EVLA Front-End CDR. Overview & System Requirements

Similar documents
EVLA Front-End CDR. EVLA Ka-Band (26-40 GHz) Receiver

EVLA Front-End CDR. Plans for S (2-4), X (8-12) & Ku (12-18 GHz) Receiver Bands

EVLA Receivers PDR. (4m, P,) L, S, C BAND RECEIVERS. AuthorDaniel (Mert) Mertely

EVLA Receiver Issues. EVLA Advisory Committee Meeting, March 19-20, 2009

EVLA System Commissioning Results

EVLA Scientific Commissioning and Antenna Performance Test Check List

EVLA Memo #119 Wide-Band Sensitivity and Frequency Coverage of the EVLA and VLA L-Band Receivers

EVLA Antenna and Array Performance. Rick Perley

Ku-Band Receiver System for SHAO

5 RECEIVERS TABLE TBD: EVLA RECEIVER FREQUENCY RANGES AND OPERATING TEMPERATURES

Summary Report / EVLA FE PDR

EVLA Memo 60. The Circular Polarization Characteristics of the New VLA K-Band Receiver System

EVLA Memo 151 EVLA Antenna Polarization at L, S, C, and X Bands

EVLA Technical Performance

2 Gain Variation from the Receiver Output through the IF Path

Antennas and Receivers in Radio Astronomy

Figure 1 Photo of an Upgraded Low Band Receiver

EVLA Project Book, Chapter 4 4 Antennas and Feeds. Jim Ruff, Ed Szpindor, S. Srikanth Last changed 2002-Feb-28

Antennas & Receivers in Radio Astronomy Mark McKinnon. Twelfth Synthesis Imaging Workshop 2010 June 8-15

The WVR at Effelsberg. Thomas Krichbaum

Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array Expanded Very Large Array Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope Very Long Baseline Array

K band Focal Plane Array: Mechanical and Cryogenic Considerations Steve White,Bob Simon, Mike Stennes February 20, 2008 COLD ELECTRONICS

EVLA Memo # 194 EVLA Ka-band Receiver Down Converter Module Harmonics: The Mega-Birdie at MHz

Receiver Design for Passive Millimeter Wave (PMMW) Imaging

Millimeter Wave Product Catalogue VivaTech Consulting S.A.R.L.

EVLA Memo 137 Performance Tests of the EVLA K, Ka, and Q-Band Receivers

VHF testing 05 May 10-12

Using the OML Millimeter Wave Vector Network Analyzer Frequency Extension Modules with the HP 8510 Vector Network Analyzer

AVN Training HartRAO 2016

GBT Spectral Baseline Investigation Rick Fisher, Roger Norrod, Dana Balser (G. Watts, M. Stennes)

Symmetry in the Ka-band Correlation Receiver s Input Circuit and Spectral Baseline Structure NRAO GBT Memo 248 June 7, 2007

RF Components Product Catalogue

Receivers for. FFRF Tutorial by Tom Clark, NASA/GSFC & NVI Wettzell, March 19, 2009

Anne-Laure Fontana, Catherine Boucher, Yves Bortolotti, Florence Cope, Bastien Lefranc, Alessandro Navarrini, Doris Maier, Karl-F.

Detector Systems. Graeme Carrad

NATIONAL RADIO ASTRONOMY OBSERVATORY Socorro, NM ELECTRONICS DIVISION TECHNICAL NOTE NO. 217

AMPLIFIERS, ANTENNAS, MULTIPLIERS, SOURCES, WAVEGUIDE PRODUCTS MILLIMETER-WAVE COMPONENTS FERRITE PRODUCTS AND SUB-SYSTEMS

Multiplying Interferometers

NATIONAL RADIO ASTRONOMY OBSERVATORY CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA. ELECTRONICS DIVISION INTERNAL REPORT No. 275 CRYOGENIC, HEMT, LOW-NOISE RECEIVERS

EVLA Memo 80. A Gain Slope Correction Scheme for the EVLA Receiver System

EVLA Memo #168 Assessing the Impact of Using Three Cryogenic Compressors on the Performance of the EVLA

