January 7, Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "January 7, Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C"

Transcription

1 Gas Pipeline-Transco 2800 Post Oak Boulevard (77056) P.O. Box 1396 Houston, Texas / January 7, 2009 Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C Re: OEP/DG2E/Gas Branch 2 Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC Sentinel Expansion Project (Docket No. CP ) Environmental Condition 34 Pre-Construction Sound Survey at Compressor Station 200 Dear Ms. Bose: As required under Environmental Condition 34 of the Commission s Order for the above-referenced project, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC (Transco) hereby submits the results of a pre-construction sound survey for Compressor Station 200. The survey was conducted on October 8 and 9, 2008 (while the station was operating at full load) with sound measurements taken at the property line and nearby noise sensitive areas (NSAs). The attached report includes drawings that show detailed information about Transco s compressor station facilities. These drawings have been removed from the public document and marked as CEII. Pursuant to Order No. 630, Critical Energy Infrastructure Information, 68 FR 9862 P 33 (2003), Transco requests that these drawings be treated as Critical Energy Infrastructure Information. Please direct any technical questions with respect to this submittal to Joseph Dean at (713) or joseph.dean@williams.com. Respectfully submitted, TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC By: Thomas F. Messick, Jr. Manager, Permits and Natural Resources cc: John Peconom, Gas Branch 2

2 TRANSCO STATION NO. 200 (TOWNSHIP OF EAST WHITELAND, PENNSYLVANIA) RESULTS OF A RECENT SOUND SURVEY PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF A RECEIVER TRAP AND ASSOCIATED PIPING THAT IS RELATED TO THE SENTINEL EXPANSION PROJECT H&K Report No H&K Job No Date of Report: December 12, 2008 Prepared for: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation A Subsidiary of Williams Gas Pipeline Company, LLC P.O. Box 1396 Houston, TX Submitted by: Paul D. Kiteck, P.E Meadowglen, Suite D Houston, Texas Applicable FERC Docket Number for Project: CP Consultants in Acoustics and Noise Control Engineering Meadowglen, Suite D, Houston, TX Phone: (281)

3 REPORT SUMMARY The following report provides the results of a recent sound survey (conducted on October 8 & 9, 2008) during full load operation of Transco Station No. 200 (abbreviated as Station in the report) prior to the installation of a receiver trap and associated piping that is related to the Sentinel Expansion Project. This sound survey was conducted in response to the United States of America Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Order Issuing Certificate and Granting Abandonment Authority, Docket No. CP , Appendix A, Condition No. 34. The following table summarizes the measured daytime/nighttime A-wt. sound levels (i.e., L d and L n ) in the nearby community/residences during the recent 2008 sound survey with the Station operating at full capacity along with the calculated L dn based on the measured L d and L n. Station 200: Summary of Meas d Sound Data in the Community during the Recent Sound Survey Meas. Pos. Brief Description of the Sound Measurement Location Average Meas d Ld Average Meas d Ln Calc d Ldn of the Station Pos. 1 Residences at end of Cameron Ct, 1,000 ft. south of Bldg. A 48.0 dba* 49.5 dba* 55.8 dba Pos. 2 Residences at end of Kingston Circle, 450 ft. west of Bldg. A 52.2 dba 53.4 dba 59.7 dba Pos. 3 Residences at end of Elliston Court, 600 ft. SW of Bldg. A 49.2 dba 49.7 dba 56.0 dba Pos. 9 Residences north side of Station, 1,700 ft. north of Bldg. A 48.6 dba* 52.1 dba* 58.2 dba *Sound of non-station noise sources (e.g., insects, distant traffic, and distant construction activity) also contributed to the meas d A-wt. sound levels The following table summarizes the measured L d and measured L n along the Station property line adjacent to the closest residences (i.e., west and south property line of the Station) during the recent 2008 sound survey with the Station operating at full capacity along with the calculated L dn based on the measured L d and L n. Station 200: Summary of Meas d Sound Data along the West/South Property Line of the Station Meas. Pos. Brief Description of the Sound Measurement Location Average Meas d Ld Average Meas d Ln Calc d Ldn of the Station Pos. 4 NW corner of Station fenceline, along west property line of 57.7 dba 58.5 dba 64.8 dba Station (approx. 400 ft. NW of Compressor Bldg. A) Pos. 5 West property line of Station, in the adjacent power line 58.4 dba 59.0 dba 65.3 dba ROW (approx. 240 ft. west of Compressor Bldg. A) Pos. 6 West property line/fenceline of Station (approx. 500 ft. SSW 57.4 dba 57.2 dba 63.6 dba of Compressor Bldg. A) Pos. 7 SW corner of Station fenceline, along south property line of Station (approx. 1,000 ft. south of Compressor Bldg. A) 50.9 dba* 50.7 dba* 57.1 dba *Sound of non-station noise sources (e.g., insects, distant traffic, and distant construction activity) also contributed to the meas d A-wt. sound levels -Page i-

4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION SOUND LEVEL CRITERIA DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE/FACILITY MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS AND METHODOLOGY Sound Measurement Locations Data Acquisition and Sound Measurement Equipment STATION OPERATING CONDITIONS DURING SOUND SURVEY MEASUREMENT RESULTS AND FINAL COMMENT APPENDIX: DRAWING/FIGURES, SUMMARY OF SOUND SURVEY DATA, AND SUMMARY OF ACOUSTICAL TERMINOLOGY Figure 1: Area Layout and Reported Sound Measurement Positions in nearby Community... 8 Figure 2: Drawing showing Sound Measurement Positions around the Station Property... 9 Table A: Summary of Meas d Sound Data during Recent 2008 Sound Survey Table B: Meteorological Conditions during the Recent 2008 Sound Survey Table C: Meas d Daytime Levels and Unweighted O.B. SPLs during Oct. 8 Tests Table D: Meas d Nighttime Levels and Unweighted O.B. SPLs during Oct. 8 Tests Table E: Meas d Daytime Levels and Unweighted O.B. SPLs during Oct. 9 Tests SUMMARY OF TYPICAL METRICS AND ACOUSTICAL TERMINOLOGY Page ii-

5 1.0 INTRODUCTION In this report, (H&K) provides the results of a recent sound survey (i.e., conducted October 8 & 9, 2008) during full load operation of Transco Station No. 200 prior to the installation of a receiver trap and associated piping that is related to the Sentinel Expansion Project. Station No. 200 (abbreviated as Station in the report) is a natural gas compressor station located in the Township of East Whiteland, Pennsylvania. This sound survey was conducted in response to the United States of America Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Order Issuing Certificate and Granting Abandonment Authority, Docket No. CP , Appendix A, Condition No. 34. For the reader s information, a summary of acoustical terminology and technical information in this report and a list of typical metrics used to measure and regulate environmental noise are provided at the end of this report (Appendix, pp ). 2.0 SOUND LEVEL CRITERIA The Office of Energy Projects (OPC) of the FERC require that after the planned Station modifications, the noise of the Station at full capacity (i.e., full load operation of all authorized units) does not exceed the previously existing noise levels at nearby noise-sensitive areas (NSAs), such as residences, schools and hospitals, if the existing Station sound contribution is equal to or greater than a day-night average sound level (i.e., L dn ) of 55 dba. If both the daytime A-weighted ( A-wt. ) equivalent sound level (i.e., L d ) and nighttime A-wt. equivalent sound level (i.e., L n ) are measured and/or estimated, then the L dn is calculated using the following formula: L dn = 10log L /10 9 d ( L 10) n + / DESCRIPTION OF SITE/FACILITY Figure 1 (Appendix, p. 8) provides an area layout around the Station showing the location of nearby residences and residential areas along with the chosen sound measurement positions in the nearby community/residences surrounding the Station. The closest residences include singlefamily houses and townhomes located in the Malvern Hunt Subdivision, located along the West Side of the Station. There are also residences on the North Side of the Station, near the intersection of Old Valley Road and North Bacton Hill Road. The closest residences (i.e., area of the Malvern Hunt Subdivision) are approximately 450 feet from Compressor Building A at the Station (i.e., townhomes at the end of Kingston Circle). Other nearby residences in the Malvern Hunt Subdivision are approximately 600 to 1,000 feet from Compressor Building A (i.e., residences on Elliston Court and Cameron Court). -Page 1-

6 Figure 2 (Appendix, p. 9) shows a layout of the buildings/equipment associated with the Station along with the location of the sound measurement positions around the Station property line and on the Station property. The Station is equipped with thirteen (13) engine-driven reciprocating compressor units, and the total authorized Station capacity is 30,860 horsepower (HP). The following Table 1 provides a brief description of the Station compressor units: Unit Nos. Manufacturer & Model No./Type Type of Driver Type of Compressor Transco HP Limit FERC Auth. HP In-Service Date #1 #6 Clark BA-8 Gas Engine Integral Reciprocating 2,050 HP 1,760 HP Apr, 1951 #7 & #8 Clark TLA-6 Gas Engine Integral Reciprocating 2,100 HP 2,000 HP Dec, 1957 #9 Clark TLA-6 Gas Engine Integral Reciprocating 2,100 HP 2,000 HP Oct, 1961 #10 Clark TCV-10 Gas Engine Integral Reciprocating 3,400 HP 3,400 HP Dec, 1962 #11 Clark TCV-10 Gas Engine Integral Reciprocating 3,400 HP 3,400 HP Dec, 1968 #12 Clark TCV-16 Gas Engine Integral Reciprocating 5,500 HP 5,500 HP Apr, 1970 #13 Clark TLA-6 Gas Engine Integral Reciprocating 2,100 HP 2,000 HP Mar, Units Totals: 33,000 HP 30,860 HP Table 1: Brief Description of the Gas Compressor Units at Transco Station 200 Units #1 #9 and Unit #13 are located inside Compressor Building A. Units #10, #11 and #12 are located in Compressor Building B. The Station does not operate all 13 units because of the authorized operating capacity of the Station, and consequently, 12 units is the maximum number of compressor units that operate simultaneously. 4.0 MEASUREMENT METHODOLOGY/LOCATIONS AND OPERATING CONDITIONS 4.1 Sound Measurement Locations During the recent 2008 sound survey, ten (10) locations were chosen to measure the sound level in the surrounding residential areas and around the Station property during Station operation. The following is a description of the reported sound measurement positions: Pos. 1: Residences at end of Cameron Court, between houses at 31 and 36 Cameron Court, in the Malvern Hunt Subdivision. This sound measurement position and associated homes are approximately 1,000 feet south of Compressor Building A; Pos. 2: Residences at end of Kingston Circle, between townhomes at 11 and 18 Kingston Circle, in the Malvern Hunt Subdivision. These homes are approximately 450 feet west of Compressor Building A and are considered the closest residences to the Station; Pos. 3: Residences at end of Elliston Court, between townhomes at 12 and 14 Elliston Court, in the Malvern Hunt Subdivision. This sound measurement position and nearby townhomes are approximately 600 feet SW of Compressor Building A; -Page 2-

