DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM
|
|
- Jack Little
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM AGENDA DATE: MARCH 16, 2016 TO: THRU: FROM: SUBJECT: Chair Fox and Members of the Design Review Committee Leslie Aranda Roseberry, Planning Manager Robert Garcia, Senior Planner DRC No The New Home Company (Marywood Site) SUMMARY Final review of the design elements for the construction of 40 new detached two-story singlefamily residences at the former Marywood Pastoral Center - Diocese of Orange. RECOMMENDED ACTION - FINAL REVIEW Staff is requesting that the Design Review Committee (DRC) review the final design proposal in accordance with the recommended changes in the Conditions of Approval prior to building permit issuance which serve to support the required findings and ensure the preservation of community aesthetics. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Applicant/Owner: Property Location: General Plan Designation: Zoning Classification: Existing Development: Property Size: Associated Applications: The New Home Company 2811 East Villareal Drive Low Density Residential (LDR) Single Family Residential (R-1-6) Marywood Pastoral Center for the Diocese of Orange 16 Acres TTM No , CUP No , MJSP No , and ENV No Previous DRC Project Review: Preliminary Review on December 17, On July 15, the DRC provided a full review and requested additional information prior to making a recommendation. On August 19, 2015, the DRC reviewed the revised full design and recommended approval with conditions. PUBLIC NOTICE No Public Notice is required.
2 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Design Review Committee Staff Report Page 2 of 6 The project was subject to environmental review per the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The City of Orange certified an Environmental Impact Report (ENV No ) on October 13, PROJECT DESCRIP TION The New Home Company/applicant, is proposing to construct 40 new detached two-story single family residences on the 16 acre Marywood Site. All existing development associated with the Marywood Pastoral Center will be cleared from the site to accommodate the new residential development. The proposal calls for three floor plans and three architectural styles. The applicant is clustering architectural styles, with one dominant style on each of the streets, but having a mix of all three styles. All three floor plans can be reversed to provide a varied streetscape. The smallest floor plan would have four bedrooms. The larger floor plans would have five bedrooms. Each of the floor plans would include covered outdoor living area in the rear of the house. The applicant has proposed a varied street plan, which would be achieved by the three different floor plans that can also be reversed, three different architectural styles, and three different color palettes, which results in many different combinations of floor plan, architectural style, and color palette. At the DRC meeting of August 19, 2015, the Committee recommended approval of DRC No , Marywood Residential Development, to the Planning Commission based on the findings and conditions listed in the Staff Report, and with the additional conditions: 1. Appearance of the second level decks be studied and provided to the DRC for review in elevation prior to final approval. 2. Applicant study enhancement of the secondary elevations or façade where they are most highly visible on Lots 25, 26, 29, 31 and The side yard wall adjacent to the neighbors on Lot 17 be constructed of slump stone. 4. Restudy the walls and slope conditions adjacent to Lots 22, and Explore all the façade conditions and geometry of roof gables particularly where materials begin and end and balance those on the façade and come back for final review including a color and material sample board for each of the styles that are offered. With the following recommendation: 1. Lessen the exposure of the bedrooms that face one another between Lots 19 & 20 and Lots 33 and 34. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the project to the City Council on September 21, The City Council approved the project on October 13, EVALUATION CRITERIA Orange Municipal Code (OMC) Section establishes the general criteria the DRC should use when reviewing the project. This section states the following:
3 Design Review Committee Staff Report Page 3 of 6 The project shall have an internally consistent, integrated design theme, which is reflected in the following elements: 1. Architectural Features. a. The architectural features shall reflect a similar design style or period. b. Creative building elements and identifying features should be used to create a high quality project with visual interest and an architectural style. 2. Landscape. a. The type, size, and location of landscape materials shall support the project s overall design concept. b. Landscaping shall not obstruct visibility of required addressing, nor shall it obstruct the vision of motorists or pedestrians in proximity to the site. c. Landscape areas shall be provided in and around parking lots to break up the appearance of large expanses of hardscape. 3. Signage. All signage shall be compatible with the building(s) design, scale, colors, materials and lighting. 4. Secondary Functional and Accessory Features. Trash receptacles, storage, and loading areas, transformers, and mechanical equipment shall be screened in a manner, which is architecturally compatible with the principal building(s). ANALYSIS/STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES Below is a list of the items that the DRC requested that the applicant further analyze and return to the Committee for review. They were further refined and additional conditions were incorporated into Conditions of Approval in City Council Resolution No The conditions are numbered as contained in the City Council resolution. The applicant has provided a text response to each of the conditions (Attachment 4). 20. Prior to the submittal of plans into building plan check, the applicant shall return before the Design Review Committee with final architectural and landscape plans, and color and materials for review and approval by the Design Review Committee. The applicant has provided a complete half size set of the architectural drawings and the landscape plans. In addition, the applicant has provided a color and material board for each of the proposed color schemes. 21. Prior to the submittal of plans into building plan check, the applicant shall study enhancement of the secondary elevations or façade where the elevations are most highly visible on Lots 25, 26, 29, 31 and 39 and provide to the Design Review Committee for review prior to final approval. The applicant has provided floor plans and elevations of both the standard the enhanced elevations for Lots 25, 26, 29, 31 and 39. In addition, the applicant has also provided enhanced elevations for Lots 28 and 40.
