ERA-related groups and other expert groups

Transcription

1 and other expert Introduction The Council conclusions on the review of the European Area advisory structure of May 2015, Article 5: RECALLS that the EU research and innovation policy landscape includes a number of advisory structures providing inputs and expertise and URGES to carry out an inventory to identify these structures and highlight any ERAC and the other Groups and to submit its assessment to ERAC by 30 June 2015; ENCOURAGES ERAC, with the support of, to strive for close interaction with any relevant regarding the aspects of their work programmes; In order to optimise the inputs from all the various, the advisory structure needs to be streamlined to avoid duplication of work and/or representation in similar. Annex 1 lists the current Commission advisory ('expert') as requested by the Council that have ERA-type activities. It gives details of their s, activities, and membership. Based on this evidence, the summary table in Annex 2 maps the current and the 'expert' onto the ERA priories. and Commission advisory ('expert') The broad differentiating factor between the and Commission advisory ('expert') is that the group are composed of delegates who are nominated by the Member State from the relevant Ministry. These delegates should have the authority to take a line for the Member State they represent. It is less ideal when nominations are 'nongovernmental' experts, e.g. from research performing organisations, who can only act in a personal capacity, which results in uninformed debates. Commission 'expert' usually have a specific role in that seeks specialised advice from experts acting in a personal or organisational capacity. However, some 'expert', such as Digital ERA Forum and National points of reference for scientific information, have delegates nominated by Member States, although in principle the purpose is still to provide independent advice to. Both and Commission advisory ('expert ') s should have, as a principle, limited duration, in order that their specific tasks are both relevant and concluded in a timely way. Groups should be set up with variable geometries to achieve their work. Under Regulation 1291/2013 establishing Horizon 2020, Article 12: External advice and societal engagement states that: For the implementation of Horizon 2020, account shall be taken of advice and inputs provided by independent advisory of high level experts set up by [ ].Advice on the identification and design of strategic priorities by the European Area and Innovation Committee (ERAC), other and the Enterprise Policy Group (EPG) shall, where appropriate, also be taken into consideration. DG RTD /

2 The Commission, in preparing the work programmes, draws on the external advice from experts participating in the advisory in their individual capacity or as individuals representing an interest or an organisation. Commission staff, including JRC personnel and Member States' authorities at national, regional or local level cannot be selected as experts. Therefore, whilst for ERA priorities 2B, 3, 4 and 6 there is a Horizon 2020 advisory group as well as an group (ESFRI, SGHRM, Helsinki and SFIC respectively), the context and rationale for setting up the and their composition are different. The s of the Horizon 2020 advisory should be limited to advice on the Horizon 2020 work programme. DG RTD /

3 Annex 1: ERA-advisory Inventory (as requested in Council conclusions on ERA Advisory structure) Other ERAadvisory PRIORITY 1 1. Mutual learning exercise on business R&I investments (start-up phase of the Policy Support Facility) 2. Peer review of Bulgarian R&I system (start-up phase of the Policy Support Facility) 2015 Individual expert contracts, as foreseen in WP Five individual expert contracts, as foreseen in WP Panel of five independent experts Panel of five high level independent experts and five peers (AT, ES, PL, PT, SI) C: Terttu Luukkonen, S: DG RTD A4, (PSF team) C: L Soete, S: DG RTD A4, (PSF team) January to September 2015 March to September 2015 Support to in-depth mutual learning between national policy-makers on measures to stimulate business research and innovation, and in the definition of a new methodology for in-depth mutual learning. The peer review shall provide recommendations to Bulgarian authorities on reforms to improve the performance of the Bulgarian R&I system. 3. Pre-Peer review 2015 Individual expert Panel of three Rapporteur: M May to Gather the evidence-base and focus The group set up under the request of ERAC (outcome of the Expression of interest for the PSF services sent to ERAC in November 2014) as above 1 The currently include the European Area and Innovation Committee, the European Strategy Forum on Infrastructures (ESFRI), the Strategic Forum for International Science and Technology Cooperation (SFIC), the High Level Group on Joint Programming (GPC), the Helsinki Group on Gender in and Innovation (HG), the ERA Steering Group on Human Resources and Mobility (SGHRM), and the ERAC Working Group on Knowledge Transfer (KT). DG RTD /

