BIOLOGICAL MONITORING AT CHOWIET ISLAND, ALASKA IN 2007: SUMMARY APPENDICES
|
|
- Bridget Warner
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 BIOLOGICAL MONITORING AT CHOWIET ISLAND, ALASKA IN 27: SUMMARY APPENDICES AMNWR 7/9 Joel A. Helm Tyra A. Zeman Key Words: Aethia psittacula, black-legged kittiwake, Cerorhinca monocerata, Chowiet Island, common murre, food habits, Fratercula cirrhata, Fratercula corniculata, Fulmarus glacialis, glaucous-winged gull, growth rates, horned puffin, Larus glaucescens, northern fulmar, population size, parakeet auklet, productivity, rhinoceros auklet, Rissa tridactyla, Semidi Islands, thick-billed murre, tufted puffin, Uria aalge, Uria lomvia. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge 95 Sterling Hwy., Suite 1 Homer, Alaska 9963 October 27 Cite as: Helm, Joel A. and Tyra A. Zeman. 27. Biological monitoring at Chowiet Island, Alaska in 27: summary appendices. U.S. Fish and Wildl. Serv. Rep. AMNWR 7/9. Homer, AK. 84 pp.
2
3 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...1 STUDY AREA...1 METHODS...2 INTERESTING OBSERVATIONS...2 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS...2 REFRENCES...3 MAPS...6 FIGURES AND TABLES...8 Northern fulmars...9 Populations...9 Glaucous-winged gulls...12 Breeding chronology...12 Reproductive performance...14 Populations...16 Food habits...17 Black-legged kittiwakes...19 Breeding chronology...19 Reproductive performance...21 Populations...24 Thick-billed murres...28 Breeding chronology...28 Reproductive performance...3 Populations...33 Food habits...44 Common murres...36 Breeding chronology...36 Reproductive performance...38 Populations...41 Food habits...44 Parakeet auklets...45 Breeding chronology...45 Reproductive performance...47 Populations...49 Rhinoceros auklets...52 Breeding chronology...52 Reproductive performance...54 Populations...56 Food habits...57 Horned puffins...6 Breeding chronology...6 Reproductive performance...62 Populations...64 Tufted puffins...67 Breeding chronology...67 Reproductive performance...69 Miscellaneous...72 Off-road point count...71 Beach passerine transects...74 Sea surface temperatures...76 Annotated list...79
4 INTRODUCTION In 22, the Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge (AMNWR) established an annual ecological monitoring site at the Semidi Islands, where various seabird projects have taken place since Seabird species selected for annual monitoring were chosen based on their ability, across the refuge, to serve as indicators of fluctuations in the marine food web. Major projects include monitoring population trends and the breeding success of piscivores and planktivores - both diving and surface feeders. Goals in 27 were to estimate population and/or reproductive parameters for 9 species as indicators of the 4 major feeding guilds: surface fish-feeders (black-legged kittiwakes, Rissa tridactyla), diving fish-feeders (common and thick-billed murres, Uria aalge and U. lomvia, respectively; tufted and horned puffins, Fratercula cirrhata and F. corniculata, respectively; and rhinoceros auklets, Cerorhinca monocerata), surface plankton-feeders (northern fulmars, Fulmarus glacialis), and diving plankton-feeders (parakeet auklets, Aethia psittacula). Diets of glaucous-winged gulls (regurgitated pellets) and rhinoceros auklets (chick meals) were sampled as well. Detailed results from 27 are summarized and contained in these appendices and archived at the Refuge headquarters in Homer, Alaska. For comparisons among years, we present selected historic data sets from 1976 to 1991 (Baggot et al. 1989, Dragoo et al. 1991a and 1991b, Hatch and Hatch 198, 1981, 1983 and Leschner and Burrell 1977), unpublished data from 1993 and 1994 (Hatch unpubl. data) and data from 1995, 1998 (Nevins and Adams 1999), 21 (Hatch unpubl. data), 22 (Wang 22), 24 (Larned 24), 25 (Larned and Sapora 25) and 26 (Fairchild et al. 27). This report supersedes previous reports; in some cases data have been reanalyzed to fix inconsistencies. The following historical data appearing in this report have been amended: Rhinoceros auklet hatching and fledging chronology 22 Glaucous-winged gull food habits Murre hatching chronology 22, 26 Tufted puffin productivity 26 STUDY AREA The Semidi Islands group (N W ) consists of nine islands located on the continental shelf approximately 8 km south of the Alaska Peninsula and 16 km southwest of Kodiak Island. Local oceanography is influenced by the Alaskan Coastal Current and the Alaska Stream (Hatch and Hatch 1983a, Hatch and Hatch 1989). Approximately 2.4 million seabirds consisting of twenty species, an estimated 25% of the total seabird biomass in the Gulf of Alaska, breed in the Semidis (Hatch and Hatch 1983a). A small population of Cackling geese (Branta hutchinsii) breeds on Kaliktagik and Anowik Islands (Hatch and Hatch 1983b). The seabird population supports many avian predator species which also breed in the Semidis, including the bald eagle, (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus), glaucous-winged gull (Larus glaucescens), and common raven (Corvus corax). Dominant vegetation includes umbelliferous roots, beach rye-grasses, ferns, herbs and is classified as Alaskan maritime (Hatch 1985). Shorelines are generally precipitous; the highest elevation is approximately 3 m with sheer cliffs rising more than 2 m in many areas of the islands (Hatch and Hatch 1983b). All islands are treeless except for Chowiet Island, which has a small number (<1) of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis), most likely introduced by fox ranchers in the early 19s. Fox ranching occurred on Chowiet and Aghiyuk Islands from 1885 to about 1914 (Bower and Aller 1917), after which the natural die off of the introduced artic and red foxes (Alopex lagopus and Vulpes fulva, respectively) took place (Hatch and Hatch 1983b). The only land mammals that presently exist on the islands are arctic ground squirrels (Spermophilus parryii) and they occur on all of the Semidi Islands except for South, Suklik and Aghik (Hatch and Hatch 1983b). 1
5 METHODS Personnel : Joel Helm and Tyra Zeman were present on Chowiet Island from 2 May through 3 September, 27. Data collection and analysis: Data collection methods are outlined in the 25 protocols (Larned and Sapora 25), which are taken from 22 Summary Appendices (Wang 22), and originally modified from Williams et al. (2). Exceptions and additions to those protocols follow: Rhinoceros auklet productivity was not measured this year due to significant erosion in the South Bay colony. Common murre prey items were not identified due to time constraints and observer inexperience. Rhinoceros auklet food collection was completed during three nights of mist netting, yielding 12 food loads consisting of Pacific sandlance and Hexagrammids. INTERESTING OBSERVATIONS Two red-faced cormorants were monitored on black-legged kittiwake plots A2B1 and A2B2. Another breeding group (53 nests) was discovered 2 miles from camp on the southeastern portion of the island. Birds nested in small coves north of Puffin Point. Three pelagic cormorant nests were found in close proximity to the congregation of red-faced cormorants and those nests were followed to determine nest fate. The first red-faced cormorant chick was sighted on 27 June. The majority of chicks had fledged prior to field personnel leaving the island. A breakdown of nesting information is as follows: Nests with chicks Total chicks Red-faced cormorant Pelagic cormorant 3 9 These nests were found late in the season and should not be used for time-series productivity estimates. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The crew of the M/V Tiĝlaˆx provided safe transport to Chowiet in 27 for crew and supplies. Special thanks are extended to the refuge staff in Homer and Adak who assisted field staff in the compilation of this report and the collection of field data throughout the season. Heather Renner s advice regarding data collection and analysis were greatly appreciated throughout this season and summary process. 2