4 Design Review Committee Staff Report Page 4 of Prior to the submittal of plans into building plan check, the applicant shall further study the appearance of the second level decks in elevation and provide to the Design Review Committee for review for to final approval. Both the standard the enhanced elevations which the applicant has provided also include elevations of the optional decks. 23. Prior to the submittal of plans into building plan check, the proposed side yard wall adjacent to the neighbors on Lot 17 shall be called out to be constructed of slump stone. In the landscape plans, the applicant has provided Section B-B Lot 17 Slope Planting, which calls out the wall to be slump block for Lot Prior to the submittal of plans into building plan check, the applicant shall restudy the walls and slope conditions adjacent to Lots 22, 25, 31, and 37 and provide to the Design Review Committee for review prior to final approval. The applicant has revised the grading on all the lots including Lots 22, 25, 31, and 37 to eliminate all wall stacking. 25. Prior to the submittal of plans into building plan check, the applicant shall explore all the façade conditions and geometry of roof gables particularly where materials begin and end and balance those on the façade and return to the Design Review Committee for final review including a color and material sample board for each of the styles that are offered. The applicant has provided a complete half size set of the architectural drawings, which address the Committee s concerns. In addition, the applicant has provided a color and material board for each of the proposed color schemes. 26. Prior to the submittal of plans into building plan check, the applicant shall provide cultural details for the memorial area to the Design Review Committee for review and approval. The applicant has provided a complete half size set of the landscape plans, which include details for the memorial area. 27. Prior to the submittal of plans into building plan check, the applicant shall revise the plans to include provisions for a pedestrian access entry gate and return to the Design Review Committee for final review. The applicant has provided a complete half size set of the landscape plans, which include details on the pedestrian access gate. 28. Prior to the submittal of plans into building plan check, the applicant shall provide a pedestrian gate into the development. The location of the pedestrian gate shall be review with City staff for compliance with any applicable codes. The applicant has provided a complete half size set of the landscape plans, which include details on the pedestrian access gate. ADVISORY BOARD RECOMMENDATION Staff from interested departments reviewed the conceptual plans and draft environmental impact report on multiple occasions. On June 16, 2015, Staff reviewed the revised documentation and recommended approval with conditions.
5 STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND REQUIRED FINDINGS Design Review Committee Staff Report Page 5 of 6 The courts define a Finding as a conclusion, which describes the method of analysis decision makers utilize to make the final decision. A decision making body makes a Finding, or draws a conclusion, through identifying evidence in the record (i.e., testimony, reports, environmental documents, etc.) and should not contain unsupported statements. The statements which support the Findings bridge the gap between the raw data and the ultimate decision, thereby showing the rational decision making process that took place. The Findings are, in essence, the ultimate conclusions which must be reached in order to approve (or recommend approval of) a project. The same holds true if denying a project; the decision making body must detail why it cannot make the Findings. The Findings are applied as appropriate to each project. Based on the following Findings and statements in support of such Findings, staff recommends the DRC recommend approval to the PC with recommended conditions. 1. In the Old Towne Historic District, the proposed work conforms to the prescriptive standards and design criteria referenced and/or recommended by the DRC or other reviewing body for the project (OMC G.1). The project is not located in the Old Towne Historic District; therefore, this Finding does not apply to the application at hand. 2. In any National Register Historic District, the proposed work complies with the Secretary of the Interior s standards and guidelines (OMC G.2). The project is not located in the National Register Historic District; therefore, this Finding does not apply to the application at hand. 3. The project design upholds community aesthetics through the use of an internally consistent, integrated design theme and is consistent with all adopted specific plans, applicable design standards, and their required findings (OMC G.3). The project s architecture provides architectural continuity that reflects contemporary interpretations of the City s historic and cultural characteristics. The applicant has proposed a varied street plan, which would be achieved by the three different floor plans that can also be reversed, three different architectural styles, and three different color palettes, which would result in different combinations of floor plan, architectural style, and color palette. The project s architecture would be internally consistent and provide for an integrated design theme. The landscaping themes have been integrated and work well with each other. There is no specific plan for the site. 4. For infill residential development, as specified in the City of Orange Infill Residential Design Guidelines, the new structure(s) or addition are compatible with the scale, massing, orientation, and articulation of the surrounding development and will preserve or enhance existing neighborhood character (OMC G.4). The Infill Residential Design Guidelines apply to small scale subdivisions of four (4) lots or less, because of its size, consisting of a 40 lot subdivision, the proposed project is not considered infill residential development as defined by the City s Infill Residential Design Guidelines; therefore, this Finding does not apply.
