Andrea Baraldi, Luigi Boschetti and Chris Justice. University of Maryland, Dept. of Geographical Sciences, College Park, MD 20740, USA

Similar documents
Recent Patents on Space Technology, 2011, 1,

REMOTE SENSING INTERPRETATION

Atmospheric Correction (including ATCOR)

Service Level Agreement for. Calibration and Spectral Classification of MERIS User Image

Lecture 6: Multispectral Earth Resource Satellites. The University at Albany Fall 2018 Geography and Planning

Introduction to Remote Sensing Fundamentals of Satellite Remote Sensing. Mads Olander Rasmussen

Remote Sensing for Rangeland Applications

Introduction to Remote Sensing

Interpreting land surface features. SWAC module 3

Remote Sensing. Odyssey 7 Jun 2012 Benjamin Post

Lecture 13: Remotely Sensed Geospatial Data

Land Cover Analysis to Determine Areas of Clear-cut and Forest Cover in Olney, Montana. Geob 373 Remote Sensing. Dr Andreas Varhola, Kathry De Rego

Introduction of Satellite Remote Sensing

Remote sensing in archaeology from optical to lidar. Krištof Oštir ModeLTER Scientific Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts

APCAS/10/21 April 2010 ASIA AND PACIFIC COMMISSION ON AGRICULTURAL STATISTICS TWENTY-THIRD SESSION. Siem Reap, Cambodia, April 2010

remote sensing? What are the remote sensing principles behind these Definition

Introduction to Remote Sensing

Copernicus Introduction Lisbon, Portugal 13 th & 14 th February 2014

NON-PHOTOGRAPHIC SYSTEMS: Multispectral Scanners Medium and coarse resolution sensor comparisons: Landsat, SPOT, AVHRR and MODIS

GEOG432: Remote sensing Lab 3 Unsupervised classification

Spectral Signatures. Vegetation. 40 Soil. Water WAVELENGTH (microns)

REMOTE SENSING. Topic 10 Fundamentals of Digital Multispectral Remote Sensing MULTISPECTRAL SCANNERS MULTISPECTRAL SCANNERS

GEOG432: Remote sensing Lab 3 Unsupervised classification

9/12/2011. Training Course Remote Sensing Basic Theory & Image Processing Methods September 2011

EnMAP Environmental Mapping and Analysis Program

Module 11 Digital image processing

Remote Sensing Platforms

Comparing of Landsat 8 and Sentinel 2A using Water Extraction Indexes over Volta River

An Introduction to Geomatics. Prepared by: Dr. Maher A. El-Hallaq خاص بطلبة مساق مقدمة في علم. Associate Professor of Surveying IUG

An Introduction to Remote Sensing & GIS. Introduction

Present and future of marine production in Boka Kotorska

Land Remote Sensing Lab 4: Classication and Change Detection Assigned: October 15, 2017 Due: October 27, Classication

The studies began when the Tiros satellites (1960) provided man s first synoptic view of the Earth s weather systems.

IKONOS High Resolution Multispectral Scanner Sensor Characteristics

NORMALIZING ASTER DATA USING MODIS PRODUCTS FOR LAND COVER CLASSIFICATION

Evaluation of FLAASH atmospheric correction. Note. Note no SAMBA/10/12. Authors. Øystein Rudjord and Øivind Due Trier

Sensors and Data Interpretation II. Michael Horswell

PILOTING A DECISION SUPPORT TOOL (DST) FOR MAPPING CYANOBACTERIAL HARMFUL ALGAL BLOOMS (CHABS) TO SUPPORT PUBLIC HEALTH AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT.

