certifications Ministry of Natural Resources Ontario Bird and Bat Mortality Monitoring Workshop for Wind Power Projects, 2014 Bat Conservation Management Acoustic Software Training Workshop, 2014 Amphibian and Reptile Survey Techniques, Nature Conservancy Canada/Ministry of Natural Resources, 2014 University of Guelph Arboretum Butterflies Identification Course, 2012 University of Guelph Arboretum Dragonflies and Damselflies Identification Course, 2012 Royal Botanical Gardens Goldenrods and Asters Identification Course, 2011 Ontario Wetland Evaluation Training Course, Ministry of Natural Ms. Piette is a terrestrial ecologist with AECOM s Ecological Services Group working in Kitchener, Ontario. She received her Honors Bachelor of Environmental Studies Environment & Resource Studies from the University of Waterloo and has completed a Diploma in Environmental Impact Assessment. Her technical skills include vegetation inventories, woodland evaluations, vegetation community descriptions, wetland boundary delineation and evaluations, soils identification, airphoto interpretation, Species at Risk Screenings, amphibian and reptile surveys and bat and bat habitat surveys. She is trained and experienced in the application of Ecological Land Classification (ELC) of Southern Ontario, and the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Wetland Evaluation guidelines. Ms. Piette attended the Ontario Bird and Bat Mortality Monitoring Workshop held by the MNRF and attended the Acoustic Software Training Workshop held by Bat Conservation Management. Together, these skills facilitate in the preparation and data collection to complete environmental impact studies, constraints and opportunity reports, subject land status reports, tree preservation reports, environmental assessment evaluations, renewable energy projects, and natural heritage studies. Experience Environmental Impact Studies Orfus Realty, King Township Property Natural Heritage Constraints & Opportunities Report, King Township, Region of York. Completed terrestrial field investigations including aerial photography interpretation, the delineation of vegetation into Ecological Land Classification (ELC) units, the collection of a comprehensive floral species list and the delineation of on-site wetland communities following the Ministry of Natural Resources Wetland Evaluation Protocol for insertion into the final Natural Heritage C&O document. Completed a Species at Risk (SAR) Screening to identify any potential SAR as well as their associated habitat located within the study area. City of London, Southcrest Storm Sewer and Outfall Replacement Environmental Impact Study, London, Ontario. Completed terrestrial field investigations to determine existing site conditions. This included the delineation of vegetation communities into Ecological Land Classification Units, as well as a tree inventory along the proposed storm sewer alignment and outfall location. Completed a Species at Risk (SAR) Screening to identify any potential SAR as well as their associated habitat located within the study area. Following data collection completed

106 Resources, 2008 Ecological Land Classification for Southern Ontario Training Course, Ministry of Natural Resources, 2007 First Aid Certification, St. John s Ambulance, 2007 the corresponding sections within the EIS report. City of London, South West Area Plan Natural Heritage Report, London Ontario. Completed terrestrial investigations for 24 unevaluated vegetation patches within the City of London in order to determine their significance within the Natural Heritage System. Investigations included aerial photography interpretation as well as site specific investigations. Following data collection the City of London s woodland evaluation guidelines, and/or wetland evaluation guidelines were applied accordingly. City of London, Meadowlily Area Plan Natural Heritage Study, London Ontario Conducted terrestrial field investigations, including aerial photography interpretation, the application of Ecological Land Classification and the collection of a comprehensive floral species list for insertion into the Meadowlily Area Plan Natural Heritage Study Report. City of Kitchener, Blockline Road Extension, Kitchener, Ontario Conducted terrestrial field investigations, including aerial photography interpretation, the application of Ecological Land Classification, the collection of a comprehensive floral species list and the delineation of on-site wetland communities following the Ministry of Natural Resources Wetland Evaluation Protocol for insertion into the final Environmental Impact Study document. Regional Municipality of Waterloo, Rapid Transit Initiative, Transit Project Assessment Process, Environmental Impact Assessment. Carried out terrestrial field investigations, including aerial photography interpretation, the application of Ecological Land Classification and the collection of a comprehensive floral species list along the proposed Light Rail Transit (LRT) Route. This was completed in order to assess the significance of the existing natural heritage features, to present potential development constraints, as well as, provide direction for specific design considerations of the LRT. GMS Mortgage, Huron Shores Environmental Impact Study, Lampton County. Assisted in the delineation of wetland communities, plant identification and the completion of necessary report updates. St. Joseph s Health Care, St. Thomas Regional Mental Health Care Centre - Scoped Environmental Impact Study. Completed terrestrial field investigations for existing site conditions for the development of a Regional Mental Health Care Centre facility on lands located adjacent to Hepburn Drain and lands designated as Significant Woodland and Significant Valleyland. This included the delineation of vegetation communities into Ecological Land Classification (ELC) units, as well as a tree inventory for the subject lands for insertion into the final document. Sifton Properties, Wilton Grove Road Environmental Impact Study, London, Ontario. Assisted in the completion of

107 vegetation inventories to determine existing conditions. Completed the description of vegetation communities using proper Ecological Land Classification units according to the Ministry of Natural Resources: Ecological Land Classification System (Lee et al, 1998), created corresponding vegetation profiles, as well as assisted in the preparation of the final report. Completed salamander monitoring using cover boards as described by EMAN-Parks Canada National Monitoring Protocol for Terrestrial Salamanders. Sydney Tar Ponds Agency, Sydney Tar Ponds Baseline Avifauna Environmental Effects Monitoring Report, Sydney, Nova Scotia. Assisted in the collection of background information as well as in the completion of the Avifauna baseline report. Sifton Properties, Hardy Road Environmental Impact Study, Brantford, Ontario. Aided in the completion of vegetation inventories to determine existing conditions, completed background research on native prairie species for Brant County and created a detailed plant list. Participated in restoration efforts in association with the Ministry of Natural Resources regarding on-site tufa and a remnant prairie community. Sifton Properties, Fanshawe Ridge Environmental Impact Study, London, Ontario. Helped in the data collection to determine existing site conditions and constraints to development to be inserted in the final EIS document. This included aerial photography interpretation, vegetation community delineation into Ecological Land (ELC) Classification units, and the collection of a detailed floral species list. The onsite Fanshawe Ridge Provincially Significant Wetland boundaries were refined using the protocols set out in the Ministry of Natural Resources Wetland Evaluation Guide. GMS Mortgage, Huron Shores Environmental Impact Study, Lampton County, Ontario. Aided in the delineation of a wetland community. Labrador Iron Mines, Labrador Iron Mines Environmental Impact Study, Schefferville, Quebec. Aided in the completion of the baseline breeding birds report. Sifton Properties, Wickerson Road Environmental Impact Study, London, Ontario. Created corresponding vegetation profiles for Ecological Land Classification communities. Assisted in the completion of the final report. Completed amphibian surveys, using the point-count techniques as described in the Great Lakes Marsh Monitoring Program, as well as completed salamander monitoring using cover boards as described by EMAN-Parks Canada National Monitoring Protocol for Terrestrial Salamanders. Valente & Theocharis, Medway Road Constraints and Opportunities Report, London, Ontario. Aided in the completion of vegetation inventories to determine existing site

108 conditions. Contacted local and provincial authorities requesting background information on the subject lands. Assisted in the description of vegetation communities using proper Ecological Land Classification units according to the Ministry of Natural Resources: Ecological Land Classification System (Lee et al, 1998), and assisted in the completion of the final report. City of Woodstock, Woodstock Woodlands Environmental Impact Study, Woodstock, Ontario. Assisted in the completion of vegetation inventories, the description of vegetation communities using proper Ecological Land Classification units, according to the Ministry of Natural Resources: Ecological Land Classification System (Lee et al, 1998), and in the completion of the final report. Completed a wetland evaluation for two of the patches using the Ministry of Natural Resources Southern Ontario Wetland Evaluation System. Sifton Properties, Denfield Property DAR, London, Ontario. Aided in the completion of vegetation inventories to determine existing site conditions. Contacted local and provincial authorities requesting background information on the subject lands. Assisted in the description of vegetation communities using proper ELC units and assisted in the completion of the final report. Sifton Properties, Fratscko Lands Advisory and Environmental Impact Statement, London, Ontario. Aided in completion of field investigations to determine existing site conditions. Completed vegetation inventories and helped complete preliminary amphibian surveys, using the point-count techniques as described in the Great Lakes Marsh Monitoring Program. Downham, Downham Property Environmental Impact Statement, London, Ontario. Assisted in completion of vegetation inventories for the subject property. Prepared community descriptions and profiles using ELC units. City of Woodstock, BB2D Wetland Environmental Impact Statement, Woodstock, Ontario. Assisted in collection of vegetation inventories and prepared a detailed list with all common and Latin floral names. Contacted local and provincial authorities requesting background information. Sifton Properties, Old Victoria Road Environmental Impact Statement, London, Ontario. Aided in gathering of vegetation inventories according to Ecological Land Classification units (ELC) and delineation of wetland boundaries. Contacted local and provincial authorities to obtain necessary background information. Kenmore Home, Bierens Property, London, Ontario. Assisted in description of vegetation communities by creating vegetation profiles and detailed plant lists. Contacted local and provincial authorities obtaining necessary background information

109 Class Environmental Assessments United Counties of Prescott and Russell in partnership with the City of Ottawa, Natural Environment Report, Ottawa Road 174 / Prescott-Russell County Road 17 Environmental Assessment. Completed terrestrial field investigations, including aerial photography interpretation, the application of Ecological Land Classification, and the collection of a comprehensive floral species list along the proposed Light Rail Transit (LRT) Routes. Completed a Species at Risk Screening based on existing habitat characteristics as determined through field investigations as well as a high level application of potential Significant Wildlife Habitat. This was completed in order to assess the significance of the existing natural heritage features, to present potential development constraints, as well as, provide direction for specific design considerations of the LRT. Regional Municipality of Halton, Trafalgar Road Widening Natural Environment Report. Compiled and reviewed all background information pertaining to the study area including sources such as the Natural Heritage Information Centre Database, Regional Official Plans, and Agency Correspondence. Completed terrestrial field investigations using a combination of Rapid Ecological Land Classification (ELC), along Trafalgar Road and collection of a floral species list. Completed Species at Risk habitat screening following the completion of field investigations. This was completed in order to determine existing conditions as well as provide constraints to the overall selection of the preferred alternative. Regional Municipality of Durham, Transit Priority Implementation on Highway 2, Existing Conditions Report. Compiled and reviewed all background information pertaining to

110 the study area including sources such as the Natural Heritage Information Centre Database, Regional Official Plans, and Agency Correspondence. Was responsible for the completion of terrestrial field investigations including the application of Rapid Ecological Land Classification (ELC), along Highway 2 and the collection of a floral species list. This was completed in order to determine existing conditions as well as provide constraints to the overall selection of the preferred alternative. Regional Municipality of York, Upper York Sewage Solutions Environmental Assessment, Natural Environment Baseline Conditions Report. Completed terrestrial field investigations using a combination of Rapid Ecological Land Classification (ELC), and a comprehensive floral species list for the entire study area. This was completed in order to determine existing conditions as well as provide constraints to the overall selection of the preferred alternative. Township of Woolwich, Municipal Class Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Replacement of Floradale Road Structure # Collected necessary background documentation from local agencies. Completed terrestrial field investigations using a combination of Ecological Land Classification (ELC), and a comprehensive floral species list, and conducted impact assessment for insertion into the final EA document. Niagara Region, Municipal Class Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Reece Bridge Replacement. Collected necessary background documentation from local agencies. Completed terrestrial field investigations using a combination of Ecological Land Classification (ELC), and a comprehensive floral species list, and conducted impact assessment for insertion into the final EA document. Go Transit, Expansion of Rail Service from Oshawa to Bowmanville on the Lakeshore East Corridor: Natural Environmental Conditions Report. Completed terrestrial field investigations using a combination of Rapid Ecological Land Classification (ELC), and a comprehensive floral species list for 14 land parcels within the study area. This was completed in order to determine existing conditions as well as in the prevention and reduction of potential negative effects associated with the overall design, construction implementation and long-term operation of the rail expansion to natural heritage features. San Gold Corporation, Bissett Gold Mine Tailings Pond Expansion, Bissett, Manitoba. Aided in the completion of vegetation inventories to determine existing conditions. City of Toronto, Toronto Island Water Main Extension EA, Toronto Ontario. Aided in the completion of vegetation inventories. City of London, Sunningdale Stormwater Management Pond

