III. United States Patent (19) Ciofi et al. Assignee: Amati Communications Corporation, interleaving differently to input signals from a plurality of

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "III. United States Patent (19) Ciofi et al. Assignee: Amati Communications Corporation, interleaving differently to input signals from a plurality of"

Transcription

1 United States Patent (19) Ciofi et al. III USOO A 11 Patent Number: (45) Date of Patent: Jan. 21, (75) (73) 21 22) (51) (52) 58) 56 MULTICARRIER MODULATION TRANSMISSION SYSTEM WITH VARABLE DELAY Inventors: John M. Ciofi, Cupertino; Po Tong, Fremont, James T. Aslanis, Mountain View; Antoinette H. Gooch, Palo Alto, all of Calif. Assignee: Amati Communications Corporation, San Jose, Calif. Appl. No.: 107,0 Fed: Aug. 17, 1993 Int. Cl.... HO4K 1/10 U.S. Cl /260; ; 371/35 Field of Search /38, 39; 371/38.1, 371/39.1, 43, 35 References Cited U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS 4,394,642 7/1983 Currie et al /347 DD 4,677,625 6/1987 Betts et al ,747,104 5/1988 Piret... 37/39 4,852,102 7/1989 Yamaguchi. 371/40 4,980,897 12/1990 Decker et al. 375/38 5,105,442 4/1992 Wei /39 5,107,504 4/1992 Nakamura et al /37.1 5,243,629 9/1993 Wei /43 5,251,236 10/1993 Brehmer et al /59 5,282,019 1/1994 Basile et al /473 5,287,374 2/1994 Parr ,5,352 4/1994 Calderbank et al.. 375/39 5,321,725 6/1994 Paik et al /39 5,392,0 2/1995 Borth et al /43 OTHER PUBLICATIONS Bingham, "Multicarrier Modulation for Data Transmission: An Idea Whose Time Has Come', IEEE Communications Magazine, pp. 5-(May 1990). Chow et al., A Discrete Multitone Transceiver System for HDSL Applications", IEEE Journal on Selected Area in Communications, vol. 9, No. 6, pp (Aug. 1991). Chow et al., "Performance Evaluation of a Multichannel Transceiver System for ADSL and VHDSL Services", IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 9, No. 6, pp (Aug. 1991). Fleming et al., ADSL. The On-Ramp to the Information Highway', Telephony, pp., (Jul. 1993). Clark et al., Interleaver Structures for Coded Systems', Error-Correction Coding for Digital Communications, Sec tion 8.3, pp Primary Examiner-Stephen Chin Assistant Examiner T. Ghebretinsae Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Hickman Beyer & Weaver, LLP 57) ABSTRACT A transmission system using multicarrier modulation applies FECC (forward error correcting code) coding and codeword interleaving differently to input signals from a plurality of different data channels to produce encoded data signals having different reliabilities and different coding delays. Bits of encoded data signals having relatively less delay are allocated to carriers that are subject to relatively more attenuation and/or channel noise, and hence that are allo cated fewer bits for transmission in each symbol period, to reduce the effects of impulse noise. The data channels can comprise video, data, and control channels transmitted on an ADSL (asymmetric digital subscriber line) two-wire tele phone line. 22 Claims, 3 Drawing Sheets NPUT DATA CHANNES SWITCH BUFFER ADD PREFX POTS INTERFACE, FILTER, A-D, FER REMOVE PREFIX FEG, BUFFER 50 BIT SORTER TRELLS DECODER e? D-A, FILTER, INTERFACE SWITCH POTS OUTPUT DATA CHANNES

2 U.S. Patent Jan. 21, 1997 Sheet 1 of 3 NCIS OEC?IA TlOH. LNO NOSH TOHI NOO -61-I NOSI OEC?IA TOHI NOO NOSI TlOH NOO

3 U.S. Patent Jan. 21, 1997 Sheet 2 of 3 HELHOS SITTEIHIL HEGJOO HO_LINAS HO_LINAS SITTEHL HECJOOBC] HB LHOS #792909#793G [ldni \/LV/C)] STEINNVHO

4 U.S. Patent Jan. 21, 1997 Sheet 3 of 3 FAST 74 MICRO PROCESSOR CONTROL UNIT RAM SLOW TRELLIS CODER Fig RAM TOFFT TRELS CODER

5 1. MULTICARRIER MODULATION TRANSMISSION SYSTEM WITH VARIABLE DELAY This invention relates to transmission systems using multicarrier modulation, also known as discrete multitone (DMT) modulation where, as is desirable, the modulation is effected using a discrete Fourier Transform. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION The principles of multicarrier modulation are described for example in "Multicarrier Modulation For Data Trans mission: An Idea Whose Time Has Come' by John A. C. Bingham, IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol. 28, No. 5, pages 5-14, May As is known, in a transmission system using multicarrier modulation, FDM (frequency division multiplex) carriers spaced within a usable fre quency band of a transmission channel, forming a set of subchannels, are modulated at a block or symbol transmis sion rate of the system. The bits of input data for transmis sion within each block or symbol period are allocated to the carriers or subchannels so that the bit error rates of the subchannels as monitored at the receiver, are substantially equal. As a result, the different subchannels carry different numbers of bits in each symbol period. With an appropriate allocation of bits and transmit powers to the carriers or subchannels, such a system provides a desirable perfor aicc. The characteristics and performance of one such system, for communicating data at a rate of 1.6 Mb/s over a twisted pair channel using 256 subchannels, is described in "A Discrete Multitone Transceiver System For HDSL Applica tions by J. S. Chow et al., IEEE Journal On Selected Areas In Communications, Vol. 9, No. 6, pages , August A companion paper by P. S. Chow et al. entitled "Performance Evaluation Of A Multichannel Transceiver System For ADSL and VHDSL Services', at pages of the same publication, addresses a similar system applied to an asymmetric digital subscriber line (ADSL). An article by S. Fleming et al. entitled "ADSL.: The on-ramp to the information highway', Telephony, Jul. 12, 1993, pages 26 describes one example of an ADSL arrangement applied to a two-wire telephone subscriberline, in which four asymmetric 1.5 Mb/s channels are provided for transmission in a downstream direction from a telephone CO (central office) to a subscriber, in addition to various data channels and POTS (plain old telephone service) carried symmetrically (i.e. bidirectionally) on the line. The data channels for example comprise an ISDN (integrated services digital network) H0 channel at 384 kb/s or an ISDN basic access channel at 144 kb/s, and a control channel for example at a bit rate of 16 kb/s. The four asymmetric channels provide a total bandwidth of 6 Mb/s that can be used for digital video signals. A well known problem in the art of transmission systems is that of impulse noise, which can produce bursts of errors on transmission channels. In order to address this problem, it is known to apply forward error correction coding (FECC) and interleaving techniques in which a block of input data to be transmitted is augmented with parity data that enables one or more errors in the block to be detected and corrected, the input data and parity data constituting a codeword, and over time parts of different codewords are interleaved for transmission to reduce the effect of error bursts on individual codewords. For example, Currie et al. U.S. Pat. No. 4,394, issued Jul. 19, 1983 and entitled "Apparatus For Inter leaving and De-Interleaving Data describes one such arrangement. The interleaving can instead be convolutional interleaving, for example as described in Section of "Error-Correction Coding for Digital Communications" by George C. Clark, Jr. and J. Bibb Cain, Plenum Press, pages The use of FECC increases the bit rate required of the actual transmission system in dependence upon the parity overhead, i.e. the size of the parity data relative to the codeword size, and increases complexity. The interleaving process increases immunity to error bursts due to impulse noise, but adds transmission delay. Longer periods over which the interleaving is effected result in greater immunity to impulse noise, but greater transmission delays. Thus there is a trade-off between high reliability (requiring effective error correction and immunity to impulse noise) and short transmission delay. Different types of signals, which may be required to be transmitted via a single transmission system, may have different requirements for reliability and transmission delay. For example, digital video signals that are highly com pressed require a high reliability for their transmission, and ISDN voice signals must meet strict transmission delay requirements. In known transmission systems, it has been necessary to provide a compromise between high reliability and transmission delay for different types of signals. It is also known to apply trellis code modulation (TCM) techniques to a system using multicarrier modulation in order to improve the performance of the system through the coding gain provided by the trellis coding. For example, Decker et al. U.S. Pat, No. 4,980,897 issued Dec. 25, 1990 and entitled "Multi-Channel Trellis Encoder/Decoder' dis closes such a system in which the encoding and decoding processes operate on all of the subchannels sequentially in order to reduce delay. As is well known, TCM results in sequences of transmitted signal constellation points that have a greatly increased separation, hence the improved performance, and necessitates more complex decoding involving maximum likelihood sequence estimation, usually implemented using the Viterbialgorithm. The performance improvements that are provided by TCM and by FECC as described above are largely indepen dent of one another, so that TCM and FECC can be used together in a transmission system. In Betts et al. U.S. Pat. No. 4,677,625 issued Jun., 1987 and entitled "Distributed Trellis Encoder' there is described an FECC arrangement in which interleaving is effected by switching among a plurality of trellis coders with delay units, with corresponding switching among a plurality of trellis decoders at a receiver. The use of a plurality of encoders and decoders in such a manner undesirably adds to the costs and complexity of the arrangement. The Betts et al. patent relates to a transmission system using QAM (quadra ture amplitude modulation) of a single carrier, and not to a transmission system using multicarrier modulation. An object of this invention is to provide an improved transmission system using multicarrier modulation. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION According to one aspect of this invention there is pro vided a data transmission system using multicarrier modu FECC (forward error correction code) coding and codeword interleaving apparatus arranged for differently encoding a plurality of data signals to provide a

