Lunar Mission Operations Global Cooperation
|
|
- Oswin Weaver
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Space 2008 Conference (Hosted and organized by ESA and EUMETSAT in association with AIAA) AIAA Lunar Mission Operations Global Cooperation Thomas K. Cummings The Boeing Company, Space Exploration, Arlington, Virginia Nomenclature BNSC = British National Space Centre COPUOS = Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space Col-CC = Columbus Control Center Cx = Constellation DLR = German Aerospace Center ESMD = Exploration Systems Mission Directorate JEM = Japanese Experiment Module JSC = Johnson Space Center JWG = Joint Working Group LAT = Lunar Architecture Team LEO = Low Earth Orbit LMO = Lunar Mission Operations MCC = Mission Control Center NASA = National Aeronautics and Space Administration STS = Space Transportation System I. Introduction We are going back to the moon! Only this time we plan to stay, to create a permanent presence, to build a future of lunar inhabitants starting with a colony. And the we includes international partners and potentially commercial entrepreneurs co-located with NASA. This Lunar Mission Operations (LMO) will be a 24/7/365 operation once the lunar colony is established. Emphasis will be placed on local autonomous mission control by the colony involving both humans and robots interacting. And this colony will be supported by tele-operations from earth focused on handling exceptional aspects like telemedicine. The construct for LMO is just now being fleshed out as part of defining the overall vision and plan for the lunar colony. These are exciting times for the space operations community. In May 2007 NASA and 13 other space agencies released a document, "The Global Exploration Strategy: The Framework for Coordination" reflecting a shared vision of space exploration. This framework document allows for the establishment of a voluntary, non-binding mechanism by which space agencies can exchange information on their respective space exploration plans, including lunar operations. In addition to NASA, representatives from agencies in Australia, Canada, China, the European Space Agency, France, Germany, Great Britain, India, Italy, Japan, Russia, the Republic of Korea and Ukraine participated in these Global Exploration Strategy discussions. Key to this collaborative effort is a focus on interoperability standards and processes. At the 3 rd Space Exploration Conference in Denver last February, the NASA ESMD team presented their latest version of the NASA vision for the lunar colony. This vision continues to mature and is rapidly becoming refined to a degree that NASA will baseline a lunar architecture at the Constellation program level this summer. One facet of the vision is conveyed in Figure 1 which shows an incremental approach to Lunar and Mars operations. 1 Copyright 2008 by the, Inc. All rights reserved.
2 Lunar Colony Mars L di Figure 1 - NASA ESMD Missions LMO will have to be quite different then the current LEO operations for Space Transportation System (STS) which is very focused on launch ops and intense short term on-orbit mission operations or ISS which is still being built and is just now getting to the condition for operations it originally was visualizing with a six person crew. Each launch of the STS entails large mission and flight operations teams with detailed planning efforts conducted for each mission, starting well in advance of the actual mission. With intense short duration mission, each trying to stuff as much operations as possible into a single mission and, based on the technology of the Space Shuttle, mission operations is a labor intensive effort for the STS program. Current International Space Stations (ISS) operations involve multi-national participants and a global distributed architecture for command and control. For ten years the ISS has been supported by the Russian Mission Control Center called TsUP in Korolev, just north of Moscow. The TsUP is integrated with a world network of mission-control centers, especially those in the United States, France and China. The close working relationship between the JSC MCC and the TsUP efforts have been very beneficial to all parties. The recent activation of ESA's Columbus Control Centre (Col-CC) that supports the European Columbus laboratory from the German Aerospace Center (DLR) facility in Oberpfaffenhofen, near Munich, Germany, while interacting with the NASA ISS MCC at JSC, is an example of this global cooperative mission operations construct that has taken many years to create. Congratulations to both ESA and NASA for this achievement! And when the Japanese Experiment Module (JEM) "KIBO" is installed on the ISS this global cooperative mission operations architecture will further expand. But LMO may be too different from ISS operations for the ISS model to easily extrapolate to the future. The ISS operations construct may serve as a starting model to LMO but the scale of complexity and number of players to support LMO may be significantly greater then ISS. Moreover, the ISS is a hard mated architecture for the international partners where as the lunar architecture may not be more of an information based loosely coupled architecture. Finally, there likely will be more partners involved in the future lunar operations than are currently involved on the ISS program. Figure 2 suggests we plan right to left for LMO to ensure we will mature to an interoperable architecture, keeping the end state in mind. Planning right to left means you define an end state capability (like an operational multi-national lunar colony) and then work back from that point to find key steps along the way to reach the end state. At each of these key steps you shape the effort to keep focused on the long range end state capability. This long range right-to-left planning is key to long term cost effective solutions that allows for incremental buildup and deployment of a long term lunar presence. Then as we evolve and execute left to right for the NASA Constellation architecture and the international counterpart architectures, we ensure the solution sets we put into place for LEO operations do not preclude us from evolving to a cost effective LMO construct. LMO will also include the international partners anticipated to participate in the Lunar Colony, as well as the entrepreneurs that could be involved in LMO but may not have yet raised their hands to participate. For now, these will have to be assumptions until international partners and entrepreneurs commit to a role in the lunar architecture proposed by NASA or unfold their alternate architectures. The recent The British National Space Centre (BNSC) and NASA report from their Joint Working Group (JWG) on lunar exploration outlined some possible UK - US space exploration cooperation 2
3 efforts that could evolved into joint operations concepts. Similar joint efforts are in work across the globe. The momentum is growing for a international Lunar exploration plan that could give the space operations community an incredible opportunity to shape the next major step in space operations. JSC Plan Right to Left KSC GSFC Consolidated Construct Initial Lunar Mars Out Long Year Term Lunar Lunar JPL Internationals Commercial Cooperative Degree of cooperative ops will grow Figure 2. Plan Right to Left for a collaborative global operations concept II. Stellar Opportunity Congratulations to NASA and their space agency counterparts for having the vision to establish a framework to work issues for the betterment of all space explorers and colonists heading to the lunar surface! NASA and thirteen other space agencies that signed the "The Global Exploration Strategy: The Framework for Coordination," in May 2007 gave us a great opportunity to define and implement a space operations capability that is global in nature, supports lunar exploration, and provides us all with a way to accomplish mutual goals. The framework document allows for the establishment of a voluntary, non-binding mechanism by which space agencies can exchange information on their respective space exploration plans. Even though the document is non-binding, it s contents are consistent with ongoing bilateral and multilateral discussions that many space agencies are conducting to establish cooperative agreements for specific projects. This is an exceptional example of on going global cooperation as we head to the moon. 3
