Gaze Behaviour as a Measure of Trust in Automated Vehicles
|
|
- William Young
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Proceedings of the 6 th Humanist Conference, The Hague, Netherlands, June 2018 ABSTRACT Gaze Behaviour as a Measure of Trust in Automated Vehicles Francesco Walker, University of Twente, The Netherlands, f.walker@utwente.nl, Willem Verwey, University of Twente, The Netherlands, Marieke Martens, University of Twente, The Netherlands Extensive evidence shows that drivers intention to use self-driving technology is strongly modulated by trust, and that the benefits promised by automated vehicles will not be achieved if users do not trust them. It follows that vehicles should be designed to achieve optimal trust. However, there is no consensus as to how this should be assessed. To date, most studies have relied on self-reports, an approach subject to problems. In the driving simulator study reported here, we used drivers gaze behaviour during simulated Highly Automated Driving to investigate whether this could provide a more objective measure. The results indicated a negative relationship between self-reported trust and monitoring behaviour: The higher their self-reported trust, the less participants monitored the road, and the more attention they paid to a non-driving related secondary task. These findings suggest that gaze behaviour in a secondary task situation provides a more objective indicator of driver trust than self-reports. Keywords: trust in automation, eye movement behaviour, human factors, autonomous driving, automated vehicle, secondary task. 1 INTRODUCTION Studies show that more than 90% of road accidents are due to human errors (e.g. NHTSA, 2008). Automated vehicles are expected to drastically reduce the number of accidents. They are also expected to increase travelling comfort, allowing users to engage in all sort of activities while the car takes care of driving, and giving back the freedom to travel to individuals who have lost the ability to drive due to age or disability (Payre, Cestac, & Delhomme, 2016; Urmson & Whittaker, 2008). Nevertheless, none of these benefits will be achieved if users do not trust the automated system. Extensive evidence indicates that acceptance, perceived usefulness and intention to use self-driving technology are strongly mediated by trust (Choi & Ji, 2015; Ghazizadeh et al., 2012; Parasuraman & Riley, 1997). Importantly, trust evolves dynamically over time. This means that drivers intention to use the technology depends not just on their initial trust levels, but also on their experience with the automated system and on its perceived reliability (Körber, Baselar, & Bengler, 2018; Sauer, Chavaillaz, & Wastell, 2016; Lee & See, 2004). To understand how trust impacts the use of Highly Automated Vehicles we need effective trust metrics. Up till now, most studies have relied on self-reports. However, questionnaires are not a continuous measure. This means they cannot capture real-time changes in user trust, and are hard to use outside an experimental context (Hergeth, Lorenz, Vilimek, & Krems, 2016). Analysis of drivers gaze behaviour could potentially provide a continuous and objective measure of trust. To date, there have been few studies on the relationship between driver trust during Highly Automated Driving (HAD) and eye-movement behaviour. A few (e.g. Körber et al., 2018; Hergeth et al., 2016; Helldin, Falkman, Riveiro, & Davidsson, 2013) suggest that participants with a high level of trust tend to monitor the road less. Others (e.g. Gold et al., 2015) have failed to find such a link. The aim of our study is to generate new evidence that can help to resolve the question whether eye movement behaviour may provide a reliable indicator for the trust of drivers in automated vehicles. Importantly, if drivers trust could be objectively measured in real-time, vehicle behaviour and display information could then be tuned accordingly. In the present study, we investigated the influence of the vehicle reliability on drivers monitoring behaviour. Videos were used to simulate HAD. In the videos, the simulated vehicle performed longitudinal and lateral vehicle control, and applied the brakes when cyclists or pedestrians were crossing the road. Participants were asked to pay attention to the road and perform a secondary task, but only if they trusted the way the system was handling the driving. We compared two groups of participants, where each participant was seated in the mock-up of the driving simulator. One group viewed videos of a car handling the driving task perfectly; a second group viewed videos of a car struggling with the driving task (i.e. it tended to drift towards the centre of the road and braked abruptly when approaching crossing pedestrians or cyclists). In line with Hergeth et al. (2016) and Korber et al. s
2 (2018) results, we expected to find a negative relationship between trust and monitoring frequency: The less drivers trust the system, the more they view the road, and vice versa. 2 METHODS 2.1 Participants Thirty participants, all students of the University of Twente, were selected for the experiment and participated in exchange for money (6 euro) or study credits. Six participants were excluded from the analysis: 5 due to the poor quality of their eye-tracking data (i.e. pupil detected in less than 79% of the frames), and 1 because the post interview showed that the participant had previous experience with a Level 2 (SAE, 2014) automated vehicle. The other participants reported no previous experience with automated vehicles. All participants had their driver s licence for at least one year and reported normal vision. None wore glasses, and none reported that they commonly suffered from motion sickness. The 14 female and 10 male participants selected for the final analysis were all between 18 and 24 years of age (M = 20.46; SD = 1.414). 2.2 Videos Pilot study A Go-Pro Hero 4 Session camera, placed centrally on the hood of an Audi A4, was used to film 14 two-minute driving scenarios, encountered while driving in the surroundings of the University of Twente. We then performed a pilot study in the driving simulator of the University of Twente, in which 10 participants viewed the videos in a different random order. One participant was excluded due to motion sickness. The remaining participants were between 19 and 28 years of age (M = 21.7; SD = 2.3). They were asked to imagine being in an autonomously driving vehicle. After each video they were asked to verbally rate the vehicle s performance on a 7-point Likert scale. Of the 14 videos, the 3 with the highest scores (i.e. M > 5.7) and the 3 with the lowest scores (i.e. M < 2.8) were used in the main experiment. Wilcoxon signed ranks tests showed that the scores of the 3 highest rated videos significantly differed from the 3 scores with the lowest ratings (all p s =.005). 