6 3 plu through the coding and interleaving apparatus; and a modu lator arranged to modulate bits of the encoded data signals onto multiple carriers of the transmission system, different numbers of bits in each transmission symbol period being allocated to different carriers. The different delays through the coding and interleaving apparatus correspond to different levels of coding and/or interleaving and hence to different degrees of reliability of the transmitted signals, especially with respect to their immunity to impulse noise, the least delayed signals being the most vulnerable to impulse noise. Thus each signal to be transmitted can be communicated with an individually selected compromise between high reliability and short transmission delay. In order to compensate for the greater vulnerability of the least delayed (i.e. least interleaved) signals to impulse noise, preferably the modulator is arranged to allocate bits of encoded data signals having relatively less interleaving to carriers carrying relatively fewer bits in each symbol period. The greater transmission attenuation of such carriers, which for signal transmission are compensated for by the allocation of fewer bits in each symbol period, acts to advantage in also attenuating the impulse noise. The coding and interleaving apparatus can comprise a plurality of data paths providing the encoded data signals with different delays, and a switch for switching different data signals to different data paths. In an embodiment of the system described below, the coding and interleaving apparatus comprises a first Store for storing the plurality of data signals, a second store, an FECC coder coupled between an output of the first store and an input of the second store, and a control unit for controlling the supply of data signals from the first store to the coder and for controlling storage of FECC codewords from the coder into the second store to provide codeword interleaving. The coder can be a programmable FECC coder arranged to be programmed by the control unit to provide different coding for different data signals, and the control unit can provide different depths of interleaving for the FECC codewords of different data signals. In this case the modulator preferably comprises a table for providing indices of the carriers in order of the number of bits in each transmission symbol period allocated to the carriers, means for reading the respective number of bits for each carrier from the second store in order of the different delays through the coding and interleaving apparatus, and sorting means for supplying the respective bits for modula tion onto the respective carriers. The multicarrier modulation is preferably implemented using a discrete Fourier Transform and preferably incorpo rates trellis coding. Accordingly the modulator preferably comprises a trellis coder, apparatus for providing an Inverse Fast Fourier Transform (IFFT), a table for providing indices of the carriers in order of the number of bits in each transmission symbol period allocated to the carriers, means for reading the respective number of bits for each carrier from the second store to the trellis coder in order of the different delays through the coding and interleaving appa ratus, and a sorter for supplying signal amplitudes Supplied by the trellis coder to storage locations of the IFFT apparatus identified by the respective carrier indices. According to another aspect, the invention provides a data transmission system using multicarrier modulation, com prising: apparatus for applying FECC (forward error cor rection code) coding and codeword interleaving differently to different data signals to produce encoded data signals with different delays; and means for allocating the encoded data signals to the multiple carriers in dependence upon said delays and in accordance with a predetermined criterion. Preferably the predetermined criterion comprises trans mission attenuation of and/or noise on the carriers, bits of the encoded data signals having relatively less delay being allocated to carriers that are subject to relatively more attenuation and/or noise. Alteratively, the predetermined criterion may comprise the signal-to-noise ratios of the carriers, or another characteristic of the carriers or the transmitted signals that can be monitored by the transmis sion system, and may take into account a desired distribution of error rates among the carriers. The invention also provides a method of modulating multiple carriers with signals of a plurality of data channels, comprising the steps of: applying FECC (forward error correcting code) coding and codeword interleaving differ ently to signals of different data channels to produce encoded data signals having different delays; and modulat ing different numbers of bits of the encoded data signals onto different carriers. Preferably the modulating step includes the step of allo cating bits of the encoded data signals having relatively less delay to carriers carrying relatively fewer bits. Preferably the step of applying FECC coding and code word interleaving comprises the steps of: storing signals of the different data channels; sequentially FECC coding the stored signals to produce FECC codewords; and storing the FECC codewords in an interleaved manner, the interleaving being different for the codewords of the different data channels. The modulating step preferably also includes the step of trellis coding the bits of the encoded data signals. The invention further extends to a method of modulating multiple carriers with signals of a plurality of data channels, comprising the steps of: applying FECC (forward error correction code) coding and codeword interleaving differ ently to signals of different data channels to produce encoded data signals having different coding delays; and allocating the encoded data signals to the carriers in depen dence upon the coding delays and in accordance with a predetermined criterion. Conveniently the predetermined criterion comprises transmission attenuation of and/or noise on the carriers, bits of the encoded data signals having relatively less delay being allocated to carriers that are subject to relatively more attenuation and/or noise. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS The invention will be further understood from the fol lowing description with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which: FIG. 1 illustrates a block diagram of an ADSL transmis sion system using multicarrier modulation in accordance with an embodiment of this invention; FIG. 2 illustrates a functional block diagram of a down stream transmitter, provided at a telephone CO, and a downstream receiver, provided at a subscriber's premises, of the system of FIG. 1; FIG. 3 illustrates a block diagram of an embodiment of parts of the downstream transmitter; and FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating the operation of parts of the downstream transmitter. DETALED DESCRIPTION Referring to FIG. 1, an ADSL transmission system com prises a telephone central office (CO) transceiver 10 and

7 5 6 remote terminal (RT) transceiver 12, linked via a channel 14 The number of bits carried by each subchannel in each providing a downstream transmission path 16, from a down symbol period can be zero (i.e. the subchannel is not being stream transmitter (Tx) 18 in the CO to a downstream used) or can vary from a minimum number, for example 1 receiver (RX) in the RT, and an upstream transmission or 2 bits, to a maximum number, for example in a range from path 22 from an upstream transmitter 24 in the RT to an 5 10 to 16 bits. Because the subchannels carry variable num upstream receiver 26 in the CO. bers of bits, the total transmission rate of the system is not Signals transmitted in the downstream direction are indi fixed but can be increased or decreased to meet particular catcd by way of example as comprising digital video, ISDN, requirements. control, and POTS signals, and signals transmitted in the Signals from a plurality of input data channels, for upstream direction are indicated by way of example as 10 example information and control channels as discussed comprising ISDN, control, and POTS signals; other types of above, are supplied to inputs of the switch, which data may be transmitted in a similar manner. The system is switches these signals to one of a plurality of outputs each asymmetric in that the video signals, which require a large coupled to a respective one of the plurality of FECC coders bandwidth of for example 6 Mb/s as already discussed, are 32. Although two FECC coders 32 are shown in FIG. 2, a 15 transmitted only in the downstream direction. The other different number of such coders may alternatively be pro signals, transmitted in both directions, require a much vided. Each FECC coder 32 provides a respective degree of smaller bandwidth. In addition to these signals, an opera FECC coding and interleaving, and hence reliability of the tions control channel (OPC) provides for transmission in data signals that it encodes, and a corresponding transmis both directions on the channel 14 between the transceivers sion delay. The switch switches the data signals to the 10 and 12 of control signals required for operation of the respective outputs and hence FECC coders in accordance transceivers as described below. with latency (i.e. transmission delay) and reliability require The channel 14 is for example a two-wire telephone ments for the respective signals. As already indicated, such subscriber line on which the POTS signals are transmitted in requirements can vary for different types of signals, and for a low frequency band below about 10 khz and on which the signals on a single channel at different times. 25 other signals are transmitted by multicarrier modulation at The particular characteristics of the individual FECC higher frequencies. The downstream and upstream signals coders 32 are not important to the invention, but the different can be separated by frequency division multiplexing or coders have different degrees of interleaving so that the using echo cancellation techniques. transmitted data signals have different susceptibilities to Referring to FIG. 2, the downstream transmitter 18 func impulse noise as discussed further below. For example, one tionally comprises a switch, one or more FECC (forward of the FECC coders 32 may provide coding with relatively error correcting code) coders 32 two of which are illustrated, short term or no interleaving, or even may be omitted data buffers 34, a trellis coder 36 having an associated bit entirely, thus propagating data signals with little or no delay and energy allocation table 38 and a carrier index table 40, but with a relatively high susceptibility to impulse noise, and a sorter 42, an Inverse Fast Fourier Transform (IFFT) the other of the coders 32 may provide coding with inter 35 apparatus 44 including a buffer at its input and a prefix adder leaving over relatively long periods, thereby propagating at its output, and a digital-to-analog converter, analog filter, data signals with a high immunity to impulse noise but with and line interface block 46. Conversely, the downstream a relatively long delay. receiver comprises a line interface, analog filter, and The data signal codewords output from the FECC coders analog-to-digital converter block 48 that is assumed also to 32 are buffered in the buffers 34, which are represented in include a digital filter, an FFT apparatus 50 including a FIG. 2 as being divided into relatively fast, i.e. short delay, prefix remover at its input and frequency domain equalizers buffers and relatively slow, or long delay, buffers, corre (FEQ) and a buffer at its output, a sorter 52, a trellis decoder sponding to the respective interleaving periods associated 54, operating in accordance with the Viterbialgorithm to with the respective FECCs 32. In practice, as described perform maximum likelihood sequence estimation in known 45 below, the storage in the buffers 34 is used in implementing manner, having an associated bit allocation table 56 and the FECC interleaving. The units 36 to 42 serve to read bits carrier index table 58, data buffers 60, one or more FECC of the codewords from the buffers 34, implement trellis decoders 62 complementary to the coders 32, and a switch coding, and supply the resulting amplitudes to the IFFT 64. apparatus 44 in each transmission symbol period for trans The components 44 to 50 form a multicarrier modulation 50 mission via the multicarrier subchannels. The operation of or DMT transmission system of generally known form, to the units 36 to 42 is described further below. which system the components 36, 38,54, and 56 add trellis Conversely, in the receiver amplitudes produced by the coding and decoding in generally known manner. In this FFT apparatus 50 are converted by the units 52 and 54 to system data signals, constituted by the video, ISDN, control, codeword bits that are supplied to the buffers 60, the and OPC signals represented in FIG. 1, are frequency 55 codewords being de-interleaved and decoded by the FECC division multiplexed at frequencies above about 10 khz, i.e. decoders 62, each of which operates in a complementary above the frequencies of POTS telephone signals that are manner to a respective one of the FECC coders 32. From the supplied to and derived from the blocks 46 and 48 and are FECC decoders 62 the decoded data signals are supplied to separated by the analog filters within these blocks. respective output data channels via the switch 64. By way of example, the DMT system may have Although details of the units 44 to 50 are not significant carriers with a frequency spacing of 4 khz, the discrete to the present invention, it is noted here that the prefix added Fourier transform accordingly having a length of N=512, at the output of the IFFT apparatus 44 consists of a repetition with a symbol period of 250 us and about 1700 bits per of information from the end of a data block in order to symbol to provide a total transmission rate of about 6.8 provide a guard space to eliminate interference from one Mb/s, with each carrier or subchannel carrying a number of 65 transmitted symbol to the next. The digital filter in the block bits in each symbol period that depends on the characteris 48 is a time domain equalizer in the form of a finite impulse tics (e.g. signal to noise ratio, or SNR) of the subchannel. response filter that limits such interference to less than the

