Optimum Beamforming. ECE 754 Supplemental Notes Kathleen E. Wage. March 31, Background Beampatterns for optimal processors Array gain


 Darcy Manning
 1 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 Optimum Beamforming ECE 754 Supplemental Notes Kathleen E. Wage March 31, 29 ECE 754 Supplemental Notes: Optimum Beamforming 1/39
2 Signal and noise models Models Beamformers For this set of notes, we assume that the snapshot vector x consists of a planewave signal component plus a noise component, i.e., x = x sig + n = b s v s + n where b s is the complex weight applied to the planewave replica v s associated with the source. n is the noise vector. The statistics of the source and noise components are: S sig = E{x sig x H sig } = E{ b s b s }v s v H s = σ 2 sv s v H s S n = E{nn H } ECE 754 Supplemental Notes: Optimum Beamforming 2/39
3 Models continued... Models Beamformers When the noise consists of a single planewave interferer plus spatially white noise, the noise covariance matrix is: S n = σ 2 1 v 1v H 1 + σ2 wi where the vector v 1 is the replica for the planewave interferer and σ 2 1 is the power in the interferer. We define the interferertonoise ratio (INR) as: σ 2 I = σ2 1 σ 2 w Number of array elements is denoted by N in these notes. ECE 754 Supplemental Notes: Optimum Beamforming 3/39
4 Beamformers Background Models Beamformers In equations below,v m = replica vector for the steering direction Conventional processor (uniformly weighted): w conv = v m N Minimum variance distortionless response processor: 1 w mvdr = v H ms 1 n v m } {{ } Λ mvdr S 1 n v m = Λ mvdr S 1 Minimum power distortionless response processor: 1 w mpdr = v H ms 1 x v m } {{ } Λ mpdr S 1 x n v m = Λ mpdr S 1 x v m v m ECE 754 Supplemental Notes: Optimum Beamforming 4/39
5 Single interferer Multiple interferers beampattern for a single interferer Consider the case when the noise consists of a single planewave interferer plus spatially white noise. As derived in class (Lecture #8), the beampattern in this case can be written: where B mvdr (u a ) = w H mvdr v a [ = Λ mvdrn σw 2 ρ ma Nσ2 I ρ ] m1 1 + NσI 2 ρ 1a ρ ma = vh mv a N ρ m1 = vh mv 1 N ρ 1a = vh 1 v a N represent the spatial correlation of the v m, v 1, and v a vectors. Note that the vector v a is the replica associated with the directional cosine u a, which determines where we re evaluating the beampattern. ECE 754 Supplemental Notes: Optimum Beamforming 5/39
6 Single interferer Multiple interferers beampattern for a single interferer (cont.) Note that we can interpret the beampattern as: B mvdr (u a ) = Λ mvdrn σ 2 w ρ }{{} ma CBF: v m Nσ 2 I ρ m1 1 + Nσ 2 I ρ }{{} 1a CBF: v 1 The ρ ma and ρ 1a terms are equal to a conventional beamformer steered to v m and v 1, respectively. Thus the overall beampattern is the difference between two scaled conventional patterns. Additional insights from a look at value of BP at interferer location ECE 754 Supplemental Notes: Optimum Beamforming 6/39
7 Single interferer Multiple interferers beampattern for a single interferer (cont.) Consider the BP evaluated at the interferer location, u a = u 1 : B mvdr (u 1 ) = Λ mvdrn ρ σw 2 m1 Nσ2 I ρ m1 1 + NσI 2 ρ }{{} 11 =1 [ ( )] = Λ mvdrn Nσ 2 σw 2 1 I 1 + NσI 2 ρ m1 Thus the beamformer creates a partial null in the beampattern at the location of the interferer. Depth of this null depends on: σ 2 I = INR. As σ 2 I, the term in parentheses goes to 1, and an exact null is created in the beampattern. ρ m1 = value of conventional BP at interferer location. If there is already a null at this location, then ρ m1 =. ECE 754 Supplemental Notes: Optimum Beamforming 7/39
8 Single interferer Multiple interferers Example of beampattern for 1 interferer Plots show the and conventional beampatterns for a 1element standard linear array at different INR s. Interferer is located at u 1 =.5, which is not a null in the conventional beampattern, i.e., ρ m1. 2 db INR: since σ 2 I is small, B conv B mvdr. db INR: σ 2 I is high enough that B mvdr (u 1 ) < B conv (u 1 ). +2 db INR: deeper null created at u a = u 1. 2log 1 B(u a ) (db) 2log 1 B(u a ) (db) 2log 1 B(u a ) (db) u a INR= db Conv u a INR= 2 db INR=2 db Conv Conv u a ECE 754 Supplemental Notes: Optimum Beamforming 8/39
9 Single interferer Multiple interferers Depth of nulls in beampattern The depth of the null in the beampattern is a function of ( ) Nσ 2 1 I NσI 2 = 1 + NσI 2 The plot at right shows this factor 2 (in db) as a function of σi 2 Null depth factor as a function of σ I in db. 2 Interferer will have almost no 4 effect on the BP for 1 log 1 (σi 2 6 ) 2 db 8 Interferer will drive BP down 1 significantly for 1 log 1 (σi 2) db log (σ ) 1 I 2log 1 (1+Nσ I 2 ) ECE 754 Supplemental Notes: Optimum Beamforming 9/39
10 Single interferer Multiple interferers beampattern when interferer at null in B conv Plots illustrate what happens when the interferer is at the location of a null in the conventional pattern. Regardless of INR level, the and conventional beampatterns are identical in this case. Plots show results for a 1element standard linear array, but similar behavior would be seen for other arrays. 2log 1 B(u a ) (db) 2log 1 B(u a ) (db) 2log 1 B(u a ) (db) INR= 2 db Conv u a INR= db Conv u a INR=2 db Conv u a ECE 754 Supplemental Notes: Optimum Beamforming 1/39
11 Single interferer Multiple interferers BP as fxn of interferer location: db INR As discussed in class and explored in Problem Set 5, the behavior of the beampattern changes substantially as the interferer moves inside the mainlobe. Plots show results for u I =.9,.433,.2 and INR= db. Unity gain maintained at u a =. Mainlobe is distorted by presence of ML interferer. 2log 1 B(u a ) (db) 2log 1 B(u a ) (db) 2log 1 B(u a ) (db) INR= db, u I =.9 Conv u a INR= db, u I =.433 Conv u a INR= db, u I =.2 Conv u a ECE 754 Supplemental Notes: Optimum Beamforming 11/39
12 Single interferer Multiple interferers BP as fxn of interferer location: 2 db INR Plots show results for u I =.9,.433,.2 and INR= db. Unity gain still maintained at u a =. Mainlobe is very distorted by presence of high INR ML interferer. In general ML interferers are very hard to deal with. 2log 1 B(u a ) (db) 2log 1 B(u a ) (db) 2log 1 B(u a ) (db) INR=2 db, u I =.9 Conv u a INR=2 db, u I =.433 Conv u a INR=2 db, u I =.2 Conv u a ECE 754 Supplemental Notes: Optimum Beamforming 12/39
