Microphonics. T. Powers

Similar documents
Low Level RF Systems

Digital LLRF Test on the Renascence Cryomodule

Cavity Testing Mathematics. Tom Powers USPAS SRF Testing Course 19 Jan. 2014

C100 Cryomodule. Seven cell Cavity, 0.7 m long (high Q L ) 8 Cavities per Cryomodule Fits the existing Cryomodule footprint

R.Bachimanchi, IPAC, May 2015, Richmond, VA

ABSTRACT 1 CEBAF UPGRADE CAVITY/CRYOMODULE

Low-Level RF. S. Simrock, DESY. MAC mtg, May 05 Stefan Simrock DESY

Digital Low Level RF for SESAME

Digital Self Excited Loop Implementation and Experience. Trent Allison Curt Hovater John Musson Tomasz Plawski

Borut Baricevic. Libera LLRF. 17 September 2009

FLASH rf gun. beam generated within the (1.3 GHz) RF gun by a laser. filling time: typical 55 μs. flat top time: up to 800 μs

Cavity Field Control - RF Field Controller. LLRF Lecture Part3.3 S. Simrock, Z. Geng DESY, Hamburg, Germany

Direct Digital Down/Up Conversion for RF Control of Accelerating Cavities

CDS 101/110: Lecture 8.2 PID Control

Waveguide Arc Restrike Test Results Abstract Background

ANGLE MODULATION. U1. PHASE AND FREQUENCY MODULATION For angle modulation, the modulated carrier is represented by

Lab #2: Electrical Measurements II AC Circuits and Capacitors, Inductors, Oscillators and Filters

Digital Logic, Algorithms, and Functions for the CEBAF Upgrade LLRF System Hai Dong, Curt Hovater, John Musson, and Tomasz Plawski

Update 5/19/11. Kirk Davis, Mike Drury, Leigh Harwood, Mark Wiseman, etc. Andrew Hutton

R100 Microphonics. Kirk Davis, Mike Drury, Leigh Harwood, Mark Wiseman, etc. Andrew Hutton

Diode Circuits Recent GATE Problems

The low level radio frequency control system for DC-SRF. photo-injector at Peking University *

Theory and Practice of Cavity Test Systems. Tom Powers

Review on Progress in RF Control Systems. Cornell University. Matthias Liepe. M. Liepe, Cornell U. SRF 2005, July 14

CDS 101/110: Lecture 9.1 Frequency DomainLoop Shaping

EE3079 Experiment: Chaos in nonlinear systems

The performance of AM and FM receivers. Editor: Xuanfeng Li Teacher: Prof. Xiliang Luo

Studying Noise Contributions in Nonlinear Vector Network Analyzer (NVNA) Measurements

레이저의주파수안정화방법및그응용 박상언 ( 한국표준과학연구원, 길이시간센터 )

Slide Title. Bulleted Text

Homework Assignment Consider the circuit shown. Assume ideal op-amp behavior. Which statement below is true?

b) discrete-time iv) aperiodic (finite energy)

EE-4022 Experiment 3 Frequency Modulation (FM)

SNS LLRF Design Experience and its Possible Adoption for the ILC

Analysis and Comparison of Speed Control of DC Motor using Sliding Mode Control and Linear Quadratic Regulator

State of the Art in RF Control

Overview of ERL Projects: SRF Issues and Challenges. Matthias Liepe Cornell University

Cavity Field Control - Feedback Performance and Stability Analysis. LLRF Lecture Part3.2 S. Simrock, Z. Geng DESY, Hamburg, Germany

Digital Signal Processing in RF Applications

EXPERIMENTAL RESULT OF LORENTZ DETUNING IN STF PHASE-1 AT KEK-STF

Energy Recovering Linac Issues

RF System Models and Longitudinal Beam Dynamics

Vibration studies of a superconducting accelerating

Chapter 10. Quadrature Multiplexing and Frequency Division Multiplexing

Status of superconducting module development suitable for cw operation: ELBE cryostats