6 CONDITIONS Design Review Committee Staff Report Page 6 of 6 Conditions of Approval for the project were approved by Planning Commission Resolution No. PC Staff is recommending that the DRC approve the final design with the conditions of approval presented below as it relates to the final design. The DRC may provide additional conditions or modifications to conditions to support the required findings and ensure the preservation of community aesthetics. 1. The project shall conform in substance and be maintained in general conformance with plans and exhibits date labeled February 17, 2016 including any modifications required by conditions of approval, and as approved by the Design Review Committee. ATTACHMENTS 1. Vicinity Map 2. Design Review Committee Minutes of August 19, City Council Resolution No with Conditions of Approval 4. Applicant s response to the Conditions of Approval 5. Proposed Plans cc: David Mello The New Home Company 85 Enterprise, Suite 450 Aliso Viejo, CA 92656
Developer Design Review Submittal Requirements - SECTION 5
Developer Design Review Submittal Requirements - SECTION 5 5.0 Developer Design Review 1.0 Procedures for Submittals - All Housing Types 1. Submittals shall be by the Guest Builder or authorized agent
More informationGENERAL REQUIREMENTS (Print or Type) PROJECT DESCRIPTION OWNER CERTIFICATION
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS (Print or Type) Name of Proposed Project: Location of Project: Legal Description of Project (Assessor s Parcel No. or T, R S,): Staff Use Only CASE NO.: RELATED FILES: Applicant s
More informationPEPPER PIKE ARCHITECTURAL BOARD OF REVIEW
PEPPER PIKE ARCHITECTURAL BOARD OF REVIEW All structures, fences, or additions must be approved by the Architectural Board of Review (ABR) prior to issuance of a building permit. The purpose of the Board
More informationCITY OF MERCER ISLAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES GROUP 9611 SE 36 th Street, Mercer Island, WA (206)
CITY OF MERCER ISLAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES GROUP 9611 SE 36 th Street, Mercer Island, WA 98040 (206) 275-7605 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR DESIGN COMMISSION APPROVAL & SIGNAGE APPROVAL PURPOSE: Design Commission
More informationApplying for a Site Development Review (Sign CVCBD only)
Guide Applying for a Site Development Review (Sign CVCBD only) What is it? Site Development Review ensures that new buildings or land uses are compatible with their sites and with the surrounding environment,
More informationAPPLICATION DESIGN REVIEW Please Print or Type
www.srcity.org ZONING ADMINISTRATOR (ZA) APPLICATION DESIGN REVIEW Please Print or Type DESIGN REVIEW BOARD File # Related Files: LOCATION OF PROJECT (ADDRESS) ASSESSOR S PARCEL NUMBER(S) EXISTING ZONING
More informationPROJECT ENTITLEMENT APPLICATION
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS (Print or Type) Name of Proposed Project: Location of Project: Legal Description of Project (Assessor s Parcel/Allotment No., Township/Range/Section): Staff Use Only CASE NO.: RELATED
More informationADMINISTRATIVE DESIGN REVIEW Information
Information The following information summarizes the City s Administrative Design Review (ADR) provisions. If you have any questions, please contact the Planning and Development Services Department at
More informationOperating Standards Attachment to Development Application
Planning & Development Services 2255 W Berry Ave. Littleton, CO 80120 Phone: 303-795-3748 Mon-Fri: 8am-5pm www.littletongov.org Operating Standards Attachment to Development Application 1 SKETCH PLANS
More informationArchitectural Review Application
Architectural Review Application City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 Tel. (310) 285 1141 Fax. (310) 858 5966 Architectural Review Overview: The Architectural
More informationDESIGN REVIEW PROCESS AND APPLICATION
DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS AND APPLICATION Design review is the first step in the process of any construction project requiring permits. The Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) Board is responsible for ensuring
More informationApplying for a Site Development Review
Guide What is it? Applying for a Who approves it? ensures that new buildings or land uses are compatible with their sites and with the surrounding environment, other development, and traffic circulation.
More informationPLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS CLASS 4 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS. A. Written Material
PLANNING DEPARTMENT 970.668.4200 0037 Peak One Dr. PO Box 5660 www.summitcountyco.gov Frisco, CO 80443 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS CLASS 4 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS Per the provisions
More informationCommunity & Economic Development Department Planning Division Frederick Street PO Box 8805 Moreno Valley, CA SUBMITAL REQUIREMENTS
Community & Economic Development Department Planning Division 14177 Frederick Street PO Box 8805 Moreno Valley, CA 92552-0805 (951) 413-3206 Fax (951) 413-3210 SECOND UNITS Completed and Signed Project
More informationCHICAGO LANDMARKS PERMIT APPLICATION AND PRE-PERMIT SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
CHICAGO LANDMARKS PERMIT APPLICATION AND PRE-PERMIT SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS The Commission on Chicago Landmarks reviews all permit applications for work to designated and proposed Chicago Landmarks and
More informationDEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN INFORMATION
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN INFORMATION 220 Clay Street Cedar Falls, Iowa 50613 General Information: Applications for developing a commercial, multi-family, or residential (in an overlay
More informationDavid J. Gellner, AICP, Principal Planner
Staff Report PLANNING DIVISION COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT To: From: Salt Lake City Planning Commission David J. Gellner, AICP, Principal Planner - 801-535-6107 - david.gellner@slcgov.com Date: October
More informationNON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS (Print or Type) Name of Proposed Project: Location of Project: Legal Description of Project (Assessor s Parcel No. or T, R,S): Staff Use Only FILE NO.: RELATED FILES: Applicant s Name:
More informationCity of Santa Paula Planning Department
City of Santa Paula Planning Department INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMITTING APPLICATIONS DESIGN REVIEW, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMITS, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS AND VARIANCES A. ITEMS / DOCUMENTS REQUIRED FOR SUBMITTAL:
More informationMailing Address: Fax number: City: State: Zip: Property Owner: City: State: Zip: City: State: Zip:
/ Department of Community Development ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW APPLICATION 73-510 Fred Waring Drive Palm Desert California 92260 (760) 346-0611 Fax (760) 776-6417 Applicant: Telephone: Mailing Address: Fax
More informationChecklist for Minor Plan Modification
Checklist for Minor Plan Modification All submittal information shall be provided to the Community Development Department. All submittal information shall be presented along with the Uniform Application,
More informationSummerland Planning Advisory Committee. SunPAC Meeting #31 April 28, 2011
Summerland Planning Advisory Committee SunPAC Meeting #31 April 28, 2011 1 SunPAC Meeting Agenda Call to Order Item 1: Pledge of allegiance and roll call Agenda Item: 1 Item 2: Public comment period Item
More informationTOWN OF MANCHESTER PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. 7:00 P.M. 494 Main Street AGENDA
TOWN OF MANCHESTER PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION September 18, 2017 Lincoln Center Hearing Room 7:00 P.M. 494 Main Street AGENDA PUBLIC HEARING: 1. TOWN OF MANCHESTER PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION To revise
More informationArchitectural Commission Report
City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 458-1141 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Architectural Commission Report Meeting Date: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 Subject:
More informationSite Plan/Building Permit Review
Part 6 Site Plan/Building Permit Review 1.6.01 When Site Plan Review Applies 1.6.02 Optional Pre- Application Site Plan/Building Permit Review (hereafter referred to as Site Plan Review) shall be required
More informationCITY OF OLIVETTE SITE PLAN AND COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW INFORMATION PACKET
CITY OF OLIVETTE SITE PLAN AND COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW INFORMATION PACKET THE FOLLOWING PACKET CONTAINS: PETITION FOR NONRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN AND COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW SCHEDULE OF DATES
More informationCITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD APPLICATION PACKET
Instruction Sheet... 2 Conceptual Plan Requirements... 3 Information Sheet... 4 Submittal Checklist... 5 Application Fee Sheet... 6 City of Cape Canaveral Community Appearance Board Application 12/2018
More informationSITE PLAN Application Packet (Required For All Non-Residential Development Projects)
SITE PLAN Application Packet (Required For All Non-Residential Development Projects) Community Development Department 90 North Main Street, Tooele, UT 84074 (435) 843-2130 Fax (435) 843-2139 Dear Applicant,
More information1222 First Avenue, San Diego, CA Cycle Distributed: 11/07/2014
Cycle s Project Information Project Nbr: 379530 Title: Living Green Coop MMCC Project Mgr: Gutierrez, Edith (619) 446-5147 egutierrez@sandiego.gov Page 1 of 6 *379530* Reviewing Discipline: LDR-Planning
More informationSUMMIT COUNTY PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
SUMMIT COUNTY PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT SINGLE-FAMILY SITE PLAN INFORMATION PACKET GENERAL INFORMATION This information packet explains how your application for a single-family site plan will
More informationCITY OF PALMDALE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA ORDINANCE NO. 1415
CITY OF PALMDALE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA ORDINANCE NO. 1415 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALMDALE ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF AMATEUR RADIO ANTENNAS IN
More informationCertificate of Appropriateness (CoA) Checklist
Certificate of Appropriateness (CoA) Checklist This Checklist is intended to assist you in preparing a complete application for submittal. Occasionally, additional items may be required to complete the
More informationI. REQUEST: The undersigned petition the Village of Matteson, Illinois to approve the application(s) submitted.