Introduction. Introduction. Introduction. Introduction. Introduction

Introduction to Remote Sensing Part 1

Classification in Image processing: A Survey

Towards the Intercalibration of EO medium resolution multi-spectral imagers : MEREMSII Final Report Executive Summary

Image interpretation I and II

Field size estimation, past and future opportunities

Remote Sensing Platforms

Satellite Imagery Characteristics, Uses and Delivery to GIS Systems. Wayne Middleton April 2014

IMPROVEMENT IN THE DETECTION OF LAND COVER CLASSES USING THE WORLDVIEW-2 IMAGERY

typical spectral signatures of photosynthetically active and non-photosynthetically active vegetation (Beeri et al., 2007)

I. INTRODUCTION /$ IEEE

CHAPTER 7: Multispectral Remote Sensing

CURRENT SCENARIO AND CHALLENGES IN THE ANALYSIS OF MULTITEMPORAL REMOTE SENSING IMAGES

Using Freely Available. Remote Sensing to Create a More Powerful GIS

Chapter 1. Introduction

Data acquisition and access for the Congo Basin

Application of Satellite Remote Sensing for Natural Disasters Observation

Satellite Remote Sensing: Earth System Observations

University of Texas at San Antonio EES 5053 Term Project CORRELATION BETWEEN NDVI AND SURFACE TEMPERATURES USING LANDSAT ETM + IMAGERY NEWFEL MAZARI

Remote Sensing. The following figure is grey scale display of SPOT Panchromatic without stretching.

Lecture 7 Earth observation missions

GIS Data Collection. Remote Sensing

29 th Annual Louisiana RS/GIS Workshop April 23, 2013 Cajundome Convention Center Lafayette, Louisiana

MERIS instrument. Muriel Simon, Serco c/o ESA

Keywords: Agriculture, Olive Trees, Supervised Classification, Landsat TM, QuickBird, Remote Sensing.

CHARACTERISTICS OF REMOTELY SENSED IMAGERY. Spatial Resolution

What we can see from space; and how to link it to data and statistics

VALIDATION OF THE CLOUD AND CLOUD SHADOW ASSESSMENT SYSTEM FOR LANDSAT IMAGERY (CASA-L VERSION 1.3)

Enhancement of Multispectral Images and Vegetation Indices

Files Used in This Tutorial. Background. Calibrating Images Tutorial

In late April of 1986 a nuclear accident damaged a reactor at the Chernobyl nuclear

DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW SOUTH AFRICAN LAND-COVER DATASET USING AUTOMATED MAPPING TECHINQUES. Mark Thompson 1

Image interpretation. Aliens create Indian Head with an ipod? Badlands Guardian (CBC) This feature can be found 300 KMs SE of Calgary.

Introduction to Remote Sensing

large area By Juan Felipe Villegas E Scientific Colloquium Forest information technology

Remote Sensing Phenology. Bradley Reed Principal Scientist USGS National Center for Earth Resources Observation and Science Sioux Falls, SD

Int n r t o r d o u d c u ti t on o n to t o Remote Sensing

Application of Satellite Image Processing to Earth Resistivity Map

Remote Sensing And Gis Application in Image Classification And Identification Analysis.

Advanced Techniques in Urban Remote Sensing

GE 113 REMOTE SENSING

The studies began when the Tiros satellites (1960) provided man s first synoptic view of the Earth s weather systems.

2007 Land-cover Classification and Accuracy Assessment of the Greater Puget Sound Region

From Proba-V to Proba-MVA

Satellite data processing and analysis: Examples and practical considerations

How to Access Imagery and Carry Out Remote Sensing Analysis Using Landsat Data in a Browser

Final Examination Introduction to Remote Sensing. Time: 1.5 hrs Max. Marks: 50. Section-I (50 x 1 = 50 Marks)

USGS Welcome. 38 th CEOS Working Group on Calibration and Validation Plenary (WGCV-38)

Improvements in Landsat Pathfinder Methods for Monitoring Tropical Deforestation and Their Extension to Extra-tropical Areas

Introduction to image processing for remote sensing: Practical examples

Aral Sea profile Selection of area 24 February April May 1998

Update on Landsat Program and Landsat Data Continuity Mission

Outline. Data continuity defined. sensors. Discussion points

Environmental and Natural Resources Issues in Minnesota. A Remote Sensing Overview: Principles and Fundamentals. Outline. Challenges.