6 REFERENCES Baggot, C.M., B.K. Bain and D.R. Nysewander Changes in colony size, and reproductive success of seabirds at the Semidi Islands, Alaska, U.S. Fish and Wildl. Serv. Rep., Homer, AK. Bower, W.T. and H.D. Aller Alaska fisheries and fur industries in Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of Commercial Fisheries, U.S. Gov t. Printing Office. Dragoo, D.E., B.K. Bain and A. Perillo. 1991a. Changes in colony size and reproductive success of seabirds at the Semidi Islands, Alaska, U.S. Fish and Wildl. Serv. Rep., Homer, AK. Dragoo, D.E., B.K. Bain, M.J. Melendez and C.M. Minch. 1991b. Changes in colony size and reproductive success of seabirds at the Semidi Islands, Alaska, U.S. Fish and Wildl. Serv. Rep., Homer, AK. Evans, D.H., J.B. Claiborne and G.A. Kormanik, Osmoregulation, acid-base regulation, and nitrogen excretion. p In M.H. Horn, K.L.M. Martin and M.A. Chotkowski (eds.). Intertidal fishes live in two worlds. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. Fairchild, L., Mischler, C. and H.M. Renner. 27. Biological monitoring on Chowiet Island in 26: summary appendices. U.S. Fish and Wildl. Serv. Rep. AMNWR 7/2. Homer, AK. Hatch, M.A Vegetation and flora of the Semidi Islands, Alaska. Unpubl. M.S. thesis, Univ. of Alaska, Fairbanks, AK. Hatch, S.A Adult survival and productivity of northern fulmars in Alaska. Condor 89: Hatch, S.A. and M.A. Hatch Breeding and population ecology of seabirds at Semidi Islands, Alaska. U.S. Fish and Wildl. Serv. Rep., Anchorage, AK. Hatch, S.A and M.A. Hatch Breeding and population ecology of seabirds at Semidi Islands, Alaska. U.S. Fish and Wildl. Serv. Rep., Anchorage, AK. Hatch, S.A and M.A. Hatch Populations and habitat use of marine birds in the Semidi Islands, Alaska. Murrelet 64: Larned, A. L. 24. Results of seabird monitoring at Chowiet Island in 24: Summary Appendices. U.S. Fish and Wildl. Serv. Rep. AMNWR 4/1. Homer, AK. Larned, A. L. and S. F. Sapora 25. Results of seabird monitoring at Chowiet Island in 25: summary appendices. U.S. Fish and Wildl. Serv. Rep. AMNWR 5/15. Homer, AK. Leschner, L.L. and G. Burrell Populations and ecology of marine birds on the Semidi Islands. U.S. Fish and Wildl. Serv. Rep., Anchorage, AK. Martin, K.L.M. and C.R. Bridges, Respiration in water and air. p In M.H. Horn, K.L., M. Martin and M.A. Chotkowski (eds.) Intertidal fishes. Life in two worlds. Academic Press. 399 p. Nevins, H.M. and J. Adams Seabird monitoring in the Semidi Islands, Gulf of Alaska, 1995 and U.S. Fish and Wildl. Serv. Rep. AMNWR 98/17. Homer, AK. 3
7 Wang, S.W. 22. Results of seabird monitoring at Chowiet Island, Alaska in 22: Summary Appendices. U.S. Fish and Wildl. Serv. Rep., AMNWR 2/7. Homer, AK. Williams, J.C., L. Scharf, and G.V. Byrd. 2. Ecological monitoring methods of the Aleutian Islands Unit, Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge. U.S. Fish and Wildl. Serv. Rep., AMNWR /1. Adak, AK. 4
8 Figure 1. Location of the Semidi Islands in the Western Gulf of Alaska. 6
9 Figure 2. Map of Chowiet Island, Alaska. 7
10 DATA SUMMARIES 8
11 Adults Chicks Figure 3. Mean number of northern fulmar adults and maximum number of chicks counted at Chowiet Island, Alaska. 9
12 Table 1. Northern fulmar population index counts and breeding chronology at Chowiet Island, Alaska. bc Mean no. Max. no. First lay Last lay First hatch Years of adults SD n of chicks n date date mean SD n date mean SD n May 23 Jun 6 Jun Jul Jun 22 Jun 11 Jun Jul May 2 Jun 7 Jun Jul Jun 24 Jun 11 Jun 4 29 Jul May 2 Jul 8 Jun Jul May 25 Jun 1 Jun Jul Jun 5 Jul 15 Jun Jul 3 Jul May 19 Jun 6 Jun Jul 24 Jul Jun 15 Jun 91 1 Aug Jun - 15 Jun Jul 31 Jul Jun Jul Jun a Jul May Jul Jun Jun a a Formal productivity surveys were not conducted so lay/hatch dates are only incidental observations. b Data were not collected in , 1992, 1994, , , and 23. c (-) = data not collected in that year; () = data collected/potentially collected but not compiled as of print date. 1
13 Table 2. Counts of northern fulmar adults on index plots at Chowiet Island, Alaska, in 27. Dates Statistics Plot 17 Jun 19 Jun 24 Jun 26 Jun 3 Jun 2 Jul 4 Jul 5 Jul 9 Jul 1 Jul Mean SD Max A3N A4N A7N A1N A1N A12N A12N Totals Table 3. Counts of northern fulmar chicks on index plots at Chowiet Island, Alaska, in 27. Dates Statistics Plot 28 Aug 29 Aug 31 Aug 2 Sep Mean SD Max A3N A4N A7N A1N A1N2 A12N A12N Totals
14 Table 4. Breeding chronology of glaucous-winged gulls at Chowiet Island, Alaska. cd Mean Median Total First Last Year hatch SD n a hatch nests b hatch hatch e Jun Jun 3 22 Jun 3 Jul 25 5 Jul Jul Jun 15 Jul 26 e Jul Jul 3 1 July 11July a Sample size used for the calculation of mean and median hatch dates. These dates are a sub-sample for which we have observations of egg to chick in 7 days. b Total used for estimating the remaining parameters. These dates may include observations > 7 days apart. c Data were not collected in 1977, , , and d (-) = data not collected in that year; () = data collected/potentially collected but not compiled as of print date. e Productivity data was collected using boom-bust methodology and chronology data was not collected. 12
15 Table 5. Frequency distribution of hatch dates for glaucous-winged gulls at Chowiet Island, Alaska. Julian No. nests hatching on Julian date ac Date n = a Data were not collected in 1977, , , and b Nests were visited on a 1 day interval. c (-) = data not collected in that year; () = data collected/potentially collected but not compiled as of print date. 13
16 Table 6. Reproductive performance of glaucous-winged gulls at Chowiet Island, Alaska. Measures of success are based on nests as the sample unit. bc Parameter No. nests (A) a No. nests 1 egg (B) No. eggs (C) No. nests 1 chick (D) No. chicks (E) Laying success (B/A) Clutch size (C/B) Nesting success (D/B) Hatching success (E/C) a Represents maximum number of nests counted during the season. b Data were not collected in 1977, , , and 23. c (-) = data not collected in that year; () = data collected/potentially collected but not compiled as of print date. 14
17 Table 7. Reproductive performance of glaucous-winged gulls at Chowiet Island, Alaska, in 27. Measures of success are based on nests as the sample unit. Sub-colony Parameter A B C TOTAL No. nests (A) a No. nests 1 egg (B) No. eggs (C) No. nests 1 chick (D) No. chicks (E) Laying success (B/A) Clutch size (C/B) Nesting success (D/B) Hatching success (E/C) a Represents maximum number of nests counted during the season. 15
18 25 2 Max. no. of nests Figure 4. Maximum number of glaucous-winged gull nests counted on sub-colonies A, B, and C at Chowiet Island, Alaska. 16
19 Table 8. Occurrence of food items (%) in regurgitated pellets of glaucous-winged gulls at Chowiet Island, Alaska. a Food item Sample size Invertebrates Sea urchin Blue mussel Snail Limpet Chiton Crab Clam Unid. Shellfish Bryozoans Fish Unid. fish Birds Parakeet auklet Unid. Murre Horned puffin Rhinocerus auklet Northern fulmar Unid. bird Passerine Glaucous-winged gull egg Northern fulmar egg Murre egg Unid. egg Mammals Arctic ground squirrel Miscellaneous Terrestrial vegetation Unid. Kelp Rocks Unknown insect a Data were not collected in
20 Table 9. Percent volume of food in regurgitated pellets of glaucous-winged gulls at Chowiet Island, Alaska, a Food item Sample size Invertebrates Sea urchin Blue mussel Snail Limpet Chiton Crab Clam Unid. shellfish Bryozoans Fish Unid. fish Birds Parakeet auklet Unid. Murre Horned puffin Rhinocerus auklet Northern fulmar Unid. bird Passerine Glaucous-winged gull egg Northern fulmar egg Murre egg Unid. egg Mammals Arctic ground squirrel Miscellaneous Terrestrial vegetation Unid. kelp Rocks Unknown insect a Data were not collected in
21 Table 1. Breeding chronology of black-legged kittiwakes at Chowiet Island, Alaska. cd Mean Median No. of nests First Last First Last First Year hatch SD n a hatch monitored b lay lay hatch hatch fledge Jul 1 Jun 3 Jun 7 Jul 4 Aug 2 Aug Jul 9 Jun 3 Jun Jul 5 Jun 27 Jun Jul 17 Jun 9 Jul Jul 5 Jun 3 Jul Jul 5 Jun 5 Jul Jun 7 Jul Jul 4 Jun 29 Jun 3 Jul 24 Jul 15 Aug Jul 3 23 Jun 5 Jul Jun 8 Jul Jul 7 19 Jun 18 Jul 2 Jul 4 Aug 22 8 Jul Jul 1 Jun 28 Jun 28 Jun 25 Jul 1 Aug Jul Jul 8 Jun 26 Jun 4 Jul 24 Jul 11 Aug Aug Jul 27 Jun 14 Jul 24 Jul 12 Aug > 4 Sep Jul Jul 9 Jun 6 Jul 7 Jul 29 Jul 18 Aug Jul Jul 237 <19 Jun 1 Jul 13 Jul 6 Aug 26 Aug a Sample size used for the calculation of mean and median hatch dates. These dates are a sub-sample for which we have observations of egg to chick in 7 days. b Total used for estimating the remaining parameters. These dates may include observations > 7 days apart. c Data were not collected in , , , , and 23. d () = data collected/potentially collected but not compiled as of print date. 19