7 Pos. 9: At the corner of Old Valley Road and North Bacton Hill Road, near residences located approximately 1,700 feet north of Compressor Building A. Residences at this location were the closest NSA prior to the development of the Malvern Hunt Subdivision; Pos. 4: NW corner of the Station fenceline (i.e., along the west property line of the Station), approximately 400 feet NW of Compressor Building A; Pos. 5: West Side of the Station (i.e., west property line of the Station), in the power line right-ofway (ROW) and approximately 240 feet west of Compressor Building A; Pos. 6: Along the west Station fenceline (i.e., along the west property line of the Station), approximately 500 feet SSW of Compressor Building A; Pos. 7: SW corner of the Station fenceline (i.e., along the south property line of the Station), approximately 1,000 feet south of Compressor Building A; Pos. 8: In driveway leading to Radio Tower, approximately 100 feet from the Office Building; Pos. 10: On the sidewalk in front of the Office Building, approximately 300 feet south of Compressor Building B. 4.2 Data Acquisition and Sound Measurement Equipment During the recent 2008 sound survey, at the sound measurement locations in the community (i.e., surrounding residences), the L eq and the L 90 & L 10 (i.e., L percent A-wt. levels that are exceeded for 90 and 10 percent of the time, respectively) were measured at five (5) feet above ground. Also, during the recent 2008 sound survey, the unweighted octave-band (O.B.) sound pressure levels (SPLs) [i.e., L eq, L 90 and L 10 SPLs] were measured in the community. Typically, several sample periods of the environmental sound level were measured at each sound measurement position in the community. At each sound measurement location on the Station property (i.e., Pos. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 & 10), only A-wt. sound levels (i.e., L eq ) and unweighted O.B. SPL measurements were measured. The sound measurements at the nearby NSAs attempted to exclude "extraneous sound" such as intermittent vehicles passing immediately by the sound measurement location. The acoustical measurement system consisted of a Larson-Davis (LD) Model 2900 Real Time Analyzer/SLM (a Type I SLM per ANSI Standard S1.4 & S1.11) with a 1/2-in. LD condenser microphone covered by a windscreen, and the analyzer/slm was calibrated with a LD Model CA250 microphone calibrator that was calibrated within one (1) year of the test dates. -Page 3-

8 5.0 STATION OPERATING CONDITIONS DURING SOUND SURVEY Paul Kiteck of H&K performed this recent sound survey around the Station and in the nearby community areas during the daytime/nighttime of October 8, 2008 and during the daytime of October 9, During these recent sound tests on October 8 & 9, the wind was blowing primarily from the southwest and west, which is a wind condition that would result in less Station noise propagating toward the Malvern Hunt Subdivision (RE: discussion of factors that influence outdoor sound propagation in the Appendix, p. 16). During these recent sound survey tests with Station equipment operating, twelve (12) units were operated (i.e., all units except Unit #2), and as a result, the Station was operated at approximately full load conditions. The following Table 2 provides a summary of the operating conditions of the Station units that occurred during this recent 2008 sound survey in which the Station operating at approximately full load/capacity. Unit No. Transco HP Limit %Torque Actual BHP During Survey Engine Speed Flow (MMscfd) Load Step #1 1,800 HP 101% 2061 HP 300 rpm #2 1,800 HP 0% 0 HP 0 rpm 0 0 #3 1,800 HP 101% 2067 HP 300 rpm #4 1,800 HP 101% 2058 HP 300 rpm #5 1,800 HP 101% 2064 HP 300 rpm #6 1,800 HP 100% 2042 HP 300 rpm #7 2,100 HP 93% 1952 HP 300 rpm #8 2,100 HP 93% 1955 HP 300 rpm #9 2,100 HP 94% 1964 HP 299 rpm #10 3,400 HP 99% 3348 HP 300 rpm #11 3,400 HP 99% 3374 HP 300 rpm #12 5,500 HP 100% 5478 HP 299 rpm #13 2,100 HP 94% 1964 HP 299 rpm Table 2: Summary of Station Operating Conditions during Sound Tests on Oct. 8 9 ( 08) The results of Table 2 indicate that the actual horsepower (HP) capacity of the Station during the recent sound survey was 30,116 HP, which is approximately the full load horsepower capacity of the Station (i.e., 30,860 HP). In addition, total Station flow was approximately 1570 MMscfd, MLA & MLB suction pressures were approximately 494 psig, MLA discharge pressure was 642 psig and MLB discharge pressure was 700 psig. -Page 4-

9 6.0 MEASUREMENT RESULTS AND FINAL COMMENT Table A (Appendix, p. 10) summarizes the measured A-wt. sound levels (i.e., daytime & nighttime L eq, L 90 and L 10 ) at the sound measurement locations in the community (i.e., surrounding residences) during the 2008 sound survey along with the arithmetic average of the measured L d and measured L n since more than one test sample was taken during the sound survey tests. In addition, the calculated L dn are provided in Table A, as calculated from the measured L d (i.e., arithmetic average of L d measured on Oct. 8 & 9) and the measured L n. Meteorological conditions during the respective sound survey test periods are summarized in Table B (Appendix, p. 10). Table C (Appendix, p. 11) shows the measured daytime A-wt. sound levels (i.e., L d, L 90 and/or L 10 ) and unweighted O.B. SPLs (i.e., L d, L 90 and/or L 10 SPLs) at all of the sound measurement positions during the daytime (i.e., afternoon) sound tests on Oct. 8 ( 08). Table D (Appendix, p. 12) shows the measured nighttime A-wt. sound levels (i.e., L n, L 90 and/or L 10 ) and unweighted O.B. SPLs (i.e., L n, L 90 and/or L 10 SPLs) at all of the sound measurement positions during the nighttime sound tests on Oct. 8 ( 08). Table E (Appendix, p. 13) shows the measured daytime A-wt. sound levels (i.e., L d, L 90 and/or L 10 ) and unweighted O.B. SPLs (i.e., L d, L 90 and/or L 10 SPLs) at all of the sound measurement positions during the daytime (i.e., morning) sound tests on Oct. 9 ( 08). The following Table 3 summarizes the average of the measured L d and L n during the recent 2008 sound survey at the sound measurement positions in the community (i.e., Pos. 1, 2, 3 & 9) along with the calculated L dn based on the measured L d and L n. Meas. Pos. Brief Description of the Sound Measurement Location Average Meas d Ld Average Meas d Ln Calc d Ldn of the Station* Pos. 1 Residences at end of Cameron Ct, 1,000 ft. south of Bldg. A 48.0 dba 49.5 dba 55.8 dba* Pos. 2 Residences at end of Kingston Circle, 450 ft. west of Bldg. A 52.2 dba 53.4 dba 59.7 dba* Pos. 3 Residences at end of Elliston Court, 600 ft. SW of Bldg. A 49.2 dba 49.7 dba 56.0 dba* Pos. 9 Residences north side of Station, 1,700 ft. north of Bldg. A 48.6 dba 52.1 dba 58.2 dba* Table 3: Summary of Meas d Sound Levels (i.e., Ld & Ln) in the Community during Full Load Operation of the Station along with the Calc d Ldn (i.e., *based on the Meas d Ld & Ln). At Meas. Pos. 2 and Meas. Pos. 3 (i.e., Malvern Hunt Subdivision) during the recent 2008 sound survey, the Station noise was the dominant noise contributor since these sound measurement positions are relatively close to the Station. At Meas. Pos. 1 (i.e., end of Cameron Court) and Meas. Pos. 9 (i.e., Old Valley Rd. & North Bacton Hill Rd.) during the recent 2008 sound survey, the noise of the Station was a significant noise contributor although the noise of distant vehicle traffic and the sound of insects also contributed to the measured A-wt. sound levels. Other -Page 5-