2.3 Tasks Participants were assigned to one of two groups: The Perfect Vehicle group viewed forward looking videos recorded from a car handling the driving task perfectly (it always kept in lane, and braked comfortably in front of crossing cyclists or pedestrians). The Poor Vehicle group viewed videos of a car struggling with the driving task, with a tendency to drift towards the centre of the road, and to brake abruptly in front of crossing cyclists and pedestrians. Perfect Vehicle and Poor Vehicle participants were both confronted with one crossing cyclist or pedestrian per video. Although group assignment was random, the randomization procedure ensured the same distribution of participants by gender and initial trust level in each group. Participants of both groups performed a non-driving-related secondary task (NDRT) during simulated driving. This was presented on a Dell Latitude 7370 laptop, and was programmed using Psychopy software (Peirce, 2009). As in Verwey (2000), the NDRT consisted of a simple addition task. In each trial, a target number, between 20 and 87, was presented in red at the centre of the screen. Below the target number, the screen showed an addition in the form <number>+7. As previously, the number always lay in the range from 20 to 87. Participants were asked to indicate whether the result of the addition was higher or lower than the target number. At the end of each trial, system feedback (the word correct for correct responses, the word incorrect for incorrect responses) was presented centrally on the laptop screen. Participants had no time limit to perform the task. Responses were recorded using the right and left arrows of a standard keyboard, which participants held on their lap for the entire duration of the experiment. The task is presented in Figure 1. Figure 1. Secondary addition task. Correct trial: By pressing the left arrow, the participant correctly indicated that 76+7 is lower than the target number 86. 2
3 To perform the NDRT participants allocated their attention away from the driving simulator screen, and could not use peripheral vision to watch the road while they were performing the secondary task. The time participants were watching the NDRT screen served as an indicator of trust. 2.4 Trust questionnaire Participants trust in the simulated vehicle was also measured using a modified version of the Empirically Derived (ED) Trust Scale (Jian, Bisanz, & Drury, 2000). This uses a 7-point Likert scale (1 = totally disagree; 7 = totally agree), to indicate level of agreement with seven statements (based on Verberne, Ham, & Midden, 2012). Participants filled in the trust questionnaire before and after completing the experiment (see section Procedure ). Assessing trust before the start of the experiment was important to ensure that participants in each group were equally distributed in terms of their initial trust. 2.5 Apparatus Driving simulator The driving simulator of the University of Twente consists of a mock-up equipped with steering wheel, pedals and indicators. Videos, displayed through Psychopy software (Peirce, 2009), are projected on a screen of 7.8 x 1.95 meters. The screen has a total resolution of 3072*768 pixels (~10ppi) Mobile eye-tracker Participants eye-movements were recorded using Tobii Pro Glasses 2. The head-mounted mobile eye-tracker weighs 45 grams and is equipped with four eye cameras. It tracks movements of both eyes, and uses an additional scene camera to track the external world. The glasses were connected to a 130 x 85 x 27 mm recording unit with a weight of 312 grams. The eye-tracker was wirelessly connected to a Dell tablet, running Windows 10 operating system and the Tobii Pro Glasses Controller software (Tobii Pro Glasses 2, 2018). 2.6 Procedure Participants filled out a pre-measurement trust questionnaire online at home. Then, on the testing day, they were welcomed to the driving simulator room and told that they would view videos while sitting in the simulator mock-up. After filling in an informed consent form, the mobile eye-tracker was calibrated following the procedure recommended by Tobii (i.e. Tobii Pro Glasses 2, 2018). After calibration, participants sat down in the mock-up of the driving simulator. On screen instructions informed them that the experiment would be divided into two phases. Phase 1 would be a trust development session, in which they could develop a general idea of how the system worked by watching its behaviour. They were told that in this phase they should focus on the vehicle s behaviour. In phase 2 the car would behave as in phase 1, though the scenarios would be different. The phase 1 video was then presented on screen. At the end of the video, participants were asked How do you think that the car coped with the driving task?. Responses were expressed out loud using a 7-point Likert scale, with 1 indicating very badly and 7 very well. After participants responses had been recorded, instructions for phase 2, the active session, were displayed on screen: Participants were told to imagine they were in a self-driving car, and to perform the secondary task whenever they felt that the car was handling the driving safely. Once again, participants were reminded that the car would behave as in phase 1. Participants were given time to practice the secondary task before the start of the phase. After practice, two videos were presented. At the end of phase 2, participants were asked to rate how they thought the car had coped with the driving task. The order of the videos was counterbalanced across participants. Participants were then asked to leave the mock-up, remove the eye-tracker, and fill in the post trust questionnaire. Although the items of the post-measurement were the same as those in the pre-measurement questionnaire, they were rephrased to refer to participants trust towards the vehicle they had just experienced, and not their general trust in self-driving cars. The experiment ended with a final questionnaire, in which participants were asked to provide information on their level of education and previous experience with automated vehicles. Responses were used to check that participants had no previous experience with automated vehicles, either as drivers or as passengers. 3
4 2.7 Analysis Our analysis assessed participant eye-movement behaviour during phase 2 onto two regions of interest (ROI): 1) the road, i.e., the central section of the driving simulator screen (size 2.6 x 1.95 meters); 2) the laptop, on which the NDRT was presented. Specifically, we assessed fixation count (i.e. number of fixations made in each ROI) and fixation duration (i.e. total time spent viewing each ROI). 3 RESULTS 3.1 Monitoring behaviour and trust Analysis of the results for the two groups showed that 65% (SD =.099) of the Perfect Vehicle group s fixations were on the road, as opposed to 83% (SD =.084) for the Poor Vehicle group. A Mann Whitney U test revealed that the difference was highly significant (U = 12, p =.001). Moreover, members of the Perfect Vehicle group spent 70% (SD =.117) of their time looking at the road, as opposed to 84% (SD =.113) for the Poor Vehicle group. Again, the difference between the two groups was highly significant (U = 24, p =.007). These results are strong evidence that monitoring behaviour could be an effective measure of trust. See Figure 2. Figure 2. Participant monitoring behaviour. The Poor Vehicle group made more fixations (83% vs. 65%) and spent more time (84% vs. 70%) on the road compared to the Perfect Vehicle group. Error bars represent standard error of the means. To confirm the relationship between trust and monitoring behaviour, we used a Pearson correlation to correlate the two measures. Self-reported trust scores collected at the end of the study and pooled across the two groups correlated strongly both with fixation count (r = -.658, p <.001) and with fixation duration (r = -.611, p =.001): In brief, the higher the trust, the less participants fixated the road. See Figure 3. Figure 3. Correlation between self-reported post trust (1: low; 7: high) and monitoring behaviour. The higher the trust, the less participants fixated on the road. A) Fixations made on road; B) Time spent on road. 4