111 EA, London, Ontario. Aided in the collection of vegetation inventories and background information. City of Woodstock, Water-Wastewater EA, Woodstock, Ontario. Assisted in the collection of existing conditions to aid in selection of a preferred alternative, and in the completion of a memo reporting these findings. City of Grimsby, Russ Road Extension EA, Grimsby, Ontario. Aided in the collection of field data, including vegetation inventories. Assisted in the completion of the memo reporting the investigation results. City of London, Bradley Avenue Trunk Water Main Class EA, London, Ontario. Collected vegetation inventory for the section of Bradley Avenue from Jackson Road to Airport Road, by identifying tree species, calculating its DBH, dripline, and assessing its health. Also assisted in writing the methods, findings, and significance sections of the initial report. City of London, Western Road Widening, London, Ontario. Aided in the compilation of field data to determine existing site conditions. Completed vegetation inventories and finalized initial memo to the client. City of Milton, Alternate Water Supply Class EA, Milton, Ontario. Helped refined preferred route by taking notes and photographs then compiling the data into report form. Manitoulin Island, Islandwide Waste Management Plan, Manitoulin, Ontario. Aided in collection of background information by contacting Manitoulin s landfill and transfer station representatives and asking a series of predetermined questions pertaining to their waste practices. Also contacted were the marinas and aquaculture farms of the area. City of London, Old Oak SWM Pond, London, Ontario. Aided in gathering of field data by completing vegetation inventories and community descriptions, as well as, completing a detailed floral list for the study area. City of Guelph, Burke Well, Guelph, Ontario. Aided with compilation of vegetation inventories and community descriptions Renewable Energy NextEra Energy Canada, Bluewater Wind Energy Centres and Transmission Line Renewable Energy Project, Grand Bend, Ontario. Completed terrestrial site investigations, including delineations of vegetation communities into Ecological Land Classification (ELC) units, amphibian surveys following the Marsh Monitoring Protocol. Completed the woodland evaluations for the Natural Heritage Assessment Report following the protocols set

112 out in the Natural Heritage Assessment Guide for Renewable Energy Project Table 8: Significant Woodland Evaluation Criteria and Standards. NextEra Energy Canada, Goshen Wind Energy Centres and Transmission Line Renewable Energy Project, Grand Bend, Ontario. Completed terrestrial site investigations, including delineations of vegetation communities into Ecological Land Classification (ELC) units, amphibian surveys following the Marsh Monitoring Protocol. Completed the wetland evaluations for the Natural Heritage Assessment Report following the protocols set out in the Natural Heritage Assessment Guide for Renewable Energy Project Appendix C: Wetland Characteristics and Ecological Functions Assessment for Renewable Energy Projects. NextEra Energy Canada, Jericho Wind Energy Centres and Transmission Line Renewable Energy Project, Grand Bend, Ontario. Completed terrestrial site investigations, including delineations of vegetation communities into Ecological Land Classification (ELC) units, amphibian surveys following the Marsh Monitoring Protocol. Aided in the completion of the wetland evaluations for the Natural Heritage Assessment Report following the protocols set out in the Natural Heritage Assessment Guide for Renewable Energy Project Appendix C: Wetland Characteristics and Ecological Functions Assessment for Renewable Energy Projects. Bat and Bat Habitat Assessments NextEra Energy Canada, Bluewater Wind Energy Centres and Transmission Line Renewable Energy Project, Grand Bend, Ontario. Conducted research into bat ecology, biology and monitoring for the completion of the Newly Listed Species Mitigation Plan for Little Brown and Northern Myotis. NextEra Energy Canada, Goshen Wind Energy Centres and Transmission Line Renewable Energy Project, Grand Bend, Ontario. Conducted research into bat ecology, biology and monitoring for the completion of the Newly Listed Species Mitigation Plan for the Little Brown and Northern Myotis to be submitted to MNR for review and approval. City of Kitchener, Detailed Design and Construction Monitoring for Kitchener WWTP, Kitchener, Ontario. Completed Bat and Bat Habitat Surveys by conducting snag density calculations following the Ministry of Natural Resources Bat and Bat Habitat Survey of Treed Habitats Protocols. This consisted of selecting random plots across all represented ELC communities and surveying a minimum of ten, 12.6m plots to determine snag density. This was completed in support of the construction of a proposed outfall along the Grand River, which will require vegetation removal within potential bat habitat. City of London, Kiwanis Park Pedestrian Pathway

113 Connection, London, Ontario. Bat and Bat Habitat Surveys were completed by conducting snag density calculations following the Ministry of Natural Resources Bat and Bat Habitat Survey of Treed Habitats Protocols. This consisted of selecting random plots across all represented ELC communities and surveying a minimum of ten, 12.6m plots to determine snag density. Region of Waterloo, Waterloo Stage 1 Light Rail Transit Project, Waterloo, Ontario. Conducted a rapid cavity tree assessment, in consultation with the Ministry of Natural Resources for the Operation Maintenance Facility. Conducted night exit surveys to determine presence/absence of bats within the study area. Significant Wildlife Habitat Assessments NextEra Energy Canada, Goshen Wind Energy Centres and Transmission Line Renewable Energy Project, Grand Bend, Ontario. Completed a variety of Evaluation of Significance surveys related to identified Significant Wildlife Habitat. This included Overwintering Surveys for turtles, and Snake Hibernacula Surveys United Counties of Prescott and Russell in partnership with the City of Ottawa, Natural Environment Report - Ottawa Road 174 / Prescott-Russell County Road 17 Environmental Assessment. Completed a high level application of potential Significant Wildlife Habitat for all of the alternative routes using the Ministry of Natural Resources Significant Wildlife Habitat Ecoregion 6E Criterion Schedule. This was completed in order to assess the significance of the existing natural heritage features, to present potential development constraints, as well as, provide direction for specific design considerations of the LRT. City of London, Kiwanis Park Pedestrian Pathway Connection. Aided in Conducting Significant Wildlife Habitat Assessment using the Ministry of Natural Resources Significant Wildlife Habitat Ecoregion 7E Criterion Schedule. Sifton Properties Limited, 277 Hardy Rd Plan of Subdivision, Natural Heritage Study and Environmental Impact Study, Brantford, Ontario. Conducting Significant Wildlife Habitat Assessment using the Ministry of Natural Resources Significant Wildlife Habitat Ecoregion 7E Criterion Schedule. Sifton Properties, Fanshawe Ridge, Environmental Impact Study, London, Ontario. Aided in Conducting Significant Wildlife Habitat Assessment using the Ministry of Natural Resources Significant Wildlife Habitat Ecoregion 7E Criterion Schedule. Wetland Restoration

114 ORE Development, Highbury Business Park Wetland Creation, London, Ontario. Aided with the vegetation inventory and monitoring of the area. Wetland Monitoring City of London, Uplands North Storm Water Management Wetland Monitoring Program Baseline Data, London, Ontario. Completed baseline data collection for a 3 year monitoring program within a wetland located adjacent to a storm water management pond. This included the selection and establishment of 5 permanent monitoring quadrats within the study area as well as a tree health assessment for existing trees within the wetland. Conducted amphibian surveys following the Marsh Monitoring Protocol for inclusion into the baseline report. Following data collection completed Baseline Wetland Monitoring Report. City of London, Forest City Wetland Forest City Stormwater Management Facility Westminster Wetland Complex Assessment of Reported Die-back. Conducted wetland assessment of Westminster Wetland complex including boundary delineation and a detailed floral species list for insertion into the final document. City of London, Uplands North Storm Water Management Wetland Monitoring Program Year 1 Monitoring, London, Ontario. Completed Year 1 data collection for a 3 year monitoring program within a wetland located adjacent to a storm water management pond. This included vegetation monitoring within the 5 permanent monitoring quadrats within the study area as well as a tree health assessment for existing trees within the wetland.. Tree Preservation Plans City of Mississauga, Hanlan Feedermain Environmental Assessment, Mississauga Ontario. Completed a tree inventory along each proposed feedermain route in order to assist in the identification in the preferred route. This included noting trees species within proximity to alternative alignments, potential impacts from proposed works. As well detailed tree data was collected including identification of dominant species, measuring diameter at breast height, assessing health, calculating height, and measuring the dripline along alternative routes as well as a description of existing riparian vegetation along various watercourse crossings. Sifton Properties, Hopedale Tree Preservation Plan, London Ontario. Collected tree inventory data by identifying individual species, measuring diameter at breast height, assessing health, calculating height, and measuring the dripline in order to complete a Tree Preservation Plan.

115 Toronto Island Watermain extension EA, Toronto Ontario. Aided in the collection of tree data. This included the identification of tree species, measuring the diameter at breast height, calculating height, assessing health and measuring the dripline. This information was then used to complete a Tree Preservation Plan. City of London, Innovation Park Phase 4, London Ontario. Completed significant woodland/wetland boundary staking using the dripline of edge trees. Completed vegetation inventories and tree inventory noting species, diameter at breast height, health and height. This information was used to determine the existing conditions of the subject property in order to complete a Tree Preservation Plan. Mining Labrador Iron Mines, Labrador Iron Mines, Environmental Impact Study, Schefferville, Quebec. Assisted in the completion of vegetation community delineations by aerial photography interpretation followed by ground truthing using the Canadian Vegetation Classification System. Compiled a detailed plant species list for each of the three specific areas of interest. Helped in the completion of the baseline breeding birds report. San Gold Corporation, Bissett Gold Mine Tailings Pond Expansion, Bissett, Manitoba. Helped in the completion of vegetation inventories to determine existing conditions for the expansion of the tailings ponds. Bancroft Uranium, Bancroft, Ontario. Completed the delineation of vegetation communities using aerial photography interpretation followed by field investigations. Sydney Tar Ponds Agency, Sydney Tar Ponds Baseline Avifauna Environmental Effects Monitoring Report, Sydney, Nova Scotia. Assisted in the collection of background information as well as in the completion of the Avifauna baseline report. Subject Land Status Reports City of London, Highbury and Highway 401 Expansion, London, Ontario. Completed vegetation inventories to determine existing conditions. Completed the description of vegetation communities using proper Ecological Land Classification units according to the Ministry of Natural Resources: Ecological Land Classification System (Lee et al, 1998), and completed the final report. Sifton Properties, Fanshawe Ridge Wetland Subject Land Status Report, London Ontario. Aided in the completion of field investigations, including vegetation inventories, community delineation into proper Ecological Land Classification units according to the Ministry of Natural Resources: Ecological Land Classification System (Lee et al, 1998), the delineation and

116 staking of the wetland boundary, and in the completion of the final report. City of Woodstock, Parkinson SWM Pond Cleanout, Woodstock, Ontario. Participated in the initial amphibian s survey for the study area. Assisted in field investigations by collecting vegetation samples and prepared detailed community descriptions for the final report. Environmental Monitoring Bancroft Uranium, Bancroft, Ontario. Completed the delineation of vegetation conditions using aerial photography interpretation followed by field investigations. Woodland Assessments Pen Equity Corporation and Goal Ventures Inc., Subject Land Status Report. London Ontario. Conducted necessary site investigations to complete a woodland evaluation following criteria set out by the City of London. Sifton Properties, Van Horik Woodland Assessment, London, Ontario. Assisted in the completion of field investigations, which included the collection of detailed plant lists and the delineation of different communities within the woodland using the Ministry s Ecological Land Classification System.

117 Jessica Walker, MES. Terrestrial Ecologist Professional History 06/2014 Present, AECOM, Intermediate Terrestrial Ecologist- Kitchener, Ontario 05/ /2014, Natural Resource Solutions Inc., Terrestrial and Wetland Biologist Waterloo, Ontario 05/ /2009, Rouge Park, Biology Field Assistant - Aurora, Ontario 05/ , Toronto Zoo, Invasive Plant Research Assistant, Toronto, Ontario Education Masters of Environmental Studies, Environment and Resource Studies, University of Waterloo, 2012 Honours Bachelor of Environmental Studies, Environment and Resource Studies, Biology Minor, University of Waterloo 2009 Diploma of Excellence in Ecological Restoration and Rehabilitation, University of Waterloo, 2009 Years of Experience With AECOM: <1 years With other firms: 3 years Professional Affiliations International Society of Arboriculture, Ontario Chapter Jessica Walker is a terrestrial ecologist with AECOM s Environmental Division based out of Kitchener, Ontario. With over three years of ecologist experience, Jessica s expertise includes natural resource inventories and evaluations, research and impact studies. Her technical skills include conducting vegetation community delineation, soils analysis and identification, and fauna inventories for birds, amphibians, reptiles and mammals. Jessica is well versed in conducting Species at Risk as well as Significant Wildlife Habitat screenings and assessments and has worked on numerous projects focusing on the identification of natural features and the evaluation of significance or sensitivity. Experience Terrestrial and Wetland Ecosystem Studies Jessica has experience with the assessment of terrestrial and wetland ecosystems. She routinely conducts inventories of birds, mammals, reptiles and amphibians. Jessica is trained in applying the Ecological Land Classification System for Southern Ontario. Vegetation monitoring has included transect and random sample quadrants to assess short-term and long-term impacts of development on vegetation. Jessica s specific expertise includes: Inventories and mapping of terrestrial and wetland vegetation communities and fauna. Terrestrial and wetland habitat management and restoration. Identification and delineation of Significant Wildlife habitat including seasonal concentration areas of animals, specialized habitat for wildlife and animal movement corridors. Wildlife Studies Jessica has experience conducting a wide range of wildlife studies focused on birds, mammals, reptiles and amphibians. She regularly conducts wildlife population surveys and assessments of terrestrial, wetland and riparian wildlife habitats. Jessica also frequently identifies significant wildlife and their habitats and provides an assessment of potential impacts. She has conducted a wide range of monitoring surveys and inventories to identify the presence of Species at Risk including species-specific guided surveys for Blanding s turtle (Emydoidea blandingii) and the Yellow-breasted Chat (Icteria virens virens). Jessica has frequently conducted wildlife road crossing surveys and has conducted and analyzed road mitigation monitoring.