4 Figure 2 - The Global Exploration Strategy: The Framework for Coordination partners This framework for coordination identified key enabling interoperability areas including communications, controls, life support, and docking systems. Unfortunately lunar based operations were not specifically listed like these other key areas. My suggestion is that any global cooperative effort to develop colonies on the moon needs to address these capabilities and enablers plus local Lunar ops standards for eventual multiple colonies linked together as distributed communities. There are continued high level cooperative efforts in work to translate the multi-national agreement framework into interoperable systems for the lunar architecture. Is the space operations community part of those efforts? The rest of this paper suggests some food for thought on this subject. No one has the right answers but not planning that far ahead may result in evolution of basic operations taking us down an unanticipated path. History has taught us again and again what happens if you do not visualize the future and plan for it. III. Shackleton, a seed for the future Shackleton is potentially a great starting point for exploration, but will it eventually be the town center or the industrial park of a series of future lunar colonies, or will it always be an outpost of science? What it evolves into will eventually drive operations. Currently the concept of mission operations for the lunar site is being driven by engineering and science, while a town is more driven by economics and politics, or at least a balance of all these drivers. Will politics, economics, engineering or all of them drive the multinational lunar operations at Shackleton 50 years from now? Or will Shackleton be a beachhead and the eventual site for the first actual colony be elsewhere. Can we even visualize that far out and postulate operations concepts that will represent standards for how we want multi-national towns to operate on the moon. As we pursue balancing these drivers, questions emerge concerning whose town politics, what economics drivers, and what engineering standards, and what science expectations are involved? How will you, the global space operations community, insert yourselves into this process? What will you recommend and how will you engage each other as a community? Day 1 of lunar operations can be visualized and is rapidly becoming firmer, but what about day 1000 or 10,000, which have far more unknowns then knowns. Initially, exploration will drive operations at Shackleton, but international and commercial decisions may drive a lot of the out year lunar operations. Eventually, lunar ops could be lunar wide, with the potential for multiple lunar colony sites. Some may be focused on mining or tourist or pure national pride for the country that creates the colonies. Will this be supported by an existing Earth based model of terrestrial global operations for individual lunar colonies by individual space agencies, or will these future town and cities on the moon be supported by a 4
5 collaborative, borderless tele-operations construct that cuts across businesses who have endeavors on the moon working with multi-national space agencies and individual space agencies? How or when will there be multiple sites on the moon with permanent residents? Will each be operating as a standalone entities, or as a set of communities working together as a linked set of towns or cities? This vision is not in our foreseeable future. But we can, and should, put ourselves into that mind set and establish global collaborative rules for lunar operations. Of course this assumes that some day the moon will be home to multiple cities across it s surface, each with all of the needs and expectations of earth bound cities. This is a vision we hope will become a reality over time. If the global space operations community does not get engaged then it is quite possible that what happens initially will set those Lunar ops standards by default. Considerable effort is being focused on what happens on day 1, led by a NASA Lunar Architecture Team (LAT) working hard to define lunar ops from the United States view, but in conjunction with other interested space agencies. To their credit, NASA is very sensitive to ensuring international partners and commercial partners are involved. Today the roles of U.S. vs International Partners vs Commercial ventures are still evolving. Understandably, NASA ops concepts focus on their initial efforts because if these are not successful we sure can not be successful in the out years. One interesting question is, who will actually do day 1 of the first permanent lunar settlements. There is a very real possibility that when the next manned lunar lander from NASA reaches the surface of the moon, China may be waiting for our arrival. Will that happen? No one knows for sure. Will that result in a potential for another case of initial ops from multiple cultures on different sections of the lunar surface evolving into a dichotomy of passing to the right vs left? The Space Operations community has a great opportunity in the "The Global Exploration Strategy: The Framework for Coordination" to define and support lunar interoperability concepts for space operations. IV. Global Cooperation - Local vs Remote Historically, space exploration has been controlled by ground ops for space probes, Mars rovers, satellite ops and to some extent, man space operations. The Shuttle has lots of ground ops crews working for the entire mission. The ISS also has significant mission operations support from the ground in the United States, Russia, and Germany. Long term lunar ops may need to focus on daily lunar operations being mostly locally controlled with minimum dependency on Earth. Traditional Mission roles and responsibilities for launches or LEO operations may not be appropriate for lunar ops. But there are no international standards for space ops that could support multinational lunar ops that are local area lunar control centric unless you decide the ISS model extrapolates to the lunar colonies. If the moon does eventually become home to multiple lunar sites, then permanent multinational colonization of the moon provides a significant opportunity to create these standards. Again, the Global Exploration Strategy: The Framework for Coordination provides a means for the space operations community to define local Lunar ops standards. Unfortunately countries like China who have lunar exploration intentions are not currently members of this framework team, which is open to all interested parties. All of us have multiple bosses with agendas, needs, and expectations. The same will be true for the colonists on the moon. Figure 3 may seem a bit far fetched, but could become all too real when the lunar towns grow to a point that multiple Earth bound players will be issuing operational instructions to the lunar inhabitants. Each country or company involved in Lunar colonies will want control of their assets and operations. It is pretty straight forward. Multi-national and entrepreneurial lunar teams will want to work to the basic principle of If we paid for it, we control it. Totally understandable and universal in it s nature. The people that write the checks for those working and living on the moon will want to direct their operations. The recent activation of the Columbus control Center is just such an example. 5
6 Start unloading Supplies Ok, so are we in charge or are they? Check on drilling rig 2 Commercial Operations Time to Exercise NASA Operations JSC GSFC KSC JPL Internationals Operations Figure 3 - Local Lunar Control to support multiple objectives Just as each of us have felt at time that if we were just told what the task was and what is needed we can plan our work ourselves and do a better job of managing the multiple tasks we perform. For the lunar inhabitants this would mean local lunar control. An operations construct that is based on the local lunar control with help from Earth operations when they ask for it would be a far different construct then manned or unmanned space exploration to date. Communication from Earth operations to their respective Lunar teams and facilities will require unprecedented cooperative efforts, protocols, and standards driven by local ops control concepts on the Lunar surface, and must be defined long before the first visit. This requires identification of standards that provide a high return on investment of time and money, and long lead time standards that will be accepted by space agencies, national interests, and commercial interests. An example of global standards for operations is the use of the English language for commercial air travel. Any airport you fly into for commercial aviation uses English for air traffic management. Some day on the surface of the moon we will have multi-national travel that should plan ahead for a communication standard like this, not just the electronics standards but the language and terminology to be used for lunar surface operations. A global space operations architecture that meets those standards is needed to support the local lunar controlled operations with the ability of terrestrial teams across the world backing each other up. Once again, the Global Exploration Strategy: The Framework for Coordination provides a means to define these local Lunar ops standards V. Isaac Asimov, was he right? Imagine what it might be like fifty years after the first permanent settlement becomes operational on the moon. By that time robots and humans could be co-mingled and as mutually dependent contributors to the daily lives of the lunar inhabitants. Today we have robots in space like the highly successful Mars rovers. And we have humans in space performing both science and daily chores on the ISS. And lots of effort has been spent on NASA s Robonaut, a mechanical robot that looks like an astronaut, only on wheels. It can be mounted on various platforms that provide mobility, allowing it to support lunar operations, or least that is the plan. If we build on the previous premise of local lunar operations control based on universal standards, then we will need to address how robots and human work together on the moon surface, and how a robot from China or Russia or the U.S. would interact with a lunar citizen from Italy or Brazil or any one of the many countries that could have people on the moon. Or even how Robonaut will interact when it meets it s counterpart from China. Can Issac Asimov s three laws of ROBOTICS apply? Do they represent basic principals that could actually guide the development of rule of engagement for robots working with humans on the moon? Those three laws may be the basis for defining international standards for lunar operations and therefore drive the design of the robots that will operate on the moon. Let us review his three laws. The three laws of ROBOTICS; 1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm 6
