OTC Copyright 2011, Offshore Technology Conference

Similar documents
SUMMARY REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE PREVENTION OF MARINE OIL POLLUTION IN THE ARCTIC.

HSE and Quality. Sisimiut, 10th December FING: Arctic Region Oil & Gas Seminar in Training and Education

SPE A Systematic Approach to Well Integrity Management Alex Annandale, Marathon Oil UK; Simon Copping, Expro

Route Planning & Cable Route Surveys

Summary report RCN project no /I40

SUPPORT OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

Fig. 1. Overview map of promising areas of the Russian shelf.

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Petroleum and natural gas industries Offshore production installations Basic surface process safety systems

White Paper No. 8 ( )

Development of Floating Exploration & Production Solutions for Remote and Arctic Environments

Petroleum Safety Authority Norway Trends in Risk Level Risk Level Measuring Scheme

Type Approval JANUARY The electronic pdf version of this document found through is the officially binding version

Globalization & Economic Interests in the New Maritime Arctic

STANDARDIZATION AS A TOOL FOR PREVENTION OF OIL SPILLS IN THE ARCTIC SUMMARY REPORT

PROTECTION OF THE ARCTIC MARINE ENVIRONMENT PAME WORKING GROUP

The Norwegian Context PTIL/PSA 1

Arctic Shipping Navigating the Legal Landscape for marine infrastructure and Off-Shore Development

CLIA Member Experience Implementation of the Polar Code. Kierstin M. Del Valle February 22, 2018

Strategic and operational risk management for wintertime maritime transportation system

Defining the New Normal for Offshore Drilling Copenhagen 16 June Alan Spackman Vice President, Offshore Regulatory & Technical Affairs

Extract of Advance copy of the Report of the International Conference on Chemicals Management on the work of its second session

Satellite data for Maritime Operations. Andreas Hay Kaljord Project Manager Energy, Environment & Security

Newsletter Arctic Safety Centre Summer 2017

Marine biological diversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction. Legal and policy framework

Air pollution control in a new oil and gas developments using best available techniques

The EU and Norway: addressing Arctic and maritime challenges

WWF-Canada s Recommendations to the National Energy Board Regarding Arctic Offshore Drilling Requirements

Summary of Changes and Current Document Status

Scotian Basin Exploration Drilling Project: Timeline

The Accessible Arctic

Ice Endangers Offshore Arctic Operations

Resources for the Future. Arctic Potential

GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE CMC SERVICES

Consolidation of Navigation Safety Regulations IMO - NCSR / MSC Updates

Innovation and Risk Regulatory Challenges and tools

Click to edit Master title style APPEA AWIC UPDATE. Self Audit Checklist Source Control First Response

Risk Management in Ice Covered Waters

TECHNOLOGY QUALIFICATION MANAGEMENT

MINISTRY OF ENERGY AND PETROLEUM (MPE) ON NORWAY S PETROLEUM ACTIVITIES: WHITE PAPER (2011) AND THE STATE

4 Briefing. Responsible investor

Technology for a better society. Foto: Gunnar Sand

Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP)

ROUTEING OF SHIPS, SHIP REPORTING AND RELATED MATTERS. New traffic separation schemes and two-way routes in Norra Kvarken

Emerging Subsea Networks

National Petroleum Council. Arctic Potential Realizing the Promise of U.S. Arctic Oil and Gas Resources

Well Control Contingency Plan Guidance Note (version 2) 02 December 2015

Reversing the trend Collaboration, Robustness and Standardization

Pan-Canadian Trust Framework Overview

MARITIME FORUM GULF OF MEXICO OIL DISASTER WHAT RISKS FOR EUROPE?

Offshore Wind Risks - Issues and Mitigations

Arctic and Cold Climate. Capability & Experience

Nauticus (Propulsion) - the modern survey scheme for machinery

THE USE OF A SAFETY CASE APPROACH TO SUPPORT DECISION MAKING IN DESIGN

2. Thank you for the kind reception. I am honoured to be among the prominent speakers invited to address you at the Ny-Ålesund Symposium.