118 Certification Ecological Land Classification for Southern Ontario Training Course, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Butternut Health Assessor, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Jessica s specific expertise includes: Wildlife population surveys. Wildlife habitat assessments and mapping. Screening and identification of rare and sensitive fauna species. Familiarity with provincial and federal legislation, policies and procedures pertaining to Species at Risk. Assessing potential adverse impacts to Species at Risk and their habitats. Visual and auditory identification of bird, mammal and reptile species. Renewable Energy Studies Jessica has experience conducting both pre-construction and post-construction studies for bats and birds at large-scale wind farms in Ontario. She has been involved in a range of roles for post-construction studies including conducting mortality searches, scavenger removal trials and searcher efficiency studies. She has also produced detailed reports on the established impact on bird and bat populations in Ontario. Jessica also has experience in producing Natural Heritage and Impact Assessments for proposed hydroelectric facilities in northern Ontario. Jessica s specific expertise includes: Participation in a wide array of biological field surveys including but not limited to: acoustic bat monitoring; bird behaviour/breeding monitoring; herpetofauna, vegetation and mammal inventories; and post-construction mortality surveys. Methodological approaches for conducting a wide range of pre-construction wind farm studies, including migration surveys (dawn and dusk), daytime soaring surveys, waterfowl and shorebird surveys, walking transect surveys, and driving transect surveys. Experience in analyzing data, and interpreting and reporting monitoring results. Impact assessment of terrestrial ecosystems, including Species at Risk and Species of Conservation Concern for hydroelectric facilities.

119 Appendix D Vegetation Community Descriptions

120 Appendix D. ELC Community Descriptions City of London Cultural Meadow Ecosite ELC Code Vegetation Description Discussion FLORISTIC SUMMARY & ASSESSMENT CUM1-1: Dry-Moist Old Field Meadow Type This community is located in three locations within the study area. One small cultural meadow community is represented within each of the three areas (north, south and eastern patch). Dominant species observed included Canada goldenrod (Solidago canadensis), tall goldenrod (Solidago altissima), wild carrot (Daucus carota), healall (Prunella vulgaris), and reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea). Species Diversity Total Species: 13 Native Species: 9 Exotic Species 4 Total Taxa in Region (List Region, Source) % Regional Taxa Recorded 0.13% Regionally Significant Species 0 S1-S3 Species 0 S4 Species 0 S5 Species 9 Co-efficient of Conservatism and Floral Quality Index Co-efficient of Conservatism (CC) (average) 3.00 CC 0 to 3 lowest sensitivity 5 CC 4 to 6 moderate sensitivity 4 CC 7 to 8 high sensitivity 0 CC 9 to 10 highest sensitivity 0 Floral Quality Index (FQI) 9.00 Presence of Weedy & Invasive Species mean weediness weediness = -1 low potential invasiveness 2 weediness = -2 moderate potential invasiveness 2 weediness = -3 high potential invasiveness 0 Presence of Wetland Species average wetness value 2.08 upland 2 facultative upland 7 facultative 2 facultative wetland 2 obligate wetland 0 Although having a low FQI, and species diversity, these cultural meadow

121 Appendix D. ELC Community Descriptions City of London ELC Code Vegetation Description Discussion communities are surrounded by wetland habitat making them more valuable to certain species that require small dry openings in their habitat to carry out their life processes. Community Sensitivity: Low to Moderate Cultural Thicket CUT1: Mineral Cultural Thicket Ecosite This community is located within the eastern portion of the community connecting the northern and southern wetland patches. Dominant species observed within the shrub layer include common buckthorn, glossy buckthorn (Frangula alnus), and gray dogwood (Cornus racemosa). FLORISTIC SUMMARY & ASSESSMENT Species Diversity Total Species: 20 Native Species: 13 Exotic Species 7 Total Taxa in Region (List Region, Source) % Regional Taxa Recorded 0.20% Regionally Significant Species 0 S1-S3 Species 0 S4 Species 0 S5 Species 12 Co-efficient of Conservatism and Floral Quality Index Co-efficient of Conservatism (CC) (average) 2.31 CC 0 to 3 lowest sensitivity 9 CC 4 to 6 moderate sensitivity 4 CC 7 to 8 high sensitivity 0 CC 9 to 10 highest sensitivity 0 Floral Quality Index (FQI) 8.32 Presence of Weedy & Invasive Species mean weediness weediness = -1 low potential invasiveness 0 weediness = -2 moderate potential invasiveness 3 weediness = -3 high potential invasiveness 4 Presence of Wetland

122 Appendix D. ELC Community Descriptions City of London ELC Code Vegetation Description Discussion Species average wetness value 1.50 upland 3 facultative upland 9 facultative 4 facultative wetland 4 obligate wetland 0 Although having a low FQI, the community functions as a corridor between the two wetland patches. Cultural Plantation Community Sensitivity: Low to Moderate CUP3: Coniferous Plantation Ecosite This community is located along the eastern edge of the property between the two wetland patches. FLORISTIC SUMMARY & ASSESSMENT Species Diversity Total Species: 27 Native Species: 18 Exotic Species 9 Total Taxa in Region (List Region, Source) % Regional Taxa Recorded 0.27% Regionally Significant Species 0 S1-S3 Species 0 S4 Species 0 S5 Species 16 Co-efficient of Conservatism and Floral Quality Index Co-efficient of Conservatism (CC) (average) 2.11 CC 0 to 3 lowest sensitivity 16 CC 4 to 6 moderate sensitivity 2 CC 7 to 8 high sensitivity 0 CC 9 to 10 highest sensitivity 0

123 Appendix D. ELC Community Descriptions City of London ELC Code Vegetation Description Discussion Floral Quality Index (FQI) 8.96 Presence of Weedy & Invasive Species mean weediness weediness = -1 low potential invasiveness 2 weediness = -2 moderate potential invasiveness 3 weediness = -3 high potential invasiveness 4 Presence of Wetland Species average wetness value 0.74 upland 3 facultative upland 9 facultative 7 facultative wetland 7 obligate wetland 1 Cultural Woodland Ecosite Community Sensitivity: Low to Moderate Sensitivity FLORISTIC SUMMARY & ASSESSMENT CUW1a: Mineral Cultural Woodland This community is located within the southern patch along its eastern edge. Dominant tree species observed within the canopy include: Black walnut (Juglans nigra), Manitoba maple (Acer negundo), and green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica). The shrub layer was dominated by tartarian honeysuckle (Lonicera tatarica), riverbank grape (Vitis riparia), Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus inserta), and Virginia strawberry (Fragaria virginiana). Species Diversity Total Species: 15 Native Species: 13 Exotic Species 2 Total Taxa in Region (List Region, Source) % Regional Taxa Recorded 0.15% Regionally Significant Species 0 S1-S3 Species 0 S4 Species 1 S5 Species 11

124 Appendix D. ELC Community Descriptions City of London ELC Code Vegetation Description Discussion Co-efficient of Conservatism and Floral Quality Index Co-efficient of Conservatism (CC) (average) 2.85 CC 0 to 3 lowest sensitivity 8 CC 4 to 6 moderate sensitivity 4 CC 7 to 8 high sensitivity 1 CC 9 to 10 highest sensitivity 0 Floral Quality Index (FQI) Presence of Weedy & Invasive Species mean weediness weediness = -1 low potential invasiveness 1 weediness = -2 moderate potential invasiveness 0 weediness = -3 high potential invasiveness 1 Presence of Wetland Species average wetness value 0.73 upland 1 facultative upland 6 facultative 4 facultative wetland 5 obligate wetland 0 Although this community has a moderately low FQI, the number of native species and its proximity to the observed wetland communities increases the community s value. It functions in providing upland habitat required by some wetland species such as amphibians, reptiles and birds. Community Sensitivity: Low to Moderate CUW1b: Mineral Cultural Woodland This community is located within the northern portion of the study area along the southern edge of the wetland community. Dominant species observed within the canopy include black locust (Robinia pseudo-acacia), trembling aspen (Populus FLORISTIC SUMMARY & ASSESSMENT Species Diversity Total Species: 20

125 Appendix D. ELC Community Descriptions City of London ELC Code Vegetation Description Discussion tremuloides), cottonwood (Populus deltoides) and scot s pine (Pinus sylvestris). Shrub species observed include common buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica), and, red raspberry (Rubus idaeus). Native Species: 12 Exotic Species 8 Total Taxa in Region (List Region, Source) % Regional Taxa Recorded 0.20% Regionally Significant Species 0 S1-S3 Species 0 S4 Species 0 S5 Species 10 Co-efficient of Conservatism and Floral Quality Index Co-efficient of Conservatism (CC) (average) 1.92 CC 0 to 3 lowest sensitivity 11 CC 4 to 6 moderate sensitivity 1 CC 7 to 8 high sensitivity 0 CC 9 to 10 highest sensitivity 0 Floral Quality Index (FQI) 6.64 Presence of Weedy & Invasive Species mean weediness weediness = -1 low potential invasiveness 2 weediness = -2 moderate potential invasiveness 2 weediness = -3 high potential invasiveness 4 Presence of Wetland Species average wetness value 0.95 upland 3 facultative upland 7 facultative 4 facultative wetland 6 obligate wetland 0 Although this community has a low FQI, its proximity to the observed wetland communities increases the community s value. It functions in providing upland habitat required by some wetland species such as amphibians, reptiles and birds.

126 Appendix D. ELC Community Descriptions City of London ELC Code Vegetation Description Discussion Community Sensitivity: Low to Moderate Deciduous Forest Ecosite FOD8-1: Fresh-Moist Poplar Deciduous Forest Type This community is located in two small locations within the southern vegetation patch. One is along the northern edge and the other is found in the south west corner along the agricultural field. Dominant species observed within the canopy include: trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides) with other species including black walnut, and green ash. The species observed within the shrub layer included glossy buckthorn, common buckthorn, riverbank grape and tartarian honeysuckle (Lonicera tatarica). FLORISTIC SUMMARY & ASSESSMENT Species Diversity Total Species: 30 Native Species: 22 Exotic Species 8 Total Taxa in Region (List Region, Source) % Regional Taxa Recorded 0.30% Regionally Significant Species 0 S1-S3 Species 0 S4 Species 0 S5 Species 20 Co-efficient of Conservatism and Floral Quality Index Co-efficient of Conservatism (CC) (average) 3.50 CC 0 to 3 lowest sensitivity 11 CC 4 to 6 moderate sensitivity 9 CC 7 to 8 high sensitivity 1 CC 9 to 10 highest sensitivity 0 Floral Quality Index (FQI) Presence of Weedy & Invasive Species mean weediness weediness = -1 low potential invasiveness 1 weediness = -2 moderate potential invasiveness 3 weediness = -3 high potential invasiveness 4 Presence of Wetland Species average wetness value 0.60 upland 3 facultative upland 10

127 Appendix D. ELC Community Descriptions City of London ELC Code Vegetation Description Discussion facultative 9 facultative wetland 7 obligate wetland 1 This community has a high native versus exotic ratio and the majority of the species observed are classified within the lowest and moderate CC sensitivity ranking. Its proximity to the observed wetland communities increases the community s value. It functions in providing upland habitat required by some wetland species such as amphibians, reptiles and birds. Meadow Marsh Ecosite Community Sensitivity: Low to Moderate MAM2-2: Reed-canary Grass Mineral Meadow Marsh Type This community is located within the southern wetland patch along its southern edge and make up part of the Provincially Significant Arva Moraine Wetland Complex. Dominant species observed within the herbaceous include: reed canary grass, wild carrot, New England aster (Symphyotrichum nova-angliae), Canada goldenrod, bull thistle (Cirsium arvense) and purple-stemmed aster (Symphyotrichum puniceum). FLORISTIC SUMMARY & ASSESSMENT Species Diversity Total Species: 9 Native Species: 7 Exotic Species 2 Total Taxa in Region (List Region, Source) % Regional Taxa Recorded 0.09% Regionally Significant Species 0 S1-S3 Species 0 S4 Species 0 S5 Species 6 Co-efficient of Conservatism and Floral Quality Index Co-efficient of Conservatism (CC) (average) 1.43 CC 0 to 3 lowest sensitivity 6 CC 4 to 6 moderate sensitivity 1 CC 7 to 8 high sensitivity 0 CC 9 to 10 highest sensitivity 0 Floral Quality Index (FQI) 3.78