LE/ESSE Payload Design

NATIONAL RADIO ASTRONOMY OBSERVATORY Socorro, NM ELECTRONICS DIVISION TECHNICAL NOTE NO. 217

Radio Telescope Receivers

Antennas. Greg Taylor. University of New Mexico Spring Astronomy 423 at UNM Radio Astronomy

EVLA Memo 105. Phase coherence of the EVLA radio telescope

Antennas & Receivers in Radio Astronomy

Revisions: jee Initial A jee Webber s comments: Prediction changed to predetection and explicit text added about Warm IF amp

Revisions: jee Initial jee Corrected label on Figs 6 and 7, Updated Block Diagram

Ka Band Radar Transceiver

Gains and Signal Levels

Heterodyne Sweeping Radiometer

MMA Memo 143: Report of the Receiver Committee for the MMA

SERIES MXP BALANCED MIXERS FEATURES: APPLICATIONS: DESCRIPTION

Added Phase Noise measurement for EMBRACE LO distribution system

Parameter Min. Typ. Max. Units

EVLA Memo 103 Performance Tests of the EVLA K- and Q-Band Systems

Data Sheet SC5317 & SC5318A. 6 GHz to 26.5 GHz RF Downconverter SignalCore, Inc. All Rights Reserved

A BROADBAND POLARIZATION SELECTABLE FEED FOR COMPACT RANGE APPLICATIONS

Antennas. Greg Taylor. University of New Mexico Spring Astronomy 423 at UNM Radio Astronomy

Etude d un récepteur SIS hétérodyne multi-pixels double polarisation à 3mm de longueur d onde pour le télescope de Pico Veleta

Double-Ridged Waveguide Horn

TU Library-Downtown Library-Mountain R. Freund J. Payne A. Perfetto W. Shillue

Introduction to Radio Astronomy!

Development of SIS mixers for future receivers at NAOJ

ADI 2006 RF Seminar. Chapter II RF/IF Components and Specifications for Receivers

Passive GaAs MMIC IQ Mixer. Green Status. Refer to our website for a list of definitions for terminology presented in this table.

1. Device Overview. Low LO Drive Passive GaAs MMIC IQ Mixer

Micromachined microwave circuits at Birmingham. M J Lancaster P S Hall, P Gardner, F Huang, Y Wang, M Ke K Jiang, P Prewett

Signal Flow & Radiometer Equation. Aletha de Witt AVN-Newton Fund/DARA 2018 Observational & Technical Training HartRAO

OPTICS OF SINGLE BEAM, DUAL BEAM & ARRAY RECEIVERS ON LARGE TELESCOPES J A M E S W L A M B, C A L T E C H

Ultra High Frequency Measurements

New Trends on Receivers Development" May 30, 2005, Medicina. RECEIVING SYSTEMs for the ANTENNAS OPERATED by the INSTITUTE of RADIOASTRONOMY in ITALY

NEWTON TRAINING (2018):

Estimation of cross coupling of receiver noise between the EoR fat-dipole antennas

MICROWAVE MICROWAVE TRAINING BENCH COMPONENT SPECIFICATIONS:

The Future: Ultra Wide Band Feeds and Focal Plane Arrays

Turnstile Junction Orthomode Transducer An option for EVLA X-Band Receiver X-Band OMT Design Review Meeting; AOC, Socorro; October1, 2009

EVLA Memo 110 The Effect of Amplifier Compression by Narrowband RFI on Radio Interferometer Imaging

Low frequency noise measurements in direct detection radiometers

and GHz. ECE Radiometer. Technical Description and User Manual

Band 11 Receiver Development

MMA RECEIVERS: HFET AMPLIFIERS

SERIES PLS PHASE LOCKED SYNTHESIZER. FEATURES: Small Size, Low Cost, Simple to use Low Phase Noise Auto-sensing Internal or External 10MHz Reference

A Novel Phase Conjugator for Active Retrodirective Array Applications

Technologies for Radio Astronomy Mark Bowen Acting Theme Leader Technologies for Radio Astronomy October 2012 CSIRO ASTRONOMY AND SPACE SCIENCE