5 3.2 Validation Two independent annotators used Tobii Pro Lab software to classify the same set of fixations on the road and on the laptop. Interrater reliability was estimated using a Pearson correlation. Fixation durations and fixation counts computed from the fixations mapped by judge 1 correlated strongly with the fixations mapped by judge 2 (durations: r =.998, p <.001; counts, r =.999, p <.001). To test whether the videos presented to the Perfect Vehicle group were associated with higher self-reported trust than those presented to the Poor Vehicle group, we analysed the data with a Mann-Whitney U test. As expected, the Perfect Vehicle group had higher scores. This was true both for the videos presented during phase 1 (Perfect Vehicle: M = 6.2, SD =.632; Poor Vehicle: M = 4.93, SD = 1.328; U = 30.5) and phase 2 (Perfect Vehicle: M = 5.3, SD =.949; Poor Vehicle: M = 3.71, SD = 1.541; U = 29), p =.016. These findings are further evidence that monitoring behaviour can indeed provide a valid measure of driver trust. 4 DISCUSSION Extensive evidence shows that adoption of automated technology is strongly modulated by user trust. Up to now, however, driver trust in self-driving technology has usually been investigated through self-reports a technique that is not continuous, and difficult to use in real-world scenarios. To better understand the link between driver trust and the behaviour of automated vehicles, we need trust measures that are more objective and easier to use. Here, we investigated the potential of mobile eye-tracking technology in a secondary task situation. Participants were divided into two groups. The Perfect Vehicle group viewed videos of a simulated Highly Automated Vehicle (SAE, 2014) which coped perfectly with the driving task, while the videos presented to the Poor Vehicle group showed a vehicle that tended to swerve towards the centre of the road and braked abruptly in front of crossing cyclists or pedestrians. Participants eye-movements to the road and the secondary task were recorded, and self-reported trust was measured before the start (for control purposes) and at the end of the experiment. Comparison of the two measures showed that the higher the drivers self-reported trust scores collected at the end of study, the less time they spent viewing the road, and vice versa. These results confirm the negative relationship between trust and monitoring behaviour (i.e. fixation count and duration) during Highly Automated Driving (SAE, 2014), previously reported by Hergeth et al. (2016) and Korber et al. (2018). The results also confirm the success of our manipulation. The Perfect Vehicle group made more fixations and spent more time on the secondary task compared to the Poor Vehicle group. Participants were instructed to perform the secondary task only when they thought that the automated system was handling the driving task safely. It appears, therefore, that the Perfect Vehicle group trusted their simulated vehicle more than the Poor Vehicle group. This was confirmed by participants answers to the question How do you think that the car coped with the driving task?. Both in phase 1 and phase 2, the Perfect Vehicle group reported higher scores than the Poor Vehicle group. One limitation of our study is that participants who thought that the automated vehicle was not handling the driving task safely were instructed to keep viewing the road. In a real-world scenario, it is likely that drivers who felt uncomfortable with the car s behaviour would disengage the automated system and take back manual control. Here, due to the video-based nature of the study, drivers could not disengage the automated system. It is also likely that participants in this simulation-based study did not feel as threatened by the vehicle s behaviour as they would have felt in a real-world situation. Nonetheless, results clearly show different eye-movement behaviour between the two groups. To summarize, our study represents a step forward in the development of more objective, non-invasive and continuous measurements of drivers trust in self-driving technology. Such measurements are particularly important in real-world scenarios, where they could be used to assess real-time changes in driver trust. If drivers over- or underestimate the capabilities of their vehicles, automated systems could react by modifying their behaviour or by providing them with additional information concerning the vehicles performance. As suggested by Hergeth et al. (2016), future research should further investigate the interactions between self-reported trust, monitoring behaviour and driver behaviour. This is a necessary step towards the use of gaze behaviour as an objective and continuous measurement of driver trust. 5
6 REFERENCES Choi, J. K., & Ji, Y. G. (2015). Investigating the importance of trust on adopting an autonomous vehicle. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 31(10), Ghazizadeh, M., Lee, J. D., & Boyle, L. N. (2012). Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to assess automation. Cognition, Technology & Work, 14(1), Gold, C., Körber, M., Hohenberger, C., Lechner, D., & Bengler, K. (2015). Trust in automation Before and after the experience of take-over scenarios in a highly automated vehicle. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, Helldin, T., Falkman, G., Riveiro, M., & Davidsson, S. (2013, October). Presenting system uncertainty in automotive UIs for supporting trust calibration in autonomous driving. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp ). ACM. Hergeth, S., Lorenz, L., Vilimek, R., & Krems, J. F. (2016). Keep your scanners peeled: Gaze behavior as a measure of automation trust during highly automated driving. Human factors, 58(3), Jian, J. Y., Bisantz, A. M., & Drury, C. G. (2000). Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 4(1), Körber, M., Baseler, E., & Bengler, K. (2018). Introduction matters: manipulating trust in automation and reliance in automated driving. Applied ergonomics, 66, Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human factors, 46(1), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2008). National motor vehicle crash causation survey: Report to congress. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Technical Report DOT HS, 811, 059. Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human factors, 39(2), Payre, W., Cestac, J., & Delhomme, P. (2016). Fully automated driving: Impact of trust and practice on manual control recovery. Human factors, 58(2), Peirce, J. W. (2009). Generating stimuli for neuroscience using PsychoPy. Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2, 10. Sauer, J., Chavaillaz, A., & Wastell, D. (2016). Experience of automation failures in training: effects on trust, automation bias, complacency and performance. Ergonomics, 59(6), Taxonomy, S. A. E. Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to On-Road Motor Vehicle Automated Driving Systems. Technical report, SAE International, Tobii Pro Glasses 2 (2018). Eye tracking specifications [company website]. Retrieved from: Urmson, C., & Whittaker, W. (2008). Self-driving cars and the urban challenge. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 23(2). Verberne, F. M., Ham, J., & Midden, C. J. (2012). Trust in smart systems: Sharing driving goals and giving information to increase trustworthiness and acceptability of smart systems in cars. Human factors, 54(5), Verwey, W. B. (2000). On-line driver workload estimation. Effects of road situation and age on secondary task measures. Ergonomics, 43(2),
Calling While Driving: An Initial Experiment with HoloLens
University of Iowa Iowa Research Online Driving Assessment Conference 2017 Driving Assessment Conference Jun 28th, 12:00 AM Calling While Driving: An Initial Experiment with HoloLens Andrew L. Kun University
More informationEarly Take-Over Preparation in Stereoscopic 3D
Adjunct Proceedings of the 10th International ACM Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI 18), September 23 25, 2018, Toronto, Canada. Early Take-Over
More informationTrust in Automated Vehicles
Trust in Automated Vehicles Fredrick Ekman and Mikael Johansson ekmanfr@chalmers.se, johamik@chalmers.se Design & Human Factors, Chalmers Adoption and use of technical systems users needs and requirements
More informationDevelopment of Gaze Detection Technology toward Driver's State Estimation
Development of Gaze Detection Technology toward Driver's State Estimation Naoyuki OKADA Akira SUGIE Itsuki HAMAUE Minoru FUJIOKA Susumu YAMAMOTO Abstract In recent years, the development of advanced safety
More informationThe application of Work Domain Analysis (WDA) for the development of vehicle control display
Proceedings of the 7th WSEAS International Conference on Applied Informatics and Communications, Athens, Greece, August 24-26, 2007 160 The application of Work Domain Analysis (WDA) for the development
More informationEFFECTS OF AUGMENTED SITUATIONAL AWARENESS ON DRIVER TRUST IN SEMI-AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE OPERATION
2017 NDIA GROUND VEHICLE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY SYMPOSIUM AUTONOMOUS GROUND SYSTEMS (AGS) TECHNICAL SESSION AUGUST 8-10, 2017 - NOVI, MICHIGAN EFFECTS OF AUGMENTED SITUATIONAL AWARENESS ON
More informationWork Domain Analysis (WDA) for Ecological Interface Design (EID) of Vehicle Control Display
Work Domain Analysis (WDA) for Ecological Interface Design (EID) of Vehicle Control Display SUK WON LEE, TAEK SU NAM, ROHAE MYUNG Division of Information Management Engineering Korea University 5-Ga, Anam-Dong,
More informationCONSIDERING THE HUMAN ACROSS LEVELS OF AUTOMATION: IMPLICATIONS FOR RELIANCE
CONSIDERING THE HUMAN ACROSS LEVELS OF AUTOMATION: IMPLICATIONS FOR RELIANCE Bobbie Seppelt 1,2, Bryan Reimer 2, Linda Angell 1, & Sean Seaman 1 1 Touchstone Evaluations, Inc. Grosse Pointe, MI, USA 2
More informationTHE EFFECTS OF PC-BASED TRAINING ON NOVICE DRIVERS RISK AWARENESS IN A DRIVING SIMULATOR
THE EFFECTS OF PC-BASED TRAINING ON NOVICE DRIVERS RISK AWARENESS IN A DRIVING SIMULATOR Anuj K. Pradhan 1, Donald L. Fisher 1, Alexander Pollatsek 2 1 Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering
More informationC-ITS Platform WG9: Implementation issues Topic: Road Safety Issues 1 st Meeting: 3rd December 2014, 09:00 13:00. Draft Agenda
C-ITS Platform WG9: Implementation issues Topic: Road Safety Issues 1 st Meeting: 3rd December 2014, 09:00 13:00 Venue: Rue Philippe Le Bon 3, Room 2/17 (Metro Maalbek) Draft Agenda 1. Welcome & Presentations
More informationHuman Autonomous Vehicles Interactions: An Interdisciplinary Approach
Human Autonomous Vehicles Interactions: An Interdisciplinary Approach X. Jessie Yang xijyang@umich.edu Dawn Tilbury tilbury@umich.edu Anuj K. Pradhan Transportation Research Institute anujkp@umich.edu
More informationEvaluation of Guidance Systems in Public Infrastructures Using Eye Tracking in an Immersive Virtual Environment
Evaluation of Guidance Systems in Public Infrastructures Using Eye Tracking in an Immersive Virtual Environment Helmut Schrom-Feiertag 1, Christoph Schinko 2, Volker Settgast 3, and Stefan Seer 1 1 Austrian
More informationEFFECTS OF A NIGHT VISION ENHANCEMENT SYSTEM (NVES) ON DRIVING: RESULTS FROM A SIMULATOR STUDY
EFFECTS OF A NIGHT VISION ENHANCEMENT SYSTEM (NVES) ON DRIVING: RESULTS FROM A SIMULATOR STUDY Erik Hollnagel CSELAB, Department of Computer and Information Science University of Linköping, SE-58183 Linköping,
More informationThe Effects of Lead Time of Take-Over Request and Non-Driving Tasks on Taking- Over Control of Automated Vehicles
The Effects of Lead Time of Take-Over Request and Non-Driving Tasks on Taking- Over Control of Automated Vehicles Jingyan Wan and Changxu Wu Abstract Automated vehicles have received great attention, since
More informationInvestigating Driver Experience and Augmented Reality Head-Up Displays in Autonomous Vehicles
Investigating Driver Experience and Augmented Reality Head-Up Displays in Autonomous Vehicles by Murat Dikmen A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for
More informationLED NAVIGATION SYSTEM
Zachary Cook Zrz3@unh.edu Adam Downey ata29@unh.edu LED NAVIGATION SYSTEM Aaron Lecomte Aaron.Lecomte@unh.edu Meredith Swanson maw234@unh.edu UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE DURHAM, NH Tina Tomazewski tqq2@unh.edu
More informationThe Perception of Optical Flow in Driving Simulators
University of Iowa Iowa Research Online Driving Assessment Conference 2009 Driving Assessment Conference Jun 23rd, 12:00 AM The Perception of Optical Flow in Driving Simulators Zhishuai Yin Northeastern
More informationEye catchers in comics: Controlling eye movements in reading pictorial and textual media.
Eye catchers in comics: Controlling eye movements in reading pictorial and textual media. Takahide Omori Takeharu Igaki Faculty of Literature, Keio University Taku Ishii Centre for Integrated Research
More informationIowa Research Online. University of Iowa. Robert E. Llaneras Virginia Tech Transportation Institute, Blacksburg. Jul 11th, 12:00 AM
University of Iowa Iowa Research Online Driving Assessment Conference 2007 Driving Assessment Conference Jul 11th, 12:00 AM Safety Related Misconceptions and Self-Reported BehavioralAdaptations Associated
More informationTRAFFIC SIGN DETECTION AND IDENTIFICATION.