10 audible sound sources during the sound survey in the community not associated with the Station equipment (i.e., non-station sound sources ) included occasional noise of high-altitude aircraft and distant construction activity (i.e., occurred during the daytime sound tests). The following Table 4 summarizes the measured L d (i.e., arithmetic average of L d measured on Oct. 8 & 9) and the measured L n (i.e., as measured during the evening of Oct. 8) along the Station property line adjacent to the closest residences (i.e., west and south property line of the Station) during the recent 2008 sound survey with the Station operating at full capacity along with the calculated L dn based on the measured L d and L n. Meas. Pos. Pos. 4 Pos. 5 Pos. 6 Pos. 7 Brief Description of the Sound Measurement Location NW corner of Station fenceline, along west property line of Station (approx. 400 ft. NW of Compressor Bldg. A) West property line of Station, in the adjacent power line ROW (approx. 240 ft. west of Compressor Bldg. A) West property line/fenceline of Station (approx. 500 ft. SSW of Compressor Bldg. A) SW corner of Station fenceline, along south property line of Station (approx. 1,000 ft. south of Compressor Bldg. A) Meas d Meas d Calc d Ldn of Ld Ln the Station 57.7 dba 58.5 dba 64.8 dba 58.4 dba 59.0 dba 65.3 dba 57.4 dba 57.2 dba 63.6 dba 50.9 dba 50.7 dba 57.1 dba Table 4: Summary of Meas d Sound Levels (i.e., Ld & Ln) along West/South property line of Station during Full Load Operation of the Station along with the Calc d Ldn. For these sound tests along the Station property line (i.e., Meas. Pos. 4, 5, 6 & 7), the noise of the Station was the most dominant noise source since these sound measurement positions are relatively close to the Station equipment. The measured sound level at Meas. Pos. 7 also included the sound of non-station noise sources, such as the sound of insects, noise of distant vehicle traffic and the noise of distant construction activity (daytime, only). As a final comment, it is our opinion that the reported measured sound data adequately quantifies the existing sound levels around the Station for the meteorological conditions that occurred during this recent 2008 sound survey. If the wind was blowing was blowing from a different direction (e.g., northeast and/or east), the noise contribution of the Station in the Malvern Hunt Subdivision could be higher than measured during this recent 2008 sound survey since the direction of wind can influence the sound propagation of a sound source to a receiver. file: Transco\Station 200 Sentinel Project Modifications\Report Pre-Constr 2008 Sound Survey at Station 200 submitted version to FERC.doc -Page 6-

11 APPENDIX STATION DRAWINGS AND FIGURES SUMMARY OF THE MEASURED AND REPORTED SOUND LEVEL DATA DURING THE RECENT 2008 SOUND SURVEY SUMMARY OF TYPICAL METRICS AND ACOUSTICAL TERMINOLOGY -Page 7-

12 OLD VALLEY RD. POS.9 N 1700' GRANVILLEWAY TRANSCO STATION 200 MAIN PIPELINE R.O.W. 8/10/12 KINGSTON CIRCLE 7/9/11 14/16/18 POS.2 ELLISTON CT. 450' 600' 14/16/18 BLDG. A BLDG. B STATION PROPERTY LINE N. BACTON HILL RD. POS.3 AVONDALE CIRCLE 1000' MALVERN HUNT SUBDIVISION MALVERN HUNTWAY PIPELINE R.O.W POS SELF STORAGE 1 3 APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET SWEDESFORD ROAD CAMERON CT LEGEND - MEASUREMENT POSITION - HOUSE OR MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING - BUILDING (COMMERCIAL PROPERTY) Figure 1: Transco Station 200: Area Layout showing the Location of Nearby Residences and Location of the Chosen Sound Measurement Positions in the Community. -Page 8-

13 Information Removed for Treatment as Critical Energy Infrastructure Information Figure 2: Transco Station 200: Drawing showing the Station Buildings and Location of the Reported Sound Measurement Positions around the Station Property/Fenceline.

14 Measured A-Weighted (A-Wt.) Sound Levels (dba) Ldn via Meas. D-time N-time D-time N-time D-time N-time Avg. of Position Leq (Ld) Leq (Ln) L90 L90 L10 L10 Ld & Ln Notes/Observations during Tests Pos. 1: Residences at Daytime: Low-freq. noise of station, distant traffic, end of Cameron Ct., Note (1) insects/birds & distant contruction noise south of area. 1000' from Bldg. A 46.2 Nighttime: Station noise audible & significant, distant 47.9 vehicle traffic, insects (2 khz O.B.), wind-related noise. Pos. 2: Residences at Daytime: Mostly station noise at this location, some end of Kingston Cir., Note (1) insects/birds, at times, distant traffic & aircraft audible. 450' from Bldg. A 51.7 Nighttime: Mostly station noise (dominant/constant), 51.5 distant vehicle traffic and insects. Pos. 3: Residences at Daytime: Mostly station noise at this location, some end of Elliston Ct., Note (1) insects/birds, distant traffic & construction noise. 600' from Bldg. A 47.4 Nighttime: Mostly station noise (dominant/constant), 46.1 distant vehicle traffic, insects, at times, distant aircraft. Pos. 9: Residences, Daytime: Station noise audible & significant, insects corner of Old Valley Note (1) contributed to A-wt. level, distant vehicle traffic & wind. & N. Bacton Hill Rd Nighttime: Station noise audible & significant, insects 46.3 contributed to A-wt. level (2 khz & 4 khz O.B.). Table A: Transco Station No. 200: Summary of the Daytime Sound Levels and Nighttime Sound Levels as Meas'd on October 8 & 9 (2008) with Station at Full Load/Capacity along with the Calc'd Ldn, as Calculated from the Meas'd Ld and Meas'd Ln. Note (1): Ldn calc'd by adding 6.4 db to meas'd Ld if nighttime sound levels (Ln) not measured. If both the Ld and Ln are measured and/or estimated, Ldn is calculated using the following formula: L dn = 10log L /10 9 d ( L + 10) / 10 n Measurement Set Temp. R.H. Wind Wind Peak Position Date/Time of Testing ( F) (%) Direction Speed Wind Sky Conditions Pos :00 PM - 5:00 PM (10/8/08) Wind from the Mostly cloudy, initially, then Daytime (Afternoon) SW/SSW mph mph became mostly clear Pos :00 PM - 10:00 PM (10/8/08) Wind from Overcast (mostly cloudy) Nighttime (Before Midniight) the South mph mph Pos :00 AM - 11:00 AM (10/9/08) Wind from the Mostly cloudy Daytime (Morning) West/WSW mph mph Table B: Transco Station No. 200: Meteorological Conditions During the Daytime and/or Nightime Sound Measurements around the Station on October 8 & 9, Page 10-

15 Measurement Set Type of Sound Pressure Level (SPL) in db per Octave-Band (O.B.) Frequency (in Hz) A-Wt. Position Time Metric Level Pos. 1: Residences at 2:00 PM Leq end of Cameron Ct., 2:00 PM L ' from Bldg. A 2:00 PM L :15 PM Leq Pos. 2: Residences at 2:30 PM Leq end of Kingston Cir., 2:30 PM L ' from Bldg. A 2:30 PM L :40 PM Leq Pos. 3: Residences at 3:05 PM Leq end of Elliston Ct., 3:05 PM L ' from Bldg. A 3:05 PM L :15 PM Leq Pos. 9: Residences, 3:30 PM Leq corner of Old Valley 3:30 PM L & N. Bacton Hill Rd. 3:30 PM L :45 PM Leq Pos. 4: NW corner of 4:02 PM Leq Station fenceline; 4:03 PM Leq ' from Bldg. A Avg. SPL Leq Pos. 5: West Side of 4:05 PM Leq Station propety line; 4:08 PM Leq ' from Bldg. A Avg. SPL Leq Pos. 6: West Side of 4:15 PM Leq Station fenceline, 4:18 PM Leq ' SSW of Bldg. A Avg. SPL Leq Pos. 7: SW corner of 4:20 PM Leq Station fenceline; 4:25 PM Leq ' south of Bldg. A Avg. SPL Leq Pos. 8: On access road 4:35 PM Leq to Radio Tower; 100' 4:40 PM Leq from Office Bldg. Avg. SPL Leq Pos. 10: On sidewalk 4:50 PM Leq in front of Office Bldg. 5:00 PM Leq ' S. of Bldg. B Avg. SPL Leq Table C: Transco Station No. 200: Meas'd Daytime Ambient A-Wt. Sound Levels and Unweighted O.B. SPLs as Meas'd on October 8 (2008) during Full Load Operation of the Station/Units. -Page 11-

16 Measurement Set Type of Sound Pressure Level (SPL) in db per Octave-Band (O.B.) Frequency (in Hz) A-Wt. Position Time Metric Level Pos. 1: Residences at 9:50 PM Leq end of Cameron Ct., 9:50 PM L ' from Bldg. A 9:50 PM L :00 PM Leq Pos. 2: Residences at 9:00 PM Leq end of Kingston Cir., 9:00 PM L ' from Bldg. A 9:00 PM L :10 PM Leq Pos. 3: Residences at 9:18 PM Leq end of Elliston Ct., 9:18 PM L ' from Bldg. A 9:18 PM L :30 PM Leq Pos. 9: Residences, 8:45 PM Leq corner of Old Valley 8:45 PM L & N. Bacton Hill Rd. 8:45 PM L :50 PM Leq Pos. 4: NW corner of 8:00 PM Leq Station fenceline; 8:02 PM Leq ' from Bldg. A Avg. SPL Leq Pos. 5: West Side of 8:05 PM Leq Station propety line; 8:07 PM Leq ' from Bldg. A Avg. SPL Leq Pos. 6: West Side of 8:12 PM Leq Station fenceline, 8:15 PM Leq ' SSW of Bldg. A Avg. SPL Leq Pos. 7: SW corner of 8:18 PM Leq Station fenceline; 8:20 PM Leq ' south of Bldg. A Avg. SPL Leq Pos. 8: On access road 8:25 PM Leq to Radio Tower; 100' 8:28 PM Leq from Office Bldg. Avg. SPL Leq Pos. 10: On sidewalk 8:30 PM Leq in front of Office Bldg. 8:32 PM Leq ' S. of Bldg. B Avg. SPL Leq Table D: Transco Station No. 200: Meas'd Nighttime Ambient A-Wt. Sound Levels and Unweighted O.B. SPLs as Meas'd on October 8 (2008) during Full Load Operation of the Station/Units. -Page 12-