Blacksburg, VA July 24 th 30 th, 2010 Remote Sensing Page 1. A condensed overview. For our purposes

Development of normalized vegetation, soil and water indices derived from satellite remote sensing data

Sources of Geographic Information

RADIOMETRIC CALIBRATION

Forest mapping and monitoring in Russia using EO data: R&D activity overview

Topographic mapping from space K. Jacobsen*, G. Büyüksalih**

R a d i o m e t r i c C a l i b r a t i o n N e t w o r k o f A u t o m a t e d I n s t r u m e n t s

Earth s Gravitational Pull

Transcription:

Potential for automatic near realtime preliminary classification of Sentinel-2 (and Sentinel-3) imagery using the Satellite Image Automatic Mapper (SIAM ) Andrea Baraldi, Luigi Boschetti and Chris Justice University of Maryland, Dept. of Geographical Sciences, College Park, MD 20740, USA 1 Baraldi, Boschetti, and Justice: SIAM Automatic Preliminary Classification of Sentinel-2 and Sentinel-3 Optical Imagery 4/27/2012

GEO-CEOS QA4EO guidelines Group on Earth Observations (GEO)- Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS), ten-year implementation plan, 2005-2015. GEOSS objective: to allow the provision of and the access to the Right Information, in the Right Format, at the Right Time, to the Right People, to Make the Right Decisions. GEOSS two key principles: Accessibility/Availability and Suitability/Reliability of RS data and derived products. GEO-Committee of Earth Observations (CEOS) Quality Assurance framework for Earth Observation (QA4EO). QA4EO guidelines 1) An appropriate community-agreed coordinated programme of Cal/Val activities is required throughout all stages of a spaceborne mission, from sensor build to end-of-life. 2) Cal/Val guarantees harmonization and interoperability of EO data and derived information products generated from a variety of sources at all scales - global, regional and local. 3) Cal/Val is critical to data Quality Assurance (QA) and, therefore, data usability. Baraldi, Boschetti, and Justice: SIAM Automatic Preliminary Classification of Sentinel-2 and Sentinel-3 Optical Imagery

Problem Recognition Only 10% (or less) of usable spaceborne image data are ever downloaded by users. Possible cause: Low Accessibility/Availability. No existing commercial RS Image Understanding System (RS-IUS), but one, requires RS image radiometric calibration in compliance with the QA4EO guidelines. Effect: Low Suitability/Reliability. ecognition Server by Definiens AG Commercial RS-IUSs Radiometric calibration requirement NO RAD. CAL. statistical model, semi-automatic and site-specific. PCI Geomatics GeomaticaX NO RAD. CAL. statistical model, semi-automatic and site-specific. Pixel- and Segment-based versions of the Environment for Visualizing Images (ENVI) by ITT VIS ERDAS IMAGING Objective ERDAS ATCOR3 Proposed three-stage stratified hierarchical RS-IUS architecture: (i) rad. Cal. of DNs into top-of-atmosphere (TOA) reflectance (TOARF) or SURF, with TOARF SURF, (ii) SIAM preliminary classification and (iii) stratified battery of context-sensitive classifiers. NO RAD. CAL. statistical model, semi-automatic and site-specific. NO RAD. CAL. statistical model, semi-automatic and site-specific. Surface reflectance (SURF) physical model, inherently ill-posed atmospheric correction first stage. Consistent with QA4EO, but semiautomatic and site-specific. RAD. CAL. Of DNs into TOARF or SURF values, with TOARF SURF atmospheric correction is optional. Consistent with QA4EO. Fully automated (no user-defined parameter, no training sample). Baraldi, Boschetti, and Justice: SIAM Automatic Preliminary Classification of Sentinel-2 and Sentinel-3 Optical Imagery