TRAFFIC SIGN DETECTION AND IDENTIFICATION Vaughan W. Inman 1 & Brian H. Philips 2 1 SAIC, McLean, Virginia, USA 2 Federal Highway Administration, McLean, Virginia, USA Email: vaughan.inman.ctr@dot.gov
More informationComparison of Wrap Around Screens and HMDs on a Driver s Response to an Unexpected Pedestrian Crossing Using Simulator Vehicle Parameters
University of Iowa Iowa Research Online Driving Assessment Conference 2017 Driving Assessment Conference Jun 28th, 12:00 AM Comparison of Wrap Around Screens and HMDs on a Driver s Response to an Unexpected
More informationThe Design and Assessment of Attention-Getting Rear Brake Light Signals
University of Iowa Iowa Research Online Driving Assessment Conference 2009 Driving Assessment Conference Jun 25th, 12:00 AM The Design and Assessment of Attention-Getting Rear Brake Light Signals M Lucas
More informationInteraction in Urban Traffic Insights into an Observation of Pedestrian-Vehicle Encounters
Interaction in Urban Traffic Insights into an Observation of Pedestrian-Vehicle Encounters André Dietrich, Chair of Ergonomics, TUM andre.dietrich@tum.de CARTRE and SCOUT are funded by Monday, May the
More informationChapter 6. Experiment 3. Motion sickness and vection with normal and blurred optokinetic stimuli
Chapter 6. Experiment 3. Motion sickness and vection with normal and blurred optokinetic stimuli 6.1 Introduction Chapters 4 and 5 have shown that motion sickness and vection can be manipulated separately
More informationSupplementary Information for Viewing men s faces does not lead to accurate predictions of trustworthiness
Supplementary Information for Viewing men s faces does not lead to accurate predictions of trustworthiness Charles Efferson 1,2 & Sonja Vogt 1,2 1 Department of Economics, University of Zurich, Zurich,
More informationAssessments of Grade Crossing Warning and Signalization Devices Driving Simulator Study
Assessments of Grade Crossing Warning and Signalization Devices Driving Simulator Study Petr Bouchner, Stanislav Novotný, Roman Piekník, Ondřej Sýkora Abstract Behavior of road users on railway crossings
More informationHuman-in-the-Loop Simulation for Human Factors Challenges and Opportunities of Automated Vehicles
Institute for Transport Studies FACULTY OF ENVIRONMENT Human-in-the-Loop Simulation for Human Factors Challenges and Opportunities of Automated Vehicles Natasha Merat Professor, Human Factors of Transport
More informationHUMAN FACTORS IN VEHICLE AUTOMATION
Emma Johansson HUMAN FACTORS IN VEHICLE AUTOMATION - Activities in the European project AdaptIVe Vehicle and Road Automation (VRA) Webinar 10 October 2014 // Outline AdaptIVe short overview Collaborative
More informationUsing Driving Simulator for Advance Placement of Guide Sign Design for Exits along Highways
Using Driving Simulator for Advance Placement of Guide Sign Design for Exits along Highways Fengxiang Qiao, Xiaoyue Liu, and Lei Yu Department of Transportation Studies Texas Southern University 3100 Cleburne
More informationBaby Boomers and Gaze Enabled Gaming
Baby Boomers and Gaze Enabled Gaming Soussan Djamasbi (&), Siavash Mortazavi, and Mina Shojaeizadeh User Experience and Decision Making Research Laboratory, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, 100 Institute
More informationRevision of the EU General Safety Regulation and Pedestrian Safety Regulation
AC.nl Revision of the EU General Safety Regulation and Pedestrian Safety Regulation 11 September 2018 ETSC isafer Fitting safety as standard Directorate-General for Internal Market, Automotive and Mobility
More informationDriver Education Classroom and In-Car Curriculum Unit 3 Space Management System
Driver Education Classroom and In-Car Curriculum Unit 3 Space Management System Driver Education Classroom and In-Car Instruction Unit 3-2 Unit Introduction Unit 3 will introduce operator procedural and
More informationWB2306 The Human Controller
Simulation WB2306 The Human Controller Class 1. General Introduction Adapt the device to the human, not the human to the device! Teacher: David ABBINK Assistant professor at Delft Haptics Lab (www.delfthapticslab.nl)
More informationMovement analysis to indicate discomfort in vehicle seats
Salerno, June 7th and 8th, 2017 1 st International Comfort Congress Movement analysis to indicate discomfort in vehicle seats Neil MANSFIELD 1,2*, George SAMMONDS 2, Nizar DARWAZEH 2, Sameh MASSOUD 2,
More informationHuman Factors Studies for Limited- Ability Autonomous Driving Systems (LAADS)
Human Factors Studies for Limited- Ability Autonomous Driving Systems (LAADS) Glenn Widmann; Delphi Automotive Systems Jeremy Salinger; General Motors Robert Dufour; Delphi Automotive Systems Charles Green;
More informationHumans and Automated Driving Systems
Innovation of Automated Driving for Universal Services (SIP-adus) Humans and Automated Driving Systems November 18, 2014 Kiyozumi Unoura Chief Engineer Honda R&D Co., Ltd. Automobile R&D Center Workshop
More informationComparing Computer-predicted Fixations to Human Gaze
Comparing Computer-predicted Fixations to Human Gaze Yanxiang Wu School of Computing Clemson University yanxiaw@clemson.edu Andrew T Duchowski School of Computing Clemson University andrewd@cs.clemson.edu
More informationImage Characteristics and Their Effect on Driving Simulator Validity
University of Iowa Iowa Research Online Driving Assessment Conference 2001 Driving Assessment Conference Aug 16th, 12:00 AM Image Characteristics and Their Effect on Driving Simulator Validity Hamish Jamson
More informationGaze-controlled Driving
Gaze-controlled Driving Martin Tall John Paulin Hansen IT University of Copenhagen IT University of Copenhagen 2300 Copenhagen, Denmark 2300 Copenhagen, Denmark info@martintall.com paulin@itu.dk Alexandre
More informationHazard Perception Training for Young Drivers. Anuj K. Pradhan, PhD University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute
Hazard Perception Training for Young Drivers Anuj K. Pradhan, PhD University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute Outline The Young Driver issue Identified risk factors Hazard Perception Age differences