128 Appendix D. ELC Community Descriptions City of London ELC Code Vegetation Description Discussion Presence of Weedy & Invasive Species mean weediness weediness = -1 low potential invasiveness 1 weediness = -2 moderate potential invasiveness 1 weediness = -3 high potential invasiveness 0 Presence of Wetland Species average wetness value 0.22 upland 1 facultative upland 3 facultative 1 facultative wetland 3 obligate wetland 1 Although this community has a low FQI and species diversity it functions as a buffer along the edge of the southern limits separating it from the adjacent agricultural activities. This community is also considered as part of the Arva Moraine Provincially Significant Wetland Complex. Community Sensitivity: Moderate to High MAM2-10: Forb Mineral Meadow Marsh Type This community is found in four locations throughout the two wetland patches and make up part of the Provincially Significant Arva Moraine Wetland Complex. Dominant species observed within the herbaceous layer include spotted joe-pye-weed (Eupatorium maculatum), purple-stemmed aster, reed canary grass, broad-leaved cattail (Typha latifolia), moneywort (Lysimachia nummularia), jewelweed (Impatiens capensis) and New England aster. FLORISTIC SUMMARY & ASSESSMENT Species Diversity Total Species: 18 Native Species: 16 Exotic Species 2 Total Taxa in Region (List Region, Source) % Regional Taxa Recorded 0.18% Regionally Significant Species 0 S1-S3 Species 0 S4 Species 0 S5 Species 14 Co-efficient of Conservatism and Floral Quality Index Co-efficient of Conservatism (CC) (average) 2.93 CC 0 to 3 lowest sensitivity 8

129 Appendix D. ELC Community Descriptions City of London ELC Code Vegetation Description Discussion CC 4 to 6 moderate sensitivity 6 CC 7 to 8 high sensitivity 0 CC 9 to 10 highest sensitivity 0 Floral Quality Index (FQI) Presence of Weedy & Invasive Species mean weediness weediness = -1 low potential invasiveness 0 weediness = -2 moderate potential invasiveness 0 weediness = -3 high potential invasiveness 2 Presence of Wetland Species average wetness value upland 0 facultative upland 2 facultative 2 facultative wetland 8 obligate wetland 5 Although the community has a low FQI, its high native versus exotic ratio as well as its presence within the larger patch increases its ecological value. This community is also considered as part of the Arva Moraine Provincially Significant Wetland Complex. Community Sensitivity: Moderate to High MAS2-1: Cattail Mineral Meadow Marsh This community is located in three locations throughout the two wetland patches and make up part of the Provincially Significant Arva Moraine Wetland Complex. Dominant species observed within he herbaceous layer include: broad-leaved cattail, reed canary grass, jewelweed, and moneywort, FLORISTIC SUMMARY & ASSESSMENT Species Diversity Total Species: 13 Native Species: 11 Exotic Species 2 Total Taxa in Region (List Region, Source) % Regional Taxa Recorded 0.13% Regionally Significant Species 0 S1-S3 Species 0

130 Appendix D. ELC Community Descriptions City of London ELC Code Vegetation Description Discussion S4 Species 0 S5 Species 9 Co-efficient of Conservatism and Floral Quality Index Co-efficient of Conservatism (CC) (average) 2.10 CC 0 to 3 lowest sensitivity 8 CC 4 to 6 moderate sensitivity 3 CC 7 to 8 high sensitivity 0 CC 9 to 10 highest sensitivity 0 Floral Quality Index (FQI) 6.96 Presence of Weedy & Invasive Species mean weediness weediness = -1 low potential invasiveness 0 weediness = -2 moderate potential invasiveness 0 weediness = -3 high potential invasiveness 2 Presence of Wetland Species average wetness value upland 0 facultative upland 2 facultative 3 facultative wetland 5 obligate wetland 3 Although the community has a low FQI, its high native versus exotic ratio as well as its presence within the larger patch increases its ecological value. This community is also considered as part of the Arva Moraine Provincially Significant Wetland Complex. Community Sensitivity: Moderate to High MAM2: Mineral Meadow Marsh This community is located in the northern wetland patch just west of the cultural meadow and make up a portion of the Provincially Significant Arva Moraine Wetland Complex. FLORISTIC SUMMARY & ASSESSMENT Species Diversity Total Species: 9

131 Appendix D. ELC Community Descriptions City of London ELC Code Vegetation Description Discussion Dominant species observed include: common reed grass (Phragmites australis), reed canary grass, broad-leaved cattail. Several upland species were observed along the community s edge spreading slightly into the wetland itself. These included, Canada goldenrod, tall goldenrod, Native Species: 8 Exotic Species 1 Total Taxa in Region (List Region, Source) % Regional Taxa Recorded 0.09% Regionally Significant Species 0 S1-S3 Species 0 S4 Species 0 S5 Species 8 Co-efficient of Conservatism and Floral Quality Index Co-efficient of Conservatism (CC) (average) 1.67 CC 0 to 3 lowest sensitivity 7 CC 4 to 6 moderate sensitivity 1 CC 7 to 8 high sensitivity 0 CC 9 to 10 highest sensitivity 0 Floral Quality Index (FQI) 4.71 Presence of Weedy & Invasive Species mean weediness weediness = -1 low potential invasiveness 0 weediness = -2 moderate potential invasiveness 1 weediness = -3 high potential invasiveness 0 Presence of Wetland Species average wetness value upland 1 facultative upland 2 facultative 0 facultative wetland 4 obligate wetland 2 Although the community has a low FQI, its high native versus exotic ratio as well as its presence within the larger patch increases its ecological value. The

132 Appendix D. ELC Community Descriptions City of London ELC Code Vegetation Description Discussion community is also considered as part of the Arva Moraine Provincially Significant Wetland Complex. Swamp Thicket Ecosite Community Sensitivity: Moderate to High SWT2a: Mineral Thicket Swamp Type This community is located in two locations within northern and southern wetland patches. In the northern patch it is found in the north east corner. In the southern patch it is found along the south western edge of the patch. These communities make up a portion of the Provincially Significant Arva Moraine Wetland Complex. Dominant species observed include glossy buckthorn, common buckthorn, gray dogwood, and silky dogwood (Cornus amomum). Species observed within the ground cover layer include moneywort, water horehound, sedge species, bebb s sedge, false nettle, and spotted joe-pye-weed. FLORISTIC SUMMARY & ASSESSMENT Species Diversity Total Species: 26 Native Species: 22 Exotic Species 4 Total Taxa in Region (List Region, Source) % Regional Taxa Recorded 0.26% Regionally Significant Species 0 S1-S3 Species 0 S4 Species 0 S5 Species 21 Co-efficient of Conservatism and Floral Quality Index Co-efficient of Conservatism (CC) (average) 3.18 CC 0 to 3 lowest sensitivity 12 CC 4 to 6 moderate sensitivity 9 CC 7 to 8 high sensitivity 1 CC 9 to 10 highest sensitivity 0 Floral Quality Index (FQI) Presence of Weedy & Invasive Species mean weediness weediness = -1 low potential invasiveness 0 weediness = -2 moderate potential invasiveness 1 weediness = -3 high potential invasiveness 3 Presence of Wetland Species average wetness value -2.62

133 Appendix D. ELC Community Descriptions City of London ELC Code Vegetation Description Discussion upland 0 facultative upland 3 facultative 4 facultative wetland 10 obligate wetland 9 This is a small thicket wetland community with a high native versus exotic species ratio. The community provides valuable habitat for local wildlife and has one species, skunk cabbage, classified with a High Sensitivity CC value. This community is also considered part of the Arva Moraine Provincially Significant Wetland Complex. Community Sensitivity: Moderate to High SWT2b: Mineral Thicket Swamp Type This community is located in the northern wetland patch along the western edge of the patch and makes up a portion of the Provincially Significant Arva Moraine Wetland Complex. Dominant species observed include red-osier dogwood (Cornus sericea), sandbar willow (Salix exigua), gray dogwood. Species observed within the herbaceous layer include: bebb s sedge (Carex bebbii), narrow-leaved sedge species (Carex sp.), broadleaved cattail, and reed canary grass. FLORISTIC SUMMARY & ASSESSMENT Species Diversity Total Species: 25 Native Species: 21 Exotic Species 4 Total Taxa in Region (List Region, Source) % Regional Taxa Recorded 0.25% Regionally Significant Species 0 S1-S3 Species 0 S4 Species 0 S5 Species 20 Co-efficient of Conservatism and Floral Quality Index Co-efficient of Conservatism (CC) (average) 3.19 CC 0 to 3 lowest sensitivity 12 CC 4 to 6 moderate sensitivity 8 CC 7 to 8 high sensitivity 1 CC 9 to 10 highest sensitivity 0 Floral Quality Index (FQI) Presence of Weedy & Invasive Species

134 Appendix D. ELC Community Descriptions City of London ELC Code Vegetation Description Discussion mean weediness weediness = -1 low potential invasiveness 0 weediness = -2 moderate potential invasiveness 1 weediness = -3 high potential invasiveness 3 Presence of Wetland Species average wetness value upland 0 facultative upland 2 facultative 4 facultative wetland 10 obligate wetland 9 Deciduous Swamp Ecosite This is a small thicket wetland community with a high native versus exotic species ratio. The community provides valuable habitat for local wildlife and has one species, skunk cabbage, classified with a High Sensitivity CC value. This community is also considered part of the Arva Moraine Provincially Significant Wetland Complex. Community Sensitivity: Moderate to High SWD4-1: Willow Mineral Deciduous Swamp Type This community is found in the southern wetland patch and occupies the majority of the wetland. It also makes up part of the Provincially Significant Arva Moraine Wetland Complex. The canopy was dominated by willow (Salix X rubens) red-osier dogwood with some Manitoba maple (Acer negundo), and silver maple (Acer saccharinum) silky dogwood, gray dogwood, beggar s ticks (Biden frondosa), bebb s sedge, water horehound (Lycopus americana), false nettle (Boehmeria cylindrica), moneywort, and reed canary grass. Inclusion: SAF1-3: Duck Floating-leaved shallow Aquatic Type. This community is found within the larger swamp community and was dominated by star duckweed (Lemna trisulca). FLORISTIC SUMMARY & ASSESSMENT Species Diversity Total Species: 25 Native Species: 20 Exotic Species 5 Total Taxa in Region (List Region, Source) % Regional Taxa Recorded 0.25% Regionally Significant Species 1 S1-S3 Species 0 S4 Species 1 S5 Species 19

135 Appendix D. ELC Community Descriptions City of London ELC Code Vegetation Description Discussion Co-efficient of Conservatism and Floral Quality Index Co-efficient of Conservatism (CC) (average) 3.35 CC 0 to 3 lowest sensitivity 11 CC 4 to 6 moderate sensitivity 7 CC 7 to 8 high sensitivity 2 CC 9 to 10 highest sensitivity 0 Floral Quality Index Presence of Weedy & Invasive Species mean weediness weediness = -1 low potential invasiveness 1 weediness = -2 moderate potential invasiveness 1 weediness = -3 high potential invasiveness 3 Presence of Wetland Species average wetness value upland 0 facultative upland 0 facultative 3 facultative wetland 11 obligate wetland 11 This community with its high native versus exotic ratio and the presence of the shallow water community make this a very valuable vegetation community for resident wildlife. Two species, swamp dock (Rumex verticillatus), and skunk cabbage (Symplocarpus foetidus) are classified as within the high sensitivity CC rankings. This community is also considered as part of the Arva Moraine Provincially Significant Wetland Complex. Community Sensitivity: Moderate to High

136 Appendix E Plant Species List

137 Appendix E Master Plant Species List City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME COEFFICIENT OF CONSERVATISM WETNESS INDEX WEEDINESS INDEX PROVINCIAL STATUS OMNR STATUS COSEWIC STATUS GLOBAL STATUS LOCAL STATUS MIDD PTERIDOPHYTES FERNS & ALLIES Dryopteridaceae Wood Fern Family Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive Fern 4-3 S5 G5 X GYMNOSPERMS CONIFERS Pinaceae Pine Family Picea glauca White Spruce 6 3 S5 G5 I Pinus sylvestris Scotch Pine 5-3 SE5 G? IR DICOTYLEDONS DICOTS Aceraceae Maple Family Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 0-2 S5 G5 C Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 5-3 S5 G5 C Apiaceae Carrot or Parsley Family Daucus carota Wild Carrot 5-2 SE5 G? IC Sium suave Hemlock Water-parsnip 4-5 S5 G5 C Anacardiaceae Sumac or Cashew Family Toxicodendron radicans ssp. Radicans Poison-ivy 5-1 S5 G5T Asclepiadaceae Milkweed Family Asclepias syriaca Common Milkweed 0 5 S5 G5 C Asteraceae Composite or Aster Family Achillea millefolium var. millefolium Common Yarrow 3-1 SE? G5T? Bidens frondosa Devil's Beggar-ticks 3-3 S5 G5 X Cirsium arvense Canada Thistle 3-1 SE5 G? IC Cirsium vulgare Bull Thistle 4-1 SE5 G5 I Sonchus arvensis ssp. arvensis Field Sow-thistle 0 1 SE5 G?T? I Symphyotrichum ericoides White Heath Aster 4 4 S5 G5T? C Symphyotrichum lanceolatum Tall White Aster 3-3 S5 G5T? C Symphyotrichum lateriflorum Calico Aster 3-2 S5 G5T5 C Symphyotrichum novae-angliae New England Aster 2-3 S5 G5 C Symphyotrichum puniceum var. puniceum Purple-stemmed Aster 6-5 S5 G5T? X Eupatorium maculatum Spotted Joe-pye-weed 3-5 S5 G5T5 C Eupatorium perfoliatum Perfoliate Thoroughwort/Boneset 2-4 S5 G5 C Euthamia graminifolia Flat-topped Bushy Goldenrod 2-2 S5 G5 C Solidago altissima Tall Goldenrod 1 3 S5 U Solidago canadensis Canada Goldenrod 1 3 S5 G5 X Balsaminaceae Touch-me-not Family Impatiens capensis Spotted Touch-me-not 4-3 S5 G5 C Brassicaceae Mustard Family Cardamine concatenata Cut-leaved Toothwort 6 3 S5 G5 X Caprifoliaceae Honeysuckle Family