17 Measurement Set Type of Sound Pressure Level (SPL) in db per Octave-Band (O.B.) Frequency (in Hz) A-Wt. Position Time Metric Level Pos. 1: Residences at 10:30 AM Leq end of Cameron Ct., 10:30 AM L ' from Bldg. A 10:30 AM L :45 AM Leq Pos. 2: Residences at 9:20 AM Leq end of Kingston Cir., 9:20 AM L ' from Bldg. A 9:20 AM L :30 AM Leq Pos. 3: Residences at 9:40 AM Leq end of Elliston Ct., 9:40 AM L ' from Bldg. A 9:40 AM L :00 AM Leq Pos. 9: Residences, 9:00 AM Leq corner of Old Valley 9:00 AM L & N. Bacton Hill Rd. 9:00 AM L :10 AM Leq Pos. 4: NW corner of 8:10 AM Leq Station fenceline; 8:12 AM Leq ' from Bldg. A Avg. SPL Leq Pos. 5: West Side of 8:15 AM Leq Station propety line; 8:17 AM Leq ' from Bldg. A Avg. SPL Leq Pos. 6: West Side of 8:20 AM Leq Station fenceline, 8:22 AM Leq ' SSW of Bldg. A Avg. SPL Leq Pos. 7: SW corner of 8:25 AM Leq Station fenceline; 8:28 AM Leq ' south of Bldg. A Avg. SPL Leq Pos. 8: On access road 8:30 AM Leq to Radio Tower; 100' 8:32 AM Leq from Office Bldg. Avg. SPL Leq Pos. 10: On sidewalk 8:35 AM Leq in front of Office Bldg. 8:38 AM Leq ' S. of Bldg. B Avg. SPL Leq Table E: Transco Station No. 200: Meas'd Daytime Ambient A-Wt. Sound Levels and Unweighted O.B. SPLs as Meas'd on October 9 (2008) during Full Load Operation of the Station/Units. -Page 13-

18 SUMMARY OF TYPICAL METRICS FOR REGULATING ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE AND ACOUSTICAL TERMINOLOGY IN THE REPORT (1) Decibel (db): A unit for expressing the relative power level difference between acoustical or electrical signals. It is ten times the common logarithm of the ratio of two related quantities that are proportional to power. When adding db or dba values, the values must be added logarithmically. For example, the logarithmic addition of 35 db plus 35 db is 38 db. (2) A-Weighted Sound Level (dba): The A-weighted ( A-wt. ) sound level is a single-figure sound rating, expressed in decibels (Re: 20 µpa), which correlates to the human perception of the loudness of sound. The dba level is commonly used to measure industrial and environmental noise since it is easy to measure and provides a reasonable indication of the human annoyance value of the noise. The dba measurement is not a good descriptor of a noise consisting of strong low-frequency components or for a noise with tonal components. The A-weighted curve approximates the response of the average ear at sound levels of 20 to 50 decibels. The following are the relative response of A-weighted filter per octave band frequency, and a graph/curve is provided that shows a graphical representation of the A-wt. filter response per frequency (in Hz) Hz 63 Hz 125 Hz 250 Hz 500 Hz 1,000 Hz 2,000 Hz 4,000 Hz 8,000 Hz 16,000 Hz db db db -8.6 db -3.2 db 0 db +1.2 db +1.0 db -1.1 db -6.6 db RELATIVE RESPONSE, 10 db 0-10 C B, C A -20 B A ,000 FREQUENCY, Hz -Page 14-

19 (3) Human Perception of Change in Sound Level A 3 db change of sound level is barely perceivable by the human ear A 5 or 6 db change of sound level is noticeable If sound level increases by 10 db, it appears as if the sound intensity has doubled (4) Sound Pressure Level (L p or SPL): Ten times the common logarithm to the base 10 of the ratio of the mean square sound pressure to the square of a reference pressure. Therefore, the sound pressure level is equal to 20 times the common logarithm of the ratio of the sound pressure to a reference pressure [i.e., 20 micropascals (20 µpa) or microbar]. (5) Octave Band Sound Pressure Level (SPL): Sound is typically measured in frequency ranges (e.g., high-pitched sound, low-pitched sound) that provides more meaningful sound data regarding the character of the noise. When measuring two noise sources for comparison, it is better to measure the spectrum of each noise, such as in octave band SPL frequency ranges. Then, the relative loudness of two sounds can be compared frequency range by frequency range. As an illustration, two noise sources can have the same dba rating and yet sound completely different. For example, a high-pitched sound concentrated at a frequency of 2000 Hz could have the same dba rating as a much louder low-frequency sound concentrated at 50 Hz. (6) Daytime Sound Level (L d ) & Nighttime Sound Level (L n ): L d is the equivalent A-weighted sound level, in decibels, for a 15 hour time period, between 07:00 to 22:00 Hours (7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.). L n is the equivalent A-weighted sound level, in decibels, for a 9 hour time period, between 22:00 to 07:00 Hours (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.). (7) Equivalent Sound Level (L eq ): The equivalent sound level (L eq ) can be considered an average sound level measured during a period of time, including any fluctuating sound levels during that period. In this report, the L eq is equal to the level of a steady (in time) A-weighted sound level that would be equivalent to the sampled A-weighted sound level on an energy basis for a specified measurement interval. The concept of the measuring L eq has been used broadly to relate individual and community reaction to aircraft and other environmental noises. (8) Day-Night Average Sound Level (L dn ): The L dn is an energy average of the measured daytime L eq (L d ) and the measured nighttime L eq (L n ) plus 10 db. The 10-dB adjustment to the L n is intended to compensate for nighttime sensitivity. As such, the L dn is not a true measure of the sound level but represents a skewed average that correlates generally with past sound surveys which attempted to relate environmental sound levels with physiological reaction and physiological effects. For a steady sound source that operates continuously over a 24-hour period and controls the environmental sound level, an L dn is approximately 6.4 db above the measured L eq. Consequently, an L dn of 55 dba corresponds to a L eq of 48.6 dba. If both the L d and L n are measured, then the L dn is calculated using the following formula: L dn = 10log L /10 9 d ( L 10) n + / 10 -Page 15-

20 (9) Background or Ambient Noise: The total noise produced by all other sources associated with a given environment in the vicinity of a specific source of interest, and includes any Residual Noise. (10) Sound Level Meter (SLM): An instrument used to measure sound pressure level, sound level, octave-band SPL, or peak sound pressure level, separately or in any combinations thereof. The measured weighted SPL (i.e., A-Wt. Sound Level or dba) is obtained by the use of a SLM having a standard frequency-filter for attenuating part of the sound spectrum. (11) Sound Power Level (L w or PWL): Ten times the common logarithm of the ratio of the total acoustic power radiated by a sound source to a reference power. A reference power of a picowatt or watt is conventionally used. (12) Broadband Noise: Noise comprised of a wide frequency range and not characterized by any tonal components. (13) Tone: A tone is a sound sensation-having pitch, which is a listener s perception of the frequency (for example, the higher the frequency, the higher the pitch). For a measured sound spectrum, a tone is represented as a peak in the spectrum curve. Noise that contains significant tones is considered a tonal type of noise. (14) Airborne Sound: Sound transmitted through air as a medium rather than through a liquid or solid. (15) Groundborne Vibration: A condition in which sound waves generated by a noise source, which is in contact with the ground, are transmitted to and through the ground. (16) Factors that Influence Outdoor Sound Propagation The direction of wind can influence the sound propagation of a sound source to a receiver. For example, wind blowing from a natural gas compressor facility in the direction of the receiver can increase the received sound level contributed by the facility by 2 to 3 db at distances of 1,000 to 2,000 feet. In addition, atmospheric temperature inversions that can occur at night (i.e., a result of colder air near the ground) can increase the received sound level by 2 to 3 db at distances of 1,000 to 2,000 feet. Consequently, the sound contribution at the noise complainant s house could increase by 4 to 6 db due to favorable atmospheric conditions (e.g., wind from the station toward the house and/or temperature inversion). Regarding the acoustical effect of vegetation, many rows of trees have some value as an acoustical barrier. However, the sound attenuation from dense plantings more than 100 feet deep will be limited by the flanking of sound energy over the top of the canopy of trees. If dense plantings consist mostly of deciduous vegetation, there may be somewhat less sound attenuation due to trees during months when the leaves have fallen although the effect of wind direction and temperature inversion are considered the most significant factors that influence outdoor propagation of sound. -Page 16-

21 (17) Relevant Standards, associated Standards Institute(s) and References American National Standards Institute (ANSI) S1.4: Specification for SLM: Type I SLM: Sound level meters (SLM) that meet this specification have a tolerance of +/- 0.5 db from 22.4 to 11,200 Hz. Type II SLM: Sound level meters that meet this specification have a tolerance of +/- 0.5 db from 63 to 2,000 Hz and +/- 1.0 db from 22.4 to 11,200 Hz. ANSI S (R-1976): Specifications for Octave, Half-Octave and Third-Octave Filter Sets. Includes a method to convert SPLs in the old octave bands to SPLs in the new octave bands. ASTM Standard E : Standard Guide for the Measurement of Outdoor A-Weighted Sound Level. This guide covers the measurement of A-weighted sound levels outdoors at specified locations or along particular site boundaries, using a general-purpose sound level meter. End of Report -Page 17-

22 Document Content(s) Transco_Sentinel_Sta_200_Sound_Survey_ PDF

Appendix 8. Draft Post Construction Noise Monitoring Protocol

Appendix 8. Draft Post Construction Noise Monitoring Protocol Appendix 8 Draft Post Construction Noise Monitoring Protocol DRAFT CPV Valley Energy Center Prepared for: CPV Valley, LLC 50 Braintree Hill Office Park, Suite 300 Braintree, Massachusetts 02184 Prepared

More information

TECHNICAL REPORT 2016 IEL ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE SURVEY OF THE DAIRYGOLD CASTLEFARM FACILITY, MITCHELSTOWN, CO. CORK.