Evaluation of Strategic Area: Marine and Maritime Research. 1) Strategic Area Concept

DEVELOPMENT OF SUBSEA REGULATIONS IN THE NORWEGIAN PETROLEUM INDUSTRY FOLLOW UP AND USE OF STANDARDS

Taking a broader view

OCS leasing program draft PEIS comments Attachment A

Harmonization of Nuclear Codes & Standards Pacific Nuclear Council Working and Task Group Report

Agenda item 9: Scope, time of recording and Trade System

Oil and Gas UK Well Integrity Guidelines

Lorenza Jachia Secretary, Working Party on Regulatory Cooperation and Standardization Policies, UN Economic Commission for Europe

ROUTEING OF SHIPS, SHIP REPORTING AND RELATED MATTERS. Establishment of a Mandatory Ship Reporting System in the

API COPM CPMA Chapter 20.X

Arctic resource recovery tests materials technology

Reflection on the Norwegian Experience within the Oil and Gas sector

EIA FOR EXPLORATION DRILLING WITHIN BLOCK ER236, OFFSHORE OF THE EAST COAST OF SOUTH AFRICA. Background Information Document. Purpose of this Document

RESOLUTION MSC.229(82) (adopted on 5 December 2006) ADOPTION OF A NEW MANDATORY SHIP REPORTING SYSTEM "IN THE GALAPAGOS PARTICULARLY SENSITIVE SEA

Performance-Based Safety Regulation

Class Update on Latest Ship to Ship Transfer Plan

Presentation by Matthias Reister Chief, International Merchandise Trade Statistics

Technology challenges for year-round oil and gas production at 74 N in the Barents Sea

National Petroleum Council

National Petroleum Council. Arctic Potential

NATIONAL POLICY ON OILED BIRDS AND OILED SPECIES AT RISK

DEVELOPMENT OF A DEFINITION FOR MSPS AND CONSIDERATION FOR THE HARMONIZATION OF THE FORMAT AND STRUCTURE OF MSPS

Continuous On-line Measurement of Water Content in Petroleum (Crude Oil and Condensate)

JOINT INDUSTRY OFFSHORE OPERATING PROCEDURES TASK FORCE, JOINT INDUSTRY OFFSHORE EQUIPMENT TASK FORCE, JOINT INDUSTRY SUBSEA WELL CONTROL AND

UNSD-SACU workshop for International Merchandise Trade Statistics (IMTS 2010) in SACU Member States June 2012, Johannesburg, South Africa

DNVGL-CP-0212 Edition March 2016

Kathy Metcalf President, Chamber of Shipping of America Chairman, ICS Environmental Subcommittee ICS International Shipping Conference 2015

FRAMEWORK ACT ON MARINE FISHERY DEVELOPMENT. [Enforcement Date: Nov. 28, 2009] [Act No. 9717, May 27, 2009, Other Laws and Regulations Amended]

EU-PolarNet connecting science with society

Commercial Human Spaceflight: Self-regulation is the Future

Draft executive summaries to target groups on industrial energy efficiency and material substitution in carbonintensive

RESOLUTION MSC.21(59) (adopted on 22 May 1991)

CHAPTER TWENTY COOPERATION. The objective of this Chapter is to facilitate the establishment of close cooperation aimed, inter alia, at:

First MyOcean User Workshop 7-8 April 2011, Stockholm Main outcomes

Our position in 2010: life was good and getting better ITOPF 2010

Commercial Marine Shipping in Canada: Understanding the Risks

Responding to Montara and Macondo Actions by Australia's oil and gas industry

e-navigation Progress and trends: the IHO perspective

DRAFT ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION A. (26)

Regulations on decommissioning and plugging

Canada s Ballast Water Requirements. September 2016

Abstract. Mission. Exceptions

Wells Expert Committee Bulletin

Experience, Role, and Limitations of Relief Wells

WG/STAIR. Knut Blind, STAIR Chairman

Who are IPIECA and IOGP?