Superstructures; First Cold Test and Future Applications

Physics Requirements Document Document Title: SCRF 1.3 GHz Cryomodule Document Number: LCLSII-4.1-PR-0146-R0 Page 1 of 7

Satellite Link Connection with C6M-II-SE

Modeling and Simulation of Load Frequency Control for Three Area Power System Using Proportional Integral Derivative (PID) Controller

Project X Cavity RF and mechanical design. T. Khabiboulline, FNAL/TD/SRF

MEMS Clocks: the next big little thing? Giorgio Mussi November 14 th, 2017

Theoretical 1 Bit A/D Converter

UNIT-2 Angle Modulation System

RFID Systems: Radio Architecture

note application Measurement of Frequency Stability and Phase Noise by David Owen

PXIe Contents SPECIFICATIONS. 14 GHz and 26.5 GHz Vector Signal Analyzer

Correction for Synchronization Errors in Dynamic Measurements

Utilizzo del Time Domain per misure EMI

LCLS-II LLRF Prototype Testing and Characterization. Larry Doolittle, Brian Chase, Joshua Einstein-Curtis, Carlos Serrano LLRF 17,

Software Requirements Specification for LLRF Applications at FLASH Version 1.0 Prepared by Zheqiao Geng MSK, DESY Nov. 06, 2009

MIMO-LTI Feedback Controller Design -Status report-

Design & Implementation of the LLRF System for LCLS-II. Andy Benwell (SLAC Spokesperson) LLRF 2017 October 16, 2017

University of Portland EE 271 Electrical Circuits Laboratory. Experiment: Inductors

EET 223 RF COMMUNICATIONS LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS

Capacitive MEMS accelerometer for condition monitoring

Initial ARGUS Measurement Results

The Phased Array Feed Receiver System : Linearity, Cross coupling and Image Rejection

Local Oscillator Phase Noise and its effect on Receiver Performance C. John Grebenkemper

SECTION 4: TRANSMISSION LINES. ESE 470 Energy Distribution Systems

RF/IF Terminology and Specs

Jean-Pierre Braun obtained the B.E. degree from the Ecole d'ingénieurs de Genève, Switzerland, in 1980; the M.E.M. degree from the University of

Supplementary Figures

SC5307A/SC5308A 100 khz to 6 GHz RF Downconverter. Datasheet SignalCore, Inc.

Resonator System for the BEST 70MeV Cyclotron

Automatic Control Motion control Advanced control techniques

Spectrum Analyzer Training

Predictions of LER-HER limits

Response spectrum Time history Power Spectral Density, PSD

Accurate Power Conversion Measurements on High Power Motor Drives. Presented by: Ian Walker GMW Associates

EUROFEL-Report-2006-DS EUROPEAN FEL Design Study

Analog and Telecommunication Electronics

LORENTZ FORCE DETUNING ANALYSIS OF THE SPALLATION NEUTRON SOURCE (SNS) ACCELERATING CAVITIES *

LLRF Controls and Feedback: Free-Electron Lasers and Energy Recovery Linacs

Design and performance of LLRF system for CSNS/RCS *


A new generation Cartesian loop transmitter for fl exible radio solutions

Effects of Intensity and Position Modulation On Switched Electrode Electronics Beam Position Monitor Systems at Jefferson Lab*

National Accelerator Laboratory

PHASE NOISE MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS

ECE 421 Introduction to Signal Processing

INSTALLATION AND FIRST COMMISSIONING OF THE LLRF SYSTEM

EE470 Electronic Communication Theory Exam II

10th ESLS RF Meeting September ALBA RF System. F. Perez. on behalf of the ALBA RF Group. ALBA RF System 1/21

EE434 ASIC & Digital Systems

Lab 4. Crystal Oscillator

Examination of Microphonic Effects in SRF Cavities

Real-Time Digital Down-Conversion with Equalization

Detection Probability of Harmonics in Power Systems Affected by Frequency Fluctuation

Chapter 6: Power Amplifiers

Simulating and Testing of Signal Processing Methods for Frequency Stepped Chirp Radar

Transcription:

Microphonics T. Powers

What is microphonics? Microphonics is the time domain variation in cavity frequency driven by external vibrational sources. A 1.5 GHz structure 0.5 m long will change in frequency by `00 Hz if the length is changed 33 nm. It can be due to fixed frequency sources such as motors and equipment. When the source is white noise the results shows up as the natural vibrational frequencies or modes of the structure. We measure the microphonics on each series of cryomoudles and on a fraction of the cavities in the field. When we measured the first cryomodule installed in the machine we found larger than expected microphonics noise.