TECHNICAL REPORT 2016 IEL ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE SURVEY OF THE DAIRYGOLD CASTLEFARM FACILITY, MITCHELSTOWN, CO. CORK. TECHNICAL REPORT 16 IEL ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE SURVEY OF THE DAIRYGOLD CASTLEFARM FACILITY, MITCHELSTOWN, CO. CORK. FOR Gabriel Kelly Group Environmental Manager Dairygold Food ingredients Castlefarm Mitchelstown

More information

The following is the summary of Keane Acoustics community mechanical noise study for the City of St. Petersburg.

The following is the summary of Keane Acoustics community mechanical noise study for the City of St. Petersburg. August 11, 2017 David Goodwin Director Planning & Economic Development Department City of St. Petersburg Re: City of St. Petersburg Dear Mr. Goodwin, The following is the summary of Keane Acoustics community

More information

Portable Noise Monitoring Report March 5 - April 24, 2016 The Museum of Vancouver. Vancouver Airport Authority

Portable Noise Monitoring Report March 5 - April 24, 2016 The Museum of Vancouver. Vancouver Airport Authority Portable Noise Monitoring Report March 5 - April 24, 2016 The Museum of Vancouver Vancouver Airport Authority September 27, 2016 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 2 OBJECTIVES... 2 VANCOUVER: AIRCRAFT

More information

Liddell Coal Operations

Liddell Coal Operations Liddell Coal Operations Environmental Noise Monitoring February 2018 Prepared for Liddell Coal Operations Pty Ltd Page i Liddell Coal Operations Environmental Noise Monitoring February 2018 Reference:

More information

Lion s Gate Secondary Wastewater Treatment Plant Pile Driving North Vancouver, BC. Final Report Rev 1

Lion s Gate Secondary Wastewater Treatment Plant Pile Driving North Vancouver, BC. Final Report Rev 1 Lion s Gate Secondary Wastewater Treatment Plant Pile Driving North Vancouver, BC Final Report Rev 1 Noise Impact Assessment RWDI # 1502274 SUBMITTED TO Paul Dufault Project Manager Metro Vancouver 4330

More information

Black Butte Copper Project Mine Operating Permit Application (Revision 3)

Black Butte Copper Project Mine Operating Permit Application (Revision 3) Mine Operating Permit Application (Revision 3) APPENDIX J: Tintina Montana, Inc. July 17 MEMORANDUM DATE: October 7, 13 TO: FROM: RE: Allan Kirk / Geomin Resources Bob Jacko / Tintina Resources Sean Connolly

More information

AMERICAN UNIVERSITY EAST CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT WASHINGTON, D.C. Environmental Noise Study. Project Number

AMERICAN UNIVERSITY EAST CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT WASHINGTON, D.C. Environmental Noise Study. Project Number AMERICAN UNIVERSITY EAST CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT WASHINGTON, D.C. Environmental Noise Study Project Number 11-107 Douglas P. Koehn, M.S. Senior Consultant 12040 SOUTH LAKES DRIVE, SUITE 104, RESTON, VIRGINIA

More information

Noise Study for Proposed Mavis Tire

Noise Study for Proposed Mavis Tire Noise Study for Proposed Mavis Tire Hyde Park, New York April 4, 2017 Prepared For: Town of Hyde Park Planning Board 4383 Albany Post Road Hyde Park, NY 12538 Prepared By: Novus Engineering, P.C. 25 Delaware

More information

BASELINE NOISE MONITORING SURVEY

BASELINE NOISE MONITORING SURVEY t m s environment ltd TMS Environment Ltd 53 Broomhill Drive Tallaght Dublin 24 Phone: +353-1-4626710 Fax: +353-1-4626714 Web: www.tmsenv.ie BASELINE NOISE MONITORING SURVEY UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN Report

More information

Noise and Ground-Borne Vibration Monitoring

Noise and Ground-Borne Vibration Monitoring 69 Noise and Vibration Study Noise and Ground-Borne Vibration Monitoring Labrador City, Newfoundland Nov, 07 Iron Ore Company of Canada TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 2 1.1 Study Objectives... 2

More information

Liddell Coal Operations

Liddell Coal Operations Liddell Coal Operations Environmental Noise Monitoring May 2018 Prepared for Liddell Coal Operations Pty Ltd Page i Liddell Coal Operations Environmental Noise Monitoring May 2018 Reference: Report date:

More information

Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals

Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals Allegro Acoustics Limited, Unit 2A Riverside, Tallaght Business Park, Tallaght, Dublin 24 Tel/Fax: +33 () 1 4148 Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals Pfizer Grange Castle, Grange Castle Business Park, Clondalkin,

More information

The following is the summary of Keane Acoustics acoustical study for the City of St. Petersburg.

The following is the summary of Keane Acoustics acoustical study for the City of St. Petersburg. November 23, 2017 David Goodwin Director Planning & Economic Development Department City of St. Petersburg Re: City of St. Petersburg Dear Mr. Goodwin, The following is the summary of Keane Acoustics acoustical

More information

Please refer to the figure on the following page which shows the relationship between sound fields.

Please refer to the figure on the following page which shows the relationship between sound fields. Defining Sound s Near The near field is the region close to a sound source usually defined as ¼ of the longest wave-length of the source. Near field noise levels are characterized by drastic fluctuations

More information

Roche Ireland Limited

Roche Ireland Limited Limited Clarecastle, Co. Clare Monitoring Report Industrial Emissions Licence Number P0012-05 Report Date: 1 st February 17 Fitz Scientific Unit 35A, Boyne Business Park, Drogheda, Co. Louth Report No.

More information

Ashton Coal. Environmental Noise Monitoring May Prepared for Ashton Coal Operations Pty Ltd

Ashton Coal. Environmental Noise Monitoring May Prepared for Ashton Coal Operations Pty Ltd Ashton Coal Environmental Noise Monitoring May 2018 Prepared for Ashton Coal Operations Pty Ltd Page i Ashton Coal Environmental Noise Monitoring May 2018 Reference: Report date: 5 June 2018 Prepared for

More information

Roche Ireland Limited

Roche Ireland Limited Roche Ireland Limited Clarecastle, Co. Clare Environmental Noise Monitoring Report Industrial Emissions Licence Number P0012-05 Report Date: 6 th October 17 Fitz Scientific Unit 35A, Boyne Business Park,

More information

Pre-Construction Sound Study. Velco Jay Substation DRAFT. January 2011 D A T A AN AL Y S IS S OL U T I ON S

Pre-Construction Sound Study. Velco Jay Substation DRAFT. January 2011 D A T A AN AL Y S IS S OL U T I ON S Pre-Construction Sound Study Substation DRAFT January 2011 D A T A AN AL Y S IS S OL U T I ON S TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION...1 2.0 SOUND LEVEL MONITORING...1 3.0 SOUND MODELING...4 3.1 Modeling

More information

Standard Guide for Measurement of Outdoor A-Weighted Sound Levels 1

Standard Guide for Measurement of Outdoor A-Weighted Sound Levels 1 Designation: E 1014 84 (Reapproved 1995) e1 AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS 100 Barr Harbor Dr., West Conshohocken, PA 19428 Reprinted from the Annual Book of ASTM Standards. Copyright ASTM

More information

PURPLE LINE EXTENSION SECTION 2 AMBIENT NOISE LEVEL REPORT METRO PROJECT RODEO STATION

PURPLE LINE EXTENSION SECTION 2 AMBIENT NOISE LEVEL REPORT METRO PROJECT RODEO STATION PURPLE LINE EXTENSION SECTION 2 AMBIENT NOISE LEVEL REPORT METRO PROJECT 865522 RODEO STATION Kleinfelder Section Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction... 4 2.0 Noise Measurement Procedure... 4 3.0 Noise

More information

Black. LWECS Site Permit. Stearns County. Permit Section:

Black. LWECS Site Permit. Stearns County. Permit Section: PERMIT COMPLIANCE FILING Permittee: Permit Type: Project Location: Docket No: Permit Section: Date of Submission : Black Oak Wind,, LLC LWECS Site Permit Stearns County IP6853/WS-10-1240 and IP6866/WS-11-831

More information

REPORT PERIOD: JANUARY 01 MARCH

REPORT PERIOD: JANUARY 01 MARCH QUARTERLY NOISE MONITORING REPORT FOR EAST GALWAY LANDFILL REPORT PERIOD: JANUARY 01 MARCH 31 2018 IE LICENCE REF. NO. W0178-02 APRIL 2018 QUARTERLY NOISE MONITORING REPORT FOR EAST GALWAY LANDFILL REPORT

More information

Liddell Coal Operations

Liddell Coal Operations Liddell Coal Operations Environmental Noise Monitoring April 2016 Prepared for Liddell Coal Operations Pty Ltd Page i Liddell Coal Operations Environmental Noise Monitoring April 2016 Reference: Report

More information

WITHIN GENERATOR APPLICATIONS

WITHIN GENERATOR APPLICATIONS POWER SYSTEMS TOPICS 9 Measuring and Understanding Sound WITHIN GENERATOR APPLICATIONS INTRODUCTION When selecting a generator, there are many factors to consider so as not to negatively impact the existing

More information

Boggabri Coal Mine. Environmental Noise Monitoring October Prepared for Boggabri Coal Operations Pty Ltd

Boggabri Coal Mine. Environmental Noise Monitoring October Prepared for Boggabri Coal Operations Pty Ltd Boggabri Coal Mine Environmental Noise Monitoring October 2017 Prepared for Boggabri Coal Operations Pty Ltd Page i Boggabri Coal Mine Environmental Noise Monitoring October 2017 Reference: Report date:

More information

Boggabri Coal Mine. Environmental Noise Monitoring June Prepared for Boggabri Coal Operations Pty Ltd

Boggabri Coal Mine. Environmental Noise Monitoring June Prepared for Boggabri Coal Operations Pty Ltd Boggabri Coal Mine Environmental Noise Monitoring June 2017 Prepared for Boggabri Coal Operations Pty Ltd Page i Boggabri Coal Mine Environmental Noise Monitoring June 2017 Reference: Report date: 5 July

More information

Muswellbrook Coal Company

Muswellbrook Coal Company Muswellbrook Coal Company Environmental ise Monitoring May 2015 Prepared for Muswellbrook Coal Page i Muswellbrook Coal Company Environmental ise Monitoring May 2015 Reference: Report date: 18 June 2015

More information

Orora Pty Ltd. B9 Paper Mill EPL Compliance Quarterly noise monitoring report. 20 June Doc no QM-RP-4-0

Orora Pty Ltd. B9 Paper Mill EPL Compliance Quarterly noise monitoring report. 20 June Doc no QM-RP-4-0 Orora Pty Ltd B9 Paper Mill EPL Compliance Quarterly noise monitoring report 20 June 2017 Doc no. 102-QM-RP-4-0 Orora Pty Ltd B9 Paper Mill - EPL Compliance Title Document no. Quarterly noise monitoring

More information

WesPac Pittsburg Energy Infrastructure Project. Noise Assessment Report

WesPac Pittsburg Energy Infrastructure Project. Noise Assessment Report WesPac Pittsburg Energy Infrastructure Project Noise Assessment Report Prepared for WesPac Energy Pittsburg LLC And Oiltanking North America LLC Prepared by TRC 1200 Wall Street West, 2 nd Floor Lyndhurst,

More information

Muswellbrook Coal Company

Muswellbrook Coal Company Muswellbrook Coal Company Environmental Noise Monitoring November 2015 Prepared for Muswellbrook Coal Page i Muswellbrook Coal Company Environmental Noise Monitoring November 2015 Reference: Report date:

More information

University of York Heslington East Campus Details of Noise Modelling and Noise Survey. Report ref AAc/ /R01

University of York Heslington East Campus Details of Noise Modelling and Noise Survey. Report ref AAc/ /R01 Heslington East Campus Details of Noise Modelling and Noise Survey Report ref Heslington East Campus Details of Noise Modelling and Noise Survey January 2008 Arup Acoustics Admiral House, Rose Wharf, 78

More information

Swan DH Noise Impact Assessment Report

Swan DH Noise Impact Assessment Report Swan 4-64 6-1 3DH Noise Impact Assessment Report April 9, 2018 Prepared for: ConocoPhillips 34501 East Quincy Avenue Watkins, Colorado 80137 Prepared by: Behrens and Associates, Inc. 13806 Inglewood Avenue

More information

DOWNWIND LEG NOISE MONITORING SUMMARY REPORT

DOWNWIND LEG NOISE MONITORING SUMMARY REPORT Tel: 43-232-6771 Fax: 43-232-6762 RWDI AIR Inc. #1, 736-8 th Avenue S.W. Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 1H4 Email: solutions@rwdi.com DOWNWIND LEG NOISE MONITORING SUMMARY REPORT Introduction This report

More information

NOISE IMPACT STUDY FOR THE SOUTH PIER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT BROOKLYN, NEW YORK. April 2008

NOISE IMPACT STUDY FOR THE SOUTH PIER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT BROOKLYN, NEW YORK. April 2008 NOISE IMPACT STUDY FOR THE SOUTH PIER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT BROOKLYN, NEW YORK April 2008 NOISE IMPACT STUDY FOR THE SOUTH PIER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT BROOKLYN, NEW YORK Prepared for: ESS Group, Inc. 401 Wampanoag

More information

CHAPTER 3 NOISE FUNDAMENTALS

CHAPTER 3 NOISE FUNDAMENTALS CHAPTER 3 NOISE FUNDAMENTALS While a great deal is known about aircraft noise, the methods used to calculate noise exposure can be difficult to understand. Determining aircraft noise impacts involves logarithmic

More information

Electricity Supply to Africa and Developing Economies. Challenges and opportunities. Planning for the future in uncertain times

Electricity Supply to Africa and Developing Economies. Challenges and opportunities. Planning for the future in uncertain times Electricity Supply to Africa and Developing Economies. Challenges and opportunities. Planning for the future in uncertain times 765 kv Substation Acoustic Noise Impact Study by Predictive Software and

More information

Keystone Pipeline Phases 1 & 2 Acoustic Monitoring Report for Canadian Pump Stations

Keystone Pipeline Phases 1 & 2 Acoustic Monitoring Report for Canadian Pump Stations Revision 0 Keystone Project Document # RE-03 [2-4-22-2] ATCO Project # 763000 TransCanada Pipeline Ltd. Keystone Pipeline Project Keystone Pipeline Phases 1 & 2 Acoustic Monitoring Report for Canadian

More information

Annual Noise Monitoring Report

Annual Noise Monitoring Report Noise monitoring program Annual report sum mary 2 0 1 7 Annual Noise Monitoring Report The Vancouver Fraser Port Authority has a noise m onitoring program in place to better understand the source and intensity

More information

McGill Environmental Ltd.

McGill Environmental Ltd. McGill Environmental Ltd. Coom, Glenville, Co. Cork Environmental Noise Survey Report Date: 7 th October 2016 For inspection purposes only. KD Environmental Ltd. 1 Swiftbrook Glen, Virginia, Co. Cavan

More information

Noise Mitigation Study Pilot Program Summary Report Contract No

Noise Mitigation Study Pilot Program Summary Report Contract No Ohio Turnpike Commission Noise Mitigation Study Pilot Program Summary Report Contract No. 71-08-02 Prepared For: Ohio Turnpike Commission 682 Prospect Street Berea, Ohio 44017 Prepared By: November 2009

More information

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 2016

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 2016 Panther Environmental Solutions Ltd, Unit 4, Innovation Centre, Institute of Technology, Green Road, Carlow, Ireland. Mobile: 087-8519284 Telephone /Fax: 059-9134222 Email: info@pantherwms.com Website:

More information

Offaly County Council

Offaly County Council Derryclure Landfill Facility, Derryclure, Co. Offaly Annual Monitoring Report Waste Licence Reg. No. W0029-04 Report Date: th October 15 Fitz Scientific Unit 35A, Boyne Business Park, Drogheda, Co. Louth

More information

Fundamentals of Environmental Noise Monitoring CENAC

Fundamentals of Environmental Noise Monitoring CENAC Fundamentals of Environmental Noise Monitoring CENAC Dr. Colin Novak Akoustik Engineering Limited April 03, 2013 Akoustik Engineering Limited Akoustik Engineering Limited is the sales and technical representative

More information

CENTRAL WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY, INAGH, CO. CLARE. ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE MONITORING MAY 2017.

CENTRAL WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY, INAGH, CO. CLARE. ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE MONITORING MAY 2017. CENTRAL WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY, INAGH, CO. CLARE. ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE MONITORING MAY 2017. Prepared for: CLARE COUNTY COUNCIL ÁRAS CONTAE AN CHLÁIR NEW ROAD ENNIS CO. CLARE 3156 May 16 th, 2017 EPA

More information

Appendix L Noise Technical Report. Rehabilitation and Restoration of the Longfellow Bridge

Appendix L Noise Technical Report. Rehabilitation and Restoration of the Longfellow Bridge Appendix L Noise Technical Report Rehabilitation and Restoration of the Longfellow Bridge Noise Technical Report Rehabilitation and Restoration of the Longfellow Bridge Boston, MA May, 2011* Prepared by

More information

APPENDIX G-4 NOISE MONITORING REPORT

APPENDIX G-4 NOISE MONITORING REPORT APPENDIX G-4 NOISE MONITORING REPORT TETRA TECH, INC. 820 Mililani Street, Suite 700 Honolulu, Hawai i 96813 Telephone (808) 533-3366 FAX (808) 533-3360 February 22, 2005 Uyen Tran Contract Monitor US

More information

Bickerdike Allen Partners

Bickerdike Allen Partners 25 CHURCH ROAD, SE19 ENTERTAINMENT NOISE ASSESSMENT Report to Kayode Falebita Kingsway International Christian Centre 3 Hancock Road Bromley-By-Bow London E3 3DA A9540/R01-A-HT 26/07/2012 CONTENTS Page

More information

Quarterly Noise Monitoring Report Austar Coal Mine Middle Road, Paxton NSW January 2007

Quarterly Noise Monitoring Report Austar Coal Mine Middle Road, Paxton NSW January 2007 REPORT 30-1664R1R0 Quarterly Noise Monitoring Report Austar Coal Mine Middle Road, Paxton NSW January 2007 PREPARED FOR P.O Box 806 Cessnock NSW 2325 14 MAY 2007 Quarterly Noise Monitoring Report Austar

More information

Boggabri Coal Mine. Environmental Noise Monitoring August Prepared for Boggabri Coal Operations Pty Ltd

Boggabri Coal Mine. Environmental Noise Monitoring August Prepared for Boggabri Coal Operations Pty Ltd Boggabri Coal Mine Environmental Noise Monitoring August 2018 Prepared for Boggabri Coal Operations Pty Ltd Page i Boggabri Coal Mine Environmental Noise Monitoring August 2018 Reference: Report date:

More information

Environment Protection Authority (EPA), Industrial Noise Policy (INP) 2000;

Environment Protection Authority (EPA), Industrial Noise Policy (INP) 2000; 15 December 2017 Suite 6, Level 1, 146 Hunter Street Newcastle NSW 2300 PO Box 506 Pere Riini Quarry Manager Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd Level 5, 75 George Street Parramatta, NSW 2150 Newcastle,