More informationProposed Watertown Plan Road Interchange Evaluation Using Full Scale Driving Simulator
0 0 0 0 Proposed Watertown Plan Road Interchange Evaluation Using Full Scale Driving Simulator Kelvin R. Santiago-Chaparro*, M.S., P.E. Assistant Researcher Traffic Operations and Safety (TOPS) Laboratory
More informationExperimental Study on Different HMI Design Options for Lateral Safe Applications
Experimental Study on Different HMI Design Options for Lateral Safe Applications Evangelos Bekiaris 1, Vassilis Papakostopoulos 1, Maria Gemou 1, Evangelia Gaitanidou 1 1 Centre for Research and Technology
More informationThe Impact of Road Familiarity on the Perception of Traffic Signs Eye Tracking Case Study
Environmental Engineering 10th International Conference eissn 2029-7092 / eisbn 978-609-476-044-0 Vilnius Gediminas Technical University Lithuania, 27 28 April 2017 Article ID: enviro.2017.131 http://enviro.vgtu.lt
More informationCONSIDERATIONS WHEN CALCULATING PERCENT ROAD CENTRE FROM EYE MOVEMENT DATA IN DRIVER DISTRACTION MONITORING
CONSIDERATIONS WHEN CALCULATING PERCENT ROAD CENTRE FROM EYE MOVEMENT DATA IN DRIVER DISTRACTION MONITORING Christer Ahlstrom, Katja Kircher, Albert Kircher Swedish National Road and Transport Research
More informationFocus Group Participants Understanding of Advance Warning Arrow Displays used in Short-Term and Moving Work Zones
Focus Group Participants Understanding of Advance Warning Arrow Displays used in Short-Term and Moving Work Zones Chen Fei See University of Kansas 2160 Learned Hall 1530 W. 15th Street Lawrence, KS 66045
More informationMulti variable strategy reduces symptoms of simulator sickness
Multi variable strategy reduces symptoms of simulator sickness Jorrit Kuipers Green Dino BV, Wageningen / Delft University of Technology 3ME, Delft, The Netherlands, jorrit@greendino.nl Introduction Interactive
More informationSteering a Driving Simulator Using the Queueing Network-Model Human Processor (QN-MHP)
University of Iowa Iowa Research Online Driving Assessment Conference 2003 Driving Assessment Conference Jul 22nd, 12:00 AM Steering a Driving Simulator Using the Queueing Network-Model Human Processor
More informationOptical See-Through Head Up Displays Effect on Depth Judgments of Real World Objects
Optical See-Through Head Up Displays Effect on Depth Judgments of Real World Objects Missie Smith 1 Nadejda Doutcheva 2 Joseph L. Gabbard 3 Gary Burnett 4 Human Factors Research Group University of Nottingham
More informationASSESSMENT OF A DRIVER INTERFACE FOR LATERAL DRIFT AND CURVE SPEED WARNING SYSTEMS: MIXED RESULTS FOR AUDITORY AND HAPTIC WARNINGS
ASSESSMENT OF A DRIVER INTERFACE FOR LATERAL DRIFT AND CURVE SPEED WARNING SYSTEMS: MIXED RESULTS FOR AUDITORY AND HAPTIC WARNINGS Tina Brunetti Sayer Visteon Corporation Van Buren Township, Michigan,
More informationIntelligent Technology for More Advanced Autonomous Driving
FEATURED ARTICLES Autonomous Driving Technology for Connected Cars Intelligent Technology for More Advanced Autonomous Driving Autonomous driving is recognized as an important technology for dealing with
More informationEYE MOVEMENT STRATEGIES IN NAVIGATIONAL TASKS Austin Ducworth, Melissa Falzetta, Lindsay Hyma, Katie Kimble & James Michalak Group 1
EYE MOVEMENT STRATEGIES IN NAVIGATIONAL TASKS Austin Ducworth, Melissa Falzetta, Lindsay Hyma, Katie Kimble & James Michalak Group 1 Abstract Navigation is an essential part of many military and civilian
More informationIntroducing LISA. LISA: Laboratory for Intelligent and Safe Automobiles
Introducing LISA LISA: Laboratory for Intelligent and Safe Automobiles Mohan M. Trivedi University of California at San Diego mtrivedi@ucsd.edu Int. Workshop on Progress and Future Directions of Adaptive
More informationAdvancing Simulation as a Safety Research Tool
Institute for Transport Studies FACULTY OF ENVIRONMENT Advancing Simulation as a Safety Research Tool Richard Romano My Early Past (1990-1995) The Iowa Driving Simulator Virtual Prototypes Human Factors
More informationERDS Simulator Emergency Response Driving Simulator
ERDS Simulator Emergency Response Driving Simulator Safe in every situation. Rosenbauer - ERDS Emergency Response Driving Simulator Reduce your risk - To a minimum. Train emergency journeys with the ERDS
More informationCombined effects of low frequency vertical vibration and noise on whole-body vibration sensation
Combined effects of low frequency vertical vibration and noise on whole-body vibration sensation Hiroshi MATSUDA and Nobuo MACHIDA 2, 2 College of Science and Technology, Nihon University, Japan ABSTRACT
More informationUsability Evaluation of Multi- Touch-Displays for TMA Controller Working Positions
Sesar Innovation Days 2014 Usability Evaluation of Multi- Touch-Displays for TMA Controller Working Positions DLR German Aerospace Center, DFS German Air Navigation Services Maria Uebbing-Rumke, DLR Hejar
More informationA Three-Dimensional Evaluation of Body Representation Change of Human Upper Limb Focused on Sense of Ownership and Sense of Agency
A Three-Dimensional Evaluation of Body Representation Change of Human Upper Limb Focused on Sense of Ownership and Sense of Agency Shunsuke Hamasaki, Atsushi Yamashita and Hajime Asama Department of Precision
More informationObjective Data Analysis for a PDA-Based Human-Robotic Interface*
Objective Data Analysis for a PDA-Based Human-Robotic Interface* Hande Kaymaz Keskinpala EECS Department Vanderbilt University Nashville, TN USA hande.kaymaz@vanderbilt.edu Abstract - This paper describes
More informationAV Exterior Communications ISO TC 22/SC 39
AV Exterior Communications ISO TC 22/SC 39 GTB meeting Lisbon, Portugal November 28, 2018 John Shutko, chair ISO TC 22/SC 39 Outline Introduction to ISO Description of ISO TC 22/SC 39 AV Exterior Communication
More information"This powerpoint presentation is property of David Abbink and Delft University of Technology. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored
"This powerpoint presentation is property of David Abbink and Delft University of Technology. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in other retrieval systems or transmitted in any form
More informationDEVELOPMENT OF SAFETY PRINCIPLES FOR IN- VEHICLE INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT OF SAFETY PRINCIPLES FOR IN- VEHICLE INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS Alan Stevens Transport Research Laboratory, Old Wokingham Road, Crowthorne Berkshire RG45 6AU (UK) +44 (0)1344 770945,
More informationDesigning for End-User Programming through Voice: Developing Study Methodology
Designing for End-User Programming through Voice: Developing Study Methodology Kate Howland Department of Informatics University of Sussex Brighton, BN1 9QJ, UK James Jackson Department of Informatics
More informationAvailable online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Manufacturing 3 (2015 )
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia Manufacturing 3 (2015 ) 5028 5035 6th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE 2015) and the Affiliated Conferences,
More informationAGING AND STEERING CONTROL UNDER REDUCED VISIBILITY CONDITIONS. Wichita State University, Wichita, Kansas, USA
AGING AND STEERING CONTROL UNDER REDUCED VISIBILITY CONDITIONS Bobby Nguyen 1, Yan Zhuo 2, & Rui Ni 1 1 Wichita State University, Wichita, Kansas, USA 2 Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences,
More informationPoles for Increasing the Sensibility of Vertical Gradient. in a Downhill Road
Poles for Increasing the Sensibility of Vertical Gradient 1 Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Yamaguchi University 2-16-1 Tokiwadai,Ube 755-8611, Japan r007vm@yamaguchiu.ac.jp in a Downhill Road
More informationADAS Development using Advanced Real-Time All-in-the-Loop Simulators. Roberto De Vecchi VI-grade Enrico Busto - AddFor
ADAS Development using Advanced Real-Time All-in-the-Loop Simulators Roberto De Vecchi VI-grade Enrico Busto - AddFor The Scenario The introduction of ADAS and AV has created completely new challenges
More informationA software video stabilization system for automotive oriented applications
A software video stabilization system for automotive oriented applications A. Broggi, P. Grisleri Dipartimento di Ingegneria dellinformazione Universita degli studi di Parma 43100 Parma, Italy Email: {broggi,
More informationRomance of the Three Kingdoms
Romance of the Three Kingdoms Final HRI Project Presentation Akanksha Saran Benjamin Choi Ronald Lai Wentao Liu Contents Project Recap Experimental Setup Results and Discussion Conclusion Project Recap
More informationTobii Pro VR Analytics User s Manual
Tobii Pro VR Analytics User s Manual 1. What is Tobii Pro VR Analytics? Tobii Pro VR Analytics collects eye-tracking data in Unity3D immersive virtual-reality environments and produces automated visualizations
More informationA longitudinal simulator study to explore drivers' behaviour during highly-automated driving
Loughborough University Institutional Repository A longitudinal simulator study to explore drivers' behaviour during highly-automated driving This item was submitted to Loughborough University's Institutional
More informationThe Effect of Visual Clutter on Driver Eye Glance Behavior
University of Iowa Iowa Research Online Driving Assessment Conference 2011 Driving Assessment Conference Jun 28th, 12:00 AM The Effect of Visual Clutter on Driver Eye Glance Behavior William Perez Science
More informationLearning and Using Models of Kicking Motions for Legged Robots
Learning and Using Models of Kicking Motions for Legged Robots Sonia Chernova and Manuela Veloso Computer Science Department Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 {soniac, mmv}@cs.cmu.edu Abstract
More informationGet your daily health check in the car
Edition September 2017 Smart Health, Image sensors and vision systems, Sensor solutions for IoT, CSR Get your daily health check in the car Imec researches capacitive, optical and radar technology to integrate
More informationCognitive Radio: Smart Use of Radio Spectrum
Cognitive Radio: Smart Use of Radio Spectrum Miguel López-Benítez Department of Electrical Engineering and Electronics University of Liverpool, United Kingdom M.Lopez-Benitez@liverpool.ac.uk www.lopezbenitez.es,
More informationCAN GALVANIC VESTIBULAR STIMULATION REDUCE SIMULATOR ADAPTATION SYNDROME? University of Guelph Guelph, Ontario, Canada
CAN GALVANIC VESTIBULAR STIMULATION REDUCE SIMULATOR ADAPTATION SYNDROME? Rebecca J. Reed-Jones, 1 James G. Reed-Jones, 2 Lana M. Trick, 2 Lori A. Vallis 1 1 Department of Human Health and Nutritional
More informationChapter 6 Experiments
72 Chapter 6 Experiments The chapter reports on a series of simulations experiments showing how behavior and environment influence each other, from local interactions between individuals and other elements
More informationExploring body holistic processing investigated with composite illusion
Exploring body holistic processing investigated with composite illusion Dora E. Szatmári (szatmari.dora@pte.hu) University of Pécs, Institute of Psychology Ifjúság Street 6. Pécs, 7624 Hungary Beatrix
More informationEvaluating 3D Embodied Conversational Agents In Contrasting VRML Retail Applications
Evaluating 3D Embodied Conversational Agents In Contrasting VRML Retail Applications Helen McBreen, James Anderson, Mervyn Jack Centre for Communication Interface Research, University of Edinburgh, 80,
More informationApplied Robotics for Installations and Base Operations (ARIBO)
Applied Robotics for Installations and Base Operations (ARIBO) Overview January, 2016 Edward Straub, DM U.S. Army TARDEC, Ground Vehicle Robotics edward.r.straub2.civ@mail.mil ARIBO Overview 1 ARIBO Strategic
More informationEVALUATION OF DIFFERENT MODALITIES FOR THE INTELLIGENT COOPERATIVE INTERSECTION SAFETY SYSTEM (IRIS) AND SPEED LIMIT SYSTEM
Effects of ITS on drivers behaviour and interaction with the systems EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT MODALITIES FOR THE INTELLIGENT COOPERATIVE INTERSECTION SAFETY SYSTEM (IRIS) AND SPEED LIMIT SYSTEM Ellen S.