Transcription:

OTC 22036 Assessment of International Standards for Safe Exploration, Production and Transportation of Oil and Gas in the Barents Sea Erling Sæbø, Gus Cammaert, Det Norske Veritas Copyright 2011, Offshore Technology Conference This paper was prepared for presentation at the Arctic Technology Conference held in Houston, Texas, USA, 7 9 February 2011. This paper was selected for presentation by an ATC program committee following review of information contained in an abstract submitted by the author(s). Contents of the paper have not been reviewed by the Offshore Technology Conference and are subject to correction by the author(s). The material does not necessarily reflect any position of the Offshore Technology Conference, its officers, or members. Electronic reproduction, distribution, or storage of any part of this paper without the written consent of the Offshore Technology Conference is prohibited. Permission to reproduce in print is restricted to an abstract of not more than 300 words; illustrations may not be copied. The abstract must contain conspicuous acknowledgment of OTC copyright. Abstract In 2007, Norwegian Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Store initiated the "Barents 2020" project - a joint Norwegian-Russian project dedicated to establishing acceptable health, environmental protection and safety standards in the Barents Sea. Russia's experience of operations in harsh climate regions and Norwegian expertise in the field of offshore operations has resulted in the successful implementation of the project on the harmonization of standards for environmental protection and safety in a vulnerable Barents Sea. Cooperation continues and is now entering a new phase with the aim of preparing industry guidelines for selected topics not only for the Barents Sea, but also with a pan-arctic perspective. The main sponsors of the project are now Gazprom, Statoil, ENI, Total, Shtokman Development AG (SDAG), the Oil and Gas Producers Association (OGP) and Det Norske Veritas (DNV). The project is to be completed by December 2011. The main objective of this paper is to summarize the current findings and recommendations from the various expert groups involved in the project. Abbreviations In this report the following abbreviations are frequently referred to: API American Petroleum Institute CSA Canadian Standards Association DIS Draft International Standard DNV Det Norske Veritas EER Escape, Evacuation, and Rescue HSE Health Safety and Environment IMO International Maritime Organisation ISO International Organisation for Standardization MARPOL International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships NORSOK Norwegian offshore Petroleum Industry Standard OGP International Association of Oil and Gas Producers RP Recommended Practice WG Working Group Conclusive Summary The purpose of the Barents2020 project is to recommend HSE standards for common Norwegian Russian application in the Barents Sea, for safeguarding people, environment and asset values in connection with oil and gas activities, including marine transportation. The underlying assumption is that petroleum operations in the Barents Sea should be at least as safe as those in the North Sea. Phase 1 of the project lasted from October 2007 to October 2008. The results of Phase 1 were documented in 5 position papers. These papers provided the basis for further work in Phase 2, lasting from November 2008 to March 2009, resulting in the special topics prioritized for further study in expert working groups in Phase 3. The selection of topics for further work was carried out in close cooperation between the Norwegian and Russian participating organizations. The process was constructive and quick, based on both Russian and Norwegian proposals. There was full agreement between the parties that these topics are important issues which need to be addressed in relation to safeguarding oil and gas operations in the Barents Sea.