More information

Technical Report Noise and Vibration

Technical Report Noise and Vibration Technical Report Noise and Vibration Eagle Mine and Humboldt Mill Prepared for: Eagle Mine, LLC 4547 County Road 601 Champion, MI 49814 Date: August 8, 2014 TriMedia Project Number: 2014-083 Table of Contents

More information

Attended Noise Monitoring - Quarter Ending September 2013

Attended Noise Monitoring - Quarter Ending September 2013 Unity Mining Level 10, 350 Collins St Melbourne VIC 3000 Version: Page 2 PREPARED BY: ABN 29 001 584 612 Units 7-8, 26-28 Napier Close Deakin ACT 2600 Australia (PO Box 9344 Deakin ACT 2600 Australia)

More information

Environmental Noise Propagation

Environmental Noise Propagation Environmental Noise Propagation How loud is a 1-ton truck? That depends very much on how far away you are, and whether you are in front of a barrier or behind it. Many other factors affect the noise level,

More information

Cymbaluk Noise Complaints

Cymbaluk Noise Complaints Decision 20259-D01-2015 Cymbaluk Noise Complaints December 22, 2015 Alberta Utilities Commission Decision 20259-D01-2015 Cymbaluk Noise Complaints Proceeding 20259 Application 20259-A001 December 22, 2015

More information

Bloomfield Colliery. Quarterly Noise Monitoring and Compliance Assessment. September Report Number

Bloomfield Colliery. Quarterly Noise Monitoring and Compliance Assessment. September Report Number Report Number 630.01053 20 December 2016 Bloomfield Collieries Four Mile Creek Road Ashtonfield NSW 2323 Version: v1.0 Report Number 630.01053 20 December 2016 v1.0 Page 2 PREPARED BY: ABN 29 001 584 612

More information

Bancroft & Piedmont Cellular Facility

Bancroft & Piedmont Cellular Facility Page 1 of 19 Environmental Noise Analysis Bancroft & Piedmont Cellular Facility Berkeley, California BAC Job # 2015-177 Prepared For: Complete Wireless Consulting Attn: Ms. Kim Le 2009 V Street Sacramento,

More information

Orora Pty Ltd. B9 Paper Mill EPL Compliance Quarterly noise monitoring report. 11 August Doc no QM-RP-1-0

Orora Pty Ltd. B9 Paper Mill EPL Compliance Quarterly noise monitoring report. 11 August Doc no QM-RP-1-0 Orora Pty Ltd B9 Paper Mill EPL Compliance Quarterly noise monitoring report 11 August 16 Doc no. 102-QM-RP-1-0 Orora Pty Ltd B9 Paper Mill - EPL Compliance Title Document no. Quarterly noise monitoring

More information

Anchorage Port Modernization Program In air Noise and Ground borne Vibration Analysis Monitoring Report

Anchorage Port Modernization Program In air Noise and Ground borne Vibration Analysis Monitoring Report FINAL REPORT Anchorage Port Modernization Program In air Noise and Ground borne Vibration Analysis Monitoring Report Prepared for Municipality of Anchorage/Port of Anchorage 1980 Anchorage Port Road Anchorage,

More information

Review of Baseline Noise Monitoring results and Establishment of Noise Criteria

Review of Baseline Noise Monitoring results and Establishment of Noise Criteria Appendix G Review of Baseline Noise Monitoring results and Establishment of Noise Criteria Environmental Management Plan G May 2014 Colton Coal Mine Aldershot, Queensland Review of Baseline Noise Monitoring

More information

Further Investigations of Low-frequency Noise Problem Generated by Freight Trains

Further Investigations of Low-frequency Noise Problem Generated by Freight Trains Proceedings of Acoustics 2012 - Fremantle Further Investigations of Low-frequency Noise Problem Generated by Freight Trains Jingnan Guo, John Macpherson and Peter Popoff-Asotoff Noise Regulation Branch,

More information

Attended Noise Monitoring Program

Attended Noise Monitoring Program 16 May 2018 Ref: 171356/7853 Muswellbrook Coal Company PO Box 123 Muswellbrook NSW 2333 RE: MAY 2018 NOISE MONITORING RESULTS MUSWELLBROOK COAL MINE This letter report presents the results of noise compliance

More information

Appendix F Noise and Vibration

Appendix F Noise and Vibration 1.1 Wayside Noise Model Methods Wayside noise collectively refers to noise generated by railcars and locomotives (i.e., without including horn noise). The joint lead agencies used noise measurements from

More information

Environment Protection Authority (EPA), Industrial Noise Policy (INP) 2000;

Environment Protection Authority (EPA), Industrial Noise Policy (INP) 2000; 10 October 2017 Suite 6, Level 1,, 146 Hunter Street Newcastle NSW 2300 PO Box 506 Pere Riini Quarry Manager Hanson Construction Materials Pty Ltd Level 5, 75 George Street Parramatta, NSW 2150 Newcastle,

More information

Public Hearing on Revisions to Lincoln County Zoning Ordinance

Public Hearing on Revisions to Lincoln County Zoning Ordinance November 21, 2016 William G. Beck Bill.Beck@woodsfuller.com Extension 601 Lincoln County Commission 104 N. Main Street Canton, SD 57013 Lincoln County State s Attorney s Office 104 N. Main Street, Suite

More information

Rehab Glassco. Unit 4, Osberstown Industrial Park, Caragh Road, Naas, Co. Kildare. For inspection purposes only.

Rehab Glassco. Unit 4, Osberstown Industrial Park, Caragh Road, Naas, Co. Kildare. For inspection purposes only. Air I Noise I Water I Soil I Environmental Consultancy www.axisenv.ie Unit 5 Caherdavin Business Centre, Ennis Road, Limerick Unit 4, Osberstown Industrial Park, Caragh Road, Naas, Co. Kildare Environmental

More information

Appendix D: Preliminary Noise Evaluation

Appendix D: Preliminary Noise Evaluation Appendix D: Preliminary Noise Evaluation Acoustics The study of sound and its properties is known as acoustics. By considering basic physical properties of sound and the acoustic environment, the potential

More information

January 15, File: A. Urban Systems Ltd Homer Street Vancouver, BC V6B 2W9. Attention: Tim Stevens. Dear Tim:

January 15, File: A. Urban Systems Ltd Homer Street Vancouver, BC V6B 2W9. Attention: Tim Stevens. Dear Tim: January 15, 2016 File: 0890-15A Urban Systems Ltd. 1090 Homer Street Vancouver, BC V6B 2W9 Attention: Tim Stevens Dear Tim: Re: Highway 1 - Admirals McKenzie Interchange Project Baseline Noise Monitoring

More information

Sound Reflection from a Motorway Barrier

Sound Reflection from a Motorway Barrier Auckland Christchurch Kuala Lumpur Melbourne Sydney Wellington www.marshallday.com Sound Reflection from a Motorway Barrier Christopher W Day Paper revised June 2005 chrisday@marshallday.co.nz Abstract

More information

Attended Noise Monitoring Program

Attended Noise Monitoring Program 1 November 2018 Ref: 171356/8121 Muswellbrook Coal Company PO Box 123 Muswellbrook NSW 2333 RE: OCTOBER 2018 NOISE MONITORING RESULTS MUSWELLBROOK COAL MINE This letter report presents the results of noise

More information

PROPOSED MARYWOOD DEVELOPMENT

PROPOSED MARYWOOD DEVELOPMENT ACOUSTICAL ANALYSIS PROPOSED MARYWOOD DEVELOPMENT CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA PREPARED FOR VCS Environmental 30900 RANCH VIEJO ROAD, SUITE 100 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA 92675 PREPARED BY A/E Tech

More information

Memorandum 1.0 Highway Traffic Noise

Memorandum 1.0 Highway Traffic Noise Memorandum Date: September 18, 2009 To: Chris Hiniker, SEH From: Stephen B. Platisha, P.E. Re: Updated CSAH 14 Noise Analysis The purpose of this memorandum is to provide the results of the revised traffic

More information

Xtratherm Limited Kells Road, Navan, Co Meath

Xtratherm Limited Kells Road, Navan, Co Meath Air I Noise I Water I Soil I Environmental Consultancy www.axisenv.ie Unit 5 Caherdavin Business Centre Ennis Road Limerick Kells Road, Navan, Co Meath Annual Environmental Noise Survey 2017 IPPC Licence

More information

Subject: Ambient Noise Measurement, Creekside Park Project, Monte Rio, California

Subject: Ambient Noise Measurement, Creekside Park Project, Monte Rio, California 22 December 2011 11215-00.01810 Laura Saunders, AICP Prunuske Chatham, Inc. 400 Morris Street, Suite G Sebastopol, CA 95472 Subject: Ambient Noise Measurement, Creekside Park Project, Monte Rio, California

More information

Subject: Pappy s Grill and Sports Bar DJ System Acoustical Isolation Study

Subject: Pappy s Grill and Sports Bar DJ System Acoustical Isolation Study Page 1 of 8 WI #16 130 December 21, 2016 Alex Popov Liquid Entertainment 2367 Telegraph Avenue Berkeley, California Subject: Pappy s Grill and Sports Bar DJ System Acoustical Isolation Study Dear Alex,

More information

W For inspection purposes only. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the approval of BnM Environmental.