13 Single interferer Multiple interferers beampattern for multiple interferers The following plot shows the and conventional BP for a 1element standard linear array when the noise consists of 8 strong discrete interferers (INR=2 db) outside the mainlobe plus spatially white noise. processor has 8 deep nulls 1 2 Unlike singleinterferer 3 case, here BF 4 5 has wider mainlobe 6 than conventional BF 7 part of the price 8 paid for nulls log 1 B(u a ) (db) INR=2 db u a Conv ECE 754 Supplemental Notes: Optimum Beamforming 13/39
14 Single interferer Multiple interferers beampattern for 9 interferers The following plot shows that 9 equalpower interferers result in 9 deep nulls in the beampattern of the 1element array Mainlobe is more distorted than in the 8interferer case. 2log 1 B(u a ) (db) INR=2 db, 9 interferers 4 Note: there are 5 5 interferers to the left of 6 the mainlobe and 4 7 interferers to the right 8 of the mainlobe u a Conv Can we null out 1 interferers with this array? ECE 754 Supplemental Notes: Optimum Beamforming 14/39
15 Single interferer Multiple interferers beampattern for 1 interferers When there are 1 equalpower interferers incident on a 1element array, the beamformer can no longer null all of them. 1element array 1 coeff s in w mvdr Do not have enough degrees of freedom to satisfy unity gain constraint and maintain 1 exact nulls with a 2log 1 B(u a ) (db) INR=2 db, 1 interferers 8 1element array Resulting BF may still be useful, but BP behavior is different when # of interferers is N. u a Conv ECE 754 Supplemental Notes: Optimum Beamforming 15/39
16 Single interferer Multiple interferers Inclass problems Consider a 2element standard linear array. Can you predict how the beampattern will differ from the conventional beampattern in the following cases? 1 The noise field consists of spatially white noise plus one discrete interferer at u I =.15 with INR=4 db. 2 The noise field consists of spatially white noise plus two discrete interferers at u I = ±.1 with INR s of 2 db. 3 The noise field consists of spatially white noise plus a discrete interferer at u I =.25 with INR=2 db and a discrete interferer at u I =.5 with INR= db. ECE 754 Supplemental Notes: Optimum Beamforming 16/39
17 Single interferer Multiple interferers Inclass problem 1 solution 2element standard linear array, u I =.15, INR=4 db 1 In class 1 Conv 1 2log 1 B(u a ) (db) u a Since interferer outside mainlobe we expect to see a significant null at the interferer location in the pattern. There is no similar null in the conventional pattern. ECE 754 Supplemental Notes: Optimum Beamforming 17/39
18 Single interferer Multiple interferers Inclass problem 2 solution 2element standard linear array, u I = ±.1, INR=2 db 1 In class 2 Conv 1 2log 1 B(u a ) (db) u a Since interferers are at locations of nulls in conventional pattern, B mvdr = B conv for this example. ECE 754 Supplemental Notes: Optimum Beamforming 18/39
19 Single interferer Multiple interferers Inclass problem 3 solution 2element standard linear array, u I =.25/INR=2 db and u I =.5/INR= db. 1 In class 3 Conv 1 2log 1 B(u a ) (db) u a Expect to see significant null for interferer at u I =.25 since it is outside mainlobe and has high INR. Since the interferer at u I =.5 is inside the mainlobe, we expect some mainlobe distortion, though unity gain at broadside is maintained. ECE 754 Supplemental Notes: Optimum Beamforming 19/39
20 Single interferer Multiple interferers Summary: effect of interferers on beampattern If INR is low, beampattern resembles conventional beampattern. For modest INR ( db), processor places partial nulls in beampattern at locations of interferers. For high INR, will place exact nulls at locations of interferers, assuming the number of discrete interferers is less than the number of elements. For interferers outside the mainlobe, the mainlobe of the processor is wellbehaved (resembles conventional processor for N >>#interferers. For interferers inside the mainlobe, the mainlobe of the processor may be significantly distorted (esp. for high INR) as the processor tries to maintain the unity gain constraint and null out an interferer close to the desired signal direction. ECE 754 Supplemental Notes: Optimum Beamforming 2/39
21 Definition quantifies the improvement in signaltonoise ratio due to using the array. It is defined as the ratio of the SNR at the output of the beamformer to the SNR at an individual input sensor: = A = SNR out SNR in Note that in general the noise includes white and colored noise, as well as planewave interferers. For that reason SNR is often called SINR, which stands for SignaltoInterferenceandNoise Ratio. How to compute these quantities? ECE 754 Supplemental Notes: Optimum Beamforming 21/39
22 Definition How to compute SNR in The diagonal elements of S sig and S n are the signal powers and noise powers, respectively. Since the diagonal elements of v s v H s are equal to 1, the signal power at each sensor is σs. 2 We obtain the average noise power by summing the diagonal elements of S n and dividing by the number of sensors: σ 2 n = tr(s n) N Thus, the input SNR is: where tr denotes the trace operation SNR in = σ2 s σ 2 n ECE 754 Supplemental Notes: Optimum Beamforming 22/39
23 Definition How to compute SNR out If we process the snapshot using the weight vector w, the power in the signal component of the output is P sig = E{ w H x sig 2 } = E{w H x sig x H sig wh } = w H S sig w = σ 2 s w H v s 2 Similarly, the noise power at the output of the beamformer is P noise = w H S n w = σ 2 nw H ρ n w, where ρ n = normalized noise covariance matrix ρ n = S n /σ 2 n. Thus the output SNR is: SNR out = σ2 s w H v s 2 σ 2 n(w H ρ n w) ECE 754 Supplemental Notes: Optimum Beamforming 23/39
24 Definition Formula for array gain Thus the array gain for the BF with weight vector w is equal to: A = SNR out SNR in = σ2 s w H v s 2 σ 2 n(w H ρ n w) σ2 n σ 2 s = wh v s 2 w H ρ n w Note that if the weight vector is designed with a unity gain constraint for replica v s, then w H v s = 1 and the array gain reduces to A = 1 w H ρ n w Examples ECE 754 Supplemental Notes: Optimum Beamforming 24/39