2 OTC 900511 The Barents 2020 project in Phase 3 focused on the selection of standards and the potential improvements which would help prevent incidents or accidents from occurring, e.g. to reduce the probability of incidents happening, rather than to mitigate the consequences of incidents. This process has been unique, and represents the first serious effort at determining how existing standards may be applied for oil and gas operations in the Barents Sea. In new situations, especially for offshore projects in the Arctic, existing regulations and technical standards have normally not been prepared or updated to address Arctic conditions. The project took as a basic assumption that protection of the environment and the resources in the Barents Sea is a shared responsibility between Norway and Russia. The Phase 3 activities were completed and presented in an annual conference in Moscow in December 2009. More than 100 Russian and international experts participated in the work. Introduction The need for HSE industry standards to take into account the additional challenges due to Arctic conditions, i.e. low temperatures, ice, icing, long distances, darkness, etc. have become apparent in connection with proposed oil and gas development projects in the Barents Sea, and the increased maritime tanker traffic from the Barents Sea along the Norwegian coast due to petroleum developments in the High North. The international oil and gas industry applies recognized technical standards which are used worldwide. The accumulated experience of the industry over many years and from all parts of the world is included in these standards through systematic updating and issuance of new revisions. These standards therefore represent best international practice in order to achieve an acceptable level of safety for the oil and gas industry, including offshore activities. However, the updating of standards is a time consuming process, since it requires consensus from many parties, and the improvements may come late for actual industry needs. In new situations, such as for offshore projects in the Arctic, existing regulations and technical standards have normally not been prepared or updated to address Arctic conditions. In order to achieve an acceptable level of safety against new or expanded HSE challenges due to Arctic conditions, existing technical standards must be supplemented by: Definition of societal and company safety objectives; Suitable and sufficient risk assessment from concept to execution and operations; Survey and acquisition of site specific environmental data and loads; Definition of additional or modified functional requirements. The standards are general and can apply to many geographical areas and project development options. Certain applicable standards may require the need to establish project specific requirements and design criteria by input of: Site-specific environmental data regarding temperatures, waves, winds, etc.; Safety criteria for the project as basis for selection of safety factors, etc.; and Additional requirements of regulations for the specific area. This project gives recommendations on how existing standards may be applied specifically for oil and gas operations in the Barents Sea. Russian-Norwegian Cooperation Project This project was partly funded through the Norwegian Government s Barents 2020 program and partly by Russian and Norwegian Industry. Description of the Project The project took as a basic assumption that protection of the environment and the resources in the Barents Sea is a shared responsibility between Norway and Russia. This project has therefore aimed at creating a dialogue between relevant Norwegian and Russian parties regarding safety of petroleum related activities in the Barents Sea. Through identification of areas for harmonization of HSE standards for use in Norwegian and Russian parts of the Barents Sea, the project aimed to contribute to an acceptable and uniform safety level in the oil and gas activity in the Barents Sea, a predictable HSE framework for oil and gas companies and contractors independent of nationality, and an improved basis for cooperation for all involved parties in the future. Furthermore, the project aimed to identify areas where there is a need to update existing key industry standards to take into account the additional challenges related to Arctic conditions, and contribute to creating a dialogue, and share knowledge, between relevant Norwegian and Russian parties. The result of the work after completion of Phase 3 is summarized here. The recommendations made have been submitted to national regulatory bodies for their consideration. Proposals for updating and revision of industry standards due to Arctic challenges will be submitted to the bodies responsible for updating of the standards in question, such as ISO and IMO for instance.