SITE PLAN BUILDING ELEVATION LANDSCAPE PLAN SIGNAGE PLAN APPLICATION FOR THE VILLAGE OF MATTESON I. REQUEST: The undersigned petition the Village of Matteson, Illinois to approve the application(s) submitted.
More informationPLANNING DIVISION COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS DEPARTMENT
Staff Report PLANNING DIVISION COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS DEPARTMENT To: Salt Lake City Administrative Hearing Officer From: Casey Stewart; 801-535-6260 Date: Re: September 22, 2017 (for September 28 Administrative
More informationRadiocommunication Facility Review Protocol
Radiocommunication Facility Review Protocol 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 The purpose of this protocol is to outline the guidelines and review process through which Radiocommunication Facilities are evaluated within
More informationArticle 4.0 Measurements and Exceptions
This Article identifies and explains some of the more common forms of measurement used throughout this Ordinance. It also specifies exceptions to certain requirements of this Ordinance. Sec. 4.1 Measurements
More informationOver-the-Rhine Historic District New Construction Guidelines Competition: The Challenge to elevate new build design in OTR to national recognition.
Over-the-Rhine Historic District New Construction Guidelines Competition: The Challenge to elevate new build design in OTR to national recognition. 1. Brief: Over the Rhine Foundation Infill Committee
More informationSummerland Planning Advisory Committee
Summerland Planning Advisory Committee SunPAC Meeting #32 May 10, 2011 1 SunPAC Meeting Agenda Call to Order Agenda Item: 1 Item 1: Pledge of allegiance and roll call Item 2: Public comment period Item
More informationWILTON MANORS, Island City 2020 WILTON DRIVE, WILTON MANORS, FLORIDA 33305
WILTON MANORS, Island City 2020 WILTON DRIVE, WILTON MANORS, FLORIDA 33305 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES (954) 390-2180 FAX: (954) 567-6069 This package includes: General Submittal Procedures Submittal
More informationArchitectural Review Application New Application Processing Improvements
Architectural Review Application New Application Processing Improvements Dear Applicant, Fees Reduced. Application fees were reduced approximately 20% from the 2010 2011 fiscal year. The Planning Division
More informationFor Office Use: Filing Date: Case Number: Zoning District: LIST ALL ADDRESSES INVOLVED IN YOUR PROJECT:
City of Syracuse Zoning Administration Application for CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY Review by the Planning Commission City Hall Commons * Room 101 * 201 E. Washington Street * Syracuse, NY 13202-1426 * 315-448-8640
More informationWireless Telecommunications Facilities Meeting. Neighborhood Leaders Meeting May 8, 2014
Wireless Telecommunications Facilities Meeting Neighborhood Leaders Meeting May 8, 2014 Agenda Welcome and Introductions Project Overview Process and Schedule Wireless Concepts and Terminology Overview
More informationCity of Whitefish 418 E 2 nd St PO Box 158 Whitefish, MT Phone: Fax:
City of Whitefish 418 E 2 nd St PO Box 158 Whitefish, MT 59937 406-863-2460 Fax: 406-863-2419 File #: : Intake Staff: Check #: Amount: ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW Multifamily, Townhouse, Duplex Complete: FEE
More informationPublic Art Mural Packet
Public Art Mural Packet October 2016 Thank you for your interest in the process for executing exterior murals on public or private property in within the City of Ashland. The attached documents are intended
More information6.05 acres acres Single-family attached
R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, the Prince George's County Planning Board is charged with the approval of Detailed Site Plans pursuant to Part 3, Division 9 of the Zoning Ordinance of the Prince George's
More informationLandmarks Preservation Commission Tacoma Economic Development Department Culture and Tourism Division
Tacoma Economic Development Department Culture and Tourism Division 747 Market Street Room 1036 Tacoma WA 98402-3793 253.591.5220 APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES
More informationMULTIPLE-FAMILY DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
MULTIPLE-FAMILY DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST This application lists the content and format of the submittal requirements to initiate the Design Review process. An incomplete application will not be
More informationAPPLICATION FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) DEVELOPMENT PLAN
209 S. Main Street Marysville, Ohio 43040 Phone: (937) 645-7350 Fax: (937) 645-7351 www.marysvilleohio.org APPLICATION FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) DEVELOPMENT PLAN *** IMPORTANT INFORMATION ~ Please
More informationCHAPTER 11 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL PROCESS
CHAPTER 11 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL PROCESS 11.01.00 Preliminary Site Plan Approval 11.01.01 Intent and Purpose 11.01.02 Review 11.01.03 Application 11.01.04 Development Site to be Unified 11.01.05
More informationSMALL PROJECTS & IMPROVEMENTS: DOG RUNS, PATIO ENCLOSURES & FENCES, EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS (Abbreviated Design Review Application)
REVIEW TYPE: PRELIMINARY FINAL LANDSCAPE ABBREVIATED ADDITION COLOR BOARD Application Form* X X X X X Design Review Fee* X X X Registered Survey** X Site Plan X X X X X Floor Plans X X X Elevations X X
More informationSITE PLAN APPLICATION
