Trigger and Data Acquisition Systems. Monika Wielers RAL. Lecture 3. Trigger. Trigger, Nov 2,

Similar documents
Data acquisition and Trigger (with emphasis on LHC)

Data acquisition and Trigger (with emphasis on LHC)

The Run-2 ATLAS. ATLAS Trigger System: Design, Performance and Plans

LHC Experiments - Trigger, Data-taking and Computing

Triggers For LHC Physics

Overview of the ATLAS Trigger/DAQ System

LHCb Trigger System and selection for Bs->J/Ψ(ee)φ(KK)

The Run-2 ATLAS Trigger System

Data acquisi*on and Trigger - Trigger -

Operation and Performance of the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter and Level-1 Topological Triggers in Run 2 at the LHC

The LHCb trigger system

Trigger and Data Acquisition at the Large Hadron Collider

First-level trigger systems at LHC. Nick Ellis EP Division, CERN, Geneva

Performance of the ATLAS Muon Trigger in Run I and Upgrades for Run II

Real-time flavour tagging selection in ATLAS. Lidija Živković, Insttut of Physics, Belgrade

Monika Wielers Rutherford Appleton Laboratory

Mitigating high energy anomalous signals in the CMS barrel Electromagnetic Calorimeter

Triggers: What, where, why, when and how

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 12 Nov 2010

The design and performance of the ATLAS jet trigger

The ATLAS Trigger in Run 2: Design, Menu, and Performance

Trigger and DAQ at the LHC. (Part II)

Trigger and data acquisition

ATLAS Muon Trigger and Readout Considerations. Yasuyuki Horii Nagoya University on Behalf of the ATLAS Muon Collaboration

LHCb Trigger & DAQ Design technology and performance. Mika Vesterinen ECFA High Luminosity LHC Experiments Workshop 8/10/2016

Triggering at ATLAS. Vortrag von Johannes Haller, Uni HH Am ATLAS-D Meeting, September 2006

Track Triggers for ATLAS

The LHCb trigger system: performance and outlook

8.882 LHC Physics. Detectors: Muons. [Lecture 11, March 11, 2009] Experimental Methods and Measurements

Introduction to Trigger and Data Acquisition

First-level trigger systems at LHC

LHCb Preshower(PS) and Scintillating Pad Detector (SPD): commissioning, calibration, and monitoring

Performance of 8-stage Multianode Photomultipliers

arxiv: v2 [physics.ins-det] 13 Oct 2015

TRIGGER & DATA ACQUISITION. Nick Ellis PH Department, CERN, Geneva

The Commissioning of the ATLAS Pixel Detector

Phase 1 upgrade of the CMS pixel detector

What do the experiments want?

EPJ C direct. The ATLAS trigger system. 1 Introduction. 2 The ATLAS experiment. electronic only. R. Hauser, on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration

CMS electron and _ photon performance at s = 13 TeV. Francesco Micheli on behalf of CMS Collaboration

BaBar and PEP II. Physics

CMS SLHC Tracker Upgrade: Selected Thoughts, Challenges and Strategies

W/Z analysis with electrons

PoS(EPS-HEP2017)476. The CMS Tracker upgrade for HL-LHC. Sudha Ahuja on behalf of the CMS Collaboration

Online particle detection with Neural Networks based on topological calorimetry information

The LHCb Upgrade BEACH Simon Akar on behalf of the LHCb collaboration

Electronics, trigger and physics for LHC experiments

The online muon identification with the ATLAS experiment at the LHC

ATLAS Phase-II trigger upgrade

Layout and prototyping of the new ATLAS Inner Tracker for the High Luminosity LHC

Attilio Andreazza INFN and Università di Milano for the ATLAS Collaboration The ATLAS Pixel Detector Efficiency Resolution Detector properties

Calorimeter Monitoring at DØ

ATLAS and CMS Upgrades and the future physics program at the LHC D. Contardo, IPN Lyon

Silicon W Calorimeters for the PHENIX Forward Upgrade

The Status of ATLAS. Xin Wu, University of Geneva On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration. X. Wu, HCP2009, Evian, 17/11/09 ATL-GEN-SLIDE