FREQUENCY MULTIPLIERS

A Noise-Temperature Measurement System Using a Cryogenic Attenuator

Introduction to Radio Astronomy. Richard Porcas Max-Planck-Institut fuer Radioastronomie, Bonn

Low Cost Mixer for the 10.7 to 12.8 GHz Direct Broadcast Satellite Market

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)

IF/LO Systems for Single Dish Radio Astronomy Centimeter Wave Receivers

"Octave" Project: Application of Superwide-Band Technologies for the RATAN-600 Continuum radiometers

High Speed E-Band Backhaul: Applications and Challenges

Multibeam Heterodyne Receiver For ALMA

Holography Transmitter Design Bill Shillue 2000-Oct-03

Antenna Measurement Uncertainty Method for Measurements in Compact Antenna Test Ranges

MILLIMETER-WAVE FRONT-END INSTRUMENTATION FOR THE ESTEC COMPACT ANTENNA TEST RANGE.

A Method for Gain over Temperature Measurements Using Two Hot Noise Sources

BRAND EVN EVN) Joint Research Activity in RadioNet4 Gino Tuccari & Walter Alef plus partners

Transcription:

EVLA Front-End CDR Overview & System Requirements 1

Overview & System Requirements Introduction to the EVLA Front-End Task EVLA vs. VLA Feeds Receivers System Requirements, including: System Temperatures Linearity Gain Flatness Polarization FE CDR Presentation Overview 2

VLA versus EVLA Band Freq (GHz) VLA Feed Horn Type Freq (GHz) EVLA Feed Horn Type L 1.35-1.75 Lens + Corrugated 1 - (1.2) -2 Compact Corrugated S 2-4 Compact Corrugated C 4.5-5.0 Lens + Corrugated 4-8 Compact Corrugated X 8.0-8.8 Linear Taper Corrug 8-12 Linear Taper Corrug Ku 14.4-15.4 Pyramidal 12-18 Linear Taper Corrug K 18-26.5 Linear Taper Corrug 18-26.5 Linear Taper Corrug Ka 26.5-40 Linear Taper Corrug Q 40-50 Linear Taper Corrug 40-50 Linear Taper Corrug 3

EVLA Receiver Overview Band Frequency (GHz) L S C X Ku K Ka Q 1-(1.2)-2 2 4 4 8 8 12 12 18 18 26.5 26.5 40 40-50 T(Sys) ( K) 26 26 26 30 37 59 53 74-116 T(Sky) ( K) 12 12 10 10 12 25 13 26-68 T(Rx) ( K) 14 14 16 20 25 34 40 48 Polarizer Type QR+Hyb QR+Hyb QR+Hyb TBD PS+WB PS+WB PS+WB SS LO Frequency (GHz) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 15 18 12 16.7 16.7-20 LO Multiplier N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A x 2 x 3 x 3 Frequency Output 1 2 2 4 4 8 8 12 12 18 8 16.5 8 18 8-18 Output Power (dbm) -38-35 -34-32 -35-38 -35-38 Headroom P 1% (db) 40 38 33 29 27 23 21 15 Output to Module Refrigerator Model T302 T302 T302 T304 T303 T303 T303 1020 350 350 22 350 350 350 22 T303 4

Overview Table Notes T(Sky) ( K) : Antenna & atmosphere contribution when pointed at zenith in dry winter weather. Includes 3 K cosmic background T(Rx) ( K) : Averaged across full band, assumes LNA noise temperature of - 4 K below 4 GHz (Balanced Amplifiers) - 1 K/GHz 4-8 GHz & 0.5 K/GHz above 8 GHz. Polarizer Type : All dual circular polarization. - QR+Hyb = quad-ridge OMT followed by a 90 hybrid. - PS+WB = waveguide Srikanth Phase Shifter followed by Wollack s implementation of a Bøifot class IIb OMT. - SS = Sloping Septum polarizer. LO Multiplier : The LO frequencies are multiplied by this factor in the receiver. Output Power : Total power contained in the output band specified while observing cold sky at zenith over the specified bandwidth. Headroom : With respect to the 1% compression point when on cold sky. Output to Module : RF/IF signal from receiver feeds the designated frequency converter module: T302 = LSC Converter, T303 = UX Converter, T304 = Down-Converter Refigerator Model : CTI Incorporated model numbers. 5