Problem Recognition Existing commercial or scientific RS-IUSs score low in terms of operational quantifiable metrological/ statistical Quality Indicators (QIs) required by the QA4EO guidelines. Effect: Low Suitability/Reliability. Quality Indicators (QIs) Existing RS-IUS software products SIAM software product Degree of automation: (a) number, physical meaning and range of variation of user-defined parameters, (b)collection of the required training data set, if any. VL, L VH (fully automatic, it cannot be surpassed) Effectiveness : (a) semantic accuracy and (b) spatial accuracy. M, H, VH VH Semantic information level Land cover class (e.g., deciduous forest) Spectral semi-concept (e.g., vegetation) Efficiency: (a) computation time and (b) memory occupation. VL, L in training (hours per images) VH (5 m to 30 s per Landsat image in a laptop) Robustness to changes in input image VL (specific training per image) VH Robustness to changes in input parameters VL VH (it cannot be surpassed) Scalability to changes in the sensor s specifications or user s needs. Timeliness (from data acquisition to high-level product generation, increases with manpower and computing power). Economy (inverse of costs increasing with manpower and computing power). VL VH (e.g., the collection of reference samples is a difficult and expensive task) VL, L, high costs in manpower and also computing power VH (it works with any existing spaceborne sensor) VL, i.e., timeliness is reduced to almost zero VH, i.e., costs in manpower and computing power are reduced to almost zero Legend of fuzzy sets. Very low (VL), Low (L), Medium (M), High (H), Very High (VH). Legend of color highlights. Red = L, VL; Blue = M; Green = H, VH. Baraldi, Boschetti, and Justice: SIAM Automatic Preliminary Classification of Sentinel-2 and Sentinel-3 Optical Imagery

1 st key principle: Improve Accessibility to /Availability of existing large-scale multi-sensor multi-resolution spaceborne image databases Cost-free access to RS data (e.g., NASA-USGS access policy for Landsat data). Semantic querying systems. 2 nd key principle: Improve Suitability/Reliability of RS data and derived products Improve operational QIs of existing RS-IUSs. Levels of understanding of an RS-IUS eligible for improvement: 1. Computational theory (system architecture). 2. Knowledge/information representation. 3. Algorithms design (partitioning into highly cohesive modules mutually uncorrelated). 4. Implementation. Opportunity Recognition Baraldi, Boschetti, and Justice: SIAM Automatic Preliminary Classification of Sentinel-2 and Sentinel-3 Optical Imagery

SIAM computational theory SIAM is a top-down (deductive, prior knowledge-based) decision-tree classifier. Static, i.e., non-adaptive to input data. Context-insensitive, i.e., pixel-based. Based on spectral prior knowledge = reference dictionary of spectral signatures in TOARF values = spectral end-members = spectral categories. There are six super-categories that are mutually exclusive and totally exhaustive. 1. Water or shadow. 2. Snow or ice. 3. Clouds. 4. Vegetation. 5. Bare soil or built-up. 6. Outliers. Blue Light blue / white White Green Brown Rest of the world 6 Baraldi, Boschetti, and Justice: SIAM Automatic Preliminary Classification of Sentinel-2 and Sentinel-3 Optical Imagery 4/27/2012

SIAM prior knowledge base Expose bare rock 150 125 100 75 50 25 0 ETM1 ETM2 ETM3 ETM4 ETM5 ETM7 Discrete and finite dictionary of symbolic families of spectral signatures (spectral categories ) Water/ Shadow Snow Cloud Rnglnd Thick cloud (cumulus) 250 200 150 100 50 0 ETM1 ETM2 ETM3 ETM4 ETM5 ETM7 Continuous sub-symbolic color space Color-space quantization (mapping) into 3 discrete categorical variables Blue like WATER 1 SIAM Green like Vgt2 Green like Vgt1 7 Baraldi, Boschetti, and Justice: SIAM Automatic Preliminary Classification of Sentinel-2 and Sentinel-3 Optical Imagery 4/27/2012

SIAM functional characteristics SIAM is operational and fully automatic, i.e., it requires neither user-defined parameters nor training supervised (labeled) data to run. SIAM requires input MS images to be radiometrically calibrated into TOARF or SURF values (ala QA4EO). SIAM is multi-sensor and spatial resolution independent SIAM is near real-time (< 5 min per RS image in a laptop computer). SIAM is suitable for: RS optical image pre-processing (enhancement). For example: Stratified image co-registration, stratified image topographic correction, etc. Thematic mapping applications. Semantic querying of a large multi-sensor image database. 8 Baraldi, Boschetti, and Justice: SIAM Automatic Preliminary Classification of Sentinel-2 and Sentinel-3 Optical Imagery 4/27/2012

