Demonstrating Keystone Engineering's innovative Inward Battered Guide Structure (IBGS) offshore foundation concept at Hornsea Best practice for private-public cooperation Phil de Villiers 17 April 2012 1 Offshore Wind Accelerator (OWA)
Agenda 1. Introduction Carbon Trust Offshore Wind Accelerator (OWA) Foundations competition for 30-60m depths 2. Keystone demonstration project 3. Conclusions 2
Carbon Trust mission is to accelerate the move to a low carbon economy Advice We advise businesses, governments and the public sector on their opportunities in a sustainable, low carbon world Measurement We measure and certify the environmental impact of organisations, supply chains and products Technology We help develop and deploy low carbon technologies and solutions, from energy efficiency to renewable power 3
Offshore Wind Accelerator Objective: Reduce cost of energy by 10% in time for Round 3 Joint industry project involving 8 developers + Carbon Trust Learn from each other Do more RD&D than would be possible individually 45m programme 10m for collaborative R&D Up to 35m for demonstrations Carbon Trust contributes 1/3 using UK Government funding Offshore Wind Accelerator 4
OWA focuses on five research areas to drive down costs Cost of energy CAPEX OPEX Yield Foundations Cable installation Access systems Electrical systems Cost of finance Wake effects 5
Foundations Projects are becoming more technically challenging Larger, further from shore, in deeper water, with bigger turbines Mean number of turbines R1 R2 R3 Moray Firth 1.3GW 35 115 600 Irish Sea 4.2GW Firth of Forth 3.5GW Dogger Bank 9GW Hornsea 4GW Mean distance to shore (km) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 R1 8 R2 25 R3 65 East Anglia 7.2GW Atlantic Array 1.5GW West Isle of Wight 0.9GW Hastings 0.7GW Source: UK Ports for the Offshore Wind Industry: Time to Act, DECC / BVG Associates, 5 February 2009, p.17; Financial Times, January 2010; Carbon Trust analysis 6
Foundations 70% of Round 3 wind farms will be in water depths >30m 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 Round 1, 2 and 3 potential installed 0-10 580 capacity (MW) 10-20 835 1,340 20-30 5,880 6,260 30-40 6,050 6,220 40-50 3,660 50-60 60-70 560 5,060 Round 3 Round 2 Round 1 Depth (m) Source: Crown Estate 2009 Whereas two-thirds of current wind farms less than 20m deep 7
Foundations Turbine installation rates will need to increase dramatically Number of turbines installed per year 2003-2020 1 One new turbine installed every 11 days One new turbine installed per day 2.5 new turbines installed per day 900 1,000 1,000 Actuals 700 Modelled 500 500 21 20 30 30 33 67 150 221 300 333 400 400 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Over 6,000 turbines to be installed over 10 years 1. Number of turbines calculated from actual and forecast installed capacity figures, assuming 3MW turbines 2003 2013, and 5MW turbines from 2014 Source: Carbon Trust Offshore wind power: big challenge, big opportunity, 2008; Carbon Trust analysis 2010 8
Foundations Four foundation designs prioritised for Round 3 Objective: Reduce lifecycle cost of foundations by up to 30% in depths 30-60m Shortlist Finalists Keystone Stage II focus Fabrication Gifford / BMT / Freyssinet Installation Airbus A320 SPT Offshore Demonstration IHC Universal Foundation Source: Carbon Trust Offshore Wind Accelerator 2010, IHC 9
Foundations Keystone s Inward Battered Guide Structure (IBGS) twisted jacket Turbine Size Natural Frequency tunable for Siemens 3.6MW and RePower 5MW Water Depths Cost Competitive within water depth range 0.6/MW 0.4/MW single unit 30 units 100 units 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 Sand Waves Suitable for varying water depth over life Geotechnical Suitable for driven pile soil conditions Area 5 Areas 3-4 Area 9 Durable sand clay Mud-stone MetOcean Suitable for All Round 3 Area Conditions Concept tested by Hurricane Katrina 10 Source: Keystone Engineering, Offshore Wind Accelerator 2009-12
Foundations Twisted jacket promises to be cheaper to fabricate and install Designed for 30-60m depths and Round 3 conditions Keystone s Inward Battered Guide Structure twisted jacket Benefits Less steel: 20% less than an optimised jacket Fewer welds: only 9 nodes Easier to fabricate More units per installation vessels Design scales well for larger turbines Source: Keystone, Universal Foundation 2012 11
Agenda 1. Introduction 2. Keystone demonstration Mainstream, Keystone, Bladt, Hochtief Project execution 3. Conclusions 12