OTC 900511 3 General Identification of Hazards and Risks The Barents Sea is not uniform with respect to hazards and risks related to oil and gas operations. The south-western part is in many ways comparable to the North Sea with respect to environmental conditions, while additional Arctic challenges increase further east and to the north (see Figure 1). III I IV II V VI VII VIII Figure 1. Environmental zones for the Barents Sea, as defined by the Arctic and Antarctic Institute I II II IV V VI VII VIII Spitsbergen/Svalbard Norwegian Franz Josef Land Northeast Barents Sea Novozemelsky Kola Pechora Sea White Sea Zone II is generally ice-free Zones I, III, IV, VII and VIII usually have ice every winter Zones V and VI are in between While risk is defined as the product of the probability of an incident and the consequence of that incident, it is reasonable to assume that the consequences of accidents - in terms of loss of lives, environmental damage and/or economical loss - may be more serious in the Arctic due to remoteness, huge distances, and lack of infrastructure which make emergency response more challenging, darkness which makes response more difficult, extreme temperature and weather making response more challenging, sea ice complicating rescue operations and oil spill response, vulnerable marine and coastal environment, potentially long down-time of operations after accidents, due to only seasonal access for repair, and high public attention to activities in the Barents Sea, low public tolerance for accidents, with potential for loss of reputation for all parties involved If the consequences may be more serious in the Barents Sea, it means that the risk level also will be higher unless risk mitigating measures are made. While the risk can be reduced by reducing the probability and/or mitigating the consequences of potential accidents, some of the consequence driving factors, such as darkness, low temperatures, remoteness and vulnerable environment, cannot easily be compensated for. Hence in order to maintain the same safety level (i.e. risk level) as in the North Sea, it is more effective to address and reduce the probability of incidents to prevent accidents from happening. Standards and procedures for offshore operations in the Arctic must then reflect the need to mitigate the increased risks, by reducing the probability of incidents. Explosion and fire risk management is considered to be an important area with respect to safe design of Arctic offshore installations. Cold and harsh climate require protection of personnel and process equipment by enclosing process areas. But this reduces the ventilation rate compared to naturally ventilated areas, and may cause even a relatively small release of hydrocarbons to build up an ignitable gas cloud of sufficient size to expose an ignition source. This indicates the complexity of dealing with risk issues in the Arctic. Figure 2 illustrates how such risk mitigation measures influence platform designs through the use of protective enclosures.

4 OTC 900511 Figure 2. Platform designs for the North Sea and the Barents Sea (Left - Sevan Hummingbird installed in the North Sea. Right -Sevan Goliat design proposed for the Barents Sea) Selected Study Topics The final topics selected for further work in Phase 3 are listed in Table 1 below. The descriptions of the topics were rewritten and refined several times, both in Russian and English, in order to make absolutely sure that a common understanding existed between the Norwegian and the Russian side. The final topic descriptions were approved by the Project Steering Committee in January of 2009. Table 1. Seven selected topics addressed in Phase 3 of Barents 2020 Project 1 Recommend the basic list of internationally recognized standards for use in the Barents Sea 2 Recommend standards for design of stationary offshore units against ice loads in the Barents Sea 3 Recommend standards for risk management of major hazards, such as fires, explosions and blow-outs on offshore drilling, production and storage units in the Barents Sea 4 Recommend standards for evacuation and rescue of people from ships and offshore units, including standards for rescue equipment 5 Recommend standards for working environment and safety related to human performance and decision making (human factors) for operations in the Barents Sea 6 Recommend safe standards for loading, unloading and ship transportation of oil in the Barents Sea to minimize risk of accidental oil spills 7 Recommend standards for operational emissions and discharges to air and water in the Barents Sea Expert Working Groups DNV, responsible for project management, appointed coordinators for all seven expert working groups which addressed the topics listed. The coordinator plans, facilitates and leads the Russian-Norwegian groups through workshops and the final presentation of results. The coordinator is also responsible for compiling the group s recommendations in a written report. (The authors of this publication were Erling Sæbo, Project Manager of Barents2020, and Gus Cammaert, Group Coordinator for Work Group 4). Settlement of the Boundary Dispute After 40 years of negotiations, Norway and Russia have agreed on a maritime border for the Barents Sea. President Dmitry Medvedev of Russia and Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg of Norway signed the boundary agreement on 15 September 2010, which will enter into force after it has been ratified by the Russian and Norwegian parliaments. The agreed boundary (the yellow line in Figure 3) divides the formerly disputed area of the Barents Sea nearly in half representing a half-way compromise solution between the long-held Russian claim (in red) and the Norwegian claim (in purple). The boundary agreement sweeps away an atmosphere of uncertainty that has restrained commercial activity in the area for decades. It clarifies jurisdictions of the exclusive economic zone and continental shelf; the exploitation of trans-boundary hydrocarbon deposits is currently being addressed. In any case this new agreement makes the Barents2020 project even more relevant than ever.