SIAM multi-sensor capabilities SIAM works at the spatial resolution of the sensor ranging from 0.5 m (pan-sharpened WorldView-2) to 3 km (Meteosat SEVIRI), i.e., it is spatial resolution-independent. SIAM can be input with any radiometrically calibrated RS image whose spectral resolution overlaps with Landsat s at least in part. The number of output spectral categories depends on the number and spectral location of the bands of the sensor. Six integrated SIAM sub-systems exist for 6 classes of sensors: 7 bands (Vis, NIR, MIR, TIR): Landsat-5 TM, Landsat-7 ETM+, ASTER, MODIS. 4 bands (VIS, NIR, MIR): SPOT-4 HRVIR, SPOT-5 HRG, IRS-1C/-1D/-P6. 4 bands (Vis, NIR, MIR, TIR): NOAA AVHRR, Meteosat Second Generation. 5 bands (Vis, NIR, MIR, TIR): ENVISAT AATSR. 4 bands (Vis, NIR): IKONOS-2, QuickBird-2, OrbView-3, GeoEye-1, WorldView2, RapidEye, ALOS AVNIR-2, ENVISAT MERIS. 3 bands (Vis, NIR): Landsat-1/-2/-3/-4 MSS, DMC, SPOT-1/-2/-3 HRV. 9 Baraldi, Boschetti, and Justice: SIAM Automatic Preliminary Classification of Sentinel-2 and Sentinel-3 Optical Imagery 4/27/2012

SIAM multi-sensor Sentinel-2/-3 capabilities Six integrated SIAM sub-systems exist for 6 classes of sensors: Landsat-like SIAM (L-SIAM ). 7 bands (Vis, NIR, MIR, TIR): Landsat-5 TM, Landsat-7 ETM+, ASTER, MODIS. SENTINEL-2 (without band TIR) SENTINEL-3 SLSTR (without band VisBlue) SPOT-like SIAM (S-SIAM ). 4 bands (VIS, NIR, MIR): SPOT-4 HRVIR, SPOT-5 HRG, IRS-1C/-1D/-P6. AVHRR-like SIAM (AV-SIAM ). 4 bands (Vis, NIR, MIR, TIR): NOAA AVHRR, Meteosat Second Generation. AATSR-like SIAM (AA-SIAM ). 5 bands (Vis, NIR, MIR, TIR): ENVISAT AATSR. QuickBird-like SIAM (Q-SIAM ). 4 bands (Vis, NIR): IKONOS-2, QuickBird- 2, OrbView-3, GeoEye-1, WorldView-2, RapidEye, ALOS AVNIR-2, ENVISAT MERIS. SENTINEL-3 OLCI DMC-like SIAM (D-SIAM ). 3 bands (Vis, NIR): Landsat-1/-2/-3/-4 MSS, DMC, SPOT-1/-2/-3 HRV. 10 Baraldi, Boschetti, and Justice: SIAM Automatic Preliminary Classification of Sentinel-2 and Sentinel-3 Optical Imagery 4/27/2012