8 7 length of the prefix, the prefix then being removed or subtracted at the input of the FFT apparatus 50 thereby eliminating the interference. The frequency domain equal ization (FEQ) at the output of the FFT apparatus 50 operates individually on each subchannel and adaptively adjusts for the attenuation and delay of each carrier. In addition it is observed that, while preferred, the use of trellis coded modulation is not essential to the invention. Accordingly the trellis coder 36, which converts data bits from the buffers 34 into scaled amplitudes for the IFFT apparatus 36 as well as implementing the trellis coding, may be replaced by simpler apparatus for converting data bits into scaled amplitudes without any trellis coding, with a complementary replacement of the trellis decoder 54. As is well known and discussed above, in each symbol period of a system using multicarrier modulation different subchannels carry different numbers of bits, in accordance with the SNR of the respective subchannels. Typically, it may be desired for all of the subchannels to have substan tially the same SNR as monitored at the receiver, and this is assumed by way of example in the remainder of this description, but other distributions of SNR among subchan nels may be desirable and can alteratively be provided. The SNR of each subchannel is dependent upon the attenuation and the noise level of the subchannel. Accordingly, subchan nels with a relatively high attenuation or noise level are allocated relatively fewer bits, and hence a greater signal point spacing at the transmitter, than subchannels with a relatively low attenuation or noise level. Due to the different subchannel attenuations, the signal point spacing at the receiver (and the bit error rate) is approximately the same for all of the subchannels. Thus the characteristics of the Sub channels are substantially compensated for by an appropri ate distribution of the number of bits carried by each subchannel. The invention recognizes that impulse noise can be coupled onto the transmission path at any point along its length, and from its coupling point to the receiver is subjected to the same frequency-dependent attenuation as the data signals. (Impulse noise may also be introduced in the transmitter 10 as a result of clipping in digital logic or at the digital-to-analog converter, this possibly being intro duced deliberately in order to reduce implementation costs.) Consequently, impulse noise that appears on the relatively more attenuating subchannels, which carry relatively fewer bits in each symbol period, is relatively more attenuated at the receiver. It follows that subchannels carrying relatively fewer bits in each symbol period are less susceptible to impulse noise (because of the greater attenuation) than subchannels carrying relatively more bits in each symbol period. In order to provide the best possible overall performance, corresponding to all of the data signals having substantially the same immunity to impulse noise, the invention matches those data signals that are the most susceptible to impulse noise, by virtue of interleaving of the FECC codewords over relatively shorter periods, with the subchannels that have the most attenuation (and hence carry the fewest number of bits in each symbol period) and hence on which the impulse noise is most attenuated so that it has the least effect at the receiver. To this end, in the transmitter 18, the index table 40 is arranged to store the index, or number, i of each subchannel sorted in order of increasing number of bits b, (from the minimum number to the maximum number as discussed above) per symbol period allocated to the subchannels. In each symbol period, the sorted indices i are read in turn from the index table 40 and used to address the table 38, and are supplied to the sorter 42. The allocated number of bits to be used for the respective subchannel, and an energy Scale factor for the subchannel, are accordingly read from the table 38 and supplied to the trellis coder 36, which reads the allocated number of bits from the buffers 34 starting with the fastest (least interleaving and delay) buffer and progressing gradually through all of the bits to be read and transmitted in the symbol period, ending with the slowest (most inter leaving and delay) buffer. For each subchannel index i the trellis coder 36 produces amplitudes, representing a signal point in a constellation of 2 signal points and scaled in accordance with the energy scale factor for the subchannel, which are written by the sorter 42 into a position i in the buffer at the input of the IFFT apparatus 44. In the receiver, the index table 58 is the same as the index table 40, and the bit allocation table 56 stores the same allocations of number of bits for each subchannel as the table 38. As in the transmitter, in each symbol period the sorted indices i are read in turn from the index table 58, are supplied to the sorter 52, and are used to address the table 56. The allocated number of bits used for the respective subchannel i are read from the table 56 and supplied to the trellis decoder 54, which reads the amplitudes from the position i in the output buffer of the FFT apparatus 50 as identified by the sorter 52 and supplies the relevant number of bits to the buffers 60, starting in each symbol period with the fastest (least interleaving and delay) buffer and progress ing gradually to the slowest (most interieaving and delay) buffer. The operation of the FECC decoders 62 and the Switch 64 is the inverse of the coders 32 and switch. The various units in the transceivers 10 and 12 can be implemented in various ways, using arrangements of hard ware and/or software. FIG. 3 illustrates by way of example a block diagram of one embodiment of the units to 42, and the buffer at the input of the IFFT apparatus 44, of the downstream transmitter 18. Referring to FIG. 3, a microprocessor control unit 68, which may comprise one or more microprocessors such as digital signal processors for carrying out respective func tions, is coupled via various control paths to a RAM (random access memory) 70 that operates as the switch in FIG. 2, a programmable FECC coder 72 that constitutes the plurality of FECC coders 32 in FIG. 2, a RAM 74 that corresponds to the buffers 34, a trellis coder 76 correspond ing to the trellis coder 36, and a RAM78 that constitutes the buffer at the input of the IFFT apparatus 44 in FIG. 2. The RAM 70, shown with multiple inputs for simplicity, is supplied at its input with the input data channels and OPC data from the control unit 68 via a path 80, and the control unit 68 is supplied with information from the control chan nel (e.g. for selecting between high reliability and short delay for the transmitted data channels) via a path 82 and with OPC data from the receiver 26 (FIG. 1) via a path 84. The RAM 70 is controlled by the control unit 68 to operate as a plurality of FIFOs (first-in, first-out buffers) or elastic stores in which data from the various input data channels is stored and from which the data is read to the coder 72. The control unit 68 monitors the difference between input and output pointers for each FIFO and uses known stuffing techniques to synchronize the input data channel signals to a common multicarrier transmission clock.