Upgrade of the ATLAS Thin Gap Chamber Electronics for HL-LHC. Yasuyuki Horii, Nagoya University, on Behalf of the ATLAS Muon Collaboration

Expected Performance of the ATLAS Inner Tracker at the High-Luminosity LHC

The Trigger System of the MEG Experiment

Contents. Why waveform? Waveform digitizer : Domino Ring Sampler CEX Beam test autumn 04. Summary

Totem Experiment Status Report

SLHC Trigger & DAQ. Wesley H. Smith. U. Wisconsin - Madison FNAL Forward Pixel SLHC Workshop October 9, 2006

Trigger Overview. Wesley Smith, U. Wisconsin CMS Trigger Project Manager. DOE/NSF Review April 12, 2000

The Liquid Argon Jet Trigger of the H1 Experiment at HERA. 1 Abstract. 2 Introduction. 3 Jet Trigger Algorithm

9. TRIGGER AND DATA ACQUISITION

CMS Silicon Strip Tracker: Operation and Performance

Machine learning and parallelism in the reconstruction of LHCb and its upgrade

Signal Reconstruction of the ATLAS Hadronic Tile Calorimeter: implementation and performance

A High-Granularity Timing Detector for the Phase-II upgrade of the ATLAS Detector system

Photon Detector with PbWO 4 Crystals and APD Readout

Physics at the LHC and Beyond Quy Nhon, Aug 10-17, The LHCb Upgrades. Olaf Steinkamp. on behalf of the LHCb collaboration.

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. Conference Report. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland. CMS detector performance.

US CMS Calorimeter. Regional Trigger System WBS 3.1.2

The CMS Muon Trigger

DAQ & Electronics for the CW Beam at Jefferson Lab

Some Studies on ILC Calorimetry

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 25 Oct 2012

Trigger and Data Acquisition (DAQ)

Beauty Experiments at the LHC

arxiv: v2 [physics.ins-det] 20 Oct 2008

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. Conference Report. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland

Status of the LHCb Experiment

Tests of the CMS Level-1 Regional Calorimeter Trigger Prototypes

Status of the LHCb experiment

Studies of Jet-Track Correlations in PbPb collisions with CMS

Muon Collider background rejection in ILCroot Si VXD and Tracker detectors

Where do we use Machine learning and where do want to improve?

The upgrade of the LHCb trigger for Run III

CALICE AHCAL overview

The CMS ECAL Laser Monitoring System

Operation and performance of the CMS Resistive Plate Chambers during LHC run II

optimal hermeticity to reduce backgrounds in missing energy channels, especially to veto two-photon induced events.

The upgrade of the LHCb trigger for Run III

The ATLAS Muon System

CMS Phase 2 Upgrade: Preliminary Plan and Cost Estimate

Particle Identification. N. Baltzell CLAS12 Ready for Science Review September 25, 2017

CMS Conference Report

PoS(Vertex 2007)034. Tracking in the trigger: from the CDF experience to CMS upgrade. Fabrizio Palla 1. Giuliano Parrini

CALICE Software. Data handling, prototype reconstruction, and physics analysis. Niels Meyer, DESY DESY DV Seminar June 29, 2009

DØ L1Cal Trigger. East Lansing, Michigan, USA. Michigan State University, Presented for the D-Zero collaboration by Dan Edmunds.

PoS(LHCP2018)031. ATLAS Forward Proton Detector

Transcription:

Trigger and Data Acquisition Systems Monika Wielers RAL Lecture 3 Trigger Trigger, Nov 2, 2016 1

Reminder from last time Last time we learned how to build a data acquisition system Studied several examples of data acquisition systems at the LHC We learned what a trigger is and how it works Tells you when is the right moment to take your data Decides very rapidly what output to keep if you can t keep all of it. The decision is based on some simple criteria Can be done in several levels Now we ll learn more how the trigger looks and how to devise the set of triggers needed for a physics analysis Trigger, Nov 2, 2016 2