SIAM multi-sensor Sentinel-2/-3 capabilities Landsat-4/-5 TM and Landsat-7 ETM+ Band Spectral region ( m) ENVISAT AATSR, ERS-2 ATSR-2, SENTINEL-3 SLSTR (bands S1 to S9) Band Spectral region ( m) ENVISAT MERIS, SENTINEL-3 OLCI (bands O1 to O23) SENTINEL-2 11 Baraldi, Boschetti, and Justice: SIAM Automatic Preliminary Classification of Sentinel-2 and Sentinel-3 Optical Imagery 4/27/2012 Band 1 (B) 0.45-0.52 - - (3+4), (O4+O5) Spectral region (nm) (490 10/2 + 510 10/2) Band Spectral region (nm) 2 (10 m) 490±65/2 2 (G) 0.52-0.60 1, S1 0.545-0.565 5, O6 560 10/2 3 (10 m) 560±35/2 3 (R) 0.63-0.69 2, S2 0.649-0.669 (7+8), (665 10/2 + 4 (10 m) 665±30/2 (O8+O9) 681.25 7.5/2) 4 (NIR) 0.76-0.90 3, S3 0.855-0.875 (11+ 12+ 13+ 14+ 15), 7 (20 m) + 8a (20 m) 783±20/2 + 865±20/2 (O12+ O13 (new)+ O23(new) + O14/15 + O16/17 + O18 + O19) MERIS: (760.625 3.75/2 + 778.65 15/2 + 865 20/2 + 885 10/2 + 900 10/2), OLCI: (760.625 3.75/2 + 764.375 3.75/2 + 767. 5 2.5/2 + 778.65 15/2 + 865 20/2 + 885 10/2 + 900 10/2), 5 (MIR1) 1.55-1.75 4, S5 1.46-1.76 - - 11 (20 m) 1610±90/2 7 (MIR2) 2.08-2.35 S6 2.25 - - 12 (20 m) 2190±180/2 6 (TIR) 10.4-12.5 (central wavelength 11.45) 6 OR (6 + 7), S8 OR (S8 + S9) (10.35-11.35) OR [(10.35-11.35) + (11.50-12.50)] - - - - Table 3. Spectral resolutions of Landsat-4/-5 TM and Landsat-7 ETM+ compared with those of the ENVISAT AATSR, ERS-2 ATSR-2, SENTINEL-3 SLSTR, ENVISAT MERIS, SENTINEL-3 OLCI and SENTINEL-2.

3-stage RS-IUS employing SIAM as its preliminary classification first stage First stage: operational automatic deductive prior knowledgebased per-pixel SIAM provided with a feedback loop RS multispectral image RS multispectral image pre-processing (enhancement) Enhanced RS multispectral image First-stage pixel-based preliminary classification (fully automated SIAM ) Spectral category preliminary classification map Second-stage stratified contextual classification (class- and applicationspecific): Divide-andconquer classification approach Land cover classification map Sub-symbolic digital numbers Second-stage driven-by-knowledge context-sensitive classification (under development): Traditional techniques (unsupervised data clustering, image segmentation, supervised data learning classifiers) are employed here on a novel stratified (driven-by-knowledge) context-sensitive basis! Increasing levels of symbolic information == Coarse-to-fine semantic granularity 12 Baraldi, Boschetti, and Justice: SIAM Automatic Preliminary Classification of Sentinel-2 and Sentinel-3 Optical Imagery 4/27/2012

SIAM preliminary classification map legends "Large" leaf area index (LAI) vegetation types (LAI values decreasing left to right) "Average" LAI vegetation types (LAI values decreasing left to right) Shrub or herbaceous rangeland Other types of vegetation (e.g., vegetation in shadow, dark vegetation, wetland) Bare soil or built-up Deep water, shallow water, turbid water or shadow Thick cloud and thin cloud over vegetation, or water, or bare soil Thick smoke plume and thin smoke plume over vegetation, or water, or bare soil Snow and shadow snow Shadow Flame Unknowns L-SIAM legend for 7-band Landsat-like imagery: 95 classes (fine semantic granularity). "Large" leaf area index (LAI) vegetation types (LAI values decreasing left to right) "Average" LAI vegetation types (LAI values decreasing left to right) Shrub or herbaceous rangeland Other types of vegetation (e.g., vegetation in shadow, dark vegetation, wetland) Bare soil or built-up Deep water or turbid water or shadow Smoke plume over water, over vegetation or over bare soil Snow or cloud or bright bare soil or bright built-up Unknowns Q-SIAM legend for 4-band QuickBird-like imagery: 52 classes (fine semantic granularity). 13 Baraldi, Boschetti, and Justice: SIAM Automatic Preliminary Classification of Sentinel-2 and Sentinel-3 Optical Imagery 4/27/2012

NASA-USGS WELD. Year: 2006. Landsat-7 ETM+ in TOARF values. 663 fixed location tiles. Spatial resolution: 30 m. Area coverage: Continental USA and Alaska. Period coverage: 7-year. 14 Baraldi, Boschetti, and Justice: SIAM Automatic Preliminary Classification of Sentinel-2 and Sentinel-3 Optical Imagery 4/27/2012