OTC 900511 5 Figure 3. Final boundary adjudication between Norway and Russia Ocean Futures, Norway. Used with permission. Phase 3 Recommendations from Working Groups The recommendations from the 7 Barents2020 Working Groups are summarized below. RN01: Internationally recognized standards Group 1, also called RN01 (Russian-Norwegian expert group number 1) summarized the recommendations from all working groups, and also considered recommended recognized standards for topics which have not been studied in detail in this project. Hence the list of standards from Group RN01 covers standards for most, if not all, aspects related to safeguarding personnel, environment, and asset values in connection with offshore operations in the Barents Sea. The full list is attached to the Barents 2020 Phase 3 report (see reference below). RN02: Design of stationary offshore units against ice loads Following the analysis of the most used standards and rules on ice loads against stationary structures, the Working Group recommended the following to the Barents2020 Steering Committee: ISO 19906 should be used as basis for the design and operation of stationary units in the Barents Sea; Internationally approved direct translations of ISO 19906 should be implemented as national standards; The Working Group identified ten topics, of which four are prioritized, that should be amended in ISO/DIS 19906 (Draft International Standard). A Guidance Document was identified as the best way to address these topics. The Guidance Document should be prepared in close cooperation with ISO WG8, pay due considerations to ongoing projects be ready in draft form by end 2011, with a focus on floating platforms meet the immediate and future needs for the Barents Sea be a common Russian-Norwegian supplement to ISO 19906 until an update is available be submitted to ISO as a proposed international supplement to ISO 19906 at the first update The group concluded that ISO 19906 is the standard best suited to meet the objectives of the Working Group. Most of the Russian standards deal with fresh water ice and are not directly applicable for use in the Barents Sea, whereas the most relevant national standards such as API RP 2N and CSA S471-04 have been integrated into the recent version of ISO19906.