9 9 The programmable FECC coder 72 is a conventional Reed-Solomon FECC coder using the polynomial generator where R is the number of redundant FECC check bytes, o, is a root of the primitive polynomial x+x+x+x+1, and Z is the polynomial variable. The coder 72 is programmed by the control unit 68 to perform sequentially the functions of the plurality of FECC coders 32 in FIG. 2, and R can be different for different FIFOS of the RAM 70. The resulting FECC codewords are stored in the RAM 74 under the control of the control unit 68, which also imple ments convolutional interleaving of at least some of the codewords in storing them in the part of the RAM identified as "slow'. The codewords stored in the part of the RAM 74 identified as "fast' are relatively undelayed, either not being interleaved or being interleaved over short periods. Thus the designation of the fast and slow parts of the RAM 74 refer to the time required for the FECC coded data to become available at the output of the RAM 74 after the FECC codeword interleaving that is implemented on that data. In the interleaving process, the k-th byte in each FECC code word is delayed by 1+(d-1)k bytes, where d is an integer referred to as the depth of interleaving. Obviously, the greater the depth d of interleaving, the longer is the trans mission delay before the input data can be read from the RAM 74, and the control unit 68 can determine an individual value of d as desired for the different input data channels. The control unit 68 also implements the index table 40 and the bit and energy allocation table 38 represented in FIG. 2, and maintains this information current through commu nications via the OPC (which communications also pass through the FECC coder 72). The control unit 68 reads data bits from the RAM 74 to the trellis coder 76, and stores the resulting amplitudes in the appropriate locations in the IFFT RAM 78, in accordance with the data in these tables and in the manner already described. A complementary arrangement can be provided in the receiver, it being noted that in this case the de-interleav ing is carried out in a manner that leaves the codeword boundaries for the interleaved codewords intact to facilitate decoding of the different codewords using a common decoder, FIG. 4 diagrammatically further illustrates the operation of the arrangement described above for transferring data bits from the RAM 74 to the trellis coder 76 and for transferring the consequent amplitudes from the trellis coder 76 into the RAM78, in accordance with information stored in the tables 38 and 40. As indicated in FIG. 4, the table 40 has 256 locations, hexadecimal 00 to FF, which store the subchannel indices i in order of increasing numbers of bits allocated to the subchannels. Likewise, the table 38 has 256 locations 00 to FF each of which stores for the respective subchannel the number of bits allocated to the subchannel (and the energy scale factor, not represented in FIG. 4), and the RAM 78 has 256 locations 00 to FF for storing the amplitudes supplied by the trellis coder 76 for the respective subchannels. For example, location 59 in the index table 40 stores the channel index 75, for which 4 bits are allocated in the table 38. The next (in sequential order) location 5A in the table 40 contains the channel index 84, for which a higher number (5) bits are allocated in the table 38. The next location 5B in the table 40 stores the channel index 76, for which 5 bits are allocated in the table 38, and so on In each symbol period, the locations of the table 40 are addressed sequentially from 00 to FF to read out the respec tive subchannel indices, and these are used to address the table 38 and the RAM 78. The number of bits identified for each channel index by the table 40 are read from the RAM 74, a read address pointer for this RAM being incremented by this number of bits in a direction from the "fast' (least delayed data) to the "slow' (most delayed data) end of this RAM 74 as indicated by a downwardly pointing arrow in FIG. 4. The trellis coder 76 produces the coded and energy scaled amplitudes from these bits, and these are stored in the RAM 78 at the address of the subchannel supplied from the index table 40. It can be seen that the embodiment of the invention described above provides two significant improvements over known transmission systems using multicarrier modu lation. Firstly, it provides different levels of FECC coding and, especially, interleaving that can be used for different types of data signals. Thus a digital video signal, which may be highly compressed and therefore which is particularly vul nerable to errors, can be transmitted in a very reliable manner with a high degree of FECC coding and interleaving over relatively long time periods, and hence with a relatively long transmission delay, which is not a significant factor for video signals. In contrast, a voice signal, which may for example be included within an ISDN data stream, and which is relatively insensitive to errors but for which long trans mission delays are not tolerable, can be transmitted with little or no FECC coding and interleaving, and hence little transmission delay, but with a reduced immunity to impulse noise due to the interleaving being omitted or carried out over short time periods. With appropriate selection of the values of R and d under the control of the control unit 68 as described above, each type of data signal can be transmitted with the best compromise, individually for that type of signal, between reliability and transmission delay. Secondly, having compensated for the different charac teristics of the subchannels by allocating different numbers of bits for transmission in different subchannels, the system then allocates the data signals that are the most vulnerable to errors due to impulse noise, i.e. the data signals that are to be transmitted with the least delay and hence with no interleaving or with interleaving over the shortest time periods, to the subchannels that carry the fewest bits, and hence are the least susceptible to impulse noise because of their relatively higher attenuation. Although a particular embodiment of the invention has been described in detail, it should be appreciated that numerous modifications, variations, and adaptations may be made without departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the claims. For example, the numbers of bits allocated to the different subchannels may be determined also to take into account factors other than the SNR monitored at the receiver, for example subchannels at low frequencies may be assigned relatively fewer bits to reduce the effects of interference with POTS signals, and the allocation of numbers of bits to subchannels may also be weighted in accordance with other factors such as sources of interference. Accordingly, the sorting of subchannels in the index tables 40 and 58 may be modified to suit particular requirements; for example it may be in accordance with actual subchannel attenuations or SNRs monitored at the receiver, rather than in accordance with the number of bits allocated to the subchannels. In any event, the index tables 40 and 58 sort the subchannels into a generally non-sequential order which is determined to be

10 11 desirable to reduce the effects of impulse noise on those data signals which, due to their requirements for the least trans mission delays, are the least interleaved and hence are the most susceptible to impulse noise. What is claimed is: 1. A data transmission system using multicarrier modu encoding a plurality of data Signals to provide a plu through the coding and interleaving apparatus, the coding and interleaving apparatus comprises a plurality of data paths providing the encoded data signals with different delays, and a switch for switching different data signals to different data paths; and symbol period being allocated to different carriers. 2. A data transmission system using multicarrier modu encoding a plurality of data signals to provide a plu through the coding and interleaving apparatus, the coding and interleaving apparatus comprises a first store for storing the plurality of data signals, a second store, an FECC coder coupled between an output of the first store and an input of the second store, and a control unit for controlling the supply of data signals from the first store to the coder and for controlling storage of FECC codewords from the coder into the second store to provide codeword interleaving; and symbol period being allocated to different carriers. 3. A data transmission system as claimed in claim 2 wherein the coder is a programmable FECC coder arranged to be programmed by the control unit to provide different coding for different data signals. 4. A data transmission system as claimed in claim 2 wherein the control unit provides different depths of inter leaving for the FECC codewords of different data signals. 5. A data transmission system using multicarrier modu encoding a plurality of data signals to provide a plu through the coding and interleaving apparatus; and symbol period being allocated to different carriers, the modulator comprises apparatus for providing an Inverse Fast Fourier Transform. 6. A data transmission system using multicarrier modu encoding a plurality of data signals to provide a plu through the coding and interleaving apparatus; and symbol period being allocated to different carriers, the modulator comprises a trellis coder. 7. A data transmission system using multicarrier modu encoding a plurality of data signals to provide a plu through the coding and interleaving apparatus, the coding and interleaving apparatus comprises a plurality of data paths providing the encoded data signals with different delays, and a switch for switching different data signals to different data paths; and symbol period being allocated to different carriers, and the modulator is arranged to allocate bits of encoded data signals having relatively less interleaving to car riers carrying relatively fewer bits in each symbol period. 8. A data transmission system using multicarrier modu encoding a plurality of data signals to provide a plu through the coding and interleaving apparatus the cod ing and interleaving apparatus comprises a first store for storing the plurality of data signals, a second store, an FECC coder coupled between an output of the first store and an input of the second store, and a control unit for controlling the supply of data signals from the first store to the coder and for controlling storage of FECC codewords from the coder into the second store to provide codeword interleaving; and symbol period being allocated to different carriers, and the modulator is arranged to allocate bits of encoded data signals having relatively less interleaving to car riers carrying relatively fewer bits in each symbol period. 9. A data transmission system as claimed in claim 8 wherein the coder is a programmable FECC coder arranged to be programmed by the control unit to provide different coding for different data signals. 10. A data transmission system as claimed in claim 8 wherein the control unit provides different depths of inter leaving for the FECC codewords of different data signals. 11. A data transmission system as claimed in claim 8 wherein the modulator comprises a table for providing indices of the carriers in order of the number of bits in each transmission symbol period allocated to the carriers, means for reading the respective number of bits for each carrier from the second store in order of the different delays through the coding and interleaving apparatus, and sorting means for supplying the respective bits for modulation onto the respec tive carriers. 12. A data transmission system as claimed in claim 8 wherein the modulator comprises a trellis coder, apparatus for providing an Inverse Fast Fourier Transform (IFFT), a table for providing indices of the carriers in order of the

11 13 14 number of bits in each transmission symbol period allocated 18. A method as claimed in claim 17 wherein the modu to the carriers, means for reading the respective number of lating step includes the step of trellis coding the bits of the bits for each carrier from the second store to the trellis coder encoded data signals. in order of the different delays through the coding and 19. A method for transmitting data signals to at least one interleaving apparatus, and a sorter for supplying signal 5 receiver using multiple carriers, comprising: amplitudes supplied by the trellis coder to storage locations receiving data signals to be transmitted from a plurality of of the IFFT apparatus identified by the respective carrier input data channels; indices. 13. A data transmission system using multicarrier modu- applying error correcting coding and interleaving such 10 that the degree of interleaving differs depending on the input data channel, thereby producing encoded data signals having different delays; encoding a plurality of data signals to provide a plu modulating different numbers of bits of the encoded data signals onto different carriers based on the susceptibil through the coding and interleaving apparatus; and 15 ity of the different channels to noise, thereby producing modulated data signals, the smaller the delay of the encoded data signals the fewer the number of bits said modulating uses when producing the modulated data signals for the different carriers; and transmitting the modulated data signals to the at least one receiver using the different carriers.. A method as claimed in claim 19 wherein the data signals received are digital signals, and the modulated data symbol period being allocated to different carriers, and the modulator being arranged to allocate bits of encoded data signals having relatively less interleaving to carriers carrying relatively fewer bits in each symbol period, the modulator comprises apparatus for provid ing an Inverse Fast Fourier Transform. 14. A data transmission system using multicarrier modu encoding a plurality of data signals to provide a plu through the coding and interleaving apparatus; and 35 symbol period being allocated to different carriers, and the modulator being arranged to allocate bits of encoded data signals having relatively less interleaving to carriers carrying relatively fewer bits in each symbol period, the modulator comprises a trellis coder A method of modulating multiple carriers with signals of a plurality of data channels, comprising the steps of: applying FECC (forward error correcting code) coding and codeword interleaving differently to signals of different data channels to produce encoded data signals 45 having different delays; and modulating different numbers of bits of the encoded data signals onto different carriers, wherein the step of applying FECC coding and codeword interleaving comprises the steps of: storing signals of the different data channels; sequentially FECC coding the stored signals to produce FECC codewords: and storing the FECC codewords in an interleaved manner, the interleaving being different for the codewords of 25 signals are converted to analog signals before they are transmitted. 21. A method for transmitting data signals to at least one receiver using multiple carriers, comprising: receiving data signals to be transmitted from a plurality of input data channels; applying error correcting coding and interleaving such that the degree of interleaving differs depending on the input data channel, thereby producing encoded data signals having different delays; modulating different numbers of bits of the encoded data signals onto different carriers based on the susceptibil ity of the different channels to noise, thereby producing modulated data signals; transmitting the modulated data signals to the at least one receiver using the different carriers; storing, for each of the carriers, a value corresponding to the number of bits allocated to the carrier; and sorting the carriers in accordance with the stored values. 22. A data transmission system using multicarrier modu 50 encoding a plurality of data signals to provide a plu through the coding and interleaving apparatus; and the different data channels. symbol period being allocated to different carriers, 16. A method as claimed in claim 15 wherein the modu- wherein the modulator comprises: lating step includes the step of trellis coding the bits of the a table for storing a value corresponding to the number encoded data signals. of bits allocated to the carriers; and A method as claimed in claim 15 wherein the modu- a sorter for sorting the carriers in accordance with the lating step includes the step of allocating bits of the encoded stored values. data signals having relatively less delay to carriers carrying relatively fewer bits. ck ck k k k