What is NOT microphonics? Static Lorentz force detuning Note: There are dynamic Lorentz force detuning effects that can effect the cavity frequency shifts in time scales consistent with vibrational modes of the cavities. Proper gradient regulation can be used to address this. Low frequency pressure drifts with periods on the order of minutes to hours. These can be addressed with your motor driven tuners.

The math. Ignoring control loop gain and coupler bandwidth limitations the steady state amplitude and phase controls needed for microphonics is given by: PP RRRR = ββ + 1 LL 4ββQQ LL rr QQ 2 EE + II 0 QQ LL rr QQ ccccccφφ 2 δδδδ BB + 2QQ LL EE + II ff 0 QQ LL rr QQ ssssssφφ BB 0 φφ RRRR = aaaaaaaaaaaa δδδδ 2QQ LL EE + II ff 0 QQ LL rr QQ ssssssφφ BB 0 EE + II 0 QQ LL rr QQ ccccccφφ BB

Modal Response Testing A warm cavity was instrumented with 9 triaxial accelerometers A series of warm impulse hammer response tests were performed on structures ranging from bare cavities to a fully assembled cryomodule. This data was used in combination with finite element analysis to improve the design.

Background Microphonics Testing Data taken using digital low level RF system operated in a fixed frequency mode at 1497 MHz The RF phase angles between the incident power and the cavity field probe readings were recorded at 1000 S/sec for 100 seconds. Phase angle and cavity loaded-q used to calculate the detune frequency 8 channels of data were acquired synchronously.

Microphonics Spectra as a function of Time

Time Domain Data for Cavities 1 to 4 and 5 to 8

Microphonics Design allows for 25 Hz Peak Detuning Microphonic Detuning* C100-1 C100-4 Actual peak detuning (21 Hz) was higher than expected in first cryomodules A detailed vibration study was initiating which led to the following design change. A minor change to the tuner pivot plate substantially improved the microphonics for the CEBAF C100 Cryomodules. RMS (Hz) 2.985 1.524 6σ(Hz) 17.91 9.14 Cavity C100-1-5 Cavity C100-5-5 While both designs meet the overall system requirements the improved design has a larger RF power margin

Spectra with old and new tuner plates

Time Averaged Spectra Original Tuner Stiffened Tuner

C50 Cryomodule Microphonics Time domain and frequency domain plots of the background microphonics for a 5-cell CEBAF cavity located in the CEBAF accelerator. Data taken in Tunnel

FEL3-6 Microphonics

FEL3-5 Tuner Running 2 steps/full step

FEL3-5 Tuner Operations 128 microsteps/step

DYNAMIC COUPLING BETWEEN CAVITIES C100-4 Cavities 4, 6, 7, 8 responding to an applied PZT step control voltage change from 52 to 39 volts (130 Volt range) in cavity 5 Cavity 5 PZT moved 460 Hz. Locked in GDR Mode Because of 10 MV/m operating point, the klystron had the overhead to keep cavities locked Stepper Motor operated to tune the cavities Adjacent Cavity coupling is ~ 10% between 1-4 and 5-8 cavities Cavities 4 and 5 have a quasi mechanical support between them. Ringing is the 21 Hz mechanical Mode Curt Hovater, Tomasz Plawski,, Michael Wilson, Rama Bachimanchi