Mainstream Renewable Power Co-developer of Hornsea Offshore wind portfolio Neart na Gaoithe Horizont Hornsea Hornsea, 4GW UK Round 3 JV partner of Siemens in SMartWind consortium Neart na Gaoithe, 450MW Scottish Territorial Waters Mainstream Renewable Power Horizont, 1.2GW German North Sea Mainstream Renewable Power 13
Keystone Engineering Inc Inward Battered Guide Structure (IBGS) designer Engineering consulting firm based out of Louisiana, USA Designed two similar IBGS foundation concepts to support drilling platforms in Gulf of Mexico both installed 2005 ExxonMobil West Delta 30 Field Redevelopment Project West Delta 30 BB 14
Bladt Industries Fabricator Danish offshore wind foundation fabricator Specialists in monopiles, transition pieces, jackets Experience includes Anholt, Gwynt y Môr, Walney 2, London Array,Baltic 1, Belwind, Mobile Met Mast, Horns Rev 2, Egmond aan Zee, Samsø 15
Hochtief EPC contractor and installer Germany offshore wind EPC contractor Strategic partner to SMartWind at Hornsea Installation experience at Alpha Ventus Lillgrund Amrumbank West Global Tech I 16
Scope of demonstration project De-risk the design as much as possible Fabrication of In scope Inward battered guide structure Central caisson Piles Installation of Central caisson Inward battered guide structure Out of scope Pre-installed piles in inward battered guide structure Not possible given the vessel crane capacity Shotcrete node Only required for turbines and certified by DNV Driving the angled piles Measuring loadings 17
Responsibilities Funders Designers EPC contractor Operator Foundation Monitoring Topside Fabrication Installation 18
Project schedule Less than 9 months from design to installation Project idea Letters of intent Contracts signed Design 2010 2011 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Fabrication Installation Monitoring 19
Fabrication Caisson sleeve and battered pile sleeve Source: Jan Matthiesen, Carbon Trust 2011 20
Transporting the IBGS to Rotterdam Source: Keystone Engineering 2009; Heiko Lindenthal, REpower 2011; Mainstream 2011; SeaEnergy 2011 21
Lifting the inward battered guide structure Source: Zachary Finucane, Keystone Engineering 2011 22
Installing the IBGS onto the central caisson Source: Zachary Finucane, Keystone Engineering 2011 23
Installing the P1s Source: Zachary Finucane, Keystone Engineering 2011 24
Driving the P2s No issues driving the piles Source: Zachary Finucane, Keystone Engineering 2011 25
Successfully installed at Hornsea October 2011 First foundation installed for Round 3 Source: Mainstream Renewable Power 2011 26
Potential design improvements For consideration Fabrication Optimise plate transitions to streamline fabrication Develop serial fabrication production lines for fabrication yards Installation Consider pre-installing central caissons Specify single piles if vessel has sufficient lift capacity 27
What next? Ambition is to demonstrate the twisted jacket supporting a turbine, ideally 2013 or 2014 5MW+ turbine 30m+ water depth North sea metocean conditions Source: SeaEnergy, 2011 28
Agenda 1. Introduction 2. Keystone demonstration 3. Conclusions 29
Conclusions Keystone Engineering twisted jacket Fabricator feedback Keystone should be 20% cheaper to fabricate than optimised jackets IBGS is well-suited to serial fabrication Keystone should be safer to manufacturer as it is fabricated horizontally, not vertically Installer feedback Keystone should be as least as quick to install as an optimised prepiled jacket We see scope for optimising the installation process Keystone feedback Design improvements have been identified that should make the design cheaper to fabricate and install Source: Project lessons learned workshop, 2012 30
Conclusions Private-public cooperation Joint industry projects like OWA can be effective at identifying new innovations to address specific technical challenges However, commercialising new innovations requires demonstration and there is a shortage of demonstration sites Capacity, consents, schedule are major issues Policy makers can address this in two ways 1. Accelerating development of European test centres; or 2. Aligning innovation needs with commercial projects can unlock demonstrations The first is likely to require changes to planning regimes The second requires public funding and industry collaboration to ensure that rewards compensate for additional commercial risks Joint industry projects ensure that the ideas most relevant to industry are tested, increasing the probability of success for commercialisation 31
Questions Phil de Villiers Offshore Wind Accelerator Manager, Carbon Trust phil.devilliers@carbontrust.co.uk Offshore Wind Accelerator (OWA)