25 Definition example 1: interferer in sidelobes The figures on the right show the and conventional beampatterns and array gains for a standard 1element linear array with a single interferer. The top plot shows the results for 1 db INR, and the bottom plot shows the results for 5 db INR. The interferer is located at u I =.5. The conventional beamformer obviously has lower array gain because the interferer is located near one of the sidelobe peaks, whereas the beamformer has a partial null at the inteferer location. 2log 1 B(u z ) 2log 1 B(u z ) u I =.5, INR=1 db, A mvdr =2.3 db, A conv =15.6 db u z Conventional Conventional u I =.5, INR=5 db, A mvdr =59.9 db, A conv =17. db u z What happens when interferer is in the mainlobe? ECE 754 Supplemental Notes: Optimum Beamforming 25/39
26 Definition example 2: interferer in mainlobe and conventional beampatterns and array gains for a standard 1element linear array with a single interferer in the mainlobe. Top plot shows results for 1 db INR, and bottom plot shows results for 5 db INR. The conventional beamformer has very low array gain because the interferer is very close to the steering direction. The beamformer is able to put a null at the interferer location, so its array gain is relatively high, even though the beampattern is quite distorted. As we see on the following slides, the white noise gain is seriously affected with an interferer in the mainlobe. 2log 1 B(u z ) 2log 1 B(u z ) u I =.2, INR=1 db, A mvdr =6.6 db, A conv =.5 db u z Conventional Conventional u I =.2, INR=5 db, A mvdr =45.1 db, A conv =.1 db u z ECE 754 Supplemental Notes: Optimum Beamforming 26/39
27 Definition is the array gain when S n = σ 2 wi (and ρ n = I). A w = wh v s 2 w H ρ n w = wh v s 2 w H w If w is constrained to give unit gain in the look direction, w H v s = 1: A w = 1 w H w = 1 T se is the inverse of the 2normsquared of the weight vector. Recall from Ch. 2 of Van Trees that white noise gain is the inverse of the sensitivity function T se. Thus, the lower the white noise gain, the higher the sensitivity of the beamformer to mismatch. ECE 754 Supplemental Notes: Optimum Beamforming 27/39
28 Definition continued... Note that the weight vector used in the white noise gain calculation may be computed using a nonwhite noise covariance, e.g., w = w mvdr = Λ mvdr S n v m In this case S n may contain white noise plus colored noise plus one or more planewave interferers. The white noise gain is still A w mvdr = 1 w H mvdr w mvdr Examples ECE 754 Supplemental Notes: Optimum Beamforming 28/39
29 Definition example 1: interferer in sidelobes Beampatterns for a standard 1element array with interferer in the sidelobes at 1 db or 5 db INR. 1 db INR 5 db INR A mvdr 2.3 db 59.9 db A conv 15.6 db 17. db A w mvdr 9.9 db 9.9 db A w conv 1. db 1. db With interferer in the sidelobes the white noise gain for the and conventional processors are approximately equal. 2log 1 B(u z ) 2log 1 B(u z ) INR=1 db, A mvdr =2.3 db, A conv =15.6 db, A w mvdr =9.9, A w conv =1. db u z Conventional Conventional INR=5 db, A mvdr =59.9 db, A conv =17. db, A w mvdr =9.9, A w conv =1. db u z ECE 754 Supplemental Notes: Optimum Beamforming 29/39
30 Definition example 2: interferer in mainlobe Beampatterns for a standard 1element array with interferer in the mainlobe at 1 db or 5 db INR. 1 db INR 5 db INR A mvdr 6.6 db 45.1 db A conv.5 db.1 db A w mvdr 2.7 db 4.9 db A w conv 1. db 1. db With interferer in the mainlobe the white noise gain for the processor is substantially decreased. The conventional processor is unaffected because it does not attempt to null the strong mainlobe interferer. 2log 1 B(u z ) 2log 1 B(u z ) INR=1 db, A mvdr =6.6 db, A conv =.5 db, A w mvdr = 2.7, A w conv =1. db u z Conventional Conventional INR=5 db, A mvdr =45.1 db, A conv =.1 db, A w mvdr = 4.9, A w conv =1. db u z ECE 754 Supplemental Notes: Optimum Beamforming 3/39
31 Definition example 3: signals The following plots illustrate the effect of white noise gain on the output signals of a beamformer. The top plot shows the output (real part only) of an beamformer with white noise gain of 4.7 db and the bottom plot shows the output of an beamformer with white noise gain 7.1 db. The lower A w is, the more white noise comes through, making it harder to distinguish the underlying signal (shown in red). u I =.2 u I =.9 2 INR=2 db, blue=, red=true signal m (sample number) Note that the difference in white noise gain in these two plots is caused by the interferer moving closer to the desired signal in the mainlobe. ECE 754 Supplemental Notes: Optimum Beamforming 31/39
32 Definition Inclass problems 4 Suppose that you have a 3element linear array. What is the maximum possible value for the white noise gain for this array? What beamformer is guaranteed to achieve this white noise gain? 5 Suppose that you use two conventional beamformers to process data. The data contains the desired planewave signal plus spatially white noise. Beamformer #1 has a white noise gain of 1 db and Beamformer #2 has a white noise gain of 2 db. How do you expect the two outputs to differ? How do you build conventional beamformers with different white noise gains? ECE 754 Supplemental Notes: Optimum Beamforming 32/39
33 Definition Inclass problem 4 solution Consider deriving a beamformer by maximizing white noise gain given a unity gain constraint, i.e., { } 1 max w H subject to w H v m = 1 w This problem is equivalent to minimizing w H w, i.e., { } min w H w subject to w H v m = 1 Solution via LaGrange multipliers: Q = w H w + λ(w H v m 1) w HQ = w + λv m = λ Q = w H v m 1 = ECE 754 Supplemental Notes: Optimum Beamforming 33/39
34 Definition Inclass problem 4 solution continued... Setting the gradients equal to zero and solving yields: and w HQ = w + λv m = w = λv m (1) λ Q = w H v m 1 = Substituting 2 into 1 and solving yields: Thus w H v m = 1 (2) λ = 1 v H mv m w = 1 v H v m = v m mv m N ECE 754 Supplemental Notes: Optimum Beamforming 34/39