22 Table 11. Frequency distribution of hatch dates for black-legged kittiwakes at Chowiet Island, Alaska. Julian No. nests hatching on Julian date ab Date n = a Data were not collected in , , , , and 23. b () = data collected/potentially collected but not compiled as of print date. 2
23 1% 9% 8% 7% Percent of nest sites 6% 5% 4% 3% Laying failure Egg Loss Chick loss Productivity 2% 1% % Figure 5. Reproductive performance of black-legged kittiwakes at Chowiet Island, Alaska. Laying Failure=(A-B)/A; Egg Loss=(B-C)/A; Chick Loss=(C-D)/A; Productivity=D/A, where A=total number of nests; B=number of nests with 1 egg; C=number of nests with 1 chick; D=number of nests with 1 fledged chick. 21
24 Table 12. Reproductive performance of black-legged kittiwakes at Chowiet Island, Alaska. ab Total Mean No. nests No. nests No. nests Laying Nesting Fledging Reprod. nests clutch w/eggs w/chicks w/fledged chick success success success success Prod. Year (A) (B) (D) (F) (B/A) (D/B) (F/D) (F/B) (F/A) a Data were not collected in , 1992, , , and 23. b (-) = data not collected in that year; () = data collected/potentially collected but not compiled as of print date. 22
25 Table 13. Reproductive performance of black-legged kittiwakes at Chowiet Island, Alaska, in 27. Plots Statistics a P6B1 Total n mean SD Parameter P3B2 P3B3 P3B4 P6B2 P6B3 P9B1 P9B2 P1B2 P11B1 Total Nests (A) No. of nests with 1 egg (B) Total eggs (C) No. of nests with 1 chick (D) Total chicks (E) No. nests where 1 chick fledged (F) Total chicks fledged (G) No. of nests with 1 egg No. of nests with 2 eggs Laying success (B/A) Clutch size (C/B) Nesting success (D/B) Hatching success (E/C) Chick success (G/E) Egg success (G/C) Fledging success (F/D) Reproductive success (F/B) Overall productivity (F/A) a Statistics were calculated using ratio estimator spreadsheets and may differ slightly from the values reported in Table
26 Adults Nests Mean no. of adults Mean no. of nests Figure 6. Mean number of black-legged kittiwake adults (counted throughout the census window) and the number of black-legged kittiwake nests counted on 4 July (± 7 days). 24
27 Table 14. Black-legged kittiwake population counts at Chowiet Island, Alaska. ab Replicate Mean n SD First Count 1 Jun 6 Jun 18 Jun 6 Jun 6 Jun 22 Jun 22 Jun 1 Jul 19 Jul 12 Jun 1 Jun 21 Jun 2 Jun 17 Jun Last Count 29 Jul 28 Jun 6 Aug 25 Jul 25 Jul 18 Jul 16 Jul 21 Jul 23 Jul19 Jul 4 July 25 Jul 22 Jul 3 Aug a Data were not collected in 1976, , 1992, , and 23. b (-) = data not collected in that year; () = data collected/potentially collected but not compiled as of print date. 25
28 Table 15. Black-legged kittiwake nest counts at Chowiet Island, Alaska. ab Replicate Mean n SD Jul nest count (± 7 days) First Count 12 Jun 1 Jun 21 Jun 2 Jun 17 Jun Last Count 19 Jul 4 Jul 25 Jul 23 Jul 3 Aug a Data were not collected in , , 1992, 1992, , and 23. b (-) = data not collected in that year; () = data collected/potentially collected but not compiled as of print date. 26
29 Table 16. Black-legged kittiwake population counts at Chowiet Island, Alaska, in 27. Dates Statistics Plot 17 Jun 19 Jun 24 Jun 3 Jun 4 Jul 1 Jul 23 Jul 27 Jul 28 Jul 3 Aug Mean SD Max A2B A2B A3B A3B A3B A6B A6B A9B A9B Totals Table 17. Black-legged kittiwake nest counts at Chowiet Island, Alaska, in 27. Dates Statistics Plot 17 Jun 19 Jun 24 Jun 3 Jun 4 Jul 1 Jul 23 Jul 27 Jul 28 Jul 3 Aug Mean SD Max A2B A2B A3B A3B A3B3 1 1 A6B A6B A9B A9B Totals
30 Table 18. Breeding chronology of thick-billed murres at Chowiet Island, Alaska. cd Mean Median Mean Median No. of nests First Last First Last Year hatch SD n a hatch jump SD n jump monitored b hatch hatch jump jump Jul 11 Aug Jul 11 Aug Jul 11 Aug Jul 9 Aug Jul Aug Jul 1 Aug 6 Aug 2 Aug Jul Aug Jul 8 Aug 4 Aug 22 Aug Jul Aug Jul Jul 9 Aug Aug 8 Jul 2 Aug 1 Aug 23 Aug Jul Jul 9 Aug Aug 8 Jul 13 Aug 27 Jul Jul Jul 8 Aug Aug 8 Jul 11 Aug 28 Jul 21 Aug Jul Jul 18 Aug Aug 12 Jul 3 Jul 11 Aug 27 Aug Jul Jul Jul 16 Aug 2 Aug > 2 Sep a Sample size used for the calculation of mean and median hatch dates. These dates are a sub-sample for which we have observations of egg to chick in 7 days. b Total used for estimating the remaining parameters. These dates may include observations > 7 days apart. c Data were not collected in , 1992, 1994, , and 23. d (-) = data not collected in that year; () = data collected/potentially collected but not compiled as of print date. 28
31 Table 19. Frequency distribution of hatch dates for thick-billed murres at Chowiet Island, Alaska. Julian No. nests hatching on Julian date ab Date n = a Data were not collected in , 1992, 1994, , and 23. b () = data collected/potentially collected but not compiled as of print date. 29
32 1% 9% 8% Percent of nest sites 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% Egg loss Chick loss Productivity 2% 1% % Figure 7. Re productive performance of thick-billed murres at Chowiet Island. Egg loss= (A-B)/A; Chick loss= (B-C)/A; Productivity= C/A, where A= number of nest sites with an egg, B= number of nest sites with a chick, and C= number of sites with a fledged chick. 3
33 Table 2. Reproductive performance of thick-billed murres at Chowiet Island, Alaska. ab No. of sites No. of sites No. sites w/ Hatching success Fledging success Reproductive success Year w/ egg (A) w/ chick (B) fledged chick (C) (B/A) (C/B) (C/A) a Data were not collected in , 1992, 1994, , and 23. b () = data collected/potentially collected but not compiled as of print date. 31
34 Table 21. Reproductive performance of thick-billed murres at Chowiet Island, Alaska, in 27. Plots Statistics a 3M1 3M4 3M6 3MJH2 3M1 Total n mean SD Parameter 3M3 3M5 3M7 3MJH 3MJH3 3MJH4 3M3 No. of sites with an egg (A) No. of sites with chick (B) No. of sites with chick fledged (C) Hatching success (B/A) Fledging success (C/B) Reproductive success (C/A) a Statistics were calculated using ratio estimator spreadsheet and may differ slightly from the values reported in Table 2. 32
35 Mean no. of adults Figure 8. Mean number of thick-billed murres counted on index plots at Chowiet Island, Alaska. 33
36 Table 22. Thick-billed murre population counts at Chowiet Island, Alaska. ab Replicate Mean n SD Murre species combined Mean n SD First Count 2 Jun 22 Jun 2 Jun 2 Jun 2 Jun 19 Jul 19 Jun 26 Jun 21 Jun 21 Jun 26 Jun Last Count 1 Aug 28 Jun 1 Aug 1 Aug 1 Aug 23 Jul 29 Jul 19 Jul 31 Jul 3 Jul 28 Jul a Data were not collected in 1976, , 1992, 1994, , and 23. b () = data collected/potentially collected but not compiled as of print date. 34
37 Table 23. Thick-billed murre population counts at Chowiet Island, Alaska, in 27. Dates Statistics Plot 26 Jun 2 Jul 4 Jul 9 Jul 16 Jul 21 Jul 22 Jul 23 Jul 27 Jul 28 Jul Mean SD Max A3M A3M A6M A9M Totals
38 Table 24. Breeding chronology of common murres at Chowiet Island, Alaska. cd Mean Median Mean Median No. of nests First Last First Last Year hatch SD n a hatch jump SD n jump monitored b hatch hatch jump jump Jul 12 Aug Jul 1 Aug Jul 1 Aug Jul Aug Jul 1 Aug 6 Aug 2 Aug Jul Aug Jul 22 Aug 1 Aug 22 Aug Jul Aug Jul Aug Jun 1 Aug Jul Aug Jul 1 Aug 22 2 Jul Jul 11 Aug Aug 6 Jul 11 Aug 26 Jul 29 Aug Jul Jul 9 Aug Jul 9 Aug 28 Jul Jul Jul 6 Aug Aug 29 Jun 4 Aug 23 Jul 22 Aug Jul Jul 15 Aug Aug 13 Jul 3 Aug 2 Aug 27 Aug Jul Jul Jul 3 Aug 4 Aug > 2 Sep a Sample size used for the calculation of mean and median hatch dates. These dates are a sub-sample for which we have observations of egg to chick in 7 days. b Total used for estimating the remaining parameters. These dates may include observations > 7 days apart. c Data were not collected in , 1992, 1994, , and 23. d (-) = data not collected in that year; () = data collected/potentially collected but not compiled as of print date. 36
39 Table 25. Frequency distribution of hatch dates for common murres at Chowiet Island, Alaska. Julian No. nests hatching on Julian date ab Date n = a Data were not collected in , , , , and 23. b () = data collected/potentially collected but not compiled as of print date. 37