138 Appendix E Master Plant Species List City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME COEFFICIENT OF CONSERVATISM WETNESS INDEX WEEDINESS INDEX PROVINCIAL STATUS OMNR STATUS COSEWIC STATUS GLOBAL STATUS LOCAL STATUS MIDD Lonicera tatarica Tartarian Honeysuckle 3-3 SE5 G? I Sambucus nigra ssp. canadensis Common Elderberry 5-2 S5 G5 X Triosteum aurantiacum Wild Coffee 7 5 S5 G5 X Viburnum opulus var. americanum High Bush Cranberry 5-3 S5 G5T5 X Cornaceae Dogwood Family Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood 5-4 S5 G5T? X Cornus racemosa Red Panicled Dogwood/Gray dogwood 2-2 S5 G5? X Cornus sericea Red-osier Dogwood 2-3 S5 G5 C Lamiaceae Mint Family Clinopodium vulgare Wild Basil 4 5 S5 G? X Cucurbitaceae Gourd Family Echinocystis lobata Prickly Cucumber 3-2 S5 G5 X Fabaceae Pea Family Lotus corniculatus Bird's-foot Trefoil 1-2 SE5 G? I Robinia pseudo-acacia Black Locust 4-3 SE5 G5 IC Geraniaceae Geranium Family Geranium maculatum Spotted Crane's-bill 6 3 S5 G5 X Geranium robertianum Herb-robert 5-2 SE5 G5 IC Juglandaceae Walnut Family Juglans cinerea Butternut 6 2 S3? END G4 X Juglans nigra Black Walnut 5 3 S4 G5 X Lamiaceae Mint Family Lycopus americanus Cut-leaved Water-horehound 4-5 S5 G5 C Monarda fistulosa Wild Bergamot 6 3 S5 G5 C Prunella vulgaris ssp. vulgaris Common Heal-all 0-1 SE3 G5T? Lythraceae Loosestrife Family Lythrum salicaria Purple Loosestrife -5-3 SE5 G5 IC Oleaceae Olive Family Fraxinus americana White Ash 4 3 S5 G5 C Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 3-3 S5 G5 C Onagraceae Evening-primrose Family Circaea lutetiana ssp. canadensis Enchanter's Nightshade 3 3 S5 G5T5 X Oxalidaceae Wood Sorrel Family Oxalis stricta Upright Yellow Wood-sorrel 0 3 S5 G5 X Polygonaceae Smartweed Family Polygonum persicaria Lady's-thumb -3-1 SE5 G? I Rumex verticillatus Swamp Dock 7-5 S4 G5 VU Primulaceae Primrose Family Lysimachia nummularia Moneywort -4-3 SE5 G? I

139 Appendix E Master Plant Species List City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME COEFFICIENT OF CONSERVATISM WETNESS INDEX WEEDINESS INDEX PROVINCIAL STATUS OMNR STATUS COSEWIC STATUS GLOBAL STATUS LOCAL STATUS MIDD Rhamnaceae Buckthorn Family Frangula alnus Glossy Buckthorn -1-3 SE5 G? IU Rhamnus cathartica Common Buckthorn 3-3 SE5 G? IC Rosaceae Rose Family Geum aleppicum Yellow Avens 2-1 S5 G5 X Fragaria virginiana Virginia Strawberry 2 1 SU G5T? C Prunus virginiana Choke Cherry 2 1 S5 G5T? C Rosa multiflora Multiflora Rose 3-3 SE4 G? I Rubus idaeus Red Raspberry SE1 G5T5 Rubiaceae Madder Family Galium triflorum Sweet-scented Bedstraw 4 2 S5 G5 X Salicaceae Willow Family Populus deltoides ssp. deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 4-1 SU G5T? X Populus tremuloides Trembling Aspen 2 0 S5 G5 X Salix X rubens Reddish Willow -4-3 SE4 HYB IR Salix exigua Sandbar Willow 3-5 S5 G5 C Solanaceae Nightshade Family Solanum dulcamara Bitter Nightshade 0-2 SE5 G? IC Urticaceae Nettle Family Boehmeria cylindrica False Nettle 4-5 S5 G5 X Verbenaceae Vervain Family Verbena urticifolia White Vervain 4-1 S5 G5 X Violaceae Violet Family Viola sp Violet species Vitaceae Grape Family Parthenocissus inserta Inserted Virginia-creeper 3 3 S5 G5 X Vitis riparia Riverbank Grape 0-2 S5 G5 C MONOCOTYLEDONS MONOCOTS Araceae Arum Family Arisaema triphyllum Small Jack-in-the-pulpit 5-2 S5 G5T5 C Symplocarpus foetidus Skunk-cabbage 7-5 S5 G5 C Cyperaceae Sedge Family Carex bebbii Bebb's Sedge 3-5 S5 G5 C Carex sp Narrow-leaved sedge species Scirpus atrovirens Dark-green Bulrush 3-5 S5 G5? C Scirpus cyperinus Wool-grass 4-5 S5 G5 C Lemnaceae Duckweed Family Lemna minor Lesser Duckweed 2-5 S5 G5 X Lemna trisulca Star Duckweed 4-5 S5 G5 X Orchidaceae Orchid Family Epipactis helleborine Common Helleborine 5-2 SE5 G? I Poaceae Grass Family

140 Appendix E Master Plant Species List City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME COEFFICIENT OF CONSERVATISM WETNESS INDEX WEEDINESS INDEX PROVINCIAL STATUS OMNR STATUS COSEWIC STATUS GLOBAL STATUS LOCAL STATUS MIDD Glyceria striata Fowl Meadow Grass 3-5 S5 G5 X Leersia oryzoides Rice Cut Grass 3-5 S5 G5 X Phalaris arundinacea Reed Canary Grass 0-4 S5 G5 X Phragmites australis Common Reed 0-4 S5 G5 X Typhaceae Cattail Family Typha latifolia Broad-leaved Cattail 3-5 S5 G5 X FLORISTIC SUMMARY & ASSESSMENT Species Diversity Total Species: 80 Native Species: % Exotic Species % Total Taxa in Region (List Region, Source) % Regional Taxa Recorded 0.80% Regionally Significant Species 0 S1-S3 Species 0 S4 Species 2 S5 Species 56 Co-efficient of Conservatism and Floral Quality Index Co-efficient of Conservatism (CC) (average) 3.42 CC 0 to 3 lowest sensitivity % CC 4 to 6 moderate sensitivity % CC 7 to 8 high sensitivity % CC 9 to 10 highest sensitivity % Floral Quality Index (FQI) Presence of Weedy & Invasive Species mean weediness weediness = -1 low potential invasiveness % weediness = -2 moderate potential invasiveness % weediness = -3 high potential invasiveness % Presence of Wetland Species average wetness value -0.61

141 Appendix E Master Plant Species List upland % facultative upland % facultative % facultative wetland % obligate wetland % City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study

142 Appendix E CUM1-1 Dry-Moist Old Field Meadow Type City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME COEFFICIENT OF CONSERVATISM WETNESS INDEX WEEDINESS INDEX PROVINCIAL STATUS OMNR STATUS COSEWIC STATUS GLOBAL STATUS LOCAL STATUS MIDD DICOTYLEDONS DICOTS Apiaceae Carrot or Parsley Family Daucus carota Wild Carrot 5-2 SE5 G? IC Asclepiadaceae Milkweed Family Asclepias syriaca Common Milkweed 0 5 S5 G5 C Asteraceae Composite or Aster Family Achillea millefolium var. Common Yarrow millefolium 3-1 SE? G5T? Solidago altissima Tall Goldenrod 1 3 S5 U Solidago canadensis Canada Goldenrod 1 3 S5 G5 X Symphyotrichum ericoides White Heath Aster 4 4 S5 G5T? C Cornaceae Dogwood Family Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood 5-4 S5 G5T? X Fabaceae Pea Family Lotus corniculatus Bird's-foot Trefoil 1-2 SE5 G? I Lamiaceae Mint Family Clinopodium vulgare Wild Basil 4 5 S5 G? X Prunella vulgaris ssp. vulgaris Common Heal-all 0-1 SE3 G5T? Monarda fistulosa Wild Bergamot 6 3 S5 G5 C Onagraceae Evening-primrose Family Circaea lutetiana ssp. Enchanter's Nightshade canadensis 3 3 S5 G5T5 X Vitaceae Grape Family Parthenocissus inserta Inserted Virginia-creeper 3 3 S5 G5 X Vitis riparia Riverbank Grape 0-2 S5 G5 C MONOCOTYLEDONS MONOCOTS Poaceae Grass Family poaceae sp grass species FLORISTIC SUMMARY & ASSESSMENT Species Diversity Total Species: 14 Native Species: % Exotic Species % Total Taxa in Region (List Region, Source) % Regional Taxa Recorded 0.14% Regionally Significant Species 0 S1-S3 Species 0 S4 Species 0

143 Appendix E CUM1-1 Dry-Moist Old Field Meadow Type City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study S5 Species 10 Co-efficient of Conservatism and Floral Quality Index Co-efficient of Conservatism (CC) (average) 2.70 CC 0 to 3 lowest sensitivity % CC 4 to 6 moderate sensitivity % CC 7 to 8 high sensitivity % CC 9 to 10 highest sensitivity % Floral Quality Index (FQI) 8.54 Presence of Weedy & Invasive Species mean weediness weediness = -1 low potential invasiveness % weediness = -2 moderate potential invasiveness % weediness = -3 high potential invasiveness % Presence of Wetland Species average wetness value 2.29 upland % facultative upland % facultative % facultative wetland % obligate wetland %

144 Appendix E CUT1 Mineral Cultural Thicket Ecosite City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME COEFFICIENT OF CONSERVATISM WETNESS INDEX WEEDINESS INDEX PROVINCIAL STATUS OMNR STATUS COSEWIC STATUS GLOBAL STATUS LOCAL STATUS MIDD DICOTYLEDONS DICOTS Apiaceae Carrot or Parsley Family Daucus carota Wild Carrot 5-2 SE5 G? IC Anacardiaceae Sumac or Cashew Family radicans ssp. Toxicodendron Radicans Poison-ivy 5-1 S5 G5T Asteraceae Composite or Aster Family Euthamia graminifolia Flat-topped Bushy Goldenrod 2-2 S5 G5 C Solidago altissima Tall Goldenrod 1 3 S5 U Solidago canadensis Canada Goldenrod 1 3 S5 G5 X Caprifoliaceae Honeysuckle Family Lonicera tatarica Tartarian Honeysuckle 3-3 SE5 G? I Cornaceae Dogwood Family Red Panicled Dogwood/Gray Cornus racemosa dogwood 2-2 S5 G5? X Lamiaceae Mint Family Clinopodium vulgare Wild Basil 4 5 S5 G? X Geraniaceae Geranium Family Geranium maculatum Spotted Crane's-bill 6 3 S5 G5 X Geranium robertianum Herb-robert 5-2 SE5 G5 IC Onagraceae Evening-primrose Family lutetiana ssp. Circaea canadensis Enchanter's Nightshade 3 3 S5 G5T5 X Oxalidaceae Wood Sorrel Family Oxalis stricta Upright Yellow Wood-sorrel 0 3 S5 G5 X Rhamnaceae Buckthorn Family Frangula alnus Glossy Buckthorn -1-3 SE5 G? IU Rhamnus cathartica Common Buckthorn 3-3 SE5 G? IC Rosaceae Rose Family Fragaria virginiana Virginia Strawberry 2 1 SU G5T? C Rosa multiflora Multiflora Rose 3-3 SE4 G? I Rubus idaeus Red Raspberry SE1 G5T5 Rubiaceae Madder Family Galium triflorum Sweet-scented Bedstraw 4 2 S5 G5 X Solanaceae Nightshade Family Solanum dulcamara Bitter Nightshade 0-2 SE5 G? IC Vitaceae Grape Family Vitis riparia Riverbank Grape 0-2 S5 G5 C MONOCOTYLEDONS MONOCOTS Poaceae Grass Family Phalaris arundinacea Reed Canary Grass 0-4 S5 G5 X