6 OTC 900511 RN03: Risk management of major hazards The area of offshore safety and risk management has many interfaces to other engineering disciplines, and includes aspects within many engineering areas. It was therefore necessary to select some areas for prioritization, since the mandate for the work has been review of a limited number of key recognized standards: Standards for functionality and performance of technical safety barriers in Arctic conditions: Containment of hydrocarbons in order to prevent and mitigate uncontrolled releases; Ignition source control; Fire and explosion risk management; and Prevention of loss of well integrity and blow outs. Standards for safety risk assessment of major hazards for topside facilities on offshore drilling, production and storage units in the Barents Sea, all with the aim to prevent occurrence and escalation of incidents. The main priority of the group was to agree on a set of technical standards that can work as a framework for risk management and risk assessment of major hazards in the Barents Sea. In this work the group agreed that it would be beneficial to select a set of standards that has proven to work in an area that is comparable to the conditions in the Barents Sea, and which is based on international best practice. An agreed list of international risk management standards is included in the Phase 3 final report. One of the main recommendations of the group was to promote dialogue between Russian and Norwegian experts and executive authorities (regulation bodies) about risk management and risk assessment in the offshore design process, and application of functional safety standards. RN04: Evacuation and rescue of people from ships and offshore units The RN04 group assessed a number of Norwegian, Russian and other international standards for maritime and offshore work typical for Barents Sea conditions, taking into account Russian and Norwegian experience with cold climate operations of ships in Arctic and sub-arctic conditions, including the northern Caspian Sea and offshore Sakhalin Island. The assessment included a review of a limited number of key recognized standards, which currently contribute to the definition of the safety level for people, environment and investments within the reviewed topics. The Working Group focused specifically on ISO19906 as this is judged to be the most appropriate key standard as a basis for further development for Barents Sea use, and the only international EER standard which deals with Arctic issues. It was concluded that the best way to address the findings of the group would be to propose a separate addendum or guidance document to ISO 19906 for the Barents Sea. It is clearly recognized that safe emergency evacuation of personnel from offshore structures and vessels is of critical importance in the event of a major hazardous event. In addition to the issue of specific evacuation systems and their capabilities, the question of safe evacuation also involves the procedures and training that are necessary for personnel to respond to emergency situations, and to understand the range of environmental situations that may be met. However, while progress is being made in HSE standards and guidelines, similar progress has not been made in the development of suitable evacuation methods and equipment in order to deal with different emergency situations in both ice and open water conditions. Although it is not commonly stated, most practitioners recognize that almost all of the evacuation systems developed to date do have some major limitations, depending on the specific conditions encountered. This is particularly true for offshore structures operating in ice. RN05: Working environment and safety related to human performance The RN05 Work Group focused on how to mitigate risk to health and human work capacity due to accidents and Arctic environmental conditions in the Barents Sea, including: Physical environment and safety of workers in cold climate (e.g., hypothermia, cold related injuries and diseases); Risk of accidents from accumulations of ice and snow (e.g., slippery surfaces, falling ice); Impairment of the performance of physical tasks and work efficiency; Fatigue and impairment of the execution of complex mental tasks, cognition and decision making; and First aid and medical provision The Work Group reviewed various international, national and industry standards related to working environment and human factors for operations in cold climate. The group considered that ISO 19906 is the ideal place for articulating an international functional standard for offshore operations in the Arctic, however, the current draft lacks any treatment of working environment or human factor issues, reserving these for future development. In the meantime, the group concluded that NORSOK S-002 is the best, currently available functional standard to use as a starting point for offshore operations in the Barents Sea. It provides reasonably comprehensive guidance, at a functional level, on working environment issues. Additional research and development activities are needed in some areas that are not currently well understood: Study of work stress and fatigue in an Arctic climate; Study on the interaction between cold, noise and vibration on human health; Comparison of wind chill indices and their accompanying cold exposure risk classifications; Industry collaboration on the joint development and testing of clothing and personal protection equipment for use in the various Arctic climate zones.