7 2. A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law 3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law This level of basic guiding principles could be captured in the Exploration Strategy: The Framework for Coordination or an operations derivative as part of the operations community contributions to that effort. But far more importantly, how does this convert to a set of globally recognized standards that drive the designs of robots and operations such that decades from now, if a lunar transiting robot developed in India or Israeli comes into proximity to a human from Spain or Brazil on the moon, the robot will respond the same way regardless of who build the robot or what human they encounter. VI. Entrepreneurs at the Console Many hope for the lunar colonies to grow and become permanent. Key to the success is attracting investors and entrepreneurs who will need assurances they can turn a profit with minimum government hindrances, even in local vs remote lunar operations standards and constructs. They will have people and resources on Earth and on the moon, working in tandem to accomplish their business goals. How they decide to split the work load up between Earth bound control and local control will be driven by their business cases as much as technical aspects. The good news is that business already knows how to operate together on a global scale and to a very large extent the global business environment is able to operate despite widely varying set of rules and regulation in the countries they operate in every day. It is hoped that good business sense will drive standards and concepts for lunar based businesses as much as the technical challenges. But, just like the first countries or space agencies that set up permanent residence on the lunar surface may also set the operations standards, will the first entrepreneurs that establish lunar ops set those standards? Just as in the earlier discussion of space agencies working together to establish interoperability using the Exploration Strategy: The Framework for Coordination, entrepreneurs will find a way to work together to establish lunar based interoperability. Everyone will want the lunar colony to be a profitable village that draws business. This will necessitate a means for the global business community to establish operational concepts. These operational rules of engagement have to make it easy for a company to plug and play into the local Lunar operations. Without that long range globally based business coordination, we can find ourselves on the moon not being able to plug our hairdryers into one standard outlet across the lunar colonies just like we can not do it today across the globe. Where there is a will, there is a way, which is why we can log onto the Internet from anywhere on earth today. Of course one only has to follow the current battle of Blu-Ray vs HD-DVD or the old Beta Max vs VHS tape recorder battle to see that competition of standards can also results in a lack of interoperability. Remember the simple question, will lunar rovers pass on the right or the left as a lunar standard. It may seem absurd to pose that question today, but then is not anticipated in the industrial revolution that someday car manufactures around the world would be forced to offer both choices. The Exploration Strategy: The Framework for Coordination does not currently have a commercial bent in it s development but the charter of that document does recognize that need for industrial efforts to be included in developing global standards for lunar exploration and development. Or is there a need for a comparable commercially based global agreement on lunar exploration and utilization? VII. Shackleton UN Shackleton is a stepping stone to a much larger endeavor that will take decades if not centuries to materialize into towns or even cities across the surface of the moon. But if you believe that will eventually happen, and that it will be the result of global cooperative efforts, then you need to address the question of governance. What will be the model for Government regulation of co-located global based lunar teams and how will it drive operations? Will a Lunar United Nations be needed since the Shackleton village will be an international village? A United Nations approach to operations may be of value to consider even as strange as it may first sound. It may be a candidate solution to how we have local control of a multinational community. It is even possible that many of the potential resident companies and countries will want to have rotating leadership as a construct, much like the leadership of the UN is rotated between member states. We do that today on ISS. 7
8 And of course there will need to be a forum to adjudicate issues beyond just technical aspects. Even today on the ISS, there are instances where global politics and business interests have clashed with pure technical operations. Dennis Tito was the first person to visit space as a tourist. But before he could leave the ground in the Soyuz, the Russian-US Bilateral Crew Operations Panel had to work out non-technical issues. After his visit, Yuri Malecnchenko and Ekaterina Dmitriev were married on the International Space Station and that is not something you would expect to cover in flight rules. The lunar colonies will create a vast spectrum of issues that will have to be dealt with on a regular basis. These couple of ISS unusual issues are a tip of an iceberg for lunar colonies. Can the United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS) move to the lunar surface to represent the lunar colonies? This Committee has two standing Subcommittees: 1. The Scientific and Technical Subcommittee and 2. The Legal Subcommittee. The Committee and its two Subcommittees meet annually to consider questions put before them by the General Assembly, reports submitted to them and issues raised by the Member States. The Committee and the Subcommittees, working on the basis of consensus, make recommendations to the General Assembly. This committee has been in existence since As the race back to the moon heats up, this may be a forum to discuss these governance issues or provide a forum for mediating grievances that occur on a lunar colony that could have representatives from many nations. The charter of this COPUOS includes a review of the scope of international cooperation in peaceful uses of outer space and to devise programs to study legal problems arising from the exploration of outer space. Will a future city on the lunar surface have a COPUOS representative in residence? Will there be a seat at the UN table for the representative of the Lunar Cities? How will all of this translate into concepts of operations for the future? Will the agenda for Space 2050 conference have a panel of lunar legal representatives attending virtually from their COPUOS office on the surface of the moon? VIII. Evolution vs Revolution Evolution got us driving on the left in London and on the right in New York. Evolution in space operations has resulted in a very knowledgeable and capable space operations community. If you could look back at the last 50 years of space operations vs today would you say that evolution has resulted in the best space operations possible? Do we want the initial set up space operations for the lunar return to be the space operations for the next 50, or 100, years? Initial Constellation LEO Operations will tend to focus on evolution from current operations since the first set of Constellation missions will be with NASA assets in LEO operations, interacting with ISS, which are very well know operations. This will cause pressure to evolve from the current mission operation. After all, evolution has value because you are going from a known position to support a continuum of operations, with lower risk while keeping existing jobs, infrastructure, and roles. So evolution is not bad, as long as we understand where it will take us once towns on the moon