40 1% 9% 8% 7% Percent of nest sites 6% 5% 4% 3% Egg loss Chick loss Productivity 2% 1% % F igure 9. Reproductive performance of common murres at Chowiet Island. Egg loss= (A-B)/A; Chick loss= (B-C)/A; Productivity= C/A, where A= number of nest sites with an egg, B= number o f nest sites with a chick, and C= number of sites with a fledged chick. 38
41 Table 26. Reproductive performance of common murres at Chowiet Island, Alaska. ab No. of sites No. of sites No. sites w/ Hatching success Fledging success Reproductive success Year w/ egg (A) w/ chick (B) fledged chick (C) (B/A) (C/B) (C/A) a Data were not collected in , 1992, 1994, , and 23. b () = data collected/potentially collected but not compiled as of print date. 39
42 Table 27. Reproductive performance of common murres at Chowiet Island, Alaska, in 27. Plots Statistics a 3M1 3M2 3M3 3M4 3M6 3M7 3MJH 3MJH2 3MJH4 9M1 9M3 Total n mean SD Parameter 3M5 3MJH3 No. of sites with an egg (A) No. of sites with chick (B) No. of sites with chick fledged (C) Hatching success (B/A) Fledging success (C/B) Reproductive success (C/A) a Statistics were calculated using ratio estimator spreadsheets and may differ slightly from the values reported in Table 26. 4
43 Mean no. of adults Figure 1. Mean number of common murres counted on index plots at Chowiet Island, Alaska. 41
44 Table 28. Common murre population counts at Chowiet Island, Alaska. ab Replicate Mean n SD Murre species combined Mean n SD First Count 28 Jun 19 Jul 19 Jun 26 Jun 21 Jun 21 Jun 26 Jun Last Count 21 Jul 23 Jul 29Jul 19 Jul 31 Jul 3 Jul 28 Jul a Data were not collected in , 1992, 1994, , and 23. b () = data collected/potentially collected but not compiled as of print date. 42
45 Table 29. Common murre population counts at Chowiet Island, Alaska, in 27. Dates Statistics Plot 26 Jun 2 Jul 4 Jul 9 Jul 16 Jul 21 Jul 22 Jul 23 Jul 27 Jul 28 Jul Mean SD Max A3M A3M A3M A3M A3M A6M A9M A9M A1M A1M Totals
46 Table 3. Frequency of occurrence of prey in diets of common and thick-billed murres at Chowiet Island, Alaska. Frequency is expressed as the percentage of food samples in which each species was present. ab Date begin end No. samples Cephalapods Clupeidae Clupea pallasii 2. Osmeridae Mallotus villosus Hypomesus pretiosus 2.3 Thaleichthys pacificus Salmonidae 7.8 Gadidae Hexagrammidae 3.9 Zaproridae Zaprora silenus Trichodontidae Trichodon trichodon Ammodytidae Ammodytes hexapterus Pleuronectidae 2.3 Unid. Prey item a Data were not collected in 1978, , , 23, 26 and 27. b () = data collected/potentially collected but not compiled as of print date. 44
47 Table 31. Breeding chronology of parakeet auklets at Chowiet Island, Alaska. cd Mean Median No. of nests First Last First Last Mean Year hatch SD n a hatch monitored b hatch hatch fledge fledge fledge Jul 5 25 Jun 16 Jul 22 3 Jun Jun 2 28 Jun 1 Jul Jul Jul Jun 13 Jul 2 Aug 6 Aug 5 Aug 26 2 Jul Jul Jun 7 Jul 28 Jul 15 Aug 4 Aug 27 2 Jul Jul Jun 21 Jul 2 Aug 8 Aug 6 Aug a Sample size used for the calculation of mean and median hatch dates. These dates are a sub-sample for which we have observations of egg to chick in 7 days. b Total used for estimating the remaining parameters. These dates may include observations > 7 days apart. c Data were not collected in and d (-) = data not collected in that year; () = data collected/potentially collected but not compiled as of print date. 45
48 Table 32. Frequency distribution of hatch dates for parakeet auklets at Chowiet Island, Alaska. Julian No. nests hatching on Julian date ab Date n = a Data were not collected in and b () = data collected/potentially collected but not compiled as of print date. 46
49 1% 9% 8% 7% Percent of nest sites 6% 5% 4% 3% Egg loss Chick loss Productivity 2% 1% % Figure 11. Reproductive performance of parakeet auklets at Chowiet Island, Alaska. Egg loss= (A-B)/A; Chick loss= (B-C)/A; Productivity= C/A, where A= number of nest sites with an egg, B= number of nest sites with a chick, and C= number of sites with a fledged chick. 47
50 Table 33. Reproductive performance of parakeet auklets at Chowiet Island, Alaska. ab Parameter Total eggs (A) No. eggs lost to: disappearance abandonment breakage 3 4 Total chicks (B) No. chicks lost to: disappearance death No. chicks fledged (C) Hatching success (B/A) Fledging success (C/B) Reproductive success (C/A) a Data was not collected in , , and b () = data collected/potentially collected but not compiled as of print date. 48
51 Sep 5-Sep 26-Aug 16-Aug 6-Aug 27-Jul No. of individuals 1 17-Jul 7-Jul 27-Jun 17-Jun 7-Jun 28-May 18-May 8-May Figure 12. Counts of parakeet auklets on a water plot at Chowiet Island, Alaska. 49
52 27 No. of individuals Aug 15-Aug 8-Aug 1-Aug 25-Jul 18-Jul 11-Jul 4-Jul 27-Jun 2-Jun 13-Jun 6-Jun 3-May 23-May 16-May 26 No. of individuals Aug 15-Aug 8-Aug 1-Aug 25-Jul 18-Jul 11-Jul 4-Jul 27-Jun 2-Jun 13-Jun 6-Jun 3-May 23-May 16-May 25 No. of individuals Aug 15-Aug 8-Aug 1-Aug 25-Jul 18-Jul 11-Jul 4-Jul 27-Jun 2-Jun 13-Jun 6-Jun 3-May 23-May 16-May 22 No. of individuals Aug 15-Aug 8-Aug 1-Aug 25-Jul 18-Jul 11-Jul 4-Jul 27-Jun 2-Jun 13-Jun 6-Jun 3-May 23-May 16-May 1998 No. of individuals Aug 15-Aug 8-Aug 1-Aug 25-Jul 18-Jul 11-Jul 4-Jul 27-Jun 2-Jun 13-Jun 6-Jun 3-May 23-May 16-May Figure 13a-e. Counts of parakeet auklets on a water plot at Chowiet Island, Alaska. 5
53 Table 34. Population counts of parakeet auklets at Chowiet Island, Alaska, in 27. Counts were made between 73 and 93. Dates 23 May 26 May 27 May 28 May 3 May 1 Jun 2 Jun 3 Jun 5 Jun 6 Jun 8 Jun 9 Jun 12 Jun 13 Jun 14 Jun 22 Jun No. of Individuals Table 34. Continued. Dates 3 Jun 6 Jul 11 Jul 19 Jul 31 Jul 1 Aug 17 Aug Maximum Date maximum counted No. of Individuals Jun 51
54 Table 35. Breeding chronology of rhinoceros auklets at Chowiet Island, Alaska. cd Mean Median No. of nests First Last First Last Mean Year hatch SD n a hatch monitored b hatch hatch fledge fledge fledge Jul Aug Jul Aug Jun Jun Jun 6 Jul 6 Jul Jul Jul Jun 8 Jul a Sample size used for the calculation of mean and median hatch dates. These dates are a sub-sample for which we have observations of egg to chick in 7 days. b Total used for estimating the remaining parameters. These dates may include observations > 7 days apart. c Data were not collected in 1978, , , 23, and d (-) = data not collected in that year; () = data collected/potentially collected but not compiled as of print date. 52
55 Table 36. Frequency distribution of hatch dates for rhinoceros auklets at Chowiet Island, Alaska. Julia n No. nests hatching on Julian date ab Date n = a Data were not collected in 1978, , , 23, and b () = data collected/potentially coll ected but not compiled as of print date. 53
56 1% 9% 8% 7% Percent of nest sites 6% 5% 4% Egg loss Chick loss Productivity 3% 2% 1% % Figu re 1 4. Rep rod uc tive perf orm a nce o f rh inoceros auklets at Chowiet Island, Alaska. Egg loss= (A-B )/A ; Ch ick loss= (B-C)/A; Productivity= C/A, where A= number of nest sites with an egg, B= num b er of n est site s w it h a ch ick, and C = nu mber of sites with a fledged chick. 54
57 Table 37. Reproductive performance of rhinoceros auklets at Chowiet Island, Alaska. ab Parameter Total eggs (A) No. eggs lost to: disappearance abandonment breakage Total Chicks (B) No. chicks lost to: disappearance death No. chicks fledged (C) Hatching success (B/A) Fledging success (C/B) Reproductive success (C/A).51 a Data were not collected in 1978, , , 23, and b () = data collected/potentially collected but not compiled as of print date
58 Table 38. Census of rhinoceros auklet burrows at Chowiet Island, Alaska. a Colony Spruce Cove Sub-colony A Sub-colony B Sub-colony C Total Landing Cove South Bay Sub-colony Sub-colony Sub-colony Sub-colony Sub-colony Total South East Colony 18 Island-wide total 566 > > a Data were not collected in 1978, , , , and 24. b () = data collected/potentially collected but not compiled as of print date. 56
59 Table 39. Relative biomass of prey in diets of rhinoceros au klets at Chowiet Island, Alaska. Numbers represent the percentage of the mass of combined food samples comprised by each spec ies. ab Date begin 1 Jul 7 Jul 15 Jul end 26 Jul 13 Jul 2 Jul No. sa mples No. individual prey items Total mass (g) Osm eridae Mallotus villosus Hypomesus pretiosus Salmonida e Oncorhynch us ket a Gadidae Theragra chalcogr amma Gadus macrocephalu s Scorpaenidae Sebastes spp Anoplopomatidae Anoploma fimbria Hexagrammidae Hexagrammos decag rammus Ophiodon elongates Ammodytidae Ammodytes hexapteru s Pleuronec tidae Uni d. larval fish a Data were not collected in 1978, , , 23, and 26. b () = data collected/potentially collected but not compiled as of print date. 57