Why do I need a trigger at the LHC? Huge incoming rate of mainly uninteresting collisions Huge rejection needed from ~10 9 Hz to ~10 2-10 3 Hz for offline storage (physics analyses) Impossible to save all collisions Would result in O(100000) PetaByte or O(1000) Exabyte per year of data per experiment For comparison: 5 Exabytes: All words ever spoken by human beings. Trigger, Nov 2, 2016 3

Trigger = Rejection Problem: We must analyse and reject most collisions prior to storage Solution: Trigger Fast processing High efficiency for interesting physics Huge rejection factor 10 4 10 5 Note if the incoming rate is very high, the trigger itself is a severe physics decision Make sure your favourite physics channel is selected with high efficiency Many other trigger needed by other physics analyses will compete with you Trigger, Nov 2, 2016 4

Example: H γγ Roughly one 125 GeV Higgs for every 10 billion pp interactions H γγ is rare decay with BR 10-3 Approx. 1 H γγ per 10 trillion interactions Make sure you select them all. Trigger, Nov 2, 2016 5

Other Challenges Pile-up (overlapping collisions) Bunch crossing frequency of 40 MHz LHC produced up to 75 pileup events in Run 2. Every bunch crossing ~few 1000 particles are produced It's on-line (cannot go back and recover events) Need to monitor selection - need very good control over all conditions Any event thrown away is lost for ever! Trigger, Nov 2, 2016 6

Simple Trigger Example: dark matter experiment Detect a very small energy deposition seen as scintillation light from i.e LXe or LAr. As there is only a low background can afford to select all events Trigger rate: ~100Hz Trigger, Nov 2, 2016 7

Multi-level trigger system Sometime impossible to take a proper decision in a single place Too many readout units Too far away (transport signal) Too long decision time Distribute the decision burden in several steps E.g. reject 90% of your collisions per step Usually τ N+1 >> τ N, f N+1 << f N Done in LHC experiments (see last lecture) Trigger, Nov 2, 2016 8

Example: Higgs L1 Coarse granularity Trigger, Nov 2, 2016 9

Example: Higgs L2 Improved reconstruction, improved ability to reject events Trigger, Nov 2, 2016 10

Example: Higgs L3 high quality reconstruction, improved ability to reject events Trigger, Nov 2, 2016 11

How do I select interesting collisions Need to identify the different particles produced Muons, electrons, photons, taus, jets missing E T jet Detector feature (deposit in EM calorimeter) e/γ Trigger quantity e/γ jet Trigger, Nov 2, 2016 12

How do I select interesting collisions For each trigger / signature there is a chain of processing steps for each trigger level (L1, L2, L3, ) Called: Trigger Chain, Trigger Path E.g: reconstruct cluster - identify electron - reconstruct track - identify e ± chain chain chain chain chain chain chain mu20 2mu10 g20 e22 2e12 Bmumu etc Trigger, Nov 2, 2016 13

Trigger Path Use the identified particles above given (transverse) momentum thresholds Isolated electron, muon and photons τ-, central- and forward-jets, jets from b-decays Events with missing E T, missing E T significance You can select events according to multiplicity E.g. one electron and one muon, 4 jets etc Or even more complicated (topological trigger) Select events with a jet and a photon which are back-to-back Select events with 2 γ s with invariant mass ~ Higgs mass The set of triggers or trigger items to be run online is called Trigger Menu Each trigger item can be prescaled, thus only a fraction of the selected events is recorded. Trigger, Nov 2, 2016 14

Trigger Menu Prepare a Trigger Menu Defines the physics we want to do Each trigger item defined by trigger chain Event is stored if one or more trigger items are passed Need flexibility Cope with changing luminosities Today s Specials Electrons e24 (24 electron raviolis) 7.95 2e12 (2 12 oz electron steaks) 9.95 Muons Mu24 (24 dl muon soup) 2mu10 (2 muons 10cm!) 5.95 7.95 Jets 4j50 (4 jet pancakes) J500 (500g grilled jet fish) Be able to add triggers if needed (e.g. new triggers upon discovery) LHC exp. ~1000 triggers run online! Trigger, Nov 2, 2016 8:95 16:95 Mixed triggers J50_ETmiss50 (yummy jet with missing french fries) Tau40_e20 (tau salad with electrons) 10:95 8.95 15