start to form local autonomous operations and start to interact between the towns. But relying on evolution can have unexpected consequences. Drive on the left or drive on the right??? One thought is that lunar ops should start with a clean piece of paper approach as a revolutionary approach and plan from full up Lunar ops back to initial Lunar ops. Yes this has far higher risk but also has potential for significant gain if viewed through a very long lens. But who will drive this? Can the NASA centric Constellation LEO ops be separate from a globally based, business friendly lunar ops? Who pays for developing it? Or will it be driven by whoever arrives first getting to set the standards? IX. Plan Right to Left Planning anything as large and long range as colonies on the surface of the moon is very hard to do and is fraught with unknowns. Not planning enough can be very dangerous and costly. Good planning starts with the desired end state and works backwards from that vision. Revolutionary concepts for lunar operations require a visionary approached to prevent the much easier evolutionary changes locking in traditional approaches for operations. Let us take a step back and try to define the 1,000th or 10,000th day of operations, not just the first day, and then create an operations construct that allows that 1,000th or 10,000th day to be a local Lunar controlled environment. Figure 5 restates what I said at the start of this paper (see figure 2), we must effectively plan right to left to have a success execution going left to right over time. Vagueness grows the further to the right you go, so lunar ops with internationals and entrepreneurialism is too vague at this point to define a right to left execution plan. Maybe it is possible for the Global Exploration Strategy: The Framework for Coordination and United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space to 8
9 define a concept of mission operations to enable a global cooperation environment with commercial participants that do not depend of just traditional Earth based government missions operations processes or infrastructure. Maybe the commercial exploration paths will drive industry to define a globally supported lunar operations vision in parallel to the space agencies. JSC Plan Right to Left KSC GSFC Consolidated Construct Initial Lunar Mars Out Long Year Term Lunar Lunar JPL Internationals Commercial Cooperative Figure 5. Plan right to left to effectively evolve left to right X. Summary Degree of cooperative ops will grow Lots of questions, not many answers. This paper is intended to pose questions to the space operations communality on where they want to be in the future when we gaze at the moon and realize it is inhabited by our grandchildren and their children. When there are multiple colonies on the moon with many nations working together. When business ventures decide to open a branch at the town of Shackleton and plan on market branding their lunar products. When you goggle ShackletonResupply.com and find a company offering to ship your Christmas packages to the moon with the same efficiency as sending them from London to New York. Lunar ops is far more then a technical challenge. Every country and company that has satellites in operations that span commercial, military and scientific efforts knows that today. But we can park our satellites far enough apart that we can control them as individual assets. And the STS missions may not be good models for lunar operations. Even ISS mission operations may not work best for the lunar operations concepts in the long run. That is why existing LEO ops may not easily extrapolate to lunar ops. If we visualize the future we may find local autonomous lunar operations as the norm, not the exception. And we will see robots and humans as lunar teammates, under rules of engagement that may find their heritage in Isaac Asimov stories from the first half of the 20 th century. What international standards are in our future for all this? How will the operations community get engaged in shaping this future? Is it possible that Lunar towns may be more United Nations than extensions of space agencies across the globe like ISRO, RSA, NASA, ESA, JAXA? The challenge will be how we plan for these future lunar operations. How we arrive at a balance between the potentially conflicting priorities and approaches driven by business vs political vs scientific vs engineering solutions. There are a lot of good trade studies out there for space operations that will need a solid balance between these competing drivers and factors. I wonder what the Space 2050 panels will say about lunar operations. Interoperability is key to letting us all work on this together. We need to approach this as if we were born on the moon. I sincerely hope my great grandchildren will get the chance to see the moon as the new world we did right. Can The Global Exploration Strategy: The Framework for Coordination and the United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space help us establish local autonomous Lunar operations? Maybe. But we gotta try 9
Exploration Partnership Strategy. Marguerite Broadwell Exploration Systems Mission Directorate
Exploration Partnership Strategy Marguerite Broadwell Exploration Systems Mission Directorate October 1, 2007 Vision for Space Exploration Complete the International Space Station Safely fly the Space
More informationConstellation Systems Division
Lunar National Aeronautics and Exploration Space Administration www.nasa.gov Constellation Systems Division Introduction The Constellation Program was formed to achieve the objectives of maintaining American
More informationEarth is the cradle of the mind, but one cannot live in the cradle forever
EXPLORING TOGETHER ISECG is the international forum set up by 14 space agencies to advance the Global Exploration Strategy through coordination of their mutual efforts in space exploration Earth is the
More informationTestimony to the President s Commission on Implementation of the United States Space Exploration Policy
Testimony to the President s Commission on Implementation of the United States Space Exploration Policy Cort Durocher, Executive Director American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics NTSB Conference
More informationNASA Mission Directorates
NASA Mission Directorates 1 NASA s Mission NASA's mission is to pioneer future space exploration, scientific discovery, and aeronautics research. 0 NASA's mission is to pioneer future space exploration,
More informationThe Global Exploration Roadmap International Space Exploration Coordination Group (ISECG)
The Global Exploration Roadmap International Space Exploration Coordination Group (ISECG) Kathy Laurini NASA/Senior Advisor, Exploration & Space Ops Co-Chair/ISECG Exp. Roadmap Working Group FISO Telecon,
More informationGlobal Exploration Strategy (GES): A Framework for Coordination, Progress, and Future Opportunities
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Global Exploration Strategy (GES): A Framework for Coordination, Progress, and Future Opportunities Dr. ohn Olson Exploration Systems Mission Directorate NASA
More informationThe NASA-ESA Comparative Architecture Assessment (CAA)
The NASA-ESA Comparative Architecture Assessment (CAA) Richard B. Leshner, PhD NASA Exploration Systems Mission Directorate Bernhard Hufenbach ESA Directorate of Human Spaceflight October 29, 2008 Overview
More informationQUEST Vision for Exploration of Space
QUEST for Human Exploration of the Solar System GSAW99 NASA/JSC/Lynn R. Vernon 1 Why are we Here? Present a vision of the Ground and Space architecture to support the Human exploration of space. Develop
More informationESA Human Spaceflight Capability Development and Future Perspectives International Lunar Conference September Toronto, Canada
ESA Human Spaceflight Capability Development and Future Perspectives International Lunar Conference 2005 19-23 September Toronto, Canada Scott Hovland Head of Systems Unit, System and Strategy Division,
More informationNASA Keynote to International Lunar Conference Mark S. Borkowski Program Executive Robotic Lunar Exploration Program
NASA Keynote to International Lunar Conference 2005 Mark S. Borkowski Program Executive Robotic Lunar Exploration Program Our Destiny is to Explore! The goals of our future space flight program must be
More informationThe Space Millennium: Vienna Declaration on Space and Human Development *
The Space Millennium: Vienna Declaration on Space and Human Development * The States participating in the Third United Nations Conference on the Exploration and Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (UNISPACE III),
More informationPresentation to the UN COPUOS STSC LTSSA Workshop. ISO Space Standards. 14 February 2013
Presentation to the UN COPUOS STSC LTSSA Workshop ISO Space Standards 14 February 2013 by Frederick A. Slane Head, U.S. Delegation ISO TC20/SC14 Executive Director Space Infrastructure Foundation Purpose
More informationWHO WE ARE: Private U.S. citizens who advocate at our own expense for a bold and well-reasoned space agenda worthy of the U.S.