60 Table 4. Frequency of occurre nce of prey in diets of rhinoceros au klets at Chowiet Island, Alaska. Frequency is expressed as the percentage of food samples in which each species was ab present Date begin 1 Jul 7 Jul 15 Jul end 26 Jul 13 Jul 2 Jul No. samples Osmeridae Mallotus villosus Hypome sus pretiosus Salmon idae Oncorhynchus keta Gadidae Theragra chalcogramma Gadus macrocephalus Scorpaenidae Sebastes spp Anoplopomatidae Anoploma fimbria Hexagrammidae Hexagrammos decagrammus Ophiodon elongates Ammodytidae Ammodytes hex apterus Pleuronectidae Unid. larval fish a D ata w ere not collected in 1978, , , 23, and 26. b ( ) = d ata colle cted/pote n tiall y coll ecte d but not com p iled as of pri nt d ate. 58
61 Table 41. Species composition of prey in diets of rhinoceros auklets at Chowiet Island, Alaska. Values are expressed as the percentage of total individual prey items comprised by each s pecies. ab Date begin 1 Jul 7 Jul 15 Jul end 26 Jul 13 Jul 2 Jul No. samples Osmeridae Mallotus villosus Hypomesus pretios us Salmonidae Oncorhynchus keta Gadidae Theragra chalcogramma Gadus macrocep halus Scorpaenidae Sebastes spp Anoplopomatid ae Anoploma fimbria Hexagrammidae Hexagrammos decagrammus Ophiodon elongates Ammodytidae Ammodytes hexapterus Pleuronectidae Unid. larval fish a Data were not collected in 1978, , , 23, and 26. b () = data collected/potentially collected but not compiled as of print date. 59
62 Table 42. Breeding chronology of horned puffins at Chowiet Island, Alaska. cd Mean Median No. of nests First Last Year hatch SD n a hatch monito red b hatch h a tch First fledge Last fledge Jul Jul 17 Aug > 4 Sep Jul Jul Jul 3- Aug Jul Jul Jul 14 Aug > 2 Aug Jul Jul Jul 16 Aug 26 Aug 27 8 Aug Aug Jul 15 Aug > 2 Sep a Sample size used for the calculation of mean and median hatch dates. These dates are a sub-sample for which we have observations of egg to chick in 7 days. b Total used for estimating the remaining paramete rs. T hese dates may in clude observations > 7 days apart. c Data were not collected in d (-) = data not collected in that year; () = data collected /potentially collected but not compiled as of print date. 6
63 Table 43. Frequency distribution of hatch dates for horned puffins at Chowiet Island, Alaska. Julian No. nests hatching on Julian date ab Date n = a Data were not collected in b () = data collected/potentially collected but not compiled as of print date. 61
64 1% 9% 8% 7% Percent of nest sites 6% 5% 4% Egg loss Chick loss Productivity 3% 2% 1% % Figu re 1 5. Rep rodu ctive p erfo r man c e of horned puffins at Chowiet Island, Alaska. Egg loss= (A- B)/A ; C hick loss= (B-C)/A; Prod uctiv i ty= C /A, where A= number of nest sites with an egg, B= num b er of n est site s with a chi c k, an d C= number of sites with a fledged chick. 62
65 Table 44. Reproductive performance of horned puffins at Chowiet Island, Alaska. ab Parameter Total eggs (A) No. eggs lost to: disappearance abandonment breakage Total chicks (B) No. chicks lost to: disappearance death No. chicks fledged (C=C 1 +C 2 ) chicks fledged (C 1 ) chicks still present (C 2 ) Hatching success (B/A) Fledging success (C/B) Reproductive success (C/A).4.8 a Data were not collected in and b () = data collected/potentially collected but not c ompiled as of print date
66 Sep 5-Sep 26-Aug 16-Aug 6-Aug 27-Jul 17-Jul No. of individuals 1 7-Jul 27-Jun 17-Jun 7-Jun 28-May 18-May 8-May Figure 16. Population counts of horned puffin s at Cho wiet Island, Alaska. 64
67 65 2 -J 7 ul May 2 3- n 2 -J Jul 1-Aug 8-Aug 5-Aug 2-Aug 9-Aug 3-May May 6-Jun 13-Ju -Jun 27 un 4-Jul -Jul May 2 3- n 2 ul 11-3-May May 6-Jun 13-Ju -Jun 27-Jun 4-J Jul 18-Jul 25-Jul 1-Aug 8-Aug 15-Aug 22-Aug 29-Aug Ju May 23 - n 2 -J 1 1-Aug 8-Aug 15-Aug -May 3 May 6-Jun 13-Ju -Jun 27 un 4-Jul l 8-Jul 25-Jul 22-Aug 29-Aug n 2 -J 1 1-Aug 8-Aug 15-Aug 22-Aug 29-Aug Figure 17a-1 horned p May -May 7d. Count May 6-Jun s of 13-Ju -Jun uffins at Ch 27 un 4-Jul owiet Island, Alaska. 11-Jul 8-Jul 25-Jul
MARINE BIRD SURVEYS AT BOGOSLOF ISLAND, ALASKA, IN 2005
AMNWR 05/18 MARINE BIRD SURVEYS AT BOGOSLOF ISLAND, ALASKA, IN 2005 Photo: Paul Hillman Heather M. Renner and Jeffrey C. Williams Key Words: Aleutian Islands, black-legged kittiwake, Bogoslof Island, Fratercula
More informationBREEDING STATUS AND POPULATION TRENDS OF SEABIRDS IN ALASKA, 2017
BREEDING STATUS AND POPULATION TRENDS OF SEABIRDS IN ALASKA, 217 U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE AMNWR 218/2 BREEDING STATUS AND POPULATION TRENDS OF SEABIRDS IN ALASKA, 217 Compiled By: Donald E. Dragoo,
More informationBIOLOGICAL MONITORING AT EAST AMATULI ISLAND, ALASKA IN 2014
AMNWR 2015/06 BIOLOGICAL MONITORING AT EAST AMATULI ISLAND, ALASKA IN 2014 Arthur B. Kettle, Naomi Bargmann, and Stephanie Winnard Key words: Barren Islands, black-legged kittiwake, breeding chronology,
More informationGregory Thomson. Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge 95 Sterling Highway, Suite 1 Homer, Alaska 99602
AMNWR 06/11 WILDLIFE OBSERVATIONS AT WALRUS ISLAND, PRIBILOF ISLANDS, ALASKA, JULY 20, 2006 Gregory Thomson Key Words: arctic fox, black-legged kittiwake, common murre, monitoring, northern fur seal, Pribilof
More informationSeabird Monitoring on Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge
Community-Based Coastal Observing in Alaska: Aleutian Life Forum 2006 33 Seabird Monitoring on Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge Vernon Byrd Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge, Homer, Alaska
More informationBIOLOGICAL MONITORING AT AIKTAK ISLAND, ALASKA IN 2017
BIOLOGICAL MONITORING AT AIKTAK ISLAND, ALASKA IN 2017 AMNWR 2018/03 Sarah M. Youngren, Daniel C. Rapp, and Nora A. Rojek Key words: Aiktak Island, Alaska, Aleutian Islands, ancient murrelet, Cepphus columba,
More informationYaquina Head Seabird Colony Monitoring 2010 Season Summary
Yaquina Head Seabird Colony Monitoring 2010 Season Summary Robert Suryan Oregon State University, Hatfield Marine Science Center, Newport, Oregon, rob.suryan@oregonstate.edu, 541-867-0223 Amanda Gladics
More informationSpecies: Birds (seabirds, shorebirds, waterfowl, raptors, passerines) and marine mammals
Circumnavigation surveys Wildlife Inventory Plan Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge Protocol #22 Version 1.2 Parameter: Populations (and occasionally boom-or-bust productivity) Species: Birds (seabirds,
More informationSTATUS OF SEABIRDS ON SOUTHEAST FARALLON ISLAND DURING THE 2010 BREEDING SEASON
STATUS OF SEABIRDS ON SOUTHEAST FARALLON ISLAND DURING THE 2010 BREEDING SEASON P.M. Warzybok and R.W. Bradley Marine Ecology Division PRBO Conservation Science 3820 Cypress Drive #11 Petaluma, CA, 94954
More informationBIOLOGICAL MONITORING AT THE CHAMISSO ISLAND GROUP, ALASKA IN 2014
AMNWR 2015/04 BIOLOGICAL MONITORING AT THE CHAMISSO ISLAND GROUP, ALASKA IN 2014 Donald E. Dragoo and Leslie Slater Key Words: Alaska, black-legged kittiwake, Chamisso Island, Chukchi Sea, circumnavigation,
More informationSTATUS OF SEABIRDS ON SOUTHEAST FARALLON ISLAND DURING THE 2009 BREEDING SEASON
STATUS OF SEABIRDS ON SOUTHEAST FARALLON ISLAND DURING THE 29 BREEDING SEASON P.M. Warzybok and R.W. Bradley Marine Ecology Division PRBO Conservation Science 382 Cypress Drive #11 Petaluma, CA, 94954
More informationPROTOCOLS FOR LONG-TERM MONITORING OF SEABIRD ECOLOGY IN THE GULF OF ALASKA
PROTOCOLS FOR LONG-TERM MONITORING OF SEABIRD ECOLOGY IN THE GULF OF ALASKA Project Number: Restoration Category: Proposed By: Lead Trustee Agency: Cooperating Agencies: Alaska SeaLife Center Duration:
More informationCLASS FOUR: Seabird Research Tools and Methods
CLASS FOUR: Seabird Research Tools and Methods People study seabirds for many reasons. For example: Conservation Questions: e.g., what is causing a storm petrel population to decline? Behavioral Questions:
More informationJournal of Avian Biology
Journal of Avian Biology JAV-00626 Petersen, M. R., Byrd, G. V., Sonsthagen, S. A. and Sexson, M. G. 2015. Re-colonization by common eiders Somateria mollissima in the Aleutian Archipelago following removal
More informationCounting the Countless: Estimating the