The Basic EVLA Receiver Plan Provide Core Receiver Bands for every newly outfitted antenna L, C, X(transition), K, Ka & Q-Band Add brand new Future Receivers at a slower rate S, X, Ku-Band 6

CDR Considerations EVLA L-Band Receiver The L-Band (1-2 GHz) front-end is the most critical EVLA receiver to be reviewed Uses new octave bandwidth Circular Polarizer Will be scaled for use in both the C and S-Band OMT s (perhaps even X- Band) The FE CDR has been delayed until the EVLA L-Band Prototype Receiver underwent preliminary evaluation While waiting for completion of new EVLA design, Interim Rx s are being installed on upgraded antennas Modified with new EVLA balanced amplifiers And 90E hybrid coupler polarizers Delay is not affecting science capability with the EVLA and won t until the wideband WIDA Correlator is available Early tests start in late 2007 7

CDR Considerations EVLA K & Q-Band Receivers K-Band (18-26.5 GHz) & Q-Band (40-50 GHz) receivers are upgrades to existing VLA systems Design complete nearly 2 years ago & many of the production components have already been purchased We will be reporting on what modifications have been adopted and results of systems now on the Array Early systems installed on upgraded antennas use old VLA Card Cage and will need to be retrofitted at a later date to be EVLA compliant 8

CDR Considerations EVLA C-Band Receiver The new EVLA C-Band (4-8 GHz) receiver will use an octave bandwidth OMT scaled up in frequency from L-Band Design not yet ready, so early C-Band receivers installed on upgraded antennas built as Interim systems Uses commercial (Atlantic Microwave) 4.5-5.0 GHz Sloping Septum Polarizer, similar to the units used on the VLBA receivers To keep pace with Antenna overhaul, at least six of these narrowband systems will be built New C-Band system pioneers new the EVLA Common Dewar design which will be copied, as much as possible, by other new EVLA receivers (X, Ku & Ka-Band) To save money, many of the C-Band microwave production components have already been purchased, except for the OMT 9

CDR Considerations EVLA X-Band Receiver As the VLA already has a decent (albeit narrowband) X-Band system, the EVLA will reuse the existing 8.0-8.8 GHz receiver until late in the Project. This so-called Transition receiver can be mounted to either an old or a new X-Band feed. Retaining an old receiver forces us to use the old Monitor & Control system. A new 8-12 GHz system will be prototyped in 2008 with production scheduled for 2010, funds permitting. 10

CDR Considerations EVLA Ka-Band Receiver The Ka-Band (26.5-40 GHz) receiver provides a brand new discovery space for the VLA Due to other pressures and diversions, the Ka-Band receiver development has been slow than planned Straightforward hybrid of existing K & Q-Band receiver designs Scaled K-Band Polarizer largely verified in the GBT 1cm receiver Waveguide output similar to Q-Band Uses novel MMIC-based down converter Hope to complete design of prototype in 2006 Production begins in 2007 11

CDR Considerations EVLA S, Ku & X-Band Receivers S-Band (2-4 GHz) is a brand new receiver Will be based on a scaled L-Band system Prototype development to start in 2006 Production begins in 2008 New Ku-Band (12-18 GHz) will (eventually) replace the crummy existing VLA 14.4-15.4 GHz A-Rack system Based on scaled K-Band system Prototype development to start in 2007 Production begins in 2010 Ku-Band capability will be sacrificed as each antenna is outfitted New EVLA X-Band design will cover 8-12 GHz Polarizer design TBD Prototype development to start in 2008 Production begins in 2010 12