Summary WHO WE ARE: Private U.S. citizens who advocate at our own expense for a bold and well-reasoned space agenda worthy of the U.S. NON-PROFIT SUPPORTING ORGANIZATIONS: A project of the Alliance for
More informationA RENEWED SPIRIT OF DISCOVERY
A RENEWED SPIRIT OF DISCOVERY The President s Vision for U.S. Space Exploration PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH JANUARY 2004 Table of Contents I. Background II. Goal and Objectives III. Bringing the Vision to
More informationEuropean Space Agency Aurora European Space Exploration Programme EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
European Space Agency Aurora European Space Exploration Programme EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Aurora Programme EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. What is Aurora? A European Space Exploration Programme based on a road map culminating
More informationHUMAN ENDEAVORS IN SPACE! For All Mankind
HUMAN ENDEAVORS IN SPACE! For All Mankind RECENT HISTORY! Mythical part of culture, fantasy & SciFi Could not be a reality until rocket and electronic technology WHY GO TO SPACE? Discovery! Broaden Scientific
More informationSHOULD SPACE TRAVEL BE LEFT TO PRIVATE COMPANIES?
SHOULD SPACE TRAVEL BE LEFT TO PRIVATE COMPANIES? THE DILEMMA Missions into space are a very expensive business. As the European Space Agency (ESA) says, high technology on the space frontier is not cheap.
More informationHuman Spaceflight: The Ultimate Team Activity
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Human Spaceflight: The Ultimate Team Activity William H. Gerstenmaier Associate Administrator Human Exploration & Operations Mission Directorate Oct. 11, 2017
More informationINTRODUCTION. Costeas-Geitonas School Model United Nations Committee: Disarmament and International Security Committee
Committee: Disarmament and International Security Committee Issue: Prevention of an arms race in outer space Student Officer: Georgios Banos Position: Chair INTRODUCTION Space has intrigued humanity from
More informationNASA s Exploration Plans and The Lunar Architecture
National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA s Exploration Plans and The Lunar Architecture Dr. John Olson Exploration Systems Mission Directorate NASA Headquarters January 2009 The U.S. Space Exploration
More informationA SPACE STATUS REPORT. John M. Logsdon Space Policy Institute Elliott School of International Affairs George Washington University
A SPACE STATUS REPORT John M. Logsdon Space Policy Institute Elliott School of International Affairs George Washington University TWO TYPES OF U.S. SPACE PROGRAMS One focused on science and exploration
More informationThe NASA-ESA. Comparative Architecture Assessment
The NASA-ESA Comparative Architecture Assessment 1. Executive Summary The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) is currently studying lunar outpost architecture concepts, including habitation,
More informationCredits. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. United Space Alliance, LLC. John Frassanito and Associates Strategic Visualization
A New Age in Space The Vision for Space Exploration Credits National Aeronautics and Space Administration United Space Alliance, LLC John Frassanito and Associates Strategic Visualization Coalition for
More informationestec PROSPECT Project Objectives & Requirements Document
estec European Space Research and Technology Centre Keplerlaan 1 2201 AZ Noordwijk The Netherlands T +31 (0)71 565 6565 F +31 (0)71 565 6040 www.esa.int PROSPECT Project Objectives & Requirements Document
More informationA/AC.105/C.1/2011/CRP.4
4 February 2011 English only Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space Scientific and Technical Subcommittee Forty-eighth session Vienna, 7-18 February 2011 Item 10 of the provisional agenda * Use
More informationImplementing the International Safety Framework for Space Nuclear Power Sources at ESA Options and Open Questions
Implementing the International Safety Framework for Space Nuclear Power Sources at ESA Options and Open Questions Leopold Summerer, Ulrike Bohlmann European Space Agency European Space Agency (ESA) International
More information1. Introduction. defining and producing new materials with advanced properties, or optimizing industrial processes.
Call for Interest Commercial Agents to market and sell the use of the facilities, resources and services on board the International Space Station in the Materials and Processes sector across Europe 1.
More informationWhere are the Agencies Human Space Flight (HFR) Programs Heading? USA (NASA) System Description Goal Remarks * Space Launch System (SLS) Program
Where are the Agencies Human Space Flight (HFR) Programs Heading? The following little summary tries to collect and compare data available on official an semi-official agency and other internet pages (as
More informationInternational Efforts for Transparency and Confidence-Building Measures (TCBM) and Japan s Contribution
International Efforts for Transparency and Confidence-Building Measures (TCBM) and Japan s Contribution Atsushi SAITO 4 th March, 2016 1 1. International Rules On Outer Space (1) Committee on the Peaceful
More informationExpanding human activities beyond LEO
Expanding human activities beyond LEO 12 April 2018 Piero.messsina@esa.int ESA UNCLASSIFIED - For Official Use Why Explore? New knowledge Challenge driven innovation Inspiration Global partners What
More informationHigh Level Forum, November Masazumi Miyake Director of International Relations Dept. JAXA
Global partnership for Space Exploration High Level Forum, November 7 2017 Masazumi Miyake Director of International Relations Dept. JAXA Table of Contents Coordination status on International Space Exploration
More informationKorean Domestic Laws and Bilateral Treaties on Space Activities. Professor Jae Gon Lee, School of Law at Chungnam National University
Korean Domestic Laws and Bilateral Treaties on Space Activities Professor Jae Gon Lee, School of Law at Chungnam National University Contents The Evolution of Space Activities in Korea Domestic Laws on
More information10/29/2018. Apollo Management Lessons for Moon-Mars Initiative. I Have Learned To Use The Word Impossible With The Greatest Caution.