SITE PLAN APPLICATION SECTION 1. APPLICANT/OWNER INFORMATION Please Print or Type Applicant/Developer: City: State: Zip: Telephone: Fax: E-mail: Applicant s Status: (Check One) Owner Tenant Prospective
More informationTOWN OF NORTH BRANFORD
TOWN OF NORTH BRANFORD Town Hall 909 Foxon Road P.O. Box 287 North Branford, Connecticut 06471 Planning & Zoning (203) 484-6010 Building Department (203) 484-6008 Department Fax (203) 484-6018 INSTRUCTIONS
More informationCity of San José, California CITY COUNCIL POLICY
City of San José, California CITY COUNCIL POLICY TITLE 1 1 of 6 EFFECTIVE DATE 1/22/91 REVISED DATE 9/16/03 APPROVED BY Council Action - January 22, 1991; August 11, 1992; August 20, 1996 (9d); September
More informationCHAPTER 26 SITE PLAN REVIEW
CHAPTER 26 SITE PLAN REVIEW Section 26.1. Committee. The Planning Commission shall appoint three members of the Planning Commission to the site plan review committee which shall be responsible for site
More informationSingle Family Design Guidelines Update/ Neighborhood Preservation Ordinance Update ISSUE PAPER A. Definition: Mass, Bulk & Scale
The purpose of this issue paper is to: Single Family Design Guidelines Update/ Neighborhood Preservation Ordinance Update ISSUE PAPER A Definition: Mass, Bulk & Scale clarify current definitions of mass,
More informationCITY OF ORANGE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES FINAL April 4, 2018
0 0 0 CITY OF ORANGE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES FINAL April, 0 Committee Members Present: Tim McCormack - Chair Anne McDermott Vice Chair Carol Fox Robert Imboden Mary Anne Skorpanich Staff in Attendance:
More informationCity of Whitefish Planning & Building Department PO Box E 2 nd Street Whitefish, MT Phone: Fax:
City of Whitefish Planning & Building Department PO Box 158 418 E 2 nd Street Whitefish, MT 59937 Phone: 406-863-2410 Fax: 406-863-2409 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW Multifamily, Townhouse, Duplex FEE ATTACHED
More informationView referenced exhibit back-up material. (See Report to the City Council No ) Adoption of a Resolution certifying findings that:
Page 9 ITEM-S701: Hillel of San Diego Student Center, Project No. 149437. An application for a Public Right-of-Way Vacation (portion of La Jolla Scenic Drive North between Torrey Pines Road and La Jolla
More informationApplication Submittal Checklist for a BASIC USE PERMIT (BUP) Planning & Development Department Planning Division
Application Submittal Checklist for a BASIC USE PERMIT (BUP) APPLICABILITY. This checklist should be used when submitting an application for a Basic Use Permit. When is a Basic Use Permit required? Section
More informationHillside & Foothills Development Application
Hillside & Foothills Development Application This box for office use only File #: Cross Referenced File(s): Fee: Zone(s): Are Pre-Application materials attached? Yes No This application is a request to
More informationCITY OF EL MIRAGE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION PROCESS
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION PROCESS Development Applications are reviewed by the El Mirage Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) to ensure Building, Engineering and Zoning compliance before scheduling public
More informationCHAPTER 1123 SATELLITE EARTH STATIONS PURPOSE AND INTENT
CHAPTER 1123 SATELLITE EARTH STATIONS 1123.01 PURPOSE AND INTENT Satellite earth stations, except those described in Section 1123.08, shall require a permit approved by the Director of Safety and Service.
More informationResidential Infill Development. The Legacy Toolkit
Residential Infill Development Residential Infill Development Residential Infill Standards apply in GMA 2, the large area of older urban neighborhoods built mostly before 1940 Front Setback Standards Front
More informationMemorandum. Dear Ms. Allen,
RhoadesPlanningGroup Memorandum To: Shannon Allen, AICP, Principal Planner From: Rhoades Planning Group Date: June 10, 2015 Re: Response to Incomplete Letter, 1900 Fourth Street Dear Ms. Allen, This letter
More informationGUIDELINES AND MINIMUM ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR THE PREPARATION AND SUBMISSION OF PARKING MANAGEMENT PLANS (PMP) ARLINGTON COUNTY GOVERNMENT (ACG)
GUIDELINES AND MINIMUM ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR THE PREPARATION AND SUBMISSION OF PARKING MANAGEMENT PLANS (PMP) TO ARLINGTON COUNTY GOVERNMENT (ACG) Effective Date: February 15, 2016 Prepared by: Arlington
More informationSUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR USE PROCESS III OR PROCESS IV
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 33325 8 th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cityoffederalway.com SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR USE PROCESS III OR PROCESS IV USE PROCESS
More informationArticle 4 PROCEDURES for PLOT PLAN and SITE PLAN REVIEW
Article 4 PROCEDURES for PLOT PLAN and SITE PLAN REVIEW Section 4.01 Purpose It is the intent of this Article to specify standards, application and data requirements, and the review process which shall
More informationGUIDELINES FOR MEASURING BUILDING HEIGHT
GUIDELINES FOR MEASURING BUILDING HEIGHT THE CITY S POLICIES ON BUILDING HEIGHT In 1994, the City adopted a new General Plan that sets direction for development within Brisbane. Among its policies affecting
More informationR 1 Design Review Application
City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 Tel. (310) 285 1141 Fax. (310) 858 5966 R 1 Design Review Application Design Review Overview Beverly Hills residential
More informationEstimated Cost of Project Contractor License No. Contractor Qualifier No.