12 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION PATENT NO. : DATED January 21, 1997 INVENTOR(S) : CiOffi et al. it is certified that error appears in the above-indentified patent and that said Letters Patent is hereby corrected as shown below: Column 7, line 23, change "alteratively" to --alternatively--. Column 12, line 31, after "apparatus" insert Attest: Signed and Sealed this Twelfth Day of August, 1997 (a (eam BRUCELEHMAN Attesting Officer Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2002/ A1. Jin (43) Pub. Date: Sep. 26, 2002

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2002/ A1. Jin (43) Pub. Date: Sep. 26, 2002 US 2002O13632OA1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2002/0136320 A1 Jin (43) Pub. Date: Sep. 26, 2002 (54) FLEXIBLE BIT SELECTION USING TURBO Publication Classification

More information

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/ A1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/ A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/0193375 A1 Lee US 2006O193375A1 (43) Pub. Date: Aug. 31, 2006 (54) TRANSCEIVER FOR ZIGBEE AND BLUETOOTH COMMUNICATIONS (76)

More information

4,695,748 Sep. 22, 1987

4,695,748 Sep. 22, 1987 United States Patent [19] Kumamoto [11] Patent Number: [45] Date of Patent: Sep. 22, 1987 [54] COMPARING DEVICE [75] Inventor: Toshio Kumamoto, Itami, Japan [73] Assignee: Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha,

More information

58 Field of Search /372, 377, array are provided with respectively different serial pipe

58 Field of Search /372, 377, array are provided with respectively different serial pipe USOO5990830A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: Vail et al. (45) Date of Patent: Nov. 23, 1999 54 SERIAL PIPELINED PHASE WEIGHT 5,084,708 1/1992 Champeau et al.... 342/377 GENERATOR FOR PHASED

More information

xdsl Modulation Techniques

xdsl Modulation Techniques NEXTEP Broadband White Paper xdsl Modulation Techniques Methods of achieving spectrum-efficient modulation for high quality transmissions. A Nextep Broadband White Paper May 2001 Broadband Networks Group

More information

United States Patent (19)

United States Patent (19) United States Patent (19) McKinney et al. (11 Patent Number: () Date of Patent: Oct. 23, 1990 54 CHANNEL FREQUENCY GENERATOR FOR USE WITH A MULTI-FREQUENCY OUTP GENERATOR - (75) Inventors: Larry S. McKinney,

More information

United States Patent (19) PeSola et al.

United States Patent (19) PeSola et al. United States Patent (19) PeSola et al. 54) ARRANGEMENT FORTRANSMITTING AND RECEIVING RADIO FREQUENCY SIGNAL AT TWO FREQUENCY BANDS 75 Inventors: Mikko Pesola, Marynummi; Kari T. Lehtinen, Salo, both of

More information

(12) United States Patent

(12) United States Patent USOO7043221B2 (12) United States Patent Jovenin et al. (10) Patent No.: (45) Date of Patent: May 9, 2006 (54) (75) (73) (*) (21) (22) (86) (87) (65) (30) Foreign Application Priority Data Aug. 13, 2001

More information

(12) United States Patent

(12) United States Patent (12) United States Patent JakobSSOn USOO6608999B1 (10) Patent No.: (45) Date of Patent: Aug. 19, 2003 (54) COMMUNICATION SIGNAL RECEIVER AND AN OPERATING METHOD THEREFOR (75) Inventor: Peter Jakobsson,

More information

US A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,477,226 Hager et al. 45) Date of Patent: Dec. 19, 1995

US A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,477,226 Hager et al. 45) Date of Patent: Dec. 19, 1995 III IIHIIII US005477226A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,477,226 Hager et al. 45) Date of Patent: Dec. 19, 1995 (54) LOW COST RADAR ALTIMETER WITH 5,160,933 11/1992 Hager... 342/174 ACCURACY

More information

Feature (Claims) Preamble. Clause 1. Clause 2. Clause 3. Clause 4. Preamble. Clause 1. Clause 2. Clause 3. Clause 4

Feature (Claims) Preamble. Clause 1. Clause 2. Clause 3. Clause 4. Preamble. Clause 1. Clause 2. Clause 3. Clause 4 Claim Feature (Claims) 1 9 10 11 Preamble Clause 1 Clause 2 Clause 3 Clause 4 Preamble Clause 1 Clause 2 Clause 3 Clause 4 A method for transmitting ACK channel information by the base station in an orthogonal

More information

III IIIIHIIII. United States Patent 19 Mo. Timing & WIN. Control Circuit. 11 Patent Number: 5,512, Date of Patent: Apr.

III IIIIHIIII. United States Patent 19 Mo. Timing & WIN. Control Circuit. 11 Patent Number: 5,512, Date of Patent: Apr. United States Patent 19 Mo 54) SWITCHED HIGH-SLEW RATE BUFFER (75) Inventor: Zhong H. Mo, Daly City, Calif. 73) Assignee: TelCom Semiconductor, Inc., Mountain View, Calif. 21 Appl. No.: 316,161 22 Filed:

More information

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/ A1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/ A1 (19) United States US 2006.0056526A1 (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/0056526A1 Jain (43) Pub. Date: Mar. 16, 2006 (54) ALLOCATING DATA BETWEEN TONES IN A WDSL SYSTEM (76) Inventor:

More information

Discrete Multi-Tone (DMT) is a multicarrier modulation

Discrete Multi-Tone (DMT) is a multicarrier modulation 100-0513 1 Fast Unbiased cho Canceller Update During ADSL Transmission Milos Milosevic, Student Member, I, Takao Inoue, Student Member, I, Peter Molnar, Member, I, and Brian L. vans, Senior Member, I Abstract

More information

324/334, 232, ; 340/551 producing multiple detection fields. In one embodiment,

324/334, 232, ; 340/551 producing multiple detection fields. In one embodiment, USOO5969528A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,969,528 Weaver (45) Date of Patent: Oct. 19, 1999 54) DUAL FIELD METAL DETECTOR 4,605,898 8/1986 Aittoniemi et al.... 324/232 4,686,471 8/1987

More information

United States Patent (19)

United States Patent (19) United States Patent (19) Cheah (54) LOW COST KU BANDTRANSMITTER 75 Inventor: Jonathon Cheah, La Jolla, Calif. 73 Assignee: Hughes Aircraft Company, Los Angeles, Calif. (21) Appl. No.: 692,883 22 Filed:

More information

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,804,379 B2

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,804,379 B2 US007804379B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: Kris et al. (45) Date of Patent: Sep. 28, 2010 (54) PULSE WIDTH MODULATION DEAD TIME 5,764,024 A 6, 1998 Wilson COMPENSATION METHOD AND 6,940,249

More information

(12) United States Patent

(12) United States Patent (12) United States Patent Kiiski USOO6356604B1 (10) Patent No.: (45) Date of Patent: Mar. 12, 2002 (54) RECEIVING METHOD, AND RECEIVER (75) Inventor: Matti Kiiski, Oulunsalo (FI) (73) Assignee: Nokia Telecommunications

More information

United States Patent (19) Nonami

United States Patent (19) Nonami United States Patent (19) Nonami 54 RADIO COMMUNICATION APPARATUS WITH STORED CODING/DECODING PROCEDURES 75 Inventor: Takayuki Nonami, Hyogo, Japan 73 Assignee: Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha, Tokyo,

More information

(12) United States Patent

(12) United States Patent USOO7123644B2 (12) United States Patent Park et al. (10) Patent No.: (45) Date of Patent: Oct. 17, 2006 (54) PEAK CANCELLATION APPARATUS OF BASE STATION TRANSMISSION UNIT (75) Inventors: Won-Hyoung Park,

More information

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,438,377 B1

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,438,377 B1 USOO6438377B1 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: Savolainen (45) Date of Patent: Aug. 20, 2002 : (54) HANDOVER IN A MOBILE 5,276,906 A 1/1994 Felix... 455/438 COMMUNICATION SYSTEM 5,303.289 A 4/1994

More information

(12) United States Patent

(12) United States Patent US007072416B1 (12) United States Patent Sudo et al. (10) Patent No.: (45) Date of Patent: US 7,072,416 B1 Jul. 4, 2006 (54) TRANSMITTING/RECEIVING DEVICE AND TRANSMITTING/RECEIVING METHOD (75) Inventors:

More information

(12) United States Patent

(12) United States Patent (12) United States Patent USOO7356068B2 (10) Patent No.: US 7,356,068 B2 Park et al. (45) Date of Patent: Apr. 8, 2008 (54) FREQUENC HOPPING SEQUENCE (56) References Cited GENERATOR U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS

More information

US A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2002/ A1 Huang et al. (43) Pub. Date: Aug.