ASTR 4800 - Space Science: Practice & Policy Today: Guest Lecture by Apollo 17 Astronaut Dr. Harrison Schmitt on Origins and Legacy of Apollo Next Class: Meet at Fiske Planetarium for guest lecture by
More informationA Call for Boldness. President Kennedy September 1962
A Call for Boldness If I were to say, we shall send to the moon a giant rocket on an untried mission, to an unknown celestial body, and return it safely to earth, and do it right and do it first before
More informationNASA Space Exploration 1 st Year Report
Exploration Systems Mission Directorate NASA Space Exploration 1 st Year Report Rear Admiral Craig E. Steidle (Ret.) Associate Administrator January 31, 2005 The Vision for Space Exploration THE FUNDAMENTAL
More informationInternational Committee on Global Navigation Satellite Systems
International Committee on Global Navigation Satellite Systems Training Course on Global Navigation Satellite Systems 14 18 January 2019, Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok, Thailand Sharafat Gadimova
More informationThe Future of Space Exploration in the USA. Jakob Silberberg
The Future of Space Exploration in the USA Jakob Silberberg The History of Governmental Space Programs in the USA NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration Founded 1958 Government funded space
More informationThe Role of a Lunar Development Corporation in facilitating Commercial Partnerships in Lunar Exploration
The Role of a Lunar Development Corporation in facilitating Commercial Partnerships in Lunar Exploration LEAG - September 16, 2010 Buzz Aldrin Thomas L. Matula Stan Rosen Pat Rawlings, Public Returning
More informationLegal Aspects of Space Exploration
Legal Aspects of Space Exploration Lunar Kai-Uwe SCHROGL and Nicolas PETER European Space Policy Institute (ESPI) page 1 Mission Statement The mission of the European Space Policy Institute (ESPI) is to
More informationRETURN TO THE LUNAR SURFACE Lunar Exploration Campaign. Next COTS Project?
RETURN TO THE LUNAR SURFACE Lunar Exploration Campaign Next COTS Project? 1 Commercial Development Summit - Lunar 08 Robert M. Kelso Manager, Commercial Space Development NASA JSC, Commercial Crew/Cargo
More informationDream Chaser Frequently Asked Questions
Dream Chaser Frequently Asked Questions About the Dream Chaser Spacecraft Q: What is the Dream Chaser? A: Dream Chaser is a reusable, lifting-body spacecraft that provides a flexible and affordable space
More informationSecretary-General of the European Commission, signed by Mr Jordi AYET PUIGARNAU, Director
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 20 August 2013 (OR. en) 13077/13 COVER NOTE From: date of receipt: 1 August 2013 To: No. Cion doc.: Subject: ESPACE 54 COMPET 608 RECH 380 IND 233 TRANS 446 COSDP
More informationNATIONAL STRATEGY FOR THE SPACE SECTOR: PROPOSALS MADE BY PROESPAÇO The Portuguese Association of Space Industries MARCH 19, 2012
NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR THE SPACE SECTOR: PROPOSALS MADE BY PROESPAÇO The Portuguese Association of Space Industries MARCH 19, 2012 VISION FOR THE NEXT 10 YEARS António Neto da Silva * Portugal s space industry
More informationStructuring Global International Cooperation in Space Exploration
Structuring Global International Cooperation in Space Exploration Presentation to the International Lunar Conference 2005 Toronto, Canada September 19, 2005 Peggy Finarelli International Space University
More informationScience Enabled by the Return to the Moon (and the Ares 5 proposal)
Science Enabled by the Return to the Moon (and the Ares 5 proposal) Harley A. Thronson Exploration Concepts & Applications, Flight Projects Division NASA GSFC and the Future In-Space Operations (FISO)
More informationESA Strategic Framework for Human Exploration
ESA Strategic Framework for Human Exploration B. Hufenbach EC Workshop on Space Science and Exploration Madrid, 18/2/13 Strategic Framework ESA DG s Agenda 2015 C/M12 Decisions Strategic Guidelines- Programmes
More informationNASA s X2000 Program - an Institutional Approach to Enabling Smaller Spacecraft
NASA s X2000 Program - an Institutional Approach to Enabling Smaller Spacecraft Dr. Leslie J. Deutsch and Chris Salvo Advanced Flight Systems Program Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology
More informationENGAGING SPACE TOOLS FOR DEVELOPMENT ON EARTH: CONTRIBUTION OF SPACE TECHNOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS TO THE POST-2015 DEVELOPMENT AGENDA
ENGAGING SPACE TOOLS FOR DEVELOPMENT ON EARTH: CONTRIBUTION OF SPACE TECHNOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS TO THE POST-2015 DEVELOPMENT AGENDA SIMONETTA DI PIPPO, DIRECTOR United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs
More informationAnalysis of European Architectures for Space Exploration
Analysis of European Architectures for Space Exploration 9 th International Conference on Exploration and Utilisation of the Moon 22 26 October, Sorrento 1 Exploration Goals Extend access and a sustainable
More informationGROUP OF SENIOR OFFICIALS ON GLOBAL RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURES
GROUP OF SENIOR OFFICIALS ON GLOBAL RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURES GSO Framework Presented to the G7 Science Ministers Meeting Turin, 27-28 September 2017 22 ACTIVITIES - GSO FRAMEWORK GSO FRAMEWORK T he GSO
More informationC. R. Weisbin, R. Easter, G. Rodriguez January 2001
on Solar System Bodies --Abstract of a Projected Comparative Performance Evaluation Study-- C. R. Weisbin, R. Easter, G. Rodriguez January 2001 Long Range Vision of Surface Scenarios Technology Now 5 Yrs
More informationConnecting to Grow the Space Economy
AIAA and Aviation Week Space Commercialization Executive Summit Connecting to Grow the Space Economy Produced by Image Credit: NASA AIAA and Aviation Week Space Commercialization Executive Summit CONNECTING
More informationTHE SPACE GENERATION CONGRESS 2012: Perspectives from University Students and Young Professionals in the Space Sector
IN SUPPORT OF THE UNITED NATIONS PROGRAMME ON SPACE APPLICATIONS THE SPACE GENERATION CONGRESS 2012: Perspectives from University Students and Young Professionals in the Space Sector CONTENT What is SGAC?