CRM EXAMPLES Freq Shift (Hz) Freq Shift (Hz) 100 80 60 40 20 0 Cavity Frequency Shift (Hz) Piezo Drive Voltage (V) -20 0-0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Time (s) 100 80 60 40 20 0 Cavity Frequency Shift (Hz) Piezo Drive Voltage (V) -20 0-0.02 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 Time (s) Step response of a cavity excited by a by a 50 Hz step in the piezo tuner controls. The total range of this tuner was 550 Hz. 60 40 20 60 50 40 30 20 10 PZT Drive (V) PZT Drive (V)

Q L General equation MinPower = Choosing Loaded-Q / δf ψ B 2 ( I ( r Q) cosψ ) + 2Q E + I ( r / Q) 0 B L 0 sin f0 E 2 For an ERL with perfect energy recovery. f0 QL MinPower 2Q δf L

Power Requirements As a Function of Loaded-Q 40 Hz detune allowance 20 Hz detune allowance 748.5 MHz r/q = 525 Ω/m L = 1 m E = 12.5 MV/m

Required RF Power Including Margins As a function of Detune Allowance

The Math of Measuring Microphonics Neglecting coupler and control system bandwidths, etc. the RF power or voltage necessary to sustain steady state operation are given by the following equations. PP RRRR = ββ + 1 4ββββ LL RR QQ 2 VV CC + II oo QQ LL RR QQ ccccccφφ 2 δδδδ BB + 2QQ LL VV ff CC + II oo QQ LL RR QQ ssssssφφ BB 0 VV RRRR = ZZ 0 ββ + 1 4ββQQ LL RR/QQ VV CC 1 + iiiiiiiiφφ RRRR + II 0 QQ LL RR/QQ ccccccφφ BB + iiiiiiiiφφ BB Where φφ RRRR is the relative phase between the RF drive signal a signal (e.g. field probe signal) which is in phase and proportional to the cavity voltage. Thus as will be discussed later one can use the relative phase between the RF drive signal and the cavity field probe signal to calculate a relative value of δδδδ. Assuming that the beam current is zero this reduces to: VV RRRR = ZZ 0 ββ + 1 4ββQQ LL RR/QQ VV CC 1 + iiiqq LL δδδδ ff 0

Closed Loop RF Drive Requirements The bandwidth of the fundamental power coupler is given by the follow: BBBB = ff 0 QQ LL Equation (1) is the steady state equation that does not take into account the time domain nature of the beam loading or microphonics as well as the stored energy within the cavity. Ignoring the beam loading and stored energy effects and including the time domain microphonics effects this equation can be written as: VV RRRR = ZZ 0 ββ + 1 4ββQQ LL RR/QQ VV CC 1 + iiiqq LL δδδδ tt ff 0 It can be shown that any frequency dependence of δδδδ tt is maintained through the phase rotation and that both I an Q must be processed as part of the fundamental power coupler compensation.

Closed Loop Drive Requirements If one assumes that: δδδδ tt = ωω DD ssssss ωω mm tt And that the relative phase shift between the source and the cavity is zero then: VV RRRR = ZZ 0 ββ + 1 4ββQQ LL RR/QQ VV CC cccccc ωω 0 tt + 2QQ LL ωω DD ssssss ωω mm tt ff 0 ssssss ωω 0 tt Rewriting this in complex form: VV RRRR = ZZ 0 ββ + 1 4ββQQ LL RR/QQ VV CC 1 + jjjqq LL ωω DD ssssss ωω mm tt ff 0

Closed Loop Drive Requirements Looking at the closed loop control system block diagram: ff ββ, QQ LL VV IIIIII 1 + ωω BBBB Cavity Coupler VV RRRR VV CC Cavity VV FF VV RR VV DDDDDDDDDD LLRF VV FFFF What you are really measuring is VV IIIIII To understand what the cavity is actually doing you must apply a low pass filter to the I/Q data prior to processing. Conversely if one wants to understand the real RF power requirements one must model the system with the predicted microphonics and a cavity model that includes the coupler bandwidth.