EVLA Ka-Band Rx Block Diagram RHH : 6 Jan 2005 Cryogenic Dewar Vacuum Window MMIC Module Key: WR-28 Waveguide Coaxial Cable, 2.9mm Coaxial Cable, SMA Cal Coupler RCP Coax to WG 35 db LNA 2.9mm Quartz Window WG to Coax 25-41 RF GHz Post-Amp 15 db NF < 5 db x3 44-49 GHz IF Post-Amp 10 db NF < 2.5 db DC-18 GHz KaDCM RCP IF Output 8-18 GHz Mylar Window Transition 90 Phase Shifter 45 Twist OMT Noise Diode Magic Tee Termination or Pulse Cal Input LO Ref 12-16.7 GHz @ 0 dbm LCP Cal Coupler Coax to WG 2.9mm 35 db LNA WG to Coax Quartz Window x3 NF < 5 db 15 db 25-41 RF GHz Post-Amp 44-49 GHz NF < 2.5 db 10 db IF Post-Amp KaDCM DC-18 GHz LCP IF Output 8-18 GHz 13

Estimated EVLA Ka-Band T Rx, Output Power & Headroom EVLA Ka-Band Rx P (1dB) P (1%) Temp NF/C Loss/Gain Loss/Gain Delta T Trx BW Pnoise Pnoise Headroom (RHH : 28 March 2006) (dbm) (dbm) (K) (db) (db) (linear) (K) (K) (MHz) (dbm) dbm/ghz (db) for Tsky of 13.0 (K) 18000-84.9-97.5 Weather Window 300-0.05 0.9886 3.474-83.9 Feed Horn 300-0.05 0.9886 3.514-83.1 Vacuum Window 300-0.01 0.9977 0.708-83.0 Phase Shifter 15-0.1 0.9772 0.358-83.0 OMT 15-0.2 0.9550 0.742-83.1 Waveguide 15-0.1 0.9772 0.384-83.1 Cal Coupler (IL) 15-0.2 0.9550 0.795-83.1 Cal Coupler (Branch) 300-30 0 1.0000 0.300-83.1 Isolator 15-0.5 0.8913 2.155-83.2 LNA -10-22 20 35 3162.2777 26.426-45.1 23.1 Stainless Steel W/G 157.5-2 0.6310 0.038 38.89-47.1 Vacuum Window 300-0.2 0.9550 0.009-47.3 Waveguide 300-1 0.7943 0.054-48.3 Isolator 300-0.5 0.8913 0.032-48.8 RF Post-Amp 15 3 637.9 5 13 19.9526 0.625-35.7 38.7 RF Filter (25-41 GHz) 300-1 0.7943 0.004 14000-37.8-49.3 Attenuator 300-5 0.3162 0.040-29.8 RF Post-Amp 15 3 637.9 5 13 19.9526 0.125-29.8 32.8 Mixer (Level 10 + 5dB) 9-3 300-14 0.0398 0.071-43.8 26.8 IF Filter (DC-18 GHz) 300-1 0.7943 0.019 14000-44.8-56.3 Post-Amp 18 6 229.6 2.5 13 19.9526 0.071-31.8 37.8 Attenuator 300-3 0.5012 0.005-34.8 Isolator 300 0.5 1.1220-0.001 39.95-34.3 14

Summary of Estimated EVLA Front-End System Temperature, Output Power & Headroom EVLA Receiver T303 UX-Converter T302 LSC-Converter T304 Down-Converter Delta Receiver T Noise T @Dewar P Out Min HR T Noise P In P Out Min HR T Noise P In P Out Min HR T Noise P In P Out DAtt-1 DAtt-2 Min HR T Noise Band (K) (K) (dbm ) (db) (K) (dbm ) (dbm ) (db) (K) (dbm ) (dbm ) (db) (K) (dbm ) (dbm ) (db) (db) (db) (%) L-Band 13.91 13.61-32.7 35.2 13.92-40.2-40.2 23.7 14.16-47.2-33.6-8.0-10.0 27.0 1.8 S-Band 14.78 14.01-34.3 36.8 14.81-41.8-41.8 25.3 15.05-48.8-32.5-3.0-10.0 24.8 1.9 C-Band 15.34 14.92-31.3 31.0 15.37-38.8-38.8 22.3 15.60-45.8-33.2-3.0-11.0 21.8 1.7 X-Band 19.57 19.15-32.3 30.4 19.92-44.1-33.0-8.0-7.0 24.1 1.8 Ku-Band 24.86 24.19-35.1 28.2 24.92-40.1-31.2 28.8 25.23-41.0-33.0-8.0-10.0 21.0 1.5 K-Band 33.79 32.35-36.1 20.8 33.92-41.1-32.2 29.8 34.45-42.0-33.0-8.0-9.0 22.0 1.9 Ka-Band 39.95 38.89-34.3 23.1 40.08-39.3-32.9 28.0 40.63-42.7-33.6-8.0-9.0 22.7 1.7 Q-Band 48.43 46.42-38.5 15.5 48.84-44.3-36.4 33.0 49.71-46.2-34.1-3.0-11.0 22.2 2.6 Goal = >20-40 >20-40 >20-45 -33 > 20 < 2.0 "Delta T Noise " = Percent Difference between Receiver Noise Temperature at the Sampler Input compared to that at the Receiver Output "Headroom" = Ratio in db below the 1% Compression Point (typically 12 db below 1 db Compression Point) Goal = 20 db Goal = 1% (ie: S/N of 20 db) Goal = 20 db 15