OTC 900511 7 RN07: Loading, unloading and ship transportation of oil In order to establish and maintain an equivalent safety level in the Barents Sea compared with North Sea, a risk analysis was performed. The results identified the main hazards and highlighted the different operations which needed specific attention. Prevailing procedures and standards relevant to the risk aspects were identified and weaknesses found in those standards related to operational conditions in different areas of the Barents Sea. The operation identified as the most vulnerable one (i.e. with the largest oil spills) was considered to be the offloading from an offshore installation to a shuttle tanker. Due to the temporary connection with several parties involved a cargo transfer operation is a complex process, and a hose fracture/leakage can be considered as the most probable cause of an oil spill. The ice management carried out in connection with the loading operation taking place in ice covered waters was also identified as having a high risk level due to lack of formal procedures related to competence training and actual operations. Ice management is currently based largely on the experience of the captain onboard the icebreaker. There is an ongoing process in IMO to further develop and make the IMO Guidelines for Ships Operating in Polar Waters (issued in 2009) mandatory for all vessels entering Arctic and Antarctic waters. Hence the group decided to focus on the special operations related to loading and transport of oil, and not the regular operation of a vessel in transit. The Work Group agreed that there are significant weaknesses in current international and industry standards with regards to navigation in ice in general and the topic of ice management in particular. The group has now made some suggestions on how these standards can be updated. RN01: Operational emissions and discharges to air and water The number of international technical standards relevant to environmental aspects of offshore petroleum activities in the Barents Sea is low. However, some key international generic standards covering a wide scope and range of activities were identified and prioritized. They are supported with more narrow scoped/targeting national or industry standards where applicable. Most standards identified and recommended are basically on a high level, not going into the details of every aspect. This is considered a natural first step of harmonization, where the next step could focus on more detailed standards for certain applications. References to the detailed level technical standards are however normally given in the high level standards. The work scope of RN07 is wide, covering all relevant operational (planned) emissions to air, discharges to sea, and relevant waste management and supply services. Maritime transport activities directly linked to offshore petroleum activities form a natural part of this scope. In summary, the particular Barents Sea conditions evaluated, with few exceptions, do not justify a level of standards for the Barents Sea different to the high level of environmental standards being applied within the offshore oil and gas industry in comparable areas today (e.g. on the Norwegian Continental Shelf and the North Sea). However, harmonization is necessary in order to ensure a common set of standards throughout the Barents Sea. In certain cases more stringent standards were recommended for certain issues. Further information The full report on the Barents 2020 project (136 pages) has now been published, and is publicly available on the DNV web site (see reference below). In addition to the recommendations from the Working Groups, a full list of recommended standards is available in the Appendix to the Report. A total of 26 technical areas are covered, and the various standards are classified according to those which can currently be used for the Barents Sea, or those which need special consideration or amendment. Phase 4 Activities In 2010 the Barents 2020 Project (Phase 4) evolved into an international joint industry project, in order to draw on a wider source of competence to address challenges in the offshore Arctic, and not only in the Barents Sea. The deliverables from this final phase will consist of industry guidelines that address safety critical issues not sufficiently covered in previous work. The high degree of co-operation with Russian industry and authorities continues, as safe petroleum activity in the Barents Sea should be a shared responsibility between Russia and Norway. Phase 4 of the project will complete its work at the end of 2011, and the results should ensure that better guidance will be available to the industry for safe offshore operations in the Arctic. Table 2 lists the proposed deliverables which will be presented to the Barents2020 Steering Committee at the 4 th Annual Conference in Moscow in December 2011.

8 OTC 900511 Table 2. Proposed deliverables for Phase 4 of the Barents 2020 Project Panel Topic Phase 4 Deliverables RN01 RN02 RN03 RN04 RN05 RN06 RN07 Internationally recognized standards for use in the Barents Sea Design of stationary floating units against ice loads in the Barents Sea Risk management of major hazards, such as fires, explosions and blow-outs on offshore drilling, production and storage units in the Barents Sea Evacuation and rescue of people from ships and offshore units, including standards for rescue equipment Working environment and safety related to human performance and decision making (human factors) for operations in the Barents Sea Loading, unloading and ship transportation of oil in the Barents Sea to minimize risk of accidental oil spills Operational emissions and discharges to air and water in the Barents Sea Recommendations on how Phase 4 deliverables should be structured, edited and published to fit well into the collection of existing standards, and how they can be used in revision and/or development of new ISO standards Guidance document for design against ice loads on stationary floating structures that may serve as a common Russian-Norwegian separate supplement to ISO 19906 for the Barents Sea. Carry out risk assessment seminars for arctic conditions with focus on experience exchange, methods and software, databases and practical applications of risk assessment for offshore activities in the design process Guidance document in form of commentary on ISO19906 EER provisions. Two reports to be prepared on performance standards (or functional specifications) for an Arctic lifeboat and an emergency response vessel. Guidance document as possible annex to ISO 19906, to provide industry guidance for safe working environment for personnel on board ships and offshore installations operating in the Barents Sea Guidance document as possible annex proposal to ISO 19906, to make the ice management operations more safe and optimal from an economical and environmental point of view A regional environmental standard for the Barents Sea to reflect MARPOL Special Area (SA) requirements for discharges and emissions from oil and gas related ship traffic and offshore units References Russian-Norwegian Cooperation Project. Assessment of International Standards for Safe Exploration, Production and Transportation of Oil and Gas in the Barents Sea. DNV Report No. 2009-1626, August 2009. (Available at http://www.dnv.com/resources/reports/barents2020.asp)