Automated Application to Weld WELD tile h22v08, annual composite true color SURF (20x30km subset) Baraldi, Boschetti & Roy Automatic Land Cover Classification

Automated Application to Weld WELD tile h22v08, annual composite false color Baraldi, Boschetti & Roy Automatic Land Cover Classification

The first stage is not landcover WELD tile h22v08, Preliminary classification Strong vegetation Average shrub Average barren lands Dark barren lands Baraldi, Boschetti & Roy Automatic Land Cover Classification

NASA-USGS WELD. Year: 2006. L-SIAM SENTINEL-2, SENTINEL-3 SLSTR preliminary classification: fine (95)/intermediate (47)/coarse (18) semantic granularity. 18 Baraldi, Boschetti, and Justice: SIAM Automatic Preliminary Classification of Sentinel-2 and Sentinel-3 Optical Imagery 4/27/2012

Relationship between spectral categories and vegetation land cover classes Strong Vegetation (SV) VHNIR Average Vegetation (AV) VHNIR Average Shrub Rangeland (ASR) VHNIR or HNIR Strong Vegetation (SV) HNIR Average Vegetation (AV) - HNIR Strong Vegetation (SV) MNIR Average Vegetation (AV) - MNIR Strong Vegetation (SV) LNIR Average Vegetation (AV) - LNIR Average Shrub Rangeland (ASR) MNIR or LNIR Average Herbaceous Rangeland (AHR) Strong Herbaceous Rangeland (SHR) Weak Rangeland (WR) - Crop field (Vegetated agricultural fields) - Pastures - Deciduous Broadleaved forests - Deciduous Permanent crop (deciduous fruit-trees) - Crop field (Vegetated agricultural fields) - Evergreen Broadleaved forests - Evergreen Permanent crop (evergreen fruit-trees, e.g., orange tree field) - Crop field (Vegetated agricultural fields) - Evergreen Coniferous forests - Forests in shadow areas - Open forest - Sparse trees (e.g., olive grows) - Regrowth - Transitional woodlands - Clear cuttings - Natural grassland 19 19 Baraldi, Boschetti & Roy Automatic Land Cover Classification

Complete coverage reference map for validation purposes: NLCD2006 Land Cover Map.. 20 Baraldi, Boschetti, and Justice: SIAM Automatic Preliminary Classification of Sentinel-2 and Sentinel-3 Optical Imagery 4/27/2012

ENVISAT AATSR SENTINEL-3 SLSTR (?) 5-band AA-SIAM Fig. A. ENVISAT AATSR image acquired on 2003-01-05, covering a surface area over the Black sea (R: band 7, G: band 6, B: band 4), spatial resolution: 1 km. Fig. B. SIAM classification map generated from Fig. A, consisting of 72 spectral categories depicted in pseudo color (refer to the map legend). 21 Baraldi, Boschetti, and Justice: SIAM Automatic Preliminary Classification of Sentinel-2 and Sentinel-3 Optical Imagery 4/27/2012

ENVISAT MERIS SENTINEL-3 OLCI 4-band Q-SIAM Fig. A. ENVISAT MERIS image acquired on 2010-09-28, covering a surface area over Northern Italy (R: band (7+8) = R, G: band (11+12+13+14+15) = NIR, B: band (3+4) = B), spatial resolution: 300 m. Courtesy of Chelys s.r.l., Rome, Italy. Fig. B. SIAM classification map generated from Fig. A, consisting of 52 spectral categories depicted in pseudo color (refer to the map legend). 22 Baraldi, Boschetti, and Justice: SIAM Automatic Preliminary Classification of Sentinel-2 and Sentinel-3 Optical Imagery 4/27/2012