35 Definition Inclass problem 4 solution continued... Thus the beamformer that maximizes white noise gain is the conventional beamformer. The maximum white noise gain is A w max = 1 v H m N v mn = N2 v H mv m = N2 N = N (The Schwartz inequality can also be used to show that this is the maximum white noise gain.) For a 3element array, the maximum white noise gain in db is 1 log 1 3 = 14.8 db. This white noise gain is achieved by the conventional beamformer with uniform weighting. ECE 754 Supplemental Notes: Optimum Beamforming 35/39
36 Definition Inclass problem 5 Suppose that you use two conventional beamformers to process data. The data contains the desired planewave signal plus spatially white noise. Beamformer #1 has a white noise gain of 1 db and Beamformer #2 has a white noise gain of 2 db. How do you expect the two outputs to differ? Will the true signal coming through each beamformer differ in amplitude? Answer: No. Both beamformers are designed with a unity gain constraint. How will the noise coming through each beamformer differ? Answer: The power of the noise at the output of Beamformer #1 will be higher (by 1 db) than the power of the noise at the output of Beamformer #2. ECE 754 Supplemental Notes: Optimum Beamforming 36/39
37 Definition Inclass problem 5 continued How do you build conventional beamformers with different white noise gains? Answer: recall that the white noise gain of a conventional beamformer is equal to 1 log 1 N in db. To change the white noise gain of this beamformer, you must change the number of sensors. In this case Beamformer #1 must have 1 sensors since it has a white noise gain of 1 db. Beamformer #2 must have 2 sensors since it has a white noise gain of 2 db. ECE 754 Supplemental Notes: Optimum Beamforming 37/39
38 Definition Summary: array gain quantifies the improvement in signaltonoise ratio between the input (i.e., a single sensor) and the output of an array. measures the improvment in SNR between the array s input and output when the input noise is assumed to be spatially white. The white noise gain is an indicator of the sensitivity of the beamformer to mismatch. The lower the white noise gain, the higher the sensitivity. The white noise gain of the beamformer is substantially decreased when the interferer moves inside the mainlobe. The white noise gain of the conventional beamformer is constant regardless of the interferer location since it s beampattern is fixed. ECE 754 Supplemental Notes: Optimum Beamforming 38/39
39 Definition Summary: array gain continued... The array gain of the beamformer is always greater than or equal to that of the conventional beamformer: A mvdr A conv The equality holds when the noise is spatially white, i.e., ρ n = I. The white noise gain of the conventional beamformer is always greater than or equal to the white noise gain of the beamformer: A w conv = N A w mvdr The maximum value of white noise gain is equal to the number of sensors in the array. ECE 754 Supplemental Notes: Optimum Beamforming 39/39
ONE of the most common and robust beamforming algorithms
TECHNICAL NOTE 1 Beamforming algorithms  beamformers Jørgen Grythe, Norsonic AS, Oslo, Norway Abstract Beamforming is the name given to a wide variety of array processing algorithms that focus or steer
More informationEigenvalues and Eigenvectors in Array Antennas. Optimization of Array Antennas for High Performance. Selfintroduction
Short Course @ISAP2010 in MACAO Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors in Array Antennas Optimization of Array Antennas for High Performance Nobuyoshi Kikuma Nagoya Institute of Technology, Japan 1 Selfintroduction
More informationAntennas and Propagation. Chapter 6b: Path Models Rayleigh, Rician Fading, MIMO
Antennas and Propagation b: Path Models Rayleigh, Rician Fading, MIMO Introduction From last lecture How do we model H p? Discrete path model (physical, plane waves) Random matrix models (forget H p and
More informationPerformance Analysis of MUSIC and MVDR DOA Estimation Algorithm
Volume8, Issue2, April 2018 International Journal of Engineering and Management Research Page Number: 5055 Performance Analysis of MUSIC and MVDR DOA Estimation Algorithm Bhupenmewada 1, Prof. Kamal
More informationAN ANALYSIS OF LMS AND MVDR ON BEAMFORMING APPLICATIONS
AN ANALYSIS OF LMS AND MVDR ON BEAMFORMING APPLICATIONS EE635 : Digital Signal Processing II, Spring 2000 University of New Haven Instructor: Dr. Alain Bathelemy Students : Raheela AMIR,Wiwat THARATEERAPARB
More informationAdaptive Beamforming. Chapter Signal Steering Vectors
Chapter 13 Adaptive Beamforming We have already considered deterministic beamformers for such applications as pencil beam arrays and arrays with controlled sidelobes. Beamformers can also be developed
More informationA Review on Beamforming Techniques in Wireless Communication
A Review on Beamforming Techniques in Wireless Communication Hemant Kumar Vijayvergia 1, Garima Saini 2 1Assistant Professor, ECE, Govt. Mahila Engineering College Ajmer, Rajasthan, India 2Assistant Professor,
More informationDIRECTION OF ARRIVAL ESTIMATION IN WIRELESS MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS USING MINIMUM VERIANCE DISTORSIONLESS RESPONSE
DIRECTION OF ARRIVAL ESTIMATION IN WIRELESS MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS USING MINIMUM VERIANCE DISTORSIONLESS RESPONSE M. A. AlNuaimi, R. M. Shubair, and K. O. AlMidfa Etisalat University College, P.O.Box:573,
More informationMainlobe jamming can pose problems
Design Feature DIANFEI PAN Doctoral Student NAIPING CHENG Professor YANSHAN BIAN Doctoral Student Department of Optical and Electrical Equipment, Academy of Equipment, Beijing, 111, China Method Eases
More informationAntennas and Propagation. Chapter 5c: Array Signal Processing and Parametric Estimation Techniques
Antennas and Propagation : Array Signal Processing and Parametric Estimation Techniques Introduction Timedomain Signal Processing Fourier spectral analysis Identify important frequencycontent of signal
More informationApproaches for Angle of Arrival Estimation. Wenguang Mao
Approaches for Angle of Arrival Estimation Wenguang Mao Angle of Arrival (AoA) Definition: the elevation and azimuth angle of incoming signals Also called direction of arrival (DoA) AoA Estimation Applications:
More informationADAPTIVE ANTENNAS. TYPES OF BEAMFORMING