W For inspection purposes only. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the approval of BnM Environmental. ANNUAL MONITORING OF ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE AT THE BORD NA MóNA KILBERRY COMPOST FACILITY IN COMPLIANCE WITH IED LICENCE, NO. W0198-01 For the Attention of: Site Work & Report Prepared by: Anua File Ref:

More information

Appendix N. Preliminary Noise Assessment Technical Memorandum

Appendix N. Preliminary Noise Assessment Technical Memorandum Appendix N Preliminary Noise Assessment Technical Memorandum SENES Consultants Limited MEMORANDUM 121 Granton Drive, Unit 12 Richmond Hill, Ontario Canada L4B 3N4 Tel: (905) 764-9380 Fax: (905) 764-9386

More information

Noise monitoring during drilling operations Lower Stumble Well Site Balcombe, West Sussex

Noise monitoring during drilling operations Lower Stumble Well Site Balcombe, West Sussex Noise monitoring during drilling operations Lower Stumble Well Site Balcombe, West Sussex Report ref. PJ3159/13181 Date August 13 Issued to Cuadrilla Resources Limited Issued by Peter Jackson MSc MIOA

More information

Appendix G Noise and Vibration Assessment

Appendix G Noise and Vibration Assessment Appendix G Noise and Vibration Assessment Annex G1: Noise Perception and Terminology Annex G2: Baseline Noise Monitoring Annex G3: Construction Information Annex G4: Operational Information Annex G1: Noise

More information

ACOUSTIC BARRIER FOR TRANSFORMER NOISE. Ruisen Ming. SVT Engineering Consultants, Leederville, WA 6007, Australia

ACOUSTIC BARRIER FOR TRANSFORMER NOISE. Ruisen Ming. SVT Engineering Consultants, Leederville, WA 6007, Australia ICSV14 Cairns Australia 9-12 July, 2007 ACOUSTIC BARRIER FOR TRANSFORMER NOISE Ruisen Ming SVT Engineering Consultants, Leederville, WA 6007, Australia Roy.Ming@svt.com.au Abstract In this paper, an acoustic

More information

Background Ambient Noise Study Rosemont Copper

Background Ambient Noise Study Rosemont Copper Background Ambient Noise Study Rosemont Copper Prepared for: Rosemont Copper 40 Cherry Creek South Drive, Ste. 10 Denver, Colorado 246 (3) 0-0138 Fax (3) 0-0135 Prepared by: 31 West Ina Road Tucson, Arizona

More information

Cullen Valley Mine. Environmental Noise Monitoring Quarter 2, Prepared for Castlereagh Coal

Cullen Valley Mine. Environmental Noise Monitoring Quarter 2, Prepared for Castlereagh Coal Cullen Valley Mine Environmental Noise Monitoring Quarter 2, 2018 Prepared for Castlereagh Coal Page i Cullen Valley Mine Environmental Noise Monitoring Quarter 2, 2018 Reference: Report date: 28 June

More information

A. INTRODUCTION B. METHODOLOGY

A. INTRODUCTION B. METHODOLOGY Chapter 9: and Vibration A. INTRODUCTION This chapter analyzes the effects of Alternatives B, C, and Preferred Alternative D on ambient noise and vibration levels. can be generated by fixed facilities,

More information

Protocol for Ambient Level Noise Monitoring

Protocol for Ambient Level Noise Monitoring July 2015 Protocol for Ambient Level Noise Monitoring L pressure =10.log [10 (Lp/10) - 10 (LpBackground/10) ] L pressure = 10.log [10 (Lp/10) - 10 (LpBackground/10) ] CENTRAL POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD P

More information

Bloomfield Colliery. Quarterly Noise Monitoring. and Compliance Assessment September Report Number Q R2.

Bloomfield Colliery. Quarterly Noise Monitoring. and Compliance Assessment September Report Number Q R2. Bloomfield Colliery Quarterly Noise Monitoring and Compliance Assessment September 2015 Report Number Q59 630.01053-R2 15 October 2015 Bloomfield Collieries Four Mile Creek Road Ashtonfield NSW 2323 Version:

More information

ECOACCESS GUIDELINE FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF LOW FREQUENCY NOISE

ECOACCESS GUIDELINE FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF LOW FREQUENCY NOISE ECOACCESS GUIDELINE FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF LOW FREQUENCY NOISE Cedric Roberts Environmental Operations, Integrated Assessment, Queensland Environmental Protection Agency, 160 Ann Street, Brisbane, Queensland,

More information

Basin Electric Intertie Noise & Vibration Study and Land Use Assessment

Basin Electric Intertie Noise & Vibration Study and Land Use Assessment Executive Summary and Recommendations Black Hills Power and Basin Electric Power Cooperative constructed an Intertie outside of Rapid City, South Dakota (Facility). The Facility is a high voltage direct

More information

OneSteel Recycling Hexham Quarterly Noise Monitoring Report Q2 2017

OneSteel Recycling Hexham Quarterly Noise Monitoring Report Q2 2017 OneSteel Recycling Pty Ltd 14-Jul-2017 60493017 OneSteel Recycling Hexham Quarterly Noise Monitoring Report Q2 2017 NATA ACCREDITATION No. 2778 (14391) Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025 Testing

More information

Standard Octaves and Sound Pressure. The superposition of several independent sound sources produces multifrequency noise: i=1

Standard Octaves and Sound Pressure. The superposition of several independent sound sources produces multifrequency noise: i=1 Appendix C Standard Octaves and Sound Pressure C.1 Time History and Overall Sound Pressure The superposition of several independent sound sources produces multifrequency noise: p(t) = N N p i (t) = P i

More information

Pipeline Blowdown Noise Levels

Pipeline Blowdown Noise Levels Pipeline Blowdown Noise Levels James Boland 1, Henrik Malker 2, Benjamin Hinze 3 1 SLR Consulting, Acoustics and Vibration, Brisbane, Australia 2 Atkins Global, Acoustics, London, United Kingdom 3 SLR

More information

REPORT OF NOISE MONITORING OF TUTUR1C SID TRIAL AT EDINBURGH AIRPORT AUGUST TO NOVEMBER 2015 SITE 2: UPHALL

REPORT OF NOISE MONITORING OF TUTUR1C SID TRIAL AT EDINBURGH AIRPORT AUGUST TO NOVEMBER 2015 SITE 2: UPHALL Date: 09 March 2016 REPORT OF NOISE MONITORING OF TUTUR1C SID TRIAL AT EDINBURGH AIRPORT AUGUST TO NOVEMBER 2015 SITE 2: UPHALL Client: Edinburgh Limited Report Author:... Dr R. Peters Principal Consultant

More information

South Orange County Reliability Enhancement Project

South Orange County Reliability Enhancement Project South Orange County Reliability Enhancement Project AMBIENT NOISE SURVEY REPORT CAPISTRANO SUBSTATION NOISE & CORONA NOISE March 2012 San Diego Gas & Electric Company Prepared by: Alliance Acoustical Consulting,

More information

UC Berkeley Northside Relocation Cellular Facility

UC Berkeley Northside Relocation Cellular Facility Page 1 of 19 Environmental Noise Analysis UC Berkeley Northside Relocation Cellular Facility Berkeley, California BAC Job # 2015-290 Prepared For: Complete Wireless Consulting Attn: Kim Le 2009 V Street

More information

Glassco Recycling. Unit 4, Osberstown Industrial Park, Caragh Road, Naas, Co. Kildare. For inspection purposes only.

Glassco Recycling. Unit 4, Osberstown Industrial Park, Caragh Road, Naas, Co. Kildare. For inspection purposes only. Air I Noise I Water I Soil I Environmental Consultancy www.axisenv.ie Unit 5 Caherdavin Business Centre, Ennis Road, Limerick. info@axisenv.ie 00353 61 324587 Unit 4, Osberstown Industrial Park, Caragh

More information

City and Borough of Juneau

City and Borough of Juneau City and Borough of Juneau Flightseeing Noise Measurement and Assessment Study Proposed Work Plan BACKGROUND AND STUDY OBJECTIVES The objective of the flightseeing noise measurement program is to provide

More information

Environmental Noise Survey For. Vista Coal Project. Prepared for: Coalspur Mines Ltd. Prepared by: S. Bilawchuk, M.Sc., P.Eng.

Environmental Noise Survey For. Vista Coal Project. Prepared for: Coalspur Mines Ltd. Prepared by: S. Bilawchuk, M.Sc., P.Eng. aci Acoustical Consultants Inc. 5031 210 Street Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6M 0A8 Phone: (780) 414-6373, Fax: (780) 414-6376 www.aciacoustical.com Environmental Noise Survey For Vista Coal Project Prepared

More information

Chapter 12. Preview. Objectives The Production of Sound Waves Frequency of Sound Waves The Doppler Effect. Section 1 Sound Waves

Chapter 12. Preview. Objectives The Production of Sound Waves Frequency of Sound Waves The Doppler Effect. Section 1 Sound Waves Section 1 Sound Waves Preview Objectives The Production of Sound Waves Frequency of Sound Waves The Doppler Effect Section 1 Sound Waves Objectives Explain how sound waves are produced. Relate frequency

More information

Environmental Noise Assessment Cambourne to Cambridge options

Environmental Noise Assessment Cambourne to Cambridge options Environmental Noise Assessment Cambourne to Cambridge options CLIENT: Cambridgeshire County Council Major Infrastructure Delivery Box No SH1311 Shire Hall Cambridge CB3 0AP CONTACT: Tim Watkins REPORTED

More information

Technical Report NOISE MONITORING PROGRAM

Technical Report NOISE MONITORING PROGRAM 1 Technical Report NOISE MONITORING PROGRAM This Technical Report presents the results of a noise monitoring program conducted around Louisville International Airport (the Airport) between June 2, and

More information

Assured Monitoring Group

Assured Monitoring Group Assured Monitoring Group YARRANLEA SOLAR FARM NOISE & VIBRATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT JANUARY 2017 I3 CONSULTING PTY LTD Project ID. 10734 R_1 DATE OF RELEASE: 15/02/2017 Table 1: Document approval Name Position

More information