8-band WorldView-2 at 2 m resolution: Q-SIAM classification and segmentation maps Fig. A. 8-band WorldView-2 VHR image of the city of Rome, Italy, acquired on 2009-12-10, at 10:30 a..m., depicted in false colors (R: band R, G: band NIR1; B: band B), radiometrically calibrated into TOA reflectance. Spatial resolution: 2.0 m. Fig. B. SIAM classification map generated from Fig. A, consisting of 52 spectral categories depicted in pseudo color (refer to the map legend). 23 Baraldi, Boschetti, and Justice: SIAM Automatic Preliminary Classification of Sentinel-2 and Sentinel-3 Optical Imagery 4/27/2012

8-band WorldView-2 at 2 m resolution: Q-SIAM classification and segmentation maps Fig. A. 8-band WorldView-2 VHR image of the city of Rome, Italy, acquired on 2009-12-10, at 10:30 a..m., depicted in false colors (R: band R, G: band NIR1; B: band B), radiometrically calibrated into TOA reflectance. Spatial resolution: 2.0 m. Fig. D. Contour map generated from the preliminary classification map shown in Fig. B. Note: the bridge has disappeared (Undersegmentation error!!!) 24 Baraldi, Boschetti, and Justice: SIAM Automatic Preliminary Classification of Sentinel-2 and Sentinel-3 Optical Imagery 4/27/2012

8-band WorldView-2 at 2 m resolution (zoom): Q-SIAM classification and segmentation maps Fig. E. Zoomed image extracted from the 8-band WorldView-2 VHR image of the city of Rome, Italy, acquired on 2009-12-10, at 10:30 a..m., shown in Fig. A. Spatial resolution: 2.0 m. Fig. F. Zoomed image extracted from the preliminary classification map shown in Fig. B. Fig. F. Zoomed image extracted from the contour mapshown in Fig. D. 25 Baraldi, Boschetti, and Justice: SIAM Automatic Preliminary Classification of Sentinel-2 and Sentinel-3 Optical Imagery 4/27/2012

QuickBird-2, pan-sharpened, 0.6 m resolution (zoom) Urban areas, Q-SIAM Fig. A. Zoomed image extracted from the QuickBird-2 image of Campania, Italy (acquisition date: 2004-13-06, 09:58 GMT), depicted in false colors (R: band CH3, G: band CH4, B: band CH1), 2.44m resolution, calibrated into TOA reflectance, pan-sharpened at 0.61m resolution. Fig. B. Output map generated from Fig. A, consisting of 46 spectral categories depicted in pseudo colors (refer to the map legend). Fig. C. Sunlit Red Roof mask generated from the image shown in Fig. A and the preliminary classification map shown in Fig. B based on a stratified 2 nd -stage classspecific spectral rule. 26 Baraldi, Boschetti, and Justice: SIAM Automatic Preliminary Classification of Sentinel-2 and Sentinel-3 Optical Imagery 4/27/2012

QuickBird-2, pan-sharpened, 0.6 m resolution (zoom) Urban areas, Q-SIAM Fig. A. Zoomed image extracted from QuickBird-2 image of Campania, Italy (acquisition date: 2004-13-06, 09:58 GMT), depicted in false colors (R: band CH3, G: band CH4, B: band CH1), 2.44m resolution, calibrated into TOA reflectance, pan-sharpened at 0.61m resolution. Fig. B. Output map generated from Fig. A, consisting of 46 spectral categories depicted in pseudo colors (refer to the map legend). 27 Baraldi, Boschetti, and Justice: SIAM Automatic Preliminary Classification of Sentinel-2 and Sentinel-3 Optical Imagery 4/27/2012

SIAM is: Conclusions Fully operational (easy-to-use, efficient, accurate, fast, scalable). Sensor-independent, thus it is eligible for use with SENTINEL- 2, SENTINEL-3 SLSTR and OLCI. Completely automated no training, no user-defined parameter. Near real-time processing on a laptop computer. Capability demonstrated at local, regional and national scale. SIAM is eligible for use in: RS image pre-processing (e.g., stratified image co-registration, stratified topographic correction). RS image classification in a 3-stage RS-IUS architecture. Semantic querying of large-scale multi-sensor image databases. 28 Baraldi, Boschetti, and Justice: SIAM Automatic Preliminary Classification of Sentinel-2 and Sentinel-3 Optical Imagery 4/27/2012