Microphonics Measurements when using a frequency tracking source The goal is to come up with a way to calculate microphonics frequency from some basic RF measurement that is insensitive to magnitude. The equation for an RF signal that is frequency modulated at a frequency of ω m with a modulation depth (or frequency shift) of ω D and an RF frequency of ω m is given by: VV tt = VV PPPPPPPP CCCCCC ωω 0 tt + ωω 1 tt + ωω DD ωω mm ssssss ωω mm tt = VV PPPPPPPP CCCCCC ωω 0 tt + φφ tt In this method one uses the concept that an RF signal at a frequency of ωω 0 can be written in the form: VV = VV PPPPPPPP II tt cccccc ωω 0 tt + QQ tt ssssss ωω 0 tt Applying this to the above equation leads to: V tt = VV PPPPPPPP CCCCCC ωω 0 tt + φφ tt V tt = VV PPPPPPPP cccccc φφ tt cccccc ωω 0 tt VV PPPPPPPP ssssss φφ tt ssssss ωω 0 tt

Microphonics Measurements when using a frequency tracking source It can be shown that. QQ dddd dddd II dddd dddd = VV 2 dddd tt PPPPPPPP dddd OR 1 2 QQ dddd dddd 2ππVV PPPPPPPP II dddd dddd = ff tt Nominally VV PPPPPPPP is ½ the peak-to-peak value of the sine waveforms that are collected in the I and Q data stream, that is achieved when acquiring the data using a I/Q based receiver system. However, if the I/Q receiver happens to be very close ωω 0 + ωω 1 then I and Q will be DC or close to DC values (i.e. a full sine or cosine waveform is not collected in the data set. In this case one needs to calculate the magnitude of VV PPPPPPPP on a point by point basis as: 2 VV PPPPPPPP tt = II 2 tt + QQ 2 tt

Microphonics Measurements when using a frequency tracking source If one has a discrete data stream the general form of the frequency shift is given by: ff ii+1 = 1 2ππ QQ ii 2 + II ii 2 QQ ii II ii+1 II ii tt II ii QQ ii+1 QQ ii tt Which can be reduced to: ff ii+1 = QQ iiii ii+1 II ii QQ ii+1 2ππ tt QQ ii 2 + II ii 2 Another way to approach the problem is to look at just the I term in equation from two slides ago which is:

Microphonics Measurements when using a frequency tracking source Another way to approach the problem is to look at just the I term in equation from two slides ago which is: II tt = VV PPPPPPPP cccccc φφ tt = II 2 tt + QQ 2 tt cccccc φφ tt Solving for φφ tt φφ tt = cccccc 1 II tt II 2 tt + QQ 2 tt There is digital signal processing techniques known as a CORDIC algorithm [Lang, Antelo] which allows one to calculate the inverse cosine function efficiently. This would provide you with a sampled signal set of φφ tt. If this is done then one can calculate the frequency shift as. ff = φφ ii+1 φφ ii 2ππ tt One can also take the derivative of the inverse cosine function above and show that: ff ii+1 = QQ iiii ii+1 II ii QQ ii+1 2ππ tt QQ ii 2 + II ii 2

Approaches to Acquiring I/Q Data Stream There are two basic approaches to acquiring a digital I/Q data stream. In the first, called synchronous acquisition, the RF signal is down converted to an intermediate frequency and sampled at a frequency that is either 4, 1/1.25, 1/2.5, 1/5... times the nominal IF frequency. When this is done and the actual IF frequency the sampled points are as shown below: Sampled at 4 times the IF frequency Sampled at 1/1.25 times the IF frequency. Using this approach provides a data stream v 1, v 2, v 3,... and I and Q are given by: II kk = vv 4kk vv 4kk+2 aaaaaa QQ kk = vv 4kk+1 vv 4kk+3

Approaches to Acquiring I/Q Data Stream If the RF IF frequency is not precisely related to the sample frequency by the ratio 4, 1/1.25, 1/2.5, 1/5... the I and Q signals will have the form: II tt = VV PPPPPPPP cccccc ωω 1 tt + φφ tt QQ tt = VV PPPPPPPP ssssss ωω 1 tt + φφ tt Where ωω 1 is the difference frequency between the ideal IF frequency and the actual IF frequency. One can implement such a system using a simple mixer to down convert the RF signal to an IF frequency as shown below to collect the data. FREQUENCY TRACKING RF SOURCE FIXED FREQUENCY RF SOURCE Example Parameters: IF = 400 khz, ADC clock = 320 khz Filter BW = 200 khz RF LO IF BPF ADC_CLK ADC We will try this next week.