More informationRobotics in Space. Ian Taylor MP. Co-Chair, UK Parliamentary Space Committee VIIIth European Interparliamentary Space Conference
Robotics in Space Ian Taylor MP Co-Chair, UK Parliamentary Space Committee www.iantaylormp.com VIIIth European Interparliamentary Space Conference Brussels 12/14 June 2006 1 Men (and Women) in Space Very
More informationChristopher J. Scolese NASA Associate Administrator
Guest Interview Christopher J. Scolese NASA Associate Administrator Christopher J. Scolese joined the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) from his previous position as Deputy Director
More informationMr. Mike Pley. President and CEO,
Interview with CEO Mr. Mike Pley President and CEO, COM DEV, Toronto Canada I n our interview, COM DEV President and CEO Mr. Mike Pley speaks passionately about his business strategies for worldwide satellite
More information(Beijing, China,25 May2017)
Remarks by the Secretary General of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), Dr. Fang Liu, to the First Session of the 2017 China Civil Aviation Development Forum: New Opportunities for Aviation
More informationBenefits of Standardization in National Space Activities: ASI and the European Cooperation for Space Standardization (ECSS)
Benefits of Standardization in National Space Activities: ASI and the European Cooperation for Space Standardization (ECSS) Francesco LONGO ASI Technical Authority in ECSS Content The Italian Space Agency
More informationThe Wonders of International Space Law
University of Sydney Aerospace Engineering 30 August 2017 The Wonders of International Space Law Steven Freeland Professor of International Law, Permanent Visiting Professor, icourts Centre of Excellence
More informationChina-Brazil Cooperation: CBERS
Symposium on Legal and Policy Aspects of Space Cooperation between Europe and the BRICS Countries Inventory, Challenges and Opportunities International Institute of Air and Space Law (IIASL), Latin American
More information61 st International Astronautical Congress, Prague, CZ. Copyright 2010 by the International Astronautical Federation. All rights reserved.
IAC-10-A3.1.1 ASSESSING SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGY REQUIREMENTS AS A FIRST STEP TO- WARDS ENSURING TECHNOLOGY READINESS FOR INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION IN SPACE EXPLORATION Jean-Claude Piedbœuf Canadian
More informationThe Space Frequency Coordination Group (SFCG)
The Space Frequency Coordination Group (SFCG) Edoardo Marelli ITU-R WP 7C Chairman and SFCG Executive Secretary ITU-R Seminar Manta (Ecuador) 20 September 2012 The SFCG in a nutshell The SFCG in a nutshell
More informationA RENEWED SPIRIT OF DISCOVERY
A RENEWED SPIRIT OF DISCOVERY The President s Vision for U.S. Space Exploration PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH JANUARY 2004 Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for
More informationGeneral Assembly. United Nations A/AC.105/C.1/L.335/Add.4. Draft report
United Nations General Assembly Distr.: Limited 20 February 2014 Original: English Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space Scientific and Technical Subcommittee Fifty-first session Vienna, 10-21
More informationThe Authorization and Licensing of Small Satellite Missions
The Authorization and Licensing of Small Satellite Missions Aram Daniel Kerkonian McGill University Institute of Air and Space Law 7 November 2016 Santiago, Chile Agenda About Me Article VI of the OST
More information16502/14 GT/nj 1 DG G 3 C
Council of the European Union Brussels, 8 December 2014 (OR. en) 16502/14 OUTCOME OF PROCEEDINGS From: To: Council Delegations ESPACE 92 COMPET 661 RECH 470 IND 372 TRANS 576 CSDP/PSDC 714 PESC 1279 EMPL
More informationExploration Systems Research & Technology
Exploration Systems Research & Technology NASA Institute of Advanced Concepts Fellows Meeting 16 March 2005 Dr. Chris Moore Exploration Systems Mission Directorate NASA Headquarters Nation s Vision for
More informationRobot: Robonaut 2 The first humanoid robot to go to outer space
ProfileArticle Robot: Robonaut 2 The first humanoid robot to go to outer space For the complete profile with media resources, visit: http://education.nationalgeographic.org/news/robot-robonaut-2/ Program
More informationSPACE DOMAIN AWARENESS: A GLOBAL CHALLENGE. Konichiwa and thank you Yoshitomi-San for that very kind
SPACE DOMAIN AWARENESS: A GLOBAL CHALLENGE Konichiwa and thank you Yoshitomi-San for that very kind introduction. It is great to be back in Japan and I look forward to the opportunity of seeing many great
More informationFrom Earth to Mars: A Cooperative Plan
2000 David Livingston. All Rights Reserved. From Earth to Mars: A Cooperative Plan David M. Livingston P.O. Box 95 Tiburon, CA 94920 Office: (415) 435-6018; Fax: (415) 789-5969 email: dlivings@davidlivingston.com
More informationKNOWLEDGE ASSOCIATES INTERNATIONAL
KNOWLEDGE ASSOCIATES INTERNATIONAL ST JOHN S INNOVATION CENTRE, CAMBRIDGE, UK EUROPE. ASIA. USA. RUSSIA MOVING FORWARD WITH GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE SOUTH AFRICAN KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT SUMMIT, SANDTON, 30 th August
More informationUpdate on UK lunar exploration plans
Joint Annual Meeting of LEAG-ILEWG-SRR (2008) Cape Canaveral, Florida, 28 October 2008 Update on UK lunar exploration plans Jeremy Curtis UK Delegate to ISECG British National Space Centre Overview Current
More informationSpace Challenges Preparing the next generation of explorers. The Program
Space Challenges Preparing the next generation of explorers Space Challenges is one of the biggest educational programs in the field of space science and high technologies in Europe - http://spaceedu.net
More informationMontessori Model United Nations. Distr.: Middle School Thirteenth Session Sept Fourth Committee Special Political and Decolonization Committee
Montessori Model United Nations A/C.4/13/BG-52.A General Assembly Distr.: Middle School Thirteenth Session Sept 2018 Original: English Fourth Committee Special Political and Decolonization Committee This
More informationIAC-13,B3.1,8x Bernhard Hufenbach ESA ESTEC, Noordwijk, Netherlands,
IAC-13,B3.1,8x16946 THE 2 nd ITERATION OF THE ISECG GLOBAL EXPLORATION ROADMAP Bernhard Hufenbach ESA ESTEC, Noordwijk, Netherlands, Bernhard.Hufenbach@esa.int Kathleen C. Laurini NASA Headquarters, Washington
More information2009 Space Exploration Program Assessment
AIAA Space Exploration Program Committee 2009 Space Exploration Program Assessment Presentation to the AIAA Technical Activities Committee 08 January 2008 John C. Mankins Chair, Space Exploration Program
More informationThe Cooperation of Alcatel Alenia Space Italia and Politecnico di Torino on Space Exploration Scenarios
Page 1 The Cooperation of Alcatel Alenia Space Italia and Politecnico di Torino on Space Exploration Scenarios Authors AAS-I : P. Messidoro, C. Ferro, M. Bottacini Politecnico di Torino : S. Chiesa, S.
