The ETV Program in Korea Feb. 6 Contents Background Operation ETV Program Status Effectiveness of ETV Program

Transcription

1 The ETV Program in Korea Feb. 6 Contents Background Operation ETV Program Status Effectiveness of ETV Program

2 Background of ETV Program Necessity of of ETV Program ----() Characteristics of Environmental Technology n Differences of composition & seasonal influences n Many imported technologies from the overseas Hesitation of new technology w/o proof n Waste Money (If failed in application to the public facilities) Selection of Best Technology

3 Necessity of of ETV Program ----(2) Developer (Supplier) n Difficulty to give a conviction for BAT n Limits of new technology for the bidding - Clients prefer existing technologies to new ones n No legal system for the verification - Hope to receive the verification objectively Client (Consumer) n No judgment of new technology as objective view n No confidence with only documents Fear of misjudgment (absurdity) Preference of the existed technology Selection of Best Technology Operation of ETV Program

4 Records Oct. 997 Research for overseas the ETV program Dec. 997 Established the regulations for ETV program - EMC was designated by MOE as ETV program Organization Jan.998 Starting ETV program in Korea Type of Verification Designation of environmental new-technology - The New Environmental Technology is designated by its newness, advancement, feasibility through the document review of EMC Verification of environmental technology - It is to assess the efficiency of applied technology through on-site testing and analysis by verification entities, in accordance with verification protocols

5 Certification Criterions of New Tech Newness : New or improved technology Advanced : Better qualified technology comparing to existed one with regards to performance, cost, and environmental friendly, etc. Feasibility : Site application, Security, Regulation and so on. Protocols for Site Verification Verification Period, Times, Verification of performance Classification Contents of Verification - Biological treatment : more than 6months(Include winter) Period - Physical chemical treatment : more than 3months - Winter season(dec, Jan, Feb) : Drop in temperature - Rainy season : Inlet low concentration Times (Analysis) Verification of performance - Biological treatment : 30 times (6months) - Physical chemical treatment : 5times (3months) - Inspect inflow and comp - Treatment efficiency of pollutant, Factor of each technology - Operating factor

6 Protocols for Site Verification Operating cost, Endurance, Stability, Safety Classification Operation Cost Endurance Contents of Verification - Electricity, Chemical, Amount of sludge produced - Investigation Corrosion & Abrasion of Core facility - Stability of Control Stability - Stability of Load-fluctuation - Confidence of Continuity Operation Safety - Safety of Facility - Safety of Work Implementation Framework MOE EMC Verification Committee Verification Entities EMC KIER KIMM KTL KOTRIC KIST KEWWI Verification Entities : designated by technology fields Verification Committee : composed of professional experts for each technology MOE : Ministry of Environment ( EMC : Environmental Management Corporation ( KIER : Korea Institute of Energy Research ( KIMM : Korea Institute of Machinery & Materials ( KTL : Korea Testing Laboratory ( KOTRIC : Korea Testing & Research Institute for Chemical Industry ( KIST : Korea Institute of Science and Technology ( KEWWI : Korea Environment and Water Works Institute (

7 Status of Verification Entities & Technology Fields Verification Entities Environmental Management Corporation Korea Institute of Energy Research Korea Institute of Machinery & Materials Korea Testing Laboratory Korea Testing & Research Institute for Chemical Industry Korea Institute of Science and Technology Korea Environment and Water Works Institute Technologies Fields Treatment of waste water, Incineration, Landfill,Treatment of night soil & livestock waste water, Treatment of dust & acidify gas, Treatment of leachate, Recycling, Remediation(Soil), Environmental measurement Incineration, Treatment of dust & acidify gas, Recycling, Treatment of gas from auto-vehicles Incineration, Treatment of dust & acidify gas, Prevention of noise & vibration Incineration, Treatment of dust & acidify gas, Recycling, Environmental measurement, Prevention of noise & vibration Recycling, Treatment of drinking water Recycling Treatment of drinking water Verification Procedures Description Verification Activities Remarks Request Verification (Applicants) - Description of technology and facility for the application - Specification of verification scope (including verification items, etc.) submit to MOE Registration (EMC) Field Verification (Entity) Overall verification (Verification Committee) Announcement (MOE) - Review of application form - Setting-up of protocols - Establishment of plan for the verification scheme (including methods, contents, schedule, etc.) - Verification performance by protocol - Examination and confirmation of operating data. - Test and analysis (treatment and economical efficiency) - Review of final verification report - Issue the certificate of new technology and fact sheet from MOE reviewed by Verification committee performed by entities Official gazette

8 Fact Sheet and Certificate issued by MOE Certificate of New Environmental Technology Fact Sheet & Verification Report Verification Report ETV Program Status Classification Total Sewage Waste Water Field Sanitary Sewage Livestock Drinking Incinerator Compost Air Landfill Total Designation of environmental new-technology Verification of environmental technology

9 Effectiveness of ETV Program Benefits of Verified Technology - Verified technologies usually have a priority to be used in public facilities. Giving an extra score during Pre-qualification (PQ) review in both the application of appropriate technology for public facilities and in bids for turnkey projects Site Application Technology Developer - Good results with site application in spite of short term : applied to 92 sites. Year Application(site) Total business activities would be aided since government objectively give the verification results to consumers - The Verified technologies are easily applied to site Consumer(User) -Prefer to the verified technologies by Government Effectiveness of Verification System Help both the developer and the client Developer (applicant) Verifier (ETV) Client (user) claims the performances of the technology Verifies the performance claims by the predetermined protocols selects the verified technology Reinvestment (Developer) Withdrawal of development costs (Developer)