System Requirements The following slides present the Top Level System Requirements as specified in the EVLA Project Book Note that many of these requirements pertain directly to the performance of the entire Telescope system. Consequently, the contribution from the antenna optics, feeds & IF/LO systems may sometimes dominate the effects coming from the receivers. 16

System Polarization Characteristics (Project Book 2.2.2.5a) Required: Over an 8 hour period, and under stable weather, the RCP and LCP polarization ellipses within the inner 3 db of the antenna primary beam (FWHP) shall be stable to: 0.002 in Axial Ratio 2 degrees in Position Angle Note : This is a mechanical stability issue, not only for the front-ends and feeds but for the entire antenna structure. The stability of the circular polarizers is likely to be very stable compared to the rest of the telescope. Unfortunately this spec is very hard, if not impossible, to measure in the lab. However, it can be done interferometricly with receivers on the Array. 17

Limits on Ellipticity (Project Book 2.2.2.5b) Required: The RCP and LCP on-axis polarization ellipse (voltage) axial ratios are to be between 0.9 & 1.0 (or 0.92 db) Required: The axial ratios of the polarization ellipses are to be the same for all antennas at a given frequency, to within the same tolerances as given above. Note : The polarization will undoubtedly be dominated by mismatches arising between the polarizer & the LNA s or between other components along the input signal path. 18

System Temperature and Sensitivity (Project Book 2.2.3.1) Band T Sys (EK) L 26 S 26 C 26 X 30 Ku 37 K 59 Ka 53 Q 74-116 The indicated T Sys values apply to the middle 50% of each band and include antenna, 3EK Cosmic BG radiation, atmospheric absorption and emission when pointed at zenith in dry winter weather. Required : Degradation of receiver temperature within any band with respect to the mean defined in the central 50% is to be by less than 3 db at any frequency, by less than 1 db over the inner 85% of each band, and by less than 2 db over 95% of the band. Note : Using conservative LNA noise temperature estimates suggests these receiver temperatures should, in general, be readily achieved. 19

Band L S C X Ku K Ka Q EVLA Rx Band Noise Temperatures (Project Book 5.0) T receiver ( K) 14 14 16 20 25 34 40 48 T Sky ( K) 12 12 10 10 12 25 13 26-68 T System ( K) 26 26 26 30 37 59 53 74-116 Receiver temperature averaged across full band. Antenna, CBG & atmospheric contribution to T Sys when pointed at zenith in dry winter weather. 20

VLA/EVLA Receiver Temperature Performance vs. Frequency 50 45 40 Receiver Temperature (K) 35 30 25 20 15 Model L-Band S-Band C-Band X-Band Transition Ku-Band K-Band Ka-Band Q-Band Q-Av 10 5 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Frequency (GHz) LNA s : L & S @ 4EK ; C @ 1EK / GHz ; X, Ku, K, Ka & Q @ 0.5EK/ GHz Q-Av From Antenna 13, 14 & 16 21