What makes up a Menu Physics triggers (typically take all of them) e.g. mu25 (one muon with p T >25GeV, useful for many analysis from SM/Higgs to searches for new particles (Susy, Dark Matter ) Obviously most of the trigger bandwidth is used for these Supporting trigger or cross trigger (typically prescaled) Needed to understand (support) your physics analysis for e.g. Measure trigger/offline efficiency Understand your backgrounds Calibration Triggers E.g. select events selected by L1 only Monitoring triggers E.g. select Z ll events Trigger menu determines the physics we can do in the offline analysis! Trigger, Nov 2, 2016 16

Trigger Menu Example from CMS: how menu changed as a function of luminosity (in 2010) Trigger, Nov 2, 2016 17

How to design a trigger First understand the physics you want to do Which are the particles in your final state and how high is their p T? Understand the existing trigger menu Figure out if there is already a trigger in place which does the job No need to design a new one if it s already covered If not, think up a new trigger Can you combine several particles into one trigger, e.g. muon + 2 b-jets? Can you take advantage of the topology of your event, e.g. invariant mass, back-to-back topology? Also keep in mind that the trigger reconstruction is not as good as the offline one and your selections need to be looser Figure out if also other analyses might profit from your trigger The more analyses there are the more likely your trigger will be accepted to run online Trigger, Nov 2, 2016 18

How to design a trigger General rule: Make it as simple as possible Less trigger losses Avoids unnecessary trigger biases in your analysis Less demand for supporting/cross triggers More robust If possible, create a new trigger based on a already existing (older more inclusive) trigger Already validated and easier to implement Trigger, Nov 2, 2016 19

Example: W cross section measurement (ATLAS/CMS) How do I reconstruct W lν, l=e,µ in the offline? Select events containing 1 electron or muon with high transverse momentum (p T > 25 GeV) Select events with high missing transverse energy (E T miss > 20 GeV) Calculate transverse mass. Extract background and subtract Count events and convert in cross section (Ncand Nbkg). σ (signal) = α εtrig εoffline L dt Trigger can select these events selecting high energetic electrons or muons and/or via E miss T So what should I choose? Trigger, Nov 2, 2016 20

Example: Trigger for measuring W cross section E T of the electrons and muons Selection of E T >20 GeV e/µ s will keep most of the W s Select events containing one high p T e/µ Next: check the turn-on trigger efficiency w.r.t. offline E T near the trigger threshold E.g. e ± -trigger with E T = 20 GeV threshold (e20) efficient for offline E T > 22 GeV, plateau for E T > 25 GeV Trigger threshold few GeV lower than what you want in offline analysis (resolution effect) Check the rate: Assume: Rate 500 Hz need higher threshold and tighter selection Rate: 60 Hz electron Trigger, Nov 2, 2016 21

Example: Trigger for measuring W cross section And if the rate is still too high? Even tighter selection (typical lower eff) Even higher E T Could we rather use missing E T for the trigger? Promising for E T miss >30 GeV Let s look at turn-on for E T miss > 30GeV Efficient at offline E T miss > 40 GeV Rate: ~5 khz Combine E T miss with e/µ e/µ with E T > 25 GeV + E T miss > 30 GeV: 20 Hz But now less analyses can use this trigger perhaps rather higher E T? Best compromise needed muons Trigger, Nov 2, 2016 22

Example: Trigger for measuring W cross section Another possible solution if you do not need the full data statistics Prescaling Find out how many events you need to do a useful analysis! If you also want to measure W+1, 2, 3, etc jets cross section Add another trigger selecting based on e/µ (+ E T miss ) + jets Trigger, Nov 2, 2016 23