4 of Hungarian R&I system (start-up phase of the Policy Support Facility) 4., Innovation and Science Expert (RISE) HLG: PRIORITY 2A 5. Evaluation of Joint Programming to address Grand Societal Challenges 2014, expected renewal in 2015 contracts, as foreseen in WP Advisory body to (the Commissioner in charge of Science and Innovation) 2015 Expert Group to high level independent experts Experts, mostly private (except a few governmental experts) is based on personal capacity, not organisational representativeness Individual experts (5) Ranga, S: DG RTD A4, (PSF team) C: Luc Soete, S: RTD.A6 C: one of the Experts October 2015 Two plenaries per year, two meetings with the Commission er per year, a few workshops and smallscale meetings per year Ca. 5 meetings in 2015 the scope of the future in-depth peer review of Hungary s science and innovation system. Advises er on all matters related to R&I policy, at his request or on the EG's own initiative. The resulting policy analyses and/or recommendations are eventually published on the web ( tionunion/index_en.cfm?pg=expert) Defined by ToR, duration limited to January 2016 as above There could be overlap with ERAC on work on foresight (RISE and SFRI) DGs considered ERAC should address foresight. This work was foreseen by the GPC Implementation Group on monitoring and evaluation, but it DG RTD /

5 PRIORITY 2B 6. Horizon 2020 on European Infrastructures including e- Infrastructures 7. and Science Cloud PRIORITY 3 8. Horizon 2020 for the Marie Skłodowska- Curie actions on skills, training and career development 2013 H2020 Expert Advisory body to (DG RTD) 2013 H2020 Expert Individual Experts and Organisations (ESFRI e-irg) Private experts Individual Experts and Organisations C: one of the Experts S: RTD B4 and CNECT C1 C: B Mons; S: RTD.A6 DG EAC Twice a year About once every two months provide consistent and consolidated advice to services during the preparation of the Horizon 2020 work programme, regarding the Infrastructures part of the Specific Programme Validating the architecture and main aspects of a pan-european and cross-disciplinary cloud infrastructure for storing and managing research data provide advice to services during the preparation of the Horizon 2020 work programme for Marie Skłodowska-Curie actions sub : research career development + doctoral training and skills gender balance multi-disciplinarity + cross cutting research and innovation did not deliver. representatives from ESFRI and e-irg on group; complimentary topics with ESFRI. Digital ERA Forum have discussed the cloud recently (April 2015) potential overlaps / similarities of topics in several sub with SGHRM DG RTD /

6 PRIORITY 4 9. Horizon 2020 on Gender PRIORITY Digital ERA Forum 2013 H2020 Expert 2012 Member States Forum public authorities from all EU Member States and associated countries DG CNECT 2 meetings per year mobility + international cooperation societal and economic impact SME participation and co-funding To provide advice to the Commission services on the implementation of the gender dimension in research and innovation content as a crosscutting issue in Horizon 2020 work programme. The advice will also contribute to a broader policy context: to the Europa 2020 Strategy, the Innovation Union, and other relevant EU policies. The Digital ERA Forum will provide a platform for regular exchange and reporting on national developments on the provision, take-up and use of digital research services and sharing of best practices, with a view to support national developments on the provision, take up and use of digital as Helsinki Group on gender which also considers the broader policy context. Digital ERA services, infrastructures, and tools potential links with ESFRI and e-irg; Open Science topics have DG RTD /

7 11. National Points of Reference for scientific information 12. Open Science Charter 2012 Platform for information exchange both among MS and with the Commission cf: NCP network Advisory body to (DG RTD) National delegates nominated by MS Private experts Commission co-managed DG RTD & CNECT. C: J Wilsdon; S: DG RTD.A6 Once or twice a year About once every two months research services for collaboration, computing and accessing scientific information in a Digital ERA. As an group, it will provide reports and common position statements on the development of Digital ERA in the Member states, which also contribute to the ERA follow-up activities of the ERAC. Directly implemented as a follow up of the 2012 Recommendation to Member States different legal base than ERA. to encourage open access to scientific publications and research data for re-use, through policy coordination and adoption, longterm preservation, and deployment of the supporting e-infrastructure. Exploring options for setting up and supporting the take-up of rights and obligations of scientists and research institutions in an Open Science environment potential overlap with ERAC Task Force on Open Access for Innovation; Science Cloud work links to 7; Potential overlap with ERAC Task Force on Open Access for Innovation re: Access to data. Potential overlap with work of ERAC Task Force on Open Access for Innovation re: DG RTD /