Building, Safety and Zoning Department COMMERCIAL Application for Building Permit Owners and/or Contractors: Please fill out all the information listed below and submit those documents needed for your
More informationCity of Tuscaloosa Planning Commission
City of Tuscaloosa Planning Commission HISTORIC DISTRICT BUFFER DESIGN GUIDELINES WALTER MADDOX, MAYOR CITY COUNCIL OF TUSCALOOSA Cynthia Lee Almond District 3 Bobby Howard District 1 Harrison L. Taylor
More informationRiverside, California A Local Government CEQA Perspective
Historic Resources and CEQA Workshop 6/21/2012 Riverside, California A Local Government CEQA Perspective Erin Gettis, Associate AIA City Historic Preservation Officer and Principal Planner CEQA and Cultural
More informationChecklist for Tentative Subdivision Map
Checklist for Tentative Subdivision Map All submittal information shall be provided to the Community Development Department. All submittal information shall be presented along with the Uniform Application,
More informationArchitectural Design Process
Architectural Design Process Custom Residential A. Schematic Design Phase Pre-Design Meeting Site Analysis Site Survey Conceptual Design & Project Scope Design Program Guideline Project Team Formation
More informationPLANNED SIGN PROGRAM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
PLANNED SIGN PROGRAM SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS City of Greenwood Village Community Development Department 6060 S. Quebec Street Greenwood Village, CO 80111-4591 (303) 486-5783; FAX (303) 773-1238 SUBMITTAL
More informationDRAFT V. SITE ELEMENTS SIGNS
1. SIGNS Intent Signs are an important streetscape design element that affect not only the visual character of the Historic District but also the vitality of its businesses. Signage provides business identification,
More informationC. CEQA Determination: Categorically exempt pursuant to Section of the CEQA Guidelines ( Existing Facilities ).
Z O N I N G A D J U S T M E N T S B O A R D S t a f f R e p o r t FOR BOARD ACTION FEBRUARY 17, 2011 1760 Solano Avenue Use Permit Modification #09-70000017 to modify the T-Mobile wireless telecommunication
More informationPLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
OVERVIEW Effective January 1, 1992 all applications for multi-family residential and all non-residential building permits require site plan approval before permit issuance. All new developments and existing
More informationZONING R-LI Low Intensity Residential District. [Amended by Ord. No. 1684] PERMITTED USES BY RIGHT.
130.19. R-LI Low Intensity Residential District. [Amended 10-2-95 by Ord. No. 1684] 130.19.1. Purpose. To preserve steep slopes, floodplains, and other sensitive natural areas and to provide opportunities
More information754 Sir Francis Drake Boulevard
APN: 006-09 - 39 Town of San Anselmo Submittal Number : April 06 Revised June 0, 06 PROJECT TEAM INDEX TO DRAWINGS APPLICANT MONFREDINI PROPERTIES LLC South San Francisco, California 94080 (650) 873-0440
More informationKEY MAP PLAN AREA MAP. St. Albans Sub-Area Plan. Area Boundary
Richmond Official Community Plan CITY CENTRE AREA ST. ALBANS SUB-AREA PLAN Bylaw 7100 Schedule 2.10A ST. ALBANS SUB-AREA PLAN z ST. ALBANS SUB-AREA PLAN z ST. ALBANS SUB-AREA PLAN KEY MAP PLAN AREA MAP
More informationRecommended Changes to the Public Hearing Draft Zoning Ordinance
DATE: December 6, 2016 TO: Village of Oak Park FROM: Arista Strungys SUBJECT: Recommended Changes Recommended Changes to the Public Hearing Draft Zoning Ordinance ZONING MAP» Edit to remove right-of-way
More informationARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES
ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES The Providence Series April 2011 **Addendums at the end of document** 6.1m. Houses are to have a consistency of apparent volume. As such, house widths and sizes musht relate
More informationItem 2. September 28, 2017
September 28, 2017 Item 2 Applicant: Georgetown Development Location: 190 N 1100 W Prepared by: Sean Conroy, Community Development Director Public Hearing: No Zone: PRD-1 Attachments: 1. Findings. 2. Project
More informationOld School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD)
SECTION 4.4.24 Section 4.4.24 Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD) (A) Purpose and Intent: The Old School Square Historic Arts District (OSSHAD) is a mixed use district which is intended to:
More informationCITY OF EL MIRAGE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION PROCESS
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION PROCESS I. Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) 1. Submit TAC Review Application (See Page 3 for TAC Review Application Requirements) 2. Review of TAC Review Application by Technical