ADAPTIVE ANTENNAS TYPES OF BEAMFORMING 1 1 Outlines This chapter will introduce : Essential terminologies for beamforming; BF Demonstrating the function of the complex weights and how the phase and amplitude
More informationROBUST ADAPTIVE BEAMFORMER USING INTERPO LATION TECHNIQUE FOR CONFORMAL ANTENNA ARRAY
Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Vol. 23, 215 228, 2010 ROBUST ADAPTIVE BEAMFORMER USING INTERPO LATION TECHNIQUE FOR CONFORMAL ANTENNA ARRAY P. Yang, F. Yang, and Z. P. Nie School of Electronic
More informationPerformance Evaluation of Capon and Caponlike Algorithm for Direction of Arrival Estimation
Performance Evaluation of Capon and Caponlike Algorithm for Direction of Arrival Estimation M H Bhede SCOE, Pune, D G Ganage SCOE, Pune, Maharashtra, India S A Wagh SITS, Narhe, Pune, India Abstract: Wireless
More informationAnalysis of LMS and NLMS Adaptive Beamforming Algorithms
Analysis of LMS and NLMS Adaptive Beamforming Algorithms PG Student.Minal. A. Nemade Dept. of Electronics Engg. Asst. Professor D. G. Ganage Dept. of E&TC Engg. Professor & Head M. B. Mali Dept. of E&TC
More informationSIGNAL MODEL AND PARAMETER ESTIMATION FOR COLOCATED MIMO RADAR
SIGNAL MODEL AND PARAMETER ESTIMATION FOR COLOCATED MIMO RADAR Moein Ahmadi*, Kamal Mohamedpour K.N. Toosi University of Technology, Iran.*moein@ee.kntu.ac.ir, kmpour@kntu.ac.ir Keywords: Multipleinput
More informationAn improved direction of arrival (DOA) estimation algorithm and beam formation algorithm for smart antenna system in multipath environment
ISSN:23482079 Volume6 Issue1 International Journal of Intellectual Advancements and Research in Engineering Computations An improved direction of arrival (DOA) estimation algorithm and beam formation
More informationLecture 17 ztransforms 2
Lecture 17 ztransforms 2 Fundamentals of Digital Signal Processing Spring, 2012 WeiTa Chu 2012/5/3 1 Factoring zpolynomials We can also factor ztransform polynomials to break down a large system into
More informationSystem Identification and CDMA Communication
System Identification and CDMA Communication A (partial) sample report by Nathan A. Goodman Abstract This (sample) report describes theory and simulations associated with a class project on system identification
More informationROBUST SUPERDIRECTIVE BEAMFORMER WITH OPTIMAL REGULARIZATION
ROBUST SUPERDIRECTIVE BEAMFORMER WITH OPTIMAL REGULARIZATION Aviva Atkins, Yuval BenHur, Israel Cohen Department of Electrical Engineering Technion  Israel Institute of Technology Technion City, Haifa
More informationLecture 4 Diversity and MIMO Communications
MIMO Communication Systems Lecture 4 Diversity and MIMO Communications Prof. ChunHung Liu Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering National Chiao Tung University Spring 2017 1 Outline Diversity Techniques
More informationMicrophone Array Feedback Suppression. for Indoor Room Acoustics
Microphone Array Feedback Suppression for Indoor Room Acoustics by Tanmay Prakash Advisor: Dr. Jeffrey Krolik Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Duke University 1 Abstract The objective
More informationGoals: To study constrained optimization; that is, the maximizing or minimizing of a function subject to a constraint (or side condition).
Unit #23 : Lagrange Multipliers Goals: To study constrained optimization; that is, the maximizing or minimizing of a function subject to a constraint (or side condition). Constrained Optimization  Examples
More informationLECTURE 19  LAGRANGE MULTIPLIERS
LECTURE 9  LAGRANGE MULTIPLIERS CHRIS JOHNSON Abstract. In this lecture we ll describe a way of solving certain optimization problems subject to constraints. This method, known as Lagrange multipliers,
More informationAdaptive Selective Sidelobe Canceller Beamformer
Adaptive Selective Sidelobe Canceller Beamformer Radio Imaging With Strong Interfering Sources Ronny Levanda Supervisor: Prof. Amir Leshem BarIlan Univ. Israel CALIM 2010. Aug 25, 2010 Ronny Levanda (BIU)
More information124 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOL. 45, NO. 1, JANUARY 1997
124 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOL. 45, NO. 1, JANUARY 1997 Blind Adaptive Interference Suppression for the NearFar Resistant Acquisition and Demodulation of DirectSequence CDMA Signals
More informationLecture 8 Multi User MIMO
Lecture 8 Multi User MIMO IHsiang Wang ihwang@ntu.edu.tw 5/7, 014 Multi User MIMO System So far we discussed how multiple antennas increase the capacity and reliability in pointtopoint channels Question:
More informationGPS Antijamming Performance Simulation Based on LCMV Algorithm Jian WANG and Rui QIN
2017 2nd International Conference on Software, Multimedia and Communication Engineering (SMCE 2017) ISBN: 9781605954585 GPS Antijamming Performance Simulation Based on LCMV Algorithm Jian WANG and
More informationTIIVISTELMÄRAPORTTI (SUMMARY REPORT)
2014/2500M0015 ISSN 17973457 (verkkojulkaisu) ISBN (PDF) 9789512526406 TIIVISTELMÄRAPORTTI (SUMMARY REPORT) Modern Signal Processing Methods in Passive Acoustic Surveillance Jaakko Astola*, Bogdan
More informationMIMO Channel Capacity in CoChannel Interference
MIMO Channel Capacity in CoChannel Interference Yi Song and Steven D. Blostein Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Queen s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada, K7L 3N6 Email: {songy, sdb}@ee.queensu.ca
More informationMETIS Second Training & Seminar. Smart antenna: Source localization and beamforming
METIS Second Training & Seminar Smart antenna: Source localization and beamforming Faculté des sciences de Tunis Unité de traitement et analyse des systèmes haute fréquences Ali Gharsallah Email:ali.gharsallah@fst.rnu.tn
More informationAdaptive Systems Homework Assignment 3
Signal Processing and Speech Communication Lab Graz University of Technology Adaptive Systems Homework Assignment 3 The analytical part of your homework (your calculation sheets) as well as the MATLAB
More informationDirty Paper Coding vs. TDMA for MIMO Broadcast Channels
1 Dirty Paper Coding vs. TDMA for MIMO Broadcast Channels Nihar Jindal & Andrea Goldsmith Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University njindal, andrea@systems.stanford.edu Submitted to IEEE Trans.