8 13. Open Innovation strategy and policy group 2011-, 2014 Advisory body to DG CNECT focusing on modern innovation paradigms, especially Open Innovation Industry-led, Open Innovation experienced members from industry and academia, close collaboration with the DG Adviser for Innovation Systems Industrial chair, supported by DG CNECT, Adviser for Innovation Systems, with external rapporteur Physical meetings twice/year, teleconferenc es 3-5 times/year Additional expert meetings at conferences. working on Digital Agenda flagship of Europe unites industrial, academia, governments, and private individuals to support policies for open innovation at the European Commission. behaviour, and European Charter for ers & Code of Conduct (SGHRM) and research integrity different focus on open innovation to the High Level Group on Open Innovation (now finished) 14. Enterprise Policy Group Working group on Innovation Renewed Commission Decision 2012 Advises the Commission on all questions relating to enterprise and industrial policy. National administrations - nominated representative. DG GROW 2-3 meetings/ year Coordinates with Member States, exchange of views on innovation policy in EU and Member States. DG RTD / Potential overlap with ERAC re: discussions on IUS PRIORITY Horizon Horizon 2020 Individual experts C: M. Horvat 2-3 times per Mandate focuses on the preparation Potential overlap

9 ad hoc on International Cooperation OTHER 16. Innovation Union Competitivenes s Report (IUC) Horizon 2020 ad hoc for Science with and for Society 18. European Network of Expert Advisory Group 2015 Individual expert contracts, as foreseen in WP and organisations S: DG.RTD.C3 year of the Horizon 2020 Work Programme and the mainstreaming of international cooperation as a cross-cutting issue. Five independent experts C: NA S: DG RTD A4 February to December 2015 Support to the elaboration of the Innovation Union Competitiveness report 2015 as well as to its quality assurance, by performing an indepth and evidence-based analysis and by peer reviewing the contents. April 2014 High level experts RTD.B.7 2/year Members of the Ad hoc Advisory Group on Science with and for Society should provide consistent and consolidated advice to the Commission services during the preparation of the Horizon 2020 work programmes European Network of Integrity Integrity Officers representing C: Nicole Foeger, 2/year Is an initiative by the then director of the UK Integrity Office (UKRIO) to bring together a group with SFIC which also considers shaping international cooperation in H2020 Because of overlaps of IUC report, IU Scoreboard and ERA Roadmap monitoring, a streamlining exercise of reports is underway. Potential overlap on responsible research and innovation, research integrity and ethics European DG RTD /

10 Integrity Officers (ENRIO) 19. EURECNET / NEC FORUM a network that brings together national Ethics Committees (REC) associations, networks or comparable initiatives on the European level 20. SFRI: Strategic Foresight for R&I Policy in Horizon 2020 : Offices European Network of Ethics Committees Advisory body to (DG RTD) national bodies and organisations One national network per member country or a delegated natural person from the national research ethics committee. Private experts S: Cinzia Caporale, Ilja Richard Pavone C: Prof. E. Doppelfeld S: Dr. D Lanzerath C: J Staman S: RTD A6 2-3/year max. 6 meetings (start June 2015) GROUPS THAT HAVE RECENTLY FINISHED THEIR WORK 21. KT2050: Foresight on Advisory body to Private experts C: R Hudson, 4 meetings (completed) of eight people who were dealing with questions about research integrity, or lack of, within their national organisations. The purpose of the Association shall be to promote co-operation between national Networks of Ethics Committees in Europe; and harmonisation of multidisciplinary ethical reviews to improve the protection of human subjects in all aspects of medical and health-related research involving human subjects, human material or data. Advice reporting on the establishment of a systematic process of collecting, analysing and making sense of all foresight intelligence in view of strategic programming and the next FP Advice reporting on the implications of future scenarios for Charter for ers & Code of Conduct (SGHRM) ethics issues beyond medical field, e.g. research protocols in social sciences, and humanities, dual use - all have links with research integrity. See comments for 4. - there could be overlap with work on foresight. Potential overlap with ERAC DG RTD /