More informationSecuring Canada s Place in Space: Key to Canada s Competitiveness
Securing Canada s Place in Space: Key to Canada s Competitiveness Written Submission for the Pre-Budget Consultations in Advance of the 2019 Budget By Mike Greenley, Group President, MDA Recommendation
More informationDesigning space policies in emerging countries: main challenges. 5 th September 2016
Designing space policies in emerging countries: main challenges 5 th September 2016 1. Role of space for emerging countries 2. Main challenges in designing space policies 3. How to deal with the challenges
More informationSpace Challenges Preparing the next generation of explorers. The Program
Space Challenges Preparing the next generation of explorers Space Challenges is the biggest free educational program in the field of space science and high technologies in the Balkans - http://spaceedu.net
More informationISS and beyond: What is in there for You?
ISS and beyond: What is in there for You? Berndt Feuerbacher A very personal view Image Credits: NASA/ESA unless otherwise noted In the Beginning, there was a Dream Spacelab was the European entry Columbus
More informationDevelopment of the Strategic Research Agenda of the Implementing Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste Technology Platform
Development of the Strategic Research Agenda of the Implementing Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste Technology Platform - 11020 P. Marjatta Palmu* and Gerald Ouzounian** * Posiva Oy, Research, Eurajoki,
More informationExploration Systems Mission Directorate: New Opportunities in the President s FY2011 Budget
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Exploration Systems Mission Directorate: New Opportunities in the President s FY2011 Budget Dr. Laurie Leshin Deputy Associate Administrator, ESMD Presentation
More informationBillionaires want to help Trump send rockets to the moon again
Billionaires want to help Trump send rockets to the moon again By Agence France-Presse, adapted by Newsela staff on 03.15.17 Word Count 917 Apollo 17 mission commander Eugene A. Cernan makes a short checkout
More informationGlobal Exploration Strategy. Jeff Volosin Strategy Development Lead NASA Exploration Systems Mission Directorate
Global Exploration Strategy Jeff Volosin Strategy Development Lead NASA Exploration Systems Mission Directorate February 27, 2007 2 What Is a Global Exploration Strategy Used For? A high-level compelling
More informationStatus and Outlook for the European Exploration Envelope Programme
Status and Outlook for the European Exploration Envelope Programme Dr David Parker Director of Human and Robotic Exploration SSB Space Science Week, 27 March 2018 ESA UNCLASSIFIED - For Official Use AGENDA
More informationITU Symposium and Workshop on small satellite regulation and communication systems
ITU Symposium and Workshop on small satellite regulation and communication systems Santiago de Chile, Chile 7-9 November 2016 Prof. Dr. Lesley Jane Smith, LL.M. Leuphana University Lüneburg, Germany Scope
More informationDo commercial spaceports have a future?
Do commercial spaceports have a future? By Daisy Carrington, for CNN August 17, 2015 Houston Spaceport The Federal Aviation Administration recently gave Houston approval to build the country's tenth commercial
More informationThe new German Space Strategy makes the space sector fit for the future Dr. Juergen Drescher DLR Washington Office
The new German Space Strategy makes the space sector fit for the future Dr. Juergen Drescher DLR Washington Office 6th Eilene M. Galloway Symposium Washington D.C., December 1st, 2011 Space Policy of the
More informationThe Fourth Industrial Revolution in Major Countries and Its Implications of Korea: U.S., Germany and Japan Cases
Vol. 8 No. 20 ISSN -2233-9140 The Fourth Industrial Revolution in Major Countries and Its Implications of Korea: U.S., Germany and Japan Cases KIM Gyu-Pan Director General of Advanced Economies Department
More informationInternational Space Exploration Coordination Group Science White Paper Space Studies Board 2015 Fall Meeting 4 November 2015
International Space Exploration Coordination Group Science White Paper Space Studies Board 2015 Fall Meeting 4 November 2015 Greg Schmidt (SSERVI), Ben Bussey (NASA), Jean-Claude Worms (ESF), François
More informationROBONAUT 2: FIRST HUMANOID ROBOT IN SPACE
ROBONAUT 2: FIRST HUMANOID ROBOT IN SPACE Instructional Objectives Students will approximate a rate of change from a table of values; predict the graph of the derivative of f(t); and use numerical methods
More informationLunar Exploration Science Campaign: A commercial-leveraged lunar mission program
Lunar Exploration Science Campaign: A commercial-leveraged lunar mission program Robert M. Kelso Manager, Commercial Space Development NASA JSC, Commercial Crew/Cargo Program October 3, 2007 National Aeronautics
More informationTHE FUTURE OF DATA AND INTELLIGENCE IN TRANSPORT
THE FUTURE OF DATA AND INTELLIGENCE IN TRANSPORT Humanity s ability to use data and intelligence has increased dramatically People have always used data and intelligence to aid their journeys. In ancient
More informationLessons Learned from Terrestrial Telerobotics
Lessons Learned from Terrestrial Telerobotics Dan Lester KISS workshop Space Science Opportunities Augmented by Exploration Telepresence October 3, 2016 The nature of presence. How it has evolved? Presence
More informationTestimony of Mr. Jeffrey Manber Managing Director, NanoRacks LLC
Testimony of Mr. Jeffrey Manber Managing Director, NanoRacks LLC before the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation Subcommittee on Science and Space Wednesday, April 9, 2014 Chairman
More informationJoint Declaration of Intent. of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry of Japan, the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications of Japan
Joint Declaration of Intent of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry of Japan, the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications of Japan and the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy
More informationDON T LET WORDS GET IN THE WAY
HUMAN EXPERIENCE 1 DON T LET WORDS GET IN THE WAY ustwo is growing, so it s about time we captured and put down on paper our core beliefs and values, whilst highlighting some priority areas that we d like
More informationSection 1: Internet Governance Principles
Internet Governance Principles and Roadmap for the Further Evolution of the Internet Governance Ecosystem Submission to the NetMundial Global Meeting on the Future of Internet Governance Sao Paolo, Brazil,
More information