What other triggers do I need: background trigger Now we e.g. select events with: e/µ + E T miss I need to estimate the background under my signal Often done via cut-reversal (ABCD) method Need sample of events selected with loose or failed electron selections e.g. need e25_loose Do not need all of them, so you can prescale by e.g. a factor of 100 Enough events for the analysis Low E T miss High E T miss A (bkg enriched) C (Signal + bkg) B (mainly bkg) D (bkg enriched) Pass e ± identif. Fail e ± identif. Trigger, Nov 2, 2016 24

What other triggers do I need: efficiency extraction Trigger efficiency needs to be precisely measured since it enters in the calculation of the cross-sections Number of events passing trigger selection ε trig = Number of events without trigger selection Trigger efficiency is usually measured w.r.t. offline, such that σ (signal) = (Ncand Nbkg) α εtrig εoffline L dt Your trigger is used to collect your data with εtrig = ε(l1) ε(l2) ε(l3) You cannot blindly use your data to study efficiency as your trigger might have introduced a bias Need an unbiased measurement of trigger and offline efficiency Trigger, Nov 2, 2016 25

Methods for trigger efficiency measurements Random sample of collisions Bootstrapping via pass-through triggers Use looser trigger, e.g. apply only L1 selection, but nothing at L2, L3, events passing L2 mu20 ε (L2 mu20) = events passing L2 mu20 in pass through Drawback: you might measure the efficiency of your signal plus some background Use orthogonal trigger Trigger on certain particle type in the event, measure another one For example use muon triggered events to measure electron trigger efficiency Method might suffers from your topology (you might select more (less) crowded events), you measure signal + background Use simulations Monte-Carlo must very well describe the data Trigger, Nov 2, 2016 26

Efficiency Measurement Use well-known physics processes and do tag & probe Z ll, J/Ψ ll: trigger only on one leptons Most precise way to calculate efficiencies W lν: trigger on missing E T Example: Z ee tag and probe Trigger on one of the electrons Select offline events with 2 good electrons which have an invariant mass around the Z mass tag electron: well identified, coincides with electron which triggered event probe electron: check if this one passed or failed the trigger selection Trigger, Nov 2, 2016 27

Summary: triggers for W cross section measurement Trigger to select signals Well identified electrons/muons with E T > 25 GeV and certain identification criteria Might even consider prescaling electron/muon with E T > 25 GeV and E T miss >30GeV Trigger needed for background subtractions Prescaled trigger with loosely identified electron/muon candidates with E T > 25 GeV Triggers for efficiency extraction Well identified electrons/muons with E T > 25 GeV (use the electrons from Z decays) E t miss trigger to measure offline efficiency from W decays Trigger, Nov 2, 2016 28

Example 2: Measurement of direct photon production Measure spectrum starting with E T > 15 GeV Can t keep all the collisions with photons at low E T Use prescaled triggers g10, g20, g40, g60, etc until rate low enough Prescale each trigger to give ~1Hz rate Trigger for background extraction If photons loosely selected, can use same sample to extract the background from jets faking γ s Identification criteria vs isolation Trigger, Nov 2, 2016 29

Example 2: Measurement of direct photon production Efficiency Use bootstrapping use photon candidates selected by L1 only, measure photon efficiency w.r.t. L1 Use unbiased sample e.g. minimum bias to measure L1 efficiency ε Trigger = ε L1 ε L2, L3 Advantage: 2-step approach results in less overall statistics needed due to high rejection at each trigger level Use Z->eeγ events (tag & probe) Trigger, Nov 2, 2016 30

Example 3: B J/ψ K (LHCb) Select events with Displaced vertex 2 muons from J/ψ decay Muons come from displaced vertex Such a trigger is also useful for other analyses B µµ, B s0 J/ψ ϕ, B 0 K* 0 µµ If you can t afford the rate Muons need to fall in inv. mass window around J/ψ mass Combine with loosely identified K Trigger, Nov 2, 2016 31

Summary Introduction to trigger selection Introduction to some slang: trigger path, trigger menu Trigger strategy is trade-off between physics requirements and affordability How to devise a trigger for a physics analysis Will be (hopefully) useful for your physics analysis Trigger, Nov 2, 2016 32