Band Linearity of Power Gain to System Power Variations (Project Book 2.2.3.2 ) Headroom (db) L 47 S 48 C 43 X 42 Ku 40 K 33 Ka 35 Q 27 Required : The following table gives the headroom requirements for the signal delivered to the sampler. The headroom is defined as the power ratio between the quiescent cold sky power and the power at which the 1 db compression occurs. Note : To mitigate the effects of RFI we want to operate 20 below the 1% compression point (which is 32 db blow the P1dB compression point). Note : These are requirements are for both the RF & IF systems. In general, the IF Chain compresses before the receiver (except at Q-Band). Required : Changes in total system power monitored with an accuracy of better than 2% over an input power range between 15 and 50 db above quiescent cold sky values. Note : This applies only to receivers with the couplerfed solar observing scheme. 22

Bandpass Characteristics (Project Book 2.2.3.4) a. Amplitude Stability Required : Variations in bandpass (power units) are to be less than 1 part in 10,000 on timescales of less than 1 hour, on frequency scales less than the band frequency/1000. b. Phase Stability Required : Phase variations within the bandpass are to be less than 0.006 degrees, on timescales less than 1 hour and frequency scales less than the RF frequency/1000. Note : This is not the absolute total power stability of the RF/IF system but addresses bumps or dips appearing in the spectra of the correlator which could generate artifacts that look like absorption lines. At C-Band, the frequency scale is -5 MHz; at Q-Band it is-45 MHz Note : The spectral bandwidth & resolution needed to measure these on the Array will require the new WIDAR correlator. 23

Gain Slope (Project Book 2.2.3.4) c. Gain Slope Required : The spectral power density slope at the input to the 3-bit sampler is to be less than 1.5 db/ghz (or 3 db across the full 2 GHz wide input). Required : The spectral power density slope of the signals input to either the 3-bit or 8-bit samplers is to be less than: i) 12 db/mhz at L-Band ii) 6 db/mhz at S-Band iii) 3 db/mhz at C & X-Band iv) 1.5 db/mhz at Ku, K, Ka & Q band. d. Gain Ripples Required : Fluctuations in the spectral power density about the mean slope are to be less than 4 db, peak-to-peak, for signals input to the 3-bit digitizer. Note : This is the peak-to-peak gain ripple remaining after the slope across the inner 90% of the 2-4 GHz digitizer input has been removed by the Gain Slope Equalizer system. They are relatively gernerous. 24

Gain Flatness and Passband Ripple (Project Book 3.2.3.3) Required : The overall gain flatness of the EVLA FE/LO/IF system is specified as 5 db over any 2 GHz bandwidth with a design goal of 3 db over any 2 GHz bandwidth. These specifications have been divided as follows: one-third to the Front-End one-third to the T304 Downconverter one-third to the 4/P, LSC and UX converter combination. Note : This spec was only made possible by the adoption of the Gain Slope Equalizer scheme in the T304 Downconverter. Required : Passband ripple is specified to be a maximum of 0.2 db for ripple with a period less than 2 MHz. 25

Overview of FE CDR Presentations Paul Lilie Lisa Locke Dan Mertely Bob Hayward Chuck Kutz Hollis Dinwiddie Rudy Latasa Keith Morris Wayne Koski Darrell Hicks - OMT Development - New L, S, X & Ku-Band - New C-Band - Upgraded K & Q -Band, New Ka-Band - Existing LF Receivers & EVLA LO/IF System - Receiver Mounting - Cryogenic & Vacuum Systems - New Receiver Card Cage - Receiver Monitor & Control - Vertex Cabin Infrastructure 26

Overview of FE CDR Presentations Bob Hayward Paul Lilie Brent Willoughby Gerry Petencin Brent Willoughby Bob Hayward - Lab Receiver Testing - Solar Mode - WVR Option - LNA Procurement - Receiver Production - Project Schedule & Budget 27

Questions? 28

Backup Slides 29

EVLA Feeds Rolled Out View 30

EVLA Feed System All feeds are compact or linear taper corrugated horns with ring loaded mode converters Θ Κα Κ Κυ Ξ Χ Σ Λ 31