More informationAdaptive selective sidelobe canceller beamformer with applications in radio astronomy
Adaptive selective sidelobe canceller beamformer with applications in radio astronomy Ronny Levanda and Amir Leshem 1 Abstract arxiv:1008.5066v1 [astroph.im] 30 Aug 2010 We propose a new algorithm, for
More informationSpeech and Audio Processing Recognition and Audio Effects Part 3: Beamforming
Speech and Audio Processing Recognition and Audio Effects Part 3: Beamforming Gerhard Schmidt ChristianAlbrechtsUniversität zu Kiel Faculty of Engineering Electrical Engineering and Information Engineering
More informationStudy the Behavioral Change in Adaptive Beamforming of Smart Antenna Array Using LMS and RLS Algorithms
Study the Behavioral Change in Adaptive Beamforming of Smart Antenna Array Using LMS and RLS Algorithms Somnath Patra *1, Nisha Nandni #2, Abhishek Kumar Pandey #3,Sujeet Kumar #4 *1, #2, 3, 4 Department
More informationMeasurement of angular spread of signals in SWellEx96 using multitaper array processing
Measurement of angular spread of signals in SWellEx96 using multitaper array processing A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science at George Mason
More informationBeamforming with Imperfect CSI
This full text paper was peer reviewed at the direction of IEEE Communications Society subject matter experts for publication in the WCNC 007 proceedings Beamforming with Imperfect CSI Ye (Geoffrey) Li
More informationA BROADBAND BEAMFORMER USING CONTROLLABLE CONSTRAINTS AND MINIMUM VARIANCE
A BROADBAND BEAMFORMER USING CONTROLLABLE CONSTRAINTS AND MINIMUM VARIANCE Sam KarimianAzari, Jacob Benesty,, Jesper Rindom Jensen, and Mads Græsbøll Christensen Audio Analysis Lab, AD:MT, Aalborg University,
More informationINTERFERENCE REJECTION OF ADAPTIVE ARRAY ANTENNAS BY USING LMS AND SMI ALGORITHMS
INTERFERENCE REJECTION OF ADAPTIVE ARRAY ANTENNAS BY USING LMS AND SMI ALGORITHMS Kerim Guney Bilal Babayigit Ali Akdagli email: kguney@erciyes.edu.tr email: bilalb@erciyes.edu.tr email: akdagli@erciyes.edu.tr
More informationSTAP approach for DOA estimation using microphone arrays
STAP approach for DOA estimation using microphone arrays Vera Behar a, Christo Kabakchiev b, Vladimir Kyovtorov c a Institute for Parallel Processing (IPP) Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (BAS), behar@bas.bg;
More informationChapter 4 SPEECH ENHANCEMENT
44 Chapter 4 SPEECH ENHANCEMENT 4.1 INTRODUCTION: Enhancement is defined as improvement in the value or Quality of something. Speech enhancement is defined as the improvement in intelligibility and/or
More informationAdaptive Antenna Array Processing for GPS Receivers
Adaptive Antenna Array Processing for GPS Receivers By Yaohua Zheng Thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Engineering Science School of Electrical & Electronic Engineering Faculty of Engineering,
More information1.Explain the principle and characteristics of a matched filter. Hence derive the expression for its frequency response function.
1.Explain the principle and characteristics of a matched filter. Hence derive the expression for its frequency response function. MatchedFilter Receiver: A network whose frequencyresponse function maximizes
More informationUNEQUAL POWER ALLOCATION FOR JPEG TRANSMISSION OVER MIMO SYSTEMS. Muhammad F. Sabir, Robert W. Heath Jr. and Alan C. Bovik
UNEQUAL POWER ALLOCATION FOR JPEG TRANSMISSION OVER MIMO SYSTEMS Muhammad F. Sabir, Robert W. Heath Jr. and Alan C. Bovik Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin,
More informationEE 435/535: Error Correcting Codes Project 1, Fall 2009: Extended Hamming Code. 1 Introduction. 2 Extended Hamming Code: Encoding. 1.
EE 435/535: Error Correcting Codes Project 1, Fall 2009: Extended Hamming Code Project #1 is due on Tuesday, October 6, 2009, in class. You may turn the project report in early. Late projects are accepted
More informationInterference Mitigation Using a Multiple Feed Array for Radio Astronomy
Interference Mitigation Using a Multiple Feed Array for Radio Astronomy Chad Hansen, Karl F Warnick, and Brian D Jeffs Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Brigham Young University Provo,
More informationPerformance improvement in beamforming of Smart Antenna by using LMS algorithm
Performance improvement in beamforming of Smart Antenna by using LMS algorithm B. G. Hogade Jyoti ChougalePatil Shrikant K.Bodhe Research scholar, Student, ME(ELX), Principal, SVKM S NMIMS,. Terna Engineering
More informationBeamforming in Interference Networks for Uniform Linear Arrays
Beamforming in Interference Networks for Uniform Linear Arrays Rami Mochaourab and Eduard Jorswieck Communications Theory, Communications Laboratory Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany email:
More informationProceedings of the 5th WSEAS Int. Conf. on SIGNAL, SPEECH and IMAGE PROCESSING, Corfu, Greece, August 1719, 2005 (pp1721)
Ambiguity Function Computation Using OverSampled DFT Filter Banks ENNETH P. BENTZ The Aerospace Corporation 5049 Conference Center Dr. Chantilly, VA, USA 90245469 Abstract:  This paper will demonstrate
More informationCHAPTER 8 MIMO. Xijun Wang
CHAPTER 8 MIMO Xijun Wang WEEKLY READING 1. Goldsmith, Wireless Communications, Chapters 10 2. Tse, Fundamentals of Wireless Communication, Chapter 710 2 MIMO 3 BENEFITS OF MIMO n Array gain The increase
More informationNon Unuiform Phased array Beamforming with Covariance Based Method
IOSR Journal of Engineering (IOSRJE) eiss: 50301, piss: 788719, Volume, Issue 10 (October 01), PP 374 on Unuiform Phased array Beamforming with Covariance Based Method Amirsadegh Roshanzamir 1, M.
More informationarxiv: v1 [cs.sd] 4 Dec 2018
LOCALIZATION AND TRACKING OF AN ACOUSTIC SOURCE USING A DIAGONAL UNLOADING BEAMFORMING AND A KALMAN FILTER Daniele Salvati, Carlo Drioli, Gian Luca Foresti Department of Mathematics, Computer Science and
More informationANTENNA INTRODUCTION / BASICS
ANTENNA INTRODUCTION / BASICS RULES OF THUMB: 1. The Gain of an antenna with losses is given by: 2. Gain of rectangular XBand Aperture G = 1.4 LW L = length of aperture in cm Where: W = width of aperture
More informationOptimal Transceiver Design for MultiAccess. Communication. Lecturer: Tom Luo
Optimal Transceiver Design for MultiAccess Communication Lecturer: Tom Luo Main Points An important problem in the management of communication networks: resource allocation Frequency, transmitting power;
More informationSpaceTime Adaptive Processing Using Sparse Arrays
SpaceTime Adaptive Processing Using Sparse Arrays Michael Zatman 11 th Annual ASAP Workshop March 11 th 14 th 2003 This work was sponsored by the DARPA under Air Force Contract F1962800C0002. Opinions,
More informationTRANSMITS BEAMFORMING AND RECEIVER DESIGN FOR MIMO RADAR
TRANSMITS BEAMFORMING AND RECEIVER DESIGN FOR MIMO RADAR 1 Nilesh Arun Bhavsar,MTech Student,ECE Department,PES S COE Pune, Maharastra,India 2 Dr.Arati J. Vyavahare, Professor, ECE Department,PES S COE
More informationOcean Ambient Noise Studies for Shallow and Deep Water Environments
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Ocean Ambient Noise Studies for Shallow and Deep Water Environments Martin Siderius Portland State University Electrical
More informationSpeech Enhancement Using Beamforming Dr. G. Ramesh Babu 1, D. Lavanya 2, B. Yamuna 2, H. Divya 2, B. Shiva Kumar 2, B.