Counting the Countless: Estimating the Number of Least Auklets ATTENDING the Colony on St. George Island, ALASKA Heather M. Renner, Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
More informationSTANDARD DATA FORM FOR SPECIAL PROTECTION AREAS (SPA) FOR SITES ELIGIBLE FOR IDENTIFICATION AS SITES OF COMMUNITY IMPORTANCE (SCI) AND
Start Form NF004005 Site code: NATURA 2000 STANDARD DATA FORM FOR SPECIAL PROTECTION AREAS (SPA) FOR SITES ELIGIBLE FOR IDENTIFICATION AS SITES OF COMMUNITY IMPORTANCE (SCI) AND FOR SPECIAL AREAS OF CONSERVATION
More informationPacific Seabird Group
Pacific Seabird Group DEDICATED TO THE STUDY AND CONSERVATION OF PACIFIC SEABIRDS AND THEIR ENVIRONMENT 30 November 2016 William J. Douros West Coast Regional Director NOAA Office of National Marine Sanctuaries
More informationYaquina Head Seabird Colony Monitoring 2015 Season Summary
Yaquina Head Seabird Colony Monitoring 2015 Season Summary Robert Suryan, Stephanie Loredo, Ian Throckmorton, Amanda Gladics Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Hatfield Marine
More informationWinter Marine Bird Surveys
Winter Marine Bird Surveys February 16-March 6 2012 Prepared by Gregory Mills, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) On behalf of Oregon Wave Energy Trust March 2012 This work was funded
More informationYaquina Head Seabird Colony Monitoring 2017 Season Summary
Yaquina Head Seabird Colony Monitoring 2017 Season Summary Robert Suryan, Stephanie Loredo, Jane Dolliver, Ana Medina de Roman, Jessica Porquez, and Rachael Orben Department of Fisheries and Wildlife,
More informationSeabird Mass Mortality Event on St. Paul, Pribilofs Lauren Divine, Co-Director ACSPI ECO Julia K Parrish, Executive Director COASST
Seabird Mass Mortality Event on St. Paul, Pribilofs Lauren Divine, Co-Director ACSPI ECO Julia K Parrish, Executive Director COASST Paul Melovidov Aaron Lestenkof Ecosystem Conservation Office Island Sentinels
More informationExxon Valdez Oil Spill
Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Restoration Project Final Report Common Murre Restoration Monitoring in the Barren Islands, Alaska, 1994 Restoration Project 9439 Final Report David G. Roseneau Arthur B. Kettle
More informationANNE VALLEE (TRIANGLE ISLAND) ECOLOGICAL RESERVE
ANNE VALLEE (TRIANGLE ISLAND) ECOLOGICAL RESERVE PURPOSE STATEMENT February 2003 ANNE VALLEE (TRIANGLE ISLAND) ECOLOGICAL RESERVE Purpose Statement Ecological reserves are areas selected to preserve representative
More informationFirst page. - Helping Seabirds Thrive -
First page - Helping Seabirds Thrive - = Lots of food for wildlife Credit: Michelle Hester-Oikonos Ecosystem Knowledge meters WHAT S OUT THERE? Rockfish & Perch Filetail Catshark Flag Rockfish Rockfish
More information44. MARINE WILDLIFE Introduction Results and Discussion. Marine Wildlife Cook Inlet
44. MARINE WILDLIFE 44.1 Introduction This study examined the distribution and abundance of marine-oriented wildlife (birds and mammals) during surveys conducted by ABR, Inc. Environmental Research & Services.
More informationMARINE BIRDS. Comparison of populations of dominant marine bird between the western and eastern North Pacific are:
MARINE BIRDS Marine birds are important components of North Pacific ecosystems. At least 137 sea bird species inhabit the North Pacific, with total abundance estimated to exceed 200 million birds. They
More informationCackling Goose, Aleutian Branta hutchinsii leucopareia
Cackling Goose, Aleutian Branta hutchinsii leucopareia Conservation Status Heritage Agency G Rank: G3 USFWS/NOAA: Delisted S Rank: S3B SOA: Species of Greatest Conservation Need BLM: USFS: Class: Aves
More informationAnnual Report to SeaGrant. Agreement No. R/MPA-6B
Annual Report to SeaGrant Agreement R/MPA-6B 09-015 Baseline Characterization of Newly Established Marine Protected Areas Within the North Central California Study Region - Seabird Colony and Foraging
More informationSite Description: Gull Rock is located approximately 0.4 miles offshore and about six miles north of Yaquina Head in Lincoln County, Oregon.
Devil s Punchbowl intertidal area Gull Rock (offshore) 12. Gull Rock Site Description: Gull Rock is located approximately 0.4 miles offshore and about six miles north of Yaquina Head in Lincoln County,
More informationINTERBREEDING OF THE GLAUCOUS-WINGED GULL AND WESTERN GULL IN THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST
OF THE GLAUCOUS-WINGED GULL AND WESTERN GULL IN THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST J. Michael Scott The fifth edition of the A.O.U. Check-list (1957) states that the Glaucous-winged Gull (Larus glaucescens} breeds
More informationUse of Estuarine, Intertidal, and Subtidal Habitats by Seabirds Within the MLPA South Coast Study Region. Final Plan of Work.
Use of Estuarine, Intertidal, and Subtidal Habitats by Seabirds Within the MLPA South Coast Study Region Final Plan of Work Project Leaders: Daniel P. Robinette and Jaime Jahncke (PRBO Conservation Science)
More information431 West 7th Avenue, Suite 101 Anchorage, AK Tel: September 2016
431 West 7th Avenue, Suite 101 Anchorage, AK 99501 Tel: 907-276-7034 www.ak.audubon.org 30 September 2016 William J. Douros West Coast Regional Director NOAA Office of National Marine Sanctuaries 99 Pacific
More informationTemplate for all pages First page. Research Education Conservation Stewardship
Template for all pages First page Research Education Conservation Stewardship Program Goal Improve the survival of California s seabirds by reducing human disturbances at their breeding and roosting colonies
More informationFarallon National Wildlife Refuge Backgrounder PRBO Conservation Science Page 1 of 5
Farallon National Wildlife Refuge and H.R. 298 Fact Sheet Prepared by: PRBO Conservation Science (www.prbo.org) 4990 Shoreline Highway Stinson Beach, CA 94970 415-868-1221 Contact: Russ Bradley, Farallones
More informationIdentifying Ecological Hotspots in the Bering, Chukchi, and Beaufort Seas
Identifying Ecological Hotspots in the Bering, Chukchi, and Beaufort Seas Esri User Conference July 2018 image: Milo Burcham Erika Knight, Melanie Smith, Max Goldman, & Ben Sullender Audubon Alaska Audubon
More informationWaterbird Nesting Ecology and Management in San Francisco Bay
Waterbird Nesting Ecology and Management in San Francisco Bay Josh Ackerman, Alex Hartman, Mark Herzog, and Sarah Peterson U.S. Geological Survey (October 11, 2017) Outline Wetland Management for Nesting
More informationHERON AND EGRET MONITORING RESULTS AT WEST MARIN ISLAND: 2003 NESTING SEASON
HERON AND EGRET MONITORING RESULTS AT WEST MARIN ISLAND: 2003 NESTING SEASON A Report to the San Pablo Bay National Wildlife Refuge John P. Kelly a and Binny Fischer Cypress Grove Research Center, Audubon
More informationBLACK GUILLEMOTS IN A MELTING ARCTIC: RESPONDING TO SHIFTS IN PREY, COMPETITORS, AND PREDATORS GEORGE DIVOKY
BLACK GUILLEMOTS IN A MELTING ARCTIC: RESPONDING TO SHIFTS IN PREY, COMPETITORS, AND PREDATORS GEORGE DIVOKY Friends of Cooper Island, 652 32 nd Ave. E, Seattle, WA 98112, USA. E-mail: divoky@cooperisland.org
More informationRoberts Bank Terminal 2 Project Field Studies Information Sheet
January 2013 Port Metro Vancouver is continuing field studies in January as part of ongoing environmental and technical work for the proposed. The is a proposed new multi berth container terminal which
More informationProject Summary. Predicting waterbird nest distributions on the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta of Alaska
Project Summary 1. PROJECT INFORMATION Title Project ID Predicting waterbird nest distributions on the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta of Alaska WA2012_22 Project Period July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2014 Report submission
More informationWildlife Inventory Plan Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge Protocol #28. Version 1.2. Parameter: Populations
Wildlife Inventory Plan Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge Protocol #28 Version 1.2 Parameter: Populations Species: Seabirds and marine mammals at Walrus Island PURPOSE To census seabird and marine
More informationMAPPING DISTRIBUTION AND RELATIVE DENSITY OF AUKLETS AT SELECTED COLONIES ON HALL AND ST. MATTHEW ISLANDS, Heather M. Renner and Ian L.