More informationHuang Ke 1,2 *, Weng Ji 1 1 Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Chongqing University, Chongqing,
[Type text] [Type text] [Type text] ISSN : 0974-7435 Volume 10 Issue 23 BioTechnology 2014 An Indian Journal FULL PAPER BTAIJ, 10(23), 2014 [14269-14274] Contrast threshold research of small target visibility
More informationWATCH IT INTERACTIVE ART INSTALLATION. Janelynn Chan Patrik Lau Aileen Wang Jimmie Sim
INTERACTIVE ART INSTALLATION Janelynn Chan Patrik Lau Aileen Wang Jimmie Sim ARTIST STATEMENT In the hustle and bustle of everyday life, multitasking is the epitome of productivity representing a smart
More informationCSE Thu 10/22. Nadir Weibel
CSE 118 - Thu 10/22 Nadir Weibel Today Admin Teams : status? Web Site on Github (due: Sunday 11:59pm) Evening meetings: presence Mini Quiz Eye-Tracking Mini Quiz on Week 3-4 http://goo.gl/forms/ab7jijsryh
More informationMarkerless 3D Gesture-based Interaction for Handheld Augmented Reality Interfaces
Markerless 3D Gesture-based Interaction for Handheld Augmented Reality Interfaces Huidong Bai The HIT Lab NZ, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, 8041 New Zealand huidong.bai@pg.canterbury.ac.nz Lei
More informationAutoHabLab Addressing Design Challenges in Automotive UX. Prof. Joseph Giacomin September 4 th 2018
AutoHabLab Addressing Design Challenges in Automotive UX Prof. Joseph Giacomin September 4 th 2018 Human Centred Design Human Centred Design Involves techniques which empathise with, interact with, and
More informationLecture 26: Eye Tracking
Lecture 26: Eye Tracking Inf1-Introduction to Cognitive Science Diego Frassinelli March 21, 2013 Experiments at the University of Edinburgh Student and Graduate Employment (SAGE): www.employerdatabase.careers.ed.ac.uk
More informationDraft Report of the 1 st Session GRSG informal group on awareness of Vulnerable Road Users proximity in low speed manoeuvres (VRU-Proxi)
Submitted by the VRU-Proxi Secretary Informal document GRSG-112-13 (112 th GRSG, 24-28 April 2017 agenda item 5.) VRU-Proxi-01-06 Draft Report of the 1 st Session GRSG informal group on awareness of Vulnerable
More informationAUTONOMOUS VEHICLES AND ALTERNATIVES TO DRIVING: TRUST, PREFERENCES, AND EFFECTS OF AGE
Abraham et al. 0 0 0 0 AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES AND ALTERNATIVES TO DRIVING: TRUST, PREFERENCES, AND EFFECTS OF AGE Hillary Abraham MIT AgeLab Massachusetts Avenue E0-0, Cambridge, MA 0 Tel: --00; Email: habraham@mit.edu
More informationSubjective Study of Privacy Filters in Video Surveillance
Subjective Study of Privacy Filters in Video Surveillance P. Korshunov #1, C. Araimo 2, F. De Simone #3, C. Velardo 4, J.-L. Dugelay 5, and T. Ebrahimi #6 # Multimedia Signal Processing Group MMSPG, Institute
More informationAdolescents and Information and Communication Technologies : Use and a Risk of Addiction
Jan Lašek, Petra Kalibová, Jana Andršová Czech Republic Adolescents and Information and Communication Technologies : Use and a Risk of Addiction DOI: 10.15804/tner.2016.44.2.06 Abstract The diffusion of
More informationValidation of stopping and turning behavior for novice drivers in the National Advanced Driving Simulator
Validation of stopping and turning behavior for novice drivers in the National Advanced Driving Simulator Timothy Brown, Ben Dow, Dawn Marshall, Shawn Allen National Advanced Driving Simulator Center for
More informationTechnologies that will make a difference for Canadian Law Enforcement
The Future Of Public Safety In Smart Cities Technologies that will make a difference for Canadian Law Enforcement The car is several meters away, with only the passenger s side visible to the naked eye,
More informationReplicating an International Survey on User Experience: Challenges, Successes and Limitations
Replicating an International Survey on User Experience: Challenges, Successes and Limitations Carine Lallemand Public Research Centre Henri Tudor 29 avenue John F. Kennedy L-1855 Luxembourg Carine.Lallemand@tudor.lu
More informationLoughborough University Institutional Repository. This item was submitted to Loughborough University's Institutional Repository by the/an author.
Loughborough University Institutional Repository Digital and video analysis of eye-glance movements during naturalistic driving from the ADSEAT and TeleFOT field operational trials - results and challenges
More informationDriver Assistance for "Keeping Hands on the Wheel and Eyes on the Road"
ICVES 2009 Driver Assistance for "Keeping Hands on the Wheel and Eyes on the Road" Cuong Tran and Mohan Manubhai Trivedi Laboratory for Intelligent and Safe Automobiles (LISA) University of California
More informationComparison of Three Eye Tracking Devices in Psychology of Programming Research
In E. Dunican & T.R.G. Green (Eds). Proc. PPIG 16 Pages 151-158 Comparison of Three Eye Tracking Devices in Psychology of Programming Research Seppo Nevalainen and Jorma Sajaniemi University of Joensuu,
More informationNavigation Styles in QuickTime VR Scenes
Navigation Styles in QuickTime VR Scenes Christoph Bartneck Department of Industrial Design Eindhoven University of Technology Den Dolech 2, 5600MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands christoph@bartneck.de Abstract.
More informationResearch on visual physiological characteristics via virtual driving platform
Special Issue Article Research on visual physiological characteristics via virtual driving platform Advances in Mechanical Engineering 2018, Vol. 10(1) 1 10 Ó The Author(s) 2018 DOI: 10.1177/1687814017717664
More informationIllusory size-speed bias: Could this help explain motorist collisions with railway trains and other large vehicles?
Illusory size-speed bias: Could this help explain motorist collisions with railway trains and other large vehicles? ª, H. E., Perrone b, J. A., Isler b, R. B. & Charlton b, S. G. ªSchool of Psychology,
More informationThe Effect of Display Type and Video Game Type on Visual Fatigue and Mental Workload
Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Dhaka, Bangladesh, January 9 10, 2010 The Effect of Display Type and Video Game Type on Visual Fatigue
More information