More informationPacifica San Juan Pearl Site PACIFIC POINT DEVELOPMENT PARTNER, LLC A0.0 THE PEARL PACIFICA SAN JUAN SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CA. DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL
THE PEARL PACIFICA SAN JUAN DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL TABLE OF CONTENTS: ARCHITECTURE AO.O COVER A0.1-3 STREETSCENE - FRONT ELEVATIONS AO.4-6 PERSPECTIVES - REAR ELEVATIONS AO.7 INDOOR / OUTDOOR LIFESTYLE
More informationC I T Y O F M c K I N N E Y PLANNING
C I T Y O F M c K I N N E Y PLANNING 221 N. TENNESSEE STR EE T, McKI NNEY, TEXA S 75069 CONTENTS Approval Process Flowchart FAQs Letter of Intent Requirements Façade Plan Submittal Checklist Non-Residential
More informationCERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS AND CHECK LIST
Certificate of Appropriateness Instructions and Checklist (revised 1/18) SYRACUSE LANDMARK PRESERVATION BOARD CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS AND CHECK LIST INSTRUCTIONS: Please
More informationCity Development Department 9500 Civic Center Drive Thornton, Colorado FAX
City Hall City Development Department 9500 Civic Center Drive 303-538-7295 Thornton, Colorado 80229-4326 FAX 303-538-7373 www.cityofthornton.net Zach Lauterbach Evergreen Devco, Incorporated 2390 East
More informationAPPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS IN THE HISTORIC DESIGN REVIEW DISTRICT
209 South Main Street Marysville, Ohio 43040 Phone: (937) 645-7350 Fax: (937) 645-7351 www.marysvilleohio.org APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS IN THE HISTORIC DESIGN REVIEW DISTRICT *** IMPORTANT
More informationSITE STATISTICS SQ.FT [ SQ.M.]
SITE PLAN :00 No. 66 ADJACENT STOREY DWELLING LOT AREA GFA SITE STATISTICS 870.77 SQ.FT [777.67 SQ.M.] N 8 00'" E OVERHEAD WIRE '-7 " [760] EXISTING PRIVATE TREE TO BE REMOVED '-" [680] 9'-7" [90] 9'-7
More informationORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, the city commission created the historic district. signage task force under Resolution Number ; and
ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF KEY WEST, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMISSION S GUIDELINES FOR BANNERS, FLAGS, SIGNAGE AND LIGHTING AS REFERENCED IN SECTION 90-142
More informationSite Plan Review Application. Interest in the Property (e.g. fee simple, land option, etc.)
1. Identification CITY OF FENTON 301 South Leroy Street Fenton, Michigan 48430-2196 (810) 629-2261 FAX (810) 629-2004 Site Plan Review Application Project Name Applicant Name Address City/State/Zip Phone
More informationConceptual, Preliminary and Final Site Plan Review in Holladay City
Conceptual, Preliminary and Final Site Plan Review in Holladay City The City of Holladay incorporated in December, 1999 and adopted its own zoning ordinance in May, 2000. All land use decisions are made
More informationPismo Beach Public Art Program Outline
Pismo Beach Public Art Program Outline What is the Pismo Beach Public Art Program? The Pismo Beach Public Art Program is a means to incorporate art within new and existing developments or publically owned
More informationSUBMITTAL CHECKLIST ARCHITECTURAL COMMITTEE APPLICATION WOODMOOR HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
(Owner to Complete) SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST ARCHITECTURAL COMMITTEE APPLICATION This checklist must be completed by the Owner and must be attached to the Architectural Committee Application. Failure to complete
More informationINTENT An Administrative Site Plan is required for the following situations, excluding single-family detached development:
SECTION 13-400 ADMINISTRATIVE SITE PLAN 13-401 INTENT An Administrative Site Plan is required for the following situations, excluding single-family detached development: A. All development on vacant land
More informationSECTION II PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
SECTION II PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS A OVERVIEW All plans for construction within the Discovery Bay Property Owners Association DBPOA jurisdiction must be approved by DERC Design Environmental Review
More informationAPPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW
APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW ONLY COMPLETE SUBMISSIONS WILL BE PROCESSED CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE P&Z File No. PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Fees (Nonrefundable) $ Arch.: $ (772) 871-5212 FAX: (772) 871-5124
More information