AMNWR 05/20 MAPPING DISTRIBUTION AND RELATIVE DENSITY OF AUKLETS AT SELECTED COLONIES ON HALL AND ST. MATTHEW ISLANDS, 2005 by Heather M. Renner and Ian L. Jones Key words: Aethia cristatella, Aethia pusilla,
More informationMPA Baseline Program. Annual Progress Report. Use of Estuarine, Intertidal, and Subtidal Habitats by Seabirds Within the MLPA South Coast Study Region
MPA Baseline Program Annual Progress Report Principal Investigators - please use this form to submit your MPA Baseline Program project annual report, including an update on activities completed over the
More informationAZA Continuing Classic Conservation
AZA 2017 Continuing Classic Conservation Project Puffin and AZA: Partners Since 1990 Mary Roman Gunther Salisbury University mrgunther@salisbury.edu Egg Rock Update 2010 Field Experience for Aviculturists
More informationLANZ AND COX ISLANDS PROVINCIAL PARK
LANZ AND COX ISLANDS PROVINCIAL PARK PURPOSE STATEMENT AND ZONING PLAN March 2003 LANZ AND COX ISLANDS PROVINCIAL PARK Purpose Statement and Zoning Plan Primary Role The primary role of Lanz and Cox Islands
More informationThe Use of Seabirds as Indicators of Changes in the Marine Environment Through Provisioning and Population Trends
The Use of Seabirds as Indicators of Changes in the Marine Environment Through Provisioning and Population Trends By Joshua T. Cunningham A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfillment
More informationSea Birds. Copyright 2012 LessonSnips
Sea Birds There are hundreds of species of birds that rely on various aspects of an ocean habitat for survival and these are typically called sea birds or marine birds. Most sea birds like the albatross,
More informationImpact of the 1997/98 El Niño on Seabirds of the North East Pacific
Impact of the 1997/98 El Niño on Seabirds of the North East Pacific Ken H. Morgan Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada c/o Institute of Ocean Sciences P.O. Box 6000, Sidney, B.C., V8L 4B2 Canada
More informationINTEGRATED MANAGEMENT PROGRAM TO REDUCE BIRD STRIKES AT JFK INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT,
INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT PROGRAM TO REDUCE BIRD STRIKES AT JFK INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, 1991-2000 Richard A. Dolbeer 1, Scott C. Barras 1 and Richard C. Chipman 2 2 USDA Wildlife Services, New York 1 USDA Wildlife
More informationSEABIRDS. Background WATER SEDIMENTS SHORELINES USES
SEABIRDS Sentinel Species for the Gulf Background The Estuary and Gulf of St. Lawrence are very productive marine ecosystems abounding in wildlife resources. Seabirds are an important link in these ecosystems.
More informationLesser Sandhill Cranes, Annual Summary Homer, Alaska, Summer By Kachemak Crane Watch
Lesser Sandhill Cranes, Annual Summary Homer, Alaska, Summer 2016 By Kachemak Crane Watch This year s Sandhill Crane season started winding down on September 7 when roughly half of Homer s cranes took
More informationSeasonal distribution of short-tailed shearwaters and their prey in the Bering and Chukchi seas
PICES S5, 8 Nov. 2016 Seasonal distribution of short-tailed shearwaters and their prey in the Bering and Chukchi seas B. Nishizawa 1, K. Matsuno 2, T. Yamamoto 3, E. A. Labunski 4, K. J. Kuletz 4, A. Yamaguchi
More informationNORTH PACIFIC RESEARCH BOARD BERING SEA INTEGRATED ECOSYSTEM RESEARCH PROGRAM FINAL REPORT
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 NORTH PACIFIC RESEARCH BOARD BERING SEA INTEGRATED ECOSYSTEM
More informationSeabird Monitoring at the Cape Perpetua and Cape Falcon Marine Reserves
Seabird Monitoring at the Cape Perpetua and Cape Falcon Marine Reserves A Community Science Project Amelia O Connor Report prepared by Amelia J. O Connor 1, Joe Liebezeit 1, Jennifer Nelson 2, Shawn Stephensen
More informationState of the Estuary Report 2015
1 State of the Estuary Report 2015 Summary PROCESSES Feeding Chicks, Brandt s Cormorant Prepared by Nadav Nur Point Blue Conservation Science State of the Estuary 2015: Processes Brandt s Cormorant Reproductive
More informationCurrent Monitoring and Management of Tricolored Blackbirds 1
Current Monitoring and Management of Tricolored Blackbirds 1 Roy Churchwell, 2 Geoffrey R. Geupel, 2 William J. Hamilton III, 3 and Debra Schlafmann 4 Abstract Tricolored Blackbirds (Agelaius tricolor)
More informationCoquet Island Sponsor a Rosy box Update 3. The 2018 Season
Coquet Island Sponsor a Rosy box Update 3 The 2018 Season Another season has come to an end on Coquet Island and now we can start analysing the numbers. All in all, it s been another successful season
More informationRaptors at a Glance. Small birds, some mammals
Accipiters Common Name Sharp-shinned Hawk Cooper's Hawk Northern Goshawk Scientific Name Accipiter striatus Accipiter cooperii Accipiter gentilis Woodlands Woods, adapts well to urban areas; MF build Woodlands,
More informationExxon Vuldez Oil Spill Restoration Project Final Report
Exxon Vuldez Oil Spill Restoration Project Final Report Tufted Puffins as Samplers of Forage Fish Restoration Project (APEX) 95163D Final Report John F. Piatt Daniel D. Roby Laird Henkel Kriss Neuman Alaska
More informationTHEWILSONBULLETIN A QUARTERLY MAGAZINE OF ORNITHOLOGY. Published by the Wilson Ornithological Society
THEWILSONBULLETIN A QUARTERLY MAGAZINE OF ORNITHOLOGY Published by the Wilson Ornithological Society VOL. 107, No. 3 SEPTEMBER 1995 PAGES 397-576 Wilson Bull., 107(3), 1995, pp. 397412 ARCTIC FOX INFLUENCE
More informationIncreased use of intertidal resources benefits breeding success in a generalist gull species
The following supplement accompanies the article Increased use of intertidal resources benefits breeding success in a generalist gull species Nina J. O Hanlon*, Rona A. R. McGill, Ruedi G. Nager *Corresponding
More informationUNITED STATES AMLR ~:c:~=~: PROGRAM AMLR 1998/99 FIELD SEASON REPORT
". ";' ". ~ \ r ~." _ ~ ~..; ;~. _ ~. I...... ~ ~.... ~ ~..., I, UNITED STATES AMLR ~:c:~=~: PROGRAM AMLR 1998/99 FIELD SEASON REPORT Objectives, Accomplishments and Tentative Conclusions Edited by Jane
More informationAVIAN USE OF ROADSIDE HABITAT IN THE SOUTHERN DRIFT PLAINS OF NORTH DAKOTA AND IMPLICATIONS FOR CATTAIL (TYPHA SPP.) MANAGEMENT
AVIAN USE OF ROADSIDE HABITAT IN THE SOUTHERN DRIFT PLAINS OF NORTH DAKOTA AND IMPLICATIONS FOR CATTAIL (TYPHA SPP.) MANAGEMENT Bryan D. Safratowich, Department of Biological Sciences, Stevens Hall, North
More informationPeregrine Falcons Enable Two Species of Colonial Seabirds to Breed Successfully by Excluding Other Aerial Predators
Peregrine Falcons Enable Two Species of Colonial Seabirds to Breed Successfully by Excluding Other Aerial Predators Author(s): J. Mark Hipfner, Kyle W. Morrison and Rachel Darvill Source: Waterbirds, 34(1):82-88.
More informationMarbled Murrelet Effectiveness Monitoring, Northwest Forest Plan
Marbled Murrelet Effectiveness Monitoring, Northwest Forest Plan 2017 Summary Report Northwest Forest Plan Interagency Regional Monitoring Program Photo credits: S.F. Pearson (top) May 2018 1 Marbled Murrelet
More informationPlanet Ocean: Using Seabirds to Assay Climate Change Implications for Labrador
Planet Ocean: Using Seabirds to Assay Climate Change Implications for Labrador C Burke 1, W.A. Montevecchi 1, A Hedd 1, PM Regular 1 and AJ Gaston 2 1 Memorial University, 2 Carleton University Photo:
More informationAERIAL SURVEY OF EMPEROR GEESE AND OTHER WATERBIRDS SOUTHWESTERN ALASKA, FALL Edward J. Mallek 1 and Christian P. Dau 2
AERIAL SURVEY OF EMPEROR GEESE AND OTHER WATERBIRDS IN SOUTHWESTERN ALASKA, FALL 2008 By Edward J. Mallek 1 and Christian P. Dau 2 Key Words: aerial survey, emperor geese, waterbirds, southwest Alaska.
More informationGolden Eagle (Aquila chrysaetos)
Golden Eagle (Aquila chrysaetos) NMPIF level: Biodiversity Conservation Concern, Level 2 (BC2) NMPIF assessment score: 12 NM stewardship responsibility: Low National PIF status: No special status New Mexico
More informationCalifornia Gull Breeding Surveys and Hazing Project, 2011.