145 Appendix E CUT1 Mineral Cultural Thicket Ecosite City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study FLORISTIC SUMMARY & ASSESSMENT Species Diversity Total Species: 20 Native Species: % Exotic Species % Total Taxa in Region (List Region, Source) % Regional Taxa Recorded 0.20% Regionally Significant Species 0 S1-S3 Species 0 S4 Species 0 S5 Species 12 Co-efficient of Conservatism and Floral Quality Index Co-efficient of Conservatism (CC) (average) 2.31 CC 0 to 3 lowest sensitivity % CC 4 to 6 moderate sensitivity % CC 7 to 8 high sensitivity % CC 9 to 10 highest sensitivity % Floral Quality Index (FQI) 8.32 Presence of Weedy & Invasive Species mean weediness weediness = -1 low potential invasiveness % weediness = -2 moderate potential invasiveness % weediness = -3 high potential invasiveness % Presence of Wetland Species average wetness value 1.50 upland % facultative upland % facultative % facultative wetland % obligate wetland %

146 Appendix E CUW1a Mineral Cultural Woodland Ecosite City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME COEFFICIENT OF CONSERVATISM WETNESS INDEX WEEDINESS INDEX PROVINCIAL STATUS OMNR STATUS COSEWIC STATUS GLOBAL STATUS LOCAL STATUS MIDD DICOTYLEDONS DICOTS Aceraceae Maple Family Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 0-2 S5 G5 C Asteraceae Composite or Aster Family Cirsium vulgare Bull Thistle 4-1 SE5 G5 I Solidago altissima Tall Goldenrod 1 3 S5 U Solidago canadensis Canada Goldenrod 1 3 S5 G5 X Caprifoliaceae Honeysuckle Family Lonicera tatarica Tartarian Honeysuckle 3-3 SE5 G? I Triosteum aurantiacum Wild Coffee 7 5 S5 G5 X Cornaceae Dogwood Family Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood 5-4 S5 G5T? X Juglandaceae Walnut Family Juglans nigra Black Walnut 5 3 S4 G5 X Oleaceae Olive Family Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash/green ash 3-3 S5 G5 C Rosaceae Rose Family Geum aleppicum Yellow Avens 2-1 S5 G5 X Fragaria virginiana Virginia Strawberry 2 1 SU G5T? C Salicaceae Willow Family Populus deltoides ssp. deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 4-1 SU G5T? X Verbenaceae Vervain Family Verbena urticifolia White Vervain 4-1 S5 G5 X Vitaceae Grape Family Parthenocissus inserta Inserted Virginia-creeper 3 3 S5 G5 X Vitis riparia Riverbank Grape 0-2 S5 G5 C MONOCOTYLEDONS MONOCOTS Poaceae Grass Family Phalaris arundinacea Reed Canary Grass 0-4 S5 G5 X

147 Appendix E CUW1a Mineral Cultural Woodland Ecosite City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study FLORISTIC SUMMARY & ASSESSMENT Species Diversity Total Species: 15 Native Species: % Exotic Species % Total Taxa in Region (List Region, Source) % Regional Taxa Recorded 0.15% Regionally Significant Species 0 S1-S3 Species 0 S4 Species 1 S5 Species 11 Co-efficient of Conservatism and Floral Quality Index Co-efficient of Conservatism (CC) (average) 2.85 CC 0 to 3 lowest sensitivity % CC 4 to 6 moderate sensitivity % CC 7 to 8 high sensitivity % CC 9 to 10 highest sensitivity % Floral Quality Index (FQI) Presence of Weedy & Invasive Species mean weediness weediness = -1 low potential invasiveness % weediness = -2 moderate potential invasiveness % weediness = -3 high potential invasiveness % Presence of Wetland Species average wetness value 0.73 upland % facultative upland % facultative % facultative wetland % obligate wetland %

148 Appendix E CUW1b Mineral Cultural Woodland Ecosite City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME COEFFICIENT OF CONSERVATISM WETNESS INDEX WEEDINESS INDEX PROVINCIAL STATUS OMNR STATUS COSEWIC STATUS GLOBAL STATUS LOCAL STATUS MIDD GYMNOSPERMS CONIFERS Pinaceae Pine Family Pinus sylvestris Scotch Pine 5-3 SE5 G? IR DICOTYLEDONS DICOTS Apiaceae Carrot or Parsley Family Daucus carota Wild Carrot 5-2 SE5 G? IC Asteraceae Composite or Aster Family Cirsium arvense Canada Thistle 3-1 SE5 G? IC Symphyotrichum lanceolatum Tall White Aster 3-3 S5 G5T? C Symphyotrichum novae-angliae New England Aster 2-3 S5 G5 C Euthamia graminifolia Flat-topped Bushy Goldenrod 2-2 S5 G5 C Solidago altissima Tall Goldenrod 1 3 S5 U Solidago canadensis Canada Goldenrod 1 3 S5 G5 X Geraniaceae Geranium Family Geranium robertianum Herb-robert 5-2 SE5 G5 IC Fabaceae Pea Family Robinia pseudo-acacia Black Locust 4-3 SE5 G5 IC Lamiaceae Mint Family Prunella vulgaris ssp. vulgaris Common Heal-all 0-1 SE3 G5T? Onagraceae Evening-primrose Family Circaea lutetiana ssp. canadensis Enchanter's Nightshade 3 3 S5 G5T5 X Rhamnaceae Buckthorn Family Rhamnus cathartica Common Buckthorn 3-3 SE5 G? IC Rosaceae Rose Family Fragaria virginiana Virginia Strawberry 2 1 SU G5T? C Rubus idaeus Red Raspberry SE1 G5T5 Salicaceae Willow Family Populus deltoides ssp. deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 4-1 SU G5T? X Populus tremuloides Trembling Aspen 2 0 S5 G5 X Salix X rubens Reddish Willow -4-3 SE4 HYB IR Violaceae Violet Family Viola sp Violet species Vitaceae Grape Family Parthenocissus inserta Inserted Virginia-creeper 3 3 S5 G5 X Vitis riparia Riverbank Grape 0-2 S5 G5 C MONOCOTYLEDONS MONOCOTS Poaceae Grass Family Phalaris arundinacea Reed Canary Grass 0-4 S5 G5 X

149 Appendix E CUW1b Mineral Cultural Woodland Ecosite City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study FLORISTIC SUMMARY & ASSESSMENT Species Diversity Total Species: 20 Native Species: % Exotic Species % Total Taxa in Region (List Region, Source) % Regional Taxa Recorded 0.20% Regionally Significant Species 0 S1-S3 Species 0 S4 Species 0 S5 Species 10 Co-efficient of Conservatism and Floral Quality Index Co-efficient of Conservatism (CC) (average) 1.92 CC 0 to 3 lowest sensitivity % CC 4 to 6 moderate sensitivity % CC 7 to 8 high sensitivity % CC 9 to 10 highest sensitivity % Floral Quality Index (FQI) 6.64 Presence of Weedy & Invasive Species mean weediness weediness = -1 low potential invasiveness % moderate potential weediness = -2 invasiveness % weediness = -3 high potential invasiveness % Presence of Wetland Species average wetness value 0.95 upland % facultative upland % facultative % facultative wetland % obligate wetland %

150 Appendix E CUP3 Coniferous Plantation City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME COEFFICIENT OF CONSERVATISM WETNESS INDEX WEEDINESS INDEX PROVINCIAL STATUS OMNR STATUS COSEWIC STATUS GLOBAL STATUS LOCAL STATUS MIDD GYMNOSPERMS CONIFERS Pinaceae Pine Family Pinus sylvestris Scotch Pine 5-3 SE5 G? IR DICOTYLEDONS DICOTS Apiaceae Carrot or Parsley Family Daucus carota Wild Carrot 5-2 SE5 G? IC Asteraceae Composite or Aster Family Cirsium arvense Canada Thistle 3-1 SE5 G? IC Sonchus arvensis ssp. arvensis Field Sow-thistle 0 1 SE5 G?T? I Symphyotrichum lanceolatum Tall White Aster 3-3 S5 G5T? C Symphyotrichum lateriflorum Calico Aster 3-2 S5 G5T5 C Symphyotrichum novae-angliae New England Aster 2-3 S5 G5 C Symphyotrichum puniceum var. puniceum Purple-stemmed Aster 6-5 S5 G5T? X Euthamia graminifolia Flat-topped Bushy Goldenrod 2-2 S5 G5 C Solidago altissima Tall Goldenrod 1 3 S5 U Solidago canadensis Canada Goldenrod 1 3 S5 G5 X Caprifoliaceae Honeysuckle Family Lonicera tatarica Tartarian Honeysuckle 3-3 SE5 G? I Cornaceae Dogwood Family Red Panicled Dogwood/Gray Cornus racemosa dogwood 2-2 S5 G5? X Geraniaceae Geranium Family Geranium maculatum Spotted Crane's-bill 6 3 S5 G5 X Geranium robertianum Herb-robert 5-2 SE5 G5 IC Lamiaceae Mint Family Prunella vulgaris ssp. vulgaris Common Heal-all 0-1 SE3 G5T? Onagraceae Evening-primrose Family lutetiana ssp. Circaea canadensis Enchanter's Nightshade 3 3 S5 G5T5 X Oxalidaceae Wood Sorrel Family Oxalis stricta Upright Yellow Wood-sorrel 0 3 S5 G5 X Rhamnaceae Buckthorn Family Frangula alnus Glossy Buckthorn -1-3 SE5 G? IU Rhamnus cathartica Common Buckthorn 3-3 SE5 G? IC Rosaceae Rose Family Geum aleppicum Yellow Avens 2-1 S5 G5 X Fragaria virginiana Virginia Strawberry 2 1 SU G5T? C Prunus virginiana Choke Cherry 2 1 S5 G5T? C Solanaceae Nightshade Family Solanum dulcamara Bitter Nightshade 0-2 SE5 G? IC Violaceae Violet Family

151 Appendix E CUP3 Coniferous Plantation City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME COEFFICIENT OF CONSERVATISM WETNESS INDEX WEEDINESS INDEX PROVINCIAL STATUS OMNR STATUS COSEWIC STATUS GLOBAL STATUS LOCAL STATUS MIDD Viola sp Violet species Vitaceae Grape Family Parthenocissus inserta Inserted Virginia-creeper 3 3 S5 G5 X Vitis riparia Riverbank Grape 0-2 S5 G5 C MONOCOTYLEDONS MONOCOTS Poaceae Grass Family Phalaris arundinacea Reed Canary Grass 0-4 S5 G5 X FLORISTIC SUMMARY & ASSESSMENT Species Diversity Total Species: 27 Native Species: % Exotic Species % Total Taxa in Region (List Region, Source) % Regional Taxa Recorded 0.27% Regionally Significant Species 0 S1-S3 Species 0 S4 Species 0 S5 Species 16 Co-efficient of Conservatism and Floral Quality Index Co-efficient of Conservatism (CC) (average) 2.11 CC 0 to 3 lowest sensitivity % CC 4 to 6 moderate sensitivity % CC 7 to 8 high sensitivity % CC 9 to 10 highest sensitivity % Floral Quality Index (FQI) 8.96 Presence of Weedy & Invasive Species mean weediness weediness = -1 low potential invasiveness % weediness = -2 moderate potential invasiveness % weediness = -3 high potential invasiveness %

152 Appendix E CUP3 Coniferous Plantation City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study Presence of Wetland Species average wetness value 0.74 upland % facultative upland % facultative % facultative wetland % obligate wetland %