US A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2002/ A1 Huang et al. (43) Pub. Date: Aug. US 20020118726A1 19) United States 12) Patent Application Publication 10) Pub. No.: Huang et al. 43) Pub. Date: Aug. 29, 2002 54) SYSTEM AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR PROVIDING A SPREAD SPECTRUM SIGNAL 75)

More information

Implementation of Different Interleaving Techniques for Performance Evaluation of CDMA System

Implementation of Different Interleaving Techniques for Performance Evaluation of CDMA System Implementation of Different Interleaving Techniques for Performance Evaluation of CDMA System Anshu Aggarwal 1 and Vikas Mittal 2 1 Anshu Aggarwal is student of M.Tech. in the Department of Electronics

More information

(12) (10) Patent No.: US 7,145,943 B2 Gough et al. (45) Date of Patent: Dec. 5, 2006

(12) (10) Patent No.: US 7,145,943 B2 Gough et al. (45) Date of Patent: Dec. 5, 2006 United States Patent USOO7145943B2 (12) (10) Patent No.: US 7,145,943 B2 Gough et al. (45) Date of Patent: Dec. 5, 2006 (54) XDSL SYSTEM WITH IMPROVED 4,096,361. A * 6/1978 Crawford... 379,403 MPEDANCE

More information

(12) United States Patent

(12) United States Patent (12) United States Patent Hunt USOO6868079B1 (10) Patent No.: (45) Date of Patent: Mar. 15, 2005 (54) RADIO COMMUNICATION SYSTEM WITH REQUEST RE-TRANSMISSION UNTIL ACKNOWLEDGED (75) Inventor: Bernard Hunt,

More information

(O2 s. starriversion. (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2007/ A1. (19) United States. (43) Pub. Date: Sep.

(O2 s. starriversion. (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2007/ A1. (19) United States. (43) Pub. Date: Sep. (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2007/0217540 A1 Onggosanusi et al. US 20070217540A1 (43) Pub. Date: Sep. 20, 2007 (54) (75) (73) (21) (22) (60) PRE-CODER SELECTION

More information

(12) United States Patent

(12) United States Patent USO08098.991 B2 (12) United States Patent DeSalvo et al. (10) Patent No.: (45) Date of Patent: Jan. 17, 2012 (54) (75) (73) (*) (21) (22) (65) (51) (52) (58) WIDEBAND RF PHOTONIC LINK FOR DYNAMIC CO-SITE

More information

United States Patent (19) Davis

United States Patent (19) Davis United States Patent (19) Davis 54 ACTIVE TERMINATION FOR A TRANSMISSION LINE 75 Inventor: 73 Assignee: Thomas T. Davis, Bartlesville, Okla. Phillips Petroleum Company, Bartlesville, Okla. 21 Appl. No.:

More information

SC - Single carrier systems One carrier carries data stream

SC - Single carrier systems One carrier carries data stream Digital modulation SC - Single carrier systems One carrier carries data stream MC - Multi-carrier systems Many carriers are used for data transmission. Data stream is divided into sub-streams and each

More information

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2015/ A1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2015/ A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2015/0110060 A1 YAN et al. US 2015O110060A1 (43) Pub. Date: (54) (71) (72) (73) (21) (22) (63) METHOD FOR ADUSTING RESOURCE CONFIGURATION,

More information

24. United States Patent (19) Noé et al. 21 Appl. No. 261,066. least one correcting roller which has an adjustable depth of

24. United States Patent (19) Noé et al. 21 Appl. No. 261,066. least one correcting roller which has an adjustable depth of United States Patent (19) Noé et al. 11) 45) US005535610A Patent Number: 5,535,610 Date of Patent: Jul. 16, 1996 54 METHD AND APPARATUS FR ELMINATING CRSSBW IN METAL STRIP 75 Inventors: Rolf Noé; Andreas

More information

(12) (10) Patent No.: US 7,080,114 B2. Shankar (45) Date of Patent: Jul.18, 2006

(12) (10) Patent No.: US 7,080,114 B2. Shankar (45) Date of Patent: Jul.18, 2006 United States Patent US007080114B2 (12) (10) Patent No.: Shankar () Date of Patent: Jul.18, 2006 (54) HIGH SPEED SCALEABLE MULTIPLIER 5,754,073. A 5/1998 Kimura... 327/359 6,012,078 A 1/2000 Wood......

More information

Soffen 52 U.S.C /99; 375/102; 375/11; 370/6, 455/295; 455/ /1992 Japan. 18 Claims, 3 Drawing Sheets

Soffen 52 U.S.C /99; 375/102; 375/11; 370/6, 455/295; 455/ /1992 Japan. 18 Claims, 3 Drawing Sheets United States Patent (19) Mizoguchi 54 CROSS POLARIZATION INTERFERENCE CANCELLER 75 Inventor: Shoichi Mizoguchi, Tokyo, Japan 73) Assignee: NEC Corporation, Japan 21 Appl. No.: 980,662 (22 Filed: Nov.

More information

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2013/ A1. (51) Int. Cl.

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2013/ A1. (51) Int. Cl. (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2013/0058430 A1 Jain et al. (54) TRELLIS MODULATION PROTOCOLS FOR A VDSL SYSTEM (75) Inventors: (73) Assignee: (21) Appl. No.: (22)

More information

III. I. United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,121,014. Huang

III. I. United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,121,014. Huang United States Patent (19) Huang (54) CMOS DELAY CIRCUIT WITH LABLE DELAY 75 Inventor: Eddy C. Huang, San Jose, Calif. 73) Assignee: VLSI Technology, Inc., San Jose, Calif. (21) Appl. o.: 6,377 22 Filed:

More information

United States Patent (19) Leonardis

United States Patent (19) Leonardis United States Patent (19) Leonardis 54 SUPPORT STRUCTURE FOR AMOTOR BUS 75 Inventor: 73) Assignee: Raffaele Leonardis, Turin, Italy Centro Ricerche Fiat S.p.A., Orbassano, Italy (21) Appl. No.: 97,606

More information

William Stallings Data and Computer Communications. Chapter 8 Multiplexing. Multiplexing

William Stallings Data and Computer Communications. Chapter 8 Multiplexing. Multiplexing William Stallings Data and Computer Communications Chapter 8 Multiplexing Multiplexing 1 Frequency Division Multiplexing FDM Useful bandwidth of medium exceeds required bandwidth of channel Each signal

More information

Bit Error Rate Performance Evaluation of Various Modulation Techniques with Forward Error Correction Coding of WiMAX

Bit Error Rate Performance Evaluation of Various Modulation Techniques with Forward Error Correction Coding of WiMAX Bit Error Rate Performance Evaluation of Various Modulation Techniques with Forward Error Correction Coding of WiMAX Amr Shehab Amin 37-20200 Abdelrahman Taha 31-2796 Yahia Mobasher 28-11691 Mohamed Yasser

More information

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2007/ A1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2007/ A1 (19) United States US 20070047712A1 (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2007/0047712 A1 Gross et al. (43) Pub. Date: Mar. 1, 2007 (54) SCALABLE, DISTRIBUTED ARCHITECTURE FOR FULLY CONNECTED

More information

United States Patent (19) (11) 4,130,822

United States Patent (19) (11) 4,130,822 34.3a700 MS AU 26 EX l9/78 OR 4 gl30,822 United States Patent (19) (11) 4,130,822 Conroy Dec. 19, 1978 l2/ - (4) S A FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS (7 Inventor: Peter J. Conroy, Scottsdale, Ariz. 10083 9/193

More information

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,512,361 B1

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,512,361 B1 USOO6512361B1 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,512,361 B1 Becker (45) Date of Patent: Jan. 28, 2003 (54) 14/42-VOLTAUTOMOTIVE CIRCUIT 5,420.503 5/1995 Beha TESTER 5,517,183 A 5/1996 Bozeman,

More information

III. United States Patent (19) Fazio. 73) Assignee: Siemens Hearing Instruments, Inc., from the photodiode is routed through a bandpass filter,

III. United States Patent (19) Fazio. 73) Assignee: Siemens Hearing Instruments, Inc., from the photodiode is routed through a bandpass filter, United States Patent (19) Fazio 54 HEARING AD AND SYSTEM FOR USE WITH CELLULAR TELEPHONES 75 Inventor: Joseph D. Fazio, Bernardsville, N.J. 73) Assignee: Siemens Hearing Instruments, Inc., Piscataway,

More information

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,228,693 B2

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,228,693 B2 USOO8228693B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,228,693 B2 Petersson et al. (45) Date of Patent: Jul. 24, 2012 (54) DC FILTER AND VOLTAGE SOURCE (56) References Cited CONVERTER STATION COMPRISING

More information

USOO A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,555,242 Saitou 45) Date of Patent: Sep. 10, 1996

USOO A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,555,242 Saitou 45) Date of Patent: Sep. 10, 1996 IIII USOO5555242A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: Saitou 45) Date of Patent: Sep. 10, 1996 54 SUBSTATION APPARATUS FOR SATELLITE 5,216,427 6/1993 Yan et al.... 370/85.2 COMMUNICATIONS 5,257,257

More information

Data and Computer Communications. Tenth Edition by William Stallings

Data and Computer Communications. Tenth Edition by William Stallings Data and Computer Communications Tenth Edition by William Stallings Data and Computer Communications, Tenth Edition by William Stallings, (c) Pearson Education, 2013 CHAPTER 8 Multiplexing It was impossible

More information

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,937,567 B2

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,937,567 B2 US008.937567B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,937,567 B2 Obata et al. (45) Date of Patent: Jan. 20, 2015 (54) DELTA-SIGMA MODULATOR, INTEGRATOR, USPC... 341/155, 143 AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION

More information

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2003/ A1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2003/ A1 (19) United States US 2003O132800A1 (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2003/0132800 A1 Kenington (43) Pub. Date: Jul. 17, 2003 (54) AMPLIFIER ARRANGEMENT (76) Inventor: Peter Kenington,

More information

USOO A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 6,101,939 Giori et al. (45) Date of Patent: Aug. 15, 2000

USOO A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 6,101,939 Giori et al. (45) Date of Patent: Aug. 15, 2000 USOO6101939A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 6,101,939 Giori et al. (45) Date of Patent: Aug. 15, 2000 54) ROTARY PRINTING MACHINE FOR 4,152.986 5/1979 Dadowski et al.... 101/170 SECURITY PAPERS

More information

Other Modulation Techniques - CAP, QAM, DMT

Other Modulation Techniques - CAP, QAM, DMT Other Modulation Techniques - CAP, QAM, DMT Prof. David Johns (johns@eecg.toronto.edu) (www.eecg.toronto.edu/~johns) slide 1 of 47 Complex Signals Concept useful for describing a pair of real signals Let

More information

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,480,702 B1

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,480,702 B1 US6480702B1 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: Sabat, Jr. (45) Date of Patent: Nov. 12, 2002 (54) APPARATUS AND METHD FR 5,381,459 A * 1/1995 Lappington... 455/426 DISTRIBUTING WIRELESS 5,452.473

More information

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2010/ A1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2010/ A1 (19) United States US 2010O2O8236A1 (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2010/0208236A1 Damink et al. (43) Pub. Date: Aug. 19, 2010 (54) METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE POSITION OF AN OBJECT

More information

USOO A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,534,804 Woo (45) Date of Patent: Jul. 9, 1996

USOO A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,534,804 Woo (45) Date of Patent: Jul. 9, 1996 III USOO5534.804A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: Woo (45) Date of Patent: Jul. 9, 1996 (54) CMOS POWER-ON RESET CIRCUIT USING 4,983,857 1/1991 Steele... 327/143 HYSTERESS 5,136,181 8/1992

More information

OFDMA PHY for EPoC: a Baseline Proposal. Andrea Garavaglia and Christian Pietsch Qualcomm PAGE 1

OFDMA PHY for EPoC: a Baseline Proposal. Andrea Garavaglia and Christian Pietsch Qualcomm PAGE 1 OFDMA PHY for EPoC: a Baseline Proposal Andrea Garavaglia and Christian Pietsch Qualcomm PAGE 1 Supported by Jorge Salinger (Comcast) Rick Li (Cortina) Lup Ng (Cortina) PAGE 2 Outline OFDM: motivation

More information

United States Patent [19] Adelson

United States Patent [19] Adelson United States Patent [19] Adelson [54] DIGITAL SIGNAL ENCODING AND DECODING APPARATUS [75] Inventor: Edward H. Adelson, Cambridge, Mass. [73] Assignee: General Electric Company, Princeton, N.J. [21] Appl.

More information

(12) United States Patent

(12) United States Patent (12) United States Patent US007 184283B2 (10) Patent No.: US 7,184,283 B2 Yang et al. (45) Date of Patent: *Feb. 27, 2007 (54) SWITCHING FREQUENCYJITTER HAVING (56) References Cited OUTPUT RIPPLE CANCEL

More information

ANALYSIS OF ADSL2 s 4D-TCM PERFORMANCE

ANALYSIS OF ADSL2 s 4D-TCM PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF ADSL s 4D-TCM PERFORMANCE Mohamed Ghanassi, Jean François Marceau, François D. Beaulieu, and Benoît Champagne Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec

More information

(10) Patent No.: US 6,295,461 B1

(10) Patent No.: US 6,295,461 B1 (12) United States Patent Palmer et al. USOO629.5461B1 (10) Patent No.: () Date of Patent: Sep., 2001 (54) (75) (73) (21) (22) (51) (52) (58) (56) MULTI-MODE RADIO FREQUENCY NETWORKSYSTEM Inventors: Brian

More information

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,906,804 B2

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,906,804 B2 USOO6906804B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: Einstein et al. (45) Date of Patent: Jun. 14, 2005 (54) WDM CHANNEL MONITOR AND (58) Field of Search... 356/484; 398/196, WAVELENGTH LOCKER 398/204,

More information

United States Patent (19) Molnar et al.

United States Patent (19) Molnar et al. United States Patent (19) Molnar et al. 54) PUNCTURED CODING SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING UNEQUAL ERROR PROTECTION INA DIGITAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEM 75) Inventors: Barbara Davis Molnar; Stanley Lynn Reinhold; Amer

More information

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,013,715 B2

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,013,715 B2 USO080 13715B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,013,715 B2 Chiu et al. (45) Date of Patent: Sep. 6, 2011 (54) CANCELING SELF-JAMMER SIGNALS IN AN 7,671,720 B1* 3/2010 Martin et al.... 340/10.1

More information

OFDMA and MIMO Notes

OFDMA and MIMO Notes OFDMA and MIMO Notes EE 442 Spring Semester Lecture 14 Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) is a digital multi-carrier modulation technique extending the concept of single subcarrier modulation

More information

Performance Evaluation of STBC-OFDM System for Wireless Communication

Performance Evaluation of STBC-OFDM System for Wireless Communication Performance Evaluation of STBC-OFDM System for Wireless Communication Apeksha Deshmukh, Prof. Dr. M. D. Kokate Department of E&TC, K.K.W.I.E.R. College, Nasik, apeksha19may@gmail.com Abstract In this paper

More information

Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing & Measurement of its Performance

Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing & Measurement of its Performance Available Online at www.ijcsmc.com International Journal of Computer Science and Mobile Computing A Monthly Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology IJCSMC, Vol. 5, Issue. 2, February 2016,

More information

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,208,104 B1

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,208,104 B1 USOO6208104B1 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: Onoue et al. (45) Date of Patent: Mar. 27, 2001 (54) ROBOT CONTROL UNIT (58) Field of Search... 318/567, 568.1, 318/568.2, 568. 11; 395/571, 580;

More information

Improving Data Transmission Efficiency over Power Line Communication (PLC) System Using OFDM

Improving Data Transmission Efficiency over Power Line Communication (PLC) System Using OFDM Improving Data Transmission Efficiency over Power Line Communication (PLC) System Using OFDM Charles U. Ndujiuba 1, Samuel N. John 1, Oladimeji Ogunseye 2 1 Electrical & Information Engineering, Covenant

More information

SIMULATIONS OF ERROR CORRECTION CODES FOR DATA COMMUNICATION OVER POWER LINES

SIMULATIONS OF ERROR CORRECTION CODES FOR DATA COMMUNICATION OVER POWER LINES SIMULATIONS OF ERROR CORRECTION CODES FOR DATA COMMUNICATION OVER POWER LINES Michelle Foltran Miranda Eduardo Parente Ribeiro mifoltran@hotmail.com edu@eletrica.ufpr.br Departament of Electrical Engineering,

More information

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2010/ A1. KO (43) Pub. Date: Oct. 28, 2010

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2010/ A1. KO (43) Pub. Date: Oct. 28, 2010 (19) United States US 20100271151A1 (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2010/0271151 A1 KO (43) Pub. Date: Oct. 28, 2010 (54) COMPACT RC NOTCH FILTER FOR (21) Appl. No.: 12/430,785 QUADRATURE

More information

58 Field of Search /341,484, structed from polarization splitters in series with half-wave

58 Field of Search /341,484, structed from polarization splitters in series with half-wave USOO6101026A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: Bane (45) Date of Patent: Aug. 8, 9 2000 54) REVERSIBLE AMPLIFIER FOR OPTICAL FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS NETWORKS 1-274111 1/1990 Japan. 3-125125

More information

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2017/ A1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2017/ A1 (19) United States US 201701.24860A1 (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2017/012.4860 A1 SHH et al. (43) Pub. Date: May 4, 2017 (54) OPTICAL TRANSMITTER AND METHOD (52) U.S. Cl. THEREOF

More information

Data and Computer Communications. Tenth Edition by William Stallings

Data and Computer Communications. Tenth Edition by William Stallings Data and Computer Communications Tenth Edition by William Stallings Data and Computer Communications, Tenth Edition by William Stallings, (c) Pearson Education - Prentice Hall, 2013 CHAPTER 8 Multiplexing

More information

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2007/ A : Offsetting a start of a frame for at least one device with

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2007/ A : Offsetting a start of a frame for at least one device with US 200700.54680A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2007/0054680 A1 MO et al. (43) Pub. Date: Mar. 8, 2007 (54) METHOD OF BAND MULTIPLEXING TO Publication Classification

More information

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,859,376 B2. Johnson, Jr. (45) Date of Patent: Dec. 28, 2010

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,859,376 B2. Johnson, Jr. (45) Date of Patent: Dec. 28, 2010 US007859376B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,859,376 B2 Johnson, Jr. (45) Date of Patent: Dec. 28, 2010 (54) ZIGZAGAUTOTRANSFORMER APPARATUS 7,049,921 B2 5/2006 Owen AND METHODS 7,170,268

More information

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/ A1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/ A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/0028258 A1 Ma et al. US 20090028258A1 (43) Pub. Date: Jan. 29, 2009 (54) (76) (21) (22) (86) METHODS AND SYSTEMIS FOR TRANSMISSION

More information

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/ A1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/ A1 (19) United States US 20060265634A1 (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/0265634 A1 Silvus et al. (43) Pub. Date: (54) ITERATIVE WITH ECC IN DOMAIN (75) Inventors: Gregory L. Silvus,