11 Key long-term Transformation s of European systems:, Innovation and Higher Education 22. Innovation through Gender 23. Expert Group on Open Innovation and Knowledge Transfer' 24. Responsible research and innovation : "Policy indicators for responsible research and innovation finalised work in /11/2012; To 25/04/2014 (DG RTD) S: RTD A6 EU policy in the field of research, innovation and higher education. Independent Expert Group, set up by DG RTD Experts (12) representing academia and research performing organisations, businesses and entrepreneurs as well as investors. DG RTD B.1. Innovation Union policy 6 meetings Objective: to support the development of a comprehensive policy approach on OI and KT (cf. ERA). The experts delivered in-depth analyses on the topic of OI and KT, and advice on the final OI and KT recommendations Expert Group Private experts RTD.B.7 4/year The group helped identify existing indicators and propose new indicators that can measure impacts of RRI activities undertaken by, both in qualitative and quantitative terms. It will furthermore reflect on ways to frame RRI activities along work on R&I systems / Mutual learning Helsinki Group work was aligned with work of ERAC Working Group on Knowledge Transfer. DG RTD /

12 25. Expert group to support the reflection and future policy making in the Science Education sector in Europe 26. TRUSTFORES IGHT: "Trust at Risk? Foresight on the Medium- Term Implications for European, and Innovation SMART objectives (Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant and Timely). Report to be published soon Expert Group Private experts RTD.B.7 6/year The group carried out work on the state of affairs, give a complete picture of science education in Europe and it will provide feedback on new policy actions and initiatives to be undertaken, based also on the identification and description of advancements. It will equally feed in the European Commission's future strategy in the framework of the new ''Science with and for Society (SWAFS)'' Work Programmes ( ). Report to be published soon Advisory body to (DG RTD) Private experts C: G Hermerén S: RTD A6 3 meetings (completed) Advice reporting on weak signals that trust may be at risk, evaluate the weak signals in terms of reliability and potential impacts on society, and to draw implications for Horizon 2020 Possible links with SGHRM N/A DG RTD /

13 Policies 27. JHEB: "Junction of Health, Environment & Bio-economy: Foresight and Implications for European and Innovation Policies Advisory body to (DG RTD) Key: Listed in Commission Expert Register Private experts C: W Stahel S: RTD A6 4 meetings (completed) Provide foresight input at the junction of several fields: health, environment and bio-economy. N/A DG RTD /

14 Annex 2: / other expert ERA PRIORITIES Group Other Expert Groups with work linked to Priority 1 EFFECTIVE NATIONAL RESEARCH SYSTEMS ERAC Start-up phase of the Policy Support Facility: Mutual learning exercise on business R&I investments Peer review of Bulgarian R&I system Pre-Peer review of Hungarian R&I system [, Innovation and Science Expert (RISE) HLG] 2(A) - JOINTLY ADDRESSING GRAND CHALLENGES 2(B) - MAKE OPTIMAL USE OF PUBLIC INVESTMENTS IN RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURES 3 - AN OPEN LABOUR MARKET FOR RESEARCHERS 4 - GENDER EQUALITY AND GENDER MAINSTREAMING IN RESEARCH GPC ESFRI SGHRM Helsinki Expert Group on Evaluation of Joint Programming to address Grand Societal Challenges Horizon 2020 on European Infrastructures including e-infrastructures [ and Science Cloud (starting mid 2015)] Horizon 2020 for the Marie Skłodowska-Curie actions on skills, research career development (DG EAC), in particular sub on research career development + doctoral training and skills; gender balance; mobility and international cooperation; Horizon 2020 on Gender DG RTD /

15 5 OPTIMAL CIRCULATION AND TRANSFER OF SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE ERAC WG Knowledge Transfer The Digital ERA Forum (DERAF) (DG CNECT) National Points of Reference for scientific information ERAC Open Access and Innovation Task Force [Open Science Charter (starting mid 2015)] [Open Innovation Strategy and Policy Group (DG CNECT)] [Enterprise Policy Group Working group on Innovation (DG GROW)] 6 INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION SFIC Horizon 2020 on International Cooperation DG RTD /