153 Appendix E FOD8-1 Fresh Moist Poplar Deciduous Forest Type City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME COEFFICIENT OF CONSERVATISM WETNESS INDEX WEEDINESS INDEX PROVINCIAL STATUS OMNR STATUS COSEWIC STATUS GLOBAL STATUS LOCAL STATUS MIDD GYMNOSPERMS CONIFERS Pinaceae Pine Family Picea glauca White Spruce 6 3 S5 G5 I DICOTYLEDONS DICOTS Anacardiaceae Sumac or Cashew Family Toxicodendron radicans ssp. Radicans Poison-ivy 5-1 S5 G5T Asteraceae Composite or Aster Family Symphyotrichum ericoides White Heath Aster 4 4 S5 G5T? Symphyotrichum lateriflorum Calico Aster 3-2 S5 G5T5 C Solidago altissima Tall Goldenrod 1 3 S5 U Solidago canadensis Canada Goldenrod 1 3 S5 G5 X Brassicaceae Mustard Family Cardamine concatenata Cut-leaved Toothwort 6 3 S5 G5 X Caprifoliaceae Honeysuckle Family Lonicera tatarica Tartarian Honeysuckle 3-3 SE5 G? I Triosteum aurantiacum Wild Coffee 7 5 S5 G5 X Cornaceae Dogwood Family Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood 5-4 S5 G5T? X Cucurbitaceae Gourd Family Echinocystis lobata Prickly Cucumber 3-2 S5 G5 X Geraniaceae Geranium Family Geranium robertianum Herb-robert 5-2 SE5 G5 IC Lamiaceae Mint Family Prunella vulgaris ssp. vulgaris Common Heal-all 0-1 SE3 G5T? Onagraceae Evening-primrose Family Circaea lutetiana ssp. canadensis Enchanter's Nightshade 3 3 S5 G5T5 X Oleaceae Olive Family Fraxinus americana White Ash 4 3 S5 G5 C Fraxinus pennsylvanica Red Ash 3-3 S5 G5 C Primulaceae Primrose Family Lysimachia nummularia Moneywort -4-3 SE5 G? I Rhamnaceae Buckthorn Family Frangula alnus Glossy Buckthorn -1-3 SE5 G? IU Rhamnus cathartica Common Buckthorn 3-3 SE5 G? IC Rosaceae Rose Family Geum aleppicum Yellow Avens 2-1 S5 G5 X Fragaria virginiana Virginia Strawberry 2 1 SU G5T? C Salicaceae Willow Family Populus deltoides ssp. deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 4-1 SU G5T? X Populus tremuloides Trembling Aspen 2 0 S5 G5 X Solanaceae Nightshade Family Solanum dulcamara Bitter Nightshade 0-2 SE5 G? IC

154 Appendix E FOD8-1 Fresh Moist Poplar Deciduous Forest Type City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME COEFFICIENT OF CONSERVATISM WETNESS INDEX WEEDINESS INDEX PROVINCIAL STATUS OMNR STATUS COSEWIC STATUS GLOBAL STATUS LOCAL STATUS MIDD Urticaceae Nettle Family Boehmeria cylindrica False Nettle 4-5 S5 G5 X Verbenaceae Vervain Family Verbena urticifolia White Vervain 4-1 S5 G5 X Violaceae Violet Family Viola sp Violet species Vitaceae Grape Family Parthenocissus inserta Inserted Virginia-creeper 3 3 S5 G5 X Vitis riparia Riverbank Grape 0-2 S5 G5 C MONOCOTYLEDONS MONOCOTS Araceae Arum Family Arisaema triphyllum Small Jack-in-the-pulpit 5-2 S5 G5T5 C Orchidaceae Orchid Family Epipactis helleborine Common Helleborine 5-2 SE5 G? I FLORISTIC SUMMARY & ASSESSMENT Species Diversity Total Species: 30 Native Species: % Exotic Species % Total Taxa in Region (List Region, Source) % Regional Taxa Recorded 0.30% Regionally Significant Species 0 S1-S3 Species 0 S4 Species 0 S5 Species 20 Co-efficient of Conservatism and Floral Quality Index Co-efficient of Conservatism (CC) (average) 3.50 CC 0 to 3 lowest sensitivity % CC 4 to 6 moderate sensitivity % CC 7 to 8 high sensitivity % CC 9 to 10 highest sensitivity % Floral Quality Index (FQI) 16.42

155 Appendix E FOD8-1 Fresh Moist Poplar Deciduous Forest Type City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study Presence of Weedy & Invasive Species mean weediness weediness = -1 low potential invasiveness % moderate potential weediness = -2 invasiveness % weediness = -3 high potential invasiveness % Presence of Wetland Species average wetness value 0.60 upland % facultative upland % facultative % facultative wetland % obligate wetland %

156 Appendix E MAM2 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study COEFFICIENT OF CONSERVATISM WETNESS INDEX WEEDINESS INDEX PROVINCIAL STATUS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME DICOTYLEDONS DICOTS Asteraceae Composite or Aster Family Symphyotrichum novae-angliae New England Aster 2-3 S5 G5 C Symphyotrichum puniceum var. puniceum Purple-stemmed Aster 6-5 S5 G5T? X Solidago altissima Tall Goldenrod 1 3 S5 U Solidago canadensis Canada Goldenrod 1 3 S5 G5 X Apiaceae Carrot or Parsley Family Daucus carota Wild Carrot 5-2 SE5 G? IC Vitaceae Grape Family Vitis riparia Riverbank Grape 0-2 S5 G5 C MONOCOTYLEDONS MONOCOTS Poaceae Grass Family Phalaris arundinacea Reed Canary Grass 0-4 S5 G5 X Phragmites australis Common Reed 0-4 S5 G5 X Typhaceae Cattail Family Typha latifolia Broad-leaved Cattail 3-5 S5 G5 X OMNR STATUS COSEWIC STATUS GLOBAL STATUS LOCAL STATUS MIDD FLORISTIC SUMMARY & ASSESSMENT Species Diversity Total Species: 9 Native Species: % Exotic Species % Total Taxa in Region (List Region, Source) % Regional Taxa Recorded 0.09% Regionally Significant Species 0 S1-S3 Species 0 S4 Species 0 S5 Species 8 Co-efficient of Conservatism and Floral Quality Index Co-efficient of Conservatism (CC) (average) 1.67 CC 0 to 3 lowest sensitivity % CC 4 to 6 moderate sensitivity % CC 7 to 8 high sensitivity % CC 9 to 10 highest sensitivity %

157 Appendix E MAM2 City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study Floral Quality Index (FQI) 4.71 Presence of Weedy & Invasive Species mean weediness weediness = -1 low potential invasiveness % weediness = -2 moderate potential invasiveness % weediness = -3 high potential invasiveness % Presence of Wetland Species average wetness value upland % facultative upland % facultative % facultative wetland % obligate wetland %

158 Appendix E MAM2-2 Reed-canary Grass Mineral Meadow Marsh Type City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study COEFFICIENT OF CONSERVATISM WETNESS INDEX WEEDINESS INDEX PROVINCIAL STATUS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME DICOTYLEDONS DICOTS Asteraceae Composite or Aster Family Cirsium vulgare Bull Thistle 4-1 SE5 G5 I Sonchus arvensis ssp. arvensis 0 1 SE5 G?T? I Symphyotrichum novae-angliae New England Aster 2-3 S5 G5 C Symphyotrichum puniceum var. puniceum Purple-stemmed Aster 6-5 S5 G5T? X Solidago altissima Tall Goldenrod 1 3 S5 U Solidago canadensis Canada Goldenrod 1 3 S5 G5 X Apiaceae Carrot or Parsley Family Daucus carota Wild Carrot 5-2 SE5 G? IC Vitaceae Grape Family Vitis riparia Riverbank Grape 0-2 S5 G5 C MONOCOTYLEDONS MONOCOTS Poaceae Grass Family Phalaris arundinacea Reed Canary Grass 0-4 S5 G5 X OMNR STATUS COSEWIC STATUS GLOBAL STATUS LOCAL STATUS MIDD FLORISTIC SUMMARY & ASSESSMENT Species Diversity Total Species: 9 Native Species: % Exotic Species % Total Taxa in Region (List Region, Source) % Regional Taxa Recorded 0.09% Regionally Significant Species 0 S1-S3 Species 0 S4 Species 0 S5 Species 6 Co-efficient of Conservatism and Floral Quality Index Co-efficient of Conservatism (CC) (average) 1.43 CC 0 to 3 lowest sensitivity % CC 4 to 6 moderate sensitivity % CC 7 to 8 high sensitivity % CC 9 to 10 highest sensitivity % Floral Quality Index (FQI) 3.78

159 Appendix E MAM2-2 Reed-canary Grass Mineral Meadow Marsh Type City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study Presence of Weedy & Invasive Species mean weediness weediness = -1 low potential invasiveness % moderate potential weediness = -2 invasiveness % weediness = -3 high potential invasiveness % Presence of Wetland Species average wetness value 0.22 upland % facultative upland % facultative % facultative wetland % obligate wetland %

160 Appendix E MAM2-10 Forb Mineral Meadow Marsh Type City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME COEFFICIENT OF CONSERVATISM WETNESS INDEX WEEDINESS INDEX PROVINCIAL STATUS OMNR STATUS COSEWIC STATUS GLOBAL STATUS LOCAL STATUS MIDD PTERIDOPHYTES FERNS & ALLIES Dryopteridaceae Wood Fern Family Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive Fern 4-3 S5 G5 X DICOTYLEDONS DICOTS Asteraceae Composite or Aster Family Symphyotrichum novae-angliae New England Aster 2-3 S5 G5 C Symphyotrichum puniceum var. puniceum Purple-stemmed Aster 6-5 S5 G5T? X Eupatorium perfoliatum Perfoliate Thoroughwort/Boneset 2-4 S5 G5 C Eupatorium maculatum Spotted Joe-pye-weed 3-5 S5 G5T5 C Euthamia graminifolia Flat-topped Bushy Goldenrod 2-2 S5 G5 C Solidago altissima Tall Goldenrod 1 3 S5 U Solidago canadensis Canada Goldenrod 1 3 S5 G5 X Balsaminaceae Touch-me-not Family Impatiens capensis Spotted Touch-me-not 4-3 S5 G5 C Lythraceae Loosestrife Family Lythrum salicaria Purple Loosestrife -5-3 SE5 G5 IC Primulaceae Primrose Family Lysimachia nummularia Moneywort -4-3 SE5 G? I Salicaceae Willow Family Populus deltoides ssp. deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 4-1 SU G5T? X Urticaceae Nettle Family Boehmeria cylindrica False Nettle 4-5 S5 G5 X Verbenaceae Vervain Family Verbena urticifolia White Vervain 4-1 S5 G5 X Vitaceae Grape Family Vitis riparia Riverbank Grape 0-2 S5 G5 C MONOCOTYLEDONS MONOCOTS Cyperaceae Sedge Family Carex sp Narrow-leaved sedge species Scirpus cyperinus Wool-grass 4-5 S5 G5 C Poaceae Grass Family Phalaris arundinacea Reed Canary Grass 0-4 S5 G5 X Typhaceae Cattail Family Typha latifolia Broad-leaved Cattail 3-5 S5 G5 X

161 Appendix E MAM2-10 Forb Mineral Meadow Marsh Type City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study FLORISTIC SUMMARY & ASSESSMENT Species Diversity Total Species: 18 Native Species: % Exotic Species % Total Taxa in Region (List Region, Source) % Regional Taxa Recorded 0.18% Regionally Significant Species 0 S1-S3 Species 0 S4 Species 0 S5 Species 14 Co-efficient of Conservatism and Floral Quality Index Co-efficient of Conservatism (CC) (average) 2.93 CC 0 to 3 lowest sensitivity % CC 4 to 6 moderate sensitivity % CC 7 to 8 high sensitivity % CC 9 to 10 highest sensitivity % Floral Quality Index (FQI) Presence of Weedy & Invasive Species mean weediness weediness = -1 low potential invasiveness % weediness = -2 moderate potential invasiveness % weediness = -3 high potential invasiveness % Presence of Wetland Species average wetness value upland % facultative upland % facultative % facultative wetland % obligate wetland %

162 Appendix E MAS2-1 Cattail Mineral Shallow Marsh Type City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study COEFFICIENT OF CONSERVATISM WETNESS INDEX WEEDINESS INDEX PROVINCIAL STATUS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME DICOTYLEDONS DICOTS Asteraceae Composite or Aster Family Symphyotrichum novae-angliae New England Aster 2-3 S5 G5 C Symphyotrichum puniceum var. puniceum Purple-stemmed Aster 6-5 S5 G5T? X Eupatorium maculatum Spotted Joe-pye-weed 3-5 S5 G5T5 C Solidago altissima Tall Goldenrod 1 3 S5 U Solidago canadensis Canada Goldenrod 1 3 S5 G5 X Sonchus arvensis ssp. arvensis Field Sow-thistle 0 1 SE5 G?T? I Balsaminaceae Touch-me-not Family Impatiens capensis Spotted Touch-me-not 4-3 S5 G5 C Primulaceae Primrose Family Lysimachia nummularia Moneywort -4-3 SE5 G? I Rhamnaceae Buckthorn Family Frangula alnus Glossy Buckthorn -1-3 SE5 G? IU Salicaceae Willow Family Populus deltoides ssp. deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 4-1 SU G5T? X Vitaceae Grape Family Vitis riparia Riverbank Grape 0-2 S5 G5 C MONOCOTYLEDONS MONOCOTS Poaceae Grass Family Phalaris arundinacea Reed Canary Grass 0-4 S5 G5 X Typhaceae Cattail Family Typha latifolia Broad-leaved Cattail 3-5 S5 G5 OMNR STATUS COSEWIC STATUS GLOBAL STATUS LOCAL STATUS MIDD FLORISTIC SUMMARY & ASSESSMENT Species Diversity Total Species: 13 Native Species: % Exotic Species % Total Taxa in Region (List Region, Source) % Regional Taxa Recorded 0.13% Regionally Significant Species 0 S1-S3 Species 0 S4 Species 0 S5 Species 9