www.ijecs.in International Journal Of Engineering And Computer Science ISSN:23197242 Volume 4 Issue 4 April 2015, Page No. 1114311147 Speech Enhancement Using Beamforming Dr. G. Ramesh Babu 1, D. Lavanya
More informationSpeech Enhancement Using Microphone Arrays
FriedrichAlexanderUniversität ErlangenNürnberg Lab Course Speech Enhancement Using Microphone Arrays International Audio Laboratories Erlangen Prof. Dr. ir. Emanuël A. P. Habets FriedrichAlexander
More informationEvaluation of a Multiple versus a Single Reference MIMO ANC Algorithm on Dornier 328 Test Data Set
Evaluation of a Multiple versus a Single Reference MIMO ANC Algorithm on Dornier 328 Test Data Set S. Johansson, S. Nordebo, T. L. Lagö, P. Sjösten, I. Claesson I. U. Borchers, K. Renger University of
More informationChannel Capacity Estimation in MIMO Systems Based on WaterFilling Algorithm
Channel Capacity Estimation in MIMO Systems Based on WaterFilling Algorithm 1 Ch.Srikanth, 2 B.Rajanna 1 PG SCHOLAR, 2 Assistant Professor Vaagdevi college of engineering. (warangal) ABSTRACT power than
More informationPerformance Analysis of MUSIC and LMS Algorithms for Smart Antenna Systems
nternational Journal of Electronics Engineering, 2 (2), 200, pp. 27 275 Performance Analysis of USC and LS Algorithms for Smart Antenna Systems d. Bakhar, Vani R.. and P.V. unagund 2 Department of E and
More informationBER Analysis of Receive Diversity Using Multiple Antenna System and MRC
International Journal of Information Communication Technology and Digital Convergence Vol. 2, No. 1, June. 2017, pp. 1525 BER Analysis of Receive Diversity Using Multiple Antenna System and MRC Shishir
More informationnullbroadening with an adaptive time reversal mirror ATRM is demonstrated in Sec. V.
Nullbroadening in a waveguide J. S. Kim, a) W. S. Hodgkiss, W. A. Kuperman, and H. C. Song Marine Physical Laboratory/Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla,
More informationDegrees of Freedom in Multiuser MIMO
Degrees of Freedom in Multiuser MIMO Syed A Jafar Electrical Engineering and Computer Science University of California Irvine, California, 926972625 Email: syed@eceuciedu Maralle J Fakhereddin Department
More informationA novel digital beamformer applied in vehicle mounted HF receiving device
LETTER IEICE Electronics Express, Vol.11, No.2, 1 8 A novel digital beamformer applied in vehicle mounted HF receiving device Huajun Zhang, Huotao Gao a), Qingchen Zhou, Lin Zhou, and Fan Wang Electronic
More informationNULL STEERING USING PHASE SHIFTERS
NULL STEERING USING PHASE SHIFTERS Maha Abdulameer Kadhim Department of Electronics, Middle Technical University (MTU), Technical Instructors Training Institute, Baghdad, Iraq EMail: Maha.kahdum@gmail..com
More informationAN ADAPTIVE MICROPHONE ARRAY FOR OPTIMUM BEAMFORMING AND NOISE REDUCTION
1th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO ), Florence, Italy, September ,, copyright by EURASIP AN ADAPTIVE MICROPHONE ARRAY FOR OPTIMUM BEAMFORMING AND NOISE REDUCTION Gerhard Doblinger Institute
More informationAN ADAPTIVE MICROPHONE ARRAY FOR OPTIMUM BEAMFORMING AND NOISE REDUCTION
AN ADAPTIVE MICROPHONE ARRAY FOR OPTIMUM BEAMFORMING AND NOISE REDUCTION Gerhard Doblinger Institute of Communications and RadioFrequency Engineering Vienna University of Technology Gusshausstr. 5/39,
More informationBlind Beamforming for Cyclostationary Signals
Course Page 1 of 12 Submission date: 13 th December, Blind Beamforming for Cyclostationary Signals Preeti Nagvanshi Aditya Jagannatham UCSD ECE Department 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093 Course Project
More informationComparison of Beamforming Techniques for WCDMA Communication Systems
752 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 52, NO. 4, JULY 2003 Comparison of Beamforming Techniques for WCDMA Communication Systems HsuehJyh Li and TaYung Liu Abstract In this paper, different
More informationANTENNA INTRODUCTION / BASICS
Rules of Thumb: 1. The Gain of an antenna with losses is given by: G 0A 8 Where 0 ' Efficiency A ' Physical aperture area 8 ' wavelength ANTENNA INTRODUCTION / BASICS another is:. Gain of rectangular XBand
More informationDirection of Arrival Algorithms for Mobile User Detection
IJSRD ational Conference on Advances in Computing and Communications October 2016 Direction of Arrival Algorithms for Mobile User Detection Veerendra 1 Md. Bakhar 2 Kishan Singh 3 1,2,3 Department of lectronics
More informationA Study on Various Types of Beamforming Algorithms
IJSTE  International Journal of Science Technology & Engineering Volume 2 Issue 09 March 2016 ISSN (online): 2349784X A Study on Various Types of Beamforming Algorithms Saiju Lukose Prof. M. Mathurakani
More informationDiversity. Spring 2017 ELE 492 FUNDAMENTALS OF WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS 1
Diversity Spring 2017 ELE 492 FUNDAMENTALS OF WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS 1 Diversity A fading channel with an average SNR has worse BER performance as compared to that of an AWGN channel with the same SNR!.
More informationAdvances in Radio Science
Advances in Radio Science (23) 1: 149 153 c Copernicus GmbH 23 Advances in Radio Science Downlink beamforming concepts in UTRA FDD M. Schacht 1, A. Dekorsy 1, and P. Jung 2 1 Lucent Technologies, ThurnundTaxisStrasse
More informationNotes on Optical Amplifiers
Notes on Optical Amplifiers Optical amplifiers typically use energy transitions such as those in atomic media or electron/hole recombination in semiconductors. In optical amplifiers that use semiconductor
More informationEFFECTS OF PHASE AND AMPLITUDE ERRORS ON QAM SYSTEMS WITH ERROR CONTROL CODING AND SOFT DECISION DECODING
Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses 82009 EFFECTS OF PHASE AND AMPLITUDE ERRORS ON QAM SYSTEMS WITH ERROR CONTROL CODING AND SOFT DECISION DECODING Jason Ellis Clemson University, jellis@clemson.edu
More informationMatched filter. Contents. Derivation of the matched filter
Matched filter From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia In telecommunications, a matched filter (originally known as a North filter [1] ) is obtained by correlating a known signal, or template, with an unknown
More informationBEAMFORMING has long been used in many areas, such
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOL. 55, NO. 8, AUGUST 2007 4139 Quadratically Constrained Beamforming Robust Against DirectionofArrival Mismatch ChunYang Chen, Student Member, IEEE, and P.