California Gull Breeding Surveys and Hazing Project, 2011. Prepared By: Caitlin Robinson-Nilsen, Waterbird Program Director Jill Bluso Demers, Executive Director San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory 524
More informationCOLONY ATTENDANCE OF LEAST AUIUETS AT ST. PAUL ISLAND, ALASKA: IMPLICATIONS FOR POPULATION MONITORING
TheCondor94:93-100 0 The Cooper Ornithological Society 1992 COLONY ATTENDANCE OF LEAST AUIUETS AT ST. PAUL ISLAND, ALASKA: IMPLICATIONS FOR POPULATION MONITORING IAN L. JONES~ Department of Biology, Queen
More informationSanta Clara Valley Habitat Plan
Santa Clara Valley Habitat Plan Joint Governing & Implementation Board Meeting Burrowing Owl Survey Summary and Fee Map January 15, 2015 29 1 Agenda Brief Overview of the Key Aspects of the Burrowing Owl
More informationTrophic relationships among capelin (Mallotus villosus) and seabirds in a changing ecosystem
ICES Journal of Marine Science, 59: 1027 1033. 2002 doi:10.1006/jmsc.2002.1235, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Trophic relationships among capelin (Mallotus villosus) and seabirds in
More informationJuly Maine Grand Slam Lighthouse Tour: Species Totals
July 25 2015 Maine Grand Slam Lighthouse Tour: Species Totals Report Details: 181 miles, 17 Lighthouse and 8,169 birds counted along the way. This report contains pictures of 15 Lighthouse and some of
More informationSPECIES PROTECTION CONSTRUCTION Protective Radius
SPECIES PROTECTION Attention is directed to the existence of environmental work restrictions that require special precautions to be taken by the Contractor to protect the species of concern in conforming
More informationTHE OCCURRENCE AND STATUS OF THE HORNED PUFFIN IN THE WESTERN UNITED STATES
THE OCCURRENCE AND STATUS OF THE HORNED IN THE WESTERN UNITED STATES WAYNE HOFFMAN, Department of Zoology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331 WILLIAM P. ELLIOTT, Air Resources Laboratories--R32,
More informationIncrease of the California Gull Population in the San Francisco Bay and the Impacts on Western Snowy Plovers
Increase of the California Gull Population in the San Francisco Bay and the Impacts on Western Snowy Plovers Caitlin Robinson-Nilsen, San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory Jill Bluso Demers, San Francisco
More informationWe Are Watching! The Long-term Monitoring Program of the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Trustee Council. Mandy Lindeberg NMFS AFSC Auke Bay Laboratories
We Are Watching! The Long-term Monitoring Program of the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Trustee Council Mandy Lindeberg NMFS AFSC Auke Bay Laboratories EVOSTC: A Legacy of Significant Science and Ecosystem Approach
More informationChapter 23 Marbled Murrelet At-Sea and Foraging Behavior
Chapter 23 Marbled Murrelet At-Sea and Foraging Behavior Gary Strachan 1 Michael McAllister 2 C. John Ralph 3 Abstract: The behavior of Marbled Murrelets (Brachyramphus marmoratus) at sea while foraging
More informationebird and Citizen Science:
ebird and Citizen Science: How ebird is tapping into the crowd to revolutionize avian science. -- Jeff Gerbracht-- 8,676 contributors 239,856 checklists 3,175,430 observations Overview Citizen Science
More informationBolinas Lagoon Heron and Egret Nesting Summary 2014
Bolinas Lagoon Heron and Egret Nesting Summary 2014 With Results from Heronries at Picher Canyon, Kent Island, and the Bolinas Mainland Sarah A. Millus Cypress Grove Research Center Audubon Canyon Ranch
More informationLow Seabird Densities in the Pelagic Environment of the Strait of Georgia, British Columbia 1
Pacific Science (1977), vol. 1, no. 197 by The University Press of Hawaii. All rights reserved Low Seabird Densities in the Pelagic Environment of the Strait of Georgia, British Columbia 1 AN ROBERTSON
More informationRoberts Bank Terminal 2 Project Field Studies Information Sheet
May 2013 Port Metro Vancouver is continuing field studies in May as part of ongoing environmental and technical work for the proposed Roberts Bank Terminal 2 Project. Roberts Bank Terminal 2 Project The
More informationAERIAL SURVEY OF EMPEROR GEESE AND OTHER WATERBIRDS SOUTHWESTERN ALASKA, FALL 2003
AERIAL SURVEY OF EMPEROR GEESE AND OTHER WATERBIRDS IN SOUTHWESTERN ALASKA, FALL 2003 Edward J. Mallek 1 and Christian P. Dau 2 November 2003 1 U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2 U. S. Fish and Wildlife
More informationBolinas Lagoon Heron and Egret Nesting Summary 2015
Bolinas Lagoon Heron and Egret Nesting Summary 2015 With Results from Heronries at Picher Canyon, Kent Island, and the Bolinas Mainland Sarah A. Millus Cypress Grove Research Center Audubon Canyon Ranch
More informationBlack Oystercatcher Haematopus bachmani
Black Oystercatcher Haematopus bachmani Conservation Status Heritage Agency G Rank: G5 USFWS/NOAA: Bird of Conservation Concern S Rank: SS3B,SN SOA: Species of Greatest Conservation Need BLM: USFS: Sensitive
More informationTHE COMMON LOON. Population Status and Fall Migration in Minnesota MINNESOTA ORNITHOLOGISTS UNION OCCASIONAL PAPERS: NUMBER 3
THE COMMON LOON Population Status and Fall Migration in Minnesota MINNESOTA ORNITHOLOGISTS UNION OCCASIONAL PAPERS: NUMBER 3 Edited by Peder H. Svingen and Anthony X. Hertzel THE COMMON LOON Population
More informationSIERRA NEVADA ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN
SIERRA NEVADA ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN Study Plan and Inventory Protocol For the California Spotted Owl Study Tahoe NF Study Site Douglas J. Tempel, Project Supervisor Professor Ralph J. Gutiérrez, P.I.
More informationCASSlN'S AUK!-hTS IN MONTEREY COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
AND CASSlN'S AUK!-hTS IN MONTEREY COUNTY, CALIFORNIA GERARD J. McCHESNEY and HARRY R. CARTER, U.S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division, Western Ecological Research Center, 6924 Tremont Road,
More informationCalifornia Least Tern & Western Snowy Plover Monitoring Project. Huntington State Beach Least Tern Natural Preserve A Partnership Since 2005
California Least Tern & Western Snowy Plover Monitoring Project Huntington State Beach Least Tern Natural Preserve A Partnership Since 2005 Identification California Least Tern - CLTE Endangered 9-10 Nests
More informationDavid Allen Manuwal papers, circa
Overview of the Collection Creator Manuwal, David Allen Title David Allen Manuwal papers Dates circa 1969-2002 (inclusive) 1969 2002 Quantity 4.91 cubic feet (6 boxes) Collection Number 6045 (Accession
More informationGOA NAVY TRAINING ACTIVITIES FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL EIS/OEIS JULY 2016
3.9 Birds 3.9 BIRDS 3.9.1 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT For purposes of this Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)/Overseas EIS (Supplemental EIS/OEIS), the Region of Influence (ROI) for birds remains
More informationPeregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus
Plant Composition and Density Mosaic Distance to Water Prey Populations Cliff Properties Minimum Patch Size Recommended Patch Size Home Range Photo by Christy Klinger Habitat Use Profile Habitats Used
More informationBald Eagles Productivity Summary Lake Clark National Park and Preserve Cook Inlet Coastline
Bald Eagles Productivity Summary 1994-1996 Lake Clark National Park and Preserve Cook Inlet Coastline Introduction: Although the bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus)is not listed as endangered or threatened
More informationMLPA NCSR Baseline Seabird Nearshore Foraging and Feeding Flock Monitoring Protocol Point Blue Conservation Science
MLPA NCSR Baseline Seabird Nearshore Foraging and Feeding Flock Monitoring Protocol 2014-2015 Point Blue Conservation Science OVERVIEW This document provides instructions for collecting data within the
More informationMARINE BIODIVERSITY MONITORING. Protocol for Monitoring Seabirds
MARINE BIODIVERSITY MONITORING Protocol for Monitoring Seabirds A REPORT BY THE MARINE BIODIVERSITY MONITORING COMMITTEE (ATLANTIC MARITIME ECOLOGICAL SCIENCE COOPERATIVE, HUNTSMAN MARINE SCIENCE CENTER)
More informationREPORT Conservation biology of the endangered Madagascar plover Charadrius thoracicus,
REPORT ON Conservation biology of the endangered Madagascar plover Charadrius thoracicus, And promoting public awareness of wetland conservation at BY Sama Zefania Malagasy League for Protection of Birds
More informationWorking with wildlife A DAY IN THE LIFE
EPA ACTIVITY WORKSHEET STUDENT PAGE 1 7 Theme Student Sheet. This is the story of a scientist and their work on a day to day basis. Objectives To give students an insight into the work of scientists and
More informationTERNS TRACKING. Sitting in a blind within a colony of over 5,000 common terns is
TRACKING TERNS HOW FAR DO TERNS NESTING ON OUR COASTAL ISLANDS FLY IN SEARCH OF FOOD? BY JESSICA CARLONI Sitting in a blind within a colony of over 5,000 common terns is a remarkable experience. I was
More informationProtecting Beach-nesting Birds in Louisiana VOLUNTEER TRAINING
Protecting Beach-nesting Birds in Louisiana VOLUNTEER TRAINING How Many Bird Species in Louisiana? a. 120 b. 280 c. 480 Year-round Residents Nearctic-Neotropic Migrants W. Dave Patton Eric Liffmann Winter
More informationCALFED MERCURY PROJECT
CALFED MERCURY PROJECT Subtask 3A: Field assessment of avian mercury/selenium exposure in San Francisco Bay, Suisun Bay and the Sacramento -San Joaquin Delta. Primary Research Team: Dr. Steven Schwarzbach,
More information