163 Appendix E MAS2-1 Cattail Mineral Shallow Marsh Type City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study Co-efficient of Conservatism and Floral Quality Index Co-efficient of Conservatism (CC) (average) 2.10 CC 0 to 3 lowest sensitivity % CC 4 to 6 moderate sensitivity % CC 7 to 8 high sensitivity % CC 9 to 10 highest sensitivity % Floral Quality Index (FQI) 6.96 Presence of Weedy & Invasive Species mean weediness weediness = -1 low potential invasiveness % weediness = -2 moderate potential invasiveness % weediness = -3 high potential invasiveness % Presence of Wetland Species average wetness value upland % facultative upland % facultative % facultative wetland % obligate wetland %

164 Appendix E SWT2a Mineral Thicket Swamp Ecosite City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME COEFFICIENT OF CONSERVATISM WETNESS INDEX WEEDINESS INDEX PROVINCIAL STATUS OMNR STATUS COSEWIC STATUS GLOBAL STATUS LOCAL STATUS MIDD DICOTYLEDONS DICOTS Apiaceae Carrot or Parsley Family Sium suave Hemlock Water-parsnip 4-5 S5 G5 C Asteraceae Composite or Aster Family Symphyotrichum lateriflorum Calico Aster 3-2 S5 G5T5 C Symphyotrichum novae-angliae New England Aster 2-3 S5 G5 C Symphyotrichum puniceum var. puniceum Purple-stemmed Aster 6-5 S5 G5T? X Eupatorium maculatum Spotted Joe-pye-weed 3-5 S5 G5T5 C Solidago altissima Tall Goldenrod 1 3 S5 U Solidago canadensis Canada Goldenrod 1 3 S5 G5 X Balsaminaceae Touch-me-not Family Impatiens capensis Spotted Touch-me-not 4-3 S5 G5 C Caprifoliaceae Honeysuckle Family Lonicera tatarica Tartarian Honeysuckle 3-3 SE5 G? I Sambucus nigra ssp. canadensis Common Elderberry 5-2 S5 G5 X Cornaceae Dogwood Family Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood 5-4 S5 G5T? X Cornus racemosa Red Panicled Dogwood/Gray dogwood 2-2 S5 G5? X Cornus sericea Red-osier Dogwood 2-3 S5 G5 C Lamiaceae Mint Family Lycopus americanus Cut-leaved Water-horehound 4-5 S5 G5 C Primulaceae Primrose Family Lysimachia nummularia Moneywort -4-3 SE5 G? I Rhamnaceae Buckthorn Family Frangula alnus Glossy Buckthorn -1-3 SE5 G? IU Salicaceae Willow Family Populus deltoides ssp. deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 4-1 SU G5T? X Solanaceae Nightshade Family Solanum dulcamara Bitter Nightshade 0-2 SE5 G? IC Urticaceae Nettle Family Boehmeria cylindrica False Nettle 4-5 S5 G5 X Verbenaceae Vervain Family Verbena urticifolia White Vervain 4-1 S5 G5 X Vitaceae Grape Family Vitis riparia Riverbank Grape 0-2 S5 G5 C MONOCOTYLEDONS MONOCOTS Araceae Arum Family Symplocarpus foetidus Skunk-cabbage 7-5 S5 G5 C Cyperaceae Sedge Family Carex bebbii Bebb's Sedge 3-5 S5 G5 C Carex sp Narrow-leaved sedge species

165 Appendix E SWT2a Mineral Thicket Swamp Ecosite City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study COEFFICIENT OF CONSERVATISM WETNESS INDEX WEEDINESS INDEX PROVINCIAL STATUS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME Poaceae Grass Family Glyceria striata Fowl Meadow Grass 3-5 S5 G5 X Leersia oryzoides Rice Cut Grass 3-5 S5 G5 X Phalaris arundinacea Reed Canary Grass 0-4 S5 G5 X OMNR STATUS COSEWIC STATUS GLOBAL STATUS LOCAL STATUS MIDD FLORISTIC SUMMARY & ASSESSMENT Species Diversity Total Species: 26 Native Species: % Exotic Species % Total Taxa in Region (List Region, Source) % Regional Taxa Recorded 0.26% Regionally Significant Species 0 S1-S3 Species 0 S4 Species 0 S5 Species 21 Co-efficient of Conservatism and Floral Quality Index Co-efficient of Conservatism (CC) (average) 3.18 CC 0 to 3 lowest sensitivity % CC 4 to 6 moderate sensitivity % CC 7 to 8 high sensitivity % CC 9 to 10 highest sensitivity % Floral Quality Index (FQI) Presence of Weedy & Invasive Species mean weediness weediness = -1 low potential invasiveness % weediness = -2 moderate potential invasiveness % weediness = -3 high potential invasiveness %

166 Appendix E SWT2a Mineral Thicket Swamp Ecosite City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study Presence of Wetland Species average wetness value upland % facultative upland % facultative % facultative wetland % obligate wetland %

167 Appendix E SWT2b Mineral Thicket Swamp Ecosite City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study COEFFICIENT OF CONSERVATISM WETNESS INDEX WEEDINESS INDEX PROVINCIAL STATUS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME DICOTYLEDONS DICOTS Asteraceae Composite or Aster Family Symphyotrichum novae-angliae New England Aster 2-3 S5 G5 C Symphyotrichum puniceum var. puniceum Purple-stemmed Aster 6-5 S5 G5T? X Eupatorium maculatum Spotted Joe-pye-weed 3-5 S5 G5T5 C Euthamia graminifolia Flat-topped Bushy Goldenrod 2-2 S5 G5 C Solidago canadensis Canada Goldenrod 1 3 S5 G5 X Balsaminaceae Touch-me-not Family Impatiens capensis Spotted Touch-me-not 4-3 S5 G5 C Caprifoliaceae Honeysuckle Family Lonicera tatarica Tartarian Honeysuckle 3-3 SE5 G? I Sambucus nigra ssp. canadensis Common Elderberry 5-2 S5 G5 X Cornaceae Dogwood Family Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood 5-4 S5 G5T? X Cornus racemosa Red Panicled Dogwood/Gray dogwood 2-2 S5 G5? X Cornus sericea Red-osier Dogwood 2-3 S5 G5 C Lamiaceae Mint Family Lycopus americanus Cut-leaved Water-horehound 4-5 S5 G5 C Primulaceae Primrose Family Lysimachia nummularia Moneywort -4-3 SE5 G? I Rhamnaceae Buckthorn Family Frangula alnus Glossy Buckthorn -1-3 SE5 G? IU Salicaceae Willow Family Populus deltoides ssp. deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 4-1 SU G5T? X Salix exigua Sandbar Willow 3-5 S5 G5 C Solanaceae Nightshade Family Solanum dulcamara Bitter Nightshade 0-2 SE5 G? IC Urticaceae Nettle Family Boehmeria cylindrica False Nettle 4-5 S5 G5 X Verbenaceae Vervain Family Verbena urticifolia White Vervain 4-1 S5 G5 X Vitaceae Grape Family Vitis riparia Riverbank Grape 0-2 S5 G5 C MONOCOTYLEDONS MONOCOTS Araceae Arum Family Symplocarpus foetidus Skunk-cabbage 7-5 S5 G5 C Cyperaceae Sedge Family Carex bebbii Bebb's Sedge 3-5 S5 G5 C Carex sp Narrow-leaved sedge species Poaceae Grass Family Glyceria striata Fowl Meadow Grass 3-5 S5 G5 X OMNR STATUS COSEWIC STATUS GLOBAL STATUS LOCAL STATUS MIDD

168 Appendix E SWT2b Mineral Thicket Swamp Ecosite City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME COEFFICIENT OF CONSERVATISM WETNESS INDEX WEEDINESS INDEX PROVINCIAL STATUS OMNR STATUS COSEWIC STATUS GLOBAL STATUS LOCAL STATUS MIDD Leersia oryzoides Rice Cut Grass 3-5 S5 G5 X Phalaris arundinacea Reed Canary Grass 0-4 S5 G5 X FLORISTIC SUMMARY & ASSESSMENT Species Diversity Total Species: 25 Native Species: % Exotic Species % Total Taxa in Region (List Region, Source) % Regional Taxa Recorded 0.25% Regionally Significant Species 0 S1-S3 Species 0 S4 Species 0 S5 Species 20 Co-efficient of Conservatism and Floral Quality Index Co-efficient of Conservatism (CC) (average) 3.19 CC 0 to 3 lowest sensitivity % CC 4 to 6 moderate sensitivity % CC 7 to 8 high sensitivity % CC 9 to 10 highest sensitivity % Floral Quality Index (FQI) Presence of Weedy & Invasive Species mean weediness weediness = -1 low potential invasiveness % weediness = -2 moderate potential invasiveness % weediness = -3 high potential invasiveness %

169 Appendix E SWT2b Mineral Thicket Swamp Ecosite City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study Presence of Wetland Species average wetness value upland % facultative upland % facultative % facultative wetland % obligate wetland %

170 Appendix E SWD4 Mineral Deciduous Swamp Type City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME COEFFICIENT OF CONSERVATISM WETNESS INDEX WEEDINESS INDEX PROVINCIAL STATUS OMNR STATUS COSEWIC STATUS GLOBAL STATUS LOCAL STATUS MIDD DICOTYLEDONS DICOTS Aceraceae Maple Family Acer saccharinum Silver Maple 5-3 S5 G5 C Acer negundo Manitoba Maple 0-2 S5 G5 C Asteraceae Composite or Aster Family Bidens frondosa Devil's Beggar-ticks 3-3 S5 G5 X Symphyotrichum novae-angliae New England Aster 2-3 S5 G5 C Symphyotrichum puniceum var. puniceum Purple-stemmed Aster 6-5 S5 G5T? X Eupatorium maculatum Spotted Joe-pye-weed 3-5 S5 G5T5 C Cornaceae Dogwood Family Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood 5-4 S5 G5T? X Cornus sericea Red-osier Dogwood 2-3 S5 G5 C Lamiaceae Mint Family Lycopus americanus Cut-leaved Water-horehound 4-5 S5 G5 C Polygonaceae Smartweed Family Polygonum persicaria Lady's-thumb -3-1 SE5 G? I Rumex verticillatus Swamp Dock 7-5 S4 G5 VU Primulaceae Primrose Family Lysimachia nummularia Moneywort -4-3 SE5 G? I Rhamnaceae Buckthorn Family Frangula alnus Glossy Buckthorn -1-3 SE5 G? IU Salicaceae Willow Family Salix X rubens Reddish Willow -4-3 SE4 HYB IR Salix exigua Sandbar Willow 3-5 S5 G5 C Solanaceae Nightshade Family Solanum dulcamara Bitter Nightshade 0-2 SE5 G? IC Urticaceae Nettle Family Boehmeria cylindrica False Nettle 4-5 S5 G5 X Verbenaceae Vervain Family Verbena urticifolia White Vervain 4-1 S5 G5 X Vitaceae Grape Family Vitis riparia Riverbank Grape 0-2 S5 G5 C MONOCOTYLEDONS MONOCOTS Araceae Arum Family Symplocarpus foetidus Skunk-cabbage 7-5 S5 G5 C Cyperaceae Sedge Family Carex bebbii Bebb's Sedge 3-5 S5 G5 C Carex sp Narrow-leaved sedge species Scirpus atrovirens Dark-green Bulrush 3-5 S5 G5? C Lemnaceae Duckweed Family Lemna minor Lesser Duckweed 2-5 S5 G5 X Lemna trisulca Star Duckweed 4-5 S5 G5 X

171 Appendix E SWD4 Mineral Deciduous Swamp Type City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME COEFFICIENT OF CONSERVATISM WETNESS INDEX WEEDINESS INDEX PROVINCIAL STATUS OMNR STATUS COSEWIC STATUS GLOBAL STATUS LOCAL STATUS MIDD Poaceae Grass Family Phalaris arundinacea Reed Canary Grass 0-4 S5 G5 X FLORISTIC SUMMARY & ASSESSMENT Species Diversity Total Species: 25 Native Species: % Exotic Species % Total Taxa in Region (List Region, Source) % Regional Taxa Recorded 0.25% Regionally Significant Species 1 S1-S3 Species 0 S4 Species 1 S5 Species 19 Co-efficient of Conservatism and Floral Quality Index Co-efficient of Conservatism (CC) (average) 3.35 CC 0 to 3 lowest sensitivity % CC 4 to 6 moderate sensitivity % CC 7 to 8 high sensitivity % CC 9 to 10 highest sensitivity % Floral Quality Index (FQI) Presence of Weedy & Invasive Species mean weediness weediness = -1 low potential invasiveness % weediness = -2 moderate potential invasiveness % weediness = -3 high potential invasiveness %

172 Appendix E SWD4 Mineral Deciduous Swamp Type City of London Richmond Street Pedestrian Pathway Connection Environmental Impact Study Presence of Wetland Species average wetness value upland % facultative upland % facultative % facultative wetland % obligate wetland %

173 Appendix F ELC Data Cards

174

175

176

177

178

179

180

181

182

183

184

185

186