More informationOrthogonal vs NonOrthogonal Multiple Access with Finite Input Alphabet and Finite Bandwidth
Orthogonal vs NonOrthogonal Multiple Access with Finite Input Alphabet and Finite Bandwidth J. Harshan Dept. of ECE, Indian Institute of Science Bangalore 56, India Email:harshan@ece.iisc.ernet.in B.
More informationMIMO I: Spatial Diversity
MIMO I: Spatial Diversity COS 463: Wireless Networks Lecture 16 Kyle Jamieson [Parts adapted from D. Halperin et al., T. Rappaport] What is MIMO, and why? MultipleInput, MultipleOutput (MIMO) communications
More informationDesign of Analog and Digital Beamformer for 60GHz MIMO Frequency Selective Channel through Second Order Cone Programming
IOSR Journal of VLSI and Signal Processing (IOSRJVSP) Volume 5, Issue 6, Ver. II (Nov Dec. 2015), PP 9197 eissn: 2319 4200, pissn No. : 2319 4197 www.iosrjournals.org Design of Analog and Digital
More informationLab S3: Beamforming with Phasors. N r k. is the time shift applied to r k
DSP First, 2e Signal Processing First Lab S3: Beamforming with Phasors PreLab: Read the PreLab and do all the exercises in the PreLab section prior to attending lab. Verification: The Exercise section
More informationEELE 6333: Wireless Commuications
EELE 6333: Wireless Commuications Chapter # 4 : Capacity of Wireless Channels Spring, 2012/2013 EELE 6333: Wireless Commuications  Ch.4 Dr. Musbah Shaat 1 / 18 Outline 1 Capacity in AWGN 2 Capacity of
More informationUplink and Downlink Beamforming for Fading Channels. Mats Bengtsson and Björn Ottersten
Uplink and Downlink Beamforming for Fading Channels Mats Bengtsson and Björn Ottersten 999027 In Proceedings of 2nd IEEE Signal Processing Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications,
More informationSpatial Correlation Effects on Channel Estimation of UCAMIMO Receivers
11 International Conference on Communication Engineering and Networks IPCSIT vol.19 (11) (11) IACSIT Press, Singapore Spatial Correlation Effects on Channel Estimation of UCAMIMO Receivers M. A. Mangoud
More informationHUMAN speech is frequently encountered in several
1948 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUDIO, SPEECH, AND LANGUAGE PROCESSING, VOL. 20, NO. 7, SEPTEMBER 2012 Enhancement of SingleChannel Periodic Signals in the TimeDomain Jesper Rindom Jensen, Student Member,
More informationAdaptive Wireless. Communications. gl CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS. MIMO Channels and Networks SIDDHARTAN GOVJNDASAMY DANIEL W.
Adaptive Wireless Communications MIMO Channels and Networks DANIEL W. BLISS Arizona State University SIDDHARTAN GOVJNDASAMY Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering, Massachusetts gl CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY
More informationMATCHED FIELD PROCESSING: ENVIRONMENTAL FOCUSING AND SOURCE TRACKING WITH APPLICATION TO THE NORTH ELBA DATA SET
MATCHED FIELD PROCESSING: ENVIRONMENTAL FOCUSING AND SOURCE TRACKING WITH APPLICATION TO THE NORTH ELBA DATA SET Cristiano Soares 1, Andreas Waldhorst 2 and S. M. Jesus 1 1 UCEH  Universidade do Algarve,
More informationAdaptive Beamforming for Multipath Mitigation in GPS
EE608: Adaptive Signal Processing Course Instructor: Prof. U.B.Desai Course Project Report Adaptive Beamforming for Multipath Mitigation in GPS By Ravindra.S.Kashyap (06307923) Rahul Bhide (0630795) Vijay
More information4 to find the dimensions of the rectangle that have the maximum area. 2y A =?? f(x, y) = (2x)(2y) = 4xy
Optimization Constrained optimization and Lagrange multipliers Constrained optimization is what it sounds like  the problem of finding a maximum or minimum value (optimization), subject to some other
More informationAN ALTERNATIVE METHOD FOR DIFFERENCE PATTERN FORMATION IN MONOPULSE ANTENNA
Progress In Electromagnetics Research Letters, Vol. 42, 45 54, 213 AN ALTERNATIVE METHOD FOR DIFFERENCE PATTERN FORMATION IN MONOPULSE ANTENNA Jafar R. Mohammed * Communication Engineering Department,
More informationFIBER OPTICS. Prof. R.K. Shevgaonkar. Department of Electrical Engineering. Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay. Lecture: 22.
FIBER OPTICS Prof. R.K. Shevgaonkar Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay Lecture: 22 Optical Receivers Fiber Optics, Prof. R.K. Shevgaonkar, Dept. of Electrical Engineering,
More information260 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUDIO, SPEECH, AND LANGUAGE PROCESSING, VOL. 18, NO. 2, FEBRUARY /$ IEEE
260 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUDIO, SPEECH, AND LANGUAGE PROCESSING, VOL. 18, NO. 2, FEBRUARY 2010 On Optimal FrequencyDomain Multichannel Linear Filtering for Noise Reduction Mehrez Souden, Student Member,
More informationSmall Controlled Reception Pattern Antenna (SCRPA) Design and Test Results
Small Controlled Reception Pattern Antenna (SCRPA) Design and Test Results Dr. HuanWan Tseng and Atterberg, NAVSYS Corporation BIOGRAPHY Dr. HuanWan Tseng is an Antenna & RF Engineer at NAVSYS Corporation.
More informationOpportunistic Beamforming Using Dumb Antennas
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, VOL. 48, NO. 6, JUNE 2002 1277 Opportunistic Beamforming Using Dumb Antennas Pramod Viswanath, Member, IEEE, David N. C. Tse, Member, IEEE, and Rajiv Laroia, Fellow,
More informationAvoiding Self Nulling by Using Linear Constraint Minimum Variance Beamforming in Smart Antenna
Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology 5(12): 34353443, 213 ISSN: 247459; eissn: 247467 Maxwell Scientific Organization, 213 Submitted: November 9, 212 Accepted: December
More informationMultipath Effect on Covariance Based MIMO Radar Beampattern Design
IOSR Journal of Engineering (IOSRJE) ISS (e): 22532, ISS (p): 2278879 Vol. 4, Issue 9 (September. 24), V2 PP 4352 www.iosrjen.org Multipath Effect on Covariance Based MIMO Radar Beampattern Design Amirsadegh
More information