More information

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,275,104 B1

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,275,104 B1 USOO6275104B1 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: Holter (45) Date of Patent: Aug. 14, 2001 (54) MULTISTAGE AMPLIFIER WITH LOCAL 4,816,711 3/1989 Roza... 330/149 ERROR CORRECTION 5,030.925 7/1991

More information

USOO A. United States Patent Patent Number: 5,327,575 Menich et al. 45 Date of Patent: Jul. 5, 1994

USOO A. United States Patent Patent Number: 5,327,575 Menich et al. 45 Date of Patent: Jul. 5, 1994 b III USOO5327575A United States Patent 19 11 Patent Number: 5,327,575 Menich et al. 45 Date of Patent: Jul. 5, 1994 54 DIRECTIONAL HANDOVER CONTROLIN Assistant Examiner-Thanh C. Le E. NSE RADIOSYSTEMS

More information

5,313,661. United States Patent 1191 Malmi et al. May 17, 1994

5,313,661. United States Patent 1191 Malmi et al. May 17, 1994 United States Patent 1191 Malmi et al. US005313661A [11] Patent Number: [45] Date of Patent: 5,313,661 May 17, 1994 [54] METHOD AND CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENT FOR ADJUSTING THE VOLUME IN A MOBILE TELEPHONE [75]

More information

(12) United States Patent

(12) United States Patent (12) United States Patent Meister USOO69834B1 (10) Patent No.: () Date of Patent: Jan. 10, 2006 (54) CHANNEL ALLOCATION METHOD AND DEVICE FOR CODED AND COMBINED INFORMATION SETS (75) Inventor: Wolfgang

More information

Channel Estimation by 2D-Enhanced DFT Interpolation Supporting High-speed Movement

Channel Estimation by 2D-Enhanced DFT Interpolation Supporting High-speed Movement Channel Estimation by 2D-Enhanced DFT Interpolation Supporting High-speed Movement Channel Estimation DFT Interpolation Special Articles on Multi-dimensional MIMO Transmission Technology The Challenge

More information

(12) (10) Patent No.: US 7,226,021 B1. Anderson et al. (45) Date of Patent: Jun. 5, 2007

(12) (10) Patent No.: US 7,226,021 B1. Anderson et al. (45) Date of Patent: Jun. 5, 2007 United States Patent USOO7226021B1 (12) () Patent No.: Anderson et al. (45) Date of Patent: Jun. 5, 2007 (54) SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETECTING 4,728,063 A 3/1988 Petit et al.... 246,34 R RAIL BREAK OR VEHICLE

More information

(12) (10) Patent N0.: US 6,538,473 B2 Baker (45) Date of Patent: Mar. 25, 2003

(12) (10) Patent N0.: US 6,538,473 B2 Baker (45) Date of Patent: Mar. 25, 2003 United States Patent US006538473B2 (12) (10) Patent N0.: Baker (45) Date of Patent: Mar., 2003 (54) HIGH SPEED DIGITAL SIGNAL BUFFER 5,323,071 A 6/1994 Hirayama..... 307/475 AND METHOD 5,453,704 A * 9/1995

More information

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,187,032 B1

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,187,032 B1 US008187032B1 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,187,032 B1 Park et al. (45) Date of Patent: May 29, 2012 (54) GUIDED MISSILE/LAUNCHER TEST SET (58) Field of Classification Search... 439/76.1.

More information

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2005/ A1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2005/ A1 (19) United States US 2005OO63341A1 (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2005/0063341 A1 Ishii et al. (43) Pub. Date: (54) MOBILE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, RADIO BASE STATION, SCHEDULING APPARATUS,

More information

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,725,069 B2. Sprigg et al. (45) Date of Patent: *Apr. 20, 2004

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,725,069 B2. Sprigg et al. (45) Date of Patent: *Apr. 20, 2004 USOO6725069B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,725,069 B2 Sprigg et al. (45) Date of Patent: *Apr. 20, 2004 (54) WIRELESS TELEPHONE AIRPLANE AND 5,625,882 A * 4/1997 Vook et al.... 455/343.4

More information

Algorithm to Improve the Performance of OFDM based WLAN Systems

Algorithm to Improve the Performance of OFDM based WLAN Systems International Journal of Computer Science & Communication Vol. 1, No. 2, July-December 2010, pp. 27-31 Algorithm to Improve the Performance of OFDM based WLAN Systems D. Sreenivasa Rao 1, M. Kanti Kiran

More information

(12) United States Patent

(12) United States Patent USOO8208048B2 (12) United States Patent Lin et al. (10) Patent No.: US 8,208,048 B2 (45) Date of Patent: Jun. 26, 2012 (54) (75) (73) (*) (21) (22) (65) (51) (52) (58) METHOD FOR HIGH DYNAMIC RANGE MAGING

More information

(12) United States Patent

(12) United States Patent (12) United States Patent Suzuki et al. USOO6385294B2 (10) Patent No.: US 6,385,294 B2 (45) Date of Patent: May 7, 2002 (54) X-RAY TUBE (75) Inventors: Kenji Suzuki; Tadaoki Matsushita; Tutomu Inazuru,

More information

II I III. United States Patent (19) Johnson, Jr. 73 Assignee: Exide Electronics Corporation,

II I III. United States Patent (19) Johnson, Jr. 73 Assignee: Exide Electronics Corporation, United States Patent (19) Johnson, Jr. (54) ISOLATED GATE DRIVE (75) Inventor: Robert W. Johnson, Jr., Raleigh, N.C. 73 Assignee: Exide Electronics Corporation, Raleigh, N.C. (21) Appl. No.: 39,932 22

More information

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2010/ A1. Chen (43) Pub. Date: Nov. 4, 2010

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2010/ A1. Chen (43) Pub. Date: Nov. 4, 2010 (19) United States US 2010O27970 1A1 (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2010/0279701 A1 Chen (43) Pub. Date: (54) INTEGRATED POWER CONTROLAND LINK (52) U.S. Cl.... 455/452.2:455/522

More information

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,249,673 B1

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,249,673 B1 USOO6249673B1 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,249,673 B1 Tsui (45) Date of Patent: Jun. 19, 2001 (54) UNIVERSAL TRANSMITTER 5,661.804 8/1997 Dykema et al.. 5,680,134 10/1997 Tsui... 341/173

More information

\ Y 4-7. (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/ A1. (19) United States. de La Chapelle et al. (43) Pub. Date: Nov.

\ Y 4-7. (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/ A1. (19) United States. de La Chapelle et al. (43) Pub. Date: Nov. (19) United States US 2006027.0354A1 (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/0270354 A1 de La Chapelle et al. (43) Pub. Date: (54) RF SIGNAL FEED THROUGH METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SHIELDED

More information

73 Assignee: Dialight Corporation, Manasquan, N.J. 21 Appl. No.: 09/144, Filed: Aug. 31, 1998 (51) Int. Cl... G05F /158; 315/307

73 Assignee: Dialight Corporation, Manasquan, N.J. 21 Appl. No.: 09/144, Filed: Aug. 31, 1998 (51) Int. Cl... G05F /158; 315/307 United States Patent (19) Grossman et al. 54) LED DRIVING CIRCUITRY WITH VARIABLE LOAD TO CONTROL OUTPUT LIGHT INTENSITY OF AN LED 75 Inventors: Hyman Grossman, Lambertville; John Adinolfi, Milltown, both

More information

FDD Uplink 2 TDD 2 VFDD Downlink

FDD Uplink 2 TDD 2 VFDD Downlink (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2013/0094409 A1 Li et al. US 2013 0094409A1 (43) Pub. Date: (54) (75) (73) (21) (22) (86) (30) METHOD AND DEVICE FOR OBTAINING CARRIER

More information

United States Patent (19)

United States Patent (19) United States Patent (19) Ramaswamy 54). APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PROCESSING A QUADRATURE AMPLITUDE MODULATED (QAM) SIGNAL 75 Inventor: Kumar Ramaswamy, Indianapolis, Ind. 73 Assignee: Thomson Consumer

More information

Hill. United States Patent (19) Martin. 11 Patent Number: 5,796,848 45) Date of Patent: Aug. 18, 1998

Hill. United States Patent (19) Martin. 11 Patent Number: 5,796,848 45) Date of Patent: Aug. 18, 1998 United States Patent (19) Martin 54. DIGITAL HEARNG AED 75) Inventor: Raimund Martin, Eggolsheim, Germany 73) Assignee: Siemens Audiologische Technik GmbH. Erlangen, Germany Appl. No.: 761,495 Filed: Dec.

More information

REPEATER I. (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2014/ A1. REPEATER is. A v. (19) United States.

REPEATER I. (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2014/ A1. REPEATER is. A v. (19) United States. (19) United States US 20140370888A1 (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2014/0370888 A1 Kunimoto (43) Pub. Date: (54) RADIO COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, LOCATION REGISTRATION METHOD, REPEATER,

More information

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2003/ A1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2003/ A1 US 2003O108129A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2003/0108129 A1 Voglewede et al. (43) Pub. Date: (54) AUTOMATIC GAIN CONTROL FOR (21) Appl. No.: 10/012,530 DIGITAL

More information

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2004/ A1. Yamamoto et al. (43) Pub. Date: Mar. 25, 2004

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2004/ A1. Yamamoto et al. (43) Pub. Date: Mar. 25, 2004 (19) United States US 2004.0058664A1 (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2004/0058664 A1 Yamamoto et al. (43) Pub. Date: Mar. 25, 2004 (54) SAW FILTER (30) Foreign Application Priority

More information