Approaches to Acquiring I/Q Data Stream If the RF IF frequency is not precisely related to the sample frequency by the ratio 4, 1/1.25, 1/2.5, 1/5... the I and Q signals will have the form: II tt = VV PPPPPPPP cccccc ωω 1 tt + φφ tt QQ tt = VV PPPPPPPP ssssss ωω 1 tt + φφ tt Where ωω 1 is the difference frequency between the ideal IF frequency and the actual IF frequency. One can implement such a system using a simple mixer to down convert the RF signal to an IF frequency as shown below to collect the data. FREQUENCY TRACKING RF SOURCE FIXED FREQUENCY RF SOURCE RF LO IF ADC_CLK ADC Example Parameters CEBAF 12 GeV Field Control Chassis: IF = 70 MHz, ADC clock = 56 MHz Filter BW = 5 MHz DSP filter bandwidths 30 khz variable BPF We will also use one of these next week.

Approaches to Acquiring I/Q Data Stream Alternately one can use an analog cavity resonance monitor. I II _ + dddd dddd dddd tt KK dddd VVVVVVVV ωω 0 tt + φφ tt 10 db 0 RF LO 3 db STABLE RF SOURCE + - 1 khz LPF 1 Hz LPF LIMITER 90 RF LO I QQ _ dddd dddd + The front end circuitry requires careful tuning to ensure precise I/Q demodulation. The limiting amplifier is used to stabilize the gain in the system. Without it a separate power measurement would have to be made in order to calibrate the output signals. The analog baseband electronics provides the mathematical function of: QQ dddd dddd II dddd dddd

Application of Filters VV BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB tt = VV PPPPPPPP CCCCCC ωω 1 tt + ωω DD ωω mm ssssss ωω mm tt This is the formula for an FM modulated signal. The solution has the form of Bessel functions. VV tt VV PPPPPPPP = cccccc ωω 1 tt JJ 0 mm + 2 1 kk JJ 2kk mm cccccc 2kkωω mm tt kk=1 +ssssss ωω 1 tt 2 1 kk JJ 2kk+1 mm cccccc 2kk + 1 ωω mm tt kk=0 Where: mm = ωω DD ωω mm

Example Spectra for FM Modulation Spectrum of I for(left) f D = 25 Hz, f M =10, f 1 =100 and M=2.5, (Right) f D = 25 Hz, f M =100, f 1 =100 and M=0.25. Spectrum of I for(left) f D = 200 Hz, f M =75, f 1 =100 and M=2.66, (Right) f D = 200 Hz, f M =75, f 1 =300 and M=2.66

Effect of Sample Rate in Digitized System Time domain plot of the date from figure 3 sampled at (Top Left) 100 ks/s, (Top Right)10 ks/s, (Lower Left) 5 ks/s and (Lower Right) 2 ks/s

Lorentz Force Effect on Cavity Frequency as a Function of Gradient and for Different Instabilities in the Gradient with M=2

Impulse Response Test Math Excitation Excitation (hammer) Signal System Under Test Response Synchronous DAQ Signal Processing Transfer Function. H ω = avg Y ω avg X ω CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC. CC ωω = aaaaaa XX ωω XX ωω aaaaaa XX ωω YY ωω 2 aaaaaa YY ωω YY ωω

Math Transfer Function. Complex FFT is performed of the excitation and response signals. Because both real and imaginary information is included the transformed data contains all of the information in the original signal. The transfer function is calculated in the frequency domain and both phase and amplitude are plotted. Coherence Coherence is an indication that the system response is caused by the excitation. Coherence is calculated on a point by point basis in the frequency domain. Coherence is used to distinguish between responses that are driven by the excitation and the system response. If the system has vibrational characteristics that are driven by outside sources the coherence value will be less than one. Coherence REQUIRES averaging.